20060447 Ver 1_Application_20060317

~ Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Road .Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
~ www.SandEC.com
March 17, 2006
S&EC Project # 4865.W1
To: US Army Corps of Engineers NC Division of Water Quality
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office 401 Oversight and Express Permits Unit
Attn: Monte Matthews Attn: Ian McMillan
6508 Falls of the Neuse Rd, Suite 120 2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250
Raleigh, N.C. 27615 Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 t~
D `~
From: Sean Clark ; -1 2G~~
Soil & Environmental Consultants, P.A. MAR 1
11010 Raven Ridge Road ~ p~NR -WATER pUAL~N
Raleigh, NC 27614 ~ ~~~T~
Re: Olde Towne Site ,a ~ ~* ~`~ ~
On behalf of the owners, Olde Towne Company LLC (Attn: Rocky Keim), please find attached a
complete application and supplemental information requesting the issuance of Nationwide
Permits 12 & 39 from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (IJSACE) and issuance of General
Certifications 3374, 3402 from the NC Division of Water Quality (DWQ). Please contact me at
[phone] if you have any questions or require additional information.
PR(lTR('T STIMMARY
Project Name Olde Towne
Project T e Mixed Use Develo ment
Owner / A licant Olde Towne Com an LLC
Count Wake
Nearest Town Ralei h
Waterbod Name Walnut Creek
Basin /Sub-basin 03-04-02
Index Number 27-34- 4 & 27-34-11
Class C; NSW
TMPAC`T CTTMMARY
Stream Impact (acres): 0.0544
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.7901
Open Water Impact (acres): 0
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.8445
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 592**
* of the 0.7901 acre of impact, only 0.4752 acre is permanent
** of the 592 LF, only 300LF is permanent
Attachments:
PCN Form
Agent Authorization Form Example sheets of proposed Cart Crossings
USGS Site Vicinity Map Impact Maps/Site Plans
Wake County Soil Survey Site Vicinity Map $475 Application Fee to DWQ
Charlotte Office: Greensboro Office:
236 LePhillip Court, Suite C _ 1 _ 3817-E Lawndale Drive
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]

~~~ .V~ ~ "~ ~~A~i
.....
u~'rr. ~ ~llpf1
Office Use Only: Form Version March OS
_ °' r
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
iii any par<icuiar item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
I. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
^ Section 10 Permit ^ Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ^ Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: 39 and 12
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ^
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here:
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here: ^
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: Olde Towne, LLC
Mailing Address: Attn: Rocky Keim
387 Medina Road Suite 600
Medina OH 44256
Telephone Number: 330-239-3663 Fax Number: 330-239-6543
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Sean Clark
Company Affiliation: Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Mailing Address: 11010 Raven Ridge Road
RaleigYl, NC 27614
Telephone Number: 919-846-5900 Fax Number: 919-846-9467
E-mail Address:__ sclark ~sandec.com
Page 1 of 11

III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Olde Towne Site
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): n/a
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): 1732-14-2645, 1722-94-4878 1722-95-7498
1722-84-9482, 1722-85-3767 1732-36, 9363, 1732-34-5647 1732-47-6320 1732-45-5227
4. Location
County: Wake Nearest Town: Raleigh
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): Olde Towne Site
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.): From Raleigh; take the
inner 440 beltline; exit Poole Road going east• Turn right onto S New Hone Road• project
site located annroximately 3 miles down S New Hope Road
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): 35.7445 °N 78.5561 °W
6. Property size (acres): +/- 616 acres
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Walnut Creek 27-34-(4)• C NSW & Big Branch
27-34-11; C NSW ~~
8. River Basin:__Neuse (03-04-021
(Note -this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: The site currently contains densely vegetated areas that were
loeged annroximately 10 years a o open abandoned pasture areas and forested areas along
Page 2 of 11

streams and within some floodplain wetlands. The surrounding properties are forested or in
residential development
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The proposed project is for amixed-use golf course development with proposed permanent
and temporary impacts resulti~ from the installation of a roads, commercial use and sewer
line that are required for accessing_the entire property. Heavy equipment typically used for
road and sewer line construction will be employed for this project.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: The purpose of the proposed work is to provide
additional housing for the rapidly rg_owin~ area Proposed impacts to jurisdictional areas are
needed in order to gain access and provide utilities to the entire property.
IV. Prior Project History ~'1,.,
'?n
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or~~oI~d for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USAGE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
S&EC completed a detailed delineation of the property assemblage in March of 2003. DWQ
conducted a buffer confirmation site meeting, on 09/15/99 on the main portion of property
(NBRRO #99-244) and completed a buffer confirmation site meeting on the remaining additional
parcels on June 24 2003 (NBR 03-155 and NBR 03-156). Several site meetings have been held
with the USAGE the most recent of which was held on January 5, 2006 with Monte Matthews.
The site plans have been revised several times to avoid and minimize overall impacts. Several
short office meetings have been held with DWO and USAGE staff to try to address reQUlatory
concerns with the initial submittal.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
No additional permits are anticipated at this time
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
Page 3 of 11

permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: Proposed permanent wetland
impacts total 0.4750 acre and proposed permanent perennial stream channel impacts total
300 LF. Temporary wetland impacts total 0.3294 acre and temporary stream channel
impacts total 129 LF. Permanent impacts resulting from the installation of road crossings
need to provide access to upland areas on the property and lot fill (0.05890 acrel. Temporarv
impacts will result from the installation of utilities needed to provide service to the entire
property.
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
Wetland Impact Type of Wetland Located within Distance to Area of
Site Number Type of Impact (e.g., forested, marsh, 100-year
Floodplain Nearest
Stream Impact
(acres)
(indicate on map) herbaceous, bog, etc.) eslno linear feet
P-1* Road crossing Forested No +/- 200' 0.1990
P-2 Bridge pilings-road Herbaceous No +/- 10' 0.0006
P-4 Road crossing Forested No +/- 60' 0.1107
P-6 Road crossing Forested No +/- 1,800' 0.0838
P-7 Lot fill Herbaceous No +/- 200' 0.0590
P-8 s-golf cart
Bridge pil
'ag Forested Yes 0 0.0007
p
h
P-9 s-golf cart
Bridge pil
'ag Forested No +/- 900' 0.0005
p
h
P-16 Lot Fill Herbaceous No 0 0.0040
P-17 Road crossing Herbaceous No +/- 150' 0.0169
T-2* Utility crossing Herbaceous No +/- 80' 0.0344
(temporary)
T-3 Utility crossing Forested No +/- 100' 0.0115
(temporary}
T-6 Utility crossing Forested Yes 0 0.0735
(temporary)
T-7 Utility crossing Forested Yes 0 0.0918
(temporary)
Page 4 of 11

T-9 Utility crossing Forested No +/- 60' 0.1037
(temporary)
Total Wetland Impact (acres) **0.7901
* "P" refers to permanent impacts and "'1'" refers to temporary impacts
** of the 0.7901 acre total, 0.3149 acre is temporary
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: +/- 60 acres
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Stream Impact
Perennial o Average Impact Area of
Number Stream Name Type of Impact ~
Intermittent Stream Width Length Impact
indicate on ma . Before Im act linear feet acres
P 3 UT to Walnut Road crossing- perennial 1-2' 150' 0.0059
Creek culvert & dissipater
P 5 UT to Walnut Road crossing- Intermittent +/- 4' 150' 0.0144
Creek culvert & dissipate
P-15 UT to Walnut Road crossing- perennial 4-5' 45' 0.0046
Creek culvert & dissipate
T-1 UT to Walnut Utility crossing perennial +/- 6' 31' 0.0044
Creek (temporary)
T-4 ~ to Walnut Utility crossing Intermittent +/- 6' 42' 0.0060
Creek (temporary)
T-5 UT to Walnut Utility crossing Intermittent 4-5' 76' 0.0086
Creek (temporary)
T-6 UT to Walnut Utility crossing perennial +/- 3' 31' 0.0023
Creek (temporary)
T-7 W
lnut
UT U(~eit Poo~Y) g perennial +/- 3' 35 0.0025
k
Cr
T-8 UT to Walnut Utility crossing perennial 7-8' 32' 0.0057
Creek (temporary)
Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) *592' 0.0544
* of the 592 LF of total impact length, 29Z Lr' is temporary
Page 5 of 11

5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact
Name of Waterbody Type of Waterbody Area of
Site Number (if applicable) Type of Impact (lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay, Impact
indicate on ma ocean, etc. acres
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Total Open Water Impact (acres) N/A
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Im act acres : 0.0544
Wetland Im act (acres): 0.7901
O en Water Im act acres : 0
Total Im act to Waters of the U.S. (acres 0.8445
Total Stream Irri act (linear feet): 592
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ^ Yes ®No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet}. Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
There are no isolated wetlands or streams on this property.
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ^ uplands ^ stream ^ wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): N/A
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond: N/A
Size of watershed draining to pond: N/A Expected pond surface azea: N/A
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It maybe useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
Page 6 of 11

The applicant is proposing 2 conventional culverted road crossings of creeks (impacts P-3
and P-5~ These two crossings will utilize headwalls in an effort to further minimize stream and
buffer impacts. The impacts associated with impact P-2 will result from the installation of
pilings needed for a bridged crossing. By using the bridge, stream impacts in this area will be
completely avoided. Several wetland impacts resulting from the installation of roads (P-1, P-4,
P-6, and P-17) will also be minimized by using headwalls.
The main entrance to the property from New Hope Road has been shifted from a previously
permitted entrance location to further reduce the impacts of P-1. The previouslyproposed
impacts for the P-1 location were 0.4641 acre, but have now been reduced to 0.1990 acre.
Impacts P-1, P-4, and P-5 are due to the main road bisecting the property. This road is on the
City of Ralei~ 's thorou fare plan and is required by the city to connect New Hope Road with
Barwell Road.
Temporary impacts resulting from utility line installation have been reduced by crossing at
perpendicular angles and b,~g_only 30-foot wide easements.
Golf cart crossings of streams, wetlands, and buffers will utilize bridges instead of culverts
and fill. The crossings will only require 10' of pavement and will be laid out so as to avoid
cutting any large trees to aid in retaining stable riparian buffers.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
Page 7 of 11

of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
The applicant will utilize the Ecosystem Enhancement Program for all re uired
mitigation. EEP's acceptance letter will be forwarded to you under separate cover.
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
[phone] to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 300
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): 0
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0.5
Amount ofNon-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ^ No
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ^ No ^
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ^ No ^
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Page 8 of 11

1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify Meuse )? Yes ® No ^
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
d PPrnvndi~nlar Rnad Crossings
Zone*
s uare feet) Multiplier Required
Miti ation
1 19,800 3 (2 for Catawba) N/A
2 15,610 1.5 N/A
Total 35,410 N/A
7 Pnrnnndirnlar C.nlf Cart Crossings
Zone*
s uare feet Multiplier Required
Miti ation
1 8,460 3 (2 for Catawba) N/A
2 5,400 1.5 N/A
Total 13,860 N/A
d PPrnvndicnlar iTtility Crossings
Zone* (square feet) Multiplier Required
Miti ation
1 7,975 3 (2 for Catawba) N/A
2 5,270 1.5 N/A
Total 13,245 N/A
6 Pnrnnndirnlar Ctnrmwater nntfalls
Zone*
(s uare feet Multiplier Required
Miti ation
1 5,875 3 (2 for Catawba) N/A
2 3,700 1.5 N/A
Total 9,575 N/A
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration /Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260.
Buffer mitigation is not required because all proposed impacts are considered
"Allowable"
Page 9 of 11

XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level.
Please see the attached Sheet 19 for a detailed breakdown of the proposed building_phases and
their associated impervious surface areas As per a previous DWO office meeting stormwater is
proposed for phases that exceed 30% The final Stormwater plan is not yet finalized however
approximately sized areas are shown on the impact maps Stormwater plans will be provided for
DWO's approval prior to construction in each applicable phase We therefore request that a 401
permit be issued with a special condition requiring a stormwater approval
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
The proiect will tie into existing portions of the City of Ralei sewer system located
adiacent to the property.
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ^ No
Is this anafter-the-fact permit application? Yes ^ No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ^ No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
We have reviewed the "DRAFT Internal Policy Cumulative impacts and the 401 Water OualitX
Certification and Isolated Wetland Programs" document prepared by the NC Division of Water
Quality on October 3, 2002 version 1 6 The draft states that most residential subdivisions are
unlikely to cause cumulative impacts. Olde Towne does not meet any of the three criteria of
private proiects that can clearly result in cumulative impacts We anticipate that you will advise
us if a aualitative or quantitative impact analysis is required
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
Page 10 of 11

work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).

Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 11 of 11

Environmental Consultants, PA
Road Raleigh, North Carolina 27614 Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
AUTHORIZATION FORM
Name: Olde Towne Company, LLC Attn: Mr. Rocky Keim
Address: 387 Medina Road Suite 600
Medina OH 44256
Phone: X330)239-3663
Project Name/Description:.. Olde Towne S&EC Project # 4865.w1
Date: March 17, 2006
The Department of the Army
U:S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, NC 28402
Attn: Monte Matthews
Field Office: Raleigh
Re: Wetlands Related Consulting and Permitting
_ To Whom It May Concern:
I, the current roe owner, hereby designate and authorize Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA to
acf in my behalf as my agent in the processing of permit applications, to furnish. upon request.
supplemental information in support of applications, etc. from this day forward. The 17+~ day of March .
This notification supersedes any previous correspondence concerning the agent for this project.
NOTICE: This authorization, for liability and professional courtesy reasons, i$ valid only for
goverrunent officials to enter the property when accompanied b C staff. You should call S&EC
to arrange a site meeting prior to visiting the site. i'~~~~ ' .
© ~ ~M
Print Proper Owner's Name
cc: Ms. Cyndi Karoly
NCDENR - DWQ
2321 Crabtree Boulevard
Raleigh, NC 27604
~~ P. ~
Signature 4c-~ia~~ ~ ~ . ~ ~-E-
cc: Mr. Sean Clark
Soil & Environmental Consultants, PA
Charlotte Office: Greensboro Office:
236 LePhillip_Court, Suite C 3817-E Lawndale Drive
Concord, NC 28025 Greensboro, NC 27455
Phone: [phone] Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone] Fax: [phone]
All Blanks To Be Filled In By The Current Landowner .

... , ._

park '~r ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ;°--~ /.~ / ~ . , . '~
~ ~ ~
r.
~
~
_
±
~
,~
v

%"°i jl
//
l~
/~
/~
i~~
J•
~ze6
~~~~ - .~ _ J ,%' ~ ~_~

~\'
~ B '~
~a+as ..::..:
N
W E
S
Project No.:
4865.W1
Project Mgr.:
SC
Scale:
1" = 1320'
12!16/05
SOIL SURVEY
OLDE TOWN
RALEIGH, WAKE CO, NC
Wake Co. Soil Survey
~ Soil & Environrnental Consultants, PA
11010 Raven Ridge Rd.• Raleigh, NC 27614
[phone] • [phone]
Web Page: wwr4v.SandEC.com
C~C~CadC p
f)ENI~ • WATER C~uAL1'lY
WETLMIpe AND 8Tt~,NW1TER BRANCH

i
~~

,..- F
~ \,
r Y L `~"A'`..' r K ~. ~
~`i
.-
.~-' 2.
-~, .: i ..
~ ~ ~- 1
. ,_ .
~~.
__:
u 1
II ~ ~
~ I ~ ~ ~,..IT_
~:.
~~
•-_-`
< <
~ provided by~
~ _ :. -~
' ~„
.~.~; RK
~.:~~~
~ ~~~
~~ ~,r
~ ~ 6R1p6E COI~ICEPTS . ,
~ ,n Y'
~ ~' The Professional Bridge Company . ,.
~ _ _ J.
i . ,,
C~CAF }n.SClA
~~-~M
t
~~.~~~~ ~ _.'tEf:R~D
G<_ULAl~ GIRQER

-.rr-,
Y `,,.,;~ . RK~
', BRIDIGE i~NtEPTS '
~~The Professional Bridge Company ,'
SECTION 5
LIGHT MAINTENANCE /
CART BRIDGES
YBC has provided drawings of our light maintenance or cart bridge designs; additional features or
designs such as; pilings, cross-bracing, and splicing can be provided for more detailed
specifications. Light maintenance and cart bridges are the most cost effective -and
environmentally friendly design, due to building method utilized by all YBC construction teams.
These bridges are available in pile supported, freespan timber, freespan glu-lam, or combination
designs. If your project has special requirements please call our design team at 1.800.383.0555.
Capacity
• 5 ton GVW or 1001b per square foot live load
Uses
• Light Maintenance /golf cart traffic
• Highway overpass bridges
• Bike paths and Rails to Trails projects
• Wetlands and lake crossings
• Design capabilities for heavy water flow situations
• Ravine crossings
Features
• Ability to build from top as opposed to-most public boardwalks
• Standard 4"x6" curb on 4"x6" block -total curb height of 7"
• Crossings to suit County or State loading requirements
• 3"x8" Decking
• Unique screw fastening system utilized for years of maintenance-free service
• Hot-dipped galvanized hardware
• Various widths and spans available
• Combination pile supported and freespan timber designs available for site specific
requirements '
• Ability to gently curve, wind and arch through existing landscape
• Scenic turnarounds or decking available
• Bridge covers, pullovers, observation decks, weardecking, and various handrail
designs available
• All curb- and curb blocks kiln dried after treatment to 19% or less moisture
content to keep shrinking and checking to a minimum
Cleveland, OFi: 800-383-0555 Tampa, FL: 800-226-4178

VIEW A-A
5/8"x12" TIMBER BOLTS
W/2.25" BOLT HEAD
4"x6"x12" CURB BLOCK,
K.D.A.T., ~ MIDSPANS
4"x6"x18" CURB BLOCK, ,~ ~,
K.D.A.T., ~ PILE LOCATIONS 4x6 CURB,
/r K.D.A.T.
,_, ;_
3"x8" DECKING -
FASTENED
~ VIEW A-A W/#12x4.5" SCREWS
9" BUTT PILES ON 10'-0"f ~- 3"x12" STRINGERS
CENTERS W/3/4"x12" HEX BOLTS
3"x12" UNDER SUPPORTS
NOTCH INTO PILES
NOTES:
..
1. UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED, ALL SAWN LUMBER SHALL BE SOUTHERN. YELLOW PINE, GRADE No. 2,
S4S; PRESSURE TREATED TO A MINIMUM 0.40 PCF CCA RETENTION.
2. UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED, TIMBER PILES SHALL BE SOUTHERN YELLOW PINE CONFORMING TO ASTM
STANDARD D-25, PRESSURE TREATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH AWPA STANDARDS C-3 & C-18 TO A
MINIMUM 0.60 PCF CCA RETENTION.
3. UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED, ALL HARDWARE SHALL BE ASTM A307 STEEL, ALL ASSOCIATED WASHERS
AND NUTS, AND HOT DIPPED GALVANIZED PER AASHTO SPECIFICATfON M-232.
4. DECKING ATTACHED vr/ # 12 x4.5" GALVANIZED OR .BETTER SCREWS RECESSED A MIN.. OF 1 /8" BELOW DECK SURFACE.
5. K,D.A.T. -KILN DRIED AFTER TREATMENT TO A 19~ OR LESS MOISTURE CONTENT.
These plans, as instruments of service, are the sole ~] 8 n~
property of York Bridge Concepts. They are not to be lJ LLJJ""lL_]]
reproduced or used for any purpose other thou o o p 0
intended by the author without written permission from
00 ova
York Bridge Concepts.
f Drawing Cart Bridge
SCALE: Description
1 4 = 1'-O" DO NOT SCALE DRAWING
oRnwN ar: DATE. Side Elevation of a Pile Supported Cart Bridge
L. COBB 9/28/99 Drowin
9 Revision
APPROVED 6Y: DATE: Number ~ ~ ~ ~ Q

10'-0"
2"x 12"x 1 6" LG.
BLOCKING
3"x8" DECKING FASTENED
W/#12x4.5" SCREWS
3"x12" STRINGERS
IN ALTERNATE
LENGTHS OF 10'-0"
AND 12'-0"
I
o ~
3"x12" UNDER
SUPPORTS
GALVANIZED "HURRICANE"
CLIPS SIMPSON
H5 OR EQUAL
9" BUTT PILES -~~
.60 CCA ON
10'-0" f CENTERS
8'-6"f
Section A-A
FROM YBC DWG. N0. D7103
3/4"0x12" LG.
HEX BOLT
NOTES:
1. UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED, ALL SAWN LUMBER SHALL BE SOUTHERN YELLOW PINE,
GRADE No, 2, S4S, PRESSURE ;TREATED TO A MINIMUM 0.40 PCF CCA RETENTION.
2. UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED, TIMBER PILES SHALL BE SOUTHERN YELLOW PINE
CONFORMING TO ASTM STANDARD D-25, PRESSURE TREATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
AWPA STANDARDS C-3 & C-18 TO A MINIMUM 0.60 PCF CCA RETENTION,
3. UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED, ALL HARDWARE SHALL BE ASTM A307 STEEL, ALL
ASSOCIATED WASHERS AND NUTS, AND HOT DIPPED GALVANIZED PER AASHTO
SPECIFICATION M-232.
4. DECKING TO BE ATTACHED w/ #12 x4.5" GALVANIZED OR BETTER SCREWS RECESSED A MIN.
1 /8" BELOW DECK SURFACE. '.
5. K.D.A.T. - KILN DRIED AVER TREATMENT TO A 19~ OR LESS MOISTURE CONTENT.
These plans, as instruments of service, are the sole
property of York Bridge Concepts. They are not to be
reproduced or used for any purpose other than
intended by the author without written permission from
York Bridge Concepts.
~~~ 1/2" = 1'-0" DO NOT SCALE DRAWING
DRAwN s~': L. COBB DATE' 7/9/99
APPROVED BY: ~~~ILiI DATE: ,~ )' ~ ~ ~ r'
l ( 8 U l.1 L.J ~]
G3~DC~C~ O ~ ~s
0
Drowing Cart Bridge Section
Description
10' ~Pide, Pile Supported Cart Bridge
Drowing Revision
Number ~ ~ 1 O
4"x6" CURB
K.D.A,T.
4"x6" BLOCKS, K.D.A.T.,
18" LG. ~ PILE
LOCATIONS AND 12" LG.
~ . MIDSPANS
5/8"~ x12" TIMBER
BOLT W/ A 2.25"
~ ~ ~ .BOLT HEAD
~ i

10' -0" -~.-.
3"
Sl
x1
BC
ALTE
BUT
FASTENEDI
CREWS
CURB,
~.
BLOCKS,
/5/8"~
.R BOLTS
~OLT HEAD
~4,~~
LTS
'NOTES:
.._: ..
.UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED, ALL SAWN LUMBER SHALL BE SOUTHERN YELLOW PINE, GRADE No. 2, S4S,
PRESSURE TREATED TO A MINIMUM 0.40 PCF CCA RETENTION.
. UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED, TIMBER PILES SHALL BE SOUTHERN YELLOW PINE CONFORMING TO ASTM
STANDARD D-25, PRESSURE TREATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH AWPA STANDARDS C-3 & C-18 TO A
MINIMUM 0.60 PCF CCA RETENTION.
. UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED, ALL HARDWARE SHALL BE ASTM A307 STEEL, ALL ASSOCIATED WASHERS AND .NUTS,
AND HOT DIPPED GALVANIZED PER AASHTO SPECIFICATION M-232.
DECKING TO BE ATTACHED w/ #12 x4.5" GALVANIZED OR BETTER SCREWS RECESSED A MIN. 1/8" BELOW DECK SURFACE.
. K.D.A.T. -KILN DRIED AFTER TREATMENT TO A 19~ OR LESS MOISTURE CONTENT.
hese plans, as instruments of .service, are the sole ~8 a ~~Yj
roperty of York Bridge Concepts, They are not to be L( w
reproduced or used for any purpose other than ° ~~D~~ 0 ~ ~p
ntended by the author without written permission from °
York Bridge Concepts.
Drawing Cart Bridge Plan View
5~' Description
3/8" = 1'-0" DO NOT SCALE DRAWING
RAWN BY: DATE: lO' Wide, Pile Supported Cart Bridge
L. COBB 10/5/98
Drawing
oPROVED BY. DATE: Number Revision
® ~~,~~.~~ ~ i ~ i ~. < <~~ D "710 3 -
~~ ,.,. , .,~~ BLOCKS,
~/5/8~~~
ER BOLTS
3OLT HEAD

~'
~.
~.
~.
', BRIDGE t~DN~CEPTS
~~The Professional Bridge Company
SECTION 6
HEAVY MAINTENANCE
YBC has provided drawings of our heavy maintenance bridge designs: additional features or
;designs such as; pilings, cross bracing, and splicing can be provided for more detailed
specifications. These structures are ideal when your project calls fora low-profile structure is
;desired but must accommodate heavier maintenance equipment. Heavy maintenance bridges
;are available in pile supported, freespan timber and freespan glu-lam designs. If your project has
special requirements please call our design team at 1.800.383.0555:
Capacity
• 20,000 GVVV or 1201b per square foot live load
Uses
• Residential and commercial traffic
• Construction equipment ,
• Remote access driveways
• Highway overpass bridges
• Light traffic park settings
• Wetlands, lakes, and heavy water flow crossings
Features
• Unique building method from the top down to protect environmental areas
• Heavy-duty curbing
• Guardrail designs available =not required but recommended
• Crossings to suit County or State loading requirements
• 3"x12" Decking
• Hot-dipped galvanized hardware
~ Unique screw fastening system utilized for years of maintenance-free service
• Various widths and spans available
• Combination pile supported and freespan designs available for site specific
requirements
• Ability to gently curve, wind and arch through existing landscape
• More aesthetically pleasing than concrete or steel
• Bridge covers may be utilized on heavy maintenance bridges to enhance their
appearance
'~
Cleveland, Ofi: 800.383-0555 Tampa, FL: 800-226-4178

1 D'-D"
I
' _ 6"x6" CURBING,
K.D.A.T.
- 3"X12" DECKING
- - FASTENED
o o W/# 12x4.5"
0 o SCREWS
4"x6"x18" BLOCKS, K.D.A.T., - _
W/3/4"0 x14" TIMBER -
BOLTS W/2 5/8" BOLT HEAD - - -
- - 4"x6"x12" BLOCK
- W/3/4"~ x14" TIMBER BOLTS
- W/2 5/8" BOLT HEAD
4"x 12"x t 2'-0"
LAPPED
STRINGERS SIMPSON T-S18
STRAPS
10"x10" PILE CAP
10" BUTT PILING (.60 CCA)
2"x12"x16" w/ 3/4"0 x20" DOWEL ROD
BLOCKING
A ~ ~ fOR SECTION DETAIL SEE
~~JJ A Dwc. No. D-~,s4
4"x12"x10'-0"
BUTTED
STRINGERS ~ ~"xl2" BLOCKING ®MIDSPAN
-%-------_-~ I I K. ~~ ; I I I I ':Ill ; I I I I I ,~ ~ I I~--_
NOTES:
1. UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED, ALL SAWN LUMBER SHALL BE'"S OUTHERN YELLOW PINE,` GRADE No. 2, S4S, PRESSURE
TREATED TO A MINIMUM 0.40 PCF CCA RETENTION.
2. UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED, TIMBER PILES SHALL BE SOUTH ERN YELLOW PINE CONFORMING TO ASTM STANDARD D-25,
e PPESSURE TREATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH AWPA STANDARDS C- 3 & C-18 TO A MINIMUM 0.60 PCF CCA RETENTION.
3. UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED, ALL HARDWARE SHALL BE ASTM A307 STEEL, ALL ASSOCIATED WASHERS AND NUTS, AND
HOT DIPPED GALVANIZED PER AASHTO SPECIFICATION M-232.
4. DECKING TO BE ATTACHED w/ #12 x4.5" GALVANIZED OR BETT ER SCREWS RECESSED A MIN. OF 1/8" BELOW
DECK SURFACE.
5. K.D.A.T. -KILN DRIED AFTER TREATMENT TO A 19~ OR LESS MOISTURE CONTENT.
These plans, as instruments of service, are
the sole property of York Bridge Concepts
~' a ~~
.
'They are not to be reproduced or used for
any purpose other than intended by the o QODD ~~ 0 ~ ~p
author without written permission from York o 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bridge Conce tS. Drawing
SLALE~ ~- ~ ~
1/4 - 1 -0
DD NOT SCALE DRAWING Description H e a t/~7 M a i n t e n a n c e
J
'
BRAWN BYE DATES 10
Wide, Heavy Maintenance Bridge
L
C~BB 8/27/99
. Drawing Revision
PPROVED BY. DATES Number ~ ~ 1

10'-0"
6"x6" CURB,
K.D.A.T. 3/4"~ x14" TIMBER BOLTS
4"x6" BLOCKS, K.D.A.T., W/2 5/8" BOLT HEAD
18" LG. ®PILE LOCATIONS
AND 12" LG, ® MIDSPAN 2"x12" BLOCKING
2"x12" BLOCKING 4"x12" STRINGERS
® MIDSPANS 3"x12" DECKING FASTENED 18" C/C
W/#12x4.5" SCREWS
~=
II I II
II I II
II ! II II
~I 10"x10" PILE CAP II ~I
SIMPSON TS-18
STRAPS
3/4"0x20"
DOWEL ROD 10" BUTT PILING, .60 CCA
ON 10'-0" (t) CENTERS
Section A-A
FROM YBC DRAWING No. D-7183
NOTES:
1. UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED, ALL SAWN LUMBER SHALL BE SOUTHERN YELLOW PINE, GRADE No. 2, S4S, PRESSURE
TREATED TO A MINIMUM 0.40 PCF CCA RETENTION. '
2. UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED, TIMBERS PILES SHALL BE SOUTHERN YELLOW PINE CONFORMING TO ASTM STANDARD D-25,
PRESSURE TREATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH AWPA STANDARDS C-3 & C-18 TO A MINIMUM 0.60 PCF CCA RETENTION.
3. UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED, ALL HARDWARE SHALL BE ASTM A307 STEEL, ALL ASSOCIATED WASHERS AND NUTS, AND
HOT DIPPED GALVANIZED PER AASHTO SPECIFICATION M-232.
4. DECKING TO BE ATTACHED w/ ~ 12 x4.5" GALVANIZED OR BETTER SCREWS RECESSED A MIN. OF 1 /8" BELOW
DECK SURFACE.
5. K.D.A,T. -KILN DRIED AFTER TREATMENT TO A 19~ OR LESS MOISTURE CONTENT.
These plans, as instruments of service, are; the sole \~/
8 I oil ~'l '~
property of York Bridge Concepts. They arr; not to be L( ~,] w i
reproduced or used for ony purpose other ;thon
m ° aD O ~ ~p°
intended by the author without written per
ission from
o°
o 0 0 0
York Bridge Concepts.
Drawing
SG11E.
'
'
'~
Description Heav Maintenance
Y
• 1/2
= 1
-O DO NOT SCALE DR,4WING
IO' Wid
H M
i
t
B
id
DRAWN f3Y: DATE: e,
eavy a
n
enance
r
ge
L. COBB ~/27/g~ Droving Revision
APPROVED BY: DATE: Number ~ ~ 1 R /'

,~~
Y .~~-RK
BRIDGE t~'lN+~EP7'3
The Professional Bridge Company
~,.
..ABUTMENT WALL B~CKF~LL
YBC recommends that its crews either perform, or supervise the
backfilling. If this is not feasible, The following criteria should be closely
adhered to.
Verify that the bridge contractor has back-filled the front of the abutment wall
Step One where it was excavated during construction. The bridge contractor needs to do
this to give some support to the wall with a 1' minimum penetration of the abutment boards below
grade.
Step Two At this point, if applicable, it is important to make sure that the bridge contractor
has secured the tiebacks firmly into undisturbed soil.
Step Three It is important that only experienced operators participate in the back filling of
any wall. YBC .recommends the use of well draining sandy soil for back filling
purposes. Commence with filling the back of the wall.
Step Four The. backfill should be placed, or dropped into a position for the material to be
{ater distributed during the actual back filling process. It is imperative the material
transports (Dump Truck) do not approach within 15' of the wall location in order to avoid undue
stress or pressure on the structure.
Step Five A dozer should be used. for the distribution of the fill material. It is important not to
push the fill against any wall., in order, to avoid undue stress or pressure on the
structure. As the dozer approaches the wall with fill, the operator will gradually raise the blade of
the machine. This will allow the fill to be placed against the abutment wall without directly pushing
against the wall. Alternate equipment usage such as a front-end loader, backhoe, or bobcat can
be utilized much the same way as described for a dozer.
Ctep Six
After the fill has been put in place, it can then be hand compacted. YBC
recommends never allowing fill to exceed the elevation of any wall within 10' of the wall location.
,Step Seven Taper off terrain at least five feet beyond each end of the abutment wall. This
will not only help prevent erosion and enhance aesthetics, but will insure a
longer fife for your structure by correctly utilizing the entire wall surface.
* Drawings 5-AHF and 5-AVF illustrate proper abutment wall backfill procedure.
Cleveland, OH: 800-383-0555 Tampa, FL: 800-226-4178

IMPROPERLY BACKFILLED WALL
PROPERLY BACKFILLED WALL
.L
These plans, os instruments of service, ore the sole
property of York Bridge Concepts. They are not to
be reproduced or used for any purpose other than
intended by the author, without written permission
from York Bridge Concepts.
5ccle ~ NTS DO NOT SCALE DRAWING
Drawn by : JOE. YORK Dote : 7~27f95
Approved by L,~~h./f Date ~ ~ I I ~ r1
tJ oOQL~
0 0 0~ o 0 0
Q~DC~C C~ o aC~Cp4~
0 0 O C'= Q p ~
°r°w'n9' :ABUTMENT FILL `
Description
FOR VERTICAL ABUTMENT WITH WINGWALLS
Drawing Re~isic
Number 5 --AVF
nv~~r c w«iv i r ~~~
-COULD INCREASE THE FILL SHOULD COVER
LIKELYHOOD OF EROSION THE ENTIRE WALL

___T ._- _--..-_.- _-__--_
PROPERLY BACKFILLED WALL
IMPROPERLY BACKFILLED WALL
UNTIL THE. END OF THE WALL
NOTE ;WALLS SHOWN HERE ARE FOR A MAXIMUM APPLICATION HEIGHT OF 4'.
These plans, as instruments of service, ore the sole ~OU ll~
property of York Bridge Concepts. They are not to
o 0 0 0
be reproduced or used for any purpose other than ~ G30D~C C~O[~.]C~C~[~
intended by the author, without written permission ° 0 0 0 0 ,~ d o
from York Bridge Concepts.
Drawing ;ABUTMENT FILL
Scale NTS DO NOT SCALE DRAWING Description
FOR HORIZONTAL ABUTMENT
Drawn by : JOE YORK Date : ~ 27 95
Drawing Revision
Approved by ~,~ Date ~~, /~~ I ~~ Number 5 -AHF -
wpnc~n uinl I
iiv~vr r lVl~ly l TILL
COULD INCREASE THE
LIKELYHOOD OF EROSION

•
.~
~~ ~ FINS
transmittal
``~ ~ ASSC)CIA'T~S
INTERNATIQNAiL
Date: December 2, 2005
To: Sean Clark
Soil & Environmental Consultants
11010 Raven Ridge Road
Raleigh, NC 27614
Phone: [phone]
Delivery Method:
Project: Olde Towne
Raleigh, North Carolina
FedEx X US Mail Courier
UPS Hand Delivery
COPIES DATED DESCRIPTION
1 Various Copies of Bridge Details from York Bridge Concepts Design Manual
COMMENTS:
Sean:
', Per your request for the permitting process, the enclosed package of details illustrates
~ the basic construction of the golf cart bridges that would be used at Olde Towne.
Please let me know if you need additional information.
Thanks
Jeff
CC: Rocky Keim From: Jeff Westmoreland, ASLA
Bradley Bowling
File
Vd ~N+ prluswua"""j 9 M°S
100 Parkthrough Street • Cary, North Carolina X7511 ~ Q ~~Q
Phone: [phone] • Fax: [phone] • www.robbinsgolf.