940018_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environmental Qual

1 N SA02" P N �' 5Z9
N P E CT I N
46' U- -

N rcoutme p t omptamt p rottow-up of uwtt inspection p rottow-up of uNvv%_; review p uther
Date of Inspection
Facility Number
Time of Inspection ® 24 hr. (hh:mm)
n c o
Farm Status: ■ Registered p Applied for Permit e r mn n ��
p Certified 13 Permitted o n rtt e a11
10 oOperational Date Last Operated: 1-31-95
Farm Name: Ellco Farms County: 3i mhhoog......................................hy.AR.O.......
Owner Name:]Phyllis .................................... EUis .............................................................. Phone No: 919.19.74638.o ..442.2.....................
FacilityContact: .................................................................... ...........Title:............................................................... Phone No:....................................................
Mailing Address: a.09SI.Newland.$d............................................................................. croweHAC ........................................................... 2,7928 ..............
Onsite Representative: Daniel.{Manny.jDaxeapnrt................................................. Integrator: lndependent............................................................
Certified Operator:Daniel.T ............................... Dayrmpart...................................... Operator Certification Number:173.5.Q .............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude ©0®6 ©� Longitude ®• ®° ®
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finis
13 Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
® Farrow to Finish
600
�Other
Design Current - -D
Poultry Capacity Popalattan Cattle Ca
}
Total°Design Capacity T ;�
Total'SSLW 'C
_Current
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? p Yes ® No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: 13 Lagoon 13 Spray Field 13 Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes p No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes p No
c_ If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes 13 No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? p Yes ® No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require p Yes 13 No
4/30197 maintenance/improvement?

racility Num6er: 94_18
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
p Yes
® No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
p Yes
W No
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
® Yes
p No
Structures (Lagoons and/or Holding Ponds)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
p Yes
H No
Freeboard (ft): Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
................ 2.iil................ ................ .0................ ................ 6 0................ ....................................... ...................................... .......................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
p Yes
® No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
p Yes
® No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
N Yes
p No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
® Yes
p No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
p Yes
p No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type........................................................... ...................................................................................................................... ...........................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
p Yes
p No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
p Yes
p No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
p Yes
p No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
p Yes
p No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
® Yes
p No
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
p Yes
W No
For Certified Facilities Only
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
p Yes
p No
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
p Yes
p No
24. Does record keeping need improvement?
p Yes
p No
Comments (refer to questio©#t) Explaiwany YF.ti_answers,and/or anyrecommendationg or anv_other comments.,: = ` Comments
Use drawings"of facility to be ezpla�n situations (use additional pages as necessary) M
There hasn't been any animals on: site -in ovet two years.-- Mr. -Davenport has been-tearmg down the houses and the lagoons haven't
been pumped in over two years..- He use-to-6ontract ivith•Mr. Greg Arnold who has gone out of business (approx. two plus years
o). The last lagoon was not built to NRCS standards, "there is NOT a suitable vegetative cover on the last lagoon. The fast two
lagoons. are connected via a pipe, however the wastewater has to be pumped into•the las lagoon. ,
8 - If the lagoons are not closed out.properly tlien,the Wastewater must be managed properly.
12 - The lagcon's'dike walls must tiave'a_suitable arid•nianageable vegetative cover-
I3 -There were not_markeis:_: The second"andthe-tliiid lagoon should have a marker, _ ; -
14 - # 19 - were not answered because.there'is not a, utilization plan and wastewater, hasn't been land applied in several years.
e farm needs afollow up inspection,either.,by DWQ;:NRCS,or DSWC
OTE: The farm doesfnot intend'to'go,back-into business y'
- — - .. -
Reviewer/Inspector Name 113yn Hardison =:
Reviewerllnspector Signature: ' Date:

E
S-'4-L�
Site Requires Immediate Attention:
Facility No.
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT.
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERITIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
Date: - r 1995
Time. D
Farm Name/Owner: U, Rr V1
Mailing Address: d o ;A ,{�---
County: —
Integrator: Phone:
On Site Representative: tin Phone:
Physical Address/Location:
Type of Operation: Swine / Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity:-1no(I-0 No. of Animals on Site: ��MWJ)ZJQD
DEM Certification No A E DEM Certification No.: ACNEW
Latitude: 55 - 4- Longitude: 77b ­2j �7 Elevation: Ft
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient eeboard of 1 Ft + 25 year 24 hour
storm evert? (approxima ly 1 Ft + 7 in) Ye or No
Actual Freeboard: Ft Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagocn(s)? Yes or No
Was any erosion observed? Yes orcHo
IS adequate land available for spray? Yes or No
_e
Is the cover crop adequate?
Crop(s) being utilized,:
Yes or No
Does the facility meet SST
nLmum setback criteria?
200 Ft from Dwellings? or No 100 Ft from Wells? es r No
Is the Val waste stockpiled within 100 Ft of USGS Blue Line Stream?
Yes or /No
Is animal waste 1 d applied or spray irrigated within 25 Ft of a USGS Map Blue
Line? Yes or Nos
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state b n-made ditch,
system, or other similar [Ulan -made devices? Yes or O
If Yes, pleas_ explain:
flushing
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure,
land applied, spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes or No
S � P nA-, Atx
Insoe=r bane Signature
cc. Facili_y Assessment Unit
Comments & Sketch on Back of Sheet

DEM
SITE VISITATION RECORD
Page Two
Comments: �� �ro�c-`� C7��� � ��4nc�yt.. �/LC (q
S ket c'. vj � S r5
112CP
fffff L�tis 2 - y
rr�
pae .
/—:�' F-e.L�«0