940017_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environmental Qual

\:\ NPtN
\ � \ \ � � 7 :� 2 ��� � 1 ��� 1 �
\Im a . Aslokk
\06 Pao
\\\ )FLCTIUNO
\\\ \ -
IN.
m /bpt:c
\ IuN..'
_

h
Site Requires Immediate Attention: _�_
Facility No.
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPEPA 3 0NS-S'ITEVISITATION RECORD
1995
Time:
Farm Nam
Mailing
County:
Integrat
On Site Representative: 4: Phone: - bLA
Physical Address/Location.-
Type of Operation: Swine Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: _ 19� No. of Animals on Site:
DEM Certific ion No.: ACE BEM Certification No.: ACNEW
Latitude: -Cr`� Longitude: " (� Elevation: Ft
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Ft + 25 year 24 hour
storm event? (approximately 1 Ft + 7 in) Yes or No
Actual Freeboard: ,.V, JY(, Ft Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or No
Was any erosion observed? Yes or�
Is adequate land available for spray? Yes or No
Is the cover crop adequate? Yes or No N1ft
Crop(s) being utilized:
Does the facility meet SCS jZinimum setback criteria?
200 Ft from Dwellings? or No 100 Ft from Wells? Yes or No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Ft of USGS Blue Line Stream?
Yes or E
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Ft of a USGS Map Blue
Line? Yes or No NV 5P"T'160'_..
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state "n-made ditch, flushing
system, or other similar man-made devices? Yes o No
If Yes, please explain:
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure,
land applied, spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes or No %Llr
P Azzl - ')�Ie'l /�
Inspector Name S gnature
CC: Facility Assessment [snit
Comments & Sketch on Back of Sheet

u
m
ct
n
rount1
O
Pc N trJ
9
(DM
HC
rt
: N
in
O Ul
H
n
�
h
H
U
-
H
p
}
x
�
�
O
U
y'
J
3
6
�
r
a
^
s'
i

_. .............., w f. UD
JULi t2-95 WED 151-32 USDA SOS V FAX NO. 9197902881 P. D2/03
�.gai4M R Bi?aLBi�7Tg7 TO . 01971mm1 19=0 " -Am upluum pow? P.01/22
Oita PAvdm I- mr, We Atlandoae .-...,.�_
NVV4WI
• �ZTa Yi&il'A`t'z�N 1��aOttla .. __..... � , .. _,,.. �.�.
DAM:
7-t - l993`
WASH NGTONEOFFICE
coudyr .... rr ''
A fteast VIALRA all"�L Flt0lreS �� �' Z a
Vpol m
On Site RepmclitWvol Mono!�-- Ilk
ita2��r IL;�= / +rf 9 9
Mutllpa Address!
TAM urC?pansuvn! 'FlWt a �,� l'buttty --,- calao
1x,tpe Cepao!W.
Nwnber otAnlms& on Site., �,,..,.,•.�,�.
I-OUT04sl of . LmAudal --L�2..0 �E
Tm of In9ccllo: Omad .- �L_,_ AarW
c1mis Yee as NO
Does the Aabtml WNW Upon have euMduat ebonb of t Foat * 25 ym 24 how storm event
(gpmxlmltely 1 Foot+7lnrbom) Yee o Z u Aotnbli1lmtoW . fW .Q—
Por thcllblem with molt tbnla cm 1Mnotl.*plena addma>, the Aorlpgom' lhcbwA undtx the
COWArt tl ttcliue.
VAm kq oec iMp obraved term the taencn(o)? ea r No Wm dam crelioa of the dam?: YaR Nv
)= Woquam lod avaBabla fbr Imid eq ik lcas! oa rNv L Ibn away emp adegW0 Yea er No
AddhiunM Commmm.
IV
' •
ftd —
r
YU to (P 19) 713•3339
of ASM
Irc 0 I

a q- r7
Division of Environmental Management
October 16, 1992
S! _4Lei0e_,jb 1lY.
TO: CAFO File
Washington Regional Office
FROM: Robert Tankard
Environmental Engineer, WARD
SUBJECT: Compliance Inspection
BOYD BROTHERS SWINE FARM
Washington County
On October 15, 1992, Robert Tankard, DEM Staff of the Washington
Regional Office, visited the Boyd Brothers Swine Farm. The purpose
of this visit was to determine whether or not the aforementioned
facility was in compliance with its CAFO Designation effective
March 27, 1991.
As a result of this inspection it has been found that the Boyd
Brothers Swine Farm was in compliance at the time of inspection.
Mr. Ricky Boyd is presently working with the SCS Office on a Waste
Management Plan. They are working out the details for disposing of
the waste water by spray irrigating. Presently, Boyd Brothers are
discharging the waste onto a diked field behind the lagoon. Mr.
Bill Moore at an earlier visit had said this practice was find. I
informed Mr. Boyd that presently this office would like to see the
pipe removed. I informed Mr. Boyd that a better practice would be
spray irrigating so that an even distribution of water could be
applied without worries of a discharge through break in the diked
field.
rbt/boyd.cafo
10/16/92

CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
�fs7y� �Cc
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Northeastern Region
1424 Carolina Avenue, Washington, North Carolina 27889
James G. 1`4artin, Governor Lorraine G. Shinn
William W Cobey, Jr., Secretary March 27, 1991 Regional Manager
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
Mr. Richard Boyd
Route 1, Box 241
Pantego, N.C. 27860
Subject: Designation
Concentrated Animal Feeding Operation
Boyd Brothers Farm Washington County
Dear Mr. Boyd:
This letter is to notify you that the Boyd Brothers Swine
Operation is hereby designated a concentrated animal
feeding operation in accordance with Title 15, North
Carolina Administrative Code 2H .0123, and adopted Federal
Regulations 40 CFR 122.23. The designation of your swine
facility was based on an inspection conducted on February
8, 1991 by members of the staff of the Washington Regional
Office. This inspection showed that you had established a
concentrated animal feeding operation requiring such
designation based on the following facts:
1. The facility experienced a wastewater discharge
into an adjacent field ditch.The Swine Operation is
located next to an unnamed tributary of Pungo River
Canal which is classified as[C sw NSW] which is part
of the Pamlico River Basin.
P.O. Box 1507, Washin�non, North Carolina 27889-1507 'Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

Mr. Richard Boyd -2-
A National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
permit is required for discharges of waste to the surface
waters of the State.
However, if you can permanently eliminate the discharge by
implementing changes within sixty (60) days of your
receipt of this notice, including, but not limited to,
modifications to lagoons and the implementation of a final
waste disposal plan, a permit application will not be
required. If compliance has been achieved, you must
notify us in writing within sixty (60) days describing, in
detail, the changes or modifications you made.
If the discharge of waste to the surface waters of the
State is not permanently eliminated within sixty (60) days
of receipt of this notice, an NPDES permit application
must -be submitted within that time.
Permit applications should be submitted, in duplicate, to
the Director, Division of Environmental Management, P.O.
Box 27687, Raleigh, NC 27611. Assistance, if desired, can
be obtained by contacting Mr. Roger Thorpe, Water Quality
Supervisor, PO Box 1507, Washington N.C. 27889, phone
number 919/946-6481. The applications should be
accompanied by construction plans for the non -discharging
animal waste management system.
For your information, the following items are
enclosed:
1. One copy of.the Federal Register - Concentrated
Animal Feeding Operations, 40 CFR 122.23.
2. Three copies of NPDES Discharge Permit application
- short Form B.
If you need advice or technical assistance with regard to
managing animal waste, you should contact your county
extension chairman or North Carolina State University's
Department of'Biological and Agricultural Engineering at
(919)- 737-2675.
If you wish to contest this Designation, you must request
an administrative hearing within thirty (30) days of your
receipt of this Notice. This request must be in the form
of a written petition, conforming to Chapter 150B of the
North Carolina General Statutes, and filed with the Office
of Administrative Hearings, Post Office Drawer 11666,
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604. A copy of the Petition
should be filed with this office.

Mr. Richard Boyd -3-
If you do not request an administrative hearing, this
Designation will become final in thirty (30) days.
A copy of this letter is being sent to Rufus W.. Croom,
District Conservationist, for information and to aid them
in providing cooperative assistance. Should you have any
questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to
contact us.
SiCerely,
- C c
George T: verett
Director
Enclosu es
cct,-MfRoger Thorpe
Mr. Rufus W. Croom

Al
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
March 12, 1991.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Steve Tedder
Water Quality Section Chief
THROUGH: Jim Mulligan, Regional Supervisor
Washington Regional Office
THROUGH: Roger K. Thorpe A a e uality Supervisor
Washington Regional Office
From: Patrick Towell Environmental Technician
Water Quality Section, WARD
SUBJECT: Concentrated Animal Feeding Operation
Boyd Brothers Swine Operation
Washington County
INTRODUCTION:
The purpose of this memo is to request that the Boyd
Brothers Swine Farm be designated a Concentrated Animal
Feeding Operation. A summary of the investigation
conducted on February 8,1991 by Patrick Towell, DEM, is
enclosed as follows:
Date of the inspection:
February 8, 1991
NAME OF THE PROPERTY OWNER:
Boyd Brothers Farm
Name of Operator:
Mr. Richard Boyd and Mr. Edward Boyd

Address:
Rt. 1 Box'241
Pantego N.C. 27860
Phone Number.:
935-5324
Description of Facility Location:
The facility is located off N.C.99 approximately 4 miles
from the intersection of N.C. 32.
Type of operation (Examples: farrow to finish, topping,
dairy, swine, cattle,, chickens -layers or broilers, turkey
production, ets.):
The facility is a farrow to finish pig operation.
Number and type of animals units:
The facility houses approximately 3500 swine.
Length of Time Animals Have been, Are, or Will Be Stabled,
or Confined and Fed or Maintained in Any 12 Month Period:
The animals are housed greater than 9 months during
any 12 month period.
Are Crops, Vegetation Forage Growth, or Post -Harvest
Residues Sustained in the Normal Growing Season Over Any
Portion of the Lot or Facility?
No crops are grown on any portion of the lot or the animal
facility.
Description of Other Animal Operations in Immediate
Vicinity or Proximity to Same or.Other Surface Waters:
Mrs. Myrtle Carawan has an operation apromimately 1 mile
away.
Proximity of Facility to Neighboring Houses, Wells, etc.:
The nearest home and well is approximately 700 feet from
the facility.
Approximate Depth of Groundwater Table in the Area of the
Facility or Discharge:
The seasonal high water table appeared to be approximately
1-3 feet.

1
Proximity of Facility to Surface Waters (provide name and
class of surface waters):
The facility is located adjacent to an unnamed tributary
of Pungo River Canal which is' classified as C sw NSW which
drains into the Pamlico River Basin.
Are Pollutants Discharged into the Waters of the State?
If so, How? (directly or by man-made ditch, flushing
system, or other similar man-made device):
Yes. A discharge was observed via break out in a lagoon
dike that overflowed into a nearby farm ditch.
Do or Have Discharges Occurred in Response to a Storm
Event of Less Than a 25-year, 24-hour Intensity? (if yes,
include a brief listings of incidents and suspected
causes.): y.es
An identical complaint was investigated in 1985 by
Regional W.Q. Staff.
.Type of Waste Management (Examples: type of confinement,
free stall barns, sheltered or limited shelter dirt
lots, paved or dirt open lots, swine houses, pasture:
type of
waste handling -direct spreading in solid form, slotted
floors with lagoon or pit, single or multi -cell lagoon,
aerated lagoon, land application of liquid manure, spray
irrigation, contractor disposal, etc.)
The facility utilizes pit houses along with several
intermintent open yards.
Condition of Waste Management Facility (rate as poor -good,
no discharge, sufficient freeboard in lagoon, etc.
Include weather conditions during inspection.)
Poor. Insufficient freeboard•in Lagoons [see photos There
is need for a comprehinsive management plan.
Animal Waste Discharge (including photos and witness'
names, addressed, telephone numbers and statements of
fact). _
Please note the photographs attached for your reference.
Water Quality Assessment: (Include description of
sampling, field measurements, visual observations and
slope and vegetative cover of land adjacent to water,

r
extent of rainfall and other factor relative to the
likelihood or frequency of discharge of animal wastes and
process wastewaters).
No Field measurements were taken.
Recommendations Made to Owner/operator:
Mr. Boyd was advised to eliminate the discharge as soon as
possible and to call his local SCS representative to
develop a comprehensive waste -management program and
to eliminate the possibility of any future.discharges
to the surface waters of the State.
Recommendations for Further DEM Actions: (Re -inspect,
designate)
The Regional Office recommends that the Boyd Swine Farm
operation be designated as a Concentrated animal
Feeding Operation.
Other Comments:
NONE

17

ROPER
V p 1uL Z6ori9h� Ti ��� /Or. ear
lQf. 1771 . - -- ! 1 f n � c -
'!
_ a�a 133
V ]23
•rat .,,
.111U - /
i71 ]A
y
\� ]log
P- U L
w
s
T4LIn°vlfi 71 t
1 M--dpd <
ti
cs
lj
PETTIGREW
o �7.
OL
z_. L A K E
-
b
UU T
PUN—
NAT{QNA�
ilu
"'f r PUNGO
ull a <. LAKE .
37 0�
o � R
T C O U N T Y I H Y D E C
6C)V
D-PE el� I Ia
r��i►��r►�r,��iiii� ����f��r
r�r
KEY TO COUTM ROAD NUMBERS

Animal Operations Inspection Form
Date of Inspection: — .
Name of Owner of Property: (Check Register of Deeds or Tax
O{{ice) -{( _
Name of Operator:
Ulee . d L-a,o= e o--
Address:
P^ 44 c� L _ Z 7
Phone Number:
qFr�( e ifs- .5 5zr 9�q -,?3s ` 9-o $Z _
Description of Facility Location (State Road No.'s, etc.):
)L'UGA7e; Jv, ��C F�!��yhlrJ�x �� ;PM4 tE/`' 3 ��n,��J �fli;►..
_. A `f'�s c i o.- 0 r "V C 17 -1 tv A G, ;�� 't v�•.
Type of Operation (Examples: farrow to finish, topping,
dairy, swine, cattle, chickens -layers or broilers, turkey
production, etc.): r
ce r
Number and Type of Animals or Animal Units:
t,�Q 0_SO W s_ _ r _._ ._3 so -0 6jedj d
Length of Time Animals -Have Been, Are, or Will Be Stabled, or
Confined and Fed or Maintained in Any 12 Month Period.
Are Crops, Vegetation Forage Growth, or Post -Harvest Residues
Sustained in the Normal Growing Season Over Any Portion of
the Lot or Facility? _ V,14

Description of Other Animal Operations in Immediate Vicinity
and Proximity to Same' or Other Surface Waters:
Proximity of Facility to Neighboring Houses, Wells, etc.:
7lf L' h e-xtr r-j - h a*� s L1 u X:..,.� rat i �6� 0 tee -K
!_ -'��� �K% J r e %� !� / S s fir✓� a'l _ A 17 f n ��'v. J, 167/ . ��q
Approximate Depth of Groundwater Table in the Area 7of the
Facility or Discharge: Ti�C_ S�.1ti�+ r3�1 4,T( 1 .3, TG- �le
Proximity of Facility to Surface Waters (provide name and
class of surface waters):
7ffE j7&e 1, e7 _I S L ac 4 -fe a/AAT4c g. fa *1 7 4m, r n ...n�/
! WSO
Are Pollutants Discharged into the Waters of the State? If
so, How? (directly or by man-made ditch, flushing system, or
other similar man-made device):
0 DSp-rdt 41 ✓, 'q A 13r
Do or Have Discharges Occurred in Response to a Storm Event
of Less Than a 25-year.; 24-hour Intensity? (If yes, include
a !brief listing of incidents and suspected causes.): A
r [� C3v� -F+ c� �it1 r'ii1 �+�? � Zn 'f !.v W S- � ✓ d r �� y f�� , i► �9 � S � � 9<Zt7
E ► X 1A)0 s-1eT
Type of Waste Management (Examples: type of confinement -free
stall barns, sheltered or limited shelter dirt lots, paved or
dirt open lots, swine houses, pasture; type of waste
Dandling -direct spreading in solid form, slotted floor with
lagoon or pit, single or multi -tail lagoon, aerated lagoon,
land application of liquid manure, spray irrigation,
contractor disposal, `etc.)

L
fle
Condition of Waste Management Facility (rate as poor -good, no
discharge, sufficient freeboard in lagoon, etc. Include
weather conditions during inspection.) , CMS-
if �v�r,--s _ S �- e ><a 7l r.,� s «�
err r 2 C S : trc ^1 4 ✓, ,q ,, an /a w -
v
Animal Waste Discharge (including photos and witness' names,
addresses, telephones numbers and statements of fact).
ec)1 we-Vce,
Water Quality Assessment: (Include description of sampling,
field measurements, visual observations and slope and
vegetative cover of land adjacent to water, extent of
rainfall and other factors relative to the likelihood or
frequency of discharge of animal wastes and process
wastewaters)
0,1 of !M G/4Su✓aM P� fs__L `E-lL�ie.� G4 - iGC

Recommendations bade to Owner/Operator: PIP- 1307 f "'oj
19VSvift4 Y� 41, 0 Ste, "s_
Recommendations for Further BEM Action: (Re -inspect,
designate, etc.) i/,�E_/��,"p.,,�T oFrr'� rtrn••��Q.,,1s [�tS;�.,�aY.
Other Comments: A/0" R_
I