Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
940015_INSPECTIONS_20171231
NORTH CAROLINA Department of Environmental Qual Routine O Com taint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow-u of DSWC review O Other Date of InspectionE Facility Number g Time of Inspection / 2D 24 hr. (hh:mm) Total Time (in fraction of hours Farm Status: ® Registered ❑ Applied for Permit (ex:1.25 for 1 hr 15 min)) Spent on Review ❑ Certified ❑ Permitted or Inspection includes travel andprocessing) ❑ Not Operational Date Last Operated: .... . ..... .... . Farm Name:.{ .><�t.. ._ . `��...... _.... _.......... Land Owner Name: .� - °�. County: Phone No: !�.. 7 9 7„_L 3 ..... .... _ Facility Conctact:................................ _..... ........... ....... __..... _... Title: ................. ..... Phone No: Mailing Address: _.I�taV ._ ��l.. d..mil ............. ...._ ........., PSiNG��.. �.... �..�_....._ .... .�.� Z.. G/ �� Onsite Representative:........., ..........,C.... _ . Integrator: Certified Operator: .... . .... .....�.�.... .....��........... _. Operator Certification Number: Location of Farm: L .. �`!.T .�.r-�_�' [pal- ..w�-s.. ._..d 3......_ .........�_.... �__.... ..... _.... _ .... _,..... TOO Latitude �• C�' C�" Longitude �• �+ �' Type of Operation and Design CapacityDesrgnCurren DestgnCurrent"�Desrgn Current Swine, Ca act �Po ulaton� . Poultry ', r C$ act .r. Po "iilat�on ; , Cattle Ca aci Po utatEotz ❑ Wean to Feeder �❑ Layer ❑ Dairy ❑ Feeder to Finish ISeD p ❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non-Dairy Farrow to Weanr �n k Farrow to Feeder `Total Design Capacity k" F Farrow to Finish ?�' x Total. ❑ Otherm x� Number of Lagoons I Holding Ponds z. .. ❑ Subsurface Drains Present '' ❑Lagoon Area Spray Field Area y General 1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? 2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field ❑ Other a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water`? (If yes, notify DWQ) c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) 3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? 4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? 5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require 4/30/97 maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes 0"No ❑ Yes 4TNo ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ErNo ❑ Yes ,(rio ❑ Yes dNo Continued on back FagilityNumber: —... 6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? 7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? 8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? Structures (Lagoons andjor,Holding Ponds) 9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? Freeboard (ft): Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? Structure 4 11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? 12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? (If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) 13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑ Yes J21510 ,VYes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ,0No Structure 5 Structure 6 Waste Application 14. Is there physical evidence of over application? Of in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ) 15. Crop type 16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? 17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? 18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? 19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? 20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? 21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? For Certified Facilities Only 22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? 23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? 24. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ Yes [P4o ❑ Yes eNo ,Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes �io ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes _0''90 ❑ Yes �0<o ❑ Yes '8'N0 ❑ Yes ,ErNo ❑ Yes epKo ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No Comments (refer to'questton #€} Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any, gther COrnments ; Y " Usc drawings=of facility to better explain situations:'(use additional pages as necessary) F j v,6Au,a, U/Ak � 5 Reviewer/InspectorName x '^ Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: .... .r. ...+..... J .....a,. L+.+.....y, "...w V+,...s Y ._ro.-wwy . vsss • t."W71 Countl Tshington Owner e er JAIligood manager Address Location Registered Farm Name I rneoer Aingooa r arm I Phone Number — M- 563 essee Fr7ed Spencer Region )ARO 0MR0 @WAK0 OWSRO o FRO O RRO O NV RO mi es.no ... te. oa ........... . . . . . . . . . . . . T I. Certified Operator in Charge Certification # Backup Certified Operator Certification # Comments Date inactivated or closed M Swine p Poultry p Cattle p Sheep p Horses p Goats p None Design Capacity Total 950 Swine SSLW 128,250 Feeder to Finish Higher Yie Vegetation Acreage Other p Request to be removed 0 Removal Confirmation Recieved Comments Regional DWQ Personnel Assigned to Facility Date Record Exported to Permits Database Facility Number:q4 -1$ ` Division of Environmental Management Animal Feedlot Operations Site Visitation Record Date:. Time: $00 A,-N- General Information: WA1.4 tM4'r9. j Farm Name: l-fAm fl:L-W 6o o_ S wi.✓r 0P6t4rn,,�County: Owner Name: H E F- A- A L L ifko o n Phone No: 7177- 4 ,R3 On Site Representative: Mw Integrator: Mailing Address: AT 2 A o x q C a: Es WEL-4- { /VC_ Z 7 q a. 1h Physical Address/Location: /VCd Z CAJ -rIXN�_ flf Latitude: I I Lon 'tude: 1 1 Operation Description:. (based on design characteristics) Type of Swine No. of Animals Type of Poultry No. of Animals Type of Cattle No. of Animals Cl Sow/Boar ❑ -Layer ❑ Dairy © Nursery ❑ Non -Layer U Beef U Feeder , OtherType of Livestock Number of Animals: • Number of Lagoons: (include in the Drawings and Observations the freeboard of each lagoon) Facility Inspection: Lagoon Is lagoon(s) freeboard less than 1 foot + 25 year 24 hour storm storage?: Yes ❑ No Iff Is seepage observed from the lagoon?: Yes ❑ No W- Is erosion observed?: Yes a No ig Is any discharge observed? Yes ❑ No 0 Man-made 0 Not Man-made Cover Crop Does the facility need more acreage for spraying?: Yes ❑ No 06 Does the cover crop need improvement?: Yes ❑ No 4Y ( list the crops which need improvement) Crop type: Acreage: Setback Criteria Is a dwelling located within 200 feet of waste application? Yes ❑ NoX Is a well located within 100 feet of waste application? Yes ❑ No:it Is animal waste stockpiled within 100 feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes ❑ No R' Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 feet of Blue Line Stream? Yes ❑ No or- A01 -- January 17,1996 Maintenance Does the facility maintenance need improvement? Yes ❑ Nol-D, Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? Yes ❑ No 11� Does record keeping need improvement? Yes ❑ No X Did the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan on site? Yes ❑ No W" Explain any Yes answers: Signature: Date: 94 cc: Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed Drawin s or Observations: MA.. AOI --.January 17,1996 " s,\mil J S Site Requires Immediate Attention - Facility No. DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERA IONS SITE VISITATION RECORD Date: `off`-�7� 1995 Time: 14�30^ Farm Name/Owner: Mailing Address: County: Integrator: Phone: On Site Representative: Phone: Physical Address/Location: Type of Operation: Swine Poultry Cattle Design Capacity: No. of IYAmals on,Site: C IC2n DEM Certification No.: ACE DEM Certification% No.: ACNE`ri Latitude: JS J3 120 Longitude: Z Z .3 Elevation: Ft Circle Yes or No Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboj� of 1 Ft + 25 year 24 hour storm event? (approximately 1 Ft + 7 in) Yes o1'No ' Actual Freeboard: Ft Inche Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or Was any erosion observed? Yes or o Is adequate land available for spray? Yes or No Is the cover crop adequate? Yes or No Crop(s) being utilized: Does the facility meet SCS nimum setback criteria? 200 Ft frcm Dwellings? YY or No 100 Ft from Wells? Yes or No7 Is the a�^ -mal waste stockpiled within 100 Ft of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or �tio') Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Ft of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes or No 7 Is animal waste discharged into waters of the system, or other similar man -:Wade devices? � If Ye„ pleas_ explain: „% JEf 0- to by man-made ditch, flushing or No Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land apple , spray irrigated cn specific acreage with Cover�crop)? Yes or NO Inspeamor Name Signaiure ��33 cc: Facility Assessment Unit Comments & Sketch on Back of Sheet Zf1["�•�C71 Kc^�tiUR� Lq'JPrI f,�. �� Tt4W DEM _ SITE VISITATION RECORD _ Page Two Comments: ��� Q, 4 t�, ✓>'t� Ic1oa �� �� N��_�- Sketch: ,1�3 _-7 (rr``1r��'S i� SK r a 72-