940010_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environmental quaff

TI
=�-_
IN Pat'"', s m:m c

1,
WA 4
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and
Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
May 7, 1999
Mr. Dwight Davenport
Dwight Davenport Farm
9606 Newland road
Creswell, NC 27928
4 4W 40 WA
A&Vy
NCDENR
-
ENVIRONMENT ANl7 NAruFzAL RESOURCES
SUBJECT: Animal Feedlot Operation Compliance Inspection
Dwight Davenport Farm
Facility No. 94 -10
Washington County
Dear Mr. Davenport:
On May 14, 1999, 1 conducted an Animal Feedlot Operation Compliance Inspection at the referenced
facility_ Overall, the operation was found to be in satisfactory condition. A copy of the inspection report is
attached for your review.
In general, this inspection includes verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan (CAWMP); (2) the farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC 2110217, Senate
Bill 1217, and the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan; (3) the farm operation's waste management
system is being operated properly under the direction of a Certified Operator; (4) the required records are
being kept; (5) there are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or runoff.
The recommendations and/or continents regarding your inspection can be found in the comment section of the
attached inspection form. It is very important as the owner and Operator in Charge that you address any noted
concerns, as soon as possible. For assistance, please contact your Technical Specialist and/or the local Soil &
Water Conservation District Office.
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance during the inspection. Should you have further questions or
comments regarding this inspection, do not hesitate to call me at [phone], ext. 321.
Sincerely,
Daphne B. Cullom
Environmental Specialist II
cc: Waftmgton County SWCD Office
10�0
943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, North Carolina 27889
Telephone 252t946-6481 FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (bh:mm)
p Permitted 0 Certified p Conditionally Certified p Registeredin Not peraitona Date Last Operated: ........... _._.......
Farm Name:1Qirigh1.DAy.Wnr1F.a.rm.......................................................................... County: Washington WARO
Owner Name: Dwigh.t.An............................. PAYCAB. n................................. ......... Phone No: � :127- 7,.Q....................... ..W ..
Facility Contact: ........Title: Phone No: ................. . . ......... . .
,Nailing Address: 1.6Q4a.d.......................................................................... C wall..N..C...................._............................._. .79.':$_ _.....
Onsite Representative: Nn.omt.on.site.......................... ......... Integrator ..............................................
.
Certified Operator: Dwight A,..._ i�v�p�4 Operator'tertification Number: ,J.$$7
Location of Farm:
Latitude ©. ®• ®� Longitude ®• ®G ®N
Swine,-,.., Capacity Population
p
Wean to Feeder
®
Feeder to
tnts
2000
0
p
Farrow to
can
j3
Farrow to
ee er
❑
arrow to
tnts
13
U Its
❑
Boars
Poultry ,Capacity :Population . Cattle
Ayer
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons OSubsurface Drains Present C
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
IV
esign :: Current R
Capacit-Vepuktion =.
I
L--::±
-1 1-1
Npray Jr 100 Arm
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier: ....kfalding.Poad.... .......... Lagwa.......... ................................... ....................................
Freeboard (inches): ...............2.4. . ... 7.8.........
C Yes ® No
Yes ❑ o
dYes No
o Yes 0 \o
Dyes ®No
p Yes ®No
❑ Yes ® No
Structure 5 Structure 6
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99
Yes ® No
Continued on back

Facility Number: 94_ 10 Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda Fescue
5-6-99
® No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
Ig No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
l5. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Rectuired Records & Documents
17. Fait to have Certificate of Coverage & GeneraI Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
Oe/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified A WMP?
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further
correspondence about this visit.
❑ Yes ® No
Yes ® No
❑ Yes []No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
[]Yes []No
❑ Yes H No
[]Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ®No
[]Yes ❑ No
❑Yes ®No
❑Yes MNo
p Yes ® No
animals on sue. Mr. Davenport does not plan to raise hogs anymore. He has plans to destroy the hog houses. I his site
confirmation of no animals on site for the request of removal. Mr. Davenport was issued a request for removal form.
f you have any questions about this inspection, please contact me at [phone], ext. 321.
Reviewer/Inspector Name Daphne B. Cullom
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: 1 rn. AftJQ__. 9. 0I. U MIA Date:

a �_Xls_
cf� -to
Site Requires Immediate Attention:
IQD
Facility No.
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPEP,.ZTIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
Date: Y,,-Lf f , 1995
Time: Jn',3�_
Farm Name/Owner:
Mailing Address: b yjp i , [ 3t cd uL 2--7 q _ I?j
"County:
Integrator: Phone:
On Site Representative: ;, ,� ,r Phone: -.7q -f j 3rj ,.
Physical Address/Location:
Type of Operation: Swine Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: Z'uZ�d No. of Animals on Site:O
DEM Certification No.: ACE DEM Certification No.: ACNEw
Latitude: 3S �� Longitude: `Ft�
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1
Ft + 25 year 24 hour
storm event? (approximately 1 Ft + 7 in) Yes or No
Actual Freeboard: Ft --:-inches
Was anv seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or No
Was anv erosion observed? Yes or No
oesor
Is adequate land available for spray? Nol"y
'
Is the cover crop adequate? e or No
Crop(s) being utilized:
Does the facility meet SCSrminimum setback criteria?
200 Ft from Dwellings? es or No 100 Ft from Wells?
Yes r No
Is the a z.al waste stockpiled within 100 Ft of USGS Blue
Line Stream?
Yes or
Is animal wastend applied or spray irrigated within, 25 Ft of a USGS Map Blue
Line? Yes or o
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state b an -made ditch, flushing
system, or other similar man --made devices? Yes o No
If Yes, plea-_ ex -plain:
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes ofF anure,
land applied, spray irrigated on specific acreage wit:: cove_ crop)? es r No
InsLec ;or ti�_;*re Si nature
CC: Facility Assessment Unit

tn
X
m
it
0
n ro cn t o
O y M m
N M
m
HC
N O UI
H
H
M
' O
(� x
s
[:S