20050481 Ver 4_401 Application_20090820

05 -oy S 1 v y
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
US ARMY INSTALLATION MANAGEMENT COMMAND
HEADQUARTERS, UNITED STATES ARMY GARRISON, FT BRAGG
2175 REILLY ROAD, STOP A
REPLY TO FORT BRAGG NORTH CAROLINA 28310-5000
ATTENTION OF
Directorate of Public Works
Ms. Cyndi Karoly
Division of Water Quality
401 Wetlands Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
Dear Ms. Karoly:
t a ''ir/?I
U ! l
0
??r ?errK ?
?4Np`r?NV ST irk ?C?pC?I
"INCH
Enclosed is a Pre-Construction Notification application for
a Nationwide Permit Number 27 (Aquatic Habitat Restoration,
Establishment, and Enhancement Activities), as required by
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, and for the North Carolina
Division of Water Quality's associated General 401 Water Quality
Certification (#3689).
We understand the activities must comply with any regional
conditions that have been added by the US Army Corps of
Engineers (USAGE) and with any case specific conditions added by
the USACE or by the State in its Section 401 water quality
certification. This 401 certification requires notification to
and written concurrence from the North Carolina Division of
Water Quality.
This permit action involves stream enhancement activities
along an unnamed tributary in the Hammond Hills vicinity near
Viking Way. Total temporary stream impacts are 1326 feet; 38
feet of stream that is currently piped is to be daylighted and
stabilized/enhanced.
If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Erich Hoffman,
[phone].
Sincerely, To
Gregory G. Bean
Director of Public Works f
I:
?oF wArF9Q
v U1 OF ??,
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no. O J•CA%I 1?4
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the

Corps:
®Section 404 Permit F-1 Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 27 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? N Yes ? No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
N 401 Water Quality Certification - Regular ? Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
? 401 Water Quality Certification - Express ? Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required? For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
? Yes N No For the record only for Corps Permit:

? Yes N No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program. ? Yes N No
1 g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below. ? Yes ® No
1h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? ? Yes N No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: Hammond Hills Stream Enhancement Project
2b. County: Cumberland
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Ft. Bragg
2d. Subdivision name: Hammond Hills
1EAk
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no: N/A
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: Ft. Bragg
3b. Deed Book and Page No. n/a
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable): Ft. Bragg
3d. Street address:
3e. City, state, zip:
3f. Telephone no.:
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address:
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: ? Agent ® Other, specify:
4b. Name: Mr. Gregory G. Bean
4c. Business name
(if applicable): Department of Army - Directorate of Public Works (IMSE-BRG-PW)
4d. Street address: 2175 Reilly Road Stop A
4e. City, state, zip: Fort Bragg, NC 28310-5000
4f. Telephone no.: 910-396-4009
4g. Fax no.: 910-432-6908
4h. Email address: Gregory. g.bean @us.army.mi1
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: Ken Trefzger, Project Manager
5b. Business name
(if applicable): HDR Engineering, Inc
5c. Street address: 3733 National Drive, Suite 207
5d. City, state, zip: Raleigh, NC 27612
5e. Telephone no.: 919-785-1118
5f. Fax no.: 919-785-1187
5g. Email address: [e-mail]
Page 2 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): n/a - Ft. Bragg;
UTM Zone 17 coordinates: 3,889,458 N; 681,863 W
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.131 Longitude: - 79.004
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1 c. Property size: 2,467 linear feet of stream, or 2.8 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to Beaver Creek, a western tributary of Beaver Creek
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: C
2c. River basin: Cape Fear
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The project site is a degraded stream channel that exists in the low area of the Hammond Hills subdivision. The area is
currently forested with houses just beyond the forested areas along much of the project. Other areas are mostly forested.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
a small wetland lies downstream of the project, but is unaffected by the proposed enhancement
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
2500 I.f. of perennial stream
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of this project is to take a proactive approach to the stream degradation and try to stop downstream
sedimentation.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Please see the attached Monitoring Plan Section 1 for the project details by sections. The project consists of stabilizing
approximately 1326 total feet of a degraded channel at the Hammond Hills subdivision. Standard construction equipment
will be used such as excavators, hauling trucks, pump for keeping the channel dry, etc.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
®Yes ? No ? Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments: for the prior phases, yes; not for this phase
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
? Preliminary ®Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas? Agency/Consultant Company: HDR Engineering, Inc.
Name (if known): Vickie Miller of HDR for this phase Other: Kimley-Horn performed the prior delineation in '03
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
The stream was determined to be jurisdictional during on-site field reviews of the project (2-19-08 with Richard Spencer of
USACE and 2-27-08 with Ken Averitte of DWQ and Richard Spencer). For the prior phase of work, the area was
delineated and a JD was issued by the USACE on 10/22/2003, with an expiration of 10/22/2008.
Page 3 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for ® Yes ? No ? Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
A JD, NWP #14 and ATF NWP #12 was authorized by the USACE for the Hammond Hills neighborhood housing project,
adjacent to this proposed project.
The prior phase of stream/wetland determination and permitting was necessary to support the construction of the
Hammond Hills neighborhood housing development. This private military housing was constructed by Picerne under a
50-year lease agreement with the Army and provides additional housing requirements stemming from BRAC, Army
Transformation, and Grow the Forces Initiatives. The Hammond Hills stream and its associated riparian areas were
removed from the 50-year lease and given back to the Army so we could restore and enhance the current Beaver Creek
stream degradation.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ? Yes No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 4 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
? Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ? Buffers
? Open Waters ? Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a. 2b. 2c. 2d. 2e. 2f.
Wetland impact Type of jurisdiction
number - Type of impact Type of wetland Forested (Corps - 404, 10 Area of impact
Permanent (P) or (if known) DWQ - non-404, other) (acres)
Temporary T
W1 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W2 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
?No ?DWQ
W3 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W4 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W5 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
W6 ? P ? T ? Yes ? Corps
? No ? DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts 0
2h. Comments: n/a
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a. 3b. 3c. 3d. 3e. 3f. 3g.
Stream impact Type of impact Stream name Perennial Type of jurisdiction Average Impact
number - (PER) or (Corps - 404, 10 stream length
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T) intermittent
(INT)? DWQ - non-404, width (linear
f
t
other) (feet) ee
)
S1 ? P ®T Stabilization Beaver Creek ® PER
? INT ® Corps
® DWQ 2-5' 1326
S2 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S3 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S4 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S5 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
S6 ? P ? T ? PER ? Corps
? INT ? DWQ
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 1326
3i. Comments: temporary impacts only
Page 5 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. 4e.
Open water Name of waterbody
impact number - (if applicable) Type of impact Waterbody type Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
01 ?P?T
02 ?P?T
03 ?P?T
04 ?P?T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments: n/a
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If and or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a. 5b. 5c. 5d. 5e
Pond ID Proposed use or purpose
number of pond
Stream Impacts (feet)
Flooded Filled I Excavated I Flooded I Filled I Excavated
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments: n/a
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
? Yes ®No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. F1 Neuse
F1 Tar-Pamlico
? Other:
Project is in which protected basin?
dlem
F1 Catawba F]
Randleman
6b. 6c. 6d. 6e. 6f. 6g.
Buffer impact
number - Reason Buffer Zone 1 impact Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or for Stream name mitigation (square feet) (square feet)
Temporary T impact re uired?
B1 ?P?T ?Yes
? No
B2 ?P?T ?Yes
? No
B3 ?P?T ?Yes
? No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments: n/a
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Page 6 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Minimal stream relocation will be completed for the project. The project was designed to only impact areas that are not
currently stable and to build a bench along the sections which are currenlty degrading. Several meetings and lots of
coodination took place between the USACE, DWQ, Ft. Bragg staff, and the design team in order to mkinimize the footprint of
the project while maximizing the benefits of the stream enhancement.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Stable reaches will not be impacted by the stabilization methods or construction equipment. Construction access has been
laid out to avoid any additional or unneccessary impacts tot eh stream or riparian areas.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State? ? Yes ® No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): ? DWQ ? Corps

2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project? ? Mitigation bank

El Payment to in-lieu fee program
? Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. ? Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: ? warm ? cool ?cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 7 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) - required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation? ? Yes ® No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.

Zone 6c.
Reason for impact 6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier 6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 8 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1 a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified ? Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
? Yes ? No
Comments:
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? 0%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? ? Yes ® No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: Stream restoration project.
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
? Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan? ? DWQ Stormwater Program
? DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
? Phase II
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs ? NSW
? USMP
apply (check all that apply): ? Water Supply Watershed
? Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been ? Yes ? No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
? Coastal counties
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply [_1 HQW
? ORW
(check all that apply):
? Session Law 2006-246
? Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached? ? Yes ? No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? ? Yes ? No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? ? Yes ? No
Page 9 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the ® Yes ? No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State ® Yes ? No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1 c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.) ® Yes ? No
Comments: An REC will fulfill the NEPA documentation
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards, ? Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? ? Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in ? Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A
Page 10 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or ? Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act ? Yes No
impacts?
El Raleigh
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
? Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
The Fort Bragg DPW Environmental Management Branch SME's have determined the project area is no longer federally
protected species habitat because the area has been categorized as a "no longer' managed historic RCW cluster.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? ? Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
Evaluation of NMFS's Office of Habitat Conservation, Habitat Protection Division-Essential Fish Habitat website
(http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/habitat/habitatprotection/efh/GIS-inven.htm) and field review. No suitable habitat exists onsite for
Essential Fish Habitat.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation ? Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
National Register Information System was reviewed. The site has been altered from numerous sources including the
surrounding housing areas and road/culverts/drop structures as well as possible stream channelization and ditching.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? El Yes No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? NCFMP website
Gregory G. Bean
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided.)
Page 11 of 11
PCN Form - Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
r

r
??

....
fl.
? V
?Y
i k y,
V'

(k ViU
41:.?J
f M, Hammond Hills Vicinity Map
ONE COMPANY I Many Solutions- Figure 1
Fort Bragg I Hammond Hills Stream Enhancement I Permit Application
J
�f
MARKHAM
STREET ��. ♦�s ! '1.
A�IAM�
O �a
44. s...A'. �{
Zabitosky, Road
,.
Upper Reach
`cos' Middle Reach
J� B Virginia puce
ate.
Old Railroad
1 inch equals 500 feet A
Feet r W F
�r
0 250 500 _
�� Hammond Hills Site Map
ONE COMPANY I Many Solutions • Figure 2
Fort Bragg I Hammond Hills Stream Enhancement I Permit Application

NM
a2
O'
mU.
0
O
J
C
O
v
co
N
N
O
L
U
2
M
C
O
E
E
m
2

ti
0
z
0
o
U
W
z
0
Hammond Hills
Stream Enhancement
Project
FORT BRAGG, NORTH CAROLINA
February 2008
(Revised February 2009)
Prepared By:

HDR Engineering, Inc. of the Carolinas
HDR Project No. 011236-70600
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 Introduction ..........................................................................................................................................2
2 Site Description and Proposed Improvements ..................................................................................2
2.1 Upper Reach ..................................................................................................................................2
2.2 Middle Reach ................................................................................................................................4
2.3 Lower Reach .................................................................................................................................5
2.4 Existing Rain Gardens ...................................................................................................................7
3 Supporting Calculations ......................................................................................................................7
3.1 Hydrologic Model .........................................................................................................................8
3.2 Hydraulic Model .........................................................................................................................10
3.3 Proposed Bankfull Channel .........................................................................................................10
3.4 Proposed Cross Section ...............................................................................................................11
FIGURES
Figure 1 - Site Map .......................................................................................................................... 3
Figure 2 - Drainage Area Map ......................................................................................................... 9
TABLES
Table 1 - Rainfall .....................................................................................................
Table 2 - Land Use ..................................................................................................
Table 3 - Summary of Drainage Area, TLag and RCN ...........................................
Table 4 - Summary of Peak Discharges ..................................................................
Table 5 - Bankfull Design Summary .......................................................................
Table 6 - 1-Year Existing and Proposed Channel Velocity and Shear Stress .........
Table 7 - 2-Year Existing and Proposed Channel Velocities and Shear Stress ......
Table 8 - 10 Year Proposed Channel .......................................................................
Table 9 - 100-Year Proposed Channel ....................................................................
Table 10 - 100-Year Existing and Proposed Elevations ..........................................
APPENDICES
Appendix A - Miscellaneous Calculations
8
..................... 8
................... 10
................... 10
................... 11
................... 12
................... 13
................... 14
................... 15
................... 16
Preliminary Design Report
December 2007 (Revised February 2009) li iLJ
1 Introduction
Hammond Hill Stream Enhancement Project includes the assessment and improvement
recommendations for an unnamed stream that begins at a 60-inch storm sewer outfall and
travels between Viking Court and Virginia Place to the culvert under Zabitosky Road as
shown on Figure 1. The stream has severely eroded throughout the years with numerous
locations where the stream is deeply incised. The purpose of the enhancement project is
to stabilize the stream channel and banks using natural techniques where feasible. The
design summary report describes the site, the proposed improvements and supporting
calculations.
2 Site Description and Proposed Improvements
Figure 1 shows the delineation of three distinct reaches of the stream, upper, middle and
lower. This section summarizes the existing conditions as assessed on October 4, 2007
and the recommended improvements.
2.1 Upper Reach
Station 10+00.00 to 13+87.46 (Upper Reach) - The existing conditions for this site are
not favorable for water quality or habitat. The banks in this area are actively eroding and
greatly incised. This reach currently has an approximately 68-foot long concrete lined
ditch with a large scour hole just below the end of the concrete. A head cut is migrating
upstream at this location and is undercutting the concrete lined ditch. See photos below.
concrete ditch
Hammond Hills Stream Enhancement Project -2- Design Summary
Ft. Bragg, North Carolina February 2008 (Revised February 2009)

0-KHAM
STREET
O/
ALL AMERICq
pCNlt POb? ? ?? 'V ^?? 5 EET ?\
IYI?
Ns Zabitosky Road
Old Railroad
kI
Upper Reach n9 Co4rt
I J7
0
?o
d
3
O
? i
r 7 0 76 ,r
o `JJJ ? ? Jp//?OG? '
Q RKINGO
?G
Middle Reach
B Virginia
?.??? ?Sh 311'. r J
,ter
'J
00 00 p
®O °
'/ RG131 ? O
OONOVAN
V
STREET
Q ° 4WRKING ° 0 Q zzz?o (-
?0 0 MRKINC , ° 0 0 --?
ORUBER ROgp IL^\\0 Q °PARKW6 ° ° ° O
,=J,-?,ower Reach }) II
ice
ORNE
-SM NE - 113
n
_ _ -
J
O I
FZ Hammond Hills Site Map
ONE COMPANY I Many Solutions- Finure 1
Client Client Client I Project Project Project I Document Document Document Document
For the upper reach, it is recommended that the concrete lined section be removed and the
existing storm sewer replaced with a 72-inch RCP set at the existing channel invert. This
will require the replacement of the storm sewer manhole located approximately 38 feet
upstream of the existing 60-inch storm sewer outlet. Increasing the storm sewer size
reduces outlet velocities; however, rip rap will still be required to dissipate the energy at
the outlet. It is recommended that a concrete headwall with wing walls be constructed
and rip rap be buried 1 foot below the proposed stream invert and extend up on the banks
for protection. Burying the rip rap will allow the natural channel bed to form during
normal conditions and provide protection to the headwall and storm sewer during higher
flow events.
Due to the current incision of the stream, it is suggested that a 5 feet wide flat bench be
maintained on both sides of the base channel and the banks be laid back at a 2:1 slope.
The current stream banks are essentially vertical in this reach. With the banks laid back,
vegetation will have a better chance to establish and help hold the banks. In one
particular area of this section, there is a banded tree which indicates RCW habitat. Due
to that banding, it is proposed that a rock filled gabion wall be installed on the overbank
bench as well as a slight realignment of the channel to divert the water away from the left
bank in order to reduce impacts to the tree.
The remainder of this reach will have the slopes laid back at 2:1 slopes. Although, 3:1
slopes would be optimal, it was determined that 2:1 slopes would protect and save more
trees along the channel for all reaches proposed for enhancement. This section ties into
the existing culvert under Viking Road. The stream thalweg and flow will be slightly
relocated in this area to allow better positioning of the stream with the culvert.
2.2 Middle Reach
From Station 10+00.00 to 12+93.98 (Middle Reach), the stream will be modified by
laying back the slopes (2:1) and slight alignment changes. This section currently contains
the culvert and drop structure under Viking Road. The design attempts to realign the
stream to better accommodate the outlet of the structure and will include some structures
to help direct the flows away from the banks. See the following photographs for existing
conditions.
Hammond Hills Stream E
Ft. Bragg, North Carolina
Project - 4 -
February 2008 (Revised
Below the Middle Reach Station 12+93.98 to Lower Reach 10+00.00, it is recommended
that no action be taken in this section. The stream is currently stable and construction in
this area may impair the existing stability. Correcting the problems upstream of the
stable section will also help maintain the stability in this area.
2.3 Lower Reach
From Station 10+00.00 to 16+33.91 (Lower Reach), beginning at the utility crossing, it is
recommended that several things be done to enhance the stream including laying the
slopes back at 2:1, placing series of drop structures to restore the natural channel slope
and planting to stabilize the stream banks. The utility crossing itself has a lot of rip rap
that has stabilized this section and it is recommended to not disturb this reach
Hammond Hills Stream Enhancement Project -5- Design Summary
Ft. Bragg, North Carolina February 2008 (Revised February 2009)
Outlet of culvert at Viking Road
Downstream of culvert outlet
Sand
crossing
deposits at the upstream of utility crossing
From Station 16+33.91 to the culvert under Zabitosky Road, it is proposed that very little
construction take place. The area, although straightened, has over time become stable
and minimum improvements are recommended. In the area where the old rail/road bed is
located, it is recommended that the concrete abutments currently in the channel be
removed and a double step rock cross vane be installed to prevent future headcutting.
Also, this section currently has a trail leading up to the banks of the stream. Although the
educational opportunities abound in that area, it is visible that the traffic from the trail to
the stream is affecting the bank in this area and destroying the vegetation on the banks. It
is recommended that a post and cable fence be installed to hinder trail goers from going
down the stream banks and allow vegetation to establish. Although, this isn't going to
keep them away from the stream, it may help to deter some of the traffic.
Hammond Hills Stream Enhancement Project -6- Design Summary
Ft. Bragg, North Carolina February 2008 (Revised February 2009)
Extreme bank erosion in Lower Reach
banks in straightened section.
2.4 Existing Rain Gardens
During the development of the stream enhancement project scope of work, Fort Bragg indicated
that the rain gardens that were constructed throughout the Hammond Hills residential
development were not functioning properly and these facilities could be retrofitted to benefit the
proposed stream improvements. It was determined that only 10% of the entire stream drainage
area drains to the rain gardens and therefore retrofitting these facilities would have minimum
impact to the bankfull discharge.
Improving the rain garden functionality will benefit the stream water quality. Although a detailed
analysis and site survey was not performed as part of this project, the following observations were
made during the field assessment.
The top (surface) of the rain gardens appeared to be sloped towards the outlet structure.
Typically rain gardens are flat so that storm water will pond evenly across the facility and
drain through the media.
Some of the outlet structures appeared to be set at the surface of the rain garden allowing
storm water to immediately discharge out of the facility. Typically the outlet structures are
constructed six to nine inches above the rain garden surface so that the first flush of
stormwater runoff ponds up prior to overflowing into the outlet structure.
It is recommended that detailed as-built surveys of these structures be performed and compared
with the proposed design and the appropriate modifications be performed.
3 Supporting Calculations
The proposed improvements discussed in Section 2 require the establishment of a base channel
that will safely convey the bankfull discharge and allow the larger flows to access a floodplain
section. A hydrologic model was produced for the watershed to determine various frequency
peak discharges within the stream. A hydraulic model was produced to determine the existing
Hammond Hills Stream Enhancement Project -7- Design Summary
Ft. Bragg, North Carolina February 2008 (Revised February 2009)
Concrete abutments in channel to be removed
channel capacities and velocities. These models were used along with the field observations to
confirm the discharges and assist in the design of the stable base channel. This section describes
these models and the proposed base channel design.
3.1 Hydrologic Model
The HEC-HMS model was used to calculate peak discharges at various locations along the stream
for various 24 hour duration storm events. The total 24- hour rainfall depths were obtained from
NOAA Atlas 14 and are summarized in Table 1. The NRCS Type II rainfall distribution was
used to develop the 24-hour 5 minute storm events. Drainage areas were delineated from the
topographic map, the storm sewer map provided by the Fort Bragg Directorate of Public Works
and the design drawings for the Hammond Hills Residential Development prepared by Kimley-
Horn Associates. The NRCS Runoff Curve Number (RCN) was used to estimate the amount of
rainfall that will runoff during a storm event. The RCNs were developed based on the soils map
and landuse as reflected on the most recent aerial imagery provided by the Fort Bragg Directorate
of Public Works. RCN values were obtained from the NRCS Technical Release No. 55 and
summarized in Table 2. The runoff was transformed into flood hydrographs using the NRCS
Unit Hydrograph method which uses a lag time to define the hydrograph shape. The lag times are
based on the time of concentrations which were calculated using the NRCS time of concentration
method presented in the Technical Release No. 55. A summary of the hydrologic parameters are
presented in Table 3 and the subbasins shown on Figure 2. A summary of the HEC-HMS results
are presented in Table 4.
Table 1 - Rainfall
Event Duration
(hours) Distribution Total Rainfall
(inches)
1- ear 24 Type II 3.06
2-year 24 Type II 3.71
10- year 24 Type II 5.44
50 - year 24 Type II 7.33
100- ear 24 Type II 8.20
Table 2 - Land Use
Landus
D
i
ti Soil Classif ication/RCN
e
escr
p
on
A
B
C
D
Commercial 89.0 92.0 94.0 95.0
Industrial 81.0 88.0 91.0 93.0
Heavy Residential 77.0 85.0 90.0 92.0
Medium Residential 57.0 72.0 81.0 86.0
Light Residential 46.0 65.0 77.0 82.0
Open Space 39.0 61.0 74.0 80.0
Streets 83.0 89.0 92.0 93.0
Water 98.0 98.0 98.0 98.0
Hammond Hills Stream Enhancement Project -8- Design Summary
Ft. Bragg, North Carolina February 2008 (Revised February 2009)

.? Hammond Hills Subbasins
Figure 2
ONE COMPANY I Many Solutions-
Client Client Client I Project Project Project I Document Document Document Document
Table 3 - Summary of Drainage Area, TI-ag and RCN
B
i Area Existing
n
as acre sq.mi. CN TL (min)
10 89 0.139 75.5 12
20 7.7 0.012 72.7 13
30 5.1 0.008 77.9 10
40 60.2 0.094 65.9 15
50 12.2 0.019 76.3 13
60 6.4 0.010 79.8 7
70 50.6 0.079 76.0 16
Table 4 - Summary of Peak Discharges
Location 1-year 2-year 10-year 50-year 100-year
Subbasin 10 101 149 291 457 535
Subbasin 20 9 13 25 39 45
Junction 20c 109 162 316 496 580
Subbasin 30 8 11 20 31 36
Junction 30C 117 172 335 525 615
Subbasin 40 62 91 177 278 325
Junction 40c 176 260 507 795 930
Subbasin 50 15 22 41 63 74
Subbasin 60 8 12 24 38 44
Junction 60c 197 291 566 886 1037
Subbasin 70 22 39 97 170 206
Junction 70c 216 326 657 1048 1233
3.2 Hydraulic Model
The hydraulic model produces water surface elevations along the stream for given peak
discharges. This model was used to determine the existing channel capacities and compare the
calculated peak discharges to the field observations. This model is also used to assess the
proposed channel improvements to ensure the base channel is properly designed and to confirm
the proposed improvements will not increase flooding conditions. For the stream enhancement
project, the HEC-RAS model was used for the hydraulic modeling.
The HEC-RAS model cross sections only extend the width of the field surveying which covers 50
feet from the top of the banks; therefore, the entire floodplain was not captured throughout the
project area. The results, however, do reflect the proposed channel changes and provide a general
understanding of effects to the larger frequency flow events.
3.3 Proposed Bankfull Channel
The hydraulic model in the existing stable stream reaches between the Middle and Lower (HEC-
RAS Station 1841 to 1559) and downstream of the Lower reach (HEC-RAS Station 615 to 58)
Hammond Hills Stream Enhancement Project - 10 - Design Summary
Ft. Bragg, North Carolina February 2008 (Revised February 2009)
confirmed the hydrologic model. The results of the model indicated that the channel capacities
were between the 1 and 2-year peak discharge. The existing conditions hydraulic model also
indicated the stable channel velocities were between 4 and 6 feet per second (fps).
The proposed base channel dimensions were established by first determining an acceptable
channel slope (0.012 ft/ft) based on the existing stable stream reaches and the upstream and
downstream constraints and then sizing a trapezoidal channel that can handle between the 1 and
2-year discharge while maintaining a velocity between 4 and 6 fps. Channel dimensions were
determined for the Upper, Middle and Lower reaches as shown in the following table.
Table 5 - Bankfull Design Summary
Dischar a Base
Ch
l D
h Channel
i
V
l

Reach
1-year
(cfs)
2-year
(cfs)
Width
(feet) anne
ept
(feet)
Capacity
(cfs) e
oc
ty
(fps)
Upper 100 150 4 2.5 119 5.2
Middle 117 172 5 2.5 134 5.4
Lower 197 290 6 3 221 6.0
3.4 Proposed Cross Section
The base channel was designed to convey between the 1- to 2-year peak discharge. The
remaining channel section was designed to allow larger frequency floods to spread out into a
wider section and armoring this area with vegetation that can withstand the projected velocities.
In order to minimize the amount of tree removal, the floodplain bench was set at 5 feet on either
side of the bankfull channel and then sloped to the natural grade. The proposed channel cross
section was then incorporated into the existing conditions HEC-RAS to determine the larger
frequency flood event water surface elevations and velocities.
Tables 6 and 7 compare the existing and proposed channel velocity and shear stress for the 1- and
2-year storm events. The highlighted sections in the table were located at the top of the drop
structures and reflect the higher velocity and shear stresses that are expected at these locations.
Overall, the tables show that the proposed channel velocities and shear stresses are reduced and
remain more consistent throughout the stream reach.
Tables 8 and 9 present the proposed channel and total section velocities for the 10- and 100-year
storm events. This table shows that between the drop structures the velocities during a 10-year
storm event can get as high as 8 fps and 9.5 fps during the 100-year event. The proposed ground
cover on the floodplain bench and side slopes will be thick vegetation of herbs and shrubs. Once
established, this vegetation can withstand these high velocities.
Table 10 compares the existing and proposed 100-year water surface elevations. This table shows
that there are only 4 sections where the 100-year water surface elevation will increase more than
0.1 foot over the existing conditions; however, all of the increases will be contained within the
larger channel section and will not increase adjacent flooding.
Hammond Hills Stream Enhancement Project 11 Design Summary
Ft. Bragg, North Carolina February 2008 (Revised February 2009)
Table 6 -1-Year Existing and Proposed Channel Velocity and Shear Stress
Reach River
Sta Existing Conditions Proposed
Conditions Change
Q Total

(cfs) Velocity

(ft/s) Shear
Stress
(Ibs/sq.ft) Velocity

(ft/s) Shear
Stress
(Ibs/sq.ft) Velocity

(ft/s) Shear
Stress
(Ibs/sq.ft)
58.49729 216 2.7 0.22 2.7 0.22 0 0
148.8313 216 3.06 0.31 3.06 0.31 0 0
205.2385 216 9.2 3.24 4.44 0.7 -4.76 -2.54
234.7547 216 2.91 0.27 4.48 0.71 1.57 0.44
276.7626 216 3.66 0.44 5.31 0.98 1.65 0.54
365.8161 216 6.27 1.39 7.72 2.21 1.45 0.82
476.3823 216 3.95 0.53 3.97 0.53 0.02 0
615.6145 197 5.81 1.22 5.82 1.22 0.01 0
Lower 717.7472 197 4.34 0.65 2.94 0.3 -1.4 -0.35
Lower 817.6475 197 3.82 0.49 4.93 0.99 1.11 0.5
Lower 884.4288 176 4.22 0.64 4.44 0.81 0.22 0.17
Lower 1029.667 176 6.54 1.56 5.51 1.14 -1.03 -0.42
Lower 1192.46 176 6.82 1.75 5.98 1.36 -0.84 -0.39
Lower 1196.053 176 6.94 1.82 7.23 2.07 0.29 0.25
Lower 1258.89 176 4.06 0.58 5.44 1.11 1.38 0.53
Lower 1262.363 176 4.13 0.6 7.23 2.07 3.1 1.47
Lower 1290.226 176 5.16 0.96 5.46 1.12 0.3 0.16
Lower 1294.08 176 4.74 0.8 7.23 2.07 2.49 1.27
Lower 1348.481 176 8.47 2.74 5.5 1.14 -2.97 -1.6
Lower 1354.292 176 5.37 1.06 7.23 2.07 1.86 1.01
Lower 1407.101 176 6.93 1.94 5.3 1.05 -1.63 -0.89
Lower 1504.299 176 6.55 1.81 6.52 1.79 -0.03 -0.02
1559.362 117 3.91 0.64 3.92 0.65 0.01 0.01
1641.851 117 5.33 1.1 5.33 1.1 0 0
1698.425 117 7.19 2.08 7.19 2.08 0 0
1791.112 117 4.72 0.89 4.72 0.89 0 0
1841.552 117 4.81 0.91 4.3 0.83 -0.51 -0.08
Middle 1928.452 117 7.54 2.34 4.11 0.74 -3.43 -1.6
Middle 2003.43 117 4.24 0.66 4.27 0.81 0.03 0.15
Middle 2028.629 117 5.38 1.1 4.22 0.79 -1.16 -0.31
Middle 2034.207 117 4.56 0.78 6.66 1.85 2.1 1.07
Middle 2069.357 117 4.39 0.74 4.89 0.94 0.5 0.2
Middle 2135.043 117 3.66 0.52 4.66 1 1 0.48
2205.193 Culvert
Upper 2258.285 100 1.66 0.1 1.66 0.1 0 0
Upper 2340.584 100 2.22 0.16 2.98 0.37 0.76 0.21
Upper 2405.642 100 6.89 2.02 4.81 0.93 -2.08 -1.09
Upper 2519.765 100 3.19 0.37 5 1.01 1.81 0.64
Upper 2563.956 100 1.24 0.05 5.27 1.14 4.03 1.09
Upper 2588.809 100 8.09 1.29 5.52 0.71 -2.57 -0.58
Upper 2626.383 100 3.31 0.2 5.91 0.82 2.6 0.62
Hammond Hills Stream Enhancement Project - 12 - Design Summary
Ft. Bragg, North Carolina February 2008 (Revised February 2009)
Table 7 - 2-Year Existing and Proposed Channel Velocities and Shear Stress
Reach River
Sta
l
Q T Existing Conditions Proposed
Conditions Change
ota

cfs Velocity

ft/s Shear
Stress
Ibs/s .ft Velocity

ft/s Shear
Stress
Ibs/s .ft Velocity

ft/s Shear
Stress
Ibs/s .ft
58.49729 216 3.08 0.26 3.08 0.26 0 0
148.8313 216 3.5 0.37 3.5 0.37 0 0
205.2385 216 10.57 4.04 5.12 0.87 -5.45 -3.17
234.7547 216 3.12 0.28 5.09 0.86 1.97 0.58
276.7626 216 3.59 0.38 6.28 1.29 2.69 0.91
365.8161 216 6.44 1.35 9.04 2.84 2.6 1.49
476.3823 216 4.25 0.55 4.34 0.58 0.09 0.03
615.6145 197 6.29 1.38 6.34 1.4 0.05 0.02
Lower 717.7472 197 4.88 0.76 3.24 0.33 -1.64 -0.43
Lower 817.6475 197 4.47 0.64 4.86 0.85 0.39 0.21
Lower 884.4288 176 4.45 0.68 5.11 0.98 0.66 0.3
Lower 1029.667 176 7.34 1.86 5.72 1.28 -1.62 -0.58
Lower 1192.46 176 7.39 1.94 5.5 1.17 -1.89 -0.77
Lower 1196.053 176 7.61 2.07 7.87 2.32 0.26 0.25
Lower 1258.89 176 4.6 0.7 5.21 1.03 0.61 0.33
Lower 1262.363 176 4.68 0.73 7.87 2.32 3.19 1.59
Lower 1290.226 176 5.97 1.22 5.16 1.01 -0.81 -0.21
Lower 1294.08 176 5.49 1.01 7.87 2.32 2.38 1.31
Lower 1348.481 176 9.31 3.14 5.25 1.05 -4.06 -2.09
Lower 1354.292 176 5.69 1.15 7.87 2.32 2.18 1.17
Lower 1407.101 176 7.54 2.13 5.06 0.96 -2.48 -1.17
Lower 1504.299 176 6.97 1.96 6.97 1.96 0 0
1559.362 117 4.22 0.69 4.21 0.69 -0.01 0
1641.851 117 6.68 1.66 6.69 1.67 0.01 0.01
1698.425 117 7.17 1.93 7.17 1.93 0 0
1791.112 117 5.33 1.09 5.33 1.09 0 0
1841.552 117 5.66 1.17 4.53 0.82 -1.13 -0.35
Middle 1928.452 117 8.05 2.53 4.97 1.02 -3.08 -1.51
Middle 2003.43 117 4.81 0.81 4.91 0.99 0.1 0.18
Middle 2028.629 117 6.03 1.32 4.91 0.99 -1.12 -0.33
Middle 2034.207 117 4.97 0.89 6.02 1.59 1.05 0.7
Middle 2069.357 117 4.96 0.89 4.58 0.84 -0.38 -0.05
Middle 2135.043 117 3.66 0.48 4.98 1.02 1.32 0.54
2205.193 Culvert
Upper 2258.285 100 1.53 0.08 1.53 0.08 0 0
Upper 2340.584 100 2.52 0.2 2.51 0.21 -0.01 0.01
Upper 2405.642 100 7.13 1.98 3.68 0.52 -3.45 -1.46
Upper 2519.765 100 3.76 0.49 5.15 1.15 1.39 0.66
Upper 2563.956 100 1.49 0.07 4.81 0.98 3.32 0.91
U er 2588.809 100 9.19 1.55 5.1 0.63 -4.09 -0.92
U er 2626.383 100 3.74 0.24 5.44 0.73 1.7 0.49
Hammond Hills Stream Enhancement Project - 13- Design Summary
Ft. Bragg, North Carolina February 2008 (Revised February 2009)
Table 8 -10 Year Proposed Channel

Reach River
Station
0 Total
cfs Min Ch
El
ft W.S.
Elev
ft Velocity
Channel
ft/s
Velocity Total
ft/s Top
Width
ft
58.49729 657 235 241.29 3.86 1.73 99.7
148.8313 657 236 241.31 4.54 3.12 54.75
205.2385 657 236 241.19 6.63 6.54 24.69
234.7547 657 236.07 241.41 6.35 5.64 44.49
276.7626 657 236 241.63 6.94 4.14 77.57
365.8161 657 237 242.42 8.86 4.86 86.84
476.3823 657 237 243.7 5.37 2.96 94.2
615.6145 566 238 243.94 8.01 7.35 31.24
Lower 717.7472 566 238.7 245.1 4.17 3.54 48.92
Lower 817.6475 566 239.9 245.21 5.53 5.04 42.78
Lower 884.4288 507 240.7 245.51 5.79 5.44 35.23
Lower 1029.667 507 242.4 246.49 7.6 7.37 32.35
Lower 1192.46 507 244.4 248.66 7.08 6.82 33.02
Lower 1196.053 507 245.4 249.28 8.32 8.13 31.54
Lower 1258.89 507 246.2 250.51 6.92 6.65 33.25
Lower 1262.363 507 247.2 251.08 8.32 8.13 31.54
Lower 1290.226 507 247.5 251.84 6.85 6.57 33.36
Lower 1294.08 507 248.5 252.38 8.32 8.13 31.54
Lower 1348.481 507 249.2 253.5 6.97 6.7 33.18
Lower 1354.292 507 250.2 254.08 8.32 8.13 31.54
Lower 1407.101 507 250.8 255.21 6.54 5.65 51.11
Lower 1504.299 507 254 258.1 7.11 4.51 114.48
1559.362 335 255 259.04 4.82 2.51 86.74
1641.851 335 256 259.74 8.18 5.71 45.5
1698.425 335 257 260.71 8.16 3.99 76.42
1791.112 335 258 262.06 7.55 5.03 84.48
1841.552 335 259.1 262.98 5.45 4.44 62.18
Middle 1928.452 335 260.1 263.65 6.51 6.28 29.19
Middle 2003.43 335 261 264.59 6.38 6.14 29.34
Middle 2028.629 335 261.3 264.89 6.38 6.15 29.34
Middle 2034.207 335 261.8 265.08 7.52 7.35 28.1
Middle 2069.357 335 262.2 265.9 6.05 5.79 29.8
Middle 2135.043 335 263 266.58 6.42 6.18 29.3
2205.193 Culvert
Upper 2258.285 291 275 282.14 1.31 1.26 67.81
Upper 2340.584 291 275.5 282.14 2.25 1.77 57.86
Upper 2405.642 291 276.3 282.15 2.72 2.32 37.41
Upper 2519.765 291 277.6 282.22 3.88 3.53 32.5
Upper 2563.956 291 278.2 282.3 4.71 4.4 30.41
Upper 2588.809 291 278.5 282.35 5.25 4.96 29.41
Upper 2626.383 291 278.9 282.44 6.11 5.87 28.15
Hammond Hills Stream Enhancement Project - 14 - Design Summary
Ft. Bragg, North Carolina February 2008 (Revised February 2009)
Table 9 -100-Year Proposed Channel

Reach River
Station
Q Total
cfs Min Ch
El
ft W.S.
Elev
ft Velocity
Channel
ft/s
Velocity Total
ft/s Top
Width
ft
58.49729 1233 235 243.44 4.72 2.07 101.35
148.8313 1233 236 243.39 5.78 3.42 79.62
205.2385 1233 236 243.1 8.42 7.96 43.98
234.7547 1233 236.07 243.66 7.14 4.51 90.37
276.7626 1233 236 244.1 6.48 2.82 142.36
365.8161 1233 237 244.27 8.65 3.62 133.91
476.3823 1233 237 244.99 7.05 3.59 94.2
615.6145 1037 238 245.04 10.72 8.73 42.58
Lower 717.7472 1037 238.7 246.87 5.28 3.89 62.25
Lower 817.6475 1037 239.9 246.97 6.43 4.8 66.96
Lower 884.4288 930 240.7 247.21 6.5 4.61 95.91
Lower 1029.667 930 242.4 247.68 9.15 8.43 37.14
Lower 1192.46 930 244.4 249.64 9.28 8.56 36.94
Lower 1196.053 930 245.4 250.37 10.06 9.39 35.89
Lower 1258.89 930 246.2 251.57 8.92 8.19 37.48
Lower 1262.363 930 247.2 252.17 10.06 9.39 35.89
Lower 1290.226 930 247.5 252.96 8.7 7.95 37.83
Lower 1294.08 930 248.5 253.47 10.06 9.39 35.89
Lower 1348.481 930 249.2 254.55 8.99 8.24 37.93
Lower 1354.292 930 250.2 255.15 10.12 9.46 35.81
Lower 1407.101 930 250.8 256.51 7.65 5.16 101.04
Lower 1504.299 930 254 258.86 8.68 4.66 114.48
1559.362 614 255 259.96 5.72 2.89 86.74
1641.851 614 256 260.8 9.57 5.2 66.11
1698.425 614 257 262.03 7.42 3.1 88.13
1791.112 614 258 262.91 8.46 4.43 84.48
1841.552 614 259.1 263.53 7.69 5.38 71.99
Middle 1928.452 614 260.1 264.41 8.62 8 38.35
Middle 2003.43 614 261 265.54 7.92 7.27 33.17
Middle 2028.629 614 261.3 265.81 8.03 7.38 33.04
Middle 2034.207 614 261.8 265.96 9.1 8.51 31.65
Middle 2069.357 614 262.2 266.81 7.74 7.08 33.34
Middle 2135.043 614 263 267.49 8.08 7.44 32.94
2205.193 Culvert
Upper 2258.285 535 275 283.48 1.8 1.5 103.84
Upper 2340.584 535 275.5 283.46 3.13 2.19 62.01
Upper 2405.642 535 276.3 283.47 3.74 3 42.67
Upper 2519.765 535 277.6 283.55 4.88 4.15 37.78
Upper 2563.956 535 278.2 283.6 5.62 4.91 35.61
Upper 2588.809 535 278.5 283.62 6.13 5.39 34.49
Upper 2626.383 535 278.9 283.66 6.86 6.16 33.02
Hammond Hills Stream Enhancement Project - 15 - Design Summary
Ft. Bragg, North Carolina February 2008 (Revised February 2009)
Table 10 -100-Year Existing and Proposed Elevations
Existing Pro osed Chan e

Reach River
Station
Q Total
cfs Min Ch
El
feet W.S.
Elev
feet Min Ch
El
feet W.S.
Elev
feet Min Ch
El
feet W.S.
Elev
feet
58.49729 1233 235 243.44 235 243.44 0 0
148.8313 1233 236 243.4 236 243.39 0 -0.01
205.2385 1233 236 244.59 236 243.1 0 -1.49
234.7547 1233 236.07 245.58 236.07 243.66 0 -1.92
276.7626 1233 236 245.77 236 244.1 0 -1.67
365.8161 1233 237 245.83 237 244.27 0 -1.56
476.3823 1233 237 246 237 244.99 0 -1.01
615.6145 1037 238 245.92 238 245.04 0 -0.88
Lower 717.7472 1037 239 246.88 238.7 246.87 -0.3 -0.01
Lower 817.6475 1037 239 247.24 239.9 246.97 0.9 -0.27
Lower 884.4288 930 240 247.92 240.7 247.21 0.7 -0.71
Lower 1029.667 930 241 247.91 242.4 247.68 1.4 -0.23
Lower 1192.46 930 244 251.2 244.4 249.64 0.4 -1.56
Lower 1196.053 930 243.73 251.17 245.4 250.37 1.67 -0.8
Lower 1258.89 930 245 252.18 246.2 251.57 1.2 -0.61
Lower 1262.363 930 245 252.18 247.2 252.17 2.2 -0.01
Lower 1290.226 930 245 251.87 247.5 252.96 2.5 1.09
Lower 1294.08 930 245 252.3 248.5 253.47 3.5 1.17
Lower 1348.481 930 246.11 254.39 249.2 254.55 3.09 0.16
Lower 1354.292 930 246.09 256 250.2 255.15 4.11 -0.85
Lower 1407.101 930 251 255.99 250.8 256.51 -0.2 0.52
Lower 1504.299 930 254 258.86 254 258.86 0 0
1559.362 614 255 259.96 255 259.96 0 0
1641.851 614 256 260.8 256 260.8 0 0
1698.425 614 257 262.03 257 262.03 0 0
1791.112 614 258 262.91 258 262.91 0 0
1841.552 614 258 263.83 259.1 263.53 1.1 -0.3
Middle 1928.452 614 259 265.74 260.1 264.41 1.1 -1.33
Middle 2003.43 614 261 266.47 261 265.54 0 -0.93
Middle 2028.629 614 261 267.57 261.3 265.81 0.3 -1.76
Middle 2034.207 614 261 268.24 261.8 265.96 0.8 -2.28
Middle 2069.357 614 261 268 262.2 266.81 1.2 -1.19
Middle 2135.043 614 263 269.51 263 267.49 0 -2.02
2205.193 Culvert
Upper 2258.285 535 275 283.48 275 283.48 0 0
Upper 2340.584 535 274 283.43 275.5 283.46 1.5 0.03
Upper 2405.642 535 276 283.13 276.3 283.47 0.3 0.34
Upper 2519.765 535 277 284.29 277.6 283.55 0.6 -0.74
Upper 2563.956 535 277 284.75 278.2 283.6 1.2 -1.15
Upper 2588.809 535 284.51 290.34 278.5 283.62 -6.01 -6.72
Upper 2626.383 535 285 292.32 278.9 283.66 -6.1 -8.66
Hammond Hills Stream Enhancement Project - 16 - Design Summary
Ft. Bragg, North Carolina February 2008 (Revised February 2009)
3.5 Rip Rap Outlet Protection
The outlet of the 72-inch storm sewer shall be protected from undercutting using a 28 foot long
Class I Rip Rap outlet protection that is buried 1 foot below the proposed channel bottom. The
calculation for this outlet protection is provided in Appendix A.
3.6 Temporary Erosion Control Measures
The channel improvements will be performed from the upstream section to the downstream
section using the daily pump around method for controlling base flow and allowing for the work
within the channel section. A detailed description of the construction sequencing and associated
erosion control measures are provided in the construction drawings. In general, check dams
located at the end of each reach will capture and filter sediment that runs off the disturbed
construction corridor. The area of the channel that is worked on during the day is isolated by the
pump around set up.
Construction Entrances will be located within the construction corridors prior to the roadways. In
addition a temporary access road will be constructed from the construction entrance down to the
stream location. The temporary access road will protect the heavily traveled access corridor and
reduce rutting and sediment runoff. A temporary stream crossing is proposed at the lower end of
the lower improvements to allow the contractor to install the yard inlet and storm sewer and to
access the very downstream drop structure. Calculations for the temporary crossing are presented
in Appendix A.
Hammond Hills Stream Enhancement Project - 17 - Design Summary
Ft. Bragg, North Carolina February 2008 (Revised February 2009)
APPENDIX A - MISCELLANEOUS
CALCULATIONS
Hammond Hills Stream Enhancement Project Design Summary
Ft. Bragg, North Carolina February 2008 (Revised February 2009)
Scour Hole Calculations
Project Name: Hammond Hills - Stream Enhancement
Project No. :
Sheet Title : Scour Hole Calculations
Originated By : KET Date: January 24, 2008
Checked By: Date:
QA /QC Verification Date:
Description Units Input Calculation Source
Q10 cfs 290 From HMS Model - Subbasin 10
Diameter Pipe inches 72
Manning's "n" 0.013
Slope Pipe FT/FT 0.005
Outlet Invert Elevation FT 278.94 Set from profile
Normal Depth FT 4.8 See partial flow depth chart at right
Velocity at Normal Depth fps 12.01
Tailwater Elevation FT 282.35 Normal Depth
TW/D 0.57
Q/D^2.5 3.3
Yo/D 0.77 HEC 14, Figure III-10
Yo=Ye FT 4.62
Area at Ye FT2 22.7448 From partial flow depth chart
Velocity (V=Q/A) fps 12.75
RIP-RAP D50 FT 1.1 Class I
D50/Ye 0.24
"FROUDE #" 1.05
hs/Ye 0.4 HEC 14, Figure X1-2
hs FT 1.85
Dispersion Pool Length FT 24.00
Apron Width FT 9.24
Depth of RIP-RAP Entrance Slope FT 3.30
Depth of RIP-RAP in Basin FT 2.20
Length of Rip Rap without scour hole FT 27.72 La = 15'hs or 4'D whichever is greater
Trapezoidal or Triangular channel with same side slopes
Width 4
Side Slope 2
Channel Slope 0.0120 To channel
Depth 2.5
Cross Sectional Area 22.50
Wetted Perimeter 15.18
g
Hydraulic Radius 1.48
Manning's "n" 0.05 Class I Rip-Rap
Discharge 95.5
Velocity 4.2
Shear Stress lbs/FFT
1.87
?x
F
= O
z
U
O

Z M
} g•
p `m ° "
>-
LL
O co
p o J 00 Cl)
N
n
w - w of ri
It N
Q 7
O ° a.
> rn
U
W
2 Z
Q Q
p co
>
z _
U } > (`) r+oo °o °o
w Q ti
205
U 3: W
xW (O LC) LO 00
TNN
w N
C7 Z
Z)
Z
cn w (r
Q
O
>
=
O I II
QCL?
> W
Z Q U
d z 0 Q 0 w C/) J
w 0D
V +
7 xx
U' Z I- Z OC
Q LL o w
Q w Q W
OC > o 0 o
2
1
o
°
o z?0 c}}
o
do
¢ ir a
w
Q w = J Z Z Z 3
0 Qi r
J
O _ w
0
W °
E FL
W
a
W
x N ?
U
a o
CL
CL
n mCE
C? w
O O O
O
° x W
p
w Z C7 0 0
[C o[ oC
Q tq °o
oo w w W
> x N > O
O

C7 _
p o p p O O O O O
Z J
O
S

W
p Z
O O
=
U
o
C6

i
r _
W
J Cp
H
N ?
O
Op

O O M
O O n
w

m m r
w N N? A U (D
CV Z
F- LL o O U w
W
I D J ?f1

O II W N

N _ LL

>
Cn Z
Z) T- J >
(n w z x Y O w U)
r)
O E v N
U
o
°
3
0
a ° Z=" v CL
U
d o O U 2
2 U
0
ui
N 0
O N p
W F
J
Z
co
c
Z 00
M
a
d
(n
Z: -x O v Q
cc
U Q Q a
z
cc II II II a J
J N
w
co J 00 F-
CO J Q Q w , Cn
D
w
J

U) a
C? U)
w Z
U)
Q
U Z a M p
J U
F
U o Q p z
O Q z
o
:3
O

O o
T-
Cl) > p
a p Z O w p m

w O m
C) cm

Q

p O D o

C
i
a
m

z
W
-It Ill ui Oi
N Cl)

Jx M ¢
x O

P:
CO Z fn Q
Q V n z
9 U
W (n
o J o Wp
p O
j p ~3 QZW ¢O a
T- J z z
o zx z?a v
O w
cnw Q? JO
L
o (JW Q C
O
U (wW x w zU
N
_
(?w O LUZ W U
C7HQ W
F,) W V 0 3 z
a
Z
U
O Q
0) o
2
E rnv o
w7 wOW ~
(n -J Z
0)

E Cl)

0 CC cc N

? `-'

N
g
m CO
g
N
ox (n
Ud? v 3=0U O O

w
a w
" w
z 3:"
w
U p
Q
w O
Z
O

wa Z ZLL Lj

LD QLL

w 00 w

Q
w
a
? F- H Ye >- z Ir 0 3i
>-
Fn F-

O
in U) F15 H W p x 2 Z
to
MONITORING REPORT FOR [Insert Year]
Insert map or photo of site
Hammond Hills
Stream Enhancement Project
Cumberland County, NC
Prepared By:
Fort Bragg
Directorate of Public Works
Environmental Compliance Branch
Building 3-1631 Butner Road
Fort Bragg, NC 28310
Date
Table of Contents
......................................................................................................................III
SUMMARY
1. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................... 4
1.1 Project Description ............................................................................................4
1.2 Purpose ............................................................................................................ 5
1.3 Project History ................................................................................................... 5
2. STREAM ASSESSMENT ......................................................................................... 5
2.1 Success Criteria ................................................................................................ 5
2.2 Stream Description ........................................................................................... 6
2.3 Post Construction Conditions ............................................................................ 6
2.4 Monitoring Conditions ....................................................................................... 7
2.5 Results of Stream Monitoring ............................................................................ 8
2.6 Stream Buffer Vegetation (Species and Monitoring) ......................................... 8
3. OVERALL CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ....................................... 8
FIGURES ........................................................................................................................ 9
FIGURE 1 ................................................................................................................................ 10
FIGURE 2 ..................................................................................................................11
FIGURE 3 .................................................................................................................. 12
FIGURE 4 ..................................................................................................................13
APPENDICES ............................................................................................................................. 14
Appendix A - Photographs Pre-construction / Construction ...................................... 15
Appendix B - Photographs Year 1 Monitoring ........................................................... 18
Appendix C - Photographs Year 2 Monitoring ........................................................... 19
Appendix D - Photographs Year 3 Monitoring ........................................................... 20
Appendix E - Photographs Year 4 Monitoring ........................................................... 21
Appendix F - Photographs Year 5 Monitoring ........................................................... 22
Hammond Hills Stream Enhancement Project Page ii
SUMMARY
Hammond Hills Stream Enhancement Project Page iii
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 Project Description
The United States Army retained HDR Engineering, Inc. to review the Hammond Hills Stream
Enhancement Project and develop a plan for stabilization of the stream. On May 2nd and
October 4th, 2007, HDR reviewed the sites feasibility and provided the following summary of
activities by stations for the stream enhancement project.
Station 10+00.00 to 13+87.46 (Upper Reach) - The conditions for this site were not favorable
for water quality or habitat. The banks in this area were actively eroding and greatly incised.
This reach had an approximately 68-foot long concrete lined channel with a major scour hole
just below the end of the concrete and the channel was undercutting the concrete stream
section.
In this upper reach section, the concrete lined channel section was removed and a drop
structure put in place. This structure was designed to dissipate the energy that the stream
incurs during storm events as well as dropping the water to the current stream elevation without
causing further scour. Removing the concrete lined channel also helped to alleviate the
additional velocity that stream gained in that section. At the end of the drop structure, outlet
protection was installed to help stabilize the stream.
In addition to the drop structure in this section and due to the incision of the stream, the stream
banks were laid back with a constructed 5' bench on both sides. The stream banks were
essentially vertical in this section and laying back the slopes allowed vegetation to take hold and
provided additional capacity during high flows. Due to the potential RCW banded tree in this
section (STATION 12+20), a rock-filled gabion wall was placed along the stream to hold the
banks as well as a slight realignment of the channel to divert the water away from the left bank
The remainder of this section had the slopes laid back at 2:1. Although, 3:1 slopes would have
been optimal, it was determined that 2:1 slopes would protect and save more trees along the
channel for all reaches proposed for enhancement. This section ties into the existing culvert
under Viking Road. The stream thalweg and flow was slightly relocated in this area to allow
better positioning of the stream with the culvert.
From Station 10+00.00 to 12+93.98 (Middle Reach) - This section of stream was modified by
laying back the slopes (2:1) and slight alignment changes. This section contains the culvert and
drop structure under Viking Road. The design realigned the stream to better accommodate the
outlet of the structure and included some additional structures to help direct the flows away from
the banks.
Below the Middle Reach Station 12+93.98 to Lower Reach 10+00.00, it was proposed that no
action be taken in this section. The stream appeared very stable and construction in this area
could have impaired the existing stability. Correcting the problems upstream of the stable
section should have helped maintain the stability in this area.
From Station 10+00.00 to 16+33.91 (Lower Reach) - Beginning at the utility crossing, several
things were completed to enhance the stream including laying the slopes back at 2:1, placing
structures in the channel, and planting to stabilize the stream banks. The utility crossing was
not affected by the project.
Hammond Hills Stream Enhancement Project Page 4
From Station 16+33.91 to the culvert under Zabitosky Road -Very little construction occurred in
this reach. The area, although straightened, has over time become stable. The concrete
abutments that existed in the area of the old rail/road bed were removed and the fill material
was removed resulting in 3:1 slopes in that area. This allows the high volumes of water to pass
through area without increasing velocity. This section also has a trail leading up to the banks of
the stream. Although the educational opportunities abound in that area, it is visible that the
traffic from the trail to the stream is affecting the bank in this area and destroying the vegetation
on the banks. A section of post and cable fence was originally planned for this location;
however, it was removed after discussions that it may not necessarily hinder trail goers from
going down the stream banks and may be a safety concern for children along the trail.
1.2 Purpose
The purpose of the Hammond Hills Stream Enhancement Project was to take a proactive
approach to the actively degrading stream channel by reducing the sediment entering the
channel and stabilizing the stream banks. The purpose of this report is to fulfill the monitoring
requirements associated with the permit for building the project and to help determine if the site
is successful in stabilizing the stream channel.
1.3 Project History
Month Year
Month Year
Month Year
Month Year
Month Year
Month Year
Month Year
Construction Completed
Planting Complete
Stream Channel Monitoring Report (Year 1)
Stream Channel Monitoring Report (Year 2)
Stream Channel Monitoring Report (Year 3)
Stream Channel Monitoring Report (Year 4)
Stream Channel Monitoring Report (Year 5)
2. STREAM ASSESSMENT
2.1 Success Criteria
The following activities must occur in support of the monitoring required for this project:
¦ The stream shall be monitored for 5 years from construction completion
¦ The data shall be submitted to the USACE each year of monitoring
¦ The stream dimension shall be measured using one permanent cross-section
established within the three reaches of enhancement (Permanent locations marked
in field and GPS locations provided to assure accurate locations.)
¦ The measurement for dimension shall include a measurement of width/depth ratio,
entrenchment ration, and low bank height ration (low bank height/max. bankfull
depth)
¦ The vegetation will be monitored visually for any bare areas and an estimate of cover
provided for each stratum (herb, shrub, and tree)
Hammond Hills Stream Enhancement Project Page 5
2.2 Stream Description
The stream was in degrading condition at the onset of the project. The three sections for
enhancements were identified based on their level of impairment and need for stabilization
measures as identified in the December 5, 2007 Assessment Memo and in Section 1.1.
2.3 Post Construction Conditions
The Hammond Hills Stream Enhancement involved the construction of log vanes, rock cross
vanes, and bank sloping. Coir fiber matting was installed along the banks throughout the three
sections in any area where the existing ground was disturbed along with live staking and
plantings (temporary and permanent). The following information is from the permanent cross-
sections established in the 3 reaches:
Cross Section 1 (Upper Reach)
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Yea r 5
Station

ft

Elev. Station

ft

Elev. Station
ft

Elev. Station
ft
Elev.
Station
Elev.

Cross Section 2 Middle Reach
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
Station
ft
Elev. Station
ft
Elev. Station
ft
Elev. Station
ft
Elev. Station
ft
Elev.

Hammond Hills Stream Enhancement Project Page 6
Cross Section 3 Lower Reach
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
Station
ft
Elev.
Station
Elev.
Station
Elev.
Station
Elev.
Station
it

Elev.

2.4 Monitoring Conditions
The objective of the Hammond Hills Stream Restoration Project was to stabilize the degrading
reach and help with water quality from the active bank erosion. A total of three cross sections,
one per enhanced reach, were established as permanent for monitoring. The following data
was collected at each of the permanent monitoring locations:
Cross Section 1 (Upper Reach)
Variable Constructed Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
Drainage Area mi
Bankfull Width ft
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
Width / Depth Ratio
Maximum Bankfull Depth (ft)
Entrenchment Ratio
Cross Section 2 Middle Reach
Variable Constructed Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
Drainage Area mi
Bankfull Width ft
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
Width / Depth Ratio
Maximum Bankfull Depth ft
Entrenchment Ratio
Cross Section 3 (Lower Reachl
Variable Constructed Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
Drainage Area mi
Bankfull Width ft
Bankfull Mean Depth ft
Width / Depth Ratio
Maximum Bankfull Depth ft
Entrenchment Ratio
Hammond Hills Stream Enhancement Project Page 7
2.5 Results of Stream Monitoring
The monitoring included the visual inspection and cross-sectional data on the three enhanced
reaches. The locations of the cross sections are shown in Figure 3.
Based on the comparisons of the constructed reaches to the Year X monitoring, cross
sections appear to be unstable 1 stable with major, minor, little, no, etc. active bank erosion.
Future survey data will vary depending on actual location of rod placement and alignment;
however, this information should remain similar in appearance.
[ ?tclude any additional statements describing any changes in the channel
2.6 Stream Buffer Vegetation (Species and Monitoring)
The following species were planted on the stream bank:
¦ Salix nigra, black willow
¦ Cornus amomum, silky dogwood
The following species were planted in the buffer areas:
• To be included after construction
¦ X
¦ X
¦ X
No permanent vegetation plots were incorporated into the monitoring for this enhancement
project. Visual inspections of the enhanced reaches were conducted during each visit to the
site to identify any potential issues with the project.
The vegetation during this monitoring year includes [sparse, dense, highly, poorly, etc.]
vegetated banks. Include any additional information as necessary to describe vegetation der.
.. ....
See Appendix X for the current monitoring year photographs.
3. OVERALL CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The Hammond Hills Stream Enhancement Project has met the required monitoring protocols for
the [first, second, third, fourth, or fifth] formal year of monitoring. [Insert Text describing overall
stability of the reach. Example: The channel and structures throughout the reaches are stable
at this time. The stream banks and buffer area are highly vegetation for the [first, second, or
third, fourth, or fifth] year of monitoring.]
Hammond Hills Stream Enhancement Project Page 8
FIGURES
Hammond Hills Stream Enhancement Project Page 9
Hammond Hills Vicinity Map
fR Figure 1
ONE COMPANY I Many Solutions- -
Fort Bragg I Hammond Hills Stream Enhancement I Monitoring Report

k G r"tCA

J1

y
All;
/L

9?p
f

fZ Hammond Hills Site Map
ONE COMPANY I Many Solutions- Figure 2
Fort Bragg I Hammond Hills Stream Enhancement Monitoring Report
N M
i
C
O?
. LM
4-+ LL
V
O
J
C
O
V
n
N
N
O
L-
L)
U)
O
E
E
M
0
0

z
?o
V
W
z
0
APPENDICES
Hammond Hills Stream Enhancement Project Page 14
Appendix A - Photographs Pre-
construction / Construction
UDDer Reach - Larqe scour hole and eroded ba
nks
looking
Hammond Hills Stream Enhancement Project Page 15
downstream.
downstream of concrete ditch.
of
of
section.
stable
Hammond Hills Stream Enhancement Project Page 16
utility crossing.
channel to be removed.
utility crossing.
banks in straightened section.
Hammond Hills Stream Enhancement Project Page 17
Appendix B - Photographs Year 1 Monitoring
Hammond Hills Stream Enhancement Project Page 18
Appendix C - Photographs Year 2 Monitoring
Hammond Hills Stream Enhancement Project Page 19
Appendix D - Photographs Year 3 Monitoring
Hammond Hills Stream Enhancement Project Page 20
Appendix E - Photographs Year 4 Monitoring
Hammond Hills Stream Enhancement Project Page 21

Appendix F -Photographs Year 5 Monitoring
Hammond Hills Stream Enhancement Project Page 22

a

C/D s w
\
O z
co
C U
w
1-
C/:) _

U L
CID M M
L-U
C/D - - -
31 ?

~ ?-
r, T` L
`/
o? Fr
n'
o r
0 0
o z
O
LJLo
Q
z
z
w
w
U
z
a
z
z
w

W
rr
U)
C/J
r?
Ww Z
0

Q
U
C)
Z

M
? J
Q
M
v ^
W

Q
ME
_z
I
0
nr-
Q
U
Z
F-
cf:
0
z
V
0
H
U)
W
Q
O
M
Z
C'3 u
U
w
c/3 m
Q D
m F-
J
H

a
Y z
:3
(r
O o

U:3 W
o
m w

07 J Q
a LL
Og =z
c
n o uj ? w C)
0
g o? m
o c
U 2
w U)

a
D

in,
f
HN?
n
4
e
i
f?
6
w g??
o 2
z?ooooo?o ad???ada oo 1ao
C/D
C)
Q
C/D

3

WJ ? O O

/ N ZZ
F
E O z0F
j Z
C
J O
B N
z O
m
N
w
z z F
w ?
U pOz
U z
8
p
0 ,
$
Q
N J J J J
a s > > 0; 1
O N W W
O

??//

W
R

5

9 [h

r 5 V

F9 J
0 J
0
5
¢
W
¢
¢¢ W
¢
W W
¢
¢ W
¢
¢W
¢ Z
0
N
Q Z
0
N
2 Z
0
N
¢ Z
0
E No
2 Z
0
N
/\ C7 µ
O µ
11
O U U F Y- F .. .. 11
W S J J
Z
S
S
S
S
S
?
s
S
S
S
5 U
6 .. .
. ..

z
O
Q
W
W
'
W

W

¢
U

m

zq

W zz ZZ zz

W S

Z S

Z¢ S

¢z S

Z¢ s
U C7 U 0 (7 w a a 1 p, W y a a

O
f
u
i F
o s
r
U O
LL
f
PPS ???P
0 m'
C7 .z.' z
/a
m _ z
~ ¢
o
0,
L
Ai1bONr
W
O
z
z o? O
K m m
Q Wi (pnn z Ckf W
?C-D ¢ W W
U~ ¢
1D cr
W N 0 Q ¢ W O O
0 Er O cn Of W (n
C) LL, of < oe LL,
J
[if L'i vi F- cn
¢ < Q
r) U? Cif z V) J S
•
•
Lij
m •
•
0
O
O O
un
N
p n
O
N
W
J
U
o c/)
U
2
°o ¢
N (?
J

/)

a? o y
.2o °
3 a

o0 a
o v
mo °
°
?O+^ of
m
« «

..°

`y Y a
o+ o
v c « c

N3° v
Z
W E O
oc y
c°m -O
o n C?
Es
v E
E
a O To
rn?? nN N
EM v?vs.
?r v Cl)

W n° =
N p
° °? v`
? c 10
« O
N N U O D C p t C ^ p Q
_ -s,2
_ O O

s .`n-
Op E00 on y0yp d
O
w tn« a
o.%yo3 ,
30peo DEa ?
aN'w3 ?w ?aa
s Data a' °os Dow?mw o

Z J E
o a
v m"
o °O Ear u o m
S c m° E
`
- o a m? o ?' o c nv a
O o
rnw Q m
E v°
w a+
'0000c ° o c
CL yam,. v
c 3 a? c c
E.c
--I
E -m' o
> c -.°_
z.- 3 u.-oy rnao+

f as
_

° 3

E
? c° ..
onp
.0 a yo
•-W,ir
M .?
. ..- 00- o
v o"? °n
U U

J
J 0;.,
C p o v
°3? C.
O
-°? v°
c
- Eta
o p o
° N O
i -
Em
v
'° y0=y
w
a?
? o
E
° c o O c.?'
3o°O«o.ay«

"°
v ,
?ca?O t?
u v
cn?w 3 ?
o-
oo_rn_ .
yo -°ov o+?' c°
0
°jO °E
Q ° O 0.? C

E
' p .., d L O
r- C O
2
O O? . ?n
(n m o h N p d Q O

-°a?o+
o
v> ...u
'oa«uo
«?
°'
vo
o vvi
'
u._o
N-ya
0
aomv ° ny.-
u?•-0
L?U N v ?.`. N
E y
E 3?
3m" 2
nu.N
cn c.° w-o °?
o? C NIOi o
5t o wv `^
3? NCO•?UO r7 VOiE 7m?° viw°O +o Nyyo> O..,
+ T t
a ?
o Q
CO z
v T o z
w
0 co
z m
U o
0 LL,
O
J r
W
z a fn in o ?
N N ri
U?
8
$
W H
< Q i0 iD
CD
i i
i
i
?1 p1 0
z W :) I J D a.
O a 0 w O I ? p 01 0
0
U Q_ p U 1 M a U i p
O U J C7 1 O 0 1 w
? F- U i J
J z' 0 ? Z Y
LU C)
W i U)
U 1
a Z
O O I W =)
JFJd4Nn08 a ?kHV(]Nnoo ! O °
3AViS 3dMS LL TiViS 3dOIS 1 N 0
1 N i CO
O
1 0
Cl
J cc:
CJ J i t.
ZH ' Z=
Qd 1 Qd
U? i U0
i
zo
J ?
U i U
z i Z
? O
? ; t. Z
C7 w ? I O
CL Cl ------- U
O 2 - Z Z - ---------
1 CO o C/) g o
z z
z W (J) W 0 W= W
0 w
J C/)
CL z m°- J Q p O w Q0 Ir
0 o z a o L z m?
O 00 U Ii a 00 = Ili O
J U
W z
0
r U
CV w
CO
Q Q U_
Ir
ui w
Q Q
_CO Z :E co
zLO W~?
0 o z?0
Qp¢ ; co Q?¢
2ww =Jaw
UJa ? U
i/ Z_W i i' O Owl LLJ
0 F-CflU
i ~mw i O jc-y5-
Cn Cn J
i x0 (jj OO? X0Lu
i M aO
i O
C Jkdb'aNnoi3
3NVB 3dOIS
1 1 0
M
Z i W U
i
O Q]
O
m
3?iV1S 3dOlS
Q
UO ui
p i O LLJ U)
~ J m C7
U LL0 Y
mU
W
wm
a0
F- F
m r- N
U 0

Y
cr
O ?
W
J ?

m co
3 ?
¢

m
a
Z =

Z= z
w <
a

0
o
?
? Q m Q O

o (n w U_
p C7
?j o 3:
MOWN
m
Z
O
U
w
U)i

f
Lm ,. Z ? U
o
LLJ
g
:R
g ?6 ? a
8
s
0 h J?

'
I
I I
I II
'
I

3g a

? ?g s
S
U)
U)
0
cc:
U
Y
/ co
0
` W
1 i
9

N 00
U
w
C)
g
a
W
Q
a ~
U
Z
O
UD
C) z
0
J
Q
Cf)
0
oil
O ..W Ta$$
8

w?
A
1

I I
I I
1
1

1

I
I
>
Z
g
_ a
co
J
CD
D
U)
01
O
O
T
3¢
d
(V
II
Sol
n-
w
U)
1
W
L / J
M
0
0
1 ?
1
co
O
W
!2 1

< flpaiil:io, ??5
I '? 1 x P, Rw IRMIP.?I
° g
WIN 13
LLI
i
J
Q
CO z
o co 6 o o ? 6 m
O o
C) 2
?E z
a \
C)
-g o
g?
zW? b
b S
3
1. $ LLI
i
° Z
O Z
W
R W
.9l r
Z
i O
U
t;
t
Q
U
4 W
'NIN A-.S 3N00 01H 30NOO SNOLLVON3NNO03tl 1?NO.1UN3.W003tl .9 d
SH3U=V3nNVPi d3d B Stl3tln10VdnNVW Had
Q
°
0
b [Ell El 0 .0
b aEIEI cr
W
w
aao?
O
U
p
Z
\ Q
Z
I
H N w
o Z
Cf) J
P S O
k x ?ay $a w Z
Cn
t??{ ?? O ° 1111 1111 1I1?? Q Q
_ d 5 £8 Z p
o `N a W C
Z
W
d e 5; Q
g
66
a ?g
M
? ?g Ng U
C7
O
„ndNNV9 ? ? ? o ?
o w m U
sag ~
z
g IN P
o q
j 3
11 ?
nndHNOa m ? ? L ?I > ? ? ? '?
° wY § wo a
74
m U N
0
d ?n

Y
g ? W
?
= co
3 J
o

aT
O
o
N
o p
o ?
LL1 Z Z Z
O W ,o
F
?

E
F- m ? C7 ? ? U
Z
o ?
? o

S
fL
o= w
o

m U N
0
d co
Y

z

a W

W
J z

A
w
C')

f^)
Q

U
T

m
F _
2U
z

U 3
w
6 a.
V
w
O VZ¢ QQ
z 1
0 o
Z

G
C)
° d
O Z
W
Z p
?O F
Y
C) YY
m
o S C
G
? C7 a j
C7
a z
w Q
2 i? co
° o E
?
o
F- ¢
U. g
o Cn w u?
z
w
a
Z L S

CO SN
?
Q w w
? J
U '¢

rr
Cf)
CO
W
?? U
vY
Q
4 ?\ rr
L
? Q
ii O
a
2
LU Loo
z

l R
\
(n? X ? ?Q
Q
C}' V ,}jam S2
V ?lJ CY

rrv3uis
3
d
`s
ti?
O? 0 0
O O
OO
4 0
?,
00Oo BOO
O
O O O o
------- ---------

\' l
Z N
m
\ O 8 O O O > a
` U
O

d g
O QZ
g U
Cn Q
0
Q O O O O N Cn
c N

k c
)
O O O O ry cr
W
W ?c

O
?
??
?
yyq i
t
?62<
8??3q
p?3
ky??
4?9
MEW aW
gmn
z
W
z
0
U
Ir
I --
U)
z
0
J
w
Q
rr
rr
rr
d
w
H
Z

Q
Q
Z
O_
w
w
Cl)
J
m
D
Cl)
O
O
O
T
0
o > ? U
Y - O
? ? ?I

O sa
f $ T?
z
?
t E y Y% g
15

ti
a
a
s
J?

o
o
z
a 3
m gz
z
U `
LLJ
0
z
Z

I I o S?s
I
I I
I 2
I

I
I I
I
I
I g?y?
I
I
I I
1
I
w
>
z
g

=o
Qo ?poopooo0o ?ooo
°00000°. p op?)
0° o Oo°p oa g
pO Opo OQoO°
g
0 0
000 0o?a? op 9
0 °
0
op
Qp po 0 o po
b
o00
O o 0 0 O
00 °- o 00 0'0 o Z
yy O
S ° °°O° Oo O d
p o 0 0.. ° o
° 0 0 ° oo
-000 0.0
S oUa p°oo. oo 0.
O,oO
g (00 . p o p ° oo p o o
'b, ooh°p°0°
°
o Oo ?o O. ?0 °O ° ). s
° o poQ
< 00 P o o ° g
a ° 0% 0 0 °0 0 0 °Q 8
0°0 o 0 0 0° p
°°?

p?
W

W
Y_
cn
D
O
w
n
Z
CO
CO
Ir
J CC
LL G
O Q
CL ALL]
H
Cf)
a
LLJ
z
z
J
m
VJ
0
O
O
T
z
0
U m
w
cf)
o °o
o? z
00 °
0
O
U
o?
o °o w
=r

II1
?? ? II I I-
?? 111_111- z
,i: =111=1
1-I I I-
1111111 fit
T o ill gig z
B 1-I.
U ? ? s LL
LL
w E ?-
Z

Q
LL1
a.
Y
U
LLJ
U
J_
U)
Y
U
O
rr
cl:
Q
cc:
O
w
Z
g
z
O
U
w
0
cr
U
t6 61
g

N
m U
0
d C)
Q ~ o

o
n W 7 z
C?m
N
o

m z 3
go (
J_ W ?
z
U = U 3 z l
LLJ
¢w U) x QQ ¢ w o0

C) o a
LL z
O W Z
C) 0
C)
Es m
i

w
QQ m

p

%
j cn o = W
o (13 Q
$ o
0 o `O o 5 a
W C7
z
g
o 0 oOC E 50 o
w ap
U
(n pn
N tl
x
w w a??
0 a
O 5.
IL
0 ° ac d
z
! o
),UVCNno a 2
3NViS 3dOIS E _

N

? LL

U
E m?
Q N
C
µ c° N 'pp? d m
N 'U N?
N N F 6 w
EL mm Em N
U!

o ro

M M

z
d
ro °
cg 3 W
_?
° Ero
oa
° 4 O
W

0
O
N f.
z

O
E (n
Z
Z

Q o

E D
O

E 's

c
?
N ?-

?'
c N

a

E,
E D

o
R O
U_J

w SS
L) a: (n CL
8 a 0= 2
OOm?2 C
fr
Z
O N ?0 Q E?°goo r? d
N co °9 J 8? mm? Q
w W W W 0 ?x Q o w

Q w
-o y E (a
Z a 16
15 a
O

U

N

N °

N??
¢ c

o
E

E
'

°
E
U)
w
X Z i Q m
w w
w Y E 0 - o Z
oo Z U 3 w a B Cn
O
U) ?ro
0)
16
E°roEs0) ?
& z
Z
a CL Z'S E o 58 o
m
y
N o
m mx
N.
> N>;w? KE
O ° £ro
w rn o C
a of

73
E E E ? o o
"D -0 E
Z w w
ui o
_0 a)
o cn00O:n cn_O N

Cn v
E °
N
m 0
c
W
z c E E'

N v
c6 's
6
m
0 N
cr o co o bo N rn
E o-2
co
Z (n Z ro> _' o o?
Z y > E
?cN
Z ?? A?
w E 4) CL
co 0) cm
FL FL 0

O uo 0 o
rn a Ntvo°
a??
`
ci Eta
w= U
W cn
id
n
d ag$
w
a H
Cn
QO
(n
N d
OcU
d
U
OC
O m 7C ,
p
5r?J
U) 0 M g? 8.2
Z
) CL o?a o=a
g
CL r E
._ E

0
Z
C c
c
E 0 E F?
E 0 ? WE y E
0
- O Q o a go c N N j D m
o m E m N c
E ?o g rno
?
Uv
i 3'Jm`m(7
t E
ro Q)
?
?
0

Z
z
E'D a
L Cy
z
?? m a
? N

c') w

Z in Q

cn E°m
_

¢3
¢ s?a
E
9? o
g
'
n¢
O 3 t
c
x
3 $
Q
Q N > N
c ro?
J CV o
gg 2 E
C\l w y}
{{
uw o y?
?U
W
z ` w 7
_ w N N
O
N O (n
m ro

W m

o
ro ?°
'F i3 0 ro x E R c
d o co ro m
'S o 0
v ?' m
0

U M
w ro
z §caAE E
FF m
1 'ii Zoo? CO
?cm
X z CV N m N N
m ro E N E o
a
8 c a a
M
0
N .0 . 2
?222
0) 0 5 5 ro22?=2N?2
2
E2 .0 .0 E
_a
o- U) CL
,,adaNn oo o
3NViS 3d0IS m

p
m
4EiroE N

z
I
Z yy
N I y N N
Z
7 d (N/1
OTC i E t_ ol D g m
` °
d
cl:
Q W
Z i m
v cgAm
mc7

J
0
N
0 1 I
F-
z
(D
9
z o

?m

?
z;?E _
I

X

w'
o'
E
D
o

9
c v a

o
E 0)
'
E

a
?ao
Z Eros
c`3mcn g3 E=
g
o
a
g

Z ?

8 og c
C
c
a)
a
aj
r CO N may
Zc o 0
w o
w o f w N
9 d N
? 0 2?
ro ro
U) Z F N
s
-

w O

Q 0
w
G
CD
a C

n-0
-6 0
Q a
ca w °El $ E
E
os

' 8 x E v gro
°
5; O N ro
m m
ro
- °
E -
E a
Eoo? jca ro cm
? w cu
?

_w

E
o v
00 ? ia
m

E ? .E?.a
- d Q y
rnv?cg : 0
rna??'dcdcr°n +a? cnI--a ??

a
Qo.0 sItS
LLI a_ Oo h r? cc LO
Z J N N N. N N
w0 Q ? r in a`TO N
a ?oooi00t-
oo aoNInrn
N N N N N
m V
00 ?mwxw?
aJ
U)
D O O O O Q
O O O O
V V V C
rn CO LO
0 ?Q N 0 M
Z O
O cn Cl)
Q
C\j
can (O f? OD a00 m z
t-: N n
LLl 0) 0) C) a)
< O mrnC rnci
F
W C7 O 0) O O N
Z 2 N rn CO
N 7 of N' Q
m m c Oc rn
0 Q z m O O N O C\j O
a_ rn cn LO LO
O O) m
L n. n M
W
r
m g ON) go)
a a oo+c+\IM
Z N M
W 0 r ¢ z
> > > >
¢ m W
00 U
z v o n cMo
Q O rn V OD
N N r W0 O O
C6
LLLlllQ1JJ
p
a j
O Q)
z 0) ° M
= o rn rn
m Q(0 m00 M
m Oc S cq
N N N N N
z voi N voi poop
co O M V
Q CO m L
O "t N N
+++++

U
W
S
?W

=rm
N
v7
0 Z ? -3/V/7
° W :
' `\ N?1 bW

LU U)
(n w
?WZ J
Z Z q
O ( F` '` \'\ \ ?_
U m ??
LLJ
l /

1 \ \

/
H C
N
)
1
/
-
% / O
i % 00

0
r
O
r
Q o
S
S
U)
O
m
m
N LLl
z
m U N
0
O

w
O

3 Cl)
0
W
w M
z
o J
U ?(D

m = z U
<

w°
a z
= O w a
o 0
W 0
Z
LL) i W
:E
2? 0
v
O

q
co 5
-I z E

wu

O cl:
? 0
a 88
z
6
p Cl) U
J?
P'4
O Z
W
S
4

i
W

w '.
m }
1¢
LC)
\
l 0 ,

CD +
I ; C?=
or- m c
}
OW
Uw

F- I l
\
'\
\? •\ \ e
Q m
r
\
1)r \
\
\ Q4
0
?Z
\ \`
\
.\
\ \ \ \ W I I ,

\ \
\ \
\
J
` \
\
r

\\ F

W
I j

O
C)
W O z
O? m
Ir
= O
(D
• D
+ O
I J Z a Z U
cnZ o

--J

W
w
IL ?
oo°aa.
m a
0wa: 0
Z
?=Ua
U
V--
"j)
0
Z -
U 2
m Q Fl
:
i
?
{ -z -
10
--
o Q Z
cc
m
CL p 'wr
m
1
"
-5;8w2
o?
?

I
w¢
O m?
O L) 0=j z
Ocn
dzO
(D CL

/
Z ?
Z
f W 0? O
cr SW ? O=a p8=-j 0)
?2Z
+7 •\ UU ~U= W(nmUQN
C7 11 j ?1.. \\ \,\ \ \\ W ? O O p m0
w w LLJ ca LLI LL
EL z
¢C7 \ \ O~mZ OFZwZm
0 W U? z O
F?U-JZW
m m J - r \ \ \ co Z?WW IZLLU,t m
o I \ \. Wcn8 ?F=OOJ
M2 LL 5 LLj O~ \ O Z ZmCnJ Zr aw=
W W I \ \\ \)) 4 (0 OOU)= fizz C) co <
I \ \ \ \ ?W z~m~ EU~am
r Ci a a
I \'\ U Z OfLLf 0ao00cr
cc It _+ I \ O
\ \ w 0 0 = Zzoz amOamw
U)
m r \ U ap 00 O i{
z M) 22<2 CO 0 Lu (1)
0 m
QH a \ 1 m
N \ \ ,? z CD
Fn \ \ a ° a?
F g \ \ a?
Cl) o
r
U) \ Ir \ , \ 0
IL
0
U) vv ?v A
S
m
\ Ir \ Q
It \ \\ cn
\ \ \ W
cr-
\\
m 0 \ \
d O ?\ /\ \
CL O d M O) l % \ \ ,
\ \
cli
W < m
0 o J
W 0
rn
0 N Fr L Z M
Z W ILLS OO
c') CC
mcD? U?0
>> W W /
LLJ JQ??Za?O ?cn I
d F F C'j
a_ CL cr Cl)
g0= 11 II 00mm I?i930
CL L)
¢?Oz 0?a =z
W
n?

t
Z
0
W
m
01 c-3.?///
NHS Ned 338
-3/0
N?1 bW
J
L
m
U)
0-01
O
O
r-
l in
/ 00
Z
O °
C Z U° W
zZ co
z 0 z wo ~
44 ? zo
o ? 0205° zO=UQm
O C7 Z wC) U~=YQ
CO w ONwZFQ?m?rz
¢ ?(n z§owww?w
0} ¢- O
J W O a ¢m U-p =,z cr.
o>[ ULLO< ZZa?OM
¢
WO O °L
¢? min
a ON °W(nIxz
UH
Y Laq°? °wa¢O
Ug(n
m LL
U Z m O ¢?
U) O mO °OpLLiz(n
O m H °U ZWUJZ_W,
ZU W wg
U Q LUm m 2-
0 (n zmrn 0-00 ¢ 0 0?? 2?Z?¢
0 WO
CL 0~ fn ?OHa¢ri a
C) MF-
(n Mrz wpQQZ¢> H
Fr ow
?LL? oaOOOcl: C
(n O
C) °Q° aW¢a m
w
2z w
¢ a 22¢M ?i mC)LUU)r
_Z ¢ CZ"
?\ r Z (D a
a?
¢
0
°
1 O 0
W N
?U)
o'
Lo 0) 00r"-?, co
00 C-q, a,
P
LO
W z W -
/ \P
i
U)
z
O
Q
U
O
J
W
Ir
D
F --
c D
¢
w
m
w
z
J
Yd
H
w
CL
O
J
U)I
Z
g
a
m
0
J LL _I
w
zm
zr
C) =j
w
?
w
z¢
FFw
U'U
Z
O
w w
O = w (n 3 a ?
g o?
O n U >
U) ° W Y C7 O 0
Z 0 0 0 0° o
L LI J LL (n
J ? I
I
I
I '
I '
I
I
00
S ry
S F-

Z
0
Q
U
0
w
¢
D
U
2
ur
¢
¢
w
0
J
z
W
2
Z
C7
Q
a2
u]
¢
cr3
0
--0
Z
Q
M n
N
CO U�z::I
�wWa-w
R
\
m
00 z
J
1
Lu
°
t N
0
O
In �
I� o
V'*
In
V'
mONp
Q
N
N t
n
N
o
M n
In m
n N
ao �
0
co
O
N N
N N
N
N
N N
N
N N
N
N
NNNNNNNN
j
EZQD
Oz
Z
w
d
W
wmL)LUU)�
al
W
Q
(o 0
co n
0 pp
N aD
z
V
O
O pp
M fD
I�
o
Lo
p
8
°
Ya
M
N N
O 0
N N
0
N
CD
N
O L
N
N
V M
N
YO
cV
N
�
O M
c+nD 0
m>
LLJ
M
U')U)
MO
Ln
I�
LO V
In M
a 'T
N
V
13
w a
J
NN
N
N N
N N
N
o
LL,
C)Q
0
00
z
0O U
Q
Q
t�J (7
J¢
w C7
J
w
J
C7
Y
C7 I�
F J
L
Q
C(�t�t�
J J
C7
Ir
Q
CL
i

r. \ ? m U N

\ °
w CY)
r
Za I a oZ
a °
¢
O

Y z
Z
LU
° d
w??
N

aaC7C
o
Jw Qx
T jM

I
= z?
L
I zi Z ?-
o
$
o
-
Z

I cs u
° O w z

Y
5; m $

L) 44
co
63
z
0- F-
l\ /
C)
CD
T

o
LL
ZZ d
(SNP
I
% a c
rW g
O
cl:
w
j I
1 j °U
00 z
1
1\ ??
\
\ w w
9 z
CC Q

zY \
?
t I
U)
Z
O

=
J
w
>
wcn
U
O
L)
m !

I U z ?o

cl:

z w
I i
O
a U
co 1
no i I LU = o 0 0Z) 0
0
I
i
g ' w
J i
0 °
w 1
I
!
?
i
I
i ?
1 t
I
i I

w

I
I z

?
J
aw°
I
U) (D
U
°
I Z
0FUQ?
I

t j ?
? cr F-:
N ww°~w
11 O U?wllLLUl=)z
-zo
F?1 cr aloes
ZZ
t Z
J

t SQ
-L?
cC?
j m wLLl
n
LL
LL
j
z °
w cr
Q
LOU°0=

z 6' I

I

N ?
L/) O
l=zwzw
cn
z w U
co z m
( w
m
www2-¢
?
m

0 OW M°?
? ?
'
0E:j
?

?
z
?aSZOZOO°U
o
0L=
°a?
m 3 Z°0
)
H O a F°° z Z N
Q~ QwwOzd
LL, 5
U
F w

i ¢
Z
cl:LU
w
_ 0?
¢
w w
O Q w J m ¢
% z
O
_? ¢z¢>
cr
OC
a a z w F- z
LL O z 0 w? LEi
a ww ¢ p
a
QU
O ti°CL w ?m0=
?

z LLJ
u
n
i
i 1
0
C)

C7
LL
O
a?

I
j ?
I' I

?
a
C)
U
l I U
I ¢¢
CL

I O
W CC
H U
I j

1 t
SN
?N

?G
?P

L
LU
Z
g
LU
LU
LU
Z
J
2
U
Q
i
¢ Z
00
¢ U
¢
O¢
U
(/)0
ZU
w
UU
Q w
O
ZN
r
Z
O
0 0
¢OO
d Z U
LU Y Z
¢¢0
J d C~J
Q �
Cl) ir
O N
OC70
Ir
w
oIr
z a
r
oQo
m
N
U
o
Y
O
w
J�
0
a
g
W M
g
LTJ
i co
U
i5L
�_
0
Ow
Z
Lu
2
C c
U'
C7
U
Y
Cn.
I— LL
U
Q
_r
m
z
<��
=
J)
O
a
a
o
!L�
O
Z
LLI
cr
LLIU
00
w
LL
O
¢
cc
..
Z
U
>
/
W
ZI
¢
U
m
m
U
U
Z
a
H
J

J
Q
co
0
O
O
r
oo'ssz=x'13 i
... I g
,
es'E6+ZC 1S +
;. H013H 31001. ON3
=
C
$

Q ... ° (v ?? O
O

i
o
W

? ? $
c
L I
I
i
00'M -/313
-- - 5?
00 00+OL'V1S 25
H V38 3100111Y N199 +
o
o. app p

00'SLZ=h313
94'L6+.61.V1S
HOV9H U dd ON3

}
T ?

1
f ? S
ryry??
LL
Z ?---? O +
N
o
LU
COD

/ fU/gJi
f
f,
I
. 4684? =1313 fi
00'00+O1'V1S
HOV3y 84ddfl NIJ39 yam' !
?. +
O

2 U

N N
00.6Ed-/313
BCEE+gCV S
HJIIJU U"U I UNJ

+
I
h

1
_ W ? ? 8
2
U

m (QYJ
$
l.l.l 2
?
a

Q
? +
7
O N
aP ?

I Z
I ?
I
x
I W
I $
I? +

f
I
91 O9? =7373

0000+M V $
H MOl +
0

.a
m ? N
U o
T
?j 1?

?N Ned

3 Z
Z
Cl)
w o
a "
?? Z J
o
M
C)
Z3
co
z
Q C)

W
O o
O
Z

z

0

N o
co W
Q
(7

Q
LLJ
i p O
O U)
>
0
..

LL z
AIN r
O /
A
C) Q
r ,
? i
w 0
+ O
CY)
1
MQ®\\ \
w U) I 1 \ \ \
,\ ? ?\ VII \
?\ \J ?
u?
w
i J
cn ? ? \1 ``?? ? i O
(nW? W I ? ..
W 7 mW
ZD¢ fF 7 0 O I )< '?? i
5go z1o z
W3w 0W 9, 0
oWZp a
mp0? jF- o w 'ca
?a?0¢ w? w WpQ O o
mWz• ? O 0 z<,W U
3p
UU ~zF ¢ ?¢w ?
wwC7= p? MOOy < S
WU ULL
F> Z ?Zp o ¢ 00
°?UO
m?m?w~ic Lu °w w03 uo z
U aWHw> mmr ¢y uwm1U qgy (?
U 0 w < w SviE ?¢ U0
WW?O W 0¢? W z
z W J
??zd7c7 f8 Zqzg?? Ow
= aip
¢O?xw F? m W?z m?F
Z w~3p7 wm o?t- oa
i5 W
p, Z m
? 0 nz O W
u? wwZa ? < zoz aW5 0' Z0
?m -?o iz O?
(..) OOU w 2L O COZpZ ?J¢w p0
W Q~ ?W C07ZQ LZQ WO°O U? n
LLJ D?qp? W? m T<LL? Q ?O
~o?wf Uw? U FOOM NwO
ooh oa 3g? SD ow
FzW pE?zZU U2U UaZwm? ?p UD
?zw
Wmz 00 M' UO< wC7 W-? 0? (gym
? G°? ?wtw ?f F3 ?zo° ?o
CV 0 Y N O
N, ?W
z
zp
¢ UZI
O
¢ O
w m
?_
z F-
we
OZ
a
crQ l
82w
®E]
W
\ \ \ O Z
j O
1 \ `` C\ N Q
w
\ ® \ O U
Zz
z

W
LLJ
~
w z
J
W o
D
F-
Z

z
w
L
~
z o
O

¢d O
w ¢

Q w
CO
m O
U0
0 a x F- v>

\ U)
U)
\\ ® % r O
cc:
1 kSl
\\ \ \\ ¢
\ \\ O
' O U)
LLI
w o?
o
LU
w O \
co Cl)
CIO Cl) Egg 00 n._.-•
8
r r - r r.? T O M O `.
!O z Z
N 1- m CK5
x)x co
W J
5 O 3 O
W, 0 CAj OO ; O N ICI) CL 0 O ?. r
O ¢ 2 z l
p w
LLI
n co
i '. K it
_? r

m U N
o
r`
r

Za y Z

w Q
Z n
_
LIJ

U U
=
c?
°z i I

Q 7m x
a z z
0=
O u 3
0 OW z pp

?Z/?)

L
L)

T

o

r p

fill
O Q O I-
cl) O > ?i O ¢
¢¢
C)
O
'- LU
~5 Z
S
a z g

a

1 cn
W F
Z
OO
W ? O
O w 2

v~i O
L)
w
n•?

}
O /
Z ? ¢

? w
W
CL O

V)
! d ? J

W w 00
z
J / /? % I -1 0)
o o M
0rn
ZO
F
N
IL

R z
W Co
N LLJ

?

J
i
E Zom

-
O1 o ? 3 w
_.... Oo % i / ... mwZ?N w¢3 S 0Oy a ?a
?•? / F?g§? ~Z O 0 00

O OO ? % ® O CO

LLJ

0

c?,
J
Ww
W

R

W

Ww
o

C w O

a

(90
?J
16D5? % Z U?
IZFgZa ?? pQU
zg P, Wp
fEU UW
pp Z
Fr w?3mf
a,2;-o Q p? QU)
Off Oa
ta:
¢
`? ' W w w
0ZF
0 a{
O
o
? z
N
i Z
0 U

w 1
0
p
4W
o mWZ
??p ?
Q
6H U ??
o- WE
?o
w
U? ao
O
w

O _)?I i O o
O-
00
pp
QQwN cc z
?O

1
®% ? ???

?N oo°zd

E (J
8

?Vl
?
La

~
U

o
Lou
~?
??\I I1t
® 11 ZU?77 QpQ w
0
?
(7 2w ai qa3
Y07 m
U Yww
;?F>cn
w Z

w ?O

??
U
GLLIf 1 eh
I1\ ,?
7LCVJI i ?? ®.... (
?
W¢m?s
?¢aplgi 8
mw Wa
F?li? 0'=
F? O
OLL 85
w w?

?LLO

J
0
i \ N

LL J
m Cn % 11 \\ \
))?CC777((((
\ I? 1
0
w \ I?
0
% `
\
\?
O
UJ
O ?+ _ \
0
?Q
N
.
?
1
II

I
ON/
/ o
91

i QJ?

6[ 133HS NVld 33S 3NI I HOiVN R
O %
I' a
m
o / U
Z U)
W ; %- ,
I i yOTC i'' j/ LL O
W 0? p
r
I / 3: ? Z
1 j® O + P
i C)
/yam/ W
?_ I Q? cr
WCC W (n z
Z
O j U
O
LIJ LL

m U N
o
00
z
Z ? b

3 Q
W Z Q n

gg
7 J
O
_

°

a z

?_ ¢
w z
<
00
LL zz Z >
m
p W
Q ?
w
m Y s
T ? %Lp.
7
r?, d
Q 1 3 S
J
O z
G
? o ?
o D U) W .
S O

O J y]
W
Z? ? \ 1
z
o

w

F N
w
z
J `

(r

O

2
Y
W
N 0
Z
O

Z
W W

w
a
O
° w

W
¢

a.
Cl) LL
0
W

o ? x
\ O
?? ! ? ?';! ?fit
i
,XI w
z
W
1 ? \\j t' ??/ Z [gyp
Y l '' 0 W
O N
O
a \ \ 0w
tq \ W
" D \\
--------- -
ZO Q0
n
`? i .- 11J
\ \ i i W
Cn
w
i D
\, a w
\\ I ?cx ,'. cn
w
® ® i '
i
O ! 'j z
lb J
W
O
z
¢
W
LJ
W-
c/) L
N
a N N
¢z >
V)
U
/ o
i
` i ow
i EK:z
00 Do 2
T' f 1 w
OW ow o N a v?
?? 5 wa
w0
>? o
o
w
^i mw=FZ-N w3 w 00y ¢ a
YNQ? X ; co Qwttwr ¢¢ w x n
W O O j7C;•..e« , ?? w z5oo wm 0 °NZ QN °a
Ocr
Z ??? $ 4 j% W QoO?w c¢7 cjo ?O¢ ?F- ww
/ W ZQ ?-, 0 cc IL z
\ ® \ ® wwoOP op FoF-a 3° ? oD Ow
wu ", (jU Ua °U7 F ~ ?
O ` \' F W w= w Yw Up 15°
0
a{ m
/_.. O /`•?-? FwmZ 0m? OQ wOwx 00? OVm Lu?
?p _ Ada F-°? ZOO F-0
CV M O N N
AE?

O ,
yn1- m (D
® m CF)
za I
/ oo
O ? ? w?b w
?
i
o-
a O O
0
w J

= p z M

U °"

? ?? I ® qa
?O J :3
cm
w z Z
ZZ
Z O Uoo
l11

co ww

w ?$

d
U) O o = @@
m ro g g
3
\ ® c o
o
o
o
p
r o z o
cL
g
\ 0 wa O s
o? ?ro ? g

m
I ?-- ----? --
- - - I
O
?° (I j ® ? ®° w Z
J ¢
J
w z
>

M U
Er
z
w w

? w a °

¢
I I ?
I ?® ® J a
I
?? j .. I ? ? ? 0 ? X

o i ;
I ®? mod. °

I
o
®

® 11 \\ z
a
\1 \ f ?l

1 I 0 mwo
woo
ww w
co o
w

I zo¢
zoo T?
-O o p
o
¢ y ~

® w3W
m
°? ow
o Owoz a v_i
w
j a
zja-mo¢
w Oa o w OD 3
z LL 0 F
0 O

°
?®
® §
o ?
cc Fz p ¢

w O ? W
zN
O
3O¢ N Q °da
E
f?ZES
¢
rp ¢
w W
UU
wmw°r
W o? w wOF OZ
I I ®
IIU 1
? ®
U
u wh,

aa: 33
aw0 0 ¢¢p Y
oU
z mw? w0
Qw? a
w o
N II? II
? 1 Z ujiEzow
-7d' O d
a w ow o wp -i ¢
o
m
Z

11' 1
H
I
®
Z
w?m?
z op
?
? m w ¢
w2 O w
u
U
?? S? o0
µµo?? z 6? LLa
0
O N h m d Fil
I
I
w w O = Z I 1
ti 5
Q
w

W
J
z
zO
ww N w?
LL Z
~F 0O
?¢ ¢
0
WF Zo.
° PO ¢z O_?

}I
U U~ F Z LL
W4- I
U) L4 O a
Q O 00 O Q m Lc11

W

OoUaw
o¢ ?
w
mwz qqq
16 zP< Up m

3Ow O 00
oo v ?g
p
Q W Q w (n - fn Z
I ¢¢
VN F
? ?
wU
O p
QQWw p Hp
X O m 4 w w> /
/ R, Z
nNN© O I a¢
wi
W??? ?ro
¢¢ ¢Z °¢ nO
OU ¢? ¢f
/
/
d d z w 9 Z ~ Z
IL LL z w _ %
O Q /
O U V
No O
w U Op O¢ ¢ 0 00 mwo
o?
LLI
LL 0I?HW M.
Q O ¢
H 00
Z wS w
x YwZwU 0 C7
% ® O wmz omw oQ wmFF U¢ Um

/ c?i ni a iri <d
% o o

0
® ?
N
I IQ

I ®? Fl-
1-9

0 U) Tj
0

1
\
19

0

Fc-ol
SSE
??N?
MPA

--0
J
OD
m U N
0
? o
?
?2
cr W Z
U) o d
?
n
3 ? J L1_I O ? ?
o z ? 3 >
U

W
° c

g S
<
= Q
w
¢
o C)
L zz Z
0 w
o
O c?
U ? 0
m ?
$
o
LL 4d,
= w
¢ 3 till
LLJ ¢
<
0 3
u o
W
Q F- 0
U) ] Q
O
O
w Z
U
NW ES
W W
Z w?pZ ?w vwi
O zoa
- ZI Z z
p / w3w °w Owwz
as
J O m °qg° ziE o oW¢O¢ co
a Z w U U °
w Y Z / ?Ow¢ O ° Z<- ~
C7 v
LL, M
CC ¢ O UO.9
U ¢a
U) Ir d
W co co -i C)
Q ?' ??FkZ?? O OUOw ¢ ?LL
w~w N ~Wm?jU? 0Jp ¢?~ ?C
Z J ¢ W Z J?wip is f¢ ty°W? WO? W°U
3 Y C
W CO tL H O < O ?Wr Z
CO Y ¢? Y mw W
O Q Q LLJ
M¢oj? ? f ¢rz-a F- o
0 (r F- d O U.I z w 1L w? U?
U=
CL 0 Om w OU O / Z fF-Oz ?p w °~UO wU Ow
zg Oa
¢U o
Z- 0 ZoZ Zo¢o o? 00
o O ww?¢ ?¢ ¢ a?O 4zz OLL
J w0? w U? p F
m U U yppm? ??p O¢O gyw Oz
00
% W
cr °w Oza U°z `?jwoo ? z
F- ocr
LIJ
U) Z i cr :P¢?v?F LLC?7 ? Q¢LLW o o
U) O H
U v?a¢Zjw U.0 N° ?a¢ U E
0 pwug 0&¢ O¢? 30iq 0o O1
O / LL Z UU Ua aCLdu F UH U°
O
Ya~?¢m>2vwi ZpQ
?- UT
J % ¢mZ pU mYN UOa Np¢
? OUa OOm
?L ?Z O S~ =O
-OLL H ~LL
CV M V 0 w
k?
w
w
2
GO
z
n
w
w
U)
w
z
J
2
U
Q

a
8
O O
a
R
?\\ O O

J
co
D
CO
0
(D
O
T
L L
0 0)
C D) (f) c a d t C 4) ? .c O a N (Nn a
CU U) D) L _ D) (u = (1)
C
W '0 co U) 15 a) 3) CD -0 a) .r- 0
m U O a co c Q 3 •C Q. Y ? fu
cz co
a DO
cu
'0 'a co .E co c _ N D co cz 0 CZ
a c 0 E a) cu D) c o° 0. m? cu a) c (n m a) c u) E a)
o U U L cn c 0 0 N a ° a O U p Cl) O U)
(te) U 0 d a) 0 a) - Y o c`"0 3 c o d c D v v = au'i aoi ? c - a) a0i m
c :3 p N `O ° p_ 0 (n ` 0 0 O `1 -D a 2 E C 3 o m a) a 2 v ro o
M U)
m3 E N 0U JS00 cu c
a CO 0 .? N O C a 0 0 0 ?° •o = co a) m (n (n Q C T 0 cn 3? 0 c c C > ? CD "
8 r)
C O i co J c O w 0 O 0 .? (n C O c O cDj) H (u 0= a p i C RS
r- CD (D :3 U) U U a) }L O a) a) (n c m O (D (n cn
E a OU C) N o p a c C U O Q -.? cn a •N 0 O c°j OU Q p p) N 'a E c Y ° ° cu 0 3 c c ro cn o c L 0 E 3 a) (u c°.S O
aa) y(uy
cu .- of i•? ?3.N- 0a?om E a co aiaa)) c mJ? u°-,? w c
0 a) (D U w 0 m O (n - L O c L N O p cd o a)
d a a) 0.3 L C C > N L N cn (1) - a) Q a) a N O co c Y L M p a) a 0 (d C-) 0 cn co 75 co E a) ?o -0 0 (n
- co 0 a) (D E (D
d O Cp C- ? c c Co (n cz 7 C: 0) C c a) y :3 O 0- (a a Co a)
U) .0 cU - co cz _0 C) (D L D O
C: 0 0 CD N - U N C (°n C +? p U r a) - c L w CZ a° U6 C Q U O O c CD 7 a) O C N C> E g U a) 05 E
:3 0 E CD CD cz cu (C 2 2_2 22
? ,0 O C Q EO 3 c u) (Z O _N 'D w co 9 D) (d a) L 0. C O co O N to a) ? D C
c 0'- O a) C cu a) t a) a) a) -O (u D -D () O C a) a) L D a C
= co L L 0) C c O D ` c c C D' - 'D co -C a) U ? a) (n c fO 0'-
co a) O Q ? L
?•? o)? U?Ca)° V) cu yEu, ?ocncu'? •- (u a)oso EUQ)Eu,oca)O_
- CD c U) cu ° 3 c a) L p cu (u ° -D 0 0 N m e O O) o E (u (u (u c' a) w n 6 0
(0 (u o C u) 4) L) p -0 .0 N a) c V a(D a Co c cu cn C vi D) C Y ° C O C ca O ?' c U)
a
-a t5 0 (z a) 2-6 CD c 0 0 -r z p in (n CL a) c coE U
cu 0 y U C U () cn a) cu i ° U N E O a U p ° D C (a D r Y c D 3 0 7> D C N Y c
Fn -
a) U m (Z O 'v) U
Q. O D -D C L v) - -D cu-„ 0° (n as p O U c U D (n
W O o D
O O •U) d C -O p a) n a c c N d U) a c 4 'N a) U 0 0 OL (d c o-0 cn O •° °'
oEYcn ° 0 0c o0. _ a co C c (C (nE cc _Ile 0 L ° pC c O 0 cu . o c n e w 0° E `? N U (u °.c o 0. o O
v a`ui m E d)0. L a) O cCu U (n O.0 O c uiQ ?? = co a) E? a) ?Q 0 0 oc o,0. N
LU D u c a) c a) .9U. = c c Q) 0 N C a) 'O co U U i) O L p .C O (u a) ? L D 70-a) Y ci EO c D)
U U O C 3 - Y W .?.. 7 (n m U = (A >. a) c c 0 L D) C N ° U a) rL
CC -0 co -
C U N c J O 3 O C E p C OL 0.'E CO 0) E(D a co Y a a c0 •C C O o -D O CO "O 0 c 0 .E Q
m m c° c? cu c 3 o 0 o 0 O cu cu o v c o= - a) a) L a) c cu a) N a) c? U a a) c m- u) c o
0 c ?a ocu rn"' a xC' C:M a) na)E r0. E =3 v (M -0
Z E C: a) (D -CM
g ? n (Ln D -° ?.mE D)0. ?? a) E a) c °nU i.o.0 aa))-0 o V; E (u > 0 > 0 m c O D E ' a) a) C `- u
O =ompCE U a cn L??uEa £°) nc0.°i mJ a0.°i ° E- ° Q,c?Ea'X? °ccczD
E - ° . o c E E a) o c o` ° ° c ° - vi (n a ,. N (D - (n cu E U) c a 0 c a) D v°)i o : E
(La> ro ro? N °3, c°)VUa)0O°? o -mo(nO UQ.L ?a)a) a)c?p E a) a)° o 00
_ O U (n D U D a) w a) cif a) U c •a
o 0 D o p C J (n E cu O (n- ` C O U 0 L O c L>> 3 cud - - O)N >'D > .ro (u [F
U m aEU oc U o0 70m 0-0Y ??°).U.a)c ? aEc ° 0 c (D c E 70 C" -0 E.50.Eoc ?_
a) ? a) O 0. L p c 0 Z; 2 ?u c c o 0 O= co a) a) p 0 a) a) O a) c •X 0 0 a) 0 p p C cu a) O
F- amoC 00 E(?N a) ?H 0- L 0. o(n 0. CL am?C cnU?fnN L C Q O c cps CIr Cr 8 EU) 0 Ca
c c ?
• • • • cCa • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 3 • • • • • • • • H
U 0
r? 0
V J
z
0
U (D rn `
?o 0) a o0. a c a (nc
L C 1 co co a) c CO a) a) C (n m c co ,> ui a a) ;E a)
a) O
. cn c C C) 0 d U 1-- a) ca
p N C L .L.
(z co -E cli o c aa))c?cL' a ooY co 70 a) M o3c
0 a)?0 3 ((n> CL
a) (? a cr 0. ) 0 a) o O 0 Cc ° L .C L L (u D) cz a (Z a) a
-
C 0- co '°D C C °- O Oa a) U c (D L C O. a c U E a) C cn cn C a a) oC E N 0 C 70 co °c m ° cLD m>0.0.0.0 a)o(n3? D `n cu V5 tY cu ° o °ro?ao
N °U U ` O C Q O U 0. a) C- a) a) j N d a) U> O L U -D 'D c ?0 a)
W (n ? U E a) > ro .a O c .O o (u o m L L O i c c 70 U) L`
s ?70 (n c (n0o 70 070
U ? m c cE 0C c =°)- Z = oo°a• - cu co -
mo(n rn UE UO co °) m ?3 Q-0?o a c o?> N c Q co c U) _°
Z C C C co Rf CD 'U) L c D) 3 a) U m` OU U .y U U a O U C O c o N o w CO
S; 2 co m
C ° N O O D c (u -° d cu C m O O
•'-' ° c
c
?' w 73 O U a) W
w p C N O N U O ro? a) iu C) C O C L y in ?, o O a O .? u°j D
0) 0 (n= CjJ CO C o+ D? a) Co c c (D
a) ?U v c (D ° O CZ a)? N
v E 3 Q3 ° 0 ?M
N D O C C O L cn O w 4 o i O D O
o o CD E 70 p .c (D o 0) Q Y E a c c :? m a a 0.9 o 0.D a in C 0 a) c: Y 0 0 w °
(n i5
° 0. L E o w 3 .N -0 j° 0 c Ir ° 75 a (emu co a Y 0 O c 0 c cu N cn
W ooc 0? ``n°?m o0.Uv(ni yca n.0 0- ° ° vi oo i3g0?
-c- Z
w co E
L) 0 U) U
a) C)
a) CU a)
Q i NU 'D (u co
C a) O (u L a) 4) i O C co Cl) =N fu (() s
cz :5 > O (u w (1) cm 0.1 1575-0
C (co -6 Ch n
CD N `) V) C ° D) E o .- U c N N N 0 0 'Q C C O D C N w U) -C
(u D U C U=
.? C L N N c '? D) .- O (u -E (u cu - Y O a) >1 p p o L C cz (?0 w
D- cu cu
va?i E O° cw>--0.)3 °)0c°0.c ??0- (cu °.>cu ca UY O o oaa)i'c OUDo
pI a N O 0 cn 0-0- _U) cd o .0 fu y C c cn > c ..C a «-.
U E y a)
r_ cu Z c a) V) C a) X c cu a) (D 'n 0) a) (u N D -0 `O C O O UO U cn :3 co
++ O (n
(n _? C a)
F' Q w _0 U a) (u a) E (n a) (0 y C p C a- C a) 0 Ca L .0 ?.`-. c (u u) D L N N -D -0
Z 3 a) co Q) C C a C m (u L
C 4) (n a) u) c
6 0) (n
?Q -C w ° (n ° ?" a) ° c 0.) Y 3roM °M? m c co o c)(n m ° a) (°n E ti c 0.0 °
(? - a) co U •0 d ` O N L 0 .? c
> O-0 ccq ° D) Y C:0.- c cu E(D Q' O U CL U c u) 70 cn U C
w d ro > U c
u) w u) c° U N c ° C o - E 0) E c° C (S1 c p y Y C i U C c o U CL U 0.
Z a O cz O a) a) - -0 c d X 0- 0 co (u (u (D - 0 0 0. 0 D U y () R) ? p 0' E ° 0 Q O
O L n v? c? CL ro.o a CD Q?c ? c? o g'a's ° D o E y c m m C? (n c_ D°? roy 0 O (n
V N 0.N N -0 O N O -0 = co -a N in cu 0 c N U T L ca a) E p) Od OC °- U E C m N •2 O- CD co C'5 o °-? C
?-0 a ?(D° '0.- m 0 o m a) ° oF-a in cu ?mQ V; co ?? a) o.?m a) m-0 m 0 ° 4 -a :S ° u) u)
D o cQ
,? 3Y ca C ? :- U?E°O?o>o c r -D cuc (u :. -0c(n (n E a)c a) rovi
N O N(D > O D (u 0 cu co C C O a) 0. (u a ui O N N C 3 c a) -D D U D U V)
Z a_DD> c??m °): a O?a?NU N OX°o• ium .0 (1) Ed os E C:cE a>oEo
O d cz E o N cu :3 c E aci E aEi a)Ua Z ? 0°° a- E ? a D E c? a c U o.0 a) co 0) p cu cu o U 0-
U u)Yc m3 D) E D UD)mUt m(na)a a a)°DO o(u•D mt5' a Xc c0
(ncc° 0 o(E min a cuL m ° Oa)?a)Ycc'6 D ?ccuEY 0 o°Ein.50.°i caci E Q0.)oco.?
LL a) (n C N C "O cu O (LS .Q O O a) o 0 w N D).L L D a) co U w-
O i >(D a c O° O a) rtLp N ID CD N(D O 02 U U 'V N .? = U. C U Q a) in C M
O p y a a) N U
CL a) 0. O U "-. N p U L D) F? ` U =3 fu 0 U C D C C -D a)
v t5 0 0 ° ?c a) a) a? u u- c o.c ?u 0'U) t'c N c 0 F° L ro? m $? 0)0 a)m 0 a) Y :3 0 0 0 0 a
z c ?'ic U ?.° co c I°?) (u c c° a) F, E cc)- m X V)a? Ca or 0000 aai aEi Oyu a)0 O c? u ai a a) -- ?.5 o oc a) -6 0 i E c H a- L m Cn --D co m o co M U F U U U a H a oC OC U E (n N U a p in c a) Iz m in c ro 0 E U) -C E (D 'o
U c c o0. oc? °DUH c o 0.
U a) c c a) cu • • • • • • • • • • • • c = ~ 3
C/) H U ° U ° o U 0 • • • • • • • •
s
U

?CD
o
U

C\j
N

z
a ?Z NS N
?d
?? Y H
z
J? Z
o d
o
MN
W =r-
m Q =
J w¢ a
=
?
Z Z F
-
z z
o 0
O
- co
p
?

Q Q
o
co 0

?

a
P- Li
0 < E
l
?
'\ o
T
z
O
g
..... p Z §

1
\
U
,\ )
O
U

I

1
I

O
\ U
z
I ` 0
I
9 \ O

'\ •\
l
\

\ `

\

Q W
U
ZZQ
F

O \
•\
?\ O
(t
CO z
W
J
Q
co
\

• d ?

w UQ Z
O

} C
C)

co

Q

\
\ ¢
a
?Z
O
ai ?
CO /
w D /

N a a
D \
d
C) \
w / \

O Z
LL C) Ir
O
O
LU vZ?
m
C:)
a
Z
pQ a /
i
c ?
F o a s

?U ?d

¢U o
Y (n
??
O ?

cnU
? r
Q

0 O

Uw
Z
>- a Z
¢cr O
}¢
/
/
Q
Z
ILI =
CO
g
F-
LU O
aw
2 a ?
-
C) a
LU
a CL

2
d

Z
Q? O?
aw uiV)i
? U z rn
wo %

/;
?r
W I
I ?? v
in ?Q
J I ? /
a l ? ? ® /

a
N
w
-m?
?
w
C3
m
P-
?
Z
o }p Z
~Z ?g rY }cn 1-Y Uw m¢ O
DO w Z) ¢ U D U)O
~a ?= 00 ?¢ ? U Own c9a
OU am U a N aw 2d
W M?- Ma- C a OUw w00 wz C/)
?
J I
I
x
J
m
D
U)
0
0
T
ii r •
/
i
/ r
1 /
i
i
i ?
i
i %
f
'/ /
I .
i D
? i
i i Z
8 Zw
LL 0 N
i C o
m?w
i cr
L
I ?¢ OC d
i \ o°
/ 0
Z
HOUS
¢ U)co(D0
\ r \
` \\ ? W
?• I F Q
P?
S Ned ??S ?
1 b!N
Z
O
g?w
0 \j
a
wo C?
PP
\P
\P

z 9Z 133HS Nb`ld 33S 3NIl HOIVN v N
o
; N
J n
/ % Y W
j Z ¢
_
?U M
2 °
z
/ /
\J W o a
LL o=
z O
z 0 0
0 O w O

U ?i S = W m O z

J
R
Q o
U)
u LLI
e
O
O
o >
I / ° w
O

!
1 51 U g
LL
4
\ O
O z Z
\\ >- w O
Y

O c7 Z

Z
x

\\
\?
;: \

m
_
I O
O
Im
J a

(nU
F-

m
0
?• ?U ?d
\
\\ \.\
?\ z L-

W
? U=

ai3

d mw

wa

?- 13 I
~ -

\
\ I
w
Cl)

i

i Z
O
1
1 ! U
1 I
1
? j

it
Z
O

i \ o
j -

Z
¢ O ;
O ?\ \
a
w
\
D
N

i
i W
\
\ \ \ i i W
I / y U)
i i

W
W
U)
W
z
`r-'? ;
0 _

/
!
!
!
i
t
i' ?
;

1 i
i \

w co

W w
1

1
i?
? Ln
QNNO?
V
/
Z F
Sil?zoaZ
Q %
j %
i

\ m U N

z a
\
j

6J LO
N
w
LLI z a ?Q?{
z
? I j

I
I
¢ = 2Z U
Uoo

d
0 CL

I 1

M
°

U- Z.
?

ZZ
O Lu

z
22
w ? i
1 co
D w
I=
22 cs
-
z
FJ5 _
fill
U)
oo
=is
m
a wl
y
`
\\
\
/ °
O
o

o
°
H
U) 0
? LLI

> o?
a
\ ` T
10
Z
4

I
-- --------
r
----- -------
I
I
I
O
z z
I
` ¢
w o z)
r
a. 2
r Y C7 ?
P:
zQ Q
Z
I w z
=30 Y w
?0
g C
U
?
rO
j
j =

m Z
ll! aaU
w aw
w C
J=
a a
a ¢va-i
w 0

I
? W I
J

j
j

w
?
m
cc
j

j

a 177

1 j
1 1
1 1
j
1
O j
I
¢ I
I
0 I j
O j

J I I
I I

I
j'
i ?
1 ?
j
j j
j
I ?
? I
i
i

j
I
I
I
I
I ?
L j
j I
I
i I
a j i
I j
ra I j
Paz
CL U)
I
w U

-?G
?P

a
Q
CL
O
O U)
LLI
IL Q
d'
N
tTi
w
2
U)
Z
w
w
U)
w
z
J
U
Q
m
i
i
LLI
i
w
O
I
W
Z
O
?U
a?
g Z
0