890012_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NOHTH CAHOLINA
Department of Environmental Qual

OPNI !,zl)
IN
Ask
'1 53
I sl

❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation 0 Other Agency
vision of Water Quality
1prRoutine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWO inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other l
Date of Inspection
Facility Number 9 Time of Inspection : IS 24 hr. (hh:mm)
D Registered Certified ElApplied for Permit 0 Permitted' JE3Not Opera Date Last Operated:
Farm Name:....�.t J;. ..�... ...-� .. ... .. ........ County:..-��
!1` }V................_f D �t 5..................... ..... Phone No.- ..Owner Name:..........-i 7d
........
FacilityContact: .............................................................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
MailingAddress:. .,. .:.......5..3.0............................................................ ....klL .......................... s 1
Onsite Representative: .....M..........0. cS.................................................................. Integrator:.. &. TJs YYl,S....................-----....----
I
Certified Operator,.. .�.J.�1Q� N1...... N......... `�f>Z.���.5.... ..r........................ Operator Certification umber:. .Q �....--.---.--
Location of Farm:
Latitude Longitude �• �� ®��
Swine `'C
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ F der to Finish
U'Varrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Vumber of Lagoons /X
esign Curi enE Design ;Current Design Current
pactty- Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle„ Capacity, Population x
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer I JE1 Nan -Dairy
❑ OtheC
y Total Design Capacity,
TotalSSLW" ys
© ❑ Subsurface Drains Present
❑ No Liquid Waste Managen
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaVrnin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Lagoon Area I❑ Spray Field Area
System `>
�t
❑ Yes Lld'No
❑ Yes No
k)A- -� o6e, u a,,c S .
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes
❑,, NoElYes
E o
❑ Yes
[�io
❑ Yes
[;Ko
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
9
;eo-
Continued on back

Facility Number: B — 1�
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes io
Structures (Lagoons,tiolding Ponds Flush Pits etc.
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? Yes ❑ No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure _; Structure 4 St�ictu e 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ..a.!`�7�C�T'........:,�.............. •..:,T........ Q�"w�"�
I... .................. ....-. !C) ...........................................
Freeboard (ft):........ IT . � .� .1Z.. at
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes E!(Noo
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes R O
12. Do any of the structures need maintenancelimprovement? j,ldYes ❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ["Yes ❑ No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes
(If in excess of WMP, or
r`u�noff�e�ntteerrirng`waterss of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type 111�..1� Q� !..i...4 �W.! j ]Q.iA.N..................................................................................................................... ......... ................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? O Yes ❑ No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes VN<O
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes Rio
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? u ec�v��vu�na,L El Yes L( No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? `SQ 2Yes ❑ No
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes 63 No
22. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ Yes - `so,
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only 23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑ Yes M<
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? n ❑ Yes ErNo
25. Were -any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit? I) �-��J , ❑ Yes ❑ No
No viola-tionsor. deficiencies. were noted-dtiring this.visit.-.You.will receive rto further
eorrespandehce a out this visit..:
better explaui'sttuatEons (bse additional pages;as
L £ n 5 .
_e-CD cLA rrr--e-- �e or
Df�UQ-v �t,� d�Cs�snLt B— f 00.66zbUQ_ &A! G,C6AAP
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/inspector Signature:
Date:

Facility Number: — t,-3, i)ste cif lnspt�tic�n —IS
v
so; , s .
fa3[48 166/1 Cooks_
00 vz a,ti YC�,rd1S �cs� v`e-V i d�2� tJD �,lYz D ✓�_
W Q..� i [Q� 6 a0-5 �. e�` S rt5 p evi-� ova
E+1 n�p�ct.-c2_ . n
P
r��en c` v► CA6ff, (Op P,t cc: r o,ti. 'ISP,v+'eLv CIq 6 .
ok"
vn-. eGUj/
,V i `� e_ Cta+rY5 oL was
VV
(6 aj v 4- LAJ41( 6, aol(khltd? -to KWAKS
a,o�.c�
C1vL)p eC4— o�,s uJ�-
V \�r �.i� T-,MpvGx r
M557

Facility Number: Date of Inspection
5—"t� - a
2SnoU
-e
a
0
7/25/97

14p muut►ne 0 %,umpaaint 0 ronow-up ui Lpw%4 mspecnon 0 rouow-up or uaw%_ review 0 vmer
Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection © 24 hr. (hh:mm)
p Registered 0 Certified p Applied for Permit p Permitted in Not pera "— Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: Frce.&.Easy.Farm.......................... ............... County: Tyrrell WaRO
Owner Name:.William................................. Hollis............................... .......... Phone No: 919-.7.966.0621.ox.19. 4..........................
Facility Contact: AL.Hollis............................................................Title: ownrx .................................................. Phone No: 2521.79 .1Q44.......................
1%— 1-770 Lb.�
Mailing Address: P1?.Eox.6.711............................................................................................ Columbj&..N.0 ....................................................... 27925 ..............
Onsite Representative:. l.Hollia................... ............................... Integrator: Ruiating.F.arms......................................................
Certified Operator:W. jUiam.A............................ Hallis.11............................................ Operator Certification Number:2023 ............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude ©• ®6 ®" Longitude ®• ®& ®"
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to mts
Farrow to Wean
El rarrow to ee er
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
p Boars
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? p Yes ® No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
p Yes ® No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7125/97
p Yes ® No

act t Number: 89_12 Date of Inspection
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
p Yes ® No
Structures flLagoons,Holding Ponds Flush Pits etc.
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
13 Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier: .......solids.nrapi....... ....... solids.t�rap....... ....... mlid&1raA....... ......... prirnazy.......... .............final.............
Freeboard (ft): 2.0 1.5 1.0 1.5 2.3
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
p Yes ® No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
p Yes a No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
N Yes p No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
13 Yes ® No
Waste Apolication
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
p Yes H No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ........ camisoybeansI.Wmat..............................................................................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
t3 Yes ® No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
p Yes ® No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
p Yes ® No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
p Yes ®No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
p Yes ®No
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewfinspection with on -site representative?
p Yes ®No
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
M Yes p No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
p Yes ®No
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
p Yes ®No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
p Yes p No
R. eo`•xeoSpoAol�nCsU.oe�r �4>(�iexi�Lleik5 Ys-tw§iere.o urtngthis visit. umWit[.receive nofurther.,.*
C�...... ..
Reviewer/Inspector Name at Doper
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

ace t um er: 89_12 Date of Inspection
tAdtlna oin*its and/or wings r
4&
2. Need to secure 1997 soil sample reports for farm records
Need to keep irrigation/ land application information for a &ree year period - no irrigation records available at time of Review
reed
Operation & Maintenance Plan
to secure irrigation operating parameters (system was existing 9/l/96).
6/24/98

r p Division o1; Soil and Watei
i Cam`E Division of WaterQ u a Uty
L.
Ig xoutine 0 c.ompiamt 0 ronow-up of uwtj inspection 0 ra
Facility Number
■ Registered p Certified p Applied for Permit p Permitted
up of uawc: review 0
Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
in o perationa Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: Erec.&.Eas .Eat:m....... __..... ........................ ............................................... County: Tyrrell WaRO
Owner Name: 1Nilliam._. _. _. _......... Hollis ...._................................................... Phone No: 9.L4-7.9b-1944.......... .......................... ----............
Facility Contact: ...............................................................................Title: .. Phone No:
MailingAddress: RU..Bxau.317........................................................................................ Coitttabia..NC............... ........................................ 27925 ..............
Onsite Representative: AI.Halk.......... _................ ..... ............................... Integrator: Bmting.Euin............ ...... .......... .........................
Certified Operator: W. jUiatn.A........................... HnWSE.......................... .................. Operator Certification Number:20323............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude ©• ®4 ®u Longitude ®• ®1 ®�
Swine
esign _ urren - = esign urren _ - Design Current
Capacity., �Ponitry_ .0_Capacity Population •-Cattle 'Capacity Population
can to Feeder
Feeder to Finis
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to mis
13 Gilts
Boars
3
Layer
p
N on -Layer
.Number bf Lagoons I Holding _Eon ds p Subsurface Drains Present 11[3Lngoon rea JE3 Spray kield Area
;g - p o tqut Waste Management System
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? t3 Yes ® No
2. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? t3 Yes p No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes p No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) 13 Yes Cl No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes E No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? 13 Yes ® No
5. Does any part e`the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require 13-Yes ® No
maintenance/improvement?
5. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? p Yes N No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? p Yes ® No
7125/97

v
-acr i Number: 89_12
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
13 Yes N No
Structures �aeoons,Holding Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
p Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (ft): 1 ft. 2.5 ft. 2.5 ft. 2 ft.
2 ft.
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
p Yes H No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
p Yes ® No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenancelimprovement? -
p Yes ® No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
N Yes p No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
p Yes p No
(if in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ...... Cnan.(Silage.& Gaa.in)...........................SMgW.GraiU.(Wheaz,.Barley...........................
......... .........................
pp
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste ManagemMilo ent PranaiJ)AWMP)? 13 Yes ® No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
Q .No'viqLations.ordeficiencies-were.noa urtng this visit., oa wil .receive nay further.,
or respott0kt 4WO xiiis•visit: -. • . . • ... • .
p Yes ®No,
p Yes ®No
p Yes N No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
13 Yes p No
13 Yes p No
w asw uuiizasion plan avauaoie ror review..
Hollii�is`uncertain of the fiiture `of this facility._•He may possibly sell this farm to the -Department of Transportation for wetland
itigation purposes
� 5.7. BIZ � .. w .. :f-.. •' .~ _ .� ..- N vr^Fl � 42',� .A � i � .. _
•i+Please`be rerriinded that all farms must be certified by December 31,1997 i1lbere-sre no exoeptionsl'•If they.are not certified,
they must be below the'250 animal dYesholdliddtor oui_•_of operation y1f a facilrrytis in -violation .of,this "requFrement,, it -is subject to
-
an
enforcement action; which nia}t,resulr in a civ�ii �p�eraaltjlessessment _ - _ _
7/25/97 -
-., .. cy_ ... ":""'• . .:a .. t-. - - - _ .fit .. - �
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: L a�LA4 P) Q __L UA-A Date: I I — t 4 —q -7

m
L:
w
W,p
•IQ
`fdr
.,j - . r AL�;- 1. � - ...
l!" of 'J"i J
VI -1
r" Y
6 11
yf
OfR. 'z.
IJ
�jo' is "V'.
1-0
4 il f r�' 1P to. i,
%Y71 /1
.11f
if .1 4�
.Ir
JL
'q-
Y4 l.
4%
FA4�S�
1"" ..;"II�; -% lI- t q
T1�T1
tP,

Facility Number:- y z,
Division of Environmental Management
Animal Feedlot Operations Site Visitation Record
Date:_ 4. 40 -'4
Time: /!n -Q
General Information:
Farm Name:_ FREE d- Ecr,&X "'�A4!!U _ County: :QN-p-t-r
Owner Name: L.D j u R n. HAO LLAS Phone No: 7q6 -0 fak 1 796 -19 ¢¢
On Site
Mailing Address: P. p • aox -S 70
Co w M,a lie} /VC, 2L7 92,97
Physical Address/Location:
Latitude: I I Longitude: I I
Operation Description: (based on design characteristics)
ZNT pe of Swine No. of Animals Type of Poultry No. of Animals Type of Cattle No. of Animals
SowBoar _434 an u%, ❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Nursery ❑ Non -Layer ❑ Beef
Feeder
OtherType of Livestock: Number of Animals:
Number of Lagoons: p� (include in the Drawings and Observations,the freeboard of each lagoon)
Facility Inspection: -
Lagoon
Is lagoon(s) freeboard less than 1 foot + 25 year 24 hour storm storage?:
Is seepage observed from the lagoon?:
Is. erosion observed?:
Is any discharge observed?
D Man-made Ll Not Man-made
Cover Crop
Does the facility need more acreage for spraying?:
Does the cover crop need improvement?:
(list the crops which need improvement)
Crop type:_ QA,,,,2 'is a&,,, )� k4� +Acreage:
Setback Criteria
Is a dwelling located within 200 feet of waste application?
Is a well located within 100 feet of waste application?
Is animal waste stockpiled within 100 feet of USGS Blue Line Stream?
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 feet of Blue Line Stream?
AOI -- January 17,1996
Yes ❑ No ei
Yes ❑ No a
Yes ❑ No &
Yes ❑
No W
Yes ❑
No W_
Yes A
No lb
Yes ❑
No 0
Yes ❑
No Of
Yes ❑
No' n
Yes ❑ No 13,

Maintenance
Does the facility maintenance need improvement? Yes ❑ No 12
Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? Yes ❑ No
Does record keeping need improvement? Yes ❑ No 3
Did the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan on site? Yes ❑ No Q'
Explain any Yes answers:,
Signature:_ Ja� 1,
cc. Facility Assessment Unit
Drawings or Observations: i
1,11k
Date: 4 - 30 - 9 to
Use Attachments if Needed
4�&:,A6 Q— // 3D Ar h.
ON r LM004 NA+4 *qE.T SC-090��� n7E�riS +�€MO b . Co¢�6 •S�tm
7Fr�� cJmtq- 64" 6 -X 6 crrcF of JT.
��J o kA e_ 6, � 4^ a porn N•� d 444-#f7 ' " I LT x
O&(Aw,•v6 -A, -Aa k-Vrs) ,"l aqPl�f k4Cd0Ns ^40 C9tW--j 16A04SA^1
A01-- January 17,1996

+,: 4
fy State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Washington Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Nancy W. Smith, Regional Manager
Al I
F 5
[)EHNF:1
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
Water Quality Section
August 17, 1995
Mr. William Hollis
P. O. Box 570
Columbia, North Carolina 27925
Subject: Animal Waste Lagoons
Facility No. 89-12
Tyrrell County
Dear Mr. Hollis:
On August 15, 1995 staff from the Washington Regional Office
of the Division of Environmental Management inspected the lagoons
serving your animal feeding operation. It was observed that your
lagoons had an insufficient amount of freeboard, water level in
relation to the lowest point of your dike wall. You should maintain
a minimum of nineteen inches of freeboard in the lagoon. This
letter is written to bring your attention to this situation and to
ask you to, begin spray irrigating wastewater or take the
appropriate action necessary to reduce the level of your lagoon(s)
immediately. Please note that a buffer of twenty-five feet must
be maintained while spray irrigating from any drainage system
(ditch, swale, canal, stream, etc.).
Please be aware that it is a violation of North Carolina
General Statutes to discharge wastewater to the surface waters
(farm ditches, creeks streams, etc) of the State without a permit.
The Division of Environmental Management has the authority to levy
a fine of not more than $10,000 per day for the unpermitted
discharge of wastewater into -the surface waters of the State. At
some point in,the future, staff will reinspect your facility.
Lagoon dikes should be mowed so they can be visually inspected.
If you have any questions in regard to this letter I can be
contacted at [phone].
Sincerely,
Robert Tankard
Environmental Engineer
cc: Dianne Wilburn
AFO filed
1424 Carolina Avenue, Washington, Borth Carolina 27689 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

Site Requires Immediate Attention:
. Facility No.
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
Date: %-Ic , 1995
Time: .110 Q_
Farm Name/Owner: f 9-E-' d. tLor4K Q Ai, S ln1 ur,., Ho", r
Mailing Address: _ by Ak _-M fin ,., ,, ,,, _ n_ J C..
County: _
Integrator: Phone:
On Site Representative- Phone:_ 1 79 79t—/qff-
Physical Address/Location: AjjCZ2_ l�DR n.eQ,,.. Fr�Ar k juei.;G
Type of Operation: Swine Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: 5b" soss No. of A Imals on Site: 1�00
DEM Certification No.: ACE DEM Certification No.: ACNEW
Latitude: Longitude: Elevation: Ft
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Ft + 25 year 24 hour
storm event? (approximately 1 Ft + 7 in) Yes or No
Actual Freeboard: I Ft �*-_ Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or(]qi?_
Was any erosion observed? Yes or
Is adequate land available for spray? 0--lor No
Is the cover crop adequate? i or No
Crop(s) being utilized: �,OAIS
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria?
200 Ft from Dwellings? '7fe or No 100 Ft from Wells? �r No
I the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Ft of USGS Blue Line Stream?
or No
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Ft of a USGS Map Blue
Line? Yes orl�pl_
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state b an -made ditch,
system, or other similar man-made devices? Yes o N
If Yes, please explain:
flushing
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure,
land applied, spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes or No
12
Inspector Namfe Signature
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
Comments & Sketch on Back of Sheet

y
DEM
SITE VISITATION RECORD
Page Two
coi[ment s :
Sketch:
C6r—JKr,,r ` -o--' NC S c 09
Q, r H
e

",*:; JL-1. 9b THU
FAX KQ 9197902881 P.02/03
.,it11.-],2-85 4IID 15:328 ICI
Fi7Bf tSq $OIL4.�IL3Tsi1 Tq a
9�978� 194G.a7�i2 �•�{ �B'i'T P.�/0,2
aw Rcgaires fuIIac4= Atb=dau
G -7
ITAdity�Inmbat_ I U
SITB VMITAZ=i MWW3
DEATH. ]995
Al
AIL
CKyn �} t� Farm Ntl = is
Cofmty ` ur rc.
Astnty-siftSilm L- Phaa��
Op ma w.1w, 1i , AbillPha��
Om 3it� Rat�vtl: I%na
�Siyxic� Ad�j: . s n l _ C1
ory OFFICF
p -- Number o€1p1mab an Sits: q--A-IIC 11 1995
dreuY- w vrso
( �%tsu ey 1 Foot-+7 htw) y1m or No. Actual I=b=d..
•Fct4ltra`�it1� wlilzmo� t1�I a,�ixgc}on, pir�c�dd�s cila cr�arla�6oa;' irrx�Itd pntkt �
Wiu rcy= a ob ix d the lYgaa 'Yes a ilo wu Draw 44m?: Y= OrNO
Is ;rquFit i svnili ]a flit 1 a iiCt3ti�I? Ycs %XD Is the arms=== wkgt1aO Yes aeNOt
• S�u�i � , 2 .�
To
. —
Fi►� to (�19) 7I��s�4
5ipstm of Agcut
k'C tI I

Division of Environmental Management
October 9, 1992
MEMORANDUM
TO: CAFO File
Washington Regional office
FROM: Scott Jones '5, rv° � --
Environmental Technician, WARO
SUBJECT: Compliance Inspection
Free & Easy Farms (Swine Operation)
Tyrrell County
On October 8, 1992, Scott Jones, DEM Staff of the Washington
Regional Office, visited the Free & Easy Farms (Swine Operation).
The purpose of this visit was to determine whether or not the
aforementioned facility was in compliance with its CAFO Designation
effective October 5, 1989.
As a result of this inspection it has been found that Free & Easy
Farms (Swine Operation) was in compliance at the time of
inspection.
msj/REVISIT/FREEEASY
921009