890001_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environmental Quay

T
¢ - --
E
� \ \ � /
] / \\ F
/
I i «\ a
® N
S
P
®
I : -_ - 2

ry
M Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 890001 Facility Status: Active
Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection
Permit: AWS890001
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Tyrrell Region:
Date of Visit: 11129/2017 Entry Time: 10:00 am Exit Time: 11:00 am
Farm Name: New Colony Sow Farm
Owner: Murphy -Brown LLC
Mailing Address: PO Box 487
Physical Address: 365 N Phelps Rd
Facility Status: ❑
❑ Denied Access
Washington
Incident #
Owner Email:
Phone: [phone]
Warsaw NC 28398
Columbia NC 27925
Murphy -Brown LLC
Compliant Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35° 49' 37"
6 miles SW Columbia NC, State Road 1105, Cross Landing Loop Road, South BDdwell Road, North
Longitude: 76' 19' 18"
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Earl A Queen
Secondary OIC(s):
Operator Certification Number: 22409
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On -site representative Earl Queen Phone :
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis: P1
P2 P3
P4
P5 SH1
SH2
Cl TW
10-9-17 3.23
3.69
3,73
4.36
3.54
0.40 0.44 0.49 0.39
8-21-17 3.27
3.35
4.68
3.68
3.29
0.43 0.40 0.42 0.07
4-20-17 5.91 5.52
5.33
6,32 5.79
0.09
0.21 0.12 0.09
2-24-17 6.82
5.93
4.85
6.83
5.32
0.10 0.45 0.19 0.09
IRR records are complete & balanced out for N&P
Reviewed: sludge survey 2-21-17; SH1 T=4.31, LTZ=2.76, SH2 T=5.09,LTZ=4.40; Cl T=4.67, LTZ=1.55
Crop yield for 2016 Cotton, 2017 SB; stocking; rainfall/freeboard
page: 1

r=
I
Permit: AWS890001 Owner - Facility : Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: 890001
Inspection Date: 11/29/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine -Farrow to Wean7- 9,542 9,519
Total Design Capacity: 9.542
Total SSLW: 4,131,686
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon
BOAR STUD
Lagoon
COW ISLAND
2.04
54.00
Lagoon
RECYCLE COW ISLAND
2.00
65.00
Lagoon
RECYCLE SAND HILL
2.04
Lagoon
SAND HILL
2.00
56.00
Waste Pit
BOAR STUD SOLIDS TRA
11/05/07
Waste Pit
NEWLAND BARN PITS
68.00
Waste Pit
WASH WATER CATCHME
07/01/07
38.00
page: 2

0-
a
Permit: AWS890001 Owner - Facility : Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: 890001
Inspection Date: 11/29/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No Na Ng
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
■ ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■ ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
0 ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No Na Ne
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large
❑
0 ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
M ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
M ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
0 ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ M ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
[]
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? -
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

r7�
I
Permit: AWS890001 Owner - Facility : Murphy -Brawn LLC Facility Number: 890001
Inspection Date: 11/29/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes
No Na Ne
Crop Type 1
Small Grain (Wheat,
Barley,
Oats)
Crop Type 2
Corn (Grain)
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Sail Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
N ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
0 ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
M ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na Ne
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
0 ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

i
. Permit: AWS890001 Owner - Facility : Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: 890001
Inspection Date: 11/29/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na Ne
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
[]
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
N ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
■ ❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
0 ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to -provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
N ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Other issues
Yes
No Na Ne
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
E ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
0 ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
0 ❑
❑
CAWM P?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
N ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? '
❑
M ❑
❑
page: 5

,k
I
M Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number:
890001 Facility Status,
Active Permit: AWS890001
Denied Access
Inpsection Type:
Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for visit:
Routine
County: Tyrrell Region:
Washington
Date of Visit: 11/30/2016 Entry Time: 08:50 am Exit Time: 10:30 am
Farm Name: New Colony Sow Farm
Owner: Murphy -Brown LLC
Mailing Address: PO Box 487
Physical Address: 365 N Phelps Rd
Facili Status•
Incident #
Owner Email:
Phone: [phone]
Warsaw NC 28398
Columbia NC 27925
ry Murphy -Brown LLC
Compliant Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35' 49' 37"
6 miles SW Columbia NC, State Road 1105. Cross Landing Loop Road, South Bodwell Road, North
Longitude: 76" 19' 18"
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Earl A Queen Operator Certification Number: 22409
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Earl Queen Phone:
On -site representative Earl Queen Phone:
Primary Inspector:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Marlene Salyer
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis: p1
p2 p3
p4 p5
SH1
8-2-16 = 3.44
3.03
4.11
5.35
6-8-16 4.20
3.34
5.02
5.82
4-1-16 3.54
5.83
6.75
9.42
2-17-16 4.90
4.08
5.02
6.64
12-16-15 3.53
3.34
4.84
6.29
IRR records are complete & balanced out.
SH2
Cl TW
4,27
0.09
0.52
0.12
0.09
5.24
0.05
0.40
0.14
0.06
6,32
0.06
3.78
0.27
0.09
5.82
0.04
0.51
0.13
0.05
3,32
0.06
2.67
0.16
0,04
Reviewed: sludge survey; soil tested 2016; crop yield; rainfall/freeboard
Phone:
Date:
page: 1

Permit: AWS890001 Owner - Facility : Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: 890001
Inspection Date: 11/30/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Farrow to Wean 9,542 10,112
Total Design Capacity: 9,542
Total SSLW: 4,131,686
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon
BOAR STUD
goon
F
COW ISLAND
2.04
70.00
Lagoon
RECYCLE COW ISLAND
2.00
Lagoon
RECYCLE SAND HILL
2.04
44.00
Lagoon
SAND HILL
2A0
61.p0
Waste Pit
BOAR STUD SOLIDS TRA
11/05/07
Waste Pit
NEWLAND BARN PITS
12,00
Waste Pit
WASH WATER CATCHME
07/01/07
50.00
page: 2

t
Permit: AWS890001 Owner - Facility : Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number:
890001
Inspection Date: 11/30/16 Inssection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Discharges_& Stream Impacts
Ye
N� o N2 Ne
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
M ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
M ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No Na Ne
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■ ❑
[]
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.eJ large
❑
M ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
M ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
M ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
M ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
M ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na Ne
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ M ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ 0 E-] ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

I
Permit:
AWS890001
Owner - Facility:
Murphy -Brown LLC
Facility Number:
890001
Inspection Date:
11/30/16
Inpsection Type:
Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit:
Routine
Waste Application Yes No Na Ne
Crop Type 1 Conn, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2 Small Grain (Wheat, Barley,
Oats)
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
0 ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
0 ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■ ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of property operating waste application equipment?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na No
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
0 ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
[]
N ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
[]
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ E ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWS890001 Owner - Facility : Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: 890001
Inspection Date: 11/30/16 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na Ne
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
0 ❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
M ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
M ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
M ❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No Na Ne
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
M ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes.
❑
0 ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other -
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
M ❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
0 ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
0
M ❑
❑
page: 5

Type of Visit: 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: ® Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County:
Farm Name: Owner Email:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Phone:
Region:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: ��,�,� �Q�,,�� Certification Number:
--r
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Longitude:
Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Finish Layer
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
DairyCow
Feeder
Qd
Non -La er
EA
DairyCalf
FFeederottoFinish
Dai Heifer
o Wean
Design C►urrent
D , P,uul Ca aci Rio ,
La ers
Cow
o Feeder
Finish
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Non -La ers
Beef Feeder
"Farrowo
Pullets
Beef Brood Cow
�Turke
r r
Other
s
TurkeyPoults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
❑ Yes 2No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
[:]Yes ❑ o
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3 21412014 Continued

Facility Number: TV- Date of Ins !!Hon:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ErNo
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: A/ i / 7XI
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): Z2 n P'A.S
Observed Freeboard (in): C� r _3
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes ENo ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmentl threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes hl 1Ve ❑ NA ONE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require [:]Yes EZ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes 21 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. [:]Yes E:(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): W - C -
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving craps differ from those designated in the CAWMP? [:]Yesji
❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑ Yes VNo
o
❑ Yes
❑ Yes d?No
[:]Yes ❑ No
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑Yes ] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes iNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
[] NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412014 Continued

Facila Number: - Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? 5%,/- ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check [] Yes G3No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes E�No
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes []�No
❑ Yes dN0
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ro/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes O/ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes E6 o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
[:]Yes WNNo DNA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #):.Explain any. YES°.answers `and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments. .
e,
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use. additional pages as necessary).
ltu�,rc�
z"ad-- AK4
T�,G� 12—
Tom- � %I
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
f
Phone:AV-9-! — 3� 1
Date: %l—%2 — ,5-
21412015

!u
S T
%�
(71-or
G
v/
9W
5.,
$5
''
h-d
'
v
/•
C
p
£ -
p
v
P o
88v
AF OP
h7T WP
86'/
tqY
F7
&P�7 F- W;,
5pr,p
33917
v
Vv
- r
h,gv PY £
ot
1
S-
t fi
L[;i
PC'
6S
C le,
- S
h .VE-
L'e'
'r
-:V-7 Iri
LC'L'
I
£ s
sc IF
/-09'
i)

a
0 Division of Water Resources
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Other Agency
Facility Number.
890001 Facility Status:
Active permit: AWS890001
Denied Access
inpsection Type:
Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason far Visit:
Routine
County: Tyrrell Region:
Washington
Date of Visit: 1111912014 Entry Time: 09:00 am Exit Time: 12.00 pm Incident #
Farm Name: New Colony Sow Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Murphy -Brown LLC Phone:
910-296-1800
Mailing Address: PO Box 487 Warsaw NC 28398
Physical Address: 365 N Phelps Rd Columbia NC 27925
Facility Status: Compliant 0 Not Compliant Integrator Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35' 4W 37" Longitude: 76° 19' 18"
6 miles SW Columbia NC, State Road 1105, Cross Landing Loop Road, South Bodwell Road. North
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts
Records and Documents
Waste Col, Star, & Treat Waste Application
Other issues
Certified Operator: Earl A Queen Operator Certification Number: 22409
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Earl Queen Phone:
On -site representative Earl Queen Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
page: 1

0
Permit: AWS890001 Owner - Facility : Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: 890001
Inspection Date: 11/19/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Vislt: Routine
Waste Analysis: P1
p2
p3 p4
p5
shl sh2 CW Tw
10-13-14 2.30
4,2
4A8
11.5
10.4
10-15-14
2.54
1.06 0.13 ' 0.09
9-9-14 3.46
8-21-14 3.31
4.61
9.86
11.0 0.22 1.99 0.38
5-5-14 4.71
4.80
7.14
13.9 0.08 0.07 0.36 0.36,
3.12-14 4.17
4,97
5.90
12.8 14.8 0.32 0.22 0.23
1-28-14 4.72
4.82
3.49
12.1 11.8 0.06 0.09 0.43 0.13
IRR records are complete & balanced out with PAN remaining. Reviewed: rainfall, freeboard, "Monitoring wells", stocking, sludge
surveys done on April 4, 2014
Soil tested in March & Sept. 2014
record keeping S facility look good.
page: 2

9
Permit: AWS890001 Owner - Facility : Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: 890001
Inspection Date: 11/19/14 lnpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Farrow to Wean
7,924
7,900
Swine - Feeder to Finish
2,736
2,736
Swine - Wean to Feeder
600
200
Total Design Capacity: 11,260
Total SSLW: 3.818,452
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon
BOAR STUD
Lagoon
COW ISLAND
2.04
73.00
Lagoon
RECYCLE COW ISLAND
2.00
Lagoon
RECYCLE SAND HILL
2.04
64.00
Lagoon
SAND HILL
2.00
75.00
Waste Pit
BOAR STUD SOLIDS TRA
111OW07
Waste Pit
NEWLAND BARN PITS
75.00
Waste Pit
WASH WATER CATCHME
07/01/07
50.00
Page: 3

Permit: AWS890001 Owner - Facility : Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: 890001
Inspection Date: 11/19/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes No Na Ne
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
0 ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
M ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■ ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■ ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
0 ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
yes
No Na Ng
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./large
❑
0 ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
0 ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
❑
❑
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
0 ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
0 ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na Ne
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ M ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ M ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWS890001 Owner - Facility : Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number:
890001
Inspection Date: 11/19/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Waste Application
Yes
No Na No
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
E ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
0 ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
E ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Records and Documents Yes No Na No
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 5

Permit: AWS890001 Owner - Facility : Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: 890001
Inspection Date: 11/19/14 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na No
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
[]
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
N []
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
E ❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
E ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
[]
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No Na , Ne
28. Did the facility fall to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
N ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
0 ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
N ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
E ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
❑
❑
CAWM P?
33. Did the Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
❑
❑
page: 6

0 Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 890001 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS890001 n Denied Access
Inspection Type: CelpGano Inspection _ Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Tyrrell Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 12/11/2013 Entry Time: 03:00 PM Exit Time: 04:15 PM incident #:
Farm Name: Ne)& C!24r}y S!2w Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Murphy -Brown LLC Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: PO Box 487 Warsaw NC 28398
Physical Address: 365 N Phelps Rd Columbia NC 27925
Facility Status: E Compliant Not Compliant Integrator: Bmi
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°49'37" Longitude: 76°19'18"
6 miles SW Columbia NC, State Road 1105, Cross Landing Loop Road, South Bodwell Road, North
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Cal, Stor, & Treat
Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Earl A Queen
Operator Certification Number: 22409
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name
Title Phone
24 hour contact name Earl Queen
Phone:
On -site representative Earl Queen
Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer
Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AWS890001 Owner - Facility: Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: 890001
Inspection Date: 12/11/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis: P = pitt
p1 p2 p3 p4 p5 Cl F10
10-22-13 .53 .47 .82 1.37 1.70 1.06 3.04 — before Earl Queen
11-22-13 4.66 3.76 4.02 8.70 10.7 .21 5.83 —taken by Earl Queen
IRR balanced using 10-22-13 analysis, pumping done by Lee Dunn ending approx. end of Sept. 2013.
soil tested October 2012 Caliberabon is due in 2014 Sludge Survey Cl 12/5/13
kRainfall & freeboard were recorded. Looks Good.
site where old housed were is progressing with some debris left on 4 sites - soon to be cleaned up.
Page: 2

Permit: AWS890001 Owner - Facility: Murphy -Brown LLC
Facility Number : 890001
Inspection Date: 12/11/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Farrow to Wean
7,924
10,413
Swine - Feeder to Finish
2,736
1,112
Swine -Gilts
2,089
1,202
Q Swine - Wean to Feeder
600
570
Waste Structures
Type
Identifier
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW:
13,349
4,131,802
Designed Observed
Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
agoon
BOAR STUD
agoon
COW ISLAND
2.04
56.00
agoon
RECYCLE COW ISLAND
2.00
agoon
RECYCLE SAND HILL
- 2.04
agoon
SAND HILL
2.00
aste Pit
BOAR STUD SOLIDS TRA
11/05/07
Waste Pit
NEWLAND BARN PITS
Waste Pit
WASH WATER CATCHMENT
07/01/07
Page: 3

Permit: AWS890001 Owner - Facility: Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: 890001
Inspection Date: 12/1112013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at:
Structure
Application Field
Other
a. Was conveyance man-made?
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
Yes No NA NE
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
rl
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
❑ ■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑ ■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
Hydraulic Overload?
Frozen Ground?
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
■
❑
❑
❑
■
Cl
❑
❑
■
❑
❑
Yes
No
NA
NE
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ Cl
Page: 4

Permit: AWS890001 Owner - Facility: Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: 890001
Inspection Date: 12/11/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
Total Phosphorus?
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil?
Outside of acceptable crop window?
Evidence of wind drift?
Application outside of application area?
Crop Type i
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Records and Documents
19, Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑■❑❑
❑■❑❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
11
Page: 5

r.
Permit: AWS890001 Owner - Facility: Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: 890001
Inspection Date: 12/11/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Checklists?
Design?
Maps?
Lease Agreements?
Other?
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Yes No NA NE
Waste Application?
0
Weekly Freeboard?
0
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
Waste Transfers?
D
Weather code?
11
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
Q
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
Q
■ Q Cl
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
■ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑ 13
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
Q
■ ❑ Q
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
L
■ D ❑
Page: 6

Permit: AWS890001 owner - Facility: Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: 890001
Inspection Date: 12111/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ ■ D ❑
Otherlssues Yes No NA NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field ❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond ❑
Other ❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewtinspection with on -site representative? 13000
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 7

0
Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency rr--��
Facility Number: 890001 , , Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS890001 Ci Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Tyrrell Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 05/23/2012 Entry Time: 02:30 PM Exit Time: 04:15 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: New Colony Farms Owner Email: bwilson(@bmiaro_com
Owner: New ColonYPhone: 252-792-4123
Mailing Address: 347 Shore Dr Qrg§well
Physical Address: 365 N_ PheID5Rd_ _ _ Columbia NC 27925
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Dmi
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°49'37" Longitude: 76°19'18"
6 miles SW Columbia NC, State Road 1105, Cross Landing Loop Road, South Bodwell Road, North
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Star, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Joshua Cole Fassnacht Operator Certification Number: 995232
Secondary OiC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Lee Dunn Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Josh Fassnacht Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: 14q Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AWS890001 Owner - Facility: New Colony Farms LLC
Facility Number : 890001
Inspection Date: 05/23/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis: soil tested: 11/2011 & 3/2012
1-20-12 = p1=8.8 p2=5.3 p3=5.0 p4=12.6 p5=19.0 Cl= .37
I R R records are balanced out - however wrong PAN was used & wrong waste analysis for P1 was used - change PAN to 100 & use
analysis - 8.8
1RR's by Harry Craig Shoaf-(994914) on corn & wheat IRR's are balanced out.
analysis:
3-2-2011 - P1=15.2 P3=9.5 P4=19.8 P5=24.9
1-20-2012-P1=8.8 P3=5.0 P4=12.6 P5=24.9 P2=5.3
Rainfall & freeboard are recorded.
NOTE: Cow Island FB=24" If lagoon transfer occurs (one time emergency) - keep inches to 10 or less added to Cl lagoon.
Page: 2

Permit; AWS890001 Owner - Facility: New Colony Farms LLC
Inspection Date: 05/23/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 890001
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
O Swine - Farrow to Wean
7,924
7,881
Swine - Feeder to Finish
2,736
1,891
Swine - Gilts
2,089
1,840
© Swine - Wean to Feeder
600
465
Total Design Capacity: 13,349
Total SSLW: 4,131,802
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
agoon
BOAR STUD
agoon
COW ISLAND
2.04
45.00
agoon
RECYCLE COW ISLAND
2.00
agoon
RECYCLE SAND HILL
2.04
agoon
SAND HILL.
2.00
aste Pit
BOAR STUD SOLIDS TRA
1 V05107
Waste Pit
NEWLAND BARN PITS
Waste Pit
WASH WATER CATCHMENT
07/01/07
Page: 3

Permit: AWS890001 Owner - Facility: New Colony Farms LLC Facility Number: 890001
Inspection Date: 05/23/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the Slate? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑ ■
Cl
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
❑ ■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑ ■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or ❑ ■ Cl ❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
11 _ Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS890001 Owner - Facility: New Colony Farms LLC
Inspection Date: 0512312012 inspection Type. Compliance inspection
Facility Number. 890001
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA
NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/studge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Cam, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
0011
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
ONO
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
0013
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS890001 Owner -Facility; New Colony Farms LLC Facility Number : 890001
Inspection Date: 05/23/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? Q
Lease Agreements? ❑
Other? ❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
Q
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
Q.
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑ 01111
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑ ■
Q ❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Page: 6

Permit: AWS890001 Owner -Facility: New Colony Farms LLC
Inspection Date: 05/23/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Records and Documents
27, Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Facility Number: 890001
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
28. Did the facility fail to property dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concem? If yes, contact a regional OSOO
Air Quality representative immediately.
30, Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field ❑
Lagoon I Storage Pond ❑
Other ❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 7

Type of Visit: 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: ® Routine O Complaint Q Follow-up Q Referral O Emergency Q Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: O County:
Farm Name: Owner Email:
Owner Name: /,/ /fPhone:
Mailing Address: lO,`7 /%� j`'164LY
Region:
Physical Address:
' Fac 1foContact: Phone: 2 26 - H-47
Onsite Represe9n al i% // Integrator: 14f4
Certified Operator: _ _ _ Certification Number:
Back-up Operator fth� Certification Number: 9q S
Location of Farm:�1 /� I
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Latitude:
�i 9'rSa-3�
Non -Layer
2Dry P,oultrty
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
Longitude:
"T`� -:`7
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
[:]Yes [a No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
[-]Yes
[-]No
❑ NA
❑ NE
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is theie,evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were the any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Yes YNo
o ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page I of 3 21412011 Continued

V.
Facility Number: jDate of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes
a. if yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes
Structure 1
Identifier: C
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 6
Observed Freeboard (in): 1-5--Z
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed andlor managed through a
❑ Yes
[(No ❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmZo
threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
S. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
YNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require [:]Yes [J No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? if yes, check the appropriate box below. dyes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): 1�/60
T-
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
Iv l Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
i;lo
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
j(No
❑ NA
0 NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
ff No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
E3"No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? if yes, check the appropriate box below.
VYes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
2 Waste Application Q Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall [:]Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
Inspections
❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
[:]Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
[:]Yes
[:]No
❑ NA
Ea�NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facili Number: - Date of Inspection:
-� ❑ o�
24. Did the facility fail to calm Yes No NA waste application equipment as required by the permit? /D//d NE
ds"C_
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check Boaq 0Yes UFNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below. Ss
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?_
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
❑ Yes
14'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
[-]Yes
[;�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes 0No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes [No
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? RrYes ❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or. any other .comments;;
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional. a es as necessary),
3 a/i0 - ll•
M 7, �7_ le9 Ll e.
Imp 5, 3 /0.�-
V� / -
-:9 - DI
Y5116 ; 1. � I• D
Reviewer/inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
l?/-g/aa/a
Phone:
Date:
/4/2011

0 Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 890001 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS8900D1 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliano Inspection _ Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: County: 1=11 Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 06/03/2010 Entry Time:09:30 AM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: New Colony Farms _ _ Owner Email: m'
Owner: New, CQ[oov-Farms LLC Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 347 Share Dr Cre2=11 NC 27926 _
Physical Address: &5N Phelps Rd Columbia NC 27925
Facility Status: E Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: 5mi _
Location of Farm:
Latitude:335"49'37" _ _ Longitude: 76'19'18"
6 miles SW Columbia NC, State Road 1105, Cross Landing Loop Road, South Bodwell Road, North
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other issues
Certified Operator: Sammy S Cox Operator Certification Number: 22376
Secondary OiC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Sammy S Cox Phone:
On -site representative Sammy S Cox Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis:
4-1-10 P1=13.6 p2=7.5
1-7-10 p3=9.9 p5=20.0
4-8-10 p4=10.5 p5=13.1
2-22-10 Cl = .66
3-2-10 p3= 11.1 W5 = .80
soil tested March 2010
Looks Good? Cafibration 2010 Sfudge survey 2009
Page: 1

r
Permit: AWS890001 Owner - Facility: New Colony Farms LLC
Facility Number: 890001
Inspection Date: 06/0312010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Q Swine -Farrow to Wean
7,924
7,921
Swine - Feeder to Finish
2,736
2,405
Swine - Gilts
2,089
2,080
Swine - Wean to Feeder
600
599
Total Design Capacity: 13,349
Total SSLW: 4,131,802
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon
BOAR STUD
agoon
COW ISLAND
2.04
75.00
agoon
RECYCLE COW ISLAND
2.00
agoon
RECYCLE SAND HILL
2.04
Lagoon
SAND HILL
2.00
40.00
Waste Pit
BOAR STUD SOLIDS TRA
11/05/07
Waste Pit
NEWLAND BARN PITS
aste Pit
WASH WATER CATCHMENT
07/01/07
Page: 2

Permit: AWS890001 Owner - Facility: New Colony Farms LLC Facility Number: 890001
Inspection Date: 06/03/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Im acts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ m ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes No NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le,l large trees, severe
❑ ■ ❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
Cl ■ ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑ ■ ❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑ ■ ❑
❑
improvement?
Waste_ Application
Yes No NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑ ■ ❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS890001 Owner - Facility: New Colony Farms LLC
Facility Number: 890001
Inspection Date: 06/03/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crap window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Com, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■
❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
■
❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■
❑ ❑
16. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■
❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■
❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

r
Permit: AWS890001 Owner - Facility: New Colony Farms LLC
Facility Number: 890001
Inspection Date: 06/03/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
Q
Transfers?
Q
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
Q
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
Q
Stocking?
Q
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ 01113
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Other Issues
Yes No NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ Q
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

U
Permit: AWS890001 Owner - Facility: New Colony Farms LLC
Inspection Date: 06/03/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Other Issues
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Facility Number: 890001
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
❑■❑❑
Page: 6

It
Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 890001 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS890001 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine _ „ County: Tyrrell Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 06/09/2009 Entry Time: 09:1 DAM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name. New Colony Farms Owner Email: bwilsonO)bmigmLqom_
Owner: New Colony Farms LLC _ Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 34Z Shore Dr Creswell NC 27928
Physical Address: 365 N Phelps Rd Columbia NC 27925 _
Facility Status: E Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Bmi
Location of Farm: Latitude: 335°49'37 _ Longitude: 76"19'18"
6 miles SW Columbia NC, State Road 1105, Cross Landing Loop Road, South Bodweli Road, North
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Sammy S Cox Operator Certification Number: 22376
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Sammy S Cox Phone:
On -site representative Sammy S Cox Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis:Pits 1 2 3 4 5
4-21-09 = 11.7 9.3 9.5 1.6 `12.1
3-10-09 = 6.3 7.9 8.3 13.6 10.7
soil tested Dec. 2008 by Double Dee Farms #13507
Looks Good!
Page: 1

Permit: AWS890001 Owner - Facility: New Colony Farms LLC Facility Number: 890001
Inspection Date: 06/09/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Q Swine - Farrow to Wean 7,924 10.090
Total Design Capacity: 7,924
Total SSLW: 3,431,092
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon
BOAR STUD
agoon
COW ISLAND
2.04
60.00
agoon
RECYCLE COW ISLAND
2.00
agoon
RECYCLE SAND HILL
2.04
agoon
SAND HILL
2.00
60.00
aste Pit
BOAR STUD SOLIDS TRA
11/05/07
�Iste Pit
NEWLAND BARN PITS
36.00
k1ste Pit
WASH WATER CATCHMENT
07101/07
Page: 2

0
Permit: AWS890001 Owner- Facility: New Colony Farms LLC Facility Number: 890001
Inspection Date: 06/09/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? 11000
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ m ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage +& Treatment
Yes No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (i.e./ large trees, severe
❑ MOO
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ 000
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ 01111
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below,
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

a
Permit: AWS890001 Owner - Facility: New Colony Farms LLC
Inspection Date: 06/09/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 890001
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil?
Q
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
Q
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ Q
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? Q ■ ❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? Q ■ Q Q
18. Is there a lack of property operating waste application equipment? Q ■ ❑ ❑
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
19, Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? Q ❑ ■ Q
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP? Q
Page: 4

c
Permit: AWS890001 Owner - Facility: New Colony Farms LLC
Facility Number: 890001
Inspection Date: 06/09/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ❑ ■ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ❑ ■ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)? Cl ❑ ■ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ❑ ■ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ ❑ ■ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ❑ ■ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ ❑ ■ ❑
Other Issues
Yes No NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWS890001 Owner - Facility: New Colony Farms LLC
Facility Number: 890001
Inspection Date: 06/09/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency sRuations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

V
Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency II��11
Facility Number: 0001 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS8900Q1 lJ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: RoWtine County: Tvrrell Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 06/28/2008 Entry Time: 09:35 AM__ Exit Time:
Farm Name: New Colony Farms
Owner: New ColoDy Farms Lt
Incident #:
Owner Email: bwilson aQbmiam,com
Mailing Address: 347 Shore Dr Creswell NC 27928
Phone:[phone]
Physical Address: 365 N Phelps Rd Columbia NC 27925
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Bmi
I
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°49'60" Longitude, 76°16'00" _
6 miles SW Columbia NC, State Road 1105, Cross Landing Loop Road, South Bodwell Road, North
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Sammy S Cox Operator Certification Number: 22376
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name retie Phone
24 hour contact name Sammy S Cox Phone:
On -site representative Sammy S Cox Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis all irrigation events matched their lagoon samples
4-17-08
1-29-08
10-22-07
soil test Feb 2007 with lime applied as needed
rainfall & freeboard recorded as required.
Jan. 15, 2008 began composting mortality.
Page: 1

Permit: AWS890001 Owner - Facility: New Colony Farms LLC Facility Number. 890001
Inspection Date: 06/28/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon
BOAR STUD
32.00
agoon
COW ISLAND
2.04
63.00
agoon
RECYCLE COW ISLAND
2.00
agoon
RECYCLE SAND HILL
2.04
agoon
SAND HILL
2.00
67.00
aste Pit
BOAR STUD SOLIDS TRA
11/05/07
aste Pit
NEWLAND BARN PITS
Ste Pit
WASH WATER CATCHMENT
07/01/07
68.00
Page: 2

l
Permit: AWS890001 Owner - Facility: New Colony Farms LLC Facility Number: 890001
Inspection Date: 06/28/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discs & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? 00110
Discharge originated at
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ ■
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑ ■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes No
NA
NE.
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
0,000
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑ ■
❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No
NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑ ■
❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS890001 Owner- Facility: New Colony Farms LLC Facility Number. 890001
Inspection Date: 06f28/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? ❑
Total P205? ❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type 1 Com, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan{CAWMP}?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
17_ Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Records and Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑■❑❑
L
Page: 4

Permit: AWS890001 Owner - Facility: New Colony Farms LLC
Facility Number: 890001
Inspection Date: 06/28/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?'
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)? ❑ ■
❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
25, Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
26, Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
27, Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Other Issues
Yes No
NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
29, Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWS890001 Owner - Facility: New Colony Farms LLC Facility Number: 890001
Inspection Date: 06/28/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? ❑ ■ n
32. Did Reviewerlinspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ m 0 Q
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
■ 0 11
Page: 6

l
0 Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 890001 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS890001 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Structure Evaluation Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Tyrrell Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 11/29C200T- _ Entry Time:10:00 AM__ Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: New Colony Farms _ Owner Email: bwilsonlglbmiaro.com
Owner: New Colony Farms LLC Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 347 Shore Dr Creswell NC 27928
Physical Address: 365 N Phelps Rd Columbia NC 27925
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Location of Farm:
Integrator: Bmi
Latitude:35"49'60" _ Longitude:76'16'00"
6 miles SW Columbia NC, State Road 1105, Cross Landing Loop Road, South Bodwell Road, North
Question Areas:
Waste Collection & Treatment Other Issues
Certified Operator: Sammy S Cox
Secondary OIC(s):
Operator Certification Number: 22376
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Sammy S Cox
Phone:
On -site representative Larry Dietz Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
This was a site visit to tour the building pre -certification. The application for the Certification of Installation of new building - South
Breeding/Gestation was faxed to WaRO on Dec. 3, 2007 at 9:47am.
Building is very nice with the deep pit system in place as shown in the Plan View Platt that was attached to Plan Certification.
Page: 1

a
Permit: AWS890001 Owner - Facility: New Colony Farms LLC Facility Number: 890001
Inspection Date: 11/29/2007 Inspection Type: Structure Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
Lagoon
BOAR STUD
goon
COW ISLAND
2.04
goon
RECYCLE COW ISLAND
2.00
goon
RECYCLE SAND HILL
2.04
goon
SAND HILL
2.00
aste Pit
NEWLAND BARN PITS
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes No
NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
0000
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe
❑ ■
❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■
❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑ ■
❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑ ■
❑ ❑
improvement?
Other Issues
Yes No
NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
000
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those
❑ ■
❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed nominal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss reviewfinspection with on -site representative?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Page: 2

13
a
0 Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 890001 Facility Status: Active _ Permit: NCA289OQ1 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Comoliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: IX ell Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 1013012006 Entry Time:10:15 AM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Newlands Farm Owner Email: bwilson0bmiarp,com
Owner: New Cglonyr LLC Phone:[phone]
Mailing Address: 347 Shore Dr Creswell NC 27928
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: -
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°49'60" Longitude: 76°16'00"
6 miles SW Columbia NC, State Road 1105, Cross Landing Loop Road, South Bodwell Road, North
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other issues
Certified Operator: Sammy S Cox Operator Certification Number: 22376
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On -site representative Sammy Cox Phone:
24 hour contact name Sammy Cox Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: NCA289001 Owner - Facility: New Colony Farms LLC Facility Number: 890001
Inspection Date: 10/30/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Waste analyses:
Date: 8 9 10
11
12
13
14
15
16 17 SH Cl
Al
1 0-20 4.1 4.5
5.4
1.9
4.7
5.7
3.2
6.4 5.2 4.8
2.7
2.7
4.5
7-24 2.6 3.1
4.1
3.2
5.0
4.3
5.6
2.9 2.7 3.9
1.9
3.8
6.5
4-12 3.1 6.8
3.5
8.9
4.8
3.2
4.7
7.2 7.2 6.0
3.3
2.9
1.6
1-27 4.8 2.9
4.2
4.7
4.7
3.5
4.6
5.1 4.0 4.2
1.7
3.0
0.49
IRR records are complete and balanced out.
2995 soil samples were on hand and 2006 samples will be completed soon
Looks good!
Page: 2

Permit: NCA289001 Owner - Facility: New Colony Farms LLC
Facility t4umber : 890001
Inspection Date: 1013012006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Structures
Type
Identifier
Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon
001
36.00
agoon
COW ISLAND
40.00
agoon
SAND HILL
68M
Page: 3

Permit: NCA289001 owner - Facility: New Colony Farms LLC Facility Number : 890001
Inspection Date: 10/30/2006 inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? 1101111
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
❑
■ ❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■ ❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
Cl
■ ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■ ❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■ Cl
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■ ❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■ Cl
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: NCA289001 owner- Facility: New Colony Farms LLC
Facility Number: 890001
Inspection Date: 10/30/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Com, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Other
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
17, Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
1 B. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? ONOO
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP? ❑
Page: 5

permit: NCA289001 Owner - Facility: New Colony Farms LLC
Facility Number: 890001
Inspection Date: 10/30/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No NA
NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after> 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
Cl
Stocking?
Q
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
O
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? ❑ ■ ❑
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
V.. Nd NA
NF
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fall to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air 0000
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 6

e
Permit: NCA289001 Owner- Facility: New Colony Farms LLC
facility Number:
890001
Inspection Date: 1013012006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues
Yes No
NA
NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWO of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑ M
❑
Q
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
0 0
❑
Q
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ ■
❑
11
Page: 7

0 Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency ff--11l
Facility Number: L
90001 Facility Status: Active Permit: NCA289001 Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Tyrrell Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 10/30/2006 Entry Time: 10:15 AM _ Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: N wl nds Farm Owner Email: bwilsonnu bmioro.com
Owner: New Colony Farms LLC Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 347 Shorp,. Dr Creswell NC 27928
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°49'60" Longitude: 76°16'00"
6 miles SW Columbia NC, State Road 1105, Cross Landing Loop Road, South Bodwell Road, North
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Sammy S Cox Operator Certification Number: 22376
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On -site representative Sammy Cox Phone:
24 hour contact name Sammy Cox Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

.Permit: NCA289001 Owner - Facility: New Colony Farms LLC Facility Number: 890001
Inspection Date: 10/30/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Waste analyses:
Date: 8 9 10
11
12
13
14
15
16 17 Sly Cl
Al
10-20 4.1 4.5
5.4
1.9
4.7
5.7
3.2
6.4 5.2 4.8
2.7
2.7
4.5
7-24 2.6 3.1
4.1
3.2
5.0
4.3
5.6
2.9 2.7 3.9
1.9
3.8
6.5
4-12 3A 6.8
3.5
8.9
4.8
3.2
4.7
7.2 7.2 6.0
3.3
2.9
1.6
1-27 4.8 2.9
4.2
4.7
4.7
3.5
4.6
5.1 4.0 4.2
1.7
3.0
0.49
IRR records are -complete and balanced out.
2995 soil samples were on hand and 2006 samples will be completed soon.
Looks good!
Page: 2

Permit: NCA289001 Owner - Facility: New Colony Farms LLC
Facility Number: 890001
Inspection Date: 10/30/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon
001
36.00
agoon
COW ISLAND
40.00
agoon
SAND HILL
68.00
Page: 3

Permit: NCA289001 Owner - Facility: New Colony Farms LLC
Facility Number. 890001
Inspection Date: 10130/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? 0 ■ O Q
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field
Other
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
D
■
Q
0
Z Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
Q
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
El
■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
0
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
0
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
Q
■
Q
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
n
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
Cl
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
Q
■
❑
0
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
Hydraulic Overload?
Q
Frozen Ground?
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: NCA289001 Owner - Facility: New Colony Farms LLC
Facility Number: 890001
Inspection Date: 10/30/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Com,
Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Other
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■
❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑
■
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■
❑
❑
1B. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
20, Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 5

Permit: NCA289001 Owner- Facility: New Colony Farms LLC Facility Number: 890001
Inspection date: 10/30/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Other? Cl
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ■ Q ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
11
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
■
❑
❑
24, Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
Q
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
�..
❑
'V--
■
U -
❑
uA
❑
ur-
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 6

Permit: NCA289001 Owner - Facility: New Colony Farms LLC Facility Number. 890001
Inspection Date: 10130/2006 inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Yam Mn Ne MF
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewerlinspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Page: 7

(Type of Visit 0 Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit ® Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number g9 1 Date of Visit: 6/il/?DD4 Time: 1D:14
O Not Operational O Below Threshold
N Permitted 0 Certified © Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold : .........................
Farm Name: NgulaiadA.Eaxtlx.................................................. ........................... County: In ill............................................... l' ARO........
Owner Name: ................................................... l!tim.CalaAy.F.axxU5,.LLC.................. - Phone No:a52}.29XA1U....................................... I................
MailingAddress: 3.47..5ltQrr,.l?Kiyc................................................................................... cra.)UR NC............................---.--........................ Z.7928 .............
Facility Contact: .............................................................................. Title:.......................... Phone No:
OnsiteRepresentative:................................................................................... ..................... Integrator:N 1x..GAltlAy.. .....................................
Certified Operator:Saxemy..,S ............................... C.RX.............................---.................... Operator Certification Numher: 7,z3,7.6.............................
Location of Farm:
S miles SW Columbia NC, State Road 1105, Cross Landing Loop Road, South Bodwell Road, North +
,r
N Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 1 .3:)• 49 . 60 46 Longitude 1 76 ' 15 60 °
Design Current
Swine Canacitv Ponulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
N Farrow to Wean
8400
8735
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
N Gilts
3138'
2505
❑ Boars
60
59
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Po pulation
❑ Layer I I❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer I I ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 11,598
Total SSLW 4,131,90Q
Number of Lagoons 4
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes N No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-inade? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) El Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gallmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes N No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes N No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Stnlcture 6
Identifier: ........ Sand.Hill.................. Co.w.Isi..............................
Freeboard (inches): 64 70 35 34 65
12112103 Continued

Facility Number: 89-1 Date of Inspection 6/11/2004
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (iel trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
-immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste ApplicatiOts
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
12. Crop type Corn, Soybeans, Wheat
f'
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes N No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes [:]No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? . ❑ Yes N No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes N No
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes N No
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes N No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ Yes N No
Air Quality representative immediately. _
comments (reter to„question FF) .-.L' Xpiain_any Y L{ J ans}VerS anQ/or any,. recommennatlons or;^any Oiner comments , - -
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional -,pages as nccessary) [} Field Copy 0 Futal Notes
Waste 4/26/04 with Unit (bldg) #8 = 4.8 lbs N, #9 = 4.9, #10 = 5.1, #11 = 4.7, #12 = 5.I, #13 = 3.7, #14 = 5.3, #15 = 4.5,
#16=4.6,#17=4.4,AI=4.5,SH=3.6,CI=3.9&wash rack =0.06
Waste 2/17/04 with Unit #8 = 3.4, #9 = 5.0, #10 = 5.2, #11 = 3.9, #12 = 4. 1, #13 =5A#14=5.0.#15=5.1,#16=4.7,
#17=3.6, AI= 1.4, SH=2.4, CI=2.0, WR=0.12.
Waste 918/03withUnit#8=4.8,#9=2.6,#10=2.6,#11=2.7,#12=4.0,#13=4.8,#14=4.5,#15=6.2,#16=4.6,
#17=2.9,AI=1.2,CI=1.8,SH=2.5,WR=0.11.
s for Cut BT-1 & BT-4 (A.R. Spears) Archie Spear (CI1-34 & SH 35-50) 50 samples total, report #27092, with up to 2.1 Tlac lime
Cu-Zn levels within guidelines.
s 1129/04 for N6-114-26 with no lime required and Cu-Zn levels within guideline limits (report #15443).
s 1/23/04 for P1 no lime required and Cu-Zn levels adequate. (No waste has been applied to P-1 and P-2 except for a one
application with honeywagon on field 25 on P-2.)
Reviewer/Inspector Name Scott Yinson Entered'by: P6r' da'Peaden'-
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 7 I
12112103 Continued
`7

lti
Fa8ility Number: 89-1 Date of Inspection 6/11/2004
.' Required Records & Documents
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
N No
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
N No
23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
N No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
N No
25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
N No
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
N No
27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?]
Yes
N No
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
N No
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
N No
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
® Yes
❑ No
31. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment?
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Stocking Form [:]Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfall ❑ Inspection After I" Rain
❑ Yes N No -
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
13 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
.: _ :._,.......... ,,._ s.. _ _.
s for N-5 and N-6 report ## 13301 by Double Dee Farms, Inc. with some areas requiring lime. For the 26 fields sampled 232
pies were submitted. Sammy Cox took additional samples to cover fields N-6(6-13) on 5/24/04 on report #--029 for New Colony
ns. Mr. Cox's 5/24/04 soils report also covers BT3(1-35) and N1(1-11) and Pl-(21-30)
P2(2-45) and BT2(1-10) and N7(8-22) and N6(6-13) with up to 2.7 T/ac lime required on one field and Cu-Zn levels OK.
p an eye on N6-8 with a Zn-I of 1466.
s for N-5 and N-6
or the stocking record of sows there is an average overstocking for 1104 = 9,081 sows; 2104 = 8,740 sows; 3104 = 8,757 sows;
/04 9,752 sows; 5104 = 8,749 sows. Discuss this with Bill Wilson and have him call me. This is an overstocking of roughly
50 sows with the permit Limit annual average of 8,400 sows.
farm is working with Rufus Croom on the PLAT being run for all the fields. Mr. Cox will have to still take about 80 deep soil
ales to finish PLAT.
Cox is planning to perform his sludge survey within the next couple of weeks (I will send a sludge survey form to help guide you
ugh this process).
12112103

�0� WATF94 Mi�ael F. Easley. Governor ! .
Will = G. Ross. Jr„ Secretary
(. Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
y Division of Water Quality
O -C
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of water Quality
To: Producers
NPDES Permit Holder
From: Scott Vinson
Environments Engineer
Washington Regional Office
Subject: Animal Compliance Routine Inspection
Year 2004
Enclosed please find a copy or copies of the Compliance Site Inspection(s) (as viewed in DWQ database) conducted
at the referenced facility by the Division of Water Quality from the Washington Regional Office. Please read this
inspection and keep with all other documents pertaining to your animal operation for future inspections.
In general, these inspections included verifying that: (I) the farm has a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
(CAWMP); (2) the farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 13 NCAC 2H.02I7, Senate Bill 1217, and
the Certified Animal Waste ManagementPlan; 3 the farm o eratio is waste rn cement system is beiq operated
properly under the direction of a Certified Operator, (4) the required records are being kept, (5) there are no signs of
seepage, erosion, and/or runoff.
As a reminder, please note the following which are conditions of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan and the
general NPDES permit; therefore, these items must be implemented:
(a The Animal Facility Annual Certification Form must be completed every year and submitted to the Division of
Water Quality in Raleigh as well as the Regional Office.by March 1. Please be reminded that the information for
the "Annual Certification Form" is based on a calendar year.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality North Carolina DiNision of Water Quality
Non -Discharge Section Washington Regional Office
Non -Discharge Compliance/Enforcement Unit Nan -Discharge Section
1617 Mail Service Center Attu : Scott Vinson
_ Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 943 Washington Square Mall
Washington; NC 27889 - • -
(p A survey of the sludge accumulation in all lagoons is required annually. Contact your local extension office for
guidance on performing and recording the sludge accumulation survey.
5p All waste application equipment must be tested and calibrated at least once per year. The results must be
documented on forms provided by, or approved by, the Division.
(p The Permittee must maintain monthly stocking records for the facility and make the records available for review
by the Department and EPA.
(p Precipitation events must be monitored and recorded by type (rain, snow. etc.) and amount
(p The maximum waste level in lagoonststorage ponds shall not exceed that specified in the CAWMP (lagoon
design). At a minimum, maximum waste level for waste for lagoons/sto—rage ponds must not exceed the level that
provides adequate storage to contain 25 year, 24 hour storm event plus an additional foot of structural freeboard.
(p An analysis of the liquid animal waste from the lagoon shall be conducted as close to the time of application as
practical and at least within 60 days (before or after) of the date of application. This analysis shall include the
following parameters: Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Zinc and Copper.
(p Soil analysis is required annually.
9 The following records are required: off -site solids removal, maintenance, repair, rain fall, freeboard, animal
stocking and mortality, past inspections, applied commercial fertilizer, waste application equipment calibration,
sludge survey, wastetsoiI analysis and land irrigation records. These records should be maintained by the facility
owner/manager in chronological and legible form for a minimum of three (3)years.
(n Land application rates shall be in accordance with the CAWMP. In no case- shall land application rates exceed the
Plant Available Nitro?en (PAN) rate for the receiving crop or result in runoff during any given application.
943 Washington Square Mall Washington, NC 27889 252-946-6481 (Telephone) 252-945-9215 (Fax)

0� \N A.rF
A Michael F. Easley
Governor
vJ WiHlam G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
7 Department of Environment and Natural Resources
=` KerrT. Stevens
Division of Water Quality
To: Producer
From: Scott Vinson
Environmental eer
Washington Regional Office
Subject: Animal Compliance Inspection
Year 2003
Enclosed please find a copy of the Compliance Site Inspection (as viewed in the DWQ database) conducted at the referenced
facility by the Division of Water Quality from the Washington Regional Office. Please read this inspection and keep it
with all other documents pertaining to your animal operation for future inspections.
In general, these inspections included verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP);
(2) the farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC 2H.0217, Senate Bill 1217, and the Certified Animal
Waste Management Plan; (3) the farm operation's waste management systemm is being operated properly under the direction of a
Certified Operator, (4) the required records are being kept, and (5) there are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or runoff.
As a reminder, please note the following comments, which are conditions of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan and
the General Permit; thereforethese items must be implemented:
cp The maximum waste level in iagoons/storage ponds shall not exceed that specified in the CAWNT At a minimurm
maximum waste level for waste for lagoons/storage ponds must not exceed the level that provides adequate storage to
contain 25 year, 24 hour storm event plus an additional foot of structural freeboard
(p An analysis of the liquid animal waste from the lagoon shall be conducted as close to the time of application as practical and
at least within 60 days (before or after) of the date of application. This analysis shall include the following parameters:
Nitrogen Phosphorus, Zinc and Copper.
(p Soil analysis is required annually. Lime is to be applied to each receiving crop as recommended by the soil analysis.
cp The following records are required: off -site solids removal, maintenance, repair, waste/soil analysis and land irrigation
records. These records should be mairtauted by the facility owner/manager in chronological and legible form for a
mirrimum of three years.
cp Land application rates shall be in accordance with the CAWMP. In no ease shall land application rates exceed the Plant
Available Nitrogen TAhD rate for the receiving crop or result in nmoff during My given aWhcation.
T All grassed waterways shall have a stable outlet with adequate capacity to prevent ponding or flooding damages. The outlet
can be another vegetated channel, an earth ditch, stabilization stru+euure, or other suitable outlets.
y It is suggested. not a ppWA ecnent, to keep crop yield information for future use to update your waste management plan.
You will need three years of crop yield data before your plan can be updated
cQ The OIC has the duties to ensure that waste is applied in accordance with the CAWMP and General Permit by properly
managing, supervising and documenting daily operation and maintenance. The OIC also has the responsibility to certify
monitoring and reporting information. The failure of an OIC to perform his/her duties can result in a letter of reprimand
suspension, of certification, or revocation of certificates.
For your information, any swine facility that has a discharge to surface waters of the State will have to apply for a National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit with the Division of Water Quality, effective January 1, 2001.
Thank you for your assistance and cooperation during the inspection. If you have any questions, please contact meat 252-946-
6481, exL 208 or your Technical Specialist.
Cc: WaRO Files
SAV Files
943 Washington Square Mall Washington, NC 27889 252-946-6481 (Telephone) 252.946-9215 (Fax)

IType of Visit - © Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit *Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
- . Date of i0t: t18lt17/20Q3 Time: 11 00
Facilit, Nunrb::r 89 1
5 fat o3 erational Q Below Threslfolc#
Permitted Certified Conditionally Certified Registered Date List Operated or Above Threshold: ............. _.
FarmName.&Wl=d3f.FArM................................�`oul�t+: ............................................................ yXRV..............................................
Owner Name: New.CAvay..F.aax..LLC............. —... Phone ENo:(252).7.914123.......................................................
Mailhig r ddress: 3i1� SIEA .DI e. ..........................................................._.. IC=xYf LNIC.................................................W..._. 17928.............
ha dlity Cont:t.ei: Bill.�C]1110ja ........................................................Title. AUDAM.............................................. Plhwi4e Nu: ... ........ »......... ..................................................
1 ii5titi: 1?L'l)!'t:9t:ti'ialilti'€': ,7 ]'..�,Qx.................... �Ykf�',ta"lt(Y!'� $1[llJ1'�1l:Qi�t1.♦ 1lQR..JI.ca.C..............
-Ccetilieal DiieratOr: 8apip0.y, a.. ........................... Cats..................................................... i,'lie iber!22J7.6.............................
1-Aleatical of Farm -
miles SW Columbia NC, State Road 1105, Cross Landing Loop Road, South Bodwell Road, North
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Lail u6s - _ 35 " 49 1, 60 '' Liam>uxkvtdie 76 µ 55� — 60 -
Design Current
Swine Canacitv Poloulation
® Wean to Feeder
r44606-
0
❑ Feeder to Finish
® Farrow to Wean
0
8396
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
Gilts
'f 3$
3016
❑ Boars
a-1-W-
-50 -
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacitv Population
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer JO Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 29,650
Total SSLW .. 4,132,000
y Number of Lagoons 4 10 Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps 10 No Liquid Waste Management System
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: 0 Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed. Nvas the conveyance wau-made?
b. II'discharge is okerv;; i, did it reach Water of flu; Stale' (IF}v , liolif.v DWQ)
c. If discharee is observed- chat i.� the vstiaiated Moir in gal/niin'?
d. Den:; discharge bypass it lagoon system'� E,It've;. umik DVVrQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? f- Spillway
-sultoare i Stnt;--wn: _ SI: IE�ttrt' J rti iiti tii t'i -: titraislii_
:rs�nt�tr-_:•'.......SaEtdy..Hill........ ....... Ca�:.Island....... .......AaLab.�€]................. M.Lah.#2........ ....................................
°rLe,r}ari iu�.iEc: M50. ..48.. ...3.4. ..?Z..
Yes 9No
❑ Yes )D No
i=i Yes ❑ No
Yes
?
i = No
❑ Yes
tom; No
[j Yes
No
Yes
j :`: No
.�...Tntcb;.�.aiad......
32..

05103101
Facility Number. 89 ~ 1
Date of Inspection 08/07/2003
c oral rues
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintcnance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctums lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Wh li� Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type Corn, Soybeans, Wheat Potatoes Cotton
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
68egy&aImd Records & I)tis•ements+.
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Yes 9 No
E] Yes Et No
0 Yes F& No
❑ Yes N' No
0 Yes rZ No
0 Yes 0 No
El Yes 9 No
Ef Yes E_' No
❑ Yes L! No
CI Yes -U No
L J Yes [I No
] Yes 21 No
0 Yes 'E No
Ej Yes . No
_''• Yes No
[] Yes ! No
F1 Yes tom! No
01 Yes jg No .
i__i Yes ONo
0 Yes j No
!—;
_, Yes No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? !! =.i Yes 121 No
1® No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments (refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary): Field Copy n Final Notes
Waste 5/5/03 with Buildings #8-4.9, #9-3.7, 410-2.9, #11-2.1, #12-4.6, #13-6.0, #14-4.0, #15-1.6, #16-1.4, #17-5.7 & SH-2.9,
1-2.6_ AI-2.1 & Wash Rack-0.06.
Waste 2/11/03 with Buildings #8-5.6, #9-7.4, #10-5.8, #11-4.4, #12-6.9, #13-9.4, #14-4.4, #15-7.3, #16-2.7, #17-7.7 & SH-3.9,
[-2.8. AI-4.2 & Wash Rack-0.10
Reviewer/Impector Name Scott Vinson ,
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date: q ,z /o_3

05103101 ContWued • `-
Facility Number: 89-1 Date of Lrspectiort O8/07/2003
t"3dr)r bomes
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge attor below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
0 Yes LJ No
C1 Yes No
Yes No
Yes No
0 Yes ® No
(l Yes ® No
El Yes 0 No
Cuts on Block BT4: Cuts --9-12 are partially corn and part planted in soybeans. Mr. Spear plowed up com after planting and replaces
ith soybeans because corn was doing poorly. Cuts 7&8 were entirely plowed up and the corn was replaced with beans. When
dculatmg PAN on soybeans in these cuts make sure to cary over what Nitrogen you first applied for corn and deduct it from the PAN
d. on the bean crop. No further waste applications will be made on these cuts. IRR2 forms are filled out but a couple are not balanced
.1. No overapplication noted. Please have the third party farmers fill out the commercial fertilizer applications to help determine
7erall PAN balance. On 2002 crop Sammy Cox gave copies of the 1RR2 forms to the third party farmers so that they could fill out the
auks stating how much commercial fertilizer was applied to the crops. According to records, no commercial fertilzer was applied by
Soil analysis for cuts B1-12 & B1- 13 for two cuts used for irrigation of Truckwash lagoon, dated 3/25/03 with no lime required.
Soils dated i OCl/02 with some samples required more than 1 T/ac lime. Landowners verify, with the four different farmers that
)propriate liming of fields are completed. (Total of 108 samples taken for Blocks N6 & N5.)
dditional soil samples were done by Archie Ray Spruill (farmer) dated 3/10/03 with only 2 samples out of 41 samples having 1 T/ac
me required on Block BT-1
19) Farm has new gauged markers installed back in October, 2002 for all four lagoons. Missing freeboard records from October 4.
2002 through December 20, 2002, Mr. Cox did record levels b/w Oct -Dec. but thinks they may be on individual sheets on file, he will
then to records.
freeboard levels 8-1-03 with SH=53", CI=48", AI #1=40". AI #2=26" & WR= 34".
The Truckwash lagoon was permitted on May 28, 2003. Perrnit No. WQ 0012892.
Wilson, in Indiana, [phone]

' �OF-WATF,a
P7
:r
3 �
To: Producer
Prom: Scott Vinson
Eavironmental
Washington Regional Office
Subject: Animal Compliance Inspection
Year 2003
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Kerr T. Stevens
Division of Water Quality
Enclosed please find a copy of the Compliance Site inspection (as viewed in the DWQ database) conducted at the referenced
facility by the Division of Water Quality from the Washington Regional Office. Please read this inspection and keep it
with all other documents pertaining to your animal operation for future inspections
In general, these inspections includedvcdfying that: (1) the farm has a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP);
(2) the farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC 2H.0217, Senate Bill 1217, and the Certified Animal
Waste Management Plan; (3) the iarin operation's waste management system is being operated properly under the direction of a
Certified Operator, (4) the required records are being kept; and (5) there are no signs of seepage, erosion, andlor nwoff.
As a reminder, please note the following comments, which are conditions of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan and
the General Permit; therefore, these items must be implemented:-
(p The maximum waste level in lagoons/storage ponds shall not exceed that specified in the CAWMP. At a minimum,
maximum waste level for waste for lagoonststorage ponds must not exceed the level that provides adequate storage to
contain 25 year, 24 hour storm event plus an additional foot of structural freeboard
T An analysis of the liquid animal waste from the lagoon shall be conducted as close to the time of application as practical and
at least within 60 days (before or after) of the date of application. This analysis shall include the following parameters:
Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Zinc and Copper.
(p Soil analysis is required annually. Lime is to be applied to each receiving crop as recommended by the soil analysis.
(p The following records are required: off -site solids removal, maintenance. repair, waste/sod analysis and land irrigation
records. These records should be maintained by the facility owner/manager in chronological and legible form for a
mininmm of three years.
<p Land application rates shall be in accordance with the CAWMP, In no case sW land application rates exceed the Plant
Available Nitrogen (PAN) rate for the receiving cror) or result in numoff during anv given wulication.
T All grassed waterways shall have a stable outlet with adequate rapacity to prevent ponding or flooding damages. The outlet
can be another vegetated charnel, an earth ditch, stabilization structure, or other suitable outlets.
(p It is suggested, not a reuuireme� to keep crop yield information for future use to update your waste management plan.
You will need three years of crop yield data before your plan can be updated-
(p The OIC has the duties to ensure that waste is applied in accordance with the CAWMP and General Permit by properly
managing, supervising, and documenting daily operation and maintenance. The OIC also has the responsibility to certify
monitoring and reporting information. The failure of an OIC to perform his/her duties can result in a letter of reprimand,
suspension, of certification, or revocation of certificates.
For your information, any swine facility that has a discharge to surface waters of the State will have to apply for a National
Pollu ant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit with the Division of Water Quality, effective January 1, 2001.
Thank you for your assistance and cooperation during the inspection. If you have any questions, please contact me at 252-946-
6481, ext. 208 or your Technical Specialist.
Cc: WaRO Files
SAV Files
943 Washington Square Mall Washington, NC 27889 252-946-6481 (Telephone) 252-946r9215 (Fax)

of Visit © Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O lagoon Evaluation
for Visit ©Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: tl$/07l2003 i:tTie: 11:411
Facility Number- 89 1
ere#i%na! Below Threshold of O ft Permitted a Certified Conditionally Certified Registered hate Last Operated or Above Threshold. .............. »...
ouiif
rB arm Name. Mw ald&NAra1............................_.............. _............................................... .. • yrre..................................................
Owner N' uiiC: �T�tti C� . E ............ ............................ .Qy. a�r�ls,.LT.��................... Pl;4isa3i r4o: (2S,2)37J.-..4U3... ... ....................._._...........w........
=i.ailhig Addr•ex—: 42 �u .DztY� ............................................................................ C.CaWeli.NC ............................. ... - ..... ..... 179.21.............
Faciiity colltact: Blll.M189lll....................................................... Tlfle: Atawgcr ............................................ Flttr►ie Ntl.............7:.......$��....,............
onslte UepreselutatlV`e, J2 Y.CQ.X ................................................................................. 111U-IR01 t011-- B1WLP udo11..LLC
a:cl 17iwSAMM.5............................. Cox ........ ........... ........ «...................... $Diiei•_tto3' Number: 2Z3.7u................. ..........
iL..{9('i3tIV1� its �i�j i'33f:
6 miles SW Columbia NC, State Road 1105, Cross Leading Loop Road, South Bodweil Road, Narth t A.
_F
® Swine ❑Poultry [ICaitEe ❑Horse �arta.l�;.- _ 35 ' ` 49 - 60 Lola �:�r 76 15�• a 60�
Design Current
Swine ranacity Pnnulatian
® Wean to Feeder
R699-
0
❑ Feeder to Finish
!® Farrow to Wean
Woo
8396
€❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
Gilts
3139
3016
Design Current �^ Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer I I❑Non-Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 29,650
Total SSLW- 4,132,000
Number of Lagoons 4 l❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑^Lags„m Area ] Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Mananement 5vstem
-i��:4:�le?:}%k .,:,'.. €3�vi�".ate._- G.E�±.grJ,�•o-•_
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? "i Yes ma's No
Discharge originated at: Ei- Lagoon C]Spray Field 0 Other
a. If discharge is observed.. %vas the: convevanc;e Man-made'? 0 Yes 0 No
b. Ifdisoharge is obscl%id, did it reach Water of the Stale? ilk,Qs: costly%- 17WQ) �13Yes ❑ No
c. if discharge is observvd- what is the estiura#ed flow in gillmiU9
d. Doi; discharge b%pass a hgooa cyst in? trotifi IDWQ) 0 Yes E No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? [ Yes 9 No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes 9 No
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? a Spillway Yes (;> No
�irllCf'eilt l �trll lFEf!' _ Sinlunirc F-llitli6
........Ai.Lah.#2........ Trttck.�ilash .....
i r� art a r•�r: ........ Sand.XHilL....... .......Caw.Islartd.............Az�..ab..�l................................................
i3. c?,oard l irlv..�.... :.54.......... ............... 4.8............... ..3..4............... ............... 2.5................ ...32..

05103101
Facility Number- 84-1
!).-tie Of 111aneetion 08f07/2003
[:onanuea
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type Corn, Soybeans, Wheat Potatoes Cotton
i] Yes N No
[� Yes No
Yes No
© Yes No
,I Yes No
L Yes 9 No
Yes R No
13. Do the'receivWg crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? r Yes o-� No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes E? No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes u No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? 0 Yes n No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? El Yes E.<] No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
�10 Yes
?e! No
Required Records ti Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
Yes .
No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
101 Yes
N No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
0 Yes
ittj No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
1 Yes
No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
[ Yes
�7, j No .
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, fi-eeboard problems, over application)
Lj Yes
FQ No
23, Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
Yes
9 No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
_i Yes
U- No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
!! w Yes
fx:? No
k ® No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary): ! Field Copy i "Final Notes
* Waste 5/5/03 with Buildings #8-4.9, #9-3.7, #10-2.9, 411-2.1, #124.6, #13-6.0, 414-4.0, #15-1.6, #16-1.4, #17-5.7 & SH-2.9,
CI-2.6, AI-2.1 & Wash Rack-0.06.
Waste 2/11103 with Buildings #8-5.6, #9-7.4, #10-5.8, #11-4.4, #12-6.9, #13-9.4. #14-4.4, #15-7.3, #16-2.7, #17-7.7 & SH-3.9,
1-2.8. AI-4.2 & Wash Rack-0.10
Reviewer/Inspector Name Scott Vinson _f..
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: ; ;x � Date: 7/ J��

05103101 Co> rued
Faeility Number. 89-1 1 Date of Inspection 08/07/2003
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
El Yes [,j No
Yes 9 No
❑ Yes 9 No
0 Yes g No
El Yes N No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Cuts on Block BT-4: Cuts --9-12 are partially corn and part planted in soybeans. Mr. Spear plowed up corn after planting and replaces
ith soybeans because coin was doing poorly. Cuts 7&8 were entirely plowed up and the corn was replaced with beans. When
dculating PAN on soybeans in these cuts make sure to cary over what Nitrogen you first applied for corn and deduct it from the PAN
il. on the bean crop. No further waste applications will be made on these cuts. I11 2 forms are filled out but a couple are not balanced
,t. No overapplication noted. Please have the third party farmers fill out the commercial fertilizer applications to help determine
ierall PAN balance. On 2002 crop Sammy Cox gave copies of the MR2 forms to the third party farmers so that they could fill out the
anks stating how much commercial fertilizer was applied to the crops. According to records, no commercial fertilzer was applied by
J* Soil analysis for cuts B I -12 & B I-13 fur two cuts used for irrigation of Truckwash lagoon, dated 3/25/03 with no lime required.
* Soils dated 1017102 with some samples required more than 1 T/ac lime. Landowners verify with the four different farmers that
appropriate liming of fields are completed. (Total of 108 samples taken for Blocks N6 & N5.)
Additional soil samples were done by Archie Ray Spruill (farmer) dated 3/10/03 with only 2 samples out of 41 samples having 1 T/ac
lime required on Block BT-1
'9)
Farm has new gauged markers installed back in October, 2002 for all four lagoons.- Missing freeboard records from -October 4:
2002 through December 20, 2002. Mr. Cox did record levels b/w Oct -Dec. but thinks they may be on individual sheets on file, he will
add then to records.
freeboard levels 8-1-03 with SH=53", CI=48", AI #1=40", AI #2=26" & WR= 34".
The Truckwash lagoon was permitted on May 28, 2003. Permit No. WQ 0012892.
Wilson, in Indiana, [phone]

Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection © Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation .
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 89 1 Date of Visit: 12-1-2002 'rime: 935
0 Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
® Permitted (3 Certified 0 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: NmInds.l;arm.............................................................. )'. ....... County: IYErAL-------•--------------•--•--•-..... AW......
Owner Name: •-------- --- - --- - - - N r}x_CnLQuy_L'jj:g1s, LLC----.---- Phone No:(Z5?179-1=41?,.�------------------.- - - --
Mailing Address: 3.9.T..S>kare..>?r.ixC ........................... ... . CreswM.NC........................................................... Z79.28..............
Facility Contact: ........................................................... Title: ....................................... Phone No:
Onsite Representative: @@ �4GC1IueJILt sQst141L------------------------.------ Integrator:.------------------------------------------•
Certified Operator: SAmmy..S.............................. Gst'X ........................................ ............. Operator Certification Number: 2M.7.6.................
...........
Location of Farm:
miles SW Columbia NC, State Road 1105, Cross Landing Loop Road, South Bodwell Road, North
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle []Horse Latitude F 35 • 49F 60 u Longitude 7b • 15 60 u
Design
Current•
Design Current
Design Current
Ca aci-
P,o elation
Poultry Ca aci. P,o elation C►attle
C_a acit rip elation
Feeder 21600
rEFeeder
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
Finish
f
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
o Wean 8000
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
k „� s Total Desi n. Ca aci
"" l , P tY
�''' �C✓S
29,650
❑ Boars 50
-LAB E - .y
' sTiotal
4,132 000
Number of Lagoons
4�. ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
11
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system`? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge.
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Stricture 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes []No
❑ Yes []No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure 6
Identifier:--•--•--•--•-----•--•--------------------------------- .......
Freeboard (inches):
05103101
Continued

Facility Number: 89-1 Date of Inspection 12-1-2 002
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Pen -nit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
10 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
omm nt qu flop Rxp aim an} answers and or an recommendations or an, ottieriltiommen
s drawing of acil't} to better ezplain situations. use additional pages as necessary): ❑Field Copy ❑Final Notes
Facility is operating under an individual permit and not subject to a routine operation review at this time.
Reviewer/Inspector Name iPat Hooper
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
05103101
Continued

Faeility Number: 89-1 Date of Inspection 12-1-2002
Odor Issues
26.
Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
❑ yes
❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27.
Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
❑ No
28.
Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
❑ Yes
❑ No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29.
Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
❑ Yes
❑ No
30.
Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
❑ Yes
❑ No
31.
Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
❑ Yes
❑ No
32.
Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes
❑ No
J
O5103101

(Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
(Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number $9 1 Date of Visit: 10/1/2002 Time: 10:00
O Not Operational Q Below Threshold
® Permitted 0 Certified 0 Conditionally Certified ❑ Registered pate Last Operated or Above Threshold: . .. .. .. -. .- -
Farm Name: NewJ.aads.Fairm................................................... .................. County: Tyrrell................................... W .._..
Owner Name: - --- - - - - - - --- - - Ngy Cnlrwy_Faxtns%LLC._ - --- Phone No: (25?1.791:411 ---- --- -------------------
Mailing Address: 3.9.7..StxR]C�.A1r1.Y.e.............................. Gres elA.1YC........................................................... 2,792B ..............
Facility Contact: Rill.WIlsoo......................................... Title: Manager ................................ Phone No: 252-7,91-4123...........---...
Onsite Representative: 11it113'dls9ns_Sartur CSt�---------------------_-_--- Integrator:lY1L1's�dustiQ�.],)�C_____-------_-___-•
Certified Operator: S.ou my..S.............................. Cux ..................................................... Operator Certification Number-Z.Z3.7.6 ............................
Location of Farm:
i miles SW Columbia NC, State Road 1105, Cross Landing Loop Road, South Bodwell Road, North rA,
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 a 49 ° 60 LL Longitude 76 • 15 ` 60
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes [-]No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: _--_-Sandy!BA..... .....Caw.ls md.---- ----- ALLah-d1...... ...... AUah.#`2...... ...........................
Freeboard (inches): 56 44 28 29
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: 84-1
Date of Inspection 00/1/ 2-0-02-
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste A13plication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type Corn, Soybeans, Wheat Potatoes (sow units)
❑ Yes IN No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
•omments refer o question # : Explain an} answers and/or any recommendations or any o her comments.
s drawings 11 facility to better explain situation - ('.use additional pages as necessary): ❑Field Copy ❑Final Notes
* Waste dated 9/27/02 with house pit #8 - 2.0 lbs N/1000 gals. #9 - 3.0 lbs N; #10 - 3.3 lbs N; #11 - 4.1 lbs N;
`
12-3.4lbsN;#13-3.9lbsN;#14-4.3lbs N;#15-3.51bsN;#16-3.7lbsN;#17-3.5lbs N;Sand Hills Lagoon
-
3.6 lbs N; Cow Island Lagoon - 2.8 lbs N; (Wash Rack - 0.13 lbs N/1000 gals.)
* Waste dated 6/18/02 8/18/02 (60 days) with #8 - 1.3; #9 - 2.7; #10 - 2.7; 911 - 3.8; #12 - 2.6; #13 - 2.8; #14, 3.6
#15-2.7;#16-2.6;#17-2.1;?CI and SH.
* Waste analysis 12/7/01 - Al (Boar Stud Lagoon) 4.6 lbs N/1000 gals.
(Wash Rack} 0.32 lbs N/1000 gals. (SEE PAGE 3)
Reviewer/Inspector Name , Scott Vinson entered by Ann Tyndall
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
05103101
Continued

G
Facility Number: 89-1 Date of Inspection 10/1/2002
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
`d"ditio:aQQ omrnenfs and' o0ra
* Soil test 12/7/01 with some lime required. Soil analysis for 2002 should be delivered soon by tenant farmers.
* Freeboard levels are recorded weekly as required. Sandy Hill - 56", Cow Island - 44", Al-1 - 10", Al - 36",
WR - 44"
* On IRR2 forms for August & September, irrigation events on beans on Block N-6, go back and change waste
analysis for events after 8/19/02 and recalculate PAN balance with waste analysis dated 9/27/02.
* Recalculate block N-5 irrigation events on beans for April and May events using 6/18/02 waste analysis instea
of the out-of-date 12/7/01 waste analysis. Overapplication does not appear to have occurred. Also for block N-1
events 1 & 2 SLL2 forms!
* Need Cow Island waste results for April 2002 irrigation events on beans (used 1.5 lbs N/1000 gals.)
* Need Sandy Hill waste results for April 2002 irrigation events on beans block BI-3, cut 33 & 39 (used 0.861b
Please call 252-946-6481, extension 208 when IRR2 forms have been recalculated.
05103101

of Visit O+ Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
(Reason for Visit 0 Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Faacilit\" Number of Visit: 11-14-2001 Thne: 1300 �Frinted on: 11/16/2001
l' $9 1
-. �.-..�-----.- �_ w_ _�_LL,_. Q Not Q �erational Q Belot Threshold
Permitted Certified 0 Canditionalty Certified "' Registered Rate f Last Operated or above Threshold . ............
Farm tame: Ne.w.Iam sSaxxu..................... County: Iyx"la............................................... �'.4'.a. U........
.................................... ............................
Oivner N'atne: ................................. N9R'..C.ai0jv...>F:ar.[ntat.UC_.................. Phone No:(252).7914123 .......................................................
MailingAddress: 3 7. hv.D.ra_Y.e.............._..................._............................................. !C mawell.NC.......................................................... 2,7.92a .............
No:
Facility Contact: ... SlIU ....................................................... Title: AJ1M=grr ............................................ Phone jamt ........................................
Onsite Representative- R.i11.W.ilsan,.SamMy...Cox.............. _....................................... Integrator: D7,►+II.I'tr-aslustion-LU.......................................
Certified Operators ,5Ara aY.&............................. Qtj .................................................... Operator Certification Number:2237.6 .............................
Location of Farm:
!6 miles SW Columbia NC, State Road 1105, Cross Landing Loop Road, South Bodwell Road, North
7 r--
_---------- _----------- _-.._.__
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 ° 49 � 60 � - Longitude i 76 � ° i 15�;• � 6U
Design Current
Swine Canacity Ponulation
® Wean to Feeder
2I600
4000
❑ Feeder to Finish
® Farrow to Weau
8000
2900
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
50
57
--- Design Current - - �..._ Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Laver 1 10 Dairy
❑ Non -Layer L j ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 29,650
Total SSLW 4,132,000
Number of Lagoons 3 ❑Subsurface Drains Present 1111 Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps I ID No Liquid Waste Management System
[?_sxa'ift=r;rca & S;iutl Impa'c•t4
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 5�1 No
Dischar,ri: ori4giltaled aft: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field E] Other
al- If discharge is ob.'el-vecl. was tl)e conveE--anee mmn-toad;:" ❑ Yes r No
1). Il'discharge is obsw-%cd, (lid it rcach Walvt uI rile Stag' (IfNes_ noldi IDWO3) ❑Yes ❑ No
c. If &chaal•s=v is wha is tht ; V"Tu" tlz4ied flow in t al/milt''
d- Does aE Ofves_ uotifi Dltt'4❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
n Yes
No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
L! Yes
No
'tom <r4tt �ii�°cSiu� ° "• e:.}:±=�r?*
4. Is storage capacity (fieeboard plus stoini storage) less than adequate?
El Spillway
❑ Yes
No
SI]'l1E:tllr Sl-ttcim-l: 2 "11110MV 3
Str.El:tt:rl: 4 Slrn; urc �
[d,.uliii.r:........ SaundUHEII........ ....... Cawlslw&...... ....... Ai.LalzA .1...............Ai.Lab.#.2........................._...
947'+ 84"+ 50"
52"

v.3ivsiv!
Facility Number: "-I
Date of Inspection 11-14-2001
t,onnnuea
Printed on: 11/16/2001
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application:? ❑ Excessive Pouding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type Corn, Soybeans, Wheat
_�q.
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
Cl Yes ® No
Cj Yes 9 No
❑ Yes] No
0 Yes ® No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes [9 No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? n Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ 'Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. is there
a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
RV-PuiP' "d nei'f rds , i. DEivz;mwnts
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ W1IP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit`?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/luspector fail to discuss reviewhuspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Cl Yes No
❑ Yes ; No
❑ Yes R No
] Yes 9 No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
Ci Yes 0. No
j Yes 0 No
Cl Yes P. No
ED Yes 't No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes 9 No
® No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit. `
Comments (refer to question t): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary): Ci Field Copy 9 Final Notes j
;cords available for review.
til analysis for 2001 (1-26-01) available (Cherry Farms)
aste analysis: 10-1-01 - SH = 2.2 lb.; 8-28-01 - SH = 1.5 lb., Cl = 2.21b., Al =1.1 lb. ( the pits of the sow units were tested as well) _
24-01 - SH = 3.4 lb., Cl = 4.2 lb.. AI =2.7 lb.; 11-14-00 - SH = 2.5 lb., CI = 2.5 lb., AI = 0.1 lb..
-eeboard levels are recorded weekly as required. NOTE: 3-2-01: SH = 21", CI = 30", All = 22" & AI2 = 30"
11-9-01: SH = 96", CI = 105". All = 36" & Al2 = 40"
rigation records are complete and balanced out except BT-4 records. Need to complete this record ASAP.
'V,
Reviewer/Inspector Name Daphne B. Cullom Lyn B. Hardison
Ravioivarr1ncnrrtnr Cinnativra•

05103101 Continued
F,acility.Number: 89-1 Date of Inspection 11-i4-20t11
Printed on: 11/16/2001
Odor L�stkv%
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blades), inoperable shutters, etc.)
3 1. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
:unit modification has been submitted to Raleigh/DWQ last month.
words are well organized_
`**Suggested to calibrate the irrigation equipment at a minimum of once per year_****
you have any questions, contact your Technical Specialist/Engineer or us @ 252-946-648 L
[f Yes ❑ No
© Yes ® No
❑ Yes 9 No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes 0 No

Michael F. Easley
Y' Governor
ma
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
G C
_ Kerr T. Stevens
Division of Water Quality
To: Producers
From: Lyn B. Hardison
Environmental Specialist
Washington Regional Office
Date-. November 16, 2001
Subject: Animal Compliance Routine inspection
Year 2001
Enclosed please find a copy or copies of the Compliance Site Inspection(s) (as viewed in DWQ database) conducted at the
referenced facility by the Division of Water Quality from the Washington Regional Office. Please read this inspection and
keep with all other documents pertaining to your animal operation for future inspections.
hi general, these inspections included verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified Anirrral Waste Management Plan (CAWMP);
(2) the farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC 2H.0217, Senate Bill 1217, and the Certified Animal
Waste Management Plan; (3) the farm operation's waste management system is being operated properly under the direction of a
Certified Operator, (4) the required records are being kept; (5) there are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or runoff.
As a reminder, please note the following which are conditions of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan and the general
permit: therefore, these items must be implemented:
q) The maximum waste level in lagoons/storage ponds shall not exceed that specified in the CAWMP. At a minimum,
maximum waste level for waste for lagoons/storage ponds must not exceed the level that provides adequate storage to
contain 25 year, 24 hour storm event plus an additional foot of structural freeboard
T An analysis of the liquid animal waste from the lagoon shall be conducted as close to the time of application as practical and
at least within 60 days (before or after) of the date of application. This analysis shall include the following parameters:
Nitrogen, Phosphones, Zinc and Copper.
(p Soil analysis is required annually.
cp The following records are required: off -site solids removal, maintenance, repair, wastelsoil analysis and land irrigation
records. These records should be maintained by the facility owner/manager in chronological and legible form for a
minimum of three years.
T Land application rates shall be in accordance with the CAWMP. In no case shall land application rates exceed the Plant
Available Nitrop-en (PAN) rate for the receivine crop or result in runoff during anv ;given application.
cp In accordance with you waste utilization plait the irrigation application events should not exceed the hydraulic loading as
specified per the soil tape and in no case should an irrigation event exceed one inch per acre.
cp All grassed waterways shall have a stable outlet with adequate capacity to prevent ponding or flooding damages. The outlet
can be another vegetated channel, an earth ditch, stabilization structure. or other suitable outlets.
cp It is suggested. not required. to keep crop yield information for future use to update your waste management plan. You will
need three years of crop yield data before your plan can be updated
For your information, any swine facility that has a discharge to surface waters of the State will have to apply for a National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit with the Division of Water Quality, effective January 1, 2001.
Thank you for your assistance and cooperation during the inspection. If you have any questions_ please contact your Technical
Specialist or me at 2 52 -946-648 1. ext. 318.
Cc: WaRO
LBH Files (inspection form only)
943 Washington Square Mall Washington, NC 27889 252-946-6481 (Telephone) 252-946.9215 (Fax)

%0
Facility Number 89 Date of Inspection 919199
Time of Inspection 10:20 j 24 hr. (hh:mm)
A Permitted 13 Certified 13 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered 0 Not O erational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: Nimland.k:am...................................................................... ................ County: lyrrgU............................................... WARO........
Owner Name: Pube.P.Qrlj..GrD. p............... :iysou.FQ9.dxTnc.................................... Phone No: ...........................................................
Facility Contact: ..Title: ................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
Mailing Address: 34I.Sh9.rC.Dr,................................ ... cirawRUic ............ ................ 2.792,8 .............
Onsite Representative: ,Iimmy..Fjemiatg,.E,art.QlmVR.............................................. integrator:................
Certified Operator: ................................................... ............................................................. Operator Certification Number: ..........................................
Location of Farm:
Latitude 35 • 49 i 60 Longitude 76 • 15 f b0
DischarF_es & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated ar. ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: CI SH # 1 SH #2
Freeboard (inches).................4. ...... 4 .................
® Yes []No
? ❑ Yes ® No
® Yes ❑ No
Structure 6
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (iel trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99
❑ Yes ® No
Continued on back

Y
'J Facilfty Number: 89-1 Date of Inspection 9/9199
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ❑ No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes []No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
❑ Yes
❑ No
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management PIan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes ❑ No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ❑ Yes ❑ No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes ❑ No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes ❑ No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes ❑ No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes ❑ No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No
10. i� violatitjsis:or defciencie were:noted during this visit:: Ytia:wip:receive no fur tie- : :
correspondence about this.visit. - - . ..... ..... .... ..... .... ....... .
ee'Attached Sheet.
. and 3. Overtopping occurred at the small lagoon yesterday. Waste did not reach surface waters. See next sheet foi
ornments. Additional soil material was added at Cow Island's small lagoon to reinforce the dike on the low side on
;unday and soil material was added to the overtopped area at Sandhill for reinforcement yesterday.
site inspection due to lagoon levels and recent rainfall events from Tropical Storm Dennis. This facility received
pproximately 15" of rain within 6 days. Recent rainfall events in July placed lagoon levels within 19" of freeboard. Land
pplication events lowered levels approximately 10-12" at Cow Island and 8" at Sandhill.
;EE PAGE 3
qV
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signai
Entered by Ann
Date:

Facility Number: 89-1 Date of Inspection 919/99
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ❑ No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ❑ No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ❑ No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ❑ No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
FA'd" ihoaa 1 •animents7ao .6r] rawEngs:
Initial hit of Hurricane Dennis left 6" of rain and .25-.75" of rain each day after the storm until it made landdfall again and
left an additional 6-8" of rain. Prior to Dennis' second hit, approximately 235,000 gallons of waste were transferred from
Sandhill to Cow Island to maintain the lagoons and to prevent a discharge. Approximately 30 gallons overtopped small
lagoon at Sandhill yesterday but ponded adjacent to lagoon and did not enter ditches and/or surface waters of the state.
ARO contacted and report made of current situation. Mr. Fleming is planning to land apply on land available and
suitable at this facility to lower current lagoon levels. ' Also planning to contract additional irrigation services. This
facility will receive a NOD due to the current farm status.

wY.
- -0 Drvision of Soil and Water Conservation -Operation Review
0 Dtv>isEon of Soil and -Water Conservation -Compliance Inspection
Drvision.of Water Quality - Compliance Inspection e
-`
r O'OtherAgency Operation Review-1
9) Routine Q Complaint Q Follow-up of DWQ inspection Q Follow-up of DSWC review Q Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection 2 23-9y
I'ime,oi• Inspection pl 3v 24 hr. (hh:mm)
© Permitted © Certified 0 Conditionally Certified 13 Registered 113 Not O erational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: 1Q.� ^k County:............................................................................
. Owner Name:Y..5°::!...-..-..Fo°�s i nc .
Phone i�r
o:.....................................
FacilityContact: ............. i.°".'`1......... �c�.".:.'.}....,............. Title...................... Phone No:... ............................................ .. ..............................................
Mailing Address: -3 47 �a-t ,%Ji. ...�`rs ve I i 27gZ g ..........................
Onsite Representative: �..'."''�L........ rf.gc. . Integrator:.................................................
`� .......................
Certified Operator: ) Flcr....t ,.... Operator Certification Number: ..........................................
Location of Farm:
.. _..
..:.............................................................I....-. ...........................................................................................................................-.......................................
Latitude Longitude • ��°�
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
2'32-00
I -1000
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
000
77 oo
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
5 0
-3 Z
Design Current Design, Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ��TJ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other I I I
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons S ❑ Subsurface Drains Present 110 Lagoon Area ID Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid.Traps JE1 No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation (If yes, notify DWQ)?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ElSpray Field ❑ Other
a. if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
h. II' discharge is observed, did it reach: ❑ Surface Waters ❑ Waters of the State
c. if dischar e. is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/min'?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 9 No
❑ Yes 1� No
V1 Yes ❑ No
Structure I
Structure 2
Structure 3
Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Al -1
.5.46111
eo-- F,1"
Frechoard (inches): ......................
...................................4)_
................................................................................................................................................
1-(O
1 S
1/6/99 Continued on back

Facility Number: acy — Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes KNo
seepage, etc_)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? y ❑ Yes kNo
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes E,No
8. Does any pact of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes P§ No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required top of dike, maximum and minimum
liquid level elevation markings? ❑ Yes �q No
Waste Apnlication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes t;�No
11. Is there evidence of over application'? ❑ Ponding ❑ Nitrogen ❑ Yes OgNo
12. Crop type .........e 1'^. .....�i%.vJ �-,.5 ......_ 5i"`.i ....�.'..'" n......C:aV¢..............................................................................................
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
14. Does the facility lack wettable acreage for land application'? (footprint) ❑ Yes &No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ] No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coveraue & General Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
Cl No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ic/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
',No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
IR No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
ElYes
RNo
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
❑ No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
WINo
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
&No
0; No'violations;or. deficiencies .were noted. dairing Ais.visit:. -Wu' wvili'retceive nor further., - . -
corresbbfideitce' about; this visit.; ; .. . • ; . ........
Comsrinents (refer to question,#): Explain any YES answers and/or any.' recommendations oranyother.comments_ 4 A _.
Use di-aww ilzS'of facility to better explain situations. {use additional pages as necessary} - '
LI UA�v51,4- 54,.)e_ + Suv 6per-.+I — e-\,l l+ta� ��profC. GdA d'Ly5 5)01`4ne AL
1,./i ..fie./ 11pp .'e"4,94 is etc Co its�+~.- Vke �v !Uf ..� Ov- 10f 0;ice.-•e••-13
i S tr�Q cCSS.c�. �i �.t 4ii}�i� Cp�ar �+ •ty -io'1 t/j�n-t �C �.
fl I y E r
L�c�7v,.s W-*LrL .iSG� {cr h.. slt-I- S•jvr'+yG rC7fCl, �✓r'��i'¢r C.�.+Y/ biS •1a�..
It
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
1 /609

rE
J
�
r
�.� r
�
J
c J
i
�
S
lDNo{
b
Q

16 rcounne p t✓omptamt p rouow-up of uwt1 inspection p ronow-up of uawu review p utner
Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Registered p Certified 0 Applied for Permit p Permitted 10 Not Operational iDate Last Operated:
Farm Name: NewJands.Earm............................................................ ............ County: Tyrrell WaRO
OwnerName: ................................................... Tysan.F.nads.Inc.................................... Phone No: 919=19.74123..........................................................
Facility Contact:JimmyXieming.............................................Title: P.raid.uctinnManager................... Phone No .....................................................
MailingAddress: 34.7..Shotrr..I?rr........................................................................................ cresweU.Mc .......................................................... 2792.8 ..............
Onsite Representative: diimmyF.leJWD&........................................................................Integrator:.......................................................................................
Certified Operator:En3cst.................................... EQrwArjd ........................................... Operator Certification Number: 1821.2.............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude ©* ®®u
es�gn : -"u
Swine CapacityYopi
Longitude ®o ©4 ®K
Wean to Feeder
p Layer
13 Feeder to 00
p Non -Layer
p Farrow to Wean
7,760
p er
13 arrow to Feeder
® Farrow to FinishTatal�Desig
a
p Gilts
Boars
T�
Cattle Capacity Populahan_ �"
0 auy _
[3 on- airy
-77
n Capacityq2,400- -
►t2&S9LW T 3,400,800
- w
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? E3 Yes ® No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
5. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
p Yes N No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
© Yes
Cl No
p Yes
® No
p Yes
® No
p Yes
N No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ®No

Facility um er: 89_l Date of Inspection 8-13-99
S. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
p Yes
® No
Structures fLagoons,Holdinp,Ponds Flush Pits etc.
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
p Yes
® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5 Structure b
Identifier: ..CI_-.LagooaA5.. .......... Cl.-..J l!...........S1L:.Lagoon.#�6...........Sl3-.HP.........
AI.LJh/LaguojiA7. ......AIa.:.HP......
Freeboard (ft): 3.2 ft. 2.5 ft. 2.3 ft. 2.5 ft.
2.9 ft. 3.5
ft.
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
p Yes
H No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
p Yes
® No
12. Do any, of the structures need maintenancelimprovement?
® Yes
p No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
p Yes
N No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
p Yes
N No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ....... orn.(S,ilage.,&. Grain)...........................Say-]X ...........................................lYhcal ..................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application -equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did ReviewerMspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
Q .. qyiqlations.or ciencies"were -noted during. this visit.,. You will.reiceive nay u er . _ .
•.:�e�>tes�iopdet;e�a�dtit�iis•Yisi�::•.•.•...•.. ....... ..•.-.-.-:-:-.-:-.
p Yes ® No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ®No
p Yes N No
p Yes H No
p Yes p No
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

n�uw.�iwwrwi � i w
ac i Number: 89_1 Date of Inspection

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Washington Regional Office
,lames B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
December 4, 1997
Mr. Joe Locke
Tyson Foods, Inc.
347 Shore Dr.
Creswell, NC 27928
SUBJECT: Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
Newlands Farm
Fac. No. 89-1
Tyrrell County
Dear Mr. Locke:
o
On August 26, 1997, I conducted an Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection at the Newlands Fans in
Tyrrell Counts. Overall, the operation was found to be in satisfactory condition. A copy of the inspection
report is attached for your review.
In general, this inspection includes verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan (CAWMP); (2) the farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC 21-1.0217,
Senate Bill 1217, and the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan; (3) the farm operation's waste
management system is being operated properly under the direction of a Certified Operator; (4) the required
records are being kept; (5) there are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or runoff.
The recommendations and/or comments regarding your inspection can be found in the comment section of
the attached inspection form. It is very important as the owner and Operator in Charge that you address any
noted concerns, as soon as possible. For assistance, please contact your Technical Specialist and/or the
local Soil & Water Conservation District Office.
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance during the inspections. Should you have further
questions or comments regarding these inspections, do not hesitate to call me at [phone], ext.
321.
Sincerely,
Daphne B. Cullom
Environmental Specialist]]
cc: Tyrr l County SWCD Office
Y6RO
943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, North Carolina 27889 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Atfunative Action Employer

11
s
ne
Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of Inspections :� 24 hr. (hh:mm)
■ Registered p Certified p Applied for Permit p Permitted o perational I Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: County: Tyrrell WaRO
Owner Name:._ ._...... _ ..........._.... Tynan.Eaods.lae.................................... Phone No: 919:747.:4M.................. ......................................
Facility Contact: dor. Larke.... ......_ ... ............................Title: Regional.Maaageir...._._....... ........ Phone No:............................ ................. ...
Mailing Address: d4.7-Sbara.Der.----...._.--.......... .�.... ......... ...................... ................... .:CaresweU xC......................................I......I............. 27928 ..............
Onsite Representative: Jimmy. Fleming. E o artian1 anager .......................... Integrator: ....».... ....... ......... ..................................... ........................
Certified Operator: Eat:avaril............ ...._............ ...... ....... Operator Certification Number: 182a2.............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude ©• ®t ®K Longitude ®• ©, ®K
"$wine - -=C$
p --Wean to Feeder
urren _:: r - esign urren _ -- - esign urren
Popalat�on ,=Poultry- Capacity `Population ;Cattle Capacity Population -
I] any
p on- airy
Feeder to Finish
13 Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feerer
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
p
Layer
p
Non -Layer
Other - - - -
Total Design Capacity". ,
ej
;T_otal SSLW.: ,
'.--'Number.of Lagoons / Holdmg'Ponds , see no es p u sus ace rams resen p goon rea p pray �e rea
-- o Mquid WasFe Management Syslem
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? p Yes ® No
2. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon t3 Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes p No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes p No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) 13 Yes p No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes ®No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? p Yes ® No
5. Does any part o1 the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require p-Yes ®No
maintenance/improvement?
5. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? p Yes ®No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? p Yes ®No
7/25/97

acility Number: 89_ 1
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons,Holdinp Ponds Flush Pits etc.
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
p Yes B No
n Yes ® No
Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: .-Nurvjy.A1..-A..__b1ttrsery.A1..-8........Nmery.AZ-A...... Nurnexy.#.2.B.... .....Boar..)B'.............Hoar.Lagaan....
Freeboard (ft): 2.5 ft. 2.5 ft. 2.5 ft. 3 ft.
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
3 ft. 4-5 ft.
n Yes ® No
n Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
13 Yes ® No
n Yes ® No
15. Crop type ...... Cotm.(Silage.&..Grain) .............. ............ Saybrans.................... .... ........ ............. .................................................................................... ......
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20- Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22: Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
R . ono ons.or rnies•ere.os "grs visit; as will.receive nofurther.".,
>Carrespooft4ce bou� z�iis visa:.
n Yes N No
n Yes ® No
n Yes ® No
n Yes ® No
n Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
n Yes ® No
n Yes N No
n Yes ® No
n Yes n No
it fac ity-. recently sum an app ication or an individual_ non-discarge permit- a New and facility consists_ 0 10 sow
ts, two aff-site nurseries, and aboar/stud 1mrt The `sow, units include 2-houses �I60 h_ ead :each aad, 8 houses @ 760 head each
or a total 'of;7,900 sows: -These houses'are.pit b6nu s witif8.5-9.month storage,capacity. SJbe houses are.owned by contract
groyqs_b6,W6ei Tyson is responsiblegr eontm7iing the waste treatment. 'I yson has r@ceQtly sold the land to individuals with an
easement for 30 years: _-
e two offsite nurseries (owned by'l�j"iiouses 12,000 head each for total of 24;Q00 Eac}i nursety,hasilZhouses and 2
agoons. All lagoons at both nurseries' had adequate freeboard. 'These houses are pull plug flush pit with the common lagoon. A .
oneywagon or 'injection sy ..stem caa'be used -from the hydrant system at the houses.-
eBoar/5ttid site (owned by Tyson) has a'S0 head capaacity. -20 head is ar average_number housed at�the facility.' There'i45/97
_ ... .
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: �� � Date: k — lei --q -7

ace I i SynNum r: 89-1 Date of Inspection
finedo g pon an - oon _Ac
e fiaislag- jloors are located &Washin
e t. pomng ipquycemenis for:this tly
you have any OeWons,coniact meat c
w4 ; k-
e
-Lryk
�.A
Y
"'?-� ri ma's•
quate tree Rod maintained
t�sn=F o?"at the-Northline-fih wain!.•:=`
SAW. heed 'sS�s�". iti�`ac+Ji eY k rr r r
will be`outlined m the non-d�sciiarge permirwhen`rt'�s issued. � �' � - -
{ " vZ:•!:'�, � - '- 2 - �- rr YL.: 'fir'!""� � "=-Si �s '" S
9rsa8i;<eitt ;321�ti . z�s Y� r� "
from
`^'.�zrlryYr..00-T-.' ';,.�F+_-� t.�- • -
4 - �..a � �T•- -q e ' yr. - � r -� z'
mow w
ai 11Ftii�l � � '� ' Y,' A i � j !'[+L'Ss-.1%3`�F a.-- 1t-• '.+_ � _ -
. � . � ti Y� � L t� r ^r'z .+�.� �:.�+t� •� � rt =ems -t �' '. _ .
4 ~ f
Q-
a
to
Own
�r,� d:°r�{°'' .7- T. �.r++ - -Y,S _ � �:''� t' },1.-j,.. er• �+_-n, _
�. �� ': d-'r-^--,.:�.., - - - ' ifs. •r r _ - _ _
��� '�;• �' " �" � "`.ice"' J'� - �. �--�:: � �,:,.'� "r.;.:,i*- :c -
r'"g' Y" _—cT;iV`L�..:s- + tR+t> • -�" r!�..
Y
r .�-"'�"'►� a'Y-r * y. � ;.. �_w; J � Yp.. '"��.e; I'uw. �-tiT+gy' �. �. Z -
�.rs
151F
G.e - �it!r � •ram - - '+L L _ � .i - ^'i1 :-Z ' K _S ,r _ . .