720019_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environmental Qual

Tlf

L rcoutme 0 t-ompiamt 0 roiiow-up or u%vyr inspection 0 rouow-up or uawtr review 0 inner
Date of Inspection -f6-97
Facility number Time of Inspection ® 24 hr. (hh:mm)
ilotaftlame,linitractionlofiltours
Farm Status: Registered i(ez I25 far I hr I S thin Spent on Revie.
Farm Dame: Earnest.Stallings.lFarm.............................................................................. County: Perquimans WARD
OwnerName: Earaest.................................. Stallings..................................................... Phone No: 2,9.7.-.2865 .....................................................................
Mailing Address: P.D.B.Qx..1R4........................
Onsite Representative: Ert estSxallings...............
Certified Operator: .................................................. ....
Location of Farm:
Selvidime... NC ....................................................... 2.7919 .............
Integrator: ......................................................................................
Operator Certification Number: .........................................
.... ...... .........................e. o.....
......-gain ,t,�zvar...s::.. ties an.........................................................................................................................
Latitude ®. ®� ®11 Lnngitude ®0 ©6 ®66
in Not perationa Date Last Operated : ............................................................
Type of Operation and Design Capacity
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? p Yes ® No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes M No
a. If discharge is observed. was the conveyance man-made? p Yes p No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes p No
c_ If discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes. notify DWQ) p Yes p No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? p Yes 0 No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require p Yes N No
maintenance/improvement?

f�
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria?
p Yes
® No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge (if inspection after 1/1/97)?
N Yes
p No
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
® Yes
N No
Structures (Lagoons and/or Holdin(Ponds)
9. Is structural freeboard less than adequate?
p Yes
® No
Freeboard (ft): Lagoon I Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3
Lagoon 4
................ 5..0............. .......................................................................................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
p Yes
N No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
p Yes
® No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenancelimprovement?
p Yes
N No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adquate markers to identify start and stop pumping levels?
® Yes
p No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
p Yes
N No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type................................................................................................................................................
16. Do the active crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan?
p Yes
p No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
p Yes
p No
18. Does the cover crop need improvement?
p Yes
p No
19. Is there a lack of available irrigation equipment?
p Yes
p No
For Certified Facilities 0nh
20. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
p Yes
p No
21. Does the facility fail to comply with the Animal Waste Management Plan in any way?
p Yes
p No
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
p Yes
p No
23. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
p Yes
p No
24. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with owner or operator in charge?
0 Yes
p No
realcing w�th�Mr�Stallings, he has indicated that he has no intentions. of operating above the threshold The lagoon hadfivef of
ffar-15.6ta—rwand1here were not signs of present or past discharges. The wastewater still needs':to be mamtamed proPeriyyand is still
ubjected to the; 02U0 regulations until the operation is properly closed. R.
y
*I
f FF
4" S Div
.i'� � -. ,_ � i`�•'� .ram
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: 4 Mah dZJAC f � '_ Date: 5 A,) —q,-q