720014_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NORTH CAROLINA J
Department of Environmental Qua

I
N
P
Tl
N
� %� y �
vN
E
" � \� [ . :
. < foll,
`
�l

k t
E Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Other Agency
Facility Number:
720014
Facility Status: Active
Permit: AWS720014
❑ Denied Access
Inpsection Type:
Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed Dale:
Reason for Visit:
Routine
County:
Perquimans Region:
Washington
Date of Visit:
08/18/2017 EntryTime: 11:25 am .Exit Time: 11:40 am Incident #
Farm Name:
Larry & Barbara Stallings Farm
Owner Email:
Owner:
Larry Stallings
Phone:
252-297-2153
Mailing Address:
779 Tpke Rd
Belvidere NC 279199747
Physical Address:
779 Turnpike Rd
Belvidere NC 27919
Facility Status:
Compliant ❑
Not Compliant Integrator:
Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
36' 21' 13" Longitude:
76° 27' 31"
3 miles North of intersection of Sandy Cross Rd. and Turnpike Rd. on Turnpike Rd., SR 1001 in Perquimans County
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Slor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number:
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representatives): Name Title Phone
Phone:
Primary Inspector: Justin K Davis Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspectorls):
Inspection Summary:
Farm appears to be in good shape. New owner sign. No contact made. Contact Barbara Stallings for details. Previous owner
and operator has passed away.
page: 1

Permit: AWS720014 Owner- Facility: Larry Stallings' Facility Number: 720014
Inspection Date: 08/18/17 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine -Gilts 504
Total Design Capacity: 504
Total SSLW: 75.500
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon L1 19.00
page: 2

r
Permit: AWS720014 Owner - Facility : Larry Stallings Facility Number: 720014
Inspection Date: 08/18/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No Na No
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
M ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
M ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
ME]
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
M ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No Na No
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large
❑
M ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
0 ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
M ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
0 ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
M ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ M ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/l0 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

4
Permit: AWS720014 Owner - Facility : Larry Stallings Facility Number: 720014
Inspection Date: 08/18/17 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No Na No
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
E ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
E ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
E ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
0 ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No Na No
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ 110 E
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WU P?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
2i. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ [IDS
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page. 4

Permit: AWS720014 Owner -Facility: Larry Stallings Facility Number: 720014
Inspection Date: 08/18/17 Inppeclion Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No Na Ne
Crop yields? ❑
120 Minute inspections? ❑
Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections ❑
Sludge Survey ❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ ❑ ❑ E
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
❑ ❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑ ❑
Other Issues
Yes
No Na Ne
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
0 ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
0 ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30, Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
E ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
E ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon 1 Storage Pond
Cl
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
E ❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewerlinspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
❑ 0
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
E
❑ ❑
❑
page: 5

L
i
Division of Water Resources
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
El Other Agency
Facility Number:
720014 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS720014
Denied Access
Inppection Type:
Compliance Inspection Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for visit:
Routine County: Perquimans Region:
Washington
Date of Visit:
031M2016 Entry Time: 09:30 am Exit Time: 11:50 am Incident #
Farm Name:
Larry & Barbara Stallings Farm Owner Email:
Owner:
Larry Stallings Phone:
252-297-2153
Mailing Address:
779 Tpke Rd Belvidere NC 279199747
Physical Address:
779 Turnpike Rd Belvidere NC 27919
Facility Status:
Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm:
Latitude: 36" 21' 13" Longitude:
76° 27' 31"
3 miles North of intersection of Sandy Cross Rd. and Turnpike Rd. on Turnpike Rd., SR 1001-in Perquimans County.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Cot, Star, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Joseph L Stallings Operator Certification Number: 19375
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
Primary Inspector:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspectorls):
Inspection Summary:
Justin K Davis
Phone :
Phone:
Date:
page: 1

Permit: AWS720014 Owner- Facility : Larry Stallings Facility Number: 720014
Inspection Date: 03/02/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Report N
7-6-15
1.99
10-27-15
1.23
2-2-16
2.79
Soil Report
8-24-2015
Zn<150
Due 2018
Cu<50
Calibration 4-6-2015
Due 2017
Lagoon Sludge Survey 6-13-2015
Due 2017
Crop Yield 2015
Flushing houses during inspection.
page: 2

Permit: AWS720014 Owner - Facility: Larry Stallings Facility Number: 720014
Inspection pate: 03/02/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine -Gilts 504 300
Total Design Capacity: 504
Total SSLW: 75,600
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon L1 19.00 19.00
page: 3

Permit: AWS720014 Owner - Facility: Larry Stallings Facility Number: 720014
Inspection Date: 03/02/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at:
Structure
.Application Field
Other
a. Was conveyance man-made?
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection Storage & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10, Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
Hydraulic Overload?
Frozen Ground?
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
PAN?
r
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
Total Phosphorus?
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
Outside of acceptable crop window?
Evidence of wind drift?
Application outside of application area?
Yes No Na No
❑■❑❑
El
❑ M ❑ ❑
❑ M ❑ ❑
❑■❑❑
❑■❑❑
❑ M ❑ ❑
Yes No Na No
❑■❑❑
13
❑■❑❑
❑■DE]
❑ M Cl ❑
❑ M ❑ ❑
❑■❑❑
Yes No Na Ne
❑ M ❑ ❑
on ions
page: 4

Permit: AWS720014 Owner - Facility : Larry Stallings Facility Number: 720014
Inspection Date: 03/02/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes
No Na Me
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
0 ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
0 ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
E ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na No
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
E ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 5

Permit: AWS720014 Owner - Facility : Larry Stallings Facility Number:
720014
Inspection Date: 03/02/16 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na No
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
E ❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
E ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
01111
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
E ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No Na Ne
26. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
E ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon I Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
E ❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
E ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
0 ❑
❑
page: 6

e Division of Water Resources
El Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number:
720014 Facility Status:
Active Permit: AWS720014
❑ Denied Access
Inpsection Type:
Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for visit:
Routine
County: Perquimans Region:
Washington
Date of Visit:
09/29/2015 Entry Time: 09:00 am
Exit Time: 11:45 am Incident #
Farm Name:
Larry & Barbara Stallings Farm
Owner Email:
Owner:
Larry Stallings
Phone:
252-297-2153
Whiling Address:
779 Tpke Rd
Belvidere NC 279199747
Physical Address:
779 Turnpike Rd
Belvidere NC 27919
Facility Status:
® Compliant El Not Compliant
Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm:
Latitude: 36" 21' 13" Longitude:
76' 27' 31"
3 miles North of intersection of Sandy Cross Rd. and Turnpike Rd.
on Turnpike Rd., SR 1001 in Perquimans County.
Question Areas:
® Dischrge & Stream Impacts ® Waste Cal, Star, & Treat Waste Application
® Records and Documents ® Other Issues
Certified Operator: Joseph L Stallings Operator Certification Number: 19375
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Reprosentative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Larry Stallings Phone:
Primary Inspector: Justin K Davis Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
page: 1

Permit: AWS720014 Owner - Facility : Larry Stallings Facility Number: 720014
inspection bate: 09/29/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Report
4-20-15 4.19
1-26-15 1.66
7-6-15 1.99
Soil Report 8-24-2015
Zn<150
Cu<50
Lagoon Sludge Survey 6-13-15
Calibration 4-6-2015
Lagoon in compliance.
Fixing Reel, planning to pump in 2 days. Borrowing reel if neccessary.
Crop Yield 2015-42 bails of hay
page: 2

Permit: AWS720014 Owner -Facility: Larry Stallings Facility Number: 720014
Inspection Date: 09/29/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
® Swine -Gilts 504 300
Total Design Capacity: 504
Total SSLW: 75,600
Waste Structures Observed
Disignatod
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon Ll 19.00 20.00
page: 3

Permit: AWS720014 Owner - Facility : Larry Stallings Facility Number: 720014
Inspection Date: 09/29/15 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No Na Ne
1- Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
®❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
®❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
®❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
®❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
®❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collections Storage & Treatment
Yes
No Na Ne
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le) large
❑
®❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not property addressed and/or managed through a
❑
0 ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
®❑
❑
S. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
®❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
®❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ ®❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ M ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%110 tbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWS720014 Owner - Facility : Larry Stallings Facility Number: 720014
Inspection Date: 09/29/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes
No Na Ne
Crop Type i
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
©❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
©❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
N ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
®❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
®❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na Ne
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
®❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
WU P?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ®❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 5

Permit: AWS720014 Owner - Facility : Larry Stallings Facility Number: 720014
Inspection Date: 09/29/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na Ne
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
®❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
M ❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24, Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
®❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
e ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
®❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No Na Ne
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
®❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
NO
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately,
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
®❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
[]
®❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon 1 Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
e ❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
■ ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
®❑
❑
page: 6

n
E Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 720Q14 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS7,20014 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Perguimans Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 09/17,2012 Entry Time: 11:3_, 0 AM _ Exit Time: 12:00 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: Larry & Barbara Stallings Farm Owner Email:
Owner: L-ay Stallings Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 779 Tpke Rd Belvidere NC 279199747
Physical Address: 779 Turnpike Rd Belvidere NC 27212_
Facility Status: E Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: MMrphy_Brown L4Q_,.,. _
Location of Farm: Latitude: 36°21'13" Longitude: 76°27'31"
3 miles North of intersection of Sandy Cross Rd. and Turnpike Rd. on Turnpike Rd., SR 1001 in Perquimans County.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Slor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Joseph L Stallings Operator Certification Number: 19375
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Larry Stallings Phone:
On -site representative Larry Stallings Phone:
Primary Inspector: Ronnie T Smith Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AWS720014 Owner -Facility: Larry Stallings Facility Number. 720014
Inspection Date: 09/17/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
'Ask Marlene about permit renewal call Larry about"
WUP in records 516/96
Waste Analysis N
3/22112 = 2.0
6/11/12 = 5.27
9124/12 = .86
irrigation calibration 5111/12
"due again in 2013"
Soil Test done for 2012
"due again in 2013
rainfall and lagoon records correspond to irrigation records
crop yield records reviewed
'"ask martin about sludge survey.
Page: 2

Permit: AWS720014 Owner -Facility: Lary Stallings
Inspection Date: 09/17/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 720014
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Q Swine - Feeder to Finish 560 495
Total Design Capacity: 560
Total SSLW: 75,600
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date , Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
kgoon L1 19.00 27.00
Page: 3

Permit: AWS720014 Owner - Facility: Larry Stallings Facility Number : 720014
Inspection Date: 09/17/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWO) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than ❑ N ❑ ❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? 11011 ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? ❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le-1 large trees, severe ❑ ■ ❑ Cl
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or ❑ M ❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 4

Permit. AWS720014 Owner -Facility: Larry Stallings
Inspection Date: 0911712012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number : 720014
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
!i
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Fescue (Pasture)
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crap Type 6
Soil Type 1
Alpin
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑ Cl
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
1100 ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
ONO ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below_
WUP?
❑
Page: 5
4

Permit: AWS720014 Owner - Facility: Larry Stallings Facility Number: 720014
Inspection Date: 09/17/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Lease Agreements? ❑
Other? ❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑
❑
23. if selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
■ ❑
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑
■ ❑
❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon ❑
List structure(s) and date of first surrey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

Permit: AWS720014 Owner -Facility: Lary Stallings Facility Number: 720014
Inspection Date: 09117/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report Q ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? if yes, contact a regional ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field ❑
Lagoon I Storage Pond ❑
Other ❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? 00110
Page: 7

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 720014 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS7720014 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: CoMpliance I tin Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine — _ County: PeMuimans Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 09/14/2011 Entry Time: 10:20 AM Exit Time: 10:30 AM Incident #:
Farm Name: Larry & Barbara Stallings Farm Owner Email:
Owner t=aay §Shillings
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 779 Tpke Rd „ Belvidere NC 279199747
Physical Address: 779 Tumoike Rd Belvidere NC 27919
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 36°21'13" Longitude: 7 °27' 1'
3 miles North of intersection of Sandy Cross Rd. and Turnpike Rd. on Turnpike Rd., SR 1001 in Perquimans County,
Question Areas:
Dischrge & stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Joseph L Stallings Operator Certification Number: 19375
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Larry Stallings Phone:
On -site representative Larry Stallings Phone:
Primary Inspector: Ronnie T Smith Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AWS720014 Owner - Facility: Larry Stallings
Facility Number: 720014
Inspection Date: 09/1412011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
New CoC in records
Sludge Survey 9118/10
thickness = 3.9
LTZ = 5.3
36%
irrigation calibration 9/16/11
in 2012**
**due again in 2013**
Waste Analysis N
1/19111 = 2.3
4/12/11 = 2.5
10/11/11 = 1.7
Soil Test 10/21/11
L = 1.5T
Cu & Zn levels wrn range
lagoon records correspond to rainfall and irrigation records
crop yield records reviewed
"lagoon level high due to slushing and farmer says going back into house"
**Due again
Page: 2

Permit: AWS720014 Owner -Facility: Larry Stallings
Inspection Date: 09/1412011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 720014
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 560 0
Total Design Capacity: 560
Total SSLW: 75,600
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Typo Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
ILagoon L1 19.00 22.00
Page: 3

Permit: AWS720014 Owner - Facility: Lary Stallings Facility Number: 720014
Inspection Date: 09/14/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges S Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
Q ■
Q
Q"
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ ■
❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than
Q ■
Q
Q
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
Q
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not property addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑ ■
❑
❑
dry slacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑ ■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑ ■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, check the approprtate box below.
Excessive Ponding? Q
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
r
Page: 4

Permit: AWS720014 Owner -Facility: Larry Stallings
Facility Number: 720014
Inspection Date: 09/14/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
n
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Winter Annual
Crop Type 2
Bermuda Grass (Hay,
Pasture)
Crop Type 3
Fescue (Hay. Pasture)
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14_ Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■
n
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
■
n
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
n
■
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
n
■
n
n
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS720014 Owner - Facility: Larry Stallings Facility Number; 720014
Inspection Date: 09114/2011 inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Lease Agreements? ❑
Other? ❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement? Q ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
Q ■
n n
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
Q ■
❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑ ■
❑ ❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Page; 6

Permit: AWS720014 Owner - Facility: Larry Stallings
Inspection Date: 09/14/2011 inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Records and Documents
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Facility Number: 720014
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
n■nn
Yes No NA NE
28_ Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional 0 ■ ❑ ❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge, ❑ ■ ❑ D
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon / Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewfinspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
■
■
Page: 7

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 720014 _ Facility Status: Active Permit. AWS720014 t_..J Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance -Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Perguimans Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 11/23/2010 Entry Time,10Q0 AM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Larry & Barbara Owner Email:
Owner: Larry Stallings Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 779 Tyke Rd , Belvidere NC 279129747
Physical Address: 779 Turnpike Rd Belvidere NC 27919
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 36°21'13" Longitude: 76"27'31"
3 miles North of intersection of Sandy Cross Rd. and Turnpike Rd. on Turnpike Rd., $R 1001 in Perquimans County.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Joseph L Stallings Operator Certification Number. 19375
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Larry Stallings Phone:
On -site representative Larry Stallings Phone:
Primary Inspector:
Inspector Signature:
Marlene Salyer
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste Analysis:
10/27/10 = 1.3
06/23/10 = 7.5
04/13/10 = 2.0
BP = 190, Fescue = 125, Sorghum
Soil Test:
911 /10
L=.6T
Cu & Zn level look good
Have Coe and permit in record.
Crop Yields look good
Rainfall and irrigation records correspond
Phone:
Date:
Page: 1

r
Permit: AWS720014 Owner - Facility: Larry Stallings Facility Number : 720014
Inspection Date: 11/23/2010 inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 560 560
Total Design Capacity: 560
Total SSLW: 75,600
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon L1 19.00 23.0(
a
Page: 2

Permit: AWS720014 Owner. Facility: Larry Stallings Facility Number: 720014
Inspection Date: 1112312010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? 110110
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) 1101111
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage_& Treatment
Yes
No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large trees, severe
❑
■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■ ❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS720014 Owner - Facility: Lary Stallings
Inspection Date: 11123/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 720014
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
Q
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Pasture)
Crop Type 2
Fescue (Hay, Pasture)
Crop Type 3
Sorghum, Sudex
(Pasture)
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1 Arapahoe
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ ■ Cl ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ ■ Q ❑
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
% Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? Q ■ Q ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? Q ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Page: 4

Permit: AWS720014 Owner- Facility: Larry Stallings Facility Number : 720014
Inspection Date: 1111123120110 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
WUP? ❑
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Other? ❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after n 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑ ❑ ❑
■
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
Q ■ ❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
Yns Nn NA
NF
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ Q
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
Page: 5

Permit: AWS720014 Owner - Facility: Larry Stallings Facility Number. 720014
Inspection Date: 11/23/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
�.�--'---_-- Vnc Nn Ne NF
30. Al the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

Division of Water Quality
0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency n
Facility Number: 720014 Facility Status: Active Permit: AW 720014 IJ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine _ County: Perouimans Region: Washington
Date of Visit 12/04/2009 Entry Time:10:00AML Exit Time:
Farm Name: LaU & Barbara Stallings Farm
Owner. Larry Stallinas
Incident #:
Owner Email:
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 779 Toke Rd Belvidere NC 279199747
Physical Address: 779 Turnpike Rd Belvidere, NC 27919
Facility Status: E Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Myr-phy-Brown. LLC
Location of Farm:
Latitude:36°21'1Y Longitude:76°27'31"
3 miles North of intersection of Sandy Cross Rd. and Turnpike Rd. on Turnpike Rd., SR 1001 in Perquimans County.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Joseph L Stallings Operator Certification Number: 19375
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Phone:
On -site representative Larry Stallings Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis:
8-26-09 2.0
5-29-09 4.7
soil tested 7-2009 calibration 9-09 sludge survey 9-09
Looks Great!
Page: 1

Permit: AWS720014 Owner - Facility: Larry Stallings Facility Number: 720014
Inspection Date: 12/04/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 560 510
Total Design Capacity: 560
Total SSLW: 75,600
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon L1 19.00 22.01
Page: 2

Permit: AWS720014 Owner - Facility: Larry Stallings Facility Number: 720014
Inspection Date: 12/04/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe
❑ ■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ ■
❑
❑
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑ ■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑ MUD
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑ ■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS720014 Owner -Facility: Larry Stallings
Inspection Date: 12/04/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number, 720014
Reason for Vistt: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10°/4/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manureisludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Com, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Pasture)
Crop Type 3
Fescue (Pasture)
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ .
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ `
18. Is there a lack of property operating waste application equipment? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
19, Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP? ❑
Page: 4
s

Permit: AWS720014 Owner -Facility: Larry Stallings Facility Number. 720014
Inspection Date: 12/04/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Other? ❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
Cl
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
■
❑
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■
❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■
❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those
❑
■
❑
❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
❑
■
❑
❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

0
Permit: AWS720014 owner - Facility: Larry Stallings Facility Number: 720014
Inspection Date: 12/04/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance tnspection Reason for Visit: Routine
V.. krn MA uF
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? ❑ M Q ❑
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss reviewfinspection with on -site representative? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

0 Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 720014 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS720014 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Perauimans _ Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 12/19/2008 Entry Time.09:00 AM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name. Lamy & Barbara Stallings Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Larry Stallings Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 779 Tpke Rd Belvidere NC 279199747
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown. LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 36'21'13" _ Longitude: 76°27'31"
3 miles North of intersection of Sandy Cross Rd. and Turnpike Rd. on Turnpike Rd., SR 1001 in Perquimans County.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator. Joseph L Stallings Operator Certification Number: 19375
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Larry Stallings Phone:
On -site representative Larry Stallings Phone:
Primary Inspector: Eric Newsome Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit:AWS720014 Owner -Facility: Lary Stallings Facility Number:720014
Inspection hate: 12/19/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
New WUP signed 8110/2006. Copy made and given to DWQ today from Mr.Stallings. Note, the following should be corrected, per Mr.
Stallings: T722, Field 4 should read corn (part of a C/W/SB rotation) and not fescue as written (130 lbsN/ac), Corn/Wheat/SB should
be the crop rotation for T726 (Fields 3-6).
**Freeboard level is 20" and needs to increased such that the 24 hr, 25yr storm level (</= 19") is not entered. Mr. Stallings is aware of
this and will pump on fescue to avoid this situation.
WARS (lbsN/1000gal): 313/08-2.8; 5/1/08-3.0
IRR1/2 (2008): T722 Field 4-corn (4/5/2008); T726 Field 1-bermuda (10130108)*; T726 Field 3-soybeans (5/31/2008); T726 Field
4-fescue (12(8/2008)*, soybeans (5124/2008); T726 Field 5-soybeans (5/10/2008), and; T726 Field 6-soybeans (4/28/2008).
*This irrigation event is awaiting a waste analysis result to calculate the amount of PAN applied.
IRR1/2 (2007): T726 Field 2-fescue (solid set, 8 sprinklers). All 2007 and 2008 recorded PAN rates were in balance with the WUP.
Typical flowrate with reel is 182 gal/min.
Rainfall records were adequate and freeboard entries are consistent with recorded pumping events.
Soil test results (5/6/2008): 0.3 tons/acre (sample 808); highest ZnA1-1064, Cul-40 (sample 804).
Reel calibration results (5/31/08) were the result of running gun in a circle; the depth of water captured in one hour was measured and
compared against manufacturer's literature. The average depth of 0.407hr is equal to manufacturer's guidance. Honeywagon not in
use at this time, per Mr. Stallings. Next calibration due before the and of 2010.
Sludge survey (9/27/08): Thick=3.44', LTZ (DWQ estimated, based on current freeboard reading and the lagoon design dimensions)=
5.76'
Crop yields (fescue and bermuda, grazed): corn 210 bushels, soybeans 414 bushels
Farm uses burial method of disposal; Per Mr. Stallings the site is west of the lagoon (northwest end of the property).
Page: 2

Permit: AWS720014 Owner- Facility: Larry Stallings Facility Number: 720014
Inspection Date: 12/19/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
O Swine - Feeder to Finish 560 570
Total Design Capacity: 560
Total SSLW: 75,600
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
lagoon L1 19.00 2D.D0
Page: 3

Permit: AWS720014 Owner - Facility: Larry Stallings Facility Number : 720014
Inspection Date: 12/1912008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ 0
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Oth er ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ ■
❑
n
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑ ■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe
❑ ■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑ ■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
8. Do any.of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■ ❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■ 0 0
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS720014 Owner - Facility: Larry Stallings
Facility Number: 720014
Inspection Date: 12It912008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Com, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Fescue (Pasture)
Crop Type 3
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Pasture)
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6 -
Soil Type 1
Arapahoe fine sandy
loam
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■ ❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■ ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
■ ❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■ ❑
❑
18, Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■ ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No NA
NE
19, Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■ ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Page: 5

Permit: AWS720014 Owner - Facility: Larry Stallings
Facility Number : 720014
Inspection date: 1211912008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No NA NE
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
Maps?
❑
Other?
11
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
if yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after> 1 inch rainfall 8 monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ n ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? ❑
■ ❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑ ■ ❑
Other Issues
Yes
No NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ ❑ Cl
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
Page: 6

Permit: AWS720014 Owner - Facility: Lary Stallings
Facility Number: 720014
Inspection Date: 12/1912008 Inspection Type: compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Ottler Issues Yes No NA NE
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
Quality representative immediately.
31, Did the facility fail to notify regional DWo of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
n■nn
Page: 7

N Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 720014 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS720014 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Comoliancelnspection _ Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: RQsIine County: Perauimans Region: Washington
pate of Visit: i 0/26/2007 Entry Time: j 1:13 AM Exit Time:
Farm Name: Laay & Barbara Stallings Farm
Owner: Larry Stallings
Incident #:
Owner Email:
Phone: 252- -2153
Mailing Address: 779 Toke Rd Belvidere NC 279199747
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator.
Location of Farm: Latitude: 3621'13" Longitude: 7fio27'31"
3 miles North of intersection of Sandy Cross Rd, and Turnpike Rd. on Turnpike Rd., SR 1001 in Perquimans County.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts JW Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Joseph L Stallings Operator Certification Number: 19375
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Tine Phone
On -site representative Larry Stallings Phone:
24 hour contact name Larry Stallings Phone:
Primary Inspector: Eric Newsome Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AW5720014 Owner- Facility: Larry Stallings
Facility Number: 720014
Inspection Date: 10/26/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance'lnspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Saw CoC. and Permit (AWG100000).
Latest WUP signed 8/1012006: T722 (Fields 1-4), SIB w/ cover crop; T726 (F1=Bermuda, F2-F4=Fescue, F5-7=Cam wl cover crop).
Waste Analysis Results revealed a sharp increase in the Nitrogen level from 2.8 Ib11000gal (Feb 2007) to 4.5 Ib/1000gal (May 2007).
Continue to monitor this situation and consider comparing measurements at individual points in the lagoon.
Reviewed IRR1 and IRR2 forms; PAN limits were complete and balanced. Will give farmer a copy of the combined IRR1/lRR2 form.
Solid set system is on the Fescue and Bermuda Melds; reel and gun system is used on the remaining fields.
Saw the lagoon sludge surveys for 9/30/2006 and 9/15/2007, both performed by Mr. Stallings with identical readings: Thick=3.50',
LTZ (estimated)=6'
Soil test results seen for 2006 (online): 2 Ton1Ac of lime needed; Znl-393, Cut-61 (acceptable values, but continue to monitor). Lime
applied since 2006 report. Need to conduct a soil analysis for 2007.
#24. No calibration results provided for the solid set, irrigation reel/gun system, or the honeywagon. Current practice with the reel is
to attach a flowmeter and multiply the time run by the average rate; this provides the total gallons irrigated. Copies of proper
calibration techniques to be sent for the three systems.
Lagoon freeboard records and the rainfall records reviewed. Freeboard increases are consistent with pumping events.
Page: 2

Permit: AWS720014 Owner - Facility: Larry Stallings
Facility Number: 720014
Inspection Date: 10/26/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity
Current Population
Swine
Swine -Feeder to Finish 560 588
Total Design Capacity: 560
Total SSLW: 75,600
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
lagoon L1 19,00 26.00
Page: 3

Permit: AWS720014 Owner - Facility: Larry Stallings Facility Number: 720014
Inspection Date: 10/26/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impact
Yes No NA
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
n ■ n
n
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ■ ❑
❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ■ ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑ ■ ❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes No NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.ed large trees, severe
❑ ■ ❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
8, Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑ ■ ❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑ ■ ❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
n ■ n
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS720014 Owner - Facility: Lary Stallings
Inspection Date: 10/26/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 720014
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Pasture)
Crop Type 2
Fescue (Pasture)
Crop Type 3
Soybeans
Crop Type 4
Small Grain Cover
Crop Type 5
Com (Grain)
Crop Type 6
Small Grain Cover
Soil Type 1
Arapahoe fine sandy
loam
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Page: 5

Permit: AWS720014 Owner - Facility: Larry Stallings Facility Number : 720014
Inspection Date: 10/26/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
WUP? ❑
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Oth er? ❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
It yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after n 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility tail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
❑ ■ ❑
24, Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
■
❑ ❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑ ■ ❑
Yae
Nn NA NF
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
29, Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
Page: 6

Permit: AWS720014 Owner - Facility: Larry Stallings Facility Number : 720014
Inspection Date. 10/2612007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
Quality representative immediately.
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewfinspection with on -site representative? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑■00
Page: 7

Division of Water Quality
_n Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 720014 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS720014 n Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Perauimans Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 04/19/2006 Entry Time:04:00 PM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Larry & Barbara Stallinas Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Larry Stallings
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 779 Tpke Rd �Belvidere NC 279199747
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Location of Farm:
Integrator:
Latitude: 36'21'13" Longitude:76°27'31"
3 miles North of intersection of Sandy Cross Rd. and Turnpike Rd. on Turnpike Rd., SR 1001 in Perquimans County.
Question Areas:
Discharges &-Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Joseph L Stallings
Secondary OIC(s):
Operator Certification Number: 19375
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On -site representative Larry Stallings Phone:
24 hour contact name Larry Stallings Phone:
Primary Inspector: Joseph Gyamfi Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AW5720014 Owner - Facility: Larry Stallings Facility Number: 720014
Inspection Date: 04/19/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
CoC & Permit available in notebook
WUP dated 813199,and revised on 813199 & 1/24/05 to include cover crp and new fields
Waste Analysis:
2/23/06 = 3.1
10/25/05 = 2.3
7/11105 = 2.6
4/29/05 = 3.5
Soil test report dated 1/10/06: P-1 >150 on 2 fields, Cu & Zn levels ok.
Reviewed IRR1 & IRR2 records - complete & balanced, weather codes and inspection initials completed
Please consult technical specialist to help calibrate honey wagon and the fixed irrigation system by 9/30/2006
Secure sludge survey by 9/30/2006
Lagoon levels recorded weekly -
(#31) Levels reached 17" from 1/21/2006 through 2/18/2006. Producer says he called DWO Washington Office and left
message on a voice mail. No plan of action was submitted. - Please keep calling until you get to speak with someone and
follow up with plan of action. Waste Level
back in compliance.
Rainfall recorded and initials completed
Stocking and mortality records are kept in hog house
No crop yield required since fields are grazed.
Page: 2

Permit: AWS720014 owner - Facility: Larry Stallings Facility Number: 720014
Inspection Hate: 04/19/2006 inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations, Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
W Swine - Feeder to Finish 560 520
Total Design Capacity: 560
Total SSLW: 75,600
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon FL I 22.00
Page: 3

Permit: AWS720014 Owner - Facility: Larry Stallings Facility Number: 720014
Inspection Date. 04/19/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No
NA
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
■
n
n
Discharge originated at:
Structure
n
Application Field
n
Other
n
a_ Was conveyance man-made?
n
■
n
n
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
n
MOD
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
I l
■
n
n
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
n
■
n
n
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
n
■
n
n
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
n
■
n
n
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
n
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe
n
■
n
n
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management n
■
n
n
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
n
■
n
n
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
n
■
n
n
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
n
■
n
n
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
n
■
n
n
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
n
■
n
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? n
Hydraulic Overload? n
Frozen Ground? n
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? n
Page: 4

a
Permit: AWS720014 Owner - Facility: Larry Stallings
Inspection Date: '04/1912006 Inspection Type: Compliance inspection
Facility Number: 720014
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA
NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN ? 10%/10 lbs.?
n
Total P205?
n
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
n
Outside of acceptable crop window?
n
Evidence of wind drift?
n
Application outside of application area?
Q
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Pasture)
Crop Type 2
Fescue (Pasture)
Crop Type 3
Small Grain
Cover
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Arapahoe
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management'
❑ ■ ❑
El
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑
ci
16, Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
n ■ ❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
n ■ Q
D
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ n
n
Records and Documents
Yes No NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ n
n
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
n ■ n
n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
Page: 5

Permit:AWS720014 Owner -Facility: Larry Stallings Facility Number:720014
Inspection Date: 04/19/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? n
Design? n
Maps? n
Other? n
21. Does record keeping need improvement? n ■ n n
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Waste Application? n
120 Minute inspections? n
Weather code? n
Weekly Freeboard? n
Transfers? n
Rainfall? n
Inspections after> 1 inch rainfall & monthly? n
Waste Analysis? n
Annual soil analysis? n
Crop yields? n
n
Stocking?
—
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
n
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
n
■
n
n
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
n
n
■
n
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
n
❑
n
■
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
n
n
n
■
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
n
■
n
n
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
n
n
■
n
Other issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
n
■
n
n
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those
n
■
n
n
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30_ At the time of the'inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
❑
■
n
n
Quality representative immediately,
Page: 6

Permit: AWS720014 Owner- Facility: Larry Stallings
Inspection Date: 04/19/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Other Issues
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Facility Number : 720014
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
■000
p■n❑
0 0 D 0
Page: 7

It
Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 720014 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS724014 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Cgml2liance lasgection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Perauimans Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 0610612Q05 _ Entry Time: 08:19 AM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Larry & Barbara Stallings Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Larry Stallings Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 779 TDke Rd Belvidere NC 279199747
Physical Address:
Facility Status: E Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 36"21'13" Longitude: j6°27'31"
3 miles North of intersection of Sandy Cross Rd. and Turnpike Rd. on Turnpike Rd., SR 1001 in Perquimans County.
Question Areas:
0 Discharges & Stream Impacts 0 Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Q Records and Documents 0 Other Issues
Certified Operator: Joseph L Stallings Operator Certification Number: 19375
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On -site representative Larry Stallings Phone:
24 hour contact name Barbara Stallings Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis:
4-29-05 = 3.5; 1-1"5 = 2.7; 10-18-04 = 1.7; 8-27-04 = 2A
Soil test 4-4-05
The freeboard levels and rain events are recorded weekly.
The irrigartion records are complete and balanced out.
Everything looks good!
Phone:
Phone:
Page: 1

,
IF
Permit: AWS720014 Owner -Facility: Larry Stallings Facility Number. 720014
Inspection Date: 06/06/2005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
0 Swine - Feeder to Finish 560 1-
Total Design Capacity: 560
Total SSLW: 75,600
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
.agoon Li 22.0C
Page: 2

♦'
Permit: AWS720014 Owner -Facility: Larry Stallings
Facility Number: 720014
Inspection date: 06/06/2005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts_ Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ M ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? 1301111
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
M ❑
❑
2. is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑
Yes
0 ❑
No NA
❑
NE
Wastes QnjIPf-,�n. Storage & Treatrngnt
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe erosion,
❑
M ❑
❑
seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed andlor managed through a waste management or
❑
M ❑
❑
closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks
❑
M ❑
❑
andlor wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
0 ❑
❑
improvement?
Yes
No NA_
NE
Waste Al2glicatagn
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or improvement?
130
❑
❑
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%!10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Pasture)
Crop Type 2
Fescue
(Pasture)
Crop Type 3
Small Grain (Wheat,
Barley,
Oats)
Crop Type 4
Page. 3

J
Permit: AWS720014 owner -Facility: Larry Stallings
Facility Number: 720014
Inspection Date: 051OW005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
No NA NE
Waste Application
Crop Type 5
yes
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14, Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan(CAWMP)? ❑
0 ❑ ❑
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
00
❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
0 ❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
N ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
E ❑ ❑
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
0 ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
on
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ 000
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after ? 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ E ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑ ❑ 0 ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ 1100
25, Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ ❑ 0 ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ m ❑ ❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS720014 Owner - Facility: Larry Stallings
Inspection Date: 06106/2005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
:ords an 1`10Q lments
27, Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Facility Number: 720014
Reason for Visit: Routine
28, Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those mortality
rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality
representative immediately.
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Yes No NA NF
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑■❑❑
❑ M ❑ ❑
O ■ ❑ ❑
❑■❑❑
❑ M ❑ ❑
Page: 5

l'
Incident Report
Report Number: 200500864
Incident Type: Non -Compliance Reporting
Category: Animal
Incident Started: 03/28/2005
County: Perquimans
City:
Farm #: 72-14
Responsible Party:
First Name:
Middle Name:
Last Name:
Owner:
Address:
City/State/Zip:
Phone:
Permit
Material Category: Estimated Qty: UOM
DD:MM:SS Decimal
Latitude:
Longitude:
Location of Incident: Larry Stallings hog Farm
Address: Sr 1001
City/State/Zip Belvidere NC
Report Created 05/09/05 03:23 PM
On -Site Contact:
First/Mid/Last Name:
Company Name:
Phone:
Pager/Mobile Phone:
Reported By:
First/Mid/Last Name:
Company Name:
Address:
City/State/Zip:
Phone:
Pager/Mobile Phone:
Position Method:
Position Accuracy:
Position Datum:
27919
Reportable Qty. lbs. Reportable Qty. kgs.
Page 1

i
Cause/Observation:
Mr. Stallings left a voice message with Scott Vinson informing
him of a high freeboard level on 03/28105.
Action Taken:
David May spoke with Mr. Stallings on 3-30-05 at 820 am and
asked him to send in a POA by the 31st.
Incident Questions:
Did the Material reach the Surface Water? No
Surface Water Name?
Did the Spill result in a Fish Kill? Unknown
If the Spill was from a storage tank indicate type.
Containment? Unknown
Cleanup Complete? Unknown
Directions:
Comments:
of 04-05-05 we have no POA, however he told Scott they have about
A, of rye that could be sprayed when it gets dry enough.
Conveyance:
Estimated Number of fish?
(Above Ground or Under Ground)
Water Supply Wells within 1500ft: Unknown Groundwater Impacted : Unknown
Access to Farm Animal Population Spray Availability
Structure Questions
Report Created 05/09/05 03:23 PM
Page 2

i
Access to Farm
Farm accessible from the main road?
Animal Population
Confined?
Depop?
Feed Available?
Mortality?
Spray Availability
Pumping equipment?
Available Fields?
Structure Questions
Breached?
Inundated?
Overtopped?
Water on outside wall?
Poor dike conditions?
Waste Structure Type Waste Structure Identi inches
Lagoon LAGOON 1 16.00
Event Type
Incident closed
Requested Additional information
Referred to Regional Office - Primary Contact
Report Entered
Incident Start
Report Received
Event Date
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
ONE
❑ Yes
[]No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
[]No
❑ NA
LINE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
ONE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
ONE
❑ Yes
❑No
❑NA
LINE
❑ Yes
❑No
❑NA
ONE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
ONE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
ONE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑NE
Plan Due Date Plan Recieved Date Level OK Date
05-03-31 12:00:00
2005-03-30 04:33:39
2005-03-28 09:00:00
2005-03-28 09:00:00
Report Created 05/09/05 03:23 PM
Due Date Comment
Page 3

Standard Agencies Notified:
Agency Name
Phone First Name M.E. Last Name Contact Date
Other Agencies Notified:
Agency Name Phone First Name M.I. Last Name Contact Date
DWQ Information:
Report Taken By: Report Entered By: Regional Contact:
Scott A Vinson Marlene Salyer Marlene Salyer
Phone:
Date/Time: 2005-03-28 09:00.00 AM 2005-03-30 04:33:39 PM
Referred Via:
Did DWQ request an additional written report?
If yes, What additional information is needed?
Report Created 05/09/05 03:23 PM page 4

Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O• Routine O Complaint Q Follow up Q Emergency Notification O Other . ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 72 I4 Date of Visit: 5/14/ZO114 Time: 1LUO
O Not Operational Q Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified 13 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .................
Farm Name: ..........................._................ ......... County: ..........................
laa.l:�:.�.l�.ax�a�[:a,�S�ka117uigS.l~',�tiixi............ W,A►RQ.......
Owner Name: L3.rry/.Rarhara................... Stahlng&....................................... .............. Phone Na: (� I.Z�7- 15,......... ...............................................
Mailing Address: 7.79..T xIjpAkc.ti,RAd............................................................................Rdyxd.vjr.r,.KC ........................................................ 7.7919 .............
-_Facility_Contact:_................................................................. ... _ ,Title: Phone No: .........................................
Onsite Representative: Larrx.Statlial j...................................... .... Integrator: 7AU0jjy.zrj0Wjn .....................
Certified Operator:JosoptI.L.............................. S.tallino ........................................... Operator Certification Number: D.3.75.............................
Location of Farm:
i miles North of intersection of Sandy Cross Rd. and Turnpike Rd. on Turnpike Rd., SR 1001 in Perquimans County. #
•r
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 3b • Z1 6 13 '� LongitudeF 76 • 27 31 °
Design Current
Design Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
Poultry
Capacity Population Cattle
Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
10 Layer
❑ Dairy
® Feeder to Finish
560
565
ID Non -Layer
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
10 Other
Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
560
❑ Gilts
Total SSLW
75,600
❑ Boars
Number of Lagoons
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑.Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ...................................................................... ........... . ..................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): 22
12112103
Continued

Facility Number: 72-14
Date of Inspection 5/14/2004
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? if yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
}
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Fescue (Hay)
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes N No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional
Air Quality representative immediately.
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
Comm6nts:(refer to'questeoq#js. Explain. any YES'ansivers and/or any reconinnendations or any other comments., '
Use drawings of facility, to Better eaplain'situadons. (use, additional pages as necessary):": -[]-Field Copy—[j Final Notes
Pump lagoon as often as weather allows to lower lagoon level.
Waste 5/3iO4 = 4.0 lbsN/1000gal., 2/9104 = 2.3, 6123103 = 2.5, 1117103 = 2.0.
Soils 2/24/04 with no lime required and Cu-Zn levels within guidelines.
Have Bill Blackwell amend WUP for year aroung Fescue application window.
Reviewer/Inspector Name Scott Vin n
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: [o
1211210.3 Continued

Facility Number: 72-14 Date of Inspection 1 5/14/2004
r
,Required Records & Documents
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
® No
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
® No
23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
® No
25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
® No
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
®No
27. 'Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
®No
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
®No
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?.
❑ Yes
® No
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
❑ Yes
® No
31. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
❑ Yes
❑ No
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Stocking Form ❑ Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfall ❑ Inspection After V Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
12112103

WA-i�z
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross Jr., secretary
Department of Environment and natural Resources
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
To: Producer
From: Daphne B. Cullom
Environmental Specialist
Washington Regional Office
Subject: Animal Compliance Inspection
Year 2001
Enclosed please find a copy of the Compliance Site Inspection (as viewed in the DWQ database) conducted at the referenced facility
by the Division of Water Quality from the Washington Regional Office. Please read this inspection and keep it with all other
documents pertaining to your animal operation for future inspections.
In general, these inspections included verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP); (2) the
farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC 2110217, Senate Bill 1217, and the Certified Animal Waste
Management Plan; (3) the farm operation's waste management system is being operated properly under the direction of a Certified
Operator; (4) the required records are being kept; and (5) there are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or runoff.
As a reminder, please note the following comments, which are conditions of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan and the
General Permit; therefore, these items must be implemented:
(p The maximum waste level in lagoons/starage ponds shall not exceed that specified in the CAWMP. At a minimum, maximum waste
level for waste for lagoons/storage ponds must not exceed the level that provides adequate storage to curtain 25 year, 24 hour storm
event plus an additional foot of structural freeboard.
ep An analysis of the liquid animal waste from the lagoon shall be conducted as close to the time of application as practical and at least
within 60 days (before or after) of the date of application. This analysis shall include the following parameters: Nitrogen,
Phosphorus, Zinc and Copper.
(p Soil analysis is required annually. Lime is to be applied to each receiving crop as recommended by the soil analysis.
e) The following records are required: off -site solids removal, maintenance, repair, wastelsoil analysis and land irrigation records.
These records should be maintained by the facility owner/manager in chronological and legible form for a minimum of three years.
ep Land application rates shall be in accordance with the CAWMP. In no case shall land application rates exceed the Plant Available
Nitrogen (PAN) rate for the receiving crop or result in runoff during env Given application.
ep All grassed waterways shall have a stable outlet with adequate rapacity to prevent ponding or flooding damages. The outlet can be
another vegetated channel, an earth ditch, stabilization structure, or other suitable outlets.
ep It is suggested, not a requirement, to keep crop yield information for fimire use to update your waste management plan. You will
need three years of crop yield data before your plan can be updated.
For your information, any swine facility that has a discharge to surface waters of the State will have to apply for a National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit with the Division of Water Quality, effective January 1, 2001.
Thank you for your assistance and cooperation during the inspection. If you have any questions, please contact me at 252-946-6481, ext.
321 or your Technical Specialist.
Cc: �3iWdlto
DBC Files
943 Washington Square Mail Washington, NC 27889 252-946-6481 (Telephone) 252-946-9215 (Fax)

Type of Visit a Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit *Routine O Complaint O Foliow up O Emergency Notification O Ottler ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 72 14 Date of Visit: 11M2001 Time: 11:00 am
rO Not Operational ORelowThreshold
® Permitted ® Certified ©Conditionalfv Certified © Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .............
Farm Name: Lar , .HArbara.Sta ' County: Pcrq>x mains ....................
Owner Name: JArryfBadmrA...................s1aI11][tgs. ......... ...................... (2 ). ...................... Phone No: �2?,97:2L5.%...-----............................................_..
Mailing Address: 2.7.2..TUlrtiAilk&............................................................................ BrIvidetAC......................................................... 27.91Q.............
Facility Contact: .............................................................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No:......,............................................
Onsite Representative: No.o ez.owite............................................................................... Integrator: C.arm'.i.................... .................................... _.........
Certified Operator:,)oseph.l. . ..................... ........ StwIftw........................................... Operator Certification Number:,12,37,1...........................
Location of Farm:
miles North of intersection of Sandy Cross Rd. and Turnpike Rd. on Turnpike Rd., SR 1001. in Perquimans County. +
�i
1.7]
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude F 36 OF 21 13 4� Longitude 75 • 27
Desk Current:--; _.- .Desi .:Current:; De§t n ::Cureent
:..... ..:.....: .
Capacity: Pbliulaiti6n ;Poultry ; : C ac' Po elation ::'Cattle .. Ca `it ':::Po ulatioia
ElWean to Feeder ❑Layer ❑ Dairy
i!
® Feeder to Finish 560 0 .- ❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other
:. ❑ Farrow to Finish .: Total Design Capacity.: 560
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars ::.:Total SSLW 75,600
Number of La Dons 1 ❑Subsurface Drains Present © Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds! Solid:Traps ' - ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yus Z No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance nran-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b_ If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. if discharge is observed_ what is the estimated tlow in eal/min?
d. Does discharge by-pass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify- DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes 0 No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes rg No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Sintcture 6
Ident iI icr:...................................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard{inches}: dQ.............................................. .................................... ................................... .................. ---.............. ...................................

Facility Number: 72-14 Date of Inspection 1 1119/2601
,5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes N No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑Yes ®No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes N No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes N No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes N No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload []Yes ® No
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Fescue (Graze)
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
N No
16, Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
Recguired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
N No
18. Does the facility fail to have all component,-; of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
N No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
N No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
N No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
N No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
N No
23. Did Reviewer&Bpector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
N No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
®No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes N No
❑ No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit- You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Cowmen#s {refer #o questron #) Explarn any YES answers andlor any ecommendatri►ns or any other comflrents - i
Use drawyngs of facdity #o better explaur srtuatrans Y(use addrhonid pages as necessar3) ❑ Field Cop} ❑Final Notes
Excellent freeboard level. No animals onsite at time of inspection. Currently cleaning housing and switching to new
integrator (Carroll's). Please send a copy of your latest irrigation records, waste and soil analysis and freeboard level
records to my office @ Daphne Cullom, 943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, NC 27889. If you have any
questions, please call me at 252-946-6481, ext, 321. Thank you!
12-31-2001, D. Cullom - Division received records 12-6-2001. All irrigation records complete with a nitrogen balance.
Freeboard levels recorded weekly. Waste analysis dated 9-10-2001, 2.21bs./1000 gals.
Reviewer/Inspector Name Da ne B.`Cullom< entere[i bi AQn Tgdall
Reviewer/Insvector 5ignatu 3&0 rf*k-- Date: 1 'Z_ 3 i — O t

05103101 Continued
Facility Number: 72-14 date of Inspection 1119/20U1 - •a
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge atlor below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanenthemporary cover?
[-]Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes ® No
[:]Yes [:]No

A
.r
State of Noah Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Govemor
1301.Holman, Secretary. -
Kerr T_ Stevens, Director _
June 5, 2000
Mr. Larry Stallings
Larry & Barbara Stallings
Route 1, Box 382-B
Belvidere, North Carolina. 27919
SUBJECT: Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection _
Larry & Barbara Stallings
Facility No.' # 72-14
Perquimans County
Dear Mr. Stallings:
Enclosed please find a copy of the Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection (as viewed in DWQ
database) conducted at the referenced facility by the Division of Water Quality from the
Washington Regional Office. Please read this inspection and keep with all other documents
pertaining to your animal operation for future inspections.
In general, these inspections included verifying that:.(1) the_ farm has a Certified Animal Waste
Management Plan (CAWMP); (2) the farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15
NCAC 21L0217, Senate Bill 1217, and the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan; (3) the .
farm operation's waste management system is being operated properly under the direction of a
Certified Operator, (4) the required records are being kept; (5) there are no signs of -seepage,
erosion, and/or runoff -
As a reminder, please note the following which are conditions of the Certified Animal Waste
Management Plan and the general permit therefore these items must be implemented:
cp The maximum waste level in lagoons/storage ponds shall not exceed that specified in the
CAWMP. At a minimum, maximum waste level for waste for lagoons/storage ponds must not
-exceed the level that provides adequate storage to contain 25 year, 24 hours storm eves plus an
additional foot of structural freeboard.
cp An analysis of the liquid animal waste from the lagoon shall be conducted as close to the time
of application as practical and at least within 60 days (before or after) of the date of application.
This analysis shall include the following parameters: Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Zinc and Copper.
q) Soil analysis is required annually
943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, North Carolina 27889 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer' .

Page Two
Larry & Barbara Stallings
# 72-14
4p The,followimg records are required: rainfall and lagoon level data, off -site solids removal,
maintenance, repair; waste/soil analysis and land irrigation records. These records should be
maintained by the facility owner/manager in chronological and legible form for a minimum of
three years.
q) Land application rates shall be in accordance with the CAWW- In no case shall land .
s
ya�plicati6i `ikes iXc the Plant Available Nitro en�PAI� rate for the receiving crop ar
result in ruimffd&irig m g ve application.
, Keep lagooWstorage ponds free of foreign debris including; but not limited to .tires, bottles,
plastic products; light bulbs, glo�es;-syringes or any other solids waste.
(p The lagoon areas should be kept mowed or otherwise controlled and accessible. High grass
does not allow you to conduct a thorough inspection of the lagoon area for seepage, rodent
damage, etc.
sp All gxassed waterways shall have a stable outlet with adec uate'capacity to p event-po4ding or
flooduag_dainageg: "The outlet can be aiiotlier vegetated channel, an earth ditch,'stabilization
structure, or other suitable outlets.
( _It is eseed'not Muired to keep crop yield information for future use to update your waste
management plan. You will need three years of crop yield data before your plan can be
updated.
Thankyou for your assistance and cooperation during the inspection. If you have any questions,
please contact me at 919/•946-6481, ext. 318 or your Technical Specialist.
Sincerely,
Lyn B. Hardison -
Environmental Specialist
Cc: Perquimans MRCS
�-WaRo
.,,-LBH fides .'

Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit © Routine O Complaint Q Follow up Q Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 72 14
E Permitted M Certified E3 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered
Date of Visit 4rz4rz000 Printed on: 5/22/2000
FO Not Operational Q Below Threshold
Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: .... ............. -... County: IftrQuuIDUSEtwS................. _ W.A$0_....
Owner Name: >trKy/ftrUxxt...................f��liia................................_........... Phone No: (5�.2��:5.......W .............
_.
Facility Contact: ..............................................................................Title:................................ Phone No:
Mailing Address: �iRultC..l.. l3aC. ------------------------------- ... VP1Ad.grc.], C........................... .. 179 .... . .
Onsite Representative: 1CiI7.F.�Cblil[�l.t�60.gS..,.-- Integrator: WI�I,�IJtS.FaxLA0.;i.9
Certified Operator:JQ&Cpjt.L.............................. 5.WJ=........................................... Operator Certification Number:19 7.5. ....... ------ --..
Location or Farm:
- - - - - -- - ..I
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 36 • 2141 13 u Longitude 76 ' 27 L 31
Discharges & Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes ®No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ® No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ® No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in -al/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ® No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: .................................... .................................... ......... ......... ............... .....................................
Freeboard (inches): 24

'Continued on baU
Facility Number: ^ 72-14_ I Date of Inspection V24/2000 Printed on: 5/22/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepige, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7- Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9_ Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste. Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Yes ® No
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Graze) Fescue (Grazed)
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Impector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility iequire a follow-ap'visit by seine agency? "-
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
i�To vioratiods.or deficwiacies•were'noted'dW iing this visit: - Yoti will receive no further ' • _ -
- correspondence about tnis:visit.::::::::.:::::::: :::.: :::: :::: .
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes 19 No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes IN No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
Records available for review.
Conditional certification has been met as early as 8/30/96.
IRR2 records up to date.
Waste analysis 9/13/99 = 2.8 lbs.
Need another waste analysis.
1999 soil analysis available.
If waste is applied via honey wagon, make sure to have a waste analysis result for honey wagon
japplication. SEE PAGE 3
Reviewer/Inspector Name _tHsrdison

V
• LReviewer/Inspector Signatures Date:
Facility Number: 72-14 Date of Inspection 4R4R000 Printed on: 51=000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail.to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes ❑ No
The old lagoon onsite had been closed.
It is suggested to check the location of stop and start pump mark. The marker indicates <19,
but visually it's 24".
Practice weed control in sprayfield.
Continue to address bare spots on dike wall.
If you have any questions, contact me at 252-946-6481, extension 318.
c

State of North Carolina
Department'of Environment and
Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Mr. Larry Stallings
Larry & Barbara Stallings Farm
Rt. 1, Box 382-B
Belvidere, NC 27919
NC1>1ENVk
NOFrr" Cr.ARQLINA E>EPARTMENT OF'
ENVIRONMENT ANa NATURAL RESOUF2GE$
April 30, 1999
SUBJECT: Animal Feedlot Operation Compliance Inspection
Larry & Barbara Stallings Farm
Facility No. 72 -14
Perquimans County
Dear Mr. Stallings:
On March 31, 1999, I conducted an Animal Feedlot Operation Compliance Inspection at the referenced
facility. Overall, the operation was found to be in satisfactory condition. A copy of the inspection report is
attached for your review.
In general, this inspection includes verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan (CAWMP); (2) the farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC 2H.0217, Senate
Bill 1217, and the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan; (3) the farm operation's waste management
system is being operated properly under the direction of a Certified Operator, (4) the required records are
being kept; (5) there are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or runoff
The recommendations and/or comments regarding your inspection can be found in the comment section of the
attached inspection form. It is very important as the owner and Operator in Charge that you address any noted
concerns, as soon as possible. For assistance, please contact your Technical Specialist and/or the local Soil &
Water conservation District Office.
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance during the inspection. Should you have further questions or
comments regarding this inspection, do not hesitate to call me at [phone], ext 321.
Sincerely,
Daphne B. Cullom
Environmental Specialist 11
cc: Perquimans County SWCD Office
AaR0
943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, North Carolina 27889
Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

f
^ T l
'�, � -� •-�•x �; p rvu on ot hou'and, water oaserva ion - pera ion eview -
O.Divisiou of Soil`and,Water Conservation Compliance Inspection Yr s
Division of Water Quality4,Compliance Inspection
zsyk p Other Agency _Operation Review'
- ;.
10 ttoutine p t:ompiamt p rouow-up of uwd inspection p rollow-up of uNwc: review p Vtlier _
Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection 1 14:20 _j 24 hr. (hh:mm)
p Permitted p Certified r Conditionally Certified p Registered 10 Not operationa Date Last Operated: ...........................
Farm Name: l arry..&.13arbara.StallingsF.arm......................................................... County: Perquimans WARO
Owner Name: r!ALB#.r.b.gra................... $m l �lgS..._.................................................. Phone No: ��7r.�1.��.......................
.............................................
FacilityContact: ................. .............................................................. Title :............................................................... Phone No:
MailingAddress: I..1..$ .............. B....................................................................... Adyiduc.N.0 ......................................................... V.P.J.9 .............
Onsite Representative:$arbara.S.tallings..................................................................... lntegrator: W.ilUms.Farm.mLNlw„Inc_..........._..................
Certified Operator: JoNgph.JL ...............................$.(alling5........................................... Operator Certification Number: 1�,, 7$................_.._.........
Location of Farm:
.miles.I!larrth..af.iataryl:cxiran..al'.SaarIX..Cr�ass.R.d.and.Tu>:mpike.R.d..Qn.T.ur�aRi�e.Bd.,.SR.IQQ.1.iui.P�es4uixnans.Coua€��.................... _`
�t
Latitude ®• ©' ©� Longitude ®• ©z ©�
Swine Capacity Population
❑
Wean to Feeder
®
ee er to
Finish
560
524
❑
arrow to
Wean
❑
Parrow to
Feeder
❑
twrow to
Finish
❑
Ults
❑
oars
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer p Dairy
❑ Non -Layer p Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 560
Total SSLW 75,600
Number of Lagoons 1 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present 13 agoon rea jr3Spraykielrea
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ oLiquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? p Yes N No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4, Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes N No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ..................................................................................................................... .......................................
Freeboard(inches):.....3.3...............................................................................................................................................................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (iel trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back

r
Facility Number: 72-14 Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
❑ Yes
B No
(if any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
p Yes
N No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
B No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
p Yes
B No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
p Yes
B No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
p Yes
p No
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified. Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
p Yes
13 No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
p Yes
p No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
p No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
p Yes
p No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
B No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
p Yes
B No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
p Yes
p No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
13 Yes
p No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ic/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
p Yes
p No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
p Yes
B No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
13 Yes
B No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
p Yes
p No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
B No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
p Yes
B No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
p Yes
0 No
G ::No: violations; or:deficiencies were: noted: 6iing 6is:visit..You:will receive: no: further
..:c6rre pbadeth&6 about ->this: ::: ::: :: : :: :: :: :
-14, 18-19. A follow up review at the local S W CD office will be conducted along with a follow up site visit later this year.
A Justification & Documentation for Mandatory WA Determination should be conducted during the 1999 Operation Review.
you have any questions about this inspection, please contact me at [phone], ext. 321.
Reviewer/Inspector Name DaphneB.. ullom
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

j Site Requires Immediate Attention:
Facility No. 7 z- 14
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT.
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: �iL� z7 , 1995
Time: f a ' Sri
Farm Name/Owner:_Loc.r r
Mailing Address: _ _� #j o Y_ _39_ 2_ -
County: Te""A U bD nS - -
Integrator. Phone: _ Zj 7- 2-*53
On Site Representative: 93a b _�-c, t S Phone:
Physical Address/Location:
Type of Operation: Swine ✓ Poultry U Cattle
Design Capacity:
,,3 1 S 9- 1-2—
Number of Animals on Site: 55 '5--
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: 3 6 ' 2 Z " Longitude: -76 ' 2 7 ' 527 ' Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon havg sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
1-76-1
(approximately I Foot + 7 inches) Yes r No Actual Freeboard: __4 _Ft. Inche
Was any seepage observed from the n(s)? Yes or as any erosion observed? Yes o
Is adequate land available for spray Ye " or No7 Is the cover crop adequate? Yes or No ?
Crop(s) being utilized:
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from
No
100 Feet from Wells? es br No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes or To
Is animal waste discharged into waters a state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes o No If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate w management records mes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on spec acreage with cover crop)? Yes 04
Additional Comments:
B�-�
Inspector Name Signature
cc: Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed.
FAV

kA
moo