720012_ENFORCEMENT_20171231

NORTH CAROLI NA
Department of Environmental Qua

ENFORCEMENT
ENFORCEMENT
ENFORCEMENT

WArFR.
Q�
0 �
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
CM# 7005 1820 0003 6595 0603
Mr. Bryant Perry
Belvidere Farm
334 Icaria Rd
Tyner NC 27980
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION
April 20, 2006
RE: Notice of Violation (NOV-2006-PC-0122)
Animal Operation Compliance Inspection
Belvidere Farm
Facility Number 72-12
Perquimans County
Dear Mr. Perry:
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
This letter is to notify you that facility number 72-12 is in violation of its CAWMP and North Carolina
Administrative Code Subchapter 15A.0217. Joseph Gyamfi, from the Washington Regional Office of the
Division of Water Quality conducted an inspection on April 13, 2006 at your facility in Perquimans County.
Attached is a copy of the inspection report for your review.
In general, the inspection was conducted as a routine annual compliance inspection to verify that (1) the
farm has a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP); (2) the farm is complying with requirements
of the State Rules 15A NCAC 2H.0217; (3) the farm operation's waste management system is being operated
properly'under the direction of a Certified Operator; (4) the required records are being kept; and that (5) there
are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or runoff. The following violation was noted during the inspection:
• In accordance with Condition III, Item 4 of your General Permit, a Standard Soil Fertility Analysis
including pH, phosphorus, copper, and zinc shall be conducted on each application field receiving
animal waste in accordance with NCGS 143-215.1 OC(e)(6) at least annually. The NCDA & CS
Agronomic Division website indicates that the latest soil test report for your facility is dated 7/29/2004,
which was confirmed during the inspection. Additionally, soil sampling data was not provided during
the inspection. Based on the absence of soil test report for 2005, you failed to conduct soil fertility
analysis for fields that received animal waste in 2005,
North Carolina Division of Water Quality Internet www.nswaterqual'ity.org
943 Washington Square Mall Phone: [phone]
Washington, NC 27889 FAX [phone]
An Equal OpportunitylAffirmative Action Employer— 50% Recycledl10% Post Consumer Paper
Nne
orthCarolina
Naturally

Cont. Page Two
�,^, ,kpQ 20, 2006
Belvidere Farm
Facility # 72-12
The Permittee shall provide to this_ office within ten (10) working days from receipt of this violation notice, a
written explanation and a plan that will ensure that the problem does not recur. Please note that this office's records
indicate that you were previously cited for similar violations in a Notice of Violation dated July 15, 2004 in which
no soil sample analysis was conducted in 2003. Your explanation will be reviewed, and be advised that if this
violation continues, the Division will send recommendation for enforcement action to the Director of the
Division of Water Quality:
It is very important as the owner and/or the Operator in Charge that the aforementioned violation(s) and/or
deficiencies and any other.problems that may arise be resolved, as soon as possible.
Thank you for your assistance and cooperation during the inspection. If you have any questions concerning
this matter, please contact me at 252-948-3939, or Joseph Gyamfi, 252-948-3942..
Sincerely,
r
David May
Aquifer Protection Regional Supervisor
Washington Regional Office
Cc: Perquimans SWCD Office
NCDSWC-WaRO
Aquifer Protection Animal Central Files
WaRO Compliance Animal Files
Murphy Family LLC

Perry, William Copies To:
3341ca C Rd.RE: (/V
QV-� 2 UV 7 - PC `®/ 2,ZfTyner, NC 27980
1 200
.oilTest''- - oft
copy-/ w tour r2corlds
WASNINGT �REGIONA, OFFICE � Farm. 72.12
OWq
5/9/2006 SERVING N.C. RESIDENT'S FOR 0- J Perquimans County I v l K �, _ Y a�G
Agronomist Comments
C -- 12, 3
F + orma oa
ale l;iwe
;:: Recomirieu gu$
,�xa{�, r
ry
Sample No. East Crop
Me Yr TIA
Crop or Year
Lime
N P205
K20
lilg S
Cu
Zn
B
Mn
See Note
01
1st Crop: Fes/OG/I'im,M
0
120-200 0
0
0 0
0
0
.0
0
12
2nd Crop: Fes/OG/fim,M
0
120-200 0
0
0 0
0
0
.0
0
12
Test Results
Sail Class HM% WIV
-CEC BS%
Ac pH P-I K I
Ca% Mg%
Mn-1 Mn-AI(1)Mn-AI(2) Zn-1
Zn-AI
Cu-1
S I
SS -I
NO3-N NH4-N
Ni
MIN 1.31 1.19
6.2 82-o
1.1 6.2 407 273
45.0 16.o
30 32
32 359.
359
225
34
0.
lel(i or+matlon�
,,. ....... .. ....... .,
A�] II d=Z t
'."PIG...--..,.... o. ...
Reiwo eII 1 a y # z r
.,.. :,.. ..-.-..., ....., .. �:, .r,.3.,s...,,.,•.r, ,.sae Y„awy.t.• ,IdN''.:-: .,rx.c_.-dn+`i
Sample No East Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime .
P205
K20
Mg . S
Cu
Zn
B
Mn
See Note
02
1st Crop: Fes/OG/Tim,M
-3T
120-200 0
0
0 0
0
0
.0
0
12
2nd Crop: Fes/001rn,M
0
120-2W 0
0
0 0
0
0
.0
0
12
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V
CEC BS%
Ac pH' P-1 K I
Ca% Mg%
Mn-1 Mn-AI(1)Mn-AI(2) Zn-1
Zn-AI
Cu-I
S-1
SS-1
NO3-N NH4-N
N,
MIN 1.08 1.12
6.4 81.0
1.2 5.8 - 507 156
56.0 13.0
39 40
40 887
887
499
29
0
%ld'lnfdrmatlon
lied
mmepP Ops
r
Sample No. Last Crop
_A
Mo , Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
IV P205
K20
Mg S
Cu
Zn
B
Mn
See Note
03
1st Crop: Corn Grain
0
120-160 0
0
0 0
0
0
.0
0
3
2nd Crop: Soybeans
0
0 0
0
0 0
0
0
0
3
Test Results
o W/V
CEC BS%
Ac p H P-I K I
Ca% Mg%
Mn-1 Mn-AI(1) Mn-AI(2) Zn-I
Zn-AI
Cu-I
S-1
SS-1
NO3-N NH4-N
N
0. 1.22
5.2 85.0
0.8 6.0 308 98
57.0 19.0
32 36
29 369
369
333
31
0
Field1nformati6n
lAppliedlinie
Recommends
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T'lA
Crop or Year
,Lime
N P205
K20
Mg 'S
Cu
Zn
B
Mn
See Note
04
Ist Crop., Corn Grain
.3T.
120460 0
0
0 0
0
0
.0
0
3
2nd Crop: Soybeans
0
0 0
0
0 0
0
0
0
3
Test Results
Sots Class HM% W/V
CEC BS%
Ac pH P-1 K 1
Ca% Mg%
Mx-1 Mn-AI(1)Mn-AI(2) Zn-I
Zn-Al
Cu-I
S-1
SS-1
NO3-N AFH4-N
N
MIN 0.91 1.24
6.4 84.0
1.0 5.8 389 86
64.0 13.0
47 45
38 534
534
436
29
0

wAr4� r '' Michael F_ Easley. Governor
'9 William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
`ot QG North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Crj Wan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
j Division of Water Quality
o cmff '30-fG 8 } November 5, 2002
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Bryant Perry
Belvidere Farms
334 Italia Road
Tyner, NC 27980
SUBJECT: NOTICE OF VIOLATION
Animal Feedlot Operation Compliance Inspection
Belvidere Farms
Facility No. 72-12
Perquimans County
Dear Mr. Perry:
This letter is to notify you that the subject facility is in violation of its Certified Ali" Waste Management Plan, General
Permit, Title 15A North Carolina Administrative Code, Subchapter 2H, Section .0217(d) and N.C.G.S. 143-215.1.
On August 9, 2002, Scott Vinson from the Washington Regional Office of the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) conducted
an Animal Feedlot Operation Compliance Inspection at the Pitchfork Farms in Lenoir County. A copy of the inspection
report is attached for your review. In general; the Compliance Inspection was to determine if: (1) the farm has a Certified
Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP); (2) the farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC
2H.0217, Senate Bill 1217, and the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan; (3) the farm operation's waste management
system is being operated property under the direction of a Certified Operator, (4) the required records are being kept; and
that (5) there are no signs of seepage, erasion, and/or runoff. The following violations were observed during the inspection:
➢ During the compliance inspection conducted by Mr. Scott Vinson, it was noted that there was an inadequate amount
of freeboard in lagoon #1. This holding pond or "solids pit" is required to have a minimum of 12 inches of freeboard at
all times. Upon inspection on August 9, 2002 lagoon #1 only had 9 inches of freeboard with no prior significant rainfall
to justify this level. In accordance with condition V, item 3 of your General Permit, the maximum waste level in
lagoonslstorage ponds shall not exceed that specified in the CAWMP. At a minimum, maximum waste level for waste
for lagoonsistorage ponds must not exceed the level that provides adequate storage to contain 25 year, 24 hours storm
event plus an additional foot of structural freeboard.
➢ The Washington Regional Office was not notified as to the high freeboard problems prior to finding it during the routine
inspection. In accordance with condition III, item 6(e) of the General Permit, the Permittee shall report by telephone to
the appropriate Regional Office as soon as possible, but in no case more than 24 hours following first knowledge of the
occurrence of any of the following events: e. Failure to maintain storage capacity in a IagooNstorage greater than or
equal to that required in Condition V(3) of this General Permit. -
Q43 Wachinrrtnn Rmcaro Mail Wawhirmit m N(' 77RR4 (757) 44R-64R1 1TaJpnhnnw1 (9571 44Fi51715 (Fax)
NCDENR
r imtnrnPrRmvinA.

Page Two
Notice of Violation
November 5, 2002
Belvidere Farms
It is very important as the owner andfor the Operator in Charge that these aforementioned violations and any other problems
that may arise be resolved, as soon as possible. For additional assistance, please contact your Technical Specialist.
You are requested to respond in writing to this notice within 15 days of receipt, outlining the corrective actions that have
been undertaken andfor have been planned to address these violations and any -further actions taken to prevent future
violations of this nature from occurring. The effectiveness of your response will be a factor in the consideration of future
enforcement. Please be advised that this letter does not prevent the Division of Water Quality from taking enforcement
actions for past or future violations.
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact me at
252-946-6481, ext. 212 or Scott Vinson at ext. 208.
Sincerely,
A -Jim Mulligan
Regional Supervisor
cc: Brown's of Carolina, Inc.
Perquimans County SWCD Office
DSWGWaRO
Compliance Group
„ W9R0
SAV Files

i=
Facility Number Date of Visit: 8/9/2002 : Time1:45
p of Operational p BeiowThresbold
a Permitted E Certified p Conditionally Certified p Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm -Name: Belvidere Farms County: PAr.0i mans ..................................... ..WARQ.......
Owner Name. Bryant Perry Phone No: 252-221-8750
Mailing Address: 334.Icaria.Road............................ ......._..............------......---... 1,yaer.._NC ............................................................. 2.7.1811..............
Facility Contact: ftaa-P rry-__............---------------------------Title:............................................................... Phone No:...........................
Onsite Representative: Bryant -Perry .............. ..................... .._.............. Integrator: BxovKW..s..nL.Carolinajuc......................
Certified Operator:William.B.-_.................... rxxxy............... ....... .......... ........ Operator Certification Number:21k352 ............................
Location of Farm:
mile North ofFe-ech Springs RZ on the western side of Goodwin and the second location os approx. 112 mile from this on i
the Southern side of Beech Springs Rd. SR l 111
r
® Swine p Poultry [3Cattle [3 Horse Latitude �• ®' ®" Longitude ®• L 1 ®u
-mmg Design Cnrient ��,s��'Des
'�
Current Design-Currcent
�`�
Somme^ - =r= ' Panl Cattler; a -``
P,opulatian Capacity
,zCapacEtyPopulahon!Y
-
>�-Capacity _Population
... -
v _r7i
can to ee er
� ❑ ayer �� p auyee
❑ an- ayerEE] on- any
er to mrs
arrow to can
:
I] er
❑ Farrow to Fe er
❑ Farrow to Finish
a �:;Z, � otal Des"tgn Capacttyfl = 4,400
p Gilts".
- ,,�
~_ _ ;
y xxTo#al_SSLW 384,000
� ..sue .�
❑ Boars--
❑ u su ace rams resent p p Lagoon Area pray Pit Are
T
`� _
; ❑ o Liquid Waste anagement System
ry,j '
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes N No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a- if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes Cl No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes R No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes N No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway N Yes ❑ No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: TT�i1Sff~I. ..... ................................................................................................................................................................................
......
Freeboard(inches): ................ 9.... ............ ............... a7................ ............ -..................... ....................................

IF ace ity um er: 72_I2
Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4.6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? p Excessive Ponding p PAN p Hydraulic Overload
Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ®No
pYes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes. N No
12. Crop type Corn, Sm Grain OS (wheat) Soybeans Fescue
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? D Yes N No
14. a) Does the facility lick adequate acreage for land application? p Yes p No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WllP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) -
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified A WMP?
p Yes ❑ No
p Yes p No
p Yes N No
p Yes N No
p Yes N No
p Yes ® No
N Yes ❑ No
13 Yes N No
p Yes H No
®Yes []No
pYes ®No
p Yes ® No
p Yes H No
p No violations or dericiencies were noted 2unng this visit You will receive no turtber correspondence about this visit.
13 Nulal Notes
;. * Need to lower the small lagoon to at least 12 inches of freeboard. Yump into large lagoon as soon as possi
Please give me a call at 252-946-6481, ext. 208, when 12" of freeboard is achieved.
* Waste 9/4/01 with 022 lbs N/1000 gal-
* Last irrigation was 7/24/01 on corn. No irrigation events have been made since.
19.* Soils analysis; need to locate 2001 and trail or fax me a copy. Remember to take a 2002 soil analysis.
Scott Vinson, DWQ-DENR, 943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, NC 27889 (252-946-6481, ext. 208)
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date: J" /y/n r

05103101
Continued
E
ace fity N um er: 72_12
Date of Inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below 0 Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? p Yes ®No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (Le, residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, p Yes '® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? p Yes ®No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) p Yes ®No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? p Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
E
13 Yes p No
�ajifK+�iV '"F- �i'1 l'•+.�� «x-i "..a ��t � ���x,•1� �t � �"YP S� w •T R„ - —S - S _
Mt
y.s. -ON
,, t �5^si�-- �'_^'�'T. „mom'' t•-y f
kll
�3 - �'t -.S �a�� � f .�..T ti�'�`"L. • _
z:ys.,�Sd+� t.�''tx 3• p"" x .�i-• .T - a'4-'y.l r :�� _ -
-� c �.r _ _. ^;i' =fin '.� • " ". .,� _
'.
+"ra•- - --poi -+� .�3�t.`.-�'�"�.,._ ! � �� .�r�. y � +� --� � _
rL
Al
-X•!-.T�.�rs r ;h ~-ems ^sS ?..w 4 1�:.w .Z
t
� s _
it H*4J.
rd M•_iy,i«a+ t; ��..�'Y+".'T-.� �r-;,�.-�x•r .. rv,.:-,..R _ ._ ._�. .-
J

I
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, .Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
June 5, 2000
Mr. Bryant Perry
Belvidere Farms
Route 2, Box 75
Hertford, North Carolina 27944
SUBJECT: Notice of Deficiency
Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
Belvidere Farms
Facility No. # 72-12
Perquimans County
Dear Mr. Perry:
Enclosed please find a copy of the Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection (as it is
viewed in DWQ database) conducted at the referenced facility by the Division of Water
Quality from the Washington Regional Office. Please read this inspection and keep it
with all other documents pertaining to your animal operation for future inspections.
In general, this inspection included verifying that: (1) the farm is complying with
requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC 211.0217, Senate Bill 1217, the Certified
Animal Waste Management Plan and/or General Permit; (2) determine whether the
waste utilization plan is based on total or actual wetted acres; (3) the farm operation's
waste management system is being operated properly under the direction of a Certified
Operator; (4) the required records are being kept; (5) there are no signs of seepage,
erosion, and/or runoff. The following deficiencies were noted during the inspection.
cp In accordance with condition III, item 2 of your General Permit, you are required to
record weekly lagoon levels on forms provided and/or approved by DWQ.
cp In accordance with General Permit, land application shall be in accordance with the
CAWMP. Each crop has an ideal irrigation window and fescue is a cool weather grass
therefore it should not be applied onto in the hottest months such as June, July, August
and possibly September. Follow your waste plan and general permit.
943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, North Carolina 27889 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity AffirmaUw Action Employer

Page 2
Belvidere Farms
# 72-12.
(p The irrigation records were unavailable because of being misplaced. It is advised to
find them and/or calculate an estimated amount of nitrogen that has been applied and
create irrigation records. It was mentioned that the lagoon had been dropped by
approx. 18 inches.
cp Continue to address the weeds on the dike wall and in the sprayfields. The vegetation
on the dike wall needs to be controlled so that a visual inspection can be done by you
and by the inspectors.
cp It is suggested to contact your Technical Specialist for assistance on the accuracy of
the lagoon marker in comparison to the lagoon wall.
As a reminder, please note the following which are conditions of the Certified Animal
Waste Management Plan and the general permit therefore these items must be
implemented:
cp The maximum waste level in lagoons/storage ponds shall not exceed that specified in
the CAVVW. At a minimum, maximum waste level for waste for lagoons/storage
ponds must not exceed the level that provides adequate storage to contain 25 year, 24
hours storm event plus an additional foot of structural freeboard.
cp An analysis of the liquid animal waste from the lagoon shall be conducted as close to
the time of application as practical and at least within 60 days (before or after) of the
date of application. This analysis shall include the following parameters: Nitrogen,
Phosphorus, Zinc and Copper.
(p Soil analysis is required annually
cp The following records are required: rainfall and lagoon level data, off -site solids
removal, maintenance, repair, waste/soil analysis and land irrigation records. These
records should be maintained by the facility owner/manager in chronological and
legible form for a minimum of three years.
(p Land application rates shall be in accordance with the CAWW. In no case shall land
implication rates exceed the Plant Available Nitrogen AM rate for the receiving crop
or result in runoff during my gLve application.
cp Keep lagoons/storage ponds free of foreign debris including, but not limited to tires,
bottles, plastic products, light bulbs, gloves, syringes or any other solids waste.
(p The lagoon areas should be kept mowed or otherwise controlled and accessible. High
grass does not allow you to conduct a thorough inspection of the lagoon area for
seepage, rodent damage, etc.
(p It is suggested not required to keep crop yield information for future use to update your
waste management plan. You will need three years of crop yield data before your plan
can be updated.

Thank you for your assistance and cooperation during the inspection. If you have any
questions, please contact me at 252/946-6481, ext. 318 or your Technical Specialist.
Sincerely,
Lyn B. Hardison
Environmental Specialist
Cc: Perquimans NRCS
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit (w/out attachments)
NCDSWC-WaRO (w/out attachments)
✓WaRO
LBH files
943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, North Carolina 27889 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

Type of Visit 0 Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
(Reason for Visit &• Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 72 I2 Date of Visit: 41Z4/2000 Time: E== Printed on: 5/23/2000
O Not Operational Q Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified El Conditionally Certified 13 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ..............
Farm Name: ile yA re.EArras........................................................................................... County: FCrjqjLjMRUfi .................................... WARO?.... ...
OwnerName: Biry.alut.................................... Fury ........................................................... Phone No: 252-221-8.75.0 ..........................................................
Facility Contact: ........
Title:
Phone No:
MailingAddress: RIAt+ .Z,.> x..7.................................................................................... HcrifujIM ......................................................... 2.79.44 .............
Onsite Representative: )B.13?Aatl't=rry............................................................................... Integrator:IkarxRll'.;<.QQ�is.S�f.Y�.Xlits...............................
Certified Operator::5?Y.AII1am..H............................. F.Cr]CJ'-................................................ Operator Certification (slumber: 0 2.............................
Location of Farm:
l/�.tnil�.l!3arkh.Q��e��Jbl.�lzringa.T�.dA.Qxt.thii:.�:cst�xm.side.ai.G�.atl�rin..amd.ihe.sewed..lAcaxinm.Qs.appr.Q�c,..l.C.�.ianiie..€xam.t)ais.�atx. �`:
tl«.aut)hexal.side.nf.c�sb. rin s.>[�d, .SLi.lt.>il...................................................................................................................................................................
IN Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 36 ' 14 413 K Longitude F 46
Design Current
Swine Canacity Population
® Wean to Feeder
2000
3875
® Feeder to Finish
2000
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity population Cattle capacity Population
❑ Layer 1[3Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 4,000
Total SSLW 330,000:::::]
Number of Lagoons 2 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area I0 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds/ Solid Traps 1 10 No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ® No
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ® No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ® No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ....................................................
Freeboard (inches): 24

Continued on back
Facility Number: 72-12 Date of Inspection 4/24/2000 Printed on: 5/23/2000
I' 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenancelimprovement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ❑ No
12. Crop type Corn, Soybeans, Wheat Fescue
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the -facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ 1fl viol_atious:ou:defieiencies•wet�e:noted :dui-iug•this •visit.; Nott will:receive nb further : • : -
corres�o-ndence abaitt fhis.visit.
-s'aifd/oi. any
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
Records available for review.
Waste analysis 414100 = #1, 1 A and #2, 0.25
Awaiting soil analysis.
Continue to manage the vegetation on dike wall. Practice weed control.
Do not apply on fescue in June, July and August._
Continue to address stormwater diversion area to move rainwater offsite.
Misplaced irrigation records from this past fall and winter. However, the lagoon was dropped 18".
SEE PAGE 3
Reviewer/Inspector Name °Lyn Ha dison Entered by Ann Tyndall { ,"

Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
Facility Number: 72-12 Date of Inspection 4/24/2000 Printed on: ar�a�2uvv ';
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge attor below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes []No

war
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and
Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B_ Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Bryant Perry
Belvidere Farms
Rt. 2, Box 75
Hertford, North Carolina 27944
4 Or�!'W'A •
ODENR
NOFrTWI CAROLrNA C?EF-AFZTMENT OP
ENVIRONMENT ANn NarLJRAI,._ RESOURCES
November 17, 1999
SUBJECT: Notice of Deficiency
Animal Feedlot Operation Compliance Inspection
Belvidere Farms
Facility No. 72-12
Perquimans County
Dear Mr. Perry:
On April 5, 1999, 1 conducted an Animal Feedlot Operation Compliance Inspection at the
Belvidere Farms in Perquimans County. A copy of the inspection report is attached for
your review.
In general, this inspection included verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified Animal
Waste Management Plan (CAWMP) and the General Permit; (2) the farm is complying
with requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC 2H.0217, Senate Bill 1217, the Certified
Animal Waste Management Plan and the General Permit; (3) the farm operation's waste
management system is being operated properly under the direction of a Certified
Operator, (4) the required records are being kept; (5) there are no signs of seepage,
erosion, and/or runoff. The following deficiencies were observed during the inspection.
➢ Overapplication of animal waste in excess of the Plant Available Nitrogen Rate
set our in your CAWMP for the receiving crop(s) was noted in the irrigation
records (IRR-1 & IRR-2). See the attached inspection form for further
comments.
It was determined from.a review of the CAWMP that a wettable acre determination is not
required of this facility.
943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, North Carolina 27889
Telephone 252194E-fi481 FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

o-
U.S. Postal
r-'
CERTIFIED MAIL
RECEIPT
N
ca
i.
. j
f
I�
r3
0
postage
$
o
r
C3
Certified Fee
-7 /
Z / I
►P
f3
Return Receipt fee
(,
—0
(EndDrseme.rt Requir"
C3
c
Tote! Postage 3 Fan
M
0
0
r`
MR BRYANT PERRY
BELVIDERE FARMS
334 ICARIA ROAD
TYNER
NC 27980
z

Page Two
Belvidere Farms
Facility No. 72-12
November 17, 1999
It is very important as the owner and the Operator in Charge that you resolve these
aforementioned deficiencies and any other problems that may arise, as soon as
possible. Nothing in this letter should be taken as absolving this facility of the
responsibility and liability of any violations that have resulted or may result from these
deficiencies.
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance during the inspection. Should you have
further questions or comments regarding this inspection, do not hesitate to call at (252)
946-6481, ext. 321.
Sincerely,
Daphne B. Cullom
Environmental Specialist
cc: Carroll's Foods of Va., Inc.
Perquimans County SWCD Office
DSWC-WaRO
Co fiance Group
44 RO

Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Operation Review
0 Division of Soil and Water Consen'ation - Compliance Inspection
{
E Di%•isioii�of Water Quality - Compliance Inspection
Q Other Agency:- Operation Review
:..
E6 Routine Q Complaint Q Follow-up of DR'Q inspection 0 Folio,.v-up of DSWC re%-ienv Q•Other
- - Facility' Number 72 l2 Date of lnspection 4-5-99
Time of Inspection 11:00 124 hr. (hh:mm)
Permitted R Certified ❑ Conditionally Certified Registered [3 Not Operational Date Last Operated:
County: PeICtllRllxtts ....................
Farm Name: l;rAvidry.k•ums...................................................................................... ................. V!'ARQ.......
Otv nor Name: $xJalulL.................................. J!cra ......................... Phone No: 2-9 -2B .
Facility Contact:
Title:..........
Mailin- Address: Rt.2.$oa.7.S............................................................................................. HcrjfQrd-YC
PhoneNo: ...................................................
....................... 2.79.44 .............
Onsite Repmsentative: 0 , ..... ' Integrator: - '
n�at.Pcr :............ ...................... ............................... n alrxo s...ta►ds..Df.Majmr..
Certified Operator: --William.B............................. P.erp .................................................. Operator Certification Number: 2035.2.............................
Location of Farm:
:1/2_mile.N�.rtlt_�af.Bceclt.SptGita;~s_Rd..�zt� txestcnol.side.�.fat►dst�nt.and.lh,�.seecn�a�d.kczea�#tan.as.ap�pxax,..11.2.3apule-frnttx.this.an........`
lthe.�auutlxezinside-at llee�h Sftri�ogs� Rd.&.u11.....................................................................................................................................................................
Latitude 36 14 48 Longitude 1 76 j• = 32 1• 46 1M
Design Current
Swine Canacity Ponulation
M Wean to Feeder
900
—1770
® Feeder to Finish
1800
—1875
❑ Farrow to Wean
J❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry- Capacity Population Cattle Ca acity Population
❑ Laver ❑ Dain
❑ Non -Laver JEJ Non -Dairy
Q Other I _
Total Design Capacity 2,700
Total SSLW 270,000
Number of Lagoons L ` J �❑ Subsurface Drains Present 10 Lagoon Area ❑ Sprat Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps No Liquid Waste Management System
Bls-hartes & Streanf lnma-!s,
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? i11 Yes M No
Disclhargtcr oricinal4u a-: ❑ Lagoon Ej Spray Field f 1 Other
a. If discharge is obsciz-ed. was the c:onv-eyante man-made? Cj Yes ❑ No
b. lf-discltargc is obscr ed. did ii reacli Water of tltc State" ( f yus. noidl - D Q) ❑Yes ❑ No
c. If dis_harpt is ott,;�-:l-ed. what;_ thte e>tit:raled f1ov: iri caVnini''
d. Do,: discharge bypass a lagoon syste:m? notify D„,'Q) [] Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? U Yes M No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes Mi No
lVasteR Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? r1 Spillway ❑ Yes M No
Structure 1 Stricture 2 structure.", Structure 4 Structure 5 SlmF :cure b
1 dentii i cr :................................... ..........
Freeboard (inches): ..............?5............................... —1............... ......
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity- of anv of the structures observed? (ie/ trees_ severe erosion -
seepage. etc.)
D. Yes M No
Continued on back
3/23/99

Printed on 11/17/99
Facility Number: 72-12 Date 4Pf lnNpec•tion
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do anv of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
8- Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ® PAN ® Yes ❑ No
12. Crop type Fescue (Graze) Corn (Silage & Grain)
U- Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16, Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Reuuired Records & Documents
17- Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fait to have a actively' certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge. freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Re%zewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection R7th on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
El. -No vioIatiaris or:defieiericies'-were, noted:during'this visit::1'o1i wdl:re iv no further: :
correspondence about this visit.' : ::: :. .: :: . . .
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes [:]No
❑ Yes No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ® No
D Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 9 No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
Comments (refer fo question #j: I7cplai :any,YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other coinments.�" _
.-
IIse drawings of facilify'to natter eaplaitr situations (use addtttnaal pages as necessary) - t
7. Continue efforts to establish vegetation along dike walls.
11. Tract #87, field 4 (Fields 1&2 in records) denotes overapplication as follows: field #1 248.33 lbs./-58.33 lbs./31% and field *2
216.05 lbs./-26.05/14%. Calibrate irrigation equipment to clarify GPM. Follow up visit will be conducted to review irrigation records
for corrections.
13. Grazing in "PUP? Field 4, Tract 87. Needs to be included in WUP.
14. Contact local SWCD for clarification on total acreage for tract 87, fields I & 2 to complete the WA determination.
you have any questions about this inspection, please contact me at [phone], ext. 321.
Reviewer/inspectorName Di
Rnvirwnr/Inenwetnr Cian�hvr i
axullom
e> -Lac Datp? I l i `1 - t c[

Printed on 11/17/99
Facilit) Number. 72-12 Dale of Inspection 4-5-99
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
❑ Yes
❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
❑ No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
❑ Yes
❑ No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
❑ Yes
❑ No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
❑ Yes
❑ No
'a 1. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
❑ Yes
❑ No
32. Do the flush tams lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑yes ❑ No

Revised January 22, 1999
JUSTIFICATION &. DOCUMENTATION FOR MANDATORY WA DETERMINATION
Facility Number­ja - 1
Farm Name:
On -Site Representab
Inspector/Reviewer's Name:=
Date of site visit:_ 4 -S _g s
Date of most recent WUP: -Ck
Operation is"flagged for a wettable
acre determination due to failure of
Part 11 eligibility item(s) F9 F2 F3 F4
Operation not required to secure WA
determination at this time b ed on
exemption E1 E2 E3 E4
Annual farm PAN deficit: pounds
Irrigation System(s) - circle #: . hard -hose traveler- 2. center -pivot system; 3. linear -move system;
4. stationary sprinkler system w perma pipe; 5. stationary sprinkler system w/portable pipe;
6. stationary gun system w/permanent pipe; 7. stationary gun system wlportable pipe
PART 1. WA Determination Exemptions (Eligibility failure, Part 11, overrides Part I exemption.)
E1 Adequate irrigation design, including map depicting wettable acres, is complete
and signed by an I or PE.
E2 Adequate D, and D2/D3 irrigation operating parameter sheets, including map
depicting wettable acres, is complete and signed by an I or PE.
E3 Adequate D, irrigation operating parameter sheet, including map depicting
/E4
wettable acres, is complete and signed by a WUP.
75% rule exemption as verified in.Part ill. (NOTE: 75 % exemption cannot be
applied to farms that fail the eligibility checklist in Part 11. Complete eligibility
checklist, Part 11 - F1 F2 F3, before completing computational table in Part 111).
PART 11. 75% Rule Eligibility Checklist and Documentation of WA Determination
Requirements. WA Determination required because operation fails one of the eligibility
requirements listed below:
F1 Lack of acreage which resulted in over application of wastewater (PAN) on spray
field(s) according to farm's last two. years of irrigation .records.
F2 Unclear, illegible, or lack of inform ationlmap.
F3 Obvious field limitations (numerous ditches; failure to deduct required
buffer/setback acreage; or 25% of total acreage identified in CAWMP includes
small, irregularly shaped fields - fields less than 5 acres for travelers or less than
2 acres for stationary sprinklers).
F4 . WA determination required because CAWMP credits field(s)'s acreage in excess
of 75% of the respective field's total acreage as noted in table in Part Ill.

Revised January 22, 1999
Facility Number-� - 1Gk
Part 111. Field by Field Determination of 75% Exemption Rule for WA Determination
TRACT
NUMBER
FIELD
NUMBER',2
TYPE OF
IRRIGATION
SYSTEM
TOTAL
ACRES
CAWMP
ACRES
FIELD
%
COMMENTS3
'67
1-3
�
7
r g.ti
Z, ,r-1.,e
(
87
4
I
FIELD NUMBER' - hydrant pull zone or point numbers may be used in place of field numbers depending on CAWMP
I
and type of irrigation system. If pulls, etc. cross more than one field, inspector/reviewer will have to combine fields to
calculate 75% field by field determination for exemption if possible; otherwise operation will be subject to WA
determination.
FIELD Nt1MBER2 - must be clearly delineated on map.
COMMENTS' - back-up fields with CAWMP acreage exceeding 75% of its total acres and having received less than 50%
of its annual PAN as documented in the farm's previous two years' (1997 & 1998) of irrigation records, cannot serve as the
sole basis for requiring a WA Determination. Back-up fields must be noted in the comment section and must be accessible
by irrigation system.

.i
t0a,06
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
B.
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
January 21, 1999
Mr. Bryant Perry
Perry Hog Farm
Route 2, Box 75
Hertford, NC 27944
SUBJECT: Notice of Deficiency
Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
Perry Hog Farm
Facility No..72-12
Perquimans County
Dear Mr. Perry:
On May 7 & 19, 1998, I conducted Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspections at the referenced
facilities in Perquimans County. Copies of the inspection report s are attached for your review.
In general, this inspection included verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified Animal Waste
Management Plan (CAWMP); (2) the farm is complying with requirements of th�State Rules 15 NCAC
2H.0217, Senate Bill 1217, and the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan; (3) the farm operation's
waste management system is being operated properly under the direction of a Certified Operator; (4) the
required records are being kept; (5) there are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or runoff. The following
deficiencies were observed during the inspection.
♦ The dike walls are lacking vegetation. The walls must be stabilized with grass. It is suggested to
level the top surface of the dike wall.
♦ Your waste plan does not include fescue or grazing. The waste plan must reflect the farming
activities of which you are doing. Any and all crops to be planted on the designated fields in the
plan must also be listed with the correct plant available nitrogen.
♦ The irrigation records must be completed regularly. The records must be completed in
accordance to the waste plan and the irrigation windows.
♦ Make sure your records are readily available for future inspections.
943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, NC 27889 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled / 10% post -consumer paper

Cont. Page Two
Bryant Perry Farm
Facility -No. 72-5
January 21, 1999
It is very important as the owner and the Operator in Charge that you resolve these aforementioned
deficiencies and any other problems that may arise, as soon as possible. For additional assistance,
please contact your Technical Specialist. Nothing in this letter should be taken as absolving this
facility of the responsibility and liability of any violations that have resulted or may result from these
deficiencies. Failure to comply with your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan and General
Permit could result in civil penalty assessment and/or revocation of your General Permit.
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance during the inspection. Should you have further
questions or comments regarding this inspection, do not hesitate to call at [phone], ext. 318.
Sincerely,
� 4 g -
Lyn 'B. Hardison
Environmental Specialist
cc: Perquimans County S WCD Office
DSWC-WaRO (w/out attachments)
Compliance Group (w/out attachments)
WQ Central Files
—WaRO

Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of lnspection ® 24 hr. (hh.mm)
o Registered s Certified p Applied for Permit d Permitted In Not perauona Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: Perry.Hag,.Fa.rmn........................................................................................... County: Peryuimans WARO
OwnerName: B.cYa.rkt................................... Fern, .... ....................................................... Phone No: 252-29.7.-200 .............................
Facility Contact: Rnxxtkerry..................................................Title: 01C ...................................................... Phone No: 2,52-.22.1 .8.7SIl.......................
Mailing Address: RURox..7S............................................................................................. HertfurANC .......................................................... Z79.44 ..............
Onsite Representative: Bn:aial.Pert:y.............................................................................. Integrator:lCa:rratl's.F.omds OtYa.ltxc...............................
Certified Operator:�'�'jUiam.B ........................... Prxxy ................................................. Operator Certification Number:2.035Z ............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude ® • ®'
c Swine �-
_:Capacity, Po
® Wean to Feeder
1000
IN ee er to mts
13 arrow to Wean
p Farrow to Feeder
p Farrow to Finish
p Gilts
p Boars
u Longitude ®• ©®K
urren -Design.-"Current-
0,
pulation Pultry Capacity Population' Cattle
_❑ a
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW-
�es�gn.•-.aJnrrent -
apacm#y �Popttlation_�_,
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenancelimprovement? p Yes ® No
2. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: El Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes ® No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes ®No
c_ If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d_ Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If ves, notify DWQ) Yes ®No
3. is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? p Yes ® No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require p Yes ® No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? p Yes ® No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? p Yes ® No
7/25/97 Continued on hack

S. Are their lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed
Structures (Lagoons,Holdine Ponds, Flush Pits. etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier.
Freeboard(ft):..............1.5&...-•----......-----......2.23..............
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
I I - Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an.
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
s
[3 es
® No
p Yes
® No
Structure 5 Structure 6
p Yes
® No
Yes
® No
® Yes
p No
p Yes
R No
p Yes
p No
15. Crop type ........... ..................
............................ ................ ...............................................-....................... ................................................... .............. .........................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (A WMP)? p Yes p No -
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
® Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
® Yes p No
..--- p Yes p No
[1 a'v d e S 4r' a cietit>Ees'v�eke �a3te d qg. t s W s t. • , oU w1 - reuiv-e Flo; t•t E-r . •
romespanderice ab6tit tills visit: :. . .
p Yes p No
nspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: } ��1-7LA_ ,/ , J Date: 4 J1-

Facilitv Number Date of Inspection FrI�9, ,- K
Time of lnspection © 24 hr. (hh:mm)
p Registered ■ Certified p Applied for Permit p Permitted 1U.Not Operational I Date Last Operated:
Farm Fame. Prx ty. H.og.Faxm........................................................................................... County: Perquimans WARO
OwnerName- Rryant.................................... Perry ........................................................... Phone No: 29.7:-.2985 ...................................................................
FacilityContact: ...............................................................................Title:............................................................... Phone No:
MailingAddress: RU.Hox..75............................................................................................. Heirt%x BC....................------------•......................... Z79.4.4 ..............
Onsite Representative: Bryant.P.erx:y.............................................................................. Integrator:Carr:ull's.FoAds.Of..Y.a..ime................................
Certified. Operator: W!lliam.B_........................... Frxry ................................................. Operator Certification Number:203-,U ............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude ®•®° ®
Swine Capacity Populati
can to ee eree
er to mis
r1_3
arrow to ean
❑ Farrow to ee er
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Longitude ®• ©' ®'
P�-�F=.uestgn W L:etrreat..:-� Design ;C:urrent�==-
Poaltry a; Capacity7 Population Catfle CapacityPopulation__
- r
3 ayer =° ❑ atry ;:
❑ Non -Layer Y113 N on- atry
= T©tal DesignYCapacxty Y2,700
r
�270
s Total'SSLW ,
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c- If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than Iagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
b. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7: Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
n/a
❑ Yes ® No
❑ .Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
❑ Yes ig No
Continued on back

- u
a. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed"
Structures (Lagoons, Holding Ponds Flush Pits etc.
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3
Identifier:
Freeboard (ft):....................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
dr
p Yes N No
p Yes p No
Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
E3 Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes R No
15. Crop type .._.. Cahn.(Silage.&..Grain)........5m ali.Grain ..WheatBarley,.................... S.Qyheaaa.......................................... Eta= ............... .......
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated m e' Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ® Yes p No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail.to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
a • o ti ehS 0�' a �ciet�Cies'r�ere•ritite R tig s W s t: • _ oN •receive Rio' ee'
correspQndence about iHiis_visit:. -.
p Yes N No
p Yes ®No
© Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
® Yes p No
13 Yes ® No
13 Yes ® No
p Yes N No
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: r�,�� �/� by Date:

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
July 18, 1997
Mr. Bryant Perry
Perry Hog Farm
Route 1, Box 75
Hertford, NC 27944
SUBJECT: Notice of Deficiency
Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
Perry Hog Farm
Facility No. 72-12
Perquimans County
Dear Mr. Perry:
1DEHNR
On April 8, 1997, I conducted an Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection at the Perry Hog
Farm in Perquimans County. I was accompanied by John Fitzgerald from the Division of Soil &
Water and Mike Nixon. Overall, the operation was found satisfactory with a few deficiencies that
should be addressed by the Operator in Charge and/or the owner. A copy of the inspection report
is attached for your review.
In general, this inspection includes verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified Animal Waste
Management Plan (CAWMP); (2) the farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15
NCAC 211.0217, Senate Bill 1217, and the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan; (3) the farm
operation's waste management system is being operated properly under the direction of a Certified
Operator; (4) the required records are being kept; (5) there are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or
runoff. The following were noted during the inspection
The referenced farm is currently registered and you are currently working with the
Perquimans County Soil & Water Conservation District Office on getting the farm
certified.
2. Once the farm has a certified plan, please maintain all components of the Certified
Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP) on site. A CAWMP component list is
attached to this letter for reference.
3. The freeboard of the two lagoons was one foot and three feet.
943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, NC 27889 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled 110% post -consumer paper

Mr. Bryant Perry
Perry Hog Farm .
July 18, 1997
Page 2
4. Ducks, cows and a goat had complete access to the lagoons and there were large
areas of erosion along the dike walls. Animals should be limited to their access to
the dike walls. A vegetative cover must be maintained on the dike walls.
5. Tires and trash were noted in the lagoon. All foreign debris and objects must be
removed and kept out of the lagoon according to the NRCS guidelines.
6. Maximum and minimum pump markers will be installed as a requirement of
certification. These markers are to be installed to show the top and bottom
elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of the lagoon. Pumping
should be managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers. The primary
lagoon is pumped into the secondary lagoon therefore it is recommended to install
markers in the primary lagoon as well.
7. Irrigation records must be kept and the IRR-1 and IRR-2 forms should be used.
As a reminder, a minimum of nineteen inches of freeboard must be maintained in the lagoon and it
is required to maintain a buffer of twenty-five feet while spray irrigating from any drainage system
(ditch, swale, canal, stream, etc.). Please be aware that it is a violation of North Carolina General
Statutes to discharge wastewater to the surface waters (farm ditches, creeks, streams, etc) of the
State without a permit. The Division of Water Quality has the authority to levy a fine of not more
than $10,000 per day for the unpermitted discharge of wastewater into the surface waters of the
State.
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance during the inspection. Should you have further
questions or comments regarding this inspection, do not hesitate to call me at [phone];
ext. 318.
Sincerely,
Lyn . Hardison
Environmental Specialist II
cc: Perquimans County SWCD Office
DSWC-WaRO
Compliance Group
W entral Files
-W 0
943 Washington Square Malt, Washington, NC 27889 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled / 10% post -consumer paper

Routine
❑ DSWC Animal Feedlot Operation Review
® DWQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
Follow-un of
Facility Number 72 12
FarmStatue: Heght d.........................................................................
Follow-up of DSWC review Q Other
Date of Inspection 44-97
Time of Inspection 1400 124 hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time (in fraction of hours
(ex:1.25 for 1 hr 15 min)) Spent on Review 0
or Inspection (includes travel and processing)
Farm Name: Pant...%•Fsa............................................................................................ County: Purr mimans......------•....................... WAg.Q.......
OwnerName: B�3�tmt`. .. .. ....._. ._.. P.e=......................................................... Phone No: 29.7..72M5....... ........ ........... ....................... ... ».........
Mailing Address: Bl �o-IS. - .,................,........ �........_ ........__. ...rtts►jpd.N ................... _ ........_... 2I94..............
Onshe Representative: 19*921UM................. ............................... ........................ »..... Integrator. Fr .WjUiat ni.1C........................................
Certified Operator..W.HUAn.............. .............. ..... Perx7.... ............... ............................ Operator Certification Number.20,352 .......................... ».
Location of Farm:
Latitude ®• 14 f 48 Longitude 7b ' 32 • ®�
0 Not Operational Date Last Operated:...............................................................................
of vperatton and vestgn
Swine Number
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
® Farrow to Finish
600
General
Poultry Number Cattle Number
❑ Layer 10 Dairy
❑ Non -Layer 10 Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Number of Lagoons 1 Holding Ponds 2 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present
❑ Lagoon Area j 1[:] Spray Field Area
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenanedimprovement? ❑ Yes ® No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
a If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ®No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ® Yes [:]No
maintenance/improvement?
Continued on back

• . 6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge (if inspection after l/1/97)?
1' 8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures Maroons and/or Holding Ponds
9. Is structural freeboard less than adequate?
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
® Yes
❑ No
Freeboard (fl): Lagoon I Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3 Lagoon 4
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ® Yes ❑ No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenancefunprovement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adquate markers to identify start and stop pumping levels?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(if in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type .... 5mAU..Grkmf. dh aLJ3a1q .U10 ............................. .....................
16. Do the active crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the cover crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available irrigation equipment?
For Ceed Eacilities_Only
20. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
21. Does the facility fail to comply with the Animal Waste Management Plan in any way?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
23. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
24. Did Reviewerllnspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with owner or operator in charge?
® Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
[--]Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ' ® No
❑ Yes ® No
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments. 72 —12 I
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations_ (use additional pages as necessary):
he Perry Farm grows pigs for Frank Williams of NC and Mike Nixon manages the pigs while Bryant Perry is the OIC. There were 900 s
jean to feeders and 1800 feeder to finish. In addition there were approx. 15 cows, 1 goat and many geese and ducks. the lagoon had
res floating in it to serve as homes for the water foul. Mr. Perry is working with the NRCS office to obtain a CAWMP. # 5: the
rounds were very messy and tires in the lagoon; # 9, 13: the primary lagoon had one foot of freeboard and the wastewtaer has to be
umped to the secondary lagoon , there were no markers; # 11, 12: there was not a suitable cover on the dike wall, erosion was noted.
he cows and other animals had interfered with the cover crop. There is approx. 22 acres onsite and 40 acres across the road. Irrigation
y real system with three hydrants. During the exit conversation, Mr. Perry was informed of the deficiencies mentioned above
Reviewer/inspector Name
Reviewerllnspertor Signature:
Date: lidAl 7, 19
cc. Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Sedion, Facility Assessment Unit 11 /14196