700001_ENFORCEMENT_20171231

NUH I H UAHULINA
Department of Environmental Qual
II

ENFORCEMENT
ENFORCEMENT
ENFORCEMENT

---- p ---- - -7-7- a
Ll
R OWED
�4i✓�fn,�_��G�l.. �__ �C/.as� ar-1 �v��lf�-,. � _. �rjoGc�l''"+v
---
--�6�-��rL �� _ w� c � films �f � �c l�f ��+-•-'�`�oC#�% _�� _�c�
i Q

t ' WMI�6
\N Michael F. Easley, Governor
O Y9 William G. Ross Jr., secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
0 Division of Water Quality
June 23, 2004
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
7003 3110 0005 8968 8791
Mr. Bobby Keaton
812 Andrews Crossing
Smithfield, VA 23430-5833
SUBJECT: NOTICE OF VIOLATION
Animal Feedlot Operation Compliance Inspection
Weeksville Farm
Facility No. 70-1
Pasquotank County
Dear Mr. Keaton:
This letter is to notify you that the subject facility is in violation of its Certified Animal Waste Management Plan, General
Permit, Title 15A North Carolina Administrative Code, Subchapter 2H, Section .0217(d) and N.C.G.S. 143-215.1.
On March 18, 2004. Scott Vinson from the Washington Regional Office of the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) conducted
an Animal Feedlot Operation Compliance Inspection at the Weeksville Farm in Pasquotank County. A copy of the
inspection report is attached for your review. In general, the Compliance inspection was to determine if: (1) the farm has a
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP); (2) the farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15
NCAC 2H.0217, Senate Bill 1217, and the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan; (3) the farm operation's waste
management system is being operated properly under the direction of a Certified Operator; (4) the required records are
being kept, and that (5) there are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or runoff. The following violations were observed during
the inspection:
There was an over application of nutrients from September 6 through September 16, 2003 on Field #2, Tract 1162 due
to the failure to plant a receiving crop. There were eight (8) applications total each lasting 60 minutes. The IRR2 forms
were not complete at the time of the inspections and should be completed as soon as possible. The most current waste
analysis to be use when calculating the amount of Nitrogen over applied is dated August 18, 2003 with 0.70
lbsN/1000gai. In accordance with condition Il, item 2 of your General Permit, a vegetative cover shall be maintained on
all land application fields and buffers in accordance with the CAWMP. No waste may be applied upon fields not included
in the CAWMP. Also in accordance with condition 11, item 4 of your General Permit, land application rates shall be in
accordance with the CAWMP. In no case shall land application rates exceed the Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) rate for
the receiving crop or result in runoff during any give application.
It is very important as the owner and/or the Operator in Charge that these aforementioned violations and any other problems
that may arise be resolved, as soon as possible. For additional assistance, please contact your Technical Specialist.
You are requested to respond in writing within ten (10) days of receipt of this Notice, outlining the corrective actions that
have been undertaken and/or have been planned to address these violations and any further actions taken to prevent future
violations of this nature from occurring. Your explanation will be reviewed and if an enforcement action is still deemed
appropriate, your explanation will be forwarded to the Director with the enforcement package for his consideration. Please
be advised that this letter does not prevent the Division of Water Quality from taking enforcement actions for past or future
violations.
943 Washington Souare Mall Washinoton. NC 27889 [phone] (Telenhnnel (2521 946-9215 (Fax)
AV.?
i
Customer Service

Page Two
Notice of Violation
June 23, 2004
Weeksville Farm
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact me at
252-946-6481, ext. 212 or Scott Vinson at ext. 208.
Sincerely,
� f
Jim Mulligan,
Regionial Supervisor
cc: Murphy Brown
Pasquotank County SWCD Office
DSWC-WaRO
Non -Discharge Compliance and Enforcement Unit
OWQ Central Files
WaRO
SAV Files

r♦ Division 'of Water Quality
O DivisI" of Soil and Water Conservation
O :Other Agency -
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit 0 Routine O Complaint O Follow up Q Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facilit-v Number 70 1 Date of Visit: 3/18/2004 Time: 12:00
- .,. .�® O Not O erational O Below Threshold
® Permitted N Certified [3 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name::YE'.eckuiille.Fum..................................................... ........ County: ftswol mk................... Owner Name: Bob1ty1yrm........................ lzakaia....................... ................................. Phone No: 757-356:-.9214 ..........................................................
Mailing Address: 812.,Aimdum.a..C.rossing..................................................................... Smith iglu,-YA..................................................... U.43.15-5831-
FacilityContact: ...... Title: ..... .......................................................... Phone No:...................................................
Onsite Representative: llahby.Ke.alw............................................................................ Integrator: Xf•►Mh B.r.gWjn...........................
Certified Operator:UEiwQgd.Kaki..................... SWUM ........................................... Operator Certification Number:l93.7.6 ................... .........
Location of Farm:
ake R'eeksville Rd. from Elizabeth City turn left on Dry Ridge Rd. on left about 1/4 mile. A.
T
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 36 •F 11 , Longitude 76 • 11 St3
Design Current
Swine Canacitv Ponulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
1500
2
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
EE
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Cavacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 1,500
Total SSLw 202,500
Number of Lagoons 2
Holding
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes N No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:.........L(&ono......... ......... 2..(ba ki......... .................................... ................................... ................................... ......
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
N No
❑ Yes
N No
❑ Yes
N No
Structure 6
Freeboard (inches): 25 26
12112103 Continued

Facility Number: 70—I
Date of Inspection 3/18/2D04
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minim liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
N Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes N No
N Yes [--]No
12. Crop type Corn, Soybeans, Wheat
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application"? (i.c. residue on neig.]—,boring vegetation; asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional
Air Quality representative immediately.
❑ Yes []No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
N Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes [:]No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary): ❑ Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
11 & 15) A Notice of Referral was sent on this farm from Soil & Water due to the overapplication of Nitrogen on Field #2, Tract 1162.
There was no receiving crop planted. As noted during Soil & Water's review, IRRI forms had irrigation events recorded from Sept. 6
through September 16, 2003.
23)The IRRI records are currently missing from Mr. Keaton's records. These records need to be found and the IRR2 form needs to be
completed and placed in the records with a copy forwarded to me at: 943 Washington Square Mall Washington, NC 27889 along with
an explanation of how this violation occurred. An NOV will be sent.
Need to have your Tech. Spec. help with resiting lagoon markers as soon as possible.
Soils dated 3/28/03 w/ no lime required and Cu/Zn levels adequate.
Waste dated 6/19/03 wl 1.1 lbsN/1000gal. and 3/5/03 w/ 0.39 1bsN/ I 000gal.
Waste dated 1/13/04 w/ 1.2 lbsN/1000gal. and 8/18/03 w/ 0.70 IbsN/100gal.
Reviewer/Inspector Name Scott Vinson
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date: 7/b J4
12112103 Continued

Facility Number: 70-1 Date of Inspection 3/18I2004
Reguired Records & Documents
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
® Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
31. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment?
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Stocking Form ❑ Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfall [:]Inspection After I" Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
❑ Yes ® No
[:]Yes ® No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
® Yes ❑ No
❑Yes ®No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
12112103

FORM 1RR-1 Lagoon Liquid Irrigation Fields Record
For Recording Irrigation Events on Different Fields
Farm Owner Facility Number
Irrigation Operator
Tract
Field t#
Date
dd r
Crop Type
Field Size
acres
Irrigation Time
Number"afin
Sri klers O
_�?
2-1
` ?-v
y
/
.
y
>r'
��_ E

i Division of Water Quality
O Diyision of Soil and _Water Conservation
= O.Other Agency
of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review Q Lagoon Evaluation
Reason #or Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O+ Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 70 1 Date of Visit: Q9/25/2003 Time:L rO 12:110
Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified © Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ............
Farm Name: W&Cksulk.Farin.................................................................................... County: Elugulank ..................................... WARD........
Owner Name:RobbyLy.D.il.........................&'RUX........................................................ Phone No: 75.7-356-9214 ...........................................................
Mailing Address: 1112.,P jjdreAla.Cx.o55jUg.................................................................... Satx th i.CJd v.A...................-----..............................
Facility, Contact: .............................................................................. Title: Phone No:
OnsiteRepresentative: JgS?..l;'Ale.QI0.ii1�............................................................................... Integrator: ClKAtll'S.1+ARld�.ofY��.1101�.............. ................
Certified Operator:f apt,w.9u.d.Ealcl..................... St;,ljiUgj............... :.......... I ...... I......... Operator Certification Nurnber:193,7.6 .............................
Location of Farm:
ake Weeksville Rd. from Elizabeth City turn left on Dry Ridge Rd. on left about 114 mile.
r
® Swine ❑ Poultry El Cattle [I Horse Latitude 36 • 11 6 40 « Longitude 76 • 11 1 58
Design Current
Swine Canacitv Ponulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
1500
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Cavacitv Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer I IFEE]
Dairy
❑ Non -Layer Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 1,500
Total SSLW 202,500
Number of Lagoons 2 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present 110 Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds 1 Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed; was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
1 Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ® Yes ❑ No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ® Yes ❑ No
Swucture 1 Structure ? Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:.............................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): 16? 12?
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: 70-1 Date of Inspection 09/25/2003
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum nm and minimum liquid level
elevation marld ngs?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload [
12. Crop type
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
® Yes
❑ No
® Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewhrispection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
C Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
25. Were any additionatproblems noted -which -cause non oniplianee A'vYM-P`r --ayes ❑ ItFo-
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary): ❑ Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
* Emergency site visit conducted as part of Hurricane Isabel's damage assessments.
+
Received notification that there was evidence of possible discharge from farm by Carl Dunn, DSWC, on 9/24/03.
& 8) There is the possibility of a prior discharge, however there is no waste being discharged today. The joints to the irrigation
pipe have been leaking, especially near the lagoon/pump where the angles at the joints are too great, The joints need to be sealed
properly before any further irrigation takes place.
9) The lagoon marker looks to read approximately 19", however after walking the perimeter of the lagoon the waste level appears
to be around 12", Have a new gauged marker appropriatley installed in each lagoon. Notify me of the day this is to happen.
14) A 30 day POA is re�uired be of the high freeboard. A message was left for Mr. Keaton describing these problems and requirements.
Jyj
Reviewer/Inspector Name Scott Vinso
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
05103101 Continued

i'Faellity Number: 70-1
Date of Inspection 09/25/2003
gdor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
05103101

Stallings Wholesale Meats, Inc.
Linwood E. Stallings
111 Lane Drive
Elizabeth City, N.C. 27909
October 31, 2002
DENR-DWQ
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, N.C. 27889
Dear Mr. Mulligan:
I am writing in reply to the Certified Letter I received on Wednesday,
October 29 from your department.
We had a bad pump seal which caused a leak in February, which we
promptly replaced with a new pump. We also caulked around the pipe
in the corner of Building 1 near the flush tank when we saw a small leak
to prevent any future leakage. This same action was taken for Building 2
near the flush pit.
The leakage we experienced from the above problems were minimal
leakages leading us to assume it wasn't enough to report. However, we now
realize that we should have reported it and any future problems will be
promptly reported.
We understand that the water level minimum is 19 inches freeboard at all
times. We have no problem complying with this and regularly pump when
the levels indicate necessary.
Please feel free to contact me at 252-335-w4741 if I can be of further
assistance or if you have any further questions considering this matter.
Sincerely,
Linwood E. Stallings
RECcI VPO
NOV 0 5 2002

0FFjc�j e,"'. "_- USE
co
U7
Postage
6�9 sa
Certified Fee c�. Q �4
d
e
Retum Redept Fee f�
(Endorsement Required)
ED
rR
r--1
Restricted Dellvery Fee
(Endorsement Required) ��
1NiHS
♦�
f
4
Total Poets^'
m
Q
U MR BOBBY KEATON
71
r`
sa1 f Ap[ 812 ANDREWS CROSSING
arPosax SMITHFIELD VA 23430-5833
Crty Stare,

L09 c
'NNA i >= Michael F. Easley, Governor
O' Witham G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
f Alan W. Klimek, P.E Director
> f Cx =1 Division of Water Quality
o
-Tour- [)F>L C C_,Oil (,F Eq-Zy October 22, 2002
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr_ Linwood E. Stallings
Stallings Wholesale Meats, Inc.
111 Lane Dr.
Elizabeth City, NC 27909
SUBJECT: NOTICE OF VIOLATION
Animal Feedlot Operation Compliance Inspection
Stallings Wholesale Meats, Inc.
Facility No. 70-1
Pasquotank County
Dear Mr. Stallings:
This letter is to notify you that the subject facility is in violation of its Certified Animal Waste Management Plan, General
Permit, Title 15A North Carolina Administrative Code, Subchapter 2H, Section _0217(d) and N.C.G.S. 143-215.1.
On August 8, 2002, Scott Vinson from the Washington Regional Office of the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) conducted
an Animal Feedlot Operation Compliance Inspection at the Pitchfork Farms in Lenoir County. A copy of the inspection
report is attached for your review. In general, the Compliance Inspection was to determine if: (1) the farm has a Certified
Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP); (2) the farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC
2H.0217, Senate Bill 1217, and the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan; (3) the farm operation's waste management
system is being operated property under the direction of a Certified Operator, (4) the required records are being kept; and
that (5) there are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or runoff. The following violations were observed during the inspection:
During the compliance inspection conducted by Mr. Scott Vinson, he noted evidence of past discharges from two
leaks first detected by Mr. Martin McLawhom, DSWC, during his annual routine operation review on February 6, 2002.
The first being a small leak coming from the comer of Building #1 near the flush tank. Note that this leak had been
caulked prior to the inspection. A leaking flush pipe at Building #2 by the flush pit was also detected. This leak was
also caulked prior to Mr. Vinson's inspection. Mr. McLawhom noted in his review that the ditch behind building #2 had
evidence of a past discharge from a leaking seal from the flush pump. According to Mr. McLawhom due to the dry
conditions it appeared that waste did not leave the farm site. In neither circumstance were these leaks reported to the
Division of Water Quality as required by your General Permit. In accordance with condition III, item 6g of the General
Permit, the Permittee shall report by telephone to the appropriate Regional Office as soon as possible, but in no case
more than 24 hours following first knowledge of the occurrence of any of the following events: g. Any discharge that
bypasses a lagoon/storage pond resulting in a discharge to surface waters or that poses a serious threat to the
environment.
There was approximately 17 inches of freeboard in the small lagoon. It is noted that you frequently transfer waste from
the small lagoon over into the large lagoon in order to apply to fields. However your design is not considered a two
stage lagoon system therefore there is a required minimum of a 19 inch freeboard at all times in both lagoons. in
accordance with condition V, item 3 of your General Permit, the maximum waste level in lagoons/storage ponds shall not
exceed that specified in the CAWMP. At a minimum, maximum waste level for waste for lagoons/storage ponds must
not exceed the level that provides adequate storage to contain 25 year, 24 hours storm event plus an additional foot of
structural freeboard. It is also noted that you corrected this violation on or before August 19, 2002 when you notified Mr.
Scott Vinson by phone that this violation had been property foxed.
44'� WachinMnn RniiarP MAII Mmhinntnn N(: 97RRq 0 ;?) 44F A4R1 M14-nhonp1 17Fi71 Q46-g715 (Fax)
©VXX
w5b- ENR
C:iictnmPr Sarnr.P

Page Two
Notice of Violation
October 22, 2002
Stallings Wholesale Meats, Inc.
It is very important as the owner and/or the Operator in Charge that these aforementioned violations and any other problems
that may arise be resolved, as soon as possible. For additional assistance, please contact your Technical Specialist.
You are requested to respond in writing to this notice within 15 days of receipt, outlining the corrective actions that have been
undertaken and/or have been planned to address these violations and any further actions taken to prevent future violations
of this nature from occurring. The effectiveness of your response will be a factor in the consideration of future enforcement.
Please be advised that this letter does not prevent the Division of Water Quality from taking enforcement actions for past
or future violations.
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact me at
252-946-6481, ext. 212 or Scott Vinson at ext. 208.
Sincerely,
r
m Mulligan
.onal Supervisor
QC: gown's of Carolina, Inc.
Pasquotank County SWCD Office
DSWC-WaRO
Copliance Group
aRc
SAV Files

Type of Visit p Compliance Inspection p Operation Review p Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit p Routine p Complaint p Follow up p Emergency Notification p Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit: 8/8/2002 Time: 1t1:10
p Not Operational p Below Thresholl
Permitted 0 Certified p Conditionally Certified p Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ....................
Farm Name: Stallings Wholesale Meats Inc County: P.ascluatank..................................... 1?V,A.R0.......
Owner Name: Linwood E. Stallings Phone No: 252-335-4741
Mailing Address: 111.Laae.D.x........................................................................................... Elizabeth.City...Nr.............................................. Z7.909..............
FacilityContact: ......... .......... ................................................ ........... Title: ............................................................... Phone No:
Onsite Representative: I. -Earl Stallings ..................... _ _...._.................... Integrator: Rrn rm's.Hof.Cariali na,.loc........I....._I..................
Certified Operator: Lin_w.otzdEarl._................. Stallings............................................ Operator Certification Number: 19.3.7.6.................. ...........
Location of Farm:
w
IT
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude ®• ©�°� Longitude ®. ©� ®«
Swine
Capacity Population Poultry
❑ can to Feeder
® Feeder to Mish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
p Boars
Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ OaUY
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Layer
❑ Non — aye
Other
Total Design Capacity 1,500
Total SSLW 202,500
Number of Lagoons 2
❑
SuBsurface
Drains
resent 13
Lagoon Area p Spray Fie rea
Holding Ponds ISolid Traps
System
JE3
No
Liquid Waste
Management
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is and' discharge observed from an), part of the operation? ❑ Yes N No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes []No
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the. State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes p No
c_ If discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gaI/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ® Yes p No
3_ Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ®No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ® Yes p No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: .I,o.Qn rL.L1�1. ..I�ag2.(small}................_._. ......
Freeboard(inches): ............... 24........ ...... ................. 1.2................ ............................ ....... .................. .................. .--................................. ................. ...................

act rt}, Number: 71D_1 Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
❑ Yes
® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
❑ Yes
® No
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
N No
S. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
N No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
® No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN p Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
® No
12. Crop type Corn, Soybeans, Wheat
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
p Yes
® No
14, a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
p No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
p No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. hoes the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
®N o
Reauired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ®N o
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes ®No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ❑ Yes N N o
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes N No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? p Yes ®No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
Oe/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ® Yes ❑ No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes ® No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? p Yes ®No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AlAIMP? ❑ Yes N NO
10 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments (refer to question #):. Explain;anSy:YEansvpers andlor anp recommendations or any, other comments'.
Use drawrings 61 facility; to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):. ❑ Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
* Waste 5/16/02 with 1.9 lbs N/1000 gal.
Waste 2/22/02 with 2.6 lbs N/1000 gal.
* Soils 4/11/02 with no lime required.
* Please call me at 252-946-6481, ext. 208 when lagoon #2 (= 17" freeboard) is pumped down to at least 19"
freeboard. (Will transfer to larger lagoon)
19.* Need to find out from Mr. Wilson (landowner of neighboring land that is irrigated on crops) if any commercial
fertilizer has been applied and if so add amount to IRR2 forth PAN balance. (SEE PAGE 3)
IReviewer/Inspector [dame Scott Vinson entered by Ann Tyndall I
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: /,}/yam/9

O5103101
Continued
acifit} Number: 70_1
Odor Issues
Date of Inspection
26.
Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
❑ Yes
p No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27.
Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
p Yes
® No
28.
Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
[]Yes
® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29.
Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
p Yes
Ig No
30.
Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
p Yes
® No
31.
Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
p Yes
ll No
32.
Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
p Yes
p No
noted in his 1"ebru n= inspection (A h&
4e,.howevez, it was minoi.
P. 9P a O�D% 1 5 �l1�1cY 'a�5horn; ..
uc'IaSe"' E fence o ast dh`fHW a was still
:.+iir :. a✓.t �;. [ F:i� ice, Dili T.-:pig
1
as�
} .. ?• -
J

Postal
ru
DoCERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT
Cc (mestic Mail Only: No insurance Cov(�,,age Provided)
-D
0 C L E
C3 Postage $ Jac
n ?
CeAifled Fee L 30
Retum Receipt Fee TTIC(Endoesemetn Rsquired) CID
-
dTOW Posbm* S Fees
e7
�I DIR LINWOOD E STALL �N r,`;T,
STALLINGS WHOLESALE 7441k
111 LANE DRIVE
ELIZABETH CITY NC 27909

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
June 5, 2000
Mr. Linwood E. Stallings
Stallings Wholesale Meats, Inc.
I I I Lane Drive
Elizabeth City, North Carolina 27909
SUBJECT: Notice of Deficiency
Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
Stallings Wholesale Meats, Inc.
Facility No. # 70-1
Pasquotank County
Dear Mr. Stallings:
Enclosed please find a copy of the Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection (as it is
viewed in DWQ database) conducted at the referenced facility by the Division of Water
Quality from the Washington Regional Office. Please read this inspection and keep it
with all other documents pertaining to your animal operation for future inspections.
In general, this inspection included verifying that: (1) the farm is complying with
requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC 21-1.0217, Senate Bill 1217, the Certified Animal
Waste Management Plan and/or General Permit; (2) determine whether the waste
utilization plan is based on total or actual wetted acres; (3) the farm operation's waste
management system is being operated properly under the direction of Certified Operator;
(4) the required records are being kept; (5) there are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or
runoff. The following deficiencies were noted during the inspection.
cp In accordance with condition III, item 3 of your general permit, you are required to
conduct an annual Standard Soil Fertility Analysis, including pH, copper and zinc.
9 The irrigation events in November were in preparation for the winter crop of which was
never planted by the land owner. It is very important to make sure there is a crop in the
designated fields that will utilize the applied nitrogen.
In addition, it is suggested to contact your Technical Specialist to check the accuracy of the
lagoon marker in comparison to the lagoon wall.

Page Two
Stallings
# 70--1
As a reminder, please note the following which are conditions of the Certified Animal
Waste Management Plan and the general permit therefore these items must be
implemented:
cp The maximum waste level in lagoons/storage ponds shall not exceed that specified in
the CAWMP. At a minimum, maximum waste level for waste for lagoons/storage
ponds must not exceed the level that provides adequate storage to contain 25 year, 24
hours storm event plus an additional foot of structural freeboard.
9 An analysis of the liquid animal waste from the lagoon shall be conducted as close to
the time of application as practical and at least within 60 days (before or after) of the
date of application. This analysis shall include the following parameters: Nitrogen.,
Phosphorus, Zinc and Copper.
9 Soil analysis is required annually
9 The following records are required: rainfall and lagoon level data, off -site solids
removal, maintenance, repair, waste/soil analysis and land irrigation records. These
records should be maintained by the facility owner/manager in chronological and
legible form for a minimum of three years.
cp Land application rates shall be in accordance with the CAWMP. In no case shall land
application rates exceed the Plant Available Nitro egenn (PAN) rate for the receiving crop
or result in runoff dg&g any give application.
cp Keep lagoons/storage ponds free of foreign debris including, but not limited to tires,
bottles, plastic products, light bulbs, gloves, syringes or any other solids waste.
cp The lagoon areas should be kept mowed or otherwise controlled and accessible. High
grass does not allow you to conduct a thorough inspection of the lagoon area for
seepage, rodent damage, etc.
cp It is suggested not required to keep crop yield information for future use to update your
waste management plan_ You will need three years of crop yield data before your plan
can be updated
Thank you for your assistance and cooperation during the inspection. If you have any
questions, please contact me at 252/946-6481, ext. 318 or your Technical Specialist.
Sincerely,
y„
r
Lyn B. Hardison
Environmental Specialist
Cc: Pasquotank NRCS
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit (w/out attachments)
NCDSWGWaRO (w/out attachments)
- -WaRO
LBH files
943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, North Carolina 27889 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

Division of -Water Quality
Q Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit © Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit @ Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 70 1 Date of Visit 4/19/2000 Printed on: 4/20/2000
Q Not Operational Q Below Threshold
[] Permitted ® Certified 0 Conditionally Certified E3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ........................
Farm Name: Stallings.�?!!hilrsa�.�t..in.i~.
County: ..................................... W.ARQ.......
Owner Name: Linwoad.E............................ stal.lings..................................................... Phone No: 25. --..............,...,............
FacilityContact: ..............................................................................Title:................................................................ Phone No:
...................................................
Mailing Address: 1.h1..1.t+i�1e..M.......................................................................................... L'tx ktG.t�1.G11�y...lY.............................................. 2.7.909..............
Onsite Representative: E.Ar1.S.t;it111agS.............................................................................. Integrator: .`R,1 .A,.Ijar ..............................
Certified Operator:1,clt>tHOQd. axt..................... S.tAlllpg&......... ................................. Operator Certification Number:1UNt..................
Location of Farm:
A6
fatke.l?N��1C�.ii1�.11A.Lr.Q�n..11�zal�tlt.it ..tulr.l�t.ant.l? ...Lipid..Rs1,.at�.I.�f1.a.o�tt..1L4.111e,.........................................................................
IV
®Swine ❑ Poultry []Cattle ❑ Hor Latitude F 40 Longitude
Design Current
Swine Canacitv Ponulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
1500
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer Dairy
❑ Non -Layer �1[3
Non-Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 1,500
Total SSLW 202,500
Number of Lagoons 2 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon .Area I0 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps 10 No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1, Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ® No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ® No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d, Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ® No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:........................................................................
Freeboard (inches): 26 26
!'..-J L--7.

Continued on back.
Facility Number: 70—I Date of Inspection 4/19/2000 Printed on: 4/20/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes N No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes N No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11, Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
12. Crop type Corn, Soybeans, Wheat
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18, Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
0 'Novio'lations.or de,ciendes-we re noted during•this visit: Yore will reeeive na further
cflrresp©tidence about this•visit. . . . . . . . . . . . .
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ONO
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes N No
[]Yes ONO
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
N Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
Comrnsns (refer #o gueshan"#): )gplars any YES answers _andfor`any recommendations or:any tither comments =
IFse dreiings of facility to fetter egplari situations. (hie additional pa as necessary):
Records available for review. A.
Waste analysis: 8-27-99 - #1 = 1.1 lbs; #2 = 0.87 lbs.
2-10-00 - #1 = 1.8 lbs; #2 = 1.2 lbs.
Soil analysis not available for review.
Pumped in November `99; prepping for wheat, but farmer (third party) did not plant wheat.
Continue to practice weed control.
Make sure to have all records (permit, freeboard, irrigation records, etc.) available for review.
SEE PAGE 3 IWI
Reviewer/Inspector Name Lyn Hardison 1 Entered by Ann Tyndall
/ A J4J

�Reviewer/Inspector Signature: _ Date:
)Facility Number: 70-1 Date of Inspection 4/19/2000 Printed on: 4/20/2000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ® No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ®No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ®No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ® No

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and
Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr_ Linwood E_ Stallings
Stallings Wholesale Meats Inc.
111 Lane Dr_
Elizabeth City, North Carolina 27909
RL
Oro.vqwAd •
�!
NCDENFt
Nc3F2TH C`.AFiQLiN^ DEPAF2TmEtJT OF
ElvN/IRONmE:N-r AFV6 N^-ruRAL RF�-satJRCES
July 2, 1999
SUBJECT: Notice of Deficiency
Animal Feedlot Operation Compliance Inspection
Stallings Wholesale Meats Inc.
Facility No. 70-1
Pasquotank County
Dear Mr. Stallings:
On June 4, 1999, 1 conducted an Animal Feedlot Operation Compliance Inspection at
the Stallings Wholesale Meats Inc. in Pasquotank County. A copy of the inspection
report is attached for your review.
In general, this inspection included verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified Animal
Waste Management Plan (CAWMP) and the General Permit; (2) the farm is complying
with requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC 2H.0217, Senate Bill 1217, the Certified
Animal Waste Management Plan and the General Permit; (3) the farm operation's waste
management system is being operated properly under the direction of a Certified
Operator, (4) the required records are being kept; (5) there are no signs of seepage,
erosion, and/or runoff. The following deficiencies were observed during the inspection.
;;o The flush tank on the south house next to the lagoon was overflowing due to a
clogged line. You turned the pump off and repaired the line. The inspection
revealed that animal wastewater did not reach Waters of the State.
It was determined from a review of the CAWMP that a wettable acre determination is not
required of this facility.
943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, North Carolina 27889
Telephone 252J946-5481 FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

Page Two
Stallings Wholesale Meats Inc_
Facility No. 70-1
July 2, 1999
It is very important as the owner and the Operator in Charge that you resolve these
aforementioned deficiencies and any other problems that may arise, as soon as
possible. Nothing in this letter should be taken as absolving this facility of the
responsibility and liability of any violations that have resulted or may result from these
deficiencies.
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance during the inspection. Should you have
further questions or comments regarding this inspection, do not hesitate to call at (252)
946-6481, ext_ 321.
Sincerely,
Daphne B. Cullom
Environmental Specialist
cc: Pasquotank County SWCD Office
DSWC-WaRO
Cpmpliance Group
v17VaRO

(] Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Operation Review
Division of Soil and Rater Conservation - Compliance Inspection
® Division of Water Quality- Compliance Inspection
© Other Agency - Operation Review
14PRoutine O Compiaint O Follou-up of DWQ inspection O Folimv-up of DSVI'C revie�1 O Other
Facility Number 70 1
Date of Inspection 64-99
--_ Time of inspection ]2:15 21 hr. (hlt:mm)
l� Permitted M Certified ❑ Conditionally Certified ❑ Registered JE3 Not Operational I Date Last Operated .
Farm Name: Stallks 95M...lxsticsaheMCa1tUM............................................................... County: Pasquolank.................................. -. A.ARO......
.
OyvnerName: Litt-Fta3uA..�............................ $Iallines.............. ........................................ Phone No: 3,354741.................. .................... ............ _...............
Facility- Contact: ......................................... Title ................................................................. Phone No:...................................................
of tnnAddress: 111. amc.Ur--.----.---.•---...................W......-...---._..... EIbabr1h.Cfty..N.0...... -..................................... Z72Q2._..........
Onsite Representative. Earl.S..talbt�------------_................_..._.._._...._.................._....... Integrator: C.a>rxo.IX.s..Euocls_aLY.c#..Loc,.--....... ..--.-..............
Certified Operator: L•ltl x9.ud.Earl..--..-.-----...... stwhl 5----- ............ ._...._.... Operator Certification Number: 19,37.6
Location of Farm:
TaltR?eeksxilieB�,.frnna�Eliaktst.C�it:.tuxalel# ata 1?x.Sie.Rd..n�a.left-ab�tu�t.3l uou1�...................-•----.......................................---------•--•:
.....................••-••..................••......-_...................... ...................•• . _ :..-.... . - ------•------------...-------•----•--..............------....---.............................................-...... .r-----...--...-........- ............................ ............
Latitude 36 , • l l !- F 40 Longitude ( 76 • ; 11 €. 58
Design Current
same Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish 1500 1300
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current
Poultry- Capacity Population
❑ Laver
❑ Non -Laver
❑ Other
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Dairy
Total Design Capacity 1,500
Total SSLW 202.500
Number of Lagoons r2 10 Subsurface Drains Present ❑ 1 Aguon Area E3 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds 1 Solid Traps ILI No Liquid Waste Management System
Dischar<-rek & Srream Impacts
Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Dis;:harpc onglllaied at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ®Other
a. If discharge is observel was the couy'gance than -made?
b. If discharge is observed_ did ii reach Watur of the State" (If yes. notify DM:Q )
c. If discharge is observed- what is the estimated floe m 2aFmin?
d. Does discharge hypass a In system? (If yes. uotitV DV7Q)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes CK No
❑ Yes [K No
❑ Yes Z No
❑ Yes X No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes ® No
Structure. I Structure ? Structure 3 Structure I Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ............................. ... ...... ..... ....................... ....... -..................... ........ ..................... .............. .................. .,...... .......... ............................. _.....
Freeboard (inches}: �Q_............. ......
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integzity of any of the structures observed? (iel trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
i!7 tl94 Continued nn hark

Facility Number: 70-1 Date of 1wipection
6. Are there structures on -sire which are not properly addressed anchor managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered des, and the situation poses an
immediate public Health or environmental threat, notihr DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system outer than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Annlication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there etridence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
12. Crop type Wheat Soybeans
6-4-44
❑ Yes
N No
❑ Yes
N No
❑ Yes
N No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
N No
❑ Yes
N No
13. Do the receiving, crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes N No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes N No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes N No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes N No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all component of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(iel WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19_ Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively, certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23_ Did Re-,newer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
[3 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit.: You will -receive no further:
_correspondence about this visit.
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
El Yes No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
Comments (refer to question #):- Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments._.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary): -
Irrigation records complete with nitrogen balance.
Facility exempt from WA Determination due to irrigation design.
1. Flushtank fine clogged and animal wastewater was overflowing from the flush tank. The pump was turned off and the line repaired.
Animal wastewater did not reach Waters of the State. This facility will receive an Notice of Deficiency.
J
Re-s iewer/Inspector Name Daphne B. Cullom - - -
Re-w iewer/Insnector Signatur CU_� --`— Date: (::,_ 4 - q 9

_/23/99
Facility- Number. 74—I Date of Inspection 6-l-99
Odor Issues
26_ Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ElYes ® No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27 _ Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? []Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fau(s) noied? (i.e_ broken fan belts. missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
31 _ Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ® No

+;, .7• 1 + ,St V i, ` r'"Y+ Ir ' III rr4 1, \ 5' o/f ''{''t%C. i "�I,•�L' S + ' n �� t ! /_%6 �./� ' J
3.0
12'30" y R¢ '4 y Y t'j /,, J` �•,' _.
' I, ;� .'� � •� far '�.. "ty �'+ :"r'>G t V I
!- I,. � ...14 � �a� i� it 7' t- '�•- �' �
1 �1 . r'C . ti . � + .%.' 1 _ r<a r�2 a. M. Vr�'ft �' ri ''• L �a T„ M w r: ' '.. , y� / . — � r _
6 '
r"N' a s
_ r Landing Symogde Cyee
Ship ' Tabernacle tt yam 4, / �� r `
r ,
2.0 -CE •\ I `Ij +�+ Ili'I ,�ti- .. .� .�{'�• ,n. 1 ;,� x - r
nds } x
4'O6
BM
Trailer ,• - J�. +, - i i -ti FL�fAy 5
Park } Trailer
/ ` { .I Par
gm
i � 1 v �,'-' -._ � 1. t! '�J • �r � '�' 1. ` ,y_
"0 A ~ - i•5
Lo rig Point
2.0
•r� r !+ ! 1 3 e t
01
`� _- __ .__ __- 'tti.., p!'+' I :; hn' r 4 li:• jL ,, .`t,{I.r .._._ ~� h _ r ; •a—_
l
-- � -- - _ i;:,; itvr, / !/ ' a` • -� .'fir, ,. � ice,

•\ s ,
SC AL
Lim lips
IN
IJJe' S 13l1 J
`x
a lilD
304, ti ! La! I
Sx
lZily a
!41r
'!
1J77 m
w LnR! Il h
y
a
`p•
M1
NJ �
LUI
,
YJ
Y
T
w
1
S'
17.iJ
13J.
{Jsn
!a7L
1
�p
VA
1333 y
II
-y 1
14
,act
\
!AS e
K
10
i
Orange Count
Established in 1752, this north centrally V
located county has been said to be named
for William III of the House of Orange,
who ruled England from 1689 to 1702.
However, in 1752, when the county was
formed, the infant William V of Orange
was Stadholder, and controlling the affairs
of the state was his mother Anne, daugh-
ter of George 11. Therefore, it seems rea-
sonable to assume the county was named
in honor of William V of Orange, rather
than for William III who had been dead
for fifty years.
Hillsborough is the county seat and lo-
cated here is Antique Music and Wheels.
The museum has many of the world's
greatest music and automobile machines.
It is located at the Daniel Boone Antique
Village, and is among many other inter-
esting places to explore.
At Chapel Hill, sights to see include the
Coker Arobretum on the University of
North Carolina campus; the Morehead
Planatarium, also on the campus; the
North Carolina Botanical Gardens; and
Patterson's Mill Country Store.
Pasquotank County
One of the earliest established counties
is Pasquotank County founded in 1681.
Located in the northeastern section of the
state, the name is an Indian word
pack-e'tan-ki, "where the current (of the
stream) divides or forks." Elizabeth City
is the county seat and has much to offer.
The Swamp Canal forms the county's
eastern border; Albemarle Sound the
southern border and the Little River
makes up a small portion of the western
border.
r�
z9ri wt:
1344 1,1]- .� riq
Ilex 1177 % .g
Nixon lq, ` ~
3!QQ I14]
e nr
A R L. E
xtr r0 COL*4rY RCJAb WAA11I 3
M, r'.wY1 lAl
_7 Q
-- �� �1
V � I
F 31
!J4!
i 11W
19-d
is
�
t3
°
s