480020_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environmental Qua

- ° \�� \ \ � \ � � � < � � �
? / - % \ \� 55�e < } «�! ` JQ :.®
- / - 2� �� 2 z = w - ° \ �� > ? } «
\ _ ® ��� � w- 4 \ : � \ ~-
< _ - �� < � \_ . , : ; z
} \ «�� � \�� � w / % � �« } � y�\-
� � : _ + _ .� �._ � _- s - � -
\ _- �� \^� \ � � \ i - � � \
_ _ _ k }� ¥ ���
� \ \ .� s \ � . , ƒ � � � � � . \

Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review •O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit OO Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 4t3 20
Permitted 0 Certified [3 Conditionally Certified © Registered Date of Visit 3R4I2000
O Not Operational O Below Threshold 1 Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: 1/j/97,._.,,,,,,.,
Farm Name: .0 K=tat.JK,yJ9Xeay.. A1M.......................................................... ... County: Hyde................. .......WARO........
OwnerName: .Glrmoa Kyle ...................... Bem ........................................................... Phone No: 92;5-4421 ...................................................................
Facility Contact:...............................................................................Title Phone No:
....................................................................................................................
Mailing Address: Rt,..1.B.a&224E...................................................................................... JEgk etd.AC...................................................... 2.7.8.2A..
OnsiteRepresentative:........................................................................................................... Integrator:................................................................................
Location of Farm:
.milit�...Q>ngielberd 3.mil�ea.l!1..a1� MiddlsLan.� tttld,,)PadtitieQ.Sn�twti.................................................................................................................
................................................................................................................................................................................................................
® Swine ' ❑`Poultry; [].Cattle ❑ Horse
=Designs 'Current Design Current : _ Design : Current
Swine Ca aci < Po elation '" Poultry "_Capacity -Population " Cattle Capacity Population- ..
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
® Farrow to Finish
50
0
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Number cif ]Lagoons L.J Holding` Ponds f;Sohd Traps:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes N No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field [-]Other
a. If discharge is observed.. was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observ4 did it reach Water of the State? (if res, notify DWG [j yes ❑ No
c. if discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
2. is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes N No
3- Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes N No
Waste; Collection & Treatment
Please see attached Lagoon Field Data Sheets
Reviewer/Inspector Name-
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
• r+ o nnnn

Facility Number 48 — 20 Lagoon Number .1............ Lagoon Identifier sina l..seconds.Cy..........................
O Active © Inactive Latitude 35 29 36
Waste Last Added.1,1.11.97........................................... Longitude 75 59
Determined by: ❑ Owner ® Estimated By GPS or Map? JZ GPS ❑ Map
GPS file number: IL032915A
Surface Area (acres): O.A...........................
Embankment Height (feet): 4.
Distance to Stream: Q <250 feet 0 250 feet - 1000 feet 0 >1000 feet
By measurement or Map? ® Field Measurement ❑ Map
Down gradient well within 250 feet? O Yes *No
Intervening Stream? O Yes ©No
Distance to WS or HQW (miles): Q < 5 0 5 - 10 0 > 10
Overtopping from Outside Waters? O Yes O No *Unknown
inspection date 3/29/2000
appearance of O Sludge Near Surface
lagoon liquid 0 Lagoon Liquid Dark, Discolored
O Lagoon Liquid Clear
O Lagoon Empty Freeboard (inches): 24
embankment condition 0 poorly Built, Large Trees, Erosion, Burrows, Slumping, Seepage, Tile Drains, Etc.
Q Construction Specification Unknown But Dam Appears in Good Condition
O Constructed and Maintained to Current NRCS Standards
outside drainage 0 Poorly Maintained Diversions or Large Drainage Area not Addressed in Design
O Has Drainage Area Which is Addressed in Lagoon Design
No Drainage Area or Diversions Well Maintained
liner status 0 High Potential for Leaking, No Liner, Sandy Soil, Rock Outcrops Present, Etc.
Q No Liner, Soil Appears to Have Low Permeability
0 Meets NRCS Liner Requirements
cation equipment fail to make contact
and/or Sprayrield O Yes 0 No O Unknown with representative *Yes ONO
unavailable
comments

Facility Number 48 — 20 Lagoon Number 2........... Lagoon Identifier big_.seendry ...........................
0 Active Op Inactive
Waste Last Added.1,1.1,(.92.............................
Determined by: ❑ Owner ® Estimated
Surface Area (acres):
Embankment Height (feet):
Distance to Stream:
By measurement or Map?
Down gradient well within 250 feet?
Intervening Stream?
Distance to WS or HQW (miles):
Overtopping from Outside Waters?
inspection date 3/29/2000
Latitude 3q 29 36
Longitude 75 59 E]
By GPS or Map? FM-GPS ❑ Map
GPS file number: IL032915B
.1.................................
4................................
OO <250 feet 0 250 feet -1000 feet 0 > 1000 feet
® Field Measurement ❑ Map
O Yes 0 No
O Yes Q No
Q<5 05-10 0>10
O Yes O No *Unknown
appearance of O Sludge Near Surface
lagoon liquid 0 Lagoon Liquid Dark, Discolored
O Lagoon Liquid Clear
O Lagoon Empty Freeboard (inches): 60
embankment condition O Poorly Built, Large Trees, Erosion, Burrows, Slumping, Seepage, Tile Drains, Etc.
O Construction Specification Unknown But Dam Appears in Good Condition
O Constructed and Maintained to Current NRCS Standards
outside drainage O Poorly Maintained Diversions or Large Drainage Area not Addressed in Design
O Has Drainage Area Which is Addressed in Lagoon Design
0 No Drainage Area or Diversions Well Maintained
liner status 0 High Potential for Leaking, No Liner, Sandy Soil, Rock Outcrops Present, Etc.
OO No Liner, Soil Appears to Have Low Permeability
0 Meets NRCS Liner Requirements
cation equipment fail to make contact
and/or Sprayfield O Yes 0 No * Unknown with representative OO Yes O No
unavailable
comments

Facility Number 48 -- 20 Lagoon Number Z........... Lagoon Identifier primary ..................
O Active OQ Inactive Latitude 35 29 36
Waste Last Added .1�(a 1�7...........................................
Determined by: ❑ Owner ® Estimated
Surface Area (acres): .0.2...........................
Embankment Height (feet): 0.5..........................
Longitude 75 59 44
By GPS or Map? ® GPS ❑ Map
GPS file number: IL032915C
Distance to Stream: 0 <250 feet 0 250 feet - 1000 feet 0 >1000 feet
By measurement or Map? ® Field Measurement ❑ Map
Down gradient well within 250 feet? O Yes *No
Intervening Stream? O Yes # No
Distance to WS or HOW (miles): 0 < 5 0 5 - 10 0 > 10
Overtopping from Outside Waters? O Yes O No 0 Unknown
inspection date 3/29/2000
appearance of 0 Sludge Near Surface
lagoon liquid 0 Lagoon Liquid Dark, Discolored
0 Lagoon Liquid Clear
O Lagoon Empty
Freeboard (inches): 12
embankment condition 0 Poorly Built, Large Trees, Erosion, Burrows, Slumping, Seepage, Tile Drains, Etc.
O Construction Specification Unknown But Dam Appears in Good Condition
O Constructed and Maintained to Current NRCS Standards
outside drainage O Poorly Maintained Diversions or Large Drainage Area not Addressed in Design
0 Has Drainage Area Which is Addressed in Lagoon Design
O No Drainage Area or Diversions Well Maintained
liner status 0 High Potential for Leaking, No Liner, Sandy Soil, Rock Outcrops Present, Etc.
0 No Liner, Soil Appears to Have Low Permeability
O Meets NRCS Liner Requirements
cation equipment fail to make contact
and/or Sprayfield 0 Yes O No 0 Unknown with representative *Yes O No
unavailable
comments

Facility Number 48 — 20 Lagoon Number �........... Lagoon Identifier primary .................................................
O Active Op Inactive
Waste Last Added.11.11.97 ...........................................
Determined by: ❑ Owner 0 Estimated
Surface Area (acres):
Embankment Height (feet):
Distance to Stream
By measurement or Map?
Down gradient well within 250 feet?
Intervening Stream?
Distance to WS or HQW (miles):
Overtopping from Outside Waters?
Latitude 35 29 36
Longitude 75 59
By GPS or Map? IN GPS ❑ Map
GPS file number: IL032914D
.0.2..........................
M..........................
Q <250 feet 0 250 feet - 1000 feet O >1000 feet
® Field Measurement ❑ Map
0 Yes Q No
0 Yes a No
Q<5 05-10 O> 10
O Yes O No *Unknown
inspection date 3/29/2000
appearance of O Sludge Near Surface
lagoon liquid O Lagoon Liquid Dark, Discolored
O Lagoon Liquid Clear
0 Lagoon Empty Freeboard (inches): 12
embankment condition O Poorly Built, Large Trees, Erosion, Burrows, Stumping, Seepage, Tile Drains, Etc.
p Construction Specification Unknown But Dam Appears in Good Condition
O Constructed and Maintained to Current NRCS Standards
outside drainage 0 Poorly Maintained Diversions or Large Drainage Area not Addressed in Design
0 Has Drainage Area Which is Addressed in Lagoon Design
0 No Drainage Area or Diversions Well Maintained
liner status O High Potential for Leaking, No Liner, Sandy Soil, Rock Outcrops Present, Etc.
0 No Liner, Soil Appears to Have Low Permeability
0 Meets NRCS Liner Requirements
cation equipment fail to make contact
and/or Sprayfieid 0 Yes O No * Unknown with representative* Yes 0 No
unavailable
comments

FaC�lif}► Nutrber= �j _ _Za 'ale of :Inspection lime Hof [nspectton
Farm . Status: 5�re c� ❑ Routine ❑ Complaint Fallow -up
Farts Name:G-tln✓]— i7•iM _. County:
Owner Name:------� _. Phone No:
Mailing Address:
Onsite representative: .Fin- Integrator:
Certified Operator Name:
Location of Farm: -
L d �
Latitude •���-- Lonaitude.�`
Nat Operational Da'e Last Operated: _.��.�..�__...
Type of Operation and Desion Capacity
5vv�ne_" Nurnbe' R0uIfTY w" <Number Mr Cate-. Q%, Number W
Wean to Feeder _ Laver zl-
i i.ff�afrv_
© Feeder to Finish Non Lave R"r E f
11 z
Farr } ' Wp_n A
ato
`13 Farrow to Finish Qther Type of Livestock ti
a"p-` �,nc-�s
--`�
mbern�goons JH d n❑ P n'dsj 0Su6sur#ace Drains Present '
N Lagoon Area ❑ 5pray FieldArea
..Ca....
General
1. Are there any butters that need maintenancGjimprove men t?
2. Is any discharge observed froni any par of the operation?
a. 'If discharge is observed, was the cz;nveyanca man -image? k
b. ff .discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify IN
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaVrnin?
d. Does discharc bycass a Iacocn s;istem? (If y-s, notify DNC)
3. Is there evidence of past disc`a-._= from any pan of the opera-,icri?
4. Was there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other t`an from a discharge?
Dces any part of the :vaste manec_mert system (rather than fa_ccrsnc�icnc pc ;dsj ractir_
Yes
✓ �tia
Yes
i o
Yes
e,�Jo
El Yes
R,<3
C Yes
C Yes+o
C Yes
Continued cri Lac-{

6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria? ❑ Yes
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge (if inspection after 1/1/97)? ❑ Yes 2 im
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? Yes ❑ NO
Structures lLaccons andicr Hold'€na Fords)
9. Is structural freeboard less than adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Freeboard (ft): Lagoon 1 Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3 Lalg_oon 4
10, Is seepace obs=erred from any of the structures? ❑ Yes M'�O
11.
is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑'Yes
of
12.
Do any of the structures need maintenancefimprovement?
❑ Yes
ENo,
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or 'environmental threat, notify DWO)
13.
Do any of the structures lack acquate markers to identify start and stop pumping levels?
,
d Yes
❑ m
Waste. ADalicatfon
14,
Is there physical evidence of over appfiication?
❑ Yes
Eau --
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWO)
15.
Crop type
16.
Do the active crops differ with. L`tosa designated in the Anirrial Waste'Manaaament Plan?,❑ Yes
❑ M
17.
Does `the'facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? L4kM0 —
❑ Yes
[] No
18.
Does the cover crop need improvement? � �
❑ Yes
❑ No
19.
Is there a lack of available irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes"
-❑ No
For
Certified Facilities Only
20.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste klanagement Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
21.
Does the facility fail to comply with the Animal Waste Management Plan in any way?
❑ Yes
❑ No
22.
Does record keeping need improvement? _
❑ Yes
❑ No'
23.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by samra agency?
❑ Yes
❑ m
24.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewfinspection with owner or operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ Ib
.r
-,
�.Wr'"3 } .ry "�F 3�„
•,.,
-HI^k
\ i- _ y -xw - e,�.' , - fi z�""'� ""6.'r^h�."
S."
.... P ..—ate'ZV,
y
. u
I
lul
.X '`- s '`�-w."„a3 3�✓ "E'�.��,:.�s •�'� -s _--�'cu- .l -:`... v3"' �-'"��c`'.`��¢� ^�,+c7S�r
Reyi_etiverIles actor Name`- .�
Revivlerlln`spector Sigriature:. -` •Dates..�� ..._ -h
—77
cc: Division of Water. Quality, Water Ouality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 11114/96

} ' Site Requires Immediate Attention.
j ! Facility No. 48 - Z,::'
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT.
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: 1995
Time: PS-3
Farm Name/Owner;& r r ti - - -- _
Mailing Address:
County:
r .
Integrator. Prone.
On Site Representative: No o, -e Dr v se„1 Phone:
Physical Address/Location: _ /, z m e N2 of lkI; dd A 1Q t.J k, o„ c_a5-1- 0-
Type of Operation: Swine Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: Number of Animals on Site:
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: 3 5' r;�9_' ` 5F " Longitude: -7.5 ' SS' !IZ ' Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot f 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) Yes No Actual Freeboard: Ft.D- 3 Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes o Noas any erosion observed? Yes or No
Is adequate land available for spray? Yes r No is the cover crop adequate? Yes or No
Crop(s) being utilized:
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria?
200 Feet from Dwellings es r No
100 Feet from Wells? r No
�'
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes orQTo�
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes or
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes or(g�o If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specif c acreage with cover crop)? Yes r No I�
Additional Comments: � \ PQY
Inspector Name
cc: Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed.

WYD
Mom

JuL-10-ao Inu le"10 bVb-UVLVbUVKVHU PAX NU. IVIUfJbl848 K UB
JdUl.- ?-96 WED 15:3� USDA SOS Nol FAX NO. 91070W881 P.02/03
ItFi0f1 l�.q 6[71LeA�i76i� To 1N 061•-/0 92vVWAi #"I P.21A"
' vita "+ai+rs lffwaWo htlenttoe
peolilty lwnmb�! `�� — Z. .
. �ZTa Y1Strh�'mH �BUDRTs
Owner: li m Nemx
cow.,,. �/�
Arat Vislt q ion r-w P1Mt10: , !U [rL1,62 � -
P
On she Rgmmu tivot rlaoe
5 rz 1 4 -- ----
Mulllot A4dmaI y + r
R �
Type of opmava! offlne ., Porl�y Qdde cr°^� OFF'rce
rjaAlp C%paald►:.5C?E,inLa�q._ Alimba of AdIaA an Sly: 995
t.�1t1�tlaet ���■ - a9 .' ��• Lvayhndv:.�� a S9 --�
Type of lnrpo low. Ormmd �C�_ lelmW
I��le Yn os No
Deem The Ambiml Wino Ugatm Inw mWout Ertebaa a of 1 not; 25 I= 34 hoar slam event
(t+pproKlme[ely ! Foot+7 infra) Ya CV(S) AfAuelFiov%W: .Q.IW .iL h0
Pay fullWee wlth mom d mo a* ", pUm addma do othalogooW 1coboW ands the
emen tub
W1W IV oeo-,ov obwmd from tine laran(s)l m r No l�lae It o t roalon of tto dttm�:'Xae I4v
1A eaogame I"d naftWo ft vi:d tmm"? os Ho to the tnvor mp kdtgoetie! Voi or No
FU 10 019)7134350 8lprivm or AW
A-T- �I I