480011_INSPECTIONS_20171231

Z V
NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environmental Quai

�
N
3 _ r
' mac:^- y - —t�� �A�G _ l
.1 s x c .il=l �" t5" _...

Type of Visit Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical. Assistance
Reason for Visit) Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral Q Emergency Q Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 48 11 Date of Visit: 12/3120fi4 Time: 9:30
O Not O erational O Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified 0 Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ..........•..•...........
Farm Name: UAA=.DIP.9.Earim..................................................................................... County: HydfL.................................................. W Q.......
Owner Name: Unitsl:Y.Mmaia .................... MojQrtcyd.,tx................................................ Phone No: ZU-226. 7.65....................................................----•--
Mailing Address: 1P�Q.... lJ .l ei..................................... Fairfidd...K......................................................... 2.7.87.6 ..............
FacilityContact:..............................................................................Title• Phone No:
Onsite Representative: UndsSY.MAoln........................................................................ Integrator:bWepexldt:l0.t...... .....................................................
Certified Operator- LA adSex.G............................. rdoom.111..................................... Operator Certification Number:173.61 .............................
Location of Farm:
Awy. 94 north of Fairfield.
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 • 3Z 1 50 K Longitude 76 ' 13 • 15
Design Current
Design
Current
Design Current
Swine capacity population
Poultry Ca aci
Po ulation Cattle
Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Layer
❑ Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Non -Layer
I0 Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Other
® Farrow to Finish 200 0
Total Design Capacity
200
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Total SSLW
283,400
Number of Lagoons
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gallmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure S Structure 6
Identifier:
.. .....solids............ .sralads............ .......... nursery. .......... ........... mlids............ ............
Freeboard (inches): 16 closed 16 closed 34
1211210.3 Continued

Facility Number: 48-11
Date of Inspection 1 12/3/2004
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(Many of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Annlication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes; check the appropriate box below.
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc > 3000
12. Crop"
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
®No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
®No
❑ Yes
® No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes OR No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?. ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ® No
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ Yes ® No
Air Quality representative immediately.
Comments,(refer to;questibn #)i .Eaplaio any YE5 answers"and/or any-recomri►endatioris or. any:other comments
Use drawings of facility;to better.explain situations (use; additional pages as:oecessary):',, ;(3 Field Copy ❑ Final Notes A =
is in the Sate Buy -Out program. The close out will begin hopefully this Spring. Don't forget to call 24 hrs before close-out
y begins.
small solids traps were closed out by Mr. Mooney by pumping solids into larger lagoon with Soil & Water/NRCS guidance.
Continue to take weekly freeboard levels until lagoons are all -closed out.
If you have to irrigate before the close out begins, don't foget to send off a waste sample for analysis and record applications.
Reviewer/Inspector Name ;Scott Vi V05
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: �--
Date:
12112103 Continued

Facility —Number: 48-11 Date of inspection F 12/3/2004
.Required Records & Documents
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
® No
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
Oet WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑Yes
®No
23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24, Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
® No
25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
IN No
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
®No
27. Did AeviewertInspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
® No
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
®No
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
® No
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
❑ Yes
®No
31. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
❑ Yes
❑ No
34, Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
35, Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Stocking Form ❑ Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfall ❑ Inspection After V Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
dditional.Coinmonts and/or:Drawings: '
12112103

Technical Assistance Site Visit Report
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Natural Resources Conservation Service
O Soil and Water Conservation District
O Other...
Facility Number 48
- 11
Date: 9124103
Time: 1 14:45 1
Time On Farm: 15 WARO
Farm Name Mooney Hog
Farm
county Hyde
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address P.O. Box 158 Fairfield NC 27826
Onsite
Representative Lindsey Mooney Integrator
Type Of Visit
Operation Review
Compliance Inspection (pilot only)
Technical Assistance
Confirmation for Removal
❑ No Animals -Date Last Operated:
❑ Operating below threshold
IN Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse
Purpose Of Visit
O Routine
O Response to DWQIDENR referral
O Response to DSWCISWCD referral
O Response to complaint/local referral
O Requested by producer/integrator
O Follow-up
Op Emergency
O Other...
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Ca aci Population
❑ Layer
❑Non-Laye
El
Wean #o Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
soo
❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
GENERAL QUESTIONS:
1. Is waste discharging from any part of the operation and reaching surface waters or wetlands? [:]yes ❑ no
2. Is there evidence of a past waste discharge from any part of the operation that waste reached
❑ Other
GENERAL QUESTIONS:
1. Is waste discharging from any part of the operation and reaching surface waters or wetlands? [:]yes ❑ no
2. Is there evidence of a past waste discharge from any part of the operation that waste reached
❑ yes
❑ no
surface waters or wetlands?
3. Does any problem pose an immediate threat to the integrity of the waste structure (large trees,
❑ yes
❑ no
seepage, severe erosion, etc.)?
4. Is there evidence of nitrogen over application, hydraulic overloading or excessive ponding
❑ yes
❑ no
requiring DWQ notification?
5. Is there evidence of improper dead animal disposal that poses a threat to the environment
❑ yes
❑ no
and/or public health?
6. Is the waste level within the structural freeboard elevation range for any waste structure?
❑ yes
® no
Structurel Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Identifier I primary -solids trap I final
Level (Inches) 1 12 28
CROP TYPES
SPRAYFIELD
SOIL TYPES
7. What type of technical assistance does the onsite representative feel is needed? (list in comment section)
03/10/03

Facility Number 48 -1.1 Date:
9124103
PARAMETER
Q No assistance provided/requested
❑ 8. Waste spill leaving site.-___
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE Needed
Provided
❑ 9. Waste spill contained on site
❑ 10. Level in structural freeboard
25. Waste Plan Revision or Amendment
❑
❑
❑ 11. Level in storm storage
26. Waste Plan Conditional Amendment
❑
❑
27. Review or Evaluate Waste Plan wlproducer
❑
❑
❑ 12. Waste structure integrity compromised
❑ 13. Waste structure needs maintenance -
28• Forms Need (list in comment section)
El
❑
28. Missing Components {list in comments}
❑
❑
❑ 14, Over application >= 10°/a
❑
❑
❑ 15. Over application < 10% or < 10 lbs.
30. 2H.0200 re -certification
[116. Hydraulic overloading
31. Five & Thirty day Plans of Action (PoA)
❑
❑
32. Irrigation record keeping assistance
❑
❑
❑ 17. Deficient irrigation records
❑ 18, Late/missing Waste analysis
33. Organizelcomputerization of records
❑
❑
❑ 19. Late/missing lagoon level records
34. Sludge Evaluation
❑
❑
❑ 20. Late/missing soils analysis
❑ 21. Crop needs improvement
35. Sludge or Closure Plan
❑
❑
❑ 22. Crop inconsistent with waste plan
36. Sludge removallclosure procedures
❑
❑
37. Waste Structure Evaluation
❑
❑
❑ 23. Irrigation maintenance deficiency
❑ 24. Deficient sprayfield conditions
38. Structure Needs Improvement
❑
❑
39.Operation & Maintenance Improvements
❑
❑
40. Marker checklcalibration
❑
❑
Regulatory Referrals
41. Site evaluation
❑
❑
❑ Referred to DWQ Date:
42. Irrigation Calibration
❑
❑
❑ Referred to NCDA Date:
43. Irrigation designlinstallation
El
❑
El Other...
system
Date:
44. Secure irrigation information (maps, etc.)
❑
❑
LIST IMPROVEMENTS
45. Operating improvements (pull signs, etc.)
❑
❑
MADE BY OPERATION
46. Wettable Acre Determination
❑
❑
1
47. Evaluate WAD certificationtrechecks
❑
❑
48. Crop oval uati onlrecom mendations
❑
❑
2.
49. Drainage workievaluation
❑
❑
50. Land shaping, subsoiling, aeration, etc.
51. Runoff control, stormwater diversion, etc.
❑
❑
❑
❑
3.
52. Buffer improvements
❑
❑
53. Field measurements(GPS, surveying, etc.)
❑
❑
4,
54. Mortality BMPs
❑
❑
55. Waste operator education (NPDES)
❑
❑
5'
56.Operation & maintenance education
❑
❑
57. Record keeping education
❑
❑
s
68. Croplforage management education
❑
❑
59. Soil and/or waste sampling education
❑
❑
1
03/10/03

rFacility Number 48 - 11 Date: 91241Q3 1
COMMENTS:
Emergency site visit conducted as part of hurricane damage assessment
Farm received considerable wind damage to buildings and received 9.0 inches of rainfall.
900 animals on site but no sows or boars - no animals lost due directly to storm.
Waste structures were not inundated by outside floodwaters.
This farm is scheduled for the Phase II Flood Plain Buyout.
TECHNICAL SPECIALIST jPat Hooper
SIGNATURE
Date Entered: 10/1/03 Entered By: Pat Hooper
3 03/10/03

Technical Assistance Site Visit Report
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Q Natural -Resources Conservation Service .
O Soil and Water Conservation District
Q Other...
Facility Number 48 - 1 i Date: 1/13/03 Time: 930 Time On Farm: 60 WARO
Farm Name Mooney Hog Farm County Hyde Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address P.O. Box 158 Fairfield NC 27826
Onsite
Representative Lindsey Mooney Integrator Independent
Type Of Visit Purpose Of Visit
® Operation Review
❑ Compliance Inspection (pilot only)
❑ Technical Assistance
❑ Confirmation for Removal
❑ No Animals -Date Last Operated: I
❑ Operating below threshold _
JoSwine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse
Routine
Response to DWQ/DENR referral
Response to DSWC/SWCD referral
Response to complaint/local referral
Requested by prod ucerh ntegrator
Follow-up
Emergency
Other...
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population
ulation CaDacitv Pa ulation
❑ Layer
❑
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
Non -Layer
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
® Farrow to Finish 200 150
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
❑ Dairy. -
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
GENERAL QUESTIONS:
1. Is waste discharging from any part of the operation and reaching surface waters or wetlands? ❑ yes ® no
2. Is there evidence of a past waste discharge from any part of the operation that waste reached ❑ yes ® no
surface waters or wetlands?
3- Does any problem pose an immediate threat to the integrity of the waste structure (large trees, ❑ yes ® no
seepage, severe erosion, etc.)?
4. Is there evidence of nitrogen over application, hydraulic overloading or excessive ponding ❑ yes ® no
requiring DWQ notification?
5. Is there evidence of improper dead animal disposal that poses a threat to the environment ❑ yes ® no
and/or public health?
6. Is the waste level within the structural freeboard elevation range for any waste structure? ❑ yes ® no
Structurel Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier solids road N solids trap nursery S solids trap final
Level (inches) 12 12 12 12 38
CROP TYPES orn Soybeans Wheat I F oastal Bermuda -graze I joats I Ismail grain overseed
SPRAYFIELD
SOIL TYPES
7. What type of technical assistance•does the onsite. representative feel is needed? (list in comment section)
03/10/03
❑ Dairy. -
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
GENERAL QUESTIONS:
1. Is waste discharging from any part of the operation and reaching surface waters or wetlands? ❑ yes ® no
2. Is there evidence of a past waste discharge from any part of the operation that waste reached ❑ yes ® no
surface waters or wetlands?
3- Does any problem pose an immediate threat to the integrity of the waste structure (large trees, ❑ yes ® no
seepage, severe erosion, etc.)?
4. Is there evidence of nitrogen over application, hydraulic overloading or excessive ponding ❑ yes ® no
requiring DWQ notification?
5. Is there evidence of improper dead animal disposal that poses a threat to the environment ❑ yes ® no
and/or public health?
6. Is the waste level within the structural freeboard elevation range for any waste structure? ❑ yes ® no
Structurel Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier solids road N solids trap nursery S solids trap final
Level (inches) 12 12 12 12 38
CROP TYPES orn Soybeans Wheat I F oastal Bermuda -graze I joats I Ismail grain overseed
SPRAYFIELD
SOIL TYPES
7. What type of technical assistance•does the onsite. representative feel is needed? (list in comment section)
03/10/03
❑ Other
GENERAL QUESTIONS:
1. Is waste discharging from any part of the operation and reaching surface waters or wetlands? ❑ yes ® no
2. Is there evidence of a past waste discharge from any part of the operation that waste reached ❑ yes ® no
surface waters or wetlands?
3- Does any problem pose an immediate threat to the integrity of the waste structure (large trees, ❑ yes ® no
seepage, severe erosion, etc.)?
4. Is there evidence of nitrogen over application, hydraulic overloading or excessive ponding ❑ yes ® no
requiring DWQ notification?
5. Is there evidence of improper dead animal disposal that poses a threat to the environment ❑ yes ® no
and/or public health?
6. Is the waste level within the structural freeboard elevation range for any waste structure? ❑ yes ® no
Structurel Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier solids road N solids trap nursery S solids trap final
Level (inches) 12 12 12 12 38
CROP TYPES orn Soybeans Wheat I F oastal Bermuda -graze I joats I Ismail grain overseed
SPRAYFIELD
SOIL TYPES
7. What type of technical assistance•does the onsite. representative feel is needed? (list in comment section)
03/10/03

C4.
Facility Number 48 - 11 Date:
1/13103
PARAMETER
QQ No assistance provided/requested
❑ 8. Waste spill leaving site
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE Needed
Provided,
❑ 9. Waste spill contained on site
2& Waste Plan Revision or Amendment
[]
❑
❑ 10. Level in structural freeboard
26• Waste Plan Conditional Amendment
❑
❑
-Oil. Level in storm storage
27. Review or Evaluate Waste Plan wlproducer
❑
❑ .
❑ 12. Waste structure integrity compromised
28. Forms Need (list in comment section)
❑
❑
[]13. Waste structure needs maintenance
'
❑
❑
29. Missing Components (list in comments)
[114. Over application >='10% & 10 lbs.
2H.0200
❑
❑
❑ 15. Over application < 10% or < 10 tbs.
• re�ertfication
❑ 16. Hydraulic overloading
31. Five & Thirty day Plans of Action (PoA)
❑
❑
32. Irrigation record keeping assistance
❑
❑
❑ 17. Deficient irrigation records
❑ 18. Late/missing waste analysis
33. Organ izelcomputerizatiorn of records
❑
❑
❑ 19. Late/missing lagoon level records
❑ 20. Late/missing soils analysis
34. Sludge Evaluation
❑
❑
® 21. Crop needs improvement
35. Sludge or Closure Plan
❑ -
_ ❑
❑ 22. Crop inconsistent with waste plan
36. Sludge removal/closure procedures
El
❑
37. Waste structure Evaluation
❑
❑
❑ 23. Irrigation maintenance deficiency
❑ 24. Deficient sprayfEeld conditions
38. Structure Needs Improvement
❑
❑
39.Operation & Maintenance Improvements
❑
❑
40. Marker checkicalibration
❑
❑
Regulatory Referrals
41. Site evaluation
❑
❑
❑ Referred to DWQ Date:
42. Irrigation Calibration
❑
❑
❑ Referred to NCDA Date:
43. Irrigation desigFilinstallation
El.
❑
❑ Other...
system
Date:
44• Secure irrigation information (maps, etc.)
❑
❑
LIST IMPROVEMENTS
45.Operating improvements (pull signs, etc.)
❑
0
MADE BY OPERATION
46. Wettable Acre Determination
❑
❑
47. Evaluate WAD certificationlrechecks
❑
❑
48. Cropevaluationtrecommendations
❑
E3
2.
49. Drainage workievaluation
❑
❑
50. Land shaping, subsoiling, aeration, etc.
51. Runoff control, stormwater diversion, etc.
❑
❑
❑
❑
52. Buffer Improvements
❑
❑
53. Field measurements(GPS; surveying, etc.) .
❑
❑
4
A Mortality BMPs
❑
❑
55. Waste operator education (NPDES)
❑
❑
5•
56.Operation & maintenance education
❑
❑
'
57. Record keeping education
❑
❑
6. _ .
58. Croplforage management education
❑
❑
59. Soil andfor waste sampling education
❑
❑
03/10/03

Facility Number 48 - 11 Date. 1 1/13/03
COMMENTS:
1. Field 78 is coastal bermuda. Veg. has been damaged from compaction of cows and over graze. Cows have been
:moved, plan to resprig spring of 2003
Soil test dated 4130/02 Cu, Zn and ph within guidelines. Remember to take soil test for 2003 and follow lime requirements.
Receiving crop oats in good condition. Spray fields are wet at time of inspection.
Naste analysis dated 616102 from final lagoon = 2.1 Ibs/1000 gallons and solids trap = 19.2 Ibs11000 gallons
rrigation events are complete and balanced with drops in lagoon consistent with irrigation events
TECHNICAL SPECIALIST IMartin McLawhorn
SIGNATURE
3 03/10/03

r
7
Facility Number Date of Visit: 7/19R002 Time: 11:30
p Not Operational p Below Threshold
m Permitted ■ Certified .0 Conditionally Certified p Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ........ -•• •••••••••
Farm Name:. Mooney -.Hog Farm County: Hy& .... ............................................... .WARQ.......
Owner Name: Lindsey Glenn Mooney, Jr. Phone No: 252-926-2651
r -
t
Mailing Address: M_Bay 15$_____ _ _ _ .Fairfield. iYO.m...------------
Facility Contact 2_'
—Title: Title: _ _......m. ._... Phone Na................. -._-........... --..........
.aR- e resea-tave:n -On.Int rator: L..........-.- ..............-
'--..........:........•
Certified Operator: Lindse .G..._ .. :.. Monney.M....................... _. Operator Certification Number: 17362 ........................
k Location of Farm:
r 94i v►y no o a to
f -
® Swine j3 Poultry 13 Cattle .p Horse Latitude �• ®u Longitude '®•.©� ©u
�""�`
W-1
DE�1
_ -®
^�~nreEtt
'"
,�
- , !S eLrreiCt e �Cll17Eflt�'
- - _Csit hignne
" tie
r
@a aci
�o riofl
-ou'lff Po nlatron �.= Y ac Po ulatio ��
p can to 'ceder
p Layer ' g p airy
w
�" r
ee er to m�s
p Non -Layer p on any
-�
p arrow to can
:� x
Other
•sue
wig
13 Farrow to Figer
-
® Farrow to Finish
200-
_ TOta� Design is p`aacc ifiy 200 �.
1] Gilts
2-13,400
r Boars
u u a rain resentp goon rea p pray ie reas
Number o#:Lagoons W_n
oliquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: 0 Lagoon 13 Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes p No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) 13 Yes p No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes p No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? E3 Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4.'- Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? p Spillway p Yes R No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Idenrifier. SaiidTrag....._ .... ............Final..............................
Freeboard(inches):..- .......... .-1. 2..._........ ................... 12..... ........... .............. 12............... ....A............... ................6....-----------

act lty Number.- 48--11 Date of Inspection
5. Are thereany immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are -there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
clos' plan?
_ (If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and_the situation poses an
immediate public health o'r environmental threat, notify DWQ)
h 7. Do any ofthe structures need'mamtenanceJmnprovement?
€` S. Does ariy part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stucnires lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Aaulcation
Is
p Yes H No
p Yes N No
p Yes N No
p Yes N No
p Yes ®No
t''_ , _ .10. Aie there any buffers that need mamtenancerunprovement? p Yes ®No
11. Is there evidence of over application? p Excessive Pondmg 13 PAN p Hydraulic Overload p Yes ® No
12, Crop type, Corn, Soybeans, Wheat' Coastal Bermuda (Graze) Small Grain Overseed
13. Do the recervmg crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? p Yes. ® No
T 14. a) Does the facility Iack adequate acreage for land application? p Yes ❑ No
F
'- b) Does the facility need -a wettable acre determination? - p Yes p No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes p No
15.- Does the ieceiving crop need improvement? p Yes ® No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? p Yes ® No
Reauired Records & Documents
..
17. Pail to have Certificate of Coverage &General Permit or other Permit readily available?
y
❑ Yes
No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc_) `'
p Yes
®No
r'
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (iel irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
® No
20. is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
p Yes
®No
21. Did the facility fail io have a actively certified operator in charge?
p Yes
®No
22' Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
ie/ discharge, freeboard roblems over application)
p'Yes,
® No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? p Yes ® No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? p Yes ® No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? p Yes ® No
p o violations or, a iciencies were nofed uring this visit You will receive no further correspondence about this visit
j _tt uesq 6ou ")s�nsaa _ =answers n r uy recomm�ndu""tin nstnr auy other eourmnnts, omments.(�referx
z ew�ngs�o%fa - 'fyto b rfn _ ations. (u _' ` nal� ages.as necessary< pield Capy p Final Notes -
* Waste 6/6/02 with 2.1 lbs/1000 gal. for irrigation and 19.2 for broadcast of sludge slurry
* Soils 4/30/02 with no lime required.
* Records balanced with no overapplication noted.
* Records are well maintained and the farm is well managed.
Reviewer/Inspector Name 5cottY - on 3enter'ec�by Ann':Ty ndall� -e
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: M Date: 1 ?,,/o

05103101 r Continued
ac N um ,er: 48_.11 Date of Inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below [3Yes p No
j.y liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? p Yes ® No
i' 28. Is tbere any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, 13 Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? p Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) p Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? p Yes ® No
32: Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? p Yes p No
r
t �.'S4 •.. - 4 Y • �� - 4 � 'Z'r- j?ta��"L i'{'"4 1Y--- Ty; t
_ . ��,{'t r, s""a= ' "�1 T � � .§I: U - • riw � '�„� .. � t .'z .r 5
�•#� 3`w'� _ �,�. �-�� f- 'aka - � �.�_"� 4�`3}'..iw
MEN,
�ya.2: ',,+ � '���x`��.s'�' � �'''��v-+��ir- � r, fi•c �� t f� i't � `s' �� .r r,� ���' x" � �-x •• L
.a.�.v. �y.....nr :..,.x--•E.•L." ti�L3.:'- v.,r��� `, _ -t�-"=r.T��•� :��`+ a71 >.rs.+ � ''` -;C�.:
�Y'
�' - r`e--�c'.4 �'S"i -= "� �'"'- ', � � ar�� � - .i �, � 5�., GPW nit 2a� - •l.�n s -k •� � r�. v Y
fti
. r r - --� ■aYs+f'ai._.-s{'3-�- _# ,`,•,y -- t-ti �.1,.' 3. - - -
sr.--
�
.c K ' '�` .y, � _a.. �' '3. ry -.,w" +L•�sa.. ram,_ r'�v.�, �, y . /
'� ,�c �y M.-
�'..�'
i
fi:,3: '-'� •'� zx�``r7+-x_ i,�• e=hr.,.;� a".� ,._sa, �+s.I-` r: i.' ' -t �.`.r - e� `
_ '.'u'4 � .•ri a,Jcs,��.�-•:{. ��"��.' ��' � � '.$ �^. r. d#��
g r �,� x �. �� �'Y ^�i�.'a`..o� "b_'�.�,„M� ��` � ' 'L��c'` +�-a � �•"_ r'1 -a = �- �. r-iz�:-s
i,¢Y^•a�, {+t -,e c.t.'. �„l•' r„�.,nr_"'Ci��.K. Ei,;�. �S w�,,, a. K.
is v ro_•sr.;� �+- .x �4 r•�i.''� � �_' �,��-€�,.,,., �. _�aawP..•F` - �f_.,e, ;k�"'' ,� -� :. x � �..si ,
r,.a� -a;. - a.-.F.-r-'�`i'a�-u--aiis��+-".�-�. x i' - rr'= Ftr ^aT.rrs..n.�.e ^^4,C- "-r3,R.m a«•: F� .-r. i
cS
F"`.,.'r
$r
,�r.�`,�'""7 "y°" %r.=.,••l�- sv#'`' ,;..7G�.E:c„ - ��4 y1,�i:: 3�°. t..,�L,'tl�a
ofiii s'`ne.t� ate.`_`!'. �aie�csvi1y`. t,c�..e,.,.33r�Jr.•�i t r`v�t

Type of Visit p Compliance Inspection p Operation Review p Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine p Complaint p Follow up p Emergency Notification p Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Bate of Visit: 2/5/2002 Time: 9:15
p Not Operational p Below Th reshold
E Permitted 0 Certified p Conditionally Certified p Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: Mooney Hog Farm County: Hyde ................................................... WARG.......
Owner Name: Lindsey Glenn Mooney, Jr.
Mailing Address: P.O.-BoxIS&..............................................................................
FacilityContact: ...............................................................................Title................
Onsite Representative: Lindsey.Moiximy.............................................................
Phone No: 252-926-2651
...... Fairfidd..NC.......................... 2782,6 ..............
Phone No-
........ Integrator: Indepieadzat............................................................
Certified Operator:Li:ndsey..O............................ mooneym ..................................... Operator Certification Number:1.7.3b2..
Location of Farm:
wy. 94 nortb of Fairfield.
N Swine p Poultry p Cattle p Horse Latitude ©. ©& ®« Longitude ®* ©6 ©«
Desagn ::, -
Swine Capacity'
[3 Wean to Feeder
[3 Feeder to Finish
p Farrow to Wean
p Farrow to Feeder
® Farrow to Finish
p Gilts
p Boars
�� Total Dei
n Area
283,400
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? 13 Yes N No
Discharge originated at: Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? Yes p No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If ves, notify DWQ) Yes p No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) [3 Yes [3 No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? 0 Yes H No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? p Spillway p Yes M No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: solid.trade.road... ...... rt.solid.trait...... ...........uurscq.......... ....... .,altd wip....... .fatal.............
Freeboard(inches): ................ L2 ............... ............... .1.2...............................12...............................I&..............................53....................................................

ace i y Number: 48_ 11 Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes N No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes IN No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ® No
12. Crop type Wheat, corn Small Grain Overseed Coastal Bermuda (Graze) oats
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ®No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ®No
16. is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ®No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ®No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes ®No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
N No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
® No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
®No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
®No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
®No .
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
®No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
®No
p o vio a ions or deficiencies were noted uring this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about is visit.
�,... ��� .mod �� �—�� ..,_
Comhtents {ri:fer'to question #) EzplaEn any YES�answers=and/or any&recotnmentlationsaorNny sotber- comments. tl
L)se drawings of�facility to better explain situat ons (use additional pages�hs necessary): ❑Field Copy ❑Final Notes -
* Good vegetation on dike wall. Rye grass was planted on dike walls.
* Overseed planted on coastal bermuda, grazed down by cows.
* Field 94 in WUP, but not irrigated due to solid set not installed. Waste can be applied by honey wagon.
* Lagoon levels are recorded weekly as required by Permit.
* Soil test taken 1/02/02. No results. Be sure to follow time recommendations.
* Waste analysis dated 8/16/01. Sample 41 = 1.3 lbs/1000 gallons
92 — 4.8 lbs/1000 gallons
(continued on next page)
r Us
ReviewerlInspector Name Martin McLawh&rn ;entered by.°°Della Rtiblins
ReviewerlInspector Signature: Date:

- 05103V]
Continued
Facility Number: 48_11
Mile of Inspection
Odor Issues
26.
Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
Yes
p No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27.
Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
p Yes
® No
28.
Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
13 Yes
® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29.
Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
13 Yes
® No
30.
Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
[3 Yes
® No
31.
Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
p Yes
® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
p Yes p No
* Waste analysis dated 5/16/01. Sample #1 = 2.1 Ibs/1000 gallons; #2 = 7.4 lbs/1000 gallons
* Records are complete & balanced.
* WUP updated 7/16/01 to include smallgrain overseed on coastal and delete matua signed by tech. spec.
7. Incineration
s.
i l •1
i
- u
v
}
i
C� i�

Type of Visit p Compliance Inspection p Operation Review p Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit p Routine p Complaint p Follow up p Emergency Notification p Other p Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit: 1 10/12/2001 Time: 10:00 am Printed on: 11/1/2001
p Not opera"tional p Below Threshold
Permitted ■ Certified p Conditionally Certified p Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold- .........................
Farm Name: Mooney Hog Farm County: Hyk................................................... .W..AR.O.......
Owner Name: Lindsey Glenn Mooney, Jr. Phone No: 252-926-2651
Mailing Address: P O -Hoar.1S$............................................................... ........................ FairfWMAC ......................................................... 27R26 ..............
Facility Contact: Lindsey.Mooney............................................Title:............................................................... Phone No:
Onsite Representative: Lindsey..Mao ey....................................................................... Integrator: Indeptelldenx............................................................
Certified Operator: Lindsey..G............................ Mobaeym..................................... Operator Certification Number: 1.7362 ............................
Location of Farm:
® Swine p Poultry p Cattle p Horse Latitude ©. ©� ®� Longitude ®• ©� ©K
..Design _ Current Design ;Current Design Current
Somme ..Capacity. Population' ',` PoultrynCapac�tyI?opulaon Cattle Capacity' PopuEatlon
yer auy
p Non -Layer p Non -Daffy 4:
❑ Other =
- a
-.. � Total:Desti Ca ace � 200
-� gn
P
W
- _ ,Total SSLW 283,400
r mm s Number"of La ❑ u sur ace rams resent p Lagoon Area p pray fie rea
Hold�iig Poiids /Solid Trapo LiquidWaste anagement ystem
.13
Farrow to Feeder
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to finis
❑ arrow to Wean
Dischha es_& Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes N No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? []Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes p No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes p No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? 13 Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than.from a discharge? ❑ Yes B No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) Iess than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: Salid.Trap........ .... N.Solid.Trap...............Xumery...............S..SaUd..Trap..... .... I ....... h'inal............. .............
Freeboard(inches)......................................................................................................................................................................................

[Facility Number: 48_11 Date of Inspection ® Printed on: 11/1/2001
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
❑ Yes
Ig No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(1f any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
p Yes
N No
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
N No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
p Yes
N No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
p Yes
® No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/'improvement?
p Yes
® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? p Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN p Hydraulic Overload
p Yes
®No
12. Crop type Corn, Soybeans, Wheat Coastal Bermuda (Graze) Small Grain Overseed
I3. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
®No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
p No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
p Yes
p No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
p Yes
N No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
®No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
® No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (W irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
p Yes
N No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
® No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
p Yes
® No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
N No
23,
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
®No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
H No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ® No
In No violations or deficiencies were noted during ( is visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
# Waste analysis dated 8/16/01 at 1.3 Ibs N/1000 gals.
1.9 lbs N11000 gals.
k Soil analysis dated 4/23/01 with no Iime required.
____ 0 rieia Lopy 13 rmai Notes
5/16/01 at 2.1 Ibs N/1000 gals.; 3/2/01 at
Reviewer/Inspector Name Sc
ems:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date: %;gQ/e/

r
05103101
aci ity Nume_r. 48_11
Date of Inspection
Continued
Printed on: 11/1/2001
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge atlor below 0 Yes p No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? p Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, p Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? p Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) p Yes ®No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? p Yes ® No-
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? p Yes p No
- - —�
l�L'(.r �y�v4` r= ,+ �i"."5 ar "i -'+q�e "�'.��*y xy"z''a -M. •"r_3. �-_.'`
�� 41•Siip
t i5� ..S .0 `. '+ �•t �.:'[` i'- ,�"- �.. J._ .J. Yj sal «-.....tr.. ,
4 - mitts_
1 3
aj�� � � �-;,rS - S'y s .r �. e ,J.7�rc z ' r ...{* "�" '��� - ,a- :x � •Sc- u r' .
rr-...��, - E.�c .� �S'aJ .�ye�fze a�'a r <-.& '3a-k r �T. act �, .•�"v�. „�;F ss -'�-� -s-, _. '
tt � '•.i, -ice ;3 VF`�%^ ..s t',,,.'+xc.- i ,f.-lam,-.,�''f. - • -
iz'• [!y.r� ck♦=.. . f...v.y-xJ a ti.r. ..,� ry }�;-,+ 1 .��� .6 ' ors I- •� c rtiti- i -
� E1yYLF � �-llv � a 'Sl•�i 4i'"� "Y\'i}c �'�"M �ri4..J ��r'Y` .r _ram �.
`� arms -t-• .t a i�_rC"' t'r;r' •Tsi- J{ •, -,- - . a y a:..-F �r .� .z-.a. ?-
, � '- �. �-i yew.. -•.ir '1-• - � a r -, R -
^$"�
-
r --.s 3 ,,.5} _ x - a ,� +'.�-,. �R. r s. r'+ � r z �•: z, '� .r.-s h--�-��. '>.�X•' °�•� � y�l� a
- .;ter �- .-:'h', r : i�:.�-h 3cr�r •p�.s-Jf - � d -
�^"-'�' - °°'"� _ __.. - . +_ 'r2. �x _ � -_ _...� � . ""' �:' ✓ '� c... .. ..:"��;;a �'�'_`-`� ..........�� -1, �`4''- �-s= -K�a� �" .,a'K � ?'�- .^`"'t- _ r ,_ i....
_ •�t. ,',r :��yL� 7
ems- -['":�
�.. s�'�'3".s., r�--f.+,,� �. =ate •�lJ+�.'�•i��_-'�•'-u. f'��i�i"�' _. _', w" .�.:. YFw.-.
`•y`7>, -�._ �' _may ay \ 'F`='�' 'e� .� a�i � ?L crf4, i�
_
,y ..r. - ^• •"i �= .,s jJ.�n• .».er..J �` ems\ d-c w-. 2 ..s,... _ �Yr ��-s,�r � � •lam � _ '� `. � - -

Michael F. Easley
Governor
OF WATER
`Ors 0�
To: Producer
From: Scott Vinson
Environmental Engineer
Washington Regional Office
Subject: Animal Compliance Inspection
Year 2001
Wilfiam G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Kerr T. Stevens
Division of Water Quality
Enclosed please find a copy of the Compliance Site Inspection (as viewed in the DWQ database) conducted at the referenced
facility by the Division of Water Quality from the Washington Regional Office. Please read this inspection and keep it
with all other documents pertaining to your animal operation for future inspections,
In general, these inspections included verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP);
(2) the farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC 2H.0217, Senate Bill 1217, and the Certified Animal
Waste Management Plan; (3) the tarn operation's waste management system is being operated properly under the direction of a
Certified Operator; (4) the required records are being kept; and (5) there are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or runoff.
As a reminder, please note the following comments, which are conditions of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan and
the General Permit; therefore, these items must be implemented:
(p The maximum waste level in lagoons/storage ponds shall not exceed that specified in the CAWMP. At a minimum,
maximum waste level for waste for lagoons/storage ponds must not exceed the level that provides adequate storage to
contain 25 year, 24 hour storm event plus an additional foot of structural freeboard-
(p An analysis of the liquid animal waste from the lagoon shall be conducted as close to the time of application as practical and
at least within 60 days (before or after) of the date of application. This analysis shall include the following parameters:
Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Zinc and Copper.
cp Soil analysis is required annually. Lime is to be applied to each receiving crop as recommended by the soil analysis.
rp The following records are required: off -site solids removal, maintenance, repair, waste/soil analysis and land irrigation
records. 'these records should be maintained by the facility owner/manager in chronological and legible foam for a
minimum of three years.
(p Land application rates shall be in accordance with the CAWMP. In no case shall land application rates exceed the Plant
Available Nitrogen (PAN) rate for the receiving crop or result in runoff during anv given annlication.
cp All grassed waterways shall have a stable outlet with adequate capacity to prevent ponding or flooding damages. The outlet
can be another vegetated channel, an earth ditch, stabilization structure, or other suitable outlets.
rp It is smested, not a requirement, to keep crop yield information for future use to update your waste management plan.
You will need three years of crop yield data before your plan can be updated.
For your information, any swine facility that has a discharge to surface waters of the State will have to apply for a National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit with the Division of Water Quality, effective January 1, 2001.
Thank you for your assistance and cooperation during the inspection. if you have any questions, please contact me at 252-946-
6481, ext. 321 or your Technical Specialist.
Cc: WaRO
SAV Files
943 Washington Square Mall Washington, NC 27889 252-946-6481 (Telephone) 252-946-9215 (Fax)

(Type of Visit .O Compliance Inspection p Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 4$ 11 Date of Visit: 6/1/2001 Time: 1I30 Printed on: 10/10/2001
O Not Operational O Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified 13 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ....................
Farm Name: Hoomxy..Hog.Rarim....................... ..................................... ... County: 1Eydc................................................... 1'1'ARQ.......
Owner Name: Liatidsey..Ci lvai I .................... 14') Q.Qme'y,.dx............................................... Phone No: 252-926-Z651...........................................................
Mailing Address: )P,Q....�0 . 5 ........................... ... .. 1:.ai ficU..NC......................................................... 2.7.816 ..............
Facility Contact:
....Title:
Phone No:
Onsite Representative: UIds.cy.Mooney................... .. Integrator: J dellitt{tlCplX....................
Certified Operator:UU451C...... '............. xQua.....:...................................... Operator Certification Number:17362 .............................
Location of Farm:
Hwy. 94 north of Fairfield. +
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 • 32 50 u Longitude 1 76 10 13 15 µ
Discharp_es & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ®No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ... solid.trap.road... .....n.solxdtcap................nursery........... .&.snli,d.trap...... final............. . ..... ................................................
Freeboard (inches): 17 6 6 6 44
05/113/fll rontinued

eq;o3101
Facility Number: 48-11
Date of Inspection b11/2001
Continued
Printed on: 10/10/2001
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenancehinprovement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Com, Soybeans, Wheat
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
[:]Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
Q No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YIDS answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations, use ad itional pages as necessary): ❑ Field Copy, ❑Final Notes
*Lagoon level being recorded weekly as required by permit.
*Soil test dated 4/23/01. No lime required.
*Waste plan is still being'amended to include small grain overseed. Matua will be deleted.
*Waste plan was amended on 7/31/00 to show change infield ##4 to include solid set but this system has not been installed. Crop
windows have been changed to March -Oct for coastal bermuda signed by tech. spec.
*Waste analysis dated 5f16/01 nitrogen is 2.1 Ibs/1000 gallons
3/2 01 nitrogen is 1.9 lbs/1000 gallons
rr
Reviewer/Inspector Name }Martin McLawhorn
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

03/03101
Facility Number: 48-11
Date of Inspection 6/1/2001
Continued
Printed on: 10/10/2001
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge attor below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes IN No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ®Na
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
F.• ihona 1!ommentslang .orL Law
*Spray fields are in good condition.
*Discussed IRR2/waste schedule.
�

C7 Livisian of Water�Qaahty
Division of Soil and -water ConservationiF
x
Q Other.Agency -
. r -
r
Type of Visit (r;ompliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
(Reason for Visit pHToutine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number
Date of Visit: -�.�� Time: � Printed on: 7/21/2000
f
Q Not Operational Q Below Threshold
MIrermitted Utertified [3 Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ..................•......
Farm Name: ........1�'4. {7y4. 't p .") .... County:.....i+ ..��..'.Sr ..
Owner Name:....lr�P� ��r�-4. �7. �:'"^.. If V.!1 �r Phone No: .....................
FacilityContact:.....................................................6........................ Title:......................... ..... 0.6....... Phone No
Mailing Address:. .:. ( ...... .... t�U......e:�t. ...........................
Onsite Representative: .... ' �It Integrator:... {. .............6...............
...L .�Q...�................................................
Certified Operator: ..... UAIL ........................ pp .? �,,.. .. Operator Certification Number: .....1, .�,.2Gx. .....
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Norse
Latitude 0 6 &4 Longitude �� �' 46
- Design_ Current.
- .�iYl1!! _ !'niise�ifv Pnnnlstinn
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
' Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
arrow to Finish
� p�
00
Gilts
Boars
" S Ntmber,ol[Lagobps = S ❑ Subsurface Drains Present 11OLagwwAres ❑ Spray Field Area
Hel tg Ponds / Solid Traps'Traps'l No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [(No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes dNo
b. if discharge is observed. did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes No
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Struc�tu�rre] 2 Structu e 3 Structure 4 Structure
Identifier:... -�5.� .................. ........... c r:( �..... .... / ....... ..........
Freeboard (inches): q-t� 3 IC ti 6 it
sfaa
rn 'aL.
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes 2<o
❑ Yes ENO
❑ Yes 5�No
Structure 6
Continued on hack

Facility Number: 41?— i I Date of inspection 7/21/2000
Printed on:
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed'? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
❑ Yes
No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
❑ Yes
21 i�o_
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
}moo
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
1PK0_
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
KTo
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement'?
❑ Yes
2KO
11. Is there evidence of over application? Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
❑ No
I❑
I
12. Crop type 'r I IKJU..t-- 1 :��Xt"�-+ n s�137�. � c
a - 50
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)'?
❑ Yes
�
PIZ-
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? n/f , ; _
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?/� r�y�"�
❑ Yes
❑ No
Yf�
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
L2,55%
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? c _,O`K•c
V
❑ Yes
F.,Wo`
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
1 S. Does the fg I to have al co nents of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available'?
(ie/ W[f1�, check+fssts, desig ma etc.)
❑ Yes
®-i5o
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard" waste ana}ysis & soil sam Orre
9�7e_s
❑ No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
❑. -No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes e-No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on. site representative? ❑ Yes 5?K0_
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency'? ❑ Yes [B o
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes E140
0: 10 yMhtiotis:or• &flciencies mere noted ditritig fihis:visit: Yoi� will reeeiye Ito: further: :
corresporide i ' e' abouti this visit: • :::::: ::: ' : :::: ' :::: ' : ' :::::: ' : ' ::::: '
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
i, aGet
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: o-- 1,6 -L)Cl 5100

S
Facility Number: " — I t I Date of Inspection RJE-45--Mi Printed on: 7/21/2000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge At/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes B No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes RVo
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes 2<0
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ETIZ
31 _ Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes Erfo
a
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
d-X. ,Zky-'Z
V
5100
J

Type of Visit Q Compliance Inspection O Operation Review Q Lagoon Evaluation
IReason for Visit O Routine O Complaint Q Follow up Q Emergency !Notification Q Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number
Date of Visit: 7/13/2000 Time: 830 Printed on: 11292000
48 11
w O Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
® Permitted 0 Certified © Conditionally Certified 13 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .............
Farm Name: Moomy.Boglam ...................................................................................... County: Hyde .................................................. WAR.O.......
Owner Name: �LutiS!»y..SraeAtAl.................... MAR1tc.Ya.d1r........................................ ...... Phone No: 1. Z-2ZlGc2651..........................................................
Facility Contact:
Title:....
Phone No:
Mailing Address: .(2... 0�.......................................................................................... Fairfiew..NC ......................................................... Z7826 .............
Onsite Representative: j kds:ey..M9=ry ............................... .... Integrator: Iudt�enident......................... .................... ..............................................
Certified Operator:.Liads-ey_Gc............................. Mnfljot xIII..................................... Operator Certification Number:17162 .............................
Location of Farm:
Hwy. 94 north of Fairfield.
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Norse Latitude 3S • 32 S0 K Longitude 76 • 13 ' 15 K
Design Ciii=rent
Swine canackv Ponulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
® Farrow to Finish
1 200
1 200
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Number of Lagoons 5 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System -
Dischamms & Stream impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed. was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes [:]No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, uotify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge b}pass a lagoon system" (lives, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes N No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes N No
Stm tare I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure ? Structure G
Identifier: trap/mad ........ ...............n,.solid.J.rap................ mused ........... ....... ssolid.Irap....... _............ fimal............. ...................................
Freeboard(inches).................15................................15.................... .....1.5................... ..1.5............... .....3...................

5100 Continued on back
Facility Number: 48-11 Date of Inspection 7/13/2000 Printed on: 11/29/2i)00
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes R No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7_ Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ® Yes ❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes R No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
I I . Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload [--]Yes ® No
12. Crop type Fescue (Graze) Small Grain Overseed Matua overseed
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes N No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
R No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
R No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
N No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
R No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
N Yes
❑ No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
N No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
® No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
N No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
® No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
N No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
N No
0 No violatiotas:or:' e'&iericiesivere;rioted;dui-ing tliis'viisit:; Y6u will;receive'no itirNier:-:
-corres ondence about this.visit.' -
Comments (referlo question.# ): Explain sny YES answers and/or any'recommendatians or.anv other comments.
Use.drawiags of facility to better explain situations: (use addition al' pages as necessary)—
*Lagoon level being recorded weekly as required by permit. Ak
*Soil test dated 3/17/00. Lime not recommended.
*Irrigation system is solid set.
*Waste analysis dated 3/24/00. Nitrogen is 2.1 lbs/1000 gallons.
*Mr. Mooney has had waste plan amended by district office but has not received copy yet.
*Slates that have been installed in final lagoon appear to be controlling erosion from wave action.
*Mr Mooney is using nail as marker in lagoon #2.
7. Need to mow lagoon inner walls to allow for routine and visual inspection.
Reviewer/Inspector Name

Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 5100
Facility Number: 48-11 Date of Inspection 7/13120t)t) Printed on: 11 /29/2000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28. is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt. ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i_e_ broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Additional Comments,and/or`DrawingsA7. rea around pump house on top of dike wall has been sprayed with roundup.
19. Need to secure waste analysis to cover irrigation events 6-10-00 thru 6-15-00. No over application has occurred.
*Final lagoon need to monitor cows grazing on dike walls to prevent stocking trails.
27_ Incineration

DDivrsioti of Soil and Water. Conservation -Operation Review _ _
- Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Compliance Inspection
Division of Water Quality Compliance Inspection, '
1,Other°4ency= Operation Review
Routine O Com faint O-Follow-u p of DWQ ins ection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection 1
Time of Inspection 1 13'00 24 hr. (hh:mm)
*Permitted 19 Certified U Conditionally Certified © Registered M Not O perational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: ... . ................... County:..............�y.�..--
....................................
OwnerName: L„�S�-f G n�' `.�1............. Phone No: ............................--.........................................................
Facility Contact: ........L ....... !y'^e�....................Title:.............-....-.........- Phone No:...........-..........-..-......-...........--.....
Mailing Address:
Onsite Representative: +� �Sc� itoa.Integrator:......................................................................................
.................................................
Certified Operator: ................'.^...{.. Mi°-'e( Operator Certification Number: ..........................................
Location of Farm: /
a,
........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... T
Latitude �' �� �« Longitude
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
200
(-
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer ❑Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons 10 Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation (If yes, notify DWQ)?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
h. If discharge is observed. did it reach: ❑ Surface Waters ❑ Waters of the State
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated floe' In gal/min'?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?
2- Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure I
Structure 2
Structure 3
Structure 4
Structure 5
Identifier. R>30M
Freeboard(inches): ................................ .......
{.`.^...................................1.
`.......
..... l..a"........................................
❑ Yes ,1 No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
Wo
❑ Yes
t0K No
❑ Yes
k No
Structure 6
1 /6/99 Continued on back

roacility-bi ember: t.1Q — f r Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
S. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. - Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required top of dike, maximum and minimum
liquid level elevation markings?
Waste application
10, Are there any buffers that need maintenance/imprcn,ement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Ponding ❑ Nitrogen
12. Croptype g»r1 �. - ...................
YP ............... ................................................................................
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. Does the facility lack wettable acreage for land application? (footprint).
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement`?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, Freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ic/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes ONo
❑ Yes M No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
9 Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes "No
❑ Yes 25No
❑ Yes � No
❑ Yes 19 No
❑ Yes j21 No
❑ Yes U No
❑ Yes ['WNo
❑ Yes [XNo
❑ Yes LgNo
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ❑ No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes ® No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes 59 No
P: NA.vlolatIOns:or defdenci�es.werte noted. during Hiis.visit:. You wi2l.receive nor further.:.
• : eorrespondehee' about: this visit.' ...:. . .:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:...:.:.:.:. ............... , .:.:...:.:.:.:
Comments (refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.: _
lise drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary)
-v y 56„srd r.%',kvS
.14, o1>n V" a 'i,p V,k,4
Reviewer/Inspector Name Cw 0q,14
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date: 5 S ^ Ty 1116/99

. -w i
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
May 24, 1999
Mr. Lindsey Glenn Mooney Jr
P.O. Box 158
Fairfield NC 27826
Subject: Annual Compliance Inspection
Facility Number 48-11
Hyde County
Dear Mr. Mooney Jr:
NCDENR
NORTH CAPEOU11M DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
On 5/5/99, Carl Dunn from the Washington Regional Office of the Division of Water Quality
conducted an inspection of your swine operation. Please review the enclosed inspection form. This
inspection form should be maintained as part of the records for your facility. Please note any items that may
be marked with a yes answer and make every effort to correct these deficiencies. The Division of Water
Quality will be conducting an inspection of your facility sometime during the calender year of 2000. You are
advised that you must maintain a freeboard of at least one foot in your lagoon(s) plus a storage volume
sufficient to accommodate the rainfall and any subsequent runoff from a 25 year 24 hour storm event to
remain in compliance.
Thank you for your cooperation in this inspection. If you have any questions in regard to this letter
or if I may be of any assistance, I can be contacted at [phone] ext. 208. Please do not hesitate to call.
cc: WaRO Files
/Siin^nyycerely,
Carl Dunn
Environmental Engineer
943 Walertaa Scam HaN. Wx6iama. Worth (maku 77H9 TF[ 29-946401 FIRS MSX16

a ' 60P(Vt '1/ZL,
jig ounne 0 t-ompiatnt 0 ronow-up of uwV inspection 0 roiiow-up of uNwt_ review 0 Lrtner
Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection © 24 hr. (hh:mm)
p Registered ■ Certified p Applied for Permit p Permitted of Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: Moony..dog.Fa.rm...................................................................................... County: Hyde WARO
Owner Name: Lindsey.Glem................... Mnoney.dc................. Phone No: 2521926:26511arm ...............................................
GlwaMaoa .Title: owner .................................. 9.2b-89SI..or.926-8�82,1......
Facility Contact: ey...............................................--�-�........... Phone No:
MailingAddress: F 0 ..Box.1S8......................................................................................... Fairfield..NC...................................... I ............. ...... 2282.6..... I........
Onsite Representative: Glenn.Mooney.,&.Un dsey..Mnuttey................................. Integrator: Ludepen erd............................................................
Certified Operator:Lindsey..G............................ moaney.111 ..................................... Operator Certification Number: l:I,362.............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude Longitude
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? p Yes N No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25197
p Yes ® No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No

Facility Number: 48_11 Date of Inspection
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
p Yes
® No
Structures¢agoons,Holding Ponds, Flush Pits, eta
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
p Yes
N No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure
6
Identifier: .north.solids.tmp. .north.solids.trap.. center.salids.trap..sou1h.snlids.trap. ............ Lnad.............
...........
Freeboard (ft): 1.6 1.6 1.3 2.5 2.3
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
p Yes
® No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
p Yes
® No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
p Yes
® No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
p Yes
® No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
p Yes
ig No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type....CAastaLHe=da,(9r=1.................. lVlatua.auemeed............. .............. Fescue..(graze).................... .... ....... carn.&...wi=L...............
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
R .. o,vic! ons.or �cremcies•were.no a raring rs visit: ou receive no urt er .
ei espoAs�eAe¢ abQu� #iS . : .
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes p No
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Washington Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
November 25, 1997
Mr. Glenn Mooney, Jr.
Mooney Hog Farm
P.O. Box 158
Fairfield, NC 27826
SUBJECT: Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
Mooney Hog Farm
Fac. No. 48-11
Hyde County
Dear Mr. Mooney:
On September 4, 1997, I conducted an Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection at the Mooney Hog
Farm in Hyde County. Overall, the operation was found to be in satisfactory condition. A copy of the
inspection report is attached for your review.
In general, this inspection includes verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan (CAWMP); (2) the farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC 2H.0217,
Senate Bill 1217, and the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan; (3) the farm operation's waste
management system is being operated properly under the direction of a Certified Operator; (4) the required
records are being kept; (5) there are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or runoff.
The recommendations and/or comments regarding your inspection can be found in the comment section of
the attached inspection form. It is very important as the owner and Operator in Charge that you address any
noted concerns, as soon as possible. For assistance, please contact your Technical Specialist and/or
the local Soil & Water Conservation District Office.
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance during the inspection. Should you have further questions
or comments regarding this inspection, do not hesitate to call me at [phone], ext. 321.
Sincerely,
(4� ts . CL
Daphne B. Cullom
Environmental Specialist II
cc: Hy e County SWCD Office
aR0
943 Washington Square Mail, Washington, North Carolina 27889 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

f
19 Koutine O Lompiamt p ronow-up of uwq inspection p ronow-up of unowi_, review p timer I
Date of Inspection
Facility Number
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
la Registered E Certified p Applied for Permit p Permitted 0 of peranona Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: Monney.Hog.Farm...................................................................................... County: Hyde WARO
Owner Name: Clean---------------•...........•---•...... Maonex.dr ................................................ Phone No: 919:9.2b-.2b511arm.......................................... --•
Facility Contact: Undsiey.bJu0ney............................................Title:............................................................... Phone No: 919-9J..64821.......................
MailingAddress: F.O,.. $aUS&............................•...............----....................-----............... Faix'fie,eld.M.......................................................... 27926 ..............
Onsite Representative: GIexln.Mon y.A.1. ndsey..MclD=y................................ Integrator :............................................................... I ...................... I
Certified Operator: Lindsey..G............................ Moaney.ju..................................... Operator Certification Number-.17361 ............................
Location of Farm:
Myr...:..:12o...th. lair C.....................................................•.-...........-....................•..•........-.••.•.....•.................................................•.........•........•.•..•...................-.• �
......................................................................................................-......................................................................................................------......----- ......._.... j
Latitude ©• ©' 0 Longitude
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? p Yes ® No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
0
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
S. Does any part of the waste management system (other than Iagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
p Yes ® No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes N No
p Yes ® No
p Yes H No
p Yes ® No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
p Yes ® No

' aci i um er: 48_11
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons,Holdine Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure I Structure 2 -Structure 3
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier. .................
Freeboard (ft): 2 ft. 2 ft. 2 ft. 2 ft.
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WW, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
3.5 ft.
p Yes
® No
Yes
® No
p Yes
® No
p Yes
® No
p Yes
® No
15. Crop type ................. FescueLRyr...................... Coactal.Bermudal. Mama.--- ---Coastal.Bemuda./..Matua........................................................... _..
Oms
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? p Yes H No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
q .. o via Lions. or �cren.cies "were.note unnLr this visit. - Du. willreceive n� further . - .
ceifesodndeae� about :gills -visit:: • :.. .
p Yes ® No
p Yes N No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
13 Yes ® No
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: l� ,��� p � Date: 9-7

I.
DSWC Animal Feedlot Operation Review
p DWQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
19 Routine p Complaint Q Follow-up of DWQ inspection p Follow-up of DSWU review O Other
Facility Number
Farm Status: o Registered p Applied for Permit
0 Certified p Permitted
In Not Operational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: Mooney Hog Farm
Owner Name: Glem..................................... A! 00A4......................
County: Hyk................................................... 1iV.AR.Q.......
PhoneNo: 9.26:8251 ....................................................................
Facility Contact:...............................................................................Title: .... Phone No:
...............................................................................................................
Mailing Address: P O ..Box.1M........................................................................................ Faixfx1d..NC ......................................................... 27826 ..............
Onsite Representative: Lindsey.Moomy....................................................................... Integrator:
Certified Operator: Landsq.G............................. MQ0jW4.IH..................................... Operator Certification Number:17.162 .............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude ©0 ©` ®"
awme •[::apathy _ .opuianow-
[3 Wean to Feeder
p Feeder to Finish
p Farrow to Wean
p Farrow to ee er
in Farrow to FW
Other
Longitude
n
1-
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW r
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? p Yes ® No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes p No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) n Yes n No _
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaVmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes n No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? p Yes ® No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require p Yes ® No
4/30/97 maintenance/improvement?

racility Number: 48_11
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? 0 Yes ®No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? p Yes ®No
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? p Yes ®No
Structures La oons and/or Holding Ponds
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? p Yes ® No
Freeboard (ft): Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
............... 2.L............... ............. 1..5A............. ............. 1-5.$.............. .............. 1..5.R..............
10.
Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
p Yes
® No
11.
Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
p Yes
® No
12.
Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
p Yes
N No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13.
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
p Yes
N No
Waste Application
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application?
p Yes
N No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15.
Crop type ....................... mur....................... ...... Coastal.Bezmuda Grass...................... .....
16.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
1] Yes
® No
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
p Yes
®No
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
p Yes
N No
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
p Yes
®No
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
p Yes
®No
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
p Yes
®No
For Certified Facilities Only
22.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
p Yes
® No
23.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
p Yes
®No
24. Does record keeping need improvement? p Yes ® No
Reviewer/Inspector Name Rufus Groom -
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

State of North Carolina
Department of Environmenf,
Health and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B.- Howes, Secretary
November 13, 1996
Lindsey Mooney Jr
Mooney Hog Farm
P.O. Box 168
Fairfield NC 27826
SUBJECT: Operator In Charge Designation
Facility: Mooney Hog Farm
Facility ID#: 48-11
Hyde County
Dear Mr. Mooney Jr:
RECENIM
WASHINGTON OFFICE
NOV 19 1996
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study
Commission on Agricultural Waste, enacted by the 1996 North Carolina General Assembly,
requires a certified operator for each animal waste management system that serves 250 or more
swine by January 1, 1997. The owner of each animal waste management system must submit a
designation form to the Technical Assistance and Certification Group which designates .an
Operator in Charge and is countersigned by the certified operator. The enclosed form must be
submitted by January 1, 1997 for all facilities in operation as of that date. Failure to designate a
certified operator for your animal waste management system is a violation of 15A NCAC 2H
.0224 and may result in the assessment of a civil penalty.
If you have questions concerning operator training or examinations for certification, please
contact your local North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service agent or our office.
Examinations have been offered on an on -going basis in many counties throughout the state for
the past several months and will continue to.be offered through December 31, 1996.
Thank you for your cooperation. If you have any questions concerning this requirement please
call Beth Buffington or Barry Huneycutt of our staff at 919/733-0026.
Sincerely,
reston Howard, Jr ., irector
Division of Water Quality
Enclosure
cc: Washington Regional Office
Water Quality Files
% C
P.O. Box 27687, W 4.
Raleigh, North Carolina 2761 1-7687 An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 919-715-4100 50% recycled/10°k post -consumer paper

3 Site Requires Immediate Attention: /v
Facility No. _4 It
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT.
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: Qkj 1995
Time:
Farm Name/Owns
Mailing Address:
County: AyDIE
Integrator. _,.��� Phone:
On Site Representative: Phone:
Physical Address/Location: ICJ4 Q
Type of Operation: Swine — /— Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: X% so, ,is Number of Animals on Site: _ aoo _-
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: Longitude: _ ' Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) Yes or No Actual Freeboard: 4- FL O Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes orl�wWas any erosion observed? Yes or b
Is adequate land available for
No Is the cover crop adequate? *or No
Crop(s) being utilized: 7riZJ'A�_ ---
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings?( .or No
100 Fczi 1r6m Wells? YZ
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? � r No
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes or N.
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man -mast ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes orQ-1 If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes or No
Additional Comments:
Insp oec r Name Signature
cc: Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed.

b
ro Est
9
r
G
3
0

❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency
iivision of Water Quality
iOYtoutine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow-ue orDSWC review O Other
Date of Inspection
Facility Number
Time of Inspection [ PFI 1 24 hr. (hh:mm)
0 Registered D Certified © Applied for Permit © Permitted 113 Not Operational I Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: G4...... 'AR County:........ ...................
...........I..................................
Owner Name:........ L t .. --- Phone No: ..S 1
nn ►�....,.. �........................ R...................................................
Facility Contact: .. Qe.�r�"'1........-�I.SU. ............... Title:..:....!-v. ..-----.. ..... Phone No: .." is.�..... ...... .... .... ....................
Qa-ro $
Mailing Address:... �4 :�,:...?......4`?............................................................... ...................... .Z..
Onsite Representative:.............................................................. . integrator:--•,,,
Certified Operator;...U6AV ..G............... Ific
M. ... .t ................ Operator Certification Number:.. . . ,............
---
Location of Farm: V
w
F.,± .. . ............................................................ ............. ...................................... ............ .
Latitude 1,35 J• 13a I' I Longitude 1-7 ` 1 13 I' 1 115J"
"Design Current
,Designs . Current Design Current
.,
Swine Capacity 'PopulatioiiE-, :Poul(ry Capacity Population Cattle ,. Capacity._Populahon
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑Layer1 171 ❑Dairy
,p ❑Feeder to Finish
Layer ❑Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Kmw to Feeder
1. ❑ Other ,z
Farrow to Finish aC)C7 p
Total Design Cap4city�--. I 'n-Od
❑ Gilts
❑Boars
n Total SSL s o 33
�. W
Number of Lagoons / Holding Ponds
©
❑ Spray Field Area
❑ Subsurface Drains Present
© Lagoon Area
.....
10 No Liquid Waste Management SystemAff
,F :.�
m'
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
❑ Yes E o
El Yes �
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes [[;K010
❑ Yes Ca'No
❑ Yes 2 No
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes : o

Facility Numher: ga — l
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes UINo
Structures (Laeoons,Holdine Ponds Flush Pits, etc.) , ��
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes LI No
, [[ Structure I Structure 2n Structure Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:00 45 .�. at�d�5�� ?! .............�'. ...........: 1. ..
-- ; '.-.... f ra, ..... - __� D {�------------------------I........
Freeboard(ft):............1........................�:r I 1. ti .`x c `} . ...............................................................
10. is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes @�No
11. is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes E�No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes 9<0'
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) ��
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑ Yes l�d'No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes [4a
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ) �S
r
15. Crop type .�.Q�!.!!!n^..!...... ... �?�. i . SCJU���.......--
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? [91fes ,❑D 'NNNoo
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes Lsd0
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes Ito
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? ❑ Yes M No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes Wl No
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail io discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes I4o
��O22. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ Yes
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑ Yes �9'1`To
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes WNo
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No
0• No.vidlations•or. deficiencies'.were-ntit4du' ring this:visit.• You:will i&eive°no-ftirttier
correspondence about tbis:visif.: : .:
r C_ i, _ _ . t i f7/,2,5/97
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: q 4 — q8

Facility Number: 46— ( Date of [nspec•tion L�J
cacti w1- �LiLt0.� UL� �L d✓�I/.Q V�Q�J
7/25/97

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
F /os
7/25/97

❑ DSSWWC Animal Feedlot Operation Review
5�1` Q Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
outine O Complaint Q Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Date of Inspection
Facility Number
Time of Inspection :10� 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Registered Meelt fied [3 Applied for Permit [3 Permitted 10 Not Operational
� Date Last Operated: .
Farm Name: ........ 00..- `rC�ri�Y�!li Connty:....�'L ......
„1;, ....... ................ ........................................................................ `�'
Owner Name:....... LL4!11/1..... .oQ ��--. —. ... Phone No a i9 - Zfa - $SZI . o
................ .........................
Facility Contact: .., ........JN&oa. Title: it S Phone No: A
Nlailing Address:......? ...a.......!��?........ 1.516.... �'�i.i.!r-'l-t .. I�.G...................... ............... .............. ... .
Onsite Representative:.- i�.l-..... %nc�?SP..1.......P=P.--.......................... Integrator:........---......-
ii ]
Certified Operator .-.-�.- A&5.P.JA.. G-........s..'. 6.0 ...M....... Operator Certification Number;..,.175..6Z.
Location of Farm: j
Latitude �,�s] a © ` ® °C
vestgn t-urrenr
Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ F—Xfow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
ZO CO
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
............:..n..T..,................................ ..-................................................................................... ................... .
Longitude ° © °G
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons./ Holding Ponds IM Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area I0 Spray Field Area
❑ No Liquid Waste :Management System
General 4 K)p 5o6;( C�AM-3 -1,S
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? Ate-- . ItvG.-eA t IIq+ �� • ElYes GKO
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? J ❑ Yes [Z14d6"'
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. It discharge is observed. did it reach Surface Water? (If yeti, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge'?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
mai ntenancelimprovement?
b. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
T Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ,❑ Now
[I Yes Ly'No
❑ Yes EkKo
❑ Yes
❑ YesLy,'N/o
❑ Yes L�No
Continued on back

Facility Number: —
Yes
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
❑
f�No
Structures (Lagoons,ltolding Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
QX01
ture I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
rucIt
Structure 5 Structure 6Identifier
........... . ..... ...... ........... ..- l".....-...............: SP...........
........
.... .. ......... .-.......
Freeboard(ft) Z............. .......s- ......... .......... Z:............
........ ....................... ....................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
[►, l' o
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed'?
❑ Yes
K
o
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
El0 Yes
&,
vo
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes
�o
Waste ADDlication
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes y( No
(if in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notifynDWWQ)
15. Crop type .....T r,.5.� �Q......�.. ........'............................... ........... � ..���"^�0. ....�Q.��r.........-..
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan AWMMP)!, ❑ Yes Gii o
lst0 S.
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
BINo
❑ Yes
U- o
❑ Yes
EKO
❑ Yes
L1Y�o
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes Eg1l0
22. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ YesIo
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑ Yes 1,Ko
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes RTio
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No
[] No violations or deficiencies. were noted during this" visit. - .You �wi11 receive no further
' correspondence about this'visit:. .

FACILITY NUMBER
FARM NAME: 96044go Fa&n-\-
REVIEWER: AA,_
DATE: 277,: 09 -_off_
TYPE
NUMBER
SSLW Cffi
SSLW
Cff
ANIMALS �
FGrrow/Weari
i sow
2.533
FarrcwlFeeder
I sow
522
Farrow/Finish
! Zoo sow
1417
Z8 3 406
10
ZDoo
VAIEanlFeeder
he4d
I 30
III
i
PeEderlFlnlSrl
hEad
�� i,:C
3
Gilt Deveio.oer
i
ead
10
Boar
I lead
I—.00
i
I
TOTALS
X XXXXXXX :XXX
IXXXXX=j
Z 8 3, 400XXXXXzi
p
CAWNIP Components (existing prior to February ;, 1993)
^ornnieted Ceriricaticn orm ?-- Zo-9S
Site schematic
Show design needs (storage)
_ -how measurements and calculated volumes
Rnoicontrof measures. iT acciicsbie (ader-NaV5 ciVErsicns. `icanan OUTie--S. -ill�r
i cC ._—c L' _erinC. Chic
—IG ' and a{7pfication 'ma;.. usabje i-ice!'visize. max. ac-pication rate. max. aappdc2t!Cn r
-`i-Z_^r'i V E: Tor existing c)ricr, 'c 1 :!Us
quicm�e, I e. ��Js , �VCL ai:C sciLlriGs "Cf ti�/sic's!S designed a%'r vc
-:.lster:cV of (Dperation & s41a1nzenanCe P!ar,
-CC1 a r,Cesirac'ie ,i_c :rC"'j is -iCa1.r;C '& CGcet cris
7.m' ankrner: etLiemer,L. side s;lcces: wei & ramp areas: 'r'ia!l �rCsiCi',: :CEr'i �cr GC
:Ca .:riCii:C" f;cint Secaration: cracks Cr .)reaKs: Lod s:,.l CCriEC c•'J _,ar.,le5.
GCCInc: eXie r, inic 'accon, aevcind GE. = i=CliVe
Ve,e a —Jo .,.airtenGrce srUsi n -- :reed
r �':�!Ce viitfcC_. wilier .ivers!Cns (adequate veCe 2ticri. :IVErsicn 2cacit'!. r!dce ;:'neiaht`

�Xistence of Waste Utilization P!a^^�
:��,ap of spray fields
Amount of plant available nitrogen produced/used annually
/Waste application method 6J& Sj�,
ominant soil series
raps to be growr,,�russ
✓ R.Y.E. of crops to be grown, effective 211/.3, or actual yield records (3 cf 6 yrs.`
N application by R.Y.E. (or Land Grant University recommendation)
�N balance IN applied minus R.Y.G. in ibslacre)
application windows for receiving crops. effective 2/1193
NRCS irrigation parameters (effective 9/1/96)
Stnd. #633 required specifications (includes pumping markers; not applying waste to
frozen or saturated soils, etc.)
Calibration information when applicable
^Waste sampling within 60 days of land application 3(z0j471 4, [a 7
Annual soil sampling, effective 9/1/96 (including lime requirement. Cu & Zri
measurements) 3_( 3 . q 7
REQU D RECORDS after 9/1/96
Waste application records
/Miaps of spray fields
✓ CAWMP on site -
Waste sample analysis
✓ E:dstence cf Emergency action Flan
RECOMMENDED
daily rain amounts
freeboard levels (weekly)
crop yields
animal population
soils analysis
:,+siar}c= c- an Odor Con'trcl Checklist :.rec ive 1/91
J=xistenc:. of an Insect- Control Checklist effective 1197
✓-�ovisicn fcr dead animal disposal :fec;ive 1 197
Commentsia6estions from dreducar:
kkita- "A- -.AJ-S -,,- uju P cLs 4 io"Sr'-44", Qoja,