480006_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NUH I H UAHULINA
Deparament of Environmental Quai

IN,)F-t-:c
- .a ° lu
N
z a
A ^ E
2\\�c
+- � <. I,N�w
..\; §

3
Type of Visit Q Compliance Inspection O Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit 0 Routine Q Complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 48 b Date of Visit: 12/3/2004 Time: 10:00
0 Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
® Permitted 0 Certified [3 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
FarmName: 5.W1R.&.r..O.HQF_FAM................................................................................ County: Hyde .................................................. W.8R ?........
Owner Name: C,arl]&.................................. it 811miaJr................................................ Phone No: 251:226r.1.411..................................................... ......
MailingAddress: 1069..Xaxll..Str.Cet................................................................................ 5.WA Quarto..NG..............................._.............. 2.7.80.5 ..............
FacilityContact: ..............................................................................Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
Onsite Representative: G�aix.C,aIxQ�R#........................................................... Integrator: .........
Certified Operator:Gaxl.N.......................... :........ C,ah.QQ.ri.r...................................... Operator Certificatiou Number: 17.3.4ft.............................
Location of Farm:
arm is located on the east side of Main Street in Swan Quarter, NC across from the Hyde County Health Department. �►
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 ' 24 45 Longitude F76 F 19 3Q u
Design Current
Swine ranacity 'Pnnulatinn
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
0 Farrow to Finish
300
0
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Number of Lagoons �$
Discharges_ & Stream impacts
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer FO Dairy❑ Nan -Layer Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 300
Total SSLW 425,100
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes []No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: .:.........solids ............ ........... -solids ............ ............Final............. ............solids...................S,ecaactary...........................................
Freeboard (inches): 14 14 14 30 67
12112103 Continued

Facility Number: 48-6 Date of Inspection 12/3/2004
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or ❑ Yes ® No
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level ❑ Yes ® No
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
.11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ® No
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc > 3000
12. Crop type Corn, Soybeans, Wheat Coastal Bermuda (Graze) Winter Annuals
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ® No
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ®No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ Yes ® No
Air Quality representative immediately.
Comment .1refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/orany recommendations or,any dther.comments_ ;
co _: ... .
Use drawivgs of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary) j] Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
is in the State Buy -Out Program.
't forget to keep weekly freeboard levels until lagoons are closed out.
is scheduled to hopefully begin close-out this Spring. Don't forget to call 24 hours before close out begins.
1 or 252-948-3848
Reviewer/Inspector Name Scott Vinson .:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
12112103
Date:
Continued

Facility Number: 48-6 Date of Inspection 12/3/2004
Required Records & Documents
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
® No
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
® No
23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24. is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
®No
25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
® No
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
®No
27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?.
❑ Yes
®No
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
®No
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
® No
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
❑ Yes
®No
31. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
❑ Yes
❑ No
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Stocking Form ❑ Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfall ❑ Inspection After V Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
12112103

❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
® Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
30
300
Technical Assistance Site Visit Report 7
• Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Natural Resources Conservation Service
O Soil and Water Conservation District
O Other...
Facility Number 48 - © Date: 9124103 Time: 15:20 Time On Farm: 20 WaRO
Farm Name Swan Acre Hog Farm County Hyde Phone: [phone]
Malting Address 1060 Main Street Swan Quarter NC 27885
Onsite
Representative Guire Cahoon Integrator
Type Of Visit Purpose Of Visit
® Operation Review
❑ Compliance Inspection (pilot only)
❑ Technical Assistance
❑ Confirmation for Removal
❑ No Animals -Date Last Operated:
❑ Operating below threshold
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse
O Routine
O Response to DWQ/DENR referral
O Response to DSWCISWCD referral
O Response to complaint/local referral
O Requested by producerlIntegrator
O Fallow -up
O Emergency
O Other...
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Capacity Population
❑ Layer
❑ Non -Layer
1 ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
GENERAL. QUESTIONS:
1. Is waste discharging from any part of the operation and reaching surface waters or wetlands? ❑ yes ❑ no
2. Is there evidence of a past waste discharge from any part of the operation that waste reached ❑ yes ❑ no
surface waters or wetlands?
3. Does any problem pose an immediate threat to the integrity of the waste structure (large ❑ yes ❑ no
trees, seepage, severe erosion, etc.)?
4. Is there evidence of nitrogen over application, hydraulic overloading or excessive ❑ yes ❑ no
ponding requiring DWQ notification?
5- Is there evidence of improper dead animal disposal that poses a threat to the environment ❑ yes ❑ no
and/or public health?
6. Is the waste level within the structural freeboard elevation range for any waste structure? ❑ yes ® no
Structure1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier solids trap solids trap solids trapIF secondary final
Level (Inches) 12 12 12 36 42
CROP TYPES
SPRAYFIELD
SOIL TYPES
7. What type of technical assistance does the onsite representative feel is needed? (list in comment section)
03/10/03
❑ Other
GENERAL. QUESTIONS:
1. Is waste discharging from any part of the operation and reaching surface waters or wetlands? ❑ yes ❑ no
2. Is there evidence of a past waste discharge from any part of the operation that waste reached ❑ yes ❑ no
surface waters or wetlands?
3. Does any problem pose an immediate threat to the integrity of the waste structure (large ❑ yes ❑ no
trees, seepage, severe erosion, etc.)?
4. Is there evidence of nitrogen over application, hydraulic overloading or excessive ❑ yes ❑ no
ponding requiring DWQ notification?
5- Is there evidence of improper dead animal disposal that poses a threat to the environment ❑ yes ❑ no
and/or public health?
6. Is the waste level within the structural freeboard elevation range for any waste structure? ❑ yes ® no
Structure1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier solids trap solids trap solids trapIF secondary final
Level (Inches) 12 12 12 36 42
CROP TYPES
SPRAYFIELD
SOIL TYPES
7. What type of technical assistance does the onsite representative feel is needed? (list in comment section)
03/10/03

48 - 6 Date:
9/24/03ER
FFacilityber
O No assistance provided/requested
ste spill leaving site
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE Needed
Provided
❑ 9. Waste spill contained on site
25. Waste Plan Revision or Amendment
❑
❑
❑ 10. Level in structural freeboard
❑ 11. Level in storm storage
26. Waste Plan Conditional Amendment
❑
❑
27. Review or Evaluate Waste Plan wlproducer
❑
❑
❑ 12. Waste structure integrity compromised
28. Forms Need (list in comment section)
❑
❑
❑ 13. Waste structure needs maintenance
❑
❑
29. Missing Components (list in comments)
[114. Over application >= 10% & 10 lbs.
❑
❑
❑ 15. Over application < 10% or < 10 lbs.
30.21-1.0200 re -certification
❑ 16. Hydraulic overloading
31. Five & Thirty day Plans of Action (PoA)
❑
❑
32. Irrigation record keeping assistance
❑
❑
❑ 1T. Deficient irrigation records
❑ 18. Late/missing waste analysis
33. Organize/computerization of records
❑
❑
❑ 19. Late/missing lagoon level records
34. Sludge Evaluation
❑
❑
❑ 20. Late/missing soils analysis
❑ 21. Crop needs improvement
35. Sludge or Closure Plan
❑
❑
❑ 22. Crop inconsistent with waste plan
36. Sludge removallclosure procedures
❑
❑
37. Waste Structure Evaluation
❑
❑
❑ 23. Irrigation maintenance deficiency
❑ 24. Deficient sprayfield conditions
38. Structure Needs Improvement
❑
❑
39. Operation & Maintenance Improvements
❑
❑
40. Marker check/calibration
❑
❑
Regulatory Referrals
41. Site evaluation
❑
❑
❑ Referred to DWQ Date:
42. Irrigation Calibration
❑
❑
❑ Referred to NCDA Date:
❑Other...
43. Irrigation system desfgnlinstallation
❑
❑
Date:
44. Secure irrigation information (maps, etc.)
❑
❑
LIST IMPROVEMENTS
45. Operating improvements (pull signs, etc.)
❑
❑
MADE BY OPERATION
46. Wettable Acre Determination
❑
❑
1
47. Evaluate WAD certification/rechecks
❑
❑
48. Crop oval uatfonlrecommendations
❑
❑
2.
49. Drainage work/evaluation
❑
❑
50. Land shaping, subsoiling, aeration, etc.
51. Runoff control, stormwater diversion, etc.
❑
❑
❑
❑
3
52. Buffer improvements
❑
❑
53. Field measurements(GPS, surveying, etc.)
❑
❑
4.
54. Mortality BIUIPs
❑
❑
55. Waste operator education (NPDES)
❑
❑
5.
56. Operation & maintenance education
❑
❑
57. Record keeping education
❑
❑
fi
58. Crop/forage management education
❑
❑
59. Soli and/or waste sampling education
❑
❑
03/10/03

4A
tFacility Number hate: 9124103
COMMENTS:
• Emergency site visit conducted as part of hurricane damage assessment efforts.
+
• Farm received considerable wind damage to buildings and received approximately 8-10 inches of rainfall. Majority of
rainfall received prior to eye of hurricane passing over farm. After eye passed, rainfall stopped and flooding occurred.
30 animals on site.
Waste structures 1-3 were inundated by outside floodwaters. Structures 4 & 5 were not flooded however flood waters
ere on dike wails.
This farm is scheduled for the Phase II Flood Plain Buyout.
IV
TECHNICAL SPECIALIST Pat Hooper
SIGNATURE QifJ!
Date Entered: 1011103
Entered By: IPat Hooper
03/10/03

Technical Assistance Site Visit Report
rDivision of Soil and Water Conservation
Natural Resources Conservation Service
Soil and Water Conservation District
Other...
Facility Number 4$ - © Date: 1/13103 Time: _ 1200 Time On Firm: 60 ` WaRO
Farm Name Swan Acre Hog Farm County H e Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address 1060 Main Street Swan Quarter NC 27885
Onsite
Representative Carl Cahoon Integrator lindependent
Type Of Visit Purpose Of Vsit
Dg Operation Review
❑ Compliance Inspection (pilot only)
❑ Technical Assistance
❑ Confirmation for Removal
❑ No Animals -Date Last Operated:
❑ Operating below threshold
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse
Design Current
Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder "
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish 300 15
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
OO Routine
O Response to DWQIDENR referral
O Response to DSWCJSWCD referral
O Response to complaintllocal referral
O Requested by producer/integrator
O Follow-up
p Emergency
O Other...
Design Current
Canaelty Poeulation
❑ Layer
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
GENERAL QUESTIONS:
1. Is waste discharging from any..part of the operation and reaching surface waters or wetlands? 0 yes ® no
2. Is there evidence of a past waste discharge from any partof the operation that waste reached ❑.yes ® no
surface waters or wetlands?
3. Does any problem pose an immediate threat to the integrity of the waste structure (large trees, ' ❑ yes ®no
seepage, severe erosion, etc.)? -
4. Is there evidence of nitrogen over application, hydraulic overloading or excessive ponding ❑ yes ® no
requiring DWQ notification? -
5. is there evidence of improper dead animal disposal that poses a threat to the environment ❑ yes ® no'
and/or public health? = "
6. Is the waste level within the structural freeboard -elevation range for any waste structure? ❑ yes ® no
Structurel Structure 2 ' Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier solids solids I prima secondary nursery solids
Level (Inches) 15 i E - 18 1 50 1115
CROP TYPES lCorn Soybeans Wheat oastal Bermuda -graze hminter Annuals
SPRAYFIELD
SOIL TYPES
7. What type of technical assistance does the onsite representative feel is needed? (list in comment section)
1 03/10/03
❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
GENERAL QUESTIONS:
1. Is waste discharging from any..part of the operation and reaching surface waters or wetlands? 0 yes ® no
2. Is there evidence of a past waste discharge from any partof the operation that waste reached ❑.yes ® no
surface waters or wetlands?
3. Does any problem pose an immediate threat to the integrity of the waste structure (large trees, ' ❑ yes ®no
seepage, severe erosion, etc.)? -
4. Is there evidence of nitrogen over application, hydraulic overloading or excessive ponding ❑ yes ® no
requiring DWQ notification? -
5. is there evidence of improper dead animal disposal that poses a threat to the environment ❑ yes ® no'
and/or public health? = "
6. Is the waste level within the structural freeboard -elevation range for any waste structure? ❑ yes ® no
Structurel Structure 2 ' Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier solids solids I prima secondary nursery solids
Level (Inches) 15 i E - 18 1 50 1115
CROP TYPES lCorn Soybeans Wheat oastal Bermuda -graze hminter Annuals
SPRAYFIELD
SOIL TYPES
7. What type of technical assistance does the onsite representative feel is needed? (list in comment section)
1 03/10/03

e '' 4
Facility Nu;.;b r 48 - 6 Date:
1113/03
PARAMETER
p No assistance provided/requested
❑ 8. Waste spill leaving site
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE Needed
Provided
❑ 9. Waste spill contained on site
•
25. Waste Plan Revision or Amendment
❑
El0.1
10. Level in structural freeboard
Waste Plan Conditional Amendment
❑
❑
❑ l l . Level in storm storage
26.
27, Review or Evaluate Waste Plan wlproducer
❑
❑
®12. Waste structure integrity compromised
28. Forms Need (list in comment section)
El
]
013. Waste structure needs maintenance'
29. Missing Components (list in comments)
❑
❑
❑ 14. Over application �=10% & 10 lbs.
❑
❑
❑ 1S. Over application < 10% or a 10.Ibs.
�• 2H-0200 recertification
❑ 16. Hydraulic overloading
31. Five & Thirty day Plans of Action (PoA)
❑
❑
32. Irrigation record keeping assistance-
❑
❑
❑ 17. Deficient irrigation records
[318. Latelmissing waste analysis
33. Organizelcomputerizatlon of records
❑
❑
❑ 19. Late/missing lagoon level records
❑ 20. Late/missing soils analysis
34. Sludge Evaluation
❑
❑
❑ 21. Crop needs improvement
35. Sludge or Closure Plan
❑
❑
❑ 22. Crop inconsistent with waste plan
36. Sludge removal/closure procedures
❑
❑
37. Waste Structure Evaluation -
❑
❑
❑ 23. Irrigation maintenance deficiency
❑ 24. Deficient sprayfield conditions
38. structure Needs Improvement
❑
❑
39. Operation-& Maintenance Improvements-
❑
❑
40. Marker checklcalibration
❑
❑ =
Rye ,ulatory Refermis
41: Site evaluation
❑
❑
❑ Referred to DWQ Date;
42. Irrigation Calibration
❑
_ ❑
[I Referred Referred to NCDA Date:
43. Irrigation desigNinstallation
❑
❑
❑ Other....
system -
Date:
44. Secure irrigation information (maps, etc.)
❑
❑
LIST IMPROVEMENTS
45. Operating improvements (pull signs, etc.)
❑
❑
MADE BY OPERATION
46• Wettable Acre Determination
❑
❑
1.
47. Evaluate WAD aertificationlrecheeks
❑
❑
48. Crop evaluationlrecommendations•
❑
❑
2-
49. Drainage workievaluation
❑
❑
50. Land shaping, subsoiling, aeration, etc.
fill. Runoff control, stormwater diversion; etc..
❑
❑
❑
❑
52. Buffer Improvements
❑
11
53. Field measurements(GPS, surveying, etc.)
❑
❑
4.
54. Mortality BMP9
❑
❑
5& Waste operator education (NPDES) .
❑
❑
5.
56. Operation & maintenance education
❑
❑
V. Record keeping education _
❑
❑
6.
58. Croplforage management education
❑
❑
59. Soil and/or waste sampling education
❑
❑
03/10/03

Facility Number 48 _ ® pate; 1 1/13/03
COMMENTS:
test dated 1/28/02 Sample GH001 ph, cu and zn within guidelines. Remember to take soil test for 2003 and follow lime
there have been no irrigation events during the 2002 crop year. Last irrigation event dated 11/03/01.
..ast waste analysis dated 2/16/02 nitrogen is 7.4 Ibs11000 gallons.
remember to take waste analysis 60 days before/60 days after irrigation event.
_agoon level is recorded weekly and and levels in line since there have been no irrigation events.
'Need to eradicate rodents around buildings.
2. As noted in past DSWC inspection, need to remove cows from dike walls to prevent erosion.
3. Need to complete work on dike wail NE comer in order for veg. to be established.
NIA not planted
TECHNICAL SPECIALIST IMartin McLawhom
SIGNATURE
3 03/10/03

Type of Visit ® Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit: Time: �
Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
Permitted C1 Certified 0 CondA;-,.
it`ionally Certified [3Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Ste.
Farm Name: h Ac � t � �E-v�+ _ -County:
la6Ll�'�
Owner Name: +— I .1 L.— ) r . Phone No:
Mailing Address: .2 5
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative: K G,
Certified Operator: L rr . �s>Q+� ti r .
Location of Farm:
Phone No:
Integrator:
Operator Certification Number: .12 3 4t-
VLSwine ❑ Poultry []Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude ' ' " Longitude ' 4
Design
Current Design
Current
Design Current
Swine EMECa stiff
Feeder
Pop ulatian Pl©ultry Ca aci
❑ La er
P,o ulation Cattle Ca aci P,o Motion
❑Dai
Finish
❑Non -La er
❑ Non-Dai
rFceder
Wean FeederOther
Finish
0
as Total Design Capaci
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drams Present ❑ La oon Area
11
❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds 1 Solid Traps
❑ No Liquid Waste
Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑Yes III No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) [:]Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes No
Waste Collection 8z Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes a No
Structure Structure 2 Strut re 3 Structure 4� Structur Structure 6
Identifier: S '� _ so �t.L[' iyJ /�ri ry S
Freeboard (inches):
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: — L Date of Inspection
rt)
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
S. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding
12. Crop type
❑ Yes [4 No
❑ Yes 9 No
.KYes ❑ No
❑ Yes - No
❑ Yes M No
_ ❑ Yes I No
❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ® No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes ,® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes [� No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes KNo
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) V11, ,waste anEl Yes AN No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboar aly ' & soil sa plt reports) ® Yes ❑ No
20. is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes ® No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes [allo
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
❑ Yes
0-No
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
® No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
E-No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
0-No
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments r'e`f;' o" uestr n Ez lean ariv YES answers and/or an recomm ndahons of an ;other mentsa.
Use drawingsro[faciiity to.better;eaplain"situations. (use addthonal pagesas necessary) s
❑Field Copy Final Notes
_❑
-./� ,r� ,o r—�
y
Lam - S O"- �� o-, t
Vr
q I W� 3&p� Pw O C / q 417/ 00
O^-- i✓r�uA'4 _
4
5� 09-41o' V '7 `i
ti111,
,
Reviewer/Inspector Name Ui
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date: f] l3
05103101
Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection R v?—
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge attor below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes IN No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes P3 No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes © No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes 91 No
32. Do the flush tanks tack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Additional Co mments and/or Draw'
ingsc;;
J /1 n nf— PAN N — fO I 1U DIv-
. r� P 8 ►( 5 - (- r 7o des N a .w p! us
3V s N Ito �L s N ►�°`�'+� sir �:
t LA - N v
8.-,-`J4,4 "{ f
O5103101

L
f Visit p Compliance Inspection p Operation Review p Lagoon Evaluation
for Visit p Routine p Complaint p Follow up p Emergency Notification p Other p Denied Access
Facility Number Date of visit: 2/4/2002 ,1,ime. 12:00
p Not Operational p RelowThresho Id
Permitted ■ Certified p Conditionally Certified p Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: Swan Acre Hog Farm County: Hyahe................................................... 1'.1'aRo ........
Owner Name: Carl M. Cahoon, Jr. Phone No: 252-926-1471
Mailing Address: 1060.3UW.Street................................................................................. SwanQuaxUr..N.0 ............................................... Z7885 ..............
FacilityContact:...............................................................................Title:............................................................... Phone No:
Onsite Representative: CarlCafxonn..........Mlv.'e. .................................................. Integrator:tudepeadnnt............................................................
Certified Operator:CarlAL................................. CahoonAr....................................... Operator Certification Number: 1.7.d46.............................
Location of Farm:
® Swine p Poultry ❑ Cattle p Horse Latitude ©• ®° ®" Longitude ®• ®4 ®4�
= Dest n Current :` Desi t> Current Desi n t
g g: g urren
Swine -
Capacity Poptilafion Poultry V Capac>ty Population Cattle `- Capacity Population
❑ airy
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Taial Design Capacity; 200 300
y
Total_kssLw. 425,10
_.
..
_ Number,of°Lagaons� ❑ u sur ace rains resent �Lagoon Area t] pray FieldArea
Ho[ding�Ponds !$Sohd�Traps ❑ o iquiWaste ManagementSystem
p can to ee er
p Feeder to Finish
p arrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
❑
Layer
p
Non -Layer
Dischar es & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: <a Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑ Na
c- If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gallmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3- Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes M No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes M No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:............,alids............ ........... �al ids...................... pAmary.... .............. ss.�oudary ....... ....aursery..salids... ...................................
Frceboard(inches): ...............3.8...............................38.................... ..3Q---............ ........60.................----1.5..................

ace um er: 48_6
Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type Corn, Soybeans, Wheat Coastal Bermuda (Graze) winter annuals
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ®No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ❑ No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes N No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes p No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
N Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
U o violations or deficiencies were noted uring this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about es visit.
Comment`s`.(refer;to=question #i): Explain=any YES answers and/or any rerommendstions or any other ccilnments
Use drawings of facility talbetter eiplalwsituafions: (use;additional pages:as necessary.)_ P� m® "
- �_ _ ❑Field Copy ❑Final Notes
7. Need to repair northeast corner of primary dike wall. This has been noted in previous inspection. Need to be completed as soon as
ossible. Need to establish vegetation to prevent further invasion.
* There have been no irrigation events since last DSW inspection for 2001.
* On 11/3/01 approximately 300,000 gallons of sludge was applied to wheat fields. Sludge sample taken January 15, 2002. No results.
19. This sludge sample is past the 60 days window as required by Permit. Need to balance SLD when sample is received.
* Lagoon level is recorded weekly.
* Remember to take soil test for 2002 and follow lime recommendation.
(continued next page)
Reviewer/Inspector Name jMartin McLawhorn - ~entered liy De11w obbms 1 = `.
L -- P
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

05103101 Continued
Facility Number: 48_6 Date of Inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below 13 Yes 13 No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? p Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, p Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
24. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? p Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) p Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? p Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? p Yes p No
-- _
�._
1 I. Unable to answer #1 I until complete calculation for SLD on wheat.
* Remember to take waste analysis 60 days before/60 days after irrigation events.
7. Check on burial from ditch. (50 feet?)
* Check on sludge plan.
1j
ia.
r�.
;r -

l,,
Type of Visit p Compliance Inspection p Operation Review p Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit p Routine p Complaint p Follow up p Emergency Notification p Other p Denied Access
Date of Visit: 1/1 14—0001 Time:
Facility Number 3:30
p Not Operational p Below Threshold
Permitted ■ Certified p Conditionally Certified p Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: Swan Acre Hog Farm County: Hydie.................................................... !aR.Q........
Owner Name: Carl M. Cahoon, Jr. Phone No: 252-926-1471
Mailing Address: ].0fi0 Maim.Stxeet---....--------............................................._............ SNAn.'QHaxUr..N.0 ............................................... 27885 .............
FacilityContact: ......Title: ............................................................... Phone No:....................................................
Onsite Representative: CarI.Cahoam.............................................................................. integrator: Independent ............................................................
Certified Operator:CarlAL................................. Cahann.,1.>:....................................... Operator Certification Number: 1.7346.............................
Location of Farm:
arm is located on the east side of Main Street in Swan Quarter, NC across from the Hyde County Health Department
® Swine ❑ Poultry 13 Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude ©. ®� ®" Longitude ®• ®®u
Dest Current - Design Curren# � K Design _ Cuirent,'­
Af
` Cattle
_ s.. x Capacrty Populafion Capacity Populateon _ Capacity' Population '
❑ Layer auy
�r
E3 Non -Layer p on -Dairy
[3 er -
300 AM
x T©tal De"sign Capaci#y _ 300
s W
Total SSLW 425,100
NumB5i7, fLagoons ❑Subsurface rams resent p agoon rea p pray re rea
- _ . _.
Hotdmg Ponds I Sold Traps p o LiquidWaste anagernent ystem
:. m
„
❑ Wean tv ee er
p Feeder to � m
❑ arrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Fee der
®Farrow to Finish
p Gilts
❑ Boars
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? [3 Yes ®No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field 11 Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) [3 Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ®No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes R No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway p Yes H No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
----......saitds............ ............ �al�ds............ -...nzu.�etysnlids.... .........p�mazy.......... .....s��.Qndaty........ ...................................
Freeboard(inches):................12............... ...12...............-----.12............... ............... 24........ ....... .... •.......... a ............... ....................................

.
aci ity Number: 48_6 Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
1] Yes
® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
p Yes
N No
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
® Yes
p No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
Cl Yes
® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
N No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenancelimprovement?
p Yes
® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? p Excessive Ponding p PAN p Hydraulic Overload
p Yes
® No
12. Crop type Corn, Soybeans, Wheat Coastal Bermuda (Graze) Small Grain Overseed
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
13 Yes
® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
p Yes
p No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
p Yes
p No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
p Yes
p No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
p Yes
® No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
13 Yes
® No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? 13 Yes ® No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) p Yes ®No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ❑ Yes N No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? 13 Yes ® No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? p Yes ®No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency'situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) p Yes ®No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? p Yes N No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? 13 Yes g No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? p Yes ®No
p No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visiL You will receive no turther correspondence a out this visit.
17 Final Notes
i North comer of inner wall or primary lagoon needs miner repairs as a result trom cattle entering pond. Note that cattle are c
need out.
Soil analysis dated 2/28/01 for 2001 crop with no lime required.
No irrigation events up to 11/3/01 with waste analysis pending.
The 11 /3/01 200,000 gal. of sludge was applied to wheat field. Waste sample has been sent to Raleigh and awaiting analysis.
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date: iR�1�jlD

OSIO3101 Continued
Facility Number: 48_6 Date of inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge attor below Yes p No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? p Yes ®No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, p Yes ®No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? p Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) p Yes ®No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? p Yes ®No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? p Yes p No
r
17
qsJ S t
Si
�'Y
'
+u l
s`-F t ,, `.�' .a,� .r•'�a F-/.� IiF't.tT M } k G'ij
Z -� R -
.a�i-� T '�•'t�.r 1 y.4�'It.. 'r_�"f^<k.. SF
r-,���,Gc yeti 1
:
d 7

O�O� wAr�9QG Michael F. Easley
Governor
r WOO= G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Kerr T. Stevens
Division of Water Quality
To: Producer
From: Scott Vinson
Enviroamentaak eer
Washington Regional Office
Subject: Animal Compliance Inspection
Year 2001
Enclosed please find a copy of the Compliance Site Inspection (as viewed in the DWQ database) conducted at the referenced
facility by the Division of Water Quality from the Washington Regional Office. Please read this inspection and keep it
with all other documents pertaining to your animal operation for future inspections.
In general, these inspections included verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP);
(2) the farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC 21L0217, Senate Bill 1217, and the Certified Animal
Waste Management Plan; (3) the farm operation's waste management system is being operated properly under the direction of a
Certified Operator; (4) the required records are being kept; and (5) there are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or runoff.
As a reminder, please note the following comments, which are conditions of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan and
the General Permit; therefore, these items must be implemented:
cp The maximum waste level in lagoons/storage ponds shall not exceed that specified in the CAWMP. At a minimum,
maximum waste level for waste for lagoonslstorage ponds must not exceed the level that provides adequate storage to
contain 25 year, 24 hour storm event plus an additional foot of structural freeboard
(p An analysis of the liquid animal waste from the lagoon shall be conducted as close to the time of application as practical and
at least within 60 days (before or after) of the date of application. This analysis shall include the following parameters:
Nitrogen, Phosphors, Zinc and Copper.
9 Soil analysis is required annually. Lime is to be applied to each receiving crop as recommended by the soil analysis.
(p The following records are required: off -site solids removal, maintenance, repair, waste/soil analysis and land irrigation
records. These records should be maintained by the facility owner/manager in chronological and legible form for a
minimum of three years.
q) Land application rates shall be in accordance with the CAWMP. In no case shall land application rates exceed the Plant
Available Nitrogen TANZrate for the receiving a or result in remoff during any given application.
cp All grassed waterways shall have a stable outlet with adequate capacity to prevent ponding or flooding damages. The outlet
can be another vegetated channel, an earth ditch, stabilization structure, or other suitable outlets.
rP It is suggested, not a requiremar� to keep crop yield information for future use to update your waste management plan.
You will need three years of crop yield data before your plan can be updated.
For your information, any swine facility that has a discharge to surface waters of the State will have to apply for a National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit with the Division of Water Quality, effective January 1, 2001.
Thank you for your assistance and cooperation during the inspection. If you have any questions, please contact me at 252-946-
6481, ext. 321 or your Technical Specialist.
Cc: WaRO
SAY Piles
943 Washington Square Mali Washington, NC 27889 252-946-6481 (Telephone) 252-946-9215 (Fax)

Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit OO Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other p Denied Access
Facility Number 48 6 Date of Visit: 6/5/2001 Time- 915 Printed on: 10110/2001
—71
r Not Operational Q Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified E3 Conditionally Certified E3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold----------------------....
Farm Name: 5.w=Aac.Hog.FArm.......................................................................... ...... County: Hylic ................................................... ARO........ Owner Name: CUM .................................. Cabo.oxtJr:................................................ Phone No: 251-926..4.7.t..... ........... ...........................................
Mailing Address: t0li4.1!'i0an..$tz'eCt........................... . Sma ..Quarler..NG.... VIM ..............
FacilityContact: .............. Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
Onsite Representative: Cad..atl!Dam....................... ......... Integrator: l<udlCl eiadejai.....................
Certified Operator: aA,,,,,,,,,,, .......�ahaoa.................... . Operator Certification Number:JL73.4.6 .............................
Location of Farm:
Farm is located on the east side of Main Street in Swan Quarter, NC across from the Hyde County Health Department. I +
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 • 24 4 45 K Longitude 76 • I9 4 30 K
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑Yes ®No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes ❑ Na
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ...........solids ............ ...........solids ........... .......---pruuary................... ecatadauy........ ... nurse4..solidi... ...................................
Freeboard (inches): 12 12 24 72 12
nsin_3inr C.'nntinued

05103101
Facility Number: 48-6
Date of Inspection 6/5/2001
Continued
Printed on: 10/10/2001
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenancelimprovement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type Corn, Soybeans, Wheat ' Coastal Bermuda (Graze) Small Grain Overseed '
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ®No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified A WMP?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
j3 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or sny recommendations or any other comments.
se drawings of facility to better explain situations. use additional pages las necessary): ❑Field Copy ❑Final Notes
*Cows have been sold.
_
7. North comer of final lagoon inner wall needs to be repaired from damage by cows eroding area. This area needs to be filled, packed
with soil and seed as soon as possible to prevent further erosion.
7. Need to mow lagoon inner walls to allow for routine and visual inspection.
*Need to have WUP revised to change from grazing to row crops. Consult with tech spec.
*There have been no irrigation events since 1999. Remember to take waste analysis 60 days before/60 days after irrigation event.
*Lagoon level recorded weekly as required by permit.
Reviewer/Inspector Name Martin McLawhorn
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

OSQ3101
Facility Number: 48--6
Date of Inspection 6/5/2001
Continued
Printed on: 1011012001
Odor Issues
26.
Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
❑ Yes
❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27.
Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
® No
28.
Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
❑ Yes
® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29.
Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
❑ Yes
® No
30.
Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
❑ Yes
® No
31.
Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
❑ Yes
® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
)it test dated 2/28/01. No lime required. Remember to keep lime receipts.
eed to lower level of solids trap by transferring waste to secondary lagoon.
iscussed IRR / waste schedule.
❑ Yes ❑ No
,&I
J

DIMMIGn of Water Qualrt� - :...
7 Q,Dh-isi� of Soil and.Water Coniei-ialaon - - -
d -: ,Oth6r - - ._
� -
Type of Visit OQ Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation -
Reason for Visit © Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification ©Other ❑ Denied Access
'` i Date urvisit: 12-t5-20t?0 Tinie: 9211 Printed orz': 12282000
Facility Number 48 6 �
O Not 6perational O`Below Threshold
Permitted K Certified ❑ Conditionally Certified . ❑ Registered pate Last Operated or Abose Threshold : .......................
Farm Name: S.waut.A►CMJ1 tg3:.ar�t.....-•--•--.. _ ... ...... _ .. . Count} : ,tle W- ARD .......
Owner Name: Gad lf�, . �a�ItoR�t. Jr, ..._ ... _.. _. _. Phone No- 252.:926=14.7.1.................. -- ..
Facility Contact : ................... ... .......--••--•--.,._ ... Title: .. Phone No: 7.52.:9.44-95$$
Mailing Address: 1Q6Q MaiA�tlr .... .. :.............. _. S.waa.Q rter.SIC..--•••-....-_._.-..._..------------------ 1705 ..............
Onsite Representative. Cad_.Cah m integrator: judeReadent.....--
Certified Operator: .Carl ...................................•..... CA11001L ............................................ Operator Certification Number. 11,34{.............................
Location of Farm:
Farm is located on the east side of Main Street in Swan Quarter, NC across from the Hyde Count} Heatth Department
i
® Swine ❑Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑Horse
Latitude 35 01 24 45 Longitude 76 • `:- 19 30 'K
Design Current
Swine Canacity Ponulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
[] Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
® Farrow to Finish
300
180
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle F Capacity Population
❑ Laver I JE3 Dairy
❑ Non -Laver I I[] Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total ,Design Capacity 300
Total SSLW 425,100
Number of Lagoons 5 I❑ Subsurface Drains Present J❑ Lugwin Area 10 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps JE1 No Liquid Waste Management Svstem
Dkebarge:s & Stream Tmnaos
l - Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [K No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is obsenrc: d. ix as the conveyance man-made" ❑ Yes ® No
b. If discharge is obsen ed did it reach Water of the State? (Ifs -es- notify DNAiQ) ❑ yes 0 No
c- ffdisrharge is what is the estimated flow ui gal inin? n/a
d. Does discharge bvpass a lagoon syslern? (If � es- notiA- D%kQi ❑ Yes X No
2. Is there evidence of past discbarge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes Z No
3. Were there any adverse impacts orpotential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes gi No'
, rite Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacky (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? I—J Spillway ❑ Yes Z No
Structure l Stnicture 2 Stnicture Sinteture 4 Strttcturc Stnicture 6
Identifier: Solid Tzaq_:........Nuxsex}jzap........_ Sttiwra ..... ....... erzudat:................... Fitial............ ...........----•-- ............
Freeboard (inches t: ........ 1Q 12=.....--•---......... _ ....... �..1Q................ ............... 1.9.................. .........__...61".............. ....................................

C.onfinued on back
IFacility Number. 48-6 — I Date of inspection 112-19720001 Printed ton: 12128/2000
5. Are there and° immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees. severe erosion. ❑ Yes N No
seepage, etc-)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes N No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ® Yes ❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes N No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need mainienance/mtprovement? ❑ Yes N No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes N No
12. Crop type Corn, Soybeans, Wheat Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Small Grain Overseed
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes N No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
Ci No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
N No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
N No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily- available?
❑ Yes
Nj No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
N No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
® No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
® No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
N No
22. Fail to nolif3° regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
N No
23. Did Re,,iewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlmspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
N No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
N No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
® No
44 -No violations or -deficiencies Ww r'e;tioted during this visit:: You *illreceive'no further;
4 ' corresnondence about this visit.' ... ' . ' :: ' . . ' .. ... ' :: : ' .. ' . . .
Comments (refer to question #f): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of factflhy to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
Records available for rmiew.
adn't need to irrigated since mid 1999. The farm hasn't operated to total design of 300 in a while.
Need to transfer waste to the secondan- lagoon to increase the freeboard volume in the solid traps.
# 7 - Continue to address the bare spots on the secondary lagoon.
Soil analysis are collected annually. Freeboard levels are recorded weekly
Plan to convert the bermuda fields to row crops and sale the cows.
Make sure to revise your waste plan to match your farming activities.
Remember to pull waste samples within 60 days of irrigation. If you have any questions contact me @ 252-946-6481, ext. s' 18
Re-t7ewer/Inspector Name
- - --

Ret%w•er/Inspector Signature: Date: 51001
Facility Number: Darr of Incpcction I2-I5-200(1 Printed on:.122812000
Odor ]%sues '
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below G Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond uitb no agitation? _
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properh' within 24 hours? ❑Yes 1K No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (Le, residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt. ❑ Yes Z No
roads, building structure, and/or public properly)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes 19 No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bin* fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:

Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit OO Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number
Date of Visit: 7/12/2tH10 Time: 133o Printed on: 11/29/2000
48 6�
Q Not Operational Q Below Threshold
® Permitted 10 Certified © Conditionally Certified E3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: Swxa Arxx ogYam.................... .... County: Hyde .................................................. W..aRG........
Owner Name: CArIM .................................. C81majr..----.---------..-------.---------------------- Phone No. 15Z,926=1-4.71 ..........................................................
Facility Contact:
Title:
... Phone No:
MailingAddress: Rt.A.Bax.b.............. ................................... ....................... ........ .......... Swan.QuarkerAC.--.-----------------.--.....--..---.---...... 178K .............
Onsite Representative:Guim.CAhoum............................................................................. Integrator: Indepwdent............................... ............................
Certified Operator: Car1.J.!'L.................................. CabooxUrR..................................... Operator Certification Number- .173.46.............................
Location of Farm:
Farm is located on the east side of Main Street in Swan Quarter, NC across from the Hyde County Health Department.
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 a 24 45 Longitude 76 °F 19 30 °
- Design - Current
Sine Capacity Poiulation - Poultry
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
® Farrow to Finish
300
200
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design' Current
Cattle Capacity Populatio
❑ Other
-_ Total- Design -Capacity 300
T©tai SSLW 425,100
Discharjes & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes ®No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance than -made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed. did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass, a lagoon system? (If yes_ uot4 DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway [:]Yes ® No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Ideutifier: .vlids.trap....... .......s0li&.trap....... .......... prituaLy..... ..... ....... s=mdatry........ .... autr- y.aalids.... .......................
Freeboard(inches):................1.4............... ....1.5................ 3.0.............................101.1..............................22...................................................
............ ...............

5100 Continued on hark
Facility Number: 48-6 Date of Inspection 7/12/2000 Printedon: 11/29/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, El Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes N No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? N Yes ❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelimprovement? ❑ Yes N No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ® Yes ❑ No
Waste Application
10_ Are there any buffers that need maintenancehmprovement? ❑ Yes N No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes N No
12. Crop type Corn, Soybeans, Wheat Coastal Bermuda (Graze) Small Grain Overseed
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? N Yes ❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pendcd for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16- Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage &. General Permit readily available?
18- Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
1: -No violations: yr:deficiencies were:noted:during t`W'visit:: Ytiti will:receive:no ftitrtlier: :
cor-resoondence about this•visit.' :' :. ::: : ' ::: ::::::: :::
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
N Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
Comments (refer to question #) =Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or another other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pago-M necessary): -
*Lagoon freeboard level being recorded weekly as required by permit.
*Soil test for 1999 requires lime rate of .50 tons per acre. Lime was applied at this rate. Remember to take soil test for this year.
*No irrigation has occurred since last inspection.
*Irrigation system is solid set.
*At present time, grazing coastal bermuda but plan to sell cows in fall. Be sure to have plan amended to include increase for PAN for not
*In last inspection, it was noted that north east corner of lagoon top and inner wall (secondary) had been damaged from cows. This area ha
been repaired. ,r
r-
Reviewer/Inspector Name_ _

IReviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 5100
Facility Number: 48-6 Date of Inspection 7/12/2000 Printed on: 1129/2000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc_) ❑ Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged rill pipe or a permaneut/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
AdditionalComments and/or Dra�-ings:_-
Cows need to be removed from dike walls on primary and secondary lagoon due to eroding problems they are causing. A�
9. Marker needs to be installed in lagoon #2 as noted in last report.
13. Waste plan does not include 8 acres of coastal bermuda with rye overseed . Need to include PAN rates and crop windows. Consult
tech. spec.
19. Information from IRR l has not been transferred to IRR2 dating back to 8-3-99 thru 8-13-99.

' Division ©f Soil and Wafet Conservationperation x-'Oateview
-
0 Division of Soil and. Water Conservation - Compliance inspection
sion of Water. Quality -=„Compliance Inspection
1 Other Agency - Operation Review ;
fe Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follcny-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection
•I'ime of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Permitted © Certified © Conditionally Certified [I Registered 113 Not O erational Date Last Operated:
..........................
Farm Name: � � County: rl ......
�!
Owner Name: r C-?o� Phone No:
.................................................................................I............................................................................................
Facility Contact: .............C"` C.`, �.0.".Title:
........."'........................... .............-.............- Phone No:
Mailing Address: 1060 M S+• _ VA, ",�,k � 6- 2798�
....................................~'.. .....................................I................................................................................................................. .........................
Onsite Representative: 6' ` C~ GO"� Integrator �✓�
Certified Operator: Cn "y..........^ .. Operator Certification Number: ...............................
Location of Farm:
yi
=i
Latitude �' C'=� Longitude
Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to.Feeder
Farrow to Finish
1 300
1 200
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer ❑Dairy —
❑ Non -Layer I I I JE1 Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps
❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area
❑ Spray Field Area
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation (If yes, notify DWQ)?
❑ Yes
VNo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance than-madc'?
❑ Yes
❑ No
h. If discharge is observed, did it reach: ❑ Surface Waters ❑ Waters of the State
❑ Yes
❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min"?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system?
❑ Yes
❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge From any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
f@ No
3. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes
19 No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
El Yes
KNo
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier: '}rMro 1 -{�„P Z 4r„ p 3
Freeboard (inches): 1.2.......... 2 I2 2L4
..............................I................................................................................................................................................................--..
1/6/99
Continued on
back

Facility Npmber: t.18 -- G hate of Inspection
5. -Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes bNo
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not property addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? Y ❑ Yes % No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenancelimprovement? 30 Yes ❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes '9 No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required top of dike, maximum and minimum
liquid level elevation markings? Yes ❑ No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
I. is there evidence of over application? ❑ Ponding ❑Nitrogen ❑ Yes No
12. Crop type ........Co v. ..�x� r�........... ti^�'` ..............................................................................................................................................................................
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes D(No
14. Does the facility lack wettable acreage for land application'? (footprint) ❑ Yes (S No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes 95 No
16. is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes [9 No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
El
(_No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
56 No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
IA No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑Yes
No
22.
Fail to. notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
❑ No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same a4*ency?
❑ Yes
No
0. N1DA( atioRs :or deficiencies .were riofe'd. daring this.visit:. Y.ou wilfre�ceive nnr further .:.
correspaidenee:aoout. this .visit...:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.: .
.........................................................
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or other comments
UsCdrawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as n`eycessary)
L4�ea.t br<,r`l� r^ i'f� I. 'I'ko g'�aSeS, Ids nil �„pl.r� `1�,s y,?W. Tom„ yo,..s A.
Opp"! L e.l7 n.,.,sret paced cl ��
fro lr= 11-7
T N� u2 to ��I< pn �i4'2.''.a� is -lie Sept ,�T tf> .,, "'AI I . FraS�%1 is DCCKr�r"3,
'Tr `_ pc Pii N N•�n.1C4! rn "'��A/�� rr`n "ek. 1✓X-CMG � nKrye YCt �-p �Ol(11;� ��...R ,.t}.p
Wo VA 8ke 4, tk
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:. L(�-
Ilfi/9g

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment AT
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Washington Regional Office aj7i
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor NCDENR
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary NORTH CAR°"NA DEPARTMENT of
Kerr T. Stevens, Director ENVIRONMENT AND MWURAL RESOURCES
May 24, 1999
Mr. Carl M. Cahoon, Jr.
Rt. 1 Box 6
Swan Quarter NC 27885
Subject: Annual Compliance Inspection
Facility Number 48-6
Hyde County
Dear Mr. Cahoon, Jr.:
On 4/30/99, Carl Dunn from the Washington Regional Office of the Division of Water Quality
conducted an inspection of your swine operation. Please review the enclosed inspection form.
This inspection form should be maintained as part of the records for your facility. Please note any
items that may be marked with a yes answer and make every effort to correct these deficiencies. The
Division of Water Quality will be conducting an inspection of your facility sometime during the
calender year of 2000. You are advised that you must maintain a freeboard of at least one foot in your
lagoon(s) plus a storage volume sufficient to accommodate the rainfall and any subsequent runoff from
a 25 year 24 hour storm event to remain in compliance.
Thank you for your cooperation in this inspection. If you have any questions in regard to this
letter or if I may be of any assistance, I can be contacted at [phone] ext. 208. Please do not
hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
Carl Dunn
Environmental Engineer
cc: WaRO Files
943 Washington Square Mall. Washington. North Carolina 27889 TEL [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and
Natural Resources
Washington Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr_, Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Mr. Carl M. Cahoon, Jr.
Swan Acre Hog Farm
Rt. 1, Box 6
Swan Quarter, NC 27885
Zw:�!Nw,j
AM4
NCDENR
-"
ENVIRONMENT ANo NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
October 9, 1998
SUBJECT: Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
Swan Acre Hog Farm
Fac. No. 48-6
Hyde County
Dear Mr. Cahoon, Jr.:
On October 2, 1998, I conducted an Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection at the
referenced facility. Overall, the operation was found to be in satisfactory condition. A
copy of the inspection report is attached for your review.
In general, this inspection includes verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified Animal
Waste Management Plan (CAWMP); (2) the farm is complying with requirements of the
State Rules 15 NCAC 2H.0217, Senate Bill 1217, and the Certified Animal Waste
Management Plan; (3) the farm operation's waste management system is being operated
properly under the direction of a Certified Operator, (4) the required records are being
kept; (5) there are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or runoff.
The recommendations and/or comments regarding your inspection can be found in the
comment section of the attached inspection form. It is very important as the owner and
Operator in Charge that you address any noted concerns, as soon as possible. For
assistance, please contact your Technical Specialist and/or the local Soil & Water
Conservation District Office.
943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, North Carolina 27889
Telephone [phone] FAX 252t975-3716
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

Page 2
Swan Acre Hog Farm
October 9, 1998
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance during the inspection. Should you have
further questions or comments regarding this inspection, do not hesitate to call me at
[phone], ext. 321.
Sincerely,
Daphne B. Cullom
Environmental Specialist II
cc: Yyde County SWCD Office
,/WaRO

a
Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection F_7Fr73T7 24 hr. (hh:mm)
p Registered E Certified ■ Applied for Permit p Permitted 17 Not Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: Swan.Acrt.HogFarult ............................ ........ ..... ........ .......................... County: Hyde WaRO
Owner Name: Carl.AL............................•..... Cahoun,,.Jr.............................................. Phone No: Z52-.916-1471 ..........................................................
Facility Contact: .................................... ...........Title:.............. ..... Phone No:
Mailing Address:RL.L.B,as..6............................................................:..........I..................... SH'an.QU8xtex.NC.............................................. 27985 ..............
Onsite Representative: Carl"..Guire".Cahaou........................... ................... I............. Integrator: lndeptendanf............................................................
Certified Operator.*CarLM ................................. cahaonAz ...................................... Operator Certification Number: 1.7346.............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude Longitude ®• ®®
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? p Yes ® No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at_ Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
p Yes ® No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
Yes p No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
p Yes ® No

act ity Number: 48_6 Date of Inspection
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
p Yes
N No
Structures (La_oons,HoldingPonds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
p Yes
H No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier: ...#1.Solids..Ttap... .12.Salids.Ttap.... ... LPL. S:nlids.Trag...........Pxammy.......... ....... S.econdary.......
...............
Freeboard (ft): 1 ft. 1 ft. 1 ft. 3 ft. 6 ft.
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
p Yes
® No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
p Yes
N No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
p Yes
p No
(If any of questions 9-I2 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
N Yes
p No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
p Yes
® No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type .......Coxn 1Vd=t1Snybcaas..... ....... C aastal.Rerxcutda.Gxass......................C*Mlzacur..........-..............
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? 13 Yes N No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? 0 Yei`- ® No
l S. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20- Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24- Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
Q .oyiqLations.or riencies'were noted Auringthis visit:. You ..will rerelve no further .
"ricespoinde>4ee abodt z .s v�s�i:' . .'
p Yes- ® No
p Yes a No
'r
3 Yes _ ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ®No
[3 Yes ®No
p Yes ® No
p Yes p No
c
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: �� .A, - (",, Date: I D _.:)_ lqa

Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection ® 24 hr. (hh:mm)
p Registered K Certified p Applied for Permit p Permitted 10 Not Operationa Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: Shan.Acre..HogFarm................................................................................ County: Hyde WaRO
Owner Name: Carl.M................................... Cahnan,.,Ir............................................... Phone No: 212-916-1471 ..........................................................
Facility Contact: fume.Cahoon................................................Title: owner .................................................. Phone No: 252192&147.1........................
Mailing Address: Rk..1BoLL.6...................................................................I.................I........ SwaxL.Qaartff..KC ............................................... 27,885 ..............
Onsite Representative: Carl.Cahoaalr.........................................:.............................. Integrator: IndeptegdgM............................................................
Certified Operator:CariM.................................Cahiaon.Jr ...................................... Operator Certification Number: l.7.3.46............................
Location of Yarm:
8lm.JS. Ca l fasksa eUl in Hi811ua rrL.ac=r.un.1h�:: All
. ...spaniCn...::::...H.
: :
Latitude Longitude ®� ®®"
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenancelimprovement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
7/25/97

r"acility Number: 48_6 Date of Inspection
S. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
p Yes
N No
Structures (La o�Holdine Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
N Yes
p No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure
6
Identifier: &Lids.1rap....... ......Snlids.trap................PxiIUar3l........ .......Secundar}C....... _.Hursery.zSalids..
................................
Freeboard (11): 0.9 0.8 1.5 7.5 1.5
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
p Yes
® No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
N Yes
p No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
p Yes
N No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
N Yes
p No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
p Yes
® No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ComZSaybeans/.Wheat.......... CotmraDaBemuda.(gra=� .......... Small.gain., vcrs=d.................C,ajn .E=ue.4graze)........
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
IS. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Onl
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
ons.or ierencies'were.no a g urinis visit:.You .receive ncr n er .
CekeS1)6n rjce a iQu1 ttjLg 1'iS��:. . ' . . • . .
p Yes ® No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ®No
H Yes p No
p Yes N No
p Yes ig No
p Yes p No
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

aci Number: 48_6 Date of Inspection
` ddatlanal=Com eats and/or Drawhigs:
* Need to secure volume calculations and operation & maintenance plan; and if available, design information, hazard classification`
d site evaluation
Five structures on site and not six. Lagoon 1 transfer pipe to lagoon 2 lifted by pump to lagoon 3 gravity fed, via transferpipe,tb
lagoon 4; lagoon 5 transfer pipe to lagoon 1.
a
6/8/98

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Washington Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
November 25, 1997
Mr. Carl M. Cahoon, Jr.
Swan Acre Hog Farm
Rt. 1, Box 6
Swan Quarter, NC 27885
SUBJECT: Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
Swan Acre Hog Farm
Fac. No. 48-6
Hyde County
Dear Mr. Cahoon:
On September 4, 1997,1 conducted an Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection at Swan Acre Hog
Farm in Hyde County. Overall, the operation was found to be in satisfactory condition. A copy of the
inspection report is attached for your review.
In general, this inspection includes verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified Animal Waste Management
PIan (CAWMP); (2) the farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC 2H.0217,
Senate Bill 12I7, and the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan; (3) the farm operation's waste
management system is being operated properly under the direction of a Certified Operator; (4) the required
records are being kept; (5) there are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or runoff.
The recommendations and/or comments regarding your inspection can be found in the comment section of
the attached inspection form. It is very important as the owner and Operator in Charge that you address any
noted concerns, as soon as possible. For assistance, please contact your Technical Specialist and/or
the local Soil & Water Conservation District Office.
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance during the inspection. Should you have further questions
or comments regarding this inspection, do not hesitate to call me at [phone], ext. 321.
Sincerely,
4LA,� `J . o ►'k_
Daphne B. Cullom
Environmental Specialist 11
cc: Hy,0e County SWCD Office
aRO
943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, North Carolina 27889 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

p Division of Soil and Water Conservation [3 Other Agency
■ Division of Water Quality
Routine19 p Complaint p o ow -up of DWQ inspection p o ow -up of DSWC review p Other
Facility Number
p Registered ■ Certified p Applied for Permit p Permitted
Date of Inspection
Time of inspection r� 24 hr. (hh:mm)
p of perattona Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: Sxvan.Acre.Sog.Earm................................................................................ County: Hyde WaRO
OwnerName: Carl.M................................... Caboan,.,Ir............................................... Phone No: 919:9Z64471...........................................................
Facility Contact: Carr1...1.Gu1ren.Cahonj4.Jr..........................Title:............................................................... Phone No:....................................................
Mailing Address: RL.1.Bnx.b............................. ................... Sawa.Qnajex..NC......................... I..................... 22585..............
OnsiteRepresentative: Ciuire-Ca won............................................................................ Integrator: ................................. .......................... I...........................
Certified Operator:Cad.1L1.................................. Cah'Q0.n.Jx ....................................... Operator Certification Number: 1.7,346.............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude ©• ®' ®" Longitude ® • ®4 ®u
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? p Yes ® No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes p No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notifv DWQ) p Yes p No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a Eagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) E3 Yes []No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes N No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? [3 Yes ® No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require p Yes N No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? p Yes ® No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? p Yes ® No
7/25/97

act t Number: 48_b
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Laaoons.Holding Ponds. Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
p Yes N No
I] Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:.............................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (ft): 2 ft. 2 ft.
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
2 ft. 5.5 ft. 5.5 ft.
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of W D, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
p Yes Ig No
p Yes ig No
p Yes ® No
® Yes 13 No
p Yes Cl No
15. Crop type ......Com.(Silage.&..Grain) ........................... Soyb:sans.................... .....Coastal.Bermtpia..Gross....................................................
_.
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. 1s there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted facilities Oniv
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
R • - o violations. or ciencies'were.note unng this visit:. na wt .receive no' u er . - -
e"rresi�oAdeue� about #is visit. .. • . - .. .. • .
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
Yes ®No
p Yes ® No
p Yes N No
p Yes N No
p Yes ® No
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: 1 C Date: Q 2-1 1 7

Routine p Complaint p Follow-up of DWQ inspection p Follow-up of DSWC review p Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection © 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Farm Status: 13 Registered p Applied for Permit
0 Certified p Permitted
In Not Operational I Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: Swan Acre Hog Farm
County: HytlA........................ .:......................... .aRQ........
OwnerName: Carl.M---------------------------...----- Cahonin,.Jr......---.------.......----...----------------- Phone No: 92"331 ...................................................................
Facility Contact: .............................................. .Title: .......... Phone No:
MailingAddress: Rt..1.BaL31A........................................................................................ SWA1L.QuaxUr. N:C............................................... 27885 ..............
Onsite Representative: Carl.hL.C,ahomn,.Jr................................................................ Integrator:.......................................................................................
Certified Operator:Cad.M................................... Cahonadr...................................... Operator Certification Number:17.14fi .............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude ©• 44 Longitude ®• ®& ®46
-.
ype o peration .... Design Current Design Errent Design Current
Swore Capacyty Population TT Poultry ry Capacity Popejlation T Cattle - Capacity Population
Wean to Feeder `" p Layer © Valry
Feeder to Finis r p Non -Layer ` m pNon-Dairy
_
Farrow to an
arrow to Feeder TotahDCsi` Cd aCl
- . P t3'300
Farrow to Finish
tp Other
-- Total SSLW, _ ,
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? 13 Yes ® No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes Ig No
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes p No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) 13 Yes p No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) [3 Yes p No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? p Yes ® No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require p Yes N No
4130/97 maintenance/improvement?

Facility um er: 48_6
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? p Yes p No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? p Yes ® No
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? p Yes ® No
Structures (Lagoons and/or Holding Ponds)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? p Yes N No
Freeboard (ft): Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
...............21L.............................. 5.A................ ............... 1..8................ ................ L.JL............... ............................. ......... ............................. ..
10.
Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
p Yes
® No
11.
Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
p Yes
® No
12.
Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
® Yes
p No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13.
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
® Yes
p No
Waste Application
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application?
p Yes
N No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15.
Crop type ....... ComkSi1agr..&.Crain.)....... ...................................................................................................................... ...............................................
16.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
p Yes
® No
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
p Yes
® No
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
p Yes
® No
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
p Yes
N No
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
p Yes
® No
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
p Yes
® No
For Certified Facilities Only
22.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
13 Yes
®No
23.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
® Yes
p No
24.
Does record keeping need improvement?
13 Yes
®No
Comments1refer: ques h: gp iu Any., answers"an � ol. any.rseommen a tins or.any,.other comments. ;
-
Ilse drawings;of facility to better expla�nesitnahpns. (use aildlt�pnal pages as necessary).inn
o subsurface ins'present. w.
9. Lagoons 5 and 6 also had 1 foot of freeboard. Lagoons 3, 4, 5, and 6 are actually storage pits which are pumped to a final stage
agoon (where waste is held for spray irrigation): r
1. Need to revise to show 3rd party applicator., In the process of revising plan. r -
12. Need to repair areas eroded by cattle.
13. Certified prior to requiring markers. Markers to be set within the next month.
Operation Review Form initialed by Mr. Cahoon 5/06/97.. `
Reviewer/Inspector Name Rufus Croom a
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

J r Site Requires Immediate Attention:
Facility No. 4 $ - o
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT.
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: 9 210 , 1995
Time: R Sn
Farm Name/Owner: If, .j .v 14C - 3 �ofa &,-L (2"J
Mailing Address: PI-r. A.,) a78 8S
County:
Integrator. Phone:
On Site Representative: C^ Ho, ,• Phone:
Physical Address/Location: IAy Y RIM- 6 0-4 ;A) E < < ��.,1 `�'►���
Type of Operation: Swine x._ Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: 3 0o Number of Animals on Site: 1 ZSo
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: Longitude: Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon ha�rlclo
e ffent freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) Actual Freeboard: Ft. Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes orb as any erosion observed? Yes or
Is adequate land available for spray?[�No is the cover crop adequate? Y s r No
Crop(s) being utilized: r tAsZo _ ---
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings' r No
100 Feet from Wells? YS;�fNo
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or
filp—
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes org�2�
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes or 6p___ If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop . Y��No
Additional Comments:
_ t I�nj " RIB
Inspector Name
cc: Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed.

==O=::i-