480005_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NORTH CAROLINA .�
Department of Environmental qua!

N
--_. N
�� \�� -ul
< -u
�� �� � % � \ i -��

WATF9
lx�kG
Michael F. Easley
Governor
To: Producers
From: Lyn B. Hardison n
Environmental Specialist 'J
Washington Regional Office M.
'
Subject: Animal Compliance Routine Inspection
Year 2000
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Kerr T. Stevens
Division of Water Quality
Enclosed please find a copy or copies of the Compliance Site Inspection(s) (as viewed in the DWQ database) conducted at
the referenced facility by the Division of Water Quality from the Washington Regional Office. Please read this inspection
and keep it with all other documents pertaining to your animal operation for future inspections.
In general, these inspections included verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified Animal. Waste Management Plan (CAWMP):
(2) the farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC 2H.0217, Senate Bill 1217, and the Certified Animal
Waste Management Pian, (3) the farm operation's waste management system is being operated properly under the direction of a
Certified Operator. (4) the required records are being kept; and (5) there are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or runoff.
As a reminder, please note the following comments, which are conditions of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan and
the General Permit; therefore, these items must be implemented:
cp The maximum waste level in lagoons/storage ponds shall not exceed that speed in the CAWMP. At a minimum,
maximum waste level for waste for lagoons/storage ponds must not exceed the lcvel'thw provides adequate storage to
contain 25 year, 24 hour storm event plus an additional foot of structural freeboard
cp An analysis of the liquid animal waste from the lagoon shall be conducted as close to the time of application as practical and
at least within 60 days (before or after) of the date of application. This analysis shall include the following parameters:
Nitrogen. Phosphorus, Zinc and Copper.
(p Soil analysis is required annually.
(p The following records are required: off -site solids removal- maintenance_ repair. wastc/soil analysis and land irrigation
records. These records should be maintained by the facilit_y owner/mana-ger in chronological and legible form for a
minimum of three years. V
(p Land application rates shall be in accordance with the CAWW In no case shall land application rates exceed_ the Plant
Available Nitrogen (PAN) rate for the receiving crop or result in runoff during any given application.
All grassed w aten►ays shall have a stable outlet with adequate rapacity to prevent ponding or flooding damages. The outlet
can be another vegetated channel, an earth ditch, stabilization structure, or other suitable outlets.
T It is gig jested not LeggipA to keep crop yield information for future use to update your waste management plan. You will
need three years of crop yield data before your plan can be updated
For your information, any swine facility that has a discharge to surface waters of the State will have to apply for a National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) pernit with the Division of Water Quality, effective January 1.2001.
Thank you for your assistance and cooperation during the inspection. If you have any questions, please contact meat 252-946-
6481. ext 318 or your Technical Specialist.
Cc: WaRO
LBH Files
943 Washington Square Mall Washington, NC 27889 252-946-6481 (Telephone) 252-946-9215 (Fax)

t _ D.
-- -
_ � ivision of Water Qualitf -�� .
--
- -- - D:..:..:: - - - - - -- - --
_
- - - - n�s>ton of Sod and Waicr:C
_.. - .._..-.._... - �_._._....._._..._ ,.._ 1,-- - - - Q-Ot1>ter= ry -
_.............. - -- - - ... - - - -- - �.._.. _... -- ._...... - ... .. -
----•- ---• ........... - - -
Type of Visit ' © Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O* Routine O Complaint O Follow lap O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
E _ Date of Visit: 12-27-2t10o Time: 935
F Facilit.l�'utnbcr 48 5
=ONot Q Belmt- Threshold
O Permitted M Certified ❑ Conditionally Certifiled O Registered Date Last Operated or Abate Threshold: ...................
Farm Name: _ County: Hydr. ................................................... WaSQ.-
OM ner Naroc: dl'L' _ _... —._... Sp1�tutL _—.-.•... Phone Na: 75Z-9.2G!!.61........_ .
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone. No:
Mailin- Address: Rt.-.L.B(tx.li$....... ..- _ _... _.,.............. ..-.-•--• .. _._.. S.wan..Q.ua rker.NC....................................._........ 2.7.SBa...........---
Onsite Representative: JW. .S.p r............................. _....... ....__.............._.......... lnterrator:) 11411uaFargla......................
_..............................
Certified Opera or.— J ............................................... S.Penmr............................................ Operalor Cerriflcail(in Number-.192SL.........._................
Location of Farm:
3 miles East of Swan Quarter NC on SR 1124. ! A�
® Swine ❑Poultry ❑ �.at#ie ❑ tiarse Latitude 35 24 � 33 i.. L(Irl�_itudr 7G �,' IS ! - 2(l
Design Current
Design Current
Design Current
SRine Ca acit� Population
Poultry'
Capacity Population Cattle
Capacity Population
i ❑ Wean to Feeder f
1J Layer
F❑ Darts'
f
f
JiJ` Feeder to Finish i❑[
Non -Laver ,
1❑) Non -Dairy-
;
I l Farrow to wean I
j❑ Farro- to Feeder j I
❑Other
19 Farrow to Finish j 350 ()
Total Design Capacity
350
f j❑ Gilts
i J❑ Boars j
Total SSLW
495,950
Number of Lagoons 4 Subsurface Drains Pretient 1---i Lapojin Area f ❑ Spraj Field Area
4 Holdina Ponds / Solid Traps J] No Liquid Waste Management System
Dischar;es R Strearr. imnaccts
I . Is any discharge observed from an)- part of the operation?
i7i�cllarge or igivawd at: U Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
u. 1�-di(;harn� i= ui+:er�::d. [: a< t'llc C(lII['��'.lii:;'.' i7lali-n]aCI'�•'
of -2=, -zd_ did ii i-eazh NVal:_ of fiit� Siwe„ iff yv:;. notify DVN;Q)
}3 11�:;I1(irLT UIT.tie i'� [':Il. 1� ill:.' `jol[ u? uml'tlliti.
1,/:1'�. ({IjCL;. ;3: .. ii: -Ceti: �l'�I�IIa�' (li ['C-.. Il<ltli� l�`•.'f�r j
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
�Va, t C(?llFerti()iI & T: -'arilret?:
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes :1 No
❑ Yes iJK No
n/a
0 Yes $ No
❑ Yes 9i No
El Yes N No
4, Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway. ❑ Yes X No
Structure I SlrllctlirC y tilntcnire 3 Sv-ml iure 4 Str€ calln Stru;. iture 6
]d vtifi�r. .......slid.Tm....... ....... SolicUlap....... ...... N01C.Trap.... ............ ............ BEW............ ...................................
?=r�axrsrd iliclles):................1:................................1. ........... ............ .17................ ................ l �................

j/00 Continued F►n buck
Facility Number. 48-5 I Pate• cif 1.ns ction �'"' 27 20'00 ..p: a-�. i -�.vVv
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
[] yes
No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
❑ Yes
No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notif* DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
® Yes
❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
0 Yes
0 No
Waste Ann ication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
11. is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑Yes
B► No
12. Crop type Corn, Soybeans_ Wheat Cotton Vegetables
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
IK No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
LI Yes
E No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
IJ Yes
go' No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
(0 Yes
g- No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
J Yes
9- No
Reouired Records &- Document.
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
Cl Yes
❑ No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ V UP.. checklists, design. maps. etc.)
_
'Yeti
No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard. waste analysis X soil sample reports)
� i Yes
3 No
20. is facility not in compliance with an}applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
17, Yes
IR! No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
eJ Yes
No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
'(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
iEE Yes
Q+ No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection -tiith on -site representative?
❑ Yes
9 No
24- Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Ct Yes
9 No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified A)XW?
❑ Yes
[K No
0 -No violations or'defciencies were noted during this visit., You wiffreceive no further
correspondence about this visit.
Comments (refer to question #t): Explain any YTS answers andlor any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
This farm is on the list of Swine Floodplain Buyout.
No animals on farm at time of inspection.
ecoids were available for review. New waste plan dated 3-5-1999.
The vegetables to be planted are: Squash. Cucumbers and String beans. Pre -plant nitrogen application of I00lbs.
NOTE: In the narrative of the Waste plan. corn can be planted and the nitrogen allowance is 175 Ibs/ac.
Waste sample dated 7-20-2000 was collected within 60 days of irrigation and frozen but not shipped to the lab proply- Try to pull and ship
the sample for analysis at the same time.
Soil samples are collected even- year for all fields whether its in the plan or not. Cont. to Page 3
Reviewer/Inspector Name % j j

lieNewer/inspector Signature: Date: SV
F'acdih Number. 49-5 Date of Inspection I2727-72-0 0
Odor lssues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drib during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt. ❑ Yes ®No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ® No
30, Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable -shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
3 l . Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanenthemporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Additional Comments and/or Drawings: -
. 9 - Marker hasn't been installed and now that the farm is on the buyout list, the marker may not be installed.
7 - Continue to address the rodent holes and manage the vegetation on dike walls.
Need to lower the lagoons as soon as weather and field conditions permit.
If you have any questions. contact me n, 252-946-6481, ext. 318.

' — `� Drvision�'of Soil anil Watei'Conservation - Operation Review '� • T k
D Division-6f Soil and -Water Conservation - Compliance -Inspection
� Division.6f Water Quality•- Compliance Inspection
0 Other Agency' -Operation Review
fe Routine O Complaint Q Follow-up of DWQ inspection Q Follow-up of DS�WC review 0 Other �
.�
Facility Number S
hate of Inspection S- -99
Time of Inspection �24 hr. (hh:mm)
©Permitted 10 Certified 0 Conditionally Certified [3Registered
IMNot Operational
I Date Last Operated:
FarmName: ............... r............. .�. �0�e"............._.........ns...---..........._.
County:..............�..................I......... ...... ........... .........
OwnerName: ...................... ....................(!..............----......................._..._.
Phone No:............. _ ..
.......................................................................
Facility Contact: ............ :j ... .S e-c� ........... Title:
.........
.. Phone No: ...................................................
+ 3 i a." kci R d
iMailing Address: .............- ...................................................................................................
..................................................................................... ..........................
Onsite Representative: ............7.......�.........V t eer .................
Integrator:.........��'��.7�..........................................................
.........
Certified Operator:,•••,•-••••-• t'r S
...........................................................I.................I...........
Operator Certification Number:••.,.•,,,.•..,,...........................
Location of Farm:
........................................................................................................................................................................-........._.........._...................................._........_...._......._.
..........I...............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
€
Latitude 4 " Longitude a
° 0«
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
7J
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
350
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer I I ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer I I JE1 Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons JE1 Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area JE1 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds 1 Solid Traps JE1 No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation (If yes, notify DWQ)? ❑ Yes IX No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance ratan -made.' ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed. did it reach: ❑ Surface Waters ❑ Waters of the State ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes JgNo
3. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes No
Structure t Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: 61S ro-a
Freeboard (inches): ........,6,.0.. ZO 2O 2-0
...................................................................................................................................................................................................
1/6/99 Continued on back

Facility Dumber: 4g _ 5 Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ic/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any pact of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required top of dike, maximum and minimum
liquid level elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need inaintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application`? ❑ Ponding ❑ Nitrogen
P yP {e..i�
12. Cro t e ................ ....... ...........................................
5--,I- 9
❑ Yes 14 No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. Does the facility lack wettable acreage for land application'? (footprint)
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ic/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement'? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes CK No
Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes IM No
D4 Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes P�No
❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes E&No
❑ Yes A No
❑ Yes IN No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes EgNo
0 Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes (I No
❑ Yes %No
❑ Yes ❑ No
23. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes %No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency'? ❑ Yes CgNo
�. NoMWaitions.or: clefcie7icies :were noted during.this_visit:: Y.oti 5vilfretLeive na further ::: :
correspondence. about. this :� is . . ' . . . ..... . . . . .... .: :: :::. . . . . .
Comments ([refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any. other. comments.
Use. di:alw"6 of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary)
`i, �IJ�QttI "�o o.c�-Less p,-icp'6 ,SIe- k,Ik;,3 P'n4 ar�aji, y
t 9i[ A OPI-u � IC.�, .
a,
N-t�
+-
5A-�
. JA•AJMJ- J�& 1N5&
6 jd,"s
1 el.
Na,4
4o
I Avt-
►r.,s4c q,..Irvs
on11<4`)a�Ie .
Reviewer/InspectorName Ga,t VOti,,.
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:--✓" Date: y �9
1 /6/99

State of North Carolina
Department of EnvironmentAC `
and Natural Resources �r
Division of Water Quality
Washington Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor NCDENR
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND N UURAL RESOURCES
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
May 24, 1999
Mr. J.W. Spencer
Rt. 1 Box 88
Swan Quarter NC 27885
Subject: Annual Compliance Inspection
Facility Number 48-5
Hyde County
Dear Mr. Spencer:
On 5/4/99, Carl Dunn from the Washington Regional Office of the Division of Water Quality
conducted an inspection of your swine operation. Please review the enclosed inspection form.
This inspection form should be maintained as part of the records for your facility. Please note any
items that may be marked with a yes answer and make every effort to correct these deficiencies. The
Division of Water Quality will be conducting an inspection of your facility sometime during the
calender year of 2000. You are advised that you must maintain a freeboard of at least one foot in your
lagoon(s) plus a storage volume sufficient to accommodate the rainfall and any subsequent runoff from
a 25 year 24 hour storm event to remain in compliance.
Thank you for your cooperation in this inspection. If you have any questions in regard to this
letter or if I may be of any assistance, I can be contacted at [phone] ext. 208. Please do not
hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
Carl Dunn
Environmental Engineer
cc: WaRO Files
943 Washington Square Mall. Washington, North Carolina 278B9 TEL [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

sm
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
October 1, 1997
Mr. J.W. Spencer
Spencer Heritage Farms, Inc.
Rt. 1, Box 88
Swan Quarter„ NC 27885
SUBJECT: Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
Spencer Heritage Farms, Inc.
Facility No. 48-5
Hyde County
Dear Mr. Spencer:
IDEHNR
On September 5, 1997, I conducted an Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection at Spencer
Heritage Farms, Inc. in Hyde County. Overall, the operation was found to be in. satisfactory
condition. A copy of the inspection report is attached for your review.
In general, this inspection includes verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified Animal Waste
Management Plan (CAWMP); (2) the farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15
NCAC 2H.0217, Senate Bill 1217, and the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan; (3) the farm
operation's waste management system is being operated properly under the direction of a Certified
Operator; (4) the required records are being kept; (5) there are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or
runoff. The following were noted during the inspection
1. The referenced farm is currently registered and you are currently working with the
Hyde County Soil & Water Conservation District Office on getting the farm
certified.
2. Irrigation records are not currently maintained for the farm. Once your farm has a
certified plan, please maintain all components of the Certified Animal Waste
Management Plan (CAWMP) on site. A CAWMP component list is attached to this
letter for reference.
The four lagoons located at your, farm had adequate storage capacity at the time of
the. inspection:..Maximum-and minimum-.pump.markers-will be.installed as a
requiremenfiofcertification. These markers -are installed to show the top and
943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, NC 27889 "telephone (919) 946-Wl FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled / 1 Q% pest -consumer paper

Mr. J.W. Spencer
Spencer Heritage Farms, Inc.
October 1, 1997
Page 2
bottom elevations of the temporary storage (pumping volume) of the lagoon.
Pumping should be managed to maintain the liquid level between the markers.
4. Lagoon #3 should be closely monitored to prevent overtopping. During the
inspection it was observed that animal waste had overtopped the lagoon, however it
had not reached surface waters. Animal waste from this lagoon is pumped to lagoon
#4.
As a reminder, a minimum of nineteen inches of freeboard must be maintained in the lagoon and it
is required to maintain a buffer of twenty-five feet while spray irrigating from any drainage system
(ditch, swale, canal, stream, etc.). Please be aware that it is a violation of North Carolina General
Statutes to discharge wastewater to the surface waters (farm ditches, creeks, streams, etc) of the
State without a permit. The Division of Water Quality has the authority to levy a fine of not more
than $10,000 per day for the unpermitted discharge of wastewater into the surface waters of the
State.
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance during the inspection. Should you have further
questions or comments regarding this inspection, do not hesitate to call me at [phone],
ext. 321.
Sincerely,
6 • "VV\—
Dap e B. Cullom
Environmental Specialist II
cc: Hyde County S WCD Office
DSWC-WaRO
Compliance Group
WQ Central Files
_VegRO
943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, NC 27889 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled / 10% post -consumer paper

. _ _Division of Water Quality
Routine19 p Complaint p Follow-up of 15WQ inspection p Follow-up of DSWC review p Other
Date of Inspection !
Facility Number �
Time of Inspection ] 24 hr. (hh:mm)
0 Registered p Certified p Applied for Permit p Permitted 113 Not 0perattona Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: Spencer.Hertitage.Earms.Jtir............................................................... County: Hyde WaRO
OwnerName:.L..W............................................ Spcm= ...................................................... Phone No: 91-9z92"061 ..........................................................
Facility Contact: .Title: ............................................................... Phone No:....................................................
MailingAddress: RU.3nx.8S,........................................................................................... SW.an.l vzx...XC............................................... 278.85 ..............
OnsiteRepresentative:J..W..Spe=r.............................................................................. Integrator:.......................................................................................
Certified Operator:J..W....................................... Spencer ............................................ Operator Certification Number: 197M.............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude ©9 ®6 ©°° Longitude
on-
arrow
to
to
0
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State.other.than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system -(other than lagoons/holding ponds) i-egtiire
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the tirne.of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
p Yes ® No
Yes ® No
p Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes N No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No

Facility Number: 48_5
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Strictures (Lag_oons,Holdinp- Ponds, Flush Pits. etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier: ...................................................................... .................................... ...................................
Freeboard (ft): 2 ft 2 ft. 1.5 ft. 2.5 ft.
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
p Yes ® No
p Yes H No
Structure 5 Structure 6
p Yes R No
p Yes H No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? p Yes ® No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? p Yes p No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? p Yes p No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type .......Corn.(Silage.&.Grain)........................... Soybmus.................... .......................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? p Yes p No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? p Yes ® No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? p Yes p No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? p Yes p No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? p Yes ® No
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? p Yes ®No
22. Does record keeping need improvement? p Yes ® No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? p Yes p No
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? p Yes p No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit? p Yes p No
a[. . o.via tzons. or erencies'were.note ,unng t is visit:. on .receive a� n er . .
cerzespanelae� abut XiS ;
Reviewer/Inspector Name
IReviewer/Inspector Signature: ' Tf ) . ' Date: