460006_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NORTH CAHOLINA
Department of Environmental Qual

INSPECTIONS.
INSPECTIONS
INSPECTIONS

M Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservatlon
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 460006 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS460006
Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Hertford Region:
Date of Visit: 11/27/2017 Entry Time: 11:50 am Exit Time: 12:30 pm Incident #
Farm Name: Farm 8134 Owner Email:
Owner: Murphy -Brown LLC Phone:
Mailing Address: PO Box 487 Warsaw NC 28398
Physical Address: 750 Liverman Mill Rd Ahoskie NC 27910
Facility Status: Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 36' 21' 36" Longitude: 77' 04' 26"
SR 1137, 1 mile east of SR 1142 and SR 1137 intersection.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Star, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
❑ Denied Access
Washington
910-296-1800
Certified Operator: William Edwin Bain Operator Certification Number: 991343
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Earl Queen Phone:
On -site representative Earl Queen Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Dale:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis: soil tested: 11/30/2016
10-6-17 = 1,44
8-18-17 = 1.41
7-10-17 = 1.80
IRRs are complete & balanced out.
Reviewed sludge survey; crop yield corn, SB; calibration 10/2017
page: 1

Permit: AWS460006 Owner -Facility: Murphy -Brawn LLC Facility Number: 460006
Inspection Date: 11/27/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
rjSwine - Farrow to Wean 1,446 0
Total Design Capacity: 1,446
Total SSLW: 626,118
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon 34 09/24/971 L 18.70 4g 00
N
page: 2

41
Permit: AWS460006 Owner - Facility : Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: 460006
Inspection Date: 11/27/17 Inssection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes No Na No
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
0 ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 '❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
0 ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No Na_Ne
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large
❑
0 ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
M ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
0 ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
MEJ
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste„ Application
Yes No No No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

0
Permit: AWS460006 Owner - Facility : Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number:
460006
Inspection Date: 11/27/17 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Waste Application
Yea
No AP —Re
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Fescue (Hay)
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Scil'Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
N ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
0 ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
E ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na No
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
0 ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WU P?
❑
Checklists?
[]
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
0 Cl
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
page: 4

Permit: AWS460006 Owner - Facility : Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: 460006
Inspection Date: 11/27/17 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na No
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation'of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■ ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
M ❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes No Na Ne
2& Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
0 ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes.
❑
0 ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field ❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond ❑
Other ❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or ❑ M ❑ ❑
CAWMP?
33, Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
page: 5

0 Division of Water Resources
El Division of Soil and Water Conservation
El Other Agency
Facility Number: 460006 Facility Status:
Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Dale of Visit: 11/22/2016 Entry Time. 11:30 am
Farm Name: Farm 6134
Active
Permit: AWS460006 E] Denied Access
inactive Or Closed Date:
County: Hertford Region: Washington
Exit Time: 12:20 pm Incident #
Owner Emall:
Owner: Murphy -Brown LLC Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: PO Box 487 Warsaw NC 28398
Physical Address: 750 Liverman Mill Rd Ahoskie NC 27910
Facility Status: ❑ Murphy -Brown LLC
Compliant Not Compliant Integrator.
Location of Farm: Latitude: 36° 21' 36"
SR 1137, 1 mile east of SR 1142 and SR 1137 intersection.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts
Records and Documents
Longitude: 77' 04' 26"
Waste Col, Stor, & Treat . Waste Application
Other Issues
Certified Operator: Earl A Queen Operator Certification Number: 22409
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Green Earl Phone
On -site representative Green Earl Phone
Primary Inspector:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary inspector(s):
Marlene Salyer
Inspection Summary:
Waste Analysis: soil tested: 1213115
10-3-16 = .97
7-27-16 = 1.67
5-30-16 = 2.66
44-16 = 2.29
2-15-16 = 1,74
12-14-15 = 1,66
IRR records are complete & balanced out.
Reviewed: Sludge survey 3130/16 2.7115.19LTZ; rainfall, freeboard
20"-218116 to 47"-1013116
Phone:
Date:
page: 1

Permit: AWS460006 Owner - Facility : Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: 460006
Inspection Date: 11/22/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Farrow to Wean 1,446 1,750
Total Design Capacity: 1,446
Total SSLW: 626,118
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon 34 09/24/97 18J0 35,00
page: 2

Permit: AWS460006 Owner - Facility: Murphy -Brown f.LC Facility Number: 460006
Inspection Date: 11/22/16 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No No No
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
00
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
0 ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■ ❑
❑
c, What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
N ❑
❑
2, Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
E ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
■ ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection. Storage & Treatment
Yea No No No
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large
❑
■ ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
0 ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
0 ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes_ No No No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ M ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
[]
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

a
Permit: AWS460006 Owner - Facility : Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: 460006
Inspection Date: 11/22/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yea
No _Na_Ne
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Fescue (Hay)
Crop Type 3
Smalt Grain Dverseed
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Sal Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
0 ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15, Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
M ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
M ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
0 ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
M ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No Na No
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
M ❑ ❑
20, Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
M ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
M ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
[]
page: 4

Permit: AWS460006 Owner - Facility : Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: 460006
Inspection Date: 11/22/16 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yee
No Ne No
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
M ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑
Cl
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
0 ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26, Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■ ❑
❑
27, Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Otherlssues
Yea
No Na Ne
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
0 ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
M ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
M ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
0 ❑
Cl
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon 1 Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
0 ❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
M ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
0 ❑
❑
page: 5

■ Division of Water Resources
❑
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number:
460006 Facility Status:
Active Permit: AWS460006
Denied Access
Inpsection Type:
Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit:
Routine
County: Hertford Region:
Washington
Date of Visit:
10119I2015 Entry Time: 09:50 am
Exit Time: 10:40 am Incident #
Farm Name:
Farm 8134
Qwner Email:
Owner:
Murphy -Brown LLC
Phone:
910-296-1600
Mailing Address:
PO Box 487
Warsaw NC 28398
Physical Address:
750 Liverman Mill Rd
Ahoskie NC 27910
Facility Status:
Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm:
Latitude: 36" 21' 36" Longitude:
77' 04' 26"
SR 1137. 1 mile east
of SR 1142 and SR 1137 intersection.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts
Records and Documents
Waste Cal, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Other Issues
Certified Operator: Earl A Queen Operator Certification Number: 22409
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Green Earl Phone:
On -site representative Earl queen Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste Analysis: soil tested:2014
11.25-14 = 2.15
1-22-15 = 2.58
4-8-15 = 3.29
5-11-15 = 5.79
8-6-15 = 1.39
10-7-15 = 1.04
IRR records are complete & balanced out.
"Reviewed: COC; rainfall = 49.51year, freeboard; crop yields; sludge survey 3-25-14 LTZ= 3.18, ST=3.54 W POA on 812012.
page: 1

r
Permit: AW5460006 Owner - Facility : Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: 460006
Inspection Date: 10/19/15 Iripsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
LE Swine - Farrow to Wean 1,446 1,395
Total Design Capacity: 1,446
Total SSLW: 626,118
Waste structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Data Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon 34 09/24/97 18,70 40 00
page: 2

fl
Permit: AWS460006 Owner - Facility : Murphy -Brown LLC Facility. Number: 460006
Inspection Date: 10/19/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No Na No
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
013
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■ ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
N ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
Ug No He
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
E ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le] large
❑
� ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑0
❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
N ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet slacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na Ne
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Permit: AWS460006 Owner - Facility : Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number:
460006
Inspection Date: 10/19/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Waste AApilcation
Yea
No Na No
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Fescue (Hay)
Crop Type 3
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Sail Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
0 ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
0 ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of property operating waste application equipment?
❑
■ ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yea
No Na No
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
0 ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page:
4

Permit: AWS460006 Owner - Facility : Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number:
460006
Inspection Date: 10/19/15 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No Na No
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22, Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
0 ❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
MEI
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No Na Na
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
0 ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? if yes,
❑
EEI
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
❑
❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
0 ❑
❑
page: 5

M Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of SoR and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 460006 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS460006 Denied Access
tnpsection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Date of Visit: 12101l2014 Entry Time: 09:30 am
Farm Name: Farm 8134
Owner: Murphy -Brown LLC
Inactive Or Closed Date:
County: Hertford Region: Washington
Exit Time: 10:00 am Incident #
Owner Email:
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: PO Box 487 Warsaw NC 28398
Physical Address: 750 Liverman Mill Rd Ahoskie NC 27910
Facility Status: Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 36° 21' 36" Longitude: 77' 04' 26"
SR 1137, 1 mile east of SR 1142 and SR 1137 intersection
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents. Other Issues
Certified Operator. William Edwin Bain Operator Certification Number: 991343
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Rapresentative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Earl Queen Phone:
On -site representative Earl Queen Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis: soil tested: 10/17114
10.20.14 -1.18
8,22.14 - 1.39
7.4.14 - 1.82
6.17.14 - 1.78
5.5.14 - 2.53
3.12.14 - 2.27
2.7.14 - 1.98
IRR records are complete & balanced out. Reviewed: rainfall, freeboard, crop yield (117bales), sludge survey & calibration done
in 2014.
Have new center pivots in operation. Looks Good.
page: 1

Permit: AWS460006 Owner - Facility : Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: 460006
Inspection Date: 12/01/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Data Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon 34 09/24197 18.70 45.00
0
page: 2

Permit: AWS460006 Owner - Facility : Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: 460006
Inspection Date: 12/01/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharnes & Stream Impacts
vas
No Na No
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
M ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
M ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
3, Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
MEI
❑
Slate other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection. Storane & Treatment
Yes No Na No
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.eJ large
❑
0 ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
❑
❑
waste management or closure plan? •
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
❑
❑
to roofed piss, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
M ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste APRlication
Yes No Na Ne
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11, Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

a
Permit: AWS460006 Owner - Facility : Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number:
460006
Inspection Date: 12/01/14 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Waste ARRIlication
Yes No Na Na
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Gress
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Fescue (Hay)
Crop Type 3
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑ ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ 0 ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑ M ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ❑
❑
18. 1s there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ 0 ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No Na No
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ E ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WU P?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ M ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWS460006 Owner -Facility: Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: 460006
Inspection Bate: 12/01/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na No
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
E ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
[]
Nan -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes Nv Na_ Ne
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
N ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required.by Permit?
❑
N ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
N ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
W ❑
❑
CAWM P?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
E ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
0 ❑
❑
page: 5

0 Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS460006 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Mertford Region: Washinaton
Date of Visit: 12/11/2013 Entry Time: 09:30 AM Exit Time: 10.15AM
Farm Name: Farm 8134
Owner: Murohy-Brown LLC
Incident #:
Owner Email:
Mailing Address: EQ pox 487 Warsaw NC 28398
Phone: [phone]
Physical Address: 750 Liverman Mill Rd I Ahoskie NC 27910
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 3Q021'36" _ Longitude: 77°04'26"
SR 1137, 1 mile east of SR 1142 and SR 1137 intersection.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: William Edwin Bain
Secondary OIC(s):
Operator Certification Number: 991343
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Earl Queen Phone:
On -site representative Earl Queen Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Date:
Page: 1

Permit: AW5450006 Owner - Facility: Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number : 460006
Inspection Date: 12/1112013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis:
1-17-13 = 1.89
3-13-13 = 2.14
5-1-13 = 2.67
6-23-13 = 1.70
8-13-13 = 0.80
11-21-13 = 1.20
10-7-13 = 1.03
Irr records are vompiete & balanced out. Rainfall, freeboard & crop yields are recorded.
Sludge Survey (4.06) in 2012 & POA is written 8-1-12. soil tested 11-2012
Looks Good.
Page: 2

Permit: AWS460006 Owner -Facility: Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number : 460006
inspection Date: 12/11/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Q Swine - Farrow to Wean 1,446 1,750
Total Design Capacity: 1,446
Total SSLW: 626,118
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
lagoon 34 09/24/97 18.70 48.00
Page: 3

Permit: AWS460006 Owner -Facility: Murphy -Brawn LLC
Inspection Date: 12/11/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at:
Structure
Application Field
Other
a. Was conveyance man-made?
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c• What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
Facility Number: 460006
Reason for Visit: Routine
�tT't 5=21'_M:14
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than
❑
■
❑
❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5• Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large trees, severe ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
Hydraulic Overload?
Frozen Ground?
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
■
❑
❑
Yes
No
NA
NE

Permit: AWS460006 Owner -Facility: Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: 460006
Inspection Date: 12/11/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
PAN?
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
Total Phosphorus?
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
Outside of acceptable crop window?
Evidence of wind drift?
Application outside of application area?
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Records and Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
Yes No
NA
NE
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Fescue (Hay)
Small Grain Overseed
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
❑■❑❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
U
Page: 5

Permit: AWS460006 Owner - Facility: Murphy -Brown LLC
Inspection Date: 12111/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 460006
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No NA .NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
Cl
■ ❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑
■ ❑ ❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

Permit: AWS460006 Owner -Facility: Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: 460006
Inspection Date: 12/11/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
27, Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Otherlssues
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon 1 Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
34, Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
In
Page: 7

4.
Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 4QQQQ6 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS46QOOQ ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Comnliange Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine _ County: Hertford Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 11/1912012 Entry Time: 12405 PM Exit Time: 01:00 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: Farm 34 Owner Email:
Owner: - Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: PO Box 487 Warsaw NC 28398
Physical Address: 750 Liverman td'll Rd Ahoskie NC 27910
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Location of Farm:
SR 1137, 1 mile east of SR 1142 and SR 1137 intersection.
Integrator: Murohg Brown LLC
Latitude: 36°21'36" Longitude: 77°04'26"
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: William Edwin Bain Operator Certification Number: 991343
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Earl Queen Phone:
On -site representative Earl Queen Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date.
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis:
8-13-12 = 1.61
6-20-12 = 1.9
4-26-12 = 2.8
3-6-12 = 2.0
soil tested:12/2011
IRr records are complete & balanced out. Rainfall, freeboard, & crop yields were reviewed.
Calibration was done in May 2012 & Sludge survey done in Feb.2012
Looks Good!
Page: 1

Permit: AWS460006 Owner -Facility: Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: 460006
Inspection Date: 11/19/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Q Swine - Farrow to Feeder 1,200 1,000
Total Design Capacity: 1,200
Total SSLW: 626,400
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freaboard
lagoon 34 09/24/97 18.70 44.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWS460006 Owner - Facility: Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: 460006
Inspection Date: 11/1912012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the Slate (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large trees, severe
❑ ■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑ ■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet slacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? Q
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS460006 Owner - Facility: Murphy -Brown LLC
Inspection Date: 11/19/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number; 460006
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No
NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Fescue (Hay)
Crop Type 3
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■
❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
0011
❑
18, Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4
n

Permit: AW5460006 Owner -Facility: Murphy -Brown LLC
Inspection Date: 11/19/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Records and Documents
Facility Number. 460006
Reason for Visit: Routine
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fall to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑
■ ❑ ❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and dale of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS460006 Owner - Facility: Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number : 460006
Inspection Date: 11/19/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes
No
NA
NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
0
❑
❑
Other Issues Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report
❑
■
Cl
❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional
❑
■
❑
❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge,
❑
■
❑
❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon / Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Page: 6

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 460006 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS460006 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Hertf.Qrd Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 12LQUQ11 Entry Time: 10:40 AM Exit Time: 11 Q0 AM Incident #:
Farm Name: Farm 34 Owner Email:
Owner: Murphy -Brown LLC Phone: 910-29§-1800
Mailing Address: PO Box 487 Vjrjaw NC 25328
Physical Address: 750 Liverman Mill Rd ,T
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 5Q°2118" Longitude:
SR 1137, 1 mile east of SR 1142 and SR 1137 intersection.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat © Waste Application
© Records and Documents © Other Issues
Certified Operator: William Edwin Bain Operator Certification Number: 991343
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Earl Queen Phone:
On -site representative Earl Queen Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis:
10-25-11 = 1.5
8-30-11 = 1.1
8-23-11 = 2.1
6-22-11 = 2.4
3-29-11 = 2.3
2-1-1 1 = 1.6
soil tested: 12/2010 samples pulled now
IRR records are complete & balanced out. Looks good!
Page: 1

Permit: AWS460006 Owner - Facility: Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number. 460006
Inspection Date: 12/05/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Farrow to Feeder 1,200 1,200
Total Design Capacity: 1,200
Total SSLW: 626,400
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
kgoon 34 09/24197 18,70 42.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWS460006 Owner • Facility: Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number : 460006
Inspection Date: 1210512011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑ IN
❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑ ❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
00110
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑ ❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than
❑
■
❑ ❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collectlon, Storage & Treatment Yes
No
NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large trees, severe
0013
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑
■
❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
dry slacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
11, Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS460006 Owner -Facility: Murphy -Brown LLC
Inspection Date: 1210512011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 460006
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA
NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%I10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda
Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Fescue (Hay)
Crop Type 3
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
18. is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA
NE
19, Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
20, Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS460006 Owner - Facility: Murphy -Brown LLC
Inspection Date: 12/05/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Records and Documents
Facility Number; 460006
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑
■ ❑ ❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS460006 Owner • Facility: Murphy -Brown LLC
Inspection Date: 12/05/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Records and Documents
Facility Number : 460006
Reason for Visit: Routine
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
Otherlssues Yes No
NA
NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report
❑ ■
❑
❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor. or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional
❑ ■
❑
❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWO of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge,
Cl ■
❑
❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility?
1201111
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon / Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewerlinspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Page: 6

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 460006 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS46006_ ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Comoliaag2 Ingoection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Hertford Region: Washinalon
Date of Visit: 0211412011 Entry Time:1QgQ 6M Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Farm 34
Owner: Murohv-Brown LLC
Owner Email:
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: PO Box 487 Warsaw NC 28398
Physical Address: 750 Liverman Mill Rd Ahoskie NC 27910
Facility Status: N Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude, 36°21'18" Longitude: 77°04'18"
SR 1137, 1 mile east of SR 1142 and SR 1137 intersection
Question Areas:
© Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Elena Lowery Wiggins Operator Certification Number: 987282
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Re prosentative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Ead Queen Phone:
On -site representative Green Earl Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AWS460006 Owner - Facility: Murphy -Brown LI-C
Faculty Number : 460006
Inspection date: 02/14/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
#34. No drain tiles,
waste analysis:
2-1-11 = 1.6
soil tested 10-2009, 2010 samples lost by lab, resampled
12-8-10 = .28
Jan. 2011 waiting on results. Suggested getting something
10-19-10 = .93
in writing from lab regarding loss.
9-13-10 = 1.7
7-13-10 = 2.9
5-17-10 = 2.5
IRR rescords are complete and balanced out. They are on the laptop and very neat.
SS = 2.58 Th 2010 —doing 2011 surveys now in Feb.
All fields look GReatl
Page: 2

Permit: AWS460006 Owner - Facility: Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: 460006
Inspection Date: 02/14/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
G Swine - Farrow to Feeder 1,200 1,250
Total Design Capacity: 1,200
Total SSLW: 626,400
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon 34 09/24/97 18.70 28.00
Page: 3

Permit: AW5460006 Owner - Facility: Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: 460006
Inspection Date: 02114/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No NA
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
■ ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
■ ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■ ❑
❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■ ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■ ❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■ ❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe
❑
■ ❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■ ❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■ ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■ ❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■ ❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■ ❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS460006 Owner - Facility: Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: 460006
Inspection Date: 02/14/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? ❑
Total P205? Cl
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
Pian(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Records and Documents
19, Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Fescue (Hay)
Small Grain Overseed
00011
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
0
Page: 5

Permit: AW5460006 Owner - Facility: Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: 460006
Inspection Date: 02/14/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Other? ❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
■
❑
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■
❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■
❑
❑
29, Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 6

Permit: AWS460006 Owner - Facility: Murphy -Brown LLC
Inspection Date: 02/14/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance inspection
Other Issues
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
34. Are subsurface drains present on this farm?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Spray Field
Lagoon / Storage Pond
Other
Facility Number : 460006
Reason for Visit: Routine
You No NA NE
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 7

r
Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 466006 Facility Status: Active Permit: i WS4Q0006 _ ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection_ „ Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Hertford Region: Washina(on
Date of Visit: 02/03/2010 Entry Time: 11:30 AM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Farm_ 34 Owner Email:
Owner: Muo2bY-Brown, LLC Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: PQ Box 487 Warsaw NC 28398
Physical Address: 750 Livg[Man Mill Rd Ahosk!e NC 27910
Facility Status: E Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown. LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 36°21'18" Longitude: Z7°04'18"
SR 1137, 1 mile east of SR 1142 and SR 1137 intersection.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Elena Lowery Wiggins Operator Certification Number: 987282
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Earl Queen Phone: 5 - -
On -site representative Earl Queen Phone:
Primary Inspector:
Inspector Signature:
Marlene Salyer
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis: Freeboard on 11-6-09 was 50 inches!
11-23-09 1.7
8-24-09 1.9
7-2-09 2.4
5-12-09 3.2
3-20-09 2.4
1-26-09 2.7
soil tested 1012009 SS 312009 calibration B-2008
Phone:
Date:
Page: 1

y
Permit: AWS400006 Owner -Facility: Murphy -Brown, LLC
Inspection Date: 0210312010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number:460006
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine -Farrow to Feeder 1,200 1,260
Total Design Capacity: 1,200
Total SSLW: 626,400
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Data Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
kGon 34 09/24/97 18.70 24,00
Page: 2

0
Permit: AW5460006 Owner - Facility: Murphy -Brown, LLC Facility Number: 460006
Inspection pate: 02/03/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1, Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? 00110
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a ❑ MOO
discharge?
Waste Collection Storage & Treatment Yes No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? ❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large trees, severe ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7, Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑ ■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑ ■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance altematives that need maintenance or
❑ ■
❑
❑
improvement?
11, Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS460006 Owner - Facility: Murphy -Brown, LLC
Inspection Date: 02103/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number. 460006
Reason forVislt: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(May)
Crop Type 2
Fescue (Pasture)
Crop Type 3
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
00011
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■ ❑
❑
16, Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
■ ❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■ ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■ ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yee
No NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■ ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AVVS460006 Owner- Facility: Murphy -Brown, LLC
Facility Number: 460006
Inspection Date: 021D3/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ moo
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
Q
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? ❑ ■
❑ ❑
24, Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Van Nn
NA NR
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30, At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air 11000
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWS460006 Owner - Facility: Murphy -Brown, LLC Facility Number: 460006
Inspection Date: 02/03/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yea No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Page: 6

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 460006 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS460006 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Hertford Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 02/03/2009 Entry Time:12*09 PM Exit Time:
Farm Name: Farm 34
Owner: Brown's Of Carolina Va Division
Incident #:
Owner Email:
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: PO Box 1240 Waverly VA 23890
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Location of Farm:
Integrator: Murphy -Brown, LLC
Latitude:36'21'18" Longitude:77°04'18"
SR 1137, 1 mile east of SR 1142 and SR 1137 intersection.
Question Areas:
© Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Elena Lowery Wiggins Operator Certification Number: 987282
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Sits Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Kurt Elmer Phone:
On -site representative Kurt Elmer Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis:
12-5-08 = 2.3
9-30-08 = 1.9
7-25-08 = 2.0
5-29-08 = 3.0
3-28-08 = 13
soil test 10-30-08
No irrigation events in 2009 thus far, it's too wet?
Date:
Page: 1

Permit: AWS460006 Owner- Facility: Brown's Of Carolina Va Division Facility Number : 460006
Inspection Date: 02/03/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason forVlsit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Q Swine - Farrow to Feeder 1,200 1,225
Total Design Capacity: 1,200
Total SSLW: 626,400
Waste Structures
Type iaennner V10300 wale arari uaze vewUneu rreuuuaru vwuurvvo rr969uaru
kgoon 34 09124197 18.70 41,00
Page: 2

Permit: AW5460006 Owner - Facility: Brown's Of Carolina Va Division Facility Number : 460006
Inspection Date: 02/03/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ M ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
Cl ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
01111
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? Cl ■ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑ ❑
improvement?
11, Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS460006 Owner - FacIIlty: Brown's Of Carolina Va Division
Inspection Date: 02/03/2009 inspection Type: Compliance inspection
Facility Number: 460005
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No
NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal
Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Fescue
(Hay)
Crop Type 3
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14, Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■
❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Records and Documents
You No
NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS460006 Owner - Facility: Brown's Of Carolina Va Division
Facility Number: 460006
Inspection Date: 02/03/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual sail analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ Cl ❑
23, If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? ❑
■ ❑ ❑
24, Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
26, Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
Other Issues
Yes
No NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
29, Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWS460006 Owner - Facility: Brown's Of Carolina Va Division
Inspection Date: 02/03/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Other Issues
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Facility Number: 460006
Reason for Visit: Routine
Page: 6

J
® Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number : 460006 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS460006 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Qqmpliaoce laspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Hertford Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 03/25/2008 Entry Time:10010 AM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Farm 34 Owner Email:
Owner: Brown's Of Carolina Va Division Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: PO Box 1240 Waverly VA 23890
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant integrator: Murphy -Brown, LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 36°21'18" Longitude: 77°04'18"-
SR 1137, 1 mile east of SR 1142 and SR 1137 intersection.
Question Areas:
d Discharges & Stream Impacts ji Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
tj Records and Documents ji Other Issues
Certified Operator: Elena Lowery Wiggins Operator Certification Number: 987282
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Kurt Elmer Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Kurt Elmer Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis: soil test 12-14-07
1-29-08 = .81
11-26-07 = 2.3
9-24-07 = 2.0
no irrigation events in 2008.
Looks good.
Date:
Page: 1

Permit: AWS460006 Owner - Facility: Brown's Of Carolina Va Division Facility Number : 460006
Inspection Date: 0312512008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Farrow to Feeder 1,200 1,150
Total Design Capacity: 1,200
Total SSLW: 626.400
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon 34 09/24/97 18.70 43.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWS460006 Owner - Facility: Brown's Of Carolina Va Division Facility Number : 460006
Inspection Date: 03/25/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ 13 ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ®❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ij ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
Q+
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
Cl
0
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
Cl
©
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4, Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
®
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
Cl
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe
❑
©
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc,)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑
0
❑
Cl
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
10
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
©
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
®
❑
❑
improvement?
1f 1. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
®❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below,
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS460006 Owner • Facility: Brown's Of Carolina Va Division Facility Number : 460006
Inspection Date: 03/25/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
Is PAN > 10%110 Ibs.?
❑
Total P2O5?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal
Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Fescue
(Hay, Pasture)
Crop Type 3
Small Grain
Overseed
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soi( Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
0
❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop andlor iand application site need improvement?
❑
0
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure andlor operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
0
❑
Cl
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
0
0
❑
18, Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
W
0
Cl
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■
Cl
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
®
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
W U P?
i1
Page: 4

Permit: AWS460006 Owner - Facility: Brown's Of Carolina Va Division Facility Number: 460006
Inspection Date: 03/25/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Other? ❑
21, Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ® n
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfah?
El
Inspections after ? 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
©
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES oniy)?
❑
0
❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
®❑
❑
25, Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
0
❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
Cl
12
❑ ❑
27, Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
Other Issues Tes NO nN N
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ®❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animais within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspoction did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ la ❑ Cl
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AW5460006 Owner - Facility: Brown's Of Caroiina Va Division
Inspection Date: 03/25/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance inspection
Fr
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWO of emergency situations as required by permit?
32. Did Ravi ewer/ I nspecto r fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Facility Number : 460006
Reason for Visit: Routine
❑0❑❑
❑ to ❑ ❑
❑ M ❑ ❑
Page: 6

® Division of Water Quality
Facility Number O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Q Other Agency
Type of Visit • Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: .A31/ Departure Time: County: Region: xe
Farm Name: ,J.34� Owner Email:
Owner Name: (fi'V — Phone: rd'l - t-3151"" AP000 T
Mailing Address: _ Z2 TQ
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
❑ Other
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: = c = 6 = Longitude: ❑ ° ❑ 1
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ La er
I1 ❑ Non -La er
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ urkey Pouets
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑
Dairy Cow
❑
Daia Calf
❑
Dairy Heifer
❑
Dry Cow
❑
Non -Dairy
❑
Beef Stocker
❑
Beef Feeder
❑
Beef Brood Cow
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
Number of Structures: =;
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes [Id No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
[:] No
❑ NA
[I NE
El Yes
[O'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
ET No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page I of 3 12128104 Continued

Facility Number: 11 — (p
Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
❑ Yes Q No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure 5
Spillway?: _
Designed Freeboard (in): _
Observed Freeboard (in): / dNo
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ElYes
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes 2fNo
through a waste management or closure plan?
❑ NA ❑ NE
El NA El NE
Structure 6
El NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes PNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes &No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes IyJ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Annlication
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes �;No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 2No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside ofAcce able Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) dr�J 1�cu, •-3Q�7s ��•�I'�7�1 %S'r� d a -
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
Q o ElNA
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
NE
El NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
El Yes
[No ❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
�o El NA
❑ NE
18. is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
El Yeso
YN❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
3.�3
I
-a3-a7 -7 %
.
Reviewerfinspector Name I
r/ Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date:
Page 2 of 3 12128104 Continued

Facility Number: —Q Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes 02 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? if yes, check ❑ Yes O No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box. ❑ W­UP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Other
21.
Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and l"
Rain Inspections ❑
Weather
Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
9<0
❑ NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ N
MINA
El NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
El Yes
4�l No
❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
0No
❑ NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
[21/No
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
❑ No
2NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
[2No
❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
[/No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
l
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
2 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
ENo
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
ZNo
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
El Yes
L�J No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
Page 3 of 3 12128104

r
3
Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 460006 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS460006 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Comoliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Reglon: Washington
Date of Visit: 10/12/2006 Entry Time:10:00 AM Exit Time:
Farm Name: Farm 34
Incident #:
Owner Email:
Malling Address: PO Box 1240 Waverly VA 23890
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm:
SR 1137. 1 mile east of SR 1142 and SR 1137 intersection.
Phone:[phone]
Latitude:36°21'18" Longitude:77°04'18"
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Timothy McKinley Hedgepeth Operator Certification Number: 986038
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name' Earl Queen Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Soil test 1-27-06 lime applied with receipts in records
Waste analyses:
9-8-06 = 1.5
7-6-06 = 2.2
5-12-06 = 3.2
3-14-06 = 2.3
12-20-06 = 2.1
Don't forget the Caliberation!!
Looks good.
Page: 1

Permit: AWS460006 Owner - Facility: Brown's Of Carolina Va Division Facility Number: 460006
Inspection Date: 10/12/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason For Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Farrow to Feeder 1,200 1,191
Total Design Capacity: 1,200
Total SSL.W: 626,400
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
lagoon 34 09/24/97 18.70 61.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWS460006 Owner - Facility: Brown's Of Carolina Va Division
Facility Number: 460006
Inspection Date: 1011212006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ' ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ Cl ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage $ Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
IN
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
❑
IN
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
IN
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
IN
❑
❑
S. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
IN
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Ap licp ation
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS460006 Owner - Facility: Brown's Of Carolina Va Division Facility Number: 460006
Inspection Date: 10/1212006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? ❑
Total P205? ❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? Cl
Evidence of wind drift? . ❑
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type 1
Bermuda Grass (May,
Pasture)
Crop Type 2
Fescue
(Hay)
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■
❑
Cl
Plan(CAWMP)?
15, Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
■
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP? ❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS460006 Owner - Facility: Brown's Of Carolina Va Division Facility Number: 460006
Inspection Date: 10/12/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Other? ❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application? ❑
120 Minute inspections? ❑
Weather code? ❑
Weekly Freeboard? ❑
Transfers? ❑
Rainfall? ❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly? ❑
Waste Analysis? ❑
Annual soil analysis? ❑
Crop yields? ❑
Stocking? ❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)? ❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to Install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
■
❑
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■
❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■
❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWS460006 Owner - Facility: Brown's Of Carolina Va Division
Inspection Date: 10/12/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 460006
Reason for Visit: Routine
Otherlssues
Yes No
NA
NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWO of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑ 0
❑
❑
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ 0
❑
❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ ■
❑
❑
Page: 6

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 460006 Facility Status: Actlye Permit: AWS460006 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Comolianoe Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine _ County: Hertford Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 0212412 _ Entry Time: 02:20 PM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Farm 34 Owner Email:
Owner: Brown's Of Carolina Va Division Phone:004&34.-2109
Mailing Address: PO Box 1240 - Waverly VA 23890
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown, LLC _
Location of Farm: Latitude: 36021'18" _ , Longitude: 77°04'18" _
SR 1137, 1 mile east of SR 1142 and SR 1137 intersection
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
0 Records and Documents 0 Other issues
Certified Operator: David Earl Bowser Operator Certification Number: 27431
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name
Title
24 hour contact name Johnny Hassell Phone:
On -site representative Johnny Hassell Phone:
Phone
Primary Inspector: S A Vinson Phone: [phone]
Ext.20
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Phone:
Phone:
Inspection Summary:
Soils 2/10104 with up to 1.3 T/ac lime required and Cu-Zn levels OK.
'Waste 12/16/04 wl 1.5 IbsN/1000gal.; 10/8/04=1.6; 8/10104=2.0; 6129104=2.2; date? = 3.2; date?=2,6; date?=2.2;
1212/03=1.6; date?=2A; 9/29/03=1.2. Need to find these dates!
21)There are four waste analysis for lagoon 34P in records that need to have a corresponding date to go along with each Report No..
It appears a higher waste anaysis of 2,20lbsN/1000gal was used to balance PAN on 2004-2005 small grain than needed. You can
correct if needed.
. Need to corrrect application windows on small grain from March -April to Sept. -March.
Page: 1

Permit: AWS460006 Owner - Facility: Brown's Of Carolina Va Division
Inspection Date: 02/24/2005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 460006
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Farrow to Feeder 1,200 1,306
Total Design Capacity: 1,200
Total SSLW: 626,400
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
Lagoon 1 34 1 1 1 19.00 19.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWS460006 Owner - Facility: Brown's Of Carolina Va Division Facility Number: 460006
Inspection Date: 02/24/2005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Vlsit: Routine
Dischargas R. Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Yes
❑
No NA NE
0 ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
0 ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑
Yes
0 ❑ ❑
No NA NF
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
M ❑ ❑
If yes, Is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5, Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe erosion,
❑
0 ❑ ❑
seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed andlor managed through a waste management or
❑
■ ❑ ❑
closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
Cl
0 ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks
❑
❑ ❑
andlor wet stacks)
9. Dues any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
❑ ❑
improvement?
Yes
No NAME
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or improvement?
❑
0 ❑ ❑
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding7
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%11a lbs.?
❑
Total P2057
Failure to incorporate manurelsiudge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal
Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain (Wheat,
Barley,
Oats)
Crop Type 3
Fescue (Hay)
Crop Type 4
Page: 3

Permit: AWS460006 Owner - Facility: Brown's Of Carolina Va Division
Facility Number: 460006
Inspection Date: 02/24/2005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Crop Type 5
Yraa Nn NA
NF
Crap Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan(CAWMP)? ❑ ■ ❑
❑
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
■ ❑ ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fall to secure and/or operate per the Irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Records and Documents
❑ IN ❑
Yes No NA
❑
NF
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
0000
20. Does the facility fall to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
moo
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fall to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to Install and maintain a ralnbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
■ ❑
❑
24. Did the facility fall to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑
❑
25. Did the facility fall to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
moo
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■ ❑
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS460006 Owner - Facility: Brown's Of Carolina Va Division Facility Number: 460006
Inspection Date: 02/24/2005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Via It: Routine
E,ecords and ❑acuments
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
YAR
❑
Yes
bin NA NE
❑ 0 ❑
No NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAMP?
❑
❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those mortality
❑
❑
❑
rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality
❑
❑
❑
representative immediately.
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
❑
❑
32. Did Reviewerlinspector fail to discuss reviewCnspection with on -site representative?
❑
0 ❑
❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
■ ❑
❑
Page: 5

Type of Visit 4 Compliance Inspection O Operation Review Q Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Compialnt O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 4ti 6 pate of Visit: 3/24/2004 Time: Z:3o
0 Not Operational Q Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified [3 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:... ......................
FarmName: Fujm.34............................................................................................................ County: UcrjlQrd ........................................... WAR .......
Owner Name: ................................................... xQ.ova'.s.gat.� xoalna:,.Y�,................... Phone No:80.4.-834.4109 ..........................................................
MailingAddress: RQ.BRX.1Z4�...................................................................I.........4............ WAY90Y.-VA ......................................................... U.89.0 ..............
FacilityContact:.............................................................................. Title................................................................. Phone No:..................................................
Onsite Representative: I?t1.Y.id.ftwacr............................................................................. Integrator: ldurphy..BlCatk xL....................................................
Certified Operator: Dtl.Y.ildXa rl........................... agwfiff ............................................. Operator Certification Number:,Z7431 .............................
Location of Farm:
3R 1137, 1 mile east of SR 1142 and SR 1137 intersection, i
®Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 3G • 21 4 113 �� Longitude 77 ' 04 ' _ 11
Design Current
Design Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
Poultry
Capacity Population Cattle
Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
I ❑ Layer
I
I I[] Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish
113 Non -Layer
I
I JE]Non-Dairyl
❑ Farrow to Wean
® Farrow to Feeder
1200
1200
❑Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
1,200
❑ Gilts
Total SSLW
626,40EH
[3 Boars
'Number of Lagoons
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ......... Prima z y .........................................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): 42
12/12/03 Continued

Facility Number: 46-6
Date of Inspection 3124/20Q4
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an .
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
S. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste ARolication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
❑ Yes
®No
❑ Yes
®No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Small Grain Overseed Fescue (Hay)
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
---- _ -- - ? —_ ...----------'----'-----------
b}Does the facility ueed�a wettxJble acre determrnation. -- ---�-'-�— -Yes- El No - -
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional
Air Quality representative immediately.
❑ Yes [:]No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
drawings
of efer to question #)c; Explain any YES an ,answers d/nr"any recommendations or any other comments.
Use
gs of facility to'better explain situations. (use additional pages�as necessary): . ❑ Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
Waste anlaysis dated 9/29/03 w/ 1.2 lbsN/1000ga1.; 12/2/03 w/ 1.6; 2/9/04 w/ 2.21bsN. +
Soils report dated 4/25/03 w/ up to 1.1 T/ac lime required.
Soils report dated 2/10/04 w/ up to 1.3 T/ac lime on "34F2". Follow liming recommendations.
1 & 23) Need to have 3 yrs of past records kept onsite for review, including COC and general permit. Far all Her£ord Co. fames today
eeboard records start on 10/20/03. (need past 3 yrs. for onsite records) The only irrigation records onsite are from 12/28/03 through
t17/04 on small grain cover crop.
There is an addendum for Farm 34's WUP to cover the 30 IbsN/ac limit on a cover crop that is not to be harvested. Anything over the
) lbsN/ac on a crop not to be harvested is not allowed and would be considered overappliction if the crop is not harvested.
Need to correct crop type for IRRI forms for fields G, H, & I. (Fescue or C.Bermuda)
Reviewer/Inspector Name Scott Vins
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: ,Z10
12112103 Continued

Facility Number: 46-6 Date of Inspection 3/24/2004
ARe uired Records & Documents
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? ® Yes ❑ No
22, Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes ®No
23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ® Yes ❑ No
® Waste Application ® Freeboard ® Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
®No
25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
®No
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
. (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
®No
27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
® No
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
® No
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
®No
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
❑ Yes
® No
31. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
❑ Yes
❑ No
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Stocking Form ❑ Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfall ❑ Inspection After V Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
113 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
dditional Comments and/or Diawings
15) There is an area approx. l ac in size that was too wet when overseed was being planted and was not planted. Located in Field 1. r
This needs to be reflected in the irrigation forms and waste should not have been applied to this area. According to OIC this area was
not to be irrigated on by field crew.
There was a discharge of waste from a cracked recycle line located at the middle of the Iagoon beside the path that ran down the
mmwater diversion swale but did not leave the site nor did it reach waters of the State. The leaking pipe was found on 3/22/04. In
future please notify DWQ of any discharge regardless of size. 252-946-6481.
1211210.3

y Technical Assistance Site Visit Report
• Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Natural Resources Conservation Service
O Soil and Water Conservation District
O Other...
Facility Number 46 - © Date: 13103 Time: 8:45 Time On Farm: 90 WARO
Farm Name Farm 34 County Hertford Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address PO Box 759
Rose Hill NC 28458
Onsite
Representative David Bowser, Neil Zahradka Integrator Mur h Brown
Type Of si
Operation Review
Compliance Inspection (pilot only)
Technical Assistance
Confirmation for Removal
❑ No Animals -Date Last Operated:
❑ Operating below threshold
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse
Purpose Of_Vl�t
Op Routine
O Response to DWQIDENR referral
Q Response to DSWCISWCD referral
O Response to complaint/local referral
O Requested by prod ucerlintegrator
O Follow-up
O Emergency
O Other...
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Ca aclt Po ulatlan
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
® Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
1200
1200
❑ Layer
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
GENERAL QUESTIONS:
1. Is waste discharging from any part of the operation and reaching surface waters or wetlands? ❑ yes ® no
2. Is there evidence of a past waste discharge from any part of the operation that waste reached
❑ yes ® no
surface waters or wetlands?
3• Does any problem pose an immediate threat to the integrity of the waste structure (large trees,
[:]yes ® no
seepage, severe erosion, etc.)?
4. Is there evidence of nitrogen over application, hydraulic overloading or excessive ponding
❑ yes ® no
requiring DWQ notification?
6• Is there evidence of improper dead animal disposal that poses a threat to the environment
[]yes Ono
and/or public health?
6. Is the waste level within the structural freeboard elevation range for any waste structure?
❑ yes ® no
Structure) Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Identifier primary
Level (Inches) 25
CROP TYPES 1coastal Bermuda -hay Ismall grain overseed Fescue -ha
SPRAYFIELD
SOIL TYPES CaA AtA
7. What type of technical assistance does the onsite representative feel is needed? (list in comment section)
03/10/03

46 - 6 Date:
213/03
ER
ffFlber
Q No assistance provided/requested
ste spill leaving siteTECHNICAL
ASSISTANCE Needed
Provided
ste spill contained on site25.
Waste Plan Revision or Amendment
❑
❑vel
in structural freeboard
26. Waste Plan Conditional Amendment
❑
❑
❑ 11. Level in storm storage
27. Review or Evaluate Waste Plan w/producer
❑
❑
❑ 12. Waste structure integrity compromised
❑ 13. Waste structure needs maintenance
28. Forms Need (list In comment section)
❑
El
29. Missing Components (list in comments)
❑
❑
❑ 14. Over application >= 10% & 10 lbs.
2H.0200
❑
❑
[115. Over application < 10% or < 10 lbs.
30. re -certification
❑ 16. Hydraulic overloading
31. Five & Thirty day Plans of Action (PoA)
❑
❑
32. Irrigation record keeping assistance
❑
❑
❑ 17. Deficient irrigation records
❑ 18. Late/missing waste analysis
33. Organize/computerization of records
❑
❑
❑ 19. Late/missing lagoon level records
34. Sludge Evaluation
❑
❑
❑ 20. Late/missing soils analysis
❑ 21. Crop needs improvement
35. Sludge or Closure Plan
❑
❑
❑ 22. Crop inconsistent with waste plan
36. Sludge removallclosure procedures
❑
❑
37. Waste Structure Evaluation
®
❑
[123. Irrigation maintenance deficiency
❑ 24. Deficient sprayfield conditions
38. Structure Needs Improvement
❑
❑
39. Operation & Maintenance Improvements
❑
❑
40. Marker checkicalibration
❑
❑
Regulatory Referrals
41. Site evaluation
❑
❑
❑ Referred to DWQ Date:
42. Irrigation Calibration
❑
❑
❑ Referred to NCDA Date:
43. Irrigation design/installation
❑
❑
El Other..,
system
Date:
44. Secure irrigation information (maps, etc.)
❑
❑
LIST IMPROVEMENTS
45. Operating improvements (pull signs, etc.)
❑
❑
11. MADE BY OPERATION
46. Wettable Acre Determination
❑
❑
47. Evaluate WAD certification/rechecks
48. Crop evaluation/recommendations
❑
❑
Lagoon level markers calibrated in spring 2002
2.
49. Drainage worklevaluation
❑
❑
Incorporated new record keeping system
50. Land shaping, subsolling, aeration, etc.
51. Runoff control, stormwater diversion, etc.
❑
El
❑
❑
3' Rye was drilled into dike walls to better establish
vegetation
52. Buffer Improvements
53. Field measurements(GPS, surveying, etc.)
El
❑
❑
4. Field shaping for sprayfields under hydrants Er&F
54. Mortality BMPs
❑
❑
with Coastal Bermuda re -sprigged in April 2002
55. Waste operator education (NPDES)
❑
❑
5.
56. Operation & maintenance education
❑
❑
57. Record keeping education
6
58. Crop/forage management education
❑
❑
59. Soil and/or waste sampling education
❑
❑
03/10/03

P
Facility Number 46 - ® Date: 213103
COMMENTS:
Last waste analysis dated 10-2-02 at 1.5 Ibs PAN11000 gal. Previous report dated 8-5-02 at 2.2 Ibs PAN11000 gal.
Last soils report dated 2-28-02 with up to 1.1 Tlacre of lime needed. No lime was applied in 2002. Copper and zinc levels
fithin acceptable range.
Soil & Water Conservation notified DWQ Central Office of address change by e-mail.
4. Wettable Acres Determination recheck conducted. New certification on site is dated 4-2-02 and signed by techncial
pecialist Dawn Williamson. New map provided and compuational worksheets corrected. Waste plan was revised 4-2-02
+ith an overall PAN deficit of 3,499 lbs. No further rechecks needed.
9. Need to separate Fescue records with new 2002-03 records starting in August. No over application has occurred.
Waste last applied 12-10-02 on small grain overseed. Waste sample taken last week and awaiting results. Remember to
alculate application event with analysis dated within 60 days of the event.
5. Sprayfield conditions wet at this time. Rye overseed is established but marginal.
TECHNICAL SPECIALIST jPat Hooper
SIGNATURE
Date Entered: 15103 1 Entered By: jPat Hooper
03/10/03

Facility Number Date of Visit: 10/41Z001 Time: 11:00 am Printed on: 11/1/2001
p Not operational p Below Threshold
p Permitted ■ Certified o Conditionally Certified p Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: Farm 34 County: Hertfor.d........................................... ..WARQ.......
Owner Name:
Smithfield Carroll's Farms Phone No: 804-834-2109
Mailing Address: F..1r.-Rox.12A ...................................................................................... Waye ly.. YA......................................................... Z3,990 .............
Facility Contact:
Title:
PhoneNo: ....................................................
Onsite Representative: R aald..Y.inrint......................................................................... Integrator: Carxoll'sX..oads..ofXA,,.lnc..............................
Certified Operator:Rouald.F............................. Vincent ............................................. Operator Certification Number: 18S1.6.............................
Location of Farm:
mile east of SR 1142 and SK 1137 intersection. A
V
N Swine p Poultry p Cattle p horse Latitude ®• ©� ®�� Longitude ©• ®� ®S'
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
p Wean to Feeder
p Feeder to Fmts
13 Farrow to Wean
® Farrow to PROF
Farrow to Fims
p Gilts
p Boars
Design' Current Design! Current .`
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
p Layer p Dairy
p Non -Layer I Ip Non -Dairy
4
Other
Total Design Capacity 1,200
Total SSLW 1 626,400 ji
Number of Lagoons 0 p u sur ace rams resen p agoon rea p pray �e rea
HolcCing Ponds 1 Salid'Traps'"� p No Liquid Waste Management Sys em
Discharges & Stream ImRacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: © Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes p No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes p No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes p No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? [3 Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? p Spillway la Yes 11 No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure S Structure 6
Identifier: Pxlrztary..........................................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard(inches) .18.................................................... ................................... .................................... .................................... ....................................

.1i
ace i y Number: 46_ 6 7 Date of Inspection ® Printed on: 11/6/2001
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? (If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. is there evidence of over application? [p Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
p Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
p Yes ®No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ® No
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Fescue (Hay) Small Grain Overseed
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre detenmination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
p Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ig No
p Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p No violations or deficiencies were noted urmg is visa , You will receive no further correspondence about is vise
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any "YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary): L(� Field Copy ❑Final Notes
waste analysis aatea zsr i/u i at i .� ins nr j uuu gals.
Waste analysis dated 5/30/01 at 2.5 lbs N/1000 gals.
Waste analysis dated 4/2/01 at 2.1 lbs N/1000 gals.
Waste analysis dated 2/9/01 at 2.0 lbs N/l000 gals.
* Soil analysis dated 1/29/01 with little lime required (less than 1 T/acre).
(SEE PAGE 3) .
Reviewer/Inspector Name Scott Vinson entered by Ann Tyndall
1V
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

05103101
Continued
Facility Number: 46 6 Date of Inspection FTMUMM
Printed on: 11/1/2001
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below 0 Yes p No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? p Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, p Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? p Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) p Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? p Yes ® No
32: Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
p Yes p No
*k Wastes lan�and r later3irri�"ationiecord`s�v►� �lieconverkedttoa"ivotl ull�basisversus tlie�'currentfper'T fie d�`' �r
7p�scs tr- r'*g c. = 31
i ♦ J
basis Neil Zal�radlca°will+sta Ltrt he new ecordFkeepmg ih(2 02.t i4 �' 3 k
_rp •.-.id:. Y r -'., }, ..�. .dry„ L. N' ''f .�I•• R. 1
* Contuiue efforts to'estabhsh4good�stand's`of fescuefand ber'in &.
r # ` ' r .i SJ R/�i � � ii� '1�n 1 i l !•t " 1
�'.,a-+�'�•.'+S3t,YrY
},'
0�Lihc°L,r""
;!
tt�� r{•l• r�yt� y - rTf �S t, rJ�..tt dRy° rfzt s { ;'{" ?' ,�„ .>r'x>~'µ
�'C��r
F"•`nrl�p,`.U'f`ri- � s-5 -r '. :+;�. rr •R!. �. '�-'J `°i`. 5! ,�� ,.
. �:;� �. � ,� �,, E .l �..r��'.rr`i,�e'a, rJi *'?irr"51��"� �. 3: � r : f i z i -s �+"• r ' r - w• M : _
4 Y
`" r - ° r in -�' +f *', I rS,�T J.LFy-,y L r, w ,„. - f a r ! S ,ley ,.r t • '.� �.+a .' � t I x �Z.
,: r t 1 i eta r j a •Xa `� i_ ,rb c#�y1 i4,: J YLi yu ti4Gt} i ,� d �. r 1 `n.' �tl _
ll,._H F 4 :L ZZ
SJ" Y'� r ,-�� rg-1 `.�+r:r �'�ilr1 '✓'�^:R F'i r 1
�-- �s , r n-" s rf •� ISM 3 r'ntii rd'[ q ..✓" „ !,e �tti� '.r'} 1 - ' e r
N n ti J.J �. ry S J.a .,.•-'ti;L. _ �f'ir r-+J V 7 ,.� S, y ,'
, 5 + r6 -
_ *T =.t -3`
r<. _1`�`^ S !� -.r t r 1:• �i�- nr�i 'Y :al 4 r' �f t r
F �,...a, . -a �"� 1w.73ki - r• '�,�r^ a �� ""•yi ,lr� t- F.-, r'�ir '�' .+�i,—�. f � °�1. C r -r - r' +..
5. 4.
S*�' YC,Y �•.zy'i r'f-L-�/.! 713•t!�' ^�-,•�, Y"'7�" a �ti1..-....}� ii'a
n •, Ili „ 1 J w A- ', '.7�, .L F Y '% b;-,
-
wrl
.v
, _... `• ,i'ii ice` +.t• '' -
••l � f3 ry�T -_.ice � ° :.i N fi ' 'j L - `" 1." ..
i:. .-. - . .r:�N,i+...°:J�i.aidr�7..: 1r .-. 1.'•. Z r. .•� ro-F,:,x;,:':.4 —: s.:. _. s-:i:»i.nF. - ., r - ... � r -

ot4l0F WArF9QG Michael F. Easley
Govemor
5 r- William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
�_ Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Kerr T. Stevens
Division of Water Quality
To: Producer
From: Scott Vinson
Environments Engmeer
Washington Regional Office
Subject: Animal Compliance Inspection
Year 2001
Enclosed please find a copy of the Compliance Site Inspection (as viewed in the DWQ database) conducted at the referenced
facility by the Division of Water Quality from the Washington Regional Office. Please read this inspection and keep it
with all other documents pertaining to your animal operation for future inspections.
In general, these inspections included verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP);
(2) the farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC 21-1.0217, Senate Bill 1217, and the Certified Animal
Waste Management Plan; (3) the farm operation's waste management system is being operated properly under the direction of a
Certified Operator; (4) the required records are being kept; and (5) there are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or runoff.
As a reminder, please note the following comments, which are conditions of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan and
the General Permit; therefore, these items must be implemented:
rp The maximum waste level in lagoons/storage ponds shall not exceed that specified in the CAWMP. At a minimum,
maximum waste level for waste for lagoons/storage ponds must not exceed the level that provides adequate storage to
contain 25 year, 24 hour storm -event plus an additional foot of structural freeboard.
:p An analysis of the liquid animal waste from the lagoon shall be conducted as close to the time of application as practical and
at least within 60 days (before or after) of the date of application. This analysis shall include the following parameters:
Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Zinc and Copper.
9 Soil analysis is required annually. Lime is to be applied to each receiving crop as recommended by the soil analysis,
(p The following records are required: off -site solids removal, maintenance, repair, waste/soil analysis and land irrigation
records. These records should be maintained by the facility owner/manager in chronological and legible form for a
minimum of three years.
(p Land application rates shall be in accordance with the CAWMP. In no case shall land a lication rates exceed the Plant
Available Nitrogen TAID rate for the receiving cro or result in runoff during any given application.
q) All grassed waterways shall have a stable outlet with adequate capacity to prevent ponding or flooding damages. The outlet
can be another vegetated channel, an earth ditch, stabilization structure, or other suitable outlets.
rP It is suggested not a requirement, to keep crop yield information far future use to update your waste management plan.
You will need three years of crop yield data before your plan can be updated.
For your information, any swine facility that has a discharge to surface waters of the State will have to apply for a National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit with the Division of Water Quality, effective January 1, 2001.
Thank you for your assistance and cooperation during the inspection. If you have any questions, please contact me at 252.946-
6481, ext. 321 or your Technical Specialist.
Cc: WaRO
SAV Files
943 Washington Square Mall Washington, NC 27889 252-946-6481 (Telephone) 252-946-9215 (Fax)

State of North Carolina
.Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
June 5, 2000
Mr. Rudy Grammer
Smithfield Carroll's Farms
Post Office Box 1240
Waverly, Virginia 23890
SUBJECT: Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
Smithfield Carroll's Farms
Facility No. #46-7, 46-9, 46-11,�46-6,
Hertford County
Dear Mr. Grammer:
Enclosed please find copies of the Animal Feedlot Operation Site inspections (asviewed in
DWQ database) conducted at the referenced facility by the Division of Water Quality from the
Washington Regional Office. Please read these inspections and keep with all other
documents pertaining to your animal operation for future inspections.
In general, these inspections included verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified Animal Waste_
Management Plan (CAWMP); (2) the farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15
NCAC 2H.0217, Senate Bill 1217, and the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan; (3) the
farm operation's waste management system is being operated properly under the direction of a
Certified Operator; (4) the required records are being kept; (5) there are no signs of seepage,
erosion, and/or runoff.
As a reminder, please note the following which are conditions of the Certified Animal Waste
Management Plan and the general permit therefore these items must be implemented:
cp The maximum waste level in lagoons/storage ponds shall not exceed that specified in the
CAWMP. At a minimum, maximum waste level for waste for lagoons/storage ponds must not
exceed the level that provides adequate storage to contain 25 year, 24 hours storm event .plus an
additional foot of structural freeboard.
(p An analysis of the liquid animal waste from the lagoon shall be conducted as close to the time
of application as practical and at least within 60 days (before or after) of the date of application.
This analysis shall include the following parameters: Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Zinc and Copper.
cp Soil analysis is required annually

Page Two
Grammer
#46-7, _,46-9, 46-11, A 46-6, -146710
(p The following records are required: rainfall and lagoon level data, off -site solids removal,
maintenance, repair, waste/sod analysis and land irrigation' records. These records should be
maintained by the facilityowner/manager in chronological and legible form for a minimum of
three years.
cp Land application rates shall be in accordance with the CAMP. In no case shall ]and
- `result m runoffdurim any_gXxve" ap.Plication..` :'
t
Keep lagoons/storage ponds free''of foreign debris including, but not limited to tires, bottles,
plastic products, light bulbs;"gl6v_ es, syringes or any other solids waste.
q)- Thelagoonareas sh;�uld be kept mowed or otherwise controlled and accessible. High grass
does not allow you to conduct it thorough inspection of the lagoon area for seepage, rodent
damage, etc..
cp All grassed waterways shall have a stable outlet with adequate capacity to prevent ponding or
f flooding damages. The outlet can be another vegetated channel, an earth ditch, stabilization
structure; or other suitable outlets.
rp It is suggested not required to keep crop yield information for future use to update your waste_
W management plan. You willneed three years of crop yield data before your plan can be
updated.
Thank you for your assistance and cooperation during the inspection. Ifyou have any questions,
please contact me at-919/946-6481, ext. 318 or your Technical Specialist.
Sincerely,
Lyn B. Hardison
Environmental Specialist
Cc: Hertford NRCS
(,GaRO
LBH files
943 Washington Square Mall, Wass ington, North Carolina 27889 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

Type of Visit S Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit S Routine O Complaint O Follow up 0 Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 46 6 Date of Visit 411012000 Printed on: 4/2012000
0 Not Operational Q Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified 0 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: . ............ . .
FarmName: k:airm. 4............................................................................................................ County: Ike[tjaCjd ............ ..................... ..__.. W.tlRQ.... ...
Owner Name:...................................................AAiltiliield..lw�trli'.S.Af �'a................ Phone Na: �A4:4.,>i!09..................................._....................
Facility Contact: ..............................................................................Title .... .............. Phone No
MailingAddress: i,af... !?X.1,� Q...................................................................................... W.a.Y.er1Y..YA.......... ............................................... 23.89.0 .............
Onsite Representative:dy..Cx]Cipl[�llrxa.�pAla�d..yAa4wt<Alxs.�r�.�aLna�J[........, Integrator:S�tliltf�A�ai.GaJ[TQ�IS.A.C.Y.Rt� ...............................
Certified Operator:Lee........................................... Fajr.mcr ............................................ Operator Certification Number:Z44QZ
Location of Farm:
.........................................................................................................................................••••.......................................................................................................I....................
7..ir�t�rs��tiQn....................................................................................................................................
T
®Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Hor Latitude 36 • 2] 18 " Longitude 77 • tl4 ' ><8
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
® Farrow to Feeder
1200
1200
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
❑ Other . •'�,j•' •- i... ._ .. ' S. =
Total -Design Capacity 1,200
.Totd SSL-W1. 626,400
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes IN No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ® No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ® No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ® No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ®No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
❑ Yes ® No
Structure 6
Identifier: ................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): 21.5
__ L....r.

Continued on back
Facility Number: 46-6 Date of Inspection 4/10/2000 Printed on: 4/20/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? � ❑Yes ®No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? IN Yes ❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any swctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ®No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Yes ®No
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Small Grain Overseed Corn Rye
.13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ®No
14• a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
RenUired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (i6 irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24." Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? _
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
NO-yiolatioas'or ilefcrencies-were:tioted4datibttbis'vii$it: *Pori will'receive npfrirtber
carrespondence about this :visit. ..... • .. ' ::.:: ' ' .:::: ::: ' :::. :
Records available for review.
Waste analysis: 2/4/00 1.1
Soil analysis is up-to-date. Awaiting next results.
Irrigation and freeboards: Records are up-to-date.
Also keeping a maintenance log (condition of pipes, vegetation; rainfall, etc.)
Keep up the good work on the records.
Freeboard levels <19>12 inches in January. DWQ was notified.
SEE PAGE: 3
❑ Yes ® No
❑Yes ®No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
®No
❑ Yes
®No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
IN No
❑ Yes
® No
`I r:
Reviewer/Inspector Name MOVE-(, MR .n' �.a

i�
►� Rev iewer/lnspector Signature: Date_
Facility Number: 46-6 Date of Inspection 4/10/2000 Printed on: 4/20/2000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
7. Continue your efforts to improve the vegetation on the dike wall.
Bare spots in areas where vehicles travel.
Practice weed control on dike wall and in spray field.
The field adjacent to lagoon appears to be the wettest field.
If you have any questions, contact me at 252-946-6481, extension 318.
., 1

atsD '4to _7
AIL— 9
44-F( WK-0
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and
Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Mr. Rudy Grammer
Carroll's Foods of VA, Inc.
P.O. Box I240
Waverly, VA 23890
A-10 O&EM
Nc'DENR
NORTH CARQ6.INA 0g:F-ARTMENT OF
ENvIR4NMENT ANd NATURAL RESOURCES
January 25, 2000
SUBJECT: Animal Feedlot Operation Compliance Inspections
Farm 31, Facility No. 46 - 9
Farm 40, Facility No. 46 - 7 .lr�
Farm 34, Facility No. 'F
Farm 25 & 26, Facility o. 46 - 11
Hertford County
Dear Mr. Grammer:
On December 2I, 1999, I conducted an Animal Feedlot Operation Compliance Inspections at the
referenced facilities. Overall, the operations were found to be in satisfactory' condition. A copy of each
inspection report is attached for your review.
In general, this inspection includes verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan (CAWMP); (2) the farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC 2H.0217, Senate
Bill 1217, and the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan; (3) the farm operation's waste management
system is being operated properly under the direction of a Certified Operator; (4) the required records are
being kept; (5) there are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or runoff.
The recommendations and/or comments regarding your inspections can be found in the continent section of
the attached inspection forms. It is very important as the owner and Operator in Charge that you address any
noted concerns, as soon as possible.
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance during the inspections. Should you have further questions
or comments regarding these inspections, do not hesitate to call me at [phone], ext. 321.
Sincerely,
S. CL,—LL, --
Daphne B. Cullom
Environmental Specialist II
cc; HeOrd County SWCD Office
aRO
943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, North Carolina 27889
Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

of
review O Other
P Facility Number
Date of Inspection 12-21-99
46 9
Time of Inspection E� 24 hr. (hh:mm)
8 Permitted B Certified Q Conditionally Certified [Q Registered 0 Not O erational Date Last Operated: p ..........................
FarmName: Fit m.31............................................................................................................ County: Hertfiard ........................................... W..aRO........
Owner Name:
Facility Contact:
Smithfield.Car.011N.EArma............... Phone No: 8.Q4-.U.4-21Q9...........................................................
Title:
Phone No:
MailingAddress: P..O...Haa.114Q....................................................................................... aver+lX..Y.A.......................................................... 2389.0.............
Onsite Representative: Rudy .Granamer.Alvin.bear.Lee.F.armer.11l............. Integrator: CArmK'.s.Fafuds.Qf.Y.A,.IAc...............................
Certified Operator: AMAY................................... Unit Operator Certification Number..1850.8.............................
Location of Farm:
......................................................................................................................_................................................................................................................................................... �
Latitude =*=, =- Longitude =• =' 11-
Swine
Design
Capacity
Current
Population
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Pop ulation Cattle Ca acit Po ulation
❑Layer ❑ Davy
❑ Non -Layer ID Non -Dairy
10 Other
Total Design Capacity 1,000
Total SSLW 1,417,000
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
® Farrow to Finish
1000
—1000
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
I .. .. -Number of Lagoons_ ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field Area ' I
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps E:= JE1 No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream lmpacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. if discharge is observed. did it reach Water of the State? (If yes. notify DRrQ)
c. If discharge is observed, whit is the estimated flow in gal/mot?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: ...................................
Freeboard (inches): ............... 19..................
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
Structure 6
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back

Facility Number: 46-9
Date oT Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? -
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
Immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waite Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
I2. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Hay) _ Small Grain Overseed
Printed on 12/29199
12-21-99
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? [:]Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
violatere:noted:d.uriitk t*i4visit:; Y-otti will:receive no ffift ih :r:
-:_correspondence about this visit. - ::::: ::: :::::: :: :: :::::::::
-board levels Pre Floyd - 9-7-99: # 31 P =18", # 31 S = 19 ; Post Floyd - 9-27-99: # 31 P = 7", 4 31 S = 7"
records of the CAWMP are complete, including irrigation records.
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
r
Reviewerllmpector Name
RPa•inwPrJrn¢nPrtnr Cirt�atn � � %�, � � , N�� llata� ` � �� � �QO�

Printed on 12/29199
Facility Number. 46-9 Date of Inspection F 12721-99
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge attor below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No

..-....., - - ..... ... ..._.....
13 Diihi011 Of.SOIi. A1ad Wete� Coase'rvat
Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-u of DW2 inspection 0 Follo'A'-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number 46 7 Date of Inspection 12-21-99
Time of Inspection [ _ 24 hr. (hh:mm)
H Permitted IM Certified © Conditionally Certified ❑ Registered ©riot O crational Date Last Operated:
FarmName: ).&C1t A.Q............................................................................................................ County: He rMrd........................................... W-RO.......
Owner Name: ................................................... Smithfield.Cart.911N.Ea rma............... Phone No: 13Q 4.�2.1Q2................... ........................................
FacilityContact: .............................................................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
MailingAddress: P.10...Sox.124P...................................................................................... Waverly ...Y.A.......................................................... 238.911 .............
Onsite Representative: B,ultlJ,_xr t110.mc r..l 9jj.'.�llttlC: A........ .................................... Integrator: gk,CAII'.a.) dS.R[.Y���IOtlt...............................
Certified Operator: p RQIIWd.E ............................... Ylp&eptt............................................. Operator Certification Number:1U16 .............................
Location of Farm:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------•------------------------.....------------------------.....------------------------.....-----------•........................................
5824�Za ?.I . le.�a�aeth o� l etWe)xepa att� vxesx.a i�......................................................................................................................................._.._........---•--......
----
Latitude E 36 • 17 12 Longitude 76 • S3 24 µ T
Design Current
Swine Canneity Ponulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
N Farrow to Wean
2400
—2400
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer I❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer I 1 10 Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 2,400
Total SSLW 1,039,200
Number of Lagoons ; ? �❑ Subsurface Drains Present 11EILagoonArea 1❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds/ Solid Traps r. ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Int acts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 0 No
Dioharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observc;d, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is obsci— ed, did it reach Water of the State? (Ifyes. notify DWQ) ❑ Yes [:]No
c. If discharge is observed, ghat is the esihnated flow in gal/ntiu?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon m,stetn? (If yes, notifi- DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes N No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ...................................................................... .............................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): 24
...............................................................................................................................................................................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (iel trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
3l23/99 Continued an hack

Printed on 12/29199
(Facility Number: 46-7 I Date of IRspection 12-21-99
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes N No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes N No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes N No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes N No
Waste ADDlication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes N No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Yes N No
12. Crop type Corn (Silage & Grain) Rye Peanuts
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes N No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes N No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes N No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? ❑ Yes N No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ❑ Yes N No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes ® No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ® No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes N No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes N No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes ® No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes N No
El' : Nd violations:or:d'eficiencies,were:noted;during this visit:; You will:receive:no t'urtlier: ;
correspondence about this.visit
eboard - Pre Floyd: 9-6-99 = 43" & 19"; Post Floyd: 9-27-99 = 18" & 19"
records of the CAWMP are complete, including irrigation records with nitrogen balance.
11 maintained facility.
1 `► I
3a� ����'�3�'"Qaarwlc Vrc.rnvwn�+s-�e.��p�...�r+,:�r..a�
Reviewer/Inspector Name Daphne B: Cullom ,Entered 6*, L Hardeson �y;� n_ N. ==
RavipwarITn¢npetnr Civnwfiiraipr ilwtae 7 ZGOQ

Printed on 12129I99
Facility Number. 46-7 Date of Inspection 12-21-99
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
❑ Yes
❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
❑ Yes
® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the Iand application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
❑ Yes
® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
❑ Yes
® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
❑ Yes
® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes
❑ No

10 Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Facility Number 46 6 Date of Inspection 12-21-99
Time of Inspection O 24 hr. (hh:mm)
IM Permitted 0 Certified ❑ Conditionally Certified ❑ Registered ❑ Not O erational Date Las[ Operated; ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
FarmName: Faun.34............................................................................................................ County: Hert$ard ........................................... WAAA.......
Owner Name: ................................................... Smithfield_Carmll'a.Farmx............... Phone No: S.Q.4-834-21.Q9...........................................................
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone No:
MailingAddress: P.0...1101.1240 ......................................................................................W..averly..XA.......................................................... 2389..0.............
Onsite Representative: Rudy .Siratnmer.Ali'hl.1.atAc.1 .Parmrr..l'11............. Integrator: C.aFr.O.11:x.)!.OA.dS.R1.V.A..1AC...............................
Certified Operator: Alvin ....................................... Latte.:............................................... Operator Certification Number: .ISS0..8.............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude 36 • 1 21 18 Longitude 77 • 04 1 18 {f
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
❑
Wean to Feeder
❑
Feeder to Finish
❑
Farrow to Wean
®
Farrow to Feeder
1200
—1200
❑
Farrow to Finish
❑
Gilts
❑
Boars
Number of Lagoons
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps
Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Layer
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Other
Dischartes & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Dairy
Total Design Capacity 1 1,200
Total SSLW 626,400
Subsurface Drains PresentIO Lagoon Area JOSpraiFiehlArea
No Liquid Waste
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (Ifyes. notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed; what is the es iniated flow in eal/nrin?
d. Does discharge b.pass a lagoon system? (Ifyes, notiN DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Idcntifwr:
Freeboard (inches): ...............19...................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
3/23/99 seepage, etc.)
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes []No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
® No
[]Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
Structure 6
...............................
...............................
❑ Yes
❑ No
Continued on back

Facility Number: 46-6 Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Pouding ❑ PAN
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Hay) _ Small Grain Overseed Corn (Silage & Grain)
Printed on 12/29/99
12-21-99
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
N No
❑ Yes
N No
❑ Yes
N No
❑ Yes
N No
❑ Yes
N No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes N No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
® No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
N No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
N No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
N No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
N No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
N No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
N No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
N No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
N No
�Tti violations: tir:d'efciencies were;noted:dUring this t:; You will receive no furtiie�:
corresnondence about this- visit. . : .:.:... : .:.:::: ' :::.: : :: :::: ::::: :
acility flooded during Hurricane Floyd. Pre Floyd freeboard was 12" on 9-7-99, Post Floyd freeboard 9-20-99 was 1".
A records of the CAWMP are complete, including irrigation records.
acility flooded following Hurricane Floyd. Structural integrity is adequate.
ReviewerllnspectorName DaphaeB.;Cullomsia�y.:Enieredhvl,:,Hardison't:;rMt� mfm�t_•.. E }
Ravinworlincnnrtor Cianativrn R (� n _ � ThatA! — L-7 2_6cc]

Printed on 12129/99
Facility Number: 46--6 Date of Inspection 12-21-99
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge atlor below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ®No
roads, building structure, and/or public proper(y)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fau(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No

[�.Diyision:of S70'.a ,W
1316K6iop'of.Soil and W
®'Dis ision:o%Water.Qu>
O'Other:AReQcy.!;; pera
19 Routine O Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number 46 11
Date of Inspection F 12-21-99
- - Time of Inspection 930 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Permitted IM Certified ❑ Conditionally Certified ❑ Registered 10 Not Operational Date Last Operated:
FarmName: F.25.&.2G................................................................................................. County: HerMard ........................................... W�►RQ.......
Owner Name:...................................................,Smithfield.ca,rxQU's.Farms............... Phone No: 8.0.4.-#34-110Q.......................
.............................
FacilityContact: .............................................................................. Title................................................................. Phone No:...................................................
MailingAddress: LO.-Box.1244...................................................................................... W..averV..�'A......................................................... 7-389Q .............
Onsite Representative: 8udy..Gra13omer..t1►hia.Laim..............
integrator: ax"ll'a.Ft ds.a£.Y.A,.1.ar ...............................
Certified Operator: ,A,IYJn.P................... 1.anx.................................................... Operator Certification Number: 1850.8 .............................
Location of Farm:
f........................... ............ ....................... ............................. ................... .......................................................... ...................... .................. --......... ............ ................................
Latitude r�9 6 6& Longitude • 4 �u
Design Current
Design Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
Poultry
Capacity Population Cattle
Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Layer[[]Dairy__
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Non -Layer
I
I
1E] Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Other
® Farrow to Finish
2000
—2000
Total Design Capacity
2,000
❑ Gilts
Total SSLW
2,8349000
❑ Boars
Number of Lagoons 4 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps �' ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. Ifdischarge is observed, n-as the conveyance man-made`?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b. If discharge is obsen'ed, did it reach Water of flue State? (Ifyes. notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
❑ No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
❑ Yes
❑ No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Stricture 6
Identifier:—1.2S.Ptmazy.... ...2,5.&Pmaday....... #E.2.G.P.>anaaY--•.. A.2.f.S ty........................ ................................................
Freeboardinches 1.Q.............................. ..:2Z!............. .............. 19............. .................. 1.8.'............... .................................... .......
.............................
S. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
❑ Yes
❑ No
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99
Continued on back

Facility Number: 46— l l Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
Printed on 12/29199
12-21-99
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
12. Crop type Corn (Silage & Grain) , Fescue (Hay) Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Small Grain Overseed
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? [:]Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Reouired Records &.Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
�: . .No. voiations:ardefde'es-were.n0',during tis*Wt:: Y6ti wil:rceive'no urtber
-corresnondence nbout this.visit.'
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
[:]Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
-board - Pre Floyd: 9-7-99 - # 25P = 25", # 25S = 25", # 26P = 1 I", # 26S = 11"; Post Floyd: 9-20-99 - # 25P = 4", # 25S = 4". #
= 3", # 26S = 3".
records of the CAWMP is complete, including irrigation records with nitrogen balance.
z
Reviewer/Inspector Name lDapSne B:1,_Ciilloiii9M? Enteiel
ReviPWPr/fnenm-tnr CianAtura D . &{` 6v"�
nAtP! 1- a -I - Zoo 0

..Printed on 12/29/99
Facility Number: 46--11 Date of Inspection 12-21-99
Odor issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the Iagoon? ❑ Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? [:]Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/tempormy cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No