460006_ENFORCEMENT_20171231

NUH I H UAHULINA
Department of Environmental Qual
II

_ (R
��` :.mow iu :�n-`,w..�:.+ rp .� tea„ � .�w rw
������1����

Water Rcsaurces
ENV 1170NMENI AL OU ALIIY
April 11, 2016
Murphy -Brown LLC
Farm 34
PO Box 1240
Waverly, Virginia 23890
Subject: Notice of Deficiency - Freeboard Level
Farm 34 #46-06
AWS 460006
Hertford County
NOD-2016-PC-0063
Dear Murphy -Brown:
PAT MCCRORY
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
I .l r,.,.:-,r
We have noted chronic rainfall events in North Carolina that are historic rainfall totals in some
areas. Thank you for your recent call regarding the freeboard levels at your facilities On
February 25, 2016, during a telephone conversation with staff of the NC Division of Water
Resources (DWR), you reported a high freeboard level (18.5 inches) in the primary lagoon.
Please be advised that failure to maintain waste levels in your lagoon/storage ponds in
accordance with the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan and with Condition V.
2. of NC Swine Waste System General Permit could result in other actions being taken by the
Division in response to compliance matters.
Deficiency 1: On February 25, 2016, a lagoon/storage pond level was documented at 18.5 inches
of freeboard at the primary lagoon. A level of 19 inches is the maximum level allowed by your
permit and Certified Animal Waste Management Plan,
Thank you for submitting a 30-day Plan of Action on February 25, 2016. Take all necessary
additional steps to insure lagoon levels remain in compliance with Section 2 of your permit.
Please work to ensure that your facility is managed in a way to maintain compliance with permit
and animal waste management plan requirements, Failure to comply with conditions in a permit
may result in a recommendation of enforcement action, to the Director of the Division of Water
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Water Resources —Water Quality Regional Operations —Washington Regional Once
943 Washington Square Mail, Washington, NC 27889
252-946.6481

April 11, 2016
Farm 34
Cont. page Two
Quality who may issue a civil penalty assessment of not more that twenty-five thousand
($25,000) dollars against any "person" who violates or fails to act in accordance with the terms,
conditions, or requirements of a permit under authority of G.S. 143-215.6A. To minimize the
potential for any possible future compliance matters attributable to prolonged wet weather
conditions, you may wish to review your animal waste management system design, as well as the
waste plan itself, for any potentially beneficial modifications and/or improvements.
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please contact me at (252)-945-3939.
Sincerely,
1
David May
Water Quality Regional Operations Supervisor
Washington Regional Office
Cc: DWR-WQROS-CAFO Unit -Central Office
Hertford County Soil and Water Conservation Disrict
NCDSWC - WaRO
WaRO Compliance Animal Files
mds Files

P*
PLAN OF ACTION(Post) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
Facility Number: 46-06 County:
Hertford
Facility Name: Farm 8134
Certified Operator Name: Elena Wiggens Operator Number: 987282
1. Current liquid level(s) in inches as measured from the current liquid level in the lagoon to the
lowest point on the top of the dam for lagoons without spillways; and from the current liquid level
in the lagoon to the bottom of the spillway for lagoons with spillways.
Lagoon Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3 Lagoon 4 Lagoon 5
Lagoon Name/ID: 34
5pillway(Y or N): N
Level(inches): 16.5
2. Check all applicable items
Liquid level is within the designed structural freeboard elevations of one or more structures.
Five and 30 day Plans of Action are attached. Hydraulic and agronomic balances are
within acceptable ranges.
X Liquid level is within the 26 year 24 hour storm elevations for one or more structures. A
30 day Plan of Action is attached. Agronomic balance Is within acceptable range.
Waste is to be pumped and hauled to off site locations. Bolume and PAN content of waste
to be pumped and hauled Is reflected in section III tables. included within this plan is a list
of the proposed sites with related facility numbers, number of acres and receiving crop
information. Contact and secure approval from the DWQ prior to transfer of waste to a site
not covered in the facility's CAWMP.
Operation will be partially or fully depopulated.
*Attach a complete schedule with corresponding animal units and dates fro depopulation
*if animals are to be moved to another permitted facility, provide facility number, lagoon
freeboard levels and herd population for the receiving facility
3, Earliest possible date to begin land application of waste: as conditions permit
I hereby certify that I have reviewed the information listed above and included within the
attached Plan of Action, and to the best of my knowledge and ability, the Information Is
accurate and correct.
MWRhj Brown, LLC Phone
ity Owq ger {print)
Date:
Facility Owner/Manager (signature)
910-293-3434
212612016
I . W-W/&006,0/
fG-aa�,3

I
P
PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
1. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Namelidentifier (ID): 34
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr./24 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a, current liquid level according to marker 18,5 inches
b. designed 25 yr.124 hr. storm & structural freeboard 19,4 inches
c. line b - fine a (inches in red zone) = 0.5 inches
d, top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation) F--J-024161 ft2
e. line c/12 x line d x 7.48 gallons/ft' 31920 gallons
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design 180 days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design 153343 ft5
h. current herd # 1200 certified herd #1 1200
actual waste produced = current herd # x line g =
certified herd #
i, volume of wash water according to structural design
i. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k. (lines h + i + i) x 7.48 x 30 days/line f=
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
I. current waste analysis dated 2/15/2016
m. ((lines e + k)/1000) x line I =
REPEAT SECTION 1 FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
PoA (30 Day) 2/21/00
153343 ft'
©ft�
115500 ft3
335158 gallons
1.74 Ibs/1000 gal.
638.7 lbs. PAN

f
Il. TOTAL POUNDS OF PAN STORED WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD AND/OR 25 YR.124
H R. STORM STORAGE ELEVATIONS IN ALL WASTE STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
1.
Structure ID: 34
line m = 638.7 lb PAN
2.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
3.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
4.
Structure ID:
line rn =
lb PAN
5.
Structure ID:
line m =
lb PAN
6.
Structure ID:
line rn =
lb PAN
n. lineal +2+3+4+5+6= 638.7 lb PAN
111. TOTAL PAN BALANCE REMAINING FOR AVAILABLE CROPS DURING 30 DAY DRAW DOWN
PERIOD. DO NOT LIST FIELDS TO WHICH PAN CANNOT PIP APPLIFn nHRINc THIR an nAY PFRInn
o. tract #
p. field #
q. crop
r. acres
s, remaining IRR
2 PAN balance
(Iblecre)
L TOTAL PAN
BALANCE FOR
FIELD (lbs.)
column r x a
ur applicatlon window'
3735
Pt
Fescue
7.67
60.60
464.8
Aug -July
P2
Bermuda
27.59
300.00
8277.0
March -Sept
'state current crop ending application date or next crop application beginning date for available
receiving crops during 30 day draw down period.
v. Total PAN available for all fields (sum of column t) g 8741.8 lb. PAN
IV. FACILITY'S PoA OVERALL PAN BALANCE
w. Total PAN to be land applied (line n from section II) = 638.7 lb. PAN
PoA (30 Day) 2/21/00

x. Crop's remaining PAN balance (line v from section ill) = 8741.8 lb. PAN
y. Overall PAN balance (w - x) = .8103 Ib. PAN
Line y must show as a deficit. If line y does not show as a deficit, list course of action here Including pump and
haul, depopulation, herd reduction, etc. For pump & haul and herd reduction options, recalculate new PAN
based on new information. If new fields are to be included as an option for lowering lagoon level, add these
fields to the PAN balance table and recalculate the overall PAN balance. If animal waste Is to be hauled to
another permitted facility, provide information regarding the herd population and lagoon freeboard levels at the
receiving facility.
Irrigation onto existing spray fields will continue as weather and field conditions permit. Additional land is
available for pumping if needed.
PoA (30 Day) 2121100

PLAN OF ACTION(Poa) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
Facility Number: 46-6 County: Hertforcl
Facility Name: Smithfield Carroll's Farm34
Certified Operator Name: David Bowser Operator Number: 27431
1. Current liquid level(s) in inches as measured from the current liquid level in the lagoon to the
lowest point on the top of the dam for lagoons without spillways; and from the current liquid level
in the lagoon to the bottom of the spillway for lagoons with spillways:
Lagoon 1 Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3 Lagoon 4 Lagoon 5
Lagoon Name/ID: 34
Spillway(Y or N): N
Level(inches): 18
2. Check all applicable items
Liquid level is within the designed structural freeboard elevations of one or more structures.
Five and 30 day Plans of Action are attached. Hydraulic and agronomic balances are
within acceptable ranges.
X Liquid level is within the 25 year 24 hour storm elevations for one or more structures. A
30 day Plan of Action is attached. Agronomic balance is within acceptable range.
Waste is to be pumped and hauled to off site locations. Bolume and PAN content of waste
to be pumped and hauled is reflected in section III tables. Included within this plan is a list
of the proposed sites with related facility numbers, number of acres and receiving crop
information. Contact and secure approval from the DWO prior to transfer of waste to a site
not covered in the facility's CAWIVIP.
Operation will be partially or fully depopulated.
*Attach a complete schedule with corresponding animal units and dates fro depopulation
*if animals are to be moved to another permitted facility, provide facility number, lagoon
freeboard levels and herd population for the receiving facility
3. Earliest possible date to begin land application of waste: 1-Mar-05
I hereby certify that I have reviewed the Information listed above and Included within the
attached Plan of Action, and to the best of my knowledge and ability, the Information Is
accurate and correct.
R'6.t 0 • &,,)k , , _.,--- Phone:
i Owner ger )
-PCDate: 005
acility Owner/Manager (signature)
MAR - 3 2005

L
II. TOTAL POUNDS OF PAN STORED WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD AND/OR 26 YR./24
HR. STORM STORAGE ELEVATIONS IN ALL WASTE STRUCTURES FOR FACILITY
1. Structure ID: 34
2. Structure ID:
3. Structure ID:
4, Structure ID:
5. Structure ID:
6. Structure ID:
line m = 598.5 Ib PAN
line m = lb PAN
line m = lb PAN
line m =
lb PAN
line m =
lb PAN
line m =
lb PAN
n.lines 1+2+3+4+5+6 598.5lbPAN
III. TOTAL PAN BALANCE REMAINING FOR AVAILABLE CROPS DURING 30 DAY DRAW DOWN
PERIOD. DO NOT LIST FIELDS TO WHICH PAN CANNOT BE APPLIED DURING THIS 30 DAY PERIOD.
o. tract #
p. field #
q. crop
r. acres
a. remaining IRR-
2 PAN balance
(Ib/acre)
L TOTAL PAN
BALANCE FOR
FIELD (Ibs.)
column r x s
u. application window'
3735
F
Bermuda Hay
6.38
300.00
1914.0
Mar -Sept
G
Bermuda Hay
2.12
300.00
636.0
Mar -Sept
'State current crop ending application date or next crop application beginning date for available
receiving crops during 30 day draw down period.
v. Total PAN available for all fields (sum of column t) = 2650.0 lb. PAN
IV. FACILITY'S PoA OVERALL PAN BALANCE
w. Total PAN to be land applied (line n from section II) = 598.6 lib. PAN
PoA (30 Day) 2/21/00
MAR =- 3 2005

PLAN OF ACTION (PoA) FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
30 DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
I. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE
1. Structure Namelldentifier (ID): 34
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr./24 hr. storm storage & structural freeboard
a. current liquid level according to marker 18.0 inches
b. designed 25 yr./24 hr. storm & structural freeboard 19.0 Inches
c. line b - line a (inches in red zone) = 1.0 inches
d. top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation) 102416 fe
e. line c/12 x line d x 7.48 gallons/W 63839 gallons
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. temporary storage period according to structural design 180 days
g. volume of waste produced according to structural design 153343 ft3
h. current herd # 1200 certified herd # 1200
actual waste produced = current herd # x line g =
certified herd #
i. volume of wash water according to structural design
j. excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k. (lines h + i + j) x 7.48 x 30 dayslline f=
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
I. current waste analysis dated 1 12/6/2004
m. ((lines e + k)/1000) x line I =
REPEAT SECTION I FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE.
(Click on the next Structure tab shown below)
153343 ft'
®ft3
115500 ft'
335158 gallons
1.50 Ibs/1000 gal.
598.6 lbs. PAN
MAR - 3 2005
PoA (30 Day) 2/21/00

x. Crop's remaining PAN balance (line v from section III) = 2550.0 lb. PAN
y. Overall PAN balance (w - x) = -1952 lb. PAN
Line y must show as a deficit. If line y does not show as a deficit, list course of action here including pump and
haul, depopulation, herd reduction, etc. For pump & haul and herd reduction options, recalculate new PAN
based on new information. If new fields are to be included as an option for lowering lagoon level, add these
fields to the PAN balance table and recalculate the overall PAN balance. If animal waste is to be hauled to
another permitted facility, provide information regarding the herd population and lagoon freeboard levels at the
Irrigation onto existing spray fields will continue as weather and field conditions permit. Additional land is
available for pumping If needed.
LIAR - 3 2005
PoA (30 Day) 2/21100

Incident Report
Report Number: 200500526
Incident Type: Emergenc
Category: Animal
Incident Started: 02/21/05
County: Hertford
City:
Farm #: 46-06
Responsible Party:
First Name:
Middle Name:
Last Name:
Owner:
Address:
City/State/Zip:
Phone:
Permit
Material Category. Estimated Cty: UOM
DD:MM:SS Decimal
Latitude:
Longitude:
Location of Incident:
Address:
City/State/Zip
CauselObservation:
SR 1137 Farm 34 Lagoon I
On -Site Contact:
First/Mid/Last Name:
Company Name:
Phone:
Pager/Mobile Phone:
Reported By:
FirsVMidlLasl Name:
Company Name:
Address:
City/State/Zip:
Phone:
Pager/Mobile Phone:
Chemical Name Reportable Qty. lbs. Reportable Qty. kgs.
Position Method:
Position Accuracy:
Position Datum:
Directions:
Report Created 03/10/05 02:53 PM Page I

Action Taken:
POA submitted on 3-1-05
Incident Questions:
137, 1 mile east of SR 1 142 and SR 1 137
Comments:
Did the Material reach the Surface Water? No
Surface Water Name?
Did the Spill result in a Fish Kill? Unknown
If the Spill was from a storage lank indicate type.
Containment? Unknown
Cleanup Complete? Unknown
Water Supply Wells within 1500ft : Unknown
Access to Farm Animal Population
Structure Questions
Report Created 03/10/05 02:53 PM
Conveyance:
Estimated Number of fish?
(Above Ground or Under Ground)
Groundwater Impacted : Unknown
Spray Availability
Page 2

Access to Farm
Farm accessible from the main road?
Animal Population
Confined?
Depop?
Feed Available?
Mortality?
Spray Availability
Pumping equipment?
Available Fields?
Structure Questions
Breached?
Inundated?
Overtopped?
Water on outside wall?
Poor dike conditions?
Waste Structure Type Waste Structure Identi Inches
Lagoon 34 18.00
0 Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑NE
❑ Yes
[:]No
❑ NA
ONE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
ONE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
ENE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
ENE
0 Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
0 Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
ONE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
ONE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
ONE
❑ Yes
❑ No
[DNA
ONE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
ONE
Plan Due Date Plan Receeved Date Level OK Date
05-03-02 12:00:00
Event Type Event Date Due Date Comment
Incident closed
Requested Additional Information
Report Received
Referred to Regional Office - Primary Contact
Report Entered 2005-03-02 03:16:00
Incident Start 2005-02-21 09:00:00
Report Created 03/10/05 02:53 PM Page 3

Standard Agencies Notified:
Agency Name Phone First Name M.I. Last Name Contact Date
Other Agencies Notified:
Agency Name Phone First Name M.I. Last Name Contact Date
DWQ Information:
Report Taken By: Report Entered By: Regional Contact:
David L May Marlene Salyer Marlene Salyer
Phone:
Date/Time: 2005-03-02 03:16:00 PM
Referred Via: email
Did DWQ request an additional written report?
If yes, What additional Information Is needed?
Report Created 03/10/05 02:53 PM page 4

IL
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
July 24, 2003
CERTIFIED MAID.
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
7002 2410 0006 2026 8624
Mr. Johnny Hassell
Murphy -Brown, Va. Division
PO Box 1240
Waverly, VA 23890.
Subject: Notice of Violation - Inadequate Freeboard
No Further Action
Farm 34
Facility # 46-06
Hertford County
Dear Mr. Hassell:
Alan W. bimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
Thank you for your recent submittal of the information requested in our letter dated April 16,
2003. The Washington Regional Office has determined that no further enforcement actions will
be taken by the Division for the inadequate freeboard.
However, upon review and consideration of the information submitted, the Washington Regional
Office has determined that an NOV is appropriate due to the freeboard being less than the
structural limit of 12 inches. On April 21, 2003 the freeboard was noted as being 8 inches.
In the future, please continue to evaluate ways to maintain freeboard levels in the required range
(start pump mark of 19" & stop pump mark of 54"). These methods include, but are not limited
to, water conservation practices, adding additional application sites, updating your cropping
systems, adding additional and/or more flexible application equipment, and maintaining the
lagoon levels at the lowest allowable and appropriate levels throughout the year. Our staff looks
forward to continuing to work with you and your Technical Specialist to evaluate and implement
any needed changes to your system.
4470
1
Customer Service: Mailing Address: Telephone: [phone] Location:
1 800 62 i-7746 1517 Mail Service Center Fax: [phone] - 512 N. Salisbury St.
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 State Courier #52-01-01 Raleigh, NC 27099.1617
An Equal Opportunity / Affirmative Action Employer
50% recycled 110% post -consumer paper
hftp://h2o.enr.state.nc.us

Inadequate Freeboard
Page 2
Thank you again for your cooperation. If you have any. questions, please do not hesitate -to -
contact the staff of our Washington Regional Office at 252-946-6481.
Sincerely,
Jim Mulligan
Regional Supervisor
CC: File 46-06
Non -Discharge Compliance and Enforcement Unit
DWQ Central Files
Kraig Westerbeek, Murphy-Brown/Warsaw
.SRO
SAV Files
U.S. Postal SeruicM.,
CERTIFIED MgIL,h, RECEIPT ~_
(Domestic Mal! Only; No Insurance Coverage Pred�
Postage
COnMW Fee
cer,do� n�ae�y�u`,„ Fog
. O,

Murphy-BrownLLC PO Drawer 856
2822 Hwy. 24 West
Warsaw, NC 28398
Tel: [phone]
Fax. [phone]
May 1, 2003
Mr. Scott Vinson
Environmental Specialist
NCDENR
Washington Regional Office
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, NC 27889
Mr. Vinson,
In response to the Notices of Violations received by a number of Smithfield Carroll's Farms in the
Raleigh Region, I am forwarding, for your review, the information requested in the notice. Also, attached
to this letter, you will find copies of correspondence that has taken place between Neil Zahradka, LNM
Manager for the Va. Division, and yourself over the last few months. In particular, I refer you to a April
25, 2003 letter sent to you by Neil that outlines the actions taken to improve our freeboard situations on
these farms. These correspondence provide a timeline and documentation of our actions on these farms.
As stated in the letter referenced above, a thorough root cause analysis of each of these freeboard
issues will occur through our EMS. Once immediate issues are taken care of, work on longer -term
corrective action can, and will, occur. If there are any further questions or concerns, please feel free to call
RECEIVED
MAY 4 6 2003
DWQ G
PiQOJp � ...r.�-r..•

B ROW i S.
OF CAROLINA
April 25, 2003
Mr. Scott Vinson
Environmental Specialist
NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Washington Regional Office
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, NC 27889
RE: Response to lagoons with structural freeboard issues
Dear Mr. Vinson:
RECEIVED
APR 3 0 2003
DWQ'WARO
This correspondence is provided to supply your office with additional information
regarding Murphy -Brown's response to sow farms in the Washington region that are
experiencing delays in regaining the full 12" of structural freeboard. As of 1:00 PM
4/25/03, this list includes only Farms 25-26 (Facility ID 66-34).
We wish to emphasize that throughout these extraordinary weather conditions,
our Environmental Management System has continued to provide protection to waters of
the state, to include 1) immediate action to prevent environmental harm, 2) longer term
response to address these problems as we progress through the application season, and 3)
a root cause analysis of all farms experiencing freeboard problems to prevent
reoccurrence.
Our foremost immediate action included prudent land application practices that
will not allow ponding or runoff to occur. This decision has at times delayed our ability
to lower lagoon levels, but has assured protection of local waterways. Secondly,
acquisition of additional irrigation equipment has occurred throughout our system in
order to reduce the time required to initiate land application activities at each site. We
have also mobilized additional internal and external labor resources to ensure appropriate
monitoring and inspection procedures are maintained. Emergency water savings
management was implemented which lowered the fresh water input from washdowns,
and priority installation of additional water savings devices in the sow housing facilities
was enacted.
As continued adverse weather conditions reduced the positive effect of land
application activities, we chose to reduce the populations in the finishing component of
these farrow -finish farms through removal of animals. This reduction has produced the
BROWN'S OF CAROLINA, INC.
434 EAST MAIN STREET - P.O. BOX 1240 - WAVERLY, VA 23890 - PHONE [phone]
VIRGINIA DIVISION

expected water savings on the finishing side of these farms. Further action has included
1) cessation of feeder pig placement in the finishing barns and 2) procedures that will
reduce the sow populations. These actions related to animal population, although
extremely costly, will bolster the efforts to control freeboard until adequate land
application is possible.
Longer term steps to affect the freeboard maintenance have been initiated, to
include acquisition of additional pumping and land application equipment, modification
of existing labor pools for land application. The final outcome of these efforts will be
driven by an exhaustive root cause evaluation of the current freeboard situation at each
individual farm. While the extraordinary rainfall amounts can certainly be identified as
the major contributor to the current conditions, any and all other factors will be evaluated.
Murphy -Brown is committed to responsible environmental management under all
types of weather conditions that we may encounter. Our implementation of immediate
and long-term corrective actions coupled with root cause evaluations will serve to meet
that goal. We hope to work in a cooperative effort with the DWQ in resolving these
issues.
Sincerely,
r
Neil Zahradka
Manager of Land and Nutrient Management
Cc: J.P. Keane, Murphy -Brown, LLC - Waverly
Kraig Westerbeek, Murphy -Brown, LLC

Kraig Westerbeek
From: Scott Vinson [[e-mail])
Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2003 11:14 AM
To: Neil Zahradka
Cc: Kraig Westerbeek; Dawn Williamson; Jack Keane; Matt Miles; Dave Elkin; Jim Mulligan; Lyn
Hardison
Subject: Re: Washington region farms freeboard
1=
ATT00030.htmi
Neil,
regarding the pump & haul from Farm 33 to Farm 35, 1 will need to discuss
this option with my supervisor before DWQ can give you official approval
For this action. I know that the farms are covered by the same permit,
however the most important fact here is that the receiving farm is currently
having freeboard problems. If the rain persists before this farm's lagoon
has not been able to be lowered then Farm 35's lagoons, with the additional waste,
might very well enter into it's structural freeboard with the possibility of
breaching. Please hold off on any pump'and haul activities until approval
has been given by DWQ.
Thank you,
Scott Vinson
Neil Zahradka wrote:
> Scott:
>
> In response to the freeboard levels at several of our Washington region farms,
> the following responses are being implemented in addition to the land
> application scenarios outlined in the 5-day POA's. We are implementing
> depopulation options in order of priority based on freeboard level.
> Farms 25/26:
> Approximately 12,000 finishing hogs will be removed from the site and
> transferred to farms not located in North Carolina. Current logistics should
> allow this to happen by Saturday, April 19.
> Farms 33/35:
> If field conditions restrict adequate application, we plan to transfer water
> from Farm 33 to Farm 35 in order to regain structural freeboard at Farm 33.
> We will be evaluating reductions in animal population on the other farms <12" on
> Wednesday, April 16 after evaluating land application progress and weather
> conditions.
> Regarding berm integrity: On Thursday, April 10, 1 accompanied Dave Elkin,
> P.E., Director of Engineering for Murphy -Brown, on a walking evaluation of all
> berms with freeboard <12" in the Washington region. Dave found all berms to be
> free of problems associated with top width, outside sideslope, and vegetation
> that could exacerbate a high freeboard level. If you need more information
> regarding his evaluation, he can be contacted at the Murphy -Brown office in
> Warsaw at [phone].
> Neil Zahradka
Recz,vz-D
pRcvo DwQ

,i Kraig Westerbeek
From: Neil Zahradka [[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 5:40 PM
To: Scott Vinson
Cc: Jack Keane; Kraig Westerbeek
Subject: current freeboard levels
Scott:
In response to your request for current freeboard levels in the Washington
region, the following freeboard levels were recorded this afternoon after
approximately 7110" of rainfall in the last 24 hours:
25P:12" 25S:14"
26P:12" 26S:15"
31 P:14" 31 S:13"
32P:16"
33P:14" 33S:15"
35P:18" 35S:21"
34P:12"
4013:25" 40S:20"
91A:14" 918:14"
We did not read a freeboard at Farm 92 today in Gates County (37-04 & 37-12) but
the freeboard read Monday was as follows:
37-04: 15"
37-12: 14"
Neil Zahradka
REC,w..I,v D
MAY a B 2C.y3
PRta,T p
bw@

Kraig Westerbeek
From: Nell Zahradka ([e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 9:09 AM
To: Scott Vinson; Lyn Hardison
Cc: Jack Keane; Kraig Westerbeek; Bill Mayes
Subject: Facility ID 37-12 freeboard
Scott:
Lyn:
During the DSWC inspection of the lagoon at Farm 92 (facility ID 37-12)on
2/19/2002, it was noted that there was some minor erosion on the dike wall.
This problem was corrected last year, and it appeared that the low point on the
dike may have been raised slightly. We did not reset the freeboard marker at
that time, as we knew that any inaccuracy would be conservative.
Due to the recent problems with freeboard, I requested that our technical
specialist, Laura Gregory, check the level of the low point yesterday
(3112/03). It was discovered that while the freeboard marker as set shows a
current level of 12", the actual freeboard level today was 16". This 4"
discrepancy indicates that our freeboard reading of 10" recorded last Thursday
(316103) was actually 14",
1 am submitting a work request to have the Murphy -Brown engineering crew
evaluate the berm and reset the marker as appropriate. I will advise your
office when this is completed.
Neil Zahradka
RECE117PD
MAY 0 60
DWQ
PBpd

\i Kraig Wes#erbeek
From:
Neil Zahradka [[e-mail]]
Sent:
Tuesday, March 11, 2003 10:20 AM
To:
Scott Vinson
Cc:
Kraig Westerbeek; Jim Mulligan; Daphne Cullom; Lyn Hardison;.Jack Keane
Subject:
Re: Farms wl Freeboard Problems
9
Washington DWQ
report 3.11.03.... Scott:
Per your request, please find attached an MS Excel spreadsheet with the
freeboard information you requested.
The following pump & haul operations have been completed:
Farm 36 (RRO) transfer to Farm 25/26 (WRO) truck wash lagoon (current freeboard
19")
2/12/03-2/20/03 (Initial DWQ notification via e-mail 217/03)
150 loads @ 6500 gal each = 975,000 gal
Farm 31 (WRO) transfer to Farm 25126 (WRO) truck wash lagoon (current freeboard
19")
2120/03-2/22/03 (initial DWQ notification via my home e-mail 2/20 or 2/21)
105 loads @ 6500 gal each = 682,500 gal
Farm 32 (WRO) transfer to Farm 35 (WRO) lagoon (current freeboard prim.22",
sec.23")
315/03-317103 (initial DWQ notification via e-mail 3/5103)
90 loads @ 6500 gal each = 585,000 gal
Farm 92 (WRO) ID37-12 transfer to Farm 92 ID37-04 (current freeboard 15")
318103-319103 (initial DWQ notification via fax 3/5/03)
14 loads @ 2350 gal each = 32,900 gal
Farm 37 (RRO) transfer to Farm 40B (RRO)
3110103-ongoing (initial DWQ notification via fax 317/03)
expected maximum loads 138 @ 6500 gal each = 897,000 gal
As of 3111/03, no farms have been depopulated due to freeboard issues.
Please let me know if you require any further information.
Neil Zahradka
Scott Vinson wrote:
> Neil,
> Due to all the freeboard problems that exist and our office trying to
> get a handle on it all, my office would like a copy of freeboard records
> of all the farms controlled (owned and/or managed) by BOC, Va. Division
> in both the Raleigh region and Washington region that dates back to at
> least October, 2002. We would also like a list of facilities that waste
> has been hauled from and hauled to with the amounts(in gallons) and the
> dates on which the transfers occurred.
> Most important should be the halt of any pump and hauling of waste to
> any facility that
> currently has a freeboard violation, i.e. Farm 92, facility37-04. Do
> not expect approval of hauling waste to a facility that already has
> freeboard problems. You are only compounding the problem, not to
> mention, facility 37-04 is an above ground structure that waste is being
> hauled into while facility 37-12 is an in -ground lagoon with the less
> likely hood of a breach. Waste should be removed if it is in the
> structural freeboard but only
> with DWQ approval and definitely not into a permitted facility with
> violations of it's own.
DECEIVED
MAY po2003
PROJ go DWQ

• My office will also need a list of facilities that have depopulated as a
• result of high freeboard violations.
• My supervisor made clear that we would like these lists if possible by
> the end of business today.
7 Thank you for your prompt attention,
* Scott Vinson
* DWQ-WaRO
RECEIVED
MAY 0 6 2003
DWQ
PROD-#

Kraig Westerbeek
From:
Neil Zahradka [[e-mail]]
Sent:
Monday, March 10, 2003 7:09 PM
To:
Scott Vinson; Lyn Hardison
Cc:
Jack Keane; Kraig Westerbeek
Subject:
Farms 25/26 freeboard
Scott:
The lagoons at Farms 25 & 26 had the following freeboard readings this morning:
25 primary: 11"
25 secondary: 16"
26 primary: 11"
26 secondary: 1 S"
The following plan of action will be implemented:
The 11" freeboards will be increased to 12" by tomorrow afternoon transferring
water from the primary to the secondary. This transfer will result in the
following freeboard changes:
25 primary: 12"
25 secondary: 15.3"
26 primary: 12"
26 secondary: 16.7"
Neil Zahradka
i
RECEIVED
MAY 0 6 2003
DWQ
PROD
1

Kraig Westerbeek
From:
Nell Zahradka [[e-mail]]
Sent:
Monday, March 10, 2003 4:49 PM
To:
Scott Vinson
Cc:
Kral g Westerbeek; Jim Mulligan; Daphne Cullom; Lyn Hardison
Subject:
Re: Farms wl Freeboard Problems
Scott:
I have just returned to the office to check my e-mail. I will provide the
requested information to you by tomorrow 12:00 PM.
The pump & haul activities at Farm 37-12 have ceased. Current freeboard
readings are as follows:
37-12: 12"
37-04: 15"
Neil Zahradka
Scott Vinson wrote:
> Neil,
> Due to all the freeboard problems that exist and our office trying to.
> get a handle on it all, my office would like a copy of freeboard records
> of all the farms controlled (owned and/or managed) by BOC, Va. Division
> in both the Raleigh region and Washington region that dates back to at
> least October, 2002. We would also like a list of facilities that waste
> has been hauled from and hauled to with the amounts(in gallons) and the
> dates on which the transfers occurred.
> Most important should be the halt of any pump and hauling of waste to
> any facility that
> currently has a freeboard violation, i.e. Farm 92, facility37-04. Do
> not expect approval of hauling waste to a facility that already has
• freeboard problems. You are only compounding the problem, not to
> mention, facility 37-04 is an above ground structure that waste is being
> hauled into while facility 37-12 is an in -ground lagoon with the less
> likely hood of a breach. Waste should be removed if it is in the
> structural freeboard but only
> with DWQ approval and definitely not into a permitted facility with
> violations of it's own.
> My office will also need a list of facilities that have depopulated as a
> result of high freeboard violations.
> My supervisor made clear that we would like these lists if possible by
> the end of business today.
> Thank you for your prompt attention,
> Scott Vinson WEiCEIVED
> DWQ-WaRO
MAY 0 6 2003
DWQ
PROJ #

A Kraig Westerbeek
From: Neil Zahradka [[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 6:30 PM
To: Scott Vinson
Cc: .sack Keane; Kraig Westerbeek
Subject: new farms under 19"
The following additional farms now have less than 19" of freeboard:
Farm 34 - 18"
Farm 92 (facility id 37-04) - 18"
These were the levels read 2/24103 after the weekend precipitation.
I will be forwarding POA's.
Neil Zahradka
RECEIVED
DWQ
PROJ #

F WATE
`O�d qQt✓ Uchael F. Easley
Governor
r William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
> Department of Environment and Natural Resources
0 Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
April 16, 2003
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Brown's of Carolina, VA Division
PO Box 1240
Waverly, VA 23890
SUBJECT: Notice of Violation
Request for Information
Inadequate Freeboard
Farm 34
#46-6
Hertford County
Dear Sir or Madam:
APR 2 3 2003
On February 24, 2003, a representative of your animal operation informed the Division of
Water Quality (DWQ) that there was inadequate freeboard in the lagoon(s) serving this facility.
This lack of adequate freeboard is in non-compliance with the Certificate of Coverage
issued to this facility on October 13, 1997. In addition to this Notice of Violation (NOV), this
non-compliance is subject to an appropriate enforcement action by DWQ. This action can
consist of one or more of the following: a civil or criminal enforcement action; an injunction;
and/or a requirement to apply for coverage under an individual permit. The action chosen will
be based on complete evaluation of all factors that resulted in the inadequate freeboard; the
actions taken to restore the needed freeboard; and the actions being proposed to prevent the
problem from reoccurring.
To assist us in our review, please provide the Washington Regional Office with an
evaluation of the reasons for the freeboard violation(s) and a strategy to prevent future freeboard
violation(s). This evaluation and strategy must include but is not limited to the following:
Current Freeboard level(s)
Freeboard level records in the Iagoon(s) for the past 12 months up to the date of submittal
Spraying records for the past 12 months up to the date of submittal
AMA
NMENR
Customer Service: Mailing Address: Telephone [phone] Location:
1-877-623-6748 1617 Mail Service Center Fax [phone] N. Salisbury St.
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 State Courier #52-01-01 Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
An Equal Opportunity/Affrmative Action Employer
50% recycled 110% post -consumer paper
h t tp:1 h 2 o. en r. s to te. n c. u s

Inadequate Freeboard
Page 2
Rainfall records for the past 12 months for this site up to the date of submittal (if
available)
Cropping system and PAN specified in the CAWMP. If the cropping system was not in
compliance with the facility's CAWMP, provide details of the cropping system in place
for the past 12 months.
A summary of actions taken to restore the needed freeboard in the lagoon(s) including but
not Iimited to removal of animals from the site, delay of restocking of animals, pumping
and hauling waste to another site (specify site), securing additional irrigation equipment,
and securing additional spray sites.
A description of water conservation measures in use at the facility and the date(s)
installed.
If the lagoon level(s) are still in violation of the facility's CAWMP and Permit, provide
an updated Plan of Action as to how the facility will return to compliance.
Provide a detailed description of the actions taken or proposed to be taken to insure that
there are no further freeboard violations at this facility.
This information must be received by the Washington Regional Office at the following
address no later than 10 days following receipt of this letter.
Division of Water Quality
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, NC 27889
Once this information is received and evaluated by the DWQ staff, a determination will
be made as to the appropriate compliance/enforcement actions to be taken. Each case will be
evaluated on its own merit. The efforts by the owner/producer to notify DWQ of the problem,
efforts made to resolve the problem once identified, and efforts proposed to prevent future
problems will be positive factors in this determination.
Nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you either the responsibility or
liability for this non-compliance or future cases of non-compliance. If you have any questions
regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact our Washington Regional Office Staff at
[phone].
Sincerely, I
ze"�. W 47—
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Director
cc: Washington Regional Office
Non -Discharge Compliance/Enforcement Unit
Central Files

VYM f §
pG
William G_ Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
Mr. Neil Zahradka
PO Box 1240
Waverly, NC 23890
July 12, 2002
Subject: Notice of Deficiency
Animal Compliance Evaluation Site Inspection
Farm 34
Facility No. 46-6
Dear Mr. Zahradka,
Enclosed please find a copy of the Compliance Site Inspection (as viewed in the DWQ database) conducted at the
referenced facility by the Division of Water Quality from the Washington Regional Office. Please read this
inspection and keep it with all other documents pertaining to your animal operation for future inspections.
In general, these inspections included verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
(CAWMP); (2) the farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC 2H.0217, Senate Bill 1217, and
the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan; (3) the farm operation's waste management system is being operated
properly under the direction of a Certified Operator; (4) the required records are being kept; and (5) there are no signs
of seepage, erosion, and/or runoff. The following deficiencies were noted during the inspection:
➢ According to the new IRR 2 format, over -application of Nitrogen was noted in field # 1(28.13ac) which
exceeded the PAN by 2%. In accordance with condition II, item 4 of your General Permit, land application
rates shall be in accordance with the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). In no case shall
land application rates exceed the Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) rate for the receiving crop or result in runoff
during and given application.
➢ The irrigation records were initially confusing and incomplete. The irrigation worksheets that were completed in
the field are satisfactory, however the IRR 2 records are not forms that have been either provided by nor approved
by the DWQ. Please be advised that in accordance with Condition III, item 5 of your General Permit, "records,
including land application event(s) and removal of solids to an off -site location(s) records, shall be maintained by
the Permittee in chronological and legible form for a minimum of three years. These records shall be
maintained on forms provided or approved by the DWQ and shall be readily, available for inspection.' This
situation has been discussed before and a previous form that was being used provided all the required information.
It.is recommended to begin using the IRR I & IRR 2 forms provided by the Division and the irrigation records
should be maintained locally. The OIC will be better prepared while irrigating and over -application of Nitrogen
can be prevented._
As a reminder, please note the following comments, which are conditions of the Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan and the General Permit; therefore, these items must be implemented:
(p The maximum waste level in lagoons/storage ponds shall not exceed that specified in the CAWMP. At a
minimum, maximum waste level for waste for lagoons/storage ponds must not exceed the level that provides
adequate storage to contain 25 year, 24 hour storm event plus an additional foot of structural freeboard.
(p An analysis of the liquid animal waste from the lagoon shall be conducted as close to the time of application as
practical and at least within 60 days (before or after) of the date of application. This analysis shall include the
following parameters: Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Zinc and Copper.
(p Soil analysis is required annually. Lime is to be applied to each receiving crop as recommended by the soil
analysis.
A
�r
943 Washington Square Mall Washington, NC 27889 [phone] (Telephone) [phone] (Fax)
Customer Service
1 800 623-7748

Page 2
Farm 34
Facility No. 46-6
cp The following records are required: off -site solids removal, maintenance, repair, waste/soil analysis and land
irrigation records. These records should be maintained by the facility owner/manager in chronological and legible
form for a minimum of three years.
9 Land application rates small be in accordance with the CAWMP. In no case shall land application rates exceed the
Plant Available Nitrogen (EAM rate for the receiving crop or result in runoff during any given application.
cp All grassed waterways shall have a stable outlet with adequate capacity to prevent ponding or flooding damages.
The outlet can be another vegetated channel, an earth ditch, stabilization structure, or other suitable outlets.
9 It is suggegg not a requirement, to keep crop yield information for future use to update your waste management
plan. You will need three years of crop yield data before your plan can be updated.
<p The OIC has the duties to ensure that waste is applied in accordance with the CA WW and General Permit by
properly managing, supervising, and documenting daily operation and maintenance. The OIC also has the
responsibility to certify monitoring and reporting information. The failure of an OIC to perform his/her duties can
result in a letter of reprimand, suspension, of certification, or revocation of certificates.
For your information, any swine facility that has a discharge to surface waters of the State will have to apply for a
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit with the Division of Water Quality, effective
January 1, 2001.
Thank you for your assistance and cooperation during the inspection. If you have any questions, please contact me
at 252-946-64 8 1, ext. 208 or your Technical Specialist.
Sincerely,
Scott Vinson
Environmental Engineer
Cc: NCDSWC-WaRO (w/o attachments)
t-4aRO Files
- SAV Files

F
Reason for Visit ®;Routine p Complaint;�p,FQllow upi p Emergency NoUffeationyr'p, Dtherw ,�,� p Denied'Atxes53 ; yy4
t� w. a;.;lS, , 4 b V{ > _ F�' -� 1'�-..!'K. . • I, `.`� .] 2 ',A ..1 ..F
llate of Visit:. . 6112I2002-. I ime + 12:3D N ry '
Facility Number-,
i _ A 0 -o Operationalp !e w res o , ;?
- o_ .
Permitted Certited Conditionall Certified "Re tstered N'a''� ' r' 'f
. ■_ ■ p x Y y 0 g , Date Last Operated'or Above Threshold:
_ -'` • +' r. r ,K• a 1 �'. �y`„� •- c! - �„ F i vr• -sK.n. "s«i � y C-1. "' I �.,i ��
�� r „ r .>v -i •.s 1. + 7,T'_•4 4�3�',D r� �:f. t '^�F _�.xr-,���ir �, �". 4" .f �•,
Farm Name: Farm 34 , , ' ,. , Courity: E3ertford
AE.i T
Owner Name: Smithfield Carroll's Farms . - Phone No: 1iO4-644216 4
Mailing Address: )-Q.Hox.7S9.. fi.. . .. ... Ros T3ill.�i i �.�
v� S_ y .�y'�?,,, Y1GlyQg•}.. xi Lev.
;'x. y, .i.�- y t"-.s4� i�'. Y=-<ai_ if iS''i'r 'i�". ~' d`,�Y�t'}; 5✓'..ix,''�•j,:}< :�`Sx:',�y., !'V,Y�i:'«�"yk „yrl
o
i
Facility.Coriiact _ Title` �Y< ' PhoaeNo s
-w �5 •rc 4- i i' '7 4-� i C 1[.- `r .�+'' �.. " 'fk� ' - 7�.
Onsite Representative 8a>1:uituent r� "' y'� lntegrator:l~arxoll's Fpq�ds of YA,Itu. �" -
u .r
Certified Operator RQnalthF..:..: ' ........Y.tm ent Operator Cert�ficattan Numbe'r�1k516. r`
s
t Location of Farm:
mile east or SK 1147 and SK 1137 intersection.
;
Latitude r �s Longitude •
®Swine p Poutiry p Cattlep Horse ® ©® ©.; 1-74` � �-
-
DesgoCarr�ent i-•,Y„,Designic Current?"_ �� Dest Curreini"
Swine �Ca ac }��Po ulati �Potiltry , �a. ae Po uiaLori'� 3Cattle�`'`�
s-a} utr^r� _I?_ �q,' p.�_ Qp Vie':-rr-_ �� CaI�`� _I�, N*'._, 4Capaty Population, r
❑ yer �y
c Non -Layer ',i p on airy
+` '"Yi�'uY7"r..5`.'�'"="`°'+- «.a:...°'sF:,� �3',+-i: ��
F
other i n, $
r Y'�•r_
_ TtatalDesgnGapaclly,:; 1,200
vO
Tima L d2 00
�* °;r, Number Qf La oons' '� p u su ace rams resen p Lagoon Area 13 pray ie Area
g t_ sv
Holdiag-------------
PondslSohd'Traps "�+;lap o tqui as a anagemen ys em ......q'L ,
FUME—
p can to ee er
p ee er to mis
-
p arrow to can
® arrow to a er
p Farrow to Finish—
&Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes ®No
Discharge originated at:. ©Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes p No
' b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) 13 Yes p No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? _
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes p No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? � p Yes ®No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? 0 Yes ®No
Waste Collection &Treatment '
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? p Spillway p Yes ®No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure ; Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(inches): ................ .2............... ............................ ............................. .......... ............................ ............. ... .....................................................................

Faci1Hy7 39 umper:. 46-6 • . w - , , Date of inspection
f - ',r.'�.�.:.�,'; ,:• -•w 1-'f��K i �;,,� 'a +=�ti�''=%s-+te'��'-`k.�,sak�+ I,r �.'' �'ati�s:'���<i,�-ee'�- � t.+k. Ar,
tt ' S� Are there,any unmediate tJbreats to the mtegnty of any ofhe struaUfiesobserved?°Cie/ trees severe erosion f .. ` Y ,t
4}e i.� If ®NO
�A A4`•�F
'r6 Are there structures on=site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste:inanagement'or f �,
y } 4z closure plan? a Y s , L Y�,t I.
s ' i � rY er � ` t � [3,
f
.s:-re. '� .r;L.,` i; 5 c :_,;r3U.•a, r9. 43 i r;,•,? e,.' ,7" Ye ®Nat
Of gUestiaus�-6 vt S' answ�� i@s, -the;sittuuation poses anF
immediatepublic health
'.e,}r: e {,�{ e!'e,.+� zr> Y.ri•'i�l r.«� iw.�'-_ f x nd ...,�+� { ,i t*,�� .k, rt"r*"?IX'_��� a °Y..o#ir.Jenc3v: •i,.rofinrm7e.nt�ta'lf. th�ryrPye,.fra,G t-t'sa'r,.no-�ti,r. .fS yDFWi h 51 �.h� O1°rbsSF•5a,_ .q:'v:;� +hti`...l.t0.Y..�.:=.'. .
:i Yf c�s.�.' ut:+®ern^.t � N'70`7 06'anyofthe suctuesneedmamtenanravement7' s
-.a+ ,:... ...sr.S�. a r. ,., f-4� �...'t....d'r,.. r
aDoes any part of the waste managemen`t•systemy"other than waste strictures requite maiiit'enance/unprovement7 } p Yes' ®No+
t'-,,<-t�f''7-FS...1.� r-q"'.:s, rk'�'4'F. ,-•.=. sc,.�': a a'y- `r"�-'S�" n'!
- -x ti,-�.•y;� :Lw i 'r:,a'r i j �i ,+F�rr-za. a , b'i '9 'A,..r u. _.,.,-...t`'5....'}i `"t,. - -'�
]. t3 h . 'r
;TdDo any stuctures lackradequate; uged�inarkcrs with+required maicunuM and mmnnum liquid level% � ,,,
t cic i rro- J' r- >7 I T^, s qs.: cr�yt ai•,
u ,rr�,?.�r Li sf v' ,q, �n-Y" � c`� Y� �. f � r �..ra; -n 3 'n, rY- x
: e t yx elevation markings? iV e :�'�i1 3 r r, ;tqt t 4 1 s a r 4p s s, ti�i rills w �S 'f tA."
, 3 d pit j}" _.A
f a c`; 3 FJ• * �kk-a a SA ,,,Y f.a ,
�. r� r Ei°3 11 , t l.= i �,. f
"Y 3`'xSt.Waste A IlCatlOn �' x ;'"h f%,z t ''! •Sr rat 3 ;i�; r1,: �,4 �• r_ yt^ r. r ,'. ;p `+ t
t '4= - .i',.. ./° � ,. i - f ,e k �. � f lti..,' `� ->.. 7 .[f - 'S„_. s n - `I 't s,� • �!� _af 2 "'
;�`�'•� .^•ti.�e�' . �sK'-irFo.a.F..-r r � x +�" i� • E `� r .- !_ "_ � r., iYes� .1Vo� F ^ , .�:•�
' ~ `14 •'Are there any b tJ%&s- hat need maintehance/nnprovement? 4 ;n�a , t ;, �» p ®�
r}. '.!`- p .'-'T 1:-� -.r "`-i- c J''; •f r��'1. F a. .�4..k 1" - n _ D•
..t `+r K..-•5.t'= .•, r• " :�. m3 dr•A •�x�.iiC_'!- C-' r5'ti
" '�l 11Y.�¢ is'th�e;ie evideti of ov i pn lication7� p' ive Pondmg PAN p Hyr ratihc'Overlgad IN ";�r:' ; ` �y` f ®►Yes{q�"� ia; yY
^k7•p .,fir:- �}14 a2w•'. 8', J;ixl'�e`c "�."..tt.'t' i'!K'Y.' . ,ir?'1' '•_
xr?".:4..xac�.'. tiz�keR, e� r :sit*." r�•�z..� ti ,I :e.`'�N:� k}„r . "F
r 2.t�Croptype .�Coastat}Bermuda (Hay) r `Fescue
''rA• c. rn a �a�n:-us}xee.�,_ aae.
�"s�.�ra,,-•�Lr.*:,�".. ;-. � r .t"*,'J yr,". ",�yg �•w -:�-%_..zv.,m;�r,ar+-sr
r 13=Do the receiytng arapsrdiffer with�thosc designated m�tlie CertifediAiiimai>Waste IVianagementrPlans`(CAWMP)?R a pYes+'®Nod
:r ,. yrpr rrfi.,-•-� ...�..- ? '�h.;f-:i*',Y'. '-"•'.�",jtrs -'fi'e�:! •_'
tr�. •�'a '•wart_- s�..�'.. .
Does ff. facility,Elac REquiff.a�crrre*- f T�land�appLcationT�. � "�. t �� � � ; � �, K� -`;'� h�
a'. e •t ram'^-�'r +� r!� ram";: �i'f! JV+j.- Ik '�i ff',4ri b.�1 Y•. :� +{ y ,.'` :+ 3 ''. St.? +,, ..�7i �tki.t'r,'. ,
�. ° ,t..•�rL.,� i » } ,:f '•. ,a .�
r I b) Does the facility need'a wettable ikxe& deter mmation7;' +,, x s� �; 6 f -, �t v p Yes ; p Noy
111 -11ry' is-pended for wettable acre determination? y ' p Yes .gip No r
i 5 Does the'receiving-crop need unprov6mentT �-� p Yes ® No
'- _ � r•� y �; r _ ` �-?c,. i '. ;,�� �5 r , • � a - p.. -'� r..�• }.. '.
M lb Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?:; , ; t, -;,
"4,.rr• .;; e-atiR 'i,,�,.7 S"c, wry is ., r srsi';'r . ! I lu-,� i �'s' A i ,r. k' - V' p kYY
Besv l%t
Reqired`Records f'Docun:entst .
4'soCa&eilPrior other Permit readiyav17?Tail fohave Cetifi Glable? '
"
18°i.. ; r e i _ • - •1 au'r. � . . =v -: TY '. a ',,.t �rF ;.'. ..•" .; .- e• . ii, i •. ' .. � .-F - ; , ._ - . _ „• c M1`[
Does the-faciiity'fael to have all=components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc) ' p Yes ® No
t 19. : Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports} ? H Yes p No.; . k
{ 20. Is facility not in compliance with" any `applicable'setback criteria in effect at the time of design? p Yes' ®No
=A 21 , Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? p Yes H No,,, '
r ' 22:, Fatirto notify regional DWQ'of emergency.situatioiis as required by General Permit?
(iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application) . p Yes ®No -
~23. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/wspection with on -site representative? p Yes ®No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? p Yes ®No
r' 25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance ­of the Certified AWMP? p Yes` IN No'
p_, a v!olaffoins or deficieucies were noted uring fbis,visit. You will.receive no further correspondence about is visit.
Camments:(re%rt+n,jrtesiop,$ipla�n/aityS°tzswerand/araapreeomfipen�ateons�ofiT{�'nyothercom�ts
o
I{�' --A c �Fs ,,,. k 'h, es r
n 6^,o ci"li to bitter faits " tati se:addltiu I � a$nIC-6 Sa �. ,3,
f� ,� t, t '� r E3 Field Copy 0 Final Notes
, t+
v��- �Y'_...,w...e�.._
r S•l.iF�u. .�., r< s......,...�....::..'�.
* WUP was rewritten by Dawn Williamson on 4 02.
* Waste 6/6/02 with 2.4 lbsN/1000gal.
4/2/02 with 2.3 ibsN/I000gal.
. 2/2/02 with 2.0 IbsN/1000gal. .
* Soils dated 2/28/02 with up to 1.1 T/ac Iime required-
* Fields A, B, & C have been resprigged whit Bermuda.
* Irrigation records with PAN balances will be mailed to WaR4 office.
Reviewer/Inspector Name cnsonr [ittt, y
._J1rwer/Inspector
Signature: Date:
MLMiEL2�

{
05103101 Continued
i
Facility Number: _6
Date of Inspection C{i7T37
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
13 Yes p No
Iiqu.id level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation? r
A "Are there any dead anhinah'not d[sposed of properly within 24 hours? '�
[3Yes ®No
28. is the�e'any evidence of wind drift durn g land application? (d.e, residue on neighboring•vegetation, asphalt,
-
p Yes ®No
r
„ :roads; building structure; and/ar.public property} -.
29: : Is the land application spray system intake npt located near the liquid surface. of the lagoon? ,. .r,_ .
©,Yes ® No
r _
30 ' Were any major maintenance problelris with the ventilationfan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan bel6,,missing,or
or broken fao blade{s), inoperable shiitters;'etc:) ' "'' "` ' " ,' a" ;" "
p Yes No
-
31 Do the amm*ads feed stoiage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
p Yes"., M No
T 32.- Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/teinporary cover?A^ j`} p l p No
x ay r
-�
fYes
„�'•`• r � 1} l Y�. s • r _. +' '' _ _ s c yr a -r �. '� if i -K.'+,} .� 1�..y._ * � -.jy -
' ��'..,� `� IIc. r J {"{ ,++. t •:.Hi � 7i�n r- -
�. .. � r
,..!• r ... .. � «d.,,... �� _'r I >a tf: i.�.i. 4
._ - ..; .,.• c .. r.� ...� ,.... �. -..w. F: i{rSYg'3Y �.lS?SY1; . 1� . � � Nh, �}'` .J� x:_ .EY Zi. _ t ' V. I. "rn .. -..
..
DF
�C"�sySF'xrix�5 a A :1•`��53�'�• t, t `�j:l.
r ;•
I

Information contained in this database is from non agency sources and is considered unconfirmed
Farm Emergency Call Form
Farm Number © Date 9 799
Farm Name IFarm 34 Time
Owner Frist Name Call Number P69
Owner Last Name Smithfield Carroll's Farms 71
0 Reporting O Complaint
Source IRudy Grammer
Breached
O Yes O No
Freeboard Level 1 0-6"
Depopulated
O Yes 0 No
Freeboard Level 2
Overflowed
O Yes O No
Freeboard Level 3
LO Issue
10 Yes O o
Perm issionToPump
10 Yes 0 o
Freeboard Level 4
Inudated
10 Yes O No
Freeboard Level 5
Flooded
O Yes O No
Freeboard Level 6
Pumping Equipment
0 Yes O No
Commentsstirnated..dead..animals..-..I.9A9..............................................................................................................................................