400153_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NUH I H UAHULINA
Department of Environmental Qual

INSPECTIONS
INSPECTIONS
INSPECTIONS

0 Division of Water Resources
Facility Number ®- 53 O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency Zd
Type of Visit: *Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: O Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: 71 Arrival Time: / : Q (J Departure Time: O County:0%Region:
Farm Name:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Owner Email:
Facility Contact: Title: Phone:J/y llel/
Onsite Representative: integrator: I S`
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number: r
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Other
Latitude:
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
I LI Layer
Non -Layer
Design Current
Dry Poultry Capacity Pon.
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Longitude:
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
IDairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
on -Dairy
Beef Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
❑ Yes [Z(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 4;;40
o
❑ Yes
❑ Yes No
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued

Im
Facili Number: 41a- / _3 Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
dNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):� -�
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
5(No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environment I threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes GNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes allo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window/ ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop TYpe(s): CadGl %ST ��/�D 7::_JLL
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
® o
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
LYJ o
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
VXo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
o
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
YNo6
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other: 1.
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. [:]Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes [6No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes 5�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facili Number: - Date of Inspection:
24. Did,the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? d0 0 ❑ Yes 60 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes fi3No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes YNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes P No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes F
V(No ' ❑ NA ❑ NE
[:]Yes ENo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [%jNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
[i o ❑NA ❑NE
7[ 4o ❑ NA ❑ NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question ft Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
T 41; o ,
r ita1- 3 s,s
/Ile "d
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Date: Q/ j
/4/20I5

Division of Water Resources
0 Facility Number O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit: 49 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: ® Routine O Complaint 0 Follow-up O Referral Q Emergency 0 Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit:Ly ? GArrival Time: Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Other
Latitude:
Phone: N19—
Phone: 2L-'I--Y�&
Integrator: _5_Z_
Certification Number: AT#&
Certification Number:
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Layer
Non -Layer
Design Current
Dry Poultry Canacitv Pon -
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge' bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Longitude:
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
[:]Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑Yes ❑No ❑NA ❑NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes Yqo
❑ Yes dNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued

]Facili Number: Ild - Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment �
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes [✓J No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): �e1
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environment l threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes rNo
o ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No [DNA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): (f,_6 "(g/a.�S
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes E6qo ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ Yes 0 o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ['No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 26 o
[:]Yes 7No
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes gNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need im rovement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? El Yes NyNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 214.12015 Continued

Facility Number: jDate of Inspection: /
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
❑ Yes
Z N ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ NA ❑ NE
g �No
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
EA/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
2(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
No
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
S ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
f
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
j o ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ YesVNo
o ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
SD I
i A44 /ram✓r°� �� ! I4�DOKs we-eA �� �or/o
' 9
P�P:-_ 4 51 T_ 13
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signatw
Page 3 of 3
Phone: 57 Y',3"_
Date: Q%
21412015

Division of Water Resources
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
El Other Agency
Facility Number.
400153 Facility Status:
Inpsection Type:
Operations Review
Reason for Visit:
Routine
Date of Visit:
07/16/2015 Entry Time: 01:07 pm
Farm Name:
Cunningham Farms #1 & 2
Owner:
Jerry M Cunningham
Mailing Address:
7810 Beaman Old Creek Rd
Active Permit: AWS400153
Inactive Or Closed Date:
County; Greene Region:
Exit Time: 2:10 pm Incident #
Owner Email:
Phone:
Walstonburg NC 27888
❑ Denied Access
Washington
252-747-7792
Physical Address: 7400 Beaman Old Creek Rd Walstonburg NC 27888
Facility Status: Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35° 31' 54" Longitude: 77° 44' 25"
Take 58N off Snow Hill approx. 10 mi. Turn right on SR 1225, Go across Contnentnea Creek bridge. Take next right on SR 1222,
Go about 1 mi. where sharp curve in road turns left. Hog farm will be on the right.
Question Areas: .
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Cot, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Jerry M Cunningham Operator Certification Number: 18496
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representativeis): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Jerry Cunningham Phone:
On -site representative Jerry Cunningham Phone :
Primary Inspector:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Marlene Salyer
Phone:
Date:
Waste Analysis: 1 2 soil tested:612014
7-16-15 = 1.50 1.21
3-19-15 = 1.84 1.69
12-17-14 1.74 1,59
iRR events in March & April were balanced out with PAN remaining.
#11 IRR for oats (501b) were balanced with some over application occurring. Field #7= -13.4; #8= -16.4; #4= -7.24. Please
WATCH closely application times! NOD possible.
Reviewed: Rainfall/freeboard; crop yield, sludge survey #1 LTZ =5.12 ST=1.9; new COG/permit
#2 LTZ = 5.5 ST=1.3
#1 Lagoon - Watch erosion on inside of dike.
page: 1

Permit: AWS400153 Owner - Facility : Jerry M Cunningham Facility Number 400153
Inspection Date: 07/16/15 lnpsection Type: Operations Review Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 9,792 9,676
�. Total Design Capacity: 9,792
Total SSLW: 1,321,920
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
agoon Jill 24.00
.agoon JJ2 27.00
page: 2

Permit: AWS400153 Owner - Facility : Jerry M Cunningham Facility Number: 400153
Inspection Date: 07/16/15 Inpsection Type: Operations Review Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No Na He
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes No Na No
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large
❑
M ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
M ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
& Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
■ ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Agplication
Yes No Na No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Permit: AWS400153 Owner - Facility : ,ferry M Cunningham Facility Number:
400153
Inspection Date: 07/16/15 Inpsection Type: Operations Review Reason for Visit:
Routine
Waste Application
Yes No Na No
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Soybean, Wheat
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑ ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ 0 ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑ 0 ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ E ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No No No
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
E ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑0
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWS400153 Owner - Facility : Jerry M Cunningham Facility Number:
400153
Inspection Date: 07/16/15 Inpsection Type: Operations Review Reason for Visit:
Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No Na No
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
E ❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
0 ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26, Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
E ❑
❑
27, Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous losi assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes No Na No
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
J
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon ! Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑E
❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewerllnspector fail to discuss reviewfinspection with on -site representative?
❑
N ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
0 ❑
❑
page: 5

Division of Water.$�,fesaeerC�5
Facility Number 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: ® Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: 3 Departure Time: County f Region:
A e
Farm Name:
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Owner Email:
' Phone: 2`Z2 —�� _
Physical Address: Y
Facility Contact: Title: Phone: 41/ Tz
Onsite Representative: _ � �� _ Integrator: '11-41 Z5
Certified Operator: • Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Swine
mean to Finish
mean to Feeder
eeder to Finish
arrow to Wean
arrow to Feeder
arrow to Finish
Other
Other
Latitude:
Longitude:
(v/ 729y
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Layer
Non -La er
Design Current
Dry Poultry Capacity Pon.
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Dischar es and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
[:]Yes &(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? [:]Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters [:]Yes iNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412011 Continued

i
Facili Number: JDate of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3
Identifier:
Spillway?:
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): 3;9—` 36
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes E6 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA [] NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes � o ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? [:]Yes [No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require [—]Yes E�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need [:]Yes [(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. [:]Yes GZ(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
—
12. Crop Type(s): ,<7 =1 �r f �n �SB�/nA
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
E0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
EfNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
allo
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
o
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
[—]Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
[:]Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
[—]Yes
[( No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Oth
7es
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
E?jWaste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections [:]Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections
❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
[:]Yes
[g'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
dNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 2 of 3
21412011 Continued

L.
[Facility Number: - r3rO ly� Date of Inspection: — , ~ /
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes VNo [� NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below. �1j j1y #/ ^ �.rz �S. /a #�Pr S. 5`
ST. STs 4_7
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Fa to to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
ED Yes
Ej No
❑ NA
❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
[:]Yes
�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
[:]Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
24. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
[3�`No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
[:]Yes GjNo [DNA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [2(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
meets (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any addi
trawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as
Y)3 t�qF
�
=4IF i,Yo
1-3d -/y L /,At/ 1. ��. 1fy�
r
❑ Yes
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
DNA ❑NE
recommendations or any other comments.
k'44r"� gor '41e. a-,.) 6 d 6 -t per"l-I 1"7 A4. , / � / 1, - ((,
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone: ' Vn 3� �
Date:
214,12011

E Division of water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400153 Facility Status: Active Permit: AW5400153 tJ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 08/29/2013 Entry Time: 08:30 AM Exit Time: 09:12 AM Incident #:
Farm Name: Cunningham Farms #1 & 2 Owner Email: ierrvc444Qhotmail.co
Owner: Jerry M Cunningham Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 7643 Beaman Old Creek Rd Walstonburg NC 27888
Physical Address: 7400 Beaman Old Creek Rd Walstonburg NC 27888-
Facility Status: ■ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown I LC __ _
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°31'54' Longitude. 77044'25"
Take 58N off Snow Hill approx. 10 mi. Turn right on SR 1225. Go across Contnentnea Creek bridge. Take next right on SR 1222. Go
about 1 mi. where sharp curve in road turns left. Hog farm will be on the right.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Jerry M Cunningham Operator Certification Number. 18496
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Jerry Cunningham Phone:
On -site representative Jerry Cunningham Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis:
7-23-13 = 1.44
1.28
5-24-13 = 1.97
2.13
3-28-13 = 1.82
1.55
1-17-13 = .80
.41
soil tested: 4-23-12
IRR records are complete & balanced out. Rainfall, freeboard, stocking & crop yields are recorded. Sludge survey done in May
2013 & caliberation in April 2013.
Looks Good!
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400153 Owner - Facility: Jerry M Cunningham Facility Number: 400153
Inspection Date: 08/29/2013 inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine -Feeder to Finish 9,792 9,696
Total Design Capacity: 9,792
Total SSLW: 1,321,920
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
agoon JJ1 32.0(
agoon JJ2 26.0(
Page: 2

Permit: AWS400153 Owner - Facility: .ferry M Cunningham
Inspection Date: 08/29/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at:
Structure
Application Field
Other
a. Was conveyance man-made?
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
Facility Number: 400153
Reason for Vislt: Routine
Yes No NA NE
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
Cl
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than
[]
■
1)
0
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage $ Treatment Yes
No
NA
NE
4, Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large trees, severe ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
Hydraulic Overload?
Frozen Ground?
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
❑■❑❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400153 Owner - Facility: Jerry M Cunningham
Facility Number : 400153
Inspection Date: 08/29/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit:
Routine
Waste Application
Yes No
NA
NE
PAN?
D
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
D
Total Phosphorus?
Q
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
D
Outside of acceptable crop window?
D
Evidence of wind drift?
Application outside of application area?
D
Crop Type 1
Coastal
Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
n ■
n
n
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
D ■
D
n
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? D ■
D
D
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
D ■
❑
D
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
D ■
Cl
D
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
D ■
D
D
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
D ■
❑
D
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP? D
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400153 Owner - Facility: Jerry M Cunningham Facility Number : 400153
Inspection Date: 08/29/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
23. if selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑ . ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑
■ ❑ ❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400153 Owner - Facility: Jerry M Cunningham Facility Number: 400153
Inspection Date: 08/29/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure 'a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon / Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Page: 6

0 Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400153 Facility Status: Agtive _ Permit: AWS400153 Q Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 08/21/2012 Entry Time: 09:45 AM Exit Time: 10:40 AM Incident #:
Farm Name: Cunninaham Farms #1 & 2 Owner Email: ierrvc444(a�hotmail.co
Owner: Jay M Cunningham Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 76_4_3 Beaman Old Creek Rd__ _ Walstonburg NC 27888,
Physical Address: 7400 Beaman Old Creek Rd Walst no bur4 NC27888
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy Brown LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°31'54" Longitude: 77°44'25"
Take 58N off Snow Hill approx. 10 mi. Turn right on SR 1225. Go across Contnentnea Creek bridge. Take next right on SR 1222. Go
about 1 mi. where sharp curve in road turns left. Hog farm will be on the right.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Jerry M Cunningham Operator Certification Number: 18496
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Jerry Cunningham Phone:
On -site representative Jerry Cunningham Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary tnspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis: 1 2 3 soil tested:4-23-12
7-17-12 = .85 .74 1.11
5-3-12 = 1.9 2.8 2.3
1-20-12 = 1.8 2.0 2.0
12-8-11 = 1.3 2.0 1.5
IRR records are complete & balanced out. Freeboard, & rainfall are recorded. No record of sludge survey for 2012 - please do a
survey before Dec. 31, 2012,
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400153 Owner - Facility: Jerry M Cunningham Facility Number. 400153
Inspection Date: 08/21/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 9,792 9,696
Total Design Capacity: 9,792
Total SSLW: 1.321,920
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
goon JJ1 31.0
goon JJ2 27.0
Page: 2

Permit: AWS400153 Owner - Facility: Jerry M Cunningham Facility Number: 400153
Inspection Date: 08/21/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■ ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■ ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■ ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than
❑
■ ❑
❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes
No NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
❑
■ ❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑
■ ❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance allematives that need maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400153 Owner - Facility: Jerry M Cunningham
Facility Number. 400153
Inspection Date: 08/21/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA
NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
Q
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
Q ■ Q
Q
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
Q ■ Q
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Q ■ Q
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑, ■ ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400153 Owner - Facility: Jerry M Cunningham
Inspection Date: 08/21/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Records and Documents
Facility Number; 400153
Reason for Visit: Routine
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
0
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
11000
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker an irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑
■ ❑ ❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
Page: 5

Permit. AWS400153 Owner - Facility: Jerry M Cunningham
Inspection Date: 0812112012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400153
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e_, discharge, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31 _ Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below_
Application Field ❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond ❑
Other ❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ONOO
Page: 6

Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400153 Facility Status: Active , , Permit: AW540015Z_ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: .13outine County: Greene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 08/10/2011 Entry Time: 10415_AM Exit Time: 10:55 6M Incident #:
Farm Name: Cunningham Earms-#1 &2 _ Owner Email: iemc4440.hotmail.co
Owner: Jerry M Cunninaham Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 7643 @gaman Old Creek Rd Walstonburg NC 27888
Physical Address: 7400 Beaman Old Creek Rd _ Yyalstonbura NC 27888
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: MUrRhy-arpwn,LLQ
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35"31'54" Longitude: 77°44'25" _
Take 58N off Snow Hill approx. 10 mi. Turn right on SR 1225. Go across Contnentnea Creek bridge. Take next right on SR 1222. Go
about 1 mi. where sharp curve in road turns left. Hog farm will be on the right.
Question Areas:
0 Discharges & Stream impacts © Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
ij Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Jerry M Cunningham Operator Certification Number: 18496
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representatives): Name Title Phone
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis:
1-6-11 = 2.0 1.5 1.6
3-24-11 = 1.9 1.9 2.1
6-10-11 = 1.3 1.4 2.0
soil tested 11-2010
Reviewed stocking, mortality, & crop yield records. Rainfall & freeboard are recorded.
Remember to do another sludge survey by Dec. 2011
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400153 Owner - Facility: Jerry M Cunningham Facility Number: 400153
Inspection Date: 08/10/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon JJ1 42,00
Lagoon JJ2 50.00
Page: 2

Permit. AWS400153 Owner - Facility: Jerry M Cunningham Facility Number: 400153
Inspection Date: 08/10/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? 1301111
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) 111100
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? ❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le.! large trees, severe ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? 00011
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400153 Owner - Facility: Jerry M Cunningham
Inspection Date: 08/10/2011 Inspection Type. Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400153
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
20_ Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400153 Owner - Facility: Jerry M Cunningham
Inspection Date: 08/10/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Records and Documents
Facility Number. 400153
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
Q
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
Q
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑ 1100
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ 11110
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Q ❑ ❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400153 Owner- Facility: Jerry M Cunningham Facility Number: 400153
Inspection Date: 0811012011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? 11000
Otherlssues Yes No NA NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report 11000
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge, ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon ! Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
in
Page: 6

N Division of Water Quality
0 Division of Soil and water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Facility Number ; A 1 3 Facility Status; v Permit; ff--33
P4W�4 Ql§ __ El Denied Access
Inspection Type: mphRnce Insnoigp inactive or Closed date:
Reason for Visit: ggWjij2VCounty: Region:
Hate of Visit: IZUA '010 Entry Time:12:05 PM Exit Time: incident #:
Farm Name: gunninahim Ea s #t & 2 Owner Email- ' r
UgA4A0h2tWajI. co
Owner: jeay M QUnnjnqhgMPhone: 252-_T 4-4jA1 -- -
Mailing Address: 7643 Heamiln Qidr WalsLQnbul:g NC-2780 -
Physical Address: Z4QQ &Vig2an Qjd_CpeeX f3d yy_ l§tQnqurg NC 2&8Q
Facility Status: a Compliant ❑ Not Compliant integrator: - r
Location of farm: Latitude: 35°31'54" Longitude: ZZ04475"
Take 58N off Snow dill approx. 10 mi. Turn right on SR 1225. Go across Contnentnea Creek bridge. Take next right on Sit 1222. Go
about 1 mi. where sharp curve in road turns left. }log farm will be on the right.
Question Areas:
N Discharges & Stream impacts Waste Collection & Treatment jj Waste Application
W Records and Documents Other issues
Certified Operator: Jerry M Cunningham Operator Certification Number: 18496
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representatives): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Jerry Cunningham Phone:
On -site representative Jerry Cunningham Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date: -----------
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page:1

Permit: AWS400153 Owner - Facility: Jerry M Cunningham Facility Number: 400153
Inspection Date: 12114/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis: soil tested Jan. 2010
3-02-10 = 1,5 1.4
7-01-1 0 = 2.0 1.5
9-10-10 = 1.1 1.2
IRR records are complete and balanced out.
1 2 3
Freeboard range: 2-19-10 = 22 30 25
9-24-10 = 52 42 43
#25 Sludge survey dated 4-16-2009 - old forms used. If you did not receive an extension, please complete a surrey for 2010 & use
the new forms that calculate % of sludge. These can be found on the DWQ website under Aquifer Protection Section/Animals.
Page: 2

Permit: AWS400153 Owner - Facility: Jerry M Cunningham
Inspection Date: 12/14/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400153
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine -Feeder to Finish 9,792 9,800
Total Design Capacity: 9,792
Total SSLW: 1,321,920
Waste Structures
Type Identifier
Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
lagoon JJ1 42.00
agoon JJ2 46.00
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400153 Owner - Facility: Jerry M Cunningham Facility Number: 400153
Inspection Date: 12/14/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ 0 ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
❑
■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
B. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■ ❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400153 Owner - Facility: Jerry M Cunningham N
Inspection Date: 12/1412010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400153
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay, Pasture)
Crop Type 2
Soybean, Wheat
Crop Type 3
Small Grain Cover
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of property operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Wt1P?
❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400153 Owner - Facility: Jerry M Cunningham Facility Number: 400153
Inspection Date: 1211412010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design?
Maps?
Other?
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
Q
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑ ■
❑
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ ■
❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑ ■
❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 6

Penmit: AW5400153 Owner - Facility: Jerry M Cunningham Facility Number: 400153
Inspection Date: 12114/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss reviewfinspection with on -site representative? ❑ M ❑ ❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
34. Are subsurface drains present on this farm? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Spray Field ❑
Lagoon 1 Storage Pond ❑
Other ❑
Page: 7

E
40
��ENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Beverly Eaves Perdue
Governor
Jerry M Cunningham
Cunningham Farms #1 & 2
7643 Beaman Old Creek Rd
Walstonburg, NC 27888
Dear Jerry M Cunningham:
Division of Water Quality
Coleen H. Sullins
Director
October 1, 2009
Dee Freeman
Secretary
Subject: Certificate of Coverage No. AWS400153
Cunningham Farms #1 & 2
Swine Waste Collection, Treatment,
Storage and Application System
Greene County
In accordance with your renewal request, we are hereby forwarding to you this Certificate of Coverage
(COC) issued to Jerry M Cunningham, authorizing the operation of the subject animal waste management
system in accordance with General Permit AWG100000,
This approval shall consist of the operation of this system including, but not limited to, the management
and land application of animal waste as specified in the facility"s Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan (CAWMP) for the Cunningham Farms #1 & 2, located in Greene County, with a swine animal
capacity of no greater than the following annual averages:
Wean to Finish: Feeder to Finish: 9792 Boar/Stud:•
Wean to Feeder: Farrow to Wean: Gilts:
Farrow to Finish: Farrow to Feeder: Other:
If this is a Farrow to Wean or Farrow to Feeder operation, there may be one boar for each 15 sows. Where
boars are unnecessary, they may be replaced by an equivalent number of sows. Any of the sows may be
replaced by gilts at a rate of 4 gilts for every 3 sows.
The COC shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2014, and shall hereby void
Certificate of Coverage Number AWS400153 that was previously issued to this facility. Pursuant to this
COC, you are authorized and required to operate the system in conformity with the conditions and
limitations as specified in the General Permit, the facility's CAWMP, and this COC. An adequate system
for collecting and maintaining the required monitoring data and operational information must be
established for this facility. Any increase in waste production greater than the certified design capacity or
increase in number of animals authorized by this COC (as provided above) will require a modification to
the•CAWMP and this COC and must be completed prior to actual increase in either wastewater flow or.,- .
number of animals.
Please carefully read this COC and the enclosed State General Permit. Please nav careful attention to the
record keeping and monitoring_ conditions in this permit. Record keeping forms are unchanged with this
General Permit. Please continue to use the same record keeping forms.
1636 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1636
Location: 2728 Capital Blvd., Raleigh, North Carolina 27604 One
Phone: [phone] FAX:[phone] Customer Service: 1-877-623-6748 N©f'ithCarolli.na
Internet: www.ncwaterquality.org ��������, ,
An Equal Opportunity 4 Affirmative Acpon Employer IJ�

If your Waste Utilization Plan (WUP) has been developed based on site -specific information, careful
evaluation of future samples is necessary. Should your records show that the current WUP is inaccurate
you will need to have a new WUP developed.
The issuance of this COC does not excuse the Permittee from the obligation to comply with all applicable
laws, rules, standards, and ordinances (local, state, and federal), nor does issuance of a COC to operate
under this permit convey any property rights in either real or personal property.
Per 15A NCAC 2T .0105(h) a compliance boundary is provided for the facility and no new water supply
wells shall be constructed within the compliance boundary. Per NRCS standards a 100-foot separation
shall be maintained between water supply wells and any lagoon, storage pond, or any wetted area of a
spray field.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in this COC, the General Permit
or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of this COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
If you wish to continue the activity permitted under the General Permit after the expiration date of the
General Permit, then an application for renewal must be filed at least 180 days prior to expiration.
This COC is not automatically transferable. A name/ownership change application must be submitted to
the Division prior to a name change or change in ownership.
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this COC are unacceptable, you have the right to
apply for an individual permit by contacting the Animal Feeding Operations Unit for information on this
process. Unless such a request is made within 30 days, this COC shall be final and binding.
In accordance with Condition I1.22 of the General Permit, waste application shall cease within four (4)
hours of the time that the National Weather Service issues a Hurricane Warning, Tropical Storm Warning,
or a Flood Watch associated with a tropical system for the county in which the facility is located. You
may find detailed watch/warning information for your county by calling the Newport/Morehead City, NC
National Weather Service office at [phone], or by visiting their website at:
www.erh.noaa.gov/er/mhx/
This facility is located in a county covered by our Washington Regional Office. The Regional Office
Aquifer Protection Staff may be reached at [phone]. If you need additional information
concerning this COC or the General Permit, please contact the Animal Feeding Operations Unit staff at
[phone].
Sincerely,
for Coleen H. Sullins
Enclosure (General Permit AWG 100000)
cc: (Certificate of Coverage only for all ccs)
Washington Regional Office, Aquifer Protection Section
Greene County Health Department
Greene County Soil and Water Conservation District
APS Central Files (Permit No. AWS400153)
AFO Notebooks
Murphy -Brown, LLC

E Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400153 Facility Status: Active Permit: MS400153 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection _ Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Bgulillg County: Greene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 07/30/2009 Entry Time: 01:00 PM Exit Time:
Farm Name: Cunninaham Farms #1 & 2
Owner: Jerry M Cggningh;arn,_,,,
Incident #:
Owner Email: ' 4 it
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 7643 Beaman Old Creek Rd Waistonburg NC 27888
Physical Address: 7400 Beaman Old Creek Rd Walstonbum NC 27888
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator. Murphy -Brown. LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°31'54" Longitude: 77'44'25"
Take 58N off Snow Hill approx. 10 mi. Turn right on SR 1225. Go across Contnentnea Creek bridge. Take next right on SR 1222. Go
about 1 mi. where sharp curve in road turns left. Hog farm will be on the right.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other issues
Certified Operator: Jerry M Cunningham Operator Certification Number: 18496
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Jerry Cunningham Phone -
On -site representative Jerry Cunningham Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: _
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
soil tested 11-2008 and lime will be applied this fall.
Sludge survey needed before Dec. 31, 2009
waste analysis:
5-13-09 2.0 2.0
1-23-09 1.7 1.5
10-20-09 1.2 1.3
Looks Good!
Date:
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400153 Owner - Facility: Jerry M Cunningham
inspection Date: 07/30/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400153
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Q Swine - Feeder to Finish 91792 7,000
Total Design Capacity: 9,792
Total SSLW: 1,321,920
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
on
JJ1
4
on
JJ2
3
Page: 2

Permit: AWS400153 Owner - Facility: Jerry M Cunningham Facility Number: 400153
Inspection Date: 07/30/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes No
NA
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ ■
❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑ ■
❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ■
❑
❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ ■
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑ ■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage S Treatment
Yes No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
❑ ■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ ■
❑
❑
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑ ■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑ ■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑ ■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400153 Owner - Facility: Jerry M Cunningham
Facility Number: 400153
Inspection Date: 07/30/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay, Pasture)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 3
Soybean, Wheat
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WILIP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400153 Owner- Facility: Jerry Nt Cunningham Facility Number: 400153
Inspection Date: 07=12009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Other? ❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after> 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑ ■
Q ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Other Issues
Yes No
NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ Q ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Q ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400153 Owner- Facility: Jerry M Cunningham Facility Number: 400153
Inspection Date: 07/30/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

• S
a Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency I--1
Facility Number: 400153 Facility Status: Active Permit: AM400153 .. ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 11/25/2008 Entry Time:01:30 PM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Cunningham Farms #1 & 2 Owner Email:
Owner: Jay M Cunningham ____ Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 7643 Beaman Old Creek Rd Walstonbura NC 27888
Physical Address: 7400 Beaman OII1 Creek Rd Walstonburg NC 27888
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Premium Standard Farms Of North Carolina Inc
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°31'54" Longitude: 77°44'25"
Take 58N of Snow Hilt approx. 10 mi. Turn right on SR 1225. Go across Contnentnea Creek bridge. Take next right on SR 1222. Go
about 1 mi. where sharp curve in road turns left. Hog farm will be on the right.
Question Areas:
Discharges S Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Jerry M Cunningham Operator Certification !Number: 18496
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Jerry Cunningham Phone:
On -site representative Jerry Cunningham Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis:!
2 3
1-1"8 = 1.6
1.4 2.1
3-25-08 1.9
1.4 2.2
5-19-08 1.8
1.7 1.7
8-12-08 1.5
1.5 1.4
soil test Nov 2007
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400153 Owner - Facility: Jerry M Cunningham Facility Number: 400153
Inspection Date: 1112512008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine -Feeder to Finish 9,792 8,000
Total Design Capacity: 9,792
Total SSLW: 1,321,920
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon JJ1 46.00
agoon JJ2 28.0C
Page: 2

Permit: AWS400153 Owner - Facility: Jerry M Cunningham Facility Number: 400153
Inspection Date: 11/2512008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Vislt: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes No
NA
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ ■
❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑ ■
❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ■
❑
❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ ■
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑ ■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
❑ ■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ IN
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ ■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑ ■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑ ■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑ ■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400153 Owner - Facility: Jerry M Cunningham
Facility Number: 400153
Inspection Date: 11/2512008 inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1 Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay, Pasture)
Crop Type 2 Soybean, wheat
Crop Type 3 Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■
❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■
Q
Q
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑ ■
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■
Q
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
DEDD
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP? ❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400153 Owner - Facility: Jerry M Cunningham
Facility Number:
400153
Inspection Date: 11/25/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? ❑
■
❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Cl
■
❑ ❑
Other issues
Yes
No
NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■
❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

J
Permit: AWS400153 Owner - Facility: Jerry M Cunningham Facility Number: 400153
Inspection Date: 11/25/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for VisIt: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? ❑ ■ ❑ O
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ ■ ❑ Q
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

W Division of Water Quality
Facility Number f7 O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Vd - -1 Arrival Time: =----� Departure Time: County: Region: Wy&
Farm Name: /l/Owner Email:
Owner Name: LtJ-- Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address: /J
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Phone
Integrator: 4.05 '/
Operator Certification Number: %,`T 9rh
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: = c = ` = Longitude: = ° = L = (1
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ La er
❑ Non -La er
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
+�
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Other
❑ Other
Dry Poultry
❑ La ers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Co
Number of Structures:
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes Q4 ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes [ o ElNA ElNE
ElYes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3 12128104 Continued

ti
facility Number —
Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure Structure V Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
through a waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes I]d No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
❑ Yes lad No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [jj/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmentalth
Eleat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes 2(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Aanlication
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes [0/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes GNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
b 94 12. Crop type(s) - d �'" O � 1,�- / a 5� J S d
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
Obo ❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
ElNE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
�rvO ❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
Ir
Reviewer/Inspector Name
t'h
C' ��
Phone: 4,�-�%
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date: /�-Q - Or—Q — Or
Page 2 of 3 v 12128104 Continued

Facility Number: 4te —!5 Date of InspectionoJ
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes 0/No ❑ NA El NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes L✓J No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design El Maps El Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes V(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rain Inspection❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes �EY/Ns❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes Xo ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit? ❑ Yes Yo ❑ NA ❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge? ❑Yes Yywo ElNA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ElYeso ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes o El NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document El Yes Zo ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately .
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments and/or Drawings:
Page 3 of 3 12128104

Division of Water Quality
Division of Sol! and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency El
Denied Number: 400153 Facility Status: Active Permit: NCA240153 . _ El Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit. Routine County: Greene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 02118/2007 Entry Time:0900 AM Exit Time:
Farm Name: Cunningham Farms Al & 2
Owner: Jerry M Cunningham
Incident #:
Owner Email:
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 7643 Beaman Old Creek Rd Walstonbura NC 27888
Physical Address: 7400 Beaman Old Creek Rd Waistonbura NC 27888
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farts: Latitude: 35'31'54 Longitude: 77"44'25"
Take 58N off Snow Hill approx. 10 mi. Turn right on SR 1225. Go across Contnentnea Creek bridge. Take next right on SR 1222. Go
about 1 mi, where sharp curve in road turns left. Hog farm will be on the right.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment ij Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Jerry M Cunningham Operator Certification Number: 18496
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On -site representative Jerry Cunningham Phone:
24 hour contact name Jerry Cunningham Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis:
8-20-07 = 1.4 1.4
6-5-07 = 1.7 1.6
3-28-07 = 2.2 1.6
12-19-06 = 1.1 1.3
see comments on 40-16 re: NPDES Forms
Date:
Page: 1

Permit: NCA240153 Owner - Facility: Jerry M Cunningham
Inspection Date: 09/18/2007 Inspection Type: Compiiance Inspection
Facility Number: 400153
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
swine - Feeder to Finish 9,792 9,162
Total Design Capacity. 9,792
Total SSLW: 1,321,920
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon Jill 40.00
agoon JJ2 41.00
Page: 2

Permit: NCA240153 Owner - Facility: Jerry M Cunningham Facility Number: 400153
Inspection Date: 09/18/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ 0
Discharge originated at
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Z Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a ❑ ■ ❑ El
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes No
NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe
❑ ■
❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■
❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
00013
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑ ■
❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No
NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑ ■
❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
I=l
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

Permit: NCA240153 Owner - Facility: Jerry M Cunningham Facility Number: 400153
Inspection Date: 09/1812007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? ❑
Total P205? ❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type 1 Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay, Pasture)
Crop Type 2 Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■ ❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■ ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
■ ❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■ ❑
❑
18_ Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■ ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
0
■ ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: NCA240153 Owner - Facility: Jerry M Cunningham
Facility Number: 400153
Inspection Date: 0911812007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?.
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code? '
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > i inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)? ❑ ■
❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Vac Nn
NA NF
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: NCA240153 owner - Facility: ,ferry M Cunningham Facility Number: 400153
Inspection Date: 09/18/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss reviewrinspection with on -site representative? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Page: 6

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400153 Facility Status: Active Permit: NCA240153 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection _ Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine _ _ County: Region:
Date of visit: 02/02/2006 Entry Time:09:00 AM Exit Time: Incident #:
Faun Name: Cunninaham Farms #1 & 2 Owner Email:
Owner: Jerry M Cunningham Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 7643 Beaman Old Creek Rd _ , I n
Physical Address:
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: latitude: Z5°31'54" _ Longitude: 77°44'2 "
Take 58N off Snow Hill approx. 10 mi. Tum right on SR 1225. Go across Contnentnea Creek bridge. Take next right on SR 1222. Go
about 1 mi. where sharp curve in road turns left. Hog farm will be on the right.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Jerry M Cunningham Operator Certification Number: 18496
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On -site representative Jerry Cunningham Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste analyses:
L1 L2
4-29-05 = 1.9
2.0
7-2-05 = 2.2
1.9
8-31-05 = 1.4
0.97
12-5-05 = 0.94
1.1
02-25-05 = 1.9
1.3
Soil sample December 2005
Page: 1

Permit: NCA240153 Owner - Facility: Jerry M Cunningham Facility Number: 400153
Inspection Date: 02JO212006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Q Swine - Feeder to Finish 9,792 9,700
Total Design Capacity: 9,792
Total SSLW: 1,321,920
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
Lagoon JJ1 23.00
�agoon JJ2 25.00
Page: 2

Permit: NCA240153 Owner - Facility: Jerry M Cunningham Facility Number. 400153
Inspection Date: 02/02/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes No
NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
00110
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ■
❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ■
❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑ ■
❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes No
NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.eJ large trees, severe
❑ ■
❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■
❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑ ■
❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑ ■
❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No
NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑ ■
❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

Permit: NCA240153 Owner - Facility: Jerry M Cunningham Facility Number: 400153
Inspection Date: 02/02/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
Is PAN > 10%110 ibs.? ❑
Total P205? ❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type 1 Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay, Pasture)
Crop Type 2 Soybean. Wheat
Crop Type 3 Small Crain Cover
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1 Johns
Soil Type 2
Orangeburg
Soil Type 3
Rains
Soil Type 4
Wagram
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑ ❑_
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
18.1s there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: NCA240153 Owner - Facility: Jerry M Cunningham
Facility Number: 400153
Inspection Date: 02/02/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
000
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
23. if selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? ❑
■ ❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
Other Issues
Yes
No NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to property dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air 0000
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: NCA240153 Owner - Facility: Jerry M Cunningham Facility Number: 400153
Inspectlon Date: 02/02/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Otherlssues Yes No NA NF
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? ❑ M © ❑
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? D M ❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Page: 6

Type of Visit 0 Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 4f1 153 Date of Visit: 2-23-20Q4 Time: l 1:0t1
O Not Operational O Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified © Conditionally Certified 13Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: Q111 jUZhWU.F3.r U.#€1..&.2....................................... .................... County: G.r.c tc............................................... WARO.......
Owner Name: JlCxry....................................... Culnlningh.E m............................................ Phone No: 252-747-1t195........................... _..............................
Mailing Address: 7.64 . ealul n-.Qi :Cr.� tC.Est.........................................................'1'.alsto.r.k�xg,.NC...............--.............................. 2.7. .........
Facility Contact: .............................•---.............................................Title:................... Phone No:
Onsite Representative: Jcrry..fMlxtlAiughAm.................................................................. Integrator: �r.�ImAtllm xQlld�l i.1 AaIiAS.1? �IS?d#tl...........
Certified Operator.,]exxY.................................. Culaw1wham ......---••---................. Operator Certification Numberafl 9,¢.....................
Location of Farm:
Take 58N off Snow Hill approx. 10 mi. Turn right on SR 1225. Go across Contnentnea Creek bridge. Take next right on SR
1222. Go about 1 mi. where sharp curve in road turns left- Hog farm will be on the right.
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 • 31 54 u Longitude 77 • 44 ` 25 µ
Design Current
Design Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
Poultry
Capacity Population Cattle
Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Layer
I
1
10 Dairy
® Feeder to Finish
9792
7000
10 Non -Layer
I
1
10 Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
9,792
❑ Gilts
Total SSLW
1,321,92Q
❑ Boars
Number of Lagoons 2
Trann
Holdinix Pon
Discharzes & Stream Impacts
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ®No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Stricture 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
Structure 6
identifier: .......................................................................................... ........
Freeboard (inches): 25 24.5
12112103
Continued

Facility Number: 40-153 Date of Inspection 2-23-2004
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes N No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or ❑ Yes ® No
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threit, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes N No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes N No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level ❑ Yes N No
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any huffers that need maintenancelimprovement? ❑ Yes N No
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes N No
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Graze) Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Small Grain Overseed
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes N No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes []No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes N No
16, Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes N No
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge attor below ❑ Yes []No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes N No
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional - ❑ Yes ® No
Air Quality representative immediately.
Comments_(refer to question #) Explain any. YES answers andlor any recommendations'or any other cot_ ments
Use da•awings of:facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as neces§ary): ' :❑Field Copy ®Final Notes t
1
w
Reviewer/Inspector Name Marlene D. Salyer
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
l b/ l i/VJ I.VI{NI!KV

Facility Number: 40-153 Date of Inspection 2-23-2004
Required Records & Documents
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
® No
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
N No
23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
N No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
N No
25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
N No
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(iet discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
N No
27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
N No
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
N No
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
N No
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
® Yes
❑ No
31. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
® No
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
❑ Yes
® No
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? if yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
N No
❑ Stocking Form ❑ Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfall ❑ Inspection After i" Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
© No violations or def dencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
dditional,Comments and/or Drawings: S
Waste analysis: 3-27-03 = 1.8 1.9
5-19-03 = 1.7 2.0
8-19-03 = 1.7 1.5
11-3-03 = 1.1 095
soil sample was dated 1-14-03 with no lime needed.
freeboard levels and rain events are recorded weekly.
irrigation records are complete and balanced out.
sludge survey is scheduled.
l2/I2103

Technical Assistance Site Visit Report
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Natural Resources Conservation Service
Soil and Water Conservation District
Other...
Facility Number 40 - 153 Date: 91231Q3 Time: 1 1030 J Time On Farm: 60 WARO
Farm Name Cunningham Farms #1 & 2 County Greene
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address 7643 Beaman Old Creek Rd Walstonburg, NC 27888
Onsite
Representative Jerry Cunningham/ Matt Barefoot -- Integrator Premium Standard Farms
Type Of Visit Purpose Of Visit
Operation Review
Compliance Inspection (pilot only)
Technical Assistance
Confirmation for Removal
❑ No Animals -Date Last Operated:
❑ Operating below threshold
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse
pO Routine
Q Response to DWQ/DENR referral
O Response to DSWC/SWCD referral
O Response to complaint/local referral
O Requested by prod ucerfinteg rator
O Follow-up
O Emergency
O Other...
Design
Current Design Current
El
Wean to Feeder
Capacity Population Capacity Population
❑ Layer
❑ Non-
® Feeder to Finish 9792 8500 Layer
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
GENERAL QUESTIONS:
1. Is waste discharging from any part of the operation and reaching surface waters or wetlands? ❑ yes ® no
2. Is there evidence of a past waste discharge from any part of the operation that waste reached
❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
GENERAL QUESTIONS:
1. Is waste discharging from any part of the operation and reaching surface waters or wetlands? ❑ yes ® no
2. Is there evidence of a past waste discharge from any part of the operation that waste reached
❑ yes ® no
surface waters or wetlands?
3. Does any problem pose an immediate threat to the integrity of the waste structure (large trees,
❑ yes ® no
seepage, severe erosion, etc.)?
4. Is there evidence of nitrogen over application, hydraulic overloading or excessive ponding
❑ yes ® no
requiring DWQ notification?
6- Is there evidence of improper dead animal disposal that poses a threat to the environment
❑ yes ® no
and/or public health?
6. Is the waste level within the structural freeboard elevation range for any waste structure?
❑ yes ® no
Structurel Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Identifier
Level (Inches) 35 34 F IF -
CROP TYPES 1coastal Bermuda -hay I Ismaii grain overseed Corn, Grain I Icoastal Bermuda -graze
SPRAYFIELD
SOIL TYPES OrA GoA WaB Jo
7. What type of technical assistance does the onsite representative feel is needed? (list in comment section)
03/10/03

Facility Number 40 - 153 Date:
9/23/03
PARAMETER
O No assistance provided/requested
❑ 8. Waste spill leaving site
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE Needed
Provided
❑ 9. Waste spill contained on site
❑ 10. Level in structural freeboard
25. Waste Plan Revision or Amendment
❑
❑
❑ 11. Level in storm storage
26. Waste Plan Conditional Amendment
❑
❑
27. Review or Evaluate Waste Plan wlproducer
❑
❑
[312. Waste structure integrity compromised
❑ 13. Waste structure needs maintenance
28. Forms Need (list in comment section)
El
❑
29. Missing Components (list in comments)
❑
❑
❑ 14. Over application >= 10% & 10 lbs.
❑
❑
❑ 15. Over application < 10% or < 10 lbs.
30.2H.0200 re -certification
❑ 16. Hydraulic overloading
31. Five & Thirty day Plans of Action (PoA)
❑
❑
32. Irrigation record keeping assistance
❑
❑
❑ 17. Deficient irrigation records
❑ 18. Late/missing waste analysis
33. Organizelcomputerization of records
❑
❑
❑ 19. Late/missing lagoon level records
34. Sludge Evaluation
❑
❑
❑ 20. Late/missing soils analysis
❑ 21. Crop needs improvement
35. Sludge or Closure Plan
❑
❑
❑ 22. Crop inconsistent with waste plan
36. Sludge removallclosure procedures
❑
❑
37. Waste Structure Evaluation
❑
❑
❑ 23. Irrigation maintenance deficiency
❑ 24. Deficient sprayfield conditions
38. Structure Needs Improvement
❑
❑
39. Operation & Maintenance Improvements
❑
❑
40. Marker checklcalibration
❑
❑
Reaulatory Referrals
41. Site evaluation
❑
❑
❑ Referred to DWQ Date:
42. Irrigation Calibration
❑
❑
❑ Referred to NCDA Date:
43. Irrigation designlinstallation
El
❑
El Other...
system
Date:
44. Secure irrigation Information (maps, etc.)
❑
❑
LIST IMPROVEMENTS
45. Operating improvements (pull signs, etc.)
❑
❑
MADE BY OPERATION
❑
❑
46. Wettable Acre Determination
1
47. Evaluate WAD certificationlrechecks
❑
❑
48. Crop evaluationlrecommendations
❑
❑
land cleared to meet WA requirements
2.
49. Drainage worklevaluation
❑
❑
50. Land shaping, subsofling, aeration, etc.
51. Runoff control, stormwater diversion, etc.
❑
❑
❑
❑
3
52. Buffer improvements
❑
❑
53. Field measurements(GPS, surveying, etc.)
❑
❑
4.
64. Mortality BMPs
❑
❑
55. Waste operator education (NPDES)
5'
56. Operation & maintenance education
❑
❑
57. Record keeping education
❑
❑
5.
58. Crop/forage management education
❑
❑
59. Soil and/or waste sampling education
❑
❑
03/10/03

Facility Number 40 - 153 Date: 5123103
COMMENTS:
At time of inspection, WA complete by tech. spec, however producer has not received copy of plan and components of
design.
Will recheck in two months.
Rain cutoff switch has been installed on pump.
Need to place COC in record book.
Make records available for 5 years.
55. Discussed NRDES and new forms. Need to start recording information immediately on new forms.
Soil test dated 1/14/03 for 2002 crop year. Cu, Zn and ph within guidelines. Remember to take soil test for 2003 and follow
lime requirements to maintain proper soil ph.
*Waste analysis dated 8/19103 J1=1.5 and J2=1.7
5/19/03 J1=1.7 and J2=2.0
3/27/03 J1=1.8 and J2=1.9
1/15/03 J1=1.4 and J2=1.8
10/11/02 J1=1.4 and J2=1.6
7118/02 J1=1.3 and J2=1.6
IRR2 records are complete and balanced
hen completing IRR2 be sure to include which lagoon waste is being applied from.
*Lagoon level is recorded weekly with drops in lagoon consistent with irrigation events.
Front coastal bermuda spray field, coastal bermuda has been cut. Due to wet field conditions unable to remove. Need to
remove hay as weather permits``Back coastal bermuda field in good condition.
s
TECHNICAL SPECIALIST Martin McLawhorn
SIGNATURE
Date Entered: 9/29/03
Entered By: Martin McLawhorn

Facility Number
Date of Visit: Z/6/200Z Time: 1205 pm
0 at Operational p HelowThreshold
0 Permitted 0 Certified p Conditionally Certified p Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: Cunninghman Farms 41 & 2 County: Grr,nc............................................... .WARO.......
Owner Name: Jerry Cunningham Phone No: 252-747-8195
Mailing Address: 76.4.d.Acamon..0U.Creep-Raad..................................................... W.alsLonb=rg.NJC ................................................ 2788A ..............
FacilityContact:...............................................................................Title:............................................................... Phone No: ....................................................
Onsite Representative: derxyXitiLain.gham.............. .................................................. Integrator: Pr mium.SbndarA.Farms.oLNorth...........
Certified Operator: drrxyt3L, ................ .............. CwwinghanL ......... ...................... Operator Certification Number: 18496.............................
Location of Farm:
taKe 5af4 ott snow tuft approx. iv mi. turn rignt on ax irl--j, do across i;ontuentnea ureeK griage. take next right on sK A
1222. Go about 1 mi. where sharp curve in road turns left. Hog farm will be on the right. w
g Swine p Poultry p Cattle p Horse Latitude ©• ®� ®u Longitude ©• ®� ©��
Desjgn CurrentDesigns Current
y
Swine, - t EapaClty
Poltulatton Poultry Capacity NPopulattoqCart Q z Populafion
�Capacity
p ayer p airy
p Non -Layer = 13 Non-Dairy
y 6` + t
�
.43 Other jL_'
-
`tl� . {{TotalSDesrgnhCapacity' 9,792
R k 1
- y` Total SSLW p' 1,321,920
,
fit' �,� err,f x x
.-...----,--......:�.-.--.......--._�-_..,...... :..._.,-.--, �. ..�.. ..._... _�. �•:-i_i--_-,.s-. x. ...�'-:' a�.uW`[':be mac.=4..-a�'�'�
Number of Lagoons w ❑ u sur ace rains resen p Lagoon Area [3 pray ie rea
Hol€I�ng Ponds f Sol< ';Traps `; �� p o tqui waste Management System k
_ —�
p ean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: l7 Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes ® No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes N No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? p Spillway p Yes R No
Structure i Structure.2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ............ Frant............ .......Back............ ..................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard(inches): ............... 35................ ............... IA. ............... ................................... .................................... ....................................
.........................

Facility Number: 40-153 Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? p Excessive Ponding p PAN (3 Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Graze) Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Corn, Soybeans
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
13 Yes N No
p Yes ® No
p Yes N No
17 Yes N No
p Yes ® No
p Yes N No
p Yes R No
p Yes N No
13 Yes p No
13 Yes ❑ No
p Yes p No
p Yes ® No
p Yes N No
p Yes ® No
p Yes N No
Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes p No
p Yes R No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p o violations or deficiencies were noted urmg this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about is visit.
Coauren(ceCei7questfo�=, xptrianyF4answersndlor"pan*reromtnenda�pf�edtts orfanyother cci:m$ents:y ve_draw�ngs�ol'�far�ty,�tu betferpxpla�nrsxtuatlons (rse �diopat�pages askAecessary) �' �)✓ field Copy p Final Notes .��,
Records availableforreview.
..
Still working on meeting WA.
Waste analysis - 11/21/01 = 1.4 lbs & 1.9 lbs; 8/14/01 = 1.2 lbs & 1.2 lbs.
Irrigation records are complete and balanced out. Very little overapplication - not significant.
Freeboard levels are recorded weekly as required.
adn't used field T3242 #4 - only grass fields.
ake sure to pull soil samples for this year. Grounds are well kept. (SEE PAGE 3)
Reviewer/Inspector Name I1yr B ard�son4 _entered by Ain Tyndall , _ 'y '
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

05103701 Continued
Vacility Number: 40�153 Date of Inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below 13 Yes p No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? p Yes ig No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, 13 Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? p Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) p Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? p Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? p Yes p No
J

OF W AT
Michael F. Easley
0-' Q�
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
_ Y Gregory Thorpe, Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
To: Producers
From: Lvn B. Hardison
Environmental Specialist
Washington Regional Office
Date: February 20, 2002
Subject: Animal Compliance Routine Inspection
Year 2002
Enclosed please find a copy or copies of the Compliance Site Inspection(s) (as viewed in DWQ database) conducted at the
referenced facility by the Division of Water Quality from the Washington Regional Office. Please read this inspection and
keep with all other documents pertaining to your animal operation for future inspections.
hi general, these inspections included verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified Anunal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP);
(2) the famis complying with requirements of the -State Rules 15 NCAC 2H.0217, Senate Bill 1217, and the Certified Animal
Waste Management Plan, (3) the farm operation's waste management system is being operated properly under the direction of a
Certified Operator, (4) the required records are being kept; (5) there are no signs of seepage, erosion_ and/or runoff.
As a reminder, please note the following which are conditions of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan and the general
permit: therefore, these items must be implemented:
cp The maximum waste level in lagoons/storage ponds shall not exceed that specified in the CAWMP. At a minimum,
maximum waste level for waste for lagoons/storage ponds must not exceed the level that provides adequate storage to
contain 25 year, 24 hour storm event plus an additional foot of structural freeboard.
cp An analysis of the liquid animal waste from the lagoon shall be conducted as close to the time of application as practical and
at least within 60 days (before or after) of the date of application. This analysis shall include the following parameters-.
Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Zinc and Copper.
(p Soil analysis is required annually.
( The following records are required: off -site solids removal, maintenance, repair, waste/soil analysis and land irrigation
records. These records should bemaintained by the facility owner/manager in chronological and legible form -for a
minimum of tluee years.
cp Land application rates shall be in accordance with the CAWMP. In no case shall land application rates exceed the Plant
Available Nitrogen (PAN) rate for the receiving crop or result in runoff during and _given application_
(p In accordance with you waste utilization plan, the irrigation application events should not exceed the hydraulic loading as
specified per the soil type and in no case should an irrigation event exceed one inch per acre.
-..v*.vt r a Unnt...nt r "ibr nr f^Minpa Amm�aaa �P ut]yr".-A.]7 gauen •ulei ."u"J"a hn]� .nr.o u-ixva nun.q .Fj v �.. . Pt
can be another vegetated channel, an earth ditch, stabilization structure, or other suitable outlets.
rp It is suggested not required to keep crop yield information for future use to update your waste management plan. You will
need three years of crop yield data before your plan can be updated -
For your information, any swine facility that has a discharge to surface waters of the State will have to apply for a National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit with the Division of Water Quality, effective January 1, 2001.
Thank you for your assistance and cooperation during the inspection_ If you have any questions, please contact your Technical
Specialist or me at 252-946-6481, ext. 318_
Cc: WaRO
LBH Piles (inspection form only)
943 Washington Square Mall Washington, NC 27889 252-946-Wl (Telephone) 252-946.9215 (Fax)

Peason.for Visit a0 Routine O Complaint O Follow up ()Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
-------------------------- - ..... .......----..
Facility Number 40 153 Date of Visit: t3/2/2ot11 Time: 11t00
r- Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
❑ Permitted ❑ Certified ❑ Conditionally Certified ® Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .............
Farm Name: Qutatpuptgk a Farm AIA.2.................................---..... ......... County: �irmAte................... ............................ VNr Q.......
Owner Name: d:et'.t:y........................................ CfLanIugbAn.................... ............... ........ Phone No: 252:742-A 1..95..................
MailingAddress: 1 LJ,.fox.4SA....................................................................................... W.j&tjj%ib u=,XC................................................ 7.788K .............
FacilityContact: .............................................................................. Title:.................................. ................... Phone No:
Onsite Representative: ,) crU...C.ujaningb= .................................................................. Integrator: PrcmiumAtandard ..............................................
Certified Operator: AAra....................................... CAMnita bAm................................. Operator Certification Number: .1N2{.............................
Location of Farm:
fake 58N off Snow Hill approx. 10 mi. Turn right on SR 1225. Go across Contuentnea Creek bridge. Take next right on SR A6
1222. Go about 1 mil. where sharp curve in road turns left. Hog farm will be on the right.
®Swine []Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 ° 31 �K Longitude 77 ° 44 25 K
Design Current
Design Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
Poultry
Capacitv Population Cattle
Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Layer
❑ Dairy
® Feeder to Finish
9792
9500
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
10 Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
9,792
❑ Gilts
Total SSLW
1,321,920
❑ Boars
Number of Lagoons 1 2 JE3 Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds 1 Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impact-,
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the Stale? (if yes. notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min;
d. Doe, discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If fes, uoti]�• DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:.........----hant..........................back..................................................................................... .........
Freeboard(inches) M.............................. 25............... .................................... ........... ........... .......... ..................................... ..................................

05103101 Continued
Facility Number: 40-153 Date of Inspection 8/21200i
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? El Yes ®No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ® No
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Graze) Small Grain Overseed
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? � ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ® Yes ❑ No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ® No
Reuuired Records & Documents
17 _ Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ® No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ic/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ❑ Yes ® No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes ® No
21 _ Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ® No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ic/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes ® No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes ® No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes ® No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ® No
® No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments (refer to question #f): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary): ❑ Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
*Soil test dated 4/10/01. Lime applied at rate of one ton per acre during fall of 2000. Some fields require more than one ton lime per acre.
Need to follow lime requirements and suggest keeping lime receipts_
*Waste analysis dated 6/8/01 nitrogen is JJ12= 1.8 lbs/l000 gallons
JJI 1= 2.4 lbs/1000 gallons
4/12/01 nitrogen is sample 1000=2.2 lbs/1000 gallons
sample 2000=2.4 Ibs/1000 gallons
*Need to secure new waste analysis.
*Discussed HUU/waste analysis schedule (60 days) ;
Reviewer/InspectorName +MartinMclawhorn --- - —
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

a51#3/0I — Condnued
Faeility Number. 40-153 1 Date of inspection 8/2/2001
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29_ Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fans) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32_ Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
At time of inspection, Mr. Cunningham is working with tech. spec. WA Certification. Extension has been filed with DWQ. Addition
creage to be cleared to meet certification requirement_
lagoon level being recorded weekly on calendar in office. Need to keep this recording on lagoon sheet which is permanent in record
*Records are balanced and complete.
*Small amount of trash needs to removed from lagoon.
15_ Weeds in front pasture need to be sprayed. Back coastal pasture has been sprayed and appears free of weeds.

Facility Number 3 jDateorvisit. Time: Q 4
� Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
arPermitted a Certified 0 Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold
Farm Name: .... LA" . :- .`. AZW............. County:... .....................................
Owner Name:...........c a"' .................. ..1� Js1?!1M. . Phone No:.. .......i.� .-..s .. s.................
FacilityContact: ................................................................................. itle:............................................................... Phone No: ....................................................
Mailing Address:... ....,gl'A�M�X1...Q.�,(�.`.. za,..�..� 0 Uv15.��? ................. ... .. ...... 1...
Onsite Representative:.... .....Q; J.o.A&,i.....11 ............................ Integrator:..... l.!'L0.�- sA�llY.l......................
Certified Operator: ..... (.y(.YV.� I`.eti).... ,.,,, .►^Yl.............. Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude • • 44 Longitude ' t It
Design Current
Swine ..Capacity Population
❑ Wan to Feeder
eederto Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
n Farrow to Finish
I: n soars
. Design Current
Potiltry Capacity Population
❑ Layer
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
4TotaiSSM .
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Dairy
Number of+Lagoons aZ 'I ❑Subsurface Draiins Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds /Soled Traps z� ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges R Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes Ta
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 21�0
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes
01/01/01 Continued

Facility Number: LJO— 1�3
Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier: ,. J,.-ty6p . *ze..
Freeboard(inches):..........,J.1... ► ............................li. ...11 ..........................................................................
❑ Yes 91101
Structure 5 Structure 6
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenancelimprovement?
11. is there evidence of over application? n❑ Excessive Ponding [I PAN 1❑ Hydraulic Overload ��
12. Crop type l M lt�A_ PVX_XV D.0d l &Jx' � Q 017_9 61 1 O1 AXI �'�1Vl�J1aL'
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated inUe Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
19. is
Renuired Records & Documents
❑ Yes 2<0
❑ Yes B<O
❑ Yes B No
❑ Yes 21�o
❑ Yes 2-fio
❑ Yes 2fio
❑ Yes 210
❑ Yes [ K40
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
ElYes I;21iv0
❑ Yes &KO
19. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑ Yes 93<0
20.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
Yes
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) / ✓ ✓ ✓
❑
2'�Io
21.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
To
22.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
21No
23,
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
50
24.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
&K
25.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
G; o
26.
Does facility require afollow-up visit by same agency?
❑Yeso
27.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
Odor Issues
28.
Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
❑ Yes
No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
29.
Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
tydtvo
01/0l/01
Continued

Facility Number: L> — j Date of Inspection
Printed on: 1/4/2001
30. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
31. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
32. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
33. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
34. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanealtemporary cover?
❑ Yes 0440
❑ Yes Q-1110
❑ Yes Q,4o
❑ Yes �o
❑ Yes
113 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
:VAC UfM WIU�'J-UI 1d411I1J' W UCLLCI CX�IIdIU �lIUdUUIly. �UJC dUUIUUUdl ❑ �6�• dJ UCI.CJ%"'}')
Field COPY ❑Final Notes ,
L� l�• ; 3 - i � a t aa. a lbs./ loco c .s (L- � � Ibs•�1000 s�I.��
�;ZSJad
vo _ U"—Q- t pL�-�� Z°°c, • [� ° 1��
4-� Past IS �a _ k e. �
3
kkie-
ae�.�s cs `S , coo P
106 t,uru 4-.e.AI..—
1� C C O (UGS S�t1� O L C.0 Y if Gh p veQ]� LO
yo4- rat -
QV�Q�
Reviewer/Inspector Name C
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date:
01/01/01

of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit *Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number
Date of Visit: 8128R000 Time: 1510 � Printed on: 3192001
40 153
0 Not Operational 0 Below Threshald
❑ Permitted ® Certified 13 Conditionally Certified 13 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: .......................... ... County:!Grttte............................ ......... .......... W.ARO.......
Owner Name: dterr:Y...................................... Cwufingham........................................... Phone No: 251: 4.T.-B145.
Facility Contact: ...................................................................... .. Title: ... Phone No:
MailingAddress: R1.1.&ta.45A....................................................................................... . .algtD berg-XC................................................ 178SR .............
Onsite Representative: Jerry-C.ut njugham.............................................
Certified Operator: Berra.1%................................ C,rmninggham
Location of Farm:
Integrator: C.turnfmalarxw....................................................
Operator Certification Number: 11096.............................
rake 58N off Snow Hill approx. 10 mL Turn right on SR 1225. Go across Contneutnea Creek bridge. Take next right on SR +
1222. Go about 1 mL where sharp curve in road tarns left. Hog farm will be on the right. r
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 ° 31 A Longitude
_._ ......_.. _...... - - - -- ...................
:._
Design .::`: Current........: Design Current .. Degign.:..:...:.Current
Swrne:' .::.:Ca aeit .':;Po ulation Poultry:: pacity.:Po irlatron Cattle
p Capacrty:Populatwn...:'
::::Ca . .........
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
9792
9600
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Di4chaMes & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 0 No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed. was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/min'?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes. notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier: ....N=EjQ 1br&U".......J3.U&,jtMRtxlM................................ ....... ......... I ... I ...... .... .... I
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
Structure 5 Structure 6
S/S
Freeboard (inches):...............4S...............................-33...................

5100
Continued on back
Facility Number: 40-153 Date of Inspection $12$121)00 printed ()n;
3/9/2001
5. Are there anv immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
❑ Yes
N No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
❑ Yes
N No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public stealth or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
N No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
N No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
N No
Waste Apolication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
N No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
N No
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Graze) Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Small Grain Overseed Corn
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes N No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Rerluired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WL1P, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
0 N6'violatio6s:or;defieiericies-wel, re:noted:during thii•visit:; You wtil:reeeive'no further: ;
.' correspondence albout this -Visit.,
1
A waste analysis dated 6/19/00 L1 at 2.4 Ibs11000 gal. and
L2 at 2.2 lbs/1000 gal.
-vious report dated 4/3/00 with L1 at 2.1 and L2 at 0.77 lbs11000 gal.
rhfo soils_report available fO 1999�Fias-seat off samples_fo� 2900 7
ust PAN rates on IRR2 for grazed pastures - no overapplication has occurred.
EE PAGE 3
N Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
Ir
Reviewer/Inspector Name '� = j--

Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 51001
Facility Number: 4( -153 Date of Inspection 8/28/20114 Printed on: 3/9/2001
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads.. building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Keeping lagoon level records as required.
J

Division of Water Quality
O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
(Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit © Routine O Complaint Q Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 40 153 Date of Visit 5/11/2ot10 Printed on: 5/16/2000
O Not O erational 0 Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified D Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .....................
Farm Name: QlllUallalrhlJAil.fujam.##.)..A.2.............................................. ................... County: GrCCXkC .............................................. Wt RU.......
Owner Name:Jgrry....................................... LU.it ingbAm............................................ Phone No: 25.2. z474195...........................................................
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone No:
Mailing Address: lit,..l..Q.X..45A...................................................................................... W.8J 9.0.urg,.SIC.............................. .............. 2.7.80 .............
Onsite Representative:,]&1C1I3.C1J[#]u1J[tghAAA.................................................................. Integrator: CarAl1J[1d.k:axMj...................................... ..............
Certified Operator:,Itr1tJCJ..........................:...... CujawngllwR................................. Operator Certification Numbera5'49 .............................
Location of Farm:
olra 49M nff Cnnw 14i11 annrny 10 mi Turn riaht nn CR 1774; C.n aprncc CnntnPntnPa ('rrPli hrirlaP TalrP nPvt riaht nn OR I i
I.kkF+.17.11.+iiAJINA{A.A..Illll,..kt'A1SrA.T�.AIAHA.S:IJ.{.XIF..IA4.A.11itSl..4lAI.lA.I.JS.4..�...{.iS!.1aiJ.M0..?7CMI..U.F..NA{..VJISr.IUi IA�.............................................................................. 7
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 ° 31 54 Longitude 77 °F 44 25--1 «
Design Current
Swine C.nnarity Pnnnlatinn
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
9792
1_7792
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer 10 Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 9,792
Total SSLW 1,321,920
Number of Lagoons 2 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present 110 Lagoon Area I0 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3
Identifier: ............ Front ............ .... :....... .8ar1c............. .............................
❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
..............................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): 26 - 36

Continued on back
Facility Number: 40-153 Date of Inspection 5/11/2000 Printed on: 5/16/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the'waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ®No
l 1. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Yes ® No
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda Small Grain
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
W. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
IT Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
GO discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
0 NO wioTations:or deleiencies-Were:noted :di ring•thi9 Visit:: Yott_ will reeeive na furtheir : • : -
corresoondenee about this.visit.:::: :::: ::: :: :: :: .......
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes IN No
0 Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
Comments (refer to question ft Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
All records of the CAWMP are complete including the irrigation records with a nitrogen balance.
Well maintained facility.
Reviewer/Inspector Name
)Daphne B. Cullom Entered by Ann Tyndall

Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
Facility Number: 40-153 Date of inspection 5/11/2000 Printed on: 5/16/2000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge attor below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28.
Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
❑ Yes
® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29.
Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
❑ Yes
® No
30.
Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
❑ Yes
® No
31.
Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
❑ Yes
® No
32.
Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes
❑ No

Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Operation Review
Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Compliance Inspection
Division of Water Quality - Compliance Inspection
Q Other Agency - Operation Review
14PRoutine 0 Com laint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number 40 153 Date of Inspection 12/9199
Time of Inspection 3:00 PM 124 hr. (hh:mm)
® Permitted © Certified ® Conditionally Certified 0 Registered It3 Not O erational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: Lunnia0mam.EarxtxSAA2................... County: Gxcrmr ............................................... W. A►AQ.......
Owner Name:,lexl.y................................ .....C.ltn Ctmingham ........................................... . Phone No: 252-2.42-8.tQ5.........................................................
FacilityContact:.............................................................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
Mailing Address: RL.l.,X.45A...................................................................... ........... W.4W0.tt�Mrg'.xC............................................... 2.7.8B8..............
.....
Onsite Representative:]�xxy.Clitltai�€ghtilOR.................. ..... . I ntegrator: Hurphy..Faimily..�:�.t m................... ............................. ............. ..................
Certified Operator: ,Jet:xy..M................................. CUna t]l ham................................. Operator Certification Number:J.849bt.............................
Location of Farm:
�114k.�.S�iY.Q�.Snax►�.QilA.�l�xaxR.�R.�IIA..:t:�Ixtl..righ.t.any.Sli..1.Z,2S...Gn.acr.Qss.C!?�Itu��nt�n�ea.Cr.I:SIC.�xadgt<...�'alcc.n��xt.xagltt.�a..�tt... -�',
L222�.Ga.uboul.l..nni,.lt�t�.ahax..�urx.ila.naad.t�txns.lt•ft,.>I.a .frlm..�xlll.k.aa..kla�.�ra t,..............................................................................
Latitude 35 • 31 ' S4 Longitude 77 • 44 ° 25 µ
Design Current
Swine Canacity Pnnulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
0 Feeder to Finish
9792
9500
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer I I ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 9,792
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons 2 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps 10 No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated Flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes []No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 0 No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes 0 No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure i Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): ,jQ....42,
............... „ . ..............................................................................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99
❑ Yes 0 No
Continued on back
Printed on 12/16199

Printed on 12/16/99
(Facility Number: T40-153 I Date of Inspection 12/9/99
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
❑ Yes
® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
®No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
®No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
®No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
❑ Yes
® No
12. Crop type Corn, Wheat, Soybeans C. Bermuda S. Grain (grazed to hay)
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
®No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
® No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
® No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
® No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
® No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
® No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
❑ No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
® No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
®No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified A WMP?
❑ Yes
® No
13- �To,violations-or delidondeg-WOrenoted _diieing this vii§iit. ' Pori will'receive no furtli_eir.
.. correspondence about this•visit..... ......................... . ..... .
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
Reviewer/Inspector Name ;Carl Dunn Entered by Ann Tyndall
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

0 Division of Soil and -Water Conservation - Operation -Review
Division of Soil and Water. Conser'h aon'-,Co>' fiance Inspection
. ® Division of Water: Quality, - Compliance Inspect on
13.Oiher Agency = Uperatiotii:Renevv :e .. .
10 Routine O Complaint Q Follow-up of DWQ inspection Q Follow-up of DSWC review Q Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection = D 24 hr. (hh:mm)
%Permitted ©Certified © Conditionally Certified 0 Registered 13 Not O erational Date Last Operated:
1. 4 Z
Farm Name. f nI" .�..............F�,.S County: .......................
Owner Name: ............... Qrr`'..-..-..-... ��.�'^�� "`..........-.. Phone No:...................................
Facility Contact:.............................................................................. Title:
MailingAddress: ............................................. . ...........................................
Onsite Representative: .............. ........ G�L "r`
Certified Operator:&'^`t.............C"............
Location of Farm:
Phone No:
........................................................................................................ ..........................
Integrator: �a-� i-� F. -cs
................... Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Latitude • 9 C�.; Longitude • ° �=
Design Current.
Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
I
q sOd
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts,
❑ Boars
Design Current_ Design Current : 'e
Poultry , - . Capacity Population . Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design -Capacity
Total.SSLW
Number of Lagoons -2 [[]Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds /Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ElLagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made`?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c- If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gallmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (Freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Identifier:
❑ Yes ff No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes E] No
❑ Yes 0 No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Freeboard (inches): ..........3 ............... .......... Z
5. Are there any, immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99
❑ Yes f!fNo
Continued on back

Facility Number: YO —) 5 3 1 Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
12_ Crop type Q,)rn
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
No•' ihA'alT:ions:or deficiencies •mere noted_ di"ig this:visit: - Y;oit witi-f&6W iio futther •.
correspondence. albout. this visit: -.... -. -. -. . • . • . • . • . • . •. • .
Comments:.(refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any
Usemdrawings of facility to better explairi situations. (use additional -pages as necessary):
❑ Yes 4 No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑`No
❑ Yes 6 No
❑ Yes E[ No
❑ Yes 2TNo
❑ Yes J?J'No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ErNo
❑ Yes ONO
❑ Yes Zf No
❑ Yes 2TNo
❑ Yes ZNo
❑ Yes EfNo
❑ Yes ETNo
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes E' No
❑ Yes 6 No
❑ Yes E�fNo
1
Reviewer/Inspector Name f ar to n.,
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
3/23/99

E3 Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Operation Review
0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Compliance Inspection
® Division of Water Quality - Compliance Inspection
© Other Agency - Operation Review
10 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number 40 153 Date of Inspection 12/9/99
Time of Inspection 3:00 PM 24 hr. (hh:mm)
0 Permitted E3 Certified ® Conditionally Certified © Registered 13 Not Operational I Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: C.11A Aiplghli[1A11..) ArM. #1.&.2....................... ..... County: Greciac ............................................... WARU.......
Owner Name: Jgr.ry........................................ CtAp jjtghAM.....................I........"............ Phone No: Zj52:-7.47:-&9,5 ..........................................................
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone No:
MailingAddress: RL.1..Rox45 A...................................................................................... WAbI.Q. A urg,.NC............................................... U.N.8 .............
Onsite Representative: s.eft;j:.l(YIJUt]RI.Agh.Atxl.................................................................. Integrator: URxR4..l;'.AiUt11 !.I &rM1.....................................
Certified Operator: ArflyM................................. Cullainghm ................................. Operator Certification Number:18.49.6 .............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude 35 • 31 54 " Longitude 77 • ®25 "
Swine
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population
[I Layer
9792 9500 ❑ Non -Layer
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
[I Boars
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Dairy I I :::::]
❑ Non -Dairy
Total Design Capacity 9,792
Total SSLW 1,321,920
Number of Lagoons 2 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? [I Yes N No
Discharge originated at: El Lagoon [I Spray Field (3 Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes [I No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes N No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes N No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway E3 Yes N No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(inches): .........3.Q............... ..4.2.........................................................................................................................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes N No
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back
Printed on 5191211nO

Printed on 5/9/2000
Facility Number: 40-153 I Date of Inspection F 1-219/99
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
❑ Yes
® No
(if any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelimprovement?
❑ Yes
®No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
®No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
❑ Yes
® No
12. Crop type Corn, Wheat, Soybeans C. Bermuda S. Grain (grazed to hay)
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
®No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
®No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
®No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
® No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
® No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
® No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
® No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
❑ No
23, Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
®No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
®No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
® No
i41 .viojatiwis'or deficiencies•Were:noted"dui3iag•tbis visit::You_will receive u6 fu_rtheir
: corres' correspondence, about this •visit.
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary}:
Reviewer/Inspector Name !Carl Dunn Entered by Ann Tyndall
Reviewer/]nspector Signature: Date:

N Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Operation Review
13 Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Compliance Inspection
13 Division of Water Quality - Compliance Inspection
13 Other Agency - Operation Review
10 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number 40 153 Date of Inspection 5/26/99
--- —- --- Time of Inspection 1100 24 hr. (bh:mm}
® Permitted E3 Certified ® Conditionally Certified 0 Registered JE3 Not O erational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: CulaAil llalAn.kaxM.#1.&......................... County: Grggjap............................................... WAROi.......
Owner Name: hCry........................... c1A11t11U1 hAm................. .. Phone No: 25.2-147:11 91...--------
Facility Contact: ..............................................................................Title:................. Phone No
MailingAddress: lit,..1...Uaj.45A ...................................................................................... WA1atjx)bmrg,.XC............................................... 1.7.808 .............
Onsite Representative: Jl rU...C.ujwinghAm.................................................................. Integrator: rdurplxj'..k.Uti AYA.arms.....................................
Certified Operator: ,Jcxxy..M.................................. C.UjI jugXt>Im................................. Operator Certification Number:18.49±&.............................
Location of Farm:
.•.--------------------------.---------.... .........
Latitude 35 • 3I 54 Longitude 77 • ®� 25 µ
Design Current
Swine Canacitv Ponulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
9792
3900
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Cai)acitv Population Cattle CaiDacitv Po ulation
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer I Non -Dairy __j
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 9,792
Total SSLW 1,321,920
Number of Lagoons l2 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present JFE1 Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds 1 Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharp_es & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ®No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes 0 No
Structure i Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: near entrance back structure
Freeboard (inches): ............... 2B 45
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ®No
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back
Printed an 51912000

Printed on 5/9/2000
JFacility Number: 40--153 I Date of Inspection 5/26/99
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Yes ® No
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Graze) Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Small Grain Overseed Corn, Soybeans, Wheat
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ®No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ®No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ® Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ®No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ® Yes ❑ No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ®No
Reouired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ® No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ❑ Yes ® No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
® No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
®No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
®No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
® No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
®No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
® No
0. N,6-vi61atiotis:or deficiieneies ykfe:noted:during•this wisit:: dii Will;receive h6 further "
:: corres• ondence about this.visit. :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Comments (refer to question # ): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
* Recommend signing up for the local Neuse Rule options by 8/l/99 with the Greene Soil & Water Conservation District
* Given Integrator Registration card
14b. Operation unable to meet 75% rule and is subject to a wettable acre determination based on 8 out of 11 fields. irrigation
system installed by L&L Irrigation Company, Newton Grove NC.
r
15. Small grain overseed with PAN rates of 50 Ibs/acre must be harvested by May 1. Mr. Cunningham is concerned about small
grain rebounding. He will harvest small grain overseed next week. As requested, checked on feasibility of grazing small grain on
"hay" acreage. At 50 lb. PAN rate, it is permissible to either graze or hay small grain overseed as long as cows are removed by M
1 from hayland.
Reviewer/Inspector Name +Pat Hooper 252/946-6481
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

Printed on 5/9/2000
Facility Number: 40-153 1 Date of Inspection 5/26/99
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge attor below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ❑ No
28. is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ❑ No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ❑ No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ❑ No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
* Last waste analysis dated 5/10/99 with lagoon i at 2.5 lbs/gal. and lagoon 2 at 2.4 lbs/1000 gal
* Keeping lagoon level records as required by General Permit
* Has 1998 soil sample reports - has not applied lime
1W
Printed on 5/9/2000

Date of Inspection
Facility Number r- Time of Inspection : I 24 hr. (hh:mm)
® Registered 13 Certified 13 Applied for Permit Wertnitted 113 Not Opera Date Last Operated:
Farm Name . �.L...� .. .........Q ll►'1.....s t County:......... ,..;RR- ....................
Owner Name: ......�M !x.- - �AA`''`^ ................. Phone No:....c .Sc7�.-.. .y: ..-... .� Q.. ...................
Facility Contact:... .................... ............., ...... Title: ........... Phone No:
Mailing Address: j�} •}..Q......O .x..........S`.P. - 4.0 j �a� -7QS 6.� .. ....... Onsite Representative:.... ftil.... �,1t, v�' ......... Integrator:Aut , �-✓Ka lc•� ."��►'�
Certified O orator;. - ....k...........6� O erator Certification (Number,....r�`ta�.........p ti.'.'`..�......................... P
Location of Farm: U
35..r�J. .......................................... .. ........... . $
Latitude ®° 4 46 Longitude ©° ' a s 4C
Current
......... .....
❑ an to Feeder
ER'Fecderto Finish
q
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Number of Lagoons !Holding Ponds j I❑ Subsurface Drains Present JJU Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
.... .
MMM
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/ho[ding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25197
❑ Yes UKO
❑ Yes 53-K0-
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes R<0
❑ Yes Gll�o
❑ Yes EKNo
❑ Yes 6dNo
❑ Yes 0<0

Facility Number: t_Q —1 5�3
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
❑ Yes
[P-q6_
Structures (Laeoonsgoldi g Ponds. Flush Pits, etc.
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
Lld'No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(ft): ...... .q..1,t'. —.................SU...:.!......... ................................... ....................................
....................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
El Yes
�/
91 No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
fial�o
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes
,_,
[�,
Waste Annlication
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters LState, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type? C ..... !�? ................ ....
. 6.1`Y� ..................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (A MP) . ❑ Yes
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
No.vialationsor deficiencies:were-noted-during this:visit. Yoa:rvill receive•nti-f iriher:
: correspMde>nce dboitt this. Visit,','.:
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
U1�V o
2<0
LKN��6
2<0
Q No
(<o
❑ Yes 0<0
2Yes ,❑��No
❑ Yes LDS No
,. ___r_ -..7 ,_ ,
tt r 1
,;z4 • re co vtD s, cal t,J Jj�-
��� F I
U
7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name XA"t,
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date: t r. _ t 4 ct�

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
!; and Natural Resources
Washington Regional Office
James B. Hunt, -Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
December 19, 1997
Mr.Jerry Cunningham
Cunningham Farms #1 & 42
Rt. 1, Box 45A
Walstonburg, NC 27888
SUBJECT: Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
Cunningham Farms #1 & #2
Fac. No. 40-153
Greene County
Dear Mr_ Cunningham:
s 5CA7r Q, Y v
X.
On September 24, 1997, I conducted an animal feedlot operation site inspection at the referenced facility.
Overall, the operation was found to be in satisfactory condition. A copy of the inspection report is attached
for your review.
In general, this inspection includes verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan (CAWMP); (2) the farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC 211.0217,
Senate Bill 1217, and the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan; (3) the farm operation's waste
management system is being operated properly under the direction of a Certified Operator; (4) the required
records are being kept; (5j there are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or runoff.
The recommendations and/or comments regarding your inspection can be found in the comment section of
the attached inspection form. It is very important as the owner and Operator in Charge that you address any
noted concerns, as soon as possible. For assistance, please contact your Technical Specialist and/or
the local Soil & Water Conservation District Office.
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance during the inspection. Should you have further questions
or comments regarding this inspection, do not hesitate to call me at [phone], ext. 321.
Sincerely,
QLu— 6 • lL04—
Daphne B. Cullom
Environmental Specialist lI
cc: Greene County SWCD Office
Mike Regans, Greene County NCCES
Dr. Garth Boyd, Murphy Family Farms
,VKh0
943 WashingtDn square Mall, Washington, North Carolina 27889 Telephone 919-94W81 FAX [phone]
An Equal opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

10 r:ounne p t-ompiamt p rouow-up or uwtl inspection p ronow-up of uawe review p vtner I
Date of Inspection
Facility Number
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
p Registered 0 Certified M Applied for Permit p Permitted 0 of 0perateona Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: County: Greene WARO
Owner Name: Jerry.......... _W _ .. Cunningham ....... ........... .... ------- Phone No: 519:.7.47.:8145...__. __............ _.... _........
Facility Contact: ....____W .__....... Title: ....... . . .......... . ..... . . . ............ Phone No: ..................................... ........
Mailing Address: RL1,.Bax.545A
Onsite Representative: dergrl]ttrtinghaux.. _ .__ Integrator:lVluxp►Ity.Fapxily.FBrms... ... .. .
Certified Operator: Cu�nningbain...... ...... ........... .......... Operator Certification Number: 18996.............. ...............
L:)cation of Farm:
Latitude ©• ©4 ®K Longitude ©• ®©�
estga_,.. Current r- esign Design Current
. Swiue � capacity-..Popplation-=:Poultry'T ;_Capacity Population Cattle :Capacity':Population
Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
13 Farrow to Wean
Farrow to -Feeder
13 Farrow to Finis
Gilts
13 Boars
lumber_of Lags
ayeT
;
0 airy
L13
Non —Layer
; :
p on- airy
_Other
_ Total Design
,
—
,Capacity
r- 4 - - _
=Total SSLw
,
p o iqu
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gallmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
S. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
pray r ieia Area 1.
p Yes N No
p Yes ® No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes N No
p Yes ® No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
p Yes N No

aC t um r: 40_153
1
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (^Laeoons,Holding Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
p Yes a No
p Yes a No
Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (ft): 3.5 ft 4.5 ft
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
p Yes a No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
p Yes E No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
a Yes p No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
p Yes a No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
13 Yes a No
(if in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
I5. Crop type _. Co&galBermu�da .Ct ass...._. _ _ .... _._......_.......... ................ .._...............................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
p Yes a No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
13 Yes a No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
13 Yes a No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
p Yes N No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
13 Yes a No
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
p Yes ENO
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
p Yes a No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
p Yes a No
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
p Yes n No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
p Yes a No
R . oMq ons.or rxenctes-were.noo urtng is visit:. You will.reretve no further.
Cerrespon0a'c� about xtiis vi,§�i::
f

Division of Soil and Water Conservation p Other Agency
p Division of Water Quality
16 Routine p Complaint p Follow-up of DWQ inspection p Follow-up of DSWC review p Other
Date of Inspection
Facility Number
Time of Inspection ® 24 hr. (hh:mm)
p Registered N Certified 0 Applied for Permit o Permitted 0 of peratiana Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: CwwinghmaU.F.Arms.#1..&.2................................................................. County: Greene WARO
OwnerName:Jerry....................................... Cnnninigha u............-.------.-..................... Phone No: 919-.247.-.8195 ..........................................................
Facility Contact: ,terry.Cuuwiugham......................................Title: owner .................................................. Phone No: 9J917.47z,8195 .......................
Mailing Address: RL.I,.Bo 4 xA....................................................................................... Walsltoxxhurg,.N.0 ................................................ 27R88 ..............
Onsite Representative: drrxy..Cunnunghaat,.Junius wlwa,ms............................ Integrator: ].► arphy-Fain)}.Farms......................................
Certified Operator: Jr xy.AL ............................... comingum .................................. Operator Certification Number:18496............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude ©0 ©& ®" Longitude ©. ®6 ©"
v sign Current
Swine 5 Capacity PopidAt ou
13 Wean to Feeder
® FeeTer to E
13 Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
13 Gilts
Boars
es�gn: urren - es�gn Current
y Capacity Population-„ Cattle - Capacity Population
Other ;
N, Total Design Capacity. ,
Totk],SSLW- 1,321,920
Number of Lagoons-A61ding 1%nios u sur ace Drains Present "goon Ares 113 spraTTTFrd Area —]-
No Liquid Waste Management System
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? p Yes N No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes ® No
b. If discharge is observed; did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes N No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) [3 Yes ®No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? p Yes ® No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require p Yes ® No
maintenance/improvement?
b. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? p Yes ® No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? 0 Yes ® No
7/25/97

acility Number: 40_153
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
p Yes
® No
Structures (La oons,Holdinp, Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
p Yes
® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5 Structure
6
Identifier: .l# L.near.entLunce................92.............................. .............. ..........................
...
Freeboard (ft): 3.4 3.9
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
p Yes
® No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
p Yes
® No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
® Yes
p No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
p Yes
® No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
13 Yes
® No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type .... Caasial Rcm3uda.(,aze)-........... Small. vain.O.Ymeed ....... ...... Cmstal.Bamuda.(hay..................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
I7. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
R . o vto bons. or acrencies'were.aon unng t rs vise . ou Wi .reeeive nu u er .
:'Q00k6 6B06e� abode x�iis v�st>t- :.. .
p Yes N No
p Yes N No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ® No
p Yes N No
p Yes p No
Comments (refer to question #):• Eiplain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary.):. _
o subsurface drainage on site according to Mr. Cunningham
* Need to pull soil samples for 1997 0
Need10 secure copy of design information/calculations including Operation & Maintenance Plan, hazard classification, and site
valuation
Need to complete odor control, insect control and mortality checklists (not required at time of certification but will need for
eneral Permit)
Z. Lagoon 2 - need to mow inside wall down to top of temporary storage (bottom of red on marker). Lagoon I - initiate efforts to
,tablish grass on bare spots. * Problems pose no immediate threat to structures.
`Reviewer/Inspector Name rat H6_0pear
IReviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

❑ DSWC Animal Feedlot Operation Review
_tea
Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
10'Routine O C=i laint O Follow-up of D«°Q inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other �
Date of inspection
Facility Number 4
Time of Inspection a=a A'1'l 2.4 hr. (hh:mm)
13 Registered ErCertified © Applied for Permit 0 Permitted JE3 Not Operational I Date Last Operated:....
Farm Name: ......C..UAAU1. #fir...... County: ..... ........................ .......................
Owner Name: ............ �.r.`-�..................... ..r1,^.A_�
Facility Contact: ........................................ ................ 'Title:...................... .
i4iailing Address:..:44 ..... I.....,.,r.
Onsite Representative:....�t! , Y......�.Q,X►r...... a-!'u �f�4
Certified Operator;...��,�....................... yrt.! .-
Location of Farm:
Phone \o:...�.q `I.T..- .......
.................................. Phone No: ...................................................
Integrator: ... &T. ....:T--l5ti...c1.�t�.. 5
Operator Certification Number-.AVA. (to ....
.......................��.................................................................................................................................................................................................
1
...C.
......... ............................_._........... ..............._................................... ..........................................................................................................
..._..._._..
Latitude • 4 44 Longitude ' ° "
Swine Capacity Population
❑ W an to Feeder
G;Keeder to Finish
973
p
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer I I JEI Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity Z
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons/Holding Ponds ❑ Suhsurface Drains PresinijillLagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
General ,,�
I. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ___KO
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes trNo
Discharge oriLinated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If dischar-e is observed, did it reach Surfac4 Water'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ,�
❑_,No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? El Yes M No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes &'�o
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes hd No
maintenance/improvement? ��_'1�/
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes LNc
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes ]o
7/75/97 Continued on back

Facility Number:
8. Are there lagoons or s orage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes PHIO'_
Structures (Lagoons 11oldingPonds, Flush Pits, etc.
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes LH41,0
S�t-r-u^cture I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure. 5 Structure 6
1denEifier:lr1Ni.�.. �'ct!�Y.......
Freeboard) : ft `
( ............. ............... s�7 ....t�r1K....... ................................... .................................... .................................... ....................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes 63,Ko
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ YesO
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? le"Sto n C) dtxR, tJ& E Y s ❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses tar
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State. notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ......
.. .. .....................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designate in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement'?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
0 No.violations or deFiciencies were noted -during' this.visit.-.You.will re'ceive-ito furtlier
correspbMence about this'visit:
CominciAki efer to.Auestion #):: Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendation
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations . (use additional pages as necessary)
WeLau-
or any
t
❑ Yes M.<io
❑ Yes &Kol
❑ Yes ER<o
❑ Yes ,@1, 4io
❑ Ld
Yes No
Cl Yes �2<0
El Yes Lf No
❑ Yes 2No
❑ Yes 2<0
❑ Yes 2<0
❑ Yes hio
❑ Yes ❑ No