400153_ENFORCEMENT_20171231

NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environmental W6

ENFORCEMENT
ENFORCEMENT
ENFORCEMENT

Wa ter Resources
_NVIPONMENI AL QUALITY
April 14, 2016
Jack and Jerry Cunningham
J&JFarms #1 &2
7643 Beamon Old Creek Rd.
Walstonburg, North Carolina 27888
Subject: Notice of Deficiency - Freeboard Level
J & J Farms 440-153
AWS 400153
Greene County
NOD-2016-PC-0064
Dear Jack and Jerry:
PAT MCCRORY
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
k'rr t lmy
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
f rirdi :. ir'
We have noted chronic rainfall events in North Carolina that are historic rainfall totals in some
areas. Thank you for your recent call regarding the freeboard levels at your facilities On
February 25, 2016, during a telephone conversation with staff of the NC Division of Water
Resources (D WR), you reported a high freeboard level (17 in # 1 & 18 in 92) in the primary
lagoons.
Please be advised that failure to maintain waste levels in your lagoon/storage ponds in
accordance with the. facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan and with Condition V.
2. of NC Swine Waste System General Permit could result in other actions being taken by the
Division in response to compliance matters.
Deficiency 1: On February 25, 2016, a lagoon/storage pond level was documented at 18 inches
of freeboard at the primary lagoon. A level of 19 inches is the maximum level allowed by your
permit and Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
Thank you for submitting a 30-day Plan of Action on March 1, 2016. Take all necessary
additional steps to insure lagoon levels remain in compliance with Section 2 of your permit.
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Water Resources -Water Quality Regional Operations -Washington Regional Office
943 Washington Square Mail, Washington, NC 27889
252-946-6481

April 11, 2016
J&J # 1 &2 Farm
Cont. Page Two
Please work to ensure that your facility is managed in a way to maintain compliance with permit
and animal waste management plan requirements. Failure to comply with conditions in a permit
may result in a recommendation of enforcement action, to the Director of the Division of Water
Quality who may issue a civil penalty assessment of not more that twenty-five thousand
($25,000) dollars against any "person" who violates or fails to act in accordance with the terms,
conditions, or requirements of a permit under authority of G.S. 143-215.6A. To minimize the
potential for any possible future compliance matters attributable to prolonged wet weather
conditions, you may wish to review your animal waste management system design, as well as the
waste plan itself, for any potentially beneficial modifications and/or improvements.
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please contact me at (252)-948-3939.
Sincerely,
�•fv F 1 _y'�:
C r r
David May`s
Water Quality Regional Operations Supervisor
Washington Regional Office
Cc: DWR-WQROS-CAFO Unit -Central Office
Greene County Soil and Water Conservation Disrict
NCDSWC - WaRO
WaRO Compliance Animal Files,
mds Files

edl � 4 Ds-,T- -d 0 / 6, - f G
PLAN OF ACTION FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES d0 OZ(
THIRTY (30) DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD stateun�rsry
A&T State Unrver:
COOPEI
I. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE ® EJCiENS
- rraowrng pew
1. Structure Name/Identifier (ID): Jerry Cunningham Date: 3/1/2016
JJL1- #1
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr/24 hr. storm stroage & structural freeboard
a. Current liquid level according to marker 1:7:
b. Designed 25 yr/24 hr. storm & structural freeboard - =` 19
c. Line b - line a (inches in red zone) =
d. Top of dike surface area according to design <'z 137500
(area at below structural freeboard elevation)
e. (Line c/12) x (line d) x (7.48 gallons/ft3)
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f. Temporary storage period according to structural design _r :1$0
g. Volume of waste produced according to design = 17354�4
h. Actual waste produced=
current herd #/certified herd # x line `=1-70239216
current herd 4800 certified herd - � 4896
i. Volume of wash water according to structural design --,7iz 0
j. Excess rainfall over evaporation according to design 85ZI=3
k. (line h + line i + line j) x 7.48 x (30 days/line f) _ '= f5087 096:
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
I. Current waste analysis dated
MM/DD/YYYY �1,1/9 4%2016
m. (lines e + k)/1000 x (line 1) _1 -691:610 005.
REPEAT SECTION 1 FOR EACH WASTE STR UCT URE ON SITE

PLAN OF ACTION FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
THIRTY (30) DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
11. TOTAL POUNDS OF PAN STORED WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD
AND/OR 25 YR./24 HR. STORM STORAGE ELEVATIONS IN ALL WASTE STRUCTURES FOR FACILI'
1.
structure ID: #1
line m=..591610305
2.
structure ID: #2
line m=
4986
;-
3.
structure ID:
line m=
4.
structure ID:
line m=
5.
structure ID-
line m=
6.
structure ID-
line m=
n.
lines 1 +2+3+4+5+6
Ill. TOTAL PAN BALANCE REMAINING FOR AVAILABLE CROPS DURING 30 PERIOD.
DO NOT LIST FIELDS TO WHICH PAN CAN NOT BE APPLIED DURING THIS 30 DAY PER]
o. tract # p. field # 9. crop r. acres s. PAN balance t. total PAN u. application
Ohlarrp) column r x s window
:324Z-
'0-'
BO
3.75
.275_
�104 -2
MAR -SERT�
.3242,:
-�4�26-
--,275
17,1�
ts
MARSEPT
-3-142
'J- 12
-36� 9
.
r-.-275
1014.
MAR'-'SEPTt'
3242
-3
A
B&�
-051
z- �'-2 7 5r
-l--113.MAR.-;:SEPT,'---
t-
-3 242
14
BG
867
-SEPT. IMAR
ADDMONAE ACREAGE AVAILABLE -
State current crop ending application date or next crop application beginning date for available
receiving crops during 30 day draw down period.
V. TOTAL PAN AVAILABLE FOR ALL FIELDS (SUM OF COLUMN T.)
IV. FACILITY'S POA OVERALL PAN BALANCE
W. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED (LINE n from section II)
X. CROP'S REMAINING PAN BALANCE (LINE V FROM SECTION III)
Y. OVERALL PAN BALANCE (W-X)
1-190'.217031
5107
[�'740F16 '78971

Sine Unirersiry
A$T $rase University
COOPERATI
® EXTENSION
I. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCITM'—"g" '
1. Structure Name/IdentJerry Cunningham Date:
JJL2- #2
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr/24 hr. storm stroage & structural
a. Current liquid level according to marker
b. Designed 25 yr/24 hr. storm & structural freeboard
c. Line b - line a (inches in red zone)
d. Top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation)
e. (Line c/12) x (line d) x (7.48 gallons/ft3)
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down pei
f. Temporary storage period according to structural design
g. Volume of waste produced according to design
h. Actual waste produced=
(current herd #/certified herd #) x line g
current h � 4$ 0. certified -4896
i. Volume of wash water according to structural design
j. Excess rainfall over evaporation according to design
k. (line h + line i + line j) x 7.48 x (30 days/line f) =
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period

NE
wy &Dlutims
3/1/2016
freeboard
-8" inches
T 4 inches
inches
k --16920ft'
riod
gallons
days
ft3
.7
36
17 0 2J7
.0 ft3
Ift3
L.5437 gallons

PLAN OF ACTION FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
THIRTY (30) DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
Line y must show as a deficit. If line y does not show as a deficit, list course of action here including purr
haul, depopulation, herd reduction, etc. For pump & haul and herd reduction options, recalculate new P
based on new information. If new fields are to be included as an option for lowering lagoon level, add tl-
fields to the PAN balance table and recalculate the overall PAN balance. If animal waste is to be hauled t
another permitted facility provide information regarding the herd population and lagoon freeboard level
the receiving facility.
NARRATIVE:
PERSON COMPLETING THIS DOCUMENT:
EVE H. HONEYCUTT
NC COOPERATIVE EXTENSION
LENOIR AND GREENE COUNTIES
Date Completed: 3/1/2016

oR1. IN Ar�RQ�
>_
13 �
May 1, 2001
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT RE QLLSTED
Mr. Jerry Cunningham
7643 Beaman Old Creek Road
Walstonburg, North Carolina 27998
SUBJECT: Notice of Deteciency
Animal Feedlot Operation Compliance Inspection
Cunningham Farms #1 & #2
Facility No. 40-153
Greene County
Dear Mr. Cunningham:
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Kerr T. Stevens
Division of Water Quality
On March 20, 2001,1 conducted an Animal Feedlot Operation Compliance Inspection at the Cunningham Farms 91 & #2 in
Greene County. A copy of the inspection report is attached for your review.
In general, this inspection included verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP) and
the General Permit; (2) the farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC 21-1.0217, Senate Bill 1217, the
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan and the General Permit; (3) the farm operation's waste management system is being
operated properly under the direction of a Certified Operator; (4) the required records are being kept; and that (5) there are no
signs of seepage, erosion, and/or runoff. The following deficiencies were observed during the inspection.
➢ Your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan records did not include a soil analysis for 1999. in Section M. Monitoring
and Reporting Requirements, item number 3 of the General Permit it is a requirement that a soil analysis be collected
annually on each application field receiving animal waste. Further, Section II. Operation and Maintenance Requirements,
item number 3 requires that lime be applied, as needed, to maintain soil pH in the optimum range for crop production. This
information is received from your annual soil analysis.
It is very important as the owner and the Operator in Charge that you resolve these aforementioned deficiencies and any other
problems that may arise, as soon as possible_ Nothing in this letter should be taken as absolving this facility of the
responsibility and liability of any violations that have resulted or may result from these deficiencies.
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance during the inspection. Should you have further questions or continents
regarding this inspection, do not hesitate to call at [phone], ext. 321.
Sincerely, QQ �}
`J • x uUCd , .�
Dap a B. Cullom
Environmental Specialist
cc: Greene County SWCD Office
DSWC-WaRO
Compliance Group
,RO — Animal Compliance
✓DBC files
943 Washington Square Mall Washington, NC 27889 252-946-6481 (Telephone) 252-946-9215 (Fax)

Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit 0 Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 40 153 Darr of Visit: 3-2D-2001 Time: 9:45 sm
t O Not Operational O Beion- Threshold
Permitted ® Certified © Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold- ------------- . _-..
Farm Name: Cuunin btnian.F x#T .2--------- —._ County:Gr=ne....................................... ..........WARO......
Owner Name: ,Tern ............. ..... ............ .... .. Cjwm) nghm.............�_�......� -__ Phone No: ZS2:747.-4.1.25....... ......... ................ —... .................
Mailing Addrecr..7.ft43. kAMRR.Q1d-Ct'=kRid._..........................-.........--..-..-......Wabltumhur.- SIC........................--------------- 27-0.8 ............
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone No:
Onsite Representative: Jtri:y Cunnighatnt................................-................................ Integrator: P1:Cp0M a.StaKtdud..............................................
Certified Operator: Jrxr)L....................................... CunningJimu.................................. Operator Certification Number: 1849.6............... -...........
Location of Farm:
Take 58N off Snow Hill approx. ld mL Turn right on SR 1225. Go across Contnentnea Creek bridge. Take neat right on SR
1222. Go about 1 mL where sharp curve in road turns left. Hog farm wiU be oa the right. T
® Swine ❑ Poultry [ICattle ❑ Horse Latitude i.ongitude 77 '
Swine
❑ Wean to Feeder
10 Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow- to Wean
j❑ Farrow- to Feeder
❑ Farrow- to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Des Current :: I1esi6n .. :C>irireat ....: Des[
gn. ,.::.Current:
9792
Number.of Lagoons �2 : ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑ La_mn Area ❑ Spray- Field Area
.Holding Ponds l Solid Traps" ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharfes S Stream Imnacts
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes No
Discharse oricivated at: [:]Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is obsen•ed. was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
1). if discharge is ob en•ed. did it reach eater of the State? (If yes, notifi- DW(Q) ❑Yes ❑ No
If discharge is obsrn:ed- what i; the estimated tlon• in aalhuin?
d. Doc,; a lagoon sysiem? (If yes.. notiti- DX=Q) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2.' Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Water of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes g No

01/01/01 Continued
Facility Number. 40-153 1 Date of Inspection 3-20-2001
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity f freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure I Structure; 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:$�G►---
Freeboard (inches): ...............�) _ ��.
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, [] yes No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7_ Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelimprovement? ❑ Yes Z No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate,. gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes No
Wade Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes gj No
1 I . Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload =1 Yes EK- No
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Coastal Bermuda (Graze) Small Grain Overseed Corn
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes -CK No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a Wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑1 No
15. Does the recei,.4mg crop need improvement?
!J Yes
�' No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application cquipment?
❑ Yes
No
17. Are rock outcrops present?
❑ Yes
i`E Nc,
18. Is there a water suppl- well Within 250 feet of the sera\field boundan'? i j Unknown
❑ Y"
.❑ No
❑ ou-site f , Utf'sile
Required Records & Document—,
19. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
No
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
No
21. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste anah sis & soil sample reports)
® Yes
❑ No
22. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
® No
23. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
9. No
24. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems. over application)
❑ Yes
No
25. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
No
26. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
Z No
27. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
O No
Odor Issues
28. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
Yes
ER_ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
29. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
91 No

01/01/01
Facility Number. 40-153
Date of inspection 3-20-2001
30. Is there any evidence of aind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
31. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of The lagoon?
32. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fans) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
33. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
34. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
Continued
Printed on: 4/6/2001
[]Yes
1K No
❑ Yes
X� No
❑ Yes
R No
❑ Yes
Z No
❑ Yes
Fg No
[3 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You trill receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments (refer to questaon #) Explam,an...YES answers andlar any t eco...... tons or any other continents.
Use drawuigs of factyto betierexp)aa>,situabons.{use addiitwnal pages as necessaij;) Field Copy ❑Final Notes
M �... n...,.
.......... �. �..�___.•....,......
,r..�Y. s.xnv._ _r.. .• r._... x..,.. <........,. S :riF� ...._. .. - .. 1. ,
from original inspection, wrhich was left on site. D.Cullom 4-b-2001-
11. Reviewed only small grain overseed for 2001 in irrigation records. Records for Coastal Bermuda (2000-fall) not reviewed for overapplicatie
21- Waste analysis 2-1-01 2.2 lbs./1000 gals. (L-1), 2.8 lbs./1000 gals. (L-2). Soil analysis 9-7-00; Lime applied during 2000, No soil samples
were collected for 1999. Freeboard levels maintained on calendar in office at each farm for each lagoon- You are advised to take the past feu
years of data and enter it onto the DWQ Freeboard sheet for the CAWMP records as required for 3 years. Mr. Cunningham currently working
with his technical specialist on wettable acreage certification for this farm. New WUP Hill be written including field 13, Tract 3242. Irrigation
records should correspond with the new WUP once it is written.
Please be advised that all records of the CAVVMP are required by the General Permit to be legible and in an orderly fashion. The
-ords of the CANMP most also be maintained for a minimum of three years in chronological form. You are further adtZsed to renew
records of vour CAVVMP to ensure that you are not in violation of your General Permit by meeting the conditions listed above.
A copy of your facility's Certificate of Coverage and General Permit are also required to be a part of your CAWMP.
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: U„D�- C. ( , t by 1))DZL:� — Date: 4_ a, —o i

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and
Natural Resources
Washington Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
0911"*W'A •
AM-6��
k4cDENFt
NORTH CARpLINA E>EFPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT ANE> NATURAL F2ESOUF2GES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
February 3, 1999
Mr. Jerry Cunningham
Cunningham Farms #1 & #2
Rt. 1, Box 45A
Walstonburg, North Carolina 27888
SUBJECT: Notice of Deficiency
Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
Cunningham Farms #1 & #2
Facility No. 40-153
Greene County
Dear Mr. Cunningham. -
On October 14, 1998, 1 conducted an Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
at the Cunningham Farms #1 & #2 in Greene County. A copy of the inspection
report is attached for your review.
In_general, this inspection included verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified
Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP) and the General Permit; (2) the farm
is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC 2H.0217, Senate Bill
1217, the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan and the General Permit; (3)
the farm operation's waste management system is being operated properly under
the direction of a Certified Operator; (4) the required records are being kept; (5)
there are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or runoff. The following deficiencies
were observed during the inspection.
➢ Your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan records did not include a soil
analysis for 1997 or 1998.
943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, North Carolina 27889
Telephone 252194&W l FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

1
Ql
Page Two
Cunningham Farms #1 & #2
Facility No. 40-153
February 3, 1999
It is very important as the owner and the Operator in Charge that you resolve
these aforementioned deficiencies and any other problems that may arise, as
soon as possible. For additional assistance, please contact your Technical
Specialist —Nothing in this letter should be taken as absolving this facility of the
responsibility and liability of any violations that have resulted or may result from
these deficiencies.
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance during the inspection. Should
you have further questions or comments regarding this inspection, do not
hesitate to call at [phone], ext. 321.
Sincerely,
P. Q'u-wA.-
Daphne B. Cullom
Environmental Specialist
cc: Dr. Garth Boyd, Murphy Family Farms
Greene County SWCD Office
Mike Regans, Greene County NCCES Office
DSWC-WaRO
Compliance Group
WaRO

Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of I nspection 0 24 hr. (hh:mm)
p Registered ■ Certified p Applied for Permit Permitted [3 Not Operational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: Canninghman.F.airms.M.A.1...................................... ........................... County: Greene WARO
OwnerName:.Ieir4....................................... Cunningham ........................................... Phone No:752-.7.17.8.19.5..........................................................
Facility Contact: ...................................................... ......Title: ..... Phone No:
MailingAddress: RL.1,.Bnx.95A......................................................................................Walsl:onhurg,NC.............................................--- =88 ..............
Onsite Representative: dewy..Cnnninghatn................................................................. Integrator:Mimphy-Family.Farms......................................
Certified Operator:Jerry.n ............................... Cunningham.................................: Operator Certification Number: 184gb.............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude ©• ©� ®« Longitude ©0 ®©�
r = esjgn . - - urren m _ _Design urren .- _ T e:
Swine _Capacity ;Population �Poultry� Capacity Population: Cattle Cap
ean to ee er
=ro;Ton-
Layer
® ee er to ints
p arrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
p er
p Farrow to Finis
w� _ Totat Desi
h
_
p Gilts
p Boars
ty :Populatton_,��
r. _
•WM IM_
gn Capaeit3
a y
1,321,920
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? p Yes Ig No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
J. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenancelimprovement?
b. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
p Yes ® No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes N No
p Yes ® No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
p Yes ® No

aci ity Number- 40-153 [)ate of Inspection rITPPM
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
p Yes ® No
Structures (L�Roons,Holding_Ponds Flush Pits, etc.
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
(3 Yes H No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: .......................... ........ ...... ......... ..... ._... .............. ... ...............................
......................................................................
Freeboard (ft): 3.3 4.2
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
p Yes It No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
p Yes ® No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
p Yes ® No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
p Yes N No
Waste Anplication
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
p Yes ® No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ..... ConstaI Bermuda Gmss............................... J34A ......................... .......................................................................................... ............................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? p Yes ® No
I7. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
Q .. o'vio tions.or deficiencies -were -noted unng t rs vtsrt:. YOU w1 .receive no u er . .
.,cerre'spox�ea,ee about t>W �YWt.'
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes N No
p Yes lq No
p Yes ®No
p Yes H No
p Yes ® No
M Yes n No
p Yes ® No