400152_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NORTH CAROLINA J
Department of Environmental Qua!
II

INSPECTIONS
INSPECTIONS
INSPECTIONS

Division,of Water Resources
Facility Number - � O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit: ® Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: ® Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: ® Departure Time: 0 County: Region:
Farm Name: jcG�p ����J Owner Email:
Owner Name:Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:,,L.��-y,Q� Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Other
Latitude:
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
I FLayer
Non -La er
Non-U
Pullets
Other
Poults
Design Current
Dischar es and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
Longitude:
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Da'y Calf
Da'y Heifer
DryCow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
❑ Yes 2(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2: Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes Y o ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters [:]Yes ►[FNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: Ald jDate of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes [KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
[:]Yes dNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes E/No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
[:]Yes dNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes [dNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes N�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes (d o
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes g�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes [ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes [0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes FdNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records _& Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? [-]Yes EdNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check [:]Yes FdNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design [:]maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes Ov No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections • ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? [:]Yes Fil/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facili Number: - j` Date of Inspection: — —
&.S,
id the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? 1 it ❑ Yes r/ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, checkf & ❑ Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
e appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes &No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes dN0
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes U No
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes
iNo
i No
iNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question ft Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
)�q-/6, :-- /,.o-A.a�
kpo
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signatui
Page 3 of 3
Phone: 4
Date: . d� 9 dQ/
21412015

Division of Water Resources
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Other Agency
Facility Number:
400152 Facility Status:
Active Permit: AWS400152
Denied Access
Inpsection Type:
Compliance Inspection
inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit:
Routine
County: . Greene Region:
Washington
Date of Visit:
08/10/2016 EntryTime: 08:00 am
Exit Time: 9:10 am Incident #
Farm Name:
Moye Swine, LLC.
Owner Email:
Owner:
Moye Swine, LLC
Phone:
252-717-6575
Mailing Address:
3060 Ormondsville
Ayden NC 285137031
Physical Address:
Ormondsville Rd And Hwy 903
Ayden NC 28513
Facility Status:
Compliant El Not Compliant
Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm:
Latitude: 35' 27' 48" Longitude:
77° 33' 28"
Hwy. 123, south of Ormondsville
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Robert Neil Moye Operator Certification Number: 988418
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Neil Moye Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Neil Moye Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
wastw analysis: soil tested: 2016
7-4-16 = 1.27
11-4-15 = 1.18
7-20-15 = 1.10
IRR records are complete & balanced out.
Reviewed: rainfalllfreebaord; crop yield; sludge survey was done in Dec. 2014 = 48% - a new survey has been scheduled for Aug.
12, 20151
F. Range: 28-37"
page: 1

Permit:
AWS400152
Owner - Facility :
Moye Swine, LLC
Facility Number:
400152
Inspection Date:
08/10/16
Inppection Type:
Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit:
Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 11920 1,920
Total Design Capacity: 1,920
Total SSLW: 259,200
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon NMI 03/05/96 20.50 33.00
page: 2

Permit: AWS400152 Owner - Facility : Moye Swine, LLC Facility Number: 400152
Inspection Date: 08/10/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No Na Ne
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
0 ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
N ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
M ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
M ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No Na No
4. is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (LeJ large
❑
0 ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
M ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
M ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
M ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na Ne
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
0
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

r
Permit: AWS400152 Owner - Facility : Moye Swine, LLC Facility Number: 400152
Inspection Date: 08/10/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes
No Na Ne
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
0 ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
0 ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
❑
❑
1 B. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
E ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na No
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
N ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
E ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

U
Permit: AWS400152 Owner - Facility: Moye Swine, LLC Facility Number: 400152
Inspection Date: 08/10/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na No
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
0 ❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
0
❑ ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
E ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
E ❑
❑
Other lssues
Yes
No Na Ne
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
0 ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
N ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility?
❑
N ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
❑
❑
CAWM P?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewfinspection with on -site representative?
❑
0 ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?.
❑
❑
❑
page: 5

Division of Water Resources
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Other Agency
Facility Number: 400152 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS400152
Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for visit: Routine County: Greene Region:
Hate of Visit: 11IG412014 EntryTime: 01:00 pm Exit Time: 1:35 pm Incident #
Farm Name: Moye Swine, LLC Owner Email:
Owner: Moye Shrine, LLC Phone:
❑ Denied Access
Washington
252-717-6575
Mailing Address: 3060 Ormondsville Ayden NC 285137031
Physical Address: Ormondsville Rd And Hwy 903 Ayden NC 28513
Facility Status: 0Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator. Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35' 2T 48" Longitude: 77' 33' 28"
Hwy, 123, South of Ormondsville.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Robert Neil Moye Operator Certification Number: 988418
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Neil Moye Phone : [phone]
On -site representative Neil Moye Phone : [phone]
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis: soil tested Jan. 20121 due in 2015
11-08-13 = 1.25
6-2-14 = 1.87
IRR records are complete 8 balanced out. Please watch your dates for pulling waste samples.
Reviewed: rainfall/freeboard, crop yield; Sludge Survey dated 10/29/2013 at 48% - Need to do a S. Survey ASAP, scheduled with
Eve H. (CES) later this week, Calibration is due also in 2015.
page: 1

Permit: AWS400152 Owner - Facility : Moye Swine, LLC Facility Number: 400152
Inspection Date: 11/04/14 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 1,920 1,920
Total Design Capacity: 1,920
Total SSLW: 259,200
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon NMI 03/05/96 20.50 42.00
page: 2

Permit: AWS400152 Owner - Facility : Moye Swine, LLC Facility Number: 400152
Inspection Date: 11/04/14 Inssection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No Na No
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑M
❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
M ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
■ ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No Na No
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
[]
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large
❑
M ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
0 ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
M ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ M ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 100/6/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Permit: AWS400152 Owner - Facility : Moye Swine, LLC Facility Number: 400152
Inspection Date: 11/04/14 Inssection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No Na No
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
0 ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
0 ❑
❑
I& Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No No Ne
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
[]
N ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
[]
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

-Permit: AWS400152 Owner - Facility : Moye Swine, LLC Facility Number:
400152
Inspection Date: 11/04/14 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na No
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
M ❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
M ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
ME][]
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
M ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
M ❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No Na Ne
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
E ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
■ ❑
❑
contact. a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30, Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
E ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon 1 Storage Pond
(]
Other
n
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
M ❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
M ❑
❑
page: 5

0 Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400152 Facility Status: Active Permit: AW5400152 Q Denied Access
Inspection Type: QQmoliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 09/20/2013 Entry Time: 08306M Exit Time: 09:15 AM Incident #:
Farm Name: MMpye Swine. LLC - Owner Email:
Owner: Move Swine, LLC Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 3060 Ormondsville Ryden NC 285137031
Physical Address: Ormondsville Rd And Hwy 903 Avden NC 28513
Facility Status: ■ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC _
Location of Farm:
Hwy. 123, south of Ormondsville.
Latitude: 35°27'48" Longitude: 77°33'28"
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Robert Neil Moye Operator Certification Number: 988418
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Neil Moye Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Neil Moye Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: _
Secondary Inspector(s):
Date:
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis: soil tested: 2012
9-13-12 = .97
4-16-12 = 1.1
IRR records are complete & balanced out using an average of 1.0 for spring. Please pull a waste sample ASAP.
Rainfall, freeboard are recorded as well as stocking & crop yield.
Sludge Survey due in 2013!
Looks Good!
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400152 Owner - Facility: Moye Swine, LLC Facility Number: 400152
Inspection Date: 09120/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine -Feeder to Finish 1,920 1,920
-Total Design Capacity: 1,920
Total SSLW: 259,200
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
agoon NMI 03/05/96 20.50 37.00
Page: 2

e
Permit: AW5400152 Owner - Facility: Moye Swine, LLC Facility Number: 400152
Inspection Date: 09/20/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d_ Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? ❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e_1 large trees, severe ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

I
Permit: AWS400152 Owner - Facility: Moye Swine, LLC Facility Number: 400152
Inspection Date: 09/2012013 Inspection Type. Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? ❑
Total Phosphorus? ❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type 1 Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2 Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
1301111
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑ ■
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400152 Owner - Facility: Moye Swine, LLC
Inspection Date: 0912012013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Records and Documents
Facility Number : 400152
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fall to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? if yes, check the appropriate
❑ ■
❑ ❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26, Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400152 Owner - Facility: Moye $wine, LLC Facility Number. 400152
Inspection Date: 0912012013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? Q ■ ❑ ❑
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours andlor document and report ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge, ❑ ■ Cl ❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31 _ Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon 1 Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Page: 6

E Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400152 _ Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS400152_ ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date.
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 09L0612012 Entry Time: 09:00 AM Exit Time: 09:55 AM Incident #:
Farm Name: Mgye Swine_11-C Owner Email:
Owner: Move Swine. LLC Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 3060 Ormondsville Avden NC 285137031
Physical Address: Ormondsville Rd And Hwy 903 - T Avden NQ„ 2$,51�
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murghhy-grown LLB
Location of Farm:
Hwy. 123, south of Ormondsville.
Latitude:3517'48" _ _ Longitude: 77'3328"
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Robert Neil Moye Operator Certification Number: 988418
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Neil Moye Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Neil Moye Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Z44z� Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis: Soil tested: 10/212012
9-10-12 = .9
4-16-12 = 1.1
8-22-12 = .67
IRR records are complete & balanced out. Rainfall & freeboard are recorded, as well as crop yield.
Remember to do a calibration of reel, equipment before Dec. 2012. SS due 2013
Page: 1

rI
Permit: AWS400152 Owner - Facility: Moye Swine, LLC Facility Number: 400152
Inspection Date: 09/06/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
W Swine - Feeder to Finish 11920 1,900
Total Design Capacity: 1,920
Total SSLW: 259,200
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
agoon NMI 03/05/96 20.50 34.00
Page: 2

r
Permit: AWS400152 Owner - Facility: Moye Swine, LLC
Inspection Date: 09/06/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at:
Structure
Application Field
Other
a. Was conveyance man-made?
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
Facility Number: 400152
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
❑ M ❑ ❑
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■ ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■ ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than
❑
■ ❑
❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes
No NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
ONOO
$. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■ ❑
❑
dry slacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■ ❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■ ❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400152 Owner - Facility: Moye Swine, LLC
Inspection Date: 09/06/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number. 400152
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No
NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
16, Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
1100
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400152 Owner - Facility: Moye Swine, LLC Facility Number : 400152
Inspection Date: 09/06/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Lease Agreements? ❑
Other? ❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ 0110
23_ If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
25. is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400152 Owner - Facility: Moye Swine, LLC Facility Number : 400152
Inspection Date: 09106=12 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30_ Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon / Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
■
■
■
Page: 6

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number. 4QO152 Facility Status. Active Permit: AWS400152 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection_ Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 09/20/2011 Entry Time: 0§:OQ AM Exit Time: 08A0 AM Incident #:
Farm Name: Moye Swine, LLC Owner Email:
Owner: Move Swine, LLC Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 3060 Ormondsville Ayden_NC285137031 _
Physical Address: Ormondsville Ed And Hwy 903 Avden NC 28513
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murohv-Brown LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°27'48" Longitude: 77°33'28"
Hwy. 123, south of Ormondsville.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Robert Neil Moye Operator Certification Number: 988418
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Neil Moye Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Neil Moye Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s).
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis:
8-22-10 = .67
5-24-11 = 2.4
soil tested 12-2-2010
IRR records are complete & balanced out. Calberation due in 2012 & $S due in 2013.
Freeboard & rainfall & crop yields are recorded.
Looks Great!
Date:
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400152 Owner - Facility: Moye Swine, LLC
Inspection Date: 0912012011 Inspection Type: Compliance inspection
Facility Number: 400152
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 1,920 1,920
Total Design Capacity: 1,920
Total SSLW: 259,200
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
lagoon NM1 03/05/96 1 1 20.5050.OD
0
Page: 2

Permit: AWS400152 Owner - Facility: Moye Swine, LLC Facility Number : 400152
Inspection Date: 09/20/2011 Inspection Type; Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? 1101111
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? 1101111
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ ■
❑
❑
3_ Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than
❑ ■
❑
❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not property addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
S. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑ ■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet slacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑ ■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑ ■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

Permit. AWS400152 Owner - Facility. Moye Swine, LLC
Facility Number: 400152
Inspection Date: 09/2012011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1 Bermuda Grass (Hay,
Pasture)
Crop Type 2 Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■
❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■
❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
■
❑ ❑
17, Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■
❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■
❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■
❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400152 Owner - Facility: Moye Swine, LLC
Facility Number: 400152
Inspection Date: 09/20/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? ❑ 01111
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400152 Owner - Facility: Moye Swine, LLC
Inspection Date: 09/20/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400152
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No
NA
NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ ■
❑
❑
Other Issues Yes No
NA
NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report
0 ■
❑
❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29, At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional
❑ ■
❑
❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge,
❑ ■
❑
❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility?
110
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon 1 Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Page: 6

0 Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400152 _ Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS400152 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit. Routine County: Greene Region: Wshinaton
Date of,Visit: j Q127/201Q Entry Time.Q8:00 AM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Moye Swine, LLC Owner Email.,
Owner: Move Swine. LLC Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 3060 Ormondsville Avden NC 285137031
Physical Address: Ormondsville Rd And Hwy 903 Avden NC 28513 ,
Facility Status: E Compliant Q Not Compliant Integrator: Mur2hy-Brown LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°27'48" Longitude: 77°33'28"
Hwy. 123, south of Ormondsville.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Robert Neil Moye
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name
24 hour contact name Neil Moye
Operator Certification Number: 988418
Title Phone
Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Neil Moye Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary inspectorls):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis: soil test for 2008 on site searching for more recent tests.
6-15-10 = 1.6 Please pull a sample ASAP
2-12-10 = 2.2
7-15-10 = .83
IRR records are complete & balanced out.
Freeboard range : 2-7-10 = 26" - 55" on 9-26-10'
calib. due 2010
SS due 2013
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400152 Owner - Facility: Moye Swine, LLC Facility Number: 400152
Inspection Date: 1OW12010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 1,920 1,920
Total Design Capacity: 1,920
Total SSLW: 259,200
Type
Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon NMI 03/06/96 20.50 48.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWS400152 Owner - Facility: Moye Swine, LLC Facility Number: 400152
Inspection Date: 1012712010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No NA
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
■ ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
■ ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■ ❑
❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■ ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■ ❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■ ❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe
❑
■ ❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■ ❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
❑
❑
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■ ❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■ ❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■ ❑
❑
improvement?
11. is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400152 Owner - Facility: Moye Swine, LLC
Inspection Date: 10/27/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400152
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA
NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain
Overseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14, Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400152 Owner - Facility: Moye Swine, LLC
Facility Number: 400152
Inspection Date: 10/27/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
Q
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ ■ Q ❑
Other issues
Yes No NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air 0000
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400152 Owner - Facility: Moye Swine, LLC
Facility Number: 400152
Inspection Date: 10127/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues
Yes
No NA
NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
0
■ 0
Q
32, Did Reviewertinspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
M C)
Q
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
11
■
Page: 6

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400152 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS400152 !__I Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspecti n Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 09/02/2009 Entry Time:09:30 AM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Moye Swine, LLC Owner Email:
Owner: Move Swine. LLC Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 3060 Oanondsy0& Ryden NC 285137031
Physical Address: Orm nd ville Rd And Hwy 903 evden NC 28513
Facility Status: E Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown, LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°27'48" Longitude: 77°
Hwy. 123, south of Ormondsville
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Robert Neil Moye Operator Certification Number: 988418
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Neil Moye Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis:
7-15-09 .83
2-20-09 2.2
10-21-08 1.4
7-10-08 1.3
soil tested April 2008 and lime was applied.
Looks Great!
Page: 1

I
Permit: AWS400152 Owner - Facility: Moye Swine, LLC
Inspection Date: 09/02/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400152
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
O Swine -Feeder to Finish 1,920 1,200
Total Design Capacity: 1,920
Total SSLW: 259,200
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
lagoon NM 1 03105196A 1 20.50 50.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWS400152 Owner - Facilty: Moye Swine, LLC Facility Number: 400152
Inspection Date: 09/02/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for VisIt: Routine
Dischann es & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ M ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a 1101111
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage S Treatment
Yes No
NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large trees, severe
Cl ■
❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■
❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ m
❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑ ■
❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑ ■
❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No
NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑ ■
❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400152 Owner - Facility: Moye Swine, LLC
Facility Number. 400152
Inspection Date: 09/02/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Nay)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑ Q
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ ■ 0 Q
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP? Q
Page: 4

a
Permit: AWS400152 Owner - Facility: Moye Swine, LLC
Facility Number: 400152
Inspection Date: 09/02/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21, Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? ❑ ■
❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ ■
Cl ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Other Issues
Yes No
NA NE
28, Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
29, Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30, At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air 110110
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400152 Owner - Facility: Moye Swine, LLC Facility Number: 400152
Inspection Date: 09/02/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
31, Did the facility fail to notify regional DWO of emergency situations as required by Permit? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400152 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS400152 Q Denied Access
Inspection Type: Comoliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine .. County: Q{eene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 10 j23Q008 Entry Time:01:10 PM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Moye Swine, LLC Owner Email:
Owner: Move Swine, LLC Phone:
Mailing Address: 3060 Ormondsville Ayden NC 285137031
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: premium Standard Farms Of North Carolina Inc
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°27'48" Longitude: 77'33'28"
Hwy. 123, south of Ormondsville
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Kendall R Howell Operator Certification Number: 18619
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Neil Moye Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Neil Moye Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis: soil test April 2008
10-21-08 = 1.4
7-10-08 = 1.3
2-6-08 = 1.5
Looks good
Phone:
Date:
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400152 Owner - Facility: Moye Swine, LLC Facility Number: 400152
Inspection Date: 10/2312008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Q Swine - Feeder to Finish 1,920 L 1,900
Total Design Capacity: 1,920
Total SSLW: 259,200
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
tgoon NMI 03/05198 20.50 50.01
-L 1
Page: 2

Permit: AWS400152 Owner - Facility: Moye Swine, LLC Faciltty Number: 400152
Inspection Date: 1012312008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ 0 ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
0000
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (i.e] large trees, severe
011110
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not property addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ❑
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ ❑
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑ ❑
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑ ❑
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No
NA
NE
1l). Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑ ■
❑
❑
improvement?
11, Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400152 Owner - Facility: Moye Swine, LLC Facility Number: 400152
Inspection Date: 10/23/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.? ❑
Total P205? ❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Records and Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
tf yes, check the appropriate box below.
WU P?
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Small Grain Overseed
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑■❑❑
Yes No NA NE
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑■❑❑
X,
Page: - 4

Permit: AWS400152 Owner- Facility: Moye Swine, LLC
Facility Number: 400152
Inspection Date: 10/23/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ■ Q Q
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
O
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
Q
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
23, If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Other Issues
Yes No NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-complianoe of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? 1f yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

I
Permit: AWS400152 Owner - Facility: Moye Swine, LLC Facility Number: 400152
Inspection Date: 1012312008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Otherlssues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? ❑ Q Q
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? C3 ❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ ■
Page: 6

0
4
E Division of Water Quality
0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400152 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS400152 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance_ Inspection _ Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene - _ Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 09/19/2007 Entry Time:01:00 PM_ Exit Time:
Incident #:
Farm Name: Moyg Swine._LLC Owner Email:
Owner: Moye Swine LLC
Phone:
Mailing Address: 3060,Ormondsvilie _ n NC 265137031
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°27'48" _ Longitude: 77°33'28" _
Hwy. 123, south of Ormondsville.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number:
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On -site representative Neil Moye Phone: [phone]
24 hour contact name Neil Moye Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis:
9-12-07 = 1.2
5-12-07 = 1.9
4-24-07 = 3.5
12-19-06 = 1.6
soil test 2006 don't forget to pull one for 2007
Looks good!
Page: 1

It
Permit: AWS400152 Owner - Facility: Moye Shine, LLC
Inspection Date: 09/19/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400152
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Q Swine - Feeder to Finish 1,920 2,000
Total Design Capacity: 1,920
Total SSLW: 259,200
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon NM 1 03/05/96 20.5D 52.00
Page: 2

4
Permit: AWS400152 Owner - Facility: Moye Swine, LLC Facility Number: 400152
Inspection Date: 09/19/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
■ ❑ Cl
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■ ❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe
❑
■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■ ❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet slacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400152 Owner - Facility: Moye Swine, LLC
Inspection Date: 09/1912007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400152
Reason for Vlsit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10°/aH 0 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ Cl ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400152 Owner - Facility: Moye Swine, LLC
Facility Number: 400152
inspection Date: 0911912007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
Q
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after> 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil'analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)? ❑
■
❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■
❑ ❑
Page: 5

0 Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency ��11
Facility Number: 400152 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS400152 Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine _ County: Greene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: Q212212006 Entry Time:10700 AM Exit Time:
Farm Name: Move Swine, LLC
Owner: Move Swint. LLC
Incident #:
Owner Email:
Mailing Address: 3060 Ormondsville &yden NC 28513
Physical Address:
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm:
Phone:
Latitude:35°27'48" Longitude: '
Hwy. 123, south of Ormondsville.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number:
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On -site representative Neil Moye Phone: [phone]
24 hour contact name Neil Moye Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary lnspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste analyses:
12-20-05 = 1.7; 4-27-05 = 1.5
Soil sample pulled Jan 2006
Date:
Each irrigation event from July 2005 until Sept. 2005 is without a current waste analysis. Howeve there was enough PAN remaining
that even a high N level in any event would have been covered.
PLEASE be sure to pull waste samples every "quarter' so you will always be covered!!
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400152 Owner - Facility: Moye Swine, LLC Facility Number: 400152
Inspection Date: 02122/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance tnspectian Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 1,920 1,681
Total Design Capacity: 1,920
Total SSLW: 259,200
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
lagoon N M 1 03/05/96 20.50 36.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWS400152 Owner - Facility: Moye Swine, LLC Facility Number: 400152
Inspection Date: 02/22/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) 0000
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage_ S Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erasion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
0
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
0110
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400152 Owner - Facility: Moye Swine, LLC
Inspection Date: 02/22/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400152
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P2O5?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crap Type 6
Sail Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
Cl ■ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400152 Owner - Facility: Moye Swine, LLC
Facility Number: 400152
Inspection Date: 02/22/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)? ❑
❑ ■ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
❑ ■ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
❑ ■ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑ ■ ❑
Other Issues
Yes
No NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ Cl ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400152 Owner - Facility: Moye Swine, LLC Facility Number: 400152
Inspection Date: 02/22/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Mhor IQGIIOG Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? Q ■ Q Q
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewfinspection with on -site representative? Q ■ Q Q
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Page: 6

® Dision of Water Quality
11 Facility Number E-1
O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Other Agency
Type of Visit Q Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit O Routine 0 Complaint O Follow up Q Referral O Emergency Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: � Arrival Time: I q.' 00 Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: e- Owner Email:
Owner Name: /�{_ s.5 cc/; ►h V-__ Phone: a2 -_7 R _-_ (e 7S
Mailing Address: 3O�d l�rmo� �5v� � /� /l/t�
Physical Address: Facility Contact: 4 G D Title: gS"YS Phone No: o_ _ 712
4$r. 7yr.-8'TOo
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
❑ Other
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: = e 0 S 0 longitude: = ° = , =
ii
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Layer
❑ Non -La et
Dry Poultry
❑ La ers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Dischames & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy Heifei
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocket
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Co
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
Number of Structures:
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection 0
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4. Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: & 1
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): p��p
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ❑_No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
IL . Is there evidence of incorrect application? if yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN [:IPAN > 10% or ] 0 Ibs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13, Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
l5. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination,
El Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
Reviewer/Inspector Name Phone:d_4a
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
I211Riad

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the approprrate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑Maps ❑Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments and/or Drawings:
12128104

i
(Type of Visit © Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evafuation 1
(Reason for Visit OO Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other i] Denied Access
[:]Facility Number 40 152 Date of Visit: 3-12-2004 Time: 7:30
O Not Operational O Below Threshold
M Permitted M Certified 0 Conditionally Certified E3Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold ................
Farm Name: KCi1dAU.Hsi.�r9tl.FArM................................ ................... County:G.rcr'Etc .............................................. '.A►RQ.......
.............................
Owner Name: KcrLdjU.&............................. Hjm4l.................. ......... ............. ................. Phone No: 2S.2r.Z46. 9115_..._._....................... ..................._.
MailingAddress: 3OQ3.0rM!.0dsyM.Rd..................................................................... Axs1cn..NC................................................ ............. 21513..............
FacilityContact: Kc[tdall.........................................................Title:........-----..................•.--•-......---........--•--••-- Phone No: .................................................
Onsite Representative: ................._._.._............._....._......................._.._...................•............_.... Integrator:"tH:S.....„2f .........................•.....
Certified Operator:KcipidallA............................. Ho!cll..__..._.._.._..........._...--....._......_. Operator Certification Number:18612........
...................
Location of Farm:
Hwy. 123, south of Ormondsville. A
M Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 • 27 4 4846 Longitude 77 • 33 28
Design Current
Swine Canacity Panulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
M Feeder to Finish
1920
1900
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer I I Dairy
❑ Non -Layer [I Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 1,920
Total SSLW - 259,200
Number of Lagoons 1
T4nld'nt, P6nils Solid Trans
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field [:]Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) El Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? .. ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes M No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes M No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
e
t
Identifier:...............................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): 21
12112103 Continued

Facility Number: 40-152
Date of Inspection r 3-t2-2004
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie./ trees, severe' erasion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
12. Crop type Corn, Soybeans, Wheat
❑ Yes
• -
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
®No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes % No
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or-below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20_ At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ Yes ® No
Air Quality representative immediately.
Comments(refer, to question#): - Explain -any YES_ answers and/or any, recommendatioz<s or any other comments
f . �. v Use drawings of facility to better explain'situations (use -additional pages as necessary) .' ❑ Field Copy ® Final Notes
Reviewer/Inspector Name Marlene D. Salyer
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: �.
�. .�
Date:
Continued
..611 z/

Facility Number: 40-152 Date of Inspection 3-12-2004
Required Records & Documents
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30. Is the facility covered under aNPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
31. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment?
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Stacking Form ❑ Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfall []Inspection After V Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
12112103

Technical Assistance Site Visit Report
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Natural Resources Conservation Service
Soil and Water Conservation District
Other...
Facility Number 40 - 152 Date: 1012103 Time: 1 1220 Time On Farm: 45 WARO
Farm Name Kendall Howell Farm
Mailing Address 3003 Ormondsville Rd
County Greene Phone: [phone]
Ayden, NC 28513
Onsite
Representative Kendall Howell/Jeremy Hill Integrator jPremium Standard Farms
Type Of Visit
® Operation Review
❑ Compliance Inspection (pilot only)
❑ Technical Assistance
[]Confirmation for Removal
❑ No Animals -Date Last Operated:
❑ Operating below threshold
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse
Design Current
Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
1920
1920
Purpose Of Visit
O Routine
O Response to DWQIDENR referral
O Response to DSWCISWCD referral
O Response to complaint/local referral
O Requested by producerfintegrator
O Follow-up
O Emergency
O Other...
Design Current
Ca aci Population
❑ Layer
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
GENERAL QUESTIONS:
1. Is waste discharging from any part of the operation and reaching surface waters or wetlands? ❑ yes ® no
2. Is there evidence of a past waste discharge from any part of the operation that waste reached
❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
GENERAL QUESTIONS:
1. Is waste discharging from any part of the operation and reaching surface waters or wetlands? ❑ yes ® no
2. Is there evidence of a past waste discharge from any part of the operation that waste reached
❑ Other
GENERAL QUESTIONS:
1. Is waste discharging from any part of the operation and reaching surface waters or wetlands? ❑ yes ® no
2. Is there evidence of a past waste discharge from any part of the operation that waste reached
❑ yes ® no
surface waters or wetlands?
3. Does any problem pose an immediate threat to the integrity of the waste structure (large trees,
❑ yes ® no
seepage, severe erosion, etc.)?
4. Is there evidence of nitrogen over application, hydraulic overloading or excessive ponding
❑ yes ® no
requiring DWQ notification?
5• is there evidence of improper dead animal disposal that poses a threat to the environment
❑ yes ® no
and/or public health?
6. Is the waste level within the structural freeboard elevation range for any waste structure?
❑ yes ® no
Structurel Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Identifier
Level (Inches) 1 21
CROP TYPES 1corn Soybeans Wheat
SPRAYFIELD
SOIL TYPES NoA
7. What type of technical assistance does the onsite representative feel is needed? (list in comment section)
03/10/03

Facility Number 40 - 152 Date:
1012103
PARAMETER
pO No assistance provided/requested
❑ 8. Waste spill leaving site
❑ 9. Waste spill contained on site
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE Needed
Provided
10. Level in structural freeboard
25. Waste Plan Revision or Amendment
El
El❑
[111. Level in storm storage
26. Waste Plan Conditional Amendment
❑
❑
27. Review or Evaluate Waste Plan wlproducer
El
El❑
12. Waste structure integrity compromised
1913. Waste structure needs maintenance
28. Forms Need (list in comment section)
❑
❑
29. Missing Components (list in comments)
❑
❑
❑ 14. Over application >= 10% & 10 lbs.
❑
❑
❑ 15. Over application < 10% or < 10 lbs.
30. 21-1.0200 re -certification
❑ 16. Hydraulic overloading
31. Five & Thirty day Plans of Action (PoA)
❑
❑
32. Irrigation record keeping assistance
❑
❑
❑ 17. Deficient irrigation records
® 18. Latelmissing waste analysis
33.Organizelcomputerization of records
❑
❑
❑ 19. Latelmissing lagoon level records
34. Sludge Evaluation
❑
❑
® 20. Latelmissing soils analysis
❑ 21. Crop needs improvement
35. Sludge or Closure Plan
❑
❑
❑ 22. Crop inconsistent with waste plan
36. Sludge removallclosure procedures
❑
❑
37. Waste Structure Evaluation
❑
❑
❑ 23. Irrigation maintenance deficiency
❑ 24. Deficient sprayfeld conditions
38. Structure Needs Improvement
❑
❑
39. Operation & Maintenance Improvements
❑
❑
40. Marker checklcalibration
❑
❑
Regulatory Referrals
41. Site evaluation
❑
❑
❑ Referred to DWQ Date:
42. Irrigation Calibration
❑
❑
❑ Referred to NCDA Date:
43. Irrigation design/installation
❑
❑
❑ Other...
system
Date:
44. Secure irrigation information (maps, etc.)
❑
❑
LIST IMPROVEMENTS
45. Operating improvements (pull signs, etc.)
❑
❑
MADE BY OPERATION
❑
❑
46. Wettable Acre Determination
1
47. Evaluate WAD certificationlrechecks
❑
❑
48. Crop evaluationlrecommendations
❑
❑
2.
49. Drainage workievaluation
❑
❑
50. Land shaping, subsoiling, aeration, etc.
61. Runoff control, stormwater diversion, etc.
❑
❑
❑
❑
3
52. Buffer improvements
❑
❑
53. Field measurements(GPS, surveying, etc.)
❑
El
4.
54. Mortality BMPs
❑
❑
55. Waste operator education (NPDES)
❑
❑
5.
56. Operation & maintenance education
❑
❑
57. Record keeping education
❑
❑
6.
58. Crop/forage management education
❑
❑
59. Soil and/or waste sampling education
❑
❑
03/10/03

Facility Number 40 - 152 Date: 1012103
COMMENTS:
COC dated May 1, 2003 and on site.
Producer wants to delete row crops and add coastal bermuda hay for 2004 crop year. Contacting tech spec to include
amendment for s/g overseed for application during fall and winter months.
*Waste analysis dated 919/03 nitrogen is .81 lbs11000 gallons
3/28/03 nitrogen is 1.8 Ibs/1000 gallons
0. Missing soil test for 2002 crop year.
Remember to take soil test for 2003 and follow lime requirements.
18. There is not a current waste analysis to cover irrigation events during June 03 thru July 06, 2003. Waste analysis must
be taken 60 days before160 days after irrigation events.
Make records available for three years.
18. Missing waste analysis for irrigation events 9/4102 thru 12/13/03 and for irrigation events during August 2002.
*IRR2 records are available for review.
Lagoon level is recorded weekly with drops in lagoon consistent with irrigation events.
13. Inside dike walls of lagoon need to be sprayedlmowed to allow for routine and visual inspection. -
Need to lower lagoon level as soil and weather conditions permit and by following guidance from waste plan.
T
TECHNICAL SPECIALIST Martin McLawhorn
SIGNATURE
Date Entered: 10/3103
Entered By: Martin McLawhorn
03/10/03

O`Divt's- n of Water Qual t}
- _ - O Division -of Soil -and Water C©nservation
O Other Agency
r
pe of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
eason for Visit OO Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other [IDenied Access
Facility Number 44 152 Date of Visit: 7/11I10Q1 Time: t;3o
Q Not Operational O Below Threshold
Q Permitted ❑ Certified ® Conditionally Certified ® Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: Kendal1.Hliw4.R.Fa1im................................................................. ........... County: G=ng ........................................ W'-R.Q.......
....
Owner Name: KendaWL .......................... .. IkWC_...__.....__.........._..-._.-...._._..-...-...._....._ Phone No: 2;51:74&9115...........................................................
Mailing Address: RxtuteLJ.RQa_3$1-D............................................................................ Ayderk.-NC........................... ...................... ........... 28513 .............
Facility Contact:
Title: ....... ....................................... .................. Phone No:
Onsite Representative: KrindsltHnwell-------------------------------------------------------------------------- Integrator: Carnlinalarms....................................................
Certified Operator: Kwdall.................................. IL02VAL ...................... Operator Certification Number: ,16.619....................
........................ .........
Location of Farm:
Hwy.123, south of Ormondsville. +
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 ° 27 4 4$ Longitude 77 ° 33 6 ®�
Design Current
Swine Canacitv Ponulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
IN Feeder to Finish
1920
1900
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 1,920
Total SSLW 259,200
Number of Lagoons 1 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges tic Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a Iagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: ...........................................
Freeboard (inches): ...............2.7._....-........ ......
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
Structure 6

05103101 Continued
Facility Number: 40-152 Date of Inspection 7/11/2001
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ®No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? El Yes ®No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ® Yes ❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ®No
12. Crop type Corn, Soybeans, Wheat
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
Reuuired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
® No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
® No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
® Yes
❑ No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
® No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
® No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
® No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
®No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
® No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ® No
® No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments (refer to question 9): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary): ❑ Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
*Mr. Howell plans to have WUP amended to include coastal bermuda hay. Contact tech spec. for these changes_
*Waste analysis dated 3/19/01 nitrogen is 2.4 lbs/1000 gallons
6/19/00 nitrogen is 1.2 lbs/1000 gallons
*Discussed I1R2 / waste schedule.
19. No soil test for 1999.
*Soil test dated 5/21101 Sample K1, K4,K6, K7-9 require one than one ton lime per acre. Permit requires lime requirements to be followed.
Reviewer/Inspector Name Martin McLawhorn
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

05103101 Condnued
Facility Number. 40-152 1 Date of Inspection 1 7/11/2001
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge atlor below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
level being recorded weekly as required by permit.
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
eed to rebalance PAN for corn crop dated after 5/19/01 with new waste analysis. No over application.
UP does not list crop window for soybeans. Contact tech. spec.
Unable to walk lagoon due to dense vegetation. Need to mow lagoon walls immediately to allow for routine and visual inspections.

o�ot wAr��Qt,
>
o -c
May 1, 2001
Mr. Kendall Howell
Kendall Howell Farm.
Route 1, Box 384-D
Ayden, NC 28513
SUBJECT: Animal Feedlot Operation Compliance Inspection &
Request for Information
Facility No. 40 -152
Greene County
Dear Mr. Howell:
Michael F- Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Kerr T. Stevens
Division of Water Quality
On March 14, 2001, 1 conducted an Animal Feedlot Operation Compliance Inspection at the referenced facility.
The Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP) was not readily available for review at this facility.
Therefore, the records and documents of the CAWMP could not be reviewed during the inspection.
In general, this inspection includes verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
(CAWMP); (2) the farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC 2H.0217, Senate Bill 1217, and
the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan; (3) the farm operation's waste management system is being
operated property under the direction of a Certified Operator; (4) the required records are being kept; (5) there are
no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or runoff.
You are requested within 10 days of receipt of this letter to send a copy of your last two waste analysis reports, the
last soil analysis report, freeboard level records and complete copies of your IRR-1 and IRR-2 forms for the last
receiving crop and current receiving crop. Once this information is received in the Washington Regional Office, it will
be reviewed and the Compliance Inspection completed. If this information is not received within 10 days by the
Washinaton Regional Office, this facilitv will be in violation of its General Permit and subiect to an
appropriate enforcement action. The requested information should be mailed to the following address:
Daphne B. Cullom
Division of Water Quality
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, NC 27889
The recommendations and/or comments regarding your inspection can be found in the comment section of the
attached inspection form. It is very important as the owner and Operator in Charge that you address any noted
concerns, as soon as possible.
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance. Should you have further questions or comments regarding this
inspection, do not hesitate to call me at [phone], ext. 321.
Sincerely, (�
e) . uco_
Daphne 13. Cullom
Environmental Specialist Il
cc: %IVaRO-Animal Compliance
DBC files
943 Washington Square Mall Washington, NC 27889 252-946-6481 (Telephone) 252-946-9215 (Fax)

i_'r
15*4N� Water Qa it '�� Y: �f�!' Sid ✓l`X:' £ Y` �1'4 iV -
-
i 4r' ni,'. i.f
Q DIVtaion of soU and Water Conmri:atlan
_
l
' Ni
ry
�
.��:'
v. 0 Other AgenCF r� ice' h 6o- r y y r s t wM
l s Yxw ? � A,�fyf�,�S..��:�i� - �•Sc. '�^ �
-
� �
�� ���i' i �
�v ,'�
'y �
i.�:✓r/"J�i >��X��� "iy����u/�i.yC{i 4�� :`�.+. Jn W�.��.,
�-e¢`-y
xii., �9�'! ���/�.�'Q...-.
.'
,/�.//1X.�-� .F.-'�5.�'N.Y
r�5'::
type of Visit @ Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason €or Visit OO Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number a0 I52 i Data (if Visit, 3-14-2110i 'Pone: l:tltl PM
C
Q Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
IN Permitted B Certified Q Conditionally Certified [J Registered Date. Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm N:Imc: X9j1edAU.JJQRA1.FMM_....__.._..._- Count: t7E lle.._._.._ ........... ARQ..
Owner Name: Kco da JL-._- ... _............ Howrk... _..... .... ..................................... Phone Nip: 252n7.46=91M ..........................................................
hlailinrAddress: R9ulC. ,. 0&-.D..._......,.... ..... ............ ..........--.... ......... ......... ..A,.t*A1,.NG.... _..................... ................................... 2�5.U..............
Facility Contact: ............................................................................Title: . Phone No:
Onshe Representative: N(t.4►.-alttsite...........................................................--................ Integrator-ftmium.SXal0.dud..... ................................... ----
P ... Operator Certification ?Number: cr:it-ied Operator: Kendall ........... .V£ell....................._.. J,86jq ............................
Location of Farm:
Hvvv. I23, south of Ormondsvilie. A,
t�
® Swine ❑Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Morse Latitude 35 !• 278 l.tmgituile. 77 l• 33 28
Design Current Design Current Design-;.-:' Current
Sv<ine Ca acitv Population Paulfry Ca'acitti Po ulation Cattle Ca acity Po uiation :1
I❑ Wean to Feeder
M Feeder to Fiuisb
�❑ Farrow to Wean
1920
j Unknown 11
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
.t
❑ Laver IE3 Dairy
t .I❑ Non -Laver I❑ Non-Dain k
❑ Other
I
Total Design Capacity F 1,920 ;
Total SSLW 259,200
Number of Lagoons, I ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area 10 Spray- Field Area
Holding Ponds ! Solid Traps. ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Imnncts
1. Is any discharge observed from any past of the operation? 7
.J Yes 9� No
Discharge otininaled at: %l Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed. [[•a., the conveyance ratan -made?
IF. If' d:3,har!ae tc tf ? eR'ed- did it reach Water of the Stag." (If timify DWQy)
c. If discharge is obscnve: - [ghat is the estimated flow in gal/min,.?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon s� scent'' (If yes. notifk7 DWL )
2. Is there c6dence of past discharge from any pare of the operation?
1 Yes ❑ No
D Yes E] No
i ] Yes 0 No
Yes 9t No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State outer than from a discharge? Yes [K' No

vsiuJivi
Facility Number. 44-152
Date of inspection 3`14-2001
Continued
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Stnictw-e 4 Structure 5 Stnicwre 6
Identifier:
Freesboard (inches). ...............Z ........... ........
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees. severe erosion,
seepage. etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closwe plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7_ Do any of the structures need maiintenancelimprovement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate_ gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markines?
Waste_Applicatioo
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type Com, Soybeans. Wheat
[I Yes No
❑ Yes ® No
Z Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 19 No
Yes Z No
❑ Yes CK No
L-J Yes n No
13_ Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? L7 Yes 0 No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? Yes El No
15_ Does the receiving crop need improvement?
.rJ Yes
[K No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Yes
No
17. Are rock outcrops presznt?
= Yes
❑ No
18. Is There a n-ater suppty well v61hin 250 feet of the sprasfield boundar; ? '__E] Unlaiown
Yes
C No
[] On -site M Oil -site
Reouired Records & Documents.
19. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readil° available?
Z Yes
❑ No
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
N Yes
❑ No
21. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste anal ,sis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
❑ No
22. Is facility not m compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
CK No
23. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
X No
24. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge. fi-eeboard problems, over application)
] Yes
0 No
25. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
1=l Yes
❑ No
26. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
27. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Odor Issues
28. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discbarge at/or below
' . Yes
Et No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
29. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
Yes
9E No

. 01/01/01
Facility Number: 40—I52 Date of Inspection d-142001
30. Is there any m idence of wind drat doming Land application? (Le. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public properly)
31. Is the land application spray system intake not Located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
32. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan bells, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc_)
33. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
ConSnued
Printed on: 4/9/2001
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes X No
34. l7a the flush tanks lank a submerged fill pipe or a permanenthemporary cover? ElYes ® No
IE3 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Reviewer/Iuspector Name Daphne $::Cullom: - L — -
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: .��� Date: }+ — — O

Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection p Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
(Reason for Visit *Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number �10 152 Date of visit: 8I22/2000 Time: 800 Printed on: 3/9/2001
Q Not Operational Q Below Threshold
® Permitted 93 Certified 0 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: Kendall.kLtt7�':rti fArm................................................................................ County: Gtmtnne............................................. .. WARO.......
Owner Nance: KenttlailX............................ kbWell......................................................... Phone No: 7.51-.246�9W ..........................................................
FacilityContact: .............................................................................. Title:...................... .. Phone No:................
MailingAddress: RantrUjin UM............................................................................ Aydelt..NC............................................................. 28513.............
Onsite Representative: $a ndall.Ha►xell...........................:.............................................. Integrator: C.amunay.atntns........................... ..........................
Certified Operator: KeaWaRB............................. HowfA .............................................. Operator Certification Number:18.619 .............................
Location of Farm:
Hwy. 123, south of Ormondsville.
® Swine [I Poultry ❑ Cattle [I Horse Latittrdc 35 ° 27 f 48 f4 Longitude 77 ° 33 4 ®�
Design Current Design Current - Design Current
Swine
ulstYon.-...: Point
.�'....... :..Capacity..Popuiation.. Cattle.. .:.. .Capacity 'Popula a .:=
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
1920
1920
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Disces & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes N No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes; notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c_ If discharge is observed, what 4S the estimated flow in gal/min'?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes. notify DWQ)
2. is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes N No
Structure I Sincture 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure b
Identifier: ...................................................................... .................................... .........................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): ................33.......................

5100
Facility Number: 40-152 Date of Inspection 8/22/2000 printed on:
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
I0. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type Com, Soybeans, Wheat
Continued on bank
VW2001
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
® Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
®No
❑ Yes
N No
❑ Yes
N No
❑ Yes
® No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14, a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, fi-eeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24, Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
�, No violations;or;deficiencies were;noted;during this it:; You will;receive_no46'r her; ;
correspondence about this. visit.' . ' ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ..
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No

Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 5100
Facility Number: 40--152 Date of Inspection 8/22/2000 Printed on: 3/92001
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
3 I . Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanentttemporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
117. Need to secure COC and General Permit.

Division of Water Quality
O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
I Reason for Visit O Routine Q Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 40 Ig2 Date of Visit 1 5/10/2000 Printed on: 5/17/2000
Q Not Operational Q Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified 0 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: IGaida11.t1Q»cA.1?anion.......................................................................... County: �xiasY............................................... 1'�.r1Rt? ....
Owner Name: KCndAi.1.&............................ UQ.Wgjj ........................................................ Phone No: 25.2-z4f-Q115...................................
........................
Facility Contact:..............................................................................Title:................................................................ Phone No:
...................................................
Mailing Address: J.QQ3.Q rjffland5Yi11�.R�as1.................................. ?�ys1�n,.�[ ............................ .. 2#513.......... _...
............................................_..........
Onsite Representative: l';e�ndall.DoNg. 11......................................................................... Integrator: Carpllxta.Faa m j.........------------....... .....
Certified Operator:Kga!1R11.R ............................ RQ.W.RJj .............................................. Operator Certification Number:1809.............................
Location of Farm:
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 ® 27 48 " Longitude 77 • 33 28 "
Design Current
Swine Canacity Ponulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
1920
1906
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
F�]
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle C3DaCitV Po elation
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ID Non -Dairy
❑ Other 771
Total Design Capacity 1,920
Total SSLW 1 259,200
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ID Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps I :j ❑ No Li uid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:......L051.MA........................................................................................................................... I .......................... ....... --..I...........
Freeboard (inches): 26
i'+.....:.......e L .... F.

Continued on back
Facility Number: 40-152 Date of Inspection 5/10/Z000 Printed on: 5/17/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ® No
(if any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Yes ® No
12. Crop type Corn, Soybeans, Wheat
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
�' Io viol_atiotis o� deficiencies were noted "dWring-tbi9 visit. ' Y di will "receive no furtli_eir
..correspondence about this.visit....... - ..
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ® No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
17. CAWMP needs a copy of Certificate of Coverage and General Permit.
19. * Every two months - waste analysis (60 days before and after each irrigation event).
Correct records from February 2000 to present with new waste analysis when it arrives to show
accurate nitrogen balance.
Reviewer/Inspector Name ;Daphne B. Cullom Entered by Ann
i1.. a.. 5--t7 OV

Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
Facility Number: 40-152 Date of Inspection 511Q12Ufl0 Printed on: 5/17/2000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28.
Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
❑ Yes
® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29.
Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
❑ Yes
® No
30.
Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
❑ Yes
® No
31.
Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
❑ Yes
® No
32.
Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes
❑ No
aI

r 1 ® Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Operation Review
13 Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Compliance Inspection
Division of Water Quality - Compliance Inspection
0 Other Agency - Operation Review
14D Routine Q Complaint Q Follow-up of DWQ inspection Q Follow-up of DSWC review Q Other
Facility Number 40 1S2 Date of Inspection 7/22/99
Time of Inspection $00 24 hr. (hh:mm)
® Permitted ® Certified (3 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered (3Not Operational I Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: KemciAlwoIY.oA. arm.............................................................................. .. County: G.rccxtc .............................................. l ...... ARO.......
OwnerName: Kcpldtll.&............................ HV.WV11......................................................... Phone No: ...........................................................
Facility Contact: ..............................................................................Title Phone No
MailingAddress: Rqat.9..LU9..xA.4A) ............................................................................ Ay.dc%AC ............................................................. 2851a ..............
Onsite Representative: �pd Lj Qxy �j.......................... ...... Integrator:CargjjJpp<.�or m.................. ...........................................................................
Certified Operator:) gjftJjg11.R............................. RQ.11:c1l.............................................. Operator Certification Number:18AJ9............... ..............
Location of Farm:
.........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
•r
Latitude 3S • 27 ° 52 u Longitude =1
' 33 ' 2$ ff
Design Current
Swine Canacity Ponulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
1920
1894
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer I 1 ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer I I ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 1,920
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons 1 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area JE1 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps. ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes [:]No
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d.- Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: primary
Freeboard(inches): ............... 3.3....................................................................................................................................................................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on buck
Printed on 5/912000

Printed on 5/9/2000
' IFacility Number: 40-152 I Date of Inspection 7/22/99
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
❑ Yes
® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenancelimprovement?
❑ Yes
® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
Cl Yes
® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level -
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
® No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
❑ Yes
®No
12. Crop type Corn, Soybeans, Wheat
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
®No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
®No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
®No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
®No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
®No
Required Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
® No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
® Yes
❑ No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
® No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
®No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
® No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
® No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? .
❑ Yes
® No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
®No
El. N,6*h)' ad6ns_or deficiencies•were:noted:diiriiig•thi'g Vi$it::You;rvill:receive no ftirther
. • correspondence nbout this.visit. • •
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments. Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary): I
* Recommend signing up for the local Neuse Rule options by 8/1/99 with the Greene Soil & Water Conservation District
* Given Integrator Registration card
+ Mr. Howell has sent in fee for General Permit but has not received Certificate of Coverage and General Permit
* Last waste analysis dated 3126/99 at 2.2 lbs/1000 gal.
14. Operation has map and design package by Brock Irrigation with plan based on wettable acres. Pull #IA was added after design
was done but has never been used. Brian Tingen with Greene Soil & Water checked measurement for I and pull is included in
waste plan. Operation is not subject to a wettable acres determination.
19. Last soils report dated 12/3/97. Mr. Howell relayed that he did take samples in 1998 but report was not available.
Reviewer/Inspector Name ',Pat Hooper 2521946-6481
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

Printed on 519/2000
Facility Number: 40-152 Date of Inspection 7/22/99
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge attor below ❑ Yes ® No
liquid Ievel of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes IN No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ® No
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
" Need to correct IRR2 to starting PAN balance of 117.5 lbs/acre for corn from new plan and not 125 lbs. No over application has
occurred,
* Mr. Howell had problems with planter so corn planted May 1. He did apply waste on corn in early July. Need to secure
conditional approval from technical specialist for late applications.
Printed on 5/9/2000

P
Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Operation Review
0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Compliance Inspection
Division of Water Quality - Compliance Inspection
0 Other Agency - Operation Review
14P Routine Q Complaint Q Follow-up of DWQ inspection Q Follow-ue of DSWC review Q Other
Facility Number 40 152 Date of InspectionL — 12/15/99
Time of Inspection 1:30 PM 24 hr. (hh:mm)
® Permitted ® Certified D Conditionally Certified Q Registered 113 Not O erational Date Last Operated: ..........................
Farm Name: ReAdAll.Howetl.lrtATM.................................................................... .. County: (;.t.CCjj<�'! ............................................... ARQ..----.
Owner Name: KelxShRlA.& ............................ tta xll......................................................... Phone No: U2,446-9113 ...............................................
Facility Contact:.................................................................. . Title. Phone No
Mailing Address: fiRlAk .t..l1AX.&4,-J)........................................................................... pA3alel..XC................................ .. . 2 1 ..............
...........................
Onsite Representative: KCjt d9.11..U.QW.t511..................................... ....................... Integrator: Car.AlIJl1Rl.F#It p0.S....................
Certified Operator: lKgiutdallJR............................. RQ.WCU .............................................. Operator Certification Number:j$619
Location of Farm:
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
7.
11..,.123,.s,auttl.�zl.?.rla��n�dsxalle....................................................................................................................................................................................................
Latitude 35 • 27 52 Longitude 77 • 336 F 28
Design Current
awinr Uapacity Fo ulat
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish 1920 1680
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer I I ❑Dairy
❑ Non -Layer I 1 10 Non -Dairy
❑ Other I I i
Total Design Capacity 1,920
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present JFO Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Dischar es & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b, if discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4, is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): 22,
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
3/23199 Continued on back
Printed an 12/21199

Printed on 12/21/99
(Facility Number: 40-15Z I Date of Inspection 12/15/99
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
❑ Yes
® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
®No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
® No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
®No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
❑ Yes
®No
12. Crop type Corn Wheat Beans
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
®No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
®No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
® No
I S. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
® No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
® No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
®No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
®No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
® No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
®No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
® No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
® No
13�ifl wi©lations:or :deficiencies were :noted :during this Visit.: Y64 will ;receive northe fur : •
correspondence about tbis-visit. . - .. -
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
Naste sample 11/15/99 = 1.0 Ibs/1000
=reeboard records kept on individual sheets as sent to Carolina Farm office.
=arm has wheat for winter application. Wheat PAN = 110-132 Ibs.
Veed to remove fallen tree from dike wall.
M
ReviewerlInspector Name Carl Dunn Entered by Ann Tyndall
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

® Division of Soil and Water, Conservation - Operation Review -
Division of Soil and Water Conservattori "CoEnpliance inspection.
Division of Water Quality -.Compliance Wpection
0 Other Agency --Operation, eview,
14D Routine Q Complaint 0 Fallow -up of DWQ inspection Q Follow-up of DSWC_review Q Other
Facility Number ('J $'Z
Date of Inspection J
� Imc of Inspection13 • �D 24 hr. (hh:mm)
W Permitted 0 Certified E3 Conditionaliv Certified Q Registered JE3 Not O erational (Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: .........- �'` � ���tirs�1 rw.1 County' ..........` .. '`................................ .......................
K.... ..................................................................................
Owner Name: Kk"4~Ik Phone No:
.......................................................................................................................---........................................................................
Facility Contact: ...................................................................
Mailing Address: ............................
Onsite Representative: ,tt �P
Certified Operator:.......... .........
Location of Farm-
........ Title: ............................................ ................... Phone No:................ .............................
.................................................................................................................................... ..........................
Integrator:... �a�o �w 1 r1 - ..................................................................................................... .... ....
....................... Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Latitude �• �� ��� Longitude �• �`°�
Design Current Design . Current . ' Design Current
Swine Ca acity Po ulation Poultry '-Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population.__
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer I ❑ Dairy
Feeder to Finish Jc/� 1 QO ❑Non -Layer I[] Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean =
r: ❑Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other I I-, = -
❑ Farrow to Finish
= Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
-'= ❑Boars Total SSLW
Number -of. Lagoons. t ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field Area
Holdrng Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes EJ No
Discharge oriiinated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is obscned, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Docs discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes Vj No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes [Z No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes [ 'No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(inches): .ZZ...............................".....................................................................---.............................................
................................... ......................... ..
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes '0 No
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back

' Facility Number: 90 — TSZ Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8_ Does any pan of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
12_ Crop type (�If A 1, Le.4- '
'lr 4-
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ict discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
....N6-0olaiidiis.or- & icieudes -*ere noted d&ihig this:visit: - You WH1, -eeeiye Rio Further
�cori-es• oridenke: abouf this visit. :... .. . :
❑ Yes dNo
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes V No
❑ Yes (6 No
❑ Yes 21 No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes [;4 No
❑ Yes VNo
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes V] No
❑ Yes P No
❑ Yes q No
❑ Yes V) No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
;Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers anchor any recommendations or any other comments. -.
Use.drawings of facility to better explain situations. ..(use additional'pages.as necessary):.
1 r�hil�vc� feCa.�S kepi on �n[kw• ��1 s us a5 Xj +b Cys-c i.kw f cy+n e �J1iC
f c-0-11 -G(. „ ` ' re v.•. 4,4 "'."C
Reviewer/Inspector Name-
ReviewerfInspector Signature: Date:
3/23/99

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and
Natural Resources
Washington Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Mr. Kendall Howell
Kendall Howell Farm
Rt. 1, Box 3 84-D
Ayden, NC 28513
k1kFD.4VVW'A
NCDENFt
Nc*;rrH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OE
ENVIRONMENT kmco NA7*i1RAL RESC?unc--ES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
August 18, 1998
SUBJECT: Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
Kendall Howell Farm
Fac. No. 40-152
Greene County
Dear Mr. Howell:
On April 30, 1998, I conducted an Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection at the
referenced facility. Overall, the operation was found to be in satisfactory condition. A
copy of the inspection report is attached for your review.
In general, this inspection includes verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified Animal
Waste Management Plan (CAWMP); (2) the farm is complying with requirements of the
State Rules 15 NCAC 2H.0217, Senate Bill 1217, and the Certified Animal Waste
Management Plan; (3) the farm operation's waste management system is being operated
properly under the direction of a Certified Operator, (4) the required records are being
kept; (5) there are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or runoff.
The recommendations and/or comments regarding your inspection can be found in the
continent section of the attached inspection form. It is very important as the owner and
Operator in Charge that you address any noted concerns, as soon as possible. For
assistance, please contact your Technical Specialist and/or the local Soil & Water
Conservation District Office.
943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, North Carolina 27889
Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

a
Page 2
Kendall Howell Farm
August 18, 1998
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance during the inspection. Should you have
further questions or comments regarding this inspection, do not hesitate to call me at
[phone], ext. 321.
Sincerely,
Daphne B. Cullom
Environmental Specialist H
cc: Greene County SWCD Office
Mike Regans, Greene County NCCES
David Moore, Carolina Farms
WaRO

;p Urvtslon of boil ana-Water Conservation - Uperation:ateview a
p Division of Soil and -Water Conservation - Compliance Inspec#iou
Ds� �sion-of Water Quality-- Compliance Inspection
r
p_Qther Agency- Operatiba Review �
jqp Koutme 0 Complaint 0 hollow -up of DWQ inspection 0 kollow-up of USWC review 0 Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
p Registered ® Certified p Applied for Permit p Permitted in Not 0peratlona Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: Kendal1.11,awall.Earm.................................................................I.............I County. Greene WARO
Owner Name: Kendall.R............................. Rowell........................................................ Phone No: 9.12-146-3115 ..........................................................
FacilityContact: .................................................................... ...Title: ......... Phone No: ..................................................................................................................
MailingAddress: Rt..1,.Blax.38.4-.D.................................................................................... Aydtn,..NC .............................................................. 2851.1 ..............
Onsite Representative: Kendall.Ho.weil........................
Certified Operator: Kerxdall.R,............................ Hawell.........
Location of Farm:
....................... I ntegrator:.Car.olina-Earms .....................................................
Operator Certification Number:18619 :............................
Latitude ©• 44 Longitude ©• ©° ®61
esign urren _
Swine Capacity Population
p Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finis
p Farrow to Wean
p Farrow to Feeder
13 Farrow to Finish
p Gilts
p Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity TPopulation
13 Layer p Dairy
p Non -Layer p on- airy
p other
Total Design Capacity. 1,920
TotalSSLW :259,200
Number of Lagoons / Holding Ponds pSubsurface Drains PresenF1p agoon rea
p o tqul -Waste Management yytem
JE3 Spray ield
Areyl
-
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
E3 Yes
® No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
p Yes
® No
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Field Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
p Yes
p No
b_ If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
p Yes
p No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
[3 Yes
[3 No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
p Yes
N No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
p Yes
H No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
p Yes
®No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
p Yes
®No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
p Yes
ONO
7/25/97

acj t•y Num er: 40-152 Date of Inspection
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
p Yes
® No
Structures (La2oojis,Holdiny Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
p Yes
® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure
6
Identifier:
Freeboard (ft): L9 ft.
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
El Yes
® No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
p Yes
H No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
p Yes
N No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
p Yes
N No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
p Yes
® No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ................... .Sjuybcaus............................................................................... ...........................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
[3Yes
® No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
p Yes
®No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
p Yes
®No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
p Yes
®No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
p Yes
®No
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
®No
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
[3 Yes
N No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Oniv
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
p Yes
N No
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
p Yes
N No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
p Yes
p No
R.. ovia tions.or terencies_were.note Wringt is visit:. omwt .receive no further.,.
.-. .:
Cotif tints (refer to question #):- Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments
;Use drawings of:facilit to -better e3 lain.situations. use additional a es -as' necQssar',
Please note the following comments from the inspection:
9. Adequate freeboard maintained in the lagoon.
2. Began irrigating this spring for the first time. Irrigation records complete with nitrogen balance.
3. Waste analysis - 4/l/98 (2.9); Soil analysis - 12/3/97
there are any questions about this inspection or the requirements of the General Permit, please contact me at the Washington
:gional Office [phone], ext. 321.
7125/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name lDaphne B. Cullom '..
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: k{ 3 o ^qB
2t � nh

State -of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Washington Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
December 23, 1997
Mr. Kendall Howell
Kendall Howell Farm
Rt. 1, Box 384-D
Ayden, NC 28513
SUBJECT: Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
Kendall Howell Farm
Facility No(s). 40-152
Greene County
Dear Mr. Howell:
On October 16, 1997, I conducted an animal feedlot operation site inspection at the referenced facility. Overall, the
operation was found to be in satisfactory condition. A copy of the inspection report is attached for your review.
In general, this inspection includes verifying that. (1) the farm has a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
(CAWMP); (2) the farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC 2H.0217, Senate Bill 1217, and
the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan; (3) the farm operation's waste management system is being operated
properly under the direction of a Certified Operator; (4) the required records are being kept; (5) there are no signs of
seepage, erosion, and/or runoff.
The recommendations and/or comments regarding your inspection can be found in the comment section of the attached
inspection form. It is very important as the owner and Operator in Charge that you address any noted concerns, as soon
as possible. For assistance, please contact your Technical Specialist and/or the local Soil & Water Conservation District
Office.
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance during the inspection. Should you have further questions or
comments regarding this inspection, do not hesitate to call me at [phone], ext. 321.
Sincerely,
Qv6.
Daphne B. Cullom
Environmental Specialist 11
cc: Greene County SWCD Office
Mike Regans, Greene County NCCES
David Moore, Carolina Farms
WaRO V}
943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, NC 27889 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

. _.. -. . - .. _- - ': �,;-•. -�.-.:.:.i, . -.c � - k �'"��:.<• r.,� ,u Via,,, - -
p Division of Soil and Water-_ . Conservation p Other Agency _
Division of Water Quality
110 Kounne 0 uompisint 0 rottow-up of uwtj inspection 0 rc
Facility Number
p Registered 'S Certified p Applied for Permit p Permitted
.up of u!swu review 0 utner
Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection am 24 hr. (hh:mm)
In Not peratfona Date Last Operated: ~
Farm Name. KandalLB[aw&Il.Farm.............................................................................. County: Greene WARO
Owner Name: KcndalLS�........................... Howell........................................................ Phone No: 919-.146AUS ......................................
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone No:
MailingAddress: Rt.1,.1 jm3&4-.D.......-----•-•.................................................................... Ayden...NC .............................................................. 28513 ..............
Onsite Representative: Ket&il.Howell ......................................................................... Integrator: Carolins.Earms.....................................................
Certified Operator:Kendall.R............................ HawrlL .............................................. Operator Certification Number: U6L4.............................
Location of Farm:
.rmon....r.................................................................. ...............................
Latitude ©• ©& ©�6 Longitude ©• © ®
Swine Capacity Population
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to ee er
Farrow to Finis
Gilts
Boars
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
pLayer Dairy
Non -Layer r on- airy
er
Total Design Capacity 1,92
Total SSLW
Number_ofLagoons / Holding Ponds u sur ace Drains resen agoon rea 113 Spray �e rea
o Liquidas a anagemen ys em
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? p Yes ® No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes p No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes p No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated I1ow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) Yes p No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes N No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? p Yes N No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require p Yes ® No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? p Yes ® No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? p Yes ® No
7/25/97

Rellity Number: 40-152
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoon s,Holding Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3
Identifier:
Freeboard (ft)-. 4 ft.
10. is seepage observed from any of the structures?
Structure 4
11. is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
_Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
'(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
Structure 5 Structure 6
p Yes
N No
p Yes
® No
l7 Yes
N No
p Yes
N No
p Yes
M No
15. Crop type Goaual.Bermuda..Gtass............................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
Q . o via ons.or r-iencies,were.note -during is visit:. of wi .reeetve no er . , .
iqa'j*esooxke ce about 04-*isitl:.. .
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes M No
p Yes ® No
p Yes p No
a.omme�is (:vier w ga�uun »� �.:plan any i ra bnarwC� bnwur uuY rwuw�ucnuauvus ar uny vwcr cummrnwi.
„ _ .. T:.
us*- -of _ft- to Iie#ter expiatn situahans. (use adsiittonai pages ss necessary)
oni. wards have not t=n,.started because_,Mr. Howell has not had to urtgate as othhe date othee tttspeetion.
Cerfifi att=imnl`wage management plan is complete with all components, except the DWQ ceitif cation form. Please obtain a copy
fthis'tlie_Greene Co. SWCD office:-
{ �� � �_'�.`�'�:� '.�_��� s- --,a�� �s � . -.• ti.- .... _-• •. .. .•. ___ � '� ,_'ems V
e"foilowinjitems are'cosditions•of the Ceirified'Animal Waste Management Plan and the general*fiiK 66ifore these items
-
mmust be - implemented:
Keep lagoon;s/storage ponds-liroe df:f6iiign debirs secluding, but not'limited to tires; bottles, plastic products, light bulbs, JOA
Reviewer/Inspector Name Daphne;B: Cullom d'
-
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: LukU..V Date: 1 1 _ 7 — 9 -1

Facility Number: 40-152 Date of Inspection rTFr&Tr-1
es or ally Omer solids vage., V-�- "
should
, -� MA
'Jig ihoidd'bd'extmd6d�&;;;��idface�t�6,6.1 --toavoidrel releasing s from
discharging *aAed-ifito tbe'-�—i - eas se
U74. . - . Won
­jn
c lagooii;s should be kept mowed ovotherwtw' controlled and accessible. ,High grass does not.allow ou to conduct a
U&'s cc --- area or. seep
qg
- e-'.
--damage7
&qwd*ze*0bon'shafftiC06`as�Vi- ose110e . .....
cal and at
YS tiefore the Me oT.0p- shall indlude thefcollo eters: Nitrogen,
C cbppci.
It
0 following records are �a mibtenance, repair, waste and soil analysis and
Fd, L requiii& Aig66n' 6eata, off site solids removal, :
`irrigation records. -These records ihou4 the'fii6ility,6vner/nianager in chronological and legible form for a
minimum of three years.
r7.
Z 7.
K7-1771%77 E'T - -

10 Koutme p c,ompiamt p ronow-up of uwy inspection p ro
Facility Number
p Registered E Certified p Applied for Permit p Permitted
Farm Name: Kendall,11amellEarm.........................................
Owner Name: Kendall.R............................. Howell..............................
Facility Contact:
up of u�wt_: review p utner
Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection ® 24 hr. (hh:mm)
p Not 0perattona Date Last Operated:
County: Greene WARO
.............. Phone No: 9.19.-..74.6r.9115 ...............................................
Title:............................................................... Phone No:
MailingAddress: Rt.1,Ban:.3&4nD................................................................................... Aydext.N.0 .............................................................. 2851.1 ..............
Onsite Representative: Keadall.Ho..we1l......................................................................... Integrator: Car.alina.Farlets.....................................................
Certified Operator: Kepdall.&........................... HAwrll.............................................. Operator Certification Number:18619............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude ©+ ©6 ©"
®Design urren
Swine " Capacity Population-
[3 Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
p Farrow to Finis
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Longitude ©• ©° ®°
esign ._... Current Design
Poultr
y Capacity Population Cattle _ -Capacity
[3 Layer JE3 Dairy
p Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑vOther
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number'0-f:Lagoons l Holding Ponds. JE3 Subsurface Drains Present JE3 Lagoon Area p Spray re rea
p No Liquid Waste Management System
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? p Yes ®No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ®No
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Field 13 Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ® No
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ® No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) Yes ®No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes ®No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? p Yes N No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes ® No
7/25/97

Facility Number: 40_152
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
p Yes
® No
Structures (Lagoons,Holdin2 Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
p Yes
N No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (ft): 3.7
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
p Yes
® Na
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
p Yes
N No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
® Yes
p No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
p Yes
N No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
p Yes
® No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ......Coastal.Bermuda.(hay.).............. 5maR. Grain.O.Yerseed..................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
p Yes
® No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
p Yes
®No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
p Yes
®No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
p Yes
®No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
p Yes
®No
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
p Yes
®No
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
p Yes
®No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
p Yes
®No
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified A WMP?
p Yes
®No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
p Yes
p No
R .. o.vtd tlons.or irrencres•were.note . uringt rs v1s1 :. na, wY .rereive na urt er . %
.e.zegpolndege!' about :.. _ :.. .
-------------------------------------------------
Jse drawings of facility to better exptain situations (use additional pages as necessary.)
No subsurface drainage on site according to Mr. Howell.
Have not had to pump during 1997 - no irrigation records or waste analysis available; remember to take sample within 60 days
efore or after pumping and then every 120 days.
2. Discharge pipes to lagoon leaking at pipe extenders - need to repair and shape/vegetate eroded area on dike wall - poses no
nmediate threat to structure
9. Utilizing third party applicator to irrigate waste
Not required at time of certification but will need for -General Permit: odor control, insect control and mortality checklists
.1
F 7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name Pat oopei-
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

County
reeve
Owner
t enll R. [Howell
Mlanager
F-
Address
Rt
1, Box 384-D
Ayden,
NC
Location
Certified
Farm Name
renaaij itioweii r arm
Phone Number
E 9-746--9115
Lessee
F
Region
0 ARO 0 MRO @ WARO 0 WSRUI
0 FRO 0 RRO 0 WIRO 7
of'Onn ......................................
.............................. I ........................ .
...................... ..................................... .
Certified Operator in Charge
Backup Certified Operator
Comments
Date inactivated or closed
................ ' .......
... ............ ..
............... .
... ............... . ................. 9 ...........
M Swine 13 Poultry 13 Cattle [3 Sheep 13 Horses 13 Goats g3 None
Design Capacity
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
E . tBoar Stud
..........
Total 1,920 JF Swine
SSLW 259,ceder to Finish
Latitude Longitude
I I I

Startdate,
............ .:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:............
.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:
I*A-ie:a At :•:• ::::.:.:.........:..........
e o . . cres
TechnicalHerbeFiTrYox
Specialist
Integrator
Certification Date /20/96
DEM Reply
Certification #
Conditional Days
Conditional p Irrigation System
Requirements ❑ Higher Yields
p Vegetation
p Acreage
rn Other
p Request to be removed [3 Removal Confirmation Recieved
Comments Basin Name: Buse
Regional DWQ Staff 11IM1111111M Date Record Exported to Permits Database