400148_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NORTH CAROLINA .�
Department of Environmental Qual

INSPECTIONS
INSPECTIONS
INSPECTIONS

0 Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400148 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS400148
Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene Region:
Date of Visit: 0712512017 Entry Time: 10:30 am Exit Time: 11:20 am Incident #
Farm Name; Halfmoon Pigs Owner Email:
Owner: Murphy -Brown LLC Phone:
Mailing Address: PO Box 487 Warsaw NC 28398
Physical Address: 5177 Ormondsville Sr 1335 Ayden NC 28513
Facility Status: Compliant Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35° 29' 12" Longitude: 77° 32' 48"
From Kenansville, take NC 903 N to Snow Hill, continue on NC 903 N thru Maury to Ormondsville at Ormondsville turn Lt. onto SR
1335 and go 1.5 miles to farm entrance on Lt.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other issues
❑ Denied Access
Washington
910-296-1800
Certified Operator: Earl A Queen Operator Certification Number: 22409
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Earl Queen Phone:
On -site representative Earl Queen Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary;
waste analysis: soil tested: 11/2016
7-13-17 = .73
4-24-17 = 1.28
2-17-17 = 1.29
12-6-16 = .67
IRR records are complete & balanced out.
Reviewed: stocking; sludge survey 2114/17; calibration 10/2016; crop yield
page: 1

t
W
Permit: AWS400148 Owner - Facility : Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: 400148
Inspection Date: 07/25/17 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Wean to Feeder 6,960 6.000
Total Design Capacity: 6,960
Total SSLW: 208,800
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon
1 - PRIMARY
12/21/05
19.00
22.00
Lagoon
2-SECONDARY 12/21/05
19.00
22.00
Lagoon
3 - FINAL 12/21/05
19.00
63.00
page: 2

• 1
Permit: AWS400148 Owner - Facility: Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number:
Inspection Date: 07/25/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
400148
Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No Na Ne
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
M ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■ ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
M ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection Storage & Treatment
Yes
No Na No
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le] large
❑
M ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc_)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
■ ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
M ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
0 ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No Na Ne
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑
M ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN ? 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Permit: AWS400148 Owner - Facility : Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number:
400148
Inspection Date: 07/25/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Waste Application
Yes
No Na No
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Fescue (Hay)
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
M ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
0 []
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na No
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
0 ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
M ❑
[]
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWS400148 Owner - Facility : Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: 400148
Inspection Date: 07/25/17 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na Ne
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
0 ❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
0 ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
M ❑
❑
27, Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No Na No
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours andlor document
❑
0 ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
M ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
N ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
0 ❑
❑
CAWM P?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewfinspection with on -site representative?
❑
■ ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
M ❑
❑
page: 5

■ Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number:
400148 Facility Status:
Inpsection Type:
Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit:
Routine
Date of Visit:
09/07/2016 Entry Time: 08:45 am
Farm Name:
Halfmoon Pigs
Owner:
Murphy -Brown LLC
Active Permit: AWS400148 [] Denied Access
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Washington
County: Greene
Exit Time: 9A0 am
910-296-1800
Mailing Address: PO Box 487 Warsaw NC 28398
Physical Address: 5177 Ormondsville Sr 1335 Ayden NC 28513
Facility Status: Compliant Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35° 29' 12" Longitude: 77' 32' 48"
From Kenansville, take NC 903 N to Snow Hill, continue on NC 903 N thru Maury to Ormondsville at Ormondsville turn Lt. onto SR
1335 and go 1.5 miles to farm entrance on Lt.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other issues
Region:
Incident #
Owner Email:
Phone.
Certified Operator: Earl A Queen Operator Certification Number: 22409
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Earl Queen Phone:
On -site representative Earl Queen Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis: soil tested: 2015
7-22-16 = 1.03
5-24-16 = 1.28
3-29-16 = 1.28
12-7-15 = 1.02
IRR records are complete & balanced out.
Reviewed: Sludge Survey A: LTZ = 5.38' T= 4.59'
B: " _ .98 T= 7.13
C: "=2.71 T=.65
crop yield; rainfall/freeboard.
page: 1

1*
. 1
Permit: AWS400148 Owner - Facility : Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: 400148
Inspection Date: 09/07/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Wean to Feeder 6,960 5,200
Total Design Capacity: 6,960
Total SSLW: 208,800
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon
1 - PRIMARY
12/21/05
19.00
21,00
Lagoon
2-SECONDARY
12/21/05
19.00
21.00
Lagoon
3 - FINAL
12/21/05
19.00
66.00
page: 2

. N
Y-
Permit: AWS400148 Owner - Facility : Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: 400148
Inspection Date: 09/07/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges. & Stream Im acts
Yes
No Na Ne
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
M ❑
❑
b, did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
M ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
M ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection Storage & Treatment
Yes
No Na Ne
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large
❑
N ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
M ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
E ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
0 ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na Ne
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ M ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

:r
Permit: AWS400148 Owner - Facility : Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: 400148
Inspection Date: 09/07/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes
No Na No
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay, Pasture)
Crop Type 2
Fescue (May,
Pasture)
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
0 ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
01111
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
❑
❑
determination?
17_ Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
0 ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
0
0 ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na No
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ M ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
[]
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

r
Permit: AWS400148 Owner - Facility: Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: 400148
Inspection Date: 09/07/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na Ne
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
[]
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
0 ❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
M ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Cl
0 ❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No Na Ne
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
M ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
M ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
M ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
M ❑
❑
CAWM P?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewrnspection with on -site representative?
❑
❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
M ❑
❑
page: 5

M Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400148 Facility Status:
Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Adive Permit: AWS400148 ❑ Denied Access
Inactive Or Closed Date:
County: Greene Region:
Date of Visit: 09/29/2015 Entry Time: 08:20 am Exit Time: 9:10 am Incident #
Farm Name: Halfmoon Pigs Owner Email:
Owner: Murphy -Brown LLC Phone:
Washington
910-296-1800
Mailing Address: PO Box 487 Warsaw NC 28398
Physical Address: 5177 Ormondsville Sr 1335 Ayden NC 26513
Facility Status: Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35° 29' 12" Longitude: 77' 32' 48"
From Kenansville, take NC 903 N to Snow Hill, continue on NC 903 N thru Maury to Ormondsville at Ormondsville turn Lt. onto SR
1335 and go 1.5 miles to farm entrance on Lt.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Earl A Queen Operator Certification Number: 22409
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Earl Queen Phone:
On -site representative Earl Queen Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis: B C
Soil tested: 1012014
3-18-15 = 6.39 2.52
1.55
5-14-15 = 6.88 2.55
1.36
6-22-15 = 5.61 2.03
0.80
8-6-15 = 5.13 2.30
1.22
IRR records are complete & balanced out. Reviewed: New COC; rainfalUtreeboard; transfer records for Jan. & March 2015;
sludge survey 312014 A = 2.14 LTZ; B = 2.18 LTZ; C = 4.15 LTZ; calibration dated 912014
page: 1

ti
Permit: AWS400148 Owner - Facility : Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: 400148
Inspection Date: 09/29/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Wean to Feeder 6,960 5,564
Total Design Capacity: 6.960
Total SSLW: 208,800
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon
1 -PRIMARY
12/21/05
19.00
22.0
Lagoon
2-SECONDARY 12/21/05
19.00
22.00
Lagoon
3 - FINAL
12/21/05
19,00
102.00
page: 2

Permit: AWS400148 Owner - Facility : Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: 400148
Inspection Date: 09/29/15 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No Na No
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
[]
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
M ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
M ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes No Na Ne
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (l.e./ large
❑
0 ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
0 ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
M ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
M ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na Ne
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate mariure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Permit: AWS400148 Owner - Facility : Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: 400148
Inspection Date: 09/29/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes
No Na No
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay, Pasture)
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
E ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
M ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
M ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
M ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■ ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Y29
No Na No
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
M ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
[]
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page:
4

i .
t �
Permit: AWS400148 Owner - Facility: Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: 400148
Inspection Date: 09/29/15 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No Na No
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
M ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
M ❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
0 ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
001111
Other Issues
Yes
No Na Ne
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
0 ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
E ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
M ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
■ ❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
0 ❑
❑
page: 5

Division of Water Resources
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Other Agency
Facility Number. 400148 Facility Status: Active
Permit: AWS400148
❑ Denied Access
Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for visit: Routine County:
Greene Region:
Washington
Date of Visit: 09/26/2014 Entry Time: 08:30 am Exit Time: 9:05 am Incident #
Farm Name: Halfmoon Pigs
Owner Email:
kraigwesterbeek@murpl
Owner: Murphy -Brown LLC
Phone:
910-293-5330
Mailing Address: PO Box 856
Warsaw NC 283980856
Physical Address: 5177 Ormondsville Sr 1335
Ayden NC 28513
Facility Status: Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude;
35" 29' 12" Longitude:
77" 32' 48"
From Kenansville, take NC 903 N to Snow Hill, continue on NC 903 N thru Maury to Ormondsville
at Ormondsville turn Lt. onto SR
1335 and go 1.5 miles to farm entrance on Lt.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat
Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Earl A Queen Operator Certification Number: 22409
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Earl Queen Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Soil tested: 1212013
112013
Waste Analysis:
8-22-14= .61
7- -14= .67
5-15-14= I A6
3-12-14= 1.28
1-28-14= 1.23
IRR records are complete and balanced out.
Reviewed: crop yield, freeboard and rainfall
page: 1

Permit: AWS400148 Owner - Facility : Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: 400148
Inspection Date: 09/26/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Wean to Feeder 6,400
Total Design Capacity:
Total SSLW:
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon
1 - PRIMARY
12/21/05
19.00
Lagoon
2-SECONDARY 12/21/05
19.00
Lagoon
3 - FINAL
12/21/05
19.00
page: 2

Permit: AWS400148 Owner - Facility : Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: 400148
Inspection Date: 09/26/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes No Na No
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
0 ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
0 ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection Storage S Treatment
Yes
No Na No
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./large
❑
N ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not property addressed and/or managed through a
❑
0 ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
0 ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
M ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ M . ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ M ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Pondiing?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Permit: AWS400148 Owner - Facility : Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: 400148
Inspection Date: 09/26/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No No No
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑0
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑0
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No No Me
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
E ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have ail components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
1f Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWS400148 Owner - Facility : Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: 400148
Inspection Date: 09/26/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine.
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na Ne
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
22, Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
❑
❑
27, Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
M ❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes No Na Na
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
M ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
0 ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
M ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
0 ❑
❑
CAWM P?
1
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
0 ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
0 ❑
❑
page: 5

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400148 Facility Status: Active Permit: 6W5400148 LJ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 06/11/2013 Entry Time: 01:40 PM Exit Time: 02:30 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: f jalfnoon Pigs Owner Email:
Owner: Murphy -Brown LLC Phone: [phone]Q0
Mailing Address. PO Box 487 Warsaw NC 28398
Physical Address: 511,77 Ormondsville Sr 1335 - �, Ayden NC 28513
Facility Status: E Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35'29'12" Longitude: 77°32'48"
From Kenansville, take NC 903 N to Snow Hill, continue on NC 903 N thru Maury to Ormondsville at Ormondsville turn Lt. onto SR
1335 and go 1.5 miles to farm entrance on Lt.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Eart A Queen Operator Certification Number: 22409
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Earl Queen Phone:
On -site representative Earl Queen Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis:
4-29-13 = 1.68
3-12-13 = 1.15
1-23-13 = .85
10-9-12 = .41
IRR records are complete & balanced out. Rainfall, freebaord & mortality are recorded. Soil tested Jan. 2013.Sludge survey
conducted in 2012. another one due in 2013.
Looks Good!
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400148 Owner - Facility: Murphy -Brown LLC
Inspection Date: 06/11/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number : 400148
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Q Swine - Wean to Feeder 6,960 6,500
Total Design Capacity: 6,960
Total SSLW: 208,800
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
agoon
1 -PRIMARY
12/21/05
19.00
21.00
agoon
2-SECONDARY
12/21/05
19.00
21.00
agoon
3 - FINAL
12/21105
19.00
42.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWS400148 Owner - Facility: Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number : 400148
Inspection Date: 06/11/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■ ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? .
❑
■ ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than
❑
■ ❑
❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes
No NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large trees, severe
U
■
U
U
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400148 Owner - Facility: Murphy -Brown LLC
Facility Number: 400148
Inspection Date: 06/11/2013 inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Fescue (Pasture)
Crop Type 2
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Pasture)
Crop Type 3
Cotton
Crop Type 4
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure andlor operate per the irrigation design orwettable acre determination?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
0011 ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400148 Owner - Facility: Murphy -Brown LLC
Inspection Date: 06/11/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Records and Documents
Facility Number : 400148
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑ ■
❑ ❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
DMOO
Page: 5

Permit: AW5400148 Owner - Facility: Murphy -Brown LLC
Inspection Date: 06/11/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400148
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes
No NA
HE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■ ❑
❑
Other Issues Yes
No NA
NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report
❑
■ ❑
❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29_ At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional
❑
■ ❑
❑
Air Quality representative immediately_
M Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge,
❑
■ ❑
❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon / Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32_ Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
In
Page: 6

e
0 Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400148 Facility Status: Agtive _ Permit: AWS400148 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Ins eA ctlon Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene Region: Washington
Date of Visit, OQ11312012 Entry Time: 1000 AM Exit Time: 10:57 610_ . Incident #:
Farm Name: Halfmoon Pigs _ Owner Email:
Owner: Murphy -Brown LLC Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: PO Box 487 Warsaw NC 28398
Physical Address: 5177 Ormqnd§vilIg Sr 13,35 Avdpn NQ 26513
Facility Status: E Compliant Not Compliant Integrator: M r h r wn LL
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°29'12" Longitude: 77°3248"
From Kenansville, take NC 903 N to Snow Hill, continue on NC 903 N thru Maury to Ormondsville at Ormondsville turn Lt. onto SR
1335 and go 1.5 miles to farm entrance on Lt.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other issues
Certified Operator: Johnny M Lancaster Operator Certification Number: 28710
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Michael Griffin Prone:
On -site representative Earl Queen Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400148 Owner - Facility: Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: 400148
Inspection Date: 0611312012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis:1
2 3 soil tested: 1212011
4-17-12 2.5
1.8 1.1
2-22-12 17.1
3.3 1.2
12-20-11 8.3
2.6 .83
12-25-11 4.2
1.4 .35
IRR records are complete & balanced out. Rainfall, freeboard, & crop yield are recorded.
Sludge Survey- A- LTZ = 1.93 Sludge = 6.63
B- "=2.75 =3.22
C- " =3.36 =.92
(VOTE: POA for lagoons A & B expired on Dec. 15, 2011 A new POA is needed.
Page: 2

Permit: AWS400148 Owner - Facility: Murphy -Brown LLC
Facility Number. 400148
Inspection Date: 06/13/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
W swine - Wean to Feeder 6,960 5,419
Total Design Capacity: 6,960
Total SSLW: 208,800
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Type identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
agoon
1 - PRIMARY
12/21/05
19.00
22.00
agoon
2-SECONDARY
12/21/05
19.00
22.00
agoon
3 - FINAL
12/21/05
19.00
35.00
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400148 Owner - Facility: Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: 400148
Inspection Date: 06/13/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ❑ ■ Cl ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? ❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
dry slacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? 0000
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400148 Owner - Facility: Murphy -Brown LLC
Inspection Date: 06/13/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400148
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Pasture)
Crop Type 2
Fescue (Pasture)
Crop Type 3
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ Cl
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑ Q
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
11011 ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 5

Permit: AW5400148 Owner - Facility: Murphy -Brown LLC
inspection Date: 06/13/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Records and Documents
Facility Number: 400148
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ MOO
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ MOO
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

Permit: AWS400148 Owner - Facility: Murphy -Brown LLC
Inspection hate: 06/13/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Records and Documents
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Facility Number: 400148
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i_e., discharge, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
freeboard problems, aver -application)
31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon 1 Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Page: 7

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 409148 Facility Status: Active - Permit: &W_§100148 Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County. Greene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 06121I2011 Entry Time:12:00 RM Exit Time: Q1:10 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: Halfmoon Pig Owner Email:
Owner: Murphy -Brown LLC Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: PO Box 487 Warsaw NC 28398
Physical Address: 5177 Ormondsville Sr j 335 Avden NC 28513
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35"29'12" Longitude: 77°32'48"
From Kenansville, take NC 903 N to Snow Hill, continue on NC 903 N thru Maury to Ormondsville at Ormondsville turn Lt. onto SR
1335 and go 1.5 miles to farm entrance on Lt.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Michael Ray Griffin Operator Certification Number: 26541
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Michael Griffin Phone:
On -site representative Michael Griffin Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis: Soil tested: Jan. 2011
4-25-11 = 3.6 2.3 1.3
3-9-11 = 3.7 2.1 1.4
1-18-11 = 2.4 1.2 1.3 Calib. don 2010 & SS Feb 2011
Crop yields are recorded.
IRR records are complete and balanced out.
Wheat was harvested and SB are coming up. LOOKS GOOD!
Date,
Page: 1

r
Permit: AWS400148 Owner - Facility: Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: 400148
Inspection Date: 06/21/2011 Inspection Type: Complianoe Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Wean to Feeder 6,960 6,900
Total Design Capacity: 6,960
Total SSLW: 208,800
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon
1 - PRIMARY
12/21/05
19.00
21.00
agoon
2-SECONDARY
12/21/05
19.00
24.00
agoon
3 - FINAL
12/21/05
19.00
55.00
Page: 2

P
Permit: AWS400148 Owner - Facility: Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: 400148
Inspection Date: 06/21/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ E ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? ❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
10, Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3
c

Permit: AWS400148 Owner - Facility: Murphy -Brown LLC
Inspection Date: 06121/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400148
Reason for Visit. Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
Q
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
Cl
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Com, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Pasture)
Crop Type 3
Fescue (Hay)
Crop Type 4
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14, Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■
❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■
❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
■
❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■
❑ ❑
18, Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■
❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA NE
19, Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■
❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
Q
Page: 4

�v
Permit: AWS400148 Owner - FaciElty: Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: 400146
Inspection Date: 06/21/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection }season for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ 0110
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑ ■
❑ ❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon ❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400148 Owner - Facility: Murphy -Brown LLC
Inspection Date: 06/21/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400148
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■
❑ ❑
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report
001111
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional
❑
■
❑ ❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge,
❑
■
❑ ❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31, Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon / Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss reviewtinspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Page: 6

N Division of Water Quality
Q Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400148 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS400148 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Comoliance Inspection __. Inactive or Closed Hate:
Reason for Visit: RoutineCounty: Greene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 08/0312010 Entry Time:12:00 PM _ Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Halfmoon Pigs Owner Email:
Owner: Murphy -Brown. LLC
Mailing Address: PO,Q,gx48Z Warsaw NC 28398
Physical Address: 5177 Ormondsville Sr 1335 Avden NC 28513
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Mlj[2hy-prown. LL
Phone: [phone]
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35'29'12" Longitude: 77°32'48"
From Kenansville, take NC 903 N to Snow Hill, continue on NC 903 N thru Maury to Ormondsville at Ormondsville turn Lt. onto SR
1335 and go 1.5 miles to farm entrance on Lt.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Michael Ray Griffin Operator Certification Number: 26541
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Michael Griffin Phone:
On -site representative Michael Norris Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400148 Owner- Facility: Murphy -Brown, LLC Facility Number: 400148
Inspection Date: 0810312010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis: B
C
6-25-10 = 2.7 1.6
.61
4-28-10 = 2.9 2.0
.86
3-05-10 = 2.2 1.8
.98
1-8-10 = 2.2 1.9
.90
soil tested 10/2009 SS Jan. 2010 Calib. 5-31-10
no know drain tiles
Freeboard range 1-25-10 = 22" - 8-3-10 = 67" P0A's turned in for 12.8" on 2-10-10
Field H05B had an overapplication of -2.94 k=lb. on small grain - this PAN was subtracted from soybeans PAN
Page: 2

Permit: AWS400148 Owner - Facility: Murphy -Brown, LLC
Inspection Date: 08103/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400148
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
W Swine - Wean to Feeder 6,960 L 7,040
Total Design Capacity: 6,960
Total SSLW: 208,800
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon
1 - PRIMARY
12/21/05
19.00
20.00
agoon
2-SECONDARY
12/21/05
19.00
20.00
agoon
3 - FINAL
12/21/05
19.00
67.00
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400148 Owner - Facility: Murphy -Brown, LLC Facility Number: 400148
Inspection Date: 08/03/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges &_Stream Impacts
Yes
No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■ ❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (LeJ large trees, severe
❑
■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■ ❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
11, Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 4

r
Permit: AWS400148 Owner - Facility: Murphy -Brown, LLC Facility Number: 400148
Inspection Date: 08/03/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.? ❑
Total P205? ❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type 1 Com, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2 Fescue (Hay)
Crop Type 3 Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Pasture)
Crop Type 4 Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure andlor operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ * ■ ❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP? ❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400148 Owner - Facility: Murphy -Brown, LLC
Facility Number: 400148
Inspection Date: 08/03/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No NA
NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
Cl ■ ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)? ❑ ■ ❑
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes No NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑. ■ ❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30, At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 6

r
Permit: AWS400148 Owner - Facility: Murphy -Brown, LLC Facility Number: 400148
Inspection Date: 08103/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
fUh— ia�­­ Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3Z Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? 0 ■ Q
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ ■ ❑
Page: 7

A
0 Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency �I�11
Facility Number: 40Q148 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS400148 tJ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection _!- Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene Region: Washington_
Date of Visit: Q820/2002 Entry Time:08:55 AM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Haftgon Pias Owner Email:
Owner: Murphy -Brown. LLC Phone: 91D-296-1$QQ,
Mailing Address: PO Box 487 Warsaw NO 28398
Physical Address: 5177 Ormondsville Sr 1335 Avden NC 28513
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murohv-Brown, LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude: 77°32'48"
From Kenansville, take NC 903 N to Snow Hill, continue on NC 903 N thru Maury to Ormondsville at Ormondsville turn Lt. onto SR
1335 and go 1.5 miles to farm entrance on Lt.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Michael Ray Griffin Operator Certification Number: 26541
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Michael Norris Phone:
On -site representative Michael Norris Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis:
7-13-09 .45
5-26-09 12
4-3-09 1.6
soil tested Jan. 2009
sludge removed from A 8, B lagoons in June 2009 and sludge records are balanced.
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400148 Owner - Facility: Murphy -Brown, LLC Facility Number: 400148
Inspection Date: 08/20/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Q Swine - Wean to Feeder 6,960 5,303
Total Design Capacity: 6,960
Total SSLW: 208,800
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon
1 - PRIMARY
12/21/05
19.00
21.00
agoon
2-SECONDARY
12/21/05
19.00
21.00
lagoon
3 - FINAL
12/21/05
19.00
71.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWS400148 Owner - Facility: Murphy -Brown, LLC Facility Number: 400148
Inspection Date: 08/20/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Dischar es & Stream impacts
Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ 0110
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ 01111
8. Do any of the structures tack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑ 0110
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400148 Owner - Facility: Murphy -Brown, LLC
Facility Number: 400148
Inspection Date: 0812012009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Fescue (Hay)
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Records and Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay, Pasture)
Small Grain Overseed
Cotton
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
En
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400148 Owner - Facility: Murphy -Brown, LLC Facility Number: 400148
Inspection Date: 08/20/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Other? ❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after> 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
23, If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Other Issues Yes No NA N
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ Cl ❑
29. Did the facility fail to property dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400148 Owner - Facility: Murphy -Brown, LLC Facility Number: 400148
Inspection Date: 08/20/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
31, Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

0 Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 4QO148 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWSS400148 0 Denied Access
Inspection Type: Coml2liance Ins ion Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 091041200$� Entry Time: 08:30 AM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Halfmoon Pigs _ _. _ Owner Email:
Owner. Moses W Move Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: PO Box 759 Rose-Hwil NC 28458
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator. Mumhv_BrQvvun.LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35'29'12" Longitude: 77°32'48"
From Kenansville, take NC 903 N to Snow Hill, continue on NC 903 N thru Maury to Ormondsville; at Ormondsville turn Lt. onto SR
1335 and go 1.5 miles to farm entrance on Lt.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream impacts Waste Collection & Treatment ij Waste Application
Records and Documents Other issues
Certified Operator: Terry L Stauffer Operator Certification Number: 990565
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Michael Norris Phone:
On -site representative Michael Griffin Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date.
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis:
8-27-08 = .76
5-16-08 = 3.2 2.0 .85
3-27-08 = 5.4 3.2 1.8
1-23-08 = 1.3
soil test current
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400148 Owner - Facility: Moses W Moye
Inspection Date: 09/04/2008 inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400148
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Q Swine - Wean to Feeder 6,960 5,000
Total Design Capacity: 6,960
Total SSLW: 208,800
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freoboard Observed Freeboard
lagoon
1 - PRIMARY
12/21/05
19.00
22.00
agoon
2-SECONDARY
12/21/05
19.00
21.00
agoon
3 - FINAL
12/21/05
19.00
60.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWS400148 Owner - Facility: Moses W Moye Facility Number: 400148
Inspection Date: 09/04/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No
NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
■
❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./large trees, severe
❑
■
❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6_ Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑ ❑
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑' ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
1311
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400148 Owner -Facility: Moses W Moye
Inspection Date: 09/04/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number. 400148
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA
NE
PAN?
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay, Pasture)
Crop Type 2
Fescue (Hay, Pasture)
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
Q ■ ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400148 Owner - Facility: Moses W Moye
Facility Number: 400148
Inspection Date: 09/04/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
Q
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
Q
Transfers?
0
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after n 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
Q
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)? ❑
■
❑
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
Q
■
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■
Q
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑
Q
27_ Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Q
■
Q
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■
❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ Q ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ Q ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400148 Owner - Facility: Moses W Moye
Inspection Date: 09/04/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Other Issues
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss reviewrnspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Facility Number: 400148
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400148 Facility Status: Active _ Permit: AWS400148 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Commlianc�lnspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine _ County: Greene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 12/12/2007 Entry Time:08:30 AM_ Exit Time:
Farm Name: Halfmoon Pias
Owner: Moses W Move
Incident #:
Owner Email:
Mailing Address: PO Box 759 Rose Hill NC 28458
Physical Address:
Phone:[phone]_
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: bdurohv-Brown. LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°29'12" Longitude: 77°32'48"
From Kenansville, take NC 903 N to Snow Hill, continue on NC 903 N thru Maury to Ormondsville: at Ormondsville turn Lt. onto SR
1335 and go 1.5 miles to farm entrance on Lt.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Michael Ray Griffin Operator Certification Number: 26541
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Michael Norris Phone:
On -site representative Terry Stauffer Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Date:
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400148 Owner - Facility: Moses W Moye Facility Number: 400148
Inspection date: 12/12/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis: A
B
C
11-20-07 =
3.3
2.6
1.3
9-27-07 =
2.6
2.1
0.89
7-31-07 =
3.4
1.9
0.53
6-14-07 =
4.5
2.4
0.64
4-24-07 =
4.3
3.9
1.1
1-23-07 =
6.0
4.1
0.75
Caliberation 7-26-07 at 200GPM
Farm is looking so much better than in the past.
soil test 2007
Page: 2

Permit. AWS400148 Owner - Facility: Moses W Moye
Inspection Date: 12/1212007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400148
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
swine - Wean to Feeder 6,960 6,960
Total Design Capacity: 6,960
Total SSLW: 208,800
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
IL agoon
1 - PRIMARY
12/21/05
19.00
19.00
agoon
2-SECONDARY
12/21/05
19.00
20.00
lagoon
3 - FINAL
12/21/05
19.00
69.00
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400148 Owner - Facility: Moses W Moye Facility Number: 400148
Inspection Date: 12/12/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No
NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
■
❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑ ❑
C. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
Q Q
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑ Q
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑ Q
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
Q Q
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
Q
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe
Q
■
❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
Q Q
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
Q
■
❑ Q
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
Q
■
Q Q
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
Q
■
Q Q
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
Q
■
❑ Q
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ■ Q ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400148 Owner - Facility: Moses W Moye
Inspection Date: 1211212007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400148
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Cotton
CropType2
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Pasture)
Crop Type 3
Fescue (Pasture)
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
Cl ■ ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
t_l ■ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
•
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400148 Owner - Facility: Moses W Moye Facility Number: 400148
Inspection Date: 12/1212007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below_
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
■
❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively cerfified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■
❑ ❑
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■
❑ Q
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those
❑
■
❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
❑
■
❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 6

Permit: AWS400148 owner - Facility: Moses W Moye Facility Number: 400148
Inspection pate: 12/12/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for VisIt: Routine
Otherlssues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? Q ■ 0 Q
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ E Q ❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Page: 7

E Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 4001AQ Facility Status: Active _ Permit: AWS400148 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Comolianr& lnsoection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 0310812Q06 _ Entry Time:01:00 PM _ Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Halfmoon Ras
Owner Email:
Owner: Moses W Move
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: PO Box 759 _
Rose Hill NC 2845$
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude:
35°29'12" Longitude: 77°32'48"
From Kenansville, take NC 903 N to Snow Hill, continue on NC 903 N thru Maury to Ormondsville; at Ormondsville turn Lt. onto SR
1335 and go 1.5 miles to farm entrance on Lt.
Question Areas:
r
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment
Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Johnny M Lancaster
Operator Certification Number: 28710
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On -site representative Johnny Lancaster
Phone: [phone]
24 hour contact name Johnny Lancaster
Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer
Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
There has been no irrigation events since restocking of the farm, so there was no irrigation records to inspect.
All other records are being kept.
Page: 1

i
Permit: AWS400148 Owner - Facility: Moses W Moye Facility Number: 400148
Inspection Date: 03/08/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Wean to Feeder 6,960 8,000
Total Design Capacity: 6,960
Total SSLW: 208,800
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon
1 - PRIMARY
19.00
23.00
agoon
2-SECONDARY
19.00
23.00
agoon
3 - FINAL
06/03/96
27.60
78.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWS400148 Owner - Facility: Moses W Moye Facility Number: 400148
Inspection Date: 03/08/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage S Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (l.e./ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)? '
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑
❑.
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
- ❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑.
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400148 owner - Facility: Moses W Moye Facility Number: 400148
Inspection Date: 03/08/2006 inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
- Is PAN a 10%/10 lbs.? ❑
Total P2O5? ❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? ` ❑
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Records and Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
19
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400148 Owner - Facility: Moses W Moye
Facility Number: 400148
Inspection Date: 03/0812006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
23. if selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? ❑
■ ❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
V-
U- HA NF
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? 0000
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concem? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400148 Owner - Facility: Moses W Moye
Inspection Date: 03/08/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Otherlssues
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewCnspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Facility Number: 400148
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

r+-
CF WA
AA
r/3 [L 1) ji
2-
1-1 -- U
N5��
To: Producers
From: Marlene D. Salyer ^0
Fanvironmental Specialist
Washington Regional Office
Subject: Animal Compliance Routine Inspection
. Year 2W4
Michael F. Easley, Gavemor
Wiliam G. Ross. Jr.. Sec dory
Department of EnHronmard and Natural Resources
Alan W. YJh;k, P.E. Dhow
DArlslon of Water Quaffty
Cotaen H. Srdrns. Deputy Director
DNision of Water Quality
Enclosed please find a copy or copies of the Compliance Site Inspections) (as viewed in DWQ database) conducted
at the referenced facility by the Division of Water Quality from the Washington Regional Office. Pletse read this
inspection and keep with all other documents pertaining to your animal operation for futare inspections
In general, these inspections included verifying that: (11 the fart bas a C lifed Animas Waste Management Plan
(CAWW; (2) the farm, is complying with rsqummm is of the State Rules 15 NCAC 21L0217, Senate Bill 1217, and
the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan; (3) the farm operation's waste management system is being operated
properly under the direction of a Certified Operator, (4) the required records are being kept; (5) there are no signs of
seepage, erosion, and/or runoff
A,s a reminder, please note the following which are conditions of the Certified A»al Waste Management Plan and the .
general 1PDES pew therefore, these items must be implemented.
cp Within one hundred and twenty days of the effective date (April 9, 2003) of a COC issued under this permit, the
pennittee shall install, operate and maintain devices on all irrigation pumpstapipment designed to automatically
stop irrigation activities during preciphaliom This condition does not apply to manure spreaders or other
-piled by manned vehicles. The Devices to Automatically Stop Irrigation Events form must be
completed and returned to the Division of Water Quality within one bamdred twenty days from receipt of AiPDES
General Permit.
(p The Animal Facility Anmral Certification Form must be completed and returined to the Division of Water Quality
by March 1, 2004,
cp Submit the Devices to Antomaticany Stop irrigation Events form and the Animal Facility Annual Certification
form to:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Water Qualify Section
Non -Discharge Compliance/Enforcement Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
qp A survey of the sludge accumulation in all lagoons is required within one year of receiving the NPDES general
permit and COC (by April 9, 2004) and every year doafter Contact your local extension office for guidance on
performing and recording the sludge accuuuilation survey.
cp All waste application equipment must be tested and calibrated at least once per year. The results must be
dock on forms provided by, or approved by, the Division•_
q) The permittee must maintain monthly stncldng records for the facility and snake the records available for review
by the Department and EPA
cp Precipitation events must be maaitored and recorded by type (rain, snow, etc ) and amousit.
(p The maxan mrr waste level in lagoons/storage ponds shall not exceed that specified in the CAWMP (lagoon
design). At a ntinimurn maximum waste level for waste for lagoons/stonnge ponds must not exceed the level that
provides adequate storage to contain 25 year, 24 hoar storm event plus an additional foot of structural freeboard.
(p An analysis of the liquid animal waste from the lagoon shall be conducted as close to the time of application as
practical and at least within 60 days (before or after} of the date of application. This analysis shall include the
following parameters: Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Zinc and Copper.
cp Soil analysis is required annually.
943 Washington Square Mall Washington, NC 27889 252-94"481 (Telephone) 252-946-9215 (Fax)

cp The following records are required: off -site solids removal, mom, repair, ram fall, freeboard, arkimal
and martky, p= mVeWaw wed gal fertiliser, waste application eg Vi ma t ca�
sludge mnvey,_ waste/sod analysis and laird irrigation rem uds. These remds should be�aiiied by the bilidy
owinerlmaiiager in chronological and legible foam foz a minimum of itb eee (3) Years.
qP Land won rates shall be m accordance with the CAVIW. lit no cure shall lmd aai rates eneed the
PuntAYailableVi#rogeea (PAIN) rats for the reeeiym c or ryegh in madd`n= any mm icati
(p In accordance with you waste utikation plan, the irription application events should not emceed the
hydrauNe loading as specified per the soil type and in nq case ftnid an irrIgIgM event emceed one. inch nee
( . Waste should note be applied on land that is flooded, safurated.wiith water, fiwen or mow covered at the
time of land app&adon.
(p All grassed wateromys shall have a stable outlet with adequate capacity to prevent pcmding or flooding damages.
The outlet can be anger vegetated cbaimd an earth duck, stabai ation slructurm, or other suitable outlets.
c It is suggested to keep cmp yield.bfaarnnatimpr.f6kiie use to update your waste ,man, aged plan You need
three years of.cxop yield databefore Yowlp3aa rein be updated
(P An inspection ofthe waste coll=bm, treannent sad ft.ra,ge stru,c=w and rumffcomtrol measi=,e sbn llbe
meted at a fiequaxT to insane proper operation but at least ma&J* and after storm"events For 0x lagoon,
stm* pants and aaher MuMnes should, be irispectai far evidence. of erasion, I damage by animals or
discharge Any major sfzuctiral_ repairs (to lagoaars or waste: smiage Paddy) t have cvrrtten down from
a technical specialist certifying proper,design aiLd insfialtation.: However, i# apiece of equip( is bang zeplaflad
with a piece of equipment of the identical specifications, ao technical spe<aalist approval is i>ecssary [ie pipimg,
reels, valves, Pumps (if the GPM capacity is not being i ummsed or decreased.), etc.]. _.
q) ''lire CIC has the duties to ensure that waste. is.applied in acoogdm = with the CAWMP and General Permit by
propertyrnanasing, supervising, and docamneutiin9 daffy aPWA-on and iriaintenanoe. " Ttie OIC also -has the
respo=Iiiity to"certify monitoring and reporting iufimm anon The failure of an' blC to"perform his/her duties can
result in a letter of reprimand; suspension of Gaff ration, or revocation of certificates.
Thank you for your assistance and cooperation during the inspection. If ym bave any questions, Please �oont= your
TwInical Speaiaiist or me at.252-94&CAl, en 3.21. .

=D1v1Si0II fl�w&ter Qgaltty , � -
Q�Dtvtstonof`�utlEand��Water G`anservation'h
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Fallow up Q Emergency. Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 40 14g Date of Visit: 1-7-20D4 - Time: 2:3D PM
Q Nat Operational Q Below Threshold
® Permitted lig Cerdfled Q Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: »....,
Farm Name: UmaxiJ!W................................ ..............»... ......... County: Gx9exte... -.......................... .-........... WA►RO?.......
OwnerName: bkjohy.................................. 1jxQ�Y.ut.................. .............................. ...... .. Phone No:.....................................................................................
MailingAddress: ......... . ........................................................... . ..... ....... ; ..... ............ ........... ............
Facility Contact: JRl]uuEty.Ldul fifer......................:................Title: 11'!<Oil .............. ...... ........ ..... Phone No: 8D-2.7.2-.%49.......................
Onsite Representative: ,T.ujtvmX.LajaraAp:..................................._.....................»_...... Integrator: Mrp yFan ity.k:u ms.............».....»..... ....
Certified Operator:johany................................... LDtIAsitit:........................................ Operator Certification Number: Z8.7.1t...... ......................
Location of Farm:
From Kenansville, take NC 903 N to Snow Hill, continue on NC 903 N thru Maury to Ormondsville; at Ormondsville turn L
)nto SR 1335 and go 1.5 mules to farm entrance on Lt.
® Swine ❑Poultry ❑Cattle [I Horse Latitude 35 • 29 12 " Longitude 77 •F 32 ' 48
Design Current
Design Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
Poultry
Capacity population Cattle
Capacity Population
Wean -to -Feeder- 6960. 0
10 Layer
I Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Non -Layer
FEINon-Dairy
[] Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
6,960
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Total SSLW
108,800
Number of Lagoons 3 Subsurface Drains Present Spray Field Area
Holding PoUds / Solid Trans
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No.
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance -man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gallrnin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes N No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: .»..» ..................... ...... ............ ....................... ................................ ......... _...._._.. »..........................................................................
Freeboard (inches): 38 38 70
f I/1 0m? �.....:......a

Facility Number: 4©-148 Date of Inspection 1-7-2004
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through_ it waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any pars of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctuies lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level "
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenancelimprovement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload. ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
12. Crop type
a.wuusµru�
❑ Yes. ®No "
❑ Yes ® No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? , ❑ Yes ❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? IN Yes ❑ No
16. 'is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ® Yes . ❑ No
Odor Issues
17. "Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below.. ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes " ❑ No
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (Le. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ❑ No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ Yes ❑ No
Air Quality representative immediately.
❑ Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
aste analysis: 11-20-03= .Ol .02 .01;
records began on 10/13/03 and goes thru 12/29/03
was no waste utilization plan on site. Mr. Lancaster is working to get all this material together in a complete file.
are 3 new houses currently being built at this site. They have not decided what type of waste application equipment to use.
contact me at 252-946-6481 before adding animals so that I may see your plans and improvements to the spray fields.
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date: 1-7—

iW1,/03
Consinued
# Wacillty Number: 40-148 Date of Inspection 1-7-ZOo4
Re uired Records & Documents
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
® Yes
❑ No
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)'
® Yes
❑ No
23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard, ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
❑ No
25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
® No
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
® No
27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
® No
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
® Yes
❑ No
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
IN No
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
❑ Yes
® No
31. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
❑ Yes
❑ No
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need,improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Stocking Form ❑ Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfall ❑ Inspection After 1 ° Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form

Technical Assistance Site Visit Report
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Natural Resources Conservation Service
Soil and Water Conservation District
Other...
Facility Number 40 - 148 Date: 10/fi103 Time: 1130 1 Time On Farm: 10 WARO
Farm Name Halfmoon Pigs County Greene
Mailing Address PO Box 759
Onsite
Representative
Type Of Visit
® Operation Review
❑ Compliance Inspection (pilot only)
❑ Technical Assistance
❑ Confirmation for Removal
❑ No Animals -Date Last Operated:
❑ Operating below threshold
IS Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse
Design Current
Capacity Population
® Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
6960
a
Rose Hill NC
Integrator iMurphy Brown
Phone: [phone]
28448
Purpose Of Visit
O Routine
O Response to DWQ/DENR referral
Q Response to DSWCISWCD referral
O Response to complaint/local referral
Q Requested by producerfintegrator
O Fallow -up
O Emergency
0 Other...
Design Current
Capacity Population
❑ Layer
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
GENERAL QUESTIONS:
1. Is waste discharging from any part of the operation and reaching surface waters or wetlands? ❑ yes ❑ no
2. Is there evidence of a past waste discharge from any part of the operation that waste reached ❑ yes ❑ no
surface waters or wetlands?
3. Does any problem pose an immediate threat to the integrity of the waste structure (large trees, ❑ yes ❑ no
seepage, severe erosion, etc.)?
4. Is there evidence of nitrogen over application, hydraulic overloading br excessive ponding ❑ yes ❑ no
requiring DWQ notification?
5. Is there evidence of improper dead animal disposal that poses a threat to the environment ❑ yes ❑ no
and/or public health?
6. Is the waste level within the structural freeboard elevation range for any waste structure? ❑ yes ❑ no
Structurel Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier
Level (inches)
CROP TYPES
SPRAYFIELD
SOIL TYPES
7. What type of technical assistance does the onsite representative feel is needed? (list in comment section)
03/10/03
❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
GENERAL QUESTIONS:
1. Is waste discharging from any part of the operation and reaching surface waters or wetlands? ❑ yes ❑ no
2. Is there evidence of a past waste discharge from any part of the operation that waste reached ❑ yes ❑ no
surface waters or wetlands?
3. Does any problem pose an immediate threat to the integrity of the waste structure (large trees, ❑ yes ❑ no
seepage, severe erosion, etc.)?
4. Is there evidence of nitrogen over application, hydraulic overloading br excessive ponding ❑ yes ❑ no
requiring DWQ notification?
5. Is there evidence of improper dead animal disposal that poses a threat to the environment ❑ yes ❑ no
and/or public health?
6. Is the waste level within the structural freeboard elevation range for any waste structure? ❑ yes ❑ no
Structurel Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier
Level (inches)
CROP TYPES
SPRAYFIELD
SOIL TYPES
7. What type of technical assistance does the onsite representative feel is needed? (list in comment section)
03/10/03

40 - 148 Date:
10/6/03
F4Facilityber
ER
0 No assistance provided/requested
.ste spill leaving site
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE Needed
Provided
❑ 9. Waste spill contained on site
25. Waste Plan Revision or Amendment
❑
❑
[110. Level in structural freeboard
26. Waste Plan Conditional Amendment
❑
❑
❑ 11. Level in storm storage
27. Review or Evaluate Waste Plan wlproducer
❑
❑
❑ 12. Waste structure integrity compromised
28. Forms Need (list in comment section)
El
El29.
El 13. Waste structure needs maintenance
Missing Components (list In comments)
❑
❑
[114. Over application >= 10% & 10 lbs.
30. 23i.0200 re
❑
❑
❑ 15. Over application < 10% or < 10 lbs.
-certification
❑ 16. 'Hydraulic overloading
31. Five & Thirty day Plans of Action (PoA)
❑
❑
32. Irrigation record keeping assistance
❑
❑
❑ 17. Deficient irrigation records
❑ 18. Late/missing waste analysis
33.Organizelcomputerization of records
❑
❑
❑ 19. Late/missing lagoon level records
34. Sludge Evaluation
❑
❑
❑ 20. Late/missing soils analysis
❑ 21. Crop needs improvement
36. Sludge or Closure Plan
❑
❑
❑ 22. Crop inconsistent with waste plan
36. Sludge removallclosure procedures
❑
❑
37. Waste Structure Evaluation
❑
❑
❑ 23. Irrigation maintenance deficiency
❑ 24. Deficient sprayfield conditions
38. Structure Needs Improvement
❑
❑
39. Operation & Maintenance Improvements
❑
❑
40. Marker checklcalibration
❑
❑
Regulatory Referrals
41. Site evaluation
❑
❑
❑ Referred to DWQ Date:
42. Irrigation Calibration
❑
❑
❑ Referred to NCDA Date:
43. Irrigation designlinstallation
❑
El
El Other...
system
Date:
44• Secure irrigation Information (maps, etc.)
❑
❑
LIST IMPROVEMENTS
45. Operating improvements (pull signs, etc.)
❑
❑
MADE BY OPERATION
46. Wettable Acre Determination
❑
❑
1
47. Evaluate WAD certificationlrechecks
❑
❑
48. Crop evaluationlrecommendations
❑
❑
2.
49. Drainage worklevaluation
❑
❑
50. Land shaping, subsoiting, aeration, etc.
51. Runoff control, stormwater diversion, etc.
❑
❑
❑
❑
3
52. Buffer Improvements
❑
❑
53. Field measurements(GPS, surveying, etc.)
❑
❑
4'
54. Mortality BMPs
❑
❑
55. Waste operator education (NPDES)
El
❑
5'
56. Operation & maintenance education
❑
❑
57. Record keeping education
❑
❑
6
58. Croplforage management education
❑
❑
59. Soil and/or waste sampling education
❑
❑
03/10/03

IUD, tvtston of WaterQualitt^.`N�'t
_
ry - 0 Drvrsri n of Sod and Water Conservation .-
_
Otber_-Agency =-- —. - --
of Visit OO Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit +O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
I♦acili-ty Number I Date of Visit: 12/18/2002 Time: 2:30 PM
40 148
0 Not Operational Q Belois- Threshold
El Permitted ❑ Certified ® Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated or Abovc Threshold:
Farm Name: H#ft9Qn1'igx......................................................_....................................... County: Grwxte ............................................... Vh.i#KQ.......
OwnerName: Mom......................................Move .......................................................... Phone No: 252.-753-3751........................................ _................
MailingAddress. P1?201..59............................................................................................ Reac.Hill..NC ............................................. 284.41K.............
FacilityContact:............................................................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No....................................................
Onsite Representative: ............................ ......... Integrator:............................
Certified Operator: .% .............................. x0yc ................................................. Operator Certlication Number: 1656,1 .............................
Location of Farm:
From Kenansville, take NC 903 N to Snow Hill, continue on NC 903 N thru Maury to Ormondsville; at Ormondsville turn Lt.
ionto SR 1335 and go 1.5 miles to farm entrance on U.
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 ° 29 1 12 u Longitude 77 ° 32 ' ®°`
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
® Farrow to Feeder
400
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current
Design Current
Poultry
Capacity Population Cattle
Capacity Population
❑ Layer
I
❑ Dairy
--. ❑ Non -Layer
I
IE]Non-Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
400
Total SSLW
208,800
Number of Lagoons .- 3 1 10 Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area It@ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds f Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed f -om any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/rnin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillwav ❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
identifier: ................._.....................................-_..............._...._...........-..-•.-....._........_.._....._........_...........

05103101 Continued
Facility Number: 40-148 Date of Inspection 12/18/2002
Z. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ❑ No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? El Yes ❑ No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
11. is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ❑ No
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
16. is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Reguired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes ❑ No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, fireeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ❑ Yes ❑ No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes ❑ No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes ❑ No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes ❑ No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes ❑ No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No
® No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments (refer to question t#): Explain any YES answers andlor any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facffhy to bettereaplain situation. (use additional. pages as necessary): FEJ Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
Reviewer/Inspector Name Daphne B. Cullom
Reviewer/Inspector Signatu : 1 _ 1
Date: � —� � 9 IC) -2-

. r . o�0
❑F W Ar�gQG
>_
�C
May 1, 2001
Mr, Moses Moye
Half noon Pigs
211 E. Horne Ave.
Farmville, NC 27828
SUBJECT: Animal Feedlot Operation Compliance Inspection &
Request for Information
Facility No. 40 -148
Greene County
Dear Mr. Moye:
Michael F, Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Kerr T. Stevens
Division of Water Quality
On March 14, 2001, I conducted an Animal Feedlot Operation Compliance Inspection at the referenced facility. The
freeboard levels of all three structures were adequate and no other problems were observed.
The subject facility was not been in operation since the spring of 2000 based on the last two Compliance Inspections.
However, since your facility has a General Permit with the Division of Water Quality, it is still required to comply with its
General Permit and the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). Thus, the records and documents of the General
Permit and CAWMP should be maintained and be available for review during the annual inspection each year.
I'm writing this letter to you to find out what your future plans are for this facility. I received a copy of a letter that was sent to
you from the DWQ Central Office concerning non-payment of your annual permit fee. If you no longer wish to have this
facility permitted with the State, you may submit a letter to the Division requesting that the permit be rescinded Ifyou want to
maintain the permit, please forward your permit fee to DWQ-Raleigh. If you maintain the General Permit, as I previously
mentioned you must maintain all proper documentation. If you choose to rescind the permit, you are still responsible for closure
of the lagoons/storage ponds or developing and implementing an animal waste management plan for maintaining the structures
to prevent a discharge from occurring. Also, please be advised that if animals are not on a site for a period of four years the
facility is considered abandoned -
I have enclosed several forms for your review and consideration. Thank you for your cooperation and assistance. Should
you have further questions or comments regarding the inspection and/or this letter, please do not hesitate to call me at (252)
946-6481, ext. 321.
' cerely,
, s. Qu�-6'—
Daphne B. Cullom
Environmental Specialist II
Attachments: Swine General Permit
Request for Removal of Registration
Request for Reactivation
Animal Waste Storage Pond & Lagoon Closure Report Form
NRCS Standard for Closure of Storage Pond and Lagoons
cc: vW/aRO-Animal Compliance
DBC files
943 Washington Square Mall Washington, NC 27869 252-946- 481 (Telephone) 252-946-9215 (Fax)

�� fs r a..�1V331Da ©f
x,o.e. -h ; -,. - R Q�Dri33liln Of SOi)I and �atCr e.an82rY1tIOQ ,n+9rs�" r sk s'.'}'`�"��.'�.K ' r
x a'
Type of Visit *Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason far Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 40 148 Dare of Visit: 1 3-14-2001 1 Time: 1:3D pm
rO Not Operational Q Below Threshold
Permitted ® Certified © Conditionally" Certified © Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ..... ... —_......
Farm Name: IIAftapin Pits .................. County-: G,t]gym...... _..... .......... _... ......
O,kvner Name: Mosa.....—..._..........._........... 111 eyr.......................... ... _... .......... ......... Phone No: �Sxr.IS3-3.7.5�........_.................._..............
Mailing Address: 2,LI..E,..ij.RjMC.Axc........ —__....... ..--•-- ............... .............• —-._._.... F-AMAUC.AC .......................... ........................ 27.828 ..............
Facility Contact: ...._ .................................. ------..............................Tale . Phone No.
Onsite Representative. N�t.A1�ue_(t�tsikc......................................................................... lnte_�rator: Miulrpba-FAmi4YArms.......... ........... -......... ....
Certified Operator: Uo&ea................ ......... ......—.. MW-e......................... ........................ Operator Certification Number.].65b3.............................
Location of Farm:
Prom Mriansvffle, take NC. 9U31N to Snow Bill, continue on NU 903 N tt.ru Maury to OrmondsviHe; at Ormondsvilie turn Lt. J A -
onto SR 1335 and go 1.5 miles to farm entrance on Lt. V,
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle [IHorse Latitude 35 • 29 12 L►n-itude 77 • 32 48
.. : _ .. Destgq; . ;. Curr+enf:.:: Design ::current ' D6Agn::: Current -
Swine
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
® Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boas
Number of Lagoons 3 ® Subsurface Drains Present ❑ 1 a_iwn Area ®5pra, Field Area
Holdutg Ponds / Solid Traps JC1 No Liquid Waste Management System
Dischar res & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharne is obser%ra wa_c the conveyance man-made? Yes ❑ No
b. II'discharee is obsenTed. did it reach Water of the State^ (If yes. notify" DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If dkcharez is obsen%A what is the estimated flow in gal/thin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon systetu" (If -yes. notify DIA'Q) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any pan of the operation? ❑Yes No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? � Yes � No

Facility Number. 40-148
•
Waste Collection & Treatment
Date of Inspection 3-14-2001
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard phis storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Sinicture 4 Structure 5
Identifier:.:......_ . . A1..........� .­___#z._...w................Imp................................................................................
Freeboard (incuc5):- ----- __m—_�
3. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properhr addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do am, stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markines?
Wa.rte Anrification
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/unprovement?
1 I _ Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14 _ a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility- is pended for a wettable acre determination?
continued
❑ Yes :9 No
Stnteture 6
❑ Yes
($ No
❑ Yes
No
❑ Yes
91 No
Yes
B No
Yes
9. No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
i!! No
❑ Yes n No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Yes No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑1 Yes
❑ No
172. Are rock outcrops prestrt?
i I i'es
` Nc,
18. 1 s there a grater suppl - well within 2 50 feet of the spratf field boundary? 0 big -mown
i + Y-_s
^: '�o
❑ On -site ❑ Off -site
P.cauired Records & Documents
r
19. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage &. General Permit or other Permit readih, available?
❑ Yes
%! No
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(iel WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
i 1 No
21. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
❑ No
22. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
❑ No
23. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
El Yes
❑ No
24. Fail to noe- regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
[ No
25 _ Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
iss No
26. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
S No
27. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Odor lscues
28_ Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
❑ Yes
% No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
29. Are there any- dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
J No

01/01/01
Number:Facilitti 40-148 1 Date of lnspmion 3-14-2001
cod nifed,
Printed on: 4/912001
30. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
31. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
.32. 3 an led Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation f (.) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
33. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
34. Do the flush tan" lack- a submerged fill pipe or a permanenthemporary cover?
0 Yes 0 No
0 Yes 0 No
0 Yes El No
El Yes [I No
El Yes El No
E3 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit. I
4E�
. . ........
RevD Reviewer/Inspector Name -f
Reviewer/Inspector Signatuk: k- Q a3L. a Date: CF5 - I C>

r0 Division of Water Quality
0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit © Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number
Date of Visit: 5/181Z000 Time: n,r\ Printed on: 5/23/2000
FO 40 148
Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
0 Permitted 0 Certified [3 Conditionally Certified 13 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ....................
Farm Name: Haft w.bgs................................................................................. .............. County: Greem1� e............................................... ARO.......
OwnerName: Ram......................................mon ............................................................ Phone No: 2N.-7.46-9095 ..........................................................
Facility Contact: .............................................................................. Title:......................................................... . Phone No:
.........................................................
MailingAddress: 2j j..EjJ.Qrme..A,xe.................................... ............................... EarmyjAk...pic ...................................................... VMS.............
Onsite Representative: CIS?..Store.S2A�S1Ie..........••••••••••••••...................................................... Integrator: 5jurphy.faimity..Far.ma.....................................
Certified Operator: MQ5.q5.,W............................... 1► QY.C................................................. Operator Certification Number:165.63 .............................
Location of Farm:
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 ° 29 , 12 u Longitude 77 ' 32 6 48
Design Current
Swine Ca©aCity PODulatiOn
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
® Farrow to Feeder
400
0
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer 10 Dairy
❑ Non -Layer I0 Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 400
Total SSLW 208,800
Number of Lagoons 3 ® Subsurface Drains Present JFM Lagoon Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
10 Spray Field Area
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
0 No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
2. is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
®No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes
® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
❑ Yes
® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure b
Identifier:..........I'dinary.......... ....... Smandar........ ............ Final ............ .................................... .................................... ....................................
Freeboard (inches): 30 30 88

Continued on back
(Facility Number: 40-148 Date of Inspection 5/18/2000 Printed on: 5/23/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ❑ No
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (pasture) Cotton Fescue Small Grain
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CA WMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Reguired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
Ell�to violations: or deficiencies were "»oteil :du _ring tliis visit; Y'O W will :receive ina further
correspondence about this.visit. ..
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments (refer to question ff): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
Facility not operational. Mr. Moye has gone out of business since 12/99; last inspection date with
DWQ. Two buildings have been torn down.
Adequate freeboard levels with a lot of storage in the final stage lagoon.
Reviewer/Inspector Name
iDaphne B. Cullom Entered by Ann Tyndall
S -03 ap

' Wviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
Facility Number: 40-148 Date of Inspection 5/18/2000 Printed on: 5/23/2000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes []No
28.
Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
❑ Yes
❑ No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29.
Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
❑ Yes
❑ No
30.
Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
❑ Yes
❑ No
31.
Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
❑ Yes
❑ No
32.
Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes
❑ No

Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Operation Review
Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Compliance Inspection
® Division of Water Quality - Compliance Inspection
13 Other Agency - Operation Review
10 Routine Q Complaint Q Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review Q Other
Facility Number 4fl 148 Date of Inspection 12/2fl/99
Time of Inspection 10:00 AM 124 hr. (hh:mm)
0 Permitted ® Certified 0 Conditionally Certified 13 Registered r13 Not OperationalOperationall Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: Ra flmtoln.Pigs.......................................................................................... .... County:G.rggjap ............................................... W.f1 ,Q.......
.
Owner Name: XRSCS...................................... 1!)IQYR..................................... Phone No: 25.1-7.4b.:43QS...........................................................
FacilityContact: ..............................................................................Title:....................
Mailing Address:;J.LE,..U9lrExC.AY.9 .....................................
Phone No:
Eairmille...NC....................................................... 2.7.828 .............
Onsite Representative: MASc,5jKayc................................................................................ Integrator: Ruirphy.1mmil3:.Ear s............................
Certified Operator: lA9Se5.V1?............................... MRY�................................................. Operator Certification Number:J.fS.6 .............................
Location of Farm:
Qi}�.�.XR.>�A19.Y}.'.�Al�.£lP.I1.�lUl.ltg..Rl1l.��.QQ�.�.fll:rtl..M�AIArY•.XR.QlC1i11.Rp1S1,5Y.t)lltr�.�l�.Qrl]pAAidSXaIA�.Xllr1>..f.lt �
Latitude 35 ° 29 ° 12 lL Longitude 77 • 32 + 48 1l
Design Current
Swine C'anacity Ponulatinn
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
® Farrow to Feeder
400
260
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 400
Total SSLW 208,800
Number of Lagoons 3 ® Subsurface Drains Present❑ Lagoon Area ® Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes. notify DWQ) El Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: primary secondary holding/storage
Freeboard(inches): ................I.9................................1.9..............................72............................................................................................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (iet trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on hack.
Printed an 12/22/99

Printed on 12/22/99
Facility Number: 40-148 Dale of Inspection 12/20/99
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
❑ Yes
® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
®No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
® No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
❑ Yes
® No
12. Crop type Cotton Fescue Coastal Bermuda Small Grain
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
®No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
®No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
® No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
® No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
®No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
❑ No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
® No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
® No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
® No
Nd vi6latit) is.or deficiencies•wefe:nbted:dOiring•this Visit: _You: Wilt;receive Jno further
ctirrespol7dence abort this:visit. • :: :: . ::::::: ::::: ::::: ::::: :::
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
arm is going out of business for now.
as been told about abandonment rules. Will follow with a letter.
arm is in permit process and will follow through.
Jaste analysis 11/3199 = .51 lbs.
torage lagoon has evidence of a nutria. This animal must be watched to ensure no damage to lagoon.
Reviewer/Inspector Name ,Carl Dunn Entered by Ann Tyndall
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

0 Division of Soil and Water'Conservatioq-- Operation•Review _
© Division of Soil and Water Conservation,'- Compliance inspection - T
_ ®Division of Water,Quahty - .Compliance Inspection
t
:,. ©Other Agency -Operation Renew
Routine O Com taint O Foil ow -up of DW inspection O Follow-u of DSWC review O Other
Facility Number Lf( ? J+i Date of Inspection P 1 2- M,
Time of Inspection �a: r-0 24 hr. (hh:mm)
© Permitted 10 Certified [j Conditionally Certified Q Registered Not Operational Date Last Operated:
A.
Farm Name: N� I �'n�'� a.. C.ounty:............. ........`........'................._................._..........__.....
Owner Name: ................ `�ScS 'ye, .... I ........ ........................................................ Phone No:...............
FacilityContact: ......................................... Title: ................................................................ Phone No: ...................................................
MailingAddress: .....................................---.............................................................................................._..............._................_.................................. ..........................
Onsite Representative: .................�'?X5...................H.'.Y........................................ Integrator ,R _
Certified Operator: .......................'Y Operator Certification Number:..........................................
YS .................
Location of Farm:
Latitude 0 4 Longitude 0 4 44
Design Current
Swine Capacity Poaulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
400
2bQ
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
�'j
-Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
TotaLSSLW
iNumber of Lagoons 3 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? El Yes ❑ No
h. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify D'vVQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Dees discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier: prio-M-1 5�ca�.-/ k.iai.b111--A
Freeboard (inches): I �... .......................%..............................72...........................................
Structure 5
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 9No
❑ Yes [S No
❑ Yes 10 No
Structure 6
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc_)
3/23/99
❑ Yes Wo
Continued on back

Facility Number: 40 — jyg IDate of Inspection i
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes $No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? . ❑ Yes 19 No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes 10 No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Anolication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Yes No
12. Crop type CO(4., SG
13. Dd the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes C?�No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, -waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
0_ ,6-* 'atioris;or• deficiencies were noted during �his:visit: • Y:o4 wiil•reeeiye do; furthgr
..
corres andence. abovf this visit. . ...........................•
❑ Yes 14 No
❑ Yes 19 No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes J�g No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes 21 No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ISM No
❑ Yes � No
❑ Yes' K No
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers at dlor any.iecommeodations oi_any other -comments:,
Use=drawings offacility.to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
L I5 `jD;n> o^} Dt IJ�SrNSSr �D`r not! / `
ft�15 i, 4. ij F�o�� R�A..e:ai1��Q+� r^ies, 1�%r� t ili, %orr.11 ,q UP,",
Fire• r+i 1•, per.... �' lass .., I1 �a }ram... ,-a •Sr'
Mr.�� �►^°lys's �If31g� =+.
Q�.cicrce It
01 .nK re-,, —Tn6 oln5,r ►vti�cl^v�
Reviewer/Inspector Name i
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
_.Date: 12 /w/ 4-1
3/23199

wr'
! Site Requires Immediate Attention: /\-N
� DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT . Facility No. 4-o _ 148
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: ! /' . 1995
Time: 3 0 0
Farm Name/Owner: A A LF A% d b^) pi 6 S /j? or E_r
Mailing Address: , All F. d o-ev c 4 JE, j t.l C A-G 2 7& g
County: 6 Ag1
Integrator. Phone:
On Site Representative: Ivl Phone:
Physical Address/Location: A/C.d / 2 3S
Type of Operation: Swine Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: C0 Number of Animals on Site: �b
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: Longitude: Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) Yes or No Actual Freeboard: a..- Ft. o Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or§;�b Was any erosion observed? Yes or
Is adequate land available for spray? 6D-of No Is the cover crop adequate? Yes or No
Crop(s) being utilized: _ Qa�QJan,A,a d- Az, C4_yA &,
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings.' or No
100 Feet from Wells? i;�r No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes or 6D
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes or If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes
0-r-...s ..,..-,
`? 7���a:Lz"
Inspector Name Signature
cc: Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed.

74 11Pitt
E0Clllly_NllMI?Qr C!211nty F,lrm_Nttmq
74-8 4 Pill Gaskins fork Ptoduce
7 4-8 5 o ''Rf6�M— Hallmaon Pigs
74-06
74-87
74-80
74-89
Pill
7 4— 9 0
Pitt
74--91
Pitt
74-92
74-93
74-94
74-95
74-96
74-97
1
i
Strickland Farm
Sam Cannon Farm
Hickman Farms
Whitehursi Corp,
PAUL BURNETTE
Evans Farm
Haddock Farms
Animal Operations
°$ 9t1
�po��!lorl
Qwno
-cit".tlttg
L4.9atL±�n
Qh-ma
gAPacI.iY
TV"
Gasklns
Charles
Greenville NC
Black Jack - Grimosland; 114 mile
752-0233
400
Swine
north of Black Jack on east side of
road.
Moye
Mose's
Farmville NC
From Kenonsvllle, lake NC 903 N to
746.9395
400
Swine
Snow Hill. continue on NC 903 N thru
Maury to Ormondsvllle; at
Ormondsvllle turn I.E. onto SR 1335
an i o m es to farm entrance on
Lt. —
Strickland
Ruby
Walslonburg NC
5 miles Northwest of Farmvllla NO an
753-4679
400
Swine
Stanlsburg Rd. SA 1200.
Strickland
Ruby
Walstonburg NO
5 miles northwest of Farmvlllo NO on
753-4679
400
Swine
Slantburg Road No. 1200
Carraway
Randy
Griffon NO
From Konansvllla, lake NO 11 to
524.4358
360
Swine
Grlflon In Pill Co., turn right onto NC
118 towards Vanceboro, go about
3.0 miles out of Grifton and [urn right
by TV Tower onto SR 1753, go 0.6
mile and turn right onto SR 1914
(dlrl), go about 0,8 mile to farm
entrance on left.
Taylor
Mark
Ayden NO
From Konansvllla, take NO 11 N to
746-3629
360
Swine
Ayden; at Ayden turn Rl. onto NC
102 E end go 2.0 miles, [urn Lt. onto
SR 1712 for 1.5 miles until It
Intersects with SR 1700. and go 0.2
mile to farm entrance on Lt.
Taylor
Mark
Wlnlerville NO
On Rd. 1700 between Slick Valley
746-2110
350
Swine
And Haddocks crossroads.
Cannon
Robert
Ayden NO
On 903 coming from Bethany
746-4977
250
Swine
Church turn right at old Web's Corn
MITI (Benson) go 113 of the way down
that rd. turn right beside home of
Robert B, Cannon house Is down
that path.
Hickman
William
Greenville NC
Calico NO Hwy. 102 oast 1 Milo.
355-5844
250
Swine
Farm on left.
Whilahursl
C. Mnc
Aydon NC
2 miles west of Ayden on Hwy, 102,
746-6283
250
Swine
snuth side of road Just past Norris
Store Rd,
Burnelle
Paul
Fountain NO
1 mi. east on Hwy. 222 of Fountain
749-4631
230
Swine
from stop tight on the left.
Lewis
T.R.
Walstonburg NC
W. side of SR, 1229 S. of US. 264
753-4944
200
Swine
Evans
Ronald
Grimestand NC
SR 1760, Mobley Bridge Rd.
756-8005
100
Swine
Haddock
J.D.
Winlerville NO
On S. side of Sr 1740 between Sr
756-3432
100
Swine
1700 and SR 1725

�J �r
Nc� a7 gat
l�o D ►� - �4�� ter}
�oaoa
n

ro
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and
Natural Resources
Washington Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne .McDevitt, Secretary
CERTIFIED. MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
NORT7i C4,RQLI14A 1Dej-A rrmmi%m OF'
ENVIROIJMEIYT'AN� N.raT�.,iFx.c:L:R�SauRCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
February 3; 1999 - t'
Mr. Moses Moye
Halfmoon Pigs
211 E. Home Ave.
Farmville , North Carolina 27828
SUBJECT: Notice of Deficiency
Animal Feedlot Operation Site inspection
Halfmoon Pigs
Facility No. 40-148
Greene County
Dear Mr. Moye:
On October 13, 1998, 1 conducted an Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
at the Halfmoon Pigs in Greene County. A copy of the inspection report is
attached for your review.
In general, this inspection included verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified
Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP) and the General Permit; (2) the farm
is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC 2H.0217, Senate Bill
1217, the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan and the General Permit; (3)
the farm operation's waste management system is being operated properly under
the direction of a Certified Operator; (4) the required records are being kept' (5)
there are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or runoff. The following deficiencies
were observed during the inspection.
➢ The CAWMP should include a copy of the DWQ Certification form.
943 Washington Square Mail, Washington, North Carolina 27889
Telephone 252M46-6481 FAX 252/975_3716
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

Page Two
_:Halfmoon Pigs E
facility No. 40-148
February 3,1.999
�at.is very_important as the owner and the Operator in Charge that you resolve
these aforementioned deficiencies and any other problems that may arise, as_
soon as possible: For additional assistance, please contact your Technical
Specialist. Nothing in this letter should be taken as absolving this, facility of the
responsibility and liability of any violations that have resulted or may result.from
these deficiencies. ._._ --_
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance during the inspection. Should
you have further questions or -comments regarding this inspection, do not
hesitate to call at [phone], ext: 321.
Sincerely,
Daphne B. Cullom
Environmental Specialist
cc: Dr. Garth Boyd, Murphy Family Farms
Greene County SWCD Office
Mike Regans, Greene County NCCES Office
DSWC-WaRO
Compliance Group
WaRO

Facility Number Date of Inspection rTxrxm.
Tinie of Inspection 24 hr. (hhcmm)
n Registered ■ Certified n Applied for Permit CS Permitted 0 of 0pe­r`atj`on-aTj Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: Halfmona Pigs .................... ............. ........ ....................... .......... ........ County: Greene WARO
Owner Name: Moses. ,_. .....� _�. Mnye W_..... ...... �.... .. .. ..
Facility Contact:
Title:.,
Phone No: 2.52r7.46A39-5........................................W ._ ......
.. �._...._.... Phone No: ........... .... . ..................................
Mailing Address: 21LE...HormitAve..... ................................... ........ ............................ F.aurmxille.NlG......... ...... ............ .............. 2782A..............
Onsite Representative: Maces.Moye............................................................................... Integrator: MuurpV.Eapnily.Eaxms............. I .................... ...
Certified Operator: HosesM............................. Operator Certification Number: 1656r3.............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude-"• ®� ©u
Longitude 71 {•
1 p can -to Feeder
p Feeder to mts
Design ,, urren esign-urregt -. ;� esegn . urren _ ,
f_
1t3`.._opulatiojEoiiltry-.C-atyP°plat�°n aitle = GTap Popula�hon
jj3 Uyer I Ip airy
; p Non -Layer (3 Non -Dairy
(3 FaiTow to can
� q ..
"
0
To alDestgnC aci
- TotaiS ,
® arrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finis
p Gilts
Boars
ace Drains Present 1113 agoon Xrea IM spray k ING Area
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at.. p Lagoon p,LLSpray Field , ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria'in effect at the time of design?
p Yes ® No
13 Yes ® No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes 13 No
p Yes. ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes N No
p Yes ® No
7. Did the facility fail to have it certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
13 Yes ® No

lVaicilify7 Number. 40_148 pate of Inspection
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Laeoons,Holding Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9.. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
p Yes ® No
p Yes ®No'
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ..#f L . _ . _. _ #2 .. -01-Final......
Freeboard (ft): 1.8 1.8 42
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
p Yes N No
p Yes ® No
p Yes. ® No
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? p.Yes ® No
Waste ARplication
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? p Yes ® No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type Coastal 13r.�rnniuda morass-...�- . kecc;,e_ fps ire .. - �lheat ..-... _.... _ ........ W. W_ . ............._W.
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal -Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? p Yes . ® No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? p Yes N No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? p'Yes ® No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? p Yes ® No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? p Yes ®No
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? p Yes ® No
22. Does record keeping need improvement? p Yes ® No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
21 Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? p Yes ® No
24. Were any, additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? N Yes p No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit? p Yes ' p No
R. oyicr ons.or uiencses-were.no a ringt VIs1 oa :rerelvenor er.
.ee$poAl�eRe� ab4�t x#�s visit:. .
I Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date: t p .-

of Soil and Water Conservation [3 Other Agency
of Water Quality
JGF Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ inspeetion O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other t
Date of Inspection -l3
Facility Number l ^^
_ Time of Inspection � 24 hr. (hh:mm)
® Registered ` p ertified 13 Applied for Permit E3 Permitted ® Not O erationaln -Date Last Operated:.......„ .................
Farm Name: A :Cn0.��Iu� ovl.lV�.n...^........................................................... County:..... 4.4 ........................1ru?
OwnerName:........ A.SS .`.............................4'. '.lQ............................................ Phone No:.......................................................................................
FacilityContact: .............................................................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
Mailing Address:.r�1.1._E._or+ .....!C 4„�le Nr...................................a8
f......... ...
OnsiteRepresentative: .......... i.Y.t<O�.e.:5............. R.................._.................... Integrator:.. V�14�t �.. �a y �. ..kn&g ;S..
Certified Operator:.._1..1'.1ose 5......1v:................._................. Operator Certification Number:.......G_b_�� 3.........
.......................
Location of Farm:
Latitude ®°®,®" Longitude ®°�'®L{
Design Current Design Current" Design Current
Somme n Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder '"' ❑ Layer 1 10 Dairy -`
-_-_ ❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer I JU Non -Dairy
❑ Fpffow to Wean
Fiarrow to Feeder 4an gas❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑Boars Total SSLW OB S�d
Number of LagoorisY Holding Fonds d��r ❑ Subsurface Drains Present 10 Lagoon Area I0 Spray Field Area
❑ No Liquid Waste Management Systemv,
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenancelimprovement?
❑ Yes
[J-T�o
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
GKO
Discharge originated at ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any pan of the operation?
❑ Yes
UNo
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes
[;FNo
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
❑ Yes
Vo
maintenance/improvement?
J/
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
I� NCO
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
ElYes
w5o
7/25/97

Facility Number: () --
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
❑ Yes
&Pco'�
Structures (LagoonsZoldina Ponds Flush Pits etc.
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
l-No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ..... �.�........ ...I�rJTh ��.
.......[................
......... ` ............................... ...... ...........................
Freeboard (ft): } R ,... [ J/-��
......................................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? L) "
❑ Yes
6JKo
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
63'�o
12. Do any of the structures need maintenancelimprovement?
❑ Yes
IJ'No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13, Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes
����
o
Waste Application ,,,��
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes 9<0
(if in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15, Crop type lJ ! ..... G� vim._{ Qft5 urz l..._..........�......._. G .._ !........ T ......................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑ Yes E3 o
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
No:violationsor deiiciencies.were-noted-during this-. visit.' You;wiEi recei�e•ito,furitier : -
: . correspondeice d oitt his:visit. :
11V4�L.Q,I_, Co �5e�.va�-•`a � � i s�i C�
❑ Yes R,.,iTo
❑ Yes O`o
❑ Yes GKo
❑ Yes ,�o
6d
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes L►d'No
❑ Yes 2<o
'Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:— „,�� m �1 _ Date: 10 —1 B - qA __

Division of Soil and Water
p Division of Water Quality
10 Routine 0 complaint 0 Follow-up of uWQ inspection 0 PC
Facility Number
Registered p Certified p Applied for Permit p Permitted
0
up of ubyv%_ review 0 utner
Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection ® 24 hr, (bb:mm)
0 Not 0perationa Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: Halfmoan.P.Pigs........................... ... County: Greene WARO
Owner Name: Masts------------------------ ... Mope .........................---.--.....--- Phone No: 919-.7.46-.Qd95.(farm)................................ ...........
Facility Contact: Moses Mnye. ....................-----...........................Title: o.w.nrx ................................................. Phone No: 919.175a:37514hcune).......
MailingAddress: 211..E,,.HoxzmAxe................................................................................ Earmyllic...N.0 ....................................................... 2782.8 ..............
Onsite Representative: M,ases.Ma.e................................................................................ Integrator: Marp►liy-F.ami.ly.Farms.................................... ..
Certified Operator: MQses..W.............................. Mae ................................................. Operator Certification Nu mbe r: 16563 ............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude ©+®t ©" Longitude ©• ©t ®"
esign;-: urren �
Swifie ,Capacity Population
Wean to Feeder
p Feeder to mis
p Farrow to Wean
® Farrow to ee er
Farrow to Finis
p Gilts
p Boars
Number_iif'Lkgoons I Holding'Poeds u sur ace Drains Present 113 Lagoon Area In Spray Field Area
o iquf as a ManagementSystem
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? p Yes ® No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes N No
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon 0 Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes N No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) [3 Yes ® No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes H No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes ®No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? p Yes ®No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require p Yes ® No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? p Yes ®No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? p Yes ®No
7/25/97

Yacility Number: 40_ 148
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
p Yes
® No
Structures (La oons,Holding Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
p Yes
® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5 Structure
6
identifier: .........pomary ......SecDndary ...... Einal.Stage.......
Freeboard (ft): 1.6 1.6 4.0
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
p Yes
® No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
p Yes
® No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
p Yes
® No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
p Yes
® No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
p Yes
® No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
.... 15. Crop type ....was B�e�.uda. .............F.escue. ............... .....Sm;1J1.Gr in..Qxexs�ed..........I.......... J�groan..................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
R . o-viq ons.or emneies•were.noo uring t is visit:.Tan .receive no urt er .
corresponftrjc� About tili .*bit;*
n Yes ® No
n Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ®No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
Comments (refer to question #}: Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations -or any"other conintents.
a
Use driiwings of facility twbetter explaia:sitnatioiis. (use additionil pages -,as necessary)
Consiruction completed on final stage lagoon with bare areas seeded - operation close to certification at time of Review
Markers in lagoons 2 and 3 as required
Mr. Moye plans to separate IRR2 for coastal Bermuda and fescue pastures as requested by DWQ but has not had to pump since
Est inspection
Planning to calibrate solid set waste management system in 1998
Reviewer/Inspector Name ooper e
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

State of North Carolina
" Department of Environment
and Natural Resources ~�
Division of Water Quality --
Washington Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary +`
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
December 19, 1997
Mr. Moses Moye
Hal$noon Pigs
211 E. Horne Ave.
Farmville, NC 27828
SUBJECT: Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
Halfmoon Pigs
Facility No. 40-148
Greene County
Dear Mr. Moye:
On September 19, 1997, 1 conducted an animal -feedlot operation site inspection at the referenced facility. Overall,
the operation was found to be in satisfactory condition. A copy of the inspection report is attached for your review.
In general, this inspection includes verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
(CAWMP); (2) the farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC 2H.0217, Senate Bill 1217, and
the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan; (3) the farm operation's waste management system is being operated
properly under the direction of a Certified,Operator; (4) the required records are being kept; (5) there are no signs of
seepage, erosion, and/or runoff.
The recommendations and/or comments regarding your inspection can be found in the comment section of the attached
inspection form. It is very important as the owner and Operator in Charge that you address any noted concerns, as soon
as possible. For assistance, please contact your Technical Specialist and/or the local Soil & Water Conservation District
Office.
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance during the inspection. Should you have further questions or
comments regarding this inspection, do not hesitate to call me at [phone], ext. 321.
Sincerely,
Q&,, g
Daphne B. Cullom
Environmental Specialist 11
cc: Greene County SWCD Office
Mike Regans, Greene County NCCES
Dr. Garth Boyd, -Murphy Family Farms
_,*"aRO
943 Washington Square Mail, Washington, NC 27889 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Aifin native Action Employer

r
le Kouttne p complaint p kollow-up of DWQ inspection p follow-up of DNWU review p Vtner 1
Date of Inspection
Facility Number
Time of Inspection ?A hr. (hh:mm)
III Registered p Certified p Applied for Permit p Permitted in Not 0peratioaa Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: Hslfmafla Pigs.. _ w ...._ ....._..... _ ... _ .w .._w County: Greene WARO
Owner. Name: Mn Phone No: 919146:23951armt......_ ..__.........................
Facility Contact: ....... _ ....._.�.................. _........ ........... Title: ................................ Phone No: 919-Z"ai-37S2 ham._
Mailing Address:
Onsite Representative: Integrator: Miuphy..Eamily.Farms..........................
Certified Operator:Move.................................................. Operator Certification Number: 155fi3.... .............. ..........
Location of Farm:
Latitude ©0®� ©� Longitude ©•©®�
e
Swine
esign urren _ s Design s. urren_ _ esfgn current
Capacity.Population Pogltry Capacity Population, Cattle 9.. "Capacrty,,Popalation~
Wean to Fee er
13 ee er to Finish
Farrow to Wean
ig Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Fos
13 Gilts
Boars
pLayer
ry 13 Non -Layer
- Total Design Capacity 400
r Tonal SSLW . ,
General
1. 'Are there any buffers that need maintenancetimprovement? p Yes ® No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? 13 Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes p No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) [3 Yes p No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) 13 Yes p No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? p Yes g No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than: lagoons/holding ponds) require p Yes 0 No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? p Yes ® No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? p Yes ® No
7M/97

aC UTN UZ B er: 40_148
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lapoons.Holdina Ponds Flush Pits. etc.)
1 9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
p Yes ® No
13 Yes ® No
Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: __..... _ __ _ _ ....__ ..... ..........w . ____.._w _ . _................... �_ W . _...
Freeboard (ft): 5-6 ft. .5 ft.
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(if any or questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes N No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
15. Crop type _...Beznaudamiss ......._...._WW_._..W.___-y____...__._-
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? p Yes p No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
IS. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
2) . Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Pei mit?
R . .o•via ons.ox ctendes•were.no a ungnrs vtsi , ou wi .receive nay u er .
CeJ`>r.....e...ab...it....s� =.
p Yes ® No
p Yes ®No
13 Yes N No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes 13 No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
bra....-ar�r.L.aa....�r;..:!'.=?.:aF+>C,tr.a..'ar41i A-hr•'Hl.3+hrA.w:J�.rdraa.a's-s:.alii"Wa.::•:�-K�-..4 .•a _..:=.;a ;,_.. ..-..-ti<y:r1.:..n-�Tra--`-cs::s .�.'.:::.::: _-.. 4_"�. _ "1 Tf
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signatu