400146_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NUH I H UAHULINA
Department of Environmental Qual

INSPECTIONS
INSPECTIONS
INSPECTION2

M Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number:
400146 Facility Status:
Active Permit: AWS400146
❑ Denied Access
Inppection Type:
Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit:
Routine
County: Greene Region:
Washington
Date of Visit:
09/27/2016 Entry Time: 10:40 am
Exit Time: 11:35 am Incident #
Farm Name:
B Mack Farms, LLC # 2
Owner Email:
Owner,
B Mack Farms LLC
Phone:
252-521-2000
Mailing Address:
308 Parker Heath Rd
Pink Hill NC 28572
Physical Address:
8642 Willow Green Rd
Snow Hill NC 28580
Facility Status:
Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm:
Latitude: 35' 30' 54" Longitude:
77° 36' 16"
Take 258 N from Snow Hill about 4 miles. Turn right on 123, Go about 112 mile. Turn left on SR 1335 about 112 mi. on the left.
Question Areas:
E Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Star, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Bradley Chase Mackey Operator Certification Number: 990009
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Reprosentative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Chase Mackey Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Chase Mackey Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s)-
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis: so!] tested: Jan. 2016
5-13-16 = .17
3-10-16 = .40
B-9-16 = .79
iRR records are complete & balanced out.
Reviewed: new COC 8-2016; rainfall/freeboard; stockinglmortality; crop yield; sludge survey, 20116.
page: 1

Permit: AWS400146 Owner - Facility : B Mack Farms LLC Facility Number: 400146
Inspection Date: 09/27/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 41000 2,687
Total Design Capacity: 4,000
Total SSLW: 540,000
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon BM 03/20/95 19.00 39.00
page: 2

Permit: AWS400146 Owner - Facility: B Mack Farms LLC Facility Number: 400146
Inspection Date: 09/27/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No Na Me
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
0 ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑M
[]
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■ ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
0 ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection Storage & Treatment
Yes
No Na Ne
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.eJ large
❑
❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
M ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
0 ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
M ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance aftematives that need
❑ M ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ M ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
i
❑
page: 3

It
Permit: AWS400146 Owner - Facility: B Mack Farms LLC Facility Number:
'400146
Inspection Date: 09/27/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Waste Application
Yes No Na Ne
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Com, wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 3
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑ 0 ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ 0 ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑ 0 ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ 0 ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of property operating waste application equipment?
❑ 0 ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na No
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
N ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
E ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWS400146 Owner - Facility : B Mack Farms LLC Facility Number: 400146
Inspection Date: 09/27/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na No
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
E ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
E ❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No Na No
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
N ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
0 ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
0 ❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
0 ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
N ❑
❑
page: 5

Division of Water Resources
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
El
Other Agency
Facility Number:
400146
Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS400146
Denied Access
Inpsection Type:
Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed OaW
Reason for Visit:
Routine
County: Greene Region:
Washington
Date of Visit:
03/03/2015 Entry Time: 02:00 pm Exit Time: 2:30 pm Incident #
Farm Name:
Vandiford Swine #3
Owner Email:
Owner:
Vanrack Inc
Phone:
252-753-4972
Mailing Address:
8642 Willow Green Rd
Snow Hill NC 28580
Physical Address:
8642 Willow Green Rd
Snow Hill NC 28580
Facility Status:
❑ Compliant ®
Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm:
Latitude: 35' 30' 54" Longitude:
77' 36' 16"
Take 258 N from Snow Hill about 4 miles. Turn
right on 123. Go about 1/2 mile. Turn left on SR 1335 about 112 mi. on the left.
Question Areas:
Q Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat
Records and Documents Other Issues
® Waste Application
Certified Operator: Charles K Vandiford Operator Certification Number: 16597
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Represenlative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Keith Vandiford Phone
On -site representative Keith Vandiford Phone :
Primary Inspector:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Marlene Salyer
waste analysis: soil tested:912512014
2.10-15 = .27
8-15-14 = .31
5-14-14 = .51
3-12.14 = .89
IRR records for 2014 are complete & balanced out w1PAN remaining on all fields - No irrigation yet in 2015
Reviewed: new COC, rainfall, freeboard, crop yield, calibration , sludge survey.
Phone:
Date:
page: 1

t
Permit: AWS400146 Owner - Facility : Vanrack Inc Facility Number: 400146
inspection Date: 03/03/15 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Q Swine - Feeder to Finish 4.000 0
Total Design Capacity: 4,000
Total SSLW: 540,000
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon BHt 03/20195 19.00 18.OD
page: 2

I
Permit: AWS400146 Owner - Facility : Vanrack Inc Facility Number: 400146
Inspection Date: 03/03/15 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No Na Ne
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
®❑
❑
Discharge originated at: .
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
®❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
©❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
El 11
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
Q ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
11 ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection Storage & Treatment
Yes
No Na No
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
El
❑ ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large
❑
11 El
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
El ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
El ❑
❑
&. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
0 ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
Q ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na Ne
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ 11 ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ 11 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN n 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
[]
page: 3

t
Permit: AWS400146 Owner - Facility : Vanrack Inc Facility Number: 400146
Inspection Date: 03/03/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No Na Me
Crop Type 1 Coasial Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2 soybeans
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type i
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Sail Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
13 ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
U ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
El ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
El ❑
❑
I& Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
El ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No Na No
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
El ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
[]
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
©❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
[]
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

t
Permit: AWS400146 Owner - Facility : Vanrack Inc Facility Number: 400146
Inspection Date: 03/03/15 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na Ne
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and T' Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
23. if selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
®❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
®❑
❑
25 Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
Ej ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
Q ❑
❑
27_ Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
®❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No Na Ne
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
Ej ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWO of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
(i,e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
Ej ❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
Q ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
0 ❑
❑
page: 5

I
Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400146 Facility Status: Active, „ Permit: AWS40Q146 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type, Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine „ , County: GreeneRegion: Washington
Date of Visit: 11/07/2013 _ Entry Time: 11:05 AM Exit Time: 12L15 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: Vandiford Swine ##3 Owner Email:
Owner: Vanrack Inc - Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 8642 )&jllow Green Rd Snow HiILNC 2�0580 _
Physical Address: 8642 Willow Green Rd Snow Hill NC 28580
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC -
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35'30'54" Longitude: 77°36'16"
Take 258 N from Snow Hill about 4 miles. Turn right on 123. Go about 112 mile. Turn left on SR 1335 about 112 mi. on the left.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Charles K Vandiford . Operator Certification Number: 16597
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Keith Vandiford Phone:
On -site representative Keith Vandiford Phone:
Primary Inspector:
Inspector Signature:
Marlene Salyer
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis: soil tested: 9-2012
10-18-13 = .89
7-22-13 = 1.66
3-12-13 = 2.05
12-13-12 = 1.42
Phone:
IRR records are complete & balanced out. Rainfall, freeboard, stocking & crop yield are recorded.
Sludge survey is due 2014 & caliberation is due in 2013.
Date:
Page: 1

I
Permit: AWS400146 Owner - Facility: Vanrack Inc
Inspection Date: 11/07/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity
Facility Number: 400146
Reason for Visit: Routine
Current Population
Swine
Swine -Feeder to Finish 4,000 0
Total Design Capacity: 4,000
Total SSLW: 540,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier
Designed Observed
Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
agcon BH 1 03/20/95 19.00 28.00
Page: 2

Permit: AW5400146 Owner - Facility: Vanrack Inc Facility Number: 400146
Inspection Date: 11/07/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges S Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑ ❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑ ❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than
❑
■
❑ ❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes
No
NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.ed large trees, severe
❑
■
❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc_)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not property addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑
■
❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ ■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑ ■
❑
❑
dry stacks andlor wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑ ■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑ ■
❑
❑
improvement?
11 _ Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

I
Permit: AWS400146 Owner • Facility: Vanrack Inc
Inspection Date: 11/07/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number : 400146
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No
NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal
Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Soybeans
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■
Cl ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Cl ■
❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
20. floes the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

I
Permit: AWS400146 Owner - Facility: Vanrack Inc
Inspection Date: 1110712013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Records and Documents
Facility Number : 400146
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
Q
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑
■ ❑ ❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26, Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400146 Owner - Facility: Vanrack Inc
Inspection Date: 11/07/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Records and Documents
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Facility Number: 400146
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
1101111
Yes No NA NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concem? If yes, contact a regional ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon / Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
❑
Page: 6

It
Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400146 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS400146 Denied Access
Inspection Type: Qomoliance Inspection._ Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene, ___ Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 08/28/2012 Entry Time: 03:40 PM Exit Time: 04:20 PM Incident #:
Farm Name. Vandiford Swine #3 Owner Email:
Owner: Vanrack Inc Phone: 52-752;A 972
Mailing Address: 8642 Willow Green Rd Snow Hill NC 28580
Physical Address: 8642 Willow Green Rd Snow Hill NC 28580
Facility Status: a Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murohv-Brown LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35"50'0""Longitude: 77°36'16" TT
Take 258 N from Snow Hill about 4 miles. Turn right on 123. Go about 112 mile. Turn left on SR 1335 about 112 mi. on the left_
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts
Records and Documents
Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Other issues
Certified Operator: Charles K Vandiford Operator Certification Number: 16597
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Keith Vandiford Phone:
On -site representative Keith Vandiford Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: F�/ Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis:
8-7-12 = .99
4-2-12 = 2.49
1-27-12 = 2.1
8-10-11 = 1.3
soil tested: 10-2011
IRR records are complete & balanced out. Freeboard, rainfall, crop yield, & stocking are complete.
SS due in 2014 Calib. due in 2013
Looks Good!
Page: 1

Ci
I
Permit: AWS400146 Owner- Facility: Vanrack Inc Facility Number: 400146
Inspection Date: OB12812012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
O Swine - Feeder to Finish 4,000 2,293
Total Design Capacity: 4,000
Total SSLW: 540,000
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
lagoon BIi 1 03/20/95 19.00 24.00
Page: 2

r
Permit. AWS400146 Owner - Facility. Vanrack Inc Facility Number : 400146
Inspection Date: 08/28/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? 00011
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than ❑ ■ ❑ Cl
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? ❑
5_ Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ ■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑ ■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑ ■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑ ■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

i
M
Permit: AWS400146 Owner - Facility: Vanrack Inc Facility Number: 400146
Inspection Date: 0812MO12 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? ❑
Total Phosphorus? ❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? Q
Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type 1 Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2 Soybeans
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■
❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑ ■
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■
❑
❑
Records and Documents •
Yes No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
1100
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■
❑
❑
if yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

i
S
Permit: AWS400146 Owner - Facility: Vanrack Inc Facility Number: 400146
Inspection Date: 08/28/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Lease Agreements? ❑
Other? ❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
Q
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑ ■
❑ ❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Page: 5

L
Permit: AWS400146 Owner - Facility: Vanrack Inc
Facility Number: 400146
Inspection Date: 0812812012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit:
Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA
NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ ■
❑
❑
Otherlssues
Yes No
NA
NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report ❑ ■
❑
❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ ■
❑
❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e.,
discharge, ❑ ■
❑
❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon 15torage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
in
Page: 6

E Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number : 400146 _ Facility Status: tive_ Permit: A1WS400146 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Comoliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine . County: Greene Region: WaAbinaton
Date of Visit: 07/20/2011 Entry Time: 11:00 AM _ Exit Time: 11:30 AM _ Incf dent #:
Farm Name: Vandiford Swine #3 Owner Email:
Owner: Yanrack Inc Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 8642 Willow Green Rd - i
Physical Address: 8642 Willow Green Rd Snow Hill NC 28580
Facility Status: ■ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator. Murohv-Brown LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude: 77"36'16"
Take 258 N from Snow Hill about 4 miles. Turn right on 123. Go about 112 mile. Turn left on SR 1335 about 112 mi. on the left.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator. Charles K Vandiford Operator Certification Number: 16597
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Keith Vandiford Phone:
On -site representative Keith Vandiford Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis:
5-25-11 = 2.5
11-22-10 = .74
4-26-10 = 1.9
soil tested: 12-2010
Rainfall & freeboard records are recorded.
IRR records are complete & balanced out.
Looks Good!
Page: 1

I
r
Permit: AW5400146 Owner - Facility: Vanrack Inc Facility Number: 400146
Inspection Date: 07/20/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 4,000 2,963
Total Design Capacity: 4,000
Total SSLW: 540,000
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
lagoon B H 1 03/20/95 19.00 32.00
c
Page: 2

I
Permit: AWS400146 owner - Facility: Vanrack Inc Facility Number: 400146
Inspection Date: 07/2012011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? 11000
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ M ❑ ❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than Cl ■ ❑ ❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? ❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e.1 large trees, severe U ■ U U
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management Cl ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ M ❑ ❑
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or Q ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or 110110
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
If yes, check the appropriate box below_
Excessive Ponding?
Hydraulic Overload?
Frozen Ground?
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
r ❑
❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400146 Owner - Facility: Vanrack Inc
Inspection Date: 07/20/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number. 400146
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 Ibs_?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Cam, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Coastal Bermuda Grass
{Hay}
Crop Type 3
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP? ❑
Page: 4

Permit: AW5400146 Owner - Facility: Vanrack Inc
Facility Number: 400146
Inspection Date. 0712012011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑ 0011
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 5

S
Permit: AWS400146 Owner -Facility: Vanrack Inc
Facility Number: 400146
Inspection Date: 07/20/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit:
Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA
NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ ■
❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes No
NA
NE
28. Did the facility fail to property dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report Cl ■
❑
❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ ■
❑
❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e.,
discharge, 110
❑
❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon 1 Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
IN
Page: 6

0 Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400146 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS4 0146 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine _ County: Qr22ne _ Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 10/2112010 _ Entry Time:02:00 PM Exit Time:
Farm Name: Vandiford Swine #3
Owner: Vanrack Inc
Incident #:
Owner Email:
Phone: 2
Mailing Address: §642 Willow Gre?,p Rd _ Sngy( Hill NC 2§5„§0,,,,,,,
Physical Address: 8642 Willow Green Rd mow Hill NC 28580
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°30'54" Longitude: 77°36'1¢"
Take 258 N from Snow Hill about 4 miles. Turn right on 123. Go about 112 mile. Turn left on SR 1335 about 112 mi. on the left.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Charles K Vandiford
Secondary OIC(s):
Operator Certification Number: 16597
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Keith Vandiford Phone:
On -site representative Keith Vandiford Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: _
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis:
8-6-10 = .98
4-26-10 = 1.9
1-20-10 = 1.4
soil tested 2009 SS 2014 Calib. 2009
Freeboard range: 3-1-10 = 14" to 9-20-10 = 42"
Irr records are complete and balanced out. Looks Great.
Date:
Page: 1

Penult: AWS400146 Owner - Facility: Vanrack Inc
Inspection Date: 10/21/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400146
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 4,000 3,010
Total Design Capacity: 4,000
Total SSLW: 540,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
lagoon 131-11 03/20/95 19.00 28.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWS400146 Owner - Facility: Vanrack Inc Facility Number: 400146
Inspection Date: 10/21/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■ ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■ ❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■ ❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.eJ large trees, severe
1101111
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑
■ ❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■ ❑
❑
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■ ❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■ ❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes
No NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■ 130
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400146 Owner - Facility: Vanrack Inc
Inspection Date: 10/21/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400146
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA
NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
Cl
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Com, Wheat,
Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 3
Small Grain
Overseed
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑
❑
Plan{CAWMP}?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
16, Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of property operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
20, Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
D
Page: 4

Permit: AVVS400146 Owner - Facility: Vanrack Inc
Facility Number: 400146
Inspection Date. 10/21/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ 0
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)? ❑ ■
❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Ill
❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Other Issues
Yes No
NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-complianoe of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately,.
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400146 Owner - Facility: Vanrack Inc
Inspection Date: 10/2112010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Other Issues
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Facility Number: 400146
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

do
0 Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400146 Facility Status: grove Permit: AWS400146 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Cornolianoe Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine _ County: Greene Region: Washington _
Date of Visit: 08/31/2009 Entry Time:11:00 AM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Vandiford Swine #3 Owner Email:
Owner: Vanrack Inc Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 8642 ffillow Green Rd - Snow Hill NC 28580
Physical Address: 8642 Willow Green Rd Sog& Hill 285§0
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Mummy-gr2&n. LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 355°30_54" _ — Longitude: 77°36'16"
Take 258 N from Snow Hill about 4 miles. Turn right on 123. Go about 112 mile. Turn left on SR 1335 about 112 mi. on the left.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Charles K Vandiford Operator Certification Number: 16597
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Keith Vandiford Phone:
On -site representative Keith Vandiford Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis:
7-17-09 1.9
5-22-09 2.5
10-20-09 1.3
soil tested 2008
Looks Good!
Page: 1

Permit: AVVS400146 Owner - Facility: Vanrack Inc
Inspection Date: 08/31/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400146
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Q Swine - Feeder to Finish 4,000 2,495
Total Design Capacity: 4,000
Total SSLW: 540,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon BH1 03/20/95 19.00 28. 00
Page: 2

i
It
Permit: AWS400146 Owner - Facility: Vanrack Inc Facility Number: 400146
Inspection Date: 08/31/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes No
NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (i.e] large trees, severe
❑ ■
❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■
❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑ ■
❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑ ■
❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No
NA NE
10, Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑ ■
❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400146 Owner - Facility: Vanrack Inc Facility Number: 400146
Inspection Date: 08/31/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
Is PAN n 10%110 lbs.? ❑
Total P205? ❑
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan(CAWMP)?
15, Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
1 B. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Records and Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
Com, Wheat, Soybeans
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Small Grain Overseed
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
0
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400146 Owner- Facility: Vanrack Inc
Facility Number: 400146
Inspection Date: 08/31/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after n 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
[]
Crop yields?
(�
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22, Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ 0 110
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ N 00
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ ■ Cl ❑
Oth I
-
er ssues Yes No NA N
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ IN ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

41
Permit: AWS400146 Owner - Facility: Vanrack Inc
Inspection Date: 08/31/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Other Issues
31, Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Facility Number: 400146
Reason for Visit: Routine
Page: 6

N Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400146 — Facility Status: Active Permit: AAWS400146 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Rgjjjine __. County: Greene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 09/15/2008 Entry Time:02:00 PM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Vandiford Swine #3 Owner Email:
Owner: Vanrack Inc Phone: [phone]
I', E111 r�T.7_r GTE' I? ��dlllr . e3i4T A : 3
Physical Address: 8642 Willow Green Rd Snow Hill NC 28580
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Premium Standard Farms Of North Carolina Inc
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°30'54" Longitude: 77°3Q'16"
Take 258 N from Snow Hill about 4 miles. Turn right on 123. Go about 1/2 mile. Turn left on SR 1335 about 112 mi. on the left.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Records and Documents
Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Other Issues
Certified Operator: Charles K Vandiford Operator Certification Number. 16597
Secondary OiC(s):
OnSite Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Keith Vandiford Phone:
On -site representative Keith Vandiford Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary tnspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis:
7-1-08 = 1.5
1-11-08 = 1.4
3-25-08 = 1.9
Looks Good!
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400146 Owner - Facility: Vanrack Inc
Facility Number: 400146
Inspection Date: 09/15/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity
Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 4,000 316
Total Design Capacity: 4,000
Total SSLW: 540,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon 131-11 03/20/95 19.00 34.00
Page: 2

Permit: AW5400146 owner - Facility: Vanrack Inc Facility Number: 400146
Inspection Date: 09/15/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe
❑
■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management 0000
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (blot applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■ ❑ ❑
dry stacks andlor wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu. Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400146 Owner - Facility: Vanrack Inc Facility Number: 400146
Inspection Date: 09/15/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? ❑
Total P205? ❑
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type 1 Com, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2 Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 3 Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■
❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑ ■
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400146 Owner - Facility: Vanrack Inc
Facility Number. 400146
Inspection Date: 09/15/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21_ Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
.Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? ❑ ■
❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Other Issues
Yes No
NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400146 Owner - Facility: Vanrack Inc
Inspection Date: 09/15/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss reviewhnspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Facility Number. 400146
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
❑■00
Q■pn
0■Q❑
Page: 6

0 Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency �n-1
Facility Number: 400146 Facility Status: Active Permit: 6M400146 l__! Denied Access
Inspection Type: Comoliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 09/122007 Entry Time:12:00 PM _ Exit Tlme: Incident #:
Farm Name: Vandiford Swine #3 Owner Email:
Owner: Vanragk Inc _ Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 8E42 Willowa Snow Hill NC 28580
Physical Address: 88UR Willow Green Rd Snow Hill NQ 28580 _. .
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:35"30'50" _ Longitude: 77°36'16" __
Take 258 N from Snow Hill about 4 miles. Turn right on 123. Go about 1/2 mile. Turn left on SR 1335 about 112 mi. on the left.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection 8, Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues Technical Assistance
Certified Operator: Charles K Vandiford Operator Certification Number: 16597
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On -site representative David Vandiford Phone:
24 hour contact name Keith Vandiford Phone:
On -site representative Keith Vandiford Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste Analysis:
2-26-07= 1.5
4-24-07= 2.5
5-10-07= 1.8
7-2-07= 1.8
8-12-07= 1.8
' Soil test- 2006 Lime applied
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400146 Owner - Facility: Vanrack Inc Facility Number : 400146
Inspection Date: 09/12/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 4,000 3,837
Total Design Capacity: 4,000
Total SSLW: 540,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon BH 1 03/20/95 19.00 40.00

Permit: AWS400146 Owner - Facility: Vanrack Inc Facility Number : 400146
Inspection Date: 09/12/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5_ Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400146 Owner - Facility: Vanrack Inc
Inspection Date: 09/12/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400146
Reason Tor Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
Q
Is PAN > 100/6/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1 Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2 Com, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 3 Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop andlor land application site need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? Q m ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP? ❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400146 Owner - Facility: Vanrack Inc Facility Number: 400146
Inspection Date: 09/12/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design?
Maps?
Other?
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
01111
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
■
❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■
❑ ❑
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA NE
2$. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■
❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400146 Owner - Facility: Vanrack Inc
Facility Number : 400146
Inspection Date: 09/12/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues
Yes
No NA
NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
00011
32. Did Reviewerlinspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
0
■ ❑
Q
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
■ Q
Q
Page: 6

,4.
0 Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400146 Facility Status: Active Permit: NCA240146 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: Q310712006 Entry Time:10:00 AM Exit Time:
Farm Name: Vandiford SA'ne #3
Owner: Vanrac ng_
Incident #:
Owner Email:
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 8642 Willow Green Rd Snow Hill NC 28580 _
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: ' Latitude: 35°30'50" Longitude: 773616"
Take 258 N from Snow Hill about 4 miles. Turn right on 123. Go about 112 mile. Turn left on SR 1335 about 112 mi. on the left.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Charles K Vandiford Operator Certification Number: 16597
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On -site representative keith Vandiford Phone: [phone]
24 hour contact name keith Vandiford Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Soil test 12-27-05 & 243-06
Waste analyses:
12-20-05 = 1.9
7-26-05 = 0.66
Everything looks much improved & just Great!
Phone:
Date:
Page: 1

r
Permit: NCA240146 Owner - Facility: Vanrack Inc Facility Number: 400146
Inspection Date: 03/07/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Q Swine - Feeder to Finish 4,000 3,750
Total Design Capacity: 4,000
Total SSLW: 540,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Deslaned Freeboard Observed Freeboard
lagoon BH 1 03/20/95 19.00 26. 00
Page: 2

Permit. NCA240146 Owner - Facility: Vanrack Inc Facility Number: 400146
Inspection Date: 03/07/2006 inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le.! large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not property addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (blot applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding7
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

i-
Permit: NCA240146 Owner - Facility: Vanrack Inc Facility Number: 400146
Inspection Data: 03/07/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? ❑
Total P205? ❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type 1 Com (Crain)
Crop Type 2 Soybeans
Crop Type 3 Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hey)
Crop Type 4 Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fait to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: NCA240146 Owner - Facility: Vanrack Inc _
Facility Number: 400146
Inspection Date: 03/07/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ 0011
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ 000
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Von Nn NA NF
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30, At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: NCA240146 Owner - Facility: Vanrack Inc Facility Number : 400146
Inspection Date: 03107r1006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fall to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? 001111
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewfinspection with on -site representative? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Page: 6

t
Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400146 Facility Status: Active Permit: NCA240146 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Gr ene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 05/02/2005 Entry Time: 09:00 AM _ Exit Time: 1ON10 6M Incident M.
Farm Name: Hamer Swine Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Ben Harper
Mailing Address: 309 W C2reeng St Snow Hill NC 28580
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm:
Phone: 252; 747-7675
Latitude: 35°30'50_' _, Longitude: 77°36'16"
Take 258 N from Snow Hill about 4 miles. Turn right on 123. Go about 112 mile. Turn left on SR 1335 about 112 mi. on the left.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
0 Records and Documents 0 Other Issues
Certified Operator: Benjamin T Harper Operator Certification Number: 16528
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On -site representative Ben Harper Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: John Hunt- Washington Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Date:
Phone:
Phone:
Inspection Summary:
1) Small leak at dog box for house No.3; has not left the site. Repair at the dog box should fix the problem.
5) Many small tress (<six in. dia.): due for mowing: remove trees to toe of lagoon.
9) Marker recently reset by Premium Standard Farms. Was off by about 9 inches, but grower maintained freeboard by the marker in
place, thus unaware of potential noncompliance.
19) Grower requests copy of permit and corresponding new forms,
21) Grower indicated just received copy of form for annual Certification and indicated will submit ASAP.
Page: 1

Permit: NCA240146 Owner -Facility: Ben Harper
Facility Number: 400146
Inspection Date: 05/02/2005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
I Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
Lagoon BHi 724(30]
Page: 2

0
Permit: NCA240146 Owner - Facility: Ben Harper
Facility Number: 400146
Inspection Date: 05/02/2005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Imnacts Yes Nn NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? m ❑ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other 0
a. Was conveyance man-made? 0000
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■ ❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑
Yes
■ ❑
Na NA__
❑
NE
Waste Collection_ Storage & Treatgent
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe erosion, � ❑ ❑ ❑
seepage, etc_)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed andlor managed through a waste management or ❑ M ❑ ❑
closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks
❑ ❑ ❑
and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
improvement?
Yes No NA NF
Waste Application
10, Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or improvement?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 100/6!10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain (Wheat,
Barley, Oats)
Crop Type 3
Com, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 4
Page: 3

0
Permit: NCA240146 owner -Facility: Ben Harper
Inspection Date: 05/02/2005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400146
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Adnlication
Crop Type 5
Yes No NA NE
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Norfolk
Soil Type 2
Norfolk
Soil Type 3
Norfolk
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan(CAWMP)? 110 ❑ ❑
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑ E ❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ E ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Records
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
YPs No NA NF
and Qocuments
19. Did the facility fall to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
no ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ E ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below_
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
0
❑ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
Weather code?
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
m ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
moo
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
E ❑
❑
25, Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
E ❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
moo
Page: 4

M
Permit: NCA240146 owner -Facility: Ben Harper Facility Number: 400146
Inspection Date: 05/02/2005 inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
-Ord* and Document.,;
Yes_ No NA NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ M ❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those mortality ❑ M ❑ ❑
rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality ❑ M ❑ ❑
representative immediately.
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? 110110
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewfinspection with on -site representative? ❑ M ❑ ❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? 110110
Page: 5

®Division of Water Quality
O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
]Type of Visit .O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
(Reason for Visit OO Routine O Complaint O Fallow up O Referral O Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 40 146 Date of 'Visit: 2-2Cr2004 Time: 113U
O Not Operational O Below ThresholdLj
® Permitted ® Certified 0 Conditionally Certified Q Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: axRl27C.S}yxD�.l+atlt7l............................................................................ ....... County: Gx!'cumc............................................... ARO .......
Owner Name: Hpja........................................... Dat.p&r..,lxn..
i•Iailing Address:U9.'e�t..re�m�.tx�et.........................
Facility Contact: RejaAArpu..................................................... Title:
11
Representative .......................................
... Phone No: (2,52,1 47-76.7.5....
-- 5114.Y..H.N.0........................................................ 285.0.............
Phone No: 714-5�A................................
Integrator:r�tsx� Sta nda rd.k �xl».Qtigxtlt...........
; ertified Operator:] .cujamija :j;,.. Operator Certification Number:
T
[.vocation of Farm:
r4ke 258 N from Snow Hill about 4 miles. Turn right on 123. Go about 1/2 mile. Turn left on SR 1335 about 1/2 mi. on the
t Latitude 35 • 3Q G 50 Longitude 77 • 36 4 16
,EN Swine []Poultry [:]Cattle []Horse
W Design Current
Swine Canacity Panulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
4000
3450
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer I I I ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer I 1 10 Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 4,000
Total SSLW 540,000
Number of Lagoons
Holding Ponds / Solid Trans
.3ischarges & Stream impacts
Y."-Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
K� Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
j a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is obsened, did it reach Water of the State? (If ves, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes ❑ No
s, c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gatimin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
11laste Collection & Treatment
Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier
R-"teboard (inches): 19.5
'f.,12/I2/03 Continued

r
Facility Number: 40-146 Date of Inspection 2-26-2004
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, El Yes ❑ No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or ❑ Yes ❑ No
-'' closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
❑ Yes
❑ No
elevation markings?
Waste Application
o
.a.0: Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
11: Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
F = []Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground [:]Copper and/or Zinc > 3000
�
s
4I2: Crop type
1'3. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
❑ No
4. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
1r5. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Odor Issues,
-17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
❑ Yes
❑ No
ova liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
El 8. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
❑ No
a19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
❑ Yes
❑ No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20; At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional
❑ Yes
❑ No
Air Quality representative immediately.
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments. I
1'fse drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary): ❑Field Copy ❑Final Notes
;5
Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
` 12112103 Continued

40
of Visit O Compliance Inspection OQ Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit +O Routine O Complaint O Fallow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number40 I �6 Date of Visit: 5/31lltlllZ Time: 13011
Not O erational • Below Threshold
93 Permitted Ej Certified 0 Conditionally Certified U Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ..................
Farm Name: HaMir-SwIIEtclArm.................... .. County: G mxte................................................V. ARO.......
OwnerName: Bjeyj........................................... Harper.dr............ ......... ........................ Phone No:(252)141:16.7.5 .......................................................
Mailing Address: 4Q2 W&1A9.ArMA.Ap1........................................................................ Gft0nVNkNC ....................................................... 2.78,58 .............
Facility Contact: .............................................................................. Title: ......... Phone No:
Onsite Representative:HMcr/Gxmr.A1m=.................................................... Integrator: PrrlottiumStauudaxd.)Fa.rm..uf.N.orth...........
Certified Operator: JkW,tlnu in.L........................ LUmir............................................. Operator Certification Number: ,f h.528.............................
Location of Farm:
Take 258 N from Snow Hill about 4 miles. Turn right on 123. Go about 1/2 mile. Turn left on SR 1335 about 112 mL on the left. �
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ horse Latitude 35 ° 30 50 K Lonbitude 77 ° ®� 16
Design Current:
Design Curretrt
Design ; " Current
.:Swine Capacity
P
Pooion Cale
Capacity n
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Layer
JE1 Dairy
® Feeder to Finish
4000
1000 ':
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Other
❑Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
4,000
❑ Gilts
-
Totat.SS11W.
540,000
❑ Boars
Discharees & Stream Impacts
l . Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance roan -made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes_ notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flo-w in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon s),steun? (If yes, irotifY DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier...................................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): ............... 2.,5............ ............................................

05103101
Facility Number. 40--146
Date of Inspection 1 5/31/2002
Continued
5. Are there anv immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/unprovement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11 _ Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
Cl Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
12. Crop type Corn, Soybeans, Wheat Coastal Bermuda (Graze) Kannif Small Grain Overseed
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes N No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16- Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
IT Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ® No
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
0 Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
*Waste analysis taken on 5/20/02 no results.
*Waste analysis dated 2/4/02 nitrogen is 0.92 lbs/1000 gallons
1 info nitrogen is 1.00 lbs/1000 gallons
8/22101 nitrogen is 1.2 1bs/1000 gallons
*Kenmf has been added to waste plan with PAN rate 143.75 lbs/acre crop window Mar -June tract 1373 fields 1-12. Waste plan dared
5/30/02 and signed by tech. spec.
*Soil test dated 5/1/01 Sample 44 is leased land. Lime requirements are less than one ton per acre_ Remember to take soil test for 2002 and
follow lime requirements. Cu and Zu within guidelines. •�
IReviewer/Inspector Name Martiu McLa+ horn _ = 1= _
I�nviowarllna..�nf.ar Cinno+pro• llo+n-

flS/03101 Continued
• Facility Number: 40-146 1 Date of Inspection 1 5/31/2002
Odor Issuea
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge atlor below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28_ Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
n level is recorded weekly.
are three irrigation events on coastal bermuda dated 519/02 thru 5/23/02 that requires PAN to be rebalanced with new waste
M to lower lagoon as weather permits and by following guidance from waste plan.
Lagoon inner walls were sprayed with Roundup herbicide.

Facility Number Date of Visit: SI4120Q1 Time: 745 Printed on: 61'13/200. p of Operational p Below Threshold
Permitted 0 Certified p Conditionally Certified p Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: Harper Swine Farm County: GrAU ;e............................................... . !AIM.......
Owner Name: Ben Harper, Jr. Phone No: 252-747-2I9I
MailingAddress: .P..Q.Hox- 95......... ..................................... ................................................ Silow.HiiJ,lNC......................................---............... 28581a ..............
Facility Contact: ---------- - --- ... - - -- - -.. ..... ..Title :..... ........... ............................................. Phone No:
Onsite Representative: Ben.Harger...................... _.......... _............................. _................ Integrator: L.L.MarphreyXiL ...............................................
Certified Operator: $eniamin.T._.-.--._..._._._._ Harper -.—........ .... _...... ................ Operator Certification Number: 1028.............................
Location of Farm:
a e 259 N trom Snow Hill about 4 miles. I urn right on 123. Go about mile. Turn left on SR 1335 about mi. on the
eft. --
N Swine p Poultry p Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude ©• ®° ®u Longitude ©0 ®C ©4&
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
p can to ee er
® ee er to k inish
3814
p arrow to Wean
p Farrow to Feeder
p Farrow to Finish
p Gilts
1] Boars
Design "'Current, 'Design- =Current
Poultry, j Capacity -PopulationCattle Capacrtyy. lPoptlation
© Layer ❑ airy
p on -Layer p on- Dairy
,❑ Other
`° Total Design Capac>Ity 4,000
°Tofa1:SSL�4' 540,000
Number of La oohs i - p aunsuriace crams t resent p agoon Area p spray r�e�a Area
g
Haldmg Ponds /Solid Traps : % r o iqur aste anagement_ System
Discharp_ea & Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes N No
Discharge originated at: 0 Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? Yes ® No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes ®No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes g No
2_ Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes 1M No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
-Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway p Yes 1@ No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(inches).27................ ............................... _... .._............................... .................................... .................................... ......... ...........................

ace ity Number: 40_146 Date of Inspection ® Printed on: 6/13/2001
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
❑ Yes
I& No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
❑ Yes
g No
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
N No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
®No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
ll No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
B, No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN p Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
®No
12_ Crop type Corn, Cotton Bermuda (Hay) Small Grain Overseed
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
a No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
I& No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
® No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
B No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
g No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
IR No
Reg uired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
Ili No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
® No
19.
Does record keeping need.improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
N Yes
p No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
p Yes
Ug No
21,
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
® No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
Ilp No
23.
Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
p Yes
N No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
13 Yes
®No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? p Yes M No
13 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no turtner correspondence about this visit.
Comments. refer to aestion —Ez laen an 1'ES answers antllar any recomm`eni3atioasror'14A other comments
Use . d:_Z ,rawtngs of fac�tyto better ezpla�n;sttuat�ons (useaddtGii IagesFas necessaj- s
e � = cs .�� .g_ ._ � l� , �
_ � . ' _. _ � ;... r�p Field Copy pFinal Notes
-ecoras availame Tor review.
Naste analysis 10/25/00 = 1.3 lbs; 3/28/01 = 1.8 fibs
Soil analysis up through 2001 available; 1999 results got lost.
irrigation records are complete.
Make sure to pull waste samples within 60 days of irrigation.
Suggest to pull samples quarterly.
/eaetative cover on dike wall is well established. SEE PAGE 3
Reviewer/Inspector Name Lyn:B �I3 a�rd�son" _ enteredlb ndali -
Y 4` TY _
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: C h / Date:

a
05103101
aeffity Number. 40_146
Date of Inspection
Continued
Printed on: 6/13/2001
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below 0 Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes H No
28. ,Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
24. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? p Yes M No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ®No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑Yes Na
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanenthemporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No

f ;`ems • Division of Water Quality
O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
(Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other [] Denied Access
Facility Number 40 l46 Date of Visit: 612C10g0 Time: llaq AM Printed on: 6/12/2000
O Not Operational Q Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified [3 Conditionally Certified 13 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ..............
Farm Name: Harpu.Syx7ul laram......................................... .......................................... County: Greclig......................................... ..... Wt i;?.......
OwnerName: Hem ........................................... flar cr'..Jr,,............................................... Phone No: 252:I42.Zj9.1................. ....... ............... ................
FacilityContact: ..............................................................................Title:.......................................... Phone No:
MailingAddress: rQ,0.9.29.5............................................................................................ S.UJAW..kM.N.C........................................................ 28.58.0 .............
Onsite Representative: Aka.Hairpcir................................................................................. Integrator: NLr.LX41]CPhra...CS1...............................................
Certified Operator: Aca,imiAM........................ Raxpgx_,,,.,,,..................................... Operator Certification Number:165.25.............................
Location of Farm:
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 3SOF 30 50 u Longitude 77 36 i 16 u
Design Current
Swine Caoacity Ponulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
4000
4000
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry capacity population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 4,000 771
Total SSLW 540,000
Number of Lagoons �� ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps JE1 No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
❑ Yes ® No
Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): 29
/'�..�s.'....�J ..� L....i.

Continued on back
Fac:Ifty Number: 40-146 Date of Inspection 1 6/2/2000 1 Printed on: 6/12/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancehmprovement? ❑ Yes ®No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes IN No
12. Crop type Cotton Coastal Bermuda Small Grain Wheat, Soybeans
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes IN No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Nail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified A WMP?
0 Nfl A.61atious:or :derciencie9. vere:noted "during• ttiig vigit:: Y60 Will receive no furtheir
correspondence about this.visit. .
❑ Yes IN No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
Current 2000 waste utilization plan/wheat/soybeans/small grain/coastal bermuda.
* Contact Technical Specialist for guidance on addition of tobacco to WUP for PAN rate.
CAWMP did not have a copy of 1999 Soil Analysis. Contact Soil & Water office or Cooperative
Extension for a copy of this report for your records.
Current sample mailed to Raleigh in April; still waiting for current results. Complete irrigation records
ith results of new waste analysis.
Reminder to keep weekly freeboard levels as required by General Permit.
w
Reviewer/Inspector Name #Daphne B. Cullom Entered by Ann

Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
.`•
Facility Number: 40-146 Date of Inspection 6/2/2000 Printed on: 6/12/2000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge attor below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
I
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes ❑ No
..I

j Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Operation Review
p Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Compliance Inspection
p Division of Water Quality - Compliance Inspection
p Other Agency - Operation Review
1* Routine p Complaint p follow-up of VWQ inspection p Hollow -up of I)SWC review p Other
Facility Number I)aie of luspeclion
fire of Inspection' ®24 hr. (hh:mm)
M Permitted p Certified 0 Conditionally Certified p Registered 113 Not Operattona Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: Harper.Savame.Earm............................................................ ...... County: Greene WARM
O-svner Name: Sen........................................... Harper,.Jr.............. ................................. Phone No: 252,747-1191 ....................................................
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone No:
MailingAddress: P.O.Sox.?95............................................................................................ Saox-HilIINC......................................................... 2858A........
Onsite Representative: l3cm.Harps:r................................................................................. Integrator:LL.Murphrey.Cnmpaay ...........................
Certified Operator: Renjamlia.T......................... Harper .............................................. Operator Certification Number: IOZ8 .........................
Location of Farm:
left:.
Latitude ©0 ®� ®�� Longitude ©0
Swine Capacity Population
13 Wean to -Feeder
Ig Feeder to Finish
13 Farrow to Wean
13 Farrow to Feeder
p Farrow to Finis
p Gilts
p Soars
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
p Layer 1 1p Dairy
p Non -Layer p Non -Dairy
p Other
Total Design Capacity 4,000
Total SSLW 540,050
Number of Lagoons p u sur ace DrainsPresent- 13 Lagoon Areg jr3 Spray Field Arca
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps p No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® Nt
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes p N
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes. notify DWQ) Yes p Nt
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes p N,
2. is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? 0 Yes ® N4
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® N,
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? p Spillway13 Yes ® N
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ...............#1..................
Freeboard (inches): ...............25............... ............. ........
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (iel trees, severe erosion, E3 Yes ® N,
3/23/99 seepage, etc.) Continued on bo

rrintea on 512,1
Facility Number: 40_146 Dale of luspcction -MT I
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes p N,
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? Cl Yes ❑ N,
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ❑ N,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ❑ N
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) p Yes ❑ N,
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ❑ N,
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes ❑ N,

p urvtsEon of auu ana rybLcr t-onservanon - uperatton iceview
p Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Compliance Inspection
Division of Water Quality - Compliance Inspection
p Other Agency - Operation Review
ne 0 t omplamt 0 Pollow-up or uwy mspecuon 0 Po
I Facility Number I
0 Permitted p Certified E Conditionally Certified p Registered
Farm Name: Harper.S.rwine.Facw........................................................................
Owner Name: Bien ................
Facility Contact:
H.a X.pea'.,. dx..................................
Title:
-up ofyNwt_ review 0 vtner
Date of Inspection ®� .
'Time of Inspection_) 24 hr. (hh:mm)
1� Not Operational 1 Date Last Operated:
County: Greene WARD
.. Phone No:.7.4.7.:2191..............................................................
PhoneNo: ........................................... -
Mailing Address: RO..Box.295............................................................................................ Snox.RiANC ........................................................ 28581
Onsite Representative: Bcz.Hatpter...................................................... .....[ntegrator:LL.MuCIAx.ey..Ca.................... ...................... .....................
Certified Operator: Benjami t..l......................... Haxµet:.............................................. Operator Certification Number: 16528........................
Location of Farm:
Latitude ©• ®� ®�� Longitude ©0 ° ®`i
120cann d arrant nc.rtn ..rrnnf
Swine Capacity Population
p Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to tuts
p Farrow to ean
0 Farrow to Feeder
p Farrow to Finis
p Gilts
p Boars
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
p ayer I :[===] I
p Non -Layer
p Other
Total Design Capacity 4,000
Total SSLW 540,000
Number of Lagoons 0
0
u sur ace
Drains
Present JJE3
Lagoon Area 13 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds 1 Solid Traps
p
o Liquid Waste
Management
System
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes N N-
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. [f discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes p N�
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) Yes p N4
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes p N,
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes N N�
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? 0 Yes N N,
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? p Spillway p Yes ® N,
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(itches) 27................................................................................................................................................................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (iel trees, severe erosion, [3 Yes M N,
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on &

Facility Number: I of 111spectio11
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? p Yes N N(
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? p Yes N Ni
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? p Yes n Nh
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? p Yes N N,
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? p Yes N N,
11. is there evidence of over application? p Excessive Ponding p PAN p Yes ON'
12. Crop type Cotton Bermuda Small Grain
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? p Yes n N,
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? p Yes p Nt
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? p Yes p N,
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? p Yes p N,
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
Q : Xdviotations•or. �leficiencres.were.iinted _during. this visit.: VoLr will -receive no further :.: :
..cofr60i idei�ce abbiA this:visit;
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
Need to work on getting coastal established. Will need to work on weeds.
p Yes N Nt
p Yes N N-
p Yes N N,
p Yes N N,
p Yes n N,
p Yes N Ni
p Yes n N,
p Yes p Ni
p Yes ON'
p Yes B N,
p Yes ® N,
comments.
Reviewer/Inspector Name Carl Dunn Entered by Ann Tyndall
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

Printed on 5123
Facility Number: 40_146 Date of inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below p Yes ® N,
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? p Yes ® N
28. is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, p Yes ® N-
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? p Yes ® N,
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) p Yes ® M
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? p Yes ® N,
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a pei7nanent/temporary cover?
p Yes ® N,

of Soil and Water Conservation [3Other Agency
of Water Quality
of DS W C review
1 �j I Date of Inspection .
jE r
Facility Number j ., -
r Time of Inspection 24 hr
E3 Registered Certified 0 Applied for Permit ermitted 10 Not Operational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name:...._/BA ....�.1 Aiu�t..`V1 ............................... County:..lK2J2 x1Rr......................
OwnerName:.... .................... CM .P 4_....... �..�c r ............... Phone No:.... .q. �..................................................
FacilityContact: .............................................................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
Q
Mailing Address:.....�i :.. ..:...�2A...iS...r q.......6.C.............................T7.�FL�
Q
Onsite Representative* .... <:...Nsa.............._ qA................................................... Integrator::... --.._ ...... Y..!.`:".q:�k ! (! !P.............
Certified Operator: ...... ........ ........... .._ Cu....S.c ........................... Operator Certification Number :.....�.................. ............
Location of Farm:
Latitude •:' _7" Longitude Z� • �° ®°
- Design Current Design Current Design Current
Feeder
Vto
r to Finish
DOO
t
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
'
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated Flow in ;al/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes ERIo
❑ Yes B o
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes EfNo
❑ Yes Id'No
❑ Yes 21�o
❑ Yes [yNo
❑ Yes 9'No
7/25/97 Continued on back

Facility Number: 4 () — 146
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes GJ.Ko
Structures (Lagoons.tIolding Ponds Flush Pits etc.
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes , `o
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (ft): .......C:27JA .:.......................... .....�
.............................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
G To
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
(&?'No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
2 0
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an inunediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes
Ko
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
El Yes
�,!
R'o
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
1S. Crop type 1�1r1!L....r..........................1�� 1............................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
D" es
❑l� No17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
G; o
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
IKo
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
CKo
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
2'[ o
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
[a<0
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
tj''o
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Onl
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑ Yes �o
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? El Yes R<0
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit? G?Yes ❑ No
0 No.violation'sor deficiencies.werenoted-during this:visit.-.You.w'ill receive no further
: correspondence atiout this:visit.
Cotnments (refer to question #) Explain any YES answers andJor any reconimendattons or any other comtnetits:;:
Use drawings of facihty'to better 'explain"sltuahons (ase additional pages as necessary} ! T
01. LODOv o n CL&vy; re\ z'we__ VIJILUL tjuls 4c' 6e-
y1exVl U
t'l 5-
i(P. WQ5LU LNG l i Z0. D� IMF L5iC C6*✓1 i V\ � JQ
S QJ�k_ L' UZ tD i �i a
ddC93.
�5 �gxcE "l UJct �. ; zrt. vet i
Cam. ti ,� -�-i e. a. 3 C° " I s tea A.:71, cQs
u _ 4-c, ► ,r e v I "" A
f LGOrb fj `'-O 6- +rQ__R2Cj._ �t
€ : w.�
werflnspector Name <•
LReewer/Inspector
Signature:UL ✓✓L_ Date:

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
7/25/97

' State of North Carolina
" Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Washington Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
December 19, 1997
Mr. Ben Harper, Jr.
Harper Swine Farm
P.O. Box 295
Snow Hill, NC 29580
SUBJECT: Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
Harper Swine Farm
Facility No. 40-146
Greene County
Dear Mr. Harper, Jr.:
On October 1, 1997, I conducted an animal feedlot operation site inspection at the referenced facility. Overall, the
operation was found to be in satisfactory condition. A copy of the inspection report is attached for your review.
In general, this inspection includes verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
(CAWMP); (2) the farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC 2H.0217, Senate Bill 1217, and
the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan; (3) the farm operation's waste management system is being operated
properly under the direction of a Certified Operator; (4) the required records are being kept; (5) there are no signs of
seepage, erosion, and/or runoff.
The recommendations and/or comments regarding your inspection can be found in the comment section of the attached
inspection form. It is very important as the owner and Operator in Charge that you address any noted concerns, as soon
as possible. For assistance, please contact your Technical Specialist and/or the local Soil & Water Conservation District
Office.
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance during the inspection. Should you have further questions or
comments regarding this inspection, do not hesitate to call me at [phone], ext. 321.
Sincerely,
C��) & • ti �. YD w%-
Daphne B. Cullom
Environmental Specialist II
cc: Greene County SWCD Office
Mike Regans, Greene County NCCES*
Jake Barrow, L.L. Murphrey Hog Company
Wi—RO-=
943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, NC 27889 Telephone (919) 94&W 1 FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Aifinnative Action Employer

e
q
10 icoutine 0 c,ompiaint 0 ronow-up of uwR4 inspection 0 ronow-up of u�pwc, review 0 vtner
Facility Number
0 Registered 0 Certified 0 Applied for Permit 0 Permitted
Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
p of perattona Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: Harper.Ssvine.Farm.... ......... ................. ...................... ...... .... ....._ ........ County: Greene WARO
Owner Name: . ........................� ... �.. Phone No:.9.7.-Z191.._......................... _ ........... ....................
Facility Contact: �.... _...- _._.__ ._ .�........ Title• Phone No:
MailingAddress: »........................................_» ..... Snow:liiil NC..........._............................................ 2.85811..............
Onsite Representative: Be Mazper.Jr......................................................................... Integrator: C1.Wnrphrey.Hag.Compauy.......................
Certified Operator:Operator Certification Number:1h528
Location of Farm:
Latitude ©• ®' ®u Longitude ©• ® ®
Design Design ..Uurrent Design Current
Swine- Capacity Population Poultry Capacity: Population Cattle Capacity Population
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Fints
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to ee er
Farrow to Finis
Gilts
Boars
Number of Lagoons 1 Holding Ponds
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
- b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoonslholding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes N No
p Yes K No
p Yes ® No
p Yes N No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
p Yes ® No

FFITIq Number: 40_14
• S. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Laaoons,Holdina Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.}
'1 9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier: __ ....W.-.......--.-.
Freeboard (ft): 3 ft.
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13, Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
p Yes M No
p Yes ® No
Structure 5 Structure 6
p Yes ® No
p Yes N No
p Yes a No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
15. Crop type ......................rattan .. ._. - ._.................Snybearas - - -
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities_6n1y
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional .problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AVA P?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
R P.ova ions.or rrencies•were-not -duringthis visit:. You m .reacei ve no further . .
,ce'rresponft6c� about x i§visit:
p Yes ® No
p Yes N No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ®No
n Yes ®No
p Yes N No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
Comments (refer to;question #] Ezplam-any YES answers and/or any recommendations or'any other comments.
Use dTawrrrgs of facility to better eirplain situatla�s. (useadd�tional gages as necessary)7.
T ,-
aste ysk 3-3-9.7, 6-19-9.7
Soil Analysis' -'Planning to take sample as soon as:crops are harvested. - _ - :_ " -' • - = _ '`" _
Certified animal waste management plan needs certification -form. ON
----
_11 - Erosion_°noted in -one-'comer of inner_ dike wall. -Mr. Harper is trying to let vegetation establish..-------.
e following items•are conditions of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan and the general permits therefore these items
ust be implemented:
Keep lagoonsistorage •ponds free of 'foreigii debris including„ but'tioflimitedto tires, bottles, plastic products, light bulbs, gloves,
rii►ges or any other solids waste. ;"s :;r _ -• 725/97
*r
Reviewer/Inspector Name tDahrse Br;Cullogi T <� ,—; —"
y,
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: , (_ -7

n.
H
17
!C
0
Qc
G
u
W
777
w ! ? t
r'`'' L sa xa 4 r •r
GfDi 'v 1 �I i � .d. '•{ t t.T ♦ L Ik' :fi ''•
�' s"�Q'i'�,I � �� • y :� !:,%>', '•'.:-�,.,
:1 I�i 3 ,�� L1� _ 'f'1 !I,'1 i I -ji
1
�,"r}+3
{nt'1
{.{
,�j :a :!'. n.'s+
� 1' �
Ir'
} O ; ,° r• ' 3 F1 ,, �
' ,�
�•VI^•
~-1
:t: , .. .f 1 !, ,�, ,,'i5�{ � #.
1,I , a' 4 { 7 1 , •r �e S's�F•' r!'kf •y
i � }�T t•��11 k� ilr
Fi 1 ,�
=�•L!
� fi•�.7 •.� � 4 r -'/Vl '' F ni'. " 1� st ."1
i,. }
�i�.,. 'I,
�f.
)' ,13,E 1- irJ L� I'
t.El
�^v:
�;+•.
�,;::
� D n., .t ,�'''!' b' '*' `i 1 `+' ifY .lr
�� :rat �l•" �' 1 :r T3;
�
1 S ,,I'E,y18,F ! I f L :�! P ,�1ii. :F:- + ��.:
, 1!� IGt:� '��i��',+'
-i•„1
t �.
;F;' 3 'c � t .. `,r7 ,1 i �1
G g 1 " i s , ..0 - t 1. '
�+ O t•} i�_ r jn r f
rh ' S
, `e „Ir,, 'G ESFri�r':�`�%,��? ! T5" •,�;'{'' ,
_, -. t " y• Iti r • 4,1 t
t'
,
ry, dlni'7: Qi• �pfl ( I", ' .rt i! � r4 iY•
!-«.'s4 i•. tR
r• I
I '. 1 # �'�+t t r , 5 u'd
�el.`' �1i," ' � i riy'-t
'�tiF1:
Q ,IAJ;'D{, ��!" �•5=. , I.(.,0if fat{�I r3r+ k t' (�4= -i,,r . F,,,,t.. ,r,.
{yy
7 p, 1,• ry O # ° I ".,.' i'
,k . 1{�+G41f If
,,I 11• 1'I.1 ,•1-sr • ''I,v,'t11 -ILf1 it�� FV. ice: •>! f9li'k�iit 1F r.Yl F';ii
' r I P ? �. • . +
•1"
Yp,
?,x
-.'rd
,$r•
,l,yl (, t , . II wr'' 1 1;' r'1; , rr
Gtl L7 �.3 t>d 'p �i :; V�'. 4• ti ,., ,PAR,' ., t•..�i ;44 h ;x
!t' , F f tS,•iI ,, r• I�rY S ,'e',. �.r. :.
j''r y.y + �,r •t '4 �i -i it s, 3F, .: t e
a. i11-,, O' O ! •� p, lii - v a i/ f , 1' 1=
" 1 § LF PP �dl '�:. Y', rlr� 'I t ' 'CS
xi r,. fry 1,- 67'11 • ( ' y FI UY ln''.�}� !'yf: VS d 'r ki' ':}.'-.i il.
,s4 i. , : i Y
.'• .i Ir .C'nt a i p r !•..
t at -t. , .r u:r' , ..F`„• .,.S ayy.}, I
_ .' ! .' , .w %. ,! ',' 7 :"f .F"
1 '�' f,1-i - � i r'•� ,..s I; N'l`� s.
�r
` 1, il: ��11 I i- 1 1t::Y �'�; p�.: •ram' f't--
'I t,r J. !- 'i•r +r
ANA, `,'W.# '•' 't:''
•}
-b,�..;
t,' ;
8 r. xY F .y i.L 'Tl! 'I lotV t1 rst1, I J i:'
''�{'.Mrr'
its A: i !!S'rk" I'�
r 1V ..r;'C.. ,'#4 f, �, F i,l r� }I�`i [:1'"', rt�. �.I ;i M i'••�4•.:, ••� ✓ �1 l..f' � 3.
1'r
. f:Nt
w•�..y1
}'?!� ",i , F isE't•'
_-)� •C•''"�I '�.{'' :1 i11'T}T``�i1r11!! 'r ' •'(+tfr -•t .•+�.' Id
i_' F •,'
e�t,�,�'di '71,. �" i'= ;.{ /' { '`
}. �4 .'i1' ':li `: t-yl. •7 :t'', liir i, 4Yij4-F 4" 't •� ,j
r�• t, r. ,t, r��, I1,�- 1,-,. '!'- 4i�1, F I j.� �" ]'#i•t:-i e:e' L i .�•
•1! '! �.d• -r, iL .I '1, •:'
i
� if�i d 1 _ ,� -/. :I' riJ f
•�4!s :�+•; �' 1s:F. °F�'• .0 e � r G'.4:}
a
w "jog F+'' t' S tt•fr 0p i s' i' :Ir. _ t•', i , F' ir' s r , + , ;
',' 'rt
t r }'-.: ;il,?Y!
,wa
i F t r' f � �J
t i
•
r 'iQ C j.i'yR+�%fT1(t�<,
°
-.taF'
tits
..
C'��1
l
•{,�,' �t.. 8 ,� . �: hrl.ik r'. 1 r' 1. e. a i�r. ,�•
iYCt.
k,'%+j
�•U t)
YwirN
,Mfe
L:
:,'r 1,4 -' F1 ~'.; •!tF i'' r 1•'fi; , L ,.• !", �, �,
}
'I• CrJ
.,�Y,iF
•'6.
}�!i,ti 1ij
lrFr.i.r
�,jj'P'yr{Rj
�l�F,l
FllL!5
3•ijjLl
; CU3.1r
,ql1f•
.p 1 ,S_
.ri�"ti,,-,, :? i.i...l,
'Tt'r. rj;};l(t�;
''",'
•5••t11
M'!l,.(+:�I'-J$!�x
.+.,
,i
•.f;`-1
•.t'�fi(,r
J�i�yy�r.;s
_ r'"`,'}',.�.i•
f :c;{rI,: ..'.,.r/•>;-•. P
`r�
- _ nr- 1_,."t,,.k=',.;i .<.
Cy•�''t,
•.'i.i''•-
. ,1Y'4ts
lyS.'....:..FG
�li�t„`i
1t ,.
YL!
�F'
r." i
!{.lrt I t1i},I',ht;
'
�•�j'2'
,Ia,,;,, -'1h''��1Y;''���'!'�!}F'�r
r '�S'yt}_o':
'F�3F
oi ,1i,{•
-r 1 _k{c•'a.,srI.n`,l,,' '!.ai1'f�aS�.
! 'il '' '�V�/Ji+P.t'.'.
{'I:r, y1Mil><,.,_+1 E..
S
•x-own r.•;. il?
I`j' "� �I
•'. ,Fie('•1",Y�$.yqI:t'3fi,'.. :>,�{�@'}r��F,.
1'}ts.'
•. C5:t<Y�t
�ii•'
''1i '. !L►•`.ii rI :+ .l,
lF, .;
t:„`r#7,
! :�3.�1:+.
y1 7{r,,•i,'
'"Ftl�}�5}+t•+��#lk� .. !{ .
,tP111+{
'CGS i�t '• ' � 'a
µ
i' ti;
ri1I0
'.i
a 1 .{r ,1r 1.� ,.{Ilk+L,(:. ; � II ,..+''' s P�
fyyf�� � +y , .�. •:
6i t 'f p•.r l i 1 t i
1 �'i'v U, i �.{ r ',i._ r r�a.t. I'dt+ y, 1_' i`p ,s�t {i} . r , '�. '� ! �..
�:,i ,,jam
..11,`:,
�I'j '' t 1�}'" , . ,A�:•• 1 _ l r. i� '.,"*��1y-( '"_�..�
- t! . �' , e � i:: ' r '� JT'
�' I:�.l�d' t.r tM 41 .,r_4� J, ...,- ',t ��: s k;e,,• � � ..�i f +, r4.•J,. 1
'-f`:1'�'
!J-''
{i`''1�'�1"••-�.j
,�j'�;�, ,'�'•+ 'zj ,{ '•{„ h lrjf Y-. 1 :,F' �. ,I.+, I{ 1 M S �;dr 1 !•
PL}'j !r' W � pf'M' s s
ssD�//11 ,
•_MOW.r R ,,I1 ,t( { 1
'�ttoC
''r1ZtI+ki"3S ;l*
R1+�:, iTr. -
iLi',
•jt I Slln} •_ v41�', i' ,., rH 4 "' � \'.. (4., S,.' , r t
• rIR
't �Ir ,tF 4!-.%r1 Iy.i,
!1SS1'.}�{' ".
ti1i'j 1(i�''_.
Vit
r'` ,9:
J.rqq'rs'!
r J�i�'l'
:t:j 1't«}_.II L,i{. L
1, a L t(t : - 1 r'
1 I s'#,
I1
t• 1 i�ihF.
�..{I .i.s'
r �' 1 a;Fa-".rt3 :'i!.'. •,Y I.P
.�.`.,'�6••%' .'ir4
J,
r ,
1' ,}F•
/''
.t",ii';.,"♦ 5'.{.'j•'.i,�
fl •'�fr4:. .{•''Yr,,J"•ri'I.„ 1s,'-:+y
..yts 1.
.'t.' Il'" i%" •1 '',I 1r4,r
!,. I• l: 1f\ �1 sIL.i1i
• _-'� JI1
•
�r
+r'�'tf'',,r
Mi �,• rt"-
4}ir �9�•.s.•., fJ:
i . 1; ti .d',u
.I7f:s'S j1,l 'Sr'' �; J1 - ,tip Y { 1 1 '.Flak ,Y, .,'i* w 1.1 :..l.'• t t., '{ :},
t'
_'� .4p� a�7• r�" l� jr-ql-T �I..I�i,. �'L2,,. Ih
,1; '' }..
1 1
i. ri, : .i l', r•51) ,.! ,i•, ••�,,1", 5,. •lr�Fli !: ,R„} ,11 �' '�-4 4 ,}j,l �.'' ;, `,i!"F, n,. S/=Fl. ,,'r I...
1 ,i"iyf
��
3 .Y1... r�
'� •„Q,iS 1 ri=:yf �� ;f t 1• i 1-t t •�,`-
'�,.0 " tp { •'
iw� >; _�, ii'I t ,{ i, 5 P',' i-��.
y
- i .�,. �M i.. �.. :s "f �• r
1,.5 '�I.y'''.Y',
IF,
'd '.r
„'•"�'�. ,- 1, .y Jf 'l.t, ri y+ ,- _
.'4 i• + , 7 1 {':r { i
gryJ 1y`4r,, i y
`',-
1 I"r. t A ,, .f�- fki. t t.
r -s 1� - r• i -f k ,. I,p
i' �'I t
,,
1 'f 1' , ..• " Ito so y,�, )i 1 1•, t1 K 1 ].i. 1'll
y-,�1. !•� U I.f,•Ff .1'i�•' 1P'.115 'P ��i �i. a'.f.,' ,�'4. �•tr'•'y'II
SSS.1, Not
I ' r 1i11 ' ;' f -5_ 1, Y y�Y ,' f,'!• it I AN { +I
t..r.S"I ,r' •'1 f►i"� •:�•'~r': ':i �,.
., '?'f?�1,'1fj,.
�rnt
{.'n`i I, i:ei *.,�i',+, sA�,,,
{,° •3'ti. ,1.,.. 10 O•=i,{t '�7': tit 7 d '. i.. le{*?•`�i,i ."r�r •ittl- ",7 r,rt F:l:t3'- '` t•'
+CIO �uI - a • -p.f`,.• TF F , f �. .,F.
1� ,k- $-•N �'4•i; .—",l�1l r'�+i.''s
^r, ,.,- ,ig.t,{, fr ,C,. .C, ,1,.!. ?i iif 'u�� ;' '''+'a
!` ii,.,I-.►' 1 .!�!.E y -� r.. , s�,':r,.�•ati1J
`.i,' {t !'' lint: ,•�
'S. ;1f1t••i; "i.t 'S �,
-•f`I
•p e' ��.154�5'^Il: ,+r,f;+ ,kd'e l,� 51' _ LS :,. '°,il•SFi r�f, EIL,
i J.C'� "r i. a� •'r� ,31�.
F� `I' rF+r1, ' � •'.j
'1'r{L'<FL �' !'Lrk�.y-�IrQ%ti, q�q.j'.+i. F; tr 1i .i'. �i� 't'' •�.i,r
E i{.� '' •�'.•ry•
•'1'1
/,,q ,Y ,{' ! 'f" .f °::_', ,y ,I tC.-'-, !:,1. yt�e•,. w.',
rlllY tl'l. ..Fr' 1- vli�• "�11 L};..7 L; �1,�.,,�0 ' ,rt
a }''r. yl�. ;e,'••` 1 - �. t (,' i:i-. fti. :,,;; }I,
i !.�•Fy�j�1 [iJ1.��L .•��Il�•(�t; `i,, ' '� t. lf'= ``LL �• CIF•"�$ ['�� "1 11•5,'r+}
"+• i_ lea f4j'j.� l,r i tiR
1: ey(
f/,
IYNI�
�}i-rrr , t C�.�1 EI.y' •'>ri 4 '�� R '}y 1 i jl. t a'.5-. i''i 5•' l '1
F'�7,
J -! i14, , ,y d :
I: 'i.Y F.``� 1;1.• t 'I 4' I �1
•r.D J,� l.d i }.,\1" g.i'"� r (.l' n' F.rl I # ,4k' r'1] :4 .I.rs
,�- �'+r"''�'T • 4 •,
y'S !. i y. It, G ,rf7
.0 ! la' 1' :i.'�` '} y�:, S } r ,1it{}., •,. .'1a]'
, T a 4i i' 7 0 " k 1 r, ' fi'/ '. t _,4- �t v { r '1;, r .ILi••
'� }i 1 ��,'r
-
-+ L-i i �' F , �4 t 5 :i si",�F
''
`y,
p��/,yy
_ f' +:
.V ��]t//}•/�y•,, F R;f1 3 '` r
�, •' Dir riu F+.,fi� f itt: �iFYf' Y ,
""' I O'.{. '.� `;4" ,5}•`� + "' :y�Ji I{ 5 �� rrt^l ;'+'• 'r sF 1', •„�:,
tl =1
31 ,t • 1 �, !•• i,i{'. r-i.hY,f••�
'.t �. =-: f',f . ,r ' i;
,s lf3 1, � y�,(t 1.�¢ i''r •• r{r 1 4 � 1tS '`� iV,.
Iy •t
QQQ:"
�,. ,b.�„y.n-1 w ikf'�' r•,�.�1 ',•'F'y'." •}lF-. 1:' ''dr 1 r,,, ,I-{jy}'. r;i 1 1 t
,I �P 1 i1:1 3N, �s il: i,. ',r AS f I
Om H „A {.4 , S J ;:. :1 , -tia ,1, t'P t,:..si•
'..y..xra,
1!'_ !� ss yr�'Ir'•!. 1 '; ,•� 'fi +I "'I` 1,. I �,i "•t lr..
i ., %• �'t.l i'` -1.:. '• F,1 :.1;. 1r.,.. I fit' L 't:l� 'sl•.
•r ,.. ;;; iti. Z• !. i ! J. •t:L! L'<.:. I 1
'r.:,a,:, •
, Ig , ti
of ' ,jj S1: f r1 . r. s
:b ��11 {i•-. %. t, is ! �i' •'-.i fin: t } Y 'e•. �i1P a q,! r ;y -t•. + ''.� 1 l":-N. r,'+'-x}.
' �' .,I'' !
"A"J'• Y,:r. •II. ' ,,,, 1' , F lr jjjj.., it a
Tr',. i�, a(' d q
�=11,,,F}pr1 I :� '1 "{',1 !-I '[ �. 1 "�F -�{r :a- } i�,,5r.. F •�, 1 -! t4fN ,l': �f ,S r•1:1'1. � �.,. 1- f i-� t/, �.i •} ,
.:A'/ �.,1- _f i 7 `(y` ti _."} 1 e, ,Y 1,. �r i. i ♦ ( ' 'r M�,r 't1.
1 , 4 F' 1 a' gk 1`•
,' 1�`I 4. i 1 1 t },.;.t�.� _,r t `� .;`s'::;;f; ,i t (t�, .i i' r, t 1 /F ;
P1.. �Qj�'.
�` ,t•
Fi>,:
O:
i
,1..°
s i
1 �'. 67 g,. wv n •; .F i F h it I'I .;l J `,tY� -+
wi r.� • F•I,tl • ;; 1� /., • f t' y,. F1 Eir': �iG =:, ;4 ti>'y`` -�, }. ,, i."-.jii
,•f, �� ��W,1+� ':�j()( .t 11 1. { it5,' I t ii-•.5• :lF ',.IS
.! i-� �I W 'f'j_ I i + '"� •'i� - I -.h yy ,1 '�+ `.,
�•±i .,i`�•t�{' i ' + y f
i }t Y _ li F LI
r`I ". I{.3`F',{,': �: •rteal�.F� _ r, ? 5 •i: t. - `;{3:{I i .� i g `.5} ,r"Fje,ls
li !j, IJ.v i•,M?• .It� !-"�-,,, r r'.Y:;,.St sr,:Y. 1•'i
{
,a. H I1' 9 3 " , "1 ,a ',r,4 ii. ;,' .�yti l
}I,::.' d 1 'Sa•':•, i �,•� �i'-F•'�, S 1 ��li`�y,!I l,�r�S. t'}"! t
Q f
�itt�.
4i'`!?'.'r
.'�.•l.+r rd] M� p- .1'�i`{-1`!r .rl 41 �I'Si
�
!�`ri 1p 5 r•, �•�'' WWW j' S} S„•' ,i I ? S'iJ,tr'`l.,,pgF 5�i471 � .�,r ?
y�i�!'•fl R .O :�, F^'- 5,, k 'i T;,11'�, �ft , 5thr. at sl,l..l_�^ �
9, F ! fr. I �!:
•-� 5V `` ;} f:((Y•.-7 i .1 'h i 4t..j ,.+{61 }l
;, w � ,' trr• t {t
� ' 14 3 '.F�ti'��•
Ir, t+ x. 4�•�' 1.:L' { r� y.l�'
.,:., !
I :.Ili _b. 'a ,!?�F 'r.�,�,v.i' .� � 17 :a•{i IS I, '�i ��• 4
:i�t" 1rfr'',S'1e•`� ' -J;. .'ir'F. :F' '{ , .,t :jl,!•.l ',iN'ti,L�• �F={,{� ,ref?
r.�l. �'�. L':<r� � �. �'^'s :u I• 1 1: {%3 r! �i1,;1 .. {l 1 '� .�r
i j {E L'f�li s. 1- 5,,;,Y 5 ilgr a,r 1;• , 1 }�,' (" 7!
p{,;
dry
a'.�� -'Ilk. ,3 i ,5
ad. ;:'a. O •G. �•#: ., vY :,,'S:.i: � °
; ,' p[ {il A ,►t
IL"u'. , ,� .,. �•, ,zl rl 'tf }' a F , F �: 1'hh ,�{° ii7 ! -i• }•i 1
t�
.>••:.�' ;i � :i'�' >ti'. � fy,Tw,..
,, ,a„ {', �::r r �ls;:- i c
l ;�. tilt �I `rjj, - yyjj?. 1 4: a �r
pTi `' l9 •`� y
� f
�jp�_,
r� fd'.•
�•1;1'.- i.�'11 il„ 1•,. JF•!'���M a>'�-�'I�r,i.l. TM F'Sy :rY�r:t'.{..
, 4! •+1, '7 ' ." '�' xl s ile (y d , !- 'i::.G '" _ { - `'I. � ..t•- .liF � , r. 1 ,",j�S�Li:iyi �� ��' F� rl;y.#..:u��� �7., ,h .�,. ws, t'd r
,.,`„rta?•'t;{4�'.;HF.1 , ; t}z
7.p 7SQ ' 1 f i.i Yr !�.'S EV 7 �q 1 i'C i i�' 3 / r1' ! 1 Ita y '(,11 �1h R4
!a{ �• ♦� 9I� i1 SLS+j1 ��'l, i d',-1{'�11� 1 Y �- It° d �r•',1 J ,.5� i~ - -lik g -r lli� _ I.ik IG: F,,,%`!-y�{'Fi kL: r 1 ,�'-�L 'li itl�l, pp� �{' !
: �t
EE .I"r1 •1 + + iR- _ '�i Lg{{ } -(M '(. • {'i `'1h s EI','� i'' �" Ti� t. S I�R`="1',r7..{i r -
�Gt..•N O 4-i ' d` rr 1'6' .+
�,4ys}•
•r��Y
r..l
'f
"'>�
ii .'jl }r'{ .r'
fy r,.j(• •� ��- -�.F' lt. 1� I^ ri. I•, k i.
��.f(L .%1 Q T T,1: f I•�•, 14i :1• F. ,
_ I. r,x � �.4 r i . - q
„� �Q + �'T a(T11, r•1'.•� -i � 1 fP f' '? r(1, f trl. I5�i.
I..• rA, .y„t1
I�.:�,
r .I ,. y.
C EI. 1 a �+l I. }-11` y�ry�.�, ,1 { •4t., S,,•i I't 1 , i' •'.r•'
(Fi .1 -f 1 }'i'� i �+
, er i JI 1�� L } IJ .L'SM I r���t��Y1ry`�rf �, {.11•f�p LA �S q �_P'. � �k{ Fe
^'l.►�!�!a.{YtY�n•.1s3 F
1. Y"� 'IA.
..S
tt
V}`4 r ,r{'- [^ f�)w �•. , i ,!" '!•��. 3' f .,
A�ww.iii7 ', 11111��.+•••�•••111lll ii W .5 :I ,� .l }: , .{�S r-e 'R�• A-i'
: 5t.'� . N + r " .:1" ,(r ' %II 5 _ i'♦ s %;F 1•'
OS,
• '
1 } 1( ii'. j',Lry-- `j�;:l it t'il�I1J+•Cv,A�kA14 ++.Ia+ .ix
k�tS t 'l' - r} '•. 1,6 t t':y"� 'kr• + "f
iY�i ..L "i s f ,- 3 �i i 9- /r. { {...�, 1. �re�.l: 1 Sr'N t�
I 'r F 1,t,,{( i$• Stt•'1-yy S. �i.. py>F i'SV{tr d. e.- S{ii 1
!4a
D .1053COS
,��.•��V%•: � [' J 1' '
r5Vol; wf'
! 'ifl sF i'S'1'r! I
1
. <,;, •ks w^^,' •:!~ +, •:F.. , y. :. 'I t'i .;kt,: w.
k - � . !t.

16 xounne p c:ompiamt p lHollow-up of uwt2 inspection p rotlow-up of USWG review p Other
Date of Inspection
Facility Number
Time of Inspection ® 24 hr. (hh:mm)
p Registered 0 Certified 0 Applied for Permit p Permitted In Not Operatrona Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: Harper.Swine.Farm................................................................................ County: Greene WARO
OwnerName: Bien------------------------------------------ Harper.1r................................................ Phone No: ..7.9.7..2191...................................................................
Facility Contact:&eaHarpar......................................................Title: owner ................................................. Phone No: 919.(.7.47-2191........................
MailingAddress: P..O.Box.295............................................................................................ saaw.Hill.NtZ........................................................ 28581k..............
Onsite Representative: Ben.Harper..Brian.Shanhleford....................................... Integrator: LI.Marph.rey.Flog.Company........................
Certified Operator: Ben}amin.T......................... Harper .............................................. Operator Certification Number: 16528.............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude © • ®' ) Longitude ©• ®° ®
- . uebign, %-Urreut
Swine T- Capacity -Population
pWean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
4000
p arrow to Wean
p Farrow to ee er
p Farrow to Finis
p Gilts
p Boars
Number of_Lagoons / Holding -Ponds . JE3 Subsurface Drains Present 1113 Lagoon Area 113 pray fieArea
[3 No Liquid Waste Management System
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
p Yes N No
p Yes N No
p Yes ® No
13 Yes H No
p Yes N No
p Yes N No
p Yes N No
p Yes N No
p Yes B No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
p Yes N No

act y um er: 40_lA6
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
p Yes
H No
Structures (Lagoons,Holding Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
p Yes
N No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure
6
Identifier:
Freeboard (11): 3.0
I0. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
0 Yes
N No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
p Yes
® No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
® Yes
p No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
p Yes
N No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
p Yes
® No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ...................... Cotton ........................................... Soybutts.................... ................. ! ma' U.Crxaitt........................... .......................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
p Yes
® No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
p Yes
®No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
p Yes
®No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
p Yes
®No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
p Yes
®No
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewfinspection with on -site representative?
p Yes
®No
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
N Yes
p No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
p Yes
®No
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
p Yes
®No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
p Yes
®No
q .. o vta� ions.or crencies,were.noo wring rs visit:. on will.receive nu further. .
1.
,Cel'teSodnft[le� dW'this YiSit .. .
ominents_(re er to question #) Eitp ain any Y answei% andfor any: reeom-mendatio©s or any other comments
Use-drawm s of facilit3 to better�explain situations: (use-additia al pages as necessary)• -
_ g
.w
o subsurface drainage on site according to Mr. Harper
12. Planning to remove woody vegetation from outside wall within one month; continue efforts to establish grass on bare area near
recycle line
2. Need to recalculate IRR 2 forms to balance nitrogen
* Need to secure odor control, insect control and mortality checklists for General Permit
* Calibration information available for traveling gun; need to secure system's operating information (parameters)
11/18/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name Pat -Hooper;
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: