400144_ENFORCEMENT_20171231

NORTH CAROLINA �
Department of Environmental Qua'

ENFORCEMENT
ENFORCEMEN.. T
ENFORCEMENT

Water Resources
L rivirtinntental Quality
May 12, 2017
Mr. Danny Miller
Danny Miller Farm
1211 Corbett Town Road
Snow Hill, North Carolina 28580
Subject: Notice of Deficiency - Freeboard Level
Danny Miller Farm #40-144
A W S400144
Greene County
NOD-2017-PC-0175
Dear Mr. Miller:
ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
.%,Cretarl
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
Director
Thank you for your recent call regarding the freeboard levels at your facilities. On April 26,
2017 during a telephone conversation with staff of the NC Division of Water Resources (DWR),
you reported a high freeboard level (16 inches) in the primary lagoon.
Please be advised that failure to maintain waste levels in your lagoon/storage ponds in
accordance with the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan and with Condition V,
2. of NC Swine Waste System General Permit could result in other actions being taken by the
Division in response to compliance matters.
Deficiency 1:
On April 26, 2017, a lagoon/storage pond level was documented at 16 inches of freeboard at the
primary lagoon. A level of 19 inches is the maximum level -allowed by your permit and Certified
Animal Waste Management Plan.
Corrective Action for Deficiency 1:
Thank you for submitting a 30-day Plan of Action on April 26, 2017. Take all necessary
additional steps to insure lagoon levels remain in compliance with Section 2 of your permit.
.' NoThing Compares:-.--.
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Water Resources -Water Quality Regional Operations Section -Washington Regional Office
943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, North Carolina 27889
252-946-6481

Please work to ensure that your facility is managed in a way to maintain compliance with permit
and animal waste management plan requirements. Failure to comply with conditions in a permit
may result in a recommendation of enforcement action, to the Director of the Division of Water
Quality who may issue a civil penalty assessment of not more that twenty-five thousand
($25,000) dollars against any "person" who violates or fails to act in accordance with the terms,
conditions, or requirements of a permit under authority of G.S. 143-215.6A. To minimize the
potential for any possible future compliance matters attributable to prolonged wet weather
conditions, you may wish to review your animal waste management system design, as well as the
waste plan itself, for any potentially beneficial modifications and/or improvements.
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please contact me at (252)-948-3939.
Sincerely,
f((//(•( /,14
David M
Water Quality Regional Operations Supervisor
Washington Regional Office
Cc: DWR-WQROS-CAFO Unit -Central Office
Greene County Soil and Water Conservation District
NCDS WC - WaRO
WaRO Compliance Animal Files
rods Files

NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
February 15, 2010
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REOUESTED
CM# 7009 2250 0000 9252 2753
Mr. Danny L. Miller
Danny Miller Swine Farm
1211 Corbett Town Road
Snow Hill, North Carolina 28580
Subject: NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY
Danny Miller Swine Farm #40-144
AWS40144
Greene County
NOD-2010-PC- 01 62
Dear Mr. Miller:
On February 9, 2010, during a telephone conversation with staff of the NC Division of Water Quality
(DWQ) Aquifer Protection Section (APS), you reported a high freeboard level (18.5 inches) in the
primary lagoon.
As a result of this incident, you are hereby notified that, having been permitted to have a non -discharge
permit for the subject animal waste disposal system pursuant to 15A NCAC Section .1300, you have
been found to be in violation of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan and the Swine Waste
System General Permit No. AWG100000 that you are covered to operate under, as follows:
Deficiency 1:
Failure to maintain waste levels in your lagoon/storage ponds in accordance with the facility's Certified
Animal Waste Management Plan in accordance with Condition V. 2. of Swine Waste System General
Permit No. AWG 100000
On February9, 2010, a lagoon/storage pond level was documented at 18.5 inches of freeboard at the
primary lagoon. A level of 19 inches is the maximum level allowed by your permit and Certified
Animal Waste Management Plan.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality Internet: www.ncwaterguality.org
943 Washington Square Mall Phone: [phone]
Washington, NC 27889 FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 50% Recycled110%b Post Consumer Paper -
NorthCarohna
;Vaturallff

N
Cont. Page Two
February 15, 2010
Danny Miller Farm
Required Corrective Action for Deficiency 1:
A 30 Day Plan of Action (POA) was submitted to DWQ within two (2) days of the high freeboard
occurrence. Take all necessary additional steps to insure lagoon levels remain in compliance with
Section 2 of your permit.
You are required to take any necessary action to correct the above violations on or before March
9, 2010 and to provide a written response to this Notice within 30 days of receipt of this letter
indicating that freeboard is at a compliant level. Please include in your response all corrective
actions already taken and a schedule for completion of any corrective actions not addressed.
If you have any questions concerning this Notice, please contact Marlene Salyer at (252)-948-3846 or
me at [phone].
Sincerely,
David May
Regional Aquifer Protection Supervisor
Washington Regional Office
cc: Keith Larick CAFO Unit
Greene County Soil and Water Conservation District
N�DSWC-WaRO
WaRO Compliance Animal Files
Murphy Brown rn
Ln
mds Files r4
m
ru
Ln
ru
Er
0
0
0
0
Ln
U.S. Postal Service r.,
,CERTiIF�ED MAIL., R.ECEIRATI
{)FFIC; ILL USE
. e l $
v
rU Total Par �
ru IlW L MMLPRQ�-r
� sent DAMY ro MII1-ER SWE E FAR I
p srreei, 4y 1211 CS`jT W pM -
--Poo --- q W HILL NC 2858Dcy sa--
Cerd!W Fee
Retum Reoelpt Fee
(Endorsement Requite
Restricted Delivery Fee
(Endorsement Required)

W(�R z
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WASHINGTON REGIONAL OFFICE
May 23, 2000
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Danny Miller
1211 Corbett Town Road
Snow Hill, North Carolina 28580
SUBJECT: Notice of Deficiency
Animal Feedlot Operation Compliance Inspection
Danny Miller Swine Faun
Facility No. 40-144
Greene County
Dear Mr. Miller:
On May 10, 2000, I conducted an Animal Feedlot Operation Compliance Inspection at the Danny Miller
Swine Farm in Greene County. A copy of the inspection report is attached for your review.
In genctal, this inspection included verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan (CAWMP) and the General Permit; (2) the farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15
NCAC 2H.0217, Senate Bill 1217, the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan and the General Permit;
(3) the farm operation's waste management system is being operated properly under the direction of a
Certified Operator; (4) the required records are being kept; (5) there are no signs of seepage, erosion,
and/or r uno$ The following deficiencies were observed during the inspection
➢ Your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan records did not include a soil analysis for 1999. In
Section Ill. Monitoring and Reporting Requircments, item number 3 ofthe General Permit it is a
requirement that a soil analysis be collected annually on each application field receiving animal waste.
Further, Semon IL Operation and Maintenance Requirements, item number 3 requires that lime be
applied; as needed, to maintain soil pH in the optimum range for crop production. This information is
received from your annual soil analysis.
It is very important as the owner and the Operator in Cbarge that you resolve these aforementioned
deficiencies and any other problems that may arise, as soon as possible. Nothing in this letter should be
taken as absolving this facility of the responsibility and liability of any violations that have resulted or
may result from these deficiencies.
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance during the inspection. Should you have fiWher questiods ~
or comments regarding this inspection, do not hesitate to call at [phone], ext. 321.
Sincerely,
Daphne B. Cullom
Environmental Specialist
cc: Greene County SWCD Office
DSWC-WaRO
Compliance Group
aRO — Animal Compliance
-"".EA M L Kf_R�.
2 0 1 p
943 WASHINGTON SQUARE MALL, WASHINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 27889
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 40 144
Date of Visit S/1o/2oQo Printed on: 5/17/2000
rO Not Operational O Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified 0 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold _.
Farm Name: . ...-_.................. County: GC0c1A!<..................
Owner Name: f?$AIIJ . ......................... Miftr............. - Phone No: 9n:7.47.— 7.,�9..... ._.�._.....�_..... _�.
Facility Contact: .......Title: . Phone No:
Mailing Address: j2,jj.CQrbV.tj.j.Qjyjn . .._._._.._ ..._._. SAfJa.Dill..[..........._.................... ......... _5,&Q...... _._
Onsite Representative: r[zaml0.y iYlAllcr.:-----••..............•-•--•----.............-------............... Integrator: aCQ117RqL.F:a�]pt&........ .......... _.......... __..
Certified Operator:,[Danialy..L ................................ Miner.. ................................ .............. Operator Certification Number:l,$S.l ......... _.............
Location of Farm:
A.
8.trout.,3.�n�i,...�:>Ar.�..r.' fat.un.�1;,.1�QZ,.I�'�axm.a�.�ba>xt..x.........�:
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude �• �° 0" Longitude �• �' ��
v� - 4' -.yr- csscs%.r
}'Iaestgn C1Er]'erit 3 ,•.-,.�-,� y ](ieSEgDR. .iUrlelltfn. - - a ?'-De.SIgII•,•._4CaTrent
.>u 1-= -`i 4 �F-`f
} Swme y r _ Ca Po ulat,on; Poultry Ca P6 nlatinn,,Cattie ;: a ' PnT elation:,
a ❑ Wean to Feeder: ❑ Layer ❑Dairy
® Feeder to Finish 3840 3801 7- ❑ Non -Layer I , ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean _ T
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Other I~�-•., j � -
El Farrow to Finish - ' T;6tal Design- Capacity' 3,840
❑ Gilts .
❑ Boars Total SSLW' Si8,400
y .
Dischar6es & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ®No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:..(Lg)L.0.510.18A....(Sm�LQ51Q1AB........................................................................ ............ .................. ..........---------- •............... .......
Freeboard (inches): 21 30

Continued on back
Facility Number: 40-144 1 Date of Inspection 5/1012000 Printed on: 5/17/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ®No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? []'Yes ® No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Yes ®No
12. Crop type Corn, Wheat, Soybeans Coastal Bermuda
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ®No
14..a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ® No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ® No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
Oe/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ® Yes ❑ No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes ® No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ® No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
Oe/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑Yes ®Na
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes ® No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes ® No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ® No
N,6 •Vtotatitjris: or def ciencies"wer"e :noted "du iiig this isii~ 7�0�: wiill receive nv furtlier
:. correspondence aboui this:visit. - : : ::::::: ' :: ::: ' :: :: : ' : :
12./13. Planning to add Coastal Bermuda back to waste utilization plan and will graze with sheep.
Contact Technical Specialist for assistance_
19. Last soil analysis in records from 2/98. Contact SW District or NCCES for a copy of 1999 soil
analysis.
Irrigation records complete with nitrogen balance.
Reviewer/Inspector Name Daphne B.Cizllom�r'°EateE

�Reviewer/Inspector Signature: _ _ Date:
Facility Number: 4�144 Date of Inspection 5/10R000 Printed on: 5/17/2000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon faiil to discharge attor below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ®No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes: ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property) -
29: `I§the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid "surface iof the lagoon? - ❑Yes' ®No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with~the ventilation fan{s) noted? {i.e_ broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(sj- inoperable shutters, etc) : , r ❑ Ycs ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes IN No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanenthemponny cover? ❑ yes ❑ No.

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and
Natural Resources
Washington Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
0TU.0W'A •
�f
NCDENR
Ncwrr" C.AROL[NA 0EPAF2TMENT OF
ENVIRONmF-Ny ANO NATURAL. RESOIJFtGF-S
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
February 3, 1999
Mr. Danny Miller
Danny Miller Swine Farm
Rt. 4, Box 279
Snow Hill, North Carolina 28580
SUBJECT: Notice of Deficiency
Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
Danny Miller Swine Farm
Facility No. 40-144
Greene County
Dear Mr. Miller:
On April 28, 1998, 1 conducted an Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection at
the Danny Miller Swine Farm in Greene County. A copy of the inspection report
is attached for your review.
In general, this inspection included verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified
Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP) and the General Permit; (2) the farm
is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC 2H.0217, Senate Bill
1217, the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan and the General Permit; (3)
the farm operation's waste management system is being operated properly under
the direction of a Certified Operator; (4) the required records are being kept; (5)
there are no signs of seepage, erosion, andlor runoff. The following deficiencies
were observed during the inspection.
➢ The current waste utilization plan for your facility does not contain all of the
receiving crops and/or land that are being utilized for waste management. All
receiving crops and/or land being utilized for waste management are required
943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, North Carolina 27889
Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

Page Two
Danny Miller Swine Farm
Facility No. 40-144
February 3, 1999
to be included in the waste Utilization plan. Please refer to the attached
inspection form for further comments.
➢ The irrigation records should correspond with the acreage, fields, and PAN per
acre in the waste utilization plan.
➢ The CAWMP should include the land owner agreement from Mr. Jones and the
land tract should be included in the total acreage available for irrigation.
➢ Vegetate bare areas on the lagoon dike walls to prevent further erosion.
It is very important as the owner and the Operator in Charge that you resolve
these aforementioned deficiencies and any other problems that may arise, as
soon as possible. For additional assistance, please contact your Technical
Specialist. Nothing in this letter should be taken as absolving this facility of the
responsibility and liability of any violations that have resulted or may result from
these deficiencies.
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance during the inspection. Should
you have further questions or comments regarding this inspection, do not
hesitate to call at [phone], ext. 321.
Sincerely,
Daphne B. Cullom
Environmental Specialist
cc: David Moore, Carolina Farms
Greene County: SWCD Office
Greene C.oLmty KCCES Office
DSWC-WO
Compliartao.roup
WaRO

Facility .'' is ;;i;,r 11 ll::te of ln%ncCtiorl r
Time 01 Inspecuoll 15:00 1 24 hr. (hh:mm)
p Registered Ccrtil3cd 0 .41�plied for Permit ®Permitted p of ��peratlona Date Last Operated:
Farm name: l?aluly..1)dill-cr.5��:ine.F.arrn....................................................................... County: Greene WARO
Owner Name-. Hanna'...... .............. Miller .............................
Facility Cori l aci......................................
Title:
Phone No: 9.19:-241mSM ...........
Phone No: ................
Mailing Addre• --- RtA.Roa:.2 .9...........................
Onsite Rep1•csc:;;;::i%-t.: Mtan.y.Mille:............................................................................. Integrator:Ca�r.Alin.a.E.arms.....................................................
Certified npc,::: Ilan.n..:.E.............................. Millear:................................................ Operator Certification Number:l851f}.............................
Location of Far!.::
::llll"....-AtIA1:I.lg ...QII axm.ls a o.Ut...m;..nn. t..........................................................................
n.
Latitude Longitude 0• �° �'=
cs1on urrenDesign (-urrent DeSign Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle- Capacity PapnI t' n
❑ can to -eccler
® ee er to Tints
ilS40
❑ arrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to 1-ceder
❑ Farrow to E=inish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
°5Number of Lagoons / bolding Ponds � [❑Subsurface rains resent ❑ Lagoon Area t7 pray le rea ,�,
-----------
❑ o iqul aste anagement ystem
enernl
1. Are there anv buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed ti-om anv part of the operation?
at: p La}oon ❑ Spray Field p Other
.. li:':i•_•,:.; �r �� ci�s�rved, +vas the conve;-ance man-made?
ed. did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
..: ::_: c,€ _. • cd, what is the estimated flow in -alhnin?
a lagoon system? (If yes. notify DWQ)
3. Is there evident of past dischargc from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
.. ...---- . ❑ Yes ® No
5. Does any part of the a itsi, management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
p Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes []No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes Ig No
[]Yes ® No
7. Did the facility i,ii] to h:n e certiticd operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
❑ Yes ® No

Facility N um ber: 40_144 iirspectiot. 4-28-98
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? p Yes ® No
Structures ;'muss. l frrsh Pits. etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage)less than adequate? ❑Yes ®No
:,� :•.: I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (fi;: 1.7 ft. 1.7 ft.
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ® No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? to Yes p No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or envir-oomentaI threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the strucun-es lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? p Yes M No
Waste Applicati„-
14. Is there physical evidence o€'over application? ❑ Yes ® No
(If in excess of WNW. or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ..................
...Wlieaz............. ..................................................................... ......................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or r=tnly
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
iJ..O:Vtt7 tFus.os cc-ltrenctes:«�ere.note stringt rsy!siL. Dttwl .receive no. art er .
e�'�es�10-Wile tjcc rzlKitt,t tliS.�,1$i::... .:. ..' . .
..
N Yes p No
p Yes ®No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ®No
p Yes ® No
p Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
® Yes p No
fCotnments'(rf fer to question #): Explain any-YES,answers'and/or any recommendations oe:any_ott er comments--�
`Usdra ewiq of facility to better explain sttdaiions.'(use addional tipages as necessary)
Please note the following comments from the inspection: -
12 � Reseed/vegetate bare areas on lagoon dike walls to prevent further erosion.
16:-� The waste utilization plan (WUP) does not include wheat for Mr. Jones property as a receiving crop. Itisa violation to land -`
pply wastewater on any land that is not included in the waste utilization plan.
2 Waste Analysis - 1/20/98; Soil Analysis 2/23/98; The WUP should match the irrigation records and maps. The WUP may need
o be amended to reflect each pull as an irrigation event. The irrigation records were complete with a nitrogen balance.
5 In Section 1. Performance Standards, 4 of the General Permit, a copy of all landowner agreements are to be included in the
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan. The Iand owner agreement for application of waste from Mr. Jones and the land tract;",:
sbl6uld included in the total acreage available for irrigation. Please contact your Technical Specialist for assistance., 7125/97-'
Reviewerllnspector Name (Daphne B. Cullom; W�
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: _)� `irk_' b . Qkj,-U" 0-ry--) Date: 4- 7-6 - 21 S�

k acility 'urn be r: 4u— 144 4-28-98
'Additional COInnICIItS
Z-
If there are anv—questions about this inspection or the reguirements of the General Permit, please contact me at the
Washington Re�Tional Office [phone]. ext. 321.
7/25/97