400142_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NUH I H UAHULINA
Department of Environmental Qual

INSPECTIONS
INSPECTIONS
INSPECTIONS

0 Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number:
400142 Facility Status:
Active Permit AWS400142
Inpsection Type:
Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit:
Routine
County: Greene Region:
Date of Visit:
09/15/2017 Entry Time. 01:00 pm
Exit Time: 1:55 pm Incident #
Farm Name:
Edwards & Edwards Farm
Owner Email:
Owner:
Carole D Edwards
Phone:
Mailing Address:
388 Dailtown Rd
Snow Hill NC 285809740
Physical Address:
713 Dailtown Rd
Snow Hill NC 28580
Facility Status:
0Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Faun:
NCSR 1327
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts
Records and Documents
Latitude:
Waste Col, Stor, & Treat
Other issues
[] Denied Access
Washington
252-753-2630
35° 29' 55" Longitude: 77' 38' 33"
Waste Application
Certified Operator: Timothy Brad Burress Operator Certification Number: 24799
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representatives): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Phone:
On -site representative Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis: soil tested: 2016
3-2-17 = 3.39 sludge
2-28-17 = 1.75
11-7-16 = 1.00
IRR's on sludge removal in Feb & 2016 small grain
Reviewed: sludge survey 5/2017; sludge removed Feb 2017; rainfalllfreeboard; crop yield; stocking/mortality; calibration 2016
page: 1

�. Permit: AWS400142 Owner - Facility: Carole D Edwards Facility Number: 400142
Inspection Date: 09/15/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: . Routine
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon t 22.00
page: 2

Permit: AWS400142 Owner - Facility: Carole D Edwards Facility Number: 400142
Inspection Date: 09/15/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No Na Ne
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
0 ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
M ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
M ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No Na Ne
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large
❑
0 ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
0 ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
0 ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
M ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na Ne
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN a 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manuretsludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Permit: AWS400142 Owner - Facility : Carole D Edwards Facility Number: 400142
Inspection Date: 09/15/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No Na Ne
Crop Type 1 Com, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2 Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Pasture)
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Records and Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
Checklists?
Design?
Maps?
Lease Agreements?
Other?
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
Weekly Freeboard?
Waste Analysis?
Soil analysis?
Waste Transfers?
Weather code?
Rainfall?
Stocking?
❑■❑❑
❑■❑❑
❑ E ❑ ❑
Yes No Na Ne
❑■❑❑
❑■❑❑
❑■❑❑
page: 4

Permit: AWS400142 Owner - Facility: Carole D Edwards Facility Number: 400142
Inspection Date: 09/15/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na No
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
N ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
0 ❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
E ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■ ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No Na No
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
E ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
E ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
0 ❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
E ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
N ❑
❑
page: 5

S
0 Division of Water Resources
El Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number:
400142 Facility Status:
Active Permit. AWS400142
❑ Denied Access
Inpsection Type:
Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit:
Routine
County: Greene Region:
Washington
Date of Visit:
08/04/2016 Entry Time: 10:00 am
Exit Time: 10:55 am Incident #
Farm Name:
Edwards & Edwards Farm
Owner Email:
Owner:
Carole D Edwards
Phone:
252-753-2630
Mailing Address:
388 Dailtown Rd
Snow Hill NC 286809740
Physical Address:
713 Dailtown Rd
Snow Hill NC 28580
Facility Status:
Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm:
Latitude. 35' 29' 55" Longitude:
77° 38' 33"
NCSR 1327
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Cot, Stor, & Treat
Records and Documents Other Issues
E Waste Application
Certified Operator: Timothy Brad Burress Operator Certification Number: 24799
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site RepresentativeW: Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Wayne Edwards Phone
On -site representative Brad Burress Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis: soil tested: 11/2015
11-5-15 = 1.75
4-29-16 = I Z6
6-9-15 = 2.14
IRR records are recorded & some balanced.
Reviewed: freeboard; crop yield; stocking;
Need to see sludge survey & calibration
Freebd range: 20"12-6-16 to 27"18-1-16
page: 1

ti
Permit: AW5400142 Owner -Facility: Carole D Edwards Facility Number: 400142
Inspection Date: 08/04/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 3,000 3,000
Total Design Capacity: 3,000
Total SSLW: 405,000
Waste Structures
Disignatod Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon 1 25.00
page: 2

• Permit: AWS400142 Owner - Facility: Carole D Edwards Facility Number: 400142
Inspection Date: 08/04/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No Na Ne
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑ ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑ ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
❑ ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No Na Ne
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large
❑
❑ ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
❑ ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
❑ ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
❑ ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na Ne
10- Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance altematives that need
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

• Permit: AWS400142 Owner - Facility : Carole D Erdwards Facility Number:
400142
Inspection Date: 08/04/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Waste Application
Yes
No Na Ne
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
❑ ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
❑ ❑
r]
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
❑ ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na No
% Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
❑ ❑
[]
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWS400142 Owner - Facility : Carole D Edwards Facility Number: 400142
Inspection Date: 08/04/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na Ne
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections
E]
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
❑ ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑ ❑ ❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
❑ ❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
❑ ❑ ❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
❑ ❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑ ❑ ❑
Other issues
Yes
No Na No
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
❑ ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
❑ ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field ❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond ❑
Other ❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
page: 5

` S Division of Water Resources
Facility Number Iy! - ® O Division of Soil and Water Conservation/
O Other AgencyN.
Type of Visit: ® Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review Q Structure Evaluation O Technical Assis a
Reason for Visit: ® Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: L.!P_� Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: Owner Email:
Owner Name: �� L ,a% _ _ Phone: Se)
Mailing Address:Jy`J _ _ _ _ zG
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: /,�(, Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
r
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Other
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
4Layer
Non-Layer
Non-L
Pullets
Other
Poults
Design Current
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Longitude:
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dg Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
❑ Yes U No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [:]No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [:]No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

Facility Number: 41Q - — Date of Inspection.
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes 2No ❑ NA D NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes IdNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes 60/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmen 1 threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes U No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [�(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s)
13. Soil Type(s):
—
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
o
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
o
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
o
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
l9. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
dIN o
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
rNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Oth
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. Zes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
VS122. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facili Number: Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check Yes [] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below. 9 AO / to
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey [] Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes [No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes WNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes dr�o ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility9 if yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes�ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes No [DNA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
Ay Al
v� 61
�.�
/� c � /L
Reviewer/Inspector Name: .! ' ' Q rlew �- J 4 �jl to I-- Phone:
Reviewer/]nspector Signature: Date:
Page 3 of 3 242015

e
Division of Water Resources
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number 400142 Facility Status:
Active Permit: AWS400142
❑ Denied Access
Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for VisIt: Routine
County: Greene Region:
Washington
Date of Visit,. 09/23/2014 Entry Time: 09:30 am
Exit Time: 10:00 am Incident #
Farm Name: Edwards & Edwards Farm
Owner Email:
Owner: Carole D Edwards
Phone:
252-753-2630
Mailing Address: 388 Dailtown Rd
Snow Hill NC 285809740
Physical Address: 713 Dailtown Rd
Snow Hill NC 28580
Facility Status: � Compliant � Not Compliant
Integrator. Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm:
Latitude: 35" 29' 55" Longitude:
77° 38' 33"
NCSR 1327
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor,
& Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Timothy Brad Burress
Operator Certification Number:
24799
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name
Title Phone
24 hour contact name Brad Burress
Phone
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer
Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Soil tested: 212010 Need a Soil Test every 3 yearst
Waste Analysis:
2-24-2014= 2,50
Irrigation events in the spring are complete and balanced out, however, events in August and September are waiting on waste
analysis to balance. Please take a sample ASAP and watch your PAN balances.
Stocking & mortality recorded until Aug. 2014- with movement of animals this week.
Rainfall- June- Aug.= 4.8"- Sept. not recorded in records.
Needs a current Sludge Survey for 2014 and equipment calibration also.
page: 1

Permit: AWS400142 Owner - Facility : Carole D Edwards Facility Number: 400142
Inspection Date: 09/23/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 2,878
Total Design Capacity:
Total SSLW:
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon 1
page: 2

13
rr
Permit: AWS400142 Owner - Facility : Carole D Edwards Facility Number: 400142
Inspection Date: 09/23/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes No Na Ne
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
0 Cl
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
0 ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
M ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
0 ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection Storage & Treatment
Yes ,
No Na Ne
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large
❑
0 ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
0 ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
0 ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance attematives that need
❑ ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

1*
Permit: AWS400142 Owner - Facility : Carole D Edwards Facility Number:
400142
Inspection Date: 09/23/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Waste Application
Yes No Na Ne
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
M ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■ ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
0 ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
ME]
❑
1B. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Ygs
No Na Ne
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
0 ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWS400142 Owner - Facility : Carole D Edwards Facility Number: 400142
Inspection Date: 09/23/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yea
No Na No
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
M ❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
■ ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon }
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
M ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes No Na No
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
0 ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
0 ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
0 ❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the ReviewerAnspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
M ❑
❑
page: 5

S
0 Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400142 Facility Status: Active Permit: 6WS4Q0j4Z❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 09/10/2013 Entry Time: 0 :40 AM_ Exit Time: 10:30 AM Incident #:
Farm Name: Edwards & Edwards Farm Owner Email:
Owner: QgMle Q Edwards Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 388 Dailtown Rd Snow Hill NC 285809740
Physical Address: 713,Dailto-wnBd Snow Hill bIC 2858Q
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC _
Location of Farm: Latitude: ,3529'S5 Longitude: 77°38'33"
NCSR 1327
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Timothy Brad Burress Operator Certification Number: 24799
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Wayne Edwards Phone:
On -site representative Wayne Edwards Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis:
2-24-11 = 2.1 soil tested: 212010
Applaction events in April, May 8 July are not balanced out, Please balance this record.
Rainfall, freeboard & stocking are recorded.
Sludge survey due in 2013: NOTE will be removing sludge this fall, per Wayne Edwards.
Date:
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400142 Owner - Facility: Carole D Edwards
Inspection Date: 09/10/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number. 400142
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Q Swine - Feeder to Finish 3.000 2,800
Total Design Capacity: 3,000
Total SSLW: 405,000
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
�agoon 1 2fi.40
Page: 2

I
I
Permit: AWS400142 Owner- Facility: Carole D Edwards Facility Number: 400142
Inspection Date: 0911012013 inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d_ Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large trees, severe
❑ ■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑ ■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑ ❑
improvement?
11. is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

N
Permit: AWS400142 Owner - Facility: Carole D Edwards
Inspection Date: 09/10/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400142
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare. soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Com, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Pasture)
Crop Type 3
Small Grain overseed
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑ ■
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400142 Owner - Facility: Carole D Edwards Facility Number : 400142
Inspection Date: 09/10/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Lease Agreements? ❑
Other? ❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑ ■
❑
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■
Q
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑ ■
❑
❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon ❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 5

L
Permit: AWS400142 Owner - Facility: Carole D Edwards Facility Number: 400142
Inspection Date: 09/10/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
2$. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report ❑ ■ ❑ Cl
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i_e_, discharge, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon / Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewertinspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
In
Page: 6

t
Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400142 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS400142 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection _. Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene__ Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 09/12/2012 Entry Time: 09:50 AM Exit Time: 10:40 AM Incident M
Farm Name: Edwards & Edwards Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Carole D Edwards Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 388 Dailtawn Rd _ _ Snow Hill NC 285609740 _
Physical Address: 713 Dailtown Rd Snow Hill NC 28580
Facility Status. 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown L C
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°29'55" Longitude: 77°38'33"
NCSR 1327
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Timothy Brad Burress Operator Certification Number: 24799
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Phone:
On -site representative Wayne Edwards Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature:ya% Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis: soil tested: 212012 check on sample for 2012.
6-18-12 = 2.59
2-21-11 = 2.1
9-15-10 = 1.3
Oats application used 1.1 N PAN & don't have waste analysis for this.??
IRR records are complete & balanced out. Rainfall & freeboard records were reviewed. Stocking & mortality were recorded.
Calibration due 2012 SS due 2013
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400142 Owner - Facility: Carole D Edwards Facility Number. 400142
Inspection Date: 09I1212012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Q Swine - Feeder to Finish 3,000 2,863
Total Design Capacity: 3,000
Total SSLW: 405,000
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
koon 1 23.00
Page: 2

A
Permit. AWS400142 Owner - Facility: Carole D Edwards Facility Number : 400142
Inspection Date: 09/1212012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? ❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e_/ large trees, severe ❑ ■ 110
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management 11000
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

t
Permit: AWS400142 Owner - Facility: Carole D Edwards
Inspection Date: 09/12/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number : 400142
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Com, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Pasture)
Crop Type 3
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Sail Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15'. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
17, Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

t
Permit: AWS400142 Owner - Facility: Carole D Edwards
Inspection Date: 09/12/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Records and Documents
Facility Number : 400142
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
24_ Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
25, Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Nan -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
1101111
Page: 5

e
Permit: AWS400142 Owner - Facility: Carole D Edwards Facility Number. 400142
Inspection Date: 0911212012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
r%46— 1.-........ Vac rjn N6 IJF
2& Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report Q ■ Q ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29, At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concem? If yes, contact a regional ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon / Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
IS
Page: 6

E Division of Water Quality
Cl Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400142 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS400142 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Qomoliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 08/10/2011 Entry Time: 08*10 AM Exit Time. 08:40 AM Incident #:
Farm Name: Edwards & Edwards Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Carole D EdwaWs Phone:
Mailing Address: 388 Dailtown Rd _50gw Hill NC 285809740
Physical Address- 713 DailtownRd_ Snow Hill NC 28580,
Facility Status: E Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murghv-Brown LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35*29*55" Longitude: 77°38'33"
NCSR 1327
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment © Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Timothy Brad Burress Operator Certification Number: 24799
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis:
2-21-11 = 2.1 soil tested 2010; remember to pull a sample in 2011
1RR records are complete & balanced out. Time for another waste analysis.
Stocking & mortality records are complete.
Reviewed rainfall & freeboard records.
Caliberation due in 2012. sludge survey due in 2013
Date:
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400142 Owner - Facility: Carole D Edwards
Inspection Date: 08/10/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Waste Structures
Type
Identifier
Facility Number: 400142
Reason for Visit: Routine
Designed Observed
Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon 1 25.00
Page: 2

j ,
Permit: AWS400142 Owner - Facility: Carole D Edwards
Facility Number: 400142
Inspection Date: 08/10/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit:
Routine
Discharges S Stream Impacts
Yes No
NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ EJ
❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑ ❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operafion?
011
❑ ❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than ❑ 11
❑ ❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes No
NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑ ER
❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? ❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.eJ large trees, severe 01100
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
❑ ❑
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
0000
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9_ Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
11000
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No
NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

rj
Permit: AWS400142 Owner - Facility: Carole D Edwards
Facility Number: 400142
Inspection Date: 08/10/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manurelsfudge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type t
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
Q
Q
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
Q 1
D
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
0
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

i
Permit: AWS400142 Owner - Facility: Carole D Edwards Facility Number: 400142
Inspection Date. 08/1012011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Lease Agreements? ❑
Other? ❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑
❑ ❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon ❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? 01000
Page: 5

I
Permit: AWS400142 Owner - Facility: Carole D Edwards Facility Number: 400142
Inspection Date: 08/10/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ @ ❑ ❑
r%*k .. fee-... - Van Nn NA NF
28. Did the facility fail to property dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report ❑ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal'rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ ❑ ❑
Air Quality representative immediately,
34. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge, ❑ ❑ ❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? ❑ q ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon 1 Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
■
Page: 6

0 Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 40Q142 Facility Status: Active _ Permit: AWS400142 -_ ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: ComplianceCgmpliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene Region: Washinatgn
Date of Visit: .111051201Q Entry Time. 12:10,PV,L_ Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Edwards & EwardsFaim Owner Email:
Owner: Carole D Edwards Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 388 Dailtown Rd Snow Hill NC 285809740
Physical Address: 713 Dgiltown Rd Snow Hill Nr 2§580
Facility Status: Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Mumhy-Broyrr! 4LC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°29'55" Longitude: 77'38'33"
NCSR 1327
Question Areas:
M Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
i Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Timothy Brad Burress Operator Certification Number: 24799
Secondary OICls):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Phone:
On -site representative Brad Burress Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis:
9-10-10 = 1.3
2-5-10 = 1 A
soil tested: 2009 remember to get a test for 2010.
Calib. 2008 due in 2010 SS 2009 due in 2010
Freeboard range: 2-11-10 = 18" to 35" on 9-24-10
Looks Good! Irr records are complete and balanced out
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400142 Owner - Facility: Carole D Edwards
Facility Number: 400142
Inspection Date: 11/03/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 31000
Waste Structures
Current Population
Total Design Capacity: 3,000
Total SSLW: 405,000
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
Page: 2

Permit: AWS400142 Owner - Facility: Carole D Edwards Facility Number: 400142
Inspection Date: 11/0312010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) 110011
C. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a ❑ ■ ❑ Cl
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage $ Treatment
Yes
No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe
❑
■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■ ❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
woo
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
r
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400142 Owner - Facility: Carole 0 Edwards Facility Number: 400142
Inspection Date: 11/03/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? ❑
Total P205? ❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type 1 Com, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2 Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Pasture)
Crop Type 3 Small Grain Cover
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■
❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
■
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■
❑
❑
16. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and hermit readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP? ❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400142 Owner - Facility: Carole D Edwards
Facility Number: 400142
Inspection Date: 11/03/2010 • Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for VisIt: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No NA
NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after> 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)? ❑
■ ❑
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■ ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■ ❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■ ❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400142 Owner - Facility: Carole D Edwards
Inspection Date: 1110312010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
�......--
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Facility Number: 400142
Reason for Visit: Routine
0000
Q ■ ❑ Q
0000
Page: 5

L'
■ Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400142 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS400142 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance In oection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine _ County: Greene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 10/0912009 Entry Time: 10700 AM Exit Time: Incident #:
Faun Name: Edwards & Edwards Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Carole D Edwards _ Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 388 Dailtown Rd _ _ Snow Hill NC 285809740
Physical Address: 71� Dailtown Rd Snow Hill NC 28580
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown, LLC
Location of Farm:
NCSR 1327
Latitude:35°29'55" Longitude:
Question Areas:
Discharges & stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Timothy Brad Burress Operator Certification Number: 24799
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Brad Burress Phone:
On -site representative Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: _
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis:
8-18-09 1.5
1-14-09 1.5
soil tested fall 2008
looks good.
sludge survey 912009 caliberation 2008
Date:
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400142 Owner - Facility: Carole D Edwards Facility Number: 400142
Inspection Date: 1010912009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity
Current Population
Swine
❑ Swine - Feeder to Finish 3,000
Total Design Capacity: 3,000
Total SSLW: 405,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier
Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
Page: 2

0
Permit: AWS400142 Owner - Facility: Carole D Edwards Facility Number : 400142
Inspection Date: 10/09/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for VisIt: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) 11000
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes No NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑ ■ ❑
Cl
If yes, is waste level into structural Freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe
❑ ■ ❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ 000
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑ 01111
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑ ■ ❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑ ■ ❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400142 Owner - Facility: Carole D Edwards
Inspection Date: 10/0912009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400142
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA
NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Com, Wheat,
Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Pasture)
Crop Type 3
Small Grain
Overseed
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of property operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
20, Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400142 Owner - Facility: Carole D Edwards
Inspection Date: 10/09/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Records and Documents
Checklists?
Design?
Maps?
Other?
21, Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Facility Number: 400142
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
❑■❑❑
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stacking?
❑
Annual Certification Fomn (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑ ■
❑
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑
❑
26, Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ ■
❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes No
NA
NE
28, Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑ ■
❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

v
Permit: AWS400142 Owner- Facility: Carole D Edwards Facility Number: 400142
Inspection Date: 10/09/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
32. Did ReviewertInspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

0 Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400142 Facility Status: Active _ _ Permit: 6tLFA00142 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 09/11/2008 Entry Time:03:00_FM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Edwards & Edwards Farm Owner Email:
Owner. Carole D Edwards Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 388 Dailtown Rd Snow Hill NC 285809740
Physical Address: 738 Dailtown Rd _ _ _ Snow Hill NC 28580
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Premium Standard Farms Of North Carolina Inc
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35'30'00" Longitude: 77"38'30"
NCSR 1327
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Timothy Brad Burress Operator Certification Number. 24799
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Brad Burress Phone:
On -site representative Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis:
6-10-08 = 2.3
soil test current
Remember to do the sludge survey & caliberation in 2008.
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400142 Owner - Facility: Carole D Edwards Facility Number: 400142
Inspection Date: 09/11/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 3,000 3,025
Total Design Capacity: 3,000
Total SSLW: 405,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Data Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
[,g,on 1 31.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWS400142 Owner - Facility: Carole D Edwards Facility Number: 400142
Inspection Date: 09/11/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream ImpaactS
Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was oonveyanc:e man-made?
❑ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ■ ❑ Q
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ ■ Q ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes No NA NE
a. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑ ■ Q ❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400142 Owner - Facility: Carole D Edwards
Facility Number: 400142
Inspection Date: 09111/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay, Pasture)
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■
❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑ ■
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■
❑
Cl
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA
NE
M Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400142 Owner - Facility: Carole D Edwards
Facility Number : 400142
Inspection Date: 09/11/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No NA NE
Cheddisis?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? ❑
IN ❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
Other Issues
Yes
No NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-complianoe of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400142 Owner - Facility: Carole D Edwards
Facility Number: 400142
Inspection Date: 09/11/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewerlinspector fail to discuss reviewfinspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

S
E Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400142 Facility Status: Active _ Permit: AWS400142 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene Region: Washington_
Date of Visit: 09/18/2007 Entry Time:01:30 PML_ Exlt Time:
Farm Name: Edwards & Edwards Farm
Owner: Carole D 50wards
Incident #:
Owner Email:
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 388 Dailfgw1i Rd Snow Mill NC 285609740
Physical Address: 7N Dailtown Snow Hill NQ?8580 _
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm:
NCSR 1327
Latitude:35°30'00" Longitude: 77"38'30"
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Timothy Brad Burress Operator Certification Number: 24799
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On -site representative Phone:
24 hour contact name Brad Burress Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: -.-..-
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis:
4-24-07 = 2.0
1-24-07 = 2.0
Soil test 11-2006 Don't forget 2007 soil test
sludge was removed in 2006
Looks good!
Date:
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400142 Owner - Facility: Carole D Edwards Facility Number: 400142
Inspection Date: 09/18/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 3,000 2,600
Total Design Capacity: 3,000
Total SSLW: 405,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon 1 36.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWS400142 Owner - Facility: Carole D Edwards Facility Number; 400142
Inspection Date: 09118/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Im acts
Yes
No NA
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
■ ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
■ ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■ ❑
❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■ ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■ ❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■ ❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
❑
■ ❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■ ❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■ ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■ ❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet slacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■ ❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
Cl
■ ❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400142 Owner - Facility: Carole D Edwards
Inspection Date: 09/18/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number : 400142
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No
NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fall to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■
❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit:-."MS400142 Owner - Facility: Carole D Edwards
Facility Number: 400142
Inspection Date: 09/18/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
Cl
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)? Cl ■
❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Other Issues
Yes No
NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compiiance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30, At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concem? If yes, contact a regional Air 11000
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400142 Owner - Facility: Carole D Edwards
Facility Number: 400142
Inspection Date: 09118/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewfinspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

0 Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400142 Facility Status: Active Permit: NCU40142 Q Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: GCeene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 02/21/2006 Entry Time:03:40 PM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Eftards & Qtyards Farr Owner Email:
Owner: Carole Q Eftard2 Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 388 Dailtown Rd Snow Hill NC 285809740
Physical Address -
Facility Status: N Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35'30'00" Longitude: 77°38'30"
NCSR 1327
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Timothy Brad Burress Operator Certification Number: 24799
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On -site representative Brad Burress Phone:
24 hour contact name Brad Burress Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste analyses:
1-23-06 = 2.0
8-15-06 = 1.4
4-11-06 = 2.2
2-16-06 = 2.7
8-24-05 Soil test
Page: 1

Permit: NCA240142 Owner - Facility: Carole D Edwards Facility Number: 400142
Inspection Date: 02/21/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
swine - Feeder to Finish 3,060 2,000
Total Design Capacity: 3,000
Total SSLW: 405,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon 1 27.00
Page: 2

Permit: NCA240142 Owner - Facility: Carole D Edwards Facility Number: 400142
Inspection Date: 02/21/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system?'(if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
11000
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
0000
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
001111
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

Permit: NCA240142 Owner - Facility: Carole D Edwards
Facility Number: 400142
Inspection Date: 02/21/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■
❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
0000
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
■
❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■
❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■
❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■
❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: NCA240142 Owner - Facility: Carole D Edwards Facility Number: 400142
Inspection Date: 02/21/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design?
Maps?
Other?
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? ❑
■
❑
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous toss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■
❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? .
❑
■
❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: NCA240142 Owner - Facility: Carole D Edwards Facility Number: 400142
Inspection Date: 02/21/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? 00011
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewfinspection with on -site representative? ❑ ■ 0 O
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? I ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

(Type of Visit OO Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit *Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 40 142 Date of Visit: 2-19-2t1o4 Time: 9 :211
Not Operational Q Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified 0 Conditionally Certified (] Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .............
Farm Name:Edwairds.A.EsiwArds.]Form..•-••--.............. County: G, crate............................................... !'1W.A1RO.......
Owner Name: CArojej?................................ Edwards. .................................................... Phone No:(2,52,j.Z,5S-Z6S-Q............................... .........................
Mailing Address: J.H.Dail.Town.Rud......................................................................... $A.9.W.J ill..>![G....................................................... 28.58.0 .............
Facility Contact: IQsad :.................................. ............................. ...Title:................................................................ Phone No: 7.5-6.7.T�.
Onsite Representative: JDrajd.B.vrress.............................................................................. Integrator:l'1elulipllri�Statictatd.kaR[ni5.t1 )![Q�th...........
Certified Operator:11inQftly-Brad .................... UjArcss..................................... . Operator Certification Number:,Z4 rq ...--------•---.. ....... ............
Location of Farm:
vCSR 1327
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 ' 30 ��� Longitude 77 ' 38 3t1 u
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
3000
2826
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer j I ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer In Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 3,000
Total SSLW 405,000
Number of Lagoons 1
Discharees & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaUmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure S Structure 6
Identifier:................................................................................................ ...................................
Freeboard (inches): 20
12112103 Continued

T�
Facility Number: 4U-142 Date of inspection 2-19-2044
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (iel trees, severe erosion, El Yes ®No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or ❑ Yes N No
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes N No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes N No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level ❑ Yes N No
elevation markings?
Waste Apalication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes N No
[]Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Small Grain Overseed
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes N No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes N No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes N No
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid Ievel of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of property within 24 hours? ❑ Yes N No
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ Yes N No
Air Quality representative immediately.
Co to:question #) >✓aplain'any YE5 answers audlor anyrecommendations or arty other comments,
Use drawingsof facility torbetter explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary) ❑Field Copy ® Final Notes
Reviewer/Inspector Name Marlene D.
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: L'lf�c
Date: 3
Continued

Facility Number: 40-142 Date of Inspection 2-19-2Q04
Required
Records & Documents
21.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
®No
22.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(iel WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
®No
23.
Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
IN No
25.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
®No
26.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
® No
27,
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
® No
28.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
® No
29.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP7
❑ Yes
® No
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30.
Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (if no, skip questions 31-35)
® Yes
❑ No
31.
if selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
®No
32.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
® No
33.
Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
❑ Yes
® No
34.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
35.
Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Stocking Form ❑ Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfall ❑ Inspection After 1" Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
12112103

.t
Technical Assistance Site Visit Report
• Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Natural Resources Conservation Service
O Soil and Water Conservation District
O Other...
Facility Number 40 - 142 Date: 1011I03 Time: 1 900 Time On Farm: 55 WARO
Farm Name Edwards & Edwards Farm County Greene Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address 388 Dail Town Road Snow Hill NC 28580
Onsite
Representative Brad Edwards/ Matt Barefoot Integrator 1premium Standard Farms
Type Of Visit Purpose Of Visit
Operation Review
Compliance Inspection (pilot only)
Technical Assistance
Confirmation for Removal
❑ No Animals -Date Last Operated:
❑ Operating below threshold
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse
© Routine
O Response to DWQ/DENR referral
O Response to DSWC/SWCD referral
O Response to complaint/local referral
O Requested by prod ucerfintegrator
O Follow-up
O Emergency
O Other...
Design
Current Design Current
Capacity
Population Capacity Population
[I Wean to Feeder
El
❑ Non -Layer
® Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
3000
2aoa
❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
GENERAL QUESTIONS:
1. Is waste discharging from any part of the operation and reaching surface waters or wetlands? ❑ yes ® no
2. Is there evidence of a past waste discharge from any part of the operation that waste reached
❑ Other
GENERAL QUESTIONS:
1. Is waste discharging from any part of the operation and reaching surface waters or wetlands? ❑ yes ® no
2. Is there evidence of a past waste discharge from any part of the operation that waste reached
❑ yes ® no
surface waters or wetlands?
3. Does any problem pose an immediate threat to the integrity of the waste structure (large trees,
❑ yes ® no
seepage, severe erosion, etc.)?
4. Is there evidence of nitrogen over application, hydraulic overloading or excessive ponding
❑ yes ® no
requiring DWQ notification?
5. Is there evidence of improper dead animal disposal that poses a threat to the environment
❑ yes ® no
and/or public health?
6. Is the waste level within the structural freeboard elevation range for any waste structure?
[]yes ® no
Structure1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Identifier
Level (Inches) 1 39
CROP TYPES Icoastal Bermuda -hay I Ismail grain overseed
SPRAYFIELD
SOIL TYPES Ly NoA
7. What type of technical assistance does the onsite representative feel is needed? (list in comment section)
03/10/03

Facility Number 40 - 142 Date:
10/1/03
PARAMETER
O No assistance provided/requested
❑ 8. Waste spill leaving site
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE Needed
Provided
❑ 9. Waste spill contained on site
25. Waste Plan Revision or Amendment
El
El
10. Level in structural freeboard
26. Waste Plan Conditional Amendment
❑
❑
[111. Level in storm storage
27. Review or Evaluate Waste Plan wlproducer
❑
❑
[112. Waste structure integrity compromised
28. Farms Need (list in comment section)
❑
El
❑ 13. Waste structure needs maintenance
29. Missing Components (list in comments)
❑
❑
❑ 14. Over application >= 10% & 10 lbs.
30. 21i.0200
❑
❑
[115. Over application < 10% or < 10 lbs.
re -certification
❑ 16. Hydraulic overloading
31. Five & Thirty day Plans of Action (PoA)
❑
❑
32. Irrigation record keeping assistance
❑
❑
❑ 17. Deficient irrigation records
[118. Late/missing waste analysis
33. Organ izelcomputerization of records
❑
❑
❑ 19. Late/missing lagoon level records
34. Sludge Evaluation
❑
❑
❑ 20. Late/missing soils analysis
® 21. Crop needs improvement
35. Sludge or Closure Plan
❑
❑
[122. Crop inconsistent with waste plan
36. Sludge removallclosure procedures
❑
❑
37. Waste structure Evaluation
❑
❑
❑ 23. Irrigation maintenance deficiency
[124. Deficient sprayfield conditions
38. Structure Needs Improvement
❑
❑
39. Operation & Maintenance Improvements
❑
❑
40. Marker check/calibration
❑
❑
Regulatory Referrals
41. Site evaluation
❑
❑
❑ Referred to DWQ Date:
42. Irrigation Calibration
❑
❑
❑ Referred to NCDA Date:
Irrigation designlinstallation
El
El
El Other...
43. system
Date:
44. Secure irrigation information (maps, etc.)
❑
❑
LIST IMPROVEMENTS
45. Operating improvements (pull signs, etc.)
❑
❑
MADE BY OPERATION
46. Wettable Acre Determination
❑
❑
1 • installed boaster pump to reduce fresh water to
47. Evaluate WAD certificationlrechecks
❑
❑
48. Crop evaluationlrecommendations
❑
❑
lagoon during clean out
2.
49. Drainage worklevaluation
❑
❑
50. Land shaping, subsoiling, aeration, etc.
51. Runoff control, stormwater diversion, etc.
❑
❑
❑
❑
3
52. Buffer improvements
❑
❑
53. Field measurements(GPS, surveying, etc.)
❑
❑
4.
54. Mortality BMPs
❑
❑
55. Waste operator education (NPDES)
'
56.Operation & maintenance education
❑
❑
57. Record keeping education
❑
❑
6
58. Croplforage management education
❑
❑
59. Soil and/or waste sampling education
❑
❑
03/10/03

Facility Number 40 - 142 Date: 1 10/1103
COMMENTS:
*COC dated April 9, 2003 and on site.
+
*Installed rain break switch on irrigation pump.
Remember to calibrate reel and evaluate lagoon sludge.
Make records available for 5 years.
55. Discussed NPDES and transferring information to new forms.
Soil test dated 2/17/03. Lime applied 1/11/03 amt 11.31 tons receipt in book. Cu and Zn within guidelines.
Waste analysis dated 7/15103 nitrogen is 1.6 Ibs11000 gallons
4/21/03 nitrogen is 1.6 Ibs11000 gallons
2/18/03 nitrogen is 22 Ibs/1000 gallons
8/22/02 nitrogen is 1.0 Ibs11000 gallons
Need to secure new waste analysis for irrigation events after 9/15103 for coastal bermuda fields 6, 7, 8.
lRR2 records are complete.
Lagoon level is recorded weekly with drops in lagoon consistent with irrigation events.
1. Coastal bermuda hay needs to be cut and removed. Weeds in spray field.
Oats to be planted as SIG overseed.
Need to extend discharge pipe into lagoon to prevent erosion on inside dike wall of lagoon.
TECHNICAL. SPECIALIST Martin McLawhorn
SIGNATURE
Date Entered: 1013/03 Entered By: Martin McLawhorn
03/10/03

Type of Visit OO Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit OO Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 40 1.12 Date of Visit: 12-13-2002 Time: 1330
10 Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
El Permitted ® Certified © Conditionally Certified [3Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ............
Farm Name:EdWAtrd&sSt.Ed.W:4ri5.EArm .....................................................................
Owner Name: CarALe.d? ............................... Edeards_............
County: G.rCCztt~...
WA O.......
Phone No:(252).753,-2630.......................................................
Mailing Address: 3R8.DaitTnwAAmd.......................................................................... sho.0K.B.C......................---.---------.............----- 2858Q .............
Facility Contact: ....................:......................................................... Title:..................... Phone No:
Onsite Representative: No Oxte...................... g Pmmi.S�tanAudFaemxst[Aurih...........
..................................................................... Integrator: .um
Certified Operator: W..Sy]u9 D............................... Edytzr s...
Location of Farm:
Operator Certification Number: 20.415 ............................
vCSR 1327 A�
i
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 ° ®' �" Longitude 77 ° 38 ' 30 "
Design Current
,wine Ca aci
❑ Wean to Feeder
N Feeder to Finish 3000
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ soars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Laver 10 Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity. 3,000
Total SSLW 405,000
Number of•Lagot►ns 1 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present
Holding Ponds f Solid Traps 10 No Liquid Waste Managen
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: , ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of Ilse State? (If yes, notih' DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in galimin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
Area 10 Spray Field Area
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes N No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes N No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillwav ❑ Yes ® No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ............................................................................................................................................... .............. ...................... ....................................
Freeboard (inches):..............2S....................... I...........................

05103101
Facility Number: 40-142 Date of Inspection 12-13-20Q2
Continued
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? .
(U any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop"
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail 10 have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis &,soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No
® No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments (refer to question # ):_ Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings -of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary): ❑ Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
nounced inspection by DWQ - Raining at time of review.
rds were not available.
e send the following records to 943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, NC 27889: current waste utilization
imgation records from October 2001 thru present, soil analysis for 2002, waste analysis from October 2001 thru
you have any questions, contact me @ 252-946-6481, ext. 318.
Reviewer/Inspector Name 'Lyn $. Hardiion,
ReviewerlInspectorSignature: f+_ /J, Date: �� j� Z�
b

Type of Visit 0 Compliance Inspection O Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: 615/2t102 Time: 1100
F ........ . ............ . . .. Facility Number 4I1 142 1
0 Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified 0 Conditionally- Certified 13 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Tbreshold: .........................
Farm Name: EdwAtrdaA.) d.lard&.FArm................................................................... county: Gtujar ............................................... W�'ARQ.......
Owner Name: C-arole.D ............................... Xdwards..................................................... Phone No:(252).753,r2610 .......................................................
Mailing Address: 3.Sj)aril..T9vvtt..B0 . .......................................................................... SarRxk Hill.1YC...................................................... 285 0.............
Facility Contact:.............................................................................. Title:...................... ....... Phone No:
......................................................................................
Onsite Representative: JO.rad..Edw.ardslM &de.Chdstemon.
Certified Operator:WAYXIO) ............................... Edwarlh ...............
Location of Farm:
... Integrator: Pry tum.S1w lord.Far=.of1+iafth............
Operator Certification Number: 20.415 .............................
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 ° 3U 0" Longitude 77 ° 386 F-3-0­1u
.
- ...
. De
stgi
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish 3000
Current " ;:.. Design Currents .... Desigo :: Current .:..:.
..
..... Cattle .
v `Pooulation:..:`.Pou[try Capacity Population .. ...Capacity: P6oulatton
3000
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
1
Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
No Liquid Waste M
Dischar jUs & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
e. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2- Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 0 No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes C& No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4_ Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure I Structure 2 Stnicture 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
ldcjili fier:........................................................................
Freeboard (inches): ...............3.8.

05103101
Facility Num her: 40 —142
Date of Inspection 6/5/2002
Continued
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (iel trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6_ Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do anv of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Small Grain Overseed
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management PIan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ic/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23_ Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24_ Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes E No
❑ Yes ® No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes CK No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ® No
© No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
❑ Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
)astal bermuda hay needs to be cut and removed. Coastal bermuda needs to be sprayed for weeds. (Third party)
pall grain overseed was not planted.
,it test dated 4/2/02 lime requirements are > one ton per acre. Lime to be applied in fall. Suggest keeping lime receipts.
aste analysis dated 3/20/02 nitrogen is 1.6 lbs/1000 gallons. Need to secure new waste analysis 60 days before/60 days after irrigation
at. Analysis dated 7/12/01=1.6 lbs/1000 gallons, analysis dated 4/12/01=2.8 lbs/1000 gallons.
Mraulic overload noted on tract 3155 field #4 dated 5/18/02 crop coastal bermuda gallons applied over one acre inch was 237 gallons_
not exceed one acre inch per application as noted in waste plan.
Reviewer/Inspector Name 1VIaRtiaa Mclawhor
Q nvinwn�/rnonnntn� Cinnah•rn• r1 a4n+

05103101 Continued
Facility Number: 40-142 Date of Inspection 1 6/5/2002
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fau(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes H No
[I Yes ®No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
9. There is not a current waste analysis for irrigation events after 9/12/01 on coastal Bermuda. No over application. Need to rebalance
,L,-.
AMeg coastal bermuda from 9/10/01 thru 9/12/01 using waste analysis 1.6 lbs/I000 gallons.
Need to remove small amount of trash from lagoon
Need to extend lagoon discharge pipe to prevent erosion on inside dike wall.

No Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural
Resources
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
David S. Vogel, Director
August 8, 2001
Mr. Carole D. Edwards
388 Dail Town Road
Snow Hill, North Carolina 28580
NFJ .
A••V 7
NCDENF,
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND N.xlRAL RESOURCES
SUBJECT: Operation Review Notice of Referral for
Edwards & Edwards Farm, Facility Number 40-142
Greene County
Dear Mr. Edwards:
On July 31, 2001, an operation review was conducted of Edwards & Edwards Farm,
facility number 40-142, in Greene County. This review, undertaken in accordance with
G.S. 143-215.10D, is one of two routine site visits scheduled for all subject animal
operations in 2001. The Division of Water Quality will conduct a separate compliance
inspection.
During the operation review, the following items were noted:
• Hydraulic overloading on tract 3155, field #2, on 7/21/01. Receiving crop was
Coastal Bermuda Hay. Amount of waste applied was 45,000 gallons/acre.
• Hydraulic overloading on tract 3155, field #8, on 5/5/01. Receiving crop was
Coastal Bermuda Hay. Amount of waste applied was 34,732 gallons/acre.
• Hydraulic overloading on tract 3155, field #9, on 4/2/01. Receiving crop was
Coastal Bermuda Hay. Amount of waste applied was 30,405 gallons/acre.
It was for these reasons that your operation was referred to the Division of Water
Quality for further investigation and possible enforcement action. G.S. 143-215.10E
requires staff from the Division of Soil and Water Conservation to notify the Division of
Water Quality and the owner/operator of these observed violations.
A copy of the operation review is enclosed for your information. Site findings and
recommended corrective actions as discussed are noted in the comment sections.
Please remember that in order for your facility to remain in compliance 'with
environmental regulations, animal waste cannot be discharged into waters of the State,
and the animal waste collection, treatment, storage and disposal systems must be
properly maintained and operated under the responsible charge of a certified operator.
943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, Forth Carolina 27889 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

Mr. Carole D. Edwards
August 8, 2001
Page 2
On behalf of the Division of Soil and Water Conservation, I appreciate your cooperation
with this operation review. Please do not hesitate to contact me at 252-946-6481 ext.
242 if you have any questions, concerns or need additional information
Sincerely,
If
Martin McLawhom
Environmental Specialist II
cc: ✓Lyn Hardison, Division of Water Quality
Chris Bordeaux, Greene Soil & Water Conservation District
David Moore, Premium Standard
Carroll Pierce, Division of Soil & Water Conservation
DSWC — WaRO Files
943 Washington Square Mail, Washington, North Carolina 27889 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
(Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 40 I42 Date of Visit: 7/3]/2{t131 'Erne: Soo Printed on: 8/8/2001
NNot Operational Q Below Threshold
M Permitted ® Certified © Conditionally Certified ©Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:.........................
FarmName: ................................................................... County: Guam ............................................... W.ARO .......
Owner Name: CUrple.d?................................ E.dw.ar'&.................................................... Phone No: { JLZS. -2�� i1................................... -...................
Mailing Address: 355.Dail.TQ.1xx1.RQA d......................................................................... S1no�4'.k iA..[C....................................................... 28.580..............
Facility Contact: .............................................................................. Title. Phone No:
Onsite Representative: Bxaid.Ru.txess........................ ....... Integrator: Premluxu.S.toutdArd........................ ............................................... .....................
Certified Operator:.WAyoig.................................... Edwards .......................................... Operator Certification Number:aQ�S.............
Location of Farm:
VCSR 1327
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 • 30 Longitude 77 • 38 ' 30
Design Current
Swine Capacity Ponulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
3000
3000
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design, Current Design. Current,
Poultry . Ca aci Population . Cattle Ca paci Population'
❑ Layer I I J[3 Dairy
❑ Non -Layer I 1 10 Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 3,000
Total SSLW 405,000
Number of Lagoons 1 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes ®No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gat/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes ®No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway El Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: .................................................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): 31
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: 40-142 Date of Inspection 7/31/2001 Printed on: 8/8/2001
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenancelimprovement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelimprovement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenancelimprovement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN N Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Small Grain Overseed
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
N Yes ❑ No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes N No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes N No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes N No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes N No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
[3 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments (refer to question #) Explain an YES.aiiswers and/or. any': recommendations or -an ;>
ether comments ::
Use drawings of facility to:bet<erexplain situatiaas: (use ad"ditignal pages as neces�) Field Copy Final Notes
Notes
*Soil test dated 3/5/01. Sample 01 requires 1.1 tons lime per acre. Need to follow lime requirements and suggest keeping lime receipts.
+
*Waste analysis dated 7/12/01 nitrogen is 1.6 lbs/1000 gallons
4/12/01 nitrogen is 2.81bs/1000 gallons
*Discussed 1RR2 / waste schedule.
*Lagoon level is being recorded weekly as required by permit.
T
Reviewer/Inspector Name Martin McL wh rn
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: - Date:
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: 40-142 Date of Inspection 7/31/2001 Printed on: 8/8/2001
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge attor below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during Iand application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not Iocated near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e_ broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
AdditionalComments-and/or Drawings
p
11. Hydraulic overloading - tract 3155 field #2 date 7121101. Amount of waste applied per acre from IRR2 calculations was 45,000
gallons per acre. Receiving crop was coastal bermuda hay. Tract 3155 field #8 date 5/05/01 amount of waste applied per acre from
IRR2 calculations was 34,732 gallons per acre. Receiving crop was coastal Bermuda bay. Tract 3155 field #9 date 4/02101. Amount
of waste applied per acre from IRR2 calculations was 30,405 gallon per acre. Receiving crop was coastal bermuda hay. Notice of
Referral to DWQ. Waste plan specifies that max. amount of waste applied per acre inch is 27,154 gallons.
Suggest having irrigation system calibrated by tech. spec. Need to increase reel speed to prevent hydraulic overloading.
*Coastal fields have been sprayed for weeds and appear in good condition.
J
05103101

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and
Natural Resources
Washington Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Govemor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
N.CDENFt
NpRTi--I CA c)&.iNA DF-F'AR-rmP-N-r OE
ENvimcO JMENT ANp NATURAL_ RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
October 6, 1998
Mr. Carole Edwards
Edwards & Edwards Farm
Rt. 1, Box 240
Snow Hill, NC 28580
SUBJECT: Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
Edwards & Edwards Farm
Fac. No. 40-142
Greene County
Dear Mr. Edwards:
On June 25, 1998, I conducted an Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection at the
referenced facility. Overall, the operation was found to be in satisfactory condition. A
copy of the inspection report is attached for your review.
In general, this inspection includes verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified Animal
Waste Management Plan (CAWMP); (2) the farm is complying with requirements of the
State Rules 15 NCAC 21-1.0217, Senate Bill 1217, and the Certified Animal Waste
Management Plan; (3) the farm operation's waste management system is being operated
properly under the direction of a Certified Operator, (4) the required records are being
kept; (5) there are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or runoff.
The recommendations and/or comments regarding your inspection can be found in the
comment section of the attached inspection form. It is very important as the owner and
Operator in Charge that you address any noted concerns, as soon as possible. For
assistance, please contact your Technical Specialist and/or the local Soil & Water
Conservation District Office.
943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, North Carolina 278139
Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

Page 2
Edwards & Edwards Farm
October 6, 1998
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance during the inspection. Should you have
further questions or comments regarding this inspection, do not hesitate to call me at
[phone], ext. 321.
Sincerely,
F, - we "_
Daphne B. Cullom
Environmental Specialist II
cc: Greene County SWCD Office
Mike Regans, Greene County NCCES
Jake Barrow, L.L. Murphrey Company
WaRO

Facility Number late of Inspection
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
p Registered 0 Certified ■ Applied for Permit p Permitted Itj N of Operational iDate Last Operated:
Farm Name: Edv.:a.rdsA.Edwards.Falrm..................................................................... County: Greene WARO
OwnerName: Caxmle.D ............................... Edwards .............................. _.............. ..... Phone No:753.2630...................................................................
Facility Contact: .................................................................... ......Title:............... .......... Phone No:
Mailing Address: RU.Hos.420.......................................................................................... Suox.Hill...N.0 ....................................................... 28S8A... ..........
Onsite Representative: Wzyaie.Edwari ls.................................................................._ Integrator: C.L.Morph.ray..Campany..................................
Certified Operator: W.aytrcM.............................. EdwarAs ........................................... Operator Certification Number:204J.5 ............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude ©0 ®4 �� Longitude ©0 ®' ®µ
13 Wean to Feeder
1111 Feeder to Finish
p Farrow to Wean
17 Farrow to Feeder
p Farrow to Finish
p Gilts
p Boars
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? p Yes ® No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at_ p Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
Yes ® No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes ® No
Yes ® No
©Yes ®No
p Yes ® No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
p Yes N No

ace i y Number: 40-14Z Date of Inspection
S. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
p Yes
® No
Structures (Laloons,Holding Ponds. Flush Pits, etc.)
9. 1s storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
p Yes
N No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5 Structure
6
Identifier: .........._........_._.................................... .....................
Freeboard (ft): 2.5 ft.
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
p Yes
® No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
p Yes
® No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
p Yes
IN No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of ttte structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
p Yes
® No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
p Yes
N No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type Coastal.Bermuda Grass.............Cara kS7.ag:c.&.Grain.)..._..............._......
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? p Yes ® No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Onl
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
p Yes ® No
p Yes ®No
p Yes H No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ®No
p Yes N No
p Yes ® No
p Yes H No
p Yes n No
R .. ovi(F tions.or rrencies•were.nate uti gt 4s v1s1t:. Ton will .reeelve nog FuFf7fier .
Reviewer/Inspector Name Wa
Li:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
._7
i•.
Date: (p _�5 -4Q

Type of Visit compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit 049outine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
1)ateor�'isit. -22 1 Time: 1.3
Facility Number
Not Operational O Below Threshold
"PermittedCertified 0 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: ..........................
� ........:....... � !�? .... -r` `......................... County...... vY e ............... `
-15'3 2d
Owner Name:..........(.. rCi.?CO.�c........ D.:.....i: r................................... Phone No:.................
Facility Contact: ... , r.lt.. .. :4:t.......................Title D I C. Phone No:
Mailing Address: _38$ �.� �ci� �-�?c�3...a.......................................,s�r�!ea:IRA.! ................... ...._........................
Onsite Representative: L?e.............. integrator:.....LL%1�................................................................
..
Certified Operator: „ ............ ....0�.. A y s....................... Operator Certification Number: ,.,. Zoe%„
Location of Farm: -4
Srwt,.7 Lei t1 ?�',0�D
[--]Swine []Poultry []Cattle []Horse Latitude ' 4 ig Longitude ' 0` .6
L
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
3ppa
Z�jg 5
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total-SSLW
Number<vf Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray field Area
K
Holding: Ponds /-Solid'Traps., ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ONo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes Q No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes QNo
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? ktA--
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ff No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes MNo
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes CJINo
01/01/0l Continued

Facility Number: 4tp
Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes RNo
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): •••••-•
.........................................................................................................................................................................I............
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type 4n—1 01 to �• _Xr, � () I '
215 t v p
13. Do the receiving crops! differ with those designated in the Certi
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes ► No
❑ Yes B No
❑ Yes �o
❑ Yes 04�o
❑ Yes i <0
❑ Yes 0
❑ Yes RNo
Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes
[ o
❑ Yes
[ o
❑ Yes
B-No
❑ Yes
[rNo
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
9-No
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
B-No
C
Jamie rock outcrops present?
B%esc:�
No
�Is a water supply well within 250 feet of the sprayfield boundary? ❑ Unknown
Eft*-4No
❑ On -site ❑ Off -site
Required Records & Documents
19.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
[moo
20.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
Erf�o
21.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigad6h_,__freeboard, waste aaalys'is & soil samplt r ports)
❑ Yes
B No
22.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
[ o
23.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
RNo
24.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
B No
25.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
[9'�lo
26. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes B No
27, Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ErNo
Odor Issues
28. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes E3/No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
29. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes [!(No
01/0I/01 Continued

Facility Number: Ctp — it(2_ I Date of Inspection
Printed on. 1/4/2001
30. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
31. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
32. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
33. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
34. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes dNo
❑ Yes I�Yo
❑ Yes Elo
❑ Yes [3io
❑ Yes ❑ No
10 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
��
t,0&4X P 10,-,, zo--oa
o,- -,_.,
4
L-*A( h
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
❑ Final Notes
p-r-
Date: 3 -22_ 0 1
01/01/01

OR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WASHINGTON REGIONAL OFFICE
August 16, 2000
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Carole Edwards
Route 1, Box 420
Snow Hill, North Carolina 28580
SUBJECT: Notice of Deficiency
Animal Feedlot Operation Compliance Inspection
Edwards & Edwards Farm
Facility No. 40-142
Greene County
Dear Mr. Edwards:
On May 26.2000,1 conducted an Animal Feedlot Operation Compliance Inspection at the Edwards &
Edwards harm in Greene County. A copy of the inspection report is attached for your review.
In general, this inspection included verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan (CAWMP) and the General Permit; (2) the farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15
NCAC 2H.0217, Senate Bill 1217, the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan and the General Permit;
(3) the farm operation's waste management system is being operated properly under the direction of a
Certified Operator; (4) the required records are being kept; (5) there are no signs of seepage, erosion.,
and/or runo$ The following deficiencies were observed during the inspection
➢ Your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan records did not include a soil analysis for 1999. In
Section IIL Monitoring and Reporting Requirements, item number 3 of the General Permit it is a
requirement that a soil analysis be collected annually an each application field receiving animal waste.
Further, Section EL Operation and Maintenance Requirements, item number 3 requires that lime be
applied, as needed, to maintain soil pH in the optimum range for crop production. This information is
received from your annual soil analysis.
It is very important as the owner and the Operator in Charge that you resolve these aforementioned
deficiencies and any other problems that may arise, as soon as possible. Nothing in this letter should be
taken as absolving this facility of the responsibility and liability of any violations that have resulted or
may result from these deficiencies.
Thank you for your 000peratian and assistance during the inspection Should you have further questions
or comments regarding this inspection, do not hesitate to call at [phone], ext. 321.
Sincerely, ��j (]
r • �x� ,
Daphne B. Cullom
Environmental Specialist
cc: Greene County SWCD Office
DSWGWaRO
Compliance Group
WaRO — Animal Compliance
943 WASHINGTON SQUARE MALL, WASHINGTON, [NORTH CAROLINA 27698
• PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
E AN QUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

a
��¢.+7r"�.�$C�Si�s�-...,tr �� 0� .ya�r �� a��"� .a - �� T��.u. �• cr � V��'
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 40 142 Date of Visit: 5C16C1000 Time: 11:30 AM Printed on: 5/3012000
0 Not Operational O Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified 0 Conditionally Certified D Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: - _ _�........ .
Farm Name: Edwgjrj1i.!&..EdWaLrd&.karja.................... ................. County: Greette.................................. ......... .. W1i �?_....
Owner Name: CaK>ale.A............... .............. dt7a�cls------..............---._.._...............------ Phone No:
FacilityContact: ................................._•---......Title:......................----............................._..---... Phone No: ............. ..... .... ... ......................
Mailing Address: R.t.j..B.RX 42.Q ............................... ....... SA! W Tfilj..NC............_......... 26550 .... - ..
.................................................... ....................
Onsite Representative: BXa.d.B.urrms.............................................................................. Integrator: L.L.XuXA1 rrry...CQ�............... ...............................
Certified Operator:}?yaXAe.l? ............................... EJjjyAtrdj .......................................... Operator Certification Number:ZQ.4 5....---.......----...........
Location of Farm:
® Swine El Poultry ❑ Cattle El Horse Latitude 35 • 30 1 �� Longitude 77 • 38 ° 30
- Desk - Current
m' Swine h Capadty Po a7atis
L`
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish 3000 3000
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
Ly- ❑ Boars
1
Design Current
4-You lltry is -•Ca� =�Po' ulation'. Catae = -Ca
Y ❑Layer ,� ❑Dairy.
❑Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑Other -� ���' , ' y:';
w� Total Des Capacrty
' TotaI.SSLW°�
Subsurface Drains Present JJ© Lagoon Area Jp Spray Field Area
No Liquid Waste Management System. = `
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed. from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes ®No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes IN No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier. _.,. _.- _ -- ---------- -....-------- ..._ - _.... _._ .. __ _. _.....
Freeboard (inches): 32

4 Continued on back
Facility Number: 40-142 Date of Inspection 5/26/2000 Printed on: 5/30/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
® No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
®No
]I. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
® No
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda Small Grain Overseed
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
®No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
®No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
19 No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ® Yes ❑ No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes ®No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ® No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes ® No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes ®No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes 19 No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ® No
� •violatiofis"off deficiencies •wer"e "noted-diiti©g• this visit: ' Y oti wit 'receive inb igrtheir '
correspoudence about this:visit.:: ::::::::::......... ....::: .....
ew 1/2000 waste utilization plan amended to add additional acreage for wettable acres. Plan is for
oastal Bermuda (hay) with overseed.
taste analysis 2/2000; waiting for current sample results to update irrigation records with current
trogen balance; no overapplication noted in records.
oil analysis for.1999 not in records; obtain a copy from local S&W District or CES.
NOD will be sent due to soil analysis.
Reviewer/Inspector Name
n.._. -7 -a"7-nr,

Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
Facility Number: 40-142 Date of Inspection 1 5/26/2000 Printed on: 5/30/2000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ®No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanenthemporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No

Division of Noll and water t=onservatton - uperanon Review
p Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Compliance Inspection
p Division of Water Quality - Compliance Inspection
p Other Agency - Operation Review
19 Routine 0 Complaint p Follow-up of DWQ inspection p Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Facilitv Number Date of Inspection
5/14/99
'Time of Inspection ® 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Permitted E Certified p Conditionally Certified p Registered in Not ZIperatrona Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: FAwards..&.Edkva:rds.Earm..................................................................... County: Greene WARD
Owner Name: Carole.D. .............................. Edwards .................................................... Phone No:'4252.)..7.53-200..................................................
Facilitv Contact: ....................................................... ....Title: .......... Phone No:
MailingAddress: Rt.l..l ox..4.21t.......................................................................................... Snow.Hitt.NC....................................................... Z8580....... -
Onsite Representative: WAytm.Etd.warJs....................................................................... Integrator, L.L..Mmrphrey..Campany............................
Certified Operator: W. Ay lx.L? ............................. Ed.w.ar.ds .......................................... Operator Certification Number:211415 .......................
Location of Farm:
Latitude ©� ®� &4 Longitude ©• ®I =11
4--t aernn nrran* aCrbn nrrranl
Swine Capacity Population
13 Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
13 Farrow to Wean
13 Farrow to Feeder
13 Farrow to Finis
p Gilts
p Boars
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
p Layer I 1p airy
p Non -Layer p Non -Dairy
p Other
Total Design Capacity 3,000
Total SSLW 405,000
Number of Lagoons 0 0 u sur ace Drains Present rea jr3 Spray Meld Area
Holding Ponds I Solid Traps 113 No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. if discharge is observed.. was the conveyance man-made? p Yes p No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) Yes p No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/miry?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes p No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? I] Yes ® N4
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? p Spillway Yes ® Ni
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): ...............S0............................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (iel trees, severe erosion,
3/23/99 seepage, etc.)
p Yes ® No
Continued on hi,

Facility Number: 40- 142 Dale of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? - p Yes N No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? 13 Yes N No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? p Yes ® N
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? p Yes N No
Waste AoPlication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? p Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? p Excessive Ponding p PAN p Yes ® No
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Small Grain Overseed
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? N Yes p NF
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? p Yes N No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ® Yes p No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre'determination?
p Yes
N No
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
N Yes
p NS
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
p Yes
® No
Required
Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
p Yes
®N,
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
p Yes
® No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
p Yes
® N,
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
p Yes
® No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
p Yes
N N4
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
p Yes
® N"
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
p Yes
® No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
p Yes
® No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
® Yes
p N(,
a No.vitirations:or.-ieficielacies.were io'tedl -dlirilig 46s visit.' Non. will _receive, na farthe'r.:.: .
. .Coir6S �deki Ooitf this. visit.. ............ .
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
Recommend signing up for local Neuse Rule option by 8/1/99 with the Greene Soil & Water Conservation District
Given Integrator Registration card
Waste sample dated 3/5/99 at 2.4 Ibs/1000 gal. Soil sample report dated 11/6/98 - lime applied —May 1, 1999
Keeping lagoon level records as required by General permit
3. Mr. Edwards applied waste to wheat field which is not included in plan. When waste plan is revised for wettable acres, need to
iclude corn & wheat fields owned by Mr. Edwards if waste is to be applied to these same fields. No over application has occurred.
4b. Operation unable to meet 75% rule for all fields and will require a wettable acres determination. Once wetted acres are
etermined, waste plan will need to be revised (see 913 & #25). Mr. Edwards has additional acreage.
IReviewer/inspector Name Pat Hooper 252/946-6481
ReviewerlInspector Signature: Date:

Printea on
Facility Number: 40_142 Date of Inspection
Odor Is.5uc.s
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below p Yes p Nc•
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? p Yes p M,
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, p Yes p Nt
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? p Yes p Ni
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) p Yes p No,
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? p Yes p No
32, Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? p Yes p No

p Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Operation Review
p Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Compliance Inspection
Division of Water Quality - Compliance Inspection
p Other Agency - Operation Review
le Kounne p complamt p Pollow-up of uwq inspection p Pollow-up of Intw1u review p Vtner
Facility Number hale of Inspection
Time of Inspection � 24 hr. (hh:mm)
p Permitted p Certified p Conditionally Certified p Registered Io Not Operatrona Date Last Operated:
Farm Name. Edward,&.Edwaxrds.Falrm..................................................................... County: Greene WARO
Owner Name: Carole.D................................ Edwards .................................................... Phone No:(252)..7.53-.26,30..................................................
Facility Contact: ..........
Title:
Phone No:
MailingAddress: Rt.1R0.:A2II.......................................................................................... SKLow.HilL.N.0 ....................................................... 285$Q........
Onsite Representative: Waytire.Erdwa3rrds....................................................................... Integrator: l. L.Mucpihrey.Ca...........................................
Certified Operator:W zyn:e.D.,.........
Location of Farm:
Latitude
ac�tan u
Edwards ........................................... Operator Certification Number:20415...................
Swine Capacity Population
p Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
13 Farrow to Wean
p Farrow to Feeder
p Farrow to Finish
p Gilts
p Boars
Longitude ©• ®1
Design current Design current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
p Layer p Dairy
p Non -Layer 1 13 on- airy
p Other
Total Design Capacity 3,000
Total SSLW 405,000
Number of Lagoons p u sur ace Drains Present JF13Ta9`-10n7rea © Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps JE3 No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? 0 Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed. was the conveyance man-made? p Yes p N
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) Yes N
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes p No,
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes Ig No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? 13 Yes ® No,
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? p Spillway [3 Yes IN No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(inches): ...............34.............................................................................................................................................................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, 17 Yes ® Nu
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on ht,.

Facility Number: 40-142 Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
p Yes
® N,
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
p Yes
® Ni
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
p Yes
® N,
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
p Yes
N N,
Waste A )licatlon
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
N N
11. Is there evidence of over application? p Excessive Ponding p PAN
❑ Yes
ON,,
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Small Grain
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
N Yes
p N
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
p Yes
❑ N.
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ N,
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ Ni
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
® Yes
p Nt•
16. is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
m N,-
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes N N(,
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes m N(
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
p Yes m N(,
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes N N,
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
p Yes N No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
p Yes p No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
p Yes ®N�
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
p Yes N Nc
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes N N,
N.o:viti1itions:or. ddefic�ienci e's.were-guted •during: this :visit.: Your will :receive na filrther.
�orres�b><idence:aboitf#his:visit; .........:::-;.;.:...-;-;-:-:.:.:.:.......... .
Fents(refer to question #}: Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Comments
of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
13. Has applied waste to wheat field that is not in plan. The plan is being revised for wettable acres.
15. Bermuda was not sprigged.
IReviewer/Inspector Name Carl Dunn Entered by Ann Tyndall
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

Printect on
Facility um er: 40_142 Date nC Inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge atlor below p Yes ®N�-
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? p Yes ® N�
28.
Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
p Yes
® Ne
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29.
Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
p Yes
® N,
30.
Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
p Yes
® Ni
31.
Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
p Yes
® N,
32.
Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
p Yes
® Nt,

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and
Natural Resources
Washington Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
.ODE 1�
NO%iT!-k `MiISOLFNtA �EPARTMEIJ7 OF'
ENV3MC)NMMt1Xr AWp NATLiRAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
October 6, 1998_
Mr. Carole Edwards
Edwards & Edwards Farm
Rt. 1, Box 240
Snow ITill, NC 28580
SUBJECT: Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
Edwards & Edwards Farm
Fac. No. 40-142
Greene County
Dear Mr. Edwards:
On June 25, 1998, I conducted an Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection at the
referenced facility. Overall, the operation was found to be in satisfactory condition. A
copy of the inspection report is attached for your review.
In general, this inspection includes verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified Animal
Waste Management Plan (CAWMP); (2) the farm is complying with requirements of the
State Rules 15 NCAC 2H.0217, Senate Bill 1217, and the Certified Animal Waste
Management Plan; (3) the farm operation's waste management system is being operated
properly under the direction of a Certified Operator, (4) the required records are being
kept; (5) there are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or runoff.
The recommendations and/or comments regarding your inspection can be found in the
comment section of the attached inspection form. It is very important as the owner and
Operator in Charge that you address any noted concerns, as soon as possible. For
assistance, please contact your Technical Specialist and/or the local Soil & Water
Conservation District Office.
943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, North Carolina 27889
Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

Page 2
Edwards & Edwards Farm
October 6, 1998
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance during the inspection. Should you have
fiirther questions or comments regarding this inspection, do not hesitate to call me at
[phone], ext. 321.
Sincerely,
Daphne B. Cullom
Environmental Specialist II
cc: Greene County SWCD Office
Mike Regans, Greene County NCCES
Jake Barrow, L.L. Murphrey Company
WaRO

4�
Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
p" Registered E Certified 0 Applied for Permit p Permitted Ia Not Operattona Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: Ed`xardsAEdyvalrxdsXarj L.................................................................... County: Greene WARO
OwnerName: Carole.D ............................... Edwards .................................................... Phone No: .7.5.3-263A...................................................................
Facility Contact: ...............................................................................Title: ..... Phone No:
Mailing Address:Rt.1.Bos.!I211 .......................................................................................... SELow..Hill...N.0 ....................................................... zs.58.Q ..............
Onsite Representative:Wzyac.Edwa7rAs....................................................................... Integrator: E.L.Murphrey.Company..................................
Certified Operator: W,ayne.D ............................. Ldwar& .......................................... Operator Certification Number:211415.............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude ©r ®� �_� Longitude
p Wean to Feeder
® F ee er to F mts
p P arrow to Wean
p Farrow to Feeder
p Farrow to Finish
p Gilts
p Boars
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? p Yes ® No
2. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at_ p Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
p Yes ® No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes N No
p Yes N No
p Yes ® No
p Yes R No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
p Yes ® No

act ity Number: 40_14Z Date of Inspection
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? p Yes ig No
Structures (La2oons,Holding Ponds, Flush Pits, etc_)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? p Yes H No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: _.�--•.......................................................................... ....... ...... -......... ............ .......... _...........
Freeboard (ft): 2.5 ft.
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? p Yes ® No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? p Yes H No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type _._..Coastal.B=muda.Grass............ Lom4Silage.&.Grain)............................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (A WMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
Q. - o-vjQ ons.or erencies-were.note tlringt is visit:. un .reeeive no rt er. .
. . . . . . . . . . € moot X#i5•i'. . .
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes H No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes p No
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
L
7�' Jn
­'�7 4t"t;��
=is - CLIM
e§ P,%—
Date:

0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation [3Other Agency
ivision of Water Quality
1WRoutinc 0 Complaint O Follow-up (if I)WO inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Date of Inspection
Facility Number
Time of Inspection® 24 hr. (hh:mm)
0 Registered M'Certifted [3 Applied for Permit [] Permitted 0 not Opera Date Last Operated:...
Farm Name: . v4?C7�1�& �' 1rR 1............... County:.G-.+2i� — ............................
Owner Name ...... Qa t6d k. A ne No:... !. .'_.....................................
Facility Contact: ........... ... �&kJ;> [,5..... Title: ........ O.W.t1StrA,...................... .. Phone No:
Mailing Address:.. �-�- �...........L? yS ....! �a.......................•-...-----...........---.. ....Jfia.t . `l- .t..� 1 . .:............................ ...
OnsiteRepresentative:... ...... . . Integrator:... VVW ?Y�l�- ...............
. .............................. .................... .... ..........
Certified Operator;.11111,.0 ..... ................. i U .......................... Operator Certification Number:. .!�R.........).t_-> ............
Location of Farm:
y
............f ?....................... L13........3....................................................................................... .--.............. ........................................ ......................... ............... ............... ,
Latitude •.�° 0" Longitude 0• �' �"
Design :Current Design Current Design - Current
Capacity Population Poultry ;. Capacity Population Cattle ii -:Capacity Population
❑ W to Feeder
eeder to Finish
3000
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenancelimprovement? ❑ Yes D o
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes Uk6
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gallmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes- ❑ No
❑ Yes
[] No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
�QXu
W; o
❑ Yes
I/ No
❑ Yes GKO
❑ Yes ;o
Continued on back

Facility Number: qO — NZZ
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes 'o
Structures (Lagoons,11olding Ponds Flush Pits etc.
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes 'o
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
Identi fier:...................................... ................................ .................................... ... ......... I ........ I............. ............
...................................
Freeboard (tt):...........:......... .................................... ................................... .................................... ... ......... ........................
....................................
10.
Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes
: 'o
11.
Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
j Ko
12.
Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
tkY<0
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13.
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes
Waste Application
1.4.
Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
iilo
(if in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State. notify DWQ)
15.
Crop 5`K L'LIXIhJ.s1.4
type ........ ... .................. I.........lua------.........................................---........._......._..............................._.............
16.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AW,MP)?
❑ Yes
E140
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
2 io
18,
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
�Zo
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
13 No
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
19<0
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
BNo
22.
Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
e To
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
01<0
24.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
2<0
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
0 No.violations or &fidencie's.were, noted during this.visit. Aou.will receive no further
- correspondence about this: visit:- : � � : � ' .:. • . - � :.:. .. � .. � :: � : • • : • � • : , � : - .. . � • .
Comments (refer`to question #) Y'Explain any Y:ES;answers and/or anv reconimmdations or any other comments
Use`ilrawings orfacilhy to betfer explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary) � 'S
ol`i" �� OP1 M(lE' C6 ft� 5 ���1(61 �0.� 1J�5� I � ZO�•OvV
�1 �t.✓l� .
Irfi oY1- fe-G-a!rDS
7/25/97
w
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date:

16 rcounne O c;ompiaint O vouow-up of uvvy inspection O ro
Facility Number
p Registered 0 Certified p Applied for Permit C3 Permitted
Farm Name: EdwardsA.EjJwArds.Earns ..............................
0
O
Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection ® 24 hr. (hh:mm)
in Not Operational I Date Last Operated:
I....... County: Greene WARO
Owner Name: Carole.] Edwards........... Waytlt Eid.wArds.................................... Phone No: .7.5..:2fi30...................................................................
Facility Contact: Wayxic.Edwards...........................................Title: owner .................................................. Phone No: 9191.753-16.30 .......................
MailingAddress: Rt.1.Box.! 20.......................................................................................... Sati.w.Bill.-NIC ....................................................... 2858-Q ..............
Onsite Representative: Ways e.Ed.wands,Barian.Shacklnford ............................. Integrator: L.L.Murplrey.Hog.Company.......................
Certified Opera tor:W.ayq,e.D ............................... Edwards.......................................... Operator Certification Number:20415.............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude ©a 4 64 Longitude 46
Design Current Design Current Design current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity .Population :Cattle Capacity.': Population
[3 Wean to Feeder
® Fee3er to Finish
13 Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to ee er
❑ Farrow to Finis
❑ Gilts
p Boars
Number-'of;Lagoons /Holding Ponds Fa sur ace rains resen ❑ agooa rea 13 pray ie rea
m ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System - -
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? p Yes N No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes ®No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes ® No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) 0 Yes ® No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes R No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? 13 Yes B No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes H No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes ® No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? p Yes ® No
7/25/97

ace i y Number: 411_142
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lap-oons,Holdinc Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3
Identifier:
Freeboard (ft): 3.0
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
Structure 4
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
Structure 5 Structure 6
15. Crop type ...... Caasta:l.Her mitda.(hay.�.............. utall-CAMiR.O.Yeirseed....... ...........................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
a. �N,.oyio ions.or aciencies:were.nos 40 this visit; - ua will.receive no, further .:.
tiorresponOuce a Ll� tf#i$ YiSi :.
p Yes N No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes H No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ® No
N Yes p No
p Yes p No
Contments (refer to question 4) Explain any YES answers and/or any reeomfnendations or any other corm_ eats;
Use drawings of facility to iietteeeiplart situations. (use additt6nat pages as necessary): m
o subsurface drainage on site according to Mr. Edwards
1. Need to revise waste utilization plan for a 3000 feeder to finish (current plan is for 2000); need to include 23 required
Pulled waste sample 11/97 - have not received results
Need to pull soil samples for 1997
11 /18/97
jReviewer/Inspector Name Pat ooper M
Reviewer/Inspector Signature. Date:

1� State of North Carolina
it Department of Environment^s �.
and Natural Resources' "
Division of Water Quality
Washington Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
December 19, 1997
Mr. Carole D. Edwards
Edwards & Edwards Farm
Rt. 1, Box 420
Snow Hill, NC 28580
SUBJECT: Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
Edwards & Edwards Farm
Facility No. 40-142
Greene County
Dear Mr. Edwards:
On October 1, 1997, I conducted an animal feedlot operation site inspection at the referenced facility. Overall, the
operation was found to be in satisfactory condition. A copy of the inspection report is attached for your review.
In general, this inspection includes verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
(CAWMP); (2) the farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC 2H.0217, Senate Bill 1217, and
the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan; (3) the farm operation's waste management system is being operated
properly under the direction of a Certified Operator, (4) the required records are being kept; (5) there are no signs of
seepage, erosion, and/or runoff.
The recommendations and/or continents regarding your inspection can be found in the comment section of the attached
inspection form. It is very important as the owner and Operator in Charge that -you address any noted concerns, as soon
as possible. For assistance, please contact your Technical Specialist and/or the local Soil & Water Conservation District
Office.
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance during the inspection. Should you have further questions or
comments regarding this inspection, do not hesitate to call me at [phone], ext. 321.
Sincerely,
Daphne B. Cullom
Environmental Specialist II
CC' Greene County SWCD Office
Mike Regans, Greene County NCCES
Jake Barrow, L.L. Murphrey Hog Company
Wa �
943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, NC 27889 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

I* Kounne p c:ompiaint p roirow-up of vwv inspection p ronow-up of t)Nwc review p utner I
Facility Number Date of inspection
F= I
Time of Inspection � 24 hr. (hh:mm)
p Registered 0 Certified p Applied for Permit p Permitted JU Not peratrona Date East Operated:
Farm Name: Ed.ExardsCounty: Greene WARD
Owner Name: Caroie.D..... ».... »».» » .-._ Edwaub.._-._ ................ ............. » » Phone No: 753�:2(�Q---�- — ».».....»............... ... .
Facility Contact:
Phone No:
Mailing Address: RU.Hox.4211....... »...................... »...... »....... »............................. .......... SIXG.W..Hill.-NC....... ».............................................. 215811..............
Onsite Representative: W.ayy,Eidwzrds...................... .................. .............. ....... Integrator: ULMarplrey.Hng.Company_........ ...............
Certified Operator: �lf�tytm D..» »» _...».... .»» E�#vrcar.....»».». ..._ ».» ..» .... Operator Certification Number:2II415...»........».».»..»....
Location of Farm:
Latitude Longitude ©• ®®u
esign -current
-
Swine - 'Capacity, Population.
p Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to ee er
Farrow to Finish
p Gilts
Boars
_. esign -U-urrent vesign urren
Poultry "Capacity Population Cattle -!Capacity Population
!] Layer an?`
p Non -Layer L JE3 Non -Dairy
Other-
_ Total Design Cavacity 3,000
Total SSLW .405,0
Number of Lagoons I Holding Ponds = u sur ace rains resen gooe rea p pray �e rea
o iquias a —Management system
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon 0 Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
- b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part cf the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. 1s facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
p Yes N No
p Yes ® No
p Yes n No
13 Yes p No
n Yes p No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p-Yes to No
13 Yes N No
p Yes ®No

ac i um er: 40_142
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? p Yes ® No
E Structures (Lagoons,Holdins Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
+� 9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? p Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (fl)- 2.8 ft.
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? p Yes ® No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? p Yes ® No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? p Yes ® No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? p Yes ® No
_Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? p Yes ® No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ...... Grass..........._......____ _..._................... ... ..................... ............ ..... ..... ...............................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? _
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22, Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23: Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
R . o-via ians.or urencies-were.non ring is visit:. on will.receive n� u er .
t:Or1C6OdndeQee RWtit A� -*bih . .
p Yes ® No
13 Yes ®No
13 Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
Waste -
;oil Analysis"= P'laa to sample t}iisFall
Certified atiimal waste management plan need_ s updated waste utilization plan for 3000 head. { `�
_ '� _ ^•
[rogation records.ar+e complete wrth nitrogen balance
The`following`items areconditions ofthe "Certified Animal Waste Management Plan and the general permit4., therefore these items
must be' implemented:
- Keep lagoons/storage ponds free of foretgiidebris including, liuf not limited to tizes,,l ottles, �:lastic products; light bulbs, -gloves,
v.
syringes or a*ty other solids waste: - 725/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name aphne B: Cullom`
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: 11 I-- 6 , P� � Date: I (— 7 f 9 Z

0
i., � m .. •O �'� W t { ,}.J{, '� t li. ! I� •+' s I I' {i, ! is jr ±�'• 1
ra, ( ,r� n+ � ,'�1�: S7 r �y 14' ; to ,`O 1 .; t a sti9. :ijl ` � � }`• i �..4 �s�, , ,.' � s itA ` l yr . �.{" `` .i, �4 � ;I': E ; r'1 fti{�r °,�.Y ! °, € s, '
hS
i,,. `+sf , ,.. ,CS t 1, 71Y�` '1 sa ,;�i 'dY Ar r. alb i y. - , ;St• r ,. lh,r
F},n'.
i9 q4 ��'■. IJ "f , 'r, rob lrt .7,j t. I. �I i I r I, _ •1+
6'MO " r { , I 1 > i {• " , 1r,�i
aia�Q•r !l r y� a} 5.•i'E„'��. •t{ a' fs €:'�" ALA,' !-.iir I,rl t-r' 'rMull fk
,'!. y3`• ;•�[ i,,4 '1 _ , , I yl' !. , i... r -7; )p
,4'• }j.,} :r1, a 0)'1's rl o "1: ;.r [ ;r s f t 1. . r; IrE ., . # qq EI+ ';'ta f{ ,r r � l { , 1 1�' . ,IS r,'w, ! � ,x d, �,,.
�k �, :,^J .e .,i :;Fi •Uj '_' ,: r Y„ ,,e.••• r. !ye .I ;ii+ t{s{ J;" I•. a i {• ''}s ,d.'r{ ,' r ,t'Iwr s. ilri.
`
J ff. i r k t� ;,+ 7j• . }, r lr , y.i r } )e E ' k ; @lt' SI rt�r' i
sy, C05 , �hy>'a'a ,G j, :,'. it >a 1, ',�. ''r 1. {'n" :'}{N ^,�'.',•, Iy! 1 Is ,>I it, r:f t rli .y.4••a } r
lot
�I• k�'.i� '. u' ,.y . { .1 .i:, r, }',£' i,'s'; t t, tt t w�'1'•i + t:•x_ ,s :l� {:- r. {•"'.l Y'SI :i wdF{ , s"" . I �','L'�i•f.- ''i ' 'it '{
�,.3i. ,f', J yr !:',i i, y` yr!" dj : `a .yy if. i. S. r s !h {,.i. ? .,tla!'+I. �Y�1,'t, :i,2',4 , !6r 3�� • r, ;
I i p! f;.'ll >� if' a: h: r, sa.; r 1 i i , "1..1'{ i.. ; J , } p' f. Il
r ,1 1 T:' I '
�=,{ + . [� a � � � {- i+ 'tt•`•. �.+ t I •s} 1 ' !'4y r'�• • • � 1: !-S!" . i, S f (' i 1 i. 4P � j• - i
•^yam' rw s � P3?ar ' 1 r'• �.- �G t I k?'td• Fi.,„
} ,.W -4. w1 + 'r *r ,'L 3',, I:r i�L: , �tkf li`1N 3' „�.'� '�.r� r�•i, I�ti �.r .• '1-i�ii, b,.Y, R �.i1'jl `i, '.4. 'Y•�i 1 •i{.
' J . r_ t { (' tM! 1 i. jf '.ii•-'
r l� "�f', i �i45 •fi; sr � �• 1 :i Iros •.lJ ,� $ ".d' '.,S+l k M,• e s F •7 4` 4 �0 t
{;ts i- Ot ,j; ` it i.• 3 's^, 11 '9' �, y.i; s (a" I�` '' r. ;i. , }r,' , ` t1 t-. 1 L -;i; ,;"r:li rsk S. J € � :.E 1.6 � .T i.` �;'q •'
;i a a+ y� `�t O• _ _ k.� s s_i•+ 1.. � ra e.1 1.,�F al .! ;i F,
'.:n. �' O�lk.,'� tltix, i,-r .-.r ':� '{ ..sr�`;lp, •� 'Ii:3 �:5, ,�, n'I' i:.' :y.v .k k.l t4 +; .j..,s t'd�,�+ Y.�'
1:, a.l.,'4 ,'� � �r•y.. j i 5 p, ,: ', S' 9 ,+ti.:. g r W' Y+1=., f r' I.L- ' HOW �� 1. - 7 .ii r y� • , , Y �• � s- �1�' t��f � '�• I.y ]�.;1 °r'� V
P,.i w.1 O. i S55 I, " yy �, h ;S,e, p ;� ''i ! 3. • r.Tli
:Jr Qiliri °r �1 -t- ,i;![y • +d+_'kf- irr'•'}. b f•'1 r'.I, , {.•I,-
'Aii. Y� fy .{
1: Ct L; t s 4r , 1 t• +'r :r } t r I'M.• hix -r •I;Y d't,' _'•; ::: a R t 1 A J..
.—r;7-' r •1. �r.. , 1 c r ;n+i. i-.� .. r.! ]] 7 f.• a Z
�:r,: �:•i'6- ' N} :►+.r. r 11r i -,� h} i �,:, 1, .r,,.,_s. :�: r .,tr -! ti• ��''r';N ], i (3 t'i .X,, ,-F, '<t.,t1 � 'rA h ; fti "
q ti, yy 2 :O'. p. f,l,n., �Q�• d •,ii• '4 a .r•, .t!' i;i,�:' t�t '""� � :i,�r� t, .t ..i. � 4F.t. ,NY'•t,£K {, .+. ,s � �,�.f !,,},
1 p.F.a' 5 f•77f. 'sS�yf h? ,,fii _4 I-.AS;Ir 'i: nzi'1,_ '.h. .',a r I a! ! t .d'-« -5,.i ;,:. sN'.L, t, 1,• •t �, '
€`�{,{ Ea,a 1S �4'_'le. .4�, ,.l.i s�} •4.Ts� `'.I t „t '.r r„, . r, # ^r.I.-
.i.11'w�'L3 i:.; �•r ,y :.!; I { � r,..U' ;1. q rwa•: S �... �u yi . {;,S Y.t,7+ '�''� "�t ';r',�,�i,Si t s it '�5+ , i
Sp MIN . d: .k '�StR y�• G ' 4i .:j+N' �^ kt�l'i71e.r, # t3 ,.te'{i : J� .�. {Y•:. I�jz,1Fq-`i t+' ° ' { : • �'� ?i +• 11 •1[ ! ���' t "i,:l{ r"r�,, LF�I+�,yR'i+pt PEN"
.� 17a.G:: _' x R • ':.'l• !' { rl ��-.:- , [: •T4;l:I� , �J. • f
_,,i, ,r• :.c X ' i,` ', r } :, x' 1 rr ;si,•+r r
l �t G,.a. 1 } , `3r
'°•y i I.d ; ,Og. '�.;Vii1t`i•. '{ F"• ,ril. F ' •�t•, .1•.+','•y •s.t,,. ,• k 1 { . a 1' { 7 s 1.ir�•d 'i'? S%,�1 .vt s .:lg.i..,�rlt`i 1. ;Y•+j' r
'i".1 L.y� r .4, ., 54, ,•,1:�r �.: • ..n. 7., t,�+t•r ,S, ,:,I�l ,a.,. ,.v,`u +.' ` .f.`] C #
•�1;1.•SW: ��71 : ,' ,!•'� r.:ay.� _' !•,; 'ikrt,kt `,y„r ! -a ,rye'. •1 r, `7Y%.}13,F_#s�'i''i.� i� "S' tt}J r.h,;
P�'{ iv i•ti'r'i ,'7�1."�.ri{ZiFL ef, •f�' 'fig, .;. .1� * {F, ,f. • •.FsS.`- ,`r. 7' l•v�7, I. .E,,,j..i•:,.i��}! �•^tr.,
top,
� ,�'• ti•^ •� "{•_a,f ,�r. ,�. k�3 ,Ir, Yh: # r.k. ]i',. ,P .jk r,' :1 .it,. tr vs•r y
�` 1' l;, [ ;�'•,r,,•r. y
,p :�1�:.i.�r�i.if; r i� r' 'i. t s. X� �(%,•T. [i';,'. s' kts!�'' .['N'
P a /
.ht !`'�".i. • 1rl , Ii t� .s` ) 1.'• ,'� -.'.3' �,:.. r1•'i,4 1; '{., �i' ,q?..5`:�i iy�'i}{;ru .S!:;'I. J r-ti s 3 YS''�.c- Ir .<: fr.. r•.. Si ,,yi► '+YI: t."! s i�,; t� 1, .k, L'S 1•.•l" ,tir'•',,•.'it:Yri 6.-.' ,j it•
ii t iY'1.1„}. •-- rk , ., C.,;`i,;,, 'I, I t,�,+ty, tr a; i t t r} it g ,+ �t t? 4'.;'r i . :�: s, ii-I s r� ttj�. k 4 .!,i.., r{ s ,q: ,:- •wljii+;l kY
7it p1,.1•�{p's,�hf{sg74s g . fry"ji srm.,{..Y._,,. r ,i k+ i I .F,t7j►� i '.itf Y <a ,k
,.H. }•�.,•. iM i- `t ..},., •{s- ttry !.- , }x�} i-'!��,►� -:i' .31.•!
g s. ''f.., �FA'F. C , r,• r !lS 3 `7 r t 2. .! i .•!'
?,e= � L'q ,r i �, 1 St $•,;„ t }.,! ,d r: i. ilj. , : y,i 7 'If', �: r,.l i i ,a`
g ','j 1{a :••^ICE. .'N,�f'�,t 5,%' r 5"..i�i.�l -.>ZjY �.'r s[•.:y,d s 4 JI><Y �1 S. %. l., 3,n5-�"'�"P> �•, }:¢+ �, iL �•- '+�.• ,ty t,; , j,r �I IrL .r }•>. k. .Fr::'
ovumFt Iril'.-t'i j r rif ' t „1 A s i 'S }' F
• ['r,w , i,, ia:} .t4rs,'7 ,J<. .Ri :e�+'t.f [h.. } � .I'Ir:, `' .1, ! ,j�''t ! ! �o,, •, I r r �'' � �_.''�,•. �,��47 tt r •r .
:h. .I* _ :3 ar ';r_• s_ 11 ^I rf 7:-.?. r,,irS ,s {K '1 ?A iG -3r ! '}'i •;J
} rrAA a rV • .� ,r '� a� � . { .+�_- ,�u ,�+►.! }.,� � ,.4 # •.,l,i:t_�jt ; {„ .T+,. t. 1 i t13• • ,1
,.O 0' `I'y.� a�qe .� %1 tr,� . .'4 t Js
'; + It••(r.� p'rT' ,yk 's`.},r z•r> j? :_"."5,,.{{ to -,, r tc -}r s L +:Fy., .+,f,T. ,' J. `'•'A�Ra ' E +!- if'i'!�'' tit'= 'S'. ".x ,i{.
b`.. .s s7'I,,. r4 e., Mks; t^r '°-•, t:`:lrV r�l IifIA,{ ,r.'., ;, r
:i,: t s. t 5 r,.''��r' }} � �L ol.. j r;r :I' � ,r„ 1 1 •n : �.{' ' i �l�i.. ,
P r, {.f . t'C•„ � � W i � •.I., •i.., `, } „1s,1' { IP ��ir:r .�'t��� R,�„�, {p,, I R� i r, i ��: rl�'M k,£ , f• Ii ty. \ I:r�� � ..t-. ' � I Fi' �.t ,�,•. YM '.,,'Yf l,b
��,ryryr,' ,. {{i° ., .'. 1s
`1± 1,�„ .} s}� IF'{'f°'.�,1 j`,rxh #7,i:}.�,;i•S, o:Sri!' dqi „?Sti,: h4tlrl'a i:x '. , l'ie !f, 4' 4,r i > i v: y +• « t p!
?(,;� { 1 r , .ut ■ r .r,. F, • �! ':+I� •rk . �'� r• 't n► . ' I..
,�a ;r''S•';'C1'�� }: �;' t' ,.r3 .i�..S.q,. � ! �•'{'[ _ �'''{' s�3r 1�'r� S'1 ;f.` y a.• 4 5 S• i s'•�a' c,r« ' f,j,a ,•'� lar. 'I .FHj
3:'. rj ., Il.,• :! �! r s F u J,, :tY _I r.. ., r •. a 1, ` t.,i ! {., ik'i �•�' i i C.i• .a,
.a 4 .ILA 'N t vi ', Iy rt r, ,7 1l. _ii r t A,].,. ,}�• a Jt :rt .eit 1 S:.L ii f�i!„r , r
l.fy� �'• nS.Z:} .,� •q,• ;:b {: •"rl: 'I,liy} ,•�','•,;♦{ 'c.lk.'�,} �:}. e�. x{[,+�GI' atr +`+ {% }+ hrtl.:l Ft a + � }. �'• t.r•":t�' ti~r ;Ji >.ri• %,hS< 1 i
,£:; ,�'r.�•'�, , n I:@, n' I,r ', x,�,r �. ! •,,,r.a^ ,•a.'e�,r. ,'4.R'�tt ,1• "I:; ys4'is, �;, •!,�',��ri��+' i+.�r.l� ,'r}r~,, .?.�},� R . it#i..-•!
`t, ,,,� "S t,` jj'f •I� •*{ls .,•# I �Y 'I,r `� 1>{�' 1 r,Y,l. 7• +} :'r'f. IJ ,.r• -:4t y° r, 1. q ri :! r. ! i,.Y,=iyt. ..r.},a14
'.'F, R, N`"a' .'151�19'•' i,�s.3. 'R�1{}' t (•rt:1� f,,i,p„}}b:4• s'{`;.RYy'.,,11-t4'I'�. qq':Yek'aih45 S` r,',��1:,4•,
! ' i'' -d •pp ` }'.o i�? !': I I',�-,£ ,'�.�,� ••ii i6,A-y-i 7'bd+.lF • a i h F .r A�i' . rif;JS : C {I.i' ,-iP,- s t t.ih la;,' xtni �aV�_•\i 9 � Ci �a, �. _ ,++;t '+:.� �',. "r�i � i
Vq ((II �j +s: '•r. i1t •2". �j:+' 't"L. tea: ,' :r Y r;' �1 •,r• r: r c at,t! y ' }r f; yr r .fir
_, 1�.. I' .fin. '� + :Fj. i. ,r •1.*lei 2.;y; ,-H 1t �.r {,�!.. I'y �; I�N•.•�>'t �;'�,5�< ,,r .r'',E.+i .!.:: i. 3 {r;ia�7'I t.YT`t:r}rE i::l; n'f��l+'+,V Y:
'.}C1 r: r.s ,i+ .r r- .•i�+ st b 7 .� -, �ldt:' it �t"^'w� �{ i�: , �. ''s , s .e Ss. 9ir• ,1`S yf. i••'�rij�t-'r ' t•� 1, , ps .� '� :�-J ii' .! ,•r' :k.p ,t.i ;ir.'•vl'... 1�1'{, r,X'P[ 1 r. #., 4,r') J+ y •:1: {. ;i4. ✓ ��rz :lt'':,3 , ;�- ;na3. £!T. li :.r. #[x,r, y", ,t_ ti 'E'', si j.,l :i.,ki.. r,1. SE j7 `•-.-" e�i :sd-- F ,irYf .rp,,j�t! r. 6.,' n1, :`
Y, }. F•!rp1yl-n'Q sL:i yr iS1F r:f,,.�,y^h9< k' , f. ,6 .Y »i7 e. i',t I -i� [}{.i+l,i. 4',1 R;'„t 'r' 1'+ .ErS •J7 sp e Ylly' ;� , ,f
-� O .,/. �. ' 1 X i, v 1 �_ .i !Y• i. 1 r, �� -, li, 1 ."Mod
''« r,'S p I[,�S
.F, (rr' ' F� y,,'r ,{il '�1 q ••3•�i',y` �% t'�,_i•,�' „ y Yi!- b e ,¢[}. I {, �1k rrl •1 ,y F;'
,i.'J' "•la }�11r. .,• ,ri! +'W �'••Va 4, ~r-,.t i',ii""'?ii k.<rii, :l�iq g: •te..'''t i': 1 r �yj �'• t`r;, l.,e'•[,.�.t , Tor .o; t,]C .sti'•;, ,'i. I: �:+
�+ '. o- • 3a s ti .s / +• t r ,i�t•{'s a +,l 'd�+?,r �.n �,, '. * 1 �I' s•; 3' Y, J(rtt r ,M1 ,t s,t
,9, .r i +■..
l ; r NOW
: 'S7:J ,r ! s r ,ej�• +. rii? '�'�' !6 F•_�zi:'R�':5: } #�.•fit r. "�, "�lf
Omp A Pk�� q � 6 ! '1 t�i' ;1`r.� '11 ,i ,} • i .I. `� ;� i ( 4 " }; ;� ` +,:. '� 'tQl7 ic'. I 1 �f ,1 k'
t: $. �•1, ..O r'i �£F,1,'i,� '�{ ^I %St:' i, c 11Y"' t{'�1 -� 1 i,, '{3 I'y S.ly J f'r. b�' I '9 ,i �iv� � J.}r �'^I �' '�'51'. �r:-. ,�. �.'t.\rr l f �,. i+.� (},sr 15 �i' i�:7;�� 1. i
, sr�r-.- k "i� 1: {u 1• is uis -..1 k 2 , + i r ' �4 S I, . Y:, t+l: 'r ,
:n� I .!.- 3' ,,1 ' I. y P Jr , "1rsl. ,'{ -, •,. f•. nS� r}i+ !i 1 y.`r,.}l. i rt`
iri: Fd �1 '•QX ,•' [. .{ tr ,i. R� :A :!1 '�;f,;.k rt{, Yr yi ta, nll' F 1 •i ,�.13. •• I,1' �F::� t„} EiYr4 i. .i r:iL .:'! �t. :ti' V S•
rr , JJl! .,� •Y, Jr „ � !•'}+�s ��+"+ - :'s -6!�3. t .,t.1 � .E. 1 4: i,: :'rL,k ..iiu ,5-.:•
. ,. �. {4� (.. !�{ i'rr' S q �C � ;y, S,A 't ,'1, .I 1 'r, '�' r. •1'•r t.' :JI �''
•�}'' �:-• ii •k t. �4r yi �et• a] ,i�i;, ! fr r.� G s �:�. •' i1, .n :..i,• :a S-.7'r. r i ,e 1,.. yfTT' ir: z ]dt 1 ,+;11»,��12A' r= �!•[n ��`jtC�'n{rr . • 1
err 4 !r I, i}t+{%. ps# '+ pl
'e'ti ,1. 3!, . �• - 4 O'F F,�h .,t}, ' � ,.•rGa�N•� �-:7.� • '.�' ,si' eP,Cr ;l ,if� "!. �;I,b a^�' `�"1 , {� �p,s.a:� ..5r+,} � -rst F .1- �� �,•j'. ;t' {,�Cs'�, . «!:�'„S':, �1.i y'.'.-.
:.�'
iii+ tia"'� ::} :d r� .1 r,, F '•e,itt'S: tsj-9. -��' v �•i�;; k::..,s', ,.i."i-,j 'f!;},E SJii,. 4' ''{Si.rJ .1i,'i•;. ?�.; ,,,: `;<#.. .•Yll ,rlj r' t�ts. •�:°i .1`•l idj'. "s {1 i'9..+i.�,l f,f�) .'f."J -r�'s
{ b'r ,. t, a o 'rr t�}yy I■��E L, 1 1 t r y t 7y
9q.. "�..M1 " �� �`^f ,O.,ik I.y"} .'•7� ! 1 •r, _ 7 A t.i.,.,� •.�.�{'.Fl > lF: �- C. .R•��• ,rj.1.}.l.r �li7k�:r,•j�'.�+i .rx. .{♦?,, _
vO��I •. +� r, _ •�, :;"t .;'r. .ik{•f .:i }..' ±s; .t, i �;.t #+; -s �f':r', .1 .'a,nr i3,. a'S:;�. s : t!;•,. t ,
W tp !r wb�11„'::,:s +S {' _rii?. ! ! i' i• 'I;'r?a f{ } ! i aj�• ;
L: Y '{ 'hd•+, 'YW -+L ` w %I t , .,! `° ?i ,l' k1 ''f•: i- 1. {.r'i y�.L i { k i, „ it i� r i�. rA" { i
4,M1 ,?!Y ,7' ,.':{ 4,; r . •,It' not � , t ' i al„, t 'Y r: •4,,1 if;� { . ; t y ; {; , r„ ;J+ i . I� .�! ,:
•O O 44''{'t1 fr� - q .C�.r 5 r?Yr S.r ',!s �{ �,I n- ili" ,i l.il � i'• i.. p i4iJ s�Jpr ii; i,. d' s y,r .�.•� i � ,� ;•' ' .s ti[�c
;.. Oi {(, �. 't T., 1s"4 'i.;id' e1 f' I,. :hr ty -4rar ' }1; �I . ,t12 t.� 1 i !'+'
qt' i Y�'�. ,y ,�71• 'rS+'S' ;t; s,1 ';. . _ N l'' ,� ' :IY /�' s '' 64,/f !• ; .7rF , ! s k}; } ,
•:af 1 7 �F��yy1.1 :;'I'�
m-C .�f'd c7 L. ,`` I:i' 1' ,, �'7'k .7. �l,i. d, �.T-� i!''i•' tt •�:^.4s}.+:''S'''j, r_k.l'.•�' FSi,k• `Sr, k.', �X it ,{t. it tr.-,14 r, } '�i 1,S:k iS a•-yt7F`, _i# .rY {�tr,lli rAYr. r"},. Y.•`�, sdli+is I;
q'�ii �; -7 i -� t'n. r� :;�,�c.;i.! .' r., '^i+. ►:,1 •.1„ � t,
O !�4• r.i- a .>i' ; ,�� Ld �t _ ] � IJ,. r Sr{} h f�'t s - � �G.',4, �� r
`: •] {{T++'' p, :[d... r' 'F• -�. �'� � g kr� tRX, k,• ;�s 'sK . II'7 Cr'",r I I.a _,di s• I;:.::' •S li + �,
A}.: ,Eq{: Q. S'11 •�y� .1 { l,: ry"1,!'I. s;i .;.t-.},,. 1sXrl i''lt , 6 -e: b:S,�i! }. +1' },rr.. '(+,!' "1i; '.,t; t'. i! t,s•..5, ,,,{-r,,. ! rir 0 {i,H Yr„J,d', le_.li i:.. 1. .,5},;
,.yl '1..r •!: {!�-e F7�'� .,;� #.t, ,�f�'�4' '.i}.:``�C'•.i ,:'kra r ,};r �� �.4 ri r$� ;�11;, r ', .d: '�{*, ii''�,+.. Y:.4: �,. •'1;S „�f .rd F+,I{: t'1; ,2 .s+;;,•:. •'17,�. >;$;%.: '.�'..e,�q.t ,,J k
Mr. ', 1, f pp ;�riL. �, -� �{. r L ;kxr,. f ,-{.- j - ,r:r s. � e.lr4 ,o. .1i':r. f•� A. {.s jl• �;'; �' ,s,,
p p If •i: x'.aL + '►• �•P $� �P� r: g' �ti r I i'et Jr� K}�, � r. '! :t In {k �' -r + �t:: ,`5 r.i 1k{ .}t 'ri.3:�"'f'1#'>r � ':'f'4is: 2 j: kAi�' 4�,:�t }.t �;•! F _ .f�i. •� }} J `i ,r n d' , -.1 rJ ;�F,7' ,{,. r..: r:�t: r�kn�;' re �:i4'rii..it lr, t � r, 1 i }Fi. , t.SL ' ,2t,1''',i
+ �i,. �, 'a 1 5;,, (.r>'' r pi .r:'•.r ,�. , I�� t, t k:i :r ': +,tny { td I , 'r it''1;`�,•iq i,�i�.,+ i'' " 4 ,,r.; i ��
I, ' ''� •'�y' s' ,rlr:..+.., I S'. •.. { LL 5. �,•.,ttyy■ ti"�' f •s 's �?_t .�% h
{' .1'!i y:!': •I ' Cj. 's:{. k::rr, r-� ,1-. �y:: { 7!^'i� t,l i,,, ,x '�e i ^.i':.s•r i t, 3-': �f + 4..;,- 4 + :I`+•'t :, it ,,,.P+.1; 7 :1+ , i'.j
O, Ogg yi,r,tr'•i W • i., .,i y, ,J , qs f ,,r•..,% kI +,: .s ,t;. xA„�• .i Y. �,�� C .}„!1 •,..,r, -1,{y L t.1j4 t },S•
F, � h"} 1 i I ,ri J '�' :11 t{ f!''�.i k .I' .� , [! S!„�rlY :. t:,3 I'''ti �i s '.i� F �'•' �' P �1'I
Y rl'k1J i, I :'✓ J r �. Y Y.i,r N ja s
C7, 7'].'O, b�O'�.a ;hk,', �' b! •'yt fah"ii}�;rtx,t i.l�s, 'k+f� a S.,r•;Jlflktl}ia�= ;, r� ire".+ir{,,.vti�.r.rt� .,;y;�.s}E, }Jh�� ��•y! W t.- k ',In.',1 }y ' 'i. •I•i ..?! A 3tJj.e C
�.. Ff' �, "� rr i�7 _.�.{,. (� •i ,i' ►�' v fh is} ZF t is. }e.� T;r. •., 5��'. �?} s�, t ° :{ iL.�T�ti1, ,t. 4,i(5�� •ir. i,wi i:.' ,e :�,s•�,'�Si� ,� •l.sr r�' ''�} i}:3+��•i: .a .t}tr ;:', y.. `.J ',i, f
�N:V, - •w' + i�i,• 1. .e f .!r1!,. Z• � try r�,ti�'. L - 1•; l' S 4y�, tii yt �} r �. ' i. •rq, ,�} i i 1,, :rg let
Q: -i# O-! Qrs • +s• i 17' , -t, :G = E.,;{ r.. •t',..I s'.'a 1S Y:'r' .l 4 t •i:+i1,i] •y',�tr ,, .45 j•t�,t"
{, � - xo. f�E f „ i ({, ask' r'
�' 3, kk :•iF •h '-.� gyp ,} � .t,l.�, `•v.k a. , p5 1!r si. A• \ x' } :ti � :'1M',�� a q,.
.I E!{ ; � pp y1 Y. i i 5 S .}i. li �4' b- f r j•1,�,,, s' . ' r 1 ♦„ •3(f 3� "�. ri, r i'i 'k ?:[ � f ! ,#! 2 �.F !' .n-rr i' � � {:a kf ..
e.r ",f O r,�ui'�Yr'h$It ": +� a,,!' } rk ;I k t✓s,a •^ }ji s {{ 1. :;r{.r , rZ'S.,'' .r.. ilr erY :e;ry{r•i P� .I`f5�j ,ig. •`�, _, 1 YC t. � m
• �: '•�_ { t. ;'�1 ( F`xC , � Y i _'tea `s ,: Y� l �',J-w !, fk 1' F � � �• '} ' j,y - {
f. ;.•' �+ I• � s`1�; �, ;s } 4' ai J. i ; •u F Sr:t'- 1t�, ' 1fi r { l S t{ Y { 1 t' �1 ro i,'..�,'.+ xr ! rI.��-� r 4x,.arjr", { � ,��� � 't ��4. tl.ii�y, 5�1. •i 4 �y,. !�• '�� '�+ is
rS! ;t{r','.G, s'..�•J' ; j,,r}: 1 qq q4L, 4.• ��S}�7'` r. rr + i t+t lek'. J }h+ii ?'}3ril�. { {1 ',1l. is�h4 ,rr rw C: itl taj'
,`. :.,:'} r -14 1?tar, }a -C.; F I ,rslh. r .'! b. f,[ , ,. .i I+ `1� {q i'�� „s'i,. ,:1t,L .i i[I,b; • k� F{) %,�L i, k. 'i.'• F icot' •;r_ 1,F'ii ,
u:i '-'-}.`G s'.. Qq • .s, r+,5, yr1 F u ': {' �Attssrr ''I••, , tit I' -,•'� ��. -r.. si>.s. yS �S `., '.i�yy-s i
t,{�FI r.� . ' :is..r •r i y� `'V^. ,•, :y r ,1!!rSk •,>, i rf A.�r ."ilt �j•,���,
y Z r k• t#;.�� r.]?,. v I kaFf.c r! n `ki,, } 1. �,f V �." aaa000 p C r k } S d MIN,
s
Q
p `.i,1 in
.� •� 1 [ , ��: t r raj I �} P_s �, ,•�'•„ S^}I� .f$ �'b J,i};:` .�,. .I 8�''1t r./�' ,. i,t�,', 1 �� 'r� I!r � rl %�• t �f:
<f, i'
• r '� 01� jk ..S s ,+S ! s .:F.n}.'+ xrs tiles' a r<i.s:.'+ �A i � i` .si.•. 1! f g ' ! ,,':1�:'.r
A .Q 1, a ,}y. d i • . L'• f ! .!'! h
1i eW ."r .C�.•+O r i r {k r1.��-r'+i �ry�' st- `:r j.Ss �. 'i_ - *�r. ii� �F fl •r�1;-.d �f�]'w�y�'•,1• 'Jlri ~,f. lr.;l ri{4 ej' '+ 3 •'zf"!�
1 t. ti _. ,A � i• _ Y, 1 tee• 4 1'
+v: t `:� N' ,'! - av .f -+Y tr+;t; i! i'li: r 6"il " 1.- , f•..�e ..P a I R- .r3.r ' ! , 1-' Y '�e I k';dr -{� 1 ? !yr<„ h:.,: t�, ?�:I
� t ii4 fi..h' C g s r 7 S '�. L' •�,
!�'
't1'1 .� +O iJQr,l. � `C^! c r+ S`tP, •t'r{ t zu •1: { Ir; 1 Y r t i',a:a � 1 �1 I ',, 1 ;� 4� 4t I r {Y I 1 ,.tris�• � rL
;- �{, :, , •,ab .t � q' tr t. -;r,y `i� ,r 4 „ "� t J., • .r .� '� m ''k�`• la' q a. t.+' i � 'i �i 4 r'p I ,r:
ey ,' E.r y' .- �. t ; { t F.t r � t � {> > Y s>t.: ..�� �._ ti LL ? TT I.::{' .7r ]•r =t•r�', -s
:s` � „{fti.. k `•n• -s. _ �A+:-:`t. ..P. q' 3,',, , I �: :L �`n}f<=']:w. a •ll: :ji;, h;-' '1: 1 �.•..r .7%"..J.,."
_f

4 =C Animal Feedlot Operation Review
E=Q��
,=Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
z-.
1(0 C4outine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWO inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review. O Other 1
Date of inspection u
I ... ��::j Facility Number
Time of Inspection 0 24 hr. (hh:mm)
© Registered we(�r}t�i�F�ied 0 Applied for Permit 13 Permitted 0 Not Operational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: .......5................................'r .-... ........... County:....... R.R.�IAi ....................... .
OI/L 5.......-. ........ .43q
Owner Name: ... ....1.� C JLD ...r: .:... 5 ............................... Phone '�o:... q.�...` m..�45..3t.a�..� .........................
Facility Contact:............................tG.lt.!t,S. Title: ................................................... Phone No:...................................................
soBailing Address: ..K...�........... .....�i ........: G.lY�C)S ti �..4.,. C' ....................c`?4r'...
f. �...........
Onsite Representative: ...... .................. .............. ...... �,s. ., Integrator:....
Certified Operator, ... L�J........ ....... „•. „.... . Operator Certification Number; ,.,,,,
..... ............... ..................
Location of Farm:
i
...............................................................7...:.........................................
Latitude 4 4 U .6 Longitude ET�10 6 41
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
W to Feeder
eederto Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Design Current Design ; Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer 10 Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 3cno
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons / Holding Ponds 10 Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation`?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed; was the conveyance man-madel
b, if discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Watcr? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge`?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
5. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of desiYon`?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
❑ Yes & o
❑ Yes (1d[vo
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes EkKo
❑ Yes 9240,
❑ Yes &KO
❑ Yes I�' No
❑ Yes o
Continued on hack

Facility Number: -- 141p
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons Iiolding Ponds Flush Pits, ete.) .
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
❑ Yes EKO
❑ Yes 91Q0
Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(ft): 3.�.r<�: ,t...........................................................................................................................................................................
....... ..............
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes 12'Ko
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes 2<0
12. Doanyof the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes 2<0
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13.
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes
Leo
Waste Application
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
E2414o
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15.
Crop type ...... 1.!n!��?. A f .. ......... .........................................................................................................................................................
16.
lZ
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
[—�<.
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
El Yes
19<0
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
(tdlvo
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
B No
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
Q No
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
ffNo
22.
Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
El Yes
.,,//
2<0
24.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
0<0
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
0 No.violations or. deficieneies.were noted during this.visit. Youmill receiwe-no ftirtlier'
cofneOonde'nce about this:visit:-:
Comanents {refer'to question #j. Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments
Use drawings of facthty to betWir expta n situat►ons (use additional pages as necessary)
. f. f _ .
LkQ-
eeY O�wti V,-Ok U-sm Ste— MLA c� "`� �•3 � ve GC
LUGA . a-w- r
U 7/25/97

Site Requires Immediate Attentio Ak-J-
Facility No.
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT.
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: , 1995
Time:
Farm Name/Ownt
Mailing Address: V4 . 1- Sax ¢Za L % zz = A/C -
County: �rer'm e_--
Integrator: r Phone: q/ 53
On Site Representative: Phone:
Physical Address/Location: d 52 / 3 Z_'7 -ct •�c i7Ct- h��� :,
L✓ i 1. o �e � a � ,� -� ulu�r� ,L/.�tih P-f ]A
Type of Operation: Swine L/ Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: 000 Number of Animals on Site: DDo(-�5_)
DEM Certification Number. ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: '315 _,'Z�_4/1--" Longitude: 77' 4 ' U" Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon havnesuor
cient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) No Actual Freeboard: _&_Ft. -� Inches
Was any seepage observed from the la n(s)? Yes 06Was any erosion observed? Yes
Is adequate land available for spray? Yes r No Is the cover crop adequate Ye or No �J
Crop(s) being utilized:
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from
or No
100 Feet from Wells?ems or No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or �D
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes or
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes or If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on
with cov,,er crop)? Yes or No
Additional Comments: JVeW- S /-5 t o vi 5 c 4 e u L. v S
Ce,Y w
4
Inspector Name
�.T
Signature
cc: Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed.

6`
I
j�
I�
_ - lull
E ui ;E
1
k
-
_
_
_
■
�
II[i
��IF'�'
■�
�•
■
�E
r P
ri��

Registration Date
Certification Date
DEM Reply
Certification #
Conditional Days
Conditional
Requirements
p Request to be removed 13 Removal Confirmation Recieved
Higher Yields
Vegetation
Acreage
Other
Comments . Basin Name: Buse
Regional DWQ Staff Date Record Exported to Permits Database

NUH I H UAHULINA
Department of Envirnnm entai Quai
II

INSPECTIONS..
INSPECTIONS
INSPECTIONS

9
Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number:
400142 Facility Status:
Active Permit: AWS400142
❑ Denied Access
Inppection Type:
Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit:
Routine
County: Greene Region:
Washington
Date of Visit:
09/15/2017 Entry Time: 01:00 pm
Exit Time: 1:55 pm Incident #
Farm Name:
Edwards & Edwards Farm
Owner Email:
Owner:
Carole D Edwards -
Phone:
252-753-2630
Mailing Address:
388 Dailtown Rd
Snow Hill NC 285809740
Physical Address:
713 Dailtown Rd
Snow Hill NC 28580
Facility Status:
Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm:
Latitude: 35" 29' 55" Longitude:
77° 38' 33"
NCSR 1327
Question Areas:
Dischrge & stream impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Timothy Brad Burress Operator Certification Number: - 24799
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Phone:
On -site representative Phone :
Primary Inspector:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Marlene Salyer
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis: soil tested: 20%
3-2-17 = 3,39 sludge
2-28-17 = 1.75
11-7-16 = 1.00
IRR's on sludge removal in Feb & 2016 small grain
Phone:
Date:
Reviewed: sludge survey 5/2017; sludge removed Feb 2017; rainfalllfreeboard; crop yield; stocking/mortality; calibration 2016
page: 1

Permit: AWS400142 Owner - Facility: Carole D Edwards Facility Number: 400142
Inspection Date: 09/15/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon 1 22,00
page: 2

Permit: AWS400142 Owner- Facility : Carole D Edwards Facility Number: 400142
Inspection Date: 09/15/17 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No Na No
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
0 ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection Storage & Treatment
Yes No Na No
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e.l large
❑
❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
MEI
❑
S. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
MEI
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
0 ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No No No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ M ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

' Permit: AWS400142 Owner - Facility : Carole D Edwards Facility Number:
400142
Inspection Date: 09/15/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Waste Application
Yes
No Na Ne
Crop Type 1
Corn, Wheat,
Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Pasture)
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
E ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
0 ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
0 ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
N ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na Ne
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■ ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
[]
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWS400142 Owner - Facility : Carole D Edwards Facility Number: 400142
Inspection Date: 09/15/17 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na Ne
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
M ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
M ❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑M
❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No Na No
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
0 ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
M ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
0 ❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
0 ❑
❑
page: 5

Division of Water Resources
Facility Number ®- f a2 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: ® Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:— Arrival Time: ! Q Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: i'` Owner Email:
Owner Name: �j�,/�Q . Phone: ��j— 110-/,50
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
oars
Other
Other
Title:
Phone:
Integrator: S�a
Certification Number: % 9
Certification Number:
Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Layer
Non -La er
Pullets
Other
Poults
Design Current
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DW R)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
CJ
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
❑ Yes [21/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No'
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters [:]Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facili Number: - Date of Inspection: -
WV
aste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes 2(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?: _
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes 1 ]�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes iNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmen l threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
[:]Yes No
[] NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes dNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals
(Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or l0 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable-. Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application
Outside of Approved Area
7
12. Crop Type(s `�— Q
—
-5
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes No
❑' NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
dyes ❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes FfNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. Yes ❑ No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
23. if selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? [—]Yes ❑ No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Weather Code
Sludge Survey
❑ NA Er'NE
❑ NA NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facili umber: - Date of Inspection: — —
P25. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? s ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check 1 Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes OdNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air duality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
❑ Yes d4o
❑ Yes U(No
r] Yes [17�No
❑ Yes dNo
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes
6
■
iI
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
aae_
0- _V- / �y :-- /' _�'r
4
� 'P/1 --- r1/1iG
Reviewer/InspectorName: �r�r rf �`j
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Phone: 1707 , j 174lp
Date:
/4/2015
Page 3 of 3

]� t
Division of Water Quality
Facility Number ®- ® 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: �---�-`'-�� Arrival Time: •- — Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: Owner Email:
Owner Name: �'n�¢T J .�. Phone: 2 3
Mailing Address:
1
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Phone: 9/7 —/5`�F
Integrator: -
Certification Number: 42-212 %9'
Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish 3CV6
arrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Other
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
La er
Non -La er
Poults
Design Current
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
[-]Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
[:]Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
[:]Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ro ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page I of 3 21412011 Continued

2
Facility Number: Ald- Date of inspection:
Ze
Waste Collection & Treatment
No
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
Q ❑ NA
❑ NE
a. if yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑Yes
❑ No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier: pO y�,l7
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):_
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
2'-N/o ❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environment threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes [ No [DNA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes EZ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need [—]Yes [(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes W/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): o5 ; I/�i 3 / l� f'a c
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
o
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
o
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
WNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
o
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Rewired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
o
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAMP readily available? If yes, check
W
❑ Yes
YNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design [:]Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other.
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes d No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes WNo
o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

[Facility Number: d - Date of Inspection: 3
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with ermit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check E�KYcs ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below. / ���Q/Q r,i'j/: L(J,Wy 3 ulfis Oh �ey� 100 �D�3
[Failure to complete annual sludge survey [:]Failure toffdevelop `�a P'OA for sludge levels /1/p t j Y] /1 e,4!
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon f
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ' o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
[:]Yes
�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
2(NNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
[:]Yes
M/No
❑ NA
❑ NE
[-]Yes
/No
❑ NA
❑ NE
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes [Y]No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes 2(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes MNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question ft Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
` 'Z : g acid
al _e.7
,-sAOO"
In, a
s
0. off
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Phone: 9-y3 yli_
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Date:
21412011

r j/<
--�� 1Drvision of Water Quality
f
Facility Number '17' - O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit: ® Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: ® Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: Region:p
Farm Name: -,;�',at*ft_,bwner Email:
Owner Name: Phone: `7�� ��QIf 12
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Phone: 7W
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Other
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Layer
Non -La er
Design Current
Dry Poultry Canacitv Pon.
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
❑ Yes O/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ DC40
❑ Yes VN
❑ Yes
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
NA ONE
Page I of 3 21412011 Continued

Facili Number: - / Date of Inspection-
e
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):�
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes �No[:] ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes E No 0 NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environment hreat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
S. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? [:]Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require [:]Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. [—]Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area/ r
12. Crop Type(s)
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
El ❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ YesWN
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
[:]Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design [—]Maps [:]Lease Agreements []Other:
V21. oes record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. �es [—]No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard E] aste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? [-]Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4.,2011 Continued

IF'acili Number: - Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes UK, ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? if yes, check [:]Yes k(No [] NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑Yes
�o '
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
YNo
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
[] Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
o
ixo
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
i
MIM
Phone: 74-11'-3�'i'`Gj
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date:
Page 3 of 3 r/ 21412011

a a ��/ UJ�,CS �/�,� �•� ate• 2Ori_�" 74n?
nd -j o a n 3 t"'' )
-a,/U62
�U LOWJ
' po o f n 0�
71
7/n�
n,f� J la %,//

C� is aHri,' err *i,� 1-,ddx
4f w ¢/ /jt�r.� S6 1 Ca tr
7; gn k
IN

_ PLAN OF ACTION FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
THIRTY (30) DAY DRAW DOWN PERI( SrateUnmerstty
W Slate University
W COOPERATIVE
EXTENSION
I. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED PER WASTE STRUCTURE - FmPow,ngpeeyle ProvidingSolutiong
1. Structure Name/Identifier (ID): Edwards & Edwards 40-142 AT
2. Current liquid volume in 25 yr/24 hr. storm stroage & structural freeboard
a. Current liquid level according to marker
b. Designed 25 yr/24 hr. storm & structural freeboard
c. Line b - line a (inches in red zone)
d. Top of dike surface area according to design
(area at below structural freeboard elevation)
e. (Line c/12) x (line d) x (7.48 gallons/ft3)
3. Projected volume of waste liquid produced during draw down period
f.. Temporary storage period according to structural d
inches
inches
inches
ftZ
gallons
days
g. Volume of waste produced according to design =.: .98903 ft
h. Actual waste produced
current herd #/certified herd # x line' a791224 ft3
current herd 2 Q4 certified herd � "300Ot
i. Volume of wash water according to structural design ``�'=0' ft3
j. Excess rainfall over evaporation according to design >a_-504,00; ft
k. (line h + line i + line i) x 7.48 x (30 days/line f) _ 08, 09 ZW, gallons
4. Total PAN to be land applied during draw down period
I. Current waste analysis dated
MM/DD/YYYY2 .2
m. (lines e + k)/1000 x (line 1) _
REPEAT SECTION 1 FOR EACH WASTE STRUCTURE ON SITE
lb/1000 gal
lb PAN

PLAN OF ACTION FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
THIRTY (30) DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
II: TOTAL POUNDS OF PAN STORED WITHIN STRUCTURAL FREEBOARD
AND/OR 25 YR./24 HR. STORM STORAGE ELEVATIONS IN ALL WASTE STRUCTURES FOR FACILIT
1.
structure ID:
line m==.t
381' lb PAN
2.
structure ID:
line m=
__- - lb PAN
3.
structure ID:
line m=
771
lb PAN
4.
structure ID:
line m=2f.
MnvnFy La. lb PAN
5.
structure ID:
line m=-
_ `?` -- lb PAN
6.
structure ID:
line m=
;.{ .: -,F,1- Ib PAN
;. ,
n.
lines 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 =
,;,�- 3$v total lb PAN
III. TOTAL PAN BALANCE REMAINING FOR AVAILABLE CROPS DURING 30 PERIOD.
DO NOT LIST FIELDS TO WHICH PAN CAN NOT BE APPLIED DURING THIS 30 DAY PERII
o. tract # p. field # _4 crop r, acres s_ PAN balance t. total PAN L. application
tlb/arra} column r x s window
. �3.155
1:', I.
overseeii�
"-2': T
`�• SQ
" ` 105
_
1-55 3.
10A t
W wti�
bleat
�� � 1:4
-
� r�� � 63
$$.
-
_-
�
- .1,9-
: .� �
�I��
��-�_.:
5Q
WjtPt w6.4;
- /1 3/°3.1 ,
Z:4
SQ
y 120.'10/1-3
y3ra-
_
1°55,
?€A:
6verseeda'
117.10/13%31
, _:
315.5
; `hr -'r` 5
overseed
2:58,
35
-i ;
-10/1 T:3G31 `
t -_9Q:3
�-; "31-55
6'
overseed,
=, 3] 55
+7
overseei9
3_2$
y
_�
Y _-3
->'
-zrx _322
3155.
F
'� yjt'3
8--.ove�se'ed�ra_�-�-
-. " �i'f
,� zk.,fH'S[1 c_ -a _
'.,,= 6 .K� A . _ ..
4
S ..1
� 90 �5':1':Q/1��3131.�;,":.
.
G �:��
��.Z.98.
� :�..�.-�,�30
.� K
9
overseedE>
t3155
=. :F .,a
t
�.t�..r?:
-
State current crop ending application date or next crop application beginning date for available
receiving crops during 30 day draw down period.
V. TOTAL PAN AVAILABLE FOR ALL FIELDS (SUM OF COLUMN T.)
IV. FACILITY'S POA OVERALL PAN BALANCE
W. TOTAL PAN TO BE LAND APPLIED (LINE n from section II)
X. CROP'S REMAINING PAN BALANCE (LINE V FROM SECTION III)
Y. OVERALL PAN BALANCE (W-X)

PLAN OF ACTION FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
THIRTY (30) DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD
Line y must show as a deficit. If line y does not show as a deficit, list course of action here
including pump and haul, depopulation, herd reduction, etc. For pump & haul and herd
reduction options, recalculate new PAN based on new information. If new fields are to be
included as an option for lowering lagoon level, add these fields to the PAN balance table and
recalculate the overall PAN.balance. If animal waste is to be hauled to another permitted facility
provide information regarding the herd population and lagoon freeboard levels at the receiving
facility.
NARRATIVE:
Mr. Edwards is very proactive and will be pumping the extra water as soon as it is dry enough.
PERSON COMPLETING THIS DOCUMENT:
EVE H. HONEYCUTT
NC COOPERATIVE EXTENSION
LENOIR AND GREENE COUNTIES

PLAN OF ACTION FOR HIGH FREEBOARD AT ANIMAL FACILITIES
THIRTY (30) DAY DRAW DOWN PERIOD

S
Division of Water Quality
Facility Number ®- ® 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: ® Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: / — — Arrival Time: r Departure Time: County: Region: (�
Farm Name:` -� Owner Email:
Owner Name: ���� Phone:
Mailing Address: �� ��&ez
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
can to Finish
can to Feeder
eder to Finish
.crow to Wean
.crow to Feeder
.crow to Finish
Other
Other
Integrator:
Phone:
' / -
Certification Number:
DYt-
Certification Number:
Latitude:
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Layer
Non -Layer
Non-L
Pullets
Other
Poults
Design Current
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
Longitude:
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
[:]Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
[]No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
0 NA
❑ NE
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes ❑ o ❑ NA ❑ NE
El Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
[]Yes ;rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page I of 3 21412011 Continued

t
"[Facility Number: jDate of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes UrNo
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes [A No ❑ NA
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA
waste management or closure plan?
❑ NE
❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmen I threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. [:]Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): C /////33/ A).=
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Reouired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP [:]Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
o
JNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
[—]Yes
R] No
❑ NA
❑ NE
[]Yes
dNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes a No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rainfall Inspectioa-.
❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yeso ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

` Facility Number: jDate of Inspection: — �—
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?� ❑Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.'e�
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? [:]Yes �j(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
[:]Yes C3 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[:]Yes [%No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below. [] Yes
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
CEr No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
NO ❑NA ❑NE
L!4 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
bola �ee�' 7
9
.zA .
q-
Reviewer/Inspector Name: O��rh �j� �� ��/' Phone:
h
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date:
Page 3 of 3 U 21412011

>, Division of Water Quality
Facility Number ®- % a- 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation 1�
0 Other Agency zz
Type of Visit: 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: Region: Wn
Farm Name: ��1��%y�— �%y�,�,� Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address: k4!�
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: —4-A 1'j��y/ll�y� Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: y,Ge�J
Back-up Operator:
Phone: = — l 227
Integrator: Z1.4
Certification Number: dz1% .2 2
Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Other
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
La er
Non -La er
Other
Poults
Design Current
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non-DaiEZ
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
❑ Yes U(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[:]Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes tNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
[DNA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facili Number: jDate of lns ection: —/
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): A5
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes iNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
[:]Yes M No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environme al threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) f
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes [1 J No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes U(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes o
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
[—]Yes go
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes YNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes o
JNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
Reouired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes o
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes Vo
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other: le
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. [—]Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections [:]Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? [:]Yes [No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

FaciliNumber: 0- Date of inspection:
16
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit9 ❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
etr'J25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes j(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below. ,e(rl c�'0-D /.J
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey [] Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26, Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes Rfj o ❑ NA ❑ NE
27, Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? [:]Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
24. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface file drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
to
see ]drawings of facility to better expla
tJ
a A
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
any YES answers and/or any addi
situations (use additional pages as
❑ Yes dN0
❑ Yes W(No
[—]Yes MNo
❑ Yes ixo
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes VNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
or any other comments.
Phone: Y,— 37fG
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Date: r— I //
V4/2011

Division of Water Quality
Facility Number O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: ,�/(1 Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: OL&9 x_- d Owner Email:
Owner Name: of Phone: 7.53 - 3d
Mailing Address: 0 Ll � �G'22nCE14
Physical Address: .� /% �i{
Facility Contact: /J.Lr1.rX s[/ Title:
Phone No S3 'l % 7>7
Onsite Representative: Integrator:,14
Certified Operator:C:21z" 1:2r42 - Operator Certification Number: 2 9
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: [= o = . Longitude: = ° = i
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Layer
❑ Non -La er I E E�
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Wean to Feeder
Feeder to FinishLOU
16
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Other
ID Other------------�
Dry Poultry
❑ La ers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
El Turkey Poults
❑ Other-----
--
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Co
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
Number of Structures: =j
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes dwo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ o ❑ NA
❑ NE
El YesZo
o ❑ NA
El
El Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 1 of 3 12128104 Continued

✓ I Facility Number: d — Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes R No
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): ZR__
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes dNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
❑ Yes R(No
❑ NA
❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes I�_QJNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 5dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Annlication
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes E(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
[]PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or l0 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) G jaZZ31 ; 2 &P=
9,s-
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
dNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
►No ❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ?
❑ Yes
�No ❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
03"N ❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
Ij1 No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
* . . 1 &00
Z 3
Reviewer/Inspector Name I I Phone: PSG—ZJ�� .�g��o
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: %�%1.if%.y,e 1 �� Date: A0
Page 2 of 3

r
Facility Number:Date of Inspection
Rewired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes PNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes 2 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑Maps El Other
21.
Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
Itd No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste
Transfers
❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield 0 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections ❑
Weather Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
dNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
VNE
24.
l301{r.�j
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?_L0_eJL
❑ Yes
1
9 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the p-;Wo ermit? ad �
❑
�Yes No
❑ NA
[I NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
&dNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
E No
❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
ONo
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
ONo
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑
�o
El
❑
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
Yes
NA
NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
El Yes
YNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
AL
7VP
Page 3 of 3 12128104

6-
North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service
College of Agriculture and Life Sciences
Greene County Center
North Carolina Cooperative Extension
229 Kingold Blvd., Suite E
Snow Hill, NC 28580
Phone [phone] Fax [phone]
October 13, 2010
To: Mr. Wayne Edwards
From: Louie H. Johnson, CCA#25904
Extension Agent
Agriculture
Re: Extension for application of effluent to October 30, 2010
I visited your operation, facility number 40-142 on October 13, 2010 to determine the
growth and condition of your established Bermuda hay fields. Your coastal Bermuda
hay is actively growing and can utilize more effluent. Weather conditions look good
for the next two weeks. I recommend the application_ window for the following
facilities and pulls be extended to October 30; 2010.
Facility Number Field Pulls
40-142 1-9
The application is not to exceed the PAN stated in the Waste Utilization Plan
(WUP). If you need additional information you may contact me at the Greene County
Extension Office at [phone].
Employment and program opportunities are offered to all people regardless of race, color, national origin, sex, age, or disability.
North Carolina State University, North Carolina A&T State University, U.S. Department of Agriculture, and local governments cooperating.

r
E Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency !-1
Facility Number: 4001142 Facility Status: Activate Permit: AWS400142 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine _ _ County: Greene Region: Washioatoa
Date of Visit: 10/09/2009 Entry Time: 10Q0 AM _ Exit Time: incident #:
Farm Name: Edwards & Edwards Farm _ Owner Email:
Owner: Carole D E"i1rds Phone: [phone]ZQ
Mailing Address: 388 Dailtown Rd _ ,Snow Hill NC 285809740
Physical Address: 713 Dailt wn Rd Snow Hill NC 28580
Facility Status: E Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator. Murift-Brown. LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°29'55" Longitude: 77°38'33"
NCSR 1327
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Timothy Brad Burress Operator Certification Number: 24799
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Brad Burress Phone:
On -site representative Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis:
8-18-09 1.5
1-14-09 1,5
soil tested fall 2008 sludge survey 912009 caliberation 2008
looks good.
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400142 Owner - Facility: Carole D Edwards Facility Number: 400142
Inspection Date: 10/09/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population .
Swine
❑ Swine - Feeder to Finish 3,000
Total Design Capacity: 3,000
Total SSLW: 405,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start pate Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
Lagoon 1 32.00
Page: 2

Permit: AW5400142 Owner - Facility: Carole D Edwards Facility Number: 400142
Inspection Date: 10/09/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes No
NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ■
❑ ❑
C. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ■
❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑ ■
❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes No
NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le] large trees, severe
Cl ■
❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■
❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑ ■
❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑ ■
❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No
NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑ ■
❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

n
Permit: AWS400142 Owner - Facility: Carole D Edwards Facility Number: 400142
Inspection Date: 1010912009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? ❑
Total P205? ❑
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type 1 Com, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan(GAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18, Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Records and Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Pasture)
Small Grain Overseed
❑ ■ Q ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
9
Page: 4

a
Permit: AW5400142 Owner - Facility: Carole D Edwards Facility Number: 400142
Inspection Date: 1010912009 Inspection type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design?
Maps?
Other?
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
Cl ■ ❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
Otherlssues
Yes No NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

3
Permit: AWS400142 Owner- Facility: Carole D Edwards
Inspection Date: 10109/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Other Issues
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
3Z Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Facility Number: 400142
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
❑■00
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑■❑❑
Page: 6

Facility Number D J �-
® Division of Water Quality
0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: i� County: Region: AQ
Farm Name: /_Y_ _ Q-Q.�/lin� Owner Email:
r Owner Name: ae4� ' S, Phone:
Mailing Address: v3 0/ Saz rX
__ _ _ /`�'• u '1/1�
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: � T Title:
Phone No: 261?
Onsite Representative: Integrator:'�� /
Certified Operator: � Operator Certification Number: �,7 O F�7 ^_
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
❑ Wean to Finish
❑ Wean to Feeder
ER Feeder to Finish
b3Q
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Other
❑ Other
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: = 0 , „ Longitude: = ° = ` = «
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
El Layer
❑ Non -Layer
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -La ers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy Heifej
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Cowl
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
Number of Structures: E]
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes(�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Cl Yes
Z o
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
WNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
12128104 Continued

y'
" Facility Number:
Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
M40,❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Cl Yes
❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure
5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
47No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
❑ Yes
[VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or
environmental notify DWQ
threat,
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
6 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
ENo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
0 Yes
�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? if yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
5No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 Ibs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge
into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drill [:]Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
[VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?❑ Yes
dt o
❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
ElYes
Yo
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
k sf c Av /y S I,S';
Reviewer/Inspector Name
a e e__ Phone:-
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date: ZZ —42 r
Page 2 of 3 d/
12128104 Continued

Facility Number: 49 Date of Inspection L J
Required Records & Documents /
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes O No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑Maps El Other
21.
Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V
Rain Inspections El
Weather
Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
El Yes
L+J No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
dNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
�No
ElNA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
ElYes
dNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
(,a No
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
dNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
dNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
B No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
dNo.
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
o
[I NA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
Zo
❑ NA
NE
Comments and/or Drawings:
Page 3 of 3 12128104

h
_i
W Division of Water Quality
Facility Number L %� 4 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Other Agency
Type of Visit IP Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit ® Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: � Arrival Time: : Departure Time: County: Region: Lb"
Farm Name: Czz', / 7- � d�f/i►J _ __ Owner Email:
Owner Name: ��/J�� � Phone: o'!-�,
Mailing Address: T3� S� _ ` 6110 un� / `-+!•
Physical Address: f%
Facility Contact: (/'1.4tt! L�z.rAAAP.O� Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:.A
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Other
❑ Other
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: = c = Longitude: = o = =
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ La er
=_ ❑ Non -Layer
Dry Poultry
❑ La ers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ urkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Co
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
Number of Structures:
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes IJ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ o
El NA
❑ NE
El Yes
Vo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
12128104 Continued

`! Facility Number: l/d —�lf�
Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes V'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
�
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
El,_,
Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
El Yes ,W—Q,/No
VI
❑ NA
❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental dNo
hreat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? El Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 2 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes [RNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes
No ❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes
Lta No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) 4&,, &AZ —.
p
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes
ElNA
ElNE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ElYes
o ❑ NA
El NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determinatioh?❑ Yes
;11�o❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑Yes
o El NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes
Lb No ❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
0d-0 t
ReviewertInspector Name J"— Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

rr
I Facility Number: & — Date of Inspection 1T Z —Q2
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes VNNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes ONo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design El Maps El Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? if yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
RrN.
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1"
Rain Inspections ❑
Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
N
❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
N
El NA
❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
El Yes
7Nco)
❑ NA
❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
��No
❑ NA
❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
6o
❑ NA
❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
El Yes
;'No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
/
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
o
El NA
❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
El Yes
YNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
26No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
o
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
Zxo
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
ElYes
❑ NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
ElYes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments and/or
12128104

I"
Facility Number I //f;_
I
Division of Water Quality
O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Q Other Agency
Type of Visit 0 Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit ORoutine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: Region:
FarmName: '�' Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: �f lr(� /�r/I%t1�J Title..
Onsite Representative:
Integrator:
Phone No:�'_� tv 2 7 rf
Certified Operator: L& Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: = c 0 i 0 Longitude: = o= 6= u
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Layer
❑ Non -La et
❑
Wean to Finish
❑
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
$ Q
Farrow to Wean
❑
Farrow to Feeder
❑
Farrow to Finish
❑
Gilts
❑
Boars
Other
❑ Other
Dry Poultry
N
Other
Discharees & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Daig Heifer
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Co
Number of Structures: E.
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes 2 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ El NA
El NE
❑ Yes
El YesVN
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
12128104 Continued

e.
OP .
Facility Number: J1,1 — fyl
Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No 0
NA El NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed El Yes:No ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental #hre , notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ONo NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes 53 No I NA El NE
maintenance/improvement?
IL . Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s)
13. Soil type(s)
Ea.
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ? ❑ Yes
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes
18. Is there a lack of property operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
El No [I NA ❑NE
� N El NA El NE
El NA El NE
LrJN ❑NA ❑NE
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question ft Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
IReviewer/inspector Name I Z Sa�1Z err Phone: p` — %�f� 3 UJ/ I
Reviewer/]nspector Signature: /1._ _ _ _ � Date: � —�4 �
77/71V/111f !'n..fa.......7

Facility Number: Ile — Date of Inspection ICJ
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design El Maps El Other
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V
Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
ErNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain minbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
2 <No❑
NA
❑ NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
ONo
❑ NA
❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
NA
El
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
El Yes:�N�oEl
NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
bNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
LI No
NA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
El Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
Page 3 of 3 12128104

FFacility Number Date of Visit: �- �%'� Time: 1 a-O
O Not Operational O Below Threshold
© Permitted © Certified 13 Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ... .� _. _.
Farm Name: Z& --- ........................- County: ��'1 ���'1._�. ................ ...... ..... .
Owner Name: .Zl_ t ....._..0................. ....... .._. Phone No: �4F� ... •.......................—..._.
lVlarlrng Address: � � ... �'" ......�.Q.`t�.... � .....................................
Facility Contact: .jL.,.?..1Mj_ .............. ....................... ......... Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator:. 5S ......... Operator Certification Number:.
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude ' 4 66 Longitude • 6 44
Discharges & Stream Jrnpacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes io
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes Q'116­
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes EYN�o
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ------- ............. ........... - -- w __ .. .._.............. - _. _ - --------- -------------- _.-..
Freeboard (inches): An
12112103 Continued

Facnify Number: — p2 Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes 2N_0
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or ❑ Yes To
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) ,.
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? [:]Yes
L�l tvo
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ET/No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level ❑ Yes 0<0
elevation markings?
Waste Annlication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes io
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
12. Crop type 4j-14 %75 — '-w— 15t'—
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes 8'Ko-
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge atlor below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional
Air Quality representative immediately.
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes Etfqo
❑ Yes Fo
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes ❑ 0_
❑ Yes ❑'0
❑ Yes Biro
:Comments (raster to question g) F.xplarn any YFS answers and/or any recomni i ridahons or,any tit er cem eats _ . T
:Use drawings of facility to better explain sitnataons. {useditional pages as accessary) Meld COPY ❑ Final Notes
uv_ F 9.
A.
Reviewer/Inspector Name'-
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
12112103 v Continued

Fa ' ty Number: — Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑ Yes 0o
22. Does the.facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes Erl o
23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 90
❑ Waste Application �eeboard [Waste Analysis oil Sampling
24. is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
2'1�o
25, Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
01� o
26, Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
�
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
P40,
27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
E o
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
io
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP.
❑ Yes
10
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
Yes
❑ No
31. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
01,440
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
❑ Yes
Nq
34, Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment?
El Yes
a
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
10
❑ Stocking Form ❑ Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfall ❑ inspection After 1" Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
113 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
dditional CoffiiHats iri&o Drav�nrlgs - -
C d 6,
12112103

-0-
�' - � ...� � � A - � �• ! ��.t�'-�...� � •�'h�� '. `-may ssS,�` `�1�'Ee'74 �^�YT � 0 -
L
Type of Visit OO Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Beason for Visit @ Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other 0 Denied Access
Hale of Visit:3-22r1.401 Time: 134$
Facility Number 40 142
O Nut Operational O Below Threshold
® Permitted ■ Certified 0 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ..................
Farm Name: EdW..Q dS.&.F. W0Lr&.FaM ............................... .... County: GX.=jac.................................. ............ WARO?.......
OwnerName: l ae.D......... ............. Rdnards...................._............................... Phone No: ).Z r.�fi R................._.............................._.......
Mailing Address::11.}XIA.Rtt�ld jg.Rgiad ............................. ......._................................ &�nQ- >i--N...... ..:............................................. 28.580 .............
FacilityContact: .............................................................................. Title:...................................................... -Phone No.
Onsite Representative: Z.rad.&...Y4'a3nt........................................... Integralor:L. .h uxxl�l�e3-.CQ,..................
............................ ............................
Certified Operator:j?y,1pe--•................................. Edwarch....._................................... Operator Certiiication Number: Q
Location of Farm:
NCSR 1327
® Swine ❑Poultry ❑Cattle ❑Horse Latitude 35 • ® �•� Longitude 77 ' 38 30 ••
Design Current
Design
Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
Poultry Capacity
Population Cattle
Capaci Po ulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
I
I
❑ Layer I
I
❑Dairy
JZ Feeder to Finish
3000
2985
10 Non -Laver I
J❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
other
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
3,000
❑ Gilts
Total SSLW
405,000
❑ Boars
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present Ir❑ lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps 10 No Liquid Waste Management System
Ia ischaMes S: Stream I m pacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: []Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed. was the conveyance man-made'!
b. If discharge is observed. did it reach NVater of the State" (if ves. notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in ual/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes. notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
%Paste Collection & Treatment
4- Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? [I Spillway
Structure l Structure ? Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
n/a
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
Structure 6
Identifier: ................................... ........
Freeboard (inches): 29
05103101
Continued

Facility Number: 40-14Z Date or Inspection 3-22-2001 i'
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
❑ Yes
® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
❑Yes
®No
(lf any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenancr-rimprovement?
❑ Yes
® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelimprovement?
❑ Yes
®No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings:
❑ Yes
® No
Waste —Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenancelimprovement?
❑ Yes
®No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
® No
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Small Grain Overseed
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
®No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
® No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
16. is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
Refired Records & P-swurnents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
® No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
Oe/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
® No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
® No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
® No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
® No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
® No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
® No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
®No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
® No
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
01
eo�quesdon . _ taNn3` ram— a Wn o�s4r_ 1 r
,. ,, ese�aoigs ❑ Field Copy ® Final Notes
* Records available for review.
* Waste plan dated 1-20-00.
* Soil analysis dated 3-6-01.
* Awaiting results from waste samples.
* Hadn't irrigated since last October 2000.
* Vegetation on dike wall is well established.
* Bermuda grass is established.
T
Reviewer/Inspector Name Lyn B,,iardison
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: i ,r, -, � rn,�r `L+1F r Date: 1 --
05103101 :! Continued

It- -r?a�ility Number: 40-142 _ Date of Incpeclion 3-22-Z041
Printed on: 5/18/2001
Odor Iskues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanentltemporary cover?
* The records are well kept.
* Overall the farm is very well managed.
***If you have any questions, contact your Technical Specialist or me @ 252=946-6481, ext. 318.***
❑ Yes ® No
a
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
A.1
05103101
J

® Division pf-Sotl and -Water Conservation .Oper`atyon Review < c-
-n
C Divisiowof Soil and,: Water..Conservation` Coatpliance pee ion :x
3-Mvision of Water.Quality -.Compliance Inspection
:s V Other. Agency - Operation Revrew;x _
r _ + A
0Routine Q Complaint Q Follow-up of DWQ ins ection Q Follow-up of DSWC review Q Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection L 24 hr. (hh:mm)
ermitted Certified 0 Conditionally Certified 13 Registered 113 Not Oper-a-ti-o-na-11 Date Last Operated .
GCountY Farm Name: ...........�Ch�4Ul ,�4S.. r...`f � ?� ......
Owner Name: ,1„�.. �J u�.-tCx S z s Z - 7- 3 Z1aa�
..................I............................. ..... .......... Phone No:... s z.. �. ....(¢-�.Tri..�t )
Facility Contact: .............. ..Title Phone No:
Mailing Address: �,ti.... l,_._0boX_.�z—� rLou={JG,,,,,,,,,, �SgC�
.............................................................................5.......................,.. .. �..............-----
Onsite Representative:- ............� v � .](.Q �t`�................................. :....... Integrator:... ls..r.. (Q.Sh?F. ...`6 .......................
Certified Operator:....,L l� ,;. Operator Certification Number: ..... 7-0(„1 J,,,,,,,,,_..
Location of Farm:
Latitude ' ' 46 Longitude ' 6 44
Design Current
Design " Current -
Design Ciirrent
Swine Capacity. Population
Poultry
Capacity -.Po ula6on Cattle - :
Ca achy ` Po �nlation
can to Feeder
❑r
❑Laye
Dairy
Feeder to Finish
❑ Non -Layer
VEI—Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Other I
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity.:
FT,000
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Total SSLW= ;,
i }o S taco
Number of Lagoons { ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps JE1 No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes EKo
Discharge orisinated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in galfmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If ycs, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 62,90
❑ Yes QWo
❑ Yes PK0
Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): ...............
..................... .................................... ................................... ..... ............................... ......................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes To
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back

Facility Number: l}Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
❑ Yes
MNcr-
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the strictures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
E No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
00110-
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
Yes
elevation markings?
❑
[2,111'o
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
[91G0
H. Is there evidence application? El Excessive Ponding El PAN
❑ Yes
1;4 o
%o�f'over
12. Croptype 1�0�1`trxl� , C�AA�IEl l9trriy�- LSVxJ�52�
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
O'fio
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
[Ko
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
U10
Reuuired Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
G?T40
1 &
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
Yes
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc_)
❑
2140
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil reports)
[,Kes
❑ No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
0,110
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
&y Ko
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
❑ Yes
&Ko
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
&Rd'o
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
�o
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
&�-go
K'6 •yi61ati6ris:or• & iciend;_-9 *ere noted di}ring this;visit. • Y;oit will receive dd fui-th�
Cori-espoiidence: abatit this visit
Comments (refer to question #): Explainany YES answers andMr_any recommendations or any other, comments._
Use drawin of facility to better explain situatiots (use: additional;pages as;necessary)
ilex= L—OL)P ak m a o -- _�-t Wct"CL. . .
11 55 �� OlrS�. S ti s Z4C� �� � UG'v � r e.� � fix. Y ,✓ J `�
�8l i J ,rl T Go rc� S ..� L I?O
, rr ` , CaS•
DV Ll C),r�_ �0 i� iiG_
' -
1 Of -at ct4)1,1.-A nosFt-_ ea fN I, & I �w_ ,o1.� Ln -_b
IReiiv`evc o ame `J11�1P YJ l S�1 iltJ : r: M —
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: "Xk-Al 1 Qrw' Date: rj — Zj0—i0

Facility Number: Lfo —
Date of Inspection
Odor Issues
26.
Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
❑ Yes
❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage -pond with no agitation?
27.
Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
UN6
28.
Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
El Yes
2-goroads,
building structure, and/or public property)
29_
Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
❑ Yes
G3xo
X
Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
❑ Yes
[;KO'
31.
Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
❑ Yes
I -No
32.
Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Additional- Comments and/orDrawings:�
a
J