400136_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NORTH CAROL#NA
Department of Environmental dual

INSPECTIONS
INSPECTIONS
INSPECTIONS

69
M Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400136 Facility Status: Active
Permit: AWS400136 Denied Access
Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed Date;
Reason for visit: Routine County:
Greene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 07120/2017 Entry Time: 01:20 pm Exit Time: 2:10 pm Incident q
Farm Name; Grace Farm
Owner Email;
Owner; Benny G Rice
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 504 Joe Morris Rd
Kenly NC 275429684
Physical Address: Sr1253 3443 Pope Farm Rd
Stantonsburg NC 27683
Facility Status: E Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude:
35° 30' 41" Longitude: 77" 48' 00"
From Kenansville, take NC 903 0.3 miles into Greene Co., then turn Lt. onto SR 1132 and follow through intersect with US 13 onto
SR 1210 and go 3.6 miles turn right onto SR 1058, go 0.1 mile turning Lt. onto SR 1218 go 1.2 miles and turn Rt. onto SR 12
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Cal, Star, & Treat
Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Benny G Rice Operator Certification Number: 991707
Secondary OIC(s):
On-Slte Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Benny Rice Phone
On -site representative Benny Rice Phone
Primary inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature; Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis: soil tested: 212017
7-3-17 = .73
5-2-17 = 1.11
3-2-17 = 1.04
2-8-17 = 2.17
10-17-15 = .85
7-7-16 = 1.17
5-2-16 = 1.49
IRR records are complete & balanced out.
Reviewed: sludge survey (March 2017) ST=1.761LTZ=5.3'; calibration m 240GPM 7/2017; rainfall/freeboard;
Note: coastal Bermuda needs to be harvested, which they are in the process of getting new equipment and beginning to harvest.
page: 1

Permit: AWS400136 Owner -Facility: Benny G Rice Facility Number: 400136
Inspection Date: 07/20/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Swine
Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine - Wean to Finish 9,626 2,700
Total Design Capacity: 9,626
Total SSLW: 1,106,990
Waste Structures
Dlsignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon 1 21.60 36,00
page: 2

4
Permit: AWS400136
Owner - Facility : Benny G Rice Facility Number: 400136
Inspection Date: 07/20/17 Inssection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No Na No
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
0 ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
moo
2, Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
0 ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes No Na Ne
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large
❑
❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
■ ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■ ❑
❑
B, Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
013
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na Ne
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ M ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11, Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Permit: AWS400136 Owner -Facility: Benny G Rice Facility Number: 400136
Inspection Date: 07/20/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yea No Na Ne
Crop Type 1 Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay, Pasture)
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
0 ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
0 ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
0 ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na No
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
0 ❑
❑
20, Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
C
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
[]
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
[�
page:
4

N.
i
Permit: AWS400136 Owner - Facility : Benny G Rice Facility Number: 400136
Inspection Date: 07/20/17 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No No No
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
23, If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
0 ❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
E ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26, Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
N ❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No No No
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
0 ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
0 ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑0
❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon 1 Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32, Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
❑
❑
CAWMP?
33, Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
0 ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
N ❑
❑
page: 5

M Division of Water Resources
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Other Agency
Facility Number: 400136 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS400136 ❑ Denied Access
Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene Region:
Date of Visit: 07/08/2016 Entry Time: 08:30 am Exit Time: 10:00 am Incident 0
Farm Name: Grace Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Benny G Rice Phone:
Mailing Address: 504 Joe Morris Rd Kenly NC 275429684
Physical Address: Sr1253 3443 Pope Farm Rd Stantonsburg NC 27883
Facility Status: Compliant Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35° 30' 41" Longitude: 77' 48' 00"
From Kenansville, take NC 903 0.3 miles into Greene Co., then turn Lt. onto SR 1132 and follow through intersect with US 13 onto
SR 1210 and go 3.6 miles turn right onto SR 1058, go 0.1 mile turning Lt. onto SR 1218 go 1.2 miles and turn Rt. onto SR 12
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Washington
919-920-9152
Certified Operator: Benny G Rice Operator Certification Number: 991707
Secondary 01C(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Benny Rice Phone
On -site representative Benny Rice Phone :
Primary Inspector:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s)-
Marlene Salyer
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis: soil tested: 12/2013 sample taken now
7-7-16 = 1.17
5-21-16 = 1.17
2-25-16 = 1.33
10-14-15 = .74
IRRs are complete & balanced out.
reviewed: sludge survey T=2.21ltz=5.42; calibration, rainfall/freeboard
Freboard levels: 22" on Feb 27 to 42" July 2016.
Phone:
Date:
page: 1

Permit: AWS400136 Owner - Facility :. Benny G Rice Facility Number: 400136
Inspection Date: 07/08/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Wean to Finish 9,626 9,600
Total Design Capacity: 9,626
Total SSLW: 1.106,990
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Data Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon 1 21.60 44.00
page: 2

J
Permit: AWS400136 Owner - Facility : Benny G Rice Facility Number: 400136
Inspection Date: 07/08/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes No Na-He
1, Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑M
❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
0 ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
❑
c, What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
MEID
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection Storage & Treatment
Yes
No Na No
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large
❑
M ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
M ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■ ❑
❑
S. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
M ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑0
❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ M ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ M ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

a '
Permit: AWS400136 Owner - Facility ; Benny G Rice Facility Number: 400136
Inspection Date: 07/08/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes
No Na Ne
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay, Pasture)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain Overseed
Crop.Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14, Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
E ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
N ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
0 ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
N ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na Ne
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
0 ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
El
N ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
[]
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWS400136 Owner -Facility: Benny G Rice Facility Number: 400136
Inspection Date: 07/08/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yea
No Na Ne
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
[]
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
0 ❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
0 ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26, Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■ ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
M ❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes No Na No
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
0 ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
0 ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30, Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
[]
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
0 ❑
❑
CA WM P?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
M ❑
0
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
0 ❑
❑
page: 5

0 Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400136 Facility Status: Active Permit: AW3400136 Denied Access
Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive Or Closed Date:
Roason for Visit: Routine County: Greene
Date of visit: 06/26/2015 Entry Time: 01:00 pm Exit Time: 2:30 pm
Farm Name: Grace Farm
Owner: Benny G Rice
Region:
Incident #
Owner Email:
Phone:
Washington
919-920-9152
Mailing Address: 504 Joe Morris Rd Kenly NC 275429684
Physical Address: Sr1253 3443 Pope Farm Rd Stantonsburg NC 27883
Facility Status: ® Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Intogrator: Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35' 30' 41" Longitude: 77' 48' 00"
From Kenansville, take NC 903 0.3 miles into Greene Co., then turn Lt. onto SR 1132 and follow through intersect with US 13 onto
SR 1210 and go 3.6 miles turn right onto SR 1058, go 0.1 mile turning Lt. onto SR 1218 go 1.2 miles and turn Rt. onto SR 12
Quostion Areas:
® Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
® Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Benny G Rice Operator Certification Number: 991707
Secondary OIC(s):
On-Sito Reprosentative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Benny Rice Phone
On -site representative Benny Rice Phone
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspoction Summary:
Waste analysis: P205 soil tested: 912014
8-18-14 = .08 .78
6-09-15 = .39 .90
Extension on C. Bermuda until Oct. 15, 2015. ERR records are cmplete & balanced out.
Reviewed: new COC; Sludge Survey (25%); calibration; rainfall & freeboard; crop yield
NOTE: no hay has been harvested yet in 2015 & no cattle are grazing!
page: 1

a
Permit: AWS400136 Owner -Facility: Benny G Rice Facility Number: 400136
Inspection Date: 06/26/15 Inssection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
® Swine -Wean to Finish 9,626 7,864
Total Design Capacity: 9,626
Total SSLW: 1,106,990
Waste Structures
Dlsignatod Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon 1 21,60 43,00
page: 2

Permit: AWS400136 Owner - Facility : Benny G Rice Facility Number: 400136
Inspection Date: 06/26/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No No No
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
®❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
[]
®❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
13❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
El ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
a ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
®❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection Storage & Treatment
Yes
No Na No
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.eJ largo
❑
®❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
®❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
®❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
®❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
®❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 Ibs,?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
[]
page: 3

k
Permit: AWS400136 Owner -Facility: Benny G Rice Facility Number: 400136
Inspection Date: 06/26/15 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No Na No
Crop Type 1 Bermuda Grass (Hay,
Pasture)
Crop Type 2 Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14.
Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
®❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15.
Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
®❑
❑
16.
Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
®❑
❑
determination?
17.
Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
B ❑
❑
18.
Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
W ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yos
No Na No
19.
Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
®❑
❑
20,
Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WU P?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ®❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWS400136 Owner -Facility: Benny G Rice Facility Number: 400136
Inspection Date: 06/26/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na No
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
[]
®[J
[j
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
®❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
[]
ME]
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
®❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
®�]
[]
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
M ❑
❑
Other Issues
Yos
No Na No
28, Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
®❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
®❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30, Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
IRE][]
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
®❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon / Storage Pond
[�
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
®❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
®❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
®❑
❑
page: 5

0 Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400136 Facility Status: Active
Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Permit: NCA240136 ❑ Denied Access
Inactive Or Closed Date:
County: Greene
Date of Visit: 06/13/2014 Entry Time: 09:00 am Exit Time: 11:30 am
Farm Name: Grace Farm
Owner: Benny G Rice
Mailing Address: 504 Joe Morris Rd
Physical Address: Sr1253 3443 Pope Farm Rd
Region: Washington
Incident #
Owner Email;
Phone: [phone]
Kenly NC 275429684
Stantonsburg NC 27883
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator. Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35' 30' 41" Longitude: 77' 48' 00"
From Kenansville, take NC 903 0.3 miles into Greene Co., then turn Lt. onto SR 1132 and follow through intersect with US 13 onto
SR 1210 and go 3.6 miles turn right onto SR 1058, go 0.1 mile turning Lt. onto SR 1216 go 1.2 miles and turn Rt. onto SR 12
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Cal, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Benny G Rice Operator Certification Number: 991707
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Ben Rice Phone
On -site representative Ben Rice Phone : [phone]
Primary inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis: Soil tested - Nov. 2013, due in 2016
11-25-13 = .48
10-1-13 = .53
8-6-13 = .86
IRR records were complete & balanced out for 2013- no application of waste has occurred yet in 2014. #18, will be purchasing
new equipment for waste application.
Sludge Survey dated Nov. 2013 with LTZ = 4.74 feet Crop yield recorded for 2013
This facility is in constructionf'destruction" phase with demolation of old houses going on now before the building of 3 new double
wides. Everett Murphrey will be doing the construction. NOTE: changing the operation from fe•fi to we-fi (9626) signed 612114 and
packet has been sent to Raleigh.
A call was made to the Div. of Air Quaity Re: concerns about piles of debris with "trash" in them & the burning of. Pictures were
taken and given to Air Quality.
page: 1

Permit: NCA240136 Owner - Facility : Benny G Rice Facility Number: 400136
Inspection Date: 06/13/14 lnppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 8,200 0
Total Design Capacity: 8,200
Total SSLW: 1,107.000
Wagte Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Data Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon 1 21.60 42.00
page: 2

Permit: NCA240136 Owner - Facility : Benny G Rice Facility Number; 400136
Inspection Date: 06/13/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges &.Stream Impacts
Yes No No Ne
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑0
❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
M ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of.the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
M ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
M ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection. Storage & Treatment
Yes
No Na No
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large
❑
M ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
No
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7, Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
M ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
M ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
M ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
You No Na No
10, Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑0 El ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
(]
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Permit: NCA240136 Owner - Facility : Benny G Rice Facility Number: 400136
Inspection Date: 06/13/14 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No No Ne
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay, Pasture)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
0 ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
❑
❑
determination?
17, Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
0 ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
M ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No Na No
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ M ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
n
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

V�I
Permit: NCA240136 Owner - Facility : Benny G Rice Facility Number: 400136
Inspection Date: 06/13/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na Ne
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑ ❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
❑ ❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
E ❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
0 ❑ ❑
Other Issues
Yes
No No Ne
2& Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
0 ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
M ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
0 ❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
0 ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
0 ❑
❑
page: 5

N Division of Water Quality
D Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400126 Facility Status: Active Permit: NCA240136 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene _ Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 06/11/2013 Entry Time: 03:20 PM Exit Time: 04105 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: Lindell 1&2 Owner Email:
Owner: hghv^BrQwn LLC , ,: _ Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: PO Box 487 - _ Yyprsaw NC 28398
Physical Address:
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: _
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35030'41" Longitude: 77°47'60"
From Kenansville, take NC 903 0.3 miles into Greene Co., then turn Lt. onto SR 1132 and follow through intersect with US 13 onto SR
1210 and go 3.6 miles turn right onto SR 1058, go 0.1 mile turning Lt. onto SR 1218 go 1.2 miles and turn Rt. onto SR 12
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Earl A Queen
Secondary OIC(s):
Operator Certification Number: 22409
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Earl Queen Phone:
On -site representative Earl Queen Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis:
5-1-13 = 1.09
3-2013 = 1.18
1-31-13 = .88
12-5-12 = .98
soil tested: 1-10-13
IRR records are complete & balanced out. Rainfall, freeboard & mortality are recorded. sludge survey due in 2013.
Looks Goodl
Page: 1

Permit: NCA240136 Owner -Facility: Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: 400136
Inspection Date: 06/11/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 8,200 1,200
Total Design Capacity: 8,200
Total SSLW: 1,107,000
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
1 1 1
lagoon 1 21.60 42.00
Page: 2

' Permit: NCA240136 Owner - Facility: Murphy -Brown LLC
Inspection Date: 06111/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at:
Structure
Application Field
Other
a. Was conveyance man-made?
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
Facility Number : 400136
Reason for Vlsit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
d, Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
001113
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than
❑
■
❑
❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes
No
NA
NE
4. is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5, Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (i.e./ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
S. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
Cl
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10, Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

• Permit: NCA240136 owner - Facility: Murphy -Brown LLC
Facility Number: 400136
Inspection Date: 06/11/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit:
Routine
Waste Application
Yes No
NA
NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Bermuda Grass
(Hay,
Pasture)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain
Overseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■
❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: NCA240136
Inspection Date: 06/11/2013
Records and Documents
Owner - Facility: Murphy -Brown LLC
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400136
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
■D
❑
24, Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑
■ ❑
❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26, Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■ ❑
❑
Page: 5

Permit: NCA240136 Owner -Facility: Murphy -Brawn LLC Facility Number: 400136
Inspection pate: 06/11/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
27, Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ m Q ❑
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon 1 Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/inspector fall to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
0
0
Page: 6

Division of Water Quality
Facility Number - / ( 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation -
0 Other Agency r%
Type of visit: 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Namer� i �— Owner Email:
v "
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: L ,S /Q fjp � Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Other
Latitude:
Phone: 4LS2 -
Integrator: A I
Certification Number: 1qS9/er
Certification Number:
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Layer
Non -La er
Design Current
Dry Poultry Capacity Pon.
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Discharees and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Longitude:
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
.Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
[:]Yes 2(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ o
[—]Yes Xo
❑ Yes YNo
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
❑ Yes
Structure 5
�No 0 NA ❑ NE
❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 6
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environm7,Xo
threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require [:]Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes [i�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. [] Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): ,/'r/f¢
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design [:]Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
YesgNo
o
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
Fil❑
❑ NA
❑ NE
Yes
[2(iNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes.
E(N o
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes rNoo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

.,
Facili Number: Y,2- Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions r lated to sludge? If yes, check '� ❑ Yes jNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below. �4fl
/
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structures) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ,�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
1
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ��Nio ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes [ ] No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34, Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[:]Yes 2 o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes FglfNo
o ❑ NA ❑ NE
Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
-16"7 LTA- : -3, f3 s,L�' _ a. '--��
klff__�l /zj� _t _4�
Reviewer/Inspector Name: Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
Page 3 of 3 21412011

Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency --
Facility Number: 400136 Facility Status: Permit: NCA24013Q 0 Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: f3outine County: Greene ,_,,, Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 06/21/2011 Entry Time:09:30 AM Exit Time: 10:10 AM Incident #:
Farm Name: Lindell 1&2 Owner Email:
Owner: Murphy -Brown LLC
Mailing Address: EO Box 487 Warsaw-N.C. i,3,593,__
Physical Address: Sr1253 3443 Pone Farm Rd „ , ___ ,$jgqtonsburq NC 27883
Facility Status. 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLQ,,_,
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°3Q'41" Longitude: "
From Kenansville, take NC 903 0.3 miles into Greene Co., then turn Lt. onto SR 1132 and follow through intersect with US 13 onto SR
1210 and go 3.6 miles turn right onto SR 1058, go 0.1 mile turning Lt. onto SR 1218 go 1.2 miles and turn Rt, onto SR 12
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Johnny M Lancaster Operator Certification Number: 28710
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Mike Griffin Phone:
On -site representative Mike Griffin Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis: Soil tested 11-2010
4-25-11 = 1.8
3-9-11 = 1.4
1-18-11 = 1.4
11-03-10 = .86
IRR records are complete and balanced out. Looks good.
#15 Pasture needs attention - small grain was not removed and lots of dog fennell,
Ss done Feb. 2011 Caliberation done in 2010 due in 2012
Date:
Page: 1

Permit: NCA240136 Owner - Facility: Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: 400136
Inspection Hate: 06/21/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Q Swine - Feeder to Finish 8,200 7,300
Total Design Capacity: 8,200
Total SSLW. 1,107,000
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon 1 21.60 59.01
Page: 2

Permit: NCA240136 Owner - Facility: Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: 400136
Inspection Date: 06/21/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑ W ❑
❑
b, Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■ ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gailons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than
❑
■ ❑
❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
❑
■ ❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑
■ ❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■ ❑
❑
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■ ❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■ ❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■ ❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

Permit: NCA240136 Owner - Facility: Murphy -Brown LLC
Facility Number : 400136
Inspection Date: 06/2112011 Inspectlon Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes
No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay, Pasture)
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soit Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑
■ ❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: NCA240136 Owner - Facility: Murphy -Brown LLC Facility Number: 400136
Inspection Date: 06121I2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Lease Agreements? ❑
Other? ❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
23. if selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
MOO
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
MOO
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑
SOO
box(es) below,
Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon ❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 5

Permit: NCA240136 Owner - Facility: Murphy -Brown LLC
Inspection Date: 06/21/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number:400136
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■
❑ ❑
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report
❑
■
❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional
❑
■
❑ ❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30, Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge,
❑
■
❑ ❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility?
❑
■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon / Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Page: 6

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400136, - Facility Status: Agtiy2 Permit: &WS400136 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Ij3spgS3iq0 Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: G[ggne . Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 08/0312010 Entry Time:0136 PM _ Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Lindell 1&2 Owner Email:
+���iRfn +dF • . �� 41&4I:5GI�P�
Mailing Address: PO Box 487 Warsaw NC 28398
Physical Address: Sr
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murky -Brown, LLC
Location of Faun: Latitude: 35°30'4�" Longitude: 77°47'60"
From Kenansville, take NC 903 0.3 miles into Greene Co., then turn Lt. onto SR 1132 and follow through intersect with US 13 onto SR
1210 and go 3.6 miles turn right onto SR 1058, go 0.1 mile turning Lt. onto SR 1218 go 1.2 miles and turn Rt. onto SR 12
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection 8 Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Johnny M Lancaster
Secondary OIC(s):
Operator Certification Number: 28710
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Michael Griffin Phone:
On -site representative Michael Griffin Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Date:
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400136 Owner - Facility: Murphy -Brown, LLC Facility Number: 400136
Inspection Date: 08/03/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis:
6-25-10 = 1.2
4-29-10 = 1.4
3-5-10 = 1.3
1-8-10 = 1.0
soil tested 10-2009
SS 2-4-10 Calib. 2010
Freeboard range: 4/5110 = 35" - 7/9/10 = 63"
No Known drain tiles. Looks Good!
Page: 2

Permit: AWS400136 Owner - Facility: Murphy -Brown, LLC Facility Number; 400136
Inspection Date: 0810312010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Q Swine - Feeder to Finish 8,200 3,150
Total Design Capacity: 8,200
Total SSLW: 1,107.000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon 1 21.60 60.00
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400136 Owner - Facility: Murphy -Brown, LLC Facility Number: 400136
Inspection Data; 08/03/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes No
NA
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ ■
❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
Q
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑ ■
❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ■
❑
❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ ■
❑
❑
I Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑ ■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑ ■
❑
❑ '
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large trees, severe
❑ ■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■
❑
Cl
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ ■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑ ■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑ ■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑ ■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
Cl
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400136 Owner - Facility: Murphy -grown, LLC
Inspection Date: 0810312010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number : 400136
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes
No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN a 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/siudge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal
Bermuda Grass
(Hay, Pasture)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑
■ ❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAMP readily available?
❑
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400136 Owner - Facility: Murphy -Brown, LLC
Facility Number: 400136
Inspection Date: 08103f2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■
❑ Cl
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
.
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)? ❑
■
❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■
❑ ❑
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■
Cl ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 6

Permit: AWS400136 Owner - Facility: Murphy -Brown, LLC Facility Number: 400136
Inspection Date: 08/03/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Via It: Routine
Other Issues
31, Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewerlinspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Yes No NA NE
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 7

l
Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400136 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS400136 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type; Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit; Routine _ _ County: Greene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: Q�12012009 Entry Time: 1Ga1Q6_ Exit Time:
Incident #:
Farm Name: Lindell 1&2 Owner Email:
Owner: Murphy -Brown- L,L.S
Mailing Address: PO Box 487 WjEs5jwNG 28328
Phone: Rj0-296-1800 _
Physical Address: Sr1253 3443 Pone Farm Rd _ Stantonsturg NC 27883
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Mu[phy-Brown, LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°30'41" Longitude: 77°47'60"
From Kenansville, take NC 903 0.3 miles into Greene Co., then turn Lt. onto SR 1132 and follow through intersect with US 13 onto SR
1210 and go 3.6 miles turn right onto SR 1058, go 0.1 mile turning Lt. onto SR 1218 go 1,2 miles and turn Rt, onto SR 12
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Records and Documents
Certified Operator: Johnny M Lancaster
Secondary OIC(s):
Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Other Issues
Operator Certification Number: 28710
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Michael Griffin Phone:
On -site representative Michael Griffin Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis:
7-13-09 1.2
5-26-09 1.7
4-3-09 1.9
2-16-09 1.8
soil tested Jan. 2009 IRR's balanced
Looks Good!
5
Page: 1

r>
1
Permit: AWS400136 Owner - Facility: Murphy -Brown, LLC
Inspection Date: 0=012009 inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400136
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 8,200 7,117
Total Design Capacity: 8,200
Total SSLW: 1,107,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Deslaned Freeboard Observed Freeboard
�,goon 1 21.60 56.00
Page: 2

K
Permit: AWS400136 Owner -Facility: Murphy -Brown, LLC Facility Number : 400136
Inspection Date: 08/20/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No NA
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
■ ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWO)
❑
■ ❑
❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■ ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any pad of the operation?
❑
■ ❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■ ❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large trees, severe
❑
■ ❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed andlor managed through a waste management ❑
■ ❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■ ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■ ❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■ ❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■ ❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400136 Owner -Facility: Murphy -Brown, I-I.0
Facility Number: 400136
Inspection Date: 08/20/2009 Inspection Typo: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No
NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal
Bermuda Grass
(Hay, Pasture)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
,
Soil Type 6
14, Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fall to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■
❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WV P?
Cl
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400136 Owner -Facility: Murphy -Brown, LLC
Facility Number:
400136
Inspection Date: 08/20/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after> 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
Cl
■
❑ ❑
23, If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? ❑
■
❑ ❑
24, Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑ ❑
25, Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■
❑ ❑
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■
❑. ❑
29, Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30, At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400136 Owner - Facility: Murphy -Brown, LLC
Inspection Date: 08/20/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Otherlssues
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
{
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Facility Number: 400136
Reason for Visit: Routine
Page: 6

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 4QO13Q Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS40013 I Q Denied Access
Inspection Type: ComRlionce Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 09/04/2008 Entry Time:11710 AM Exit Time:
Farm Name: Lindell 1&2
Owner: Murohv-Brown. LLC
Incident #:
Owner Email:
Mailing Address: PO Drawer 856 Agra1w NC 28398
Physical Address: Sr1253 34
Phone: [phone]
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: MSirohv-Brown. LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 5°30'41" Longitude: 77°47'60"
From Kenansville, take NC 903 0.3 miles into Greene Co., then turn Lt. onto SR 1132 and follow through intersect with US 13 onto SR
1210 and go 3.6 miles turn right onto SR 1058, go 0.1 mile turning Lt. onto SR 1218 go 1.2 miles and turn Rt. onto SR 12
Question Areas:
© Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other issues
Certified Operator: Johnny M Lancaster Operator Certification Number: 28710
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representatives): Name Title Phone
On -site representative Michael Griffin Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis:
8-27-08 = 1.7
7-10-08 = 2.2
5-16-08 = 2.8
3-18-08 = 1.2
1-23-08 = 2.9
soil test current
looks good
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400136 Owner - Facility: Murphy -Brown, LLC
Inspection Date: 09/04/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400136
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
O Swine - Feeder to Finish 8,200 6,450
Total Design Capacity: 8,200
Total SSLW: 1,107,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon 1 21.60 60.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWS400136 Owner - Facility: Murphy -Brown, LLC Facility Number: 400136
Inspection pate: 09/04/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? 13011 ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a ❑ MOO
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard7 ❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large trees, severe ❑ MOO
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ ■
❑
❑
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? {Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑ ■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑ ■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Ap licp ation
Yes No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑ ■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? Cl
Page: 3

Permlt: AWS400136 Owner - Facility: Murphy -Brown, LLC
Facility Number : 400136
Inspection Date: 09/04/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste.Application
Yes No NA
NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 Ibs.?
Cl
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Bermuda Grass
(Hay,
Pasture)
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ N ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400136 Owner - Facility: Murphy -Brown, LLC
Facility Number: 400136
Inspection Date: 09/04/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No NA
NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly, Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?'
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Farm (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? ❑
■ ❑
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
E ❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■ ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous lass assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■ ❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■ ❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. Al the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400136 Owner - Facility: Murphy -Brown, LLC Facility Number: 400136
Inspection Data: 09/04/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
31, Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

W Division of Water Quality
Facility Number 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Other Agency
Type of Visit 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: _27ffl Arrival Time: F9_1�2--- Departure Time: L. _J County: Region: 1 6
Farm Name: %}�.� „ , Owner Email:
Owner Name: - .g�Phone: f/& —d .� �g
Mailing Address: 11W
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative:A"
Certified Operator: ,irirc.!'
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Other
❑ Other
Phone No: f1d - a %/ — /94f
Integrator: A! -7 -7
Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Certification Number:
Latitude: = c 0 4 Longitude: ❑ c = , a "
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ La er
I I ❑ Non -La et
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -La ers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑
Dairy Cow
❑
Dairy Calf
❑
Dairy Heifej
❑
Dry Cow
❑
Non -Dairy
❑
Beef Stockei
❑
Beef Feeder
❑
Beef Brood Cowl
I
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
Number of Structures:
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes R(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes El No ❑ NA ❑ NE
12128104 Continued

• Facility Number: Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
,�
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
El Yes
I_I✓ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure
5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
@ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
❑ Yes
,�,�
1ld No ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or
environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ Yes
Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
El"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
El Yes
�/
Imo✓ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10, Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
�/
52 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
/
2 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Area
13.
Soil type(s)
14,
Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
f
8 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15.
Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
2No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16.
Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?[] Yes
R No
❑ NA
❑ NE
17.
Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
L,4JNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
18.
Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
E No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question ##): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
Y-N-o�� IG
Reviewer/Inspector Name S Phone:
ReviewerlInspector Signature: Date:
v 12128104 Continued

• Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? Yes Oo ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check ❑ Yes +O No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropiiate box. ❑ WU, ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Other �
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes O No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and l" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
03'No
❑ NA
[INE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
ElYes
Ej o
❑ NA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
El NA
[I NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
ElE Yes
�O'No
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
grNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
Eio
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28.
Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
El NE
29.
Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
WNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30.
At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
2 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
No
31.
Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
❑ Yes
E2
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
9 No
ElNA
❑ NE
33.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
ElYes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
12128104

E Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency �l---Il
Faclllty Number: 400136 Facility Status: Active Permit: NCA240136 l__I Denied Access
Inspection Type: CompliaaGg Inspection __ Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine I County: Greene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 031081200L Entry Time:09:00 AM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Lindell 1&2 Owner Email:
Owner: Murphy Fgmily Farms Phone: R,0-289-2111
Mailing Address: PO Box 759 Rose Hili NC 28458
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°30'43" Longitude: 77"48'07"
From Kenansville, take NC 903 0.3 miles into Greene Co., then turn Lt. onto SR 1132 and follow through intersect with US 13 onto SR
1210 and go 3.6 miles; turn right onto SR 1058, go 0.1 mile turning Lt. onto SR 1218; go 1.2 miles and turn Rt. onto SR 1216, go 2.1
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Johnny M Lancaster Operator Certification Number: 28710
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On -site representative Johnny Lancaster Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste Analyses: IbsNI1000gal
12-29-05 = 2.2
10-20-05 = 1.4
8-23-05 = 2.3
6-21-05 = 3.0
5-11-05 = 1.1
4-26-05 = 4.0
3.22-05 = 3.5
Records complete and balanced.
Page: 1

Permit: NCA240136 Owner - Facility: Murphy Family Farms Facility Number: 400136
Inspection Date: 03/08/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 8,200 8,200
Total Design Capacity: 8,200
Total SSLW: 1,107,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
lagoon 1 21.60 31.00
Page: 2

Permit: NCA240136 Owner - Facility: Murphy Famlly Farms Facility Number: 400136
Inspection Date: 03/08/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ 0
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑ ■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e.l large trees, severe
Cl IN
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑ ■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■ ❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■ ❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
00013
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
13000
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

Permit: NCA240136 Owner - Facility: Murphy Family Farms
Inspection Date: 03/08/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400136
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
18. is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: NCA240136 Owner - Facility: Murphy Family Farms
Facility Number : 400136
Inspection Date: 03/08/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No NA
NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ■ Cl
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPOES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? ❑ ■ ❑
❑
24, Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes No NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: NCA240136 Owner- Facility: Murphy Family Farms
Inspection Data: 03108l2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Facility Number : 400136
Reason for Visit: Roullne
Yes No NA NE
❑■❑❑
❑■❑❑,
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

i
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 40 136 'late of Visit: 4-23-2004 Time: 8:30
O Not Operational O Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified © Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Thresholds .........................
FarmName: LJudd.1W............................................................... ...................... I................ County: Gx.gguc ............................................... WARQ.......
OwnerName: ................................................... A' arlahy..> aao Ry..1Arms....................... Phone No: �S�r.2 -2 �...........................................................
MailingAddress; rQ11.VIn..T5. ............................................................................................ RucHULAC ........................................................ M0.3...........
Facility Contact: 1abmity..1Gmc11s1tcr.......................................Title:................................................................ Phone No: i �Q:.7Q-.%QQ9.......................
Onsite Representative: ................................................................................................ : .......... Integrator: lY�uxFl�x..]Ealm7tlY.kaxzl.....................................
Certified Operator: J.0aryM............................. 1GmAsler........................................ Operator Certification Number:2,8.7.10 .............................
Location of Farm:
From Kenansville, take NC 903 0.3 miles into Greene Co., then turn Lt. onto SR 1132 and follow through intersect with US s
13 onto SR 1210 and go 3.6 miles; turn right onto SR 1058, go 0.1 mile turning Lt. onto SR 1218; go 1.2 miles and turn Rt.
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude Longitude 77 • 48 07
Design Current
Swine C:anacity Pnnulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
8200
7400
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer JE1 Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 8,200
Total SSLW 1,107,000
Number of Lagoons... . 1
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: []Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
Structure 6
Identifier: ................................................................................................................................................................................ ....................
i 11
Freeboard (inches): 28
12112103 Continued

Facility Number: 40-136 Date of Inspection 4-23-2004
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or ❑ Yes ® No
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level ❑ Yes ® No
elevation markings?
_Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ® No
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Small Grain Overseed
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ®No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ® No
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ Yes ® No
Air Quality representative immediately.
Comments (refer` to question '#) Explain,any YE$answers and/or any recommendations or any other_comments'
U4 drawings of facility to better explain situations. {use'additio°dal pages as necessary): , ❑ Field Copy % Final Notes
COC on site
Waste analysis; 2-24-04 = 2.3; 2-9-04 = 1.8; 11-19-03 = 2.0; 10-3-03 = 2.3; 8-15-03 = 2.2; 6-24-03 = 2.7; 6-5-03 = 2.7
5-6-03 = 3.2; 3-4-03 = 2.6; 1-6-03 = 2.7
it Test 2-6-03
irrigation records are complete and balanced out
freeboard levels and rain events are recorded weekly.
Reviewer/Inspector Name Marlene Salyer
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: _ Date:
*en11in11 ^---''---
a V l...r G"

Facility Number: 40-136 Date of Inspection 4-23-2004
/�ff
iReauired Records & Documents
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
N No
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WiJP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
® No
23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
N No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24. is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
® No
25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
®No
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) '
❑ Yes
N No
27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
® No
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
N No
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
N No
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
® Yes
❑ No
31. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
N No
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
N No
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
❑ Yes
IN No
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
N No
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
N No
❑ Stocking Form ❑ Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfall []Inspection After V Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
12112103

1 Technical Assistance Site Visit Report
• Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Q Natural Resources Conservation Service
p Soil and Water Conservation District
O Other...
Facility Number 40 - 136 Date: 1019103 Time: 900 Time On Farm: fi0 WARO
Farm Name Lindell 1&2 County Greene Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address PO Box 759
Rose Hill NC
Onsite
Representative Johnny Lancaster Integrator Imurphy Brown
Type Of Visit
Operation Review
Compliance Inspection (pilot only)
Technical Assistance
Confirmation for Removal
❑ No Animals -Date Last Operated:
❑ Operating below threshold
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse
Design Current
Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
8200
8200
Purpose Of Visit
OQ Routine
O Response to DWQ/DENR referral
O Response to DSWC/SWCD referral
O Response to complaint/local referral
O Requested by producer/integrator
O Follow-up
O Emergency .
O Other...
Design Current
Capacity Population
❑ Layer
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
27883
GENERAL QUESTIONS:
1. Is waste discharging from any part of the operation and reaching surface waters or wetlands? ❑ yes ® no
2. Is there evidence of a past waste discharge from any part of the operation that waste reached ❑ yes ® no
surface waters or wetlands?
3. Does any problem pose an immediate threat to the integrity of the waste structure (large trees, ❑ yes ® no
seepage, severe erosion, etc.)?
4. Is there evidence of nitrogen over application, hydraulic overloading or excessive ponding ❑ yes ® no
requiring DWQ notification?
5. Is there evidence of improper dead animal disposal that poses a threat to the environment ❑ yes ® no
and/or public health?
6. Is the waste level within the structural freeboard elevation range for any waste structure? ❑ yes ® no
Structure1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier
Level (Inches) I
CROP TYPES lCoastal Bermuda -hay ISmall grain ov lCoastal Bermuda- raze
SPRAYFIELD
SOIL TYPES WaB
7. What type of technical assistance does the onsite representative feel is needed? (list in comment section)
03/10/03
❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
27883
GENERAL QUESTIONS:
1. Is waste discharging from any part of the operation and reaching surface waters or wetlands? ❑ yes ® no
2. Is there evidence of a past waste discharge from any part of the operation that waste reached ❑ yes ® no
surface waters or wetlands?
3. Does any problem pose an immediate threat to the integrity of the waste structure (large trees, ❑ yes ® no
seepage, severe erosion, etc.)?
4. Is there evidence of nitrogen over application, hydraulic overloading or excessive ponding ❑ yes ® no
requiring DWQ notification?
5. Is there evidence of improper dead animal disposal that poses a threat to the environment ❑ yes ® no
and/or public health?
6. Is the waste level within the structural freeboard elevation range for any waste structure? ❑ yes ® no
Structure1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier
Level (Inches) I
CROP TYPES lCoastal Bermuda -hay ISmall grain ov lCoastal Bermuda- raze
SPRAYFIELD
SOIL TYPES WaB
7. What type of technical assistance does the onsite representative feel is needed? (list in comment section)
03/10/03

Facility Number 40 - 136 Date:
10/9/03
PARAMETER
pp No assistance provided/requested
❑ 8. Waste spill leaving site
❑ 9. Waste spill contained on site
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE Needed
Provided
El 10. Level in structural freeboard
2
6. Waste Plan Revision or Amendment
❑
❑
❑ 11. Level in storm storage
26. Waste Plan Conditional Amendment
❑
❑
27. Review or Evaluate Waste Plan wlproducer
❑
❑
❑ 12. Waste structure integrity compromised
[313. Waste structure needs maintenance
28. Farms Need (list In comment section)
❑
El
29. Missing Components (list In comments)
❑
❑
❑ 14. Over application >= 10% & 10 lbs.
El
❑
El15. Over application < 10% or < 10 lbs.
30.2H.0200 re -certification
❑ 16. Hydraulic overloading
31, Five & Thirty day Plans of Action (PoA)
❑
❑
32. Irrigation record keeping assistance
❑
❑
❑ 17. Deficient irrigation records
❑ 18. Late/missing waste analysis
❑ 19. Late/missing lagoon level records
33.Organizelcomputerization of records
❑
❑
34. Sludge Evaluation
❑
❑
❑ 20. Late/missing soils analysis
❑ 21. Crop needs improvement
36. Sludge or Closure Plan
❑
❑
❑ 22. Crop inconsistent with waste plan
36. Sludge removallclosure procedures
❑
❑
37. Waste Structure Evaluation
❑
❑
❑ 23. Irrigation maintenance deficiency
❑ 24. Deficient sprayfield conditions
38. Structure Needs Improvement
❑
❑
39.Operation & Maintenance Improvements
❑
❑
40. Marker checkicalibration
❑
❑
Reaulatory Referrals
41. Site evaluation
❑
❑
❑ Referred to DWQ Date:
42. Irrigation Calibration
❑
❑
❑ Referred to NCDA Date:
43. Irrigation deslgnllnsta.11ation
El
El
Other...
system
Date:
44. Secure Irrigation Information (maps, etc.)
❑
❑
LIST IMPROVEMENTS
46. Operating improvements (pull signs, etc.)
❑
❑
MADE BY OPERATION
46. Wettable Acre Determination
❑
❑
1
47. Evaluate WAD certificationlrechecks
❑
❑
48. Crop ova
❑
❑
purchased new u irrigation reel and mp
-- I}„
2.
49. Drainage work/evaluation
❑
❑
50. Land shaping, subsoiling, aeration, etc.
51. Runoff control, stormwater diversion, etc.
❑
❑
❑
❑
3
52. Buffer improvements
❑
❑
53. Field measurements(GPS, surveying, etc.)
❑
❑
4'
54. Mortality BMPs
❑
❑
56. Waste operator education (NPDES)
❑
❑
5'
66. Operation & maintenance education
❑
❑
57. Record keeping education
❑
❑
6.
58. Croplforage management education
❑
❑
59. Soil and/or waste sampling education
❑
❑
03/10/03

t,
Facility Number 40 _ 136 pate; 1019/03
ICOMMENTS:
.ift station operating properly.
ipray fields in good condition.
Jeg. well established on dike walls.
Haste analysis dated 1013/03 nitrogen is 2.3 Ibs
8/15/03 nitrogen is 2.2 Ibs
6/24/03 nitrogen is 2.7 Ibs
6/5103 nitrogen is 2.7 Ibs
516/03 nitrogen is 3.2 ibs
3/4/03 nitrogen is 2.6 lbs
1/6/03 nitrogen is 2.7 Ibs
10/30/02 nitrogen is 2.2 Ibs
9/26/02 nitrogen is 1.6 Ibs
7/8/02 nitrogen is 2.8 Ibs
Soil test dated 216/03 Cu, Zn and ph within guidelines. Continue to monitor for elevated Zn levels.
RR1 require irrigation system inspected every 120 minutes and initialed. Need to include weather code.
RR2 records are complete and balanced.
)ocumentation shows waste transferred from Stantonsburg Farm to Lindell Farm due to high lagoon freeboard levels. T
ansferred was 276,000 gallons date 4/10/03 thru 4112/03.
Jeed to have stocking records on site.
.agoon level with rain fall recorded weekly with drops in lagoon consistent with irrigation events.
3/G overseed planted 1011 /03.
nstalled evaporative spray system in lagoon
rrigation reel calibrated May 2003
-acility has not received COC.
TECHNICAL SPECIALIST IMartin McLawhorn
SIGNATURE
Date Entered: 11/21/03 Entered By: Martin McLawhorn
3 03/10/03

d
�?'
Tj $
JT s:
} a h •h°
� ��` }
�' :.
-v�i. a $
P !S i;f �I3i' Sri :.ii'..
/ •,Y. V,f �ii',. .;��:i
f } $ � +y �� 1r f S f 6 � qTd}: ;:h ��
F?: �} }G yy..Y � .� t I I 1, �b F i � T, ��{{�� r�: � . ','ri3.
3�.� d : �- Y}Y dY' `. :: F:.:f :t:• >.f.:.^•Sry.�,::.a.,J`: c::5x :�
$2 Fi S 5':3'�•• ..¢.: .. e.^ • .a ,i
.9
!.,
'
';R;i; ::. �$.. �....
;}i,� a .�?� h x r� o: f
�Y.�• '�t�e ,� .��F 9
'•F :.. .. i. }:: �
i C'�;r }:4'^i'�:sx`:'�
.
f y
5 •} :
n'_
�'
• u3�•
.� ..¢t:C.
.::.
^ t },.•7'
•o-"��'Y:•'
. C �:
}.:. ! , +i•' ,'A•.:....'r: v } 4 ^}.. Fi
i } W}Y.1j,:..:. .t 3i. }:i b{-
a'� ':F. .ar,a'y '. � t 1 I I �I � 1• I S,�,rr,f�,: }}}}''��4;-: S R•S ;;#i
k ••
'.L
h 6'i::�
xY/v e. b�
::v x.. ii�..c R�:.t y.r..
�:��'x :�i:{4`�',<:,J�• �3':°:Sf
' ^if'. "•.I
Y. S •✓%[.
:�:'. ?✓
Yir
.b:i •-V g::
yy:�#���
•Y•Y.; 'F .
,d t o1y,...
,r'Y,
w..yy��:�;:•.'���; r: ik
'�F .3':.. �:�
'v��;M.aC YY •,;e:n
:dfii:.-.:•,.�'',';•'y;•.''
-3:Vi:aG�Jv.M�.xa:aL�.,ex
+?� x.
/vt•
r1f �y�':': :
.S ':�.'}b^�^�
::�.i ii• •.�•�,•'�•F,
.... .. .: .3Fo�,',..Js....•',.�..
y}r . n;�a:�•f"�(-.y ex e;3� 5:' ,�..(#•:•e:. .y ..:5-.•: :gib•` r:2M;f
.+�y..i%?:i�.^.. , :#�• h• $• '..d�k:� �� g "T b..-. S:•r :>:K: °�':: v'.L�uN$: :Y. V•�y:..
:'i .:: . �:;`4%Y• v:�.::: - ,.:7'.,�y:+t'.yF ,Fp.-. i 1. - »} F';.::•,�'l"`�:-..,e.. r. �oiav:fi:.v: *.'�F.+}..^j.xx.
$:i>i' Lp:.k . © � 3• •,I :. �. f.bj,:bi e^y; ..a.....:.
:�b: '>• :'ii :.:3j.:.u.'.v: y�V -: ;jri,Y. •aj.Y
$: ?✓,'! $: ,.i Y`.?;:R' .;ii`•W'.,
<i''�4' :�ii '^pi rL•.Y ,. A J: /;I'r,� .:{.: •iY,;y.l b YdY
•'YJ��V.. .. �H f ..•:^i � .:f.. •. �i�, p✓'�+ .,q� �(r., ,��n',i
...�,',: i}:':�e�•'.: i.... :•. .: �:iY,•.: 'ii��i�:•+-.iS:x'�.• a2N,:'^ '. ✓E•'%Ti .'v''J.•::-!.:::j:.S}. :.�i,'+'•i.F}.�. :r}
.:34.:r
F::.'-�:�.
.5..?....
/✓"i%n:
v
.S
ki5
.�.'�"�`:r E .:,,'4y '. ':H..
C�.�H�.riS-:::.:. n' ::3: • -
a .v:...:...•.::.S;:ii?:!, ::•}���'•:,,,'•'.:}.
',"'...,...,.
�"'�''YY:i'u' 9.� nJ":f:.:; ?:J3Y•S<'ti^'--••:)1;
e: ,n :•:. t"�i H• �.:b}:
l�i,� S �i'::}�•
F.t�s$�•,yr. ';:•'ry''
,1 .
h .: ink :Sr.;e.
...0.}•.
d:.,e.:.: F•j• '
iSf vi.Y✓.....:R
�grriti
�^::•:8' �/
of Visit *Compliance Inspection Q Operation Review Q Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint 0 Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 40 136 Date of Visit: f13/13/2003 Time: 10:30 am
0 Not Operational O Below Threshold
® Permitted IM Ceriffied 13 Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
FarmName: 1r1'.q&JUA2.....................................................................................................
Owner Name:
mulathy.FAM11t.Fa rml...........
County: Gtreciac.............................................. WAR.0.......
Phone No: 252-238:2285 ..........................................................
MailingAddress: P0.3ax.159...............................................................-'-------'--.._..----.._..... R(me.Hill..NC....."----........_........_............................ 17..8$3.............
FacilityContact: .............................................................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No:..,.......
Onsite Representative: Jcn7..FlAuAgan .l!�ettda LHuffi an.,.J.latuC stcr...... Integrator: Murpby..k:att>ply..lFttWK.......................
Certified Operator:JCrr3'•.�.................................. Ehm qua......................................... Operator Certification Number:,19.21i9............................
Location of farm:
From Kenansviile, take NC 903 0.3 miles into Greene Co., then turn Lt. onto SR 1132 and follow through intersect with [!S413-onto SR 1210 and go 3.6 miles; turn right onto SR 1058, go 0.1 mile turning Lt. onto SR 1218; go 1.2 miles and turn Rt. ont
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Morse Latitude 35 o 30 43 Longitude 1 77 10
Desugn
Current
Design Current Desugn Curren#
.,
,..
5+wine•..,..;.. Ca ac .:Po
::
t�lation .... 'Point t7:' ......::Ci3
ac' :Po" iilatton`.:,Cattle.....,
Wean to to Feeder
❑Layer
❑Dairy
® Feeder to Finish
8200
Unknown
?:'
❑ Non -Layer
"
El Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
:....'....,
::
:•
:.:::
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
............
Total Design, Capacity 8,200 °.
❑Gilts
:...-....:' Total.SSLW. 1,107,000 a
❑ Boars
Nu[pber of.ILagaoAs
1 [Subsurface Drains Present
❑Lagoon Area 0 Spray Field Area
Holdmg'Ponda l Sohd'Traps,
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges &Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Disehargc originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b- If discharge is obseted, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes. notitj DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gallntut?
d. I)oes discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ......................................................................................................................................... ....... . ......................................................................
Freeboard (inches): ................................... ............. I ...... I........

05103101
Facility Number: 40-136
Date of Inspection 03/13/2003
Continued
5. Arc there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ic/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. 1s facility not in compliance: with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
❑ Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
ved IIR-1's & IRR-2's as follow-up to inspection on 12/1812002. All records correspond with acreage and irrigation events.
analysis 7/8/2002, 2.81bs./1000 gals.
ved records @ Foe. 40-41.
Reviewer/Inspector Nam

p'Division of Water Quality
0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit WCompliance Inspection 0 OperAtion Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit Ct Routine O Complaint Follow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number a Date of Visit: 0 Time: 0�
rO Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
Permitted OrCertified O Conditionally Certified [:] Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: _U .\_ \ County: _
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Phone No. -
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative: V Ir iA Cc,tn0. l"tegrator:
4�el'0 a-�.,
Phone No:
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
GI/Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 0 & " Longitude e 6 K
Design Current
swine Capacity aci Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
I_J Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
Number of Lagoons
Holding Ponds 1 Solid Traps
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ La er ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -La er I 1 10Non-Dai
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Subsurface Drains Present 11171 Lagoon Area 10 Sorav Field Area
Discharges 8& Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a, If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection 84 Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure S
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches):
05103101
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure 6
Continued

Facility Number: 4Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
❑ Yes
❑ No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
Yes
❑ No
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
1. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
❑ No
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Reauired Records & Documents
17, Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
❑ No
19, Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
❑ No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
❑ No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
❑ No
23. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary): ❑ Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
uC :E��
I ZI 1 S OZ . c,Ll r� co,rrQS Cd�f ,f G5 0 ✓�dJ w;��-
e
l�c�stQ. • �5 7 (S(o Z a. 8, kbs. /oco
t e c_s.) mac. O
Reviewer/Inspector Name
+t�tDate:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: O
05103101
N
Continued

Q l]ivisionOf WatEr Qllallty 7 �
'
3a
r
of Sol]`and Conservation
,
q,;ys
v:
�
�'Drvision Wite,r
h
s
w
gencyi,
0
/
4 �.��, �•;t,n `�t,:ays.-
i;. S� �,_"' is s �i`+- o
t e
?.
Type of Visit Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit OO Routine
O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification
O Other
❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 40 136 Dnte of Visit: 12-18-2002 Time: 1440
L­ -- � Q Not Operational Q Below Threshold
El Permitted ® Certified ® Conditionally Certified tp Rcgistered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .............
Farm Name: LittltiellA2......................................... .... County: ti-tCmp.................... ........................... WARO.......
Owner Name: ................................................... Mitt phy.fa[ fly.Farms....................... Phone No: 251.:23:2285...........................................................
Mailing Address: Plit.Bol..7.59......................... ...... ReacBRAC ........................................................ 178B3 .............
FacilityContact:Jexxy..FJanA= ............................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
Onsite Representative: delrlry-.FlatnAgaol .................................................................. integrator: Mu vhy..F:a ndlv..Farxin.....................................
Certified Operator:Jerlly..l,'F.................................. FIAWRAn ......................................... Operator Certification Number:19202 ............................
Location of Farm:
From Kenansville, take NC 903 0.3 miles into Greene Co., then turn Lt. onto SR 1132 and follow through intersect with US 13 +
)nto SR 1210 and go 3.6 miles; turn right onto SR 1059, go 0.1 mile turning Lt. onto SR 1218; go 1.2 miles and turn Rt. onto S
®Swine [:]Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 ° 30 &F74364Longitude 77 ° 48 07
Design
Current Design Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity
Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle
Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
airy
❑ Layer Eo
® Feeder to Finish 8200
7472 ❑ Non -Layer on -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
8,200
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Total SSLW
1,107,aoo
Number of Lagoons
�.J ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds 1 Solid Traps
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. II'discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes [-]No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure I Structure 2 Sinicturc 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ........................................................................
Freeboard (inches): ........3fl"..............

05103101 Continued
Facility Number: 40-136 Date of Inspection 12-18-21102
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvcinent?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ 1:xccssive Ponding [:]PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Small Grain Oversecd
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ® No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WLJP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ® Yes ❑ No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes ❑ No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes ❑ No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes ❑ No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes ❑ No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No
® No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit. 1
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary): ❑ I. -field Copy ❑ Final Notes
Unannounced inspection. Records available for review.
Freeboard levels are recorded daily - @ 48" in mid Sept.
Waste analysis - 9-26-02 = 1.6 lbs, 4-22-02 = 2.8 lbs, 9-18-01 = 2.0 lbs
Soil test for 2002 not in manual - Send the 2002 results to my office @ 252-946-9215 (fax). If the results are not
available, samples are being collected today.
Irrigation Records were very confusing and Mr. Flanagan will complete and send to WaRO. The IRR1 and IRR 2 did no
IReviewer/Inspector Name Lyn B. Hardison
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: 4z&;W� Date: /A r S -
l �1 D 2L

05103101 Continued
Facility Number: 40-136 Date of Inspection 12-18-2-002
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, an(/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken ran blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
3 L Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
# ona omments and/orDrawings:
v

GrDivision of Water Quality
0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit erCompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit Gr<ooutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit: Time: i �
10 Not Operational Q Below Threshold
Permitted MCertified [3 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operate or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: L+` 4Q-t ( ( + 7— County:
Owner Name: Phone No: f2-J5 2-- 7­3 Z"S
Mailing Address: ��� s� - (4 N C, Sk 3
Facility Contact: "� Title:
��
Onsite Representative: �Ef VV
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
Phone No: 252-- 3'+1- 2�47
Integrator- N�t(iPgam`
OF
Operator Certification Number: i 2 6 9
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 0' 04 0" Longitude ' 0` �66
Design Current
Swine ranneity Pnnnlatinn
❑ WCan to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
1 $ 200
4-72
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Soars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer I ❑ Dai
❑ Non -Layer I IF—] Non -Dairy
❑ Other 1!
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW I
Number of Lagoons I t I JL_I Subsurface Drains Present IIU Lagoon Area IL.J Spray Field Area I
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps 0 ❑ No Liquid Waste Mana ement S stem
- - - -- --
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
ff—awk C21lection & Treatmen
4. is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches):
05103101
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
®-No
❑ Yes
MN
❑ Yes
t�No
Structure 6
Continued

Facility Number: L{0— 154, Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes M<o
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 1 !d'tvo
❑ Yes 2<0
❑ Yes EIVo
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
12.
Crop type T-Atfrvy�a_ - OGg
13.
, -
'7
Do the receiving crops t r wtt those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
❑0
14,
a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ No
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Requited
Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
9<0
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
QKo'
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
❑ No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
❑ No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
(ie/ discharge, Freeboard problems, over application)
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary): ❑ Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
?X'C� A'�- 1 u-b Lp,
_
axe M-c a�f cQ-c d dt a — ®4 5� ,A -
7-b-0Z- 1, b jigs q-- x.-z-oz- z. S 1 bs R- i g-o f - 2.0 lbs
ys z- 9 4 L - Q i 15 - 4-K-e- kL,&u �
Reviewer/Inspector Name S„a
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:—
05103101 LJ Continued

I
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection OO Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation I
Reason for Visit a0 Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 40 l36 DOC of Visit: 7/3R002 Time-, t100
0 Not O erational Q Below Threshold
Permitted ❑ Certified 13 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Fast Operated or Above Threshold: ...............
Farm .Name: 1.ilujdd.1A2.................... .... County: Gmeatr............................................... WAKO .......
Owner Name: ................................................... 11 itl'p hy.FAmily.Farms......-•----........... Phone No: 252.:238r2285.............................. .... I ...... I.................
MailingAddress: P..&i.%S9............................................................................................ Roac.HillAC........................................................ 17.833 .............
FacilityContact:.............................................................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No:..................................................
nslteRepresentative: tilg..x71cc ........................ Integrator: p•Cp y.• 13:.Far=.....................................
Certified Operator: ,1ar1t•3! L................................. flampam......................................... Operator Certification Number:19209 .............................
Location of Farm:
From Kenansville, take NC 903 0.3 miles into Greene Co., then turn LL onto SR 1132 and follow through intersect with US 13 +
)nto SR 1210 and go 3.6 miles; turn right onto SR 1058, go 0.1 mile turning Lt. onto SR 1218; go 1.2 miles and turn RL onto S
® Swine [:]Poultry ❑ Cattle (]Horse Latitude 35 ° 30 ' 43 Longitude 77 ° 48 L 07 u
Design Current
.:
Design Current: "`
Design- Current
Swine' Capacity Po ulathin
:.Poultry :
Cii aci Population Cattle
Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder❑Layer
❑ Dairy
® Feeder to Finish
8200
7090
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Noa-Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
... ...
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
'.Total Design Capacity `
8,200
❑ Grills
T.ot 'I.SSLW .
1,107,0 00
..
❑Boars
Number of:Lagoons l ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding:Ponds,! S61 Traps . ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes. notit , DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is, observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/mill?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure t Structure 2 Sinicture 3 Stricture 4 Structure 5 Structure ti
Identifier:.........................................•.............................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches):..............43................I ..............

6103101
Facility Number: 40-136
Date of Inspection 7I3120ti2
Continued
5. Arc: there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any sluctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (1-lay) Coastal Bermuda (Graze) Small Grain Oversecd
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management flan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes to No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes [ No
15, Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22, Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ic/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ®No
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
�....Y;;7>@ :: •.. •7.•.. ,.: ,.1.i.:.1 ,., �...., . ,. .. - �_' ..; !:: <...... ... ...., k. C ,.. G..r'�,.. _..-....•. .....o..c.. c. .d;...�•.. .c........ .......0
❑ Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
*Spray fields in good condition. Continue to monitor for weeds,
*Waste analysis taken on 7/1102 no results.
*waste analysis dated 4122/01 nitrogen is 2.8 lbs/1000 gallons
9/18/01 nitrogen is 2.0 lbs/1000 gallons
618/01 nitrogen is 2.9 lbs/1000 gallons
*Soil test for 2002 has been taken. results at Flanagan Farm. Need to put soil test in record book and keep on site. Lime was applied during
2001 crop year.
*Lagoon level and rainfall are recorded weekly.
I Yli IFj 'El�ih 1 II.LI it i I 1
Reviewer/Inspector Name Martiir McLawhorn I� { i " 7! I 1?P�/1PWPrfl..onnnfnr Cinna4nrn• TIofP.

j, OP03/01 Continued
Facility Number: 40-136 Date of inspection 7/3/2002
Odor [ssues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29, is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon'?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
[]Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
oea ammenEs an or: raw gs:::
.. .
*Irrigation reel was recalibrated on 6/19/02 with digital flow meter. Calibration check sheet on site. Plan to calibrate reel annually.
*Irrigation records are comp[let and balanced.
*Farm is well maintained.

a Division of Water Quality
0 Division" of Soil and. Water Conservation,
,
p Other Agency
3
Type of Visit p Compliance Inspection p Operation Review p Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit p Routine p Complaint p Follow up p Emergency Notification p Other 13 Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit: 8/2412001 Time: 1000
p Not Operationalp Below Threshold
Permitted 0 Certified p Conditionally Certified p Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: Lindell 1&2 County: Graeme............................................... .W.AR.O.......
Owner Name:
Murphy Family Farms Phone No: 252-238-2285
Mailing Address: RO.Rox.7S9............................................................................................. Ros1ti.1EIi11..NC........................................................ 278.8a ..............
Facility Contact: ...............................................................................Title:............................................................... Phone No:
....................................................
Onsite Representative: ,lot:ry-Elanagauldohn.Bizir.................... .. Integrator:MurOW-Family.F.armi.................... ............................ .................
Certified Operator:.Ter:r.,y....................................... Flanagan.......................................... Operator Certification Number: 192119 ............................
Location of Farm:
rom Kenan9ville, take NC 903 0.3 miles into reene Co., then turn Lt. ono SK 1132 and follow through intersect with i
13 onto SR 1210 and go 3.6 miles; turn right onto SR 1058, go 0.1 mile turning Lt. onto SR 1218; go 1.2 miles and turn Rt. w
I-
M Swine 13 Poultry p Cattle 13 Horse Latitude ©• ®4 ®46 Longitude ©. ®6 ®4L
Swine
Capacity Population
[3 Wean to Feeder
® Feeder toFORM—
13 Farrow to can
[3 Farrow to Feeder
p Farrow to Finish
p Gilts
p Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
[3 Eayer p Dairy
p Non -Layer p on -Dairy
CI Other
Total Design Capacity 8,200
Total SSLW 1 1.107.004
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? 13 Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: 0 Lagoon 13 Spray Field 13 Other
a. if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes p No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) [3 Yes p No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes p No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? 0 Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? 13 Yes N No
Waste Collection & Treatment . .
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? p Spillway p Yes R No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ..........prialaw......... .......
Freeboard (inches): ...............25...................................... .........

Facility Number: 40-136 Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
0 Yes
® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
p Yes
® No
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
p Yes
N No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
p Yes
N No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
p Yes
N No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
p Yes
® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? p Excessive Ponding p PAN p Hydraulic Overload
0 Yes
N No
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Coastal Bermuda (Graze) Small Grain Overseed
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
p Yes
® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
p Yes
® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
p Yes
N No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
p Yes
® No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
p Yes
® No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
p Yes
R No
Reauired Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
p Yes
N No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
p Yes
® No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
N No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
p Yes
N No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
p Yes
® No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
p Yes
N No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
p Yes
N No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
p Yes
® No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
p Yes
®No
p o violations or deficiencies were noted urmg this vise . You will receive no further correspondence about is visit.
Comments (refer ta'que tion #): Explain,any, YES answers.andlor any:recommendations or any�other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary): 0 Field Copy p Final Notes
*Tract #3 field 2 has been amended to include coastal bermuda gr=small gram overseed. PAN for coastal ermu a graze is 255
lbs/acre and PAN for small grain overseed is 50 lbs/acre. Summer annuals have been removed from waste plan.
*Waste plan dated 4/13/01 deficit-48.20lbs
*Total wetted acres 58.79
*Soil test dated 2/20/01. Lime was applied in April 2001 at rate of one ton per acre to all spray fields. Remember to take soil test for
001 and follow lime requirements. Suggest keeping lime receipts.
Vvd
.!."'t.im—^t—.'.r".i°.�....v�. fx'«`"s% P"'."!rt.'.• 'i"EwY ..."'rris�` r`1y'.. �.�. � ..Y,^iSP^..' .1x�! +.l.r�r..ve. �"f[.'^.ar.. 1
Reviewer/Inspector Name Martin'McLa`whnrn P�' I
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

O5103101 Continued
Facility Number: 40_136 Date of Inspection
Odor Issues
26, Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below 13 Yes 13 No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? p Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e, residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, 13 Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? p Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) p Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? p Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? p Yes p No
.. .... .
*Waste analysis dated 6/8/01. nitrogen is 29 lbs/1000 gallons .r
3/27/01 nitrogen is 2.8 ibs/1000 gallons
12/I9/00 nitrogen is 2.2 lbs/1000 gallons
*Discussed IRR2/waste schedule.
*Time to take new waste analysis.
*Lagoon freeboard level is being recorded weekly.
*Need to rebalance FAN for coastal bermuda after 6/8/01 with waste analysis 2.9 lbs/1000 gallons. No over application.
*Coastal field next to path. has been sprayed for weeds. Continue to monitor for weeds.since coastal is still becoming established.
*Records are well organized,
*Weeds around lagoon fence and liner have been sprayed.
C3
h

i1�1L�iaA,Fai�LI(y,-`
GOyemor'
a i G� Ross' �. Saw to 3
#� ertt� d Envg vrn� eqt arid. a�ur 1 Resoouro"-e�s'ri v
t•.' .F'i .:i�...u.+.. ...•ri+...a.Lei[:,.....� _:......'1x�~'_!'.CNG',.....+`.'...-.....t.�+.�. _w': a �i to M i 1onoffWatefQuaro k
k:� � y�. r,z $ fl � �t .�- -e. n t � �� S -�• ��� a J ;� c,�, i,a ,•�y_6 sr � � �+F 7ky�� �
ret
• `From
a Environmental Specialist
'r _ Waslrmgtan Regions] O1�Ce r ` }
� ` -kT � � .a a • k: a '- �„ r �•..�'»-•5 � r •57 '+ e .1 -�� � :ir''. F �.. •'- -
SubJectz'.- -Animal Compliance h ectron
'.'Y
ear 2�01 ` �.�s, C. -�`+4.. ,*• T.a^.i+ .4
Enclosed please find a copy of the.Compliance.Site Inspection (as viewed in the DWQ database) cbnducted'at the referenced
facility.by the Division of Water Quality from the Washington Regional Office., Please read this inspection and keep it
with all other documents pertaining to your animal operation for future inspections.
In general, these inspections included verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP);
(2) the farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC 2110217, Senate Bill 1217, and the Certified Animal
Waste Management Plan; (3) the farm operation's waste management system is being operated properly under the direction of a
Certified Operator, (4) the required records are being kept; and (5) there are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or runoff
As a reminder, please note the following comments, which are conditions of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan and
the General Permit; therefore, these items must be implemented:
(p The maximum waste level in lagoonststorage ponds sliall not exceed that specified in the CAV,%V. At a minimum,
maximum waste level for waste for lagoons/storage ponds must not exceed the level that provides adequate stowage to
contain 25 year, 24 hour storm event plus an additional foot of structural freeboard
cp An analysis of the liquid animal waste from the lagoon shall be conducted as close to the time of application as practical and
at least within 60 days (before or after) of the date of application. This analysis shall include the following parameters:
Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Zinc and Copper.
q) Soil analysis is required annually. Lime is to be applied to each receiving crop as recommended by the soil analysis.
q) The following records are required off -site solids removal, maintenance, repair, waste/soil analysis and land irrigation
records. These records should be maintained by the facility owner/manager in chronological and legible form for a
minimum of three years.
cp Land application rates shall be in accordance with the CAWMP. In no case shall land amlication rates exceed the Plant
Available Nitrogen (PAN) rate for th a receivinp drop or result in•nmoff during anYu2iven-application,
cp All grassed waterways shall have a stable outlet with adequate capacity to prevent ponding or flooding damages. The outlet
can be another vegetated channel, an earth ditch, stabilization structure, or other suitable outlets. "
cp It is suseested. not a renuirent eat, to keep crop yield 'information for future use to update your waste management plan,
You will need three years of crop yield data before your plan can be updated.
For youi informatia® any swine facility that has a discharge to surface waters of the State will have to apply far a National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit with the Division of Water Quality, effective January 1, 2001.
Thank you for your assistance and cooperation during the inspection. If you have any questions, please contad me at 252-946-
6481, ext. 321 or your Technical Specialist.
Cc: .WaRO
DBC Files
943 Washington Square Mall Washington, NC 27889 252-946-6481 (Telephone) 252-946-9215 (Fax)

n
of Visit © Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Fac€lity Number 40 136 Date of Visit: 5-16-2001 Time: 10:Q5
NNot Operational 0 Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certfied [3 Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
FarmName: Lindclf.W.................................................... .............................................. Count': Grume... ............................................ V4'r9►RSl!.......
Owner Name: .................. . .... . ........................ Mu¢PjU.F4uaijt.FArma.................... ... ' Phone No: 2111.:Z8�a�4 2,.e7�t, 9�4fi....... _............................
Mailing Address: PO].Bnx.759............................................................................................ Rase.Hi l..IliC...............---.............------................... 7.78A3.............
FacilityContact: .............................................................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
Onsite Representative: Jerry..FlavAM.JDomg.Pricr.,tQhnZidc ........................ Integrator: Ik ulphy.Fa rift.Farms.................
Certified Operator: Jerry ....................................... F.l 9Al2......................................... Operator Certification Number: .192Q,9.............................
Location of Farm:
From Kenansvilie, take NC 903 0.3 miles into Greene Co., then turn Lt. onto SR 1132 and follow through intersect with US 13 +
onto SR 1210 and go 3.6 miles; turn right onto SR 1058, go 0.1 mile turning Lt. onto SR 1218; go 1.2 miles and turn Rt. onto S
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude F 35 • 30 43 t.ongitude 77 • 48 07
Deli Current:.'.:?..`
�.:." :......
Des4 n
::. . .::: ..::...:: g..:;
: Current :':
:Deli L Current .
Im
HCItV:`.PQ
plat€bn
Ca acify Po ulation.
❑ Wean to Feeder
[] Layer
❑Dairy
® Feeder to Finish
8200 1
8200
10 Non -Laver
❑ Non -Dairy
[� Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Other
❑Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
8,200
❑ Guts
. .:
. • . -Total SSLW :
1,107,000
❑ Boars
Number of Lagoons 1 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area
Holding Panda 7 Sohd Traps : : ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
:.
Discharees & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge oiigivated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes. notitj DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the emi hated floe' in gal/ruin?
d_ Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (Ii'ves, uoliN DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection d Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Stricture 4 Structure 5 Sinicture 6
Identifier:.-.....................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard(inches):...............32.................................................. ...... ......................... ................... I.................... ............................................ I .......... I..............

Facility Number: 40-136 Date of Inspection 5-16-20b1
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ tress, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc-)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? Yes ®No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste AD. plication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ® No
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Graze) Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Small Grain Overseed
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes 0 No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes []No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Re wired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage &. General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
Oe/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
[]Yes 0 No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes 9 No
❑ Yes Z, No
❑ Yes 9 No
❑ Yes 2 No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes S No
❑ Yes ® No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ® No
© No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
❑ Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
it Analysis - 2/20/01, lime as recommended.
aste Analysis - 3/27/01, 2.81bs./l000 gals.; 12/19/00, 2.2 lbs./1000 gals.
igation records complete with a nitrogen balance.
eeboard levels maintained per General Permit.
you have any questions and/or need further quidanec, please tail me at [phone], ext. 321 or Lyn Hardison at ext. 318.
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signal
Date: S - i '7 .- o 1

O5103101 Conh ued'
FaeWty Number: 40w136 Date of Inspection 5-16-200] Printed on: 5h 71200i
Odor IssueR
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
3I. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
[AdditionafComments and/or rawipgs;
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No

of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 40 I36 Date of Visit: 8-28-Zt100 Time:E rO 1030
Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
®Permitted ®Certified E3 Conditionally Certified [3Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ...............
FarmName: Lindell.l&2..................................................... ..... ............................... County: Gregag ............................................... WARO.......
Owner Name:................ ................................... Mlurptby.fam0y.farma....................... Phone No: 257.:2,38:22.85.................................. ........................
Facility Contact:
Title: ...................
Phone No:
MailingAddress: P0.BA.X.7.S9............................................................................................ R01C.HldI..NC........................................................ 21RU .............
OnsiteRepresentative: Jerry -Flanagan .......................................................................... integrator: lkdtLmity-Flip.'lly..Fal7lu.....................................
Certified Operator: Jer y..H.................................. Flsttagain......................................... Operator Certification Number: .1Q.209.............................
Location of Farm:
From Kenansville, take NC 903 0.3 miles into Greene Co., then turn Lt. onto SR 1132 and follow through intersect with US 13 A,
onto SR 1210 and go 3.6 miles; turn right onto SR 1058, go 0.1 mile turning Lt. onto SR 1218; go 1.2 miles and turn Rt. onto S
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 ° 30 4366 Longitude 77 ° 48 6 07 LG
Design. Current Design Current Design Current
Swine ........
-oUl
Ca acit Ai ulatnon .
T.........:.Capacity :Population....:...... Capacity:;,1'opulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
8200
7684
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Discharges & Stream lmg!acts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a, if discharge is observed. was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑yes ❑ No
c. lfdischarge is observed, what is the estimated flow in galhnin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (ifyes. notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure I Structure 2 Struemre Structure 4 Structure 5 Sh'ucture 6
Identifier: ..........pzitttatry.......... .................... ...............
Freeboard(inches): ............ _AQ ............... .................................... ................................... .................................... .................................... ....................................

S/00
Facility Number: 40-136 Date of Inspection 8-28-2000
5. Are there anv immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenancehmprovemeut?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
Continued on back
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Graze) Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Small Grain Overseed Summer/Winter Annuals
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes N No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Reetuire.d Records -& Diwilim_ents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (iel irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ic/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24_ Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
E3; No violations;fir'&fl6endes-were.noted:du'rink thii-vis C You will:receive'no further: •:-
correspondence about this visit.' .. ..... .... .... ...
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
* Last soils report dated 5-19-00 with up to 1.5 T/acre lime needed. Lime applied in May 2000. Soils report still showing high indexes d
with field 1 at 1132 Zn-I and 946 Cu-I; and field 4 at 1712 Zal and 981 Cu-I
7. Planning to bushbog outer wall of lagoon wall within two weeks - vegetation is moderate
14a. Full irrigation package on site with pull information and map. Waste plan dated 5-22-00 with an overall PAN deficit of 6.8 lbs.
Operation not subject to a wettable acres determination if letter has not been sent out by DWQ Central Office.
* Need to check with technical specialist prior to grazing winter and summer annuals for T3, field 2 (plan does not show grazing option for
inter and summer annuals)
* IRR2 have been converted to new pull design
kl 13ff IIII I I, i.li I_ IIitrr II � _. I 11l1 i 4j F i it II
Reviewer/Inspector Namei'�i , . 11 IIl11�tl 3 -i l jl� l II,!1ilt� l II� I II'IJ .. .i•' 11 1.Iar a.-. .�J.��.�I ...��-

1 Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 51001
Facility Number: 40-135 Date of Inspection 8-28-200i)
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon tail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
* bast waste analysis dated 6-21-00 at 2.3 lbs/1000 gal. Previous report dated 4-3-00 at l.9 lbs/1000 gal.
* Keeping lagoon level records on production records which are complete back to last inspection
* In process of repairing culverts under farm path - collapsed culvert has been replaced. Repairs should improve field drainage.
15. Operation was late planting millet this season due to securing third party land agreements and installation of irrigation pipe - do not
put full PAN amount on summer annuals (recommend no more than one cutting worth for —50 lbs/acre)
71

' t Division of Water Quality
O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 40 13{y i?ate of Visit: 51241Z000 Time: 10:00 AM Printed on: 5/25/2000
Q Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
0 Permitted ® Certified [3 Conditionally Certified [Q Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ..............
Farm Name: t.iJ1 d9M.l&Z..................................................................................................... County: Crreexte............................................... WARO.......
Owner Name:.. ................................................. 1!'11trlxhy..k'>llrpiUYXAxtt1S....................... Phone No: 9�Q-2;�Q-1�4 9..t~ t..45.54�........,...,...,...,...,............
FacilityContact: ..............................................................................Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
Mailing Address: RRrxtt .1.. QX..4S-.9............................................................................... 1?I'4b.tAUhMrg'.NC............................................... 2.7.$98 ..............
Onsite Representative:J.Crry.jr ...................
Certified Operator:DQ.ug....................................... Prige .................................
Location of Farm:
Integrator:11:1Urphy...uxtiily.k:".IDS...................................
Operator Certification Number:j.$A4jj .............................
® Swine [IPoultry. ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 • 30 ' 43 " Longitude 77 ° 48 ' 07
66
Design Current
Swine rflnsleity Pnnnintinn
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
8200
8200
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Soars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -La er ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 9,200
Total SSLW 1,107,000
Number of Lagoons © 10 Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps 0 ❑ No Liquid Waste Mana ement S stem
10 Spray Field Area
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
®No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes
® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
❑ Yes
® No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier: ....................................................................................................................................................................:...............................I......."..,......
Freeboard (inches): 24

• - IV Continued on hack
Facility Number: 40-136 Date of Inspection 5/24/2000 Printed on: 5/25/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, 0 Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ®No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ® No
12. Crop type C. Bermuda (hay & graze) Small Grain
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ®No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
lb. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
N,6wi6,tations'or deficiencies-were:noted'd'uring•tliis visit::You:will:receive no further' -
.. correspondence a6 ' i this.visit...... • ... • .. • .... .
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
Soil analysis 5/19/00; waste analysis 4/3/00 - 1.9 lbs./1000 gals.
Irrigation records complete with nitrogen balance.
New waste utilization plan 5/22/00 included additional acreage for spray irrigation and is based on
ovettable acres. New hydrants will be installed within next couple of weeks.
Reviewer/Inspector Name 3Daphne B. Cullom Entered by Ann

I Re'lTwer/inspecto r Signature: Date:
--------------
Facility Number: 40-136 Date of Inspection 5/24/2000 Printed on: 5/25/2000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28.
Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
❑ Yes
® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29.
is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
❑ Yes
® No
30.
Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
❑ Yes
® No
31.
Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
❑ Yes
®No
32.
Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Additional omments and/orDrawings:

Wh
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and
Natural Resources
Washington Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor D
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary Nch-tTH CAROLINA DEPARTMEN-r Oi'
EIVV1RC>NMFZN-r AND NATURAL RE:sC?URCES
r DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
January 21, 1999
Dr. Garth Boyd
Lindell 1 & 2
Rt. 1, Box 45-A
Walstonburg, NC 27888
SUBJECT: Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
Lindell 1 & 2
Fac. No. 40-136
Greene County
Dear Mr. Boyd:
On March 3, 1998, I conducted an Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection at the referenced facility.
Overall, the operation was found to be in satisfactory condition. A copy of the inspection report is attached
for your review.
In general, this inspection includes verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan (CAWMP); (2) the farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC 2H.0217, Senate
Bill 1217, and the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan; (3) the farm operation's waste management
system is being operated properly under the direction of a Certified Operator, (4) the required records are
being kept; (5) there are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or runoff.
The recommendations and/or continents regarding your inspection can be found in the comment section of the
attached inspection form. It is very important as the owner and Operator in Charge that you address any noted
concerns, as soon as possible. For assistance, please contact your Technical Specialist and/or the local Soil &
Water Conservation District Office.
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance during the inspection. Should you have further questions or
comments regarding this inspection, do not hesitate to call me at [phone], ext. 321.
Sincerely,
Daphne B. Cullom
Environmental Specialist II
cc: Greene County SWCD Office
. WaRO
943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, North Carolina 27889
Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

Facility Number Date of Inspection 1 ..3-J-98 j
Time of Inspection E--TUTT07 24 hr. (hh:mm)
p Registered ® Certified p Applied for Permit C Permitted of operattona Date Last Operated: 6/1/97
Farm Name: Lind.ell..1&2..................................................................................................... County: Greene WARO
Owner Namc:................................................... 1N.urphy.F.amily.Fasts...................... Phone Not 9.1.0-289.-..6439.,.ext,A556 .....................................
Facility Contact: ...............................................................................Title Phone No:
.....................................................................................................................
Mailing Address: llU..Qas.45-A......................... .......... .............................. W.alionshux.g...N.0 ................................................ 27.888.:............
Onsite Representative: >'a#ricl.Rafxitaettc.&.Kxaig..W.es#rxltcek...................... integrator: Marriby.F.amily.Farms........................... _.........
Certified Operator:Tgrnrmie................................. Stallings........................................... Operator Certification Number: lR64$.............................
Location of Farnt: #
,S.l3..12.1.U..antiga.2.fi.wiles;.turat..righ.t..amt�.SR.11ISB,.go..Q..l.xniie..turning.Lt...onta.SR.1218;.g:a.1.,2..tniics.a.nd.#tirn.Rt_......�
LatitudeLongitude ©• ®®�
Swine
Capacity Population
❑ Wean to ee er
® Feederto FEE
-U
❑ Farrow to can
p Farrow to Feeder
p Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
p Boars
Poultry :. Capacity Population ,.Cattle Capacity. Population
p ayer ❑ airy
❑ Non -Layer 1 113 on- atry
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 8,200
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons / Holding Ponds JE3 Subsurface Drains Present p ag000 Vea p Npray k leld Area
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? []Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon ❑ Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed. was the conveyance man-made? p Yes ❑ No
b. Ifdischarge is observed. did it reach Surface Water? (Il'yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes p No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in sal/min?
d. Does discharge bvpass a lagoon System? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑yes ❑ No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
5. Does any part ofthe waste management system (other than lagoonslholding ponds) require ❑Yes ®No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes ® No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? p Yes N No
7/25/97

Facility jN umber: 40_136 Date of Inspection I 3- - 88
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? MY s es p No
Structures (Lagoons,Holding Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.) 1
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? p Yles H No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ............ Np-LY............. ........... Q1d.#1........... ........... QldR........... ......---.QUO... .... .... ........... DId.#4........... ..........Qld.#3...........
Freeboard (ft): 3.8 2.5 2.5 2.5 3.0
10. Is seepage'observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Annlication
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type :.....Coastal.13ern uda..Grass ..........................Soybeans...............................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
I8. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
r
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow=up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Onlv
23. Does -the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
2.0
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
J
....................................................
jQ. 1N'l)'v117uttions.or.ac-mcren.cies•were.noten.auring tnis vtslt:. Y Dtb win •receive no Iuriner .
Orr'e's0 nOWe� WO- t�lts.Y�si ` ............. .
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ®No
Yes ®No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes p No
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date: 3, .3. ,-zle
•�Y1 ,.

*-I 1 :1 1
kaujity NumBer: — I �11 11);Ile of 111spL.Ctioll F—T-T-gr-1
'-
.ey•-c�ently crested at the top middle of the lagoon dike waIL-No evidence of a past discharge was observeci.TMr. Westerbeek indicatec
at he was aware -of the"pf 'roblem and in order to maintain 'reeboard levels a`nd'p':reve`n't a discharge from.the abandoned la-goons',t,,-j
wastewater was being pumped to the new lagoon..
�
--' -E�t
Waste Analysis'-' 1/21/98; Soil Analysis 2/5/98; 7�9 irrigation eivehts.bave,oc'curred at the farm since
n Jyear, ther'ef&i'066
ere no irrigation records for review to date,
- YA-
' 5'.'j:A permit application was submitted to th6 Division on 4/16/98' Once facility has been issued 'iGin-&al Perrriit'i'nd'-a�-',,-rl"".
Certificate of Coveiige this information should be'maintihed with'the � existing Certified -�A:niin al Waste M6i'g'e'm'en't'Pla'n",�P-l-'e--a-sle's-
--Tdit
e , ladvised to become' familiar with the condition's of the General Permit and'ensure that these conditions -'are'bei nig'imp emente al
C tity.
if there are any questions about this inspection or the requirements of the General Permit,- please contact me at the Washingtony:.
Regional Office [phone], ext. 321,
1�41
T
16
'z. . .
"WigfV,
-A
rrn
Cj.-
-4 - U,
4
ElEt
LZZ
'P

❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency
. a vision of Water Quality u
J&Uoutine O Complaint O Follow-up of I)=inspcwtion O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Date of Inspection
Facility Number D— ( 3
Time of InspcTliou j0 =03 24 hr. (hh:mm)
13 Registered © Certified [3 Applied for Permit © Permitted 0 Not O erational Date Last Operated: ................
rr ,
Farm Name 1. ,1+[1 �. .�,...£ Z ........ County:... ........................ ...................
Owner Name:...........IM �.r ..... ► ..�.. !tis....................... Phone No: .....9..10....... .3.......fa. 3
D aa
Facility Contact:.........................Q........... ..Q ... ......... Title , t 1 .y ., Phone No: ..�{�
Mailing Address:... L ...........}�?K-4..-A..........................................p........... .11�.lLl.'; �0 +?.r: I�.�................����,�....
�7 Z Fie
Onsite Representative:. C�`t'V G :� ..ft'V.!?� y},i" .. . Integrator:11f.1A.Y.- ..... ... d 6AAVs.S.......
Certified OperatorL........^^4r. ..... . ........................ � ............... Operator Certification Number;........� ............
Location of Farm:
...... . .....a s 3..........................................................................................................................................................................................................
w
..... ..i..
Latitude Longitude
. Desigu� Current
"Swine
Desigia �" .Current -
Design "Current:
Capacity Population
Poultry
Capacity"".PopulaGtn Cattle„ ;Capacity PopuI ti6,:
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Layer
❑ Dairy
14
eeder to Finish
Ob
❑Non -Layer I
I I[]Non
Dairy
Mi
ElFarrow to Wean_
Z i
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑Other''"
❑ Farrow to Finish
,Total Design City -
Qj ZQG
❑ Gtlts •
' Total:SSLW
❑ Boars
Number ally Lagoons / Holding Pprids 4 5
❑ Subsurface Drains Present
© Lagoon Area
JEl Spray Field Are
=' ..�CT�Ct�on 5 ,n[s<::.�"n.,[r
i- II C ❑ 1\'o Liquid Waste Management System
#; :
C,annrgl
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water`! (If yes, notify DWQ)
c, if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in-al/min?
A. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste Management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
❑ Yes 2No
U
❑ Yes - o
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes
No
❑ Yes
,�❑
owf�
t
El Yes
_v
fld' O
❑ Yes
Q110
❑ Yes 19,
❑ Yes Leo -
Continued on back

Facility Number: — 3
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? nles ❑ No
Structures La oons tioldhi Ponds Flush Pits etc. �
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes 12 No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
N)e-(A) oIs#++ �� l ' I
Structure 6
{� *5
Identifier: ..............................................................1............ ............. .......... (!.�li?�... .3..-....C..4........'t.........��f
...........,.....
0
Freeboard (ft):.......3..:................ .............. ........a.:.-J~ .... :. S ............ 3..:..........................
.-. .......
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes 0�0
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes @ No
12.
Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
(<o
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13.
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes
2<0
Waste
Application
14.
Is there physical evidence of over. application?
❑ Yes
, ,�
LWt�o
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
�l!Y1r
15.
Crap type ..... ......................... �.......................................
:........... .. .Q...ea-...........................................................................................
16.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
❑ Yes
,�,,,,,,, ��'
Lti1'No
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
91<0
18,
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
�Qo
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
Ko
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑��]Yees
,.
Ek o
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
*es
22.
Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
915o
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
Ko
23.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
24.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
I
G3<o
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
❑ Yes
ST<o
No.vitifations•or. de'rciencies:wer'enoted.duri,ng this'vWE— You'will re'cei've_ito:further;::
ctirresppndehce Ahoitt this•visit'.-: , . .. ; ; ;
Cgitiments (refer o question #) .`Explain any{YES answers and/or any i'ecomntendattons or a y oiN6 cam Hem&: '
;[]se tlrawig5 of�tacthty to better. rexplain setuatign5 (use additipnal pages as necessary) '-
ti'--... .� ". .T pp
y iy
N0 olx\,mJ5 on $►
AL_us5 ' 5os -' w
ve,4. PBS r;,nc s NC- -7 e
P i 7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Nameb' s
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

Division of Soil and Water Conservation p Other Agency
p Division of Water Quality 11
ou ne p Complaint p Follow -tip of BWQ inspection p Follow-up of DSWC review p Other
Date of Inspection
Facility Number
Time of Inspection ® 24 hr. (hh:mm)
E Registered p Certified p Applied for Permit p Permitted 0 Not Opera Bona Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: Lindell fAr n.............................................................................................. County: Greene WARO
Owner Name:...... ............................................. Hurphy.Eamily.Farms...................... Phone No: 9191239-:2a5 ..........................................................
Facility Contact: Tommie.Stailings .........................................Title: &rvice-Eerson ................................ Phone No: 9191238-222BS............... 11..
Mailing Address: Rtl..fox.177........................................................................................... Stantnmshurg... C............................................... 27883 ..............
Onsite Representative: J:wnmin,S,ta.lUags..........
Integrator: Murphy-Family.Farmns......................................
Certified Operator: laumiAD........................... &ajaings ........................................... Operator Certification Number: 1864&............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude ©• ®6 ®66 Longitude ©• ®� ®66
Swine
vesign -current Design -Current Design Current
Capacity Population , Poultry ;� " Capacity ,. Population . , Cattle Capacity ..Population
;
® can to Fewer
® Feeder to
Fmis
13 Farrow to
Wean
13arrow to
Feeder
p Farrow to
Finish
13Gjts
Boars
p ayer
p Non -Layer
p Dairy
p on' any
l3 er
Total Design Capacity 11,488
Total SSLW',.1,393,3
Number of Lagoons / Holding Ponds ,'0 p u sur ace rams Present JE3 Lagoon Area p Spray Field Area
Aa �E E i F No
.. ,Liquid as a Management System„
[E k € 1 E EE E
r
Y 1
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? p Yes N No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? © Yes N No
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes ® No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes N No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes ® No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? p Yes ® No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than Iagoons/holding ponds) require p Yes ® No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? p Yes ® No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? p Yes ® No
7/25/97

[!!2ty Number: 0_136
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
p Yes
N No
Structures (Lagoon s,Hold ing Ponds-, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
p Yes
N No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure
6
Identifier: ............Naar............. .......... Middle .......... ............ )`forth ............ ..Snu1h.-.prinaarlr.. ..&u1h ..s=ond...
...................................
Freeboard (ft): 7.0 3.0 5.5 3.5 5.5
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
p Yes
H No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
p Yes
® No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
p Yes
N No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
I3. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? p Yes H No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? p Yes ® No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ...... Caastal.Bzmuda.(bay-�............... Swa,ll.grJain.auerseed...................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ® Yes p No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
R .. 'o'viqlons.or will receiveo'u iciencies'were.nos wring is visa on. .nfurther.*
............ z...v1s. .. ......... .
p Yes ® No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
N Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
n Yes p No
gs ty,ttt fetter ex lain slt�etipnsa u' a additipala p g r consents.
Comments (refer o quest ooExplain:any a any recommep a ions or any dither
-Use dratviri apt facilC � p { 1. a � es as ne�s�ary):
* This Review combined facilities 40-136, 40-137 and 40-138 under one facility number 40-136 (all waste structures are connected
and share spray fields. Projected to operate at 8200 feeder to finish; hogs removed in March 1997 to be repopulated around January
ar February of 1998. Craig Westerbeek overseeing retrofit.
* New lagoon with synthetic liner construction began in June 1997; new lagoon has toe drains
* Not including new lagoon - 9 lagoons were existing on site; 5 lagoons to be closed with other 4 to be converted to freshwater
ponds. Lagoon 1 is new structure; lagoon 2 is middle structure between buildings; lagoons 3-5 are structures at back of site with
lagoon 3 on north side (transfers via pipe to lagoon 5); lagoon 4 is south structure closest to buildings (transfers via pipe to lagoon
5); lagoon 5 is second stage southern structure.
Irl
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

Facility Number: 40_ Date of Inspection
12. Since old structures are either to be closed or converted into freshwater ponds, this Review WIfor new structure which is
completed, pre -charged, stabilized and vegetated.
1.6. Murphy Farms in process of revising waste utilization plan in preparation for certification (plan not available) so unable to
2atch crops and fields against plan
. Sludge application records are being kept by Land Management Section of Murphy Farms - need to be available for next
No pumping has occurred since June 1997.
Fulled soil samples within last 60 days
Need to secure irrigation system's operating information (parameters)
4
7/25/97

19 Kouune p Complaint p Pollow-up of DWQ inspection p Follow-up of UaWC: review p Vtner 1
Date of Inspection -9� 22-�
F�Facility Number
Time or Inspection 24 hr. (bb:mm)
Registered p Certified p Applied for Permit p Permitted In Not"t 0ppc�iona Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: .......................................................................... County: Greene WARO
Owner Murphy-Family...F.armis...................... Phone No: 238:317.7.................. ....................................................
FacilityContact: ...............................................................................Title:......................................................... Phone No:....................................................
Mailing Address: RLIBOX.177.......................................................................................... SLantonshtug..NC......... .......... ........... .............. 27883 ..............
Onsite Representative: lammiASUILings ..................................................................... Integrator: Marphy-Family.Earths......................................
Certified Operator: TaanmigLD........................... Stallings ........................................... Operator Certification Number-196A ............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude " Longitude • '
esign , . urren .
-. Swine..,. ;:.Capacity: Population
11 Wean to Feeder
p Feeder to mis
[3 Farrow to Wean
[3 Farrow to Feeder
13 Farrow to Finish
0Gits
10 Boars
Design , current 'vesign . urren
-PoultryCapacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
[3 Layer 1 [3 Dairy
p N on -Layer p on- any
0 UUer I3
Total Desigia'Capacity 1,500
TotaC SSLW ,
--Number of Lagoons? Holding Ponds. p u sur aceDrainsPresent 113LagoonArea 113 Spray kield Area
p o iqui as a ManagementSystem
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
p Yes ® No
p Yes N No
p Yes p No
13 Yes p No
p Yes 13 No
p Yes ® No
p Yes N No
13 Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
p Yes ® No

IF -ace Number: 0_ 1
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons,Holding Ponds. Flush Pits. etc.1
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier: .........#1:LN........... ........... U2.LN........... ...... #3.LN.Naw...... .............................
Freeboard (ft): 3.5 ft. 3.5 ft. 7 ft.
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13, Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
® Yes
p No
E3 Yes
® No
Structure 5 Structure 6
p Yes
H No
p Yes
® No
® Yes
p No
p Yes
® No
13 Yes
® No
15. Crop type ..... CoasWBearniu,da.'GMss.......................................................................................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? 13 Yes p No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23, Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
Q . Oyialations.or deficiencies -were .na a nnng is visit.*. You w>f .ret~eive nor further .
.. . . . . . . . . . about. x�ii§•YES .
xf',; :>,�.- w k •�;a ��;:. .cry � u .. �.:. . �.,,;
1 r2 lr S ��xi�ri th31 Y" tri, =i' L,
,,,],Some oldbuildings haive'been tornldown and�others�.rep
' L,K } � 1 5 i7 k'hii5 i tom- y��a� -�E1 ''� ill � -1 •r
and"mamtained ataman�geablc�evel"�"
yy �w �»t' r«C :. ?n13,;i-��-.�fPS i t pp 1� ��:1• r� �
Reviewer/Inspector Name
p Yes ® No
p Yes ®No
13 Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes p No
13 Yes p No
p Yes p No
``: fit.; , y:. _ .
Iired 'The farm
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: �_ Q�p_LV—Q— 6 O'Ld 0 f-eyl-t Date: 1 D— t 3 — 9 7

ace i umber: Date of Inspection
Itlona • -omments aii OC` ngs a a
y'�Yi'ir 4xrAiisi +P'.v'".`k'' Y9• ';ail it l l t�'t''�S�a fwtlAl. i aM"lr�d, r:.w.. � a:++:�P:'.TainLr,�w ��{,11-TS 6tAde .,M �' ��Fy .�� .�.� �'Ani 11,.�. •F1
�"
o =ite k n o OaWa§tej� magemept a{� -are cbn v tion"g`. en ;permit w
!?r,j..,,..`r'q'p'Fool�esq; '�nustDCAMP em n ?x r e l xK" K y'aagoonsJstoiagepo�ree o orci enslAcludmg, butn�ot..luu�ted'so'brerr,�-bottles, plasticproducts,�ghtbbibs, gio�es,
�, J��Y •�x+ i1 J �� �4. �_��Oy` c ~'S,r,t :i� n R-';' y��•+ 'r'!'�..y •'"{i-F� 1. ;• :,•e. T
i4.1.t*u2 ij T a c 19 r • I �..r �V "L:. - "[ � , R 3
apes ,wast'es nto` a goon;should�be,exten�ed beneath'the•surface:of��theclagoon to-Avoi�re kngtgases from
t I r y1 r r�wAail' nws' , 16:i •aj. Waata i la •t !t [ -
'1�40,-.rw .r�'�• '�`,'C�,'1'.` "i r y kt ,r(r li;µ,�s�r�$It�`•r= "lv[jpK i, {•AN�E"f+-f ..: Y
jN'G�s ram r; 4i i ice;S` ^Lni+ �i„R'� i il` rns
�i, - ,J-Bi i s y �«.'� �.r� +: �.}�. t'
ceptano�yed o th use controlle�•and,accessible grass1does%otOLU w ou'Ito`�conduct'a -
Cr£�3t=''*�i •�±J� +� �'�' +:y rx ths� txsltyT"t{�ryry;�"•�a ;x
OrOu�ll: On:Of:t11C' OOA area. Of SCepago, rodent damage, etcr-
�y ��11#: 4�ix'.S& X`y{i �l�Yf�t " �a 1t� avS�41i4r� I �..
jslof th 'qu><d anymal waste from the lagoon shall be conducted as close�to'the tune of app•"lsOwonmspractic4 and at
ye�, a d :17•.KW'--�tW a,,�t�tt[y� -a1K. T t'..�.s '.¢, 'r k,'+w- r - �nw r h r. +rn - -
•L.'�F�%� -1 ` -:*, t 5'�l ,?r-7- h r'i[#L'yfl•' aSi -tk
m Gil �aysr #oraxotafter) of the;�atie'of applicattonIhlS`analsis.shall cludettie`followsngparameters:rNitrogen, A
r "�rLx-r4r�e';k�sa.F,�a,y .� tf a+:, •n S rr �ti ''°'"`,1 r :•'��tfC fit, I;Ls• t ` ',
-[,�'� tP
bosphorus,Zinc ands ppe [ F k s L•' r;,k ;x
J _, tlr7.ti'4r{'i SL 7 I--
s
a: �..:. >w-' +: [ 1 r 1 U" a„•Y' {.ri� y � :•w.ra .n
r S'•"' ! �� I r•r MIN
[ •'L�CL7:.'i#t}w �
ail anal 51s, uw—mnua�l k Y M1 •"
yrr1'[d .t•y ,y {: ZLr y f LE,�s7 f i'r ;v.,{,.I <.F[d}•`r+`!h'S t -u F ...e I �W, .i��„ s ,y
the foilow�ng records'are��+equired.,�lagoonlevel data�toff site solids removal; mamteaance;_ �epair,,wasteand soil analysis and ,
it i 1 tl J. �? I• �1 l
l Ilgatld •Zr�_r r ..,'1y •r 'L 5 .e .^�;... t s-►r. *. + f •r
turps=�;hese records should�be�tnamfamed by the fac�lsty owner/maaager,m' tuoAological and legible form for a
'" T r. r'-
.. - ..s s •., L• y ..I '� r F �Sa. i�j.+,i, :� r-1-. � r� , m r r r�Y '.le � ��i
iritln] of three ears: of t• .-fil g , u � u{ � lit , a � � . ra a '?+Fy..rr .�4r tt � .
t .'' � r � C s.�'Z qb• _{ ,ay[ �w•rti^%'� ,,�, �,3 i rwi t -�ii4r i a ..r.
• ✓nt f�t�ayl d� �: l�i�l��j,•, �t���'!'�'_(��W`fFirL'��.,' i'�am.J���u��y4F'.��,-��EyArrr.+�� t.,a -,i-
K•':�f
�tr^'_ ^1 �q.,� Y L � N ��+t�x '�. R., f �� v I: � X� _� x.+r. ry th••r �' M1 ..r
Lp�•�a_. :iK•i.-�'fi°ti:7t� y.. r'�, a f '«l'� � -.�.-� Te+� i +f Lj• "� � r ;i ,r nwrt. _�. -
-f rr � .�» w _.:, '�'' �t;•�{��j�.y'�'�oJ... y.lt -. r4, I :.C� [ii %tr, {1'' !If 3y� r _t., F �t1a" S " - .
it,x .�^c ` �',., ,��,k:s� ��.r� r ` � ��� `� "" f y �#�* i� t �` . � f ����' -!•h,� .�,� •�r-� ;,} f �, -� - t c'w
' "1�;�r•c�,.,. 1. xi'�w�J.µ j �: 'p t� r� a t�;:9«t�+,,. � A'� •,� •� i,,,.rMu_�._.%�.iG�'t-! .�L•.-L��ar� y{�.r[i�. ''Ar•st
f!r
"`J` $ .+.aF':+ -w ;• =.,ISy ; -. �" +`►a, t%r� rMKrE''3:.]r' T:,�`a V: HTw•Eli
yy{{T� K 5 fV z r;t
i kk :.. � � . Y 4d� pe ! � r•.' -,��.. a..�s- r, i � �'4 r" �'�^'3_'f` h7+r;�.--
ir � if 4 � I.1` e+ 1' a•.'R` Cz• 4 a S. L'4 .'-q1.,7" ' �.' I is ` SLf - [,J" 1 ^,f h l..
Y�NyC�'L ��`�.'V`• ''
'� � .i' _ . >• . tip t ♦x. a X � .. 'Fi � a t .
r$ii+ �'`ih+•. rf
'"F7+�- �' a '` �3o r "'��, t`�,, a-•��?� tw.ks� � J �,«. J' 3i�f'r-.x-' r�.n"k:...,�..� •^;r
��[ - t ,i �' J$ ` u1 -`r'�: �� r N r•' 1 ^r �.�r•�ie- �.r• :� �r � " Y t } '.�"' °,�' ::' W�
[ k .•.-:: F.�, y r,,++-,^�-+�,f�,r�• 1 -., { r., a ti .�: - 's a Ii:Y" � FfJ •*i wl' �r r r r cr• I �,. s
'�ry.3t r A..1, _�iLr -s `��•, 3,� [•„ ,I'•'.
C, n t? .•. s t a . r t, � � G ���... A7 (17 ,.f. �,•r
"' � ,r1 sw ri.e+�,,t'i'rr " „. �� i � �w i•'•». .a :•s••
}�R� ta�.�:+F „r ,': _ �� ,,���La - _ �{" k-r�`��� vlfr� -c•�., ' �'' �w _ c���+C^�}-,' �,: i
..e��L t�3!•:a4'y' � � wn ..:Y••» �. far � r Y'( .S r1.J t!> �-� *ar ��i.,s. rr -�r�. .ti x'7.p�-Ye I •
1R ��•'�-,[ � d� �'b�ti���',.0 �{_ � �� f- �~y'r� �r�l�J a�r*.�Jn �y���1�� A�a� , �F ���1����} f� 11,�r" t�y� c •3 i��, �,s ey..
1:i-w{ .�r er %1•- :-+iZT ti,r ry�•s�!� 'n'. ^+'+M1.•
�,�;.���i ,i -a`�G,� ry''1 'Y�; •3k'?� r�1i :� _ �`��#,^.: t�Z�•` 4,5 �` IV..
����3�•.1f)� A:f� iYrylh`,gy �q _
,-l• w�.r[k} 1•,h�1 :P•',p :n1 [�lliiFi`•ir }�Y �.. 'r"�r E,..: • rn.�.l,'�7g1g y" iy' : yliir *. �../,'' fl �F."9�'v1'S Y-�'J-'4 3:.,i..
I a�`+C..:'a r. "�:�.arS..•u�-;K,1...J..c, '�� P•f'1 µr, ls„[`:1't`,1�:s.:FI'pr.s.,` -r�k� i�..1s:p•; 3':h,'y erl-:-e
3.a. .�wY. H' v �i
r r � " �ra,L:fi !:t r s>� ; -i,.ri„ra. Cr•1 H.. T. � �.'�`<t�`' �� � i^`� L't'., �i=` �.. it iers4e p �r r 7S
�7`s'.� ��w. [J:F �-r•r� � Y Ch. �1�Y�.� '� �� ,: ;i t. "' " M
. r lra ::+- L /��rI {3 pp,!•�rt" - j11�r'd�} '.�k. * S i!,� .� .E+� i
.,I �, ��" M� ,,,�. ;ry�� ° �� v= e` I�� ��,�,� � �f �1 L�� t w 1 �� ��•"'�, N x"�T't".I S• Cl v i� e.. '
�" � r:'."'^L•„ '+r � iL;li t ..lti ' � { L�Ft .i,���u� �Yr a-3 s u ��:�+ ... � a.r �:,., �� tCi. °�-^x '`� _ �
�.• f,: r * ; d-r3:iw,}yM i�s� �i": ' ir1�,Lr - ii � �� 3 ti>y�?,.� r
L:-.`C...' a«la.rJ��,���"F SI:.. Lr�•"'' {1�:�:
1 :rF llK7 ';`
rorvf. N- +- ..TY = t•4 }- J'rw sr ,Iq ." r +i'j
.s-[a rckvaty .,,� .:'" ±(:a1•s.r c �.
•tom 'i } 'Y'. j __ '7r 1 '� ti�lf Y r rf3.7r w T �}
u ° , i n !a s�.i L'# s -t' •1 gF 7 �r "��itt'c
JI
W.
" 'fcq, JJ '' *.# }_ -! ., -L ,,J t .tl �. "II: Fro x e r'• ��4 �t .'r•, �+�t- 4 .H- w. w.s,� 1 ,7 n ,.
�', r. F l` -rj, i '4�+L.7.� � �,,,,�,,S. ry.• x,e' 3 ""Q.....:...". ,,�§ s., � �y,r t I [ } ssy�:[.r•' y F� " r :� � -,� .: � L �.c �` j7rr - ,a f !- f , u .Fr ' :�'in r �t� �,wa }'�S`+ri., tl r�N.nvw >..� i•.- •.a,�' } _
f .iii�; �- �-.`l��,,;,,:.;� i:� ,+�,"`s,,y��i�l,'+C.r'� �_•i#�}� .L s. rr "Y-'Z� .� 7� s��,h•�s'-f? yT•
r r �• �F �• Kli4l� '� r } �[:_S�^�t�p;•��j�l«. a [`��+y�� `,f• Ki �}• , rl��l � ' i �•u•. ��4 �+ �t1
�h1 � :YI• L+,VK t* �j��y i� 'tl. �5y{ a ����4M i't�y
}h'(Y r� r a�SS rT1t► �R'�i n� �`I F
r�iy 171 n
..-. ` '•` .w 4.. +.fir-e."YH;
-� RE
- � >tan,
[ r M1 y �k,r a w r5 `t [t E
'', -k �'i __- 4 [t. r - [i�-J+•3� .-� �-l� !'�i•3C1 �1a , 3S+ n�� '+ �fJ t+^ a -
tr� -.i.�,y � �.3��� � T. ���r`F •i r i �t�� �x �S i�;�'G1..AS'� �'+ is �"f,' r: e_r• a�� .i "7F,r:�x� • o
t
SidS�'r ..; ,��_� �•� � �1 i�lx ..'•Y�"�•7 � '� '�� I. _ �i.-
,� w.• is s... f _fi, i I M =! , r a k F
�r `�� r[�h� twp�' � r h} !Nz , •s• n�,,, �„p.� J� tp77+�fx�tyy�'��+ � g: . i w ��T� M� >~ r .s� .�

Houtine p Complaint p hollow -up of DWQ inspection p Hollow -up of t)SWC review p vtner
Date of Inspection
Facility Number �
Time of Inspection �1U 24 hr. (hh:mm)
E Registered p Certified p Applied for Permit p Permitted in Notpera Bona Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: Lindell.#1.................................................................................................... County: Greene WARO
Owner Name: ..... ... . ....................................... Murphy.FAm.ily..Farnots... .................. Phone No: 138:3L7.Z......................... .........................................
FacilityContact: ............................................................................... Title: ............................................................... Phone No: 919-2311-2285 .......................
Mailing Address: Rt2.Bax.123......................................................................................... Stantoush rg..NE............................................... 2788.1 ..............
Onsite Representative: laap.rniie.SWliings..................................................................... Integrator: Murphy.F.amily.Farms......................................
Certified. Operator: TatnmiA.D........................... Stalling& ........................................... Operator Certification Number: 18b,8.............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude =• L C « Longitude • & "
,., esign Curren esign urren Design urren
F,
Swine ";::: Capacity Topulatioti Paaltry Capacity .Population ,_, Cattle Capacity Population
Wean Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
Cl Farrow to ee er
❑ Farrow to Finish
Gilts
❑ Boars
❑
ayer
❑
Non -Layer
Number of Lagoons / Holding Paiids „ ❑ u sur ace rains Presentp Lagoon rea 13 pray Held Area
+ii. 'quasaanagem
W eRySem w.$' �9
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ®No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: 13 Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes p No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes 13 No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) [3 Yes p No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? 13 Yes ®No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ®No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require p Yes ®No
maintenance/improvement?
b. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? p Yes ®No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? p Yes ®No
7/25/97

Facility Number: 40 _1 S
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? M Yes p No
Structures (Lagoons.Holding Ponds Flush Pits etc.
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? p Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: .........#1-11.... ....... ..... -..l#2-.L1.......... ........... #.3.:L,.i....................... #4: Ll............ .. ...............................
Freeboard (ft): 3 ft. 3 ft. 3 ft. 3.5 ft.
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? p Yes ® No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? p Yes ® No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ® Yes p No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? p Yes ® No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? p Yes N No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type »....Goasta13ermuda Gmss..........................-...................................................................................................................».....................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?'
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
Q . o'vty lons.or icienctes*were.no a during. 1s visit., You w1 .reeerve noF further .
Reviewer/Inspector Name
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: kL 01& Q C JY-1 Date: n - t 3 - 9 7

aci um e :--W-138 1 Date of Inspection
d t on$ t' Pom�en or� jaw ngs. 7a(p a�n
:.MI'• Rii{ ;." 1E"...' 'GB::fJt JE9!' F.15S? it SC%i? .�A@.0 1 .�a .. ( 7 ". '' lia "'a-,3rt... '' ' k . fi . �M1t�.4W., 4 '.!S? '1, rul ..a�.'s
'
UOraII are con ttaons o e en permit }r.
jw� y p yr /J�(��p ,
�w r ans ante emenrmeseqemvmnt
+r{•'s1.rM'4�: - Y�'1��7.tAr�fi��"'G � �{�Y.a•e,•Is_T ! uY li' �i'�>fl t ElemCIIte
-tem
;!,.,,r"oonssrae,pondsregga a mcludiIIg, but not imnted to toes, ttles;;plasttc" prod cts, hgbt bulbs, gloves,
�tfe.v.L_yth,:i.�_{np�w�{J.',r�1.�<.Y'S - h Y Ih�
gGS''olY{YJ ,. t71Gla.7V.�4,��Py 1 , ' s j�.j ( r. w `'{r'�.){ iyF'y''iW t 'il�'' r1 .ii{iy"� 7qt . , -Y`rl�:-�yr rHvk •1
� �.-1++-�'.YKJ r�Y 'Xi' r,•.. k S4!,.My y `�"b.1+' 4`i! IHk i'•#,A�`Y�r iiL
should 'extended beneath the surface of the lapaon io avoidae mggases:&om. '
gwvast�iatorheagoo ,
5•rs t[., it •.. « ?, ,1 .�F"'•` n��ki. i."Y' +t� Tsai-�.' 'SL y,:..,1yt" .,ate-.. L 4 _ orrf .y��,�,P F. A 'yt+
�.f 'ice'('' 'et :" 4�� °j"E "..i T � ✓ �
►. u S zt .r
y7 _ yc.EyJug- .�i`..}.�"{+a1 �.S ••s• -tl. y� ].,s.-..,F,a 4a7 i Y^'7s'� +.r,'d"•FwL+
xa,. yX' zi is{ -Tt:Feld'
�f• # 1'r"' 'TJ - � Ei'^d E'L'-. ; $J '!N ••�" y, � LSF:a.t F.' Y I
- '
elagos.o�.��.,.ouiXetm1 0�o1"atherwase;aontrolled and accesssble�ilisgrass�typ�yo'es nuau toanduct a ;
ifl`Nk: rM,t'F+ l t +.4S.Mrr. J1-r� .1�,('�y •�'4M'JL�'' Y' ,.t �1.:. E1"rt�-•ihrL T .+., rU�f{ 'R !1 tiNIE t�jy_ T'� y •'�•+•�Y .J
lagoon area for dainage,4-etc r 's- r 1 ' 3
omugh on'.af,thl a seepage,,rodent ry yyr; �KT1�t k "f r r h#
. ay.EY 1+ !.- vKMi :a ny4ts<'MiL IT I 'h.,I->r*t; 'I,{F .=2' t
>••y? '4 3 w +.[L t•a_K !y u 44 1 i ` C m�`�a'S M t!+n .+ i...Z-K
Fqi. lagoon be as the'time
eria�ys ethquid!annnidw. aste,fromtthe shall conducted - otose to of agpucat�onras-prachcal:and at
! F #+'.Le.+..ks�. i; -= . {.. L. r% t -�•�2 .irr }k d-..e•r+c '.. - x?h`i a -? r ` N: •-i•fiC
wi ;C daysf{bcfore a the;da���o appYicahon 'This analysis sha elude the!fp lowm parameters: itrogen;
r z t ,F -E 0.• P 1 i r,J}+} r.k`
{. �' �S �FSy[iwt I: �
�C e' iLiC .a- ,e rr •r°d. +.r
tE _�a +,r•.r}w^1�'yu'st 'c• -.-1' tNrr 1 4
05p11 � �r'L111CspSn Copp-- r�} "�eiis ' ' Oh`~� i Fis W. ".
..,' iL•t Y �T}.h"�' sa L �i�..•c
oll sls `AIIII 1 1 �... 1 ;° Pt�Y u
apal Y �lSJ )., - ,, �►�ar �� ., ; t}.:-. r,• y^"+. 'i_`cn.z.�; Ir.l 1 �.Hi :+�-Yr...�r=' e^P-•., ..
e ollowtng�recordssste utimd 4lagoonl�evel ��ata,�offlsit�e�sol ds Lemoval, maintenance; repair,�waastemdAsso�il anaiy5is and
d urigarion�records These recordslshould Whamtained by the facility owner/mlehmno76gical and legible form far a '
.[�S.iSJ° '+t- rt'ir4R t 1r !' y - ` •r:•ig •Y? 4 Y ir?� .•.> i
.., .yj--l�,�I..;,yy.�„z + ,•! J .�r� j y.;. }' ?{°3 _ �.. y 1
t
r w li• 7-ik l •["fii�L�+ {. - yRn ;..i J'`fii y
um.•of W[GC pg�{�� r t,.i.♦ ,.1:7 ...cf .y •.Miy c0. �� r ^+t
�F 7!` "^ k'rlrf • -r �-,y 65i�k+,X A �t nR;t ; 4r
A 1 E r I I
yrr' "fir't�2Sy.r '1 ?I% • �r�jyewjj{yLy r'R•'�ty^yt�jk#''Ml ".�fii'i! rL
/.Fi , i�J„ .•IfsE s. rW�,, ..�K Al![!- t A>, rf.l +� IY/ T - } �. r. 1.�` �• 3' Y ! -
�''+, ��'�''• :{ '��:., xu i'!y='tirfv!W{k '�'.}+ � { Jf} S 4 ism, I :'t��• a r+.N. .. . L. ,Y � i. �Y..�ti 5]4•�'i l�it���,{_.�3F lJS4 nksali¢4 !r+! 4 {•.t ••f'�k+• ► a ,A �y `��.rs>�}� y' �rt�� ".y� � r� .� -
•
X'�'L E r 1�i)t;1f1E1yS'�>� Yti].�r �C.
ii br�•'��,`�'t�e>te
Ar:."..ty'4h,--'
„M« yr i .4 to MALE" of `I
'1%J r3 r :: ?ik.�' n: 1 .�r�, i-� 4:� la.•^ t S 1 -+�{"k ra s. w Y.- yi.,
t p 1:+ �• t i. ZZ* W. Rr. t ^3
,: #r � 'a� yM„ .'4�a � s� •?!' r �A�J 1 r"�:�ol�,,.a��''-�+113�. t��z �t-ff(�( �j t"'.�'r"%'� �'d�•F�1�.r•i:?�� +%�ti.,"ti4 t� � J' xr i • 'i
f� �'S
�
• .� '�` �' • �`���� � 5 r w '�`: "� ><rl ¢"��` ",. f p{�{ °' �i• �3�t .1pt
b';ir'� �, ! .1 \'b +ir'r 1:10 r4 �rY.{ tG .1 ,+•, ,'. ' 4 aj �F'7'-,i/'+
Y
��aFs v.
�•cs{
'""� ° � .�r�'r�ti's; r
i . 1"iT -.4; !
t+ t.. . rt !a 5 'S.i ti h Y- �.{�+a�aa �r .i' L{ J 1 � A:'' • q��
trs At. { as [ f i•.E I A, , [ ^ If l�"�k f1F�'� 4 �f � 3 s i _r � tt� hT �' t'
- e 7y.. iJ- '.{J 1 ' ii"rs..i .iJ r" .ti ir.+. "� ft ?{ .:.0 t �r �t ry f ® �^.. y+•q�nl
�k •7 b H•M 'y 1 4
3'y h �k rft''"'I �+. ���• ty �t !" 2'r'y- i�.�'�t�:a.�i��r x'"'iYfi. -"'(.,
-�}
M 1 '[,�r�'y;� C -.a.. i'��'•[i wl: :l�,1 li C { r ECb +i- 1 'i, •�'f , r. r #r 1, f 'E ,1 'N�` r`Y ,rl4i`�`EI "ir'IaS�
..�:j� R�H�'f}i�a�tR�
-r �t{z. •E {sr'i a .+»til :- 1 s.. r r 4 F f. t i { � ,�t�.It�,, ], 4�',,, •.. jE" � 7 2'4 4 .
14�: � �'! M �w �-.
��..}yy}��,,}} �t4-.yty'k r3 r.� � p��i�]]{ . it ii.. 'f t. ...�i ;� iy •�''[' 1} Y � +.� � 'S
.4l.,5rt1C. f4 'y.�� W`�S �Sy` h � �.�� ' 4' .kl 1�� J• � � l � 1 9Y6
��J1 7 S �(.r'G F`
k
.4
t .1 J („�, , t N i � t " SS•.'�•' �t}.�3�"�{ � ,�-1�'"E� s s� i <qy�J��` '
W •i kr - s iw,-!.r�r.w�?. =. r P.—v H .1 1 r -,Jq Y -r
1�1t�4
T y;m I r,M—.Iry t 5
[_ � �+�� -..t y,' �yxl..?�+- If....: 7 i j I �� �. �r�� - .t. •; _ r+�FrY"{i�:' � s r,9- i c� 'i• + •a �'
t,•
-
. y ��'�y,"Qw.L' h,:i 3 ►��r'•'i1 ],{ `5T K� �r L{'
1.:,r.'. ! nM--{.•4'�1 _: ����ytC'� t•F (," c` i �{•rT{�.�"7l I. �t 1'..,.yL,,,."{' �41
.�'-M�L Af/f � !X- r ��4'•,`L3. 4 Y��•�r��l �i�. ry %�.i' rw 1 � f:: !�
R s,7���a • r
1 ; `�` r r ,.,. ,-:.. �: �. r •':g�rtt4� � r p ' x�t� Ez_ v�t�r!? tvr e..
�.Y P• �� -r �, � [ a•n{F� li�, ~PtL. Js-.. �� .2�4,� r��! � .r - . i � � F .;Y
,1 C_}�yY. LL�[ i.�_: f�.T I
t ~,1!i 4•'i • "{l{i •YL 1
��'.Y�- �"a R At�$�f�t
.�5 w� .CY.'al +
� p
�, 4i1►1 '� M'.. _ ,Q, IhL(. .1 , 14�.14 'SrM:GH. '1 V,{•fi1rwi'I•++'f,'i''1jGJi`MT if'fT•'.'S�! Y
f!, .. _i..,. i_�t E,' + 1 M� k3. r ..P , l- •i -' .t r ! 4r , f :«h.� ,�'P,•� yjMR>,;,,'�M'�
� ' 15�1� % - .f. YSR�:7'1.,� Y:�-tn� i'P...,y�•....: ^
..r3 ..
•,
; •S� -.
�Ol
_ +..,+ :VF• �'' lit' �r �
:�-� z" ,� � _':,�'. ,,,� s»��
� Y ~.F' Y^C mil'• K M �'• Ey_ kL �^ _' y...
. �3 q�.
'��'�`g•� 5i�s�t�,� s.: is.��r, •a�7i:t��r � � .r..x�3`:ry •red... ,�.
•,��'T�:
� a' :�e�j,��
w
�. .i . i-tV: - ,7 '.�{ , a, l �s� 3•,y a : �
����.
' a""• w r .:�� _ . ��,,�i�:v. _ :l .� i}.G•. . w
y, .: .•r.>� _ f: :j�r" .+: .t k-�..,! �{ E u7 :,"slbek�yC�a'f x" .r y ...rt.... M. ..
P �� .wlM'lti:..c-C: li i•a ..44— -%. •'].tGn��•' •ski .M -� •.rj l{,M-.....• .. C' �.! 5
-
_ ~87 W9 li 1*i + 4:���i% �e1`.%.raJ•i�ir.� �c'�s�e w hr £ ` .i'� �,yc-+�{'15�� .
� r��'�i Y �� �E� I yr t� r rv11 • s � I,�! 4C h.J :+ ,t '�.
; .. 4 T�
�. .� r• .�p�.•�=
"P�F� ij lr'
+S•�=N Ty
i.,. r _ ',".r."!F?t {ryl .�l r`i
-1
jy-� +,jt;� `
!"�^�� Y.+i ^nsR'.;� r• a-_ .ri�,t.r„-=� Ak..,��
�i +�i' ��n~ IfJ-.• '. .� Wy "iTit i�'c,t%� a. a. i
� a +J'} `� r " .i� � t E �~� s•tit�? � � �� +-,
!�
! y
b � P.
tT
ti� '^d Sir E� r
'��j'y
1F{�r
:"•w v, _ - __ y�1[�la ';� I r '+. yyx��T.1.. 4 I, r { a'L�i.k+i+CS�'v � i. y�.rE i,�rs ,t
*�a►iar,
k; [rl' ti S i>rl-1 �. 1!y CJ �t"��y��'fS'��1: 'W�� M,xf q( %ttM l�� M it r�Mq�`1�� ~�, f•1.
-
s ..i ,}k...: r • I mi
W
i i .w'1 "r' r+y« 7 •� S '.7-.•r { `," y. �' {• r � '�•" '" t, a rXti�i3kifl��`
Sn!'��F 0.r`fiwl(3>,.'%�+,1t� ti,us° a �i �
;
�'i♦��I����r'� #i "7 � T 1� '��a , ��kf�� iys'�',M • •F ,� ti �:7, yi a
4 -J v�'f). f••.l.i�a wi��� Nf� � � M1 j
!' 4 �k�yA A Y 7 r� `rEae Y�. ,�l� >.Rtirj�,1 �,ij.�T tst�.t J�.L 1'+.,-•1 r�Y�{��"yh`'.-�� �' «t`• .y ,l.i. '
��plw �.Y�+.. �+Y'1{.i i� „?' Tw},
f:,t .. ��:5� K'tl QIA'>�i.. h'4 .F..C! wl'S rb�..�, Y' Fh.]'^^f' 1�-."<v"^W rh wl!•�,^!.��.r�:Y�uwt•..

I* rcounne p c-omplaint p ronow-up of t)wy Inspection p callow -up of uawC review p Vtner
Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:arm)
E Registered p Certified p Applied for Permit p Permitted 10 Not pera Iona Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: LindgRA2............. ........ ............... ................................................................ County: Greene WARO
Owner Name: Wendell ................................. Murphy..S.t:............ ................................... Phone No: 238:317.2......... ............... ...... .......... ..... ........................
FacilityContact: ......... ....... ............................................................. Title: ........................................................... _.. Phone No:....................................................
Mailing Address: Rt1Roar.173.Statc.Rd..1253........................................................... sLantanshurg..NC ............................................... 27883 ..............
Onsite Representative: TammiaStallings..................................................................... Integrator: Murphy..Family.l+armi.....................................
Certified Operator: Tpullr kD.......................... Stalling& ........................................... Operator Certification Number: 186,48 ............................
Location of Farm:
r�pJtt. uxx e. o.. eene.. a.. m pas .CR y.. rn. .on o. .an aw. .ou ............. .
interest.xvitb..i.IS..1.3..auto.SR.�1Q.and.ga�.3�.6.m�il,ea;..turn.riglat.o�luttt�J.OSB�,.ga.11.L.tulle.xurn_ingLt..auwta.S�R.1218.;.ga.1.,2.�ttile, �
Latitude I I•&r« Longitude •6 fit
eslgn urren estgn urren esign urren
ne , fs *,;Capacity.. Population Poultry � Capacity Population ' Cattle ,..• .Capacity 'Population-
[3 Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to FORT—
13 Farrow to can
(3 Farrow to Feeder
p Farrow to ROW
13 Gilts
p Boars
E3 Layer p anyI I ::—],
[3 Non -Layer I 1 ? [3 Non -Dairy
v , Other
[
Total Design C apacity 6,723
1. .Total SSLW 908,2
' rea p pray le rea;Nutber of.Lagoons/Holding Ponds
3
+. {ll• " }r o iqul 13 Subsurface Drains Present
asre anagemen System i F°
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Field O Other
a. if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c• if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
p Yes ® No
13 Yes ® No
p Yes p No
13 Yes 13 No
p Yes 13 No
p Yes N No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
13 Yes ® No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
13 Yes ® No

ei umber: 4=
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
® Yes p No
Structures lagoons.Holding Ponds Flush Pits etc.
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier: ......»..31:I.2..........»......... #2-L2........... ...........��:L2............ .................... ........
Freeboard (ft): 4.5 ft. 4.5 ft. 4.5 ft.
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
p Yes N No
Structure 5 Structure 6
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
® Yes p No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
15. Crop type _... CoastalBermuda .Grass.......................................................................................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? p Yes p No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
1�0y!qi4tlons.or depuriencies'were.natedWring is visit.* om will.receive no further .
p Yes ® No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
Comments?{re er.=torquestion #): Expla m any? ES answ rers and,or any recommeo atloits!or any other`commentsµ4 axw
jom `Ck€a€u';• s!,(4"a6'to, aiEt��. a'Y1):t 4hi:cr` ' .l�ii�i: i:irm9�-•'5aii i.. ,,?:wiaFi..SklJn 7R , i-
sedwgs"atCil�itytaexplain�situatIons(ruse!additionalpgge3 as
ne�c�ary�'i1,r
ante: t3`, (1
�r"�*"3�
iR aI..SP` «M ✓� •� �t
r?�F' titTpp
5,FY'
�
r
�
MAP,
11 i
�ii Try}•'r �1
�?'..�`2 4
i it E den Wand I m i ir'ser 5ome'Mc butlditigs`h�ve
�s�.. t1 r�.h�,
r :�=
been+
rn dawn art4,ozhers'repanrd.
'
,The farm
'F
B it 4P"4j-9 uefto', CIO •� i
1 �
';t'�.i"Ffi"� r i{xri -M•��v,�ity.'O�.TJ�a d�E�•.r{; �^ ��' ..�ri�:�''«,�.e.'t�.ys�r,..�` :.uN,rw
�•ry/egetatioswraw ua'1 e ' ees1W"be 'ovea and'maintained at-a�'�]
0. +, ^t' #[. J l•}x!�'� '�+9. 6 + '��ii �Y9F�' «•
� �����.J
rJri �fi.�D �N :F. 1 HIY� �R, Itf� M 'Ji r Pr W f I*
'�F; "�� „'�r r;a.�ii� :�' . � �
r
�,"�.��
� i
+1.•
r
i�'`�
��
- !, �S�
�1 T 9u1 ./r
P;�
r'� ,..,..�fk r.i
;' r��r°� .1
L t� J. �M
����r,� �'��?p.�`�f r
,� ,� 4 ? ,ri-��.•y� .� r.t�,.q�'�L,��,�'��yt�,� �..�
.o � �wwr �4rV �. .$d �<<�,1 »
�
f,'w�t'� �.�Ys,�
�. �
�� �. �1L n .c. �i.. -' '". .•""."
�.'Styai�" _
�7f25i i7
Reviewer/Inspector Name ap"hneMB.r"Cullom�
...w�Jrrwl. ��E`;>,'.'-+0.t-0::r��L. _ •r�. � ti„vw'l` °`..'t': . '�i�r?f.4' �. t'.K� . : rt..:,. YA.-..:.-.4��7. ''.. !•+ srr ..:. ., '9
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: _ r

Division of Environmental Management
December 8, 1992
Y Y " '_:_1 / lv
TO: CAFO File
Washington Regional Office
FROM: Scott Jones —J "`9°0
Environmental Technician, WARO
SUBJECT: Compliance Inspection
Maurice McLaurin / Murphy Farms
LL1 and LL2 Swine Operations
Greene County
On December 3, 1992, Scott Jones and Robert Tankard, DEM Staff of
the Washington Regional Office, visited the LL1 and LL2 Swine
Operations. The purpose of this visit was to determine whether or
not the aforementioned facilities were in compliance with their
CAFO Designations effective August 22, 1991.
As a result of this inspection it has been found that the LL1 and
LL2 Swine Operations were in compliance at the time of inspection.
Toured facility with Mr. McLaurin. At this time there was no sign
of discharge from the lagoons. There were several areas in the
lagoon walls which had been fortified as preventive measures to
control erosion. Both farms share self retracting hose reel and
center pivot gun for land application on adjacent fields. Pump
pads have been installed at strategic locations to facilitate
pumping operation to fields.
msj/REVISIT/LL1&LL2
921208

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT -
August 2, 1991
MEMORANDUM
TO: Steve Tedder
Water Quality Section Chief
THROUGH: Jim Mulligan, Regional Supervisor
Washington Regional Qtfice
r�
THROUGH: Roger K. Thorper�LWa, ter Quality Supervisor
Washington Regional Office
From: Patrick Towell, Environmental Tech.
Water Quality Section, WARO/�'7"
SUBJECT: Concentrated Animal Feeding Operation
Maurice McLaurin
Murphy Farms LL-1 Greene County
INTRODUCTION:
The purpose of this memo is to request that the Maurice
McLaurin/Murphy Farms LL-1 Operation be Designated as a
Concentrated Animal Feeding Operation. A summary of the
investigation conducted on July 17, 1991 by Patrick
Towell, DEM staff, is enclosed as follows:
Date of the inspection:
July 17,1991
Name of Operator:
Mr. Maurice McLaurin
Address:
Route 2, Box 173
Stantonsburg, N.C. 27883

Phone Number:
919-238-3962
Description of Facility Location:
The facility is located off S.R. 1253, 2 miles south
of Lindell in Greene County.
Type of operation Examples: farrow to finish, topping,
dairy, swine, catt e, chickens -layers or broilers, turkey
production, ets.):
This is a Swine Topping Operation.
Number and type of animals units:
The facility houses approximately 3000 animals.
Length of Time Animals Have been, Are, or Will Be Stabled,
or Confined and Fed or Maintained in Any 12 Month Period:
The animals are housed greater than 9 months during
any 12 month period.
...Are Crops, Vegetation Forage Growth, or Post -Harvest
"Residues Sustained in the Normal Growing Season Over Any
Portion of the Lot or Facility?
No crops are grown on any portion of the lot or the
animal facility.
Description of Other Animal Operations in Immediate
Vicinity or Proximity to Same or Other Surface Waters:
Murphy Farms LL-2 is located on the same contiguous
parcel of land but is considered a seperate operation.
Proximity of Facility to Neighboring Houses, Wells, etc.:
The nearest home is located 2000 feet from the
operation.
Approximate Depth of Groundwater Table in the Area of the
Facility or Discharge:
The seasonal high water table appeared to be
approximately 4-5 feet.
Proximity of Facility to Surface Waters (provide name and
class of surface waters):

The facility is located adjacent to an unnamed
tributary to Appletree Swamp which is classified C
SW NSW within the Neuse River Basin.
Are Pollutants Discharged into the Waters of the State?
If so, How? (directly or by man-made ditch, flushing
system, or other similar man-made device):
Animal waste is discharged via waste lagoon
overflows.
Do or Have Discharges Occurred in Response to a Storm
Event of Less Than a 25-year, 24-hour Intensity? (if yes,
include a brief listings of incidents and suspected
causes.):
Discharges of animal waste occur regardless of
rainfall.
Type of Waste Management (Examples: type of confinement,
free stall barns, sheltered or limited shelter dirt lots,
paved or dirt open lots, swine houses, pasture: type of
waste handling -direct spreading in solid form, slotted
floors with lagoon or pit, single or multi -cell lagoon,
aerated lagoon, land application of liquid manure, spray
irrigation, contractor disposal, etc.),
There are 3 sloped floor type houses. This facility does
utilize land application on and as needed basis'.
Condition of Waste Management Facility (rate as poor -good,
no discharge, sufficient freeboard in lagoon, etc.
Include weather conditions during inspection.)
Overall the facility is rated as fair, though more
attention should be given to the waste management
program.
Animal Waste Discharge (including photos and witness'
names, addressed, telephone numbers and statements of
fact)
See attached photos.
Water Quality Assessment: (Include description of
sampling, field measurements, visual observations and
slope and vegetative cover of land adjacent to water,
extent of rainfall and other factor relative to the
likelihood or frequency of discharge of animal wastes and

process wastewaters).
No field measurements were taken.
Recommendations Made to Owner/operator:
Mr. McLaurin was advised to eliminate the discharge
of waste from the operation and to contact his local
SCS for guidance.
Recommendations for Further DEM Actions: (Re -inspect,
designate)
The Regional Office recommends that the Maurice
McLaurin/ Murphy Farms LL-1 Operation be designated as
a Concentrated Animal Feeding Operation.
Other Comments:
None.
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED

0
w1j
• a r \•IN
,� FF
mll • • •
OD
LQeU
100
4
• 1
Z , •.© 1 fit■ �'- IfF _i
1 ♦� \ �.
•� Milo \
00f
\ i
u U:
\ O
1 Q
1214 ' , eg aC.Em
. 4w, ✓' ♦ •
n'
1217
J •• ri � C 1
r
oa
- e t 116 ~ O
1�
roaca►4ecwo �:etdG01 .. .. Nahurita Sao IV IV 47'30• 247 t g _ irr•�
SCALE 1:24 OW ,

'
•1
�+�.. �� L _yam: �4.J.:»
- !.}y - }.' ,�:.
� �•�
1 4 +, .
'��.'��<�'���J4��+., MJ�'.:?�`,,�,��1.,-�r •tw2'`f �J ,.� it�4f
. � ' . I''. , . - - .. �: �-� �'�'' •'ram,._ 's..i.' 1
ip
1.7