400134_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NORTH CAROLINA .�
Department of Environmental Qua'

INSPECTIONS.
INSPECTIONS
INSPECTIONS

n
0 Division of Water Resources
El Division of Soil and Water Conservation
13 Other Agency
Facility Number:
400134
Facility Status: Active
Permit: AWS400134
❑ Denied Access
Inpsection Type:
Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for visit:
Routine
County:
Greene Region:
Washington
Date of Visit:
08/0912017 Entry Time: 02:40 pm Exit Time: 3:25 pm Incident #
Farm Name:
J&J Swine Farm
Owner Email:
[e-mail]
Owner:
Steven C Jones
Phone:
919-753-2554
Mailing Address:
633 Jonestown Rd
Snow Hill NC 285801700
Physical Address:
812 Albritton Rd
Snow Hill NC 28580
Facility Status:
■ Compliant ❑
Not Compliant Integrator:
Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm:
258 & US 13 at Lizzie off SR1326
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts
Records and Documents
Latitude: 35° 31' 03"
Waste Col, Stor, & Treat
Otherissues
Longitude: 77° 38' 35"
Waste Application
Certified Operator: William L Jones Operator Certification Number: 16548
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s)
24 hour contact name
On -site representative
Primary Inspector:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Name
Steven Jones
Martin Jones
Title
Phone:
Phone:
Phone
Marlene Salyer Phone:
Date:
waste analysis: soil tested: 2015
7-26-16 = .97
4-11-16 = 1.70
IRR records are balanced for 2016 - however irrigation occurred in March & Jul 2017 that are not balanced out. Please pull a water
sample immediately & balance out irrigation events. There is plenty of PAN available.
Reviewed: sludge survey 2016 T=30,4"lltz=54.5; rainfall/freeboard; crop yields
Remember to get a waste sample every 3/4 months.
page: 1

Permit: AWS400134 Owner - Facility : Steven C Jones Facility Number: 400134
Inspection Date: 08/09/17 lnpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
LM . Swine - Wean to Finish 4,695 4,920
Total Design Capacity: 4,695
Total SSLW: 539,925
Waste Structures
Dlsignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon 1 02/20/95 19.00 38,00
page: 2

Permit: AWS400134 Owner - Facility : Steven C Jones Facility Number: 400134
Inspection Date: 08/09/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes No Na No
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
M ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
M00
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection. Storage & Treatment
Yes
No Na Ng
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
[]
m ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (i.ed large
❑
0 ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
(]
[j
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
0 ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na No .
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Permit: AWS400134 Owner - Facility : Steven C Jones Facility Number:
400134
Inspection Date: 08/09/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Waste Application
Yes
No Na No
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
E ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
N ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yea No Na No
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
0 ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WU P?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
11
page: 4

Permit: AWS400134 Owner - Facility : Steven C Jones . Facility Number: 400134
Inspection Date: 08/09/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na No
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
M ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑ ❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
0 ❑ ❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26, Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
0 ❑ ❑
27, Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
0 ❑ ❑
Other Issues
Yes
No Na Ne
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
0 ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
0 ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30, Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
M ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
01111
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
page: 5

Division of Water Resources
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
El Other Agency
Facility Number: 400134 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS400134 ❑ Denied Access
Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive Or Closed Date:
Roason for Visit: Routine County: Greene Region: Washington
Data of Visit: 09/22/2016 Entry Time: 02:25 pm Exit Time: 3:15 pm Incident #
Farm Name:
J&J Swine Farm
Owner:
Steven C Jones
Mailing Address:
633 Jonestown Rd
Owner Email; [e-mail]
Phone: [phone]
Snow Hill NC 285801700
Physical Address: 812 Albritton Rd Snow Hill NC 28580
Facility Status: IN C 1' t ❑ N C 1' Murphy -Brown LLC
omp pan of omp cant Integrator.
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35° 3103"
258 & US 13 at Lizzie off SR1326
Longitude: 77° 38' 35"
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other issues
Certified Operator: William L Jones Operator Certification Number: 16548
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Steven Jones Phone:
On -site representative Martin Jones Phone :
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis: soil tested: 2015
7-26-16 = .97
4-11-16 = 1.70
5-5-15 = 1.94
IRR records are complete & balanced out.
Reviewed: stocking/mortality; sludge survey - LTZ = 55.5"/ST=29"; rainfall/freeboard; crop yield = 730 balis/800lb/bale.
fb range: 19" 2-2-16 to 48" 7-3-16
page: 1

i Permit: AWS400134 Owner - Facility: Steven C Jones Facility Number: 400134
Inspection Date: 09/22/16 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Wean to Finish 4,695 4,705
Total Design Capacity: 4,695
Total SSLW: 539.925
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon 1 02/20/95 19.00 30.00
page: 2

' Permit: AWS400134 Owner - Facility : Steven C Jones Facility Number: 400134
Inspection Date: 09/22/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No Na No
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
❑
c, What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
M ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
0 ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection Storage & Treatment
Yes No Na No
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large
❑
E ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
0 ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
[]
0 ❑
❑
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
0 ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
0 ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na Ne
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ N ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Permit: AWS400134 Owner - Facility : Steven C Jones Facility Number: 400134
Inspection Date: 09/22/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes
No Na Ne
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain Qverseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
M ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
M ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
M ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na No
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
013
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
[]
page: 4

f Permit: AWS400134 Owner - Facility : Steven C Jones
Facility Number: 400134
Inspection Date: 09/22/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
res
No Na Ne
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑ ❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
0 ❑ ❑
25. is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
E ❑ ❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
0 ❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
Other issues
Yes N2 Na Ne
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
N ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
■ ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or ❑ ❑ ❑
CAWMP?
33, Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
page: 5

U
0 Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400134
Facility Status: Active
Permit: AWWO134
❑ Denied Access
Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine
County:
Greene Region:
Washington
Date of Visit: 07/15/2015 EntryTime: 01.50 pm Exit Time: 2AS
pm Incident #
Farm Name: J&J Swine Farm
Owner Emait:
[e-mail]
Owner: Steven C Jones
Phone:
919-753-2554
Malting Address: 633 Jonestown Rd
Snow Hill NC 286801700
Physical Address: 812 Albritton Rd
Snow Hill NC 28580
Facility Status: 0Compliant ❑
Not Compliant Integrator:
Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
35° 31' 03" Longitude:
77' 38' 35"
258 & US 13 at Lizzie off SR1326
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream impacts
Waste COI, Stor, & Treat
Waste Application
Records and Documents
Other Issues
Certified Operator: William L Jones Operator Certification Number: 16548
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Steven Jones Phone :
Primary Inspector:
inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste Analysis:
05-05-2015 = 1.94
07-24-2014 = .98
09-20-2013 = .54
Marlene Salyer
soil survey:1012013
IRR records are complete & balanced out on CB April -June w PAN remaining.
Revlewed: New COC; sludge suvey - LTZ = 56.51ST = 27.95", rainfalllfreeboard; crop yield (355 bales)
Phone:
Date:
page: 1

Permit: AWS400134 Owner - Facility : Steven C Jones Facility Number: 400134
Inspection Date: 07/15/15 Inssection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
waste structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon 1 02/20/95 19.00 48.00
page: 2

r
Permit: AWS400134 Owner -Facility: Steven C Jones Facility Number: 400134
Inspection Date: 07/15/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Dischar es & Stream Impacts
Yes No Ne Ne
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
[]
M ❑
El
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■ ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
M ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collectlon Storage & Treatment
yet
UR No M
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
MEI
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le) large
❑
M ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
M ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
E ❑
❑
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
0 ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No No Ne
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ M ❑ ❑ '
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ M ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
�]
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%110 Ibs,?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

6
Permit: AWS400134 Owner - Facility : Steven C Jones Facility Number: 400134
Inspection Date: 07/15/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection ' Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No Na No
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
0 ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
r]
0 ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
0 ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■ ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
U9 Na Ng
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
0 ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
01111
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWS400134 Owner - Facility : Steven C Jones Facility Number:
400134
Inspection Date: 07/15/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Records and Documents
yes No Na No
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
.
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
E ❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
E ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑N
❑
❑
Other Issues
yes No Na Ne
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
0 ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
E ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon 1 Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
0 ❑
❑
CAWM P?
33, Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
0 ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
N ❑
❑
page: 6

jp.
0 Division of Water Resources
El Division of Soil and Water Conservation
El Other Agency
Facility Number: 400134 Facility Status: Active permit: AWS400134
Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive Or Closed Date:
❑ Denied Access
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 08/2712014 Entry Time: 01A5 pm Exit Time: 2:15 pm Incident tf
Farm Name: J&J Swine Farm Owner Emall: stumpysj®yahoo.com
Owner: Steven C Jones Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 633 Jonestown Rd Snow Hill NC 285801700
Physical Address: 812 Albritton Rd Snow Hill NC 28580
Facility Status: NCompliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm:
258 & US 13 at Lizzie off SR1326
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts
Records and Documents
Latitude: 35' 31' 03"
Longitude: 77' 38' 35"
Waste Col, Star, & Treat Waste Application
Other Issues
Certified Operator: William L Jones Operator Certification Number: 16548
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On -site representative Phone:
Primary Inspector:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Marlene Salyer
Inspection Summary:
Soil tested 10/2013
Waste Analysis:
7-21-14=.98
9-16-13= .54
2-1-13= 1.59
IRR records are complete and balanced out.
Reviewed WUP1512013; rainfall-9-10" since June, freeboard and crop yield
Remember the Sludge Survey and Calibration before 12-31-14.
Phone:
Date:
page: 1

i
Permit: AWS400134 Owner - Facility : Steven C Jones Facility Number: 400134
Inspection Date: 08/27/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Wean to Finish 4,800
Total Design Capacity:
Total SSLW:
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon 1 02120/95 19.00
page: 2

3
Permit: AWS400134 Owner - Facility : Steven C Jones
Facility Number: 400134
Inspection Date: 08/27/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes No Na No
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
0 ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
MEJEJ
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
M ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection Storapie & Treatment
Yes No Na No
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
m ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.eJ large
❑
0 ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
0 ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
MEI
❑
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
M ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
M ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Ye6_ _No No._Ne
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ M ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ M ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

rl
Permit: AWS400134 Owner - Facility : Steven C Jones Facility Number: 400134
Inspection Date: 08/27/14 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yea _N4 Ne_Ne
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
E ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
N ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No Na No
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ 01311
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ N ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
0
Waste Transfers?
[]
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

W
Permit: AWS400134 Owner - Facility : Steven C Jones Facility Number: 400134
Inspection Date: 08/27/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No No No
Crop yields?
120 Minute inspections? []
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑
Sludge Survey ❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
M ❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
0 ❑ ❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑ ❑
Other Issues
Yes
No Na No
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
M ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
m ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
0 ❑
❑
CAWM P?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
M ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
[]
❑
❑
page: 5

n
Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400134 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS400134 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 09)111.2013 Entry Time: 03:00 PM Exit Time: 04:00 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: Owner Email:
Owner: Steven C Jc)ne§ Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 633 Jonestown Rd Snow Hill NC 286801700
Physical Address:
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°31'03" Longitude: 77°38'35"
258 & US 13 at Lizzie off SR1326
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: William L Jones Operator Certification Number: 16548
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representatives): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Steven Jones Phone:
On -site representative Steven Jones Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis:
8-9-12 = 1.36
2-11-13 = 1.59
IRR records are complete & waiting on latest sample to balance - plenty of PAN remaining.
Rainfall, freeboard & crop yield are recorded. Sludge survey 12/2012
Facility in the process of building new houses with no animals on site
Looks good.
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400134 Owner • Facility: Steven C Jones
Inspection Date: 09/11/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400134
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Q Swine - Wean to Finish 4,695 0
Total Deslgn Capacity: 4,696
Total SSLW: 539,925
Waste Structures
Dealgned Observed
Type Identifier Closed Data Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
agoon 1 02/20/95 19.00 41.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWS400134 Owner - Facility: Steven C Jones Facility Number: 400134
Inspection Date: 09/1112013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑ ❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑ ❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than
❑
■
❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes
No
NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large trees, severe
U ■
U
U
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑ ■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
ONOO
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑ ■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑ ■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑ ■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400134 Owner - Facility: Steven C Jones
Inspection Date: 09/11/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number : 400134
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No
NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
Cl
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
OSO
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■
❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
1 B. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Cl ■
❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
1100
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400134 Owner - Facility: Steven C Jones Facility Number; 400134
Inspection Date: 09/11/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Lease Agreements? ❑
Other? ❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22, Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
■ ❑
❑
24, Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑
■ ❑
❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon ❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400134 Owner - Facility: Steven C Jones
Inspection Date: 09/11/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400134
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e.. discharge, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon / Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Page: 6

Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400134 -., Facility Status: Artiy2 Permit: AWS400134 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 09/28/2011 Entry Time: 12150 PM Exit Time: 01:30 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: J&J Swine Farm Owner Email: stumpys!rdyahoo.com
Owner: W!Iliam L Jones Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 301 Mt Herman Church Rd ;snow_Ijill NC 2U80 __
Physical Address: §12 Albritton Rd Snow Hill NC 28580
Facility Status: N Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brawn LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°31'03" Longitude: 77°38'35"
258 & US 13 at Lizzie off SR1326
Question Areas:
© Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: William L Jones Operator Certification Number: 16548
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name
Title Phone
24 hour contact name
Phone:
On -site representative
Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer
Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis:
3-10-11 = 1.7
7-18-11 = .92
IRR records are complete & balanced out. Freeboard & rainfall are recorded. Crop yield is recorded.
Soil tested 10-14-2010 and a sample is pulled now.
Looks Good!
Page: 1

Permit: AW5400134 Owner - Facility: William L Jones
Inspection Date: 09/28/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400134
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operatlons Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 4,000 3,200
Total Design Capacity: 4,000
Total SSLW: 540,000
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
lagoon 1 02120/95 19.00 39.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWS400134 Owner - Facility: William L Jones Facility Number: 400134
Inspection Date: 09/28/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field Cl
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
■
❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
OSO
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than
❑
■
❑
❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■ ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■ ❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■ ❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■ ❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400134 Owner - Facility: William L ,!ones
Inspection Date: 09/28/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number : 400134
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA
NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda
Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑
❑
Plan(CAW MP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
1100
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400134 Owner - Facility: William L Jones Facility Number: 400134
Inspection Date: 09128/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Lease Agreements? ❑
Other? ❑
It Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
MOD
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
MOD
25, Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑
■ ❑ ❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26• Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400134 Owner - Facility: William L Jones
Inspection Date: 09/2812011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Records and Documents
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Facility Number: 400134
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
28, Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field ❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond ❑
Other ❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
33. Did the Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

Division of Water Quality
El Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400134 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS400134 ___ ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type. Compliance Inspection ^_ Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 11/01/2010 Entry Time: 01:45 PM Exit Time:
Farm Name: ,I.f5j Swine Farm
Incident #:
Owner Email:
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 301 Mt Herman Church Rd 5ngW Hill NC _28580
Physical Address: 8_12AIbritton Rd Snow Hill NC 28580
Facility Status: N Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:Murphy-Brown
Location of Farm:
258 & US 13 at Lizzie off SR1326
Latitude:35"31'03" Longitude:77°38'35"
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: William L Jones
Secondary OIC(s):
Operator Certification Number: 16548
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Steven Jones Phone:
On -site representative Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspectors):
Inspection Summary:
4-6-10 = 1.7
7-13-10 = 1.3
10-11-10 = 1.2
Soil tested 10-14-10 SS Due 2010 Caliberation Due 2010
Freeboard range: 2-14-10 = 21" - - 9-26-10 = 46"
Looks Good! Records are complete and balanced out.
Page: 1

rs
Permit: AWS400134 Owner - Facility: William L Jones Facility Number. 400134
Inspection Date: 11 /0112010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 4,000 4,000
Total Design Capacity: 4,000
Total SSLW: 540,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
Lagoon 1 1 02120/95 1 1 19.00 30.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWS400134 Owner - Facility: William L Jones Facility Number: 400134
Inspection Date: 1110112010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ ■
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑ ■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection Storage & Treatment
Yes No
NA
NE
4. is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
❑ ■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ ■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑ ■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑ ■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No
NA
NE
10, Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance altematives that need maintenance or
❑ ■
❑
❑
improvement?
11, Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

f
Permit: AWS400134 Owner - Facility: William L Jones
Facility Number : 400134
Inspection Date: 11/01/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■
❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■
Cl
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
■
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
0
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of property operating waste application equipment?
❑
■
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permlt: AWS400134 Owner - Facility: William L Jones
Facility Number: 400134
Inspection Date: 11/01/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No NA
NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑
❑
23, If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? ❑
■ ❑
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■ ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■ ❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■ ❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30, At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400134 Owner • Facility: William L Jones
Inspection Data: 11/01/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Other Issues
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWO of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Facility Number: 400134
Reason for Visit: Routine
Page: 6

Division of Water Quality
Q Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400134 Facility Status: Active Permit: AM400134 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: CQomoliance In§Rg�Aign Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 11/16/2009 Entry Time:01700 PM Exit Time:
Farm Name: J&J Swine Farm
Owner: William L Jones
Incident N:
Owner Email: stumovsiiyahoo com
Mailing Address: 301 Mt Herman Church Rd Snow Hill NC 28580
Physical Address: 812 Albritton Rd_- Snow Hill NC 28580
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murohv-Brown. LLC
Location of Farm:
258 & US 13 at Lizzie off SR1326
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Records and Documents
Latitude:35°31'03" Longitude.77°38'35"
Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
© Other Issues
Certified Operator William L Jones Operator Certification Number: 16548
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Phone:
On -site representative Steven Jones Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400134 Owner - Facility: William L Jones Facility Number: 400134
Inspection bate: 11116/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis:
10-02-09
.85
6-24-09
1.4
2-19-09
2.1
11-10-09
1.5
soil test 2009 calibration and Sludge survey in 2008
Check on New COC and Permit and put with records
Remember to do a sludge survey before 12-31-09.
Looks Great!
Page: 2

Permit: AWS400134 Owner - Facility: William L Jones Facility Number: 400134
Inspection Date: 11116/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 4,000 3,500
Total Design Capacity: 4,000
Total SSLW: 540,000
Type Identifler Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
3goon 1 02/20195 19,00 42.01
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400134 Owner - Facility: William L Jones Facility Number. 400134
Inspection Date: 11/16/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? 13000
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DW4) ❑ ■ 0,C)
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2, Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400134 Owner- Facility: William L Jones
Facility Number: 400134
Inspection Date: 11/16/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
You No
NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 Ibs.?
❑
Total P205?
Q
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Coastal
Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
Q ■
❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■
❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?.
❑ ■
❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Q ■
Q Q
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400134 Owner- Facility: William L Jones
Facility Number: 400134
Inspection Date: 11/16/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after> 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22, Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? ❑
■
Cl ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■
❑ ❑
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■
❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 6

Permit: AWS400134 Owner - Facility: Wiliam L Jones
Inspection Date: 11/16/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Other Issues
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Facility Number.400134
Reason for Visit: Routine
Page: 7

E Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400134 Facility Status: Active _ Permit: AWS400134 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Gom iance_Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 11/16/2009 Entry Tlme:01:00 PM Exit Time:
Farm Name: J&J Swine Farm
Owner: William L Jones
Incident #:
Owner Email: stumRysiQyahoo.com
Mailing Address: 301Mt Herman Church Rd Snow Hill NC 28560
Physical Address: §1.2 61b itton Rd Snow Hill NC 28580
Facility Status: E Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown, LLC
Location of Farm:
258 & US 13 at Lizzie off SR1326
Phone: [phone]
Latitude:35°31'03" Longitude:77°38'35"
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents © Other Issues
Certified Operator: William L Jones Operator Certification Number: 16548
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Phone:
On -site representative Steven Jones Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400134 Owner - Facility: William L Jones Facility Number: 400134
Inspection Date: 11/16/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis:
10-02-09
.85
6-24-09
1 A
2-19-09
2.1
11-10-09
1.5
soil test 2009 calibration and Sludge survey in 2008
Check on New CQC and Permit and put with records.
Remember to do a sludge survey before 12-31-09.
Looks Great!
Page: 2

Permit: AWS400134 Owner - Facility: William L Jones
Inspection Date: 11/16/2009 Inspection Typo: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number,. 400134
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 4,000 3,500
Total Design Capacity: 4,000
Total SSLW: 540,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
lagoon 1 02/20/95 19.00 42.00
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400134 Owner - Facility: William L Janes Facility Number: 400134
Inspection Date: 11/16/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ In ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ IN ❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yee
No
NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of,incorrect application?
❑
■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400134 Owner - Facility: William L Jones Facility Number: 400134
Inspection Date: 11/1612009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? ❑
Total P205? ❑
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type 1 Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2 Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■
❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■
❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
■
❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■
❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■
❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■
❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
MID?
❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400134 Owner - Facility: William L Jones Facility_Number : 400134
Inspection Date: 11/16/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Other? ❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
01111
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑
❑
25. Did the facility fall to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■ ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■ ❑
❑
Other Issues Yes No NA N
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
29, Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
34. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 6

Permit: AWS400134 Owner - Facility: William L Jones Facility Number: 400134
Inspection pate: 11/16/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Otherlssues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Page: 7

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number. 400134 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS400134 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 12/11/2008 Entry T!me:01:00 PM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: J&J Swine Farm Owner Email:
Owner: William L Jones Phone: [phone]
t A o I rMjL":rrW < i I. a :. �TI^�:III�`►Iei► F I�
Physical Address: 1647 Vandiford Thomas Rd Snow Hill NC 28580
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Premium Standard Farms Of North Caroling Inc. --
Location of Farm:
258 & US 13 at Lizzie off SR1326
Latitude:35°31'03" Longitude:
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts © Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: William L Jones Operator Certification Number: 16548
Secondary O1C(s):
On -Sits Representative(a): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Phone:
On -site representative Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s);
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis:
6-12-07 = 2.9
8-15-07 = 1.9
6-09-08 = 2.0
9-18-08 = 1.2
11-10-08 = 1.5
soil test Oct 2007
Looks Great!
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400134 Owner - Facility: William L Jones Facility Number. 400134
Inspection Date: 12/11/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Q Swine - Feeder to Finish 4,000 4,000
Total Design Capacity: 4,000
Total SSLW: 540,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon 1 02/20/95 19.00 31.00
Page: 2

M
Permit: AWS400134 Owner - Facility: William L Jones Facility Number: 400134
Inspection Date: 12/11/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? 000113
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large trees, severe
❑
■ ❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■ ❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■ ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■ ❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■ ❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■ ❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
moo
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400134 Owner - Facility: William L Jones
Inspection Date: 12/11/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400134
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No
NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 Ibs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal
Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Pian(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■
❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
❑ Cl
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
Cl 0
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

t:
Permit: AW5400134 Owner - Facility: William L Jones
Facility Number: 400134
Inspection Date: 12/11/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
0110
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? ❑
■
❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
Cl
■
❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■
❑ ❑
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■
❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30, At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400134 Owner - Facility: William L Jones
Inspection Date: 12111t2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Other Issues
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWO of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Facility Number: 400134
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

n
Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400134 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS40QI34 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene _ Region: Wgsbngton
Date of Visit: 0811612QO7 Entry Time:10120 AM Exit Time:
Farm Name: J&J Swine Farm
Owner: William L Jones
Incident #:
Owner Email: sjumpvsjQvahoo.com
Mailing Address: 30011 (fit Ug[mgn Church Rd Snow Hill NC 28580
Physical Address: 1647 Vandiford Thomas Rd Snow Hill NO28580
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm:
258 & US 13 at Lizzie off SR1326
Phone: [phone]
Latitude:35°31'03" Longitude:77°36'35"
Question Areas:
© Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: William L Jones Operator Certification Number: 16548
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On -site representative Phone:
24 hour contact name Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste analyses:
6-12-07 = 2.9
4-15-07 = 1.9
soil lest 2-2007
Looks Good!
Date;
Page: 1

Q
a
Permit: AWS400134 Owner - Facility: William L Jones Facility Number: 400134
Inspection Date: 08/16/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine -Feeder to Finish 4,000 4,000
Total Design Capacity: 4,000
Total SSLW: 540,000
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
kgoon
1
02/20/95
19.00
33.00
Page: 2

4
I
Permit: AWS400134 Owner - Facility: William L Jones Facility Number: 400134
Inspection Date: 08/16/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impact Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the Stale? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ Cl
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe
❑
0011
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

s
Permit: AWS400134 Owner - Facility: William L Jones
Facility Number: 400134
Inspection Date: 08/16/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Bermuda Grass (Hay,
Pasture)
Crop Type 2
Soybeans
Crop Type 3
Com (Grain)
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

3
Permit: AWS400134 Owner - Facility: William L Jones
Facility Number: 400134
Inspection Date: 08/16/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? ❑
■ ❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
Other Issues
Yes
No NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400134 Owner - Facility: William L Jones Facility Number : 400134
Inspection Date: 08/16/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
nay__ L__..__ Vwn Nn NA NF
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32, Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Page: 6

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soli and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400134 _ Facility Status: Active _ Permit: NC6240134 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inagction Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 03/07/2006 Entry Time:12:15 PM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: J&J Swine Farm Owner Email:
Owner: William L Jones Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 301 Mt Herman Church Rd Snow Hill NC 28580
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm:
258 & US 13 at Lizzie off SR1326
Latitude: ,3501 03_ , , Longitude: 77°38'35"
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: William L Jones Operator Certification Number: 16548
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On -site representative Phone:
24 hour contact name Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Soil test 10-31-05
Waste analyses = Ibs N11000gal
2-22-06 = 2.4
7-6-05 = 2.6
10-25-05 = 1.5
Date:
Page: 1

0
Permit: NCA240134 Owner - Facility: William L Jones
Inspection Date: 03/07/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facllity Number. 400134
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
F Swine - Feeder to Finish 4,000 3,800
Total Design Capacity: 4,000
Total SSLW: 540,000
Waste Structures
Tvpe Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
lagoon 1 02l28195 19.00 30.00
Page: 2

Permit: NCA240134 Owner - Facility: William L Jones Facility Number: 400134
Inspection Date: 03/07/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑.
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? Cl ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9..Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste A Ilc�atioo
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

Permit: NCA240134 Owner - Facility: William L Jones
Facility Number: 400134
Inspection Date: 03/07/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No
NA
NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 100/6/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Pay)
Crop Type 2
Corn (Grain)
Crop Type 3
Soybeans
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■
❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■
❑
❑
1B. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ E
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■
❑
Cl
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP? ❑
Page: 4

Permit: NCA240134 Owner - Facility: William L Jones
Inspection Date: 03/0712006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Records and Documents
Checklists?
Design?
Maps?
Other?
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Facility Number: 400134
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes
No
NA
NE
.❑
Q
■
❑
❑
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail'to install and maintain a rain gauge?
Cl
■
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
■
❑
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■
❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■
❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ Cl
mortality rates. that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Duality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: NCA240134 Owner - Facility: William L Jones Facility Number: 400134
Inspection Date: 03/07/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
�►�_� __..__ Van un ue IJP
31. Did the facility fall to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/!nspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? -
Page: 6

..n r . v _..... ..... r ..r, v.�..:: a.. 3 � .r.n Cr r1 -. rt.. •P.v.i....
,Division of Water.,Quality
D1viAon,9f1Sofl,and;Water Conservation.
Other.Agency
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 40 134 Date of Visit: 2-18-2004 Time: 11 :30
0 Not O erational Q Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified 0 Conditionally Certified 13 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
FarmName:,1&J.SrdPe.FArm.................................................................................... County: Gr.Cgjap ............................................... W,A►RO .......
Owner Name: aft.........................................jojacs ......................... Phone No: x��-lid.-.4.{�k�...........................................................
Mailing Address: 3At.,.t[>u�1n.btilCcbl.13,S1........................................................ 5j11.wi1.lY........................................................ Z85AQ ..............
Facility Contact: S.texcif.1R1:.Max0a......................................... Title:................................................................ Phone No:
OnsiteRepresentative; BJUy,,S.tjeygn.&�Urjjxt.......................................................... Integrator: kr.> u�ut. tatxd x . >y►rnns.�!tlY�txxht..........
Certified Operator:.W..t117'1a7R1 L.............................J.QjjQ$ ................................................. Operator Certification Number:1654A .............................
Location of Farm:
158 & US 13 at Lizzie off SR1326
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 ' 31 03 Longitude F 77 a 38 35
Design - Current
Design Current
Design Current
Swine. Capacity Population
poultry
Capacitv population Cattle
Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
ID Layer
❑ Dairy
® Feeder to Finish
4000
2000
❑ Non -Layer
I0Non-Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
JE1 Other-
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
4,000
❑ Gilts
Total SSLW
540,000
❑ Boars
Number of Lagoons 1 [Subsurface Drains Present Spray Field Area
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If dischaije•is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Stnicture 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): 32
1 sir 11in7 r....01.......4

Facility Number: 4Date of Inspection 1 2-18-2004
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ic/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or ❑ Yes ® No
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level ❑ Yes ® No
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ® No
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Small Grain Overseed Wheat
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ® No
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ Yes ® No
Air Quality representative immediately.
Cishlments`(refer"to quest�ori #) Expiain':any YES answers and/or any, oas or a�►y Ather'comments
4re�commendat
Useydrawltigs;of�facility tn'bi tt&' explainisituations {use a/ddi�tional phges as nece�sysary)• , ❑Field Copy ®Final Notes
'y
Reviewer/Inspector Name Marlene D. Salyer
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
a

1211,2103
--� Facility Number: 40--134 Date of Inspection 2-1$-2004
Continued
Required Records & Documents
21, Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps,'etc.)
23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
® No
25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
to No
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
® No
27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
® No
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
® No
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
® No
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
® Yes
❑ No
31. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
®No
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
® No
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
❑ Yes
® No
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
®No
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Stocking Form ❑ Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfall ❑ Inspection After 1" Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
E3 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
dd� �' w �<<
Soil sample 11-13-03 and remember to take a sample for 2004.
Waste analysis: 3/18/03 = 2.6 lbs
6/5/03 = 1.6
8/13/03 = 1.1
Remember to pull waste samples more often.
Irrigation records are complete and balanced out.
The freeboard and rain events are recorded weekly.
Everything looks good!

Technical Assistance Site Visit Report
• Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Natural Resources Conservation Service
O Soil and Water Conservation District
O Other...
Facility Number 40 -
134
Date: 1011103
Time: 1 1030
Time On Farm: 65 WARO
Farm Name J&J Swine Farm
County Greene
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address 301 Mt. Herman Church Rd. Snow Hill NC
Onslte
Representative Billy and Martin Jones/ Matt Barefoot Integrator 1premium Standard Farms
Type Of Visit
Operation Review
Compliance Inspection (pilot only)
Technical Assistance
Confirmation for Removal
❑ No Animals -Date Last Operated:
❑ Operating below threshold
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse
Design Current
Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
4000
4000
Purpose Of Visit
p Routine
O Response to DWQ/DENR referral
O Response to DSWCISWCD referral
O Response to complaint/local referral
O Requested by producer/integrator
O Follow-up
O Emergency
O Other...
Design Current
Capacity Population
❑ Layer
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
28580
GENERAL QUESTIONS:
1. Is waste discharging from any part of the operation and reaching surface waters or wetlands? ❑ yes ® no
2. Is there evidence of a past waste discharge from any part of the operation that waste reached
❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
28580
GENERAL QUESTIONS:
1. Is waste discharging from any part of the operation and reaching surface waters or wetlands? ❑ yes ® no
2. Is there evidence of a past waste discharge from any part of the operation that waste reached
❑ Other
28580
GENERAL QUESTIONS:
1. Is waste discharging from any part of the operation and reaching surface waters or wetlands? ❑ yes ® no
2. Is there evidence of a past waste discharge from any part of the operation that waste reached
❑ yes ® no
surface waters or wetlands?
3• Does any problem pose an immediate threat to the integrity of the waste structure (large trees,
❑ yes Ono
seepage, severe erosion, etc.)?
4. Is there evidence of nitrogen over application, hydraulic overloading or excessive ponding
❑ yes Ono
requiring DWQ notification?
5. Is there evidence of improper dead animal disposal that poses a threat to the environment
❑ yes Ono
and/or public health?
6. is the waste level within the structural freeboard elevation range for any waste structure?
❑ yes Ono
Structurel Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Identifier
Level (Inches) 31
CROP TYPES Corn Soybeans Wheat Icoastal Bermuda -ha
SPRAYFIELD
SOIL TYPES NoA
7. What type of technical assistance does the onsite representative feel is needed? (list in comment section)
03/10/03

Facility Number 40 - 134 Date:
1011103
PARAMETER
Q No assistance provided/requested
❑ 8. Waste spill leaving site
❑ 9, Waste spill contained on site
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE Needed
Provided
❑ 10. Level in structural freeboard
25. Waste Plan Revision or Amendment
❑
❑
❑ 11. Level in storm storage
26. Waste Plan Conditional Amendment
❑
❑
27. Review or Evaluate Waste Plan wlproducer
❑
❑
El12. Waste Structure integrity compromised
13. Waste structure needs maintenance
Y8, Forms Need (list in comment section)
El
El
29. Missing Components (list In comments)
❑ 14. Over application >= 10% & 10 lbs.
2H.0200
❑
❑
❑ 15. Over application < 10% or < 10 lbs.
30. re -certification
❑ 16. Hydraulic overloading
31. Five & Thirty day Plans of Action (PoA)
❑
❑
32. Irrigation record keeping assistance
❑
❑
❑ 17. Deficient irrigation records
❑ 18. Late/missing waste analysis
❑ 19. Latelmissing lagoon level records
33. Organize/computerization of records
❑
❑
34. Sludge Evaluation
❑
❑
❑ 20. Late/missing soils analysis
❑ 21. Crop needs improvement
35. Sludge or Closure Plan
❑
❑
❑ 22. Crop inconsistent with waste plan
36. Sludge removallclosure procedures
❑
❑
37. Waste Structure evaluation
❑
❑
❑ 23. Irrigation maintenance deficiency
❑ 24. Deficient sprayfield conditions
38. Structure Needs Improvement
❑
❑
39. Operation & Maintenance Improvements
❑
❑
40. Marker checklcalibration
❑
❑
Reaulatory Referrals
41. Site evaluation
❑
❑
❑ Referred to DWQ Date:
42. Irrigation Calibration
❑
❑
❑ Referred to NCDA Date:
43. Irrigation
❑
El
❑ ether...
system design/installation
Date:
44. Secure Irrigation Information (maps, etc.)
❑
❑
LIST IMPROVEMENTS
45.Operating improvements (pull signs, etc.)
❑
❑
MADE BY OPERATION
❑
❑
46. Wettable Acre Determination
1
47. Evaluate WAD certlficationlrechecks
❑
❑
48. Crop ova luationlrecommendations
❑
❑
2.
'49. Drainage worklevaluation
❑
❑
50. Land shaping, subsolling, aeration, etc.
51. Runoff control, stormwater diversion, etc.
❑
❑
❑
❑
3
52. Buffer Improvements
❑
❑
63. Field measurements(GPS, surveying, etc.)
❑
❑
4.
54. Mortality BMPs
❑
❑
55. Waste operator education (NPDES)
5.
56. Operation & maintenance education
❑
❑
57. Record keeping education
❑
❑
6.
58. Croplforage management education
❑
❑
59. Soil and/or waste sampling education
❑
❑
03/10/03

Facility Number 40 - 134 pate: 10/1103
COMMENTS:
*COC dated April 9, 2003 and on site.
�►
*Make records available for 5 years.
*Installed rain break cut off switch.
9. Send producer copy of stocking record and crop yield.
*Facility using crop yield records and lagoon /rainfall record.
*Remember to calibrate reel and complete sludge survey.
*Waste analysis dated 8/13/03 nitrogen is 1.1 lbs/1000 gallons
6/5/03 nitrogen is 1.6 Ibs/1000 gallons
3/18/03 nitrogen is 2.6 Ibs/1000 gallons
11/1/02 nitrogen is 1.8 lbs/1000 gallons
8/8/02 nitrogen is 1.4 Ibs/1000 gallons
*Soil test dated 2/14/03. Cu, Zn and ph within guidelines.
*IRR2 records are complete and balanced.
*Need to initial lagoon freeboard/rainfall records.
*Lagoon level and rainfall recorded weekly with drops in lagoon consistent with irrigation events.
*Farm is well maintained.
*Coastal bermuda hay needs to be cut and removed.
TECHNICAL SPECIALIST IMartin McLawhorn
SIGNATURE
Date Entered: 10/3/03
Entered By: Martin McLawhorn
03/10/03

O'Di*isioiilof Water Quillty�n �
Divigiun of 5oit andNitter Cosset
Q OEher Agency,
. tlt�}� �f � «..3� � _ �L°•4 '� t nl ,�� ( 3 S i J r.{d_ :�F'� ig. �.` _.. .. _
Type of Visit OQ Compliance inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit OO Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 40 134 Datc of Visit: 12-23-2002 Time: 949
Q Not O erational O Below Threshold
ElPermitted ® Certified © Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name:J.&A.SwInc.1arm ................................................................... County: Gruxte ............................................... WARO.......
OwnerName: Billy .......................................... Jones............................................................ Phone No: 251-.2.53.4642...........................................................
Mailing Address: QX.Mt,.Hi�t�txulq.f,buUtC.t1 Rd.... ..................................................... sinma.11ilINC........................................................ 2.SS.811..............
FacilityContact: .............................................................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
Onsite Representative: S1exjm1olms................................................................................ Integrator: ft' utiu .S7t:9uld,�nd.l a an af.N.ptCth...........
Certified Operator: W. l ham jk............................ dat1,................................................. Operator Certification Number: .1654A .............................
Location of Farm:
258 & US .13 at Lizzie off SR1326 A,
_ i'r
®Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle [:]Horse Latitude F 35 OF 31 03 Longitude 77 ' F 38 i 35 '°
Design
Current Design Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity
Population Poultry Capacity., Population Cattle
Ca acity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
® Feeder to Finish 4000
4000 - ICI Non-Laycr JEI Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Other
❑ .Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
4,000
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Total SSLW
540,000
Number of Lagoons
1 ® Subsurface Drains Prcse2!J10 Lagoon Area JC& Spray Field Arex
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other .
a. If discharge is obset-ved, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify I)WQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
_-- Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:.................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard(inches): ..............34................................................... .................................... ...................................
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
Structure 6

VJ/VJ/VI
Facility Number: 40— 134 Date of Inspection 12-23-2002
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(if any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any ba ers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type Corn, Soybeans, Wheat Coastal Bermuda (Hay)
a,ununueu
❑ Yes
N No
❑ Yes
N No
❑ Yes
N No
❑ Yes
N No
❑ Yes
N No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
N No
13. Do the receiving crops difler with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
N No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15, Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ Will, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes N No
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers andlor any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary): � 0 Field Copy ❑ Final Notcs ,
* SoiI test 3-28-02 w/ sample 4 requiring 3 T/ac of lime. Lithe was applied.
9 15- Due to the season, the weed population could not be easily determined, however as Martin McLawhorn noted
during his June review, continue to practice weed control. Fields look OK
* Waste 8-8-02 w/. 1.4 lbs N/l 000 gal.
* Records balanced and well maintained.
* Farm looks good.
Reviewer/Inspector Name Scott Vinson entered by Lyn Hardison
Reviewerllnspector Signature: Date:

� Dlyisitin of;Wtiter Quality ,' ;,,` .;�
Q D1vision'of SoiLand-Water Conservation,y.
r..
Type of Visit Compliance Inspection O Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit ®Routine C) Complaint 0 Follow up Q Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit: Time:
10 Not Operational 12 Below Threshold
Permitted Certified 0 Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: 'yk• County: i;�l ►t°-s�..Q--
Owner Name: Phone No:
Mailing Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Location of Farm:
Phone No:
Integrator: i 5 i-'
Operator Certification Number:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑Horse Latitude Longitude �o �•
Design
Current Design ,. ,,Current ...:Design 'Current
Swine Capacity Population ePoultry Capacity ,'Population Cattle.;. ""Ciiiad6 Po uuliition
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Layer ❑ Da'
Feeder to Finish fl p�
OOr� I ' ❑ Non -La er 1 ❑Non-Dai
Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
;. ❑ Other
- ❑ Farrow to Finish
Total design' C20acity�.3.
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
,Total `SSL_W, r .
Number of Lagoons
r ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lalloon Area ❑ S rav Field Area
Holding Poiids7 Solid Traps
10 No Liquid Waste Management System ;.
Di5charges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Sprav Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
WasteCollection &: Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
identifier:
Freeboard (inches): 3
05103101
❑ Yes 14 No
❑ Yes ❑ No .
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
ko
❑ Yes
;kNo
❑ Yes
A No
Structure 6
Continued

10
Facility Number: 'D — Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?. (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes A No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? El Yes ®No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ZNo
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes J] No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
jo No
11. Is there evidence of over applicatio ❑ Excess've Po ding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
V No
12, Crop type o.r—h
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management P an (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
V No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
K7 No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
Z No
Reguired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
�kNo
19, Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ✓ ✓'
❑ Yes
No
19, Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
r711 No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
❑ Yes
DiNo
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
X[No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
1] No
No violations or deficiencies were. noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments (refer to question #):' Explain `ariy YES answers an'4io'r any recommendations or any other comments.'
Use drawings of facility twbetter explain situations (Rse additnal pages as nrrcessary)
• io❑Field Conv • ❑ Final Notes,
ie 4rzi
_.._ .� _ _ . __._ . ,_... _ �_ _
ReviewerlInspector Name C ...,i,:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: ZZ
05103101 Continued

Facility Dumber: AJA— Date of inspection
dor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes No
28. Is there anv evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes lNo
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:, . i
r,M /93s 4':,o)
05103101

of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit OO Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: 6/5l2002 Time: 928
Facility Number 40 134
Q Not Operational O Below Threshold
KI Permitted ❑ Certified E3Conditionaily Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ...........,
Farm Name: U.J.5wilm.Fam.................................................................................. ........ County: GVregitte............................................... ARD.......
OwnerName: Bljly..........................................James............................................................ Phone No: 251.7.53. 4692..........................................................
Mailing Address: 3Q1.Mt..i etataatt.ChtunCh d......................................................... s elk!'.Bel IK........................................................ 185RO .............
Facility Contact:.............................................................................. Title:....
......... Phone No:
Onsite Representative: >xex ,.tie, rkfn �i�attues/1kLiclitel.C�tiri�aGeinsen ..................... integrator: )Pmimiium..Stwetlard.l airmn.ofNarkh...........
Certified Operator: Wittlitum.1«............................Jum ................................................. Operator Certification Number: 16.5.48 .............................
Location of Farm:
258 & US :13 at LU211e off SR1326 �+►
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑Horse Latitude 35 ° 3l 03 µ Longitude 77 38 35
.:Design Current '.Design Current :. : Design: Current
Swine: Ca ►aci. �Po ulation: Pgnft.ry.: Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feder to Finish
4000
4000
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Crilts
❑ Boars
Nu, ether of Lagoons 1 ' ®Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ® spray Field Area
Holding PondI 15phd Traps ❑ No Ligufd Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
l]iccharge ouiginateci al: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. Irdischarge is observed, did it reach Water of the Slate? (Ifycs. notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gallniin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
SU'ucture I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier;
Freeboard (inches) : .............. W............... ...................................
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
Sinicture G
...................................

05103101
Facility Number: 40-134
Date of Inspection 6/5/2002
Continued
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ic/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public Health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Write Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application'? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type Corn, Soybeans, Wheat Coastal Bermuda (1-lay)
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes % No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
t3. Do the receiving crops differ with those designate in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for laud application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Annual Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ic/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ic/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ic/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did RLviewer/lnspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes Z No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ® No
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
❑ Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
*New waste plan dated 6/03/02 based on two year crop rotation of corn, wheat, soybeans with seven acres of tobacco on tract 1081 and 4.5
acres of tobacco on tract 2937. Waste plan completed by Carl Dunn P.E. DSWC.
*Waste analysis dated 5/8/02 nitrogen is 2.4 lbs/1000 gallons
2/11/02 nitrogen is 2.5 lbs/1000 gallons
7/12101 nitrogen is 1.8 lbs/1000 gallons
*Soil test dated 3/28/02. Lime requirements were less than one ton per acre. Sample #4 required 3 tons lime per acre. lime was applied.
Suggest keeping lime receipts.
Reviewer/Inspector Name 1 iI ��, , ;F 11
Martixr McLiwhornR.

05103101 Continued
Facility Number: 40-134 Date of Inspection 6/5/2002
Odor lssue4
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray systeui intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate covee?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Ycs ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
-------AddRionall Comments an or ravings
*Lagoon level is recorded weekly.
*Records are complete and balanced.
15. CoastaI bermuda field has Italian Rye grass and other weeds. Coastal bermuda fields needs weed control management.
* Veg. on dike walls well established.
v

[Type of Visit 0 Compliance Inspection O Operation Review Q Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 4U 134. Date of Visit: >i26-2o0I Time: I130
O NotOperational erational O Below Threshold
E Permitted 0 Certified © Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:.
Farm Name:I&I.SWIXtr.kArM.......................... »......_._..................... County: Gr cite............................................... �'4'.�R .......
OwnerName: BUly.................._._................... J'QjucS.......................................................... Phone No: 252n.7,5Z 4.642...........................................................
FacilityContact: .............................................................................Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
Mailing Address: Xb4:l..VAjadjfaid.T.IIQM , d.................... ................ ........ ........... Sao :i iI1.N........................................................ 28mv .............
Onsite Representative:'ljIL%,,.S.1.t'yeja..&,.MArliEt................................ . Integrator:L.L.Hp7C,phrt=.}:..Cv ...................
Certified Operator: iffiam.................................. 10 upu ................................................. Operator Certification Numberjfifi 45..................
Location or Farm:
258 & US 13 at Lizzie off SR1326
®Swine ❑ Pouttry ❑ Cattte ❑ Horse Latitude Longitude F 77 • 38 1 35
Design Current Design Current Design - `,,Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Po ulation Cattle Ca aci Po "ulation
❑ Wean to Feeder I 1 10 Layer 1 10 Dairy
19, Feeder to Finish 4000 4000 10 Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dais,
10 Farrow to Wean 1
10 Farrow to Feeder ❑Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity 4,000
1❑ Gilts
❑ Boars Total SSLW 540,000
Number of Lagoons IN Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area 10 Spra}• yield Area
7. Holding P66dslSolid Traps 10 No Liquid 'Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impac
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑Spray Field [I Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ® No
b. If discharge is observed. did it reach Water of the State? (If ves. notify DWQ) ❑Yes ®No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? n/a
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If ves, notify DIA'Q) ❑ Yes ® No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 19 No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ............................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): 29
5100 Continued on back

Facility Number: 40•^-04 Date of Inspection , T26-2041 Printed on: 511 s/2001
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage. etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenancelimprovement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelimprovement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste-Applicalign
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenancelimprovement?
11. is there evidence of over application? [:]Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Corn, Soybeans, Wheat
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records d documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20, Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes 9 No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes Z No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ®No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ® No
10 violations a deficient. . eve .. ..ed dilriitg•>hes; visit :�'ou;will r re ve-no.furih:er
comes" idence about this :visit. ::::::: : . .. :: • . .
* Records are available for review.
* Presently working with C. Dunn with DSWC on a new waste plan and wetted acres. New fields will be added.
* Waste analysis dated 2-5-01 = 1.7 lbs, 10/00 = 1.6 lbs.
* Soil analysis up thru 2000 available. Depending on the crops, samples are pulled at different times of the year.
* Hadn't irrigated since the DSWC inspection in October 2000, therefore no records (IRR2) to reviewed.
• Suggest to pull quarterly waste samples.
• Continue to keep your records as you are. Make sure to keep all components of the CAWMP available for future reviews.
4
Reviewer/Inspector Name Lyn B. dison - - - • - _
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: f✓,.�✓'
Date: 5100

• Favility Number. ao-Lu Date or Inspection 3-26-2DOi Printed on: 5/18/2001
Ddor ILS»
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28. Is thereany evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29, Is the land application spray system intake not located near the Iiquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes ❑ No
S/00

oWAr�9Q�
_' r
>_
0 Y
To: Producers
From: Lyn B. Hardison
Environmental Specialist
Washington Regional Office
Date: May 18, 2001
Subject: Animal Compliance Routine Inspection
Year 2001
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Kerr T. Stevens
Division of Water quality
Enclosed please find a copy or copies of the Compliance Site Inspection(s) (as viewed in DWQ database) conducted at the
referenced facility by the Division of Water Quality from the Washington Regional Office. Please read this inspection and
keep with all other documents pertaining to your animal operation for future inspections.
In general, these inspections included verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP);
(2) the farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC 2H.02I7, Senate Bill 1217, and the Certified Animal
Waste Management Plan; (3) the farm operation's waste management system is being operated properly under the direction of a
Certified Operator; (4) the required records are being kept; (5) there are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or runoff.
As a reminder, please note the following which are conditions of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan and the general
permit; therefore, these items must be implemented:
(P The maximum waste level in lagoons/storage ponds shall not exceed that specified in the CAWMP. At a minimum,
maximum waste level for waste for lagoons/storage ponds must not exceed the level that provides adequate storage to
contain 25 year, 24 hour storm event plus an additional foot of structural freeboard.
(p An analysis of the liquid animal waste from the lagoon shall be conducted as close to the time of application as practical and
at least within 60 days (before or after) of the date of application. This analysis shall incl ude the following parameters:
Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Zinc and Copper.
(p Soil analysis is required annually.
tp The following records are required: off -site solids removal, maintenance, repair, waste/soil analysis and land irrigation
records. These records should be maintained by the facility owner/manager in chronological and legible form for a
minimum of three years.'
(p Land application rates shall be in accordance with the CAWMP. In no case shall land -application rates_ exceed the Plant
Available Nitrogen (PAN) rate for the receiving crop or result in runoff during any given application.
(p All grassed waterways shall have a stable outlet with adequate capacity to prevent ponding or flooding damages. The outlet
can be another vegetated channel, an earth ditch, stabilization structure, or other suitable outlets.
(p It is suggested, not required, to keep crop yield information for future use to update your waste management plan. You will
need three years of crop yield data before your plan can be updated.
For your information, any swine facility that has a discharge to surface waters of the State will have to apply for a National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit with the Division of Water Quality, effective January 1, 2001.
Thank you for your assistance and cooperation during the inspection. if you have any questions, please contact your Technical
Specialist or me at 252-946-6481, ext. 318.
Cc: &GaRO
LBH Files (inspection form only)
943 Washington Square Mall Washington, NC 27889 252-946-6481 (Telephone) 252.946-9215 (Fax)

O'DIvis1Q'n'i'6 &il and*ater',4 onse&ahon-;'Qperation,ReVleW
o E -.a , , i .•I
�e, [��Dlvtsion of SoiandW,- l� E
: xlk Ij,;
IVISAOR oi.WateC UA11t omP Clance lnsi
n h E II a E r
' i �T A - G.Other Agency Operation Review ` E h i r € d� a °•1,
[WRoutine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ, inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Facility Number a Date of Inspection -OU
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
B-Permitted O'Kertified 0 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered 10 Not O erational Date Last Operated: .........
Farm Name
County:
Owner Name ............... .t.�.l. ......�3oPhone 3' L(L.q.� ...............
Facility Contact: ,j ........ Title Phone No
Mailing Address: Tr... .........1,rdK .................... ............................. ...�. K�A s.` t�.. �.}... ..... lze,56Q.....
......
Onsite Representative: . �� „ ,�/#,`� �,bt-S Iniegrator..,,.,�..,}� p�!. �(„�,, ...............
.....`�...t.. 1
f
Certified Operator:,..... ,,,,,,�14,[ n .{ 70. .aLS ... UperatorCertilicaiion Number: �548...........
............ ..............................
Location of Farm:
.................. .......... ... ... ............. ............
Latitude ' & 41 Longitude ' & 46
Design Current
Design Current
Design : Current
.Swine Capacity Population
Poultry
Capacity Population Cattle
Capacity' Population
❑ W an to Feeder
❑ Layer
❑ Dairy
G�feeder to Finish
LVoM
Ly_)oo
❑ Nan -Layer
10 Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity..
L41coo
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Total SSLW
StkQ coca
Number of Lagoons 1 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps 1❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes Q'No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If ycs, no(ify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notily DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes G2'go
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? [:]Yes U-90
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes [40
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4' Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(inches): .........................................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes D-Ko
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back

Facility Number: L40 — 3 Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need main(enance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
12. Crop type
-Z�•-
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated iid the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This "facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
. (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
0' CVO yi0iatiQns, -o' -• d�#jepencles IIQ'C.Ed• 0,0't irig 6, js vjsjt; • Yoh W* i1j't0egi*'r '0 fur; lharr
COC1'esAofideike. a�iOBi t�tiS .V1S1t. .' . .
❑ Yes 21,1540
❑ Yes Q'Ko
❑ Yes GI -No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes &'O
❑ Yes 2<o
❑ Yes C-EKo
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes Egql�o
❑ Yes G?Ko
❑ Yes EKO
❑ Yes RKO
Ad
alres jo
❑ Yes E ?f4o
❑ Yes �o
❑ Yes [RI�o
❑ Yes ON' o
❑ Yes �io
❑ Yesllo
C1 II' S: Explain any. YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments
r07
, E
Use drawingszof facihty,to better explain situations -(use,' additional pages.as�necessary)
A.
W o p ► +/1 OL I - % O
er";IL
u1,,
i 5
f�1p Ls
C4- iv� 1�� 5Zt, 00 l • (e J1 a ao
PS �Q+ YLrO;
Lq et 4C, tiJ
�iJYi tt•G7�{ �� YY r n r CO u,..D[�A_, �1 �1�]+`t�4-� �^-r L.3Q�A� C.2_ . .r
Reviewer/Inspector Name ' �U , T Po .
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: �F'j ���(r, 0 0

Facility Number: Date of Inspection
Odor .Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes 911q0
2& Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes 5X.
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes [40
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, ctc.) ❑ Yes D-No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes [a-N-o
32, Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
3/23/99

ri
' State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
July 6,1999
Billy Jones
Rt1Box 413
Snow Hill NC 28580
I I Vk / T ? FAA
•
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: Compliance Inspection
J&J Swine Farm
Facility Number 40 - 134
Greene County
Dear Billy Jones,
On 6/24/99,.Carl Dunn from the Washington Regional Office of the Division of Water Quality
conducted an inspection of your animal operation. Please review the enclosed inspection form. This
inspection form should be maintained as part of the .records for your facility. Please note any items that
may be marked with a yes answer and make every effort to correct these deficiencies. You are advised
that you must maintain a freeboard of at least one foot'in your lagoon(s) plus a storage volume sufficient
to accommodate the rainfall and subsequent runoff from a 25 year 24 hour storm event to remain in
compliance. You should consult your lagoon design for the exact freeboard requirement. Please
remember that you must follow your waste management plan at all times.
Thank you for your cooperation in this inspection. If you have any further questions in regard to this
matter or if I may be of any assistance, I can be contacted at [phone] ext. 208.
Sincerely,
Carl Dunn
Environmental Engineer
cc: WaRO
L L Murphrey Co.
943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, NC 27889 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

[3 Division of Soil and'Water"Conservation='Ope>ration Review i
Division of SA and Wai" C' nser +ation = Compliance Ins 14
pection
® Division of Water Quality Compliance Inspection
r !A
3 `D!Ot►er Agency_- Operation R'evietv'',„
Q Routine 0 Cum taint 0 Follow-up orDWQ inspection Q Follow-u of DSWC review Q Other
Facility Number D 3 !)site of lixspeclaon
Time of Inspection S_ 3J 24 hr. (hh:mm)
® Permitted 13 Certified 0 Conditionally Certified E3 Registered 10 Not Opera Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: ......................J....b.... ...•.... �►,r,�.u� 5, County: ............
..........................................................................................................
OwnerName: ..............................�.+.�:.............�`Ps..................................................... Phone No:.......................................................................................
FacilityContact: .............................................................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No: ...................................................
MailingAddress:...............................................^....-........................................................................................................................................................ ..........................
Onsite Representative: �� �� 17r 43 Integrator:..... L..... C ... Mirt@ .'...................................
Certified Operator: �'!,}�'� � ... Operator Certification Number: .......................................
Location of Farm:
............................................. .......
Latitude 0 ' '4 Longitude ° 6 64
;E Design Current Design! Current- Design Current
wine',, Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
j�Feeder to Finish
V0V
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts,
❑ Boars
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
„"❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other��
Total Design Capacity
Total''SSLW
lumber3of Lagoons, ❑ en Subsurface Drains Prest❑ Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area
Holding 'Ponds/ Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes IN No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field [:]Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'? ElYes ® No
K If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min'?
d. Dues discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If ycs, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from -any part of the operation? ❑ Yes Q No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? [-]Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes I No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(inches): .........2-..5 ................................................................................................................................................................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, El Yes 9 No
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back

Facility Number: LfO Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? C] Yes IS No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenancelimprovement? ❑ Yes M No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes f�,No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes & No
Waste Anolication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Yes Q No
12. Crop type C-OrSG laxl�.�ay
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes 19No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes I,No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes Eq No
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
RNo
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
(ANo
Required
Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
[:]Yes
J%No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
`
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
ISNo
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
C9 No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
9 No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
[9 No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
❑ No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
Is No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
® No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
Q No
Rio yiolai.ioos'o% d.ffleie diag -*ere pi>(.ed- 00irig •this:visit: • Y:ob wili•reeeiye iio fueftr:
correspon nce. about: this :visit. ....:: :
3/23/99

Fgcility Number: 4() -- Ily Date of Inspection 6�24
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
CkYes
No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
❑ Yes
(g No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29, Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
❑ Yes
No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e, broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
❑ Yes
�.No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
❑ Yes
g No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanenthemporary cover?
9 Yes
❑ No
A,ddifional Comments an or rOwings.' ;' r
r
3/23/99

r. 's Division of Sot] and Water Conservation - Operation Review
p Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Compliance Inspection
p Division of Water Quality - Compliance Inspection
p Other Agency - Operation Review
mine p eompraim p rouow-up of uwd it
Facility Number
0 Permitted M Certified p Conditionally Certified p Registered
FarmName:d&JS.yxina.Eairu........................................................................
w-up of u,-,we review p utner
Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection © 24 hr. (hh:mm)
In Not perahnna Date Last Operated:
,,,,,,,,, County: Greene WARO
Owner Name: Bally ......................................... 1alm ........................................................... Phone No: 252-151-4642.....
Facility Contact: ................................................... ...Title: ......... Phone No:
MailingAddress: RLI.Aox.4121 .......................................................................................... Saaw-Hill.NC ........................................................ 2858a ...........
Onsite Representative: 1 iAly.,.Stexen.&.Maxtiut.[nute�............................................ Integrator•:L.L.Mutrpbrcy.Cmw puny...............................
Certilied Opera tor:W.iltiam.JL............................lodes.................................................. Operator Certification Number:16548...........................
Location of Farm:
Latitude ©0©4 ®6k
uebign %— Ureni
Swine Capacity Population
❑ Weanto Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
p arrow to can
p P arrow to Fee er
p Farrow to Finish
p Gilts
13 Boars
Longitude ©• ®` ©11
uesign current design current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
p Layer
p Non -Layer
p Other
Total Design Capacity 4,000
E
Total SSLW 540,000
Number of Lagoons
0
In
u
sur ace
Drains
Present
JIM
Lagoon rea
In Spray re rear
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps
I
JE3
No
Liquid Waste
Management
System
insenarges & -.%treani impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes p No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) 13 Yes p No
c. Ifdischar- is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes p No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? © Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? p Spillway p Yes ® No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure C
Identifier:
Freeboard(inches): ...............34...............................................................................................................................................................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on hay.

Facility Number: 40-134 D'Oe (it, Inspeclinn 4/29/99
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
El Yes ® No
(if any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
p Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
p Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
p Yes N No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
p Yes N No
11. Is there evidence of over application? p Excessive Ponding p PAN
p Yes N No
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Small Grain Overseed Corn, Soybeans, Wheat
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
p Yes ®No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
p Yes ®No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
p Yes N No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
N Yes p No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
p Yes ®No
16.' Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
p Yes ® No
Re(mired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
p Yes ® No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ic/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
p Yes ®No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
p Yes ®No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
p Yes ®No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
p Yes ® No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
p Yes ® No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
p Yes N No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
p Yes N No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
p Yes ® No
]�io- violations -or 0kileircies:were'nnted •during.this visit.. lrou' will:> eceive na further. :
�corr pvpdehci. abou( this:visit; .......
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
i
* Recommend signing up for local Neuse options by 8/1/99 with the Greene Soil and Water Conservation District
i
* Given Integrator's Registration card
* Soils report dated 11/2/98
j
* Waste sample dated 11/13/98 at 1.3 lbs/1000 gal
* Keeping lagoon level records as required by General Permit
14c. Operation unable to meet 75% rule however in process of having plan revised and to include additional acreage to amend
Ian's field to below 75% (also changing crops but has not applied waste to new crop)
15. Overseed needs to be harvested by May 1
Reviewer/Inspector Name Pat Hooper 252/946-6481
;
!
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

p vtviston or bon ana water conservation - uperatton xevtew
p Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Compliance Inspection
N Division of Water Quality - Compliance Inspection
p Other Agency - Operation Review
19 Moutrne 0 t_.otnptarnt 0 rouow-up of uwy inspection 0 Nollow-up of u,Nwt- review 0 Vtner
Facility Number Dai.e of Inspection6/24/997
rime of Inspection � 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Permitted 0 Certified p Conditionally Certified p Registered In Not perahnna Date Last Operated:
Farm Name:.I&J..S.winr,.Earm..................... ................................................... County: Greene WARO
OwnerName: Billy ......................................... Junks ..............................................
Facility Contact: ...................................
T'itle:.........
Phone No: 9,X9::15,14642.................:.....................................
PhoneNo :................................................
MailingAddress: RU..Box.Ma.......................................................................................... smow.Hill.Nc ........................................................ 28580..........
Onsite Representative: Hitly..danes................................................................... ......... Integrator:L1.MuirW..cyXja....................
Certified Operator:WMI.liam.I............................ jaucs.........
Location of Farm:
Operator Certification Number: 16548.............
Latitude ©� ©� ®�� Longitude ©a ®, ©44
nc.rtn urrnn♦ V--f nc.rtn ...•ro..F
Swine Capacity Population
13 Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to tuts
p Farrow to can
p Farrow to ee er
p Farrow to Finis
p Giits
p Boars
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
p ayer FI3;a
iry
p Non -Layer n- airy
p Other
Total Design Capacity 4,000
Total SSLW 1 540,000
Number of Lagoons
®
u
surface
rains
Presentp
agoon rea
® pray re rear
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps
JE3
No
Liquid Waste
Management
System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge
Waste Collection & 'rreatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? [3 Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4Structure 5
[3 Yes a No
p Yes III No
Yes I7 No
[3 Yes p No
[3 Yes M No
? p Yes M No
p Yes M No
Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(inches): ...............25............................................................................................................................................................ .........................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (iel trees, severe erosion,
3/23/99 seepage, etc.)
p Yes 0 No
Continued on bur

FacilityNumber: 40-134 Dow ol• 111spectiml
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? p Yes N No .
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? p Yes N No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? 13 Yes U No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? p Yes N No
Waste Annlication
10. Are there any. buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes N No
11. Is there evidence of over application? p Excessive Ponding p PAN p Yes ® No
12. Crop type Corns, Soybeans Small Grain Bermuda
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? 13 Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? p Yes N No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? p Yes ®No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
p Yes ® No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
p Yes N No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
p Yes M No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
p Yes U No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
p Yes ® No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
p Yes N No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
p Yes ®Nn
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
p Yes N No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
p Yes p No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
p Yes ® No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
p Yes ® No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
p Yes N No
a' Nia.vitilutions•or' defiefi nk'ie's:were' ip'ted.dtiring:this visit.: You wiII'rece'ivlr na further ::
• sorxes�lalndeitce: about this:visit; -..:::::.:::.::::.:. :::::::::
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
10
Reviewer/Inspector Name Carl Dunn Entered by Ann Tyndall
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

Printed on
aci i y Number: 40_l34 I):11a of lnspCeticui
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ® Yes p No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27, Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? p Yes ® No
28.
Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
p Yes
® Ns,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29.
Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
p Yes
® No
30.
Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
p Yes
®No
31.
Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
p Yes
®No
32.
Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
® Yes
p No

ME
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and
Natural Resources
Washington Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Mr. Billy Jones
J & J Swine Farm
Rt. 1, Box 413
Snow Hill, NC 28580
•,W,A
OW4 . M
IV
N CL7FWN Ft
NORTH GARpLINA DMf=ARrmr-N7 OF
ENVIRONs4mNT ANo NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
October 6, 1998
SUBJECT: Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
J & J Swine Farm
Fac. No. 40-134
Greene County
Dear Mr. Jones:
On June 25, 1998, I conducted an Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection at the
referenced facility. Overall, the operation was found to be in satisfactory condition. A
copy of the inspection report is attached for your review.
In general, this inspection includes verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified Animal
Waste Management Plan (CAWMP); (2) the farm is complying with requirements of the
State Rules 15 NCAC 2H.0217, Senate Bill 1217, and the Certified Animal Waste
Management Plan; (3) the farm operation's waste management system is being operated
properly under the direction of a Certified Operator; (4) the required records are being
kept; (5) there are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or runoff.
The recommendations and/or comments regarding your inspection can be found in the
comment section of the attached inspection form. It is very important as the owner and
Operator in Charge that you address any noted concerns, as soon as possible. For
assistance, please contact your Technical Specialist and/or the local Soil & Water
Conservation District Office.
943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, North Carolina 27889
Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

Page 2
1 & 7 Swine Farm
October 6, 1998
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance during the inspection. Should you have
further questions or comments regarding this inspection, do not hesitate to call me at
[phone], ext. 321.
Sincerely,
Qu, e,
-
Daphne B. Cullom
Environmental Specialist H
cc: Greene County SWCD Office
Mike Regans, Greene County NCCES
Sake Barrow, L.L. Murphrey Company
WaRO

1'
[6 Koutine p Lomplaint p I oliow-up of DWQ inspection O hollow -up of OSWC review p Other 1
Facility Number Date of Inspection 6-25-98
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
p Registered M Certified la Applied for Permit 0 Permitted 10 Not 73perahona Date Last Operated:
Farm Name:J&d.5xi1ne.F.a:ran................. ................ ................ County: Greene WARO
................................. ........
OwnerName: My ......................................... J'an s,........................................................... Phone No: 9.19.-.7.53.-.4642 ..........................................................
Facility Contact: ...................................................... .Title: ... Phone No:
MailingAddress: RU.RAx. 13.......................................................................................... Sao.w.211I.NC ........................................................ Z8581Q ..............
Onsite Representative: ................. Integrator: L.L.Murphrey-Lamptamy:.................................
Certified Opera tor:W. liam.L........................... Jones .................................................. Operator Certification Number: l0,48.............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude ©+©� ®64 Longitude ©+ ®' ©«
S rDesign,
" rl'oult
r�� r.Ci
p Vean to F ee er
® Feeder to mis
[3 arrow t0 Wean
Farrow to Fee er
p Farrow to Finish
p Gilts
13 Boars
I
urren r , esign urren ;
Cattle
y Population < . ' Capacity Population,
Other
6.
Total Design'Capacity"
5
,
!"
r540,050
U
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? p Yes g No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes g No
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes p No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes p No
c, If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gallmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes p No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes g No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? p Yes g No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require E3 Yes g No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? p Yes g No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? Yes g No
7/25/97

Pr
i
Facility um er: 40_134 Date of Inspection
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons,Holding Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier: ......._...
Freeboard (ft): 3.2 ft.
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-I2 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of AW, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
p Yes
® No
p Yes
H No
Structure 5 Structure 6
p Yes
® No
p Yes
N No
p Yes
® No
13 Yes
® No
p Yes
® No
15. Crop type .......Co=.(.Silage.&..GraiO............. mast.Bmxtutda.Gxass..... .......................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified A WMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
R . o.v!q lons.or erencies•were.noo ar ing is visit.. na will.receive nofurther.*
corresponde>aep hWtjt :tlijis
p Yes H No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes H No
Yes N No
p Yes ® No
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Date: Reviewer/Inspector Signature: (� . �j , �) nti�

p Division of Soil and Water Conservation E Other Agency
p Division of Water Quality
Routine p ComplalinT p Follow-up o inspection p Follow-up of DSWC review p Other
Facility Humber Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection ® 24 hr. (hh:mm)
p Registered E Certified p Applied for Permit E Permitted In Notpera Iona Date Last Operated:
Farm Name:J&d.&wivaEairm..............................................................................I.......... County: Greene WARO
OwnerName: lull} :......................................... danoes........................................................... Phone No: 9.19.7.51.46i42..........................................................
Facility Contact: StexmJanes,J.1'1(actin.Jones ....................Title:............................................................... Phone No:....................................................
Mailing Address: Rt.l.BoxAla............................................................................
OnsiteRepresentative; .................................................................................. : .........
Certified Operator:W..illiawl ............................. Jones ....................................
Location of Farm:
Snow.Hill. NC ........................................................ 2858a ..............
Integrator: L.L.A' arphxey..Hog.Campatt,y........................
Operator Certification Number:1,65A8 .............................
153.&..Uh.U.2t.Lizzit.Off......................................:...........................................................:...............:...............................................:.:...............................
Latitude ©• ©; 3 Longitude ©• ®©
esign Current
Swine Capacity Population
p Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to in-5
p Farrow to can
p Farrow to ee er
p Farrow to Minis,
p Gilts
p Boars
esign current Design current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity: Population
p ayer p Dairy
p Non —Layer JE3 Non -Dairy
p Other
Total Design Capacity 4,000
Total SSLW
1Vumber of€Lagoons / Hol[ling Ponds: 0 '; ® u sur ace Drains Presen
p agoon rea
In Spray Field
Area
p o iqui---Waste Managementsystem
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
p Yes
® No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
p Yes
® No
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
p Yes
p No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
p Yes
p No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
p Yes
p No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
p Yes
®No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
p Yes
®No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
p Yes
® No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
p Yes
®No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? p Yes N No
7/25/97

Facility Number: 40_13
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons,Holdina Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure 1
Identifier: .................1..........
Freeboard (ft): 3.33
Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(if any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
Structure 5 Structure 6
p Yes
® No
p Yes
R No
p Yes
N No
p Yes
M No
p Yes
M No
15. Crop type............C.Qasta.1.Berminda..................................... Com........................ ...........................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
q .oorvretio's�ionio�ncs�.ocr� ab�ucien#iciise•vs,1were
sie}r:: e.rw .a ...u.n.g...is Vise. on w� .receive ncr further .
.t:.c'..... -
.. • . • . • . .
p Yes ® No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
atnmeots refer to°"" uestii n'# : x `I ... q p an y answers an _ or any recomm..en a ions or a.ny„ot er comments.
Use drawings"of facil tyto'b"etfe'r ezplatn'situatians. (use additional pages'as necessary):
ds rainfall recorded as of 11/30/97
'aste Management Plan complete
as taken soil sample - not received results
as been permitted
ood vegetation of lagoon and areas around houses
peration maintain good - records maintain well
rain tile under waterway 12/2/97
.Al
j Reviewer/Inspector Name Ponald ll+�'Smtth 4
Reviewer/Inspector Signature. Date:

State of North Carolina
A Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Washington Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
December 19, 1997
Mr. Billy Jones
J & J Swine Farm
Rt. 1, Box 413
Snow Hill, NC 28580
SUBJECT: Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
J & J Swine Farm
Facility No. 40-134
Greene County
Dear Mr. Jones:
On October 1, 1997, I conducted an animal feedlot operation site inspection at the referenced facility. Overall, the
operation was found to be in satisfactory condition. A copy of the inspection report is attached for your review.
In general, this inspection includes verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
(CA WMP); (2) the farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC 2H.0217, Senate Bill 1217, and
the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan; (3) the farm operation's waste management system is being operated
properly under the direction of a Certified Operator, (4) the required records are being kept; (5) there are no signs of
seepage, erosion, and/or runoff.
The recommendations and/or comments regarding your inspection can be found in the comment section of the attached
inspection form. it is very important as the owner and Operator in Charge that you address any noted concerns, as soon
as possible. For assistance, please contact your Technical Specialist and/or the local Soil & Water Conservation District
Office.
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance during the inspection. Should you have further questions or
comments regarding this inspection, do not hesitate to call me at [phone], ext. 321.
Sincerely,
Daphne B. Cullom
Environmental Specialist 11
cc: Greene County SWCD�Office._. � rw a.L� c� c-' A- "x'
Mike Regans, Greene County NCCES
Jake Barrow, L.L. Murphrey Hog Company
943 Washington Square Mali, Washington, NC 27689 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

�j
16 icoutine p c ompiamt p ronow-up of tiwtl inspection p ronow-up or uawe: review p vtner
Facility Number
p Registered 0 Certified p Applied for Permit E Permitted
Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection UJU 1 24 hr. (hh:mm)
p Not Operational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: J&JAwine,F.arm........................................................................................... County: Greene WARO
OwnerName: B,illy......................................... Junes........................................................... Phone No: 9.19.!.153.-4fk42 ...........................................................
Facility Contact: MarUixJanw.&.StexeJones...................Title:............................................................... Phone No:....................................................
MailingAddress: Rt.1.Box.41J........................................................................................ Saox..HillNC....................................................... 285811..............
Onsite Representative: Bi1ly.Ju>aes,Martifx.Ju>xes,,& Stryelx.,lant:s................. Integrator: LL.Murµhrey.Hog.0 mpany........................
Certified Operator:V!►'Miam►.1............................ Jones .................................................. Operator Certification Number: lft5.4&............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude ©a ©4 ®" Longitude ©• ®` ©"
Swine I . , Capacity Population
13 Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to ME=
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ P arrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finisfi
13 Gilts
❑ Boars
esign . 7Current joesign rren
Poultry Capacity Population °Cattle Capacity Population
jo,Layer ICI Vairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
'Total Design Capacity 4,UUU
Total'SSLW 540,UUO
Number of Lagoon's 1 Holding Ponds 113 Subsurface Urains
E3 o iquiWaste
.
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon E3 Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7125/97
13 Yes
® No
p Yes
® No
❑ Yes
p No
p Yes
13 No
p Yes
p No
13 Yes
®No
❑ Yes
®No
Q Yes
®No
p Yes
®No
p Yes
®No

k'acility Number: 0_13
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Laaoons,Holding Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier: ................................... ...............................
Freeboard (ft): 4.3 ft.
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste A lication
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type .......Cara.(Silage.&.Graiti)............. UastaEl.Rer utda.Grass......
Structure 5
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
p.. o•vta ions.or erelucies-were.no a uring 1s visit. ou,wl .receive ncr u er .
: Gei�[espopdeiaee abo>d� xiiis fish::
p Yes N No
p Yes ®No
Structure 6
p Yes ® No
p Yes N No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes N No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
Comments (refer to'questioo #) .Explain anrY.ES,answers and/or any recommendatiOns'or�any,,other comments pI
Userilrawtngs ofiacility to,better, explain situations (ase"addittanel pages as necessary):,, ,.:� t E � r i4,
"..' K .,: <i. -. . ii- r S,l,. ,.. �. ,. -„' :.:,,•: .al,:a _ _j `r o-e
Soil Analysis -pan to sample Mis Fall 1997
Waste lysis-°2-17-97,-5 Ana-19-97
11 components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan are complete, along.with the Geneial'Pern it.:-
gation iecordi complete with nitrogen'balamce. r 2�.
..- Z..
Starting to record weekly freeboard. a ,. t, _A
e following -items are conditions ofthe Ce�m'fid:Animal Waste Management Plan and the-generalpe_rmib-'therefore these items
must be implemented:' r, _ n .i, f w f _ _ ~ t`.�•.' n �?
g
Keep lagoons/storage ponds free'of foreign debris~ including, but not limited to'tires, bottles, plastic products, light bulbs , -gloves,
ges or any other solids waste:
P.7/25/97
.
We
Reviewer/Inspector Name `,' "J 1L rls """r� + Y ,e:s j
J� i
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:G¢ ��� - -- Date:

ace y um er: 40-134 Date of Inspection 1��T-3
r'
A-dditionaLcommentsiaR or -Draw ngs rC ♦ rir i� I t '� ,` '�E + �' "`_ :;.'
M. :3 tx;j-i'-r..+'n "i"•°'I. 1... <'i. ..d L: 1"^'n .dE4`�` ca.; it .AS. �5. - A11,"it - i..:-{_
wastes ,tom the n e s , g gases disc
a wastes^iJar is shr t r i
I, ••r -r+-^ 5 +ia.rr^ r "�,r ..• w» T w., n r i. t
"The lagoon areaould be kept mowed or otherwise controlled and accessible:High grass does not allow, you to conduct a
'omugh'iiispeGdonof the'lagOOII area,for seepage; rodent'dainageetc,``,y�-
leasf-within,60'day6
An'arialys>s of the liquid animal waste from'the:lagoon'shall beconducted as close to the timetof appLtcation as practYcal and'at
�{before or after of the vdate,of applicahon� This analysis"shall include thehfollowu�g`para:neters: Nitrogen,
..-..s�{w ...+ r !l �„ a,7 ,K tr^••-+�'t'.".. ' j
,hosphorms,+Zmcland Copper µ - �� 1.. �Etky ,rTx. � �-•�:� `� � �� A�.���
y. •�`+ ?- ° c,.m .'`r,Jsr y+-5r'.. '` i .1 't`' y. d �'•r -xr. Mrs •+wS-s-.#r��. f" .5
r r�011'allgaly88%1]11iiCd annual ly
J .. _ - .:i..- . ' •r �, .S'".SKi Z +�`3,idY'.....-.r �: ."�,.', : k �+. r- .-„'i "`- - M E " Y
r^
rThe followmg•recordsiare regwred"`lagoon`level•dat - ff--site solids removai, maintenance, repair,.waste'and soil analysis and
an d"iirigation'i&ords. ,These:records'shouldrbe maintained by the facility owner/manager'in chronological and legible form for a
in um Of three yeses r
S
1- u's•'"+. i 67.a ik •.� si-s a ., - ns a'f - o- nr .�
>a :.. �r� S3S. �' rA. a sv'`', ir�ti SC��r'r L^ :�a..,� f °E',Y •�, c �..,,�}� - t n„ - 7Mr. '?t '1' 3 i er- r .
a, � � I - f E,.Y v: � S p y,»" k .r r .,,x +a»' c �' '� ra•.. r. ,
5 , � a.r.,.,�e�ry�,�•r +rl �.;:3s r..'z t,� a. n� e,; l �t .,. »,.k n'« ..;:� "+�' �s� __`�'' �.. wy+"', a. ,..., w K�._ ..-_
a - L' �� � l,.. ` ^S x ��.�... �"^?:.±.��.;�E�i _•s. E u,a r `�v'..'-sTy� r� ti ��K * +:{ _ _ :. .. - !
1_t•7 rroa_ -'e i:..,;i•.=..r...1"a- -qs �•,' a. f`• 1 f - ., r :--�,x•«..•'�
yr=�G'^1 r _�:�ir �+�wa•-�—r r.� �, r - I dv • e- fi _. gs'2•r-»; 4^ew.."" * ,A. LL r4: "-'Y'- :.j„ err
-. s T i 1kr[Y4iyt I R 4 y{
;S.�.r '•b1' '4 r' - 5 � -•.:/ '{ E- `e �._� .:
L"IX41 ..NM1 R i"y :�`[ -ice' l.. -^'.1, t Fs J4r.• • — -
..� . J -.f; 3 r,� 3' , r � KR! L. .�,. h:3: a. ti4'.,� , � '+h'.•-.Y" I .s.r.... "�i r �
ry
- ''� "•'�•bC:�'i�s ^I°�' k",x +i '�%� �F�-,.-: '4, '�i n _v F' � '; } -... � � 1 -.Mr �'';' ° ` a a,�, i _ .
'M�.r•: �Si n.�•�,•a rr x .w ' E!"�- ": �''�s�..�ier f "J' 1�r.�T�3r�: #..n .+-ir��!'e"s"+7r:^:r - -
♦ v'r `,.j.^.. +.'�q^{" i:'r �. _ 1 r c
d..,•.�.- ' aJ ( "A -1'M1 • .�\�Y'.. 1:, �.� �M' _ {Y �.)�'L4prLrT��6 Y~ !- L�1 Y X+��.1� �3�'• '^i . t+. � Y
-Yi Yf - •h c' .,.,' r i ,t, .•G.w r. _+, r_'� .a E p .z, .i.. y�'. <..
;-:tom 4 °a:tdf -'� si,.•-- '�`-..:i �1, �' _ q': :�'_...., y. 4.Y.� � �'�v.v'.�` -
.,'•
-"L '.� ---v, n1 's + '•..� •-rK- e ;;:'- ra
{ a �i � as �.r •.i i,:i'iti .. r ��i^r r, r,i r - 'S
�'!_ to.`if drl �Y 1 '� J•,IA. _ !'..,, ••. _•-• � 5� ..f_ •4
3•} ti �Z o a -'•+? _ r •�. -' .:9q xr ...,i - - s
+S,t.. t'��i�-y' ':Z :ti 7r�x r� �yi R�+'�.' r,•aL'y �`n �'sa �•:..: s.: r._ � k '•'�. •$ r' i � h�� - :ci-'r:t�'
:_•r,�w - •v I,• S f ,�...... +r 'i' � '� 1 w♦ k � - •^ram j � ��.....�..1. I � � . L �. s i.4 � t � _
C�: lS..i.�"4=••�+[i'�t���lY ���v .r.� E r L 'S. �.r..,� _•t,' .y �; 1.}.. "'".` y ti� .:: ...
"7� r"ry ^1"C" �°,,"""v' 'TPY ,.r.3 ';� 1 Ac- � +'E i .'� p.., . _1• ,; ' 4-.,14.' _ .
1•`, ..,' a .ram .yx.IeNi�'rf ,«, �r 3 -<a_: r '� a �xz..., �;r• r '" 5 Y J
'!"•� � i. Y•ar �� �r r''S �- j'.y.l r. �' �r`".:.sw'- rs�k �f� S_ Y� C <�^ - '
'*-A: w�Y'!'^>.'r
iz
yF1 ;r.� it p`. rs
rt J -
f, ! _s- *,L� j. r J F � !«i - r•` r!-h e.•". K fr r. r
M' +L ,;,err` `ryS t r7't"�' ° r 'w. 't. .. .,j - •i, ,
J;� i
:i,�'O s4 -e,a i ^� ss- ,i•`•5 C*J� e" 'r � e � :,• � '4': t � � +r/r. N r �"''. y _ ..,
r'�
�s�..•a •.. r i .` ,di+l - , r' 2, i !7, 7•• Y`t r :+ti.. r - .,L Yr .,. -
i'�tr r
rr:�r tl_' ♦ 'r.-.i:-r lit E.-f 47
Ly 1�' S•E +1 �T•• w - rw.
,.Y.� .. M.... .� .�sY��i-a."�r_. 3 K �r+l� fi'+--�'+.Y: ''t '� Sf• �ryi��'i•.v��i.'^..��ltr "yFs-c k =' _
1S.1. •-.r•' f►2•'•a tr'<;yy- G"x z 7 ,y�^ r „�' 't 1 n 'r ,;,i `y�
h
• r -�' Sc i; •.c- 7.,,;" .r, ' 'r '�xE', � .� EE.tin;+..s,K� .�- ,
G.�-l'15h _ r'..., i ��! k .,,y-�. -a Fa -•�••� {.,/ '� 7s'•s.•. ^sq 7>r"-+x�?.. „
YQ rE �' �lit� L'FJ 1{• i 3'r}�^H , .fir .... I �G.;, S`••-^• �,.`:; �.r:. J t1�....Y't.�. .w -
�MF �Y{hL:� �re++�v':• Ml�arrV.'Z�•�-1��L'!Y.isr.!!.��!'u•tP'S -1�S+;r•�6Y' . LC'-Y`•• wV +rMr' ..