400132_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environmental Dual

INSPECTIONS.
INSPECTIONS
INSPECTIONS

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and
Natural Resources
Washington Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Mr. Robert Wooten, Jr.
Robert Wooten, Jr. Farm
5069 Hwy. 58 North
Hookerton, NC 28538
DENR
NC
ROL.INA
ENvIRONI,i=t4,r A 4o NATIJRAi- F E:sc>uRCmS
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
October 6, 1998
SUBJECT: Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
Robert Wooten, Jr. Farm
Fac, No. 40-132
Greene County
Dear Mr. Wooten, Jr.:
On June 23, 1998, I conducted an Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection at the
referenced facility. Overall, the operation was found to be in satisfactory condition. A
copy of the inspection report is attached for your review.
In general, this inspection includes verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified Animal
Waste Management Plan (CAWMP); (2) the farm is complying with requirements of the
State Rules 15 NCAC 211.0217, Senate Bill 1217, and the Certified Animal Waste
Management Plan; (3) the farm operation's waste management system is being operated
properly under the direction of a Certified Operator; (4) the required records are being
kept; (5) there are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or runoff.
The recommendations and/or comments regarding your inspection can be found in the
comment section of the attached inspection form. It is very important as the owner and
Operator in Charge that you address any noted concerns, as soon as possible. For
assistance, please contact your Technical Specialist and/or the local Soil & Water
Conservation District Office.
943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, North Carolina 27889
Telephone 252194"481 FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

4 C'
Page 2
Robert Wooten, Jr. Farm
October 6, 1998
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance during the inspection. Should you have
further questions or comments regarding this inspection, do not hesitate to call me at
[phone], ext. 321.
Sincerely,
Q�4�e) - calvx--�-
Daphne B. Cullom
Environmental Specialist II
cc: Greene County SWCD Office
Mike Regans, Greene County NCCES
Jake Barrow, L.L. Murphrey Company
WaRO

A
r
Facility Number
p Registered N Certified p Applied for Permit p Permitted
Farm Name: Roberk..Woaten.Jr..F.axtnx................
Owner Name: Robtx:t.................................... . Aat:en:,.Jx .....
Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection � 24 hr. (hh:mm)
p of perationa Date Last Operated:
......... County: Lenoir WARO
........ Phone No: 9.19:521-9465:..........................................................
Facility Contact: ............................................................ .Title: .......... Phone No:
Mailing Address: 5Afi9.JiwyA8.Horth........................................................................... Haokerlom..NC ...................................................... ZMA ..............
Onsite Representative: Rut.eri...00tea.J.r........................................I......................... Integrator: L.L.Murph.red-Company..................... ............
Certified Operator: RRbert.$ ............................... W..01o1enAr....................................... Operator Certification Number: M422.............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude ©. ©' ©" Longitude ©•
esign ` : urren r
_t ,.;,. t s '� epsaicgmnya ?a,..urren esin,t, urren
iPp.WatonsuyCpaitPCatle;wme Ca4"
9 t ,
�Popula4on ;
® Wean to Feeder
❑ 1, ceder to P this
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finis
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
p on- airy
a] rDesxgn Capac>Ify4,160
1 T,otahSSLW 3 124,01
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c, If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
❑ Yes a No
❑ Yes H No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes p No
❑ Yes a No
❑ Yes a No
❑ Yes a No
❑ Yes a No
❑ Yes ® No

Facility Number: 5Cate of Inspection
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lacoons,Holding Ponds. Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
A
13 Yes N No
p Yes ® No
Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ...............................................................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (ft): 2 ft.
10. is seepage observed from any of the structures? p Yes ® No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? p Yes ® No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? p Yes ® No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? p Yes ® No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? p Yes ® No
(If in excess of WIAP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ................... .S:aybcans............................................Mizat....................... ...........................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? p Yes ® No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? p Yes ® No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? p Yes ® No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? p Yes ®No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? p Yes ®No
21. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative? p Yes ®No
22. Does record keeping need improvement? p Yes ®No
For Certified or Permitted_ Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? p Yes ®No
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? p Yes ®No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit? p Yes p No
I. .. pwro� �ons.or �crencses•were.nu a uring . rs vrsrt:ou wr .receive no u er . .
cerrespond 4eie about Oil Vi
Reviewer/Inspector Name as ne u loint
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: (< < '1'1r Date:

p Division of Soil and Water Conservation N Other Agency
p Division of Water Quality
ou one p Uomplaint p o ow -up of UWQ inspection p Follow-up of DSWC review p Other
Facility Number
Date of Inspection
Time of Inspections 24 hr. (hh:mm)
p Registered 0 Certified p Applied for Permit p Permitted JU Not Operational I Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: RohertWaixtenAr—Eapt'm......................................................................... County: Lenoir WARO
Owner Name: Robert ................................... W..mabui.Ar............................................... Phone No: 919-523-9465................................. I ............ ... .........
Facility Contact: Robest.l' naten..Ir......................................Title: Owner ................................................ Phone No:....................................................
Mailing Address: 5069..Hwy,.58.Noxth ..............................
Haokerxan..NC...................................................... 18539.
Onsite Representative:Jim..Mliaws.............................................................................. Integrator: L.L.Mnrphrey..Hog.Company........................
Certified Operator: lftQhert.E..............................W.Qolcn.Jr........................................ Operator Certification Number: M422 .............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude ©• ©6 « Longitude ©• ©4 ®44
Swine " , , "
esign Current Design urren , , Design urren - , , ,.
Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population,;, Cattle Capacity .Population
® Wean to Feeder
[3 Feeder to Finish
[3 Farrow to can
13 Farrow to ee er
p Farrow to Finish
13 Gilts
13 Boars
Nu � s /'Holding Ponds' pSubsurface rains resen p Lagoon Area p pray ie rea
in of_LagooR
p No Liquid Waste Management System
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? p Yes ® No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes H No
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? 13 Yes p No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes p No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes 13 No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? 13 Yes ® No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? p Yes ® No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
13 Yes N No
p Yes ® No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
p Yes ® No

aci t y um er: 54-132
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
p Yes
® No
Structures Lagoons,Holding_Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
p Yes
® No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5 Structure
6
Identifier:.............................................................................................................................................
...................................................................
freeboard (ft): 1
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
p Yes
H No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
p Yes
® No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
p Yes
® No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
p Yes
N No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
p Yes
® No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type .........................Rye...............................................................................................................................................,...........................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? p Yes ® No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Oniy
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
Q.N.oyiahitions.or riencres'were.noo urmg rsvisi! . ouwy .recervenufurther. .
ttrients (refer to question ) p am any ;.:S answers and/or any.recoi
x
d awtngs of facility.to,better-explain situtationsi�(use additional pages as
-cords are in notebook and OK.
on lagoon looks good.
records are in notebook with lagoon level.
Measured from start pumping level.
p Yes H No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ® No
p Yes N No
p Yes p No
isar+y):
1115197
ReviewerlInspector Name � Wid W—nderson
ReviewerlInspector Signature: Date:

4
r 5
W flIiZo-
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality,
Washington Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
December 22, 1997
Mr. Robert Wooten, Jr.
Robert Wooten, Jr. Farm
5069 Hwy. 58 North
Hookerton, NC 28538
SUBJECT: Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
Robert Wooten, Jr. Farm
Facility No. 40-I32
Greene County
Dear Mr. Wooten, Jr.:
On October 6, 1997, 1 conducted an animal feedlot operation site inspection at the referenced facility. Overall, the
operation was found to be in satisfactory condition. A copy of the inspection report is attached for your review.
In general, this inspection includes verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
(CA WMP); (2) the farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC 2H.0217, Senate Bill 1217, and
the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan; (3) the farm operation's waste management system is being operated
properly under the direction of a Certified Operator, (4) the required records are being kept; (5) there are no signs of
seepage, erosion, and/or runoff.
The recommendations and/or comments regarding your inspection can be found in the comment section of the attached
inspection form. It is very important as the owner and Operator in Charge that you address any noted concerns, as soon
as possible. For assistance, please contact your Technical Specialist and/or the local Soil & Water Conservation District
Office.
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance during the inspection. Should you have further questions or
comments regarding this inspection, do not hesitate -to call me at [phone], ext. 321.
Sincerely,
Daphne B. Cullom
Environmental Specialist 11
cc: Greene County SWCD Office
Mike Regans, Greene County NCCES
Jak Barrow, L.L. Murphrey Hog Company
,�aRO
943 Washington Square Mail, Washington, NC 27889 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

r
Lo KOUTMe p %-ompiamt p ronow-up at uwtl inspection p roiiow-up oC uhwc review p Other
Date of Inspection
Facility Number
Time of Inspection 3:30 j 24 hr. (hh:mm)
p Registered E Certified p Applied for Permit p Permitted in Not Operauana Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: RobertWaoten.Jr..Yaxm......................................................................... County: Lenoir WARO
OwnerName: Robert .................................... Woftt,en,.Jr............................................... Phone No: 9.19-M-Q46s.......................................... _............
Facility Contact: Jlm..W!Uiam..................................................Title: Manager..
Phone No:
Mailing Address: 50.6911 xy .S.S_N rtb........................................................................... Haaltertfln..Nc................. ...._............................... 28538._..._.....
Onsite Representative:.lim..WilUms.............................................................................. Integrator: l,.I.Marphre"og.Company.......... ..__......
Certified Operator:RRherl:.L............................. Waofenlx ...................................... Operator Certification Number: 164Z2................ __.......
Location of Farm:
Latitude ©� ©� �11 Longitudes ©®u
®
can to feeder
Feeder to
Finish
13
Farrow to
Wean
p
arrow to
ee er
p
Farrow to
mrs
53—
Gilts
p Boars
L
ILJ
p Non -Layer p Non -Dairy
r
�:.�'•� -:,#yes .+.Sw -.,. r t R=��;' :w-.+E`*3"q`�-. ""'."1F'� w�• :,a,r.,, -ni - e. ,. _.
�� a rt, f, Total s r �- �_� :�1• � t =-�� eF�„ -�% -w Cry�C,, s y` �Dr- ek�t,-_C�a4
7A a_r`3r�ht'y
at-SSLy
,it
�u
,
[.eoeral
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? 13 Yes ® No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes 13 No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) 17 Yes 13 No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) 0 Yes p No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? p Yes ® No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require p Yes ® No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? p Yes ® No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? 13 Yes ® No
7/25/97

`aci ity um er: 54_132
Y
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons.Holdinz Ponds. Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3
Identifier: ................................... .
Freeboard (ft): 34 in.
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
CI Yes N No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
15. Crop type ......................... Rye ..................................... ................................................. ......................................................................................................
_
I6. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? p Yes H No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? p Yes H No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
.J9. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities On[
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
Q ovlo tlons.or Crencies•were.note unng t 1S vlsl;t:. om w1 .receive nofurther.*
s
.... ........... X�liS.v... .
13 Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® To
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes N No
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: 0 1 A Q Q r AA_ Date: