400128_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environmental Qual

INSPECTIONS
INSPECTIONS
A
INSPECTIONS

L
Division of Water Resources
Divislon of Soil and Water Conservation
Other Agency
Facility Number: 400128 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS400128
Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene Region:
Date of Visit: 08/01/2017 Entry Time: 11:30 am Exit Time: 12:10 pm Incident #
Farm Name: Collyn Beaman Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Collyn Beaman Phone:
Mailing Address: 502 Sturbridge Snow Will NC 28580
Physical Address: Dunwoody Rd Farmville NC 27828
Facility Status: ■ Compliant 11 Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm:
NCSR 1323.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream impacts
Records and Documents
❑ Denied Access
Washington
collynbeam a n@yahoo. a
252-747-7708
Latitude: 35' 32' 04" Longitude: 77' 37' 22"
Waste Col, Stor, & Treat
Other issues
Waste Application
Certified Operator: Carson E Beaman Operator Certification Number: 16497
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): T Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Phone
On -site representative Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis: soil tested: 2016
6-12-17 = 1.46
2-16-17 = 1.06
IRR records are recorded - need to change PAN rate to most current analysis.
reviewed: rainfalllfreeboard; crop yield; stocking; calibration 3/2016; sludge survey due 2019.
page: 1

Permit: AWS400128 Owner - Facility: Collyn Beaman Facility Number: 400128
Inspection Date: 08/01/17 Inpseclion Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine -Wean to Feeder 4,160 3,000
Total Design Capacity: 4,160
Total SSLW: 124,800
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon 1 CI3 03/23/95 19.00 36.00
page: 2

Permit: AWS400128 Owner - Facility : Collyn Beaman Facility Number: 400128
Inspection Date: 08/01/17 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
DIscharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No Na No
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
M ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
[]
M ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■ ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
0 ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yea No Na Ne
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (i.e./ large
❑
M ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑M
❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
M ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
No
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste ApRlication
Yes No Na No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ M ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Permit: AWS400128 Owner - Facility : Collyn Beaman Facility Number: 400128
Inspection Date: 08/01/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes
No No No
Crop Type 1
Corn (Grain)
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5.
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
N ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
013
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yea
No Na No
18. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
013
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
EEI
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21, Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
No
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWS400128 Owner -Facility : Collyn Beaman Facility Number: 400128
Inspection Date: 08/01/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No Na No
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
01111
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
013
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No Na Ne
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
M ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
M ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
(i,e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
0 ❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
0 ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
M ❑
❑
page: 6

t:.
Division of Water Resources
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Other Agency
Facility Number:
400128 Facility Status:
Active Permit: AWS400128
Denied Access
Inppection Type:
Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for visit:
Routine
County: Greene Region:
Washington
Date of Visit:
08/31/2016 Entry Time: 08:30 am
Exit Time: 9:05 am Incident #
Farm Name:
Collyn Beaman Farm
owner Email;
collynbeaman@yahoo.c
Owner:
Collyn Beaman
Phone:
252-747-7708
Mailing Address: 502 Sturbridge Snow Hill NC 28580
Physical Address: Dunwoody Rd Farmville NC 27828
Facility Status: ■ Compliant Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm:
NCSR 1323,
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts
Records and Documents
Latitude: 35" 32' 04"
Waste Col. Star, & Treat
Other Issues
Longitude: 77" 37' 22"
Waste Application
Certified Operator: Carson E Beaman Operator Certification Number: 16497
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Collyn Beaman Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Collyn Beaman Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis: soil tested: 2013
4-29-16 = .92
wainting on last analysis to finish balancing IRR records.
Irrigation recorded waiting on last analysis to finish balancing.
reviewed: rainfalVfreeboard; crop yield
freeboard levels: 30" 3/1/16 to 33" 8129/16
sludge survey due 2019
page: 1

Permit: AWS400128 Owner - Facility : Collyn Beaman Facility Number: 400128
Inspection Date: 08/31/16 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine -Wean to Feeder 4,160 3,400
Total Design Capacity: 4,160
Total SSLW: 124,800
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon 1 CB 03/23/95 19.00 32,00
page: 2

r
Permit: AWS400128 Owner -Facility: Collyn Beaman Facility Number: 400128
Inspection Date: 08/31/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yea No Na No
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
■ ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
C. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
■ ❑
❑
Slate other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection. Storage & Treatment
Yes
No Na No
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
1
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le] large
❑
0 ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
■ ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
M ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na Ne
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
[]
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: ` 3

Permit: AWS400128 Owner- Facility: Collyn Seaman Facility Number:
400128
Inspection Date: 08/31/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Waste Application
Yes
No Na No
Crop Type 1
Corn (Grain)
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type-5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
0 ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
0 ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
0 ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na Ne
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
01111
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WU P?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below,
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

r
Permit: AWS400128 Owner - Facility : Collyn Beaman Facility Number:
400128
Inspection Date: O8/31116 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No No No
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
0 ❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
E ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
01111
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge surrey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑E
❑
❑
27, Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No Na Ne
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours andlor document
❑
E ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
E ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon 1 Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
0 ❑
❑
CAWMP?
33, Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
0 ❑
❑
34, Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
0 ❑
❑
page: 5

M
❑
❑
Division of Water Resources
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Other Agency
Facility Number:
400128
Facility Status:
Active Permit: AWS400128
❑ Denied Access
Inpsection Type:
Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit:
Routine
County: Greene Region:
Washington
Date of Visit:
07/08/2015 Entry Time:
01:50 pm
Exit Time: 2:25 pm Incident #
Farm Name:
Collyn Beaman Farm
Owner Email:
collynbeaman@yahoo.c,
Owner:
Collyn Beaman
Phone:
252-747-7708
Mailing Address:
502 Sturbridge
Snow Mill NC 28580
Physical Address:
Dunwoody Rd
Farmville NC 27828
Facility Status:
Compliant ❑
Not
Compliant
Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm:
Latitude: 35° 32' 04" Longitude:
77" 37' 22"
NCSR 1323.
Question Areas:
Dischrge 8 Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Carson E. Beaman Operator Certification Number: 16497
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Collyn Beaman Phone : [phone]
On -site representative Collyn Beaman Phone : [phone]
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis: soil tested: 412013
3-13-15 = 2.33
6-7-15 = 1.07
IRR records are complete 8 balanced out w PAN bal remaining.
Reviewed: callibration due 2015. sludge survey due 2019; rainfall/freeboard 8 crop yield.
page: 1

0
Permit: AWS400128 Owner -Facility: Collyn Beaman Facility Number: 400128
Inspection Date: 07/08/15 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Wean to Feeder 4,160 3,000
Total Design Capacity: 4,160
Total SSLW: 124,800
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon 1 C13 03/23/95 19,00 25A0
page: 2

Permit: AWS400128 Owner - Facility : Collyn Beaman Facility Number: 400128
Inspection Date: 07/08/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No Na Ne
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
0 ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑0
❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
MEI
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■ ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
M ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes No Na No
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large
❑
❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
M ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na Ne
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN a 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Permit: AWS400128 Owner - Facility : Collyn Beaman Facility Number: 400128
Inspection Date: 07/08/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yea No Na Ne
Crop Type 1 Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
0 ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
M ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
0 ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
0 ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
M ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na No
19, Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WU P?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWS400128 Owner - Facility : Collyn Beaman Facility Number:
400128
Inspection Date: 07/08/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Records and Documents
Yee No No No
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24, Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
M ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
M ❑
❑
Other Issues
yes No No No
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
■ ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
0 ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑M
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
lagoon 1 Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
M ❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
E ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
0 ❑
❑
page: 5

0 Division of Water Resources
El Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Other Agency
Facility Number:
400128 Facility Status:
Active Permit: AWS400128
❑ Denied Access
Inpsection Type:
Compliance Inspection
inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit:
Routine
County: Greene Region:
Washington
Date of Visit:
07/01/2014 Entry Time: 01:30 pm
Exit Time: 2:00 pm Incident
Farm Name:
Collyn Beaman Farm
Owner Email:
collynbeaman®yahoos
Owner:
Collyn Beaman
Phone:
252-747-7708
Mailing Address: 502 Sturbridge Snow Hill NC 28580
Physical Address: Dunwoody Rd Farmville NC 27828
Facility Status: 0Compliant Not Compliant Integrator. Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm:
NCSR 1323.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts
Records and Documents
Latitude. 35' 32' 04"
Longitude: 77° 37' 22"
Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Other issues
Certified Operator: Carson E Beaman Operator Certification Number: 16497
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Collyn Beaman Phone : [phone]
On -site representative Collyn Beaman Phone : [phone]
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Soil tested 212014
Waste analysis.
2-6-14= 1.40
6-17-10.75
IRR records are complete and balanced out.
Reviewed rainfall, freeboard, stocking and mortality. Calibration & Sludge survey dated April & May 2014.
page: 1

Permit: AWS400128 Owner -Facility: Collyn Beaman Facility Number: 400128
Inspection Date: 07/01/14 Inssection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Wean to Feeder 1,800
Total Design Capacity:
Total SSLW:
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon 1 Cl3 03/23/95 19.00
page: 2

Permit: AWS400128
Owner - Facility: Collyn Beaman Facility Number: 400128
Inspection Date: 07/01/14 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges &_Stream Impacts
Yes
No Na No
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
0 []
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
2, Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
0 ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yea No Na Ne
4. is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large
❑
0 ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
M ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yea No Na No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ M ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
[]
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Permit: AWS400128 Owner -Facility: Collyn Beaman Facility Number:
400128
Inspection Date: 07/01/14 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Waste Application
Yes
No Na No
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hey)
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14, Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
0 ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
❑
❑
16, Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
0 ❑
❑
determination?
17, Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
0 ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
N ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na Ne
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
E ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
❑
[]
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WU P?
❑
Checklists?
[]
Design?
❑
Maps?
[]
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
N ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
n
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWS400128 Owner - Facility : Collyn Beaman Facility Number: 400128
Inspection Date: 07/01/14 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No Na_ No
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
M ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
0 ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26, Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No Na _Ne
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
0 ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
■ ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
0 ❑
❑
CAWM P?
33, Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
0 ❑
❑
page: 5

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 4Q9128 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWa440128 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Qgmgljgnce Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 06/20/2013 Entry Time: Q];&Q PM_ Exit Time: 02:10 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: Collyn Beaman arm Owner Email:
Owner: Collvn Beaman Phone: [phone]Q8
Mailing Address: 5.02_Sturbridoe � ; ngw Mill NC 28580
Physical Address: Duowoodv Rd Ear1llx'llg t& 27828
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murgv-Brown LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°32'04" Longitude: 77°37'22"
NCSR 1323.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Carson E Beaman
Secondary OIC(s):
Operator Certification Number: 16497
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Phone:
On -site representative Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis:
4-19-13 = 1.06
8-9-12 = .83
IRR records are complete & balanced out. Rainfall, freeboard & crop yield are recorded.
Soil tested 412013 & lime applied.
Looks Good!
Page: 1

I
Permit: AWS400128 Owner - Facility: Collyn Beaman Facility Number: 400128
Inspection Date: 06/20/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Wean to Feeder 4,160 4,000
Total Design Capacity: 4,160
Total SSLW: 124,800
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
kgoon 1 CB 03/23/95 19.00 24,00
Page: 2

i
Permit: AWS400128 Owner • Facility: Collyn Beaman Facility Number: 400128
Inspection Date: 06/20/2013 inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d, Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
M
❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than
11000
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
0
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu. Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400128 Owner • Facility: Collyn Beaman
Facility Number. 400128
Inspection Dale: 06/20/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA
NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of -acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400128 Owner -Facility: Collyn Beaman Facility Number: 400128
Inspection date: 06/20/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Lease Agreements? ❑
Other? ❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
Q
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑ 0011
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■ ❑
Cl
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑ ■ ❑
❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon ❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 5

10
Permit: AWS400128 Owner -Facility: Coliyn Beaman Facility Number: 400128
Inspection Date: 06/20/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
^A"-- v-- u- uw -
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field ❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond ❑
Other ❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
33. Did the Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

r
Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 4QQ128 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS400128 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance ln§UQgjig0 Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routing County: Oreena _ _ Region: yLgshinoton
Date of Visit: 07/18/2012 Entry Time: 01 Q0 PM Exit Time: 01:27 PM Incident M.
Farm Name: Callen Beaman Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Collyn Beaman Phone:
Mailing Address: 502 Sturbridge Snow Hill NC 28580
Physical Address:
Facility Status: E Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphv-Brown LLC
Location of Farm:
NCSR 1323.
Latitude: 35°32'04" Longitude: 77°37'22"
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat © Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Carson E Beaman Operator Certification Number: 16497
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Reprose ntative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Collyn Beaman Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Collyn Beaman Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis:
3-15-12 = .1 soil tested 6-2011 & lime applied in the fall 1TIA
IRR records are complete & balanced out. Rainfall, freeboard & crop yield are recorded.
Looks Good.
Calibration due in 2012 Sludge survey due in 2014
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400128 owner - Facility: Collyn Seaman
Inspection Date: 07/18/2012 inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400128
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Wean to Feeder 4,160 4,000
Total Design Capacity: 4,160
Total SSLW: 124,800
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Type IdentiFler Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
kgoon 1 C B 03/23/95 19.00 28. Q0
Page: 2

Permit: AWS40DI28 owner -Facility: Collyn Beaman Facility Number : 400128
Inspection Date: 0711812012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ■ ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ 0
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ 0
❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than
❑ ■
❑
❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le.l large trees, severe
❑ ■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑ ■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ M
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑ ■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑ ■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑ ■
❑
❑
improvement?
11, Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

{
Permit: AWS400128 Owner • Facility: Collyn Beaman
Inspection Date: 07/18/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400128
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Winter Annual
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? Cl ■ ❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes. check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page; 4

Permit: AWS400128 Owner -Facility: Collyn Beaman Facility Number: 400128
Inspection Date: 07/1812012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Lease Agreements? ❑
Other? ❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
MOO
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
24, Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑
■ ❑ ❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400128 Owner -Facility: Collyn Beaman Facility Number. 400128
Inspection Date: 07/1812012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report ONO ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon / Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fait to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
is
Page: 6

0 Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400128 Facility Status: Active _ Permit: MgJQQJ.$ ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: QqMlaliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Rouljpg County: Greene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 07/06/2011 Entry TIme:01 *10 PM Exit Time: 02:00 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: Collyn Beaman FOEM Owner Email:
Owner: Collyn Beaman Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 502 Sturbridge SnoV Hill NC 28580
Physical Address: Dunwoody Rd _ ,....,,._._ Farmville NC 27828
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°32'04" Longitude: 77°37'22"
NCSR 1323.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Carson E Beaman Operator Certification Number: 16497
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Collyn Beaman Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Collyn Beaman Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis: soil tested: 912010
3-14-11= 1.2
8-18-11 = .70
IRR records are complete and balanced out.
Freeboard and rainfall are recorded as required.
Sprayfield looks good.
SS due 2014 Calib. due 2012
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400128 Owner - Facility: Collyn Beaman
Inspection Date: 07l06/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400128
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Q Swine - Wean to Feeder 4,160 3,600
Total Design Capacity: 4,160
Total SSLW: 124,800
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
kgoon 1 CB 03/23195 19.00 4( 00
Page: 2

a
Permit: AWS400128 Owner -Facility: Collyn Beaman Facility Number: 400128
Inspection Date: 07/06/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ 1113
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c, What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? ❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large trees, severe U ■ U U
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or ❑ IN ❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? Cl
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400128 Owner -Facility: Collyn Beaman
Inspection Date: 0710612011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400128
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes
No NA
NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal
Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain
Overseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■ ❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■ ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑
■ ❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■ ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■ ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■ ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WU P?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400128 Owner -Facility: Collyn Beaman
Inspection Date: 07l0812011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Records and Documents
Facility Number: 400128
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21, Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
Q,
Rainfall?
Q
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
24, Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
Q 0011
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑ ■
❑ ❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26, Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400128 Owner -Facility: Collyn Beaman
Inspection Date: 07/06/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number:400128
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29, At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field ❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond ❑
Other ❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

0 Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400128 Facility Status: fictive Permit: AWS40Q128 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 11/03/2010 Entry Time:01:00 PM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Cgllyu Beaman Farm _ Owner Email:
Owner: C. . it . r 4,t—&Z% fiLri=
Mailing Address: 502 Sturb['dae Snow Hill NC 28580
Physical Address: QuaVoodv Rd Farmville NC 27828
Facility Status: N Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:Murphy-Brown
Location of Farm:
NCSR 1323.
Latitude:35'32'0j Longitude:77°37'22"
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Carson E Beaman
Secondary OIC(s):
Operator Certification Number: 16497
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Collyn Beaman Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Collyn Beaman Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis:
8-18-10 = .70
4-26-10 = 2.1
2-5-10 = 1.2
soil tested 9-2010 W one ton of lime applied
Irr Records are completea & balanced out.
Looks Good.
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400128 Owner - Facility: Collyn Beaman
Inspection Date: 11/03/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400128
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
O Swine - Wean to Feeder 4,160 3,238
Total Design Capacity: 4,160
Total SSLW: 124,800
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
k,Q oon 1 CB 03/23/95 19.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWS400128 Owner - Facility: Collyn Beaman Facility Number: 400128
Inspection pate: 11/03/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges_& Stream Impacts
Yes No
NA
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
00011
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑ ■
❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ■
1113
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ ■
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑ ■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
Cl
Cl
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le] large trees, severe
❑ ■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
Cl ■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑ ■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑ ■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑ ■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400128 Owner - Facility: Collyn Beaman
Inspection late: 11t03/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400128
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA
NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN n 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain
Overseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400128 Owner - Facility: Collyn Beaman
Facility Number: 400128
Inspection Date: 11/03/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22, Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑
❑
23, If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? ❑
■
❑
❑
24, Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■
❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■
❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400128 Owner - Facility: Collyn Beaman
Facility Number: 400128
Inspection Date: 11/03/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

v
Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility. Number': 400128 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS400128 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Eoutine County: Greene I Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 11/06/2009 _ Entry Time:11130 AM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Owner Email:
Owner: Collyn Beaman Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: Snow Hill NC 28580
Physical Address: Dunwoody Rd_ Farmville NC 27828
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown, LLC
Location of Farm:
NCSR 1323.
Latitude:35°32'04" Longitude:77°37'22"
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Carson E Beaman
Secondary OIC(s):
Operator Certification Number: 16497
On -Sits Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Collyn Beaman Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Collyn Beaman Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspectors):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis:
8-28-09 .72
4-30-09 .50
1-2-09 1.1
Remember to balance out the IRR's soil test 1012009 calibration 2009
sludge survey 2009
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400128 Owner -Facility: Collyn Beaman Facility Number: 400128
Inspection Date: 11/06/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Q Swine - Wean to Feeder 4,160 3,991
Total Design Capacity: 4,160
Total SSLW: 124,800
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
kgoon 1 CB 03/23/95 19. D0 30.00
Page: 2

Permit: AW5400128 Owner - Facility: Collyn Beaman Facility Number: 400128
Inspection Data: 11/06/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No NA
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
00011
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
■ ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■ ❑
❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■ ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■ ❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■ ❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large trees, severe
❑
■ ❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■ ❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■ ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■ ❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■ ❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■ ❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400128 Owner - Facillty: Collyn Beeman
Facility Number. 400128
Inspection Date: 11/06/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No
NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 Ibs,?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal
Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
16, Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■
❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400128 Owner -Facility: Collyn Beaman
Facility Number: 400128
Inspection Date: 11/06/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No NA
NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)? ❑
■ ❑
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■ ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■ ❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■ ❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400128 Owner - Facility: Collyn Beeman Facility Numbor : 400128
Inspection Date: 11/06/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

j
Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400128 Facility Status: Artjtip, Permit: AWS400128 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 09112/2008 Entry Time: 11:30 AM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Collvn Beaman Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Collya B Taman Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 502 Sturbridge Dr Snow Hill NC 28580
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: L L Murohrey Comfy
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°32'04" Longitude: 77°37'22"
NCSR 1323.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Carson E Beaman Operator Certification Number: 16497
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Phone -
On -site representative Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis:
9-3-08 = 1.2
5-1-08 = 1.3
1-14-08 = 1 A
soil test 3-3-08
don't forget to get caliberation!
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400128 Owner -Facility, Collyn Beaman
Inspection Date: 09/12/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400128
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Q Swine - Wean to Feeder 4,160 4,106
Total Design Capacity: 4,160
Total SSLW: 124,800
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
lagoon 1 CB 03/23/951 -] 19.00 37.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWS400128 Owner - Facility: Collyn Beaman Facility Number: 400128
Inspection Date: 09/12/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

Permlt: AWS400128 Owner -Facility: Collyn Beaman
Facility Number: 400128
Inspection Date: 09/12/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Via It: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No
NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P2O5?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■
❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
1 B. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400128 Owner - Facility: CDllyn Beaman
Facility Number: 400128
Inspection Data: 0911212008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Via It: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA
NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDFS only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDFS
only)? ❑ ■
❑
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ ■
❑
❑
Other issues
Yes No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑ ■
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400128 Owner -Facility: Collyn Beaman Facility Number: 40012a
Inspection Data: 0911212008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
31, Did the facility fail to notify regional DWO of emergency situations as required by Permit? ❑ m ❑ ❑
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

S
Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400128 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS400128 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Data:
Reason for Visit. Routine County: Greene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 09/13/2007 Entry Time:01:00 PM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Collyn Beaman Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Collyn Beaman Phone: [phone]
• • j�i►�^IiRi:TiC • e r9'i�7+�Tl:llllr;[��b�-I�
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35032'04" Longitude: 77°37'22"
NCSR 1323.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other issues
Certified Operator: Carson E Beaman Operator Certification Number: 16497
Secondary O1C(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Collyn Beaman Phone:
On -site representative Collyn Beaman Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis:
8-2-07 = 1.1
4-5-07 = .93
soil sample 3-2007
caliberation 12-2006
sludge survey - 2006
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400128 Owner - Facility: Collyn Beaman Facility Number: 400128
Inspection Date: 09113/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
G Swine- Wean to Feeder 4,160 3,100
Total Design Capacity: 4,160
Total SSLW: 124,800
Waste Structures
Type IdentiFler Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
lagoon
i CB
03/23/95
19.00
38.00
Page: 2

w
Permit: AWS400128 Owner - Facility: Collyn Beaman Facility Number: 400128
Inspection Date: 09/13/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No
NA
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
■
❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I,e./ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

a
Permit: AWS400128 Owner - Facility: Collyn Beaman Facility Number: 400128
Inspection Date: 09/13/2007 inspection Type: Compliance inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? ❑
Total P2O5? ❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6'
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14, Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Records and Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Small Grain Overseed
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
A
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400128 Owner - Facility: Collyn Beaman
Faclllty Number. 400128
Inspection Date: 0911312007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
23, If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? ❑ ■
❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Other Issues
Yes No
NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Ouality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400128 Owner - Facility: Collyn Beaman
Inspection Date: 09/13/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Other Issues
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Facility Number : 400128
Reason for Visit: Routine
Page: 6

c
Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: a00128 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS400128 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine . , County: G[eene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 0310112006 Entry Time:01 EO P_ptl,.,„- Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Collyn Beaman Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Collyn Beaman _ Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 502 Sturbridge Dr Snow Hill NC 28580
Physical Address:
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude: " Longitude:77°37'22"
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number:
Secondary OIC(s):
On-Slte Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Collyn Beaman / Phone:
On -site representative Collyn Beaman Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste analyses:
2-9-06 = 1.83
10-20-05 = .68
9-29-05 = 2.0
6-02-05 = 1.2
2-02-05 = .64
Soil test 12-05
Page: i

M
Permit: AWS400128 Owner -Facility: Collyn Beaman
Inspection Date: 03/01/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity
Facility Number: 400128
Reason for Visit: Routine
Current Population
Swine
Swine - Wean to Feeder 4,160 3,600
Total Design Capacity: 4,160
Total SSLW: 124,800
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
�agoon 1 CB 03/23/95 19.00 30.00
Page: 2

0
Permit: AWS400128 Owner - Facility: Collyn Beaman Facility Number, : 400128
Inspection Date: 03/01/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? 01111111111100
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other Q
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b, Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ M ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the Integrity of any of the structures observed (i.e./ large trees, severe
❑
moo
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
0 ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■ ❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of Incorrect application?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below,
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: . 3

M]
Permit: AWS400128 Owner -Facility: Coliyn Beaman
Facility Number: 400128
Inspection Date: 03101/2006. Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Com (Grain)
Crop Type 2
Cotton
Crop Type 3
Small Grain (Wheat,
Barley, Oats)
Crop Type 4
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 5
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
,
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the re calving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ 0.0 ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
00013
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Page: 4

E
Permit: AWS400128 Owner - Facility: Collyn Beaman
Facility Number: 400128
Inspection Data: 03/01/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Via It: Routine
Records and DoCumentS
Yes No
NA NE
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPOES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? ❑ ■
© ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Van Nn
NA NF
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
Page: 5

r
Permit: AWS400128 Owner -Facility: Collyn Beaman
Inspection Date: 03/01/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number : 400128
Reason for Visit: Routine
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
Quality representative immediately.
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewerlinspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Page: 6

(Type of Visit O+ Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
for Visit © Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification Q Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 40 128 Date of Visit: 3-10-2004 Time: 12:45
O Not Operational O Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified [] Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: Callyn.1.eamm.Fai m ................................................................................ County: Qr.ccAg ............................................... WMQ.......
OwnerName: Lollya..................................... DZIMAR ....................................................... Phone No:(252j.7.4j::.7.70.$ ........................................................
Mailing Address: a,2.5tlxrbridgC.D.ri.Y.O........................................................................ Sin.Q.W.HAINC ........................................................ 28.58.0 ...............
Facility Contact: 01ftla.Dcalmn.............................................Title:................................................................ Phone No: 93.9-65321................................
Onsite Representative: CAtlyrt............................................................................................ Integrator: L.L.HuxFtlx..CQ,,..............................................
Certified Operator:Gaxsam.L............................. DlrlxMOJR.,1r...................................... Operator Certification Nuiinber.-J.6.49.7 ..............................
Location of Farm:
14CSR 1323.
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 32 04 fi Longitude F 22 «
Design.
Current
Design Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity
population Poultry
Capacity Population Cattle
Capacity Population
® Wean to Feeder 4160
4100 ❑ Layer
I I ❑ Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Non -Layer
I ❑ Non -Dairy
E
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑Other
Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
4,160
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Total SSLW
124,800
Number of -Lagoons I I
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes [:]No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: .................................................................................................................................................. I .................... I........ ...................................
Freeboard (inches): 22
12112103 Continued

Facility Number: 40-128 Date of Inspection 3-10-2004
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Small Grain Overseed
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No'
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
IS. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ® No
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ®No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ Yes ®No
Air Quality representative immediately.
Comments'(refer'to•question #): Explain,any.YES;answers and/or any,recoinmendations or.any, other comments.
Use.drawings of.facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary): •�D Field Copy ® Final Notes
er/Inspector Name Marlene D. Salyer
E
er/Inspector Signature: Date:
12112103 ev Continued

Fpclity?iumber: 40T128 Date of Inspection 3-10-2004
Required Records & Documents
21. FaiI to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
® No
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(iel WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
® No
23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
®No
25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
® No
26, Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
® No
27. Did Revicwer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
® No
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
® No
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
® No
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
❑ Yes
® No
31. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
❑ Yes
❑ No
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Stocking Form []Crop Yield Form [:]Rainfall [:]Inspection After 1" Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
113 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Additinnal'Comments and/or.'Dr. ings:.
Waste analysis = 1-2-04 = .93
9-3-03 = .71
4-21-03 = 1.1
The irrigation records are complete and balanced out.
The soil sample was dated 10-21-03 with no lime needed.
The freeboard level and rainfall events are recorded weekly.
The irrigation equipment calibration has been done.
12112103

Technical Assistance Site Visit Report
• Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Natural Resources Conservation Service
O Soil and Water Conservation District
O Other...
Facility Number 40 - 12$ Date: 9130103 Time: 1 1034_7 Time On Farm: 60 WARO
Farm Name Collyn Beaman Farm County Greene
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address 502 Sturbridge Drive Snow Hill NC 28580
Onsite
Representative Collyn Beaman / Michele Christensen Integrator 1premium Standard Farms
Type Of Visit Purpose Of Visit
Operation Review
Compliance Inspection (pilot only)
Technical Assistance
Confirmation for Removal
❑ No Animals -Date Last Operated:
❑ Operating below threshold
IN Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse
Design Current
Capacity Population
® Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
4160
4000
OO Routine
Q Response to DWQ/DENR referral
O Response to DSWC/SWCD referral
O Response to complaint/local referral
O Requested by producer/integrator
O Follow-up
O Emergency
O Other...
Design Current
Capacity Population
❑ Layer
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
GENERAL QUESTIONS:
1. Is waste discharging from any part of the operation and reaching surface waters or wetlands? ❑ yes ® no
2. Is there evidence of a past waste discharge from any part of the operation that waste reached ❑ yes ® no
surface waters or wetlands?
3. Does any problem pose an immediate threat to the integrity of the waste structure (large trees, ❑ yes ® no
seepage, severe erosion, etc.)?
4. Is there evidence of nitrogen over application, hydraulic overloading or excessive ponding ❑ yes ® no
requiring DWQ notification?
5. Is there evidence of improper dead animal disposal that poses a threat to the environment ❑ yes ® no
and/or public health?
6. Is the waste level within the structural freeboard elevation range for any waste structure? ❑ yes ® no
Structural Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier
Level (Inches) 127 F IF 11 IF
CROP TYPES 1cotton Corn Soybeans Wheat Coastal Bermuda -hay I ISmall grain overseed
SPRAYFIELD
SOIL TYPES NoA
7. What type of technical assistance does the onsite representative feel is needed? (list in comment section)
11141[+711k'.
❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
GENERAL QUESTIONS:
1. Is waste discharging from any part of the operation and reaching surface waters or wetlands? ❑ yes ® no
2. Is there evidence of a past waste discharge from any part of the operation that waste reached ❑ yes ® no
surface waters or wetlands?
3. Does any problem pose an immediate threat to the integrity of the waste structure (large trees, ❑ yes ® no
seepage, severe erosion, etc.)?
4. Is there evidence of nitrogen over application, hydraulic overloading or excessive ponding ❑ yes ® no
requiring DWQ notification?
5. Is there evidence of improper dead animal disposal that poses a threat to the environment ❑ yes ® no
and/or public health?
6. Is the waste level within the structural freeboard elevation range for any waste structure? ❑ yes ® no
Structural Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier
Level (Inches) 127 F IF 11 IF
CROP TYPES 1cotton Corn Soybeans Wheat Coastal Bermuda -hay I ISmall grain overseed
SPRAYFIELD
SOIL TYPES NoA
7. What type of technical assistance does the onsite representative feel is needed? (list in comment section)
11141[+711k'.

Facility Number 40 - 128 Date:
9/30103
PARAMETER
Q No assistance provided/requested
❑ 8. Waste spill leaving site
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE Needed
Provided
❑ 9. Waste spill contained on site
❑ 10. Level in structural freeboard
25. Waste Plan Revision or Amendment
❑
❑
❑ 11. Level in storm storage
26. Waste Plan Conditional Amendment
❑
❑
27. Review or Evaluate Waste Plan wlproducer
El
El
12. Waste structure integrity compromised
28. Forms Need In
❑
❑
❑ 13. Waste structure needs maintenance
(list comment section)
29. Missing Components (list In comments)
❑
❑
❑ 14. Over application >= 10% & 10 lbs.
❑
❑
❑ 15. Over application < 10% or < 10 lbs.
30. 21-1.0200 re -certification
❑ 16. Hydraulic overloading
31. Five & Thirty day Plans of Action (PoA)
❑
❑
32. Irrigation record keeping assistance
❑
❑
❑ 17. Deficient irrigation records
❑ 18. Late/missing waste analysis
❑ 19. Late/missing lagoon level records
33.Organ lzelcomputerization of records
❑
❑
34. Sludge Evaluation
❑
❑
❑ 20, Late/missing soils analysis
❑ 21. Crop needs improvement
35. Sludge or Closure Plan
❑
❑
❑ 22. Crop inconsistent with waste plan
36. Sludge removallclosure procedures
❑
❑
37. Waste Structure Evaluation
❑
❑
❑ 23. Irrigation maintenance deficiency
❑ 24. Deficient sprayfield conditions
38. Structure Needs Improvement
❑
❑
39. Operation & Maintenance Improvements
❑
❑
40. Marker check/calibration
❑
❑
ReaulatorV Referrals
41. Site evaluation
❑
❑
❑ Referred to DWQ Date:
42. Irrigation Calibration
❑
❑
❑ Referred to NCDA Date:
43. Irrigation design/installation
El
El
El Other.,.
system
Date:
44. Secure Irrigation Information (maps, etc.)
❑
❑
IMPROVEMENTS
45.Operating improvements (pull signs, etc.)
❑
❑
1LIST
MADE BY OPERATION
❑
❑
46. Wettable Acre Determination
1.
47. Evaluate WAD certification/rechecks
❑
❑
installed rain cut off switch on irrigation pump
46. Crop ova luationlrecommendations
❑
❑
2,
49. Drainage worklevaluatlon
❑
❑
50. Land shaping, subsolling, aeration, etc.
51. Runoff control, stormwater diversion, etc.
❑
❑
❑
❑
3
52. Buffer improvements
❑
❑
53. Field measurements(GPS, surveying, etc.)
El
El
4.
54. Mortality BMPs5.
❑
❑
55. Waste operator education (NPDES)
❑
❑
56.Operation & maintenance education
❑
❑
57. Record keeping educatlon
❑
❑
g,
58. Croplforage management education
❑
❑
59. Soil and/or waste sampling education
❑
❑
03/10/03

Facility Number 40 _ 128 Date: 9/30/03
{COMMENTS:
rrigation design has been completed by Carl Dunn, PE, DSWC. Mr. Dunn in process of writing WUP to match irrigation
esign. Underground irrigation to be installed at later time.
HOC dated May 1, 2003 and on site.
Naste analysis dated 9/3/03 nitrogen is 0.71 Ibs/1000 gallons
4/21103 nitrogen is 1.1 Ibs/1000 gallons
12/11/02 nitrogen is 0.64 Ibs/1000 gallons
7/10/02 nitrogen is 0.55 Ibs/1000 gallons
Soil test dated 3/21/02 for coastal bermuda hay. Cu, Zn and ph within guidelines. There have been no irrigation events for
002 on row crops. Remember to take soil test for 2003 and maintain proper soil ph.
lemember to take waste analysis 60 days before/ 60 days after irrigation event. There were two irrigation events on cogs
ermuda and one event on small grain overseed that was outside waste analysis 60 day window.
_agoon level is recorded weekly with drops in lagoon consistent with irrigation events.
:1Ianning to resprig coastal bermuda spring 2004. Noted bare areas in spray field.
:)Id hay bales need to be removed from farm.
rrigation reel has been calibrated.
TECHNICAL SPECIALIST IMartin McLawhorn
11Eel 2rcY0JZ1
Date Entered: 12/17/03 1 Entered By: Imartin Mct_awhorn
3 03/10/03

Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection OO Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason €or Visit O+ Roufine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 40 128 Date of Visit: 5/29l2002 Time: t5o0
Q Not O erational Q Below Threshold
ElPermitted KICertified © Conditionally Certified 0 Registered pate Last Operated or Abase Threshold: ...................
Farm Name: Call .la.09.tila AR.Farvx..................... ....... Count}: G.Mcnc............................................... .V ARO.......
OwnerName: Cxtllyn..................................... ]Beata n...................................................... Phone No:(2521.741%7.7515......................... ...............................
Mailing Address: SRZ.aSaUj:hrWgCjDltaxt.......................................................... . SrWrr.H1IINC........................................................ 285.8Q .............
Facility Contact: .............................................................................. Title: ...... Phone No:
Onsite Representative: CoJ9yaRcwuaWJ.ercMy..Hill................................................ Integrator:)Ptrendum.S1wWard.F.#=u.QfNudh...........
Certified Operator: C Um.E..............................Rematt.A..................................... Operator Certification Number: .1b4QZ ..........................
...
Location of Farm:
� T
CMSwine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 ° 32 04 Longitude 77 ° 37 22 �
Design! Current:
'Swine ranacity Pnnulation
® Wean to Feeder
4160
4160
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current ' Design .. Current
PoultrfoCattle
Capacity- Population
❑ Layer ❑ i:airy
❑ Non -Layer I JEI Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity' 4,160
Total SSLW 124,800
Discharp_es & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (Ifycs. notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse i npacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Slrtecture 3 Stnucture 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches):...............33...............
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
Structurc 6

05/03/01
Facility Number: 40-128
Date of Inspection 1 5/29/2002
Continued
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ic/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
12. Crop type Corn, Soybeans, Wheat Cotton Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Small Grain Oversced
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes N No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the .facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes [:]No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Reuuired Records & Documents
17. Pail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available'?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ic/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ic/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Pail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ic/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
N Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes N No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes N No
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit• You will receive no further correspondence about this visit
c drawrngs of facility tojbetter explain situations (ase acldltamfaal pages ati nece�saty) r ❑ Field C �❑ Final Notes
�, .r:-.,,.., .; ..F..2, .a; ...r,...; ,A .,. ,�., .:_k 5- �..t.w y,.,.rl.« 9 .rt.xt. r-- Copy
*New waste plan dated 5/9/02 by Carl Dunn, DSWC WARD, includes irrigation design, D1 and D2 paraineters, plan deficit 1229
15. Coastal Bermuda field needs to be sprayed for weeds Small grain overseed has been removed. Suggest light clipping of weeds for
control of weed to allow coastal bermuda to emerge. Due to cotton in adjacent fields, difficult to spray for weeds in coastal bermuda fields.
Third party sprays and harvest hay.
*General permit dated 7/20/01 and on site.
*Waste analysis dated 314/02 nitrogen is 2.1 Ibs/1000 gallons
11/16/01 nitrogen is 1.2 lbs/1000 gallons
9/5/01 nitrogen is 1.2 lbs/1000 gallons
{{.11 �! �f J7q i
Reviewer/inspector Name 1Viartit► McLawhornI �Irlfl 11, '{ f
Anviaao�/lnannr•4n� Clan ofnr•a• 11gIa•

05103101 Condnued
Faeility Number: 4t1-128 Date of Inspection 5/29/2002
Odor issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of property within 24 hours'?
28. is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
[-]Yes ❑ No
Soil test dated 3/21/02. This is for 2001 crop year. Coastal bermuda field requires less than one ton lime per acre. Row crops require
;ss than one ton lime per acre. Remember to take :coil test for 2002 and follow lime requirements,
Lagoon level is recorded weekly.
Records are complete and balanced.
13MP check list complete per DWQ request.
. Need to mow lagoon dike walls to allow for routine and visual inspection.

W A r�qP
�'F:- ,
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr Secretary
VDepartment al` En iron ent and N_allurall K� T source �
s a �y/.y
tj
aw
VIr61o' n YYide Q all_•,
y.' f
17
TM.-- Prc de►cer
From. Scott Vinson
Envuronm®t4 gcndi -
I:. wi"gton Regional Office
= Subject•, h f Animal Compliance Inspeitian -
Y `t
,,�`-'�' S ,� -; , r•. � J f `� u - ° '' �7t} 9.� - 3CK y...
e'�"}k��ra,_'.,f� ��1�� 7" �,�,.P. .F'�F •3+ rV.,.'" �^P. _, < ,.,Y ,:r:r,�Fr �-,.r� ,; 4 �ry.� .,., t1«. •' s " .
Enclosed please find a copy'af the Co 1ptia�nce Site his" ectioh (as viewed in the DWQ.da abase) conducted at the referenced
,= facility by the Division afWater Quality froirithetWashingta�i Regiaaal Offices Please'read this igs`pectoa and keep
„.�a.w;,'t ' .r-t ., lw-'i�+w.r'd.: ,^.tr s;sd'Y•-7c'�K:," ^s _c 'Sw"rC Easy 'm
� with all-oth& doeameuts pertaigip- to your anima! operation fdr future inspections.
?' a�, x,.0 s+ 5.:,}.'"• rimer �, _ s.«R�r' r �.•
a. a R.ytTr • -. d n, 1 " Q ;tAbC1 t A"�^ `i�.r'sr 9 s`. J` i _' A 1 y - L? ..Z,'� �K L r, r a w
a o,^�3g •'� �c v Tt'` a , a x - a ,sr ;,o _ a
r i F
Ti'."� 7 j;x-� . r
E ' , In'general,'these'InspeCUCifis nncluded vernfyiag that•' (l) the faran }las a Certified Aniuzal Waste Managem nt Dian (CAWMP), • .
(2) the farm is Fornplying with requiremais of6e State Rules 15 NCAC 211020Senato Bill 1217, and the Certified Animal
Waste Management Plan.; (3) the farm �peiation`s waste management system is being'operaW properly under the direction. of a
Certified Operator; (4) the required records are being kept; and (5) there are no. signs of seepage; erosion, and/or runoff
As a reminder, please note the following comments, which are conditions of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan and
the General Pem* therefore, these items must be implemented:
(P The Mwdmuin waste level in lagoons/starage ponds shall not exceed that specified in the CAWMP. At a minimum,
maximums waste level for waste for lagoons/storage ponds must not exceed the level that provides adequate storage to
contain 25 year, 2416-uri stain event plus an additional foot of structural fireeboard. -
(p An analysis of the liquid animal waste from the lagoon shall be conducted as close to the time of application as practical and
at least within 60 days (before or after) of the date of application. This analysis shall include the following parameters:
Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Zinc and Copper.
cp Soil analysis is required annually. Lune is to be applied to each receiving crop as recommended by the soil analysis.
cp The following records are required: off -site solids removal, maintenance, repair, waste/soil analysis and land irrigation
recordsThese records should be maintained by the facility owner/manager in chronological and legible form for a
minimum of three years.
cp Land application rates shall be in accordance with the CAWNT. In no case shall land application rates exceed the Plant
Available Nitrogen (PAN) rate for the receiving crow or result in runoff during anv given aoalicatiaL
(p All grassed waterways shall have a stable outlet with adequate capacity to prevent ponding or flooding damages. The outlet
can be another vegetated charmel, an earth ditch, stabilization structure, or other suitable outlets.
(p It is suggested, not a reauireinent, to keep crop yield information for future use to update your waste management plan.
You will need three years of crop yield data before your plan can be updated
For your information, any swine facility that has a discharge to surface waters of the State will have to apply for a National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit with the Division of Water Quality, effective January 1, 2001.
Thank you for your assistance and cooperation during the inspection. If you have any questions, please contact me at 252-946-
6481, ext. 208 or your Technical Specialist.
Cc: WaRO Files
SAV Files
943 Washington Square Mall Washington, NC 27889 252-M-6481 (Telephone) 252-946.9295 (Fax)

I M�'/ i' H�� ✓6 i°�,�:i , "` k�N. '.
�Fa
Type of Visit p Compliance Inspection p Operation Review. p Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit p Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up p Emergency Notification p Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number I Date of Visit: 12/11/2002 Time: 1 3:30
p Not Operationalp Below I I qhresRoid
Permitted 0 Certified p Conditionally Certified p Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: Collyn Beaman Farm County: Greene ........................ ....................... .W.A.R.O.......
Owner Name: Collyn Beaman Phone No: [phone]
Mailing Address:'SR2,.SturbridgrDriyr......................................................................... Sn:ow.Hi11.NC:......................,................................. Z$58.0 ..............
FacilityContact:••-••••-•••......................•••••.........................................Title:............................................................... Phone No:
Onsite Representative: Cnllyn.BAaman......................................................................... Integrator: L.L.Mu:rphrey-Co....... .........................................
Certified Operator: Carson.E.............................. Bea=R.J..................................... Operator Certification Number: 1649.7..........................
..
Location of Farm:
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle p Horse Latitude ©• ©� ®« Longitude ©• ©«
]Des n Current -'« Des n `Current Desi n ' `Current
g, �� r $ g
Swore Cspac�ty Poputaf on,
; Poultry ��
Capacity Population � ,Cattle
�aci 6 ulatiow4100 `
�Cii
,i
❑ erg.'
Toial �ke$s><g>a,BCapac�ty 4,160
' ¢° �# �fi 3 "a rs
a.'° '•u��Y' iqt # : `$ `$e r
SSLW 124,800
TB
>'!^�9sPR.f
, Number of�La e
'❑ u
ur ace rains resen a oon rea Spray ,e rea
s CI g o A Y
��on-sh z ©...
Aaldmg�Ponds7Sal,TTraps�3 o
,qut Waste managementys em
�r � � e
•u�'W�a,�
® can to ee er
❑ Feeder to m�s
❑ arrow to can
❑ arrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Ftmsh
p Gilts
❑ Boars
❑ Myer
❑ on aver
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Yes No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes p No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes p No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes L No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? 13Yes ®No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure S Structure 6
Identifier:
...................................
Freeboard (inches): ...............fib................

aci ity um er: 40-12$
Date of Inspection
••5 Are tliere any �m 'ediate,tlireats to the`integrity. of,any of tli'c structures observed?�(le%trees; severe erosion,
.._ :x
-,, '
p Yes ®No
_
-+seepage, etc.)
� 6 Are there sti•u'ctures on -site which are not properly a ddressediuid/or managed through a waste management or
_.. closure plan? _
p Yes ® No
;, .. (If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the sitaatioh poses'an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
ry; 7. Da`any;of the structures need mainteiiancehmprovem6nt7 _
❑ Yes ig No
8: n Does atiy part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
p Yes ® No
,_.
Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markets with required maximum and minimum liquid level
"r = eie'vation markings?
pYes - ® No
WasteApplication ' -
^ ` :-10. Are tl era any buffeis that neediiiaintenancelimprovement? -"'
- p Yes E No
" I 1 Is there evidence of over application? p Excessive Pondmg p PAN p Hydraulic Overload
17 Yes ®No
12 Crop type Corn, Soybeans; Wheat CotWri = , - Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Small Grain Overseed
ft
=r` .•. 13 Do the receiving crops'differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ` p Yes ®No
i.
L
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? p Yes p No
b) Does the facility, need a wettable acre determination?
p Yes
p No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
p Yes
p No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
p Yes
® No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
p Yes
® No
Re uired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
p Yes
® No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
p Yes
U No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
p Yes
® No
20. Is facility"noi in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
p Yes
I& No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
p Yes
®No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
p Yes
®No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
p Yes
® No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
p Yes
IR No
25., Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
p Yes
® No
In No violations or a iciencies were noted uring tnis visit You will receive no lurther correspondence about is visit.
`Comm fs reiertti=`oqu�es".fio`n#):cplala'ia"S yeaor ati to coin"6endati5nilo any other commentso,;' ra
[Irawii �of� dit k n:betfie � e tpl'aui cation"s. rise di gnat pages as necessaty�:, —~
_ x w p Field Copy p Final Notes
• Lagoon walls have been mowed.
* Waste 7/10/02 with 0.55 lbsN. 3/4/02 with 2.1 lbsN Awaiting current waste analysis from Raleigh to balance out 1RR2 forms.
*Soil 3/21/02 with 0.8 T/ac lime suggested. 12/10/01 with some lime suggested.
* Due to the season, the coastal bermuda crop/weed problems were not as visible, however the problem of weeds was noted in Martin
cLawhorn's May operational review. Please keep up efforts to decrease weeds in coastal Bermuda crops.
w
Reviewer/Inspector Name ScotVm.°u:LA:.A
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: j

05103101
Continrreel
Facility Number: 40_128 Date of Inspection prnMM
Odor Issues
26.
Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
0 Yes
. ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27.
Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
p Yes
® No
28.
Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
❑ Yes
® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29.
Is the land application spray system intake not located near the Iiquid surface of the lagoon?
p Yes
® No
30.
Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
p Yes
® No
31.
Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
p Yes
B No
32.
Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
0 Yes
p No
Jim �: -- f % a
_.,yr •...s• 4t3- ;-- ..^m,- : ,� .>..- & .C;`,,: . y :».y. �.,._.. -..,,�
�, --_ ,.i..�a�.— ..�._..a�.+aA�•tiwr... �.-.,�.�.. .r_.. .'. _..._�...... J„�...w....._ »w...Y...�« M.4. �...sr h..._ati ,_�r__v�_.+..�. ,.�.1�tx�__
C-z
z
i4
'i�
1t+3�..� S<::.'�i^-�Rh �l c''� �i:'� 4#- d- Y .� �" � !/ } -.s"-� • .'
"tom" Y r��� d�i r'� r 3`•u ruts r k t
�}e,• 1 r rtiefce"�;_. S' �"''" T'�„rr+.. ..s
ai R :k: A 7Y..-3.,; st
i':� 4 S`
�_
a ' r=r•
tM. i�wk«Sf ''a r.r j� ti..,�.•�d. r�s }•'"her �tr , a '':i;�-'
-
y, �*��r � � ,WN�r��,.. � Tr.. K t r i fxi ;-F*1-C , •ei ;w .. N - :_
"`:"'L!3"r' � yr✓ ; yri_''`wi ��n{�-��. $ �.Srv✓ '4'�,.�, '" yy t m r�,.. S:• � I�,�a.-''ti t
J

�,. O�OF W A 7F9pG Michael F. Easiey
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
> Department of Environment and Natural Resources
0 , , Kerr T. Stevens
Division of Water Quality
To: Producers
From: Lyn B. Hardison
Environmental Specialist
Washington Regional Office -!
Date: May 19, 2001
Subject: Animal Compliance Routine Inspection
Year 2001
Enclosed please find a copy or copies of the Compliance Site Inspection(s) (as viewed in DWQ database) conducted at the
referenced facility by the Division of Water Quality from the Washington Regional Office. Please read this inspection and
keep with all other documents pertaining to your animal operation for future inspections.
In general, these inspections included verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP);
(2) the farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC 2H.0217, Senate Bill 1217, and the Certified Animal
Waste Management Plan; (3) the farm operation's waste management system is being operated properly under the direction of a
Certified Operator; (4) the required records are being kept; (5) there are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or runoff.
As a reminder, please note the following which are conditions of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan and the general
permit; therefore, these items must be implemented:
cp The maximum waste level in lagoons/storage ponds shall not exceed that specified in the CAWMP. At a minimum,
maximum waste level for waste for lagoons/storage ponds must not exceed the level that provides adequate siorage to
contain 25 year, 24 hour storm event plus an additional foot of structural freeboard.
cp An analysis of the liquid animal waste from the laEaon shall be conducted as close to the time of application as practical and
at i;ast within 60 days (before or after) of the date of application. This analysis shall include the following parameters:
Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Zinc and Copper.
cp Soil analysis is required annually.
cp The following records are required: off -site solids removal, maintenance, repair, waste/soil analysis and land irrigation
records. These records should be maintained by the facility pwner/manager in chronological and legible form for a
minimum of three vears.
cp Land application rates shall be in accordance with the CAWMP. In na case shall land application rates exceed the Plant
Available Nitrogen (PA.NI rate for the receiving crop or result in. runoff durinn an given application.
cp All grassed waterways shall have a stable outlet with adequate capacity to prevent ponding or flooding damages. The outlet
can be another vegetated channel, an earth ditch, stabilization structure, or other suitable outlets.
(p It is suggested -not required, to keep crop yield information for future use to update your waste management plan. You will
need threeye of crop yield data before your plan can be updated.
For your information, any swine facility that has a discharge to surface waters of the State will have to apply for a National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit with the Division of Water Quality, effective January 1, 2001.
Thank you for your assistance and cooperation during the inspection. If you have any questions, please contact your Technical
Specialist or me at 252-946-64$1, ext. 315.
Cc: VWaRO
LBH Files (inspection form only)
943 Washington Square Mall Washington, NC 27869 252-946-6481 (Telephone) 252-946-9215 (Fax)

Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date or visit: 3-27-2001 Time: $03
Facility Number 40 128
0 Not Operational O Below Threshold
Permitted ■ Certified 0 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: ................................................................................ County: 'rx'+~s~ttt:............................................... WeAA.......
Owner Name: Gitla..................................... Ref mix...................................................... Phone No:(2521147.T.7.708 .......................................................
Mailing Address: SUSlutrbradpdIr yr........................................................................ SttaxtMINC.....
218 SS D..............
FacilityContact: .......................................... .................................... Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
Onsite Representative: CollyzUkeaman....................... ... ... . Integrator: L.L.A4.ttrphrry..Co....................
Certified Operator: cm.0l....................................Deman ............................................ Operator Certification Number: 16.497..................... .....
Location of Farm:
VCSR 1323.
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 • 32 04 " Longitude 77 • 37 22
Design Current
Swine Canaritv Pnnula6nn
® Wean to Feeder
4160
4100
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current " Design', Current,
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle -,Capacity Po elation
❑ Layer I FEI
Dairy
❑ Non -Layer Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 4,160
Total SSLW 124,800
Number of Lagoons ❑_Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds/Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes ®No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ® No
b. If discharge is observed. did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ®No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated Flow in -al/min? n/a
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ® No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
VI'astr ollection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure S Structure 6
Identifier. .................................... .................................... ....................... ... .................................... .................................... ....................................
Freeboard(inches): ............... a.............. ............................................................................ ..
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: 40 128� Date of inspection 1 3.27-2001
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenancelimprovement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelimprovement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Small Grain Overseed Cotton Corn, Soybeans, Wheat
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records &: Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
113 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
❑ Field Copy ® Final Notes
* Records available fore review.
A6
* Waste analysis- 1-22-01 = 0.82 lbs, 9-11-00 = 0.88 lbs.
* Soil analysis - 11-2-00 - Will put lime out this year.
• Presently working on wetted acres with C. Dunn of DSWC.
* Irrigation records are complete and balanced out. Make sure to use the correct waste analysis in the computations.
* Freeboard levels are recorded weekly.
* Awaiting the general permit issuance.
Reviewer/Inspector Name rL�yn&jNtllson
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:M
05103101 y Continued

f ✓ Facility Number: 40-128
Date of Inspection 3-27-2001
Printed on: 5/18/2001
dor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property,)
29, Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes IN No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes IN No
❑ Yes ❑ No
WRA 1'
* According to the lagoon design, the lagoon can be lowered to 44.1 inches.
* Make sure to revisist the checklist and complete it.
* Waste plan dated 8-13-00 - includes 3rd party land and the agreement.
* Continue your efforts to improve the vegetation cover on dike wall.
* Suggest to calibrate your irrigation system every 3 year.
* Suggest to check the accuracy of the lagoon marker.
* If you have any questions, contact your Technical Specialist or me @ 252-946-6481, ext. 318.
05103101

Division of Water Quality
0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit @ Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 40 12S Date of Visit: 6/7/2000 Time: 9:20 AM Printed on: 6/12/2000
rO Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
© Permitted 0 Certified 0 Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: .......................................................
Owner Name: CgIl7ltl.....................................U.CUM.R11..........................
County: fatepag............................................... WARQ.......
Phone No: 252-2�2r...7.7.Q&..........................................................
FacilityContact: ................................................................. ....... Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
Mailing Address: SQZ.starbr.LdgC.]?r.1vA........................................ .. 5J0Q)r..Jilt.N.C............................... ............ MAQ..............
.............................. .............
Onsite Representative: ................................................ ...................... Integrator: L.L.Mumklra..Qn..............................................
Certified Opera to r:.C#X§.QA.E.............................. UCAMU.jr ..................................... Operator Certification Numberao.49.I..............................
Location of Farm:
0 Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 32 04 u Longitude 77 37 ' x2 66
Design Current
Swine ConacltV Pnn+flntinn
® Wean to Feeder
4160
4000
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer ❑ 5airy
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
p Other
Total Design Capacity 4,16;
Tatar SSLW
Number of Lagoons 0 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present 110 Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ID No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharaes & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 0 No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 0 No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): 26

r Continued on back
Facility Number: 40-128 Date of Inspection 1 6/7/2000 Printed on: 6/12/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ®No
S. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ® No
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Small Grain
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a tack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
0' l�io violatio�is'or:defciencies rwet'e'noted'duringthls visit. 'You wi11'rbeeive na further'
corresjondence about fh'I.s.visit...... .
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ® No
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
Waste analysis 5/12/00 - 1.3 lbs./1000 gals.
Soil analysis 4/7/00
Mr. Beaman is acquiring more land/third party agreements for pumping privileges for waste utilization
plan.
Irrigation records complete with nitrogen balance.
* Freeboard sheets!
Reviewer/Inspector Name jDaphne B. Cullom
Ann

Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
pr �
Facility Number: 40-128 Date of Inspection b/712flOp Printed on: 6/12/2000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge atlor below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ®No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ®No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ®No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Additional omments and/or Drawings:
t

I I •.
Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Operation Review
p Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Compliance Inspection
p Division of Water Quality - Compliance Inspection
p Other Agency - Operation Review
19 Kounne 0 t,onipianu 0 ronaw-up of uwt2 inspection 0 ronow-up of i»wk, review 0 utner
Facility Nuniber 40 Date of Inspeclion
Time of Inspection ® 24 hr. (hh:mm)
p Permitted 0 Certified p Conditionally Certified o Registered in Not perationa Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: gollyn..Reaman.E.arrm..................................................................... County: Greene WARD
Owner Name: Collyn..................................... Beaman ...................................................... Phone No: 252-717:1708 ......................................................
Facility Contact: ............:....................................... .Title: Phone No: ...
Mailing Address. 502.Skuxbrridge..Drr............................................................................... Snow-HUMC ........................................................ 28581I..........
Onsite Representative: Cklllyru.Rearmatx.....
Certified Operator.Carson-E.........
Location of Farm:
Latitude
........................................................ Integi-alor:l L.Murphr.ej..CDmprany..............................
..... ReamapeAr. ..................................... Operator- Certification Number:lb497..
Swine Capacity Population
® can to Feeder
[3 Feederto Finish
[3 Farrow to Wean
13 Farrow to Feeder
p Farrow to Finish
p Gilts
p Boars
Longitude ©0 ©6 ©"
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
E3 Layer I 1 0 Dairy
p Non -Layer I III-] Non -Dairy
113 Other
Total Design Capacity 4,190
Total SSLW 124,800
Number of Lagoons L JE3 u sur ace Drains present JE3 Lagoon Area 13 spray ie rea
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps � 0 No Liquid Waste Management Sys em
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water.of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? p Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
...............................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches):...............2.7..................................................
. .................................... ...
[3Yes ® No
p Yes p N"
p Yes p No
[3Yes [3No
[3Yes M No
? p Yes ® No
(3 Yes MNo
Structure G
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
3/23/99 seepage, etc.)
p Yes ®Nip
Continued on hn,

Facility Number: 40_E28 Date or lnspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? p Yes H Nv
(if any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate ptiblic health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? p Yes N N(l
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? p Yes ®Nt
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
p Yes
N No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
p Yes
N N(�
11. Is there evidence of over application? p Excessive Ponding p PAN
❑ Yes
R No
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Small Grain Overseed Corn, Soybeans, Wheat
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
p Yes
N Nei
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
p Yes
N Nip
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
N Yes
El No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
p Yes
H M
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
p Yes
®No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
p Yes
M No
Required Records & I)oeUments
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
p Yes
® No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
p Yes
® N(i
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
p Yes
N N(i
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
p Yes
N Nei
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
p Yes
N Ni,
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
p Yes
N No
23. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
p Yes
®No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
p Yes
® Ni
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
p Yes
H N(i
Cti, N.o.vio*1� ti0ns-or. de 'ck' l ores:were' ip'tedl'durin !4, is visit.,:Yqu.will.reeeive, no further.:.:
............................ .... .. .. .I......... :
okr6j)v�idek6. aWrt this' visit........ • : • ......:... . .....:...:....:. • .:....:.. .
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
Kecommena signing up for local Neuse Kule options by 7s/ 1199 with ttie Greene Soil & Water Conservation District a
* Mailed Integrator Registration card with copy of this Review report to owner of facility
* Waste sample dated 12/21/99 at 1.5 lbs/1000 gal. Soils report dated 12/30/98 - needs to apply lime and is waiting for soil
conditions to dry
7. Need to mow dike walls soon
14b. Operation cannot meet 75% rule and is subject to a wettable acre determination. Waste plan will need to be amended to a
wettable acre basis and row crops will need to be added to permanent plan tables.
19. For IRR2, Mr. Beaman is using 50 Ibs PAN for small grain overseed versus 133 lbs. as stated in plan. Need to bring rye down
Reviewer/inspector Name Pat Hooper 252/946-6481
Reviewer/inspector Signature: Date:

! i,
p Division of aun anti Water C-onservation - Vperation Keview
p Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Compliance Inspection
Division of Water Quality - Compliance Inspection
p Other Agency - Operation Review
Kouline p t:oniplaint O Follow-up of DWl2 nispection O Follow-up of D) OWL review 0 Other
Facility Nuiilher Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection � 24 hr. (hh:mm)
p Permitted a Certified p Conditionally Certified p Registered in Not peratrona Date Last Operated:
Farrn Name: Reaman.N.ursery......................... .................................................................. County: Greene WARD
OwnerNamc: Collyn.................................... Beaman ...................................................... Phone No: 9.19.-.741r.7708 .....................................................
Facility Contact: ............................................................ ...Title: Phone No:
Mailing Address: 502.5turbridge..Dr.............................................................................. Saaw-lull.. C.......................................................1 2,858:Q.........
Onsitc Representative: C:allyn.Btamaa......................................................................... lntegrator:L.L.Murpbx.cyXa ...........................................
Certified Operator:Carson.f.............................. Reamaa.dx..................................... Operator Certification Number: M497 ..........................
Location of Farm:
Latitude ©• ©i ®"
Swine Capacity Population
® Weanto Feeder
❑ Feederto iris
p Farrow to can
p Farrow to ee er
p Farrow to Finis
p Gilts
❑ Boars
Longitude ©0 ©6 ©
vesign t_:urrent uesign t�urrent
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ ayer Fr3atry
p on- ayer n- airy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 4,160
Total SSLW 124,800
Number of Lagoons 0 13 u sur ace Drains Present Ip agoon Area JE3 Spray Held Area
Holding Ponds 1 Solid Traps JE3 No Liquid Waste Management Sys em
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? p Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
.......................................................................
Frechoard (inches):...............la...............
❑ Yes ® No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
?
p Yes ElN(,
❑ Yes ® No
0 Yes M No
p Yes ® Nil
Structure 6
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
3/23/99 seepage, etc.)
p Yes ® No
Confinued on hrr.

Facility Number:
Y„ „ 40 _ l28 Date or hishection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
p Yes
® N
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
p Yes
N Ni,
S. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
p Yes
N No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
p Yes
® N
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
© Yes
N N"
11. Is there evidence of over application? p Excessive Ponding p PAN
p Yes
N Nr
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Small Grain
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
p Yes
N Ni,
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
p Yes
p No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
p Yes
p Nn
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
p Yes
p W
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
p Yes
N Ni,
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
p Yes
N Ni,
Itequired_Itecir�ls �CcDocuments
.
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
p Yes
p Ni,
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
p Yes
® No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
p Yes
® No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
El Yes
® N"
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
p Yes
® No
22. Fail to 'notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
p Yes
p No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
p Yes
® Nt,
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
p Yes
® No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
p Yes
N No
C : Xdviola'tioits,or' �ciefiCieitc><es.were:inoted •during. this .visit. • I'du. will ;receive na further.:
....I ............... ....... .......... ........... .
. .Coir6oRridek a oir( this visit; • • . . - . . • . • . • . - . - . • . • .
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
Reviewer/Inspector Name Carl Dunn Entered by Ann Tyndall
ReviewerAnspector Signature: Date:

Printed on .
Facility Number., 40_128 Date of Inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ® Yes p Ni
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? p Yes ®Nil
28.
Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
p Yes
® Ni
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29.
Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
[3 Yes
® Ni,
30.
Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
p Yes
® N„
31.
Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
p Yes
® No
32.
Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
p Yes
® No

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
July 6,1999
Collyn Beaman
502 Sturbridge Dr.
Snow Hill NC 28580
11Y Z
17
1 • •
Oki
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: Compliance Inspection
Beaman Nursery
Facility Number 40 - 128
Greene County
Dear Collyn Beaman,
On 6/18/99, Carl Dunn from the Washington Regional Office of the Division of Water Quality
conducted an inspection of your animal operation. please review the enclosed inspection form. This
inspection form should be maintained as part of the records for your facility. Please -note any items that
may be marked with a yes answer and make every effort to correct these deficiencies. You -are advised
that you must maintain a freeboard of at least one foot in your lagoon(s) plus a storage volume sufficient
to accommodate the rainfall and subsequent runoff from a 25 year 24 hour storm event to remain in
compliance. You should consult your lagoon design for the exact freeboard requirement. Please
remember that you must follow your waste management plan at all times.
Thank you for your cooperation in this inspection. If you have any further questions in regard to this
matter or if I may be of any assistance, I can be contacted at [phone] ext. 208.
Sincerely,
Carl Dunn
Environmental Engineer
cc: WaRO
L L Murphrey Co.
943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, NC 27889 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/l0% post -consumer paper

�. [3 Division of Soil and Water Conseryation - Operation Review
E C Division of Soil and Water onse'rvatro>q-.G"OltillliaitC$'T:ls}]eCtlOrl'
® Division of Water Quality -Compliance inspection
[3-0ther Agency - Operation Review, 4,
® Routine O Complaint Q Follow-ug of DWQ inspection Q Follow -tip of DSWC review O Other
Facility Number CIO f Z Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
13 Permitted ® Certified 0 Conditionally Certified E] Registered JE3 Not Opera Date Last Operated:
FarmName• ea✓•w.. County:................................................................ .......... ... .............hh sa.......................................................,................
Owner Name:........... Cel.....I.. ...........tir.................................................................. Phone No:
..............................................,...,....................................
FacilityContact: ...................................................................... ... Title:............................... .......... Phone No:
..... ..........................................................................
,Mailing Address: .........................................
Onsite Representative: (/.!^.........�d.`....................................................... Intel;rator:..........L-..1 .....�' 'sal.`..e�Y...................................
n.. .....
Certified Operator:..............' I ..µ............ ad-%v:.^ ^............... Operator Certification Number: ..
.........................................................................
Location of Farm:
........................................... ............................................................................................. ...
Latitude 0 A Longitude • 4 66
Design Current Design Current
Swine ; E,, Capacity PoPMatron Poultr ,',. . Capa&r 'opulatto'n; aCate,
Wean to Feeder
L414o
I-ttoO
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts,
❑ Boars
Design Current
:a ac�it Population
old-A1 fiber of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field Area
0'.
Hing Ponds /Solid Traps E:= ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes � No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? El Yes ❑ No
h. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Dices discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yeti, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 19 No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes N No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes I No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(inches): ..........43..................................................................I.......................:..................................:...................................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes N No
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back

Facility Number: ` L2 Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ,DONo
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes 9 No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? [-]Yes 21 No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes VNo
Waste Anolication
10.
Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
VNo
11.
Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
❑ Yes
MNo
12.
Crop type t) L__Jok 56
13,
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
Oq No
14.
a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
9No
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
�No
Required Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
Yes
b�No
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
IffNo
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator,in charge?
❑ Yes
No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes ❑ No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes lErNo
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes N'No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes VNo
i'Vo yi. . . . . . . itefi.cies v.. npte+41 itt rtrig his;v. ..Moir wilE >�ee�iye o fu>�th r
ctir'res ondence. about. this visit.
q �, p y y y
Comments (refer to uestion # c Ex lain an YES'answers andlor an recommendkions'or an other comineniws.'
Use.drawings of facility to better explain situations.: (use additional pages as. necessary): I,
.,
Reviewer/Inspector Name
k i F
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: & -1 Y49
3/23/99

Facility lumber: LJ pate of inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below MYes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes iR No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes KNo
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes )9 No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes XNo
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes us No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes %No
3/23/99

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and
Natural Resources
Washington Regional Office
.lames B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Mr. Collyn Beaman
Collyn Beaman Farm
502 Sturbridge Dr.
Snow Hill, NC 28580
Am I
0FM.W,A
CDENR
NORRp4.tNA
ENvIRdNMF-NT ANc> NATUFRA- RgSOIJRCr=S
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
October 6, 1998
SUBJECT: Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
Collyn Beaman Farm
Fac. No. 40-128
Greene County
Dear Mr. Beaman:
On June 24, 1998, I conducted an Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection at the
referenced. facility. Overall, the operation was found to be in satisfactory condition. A
copy of the inspection report is attached for your review.
In general, this inspection includes verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified Animal
Waste Management Plan (CAWMP); (2) the farm is complying with requirements of the
State Rules 15 NCAC 211.0217, Senate Bill 1217, and the Certified Animal Waste
Management Plan; (3) the farm operation's waste management system is being operated
properly under the direction of a Certified Operator; (4) the required records are being
kept; (5) there are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or runoff.
The recommendations and/or comments regarding your inspection can be found in the
comment section of the attached inspection form. It is very important as the owner and
Operator in Charge that you address any noted concerns, as soon as possible. For
assistance, please contact your Technical Specialist and/or the local Soil & Water
Conservation District Office.
943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, North Carolina 27889
Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

A
Page 2
Coliyn Beaman Farm
October 6, 1998
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance during the inspection. Should you have
further questions or comments regarding this inspection, do not hesitate to call me at
[phone], ext. 321.
Sincerely,
Daphne B. Cullom
Environmental Specialist H
cc: Greene County SWCD Office
Mike Regans, Greene County NCCES
Jake Barrow, L.L. Murphrey Company
WaRO

Facility Number Dale of Inspection
Time of Inspection � 24 hr. (hh:mm)
p Registered E Certified p Applied for Permit p Permitted 10 Not 0perationa Date last Operated:
Farm Name: Coliyi..Beaman.Farm........................... .......................... County: Greene WARO
OwnerName: Collyn..................................... Beaman ...................................................... Phone No: 9.19.t.74.7t720,8 .........................................................I
Facility Contact: ........................................................... ....Title: ... Phone No:
Mailing Address: 502.Sturhridge.DrI. ............................................................................. Snow.BillNC........................................................ Z858 l..............
Onsite Representative: Cictllyn.11camap ......................... ......... :........................ Integrator: LL.Muephrey..Campany.................................
Certified Operator: Carson.E.............................. l3 una.,lx..................................... Operator Certification Number: lfa49.1............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude ©* I " F+ ®•" Longitude ©0 ©4 ©14
eSt n P st a urren j a mE ; {: r' @�� eSl n
s swine_, 4 _ Capacity 'Populations P,,oultry,} ^Capacity Population F sCattle Capac:ty Population
t �,. z'.
4160
�a » ayer ;y p airy ",�
3.13 Non -Layer >;' on- auy
r a±,
! Et
l'_ 0 er
�Totaf Design Capacity ,' ,
jj
Total SSLW ,
h.
u�s5 l k 4 'Pi �
r Number'af]W '6 s�lHoldmg�Pontls����s pSubsurface rams resen �. p agoan Tres p pray ie rea
,L Y1l'x"M t1 , �. �. l'S YE �� �� �#f s`�.h� '# 4%j "rr "Hf x E eRr r', �, n f �I
e ,E E ,s t9m © O LiquidWaste anagement System dal E ta, v1
® can to Feeder
p Feeder to Finish
owcan
KC3:0w`:t:0;
ee er
p arrow to Finish
p Gilts
p Boars
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
5. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No

aety Number: 40_128 Date of Inspection 6-24-98
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Laa ons,Holdine Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Identifier:
p Yes N No
p Yes g No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Freeboard (ft): 1.8 ft.
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid -level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type......Coasta13=udaGrass............................... Ryc......................... ..........................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Oniy
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
Q .. o •vxo 1ons.or �erencies-were.no a ring is visit. ou. wt .rer-eive ntr further .
gerrespoodmeje ab<id�:this visit::
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signatu
p Yes a No
p Yes g No
p Yes a No
p Yes Ig No
p Yes a No
p Yes g No
p Yes a No
p Yes g No
p Yes g No
p Yes a No
p Yes g No
p Yes g No
p Yes a No
p Yes a No
p Yes p No

W R
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Washington Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
December 22, 1997
Mr. Collyn Beaman
Collyn Beaman Farm
502 Sturbridge Dr.
Snow Hill, NC 28580
SUBJECT: Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
Collyn Beaman Farm
Facility No. 40-128
Greene County
Dear Mr. Beaman:
On October 6, 1997, I conducted an animal feedlot operation site inspection at the referenced facility. Overall, the
operation was found to be in satisfactory condition. A copy of the inspection report is attached for your review.
In general, this inspection includes verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
(CAWMP); (2) the farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC 2H.0217, Senate Bill 12I7, and
the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan; (3) the farm operation's waste management system is being operated
properly under the direction of a Certified Operator; (4) the required records are being kept; (5) there are no signs of
seepage, erosion, and/or runoff.
The recommendations and/or comments regarding your inspection can be found in the comment section of the attached
inspection form. It is very important as the owner and Operator in Charge that you address any noted concerns, as soon
as possible. For assistance, please contact your Technical Specialist and/or the local Soil & Water Conservation District
Office.
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance during the inspection. Should you have further questions or
comments regarding this inspection, do not hesitate to call me at [phone], ext. 32 L
Sincerely,
G�� B. ULNIN—.
Daphne B. Cullom
Environmental Specialist I1
cc: Greene County SWCD Office
Mike Regans, Greene County NCCES
Jake Barrow, L.L. Murphrey Hog Company
'WAO
943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, NC 27889 Telephone (919) 94&8481 FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

ttoutme 0 Lompiamt p rouow-up of uwv inspection 0 ec
Facility Number
13 Registered 0 Certified C Applied for Permit p Permitted
-up of m vvc: review p Uther
Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
p Not operationalDate Last Operated:
Farm Name: CoJUy L1ean=.EarnL................................................................................ County: Greene WARD
OwnerName: Collyi..................................... Beamau ..................................................... Phone No: 919.:.7.47.c.Z7Q8..................................... ....................
Facility Contact: ...............................................................................Title: .. Phone No:
Mailing Address: SQ2.SturbrillgAAr............................................................................... SAO.W.BUL.NC ........................................................ 2858h ..............
Onsite Representative: Callan.B.eamaa......................................................................... Integrator:L.L.MuzW.ey..Hog.C.ampauy........................
Certified Operator: CarscwE.............................. Bxamapi,.,Ir...................................... Operator Certification Number: lb492......... ...................
Location of Farm:
Latitude Longitude ©• ©©
�� g:
v-Swtne `ti,jw:Poult
'w ren Rat � E , . ,r esign '_ � urren ¢ e * r t t estgo W. Curren
`�~.: + ._t �:�
;'
s -,.
Cattle-.-,CapacttyPapplahon
aa,z;CapacityP=optlattottry:�=Capactty;Pop�ulatton
ayer auy t
p
riQon- ayer s` p Non -Dairy
;
yr::
C4:�aEEL-iC.:'.,,, _ "fi+"``°F`.:: ..`'"'-'.![t •z•�,"A7,fi: xLP °:k�^n7%..;'£ .. -
�; '.
1Finish"Tdta!'Des><gui
Capacity{+ '
-.,,--
kisyf-.
;1 Ca" r
;Y
Y:
Total SS11 :
J.
r ems— •a--E��^�---,
Number ofLagoons /Holding Ponds CT p u sur ace rams resen p agoon Area 13 pray ie Area
p o LiquidWaste Management System
® ean to ee er
p ee er to In
arrow to ean
p arrow to Feeder
p arrow to
pGtts
0 Boars
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? p Yes ® No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes 0 No
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes p No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes p No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaumin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) 17 Yes []No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? p Yes ® No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require p Yes 0 No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? p Yes ® No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? 13 Yes ® No
7/25/97

Facility um er: 40_128
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Laizoons,Holding Ponds. Flush Pits, etc.
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure
Identifier: ......................................................................
Freeboard (ft): 2.7 ft.
10. is seepage observed from any of the structures?
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
Structure 4 Structure Structure 6
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ......................Cohan.............................................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to d iscuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified A WMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ®No
p Yes a No
p Yes ® No
Yes
® No
p Yes
N No
p Yes
® No
p Yes
® No
13 Yes
®No
13 Yes
®No
p Yes
® No
p Yes
ONO
p Yes
®No
p Yes
® No
Q . wo-violatlons.or uenereacies were.noEea auring cnrs visit:. Y oa win xeeelve no runner .
�e�1 esilitinsieue� abvl>i� • • xtiis:Y'S��' ...............:... .......... ..... .
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature. _ Ll.l V t1 CJV\ Date:

ace um r' 40_128 Date of Inspection ,
if Sito
�
5.p f�•��,d:..— �w.dt+.A.+ ..m.ih...�..—+—#ts. �. '{k�6 '• ±.:._?Y.?�If..lo�.IL ..wi7i+5i�_� C
Q gg si ew _ 0 4qlw so as a SD•
]an ul am in
yy S � '.d of k. •a �' rq, �• i �' ft,: ,� - di tr �M "'/ +, '�.• � ��� �,. _
a yes .� , [' „ � � � ., � �i ' �.0 =b,�i -° {� ° �• g�: •o� ti � �h p ,.: o f ..
o.� - ter{' _ � °.. `... �• � }j l.,� 4 .� ��p�]� �'P'- {a.�'
�,J T p FC, �1 ' �, `�(f+ Q. .{ ++���iffffff� ' ' •a ul �'.by +lAG �,L•i
�.. , ,l 5 _, J as r1•• Y
phi_ ',
r•1 p� �. 4 1.,,,H, k,T *F'}� r- Ord -.�`ti� tk�rY�+vpl+.y�'} 1V fNx 1•.a.� 1:i
� ,'.�
q� i r, 1
j,° Z Z a ! a M�. 1 yd + ftFS } t c dIi
o #` p..i 4f r 5� Vl • 'i b _. y q
t7-�� �e, -PT rr1 ���'?C4., y. a3r1r a ,+! -F �abk ?q Pf r" r+� +'b
�kP'T � � . �. w ; d # + s a r �-¢p a•t �; �, F tJ. o .s.
�'.',`� `'� ' q �ana•py� - 11�'y y;l ' � ,�r"+t,'• s , y _ � } ��d'' '2 '�. (�.. 1 �F { �- l , j
�� d ! � @'r-t {o. •�•� x•} >a Aw 3K7_,� � o��Uk�� $z,�d'i �,�'�� ��� ° 1 ° 5"lrx�i�..�e,�_5-r �..�'.".� � � '_���'
w u. ,�..r� °I,d J � p p, S f.• , r •4, .,. tl SM'-�r o r
`1 h' �,. Ei4 y: t^ ,,, #:` Pa ''rr s6 /a .{ � „• Mw pr ,1t �a,�,^�•� >rE ,� �', ': ,}} it '+ F : �
�9 .s s.7� �i�Yf,3ys_�M rs.. "!R FS�o
g'+1-`1s rr ;R 'i fR �+'. i';qq'``�•'�'4'. {�'�'�a'�b+.�1 12 '"� `f, °.L� •it r,: n..'�°'_•h{. 1, _
�'t.�.=�'S- � #'���}t'�•'�� �:�e�r ��4'F y�oY� �+' .,,�'t� q.. t �'� ry'' � �1.� ,. t.
Y
Wp �S� is H• f YryT t �
U'���.IuRh��
� ry �y,� r a�'�?�'�� r�r tF � . � >�` �•l� F vr lam'• AI.�!�•, `•14 � +o�y n�'i�i4e� � '�
Ir
�r j��^{`�i '} 1 � �*�i' � ? .���k�� ia'R� i�' •o+.,'i,l •F� �i' � 3sJ. �! 4j�"�y,�P �t p.' tiry�}C elyP �r ai r +td,C 4+ iM. +x
dY;
r _� rq, 1 }�1,rts�, =,�rz4, � , v � At k�}•�' { ��pS � [ V �{V .,� r- .
� �� ,^ �n � t �: ����� •, t . . 0 sfirq � .q w •7+�'�+[ � .�C Ll: rl=� r ,� � 3�..h i . �` '� � •y'.� . •1 c, e�'��a ..,. at � ..
F F a1 i t t. El a gg 1 ih Tx'o
.fQ.F .11 y' S, r A #• 5y.-0 " i y, R 4,• ',7L�' e�'' 1 ',j. !YEA , r ,u.,� f „s - : N o 1p u
` '� � 'v5?}= �� � P k .L � L Iby F+_ C }c, �4 "k Y i'� j?'., � � '� # "✓ •a 1 I _ '��, r �
}��A� I,�1 � ! F�1� � �•ts 3 r1- � ,`�� n Art��H g'SO,� ; � F'u � 1 f "�yi�� r
bl@ 0"XVI
3. ,�;�,���'� :_�_:� r _ •� 't , .a�,.�� ry�> x�i �p.l',rr a +i ' ,c - °.�'`c�
l

Division of Soil and Water Conservation p Other Agency
p Division of Water Quality 11
Routine p omp am p Follow-up of DWQ mspec ion p o
Facility Number
p Registered 0 Certified p Applied for Permit p Permitted
O
Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection ® 24 hr. (hh:mm)
in Not Operationa Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: Collyn..Beaman.Farm..................................................................... County: Greene WARO
OwnerName: Collyn....................................Heamam ...................................................... Phone No: 9.19-14.7.-7..7.08......................... .................................
Facility Contact: Collya.Heaman..............................................Title: owner..............
Mailing Address: 502.StuxbridgiL fir........
Onsite Representative: Gala.&earnaa,,.Rr.ian.,Shacicleford.....
Certified Operator: Carsom.E.......
Location of Farm:
Heamaa.dx ............
SUO.W. iUNC.......
Phone No: 919.1..7.4.7...7.20K.......................
... I.......... Z858%
Integrator: L.L.Murpihrey.Hog.Company............
Operator Certification Number:16i492 .............................
Latitude ©• ©6 ®Ci Longitude ©0 ©& ©4�
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
® Wean to Feeder
p Feeder to inis
p Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ arrow to Finish
13Gits
❑ Boars
pLayer 113 Dairy I I
._...,_
❑ Non -Layer JE3 Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 4,160
Total °SSLW
rea © Spray FieldAreaNumberof Lagoons / Holding Ponds Subsurface ace rams Present
E `
[3 O Liquid Waste Management System
i
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes R No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other "
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes N No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes ® No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ®No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ®No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ®No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes ®No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? p Yes ® No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes ®No
7/25/97

Facility Number: 40_128
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons,floldina Ponds Flush Pits etc.
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure I
Identifier:
...................................
Freeboard (ft): 2.8
Structure 2 Structure 3
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
p Yes N No
p Yes N No
Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ...... Craasta.1.Bm mtada..(bad').............. Small.Grzin.O.xersee,d....... ...................... Cottm.......................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
...........................................
p Yes
® No
p Yes
® No
p Yes
® No
p Yes
® No
p Yes
® No
q
..oor�vemIodnesri.oer� abouctie'tnhc�ise•Ys,iweire.na:.s .urnng is visit., -You. will.reeei.ve.n• o. • .u...er .
; �
..'.... .. . .
..
p Yes N No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
Cl Yes p No
Comments irefer:to question
q )i xp atn any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any of er comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations, (use additional pages as necessary):
o subsurface drainage on site according to Mr. Beaman
Need to balance nitrogen on IRR 2 forms
Not required at time of certification but will need for General Permit: insect control, odor control and mortality checklists
Need to secure irrigation system's operating information (parameters)
11/17/97
ReviewerlInspector Name ap „�77-77
-
ReviewerlInspector Signature: Date: