400126_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NORTH CAROLINA .�
Department of Environmental Qua

INSPECTIONS
INSPECTIONS
INSPECTIONS

f
�n
Division of Water Resources
Facility Number. - ® O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit: ® Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: ® Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: I Y—LI-121 ArrivalTime: Departure Time: County: Ztyj� . Region;G
Farm Name: C.-� Owner Email:
Owner Name: _ _ 't` ..� / '/ti�1� Phone: ] -- '`
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Title: Phone:
Integrator:
Certified Operator- L_lrt'LM�_ Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Other
Certification Number:
Latitude: Longitude:
. Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Pop,
Layer
Non -La er
Non-L
Pullets
Other
Poults
Design Current
Discharees and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non-Dai
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
❑ Yes E�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
[:]Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes ❑ No
(:]Yes Yfo
o
❑ Yes
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA [] NE
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

r _ _
i
Facili Number: - Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes E�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): ,4 3
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? [—]Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes [dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No [DNA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [�'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): � - e 12 Q '� -, a ,a,. - W /41 �Z <A - 16 r - f 24� � _<—D- --
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
o
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
FdN o
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
[No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
allo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19, Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
[, o
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
fNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes EZ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes �VNo
o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? [—]Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

r
Facili Number: -
Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? Yes
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes
the appropriate box(es) below. ;F' / /,
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
[v"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
E3'<o DNA ❑NE
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
UZ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
[0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
[:]Yes
dNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
5No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
dNo
❑ NA
ONE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
3 I. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
[—]Yes 00"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes
�No ❑NA ❑NE
[No ❑ NA D NE
1�No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
d. � ,
412'9y-
,��
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
MM
Phone:
Date: D
21412015

e
Jf
0 Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400126 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS400126
Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene Region:
Date of Visit: 11/0412015 Entry Tlme: 08:50 am Exit Time: 9:40 am
Farm Name: Triple M Farms 3
Owner: John B McLawhorn
Incident #
Owner Email:
Phone:
❑ Denied Access
Washington
)ohnbmacj r@embargmai
252-746-2559
Mailing Address: 955 Fire Sta Rd Hookerton NC 28538
Physical Address: 1237 Fire Sta Rd Hookerton NC 28538
Facility Status: Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integratoe Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35° 26' 33" Longitude: 77' 30' 24"
Intersection of SR 1408 and 1405 1237 Fire Station Road
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts
Records and Documents
Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Other issues
Certified Operator: John B MCLawhOrn Operator Certification Number: 16417
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Shea McLawhorn Phone:
On -site representative Shea McLawhorn Phone :
Primary inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis: soil tested: 812015
7-28-15 = .83
2-28.15 = 1,54
10-10-15 = ,97
IRR records are complete & balanced out.
reviewed� sludge survey, LTZ = 4' 8" 6 ST 1'6'': rainfall/freeboard, calibration 912015
page: 1

1
Pip
Permit: AWS400126 Owner - Facility : John B McLawhorn Facility Number: 400126
Inspection Date: 11/04/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Wean to Feeder 4,160 4,160
Total Design Capacity: 4.160
Total SSLW: 124,800
Waste structures
Disignaled Observed
Type Identifier Closed Data Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon ism 12/06/94 20.40 22.00
page: 2

:f
Permit: AWS400126 Owner - Facility : John B McLawhorn Facility Number: 400126
Inspection Date: 11/04/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharsaes & Stream Impacts
Ygj
No Na Ne
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
11
0 ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
[�
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
M1313
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection Storage & Treatment
Yea
No Na Ne
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (LeJ large
❑
❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
MEI
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
0 ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yea _NQ_No_ No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Permit: AWS400126 Owner - Facility : John B McLawhorn Facility Number: 400126
Inspection Date: 11/04/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste ARplicatlon
Yes No Na No
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda
Grass
(Pasture)
Crop Type 2
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 3
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
0 ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
M ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
■ ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
M ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
NQ No No
19, Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
❑
❑
20, Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

'd,
Permit: AWS400126 Owner - Facility : John S McLawhorn Facility Number:
400126
Inspection Date: 11/04/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Records and Documents
Yea No Na No
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
M ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
M ❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge surrey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■ ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes No Na No
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
0 ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
0 ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
M ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32, Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
0 ❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
0 ❑
❑
page: 5

Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400126 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS400126 ❑ Denied Access
Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for visit: Routine County: Greene Region: Washington
Date of visit: 12110/2014 Entry Time: 0100 pm Exit Time: 1:45 pm Incident #
Farm Name: Triple M Farms 3 Owner Email: johnbmacjr®embargmal
Owner: John B McLawhorn Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 955 Fire Sta Rd Hookerton NC 28538
Physical Address: 1237 Fire Sta Rd HODkerlon NC 28538
Facility Status: 0Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm:
Intersection of SR 1406 and 1405 1237 Fire Station Road
Latitude: 35' 26' 33" Longitude: 77' 30' 24"
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other issues
Certified Operator: John B McLawhorn Operator Certification Number: 16417
Secondary OIC(sy
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Shea McLawhorn Phone:
On -site representative Shea McLawhorn Phone :
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis: soil tested: 5-2013
10.10.14 - .97
2.21.14 - 1.39
9.23.13 - 1.05
IRR records are complete & balanced out.
Reviewed: rainfall, freeboard, OIC, stocking.
Remember to do a sludge survey by Dec. 31,2014.
page: 1

Permit: AWS400126 Owner - Facility : John B McLawhorn Facility Number: 400126
Inspection Date: 12/10/14 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Wean to Feeder 4,160 4,000
Total Design Capacity: 4,160
Total SSLW: 124,800
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon ism 12/06/94 20.40 24.00
page: 2

Permit: AWS400126 Owner - Facility : John 8 McLawhorn Facility Number: 400126
Inspection Date: 12/10/14 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No Na No
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
c, What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste, Collection. Storage & Treatment
Yes
NQ Na He
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.ed large
❑
■ ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
M ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
M ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ E ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11, Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
Application outside of application area?
M
page: 3

Permit: AWS400126 Owner - Facility : John B McLawhorn Facility Number: 400126
Inspection Date: 12/10/14 Inssection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No Na he
Crop Type 1
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Pasture)
Crop Type 3
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
0 ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■ ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
❑
[]
Records and Documents
Yes No Na Ne
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ M ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWS400126 Owner - Facility : John B McLawhorn Facility Number:
400126
Inspection Date: 12/10/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No Na No
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
01311
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
01111
26. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
01311
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑0
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
E ❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes No Na No
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
0 ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? if yes,
❑
0 ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
0 ❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
0 ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
0 ❑
❑
page: 5

a
I
Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400126 �- Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS400126 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine I County: gene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: IMIgZ013 Entry Time: Q9:45 AM Exit Time: j0i5Q AM Incident #:
Farm Name: Ir'l2le M Farms 3 . _ Owner Email: lohnbmacir embaram
Owner: John B bdcLawhorn Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 255 Fire Sta Rd _ _ , Hopkerton NQ 2§538
Physical Address: 1 Hopkerton NC 28538
Facility Status: N Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Location of Farm:
Intersection of SR 1408 and 1405 1237 Fire Station Road
Integrator: Murphy-Bro,Wn LLC
Latitude: 35026'33" _ __ Longitude: 77°30'24"
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: John B McLawhorn Operator Certification Number: 16417
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representativo(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Shea McLawhorn Phone:
On -site representative Shea McLawhorn Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis: soil tested: 2013
4-12-13 = 1.37
9-24-12 = .58
3-8-12 = 1.0
IRR events for spring were balanced out, Waiting on analysis to balance events in July thru Sept.
Date:
Rainfall, freeboard, stocking & crop yields are recorded. Sludge survey dated 9-1-2012 @ 20% Caliberation in 2013.
Looks Good.
Page: 1

I
Permit: AWS400126 Owner - Facility: John 8 McLawhorn Facility Number: 400126
Inspection Date: 10/08/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Vislt: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Q Swine - Wean to Feeder 4,160 3,600
Total Design Capacity: 4,160
Total SSLW: 124,800
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
lagoon ism 12/06/94 20.40 33.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWS400126 Owner - Facility: John B McLawhorn Facility Number: 400126
Inspection Date: 10/08/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ■
❑ ❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ ■
❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than
❑ ■
❑
❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collectlon, Storage & Treatment Yes No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe
u 0 u
u
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑ ■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ ■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑ ■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑ ■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑ ■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400126 Owner - Facility: John B McLawhorn
Inspection Date: 1010812013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number. 400126
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Pasture)
Crop Type 3
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ Cl ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

n
Permit: AW5400126 Owner • Facility: John 8 McLawhorn
Facility Number: 400126
Inspection Date. 10/08/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)? ❑
MOO
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate ❑
■ ❑ ❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
Page: 5

0
Permit: AWS400126 Owner - Facility: John B McLawhorn
Inspection Date: 10/08/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400126
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes
No
NA
NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■
❑
❑
Other Issues Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report
❑
■
❑
❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional
❑
■
❑
❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge,
❑
■
❑
❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon / Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewhnspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
IN
Page: 6

U Division of Water Quality
Facility Number LLJ - 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency /16
(Type of Visit: Q Compliance Inspection O Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance I
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access 1!
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Departure Time:County: Region:
Farm Na
Owner Name:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
,,",.- A
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Fecdei
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Other
Owner Email:
e:
Title:
Phone:
Integrator: ,/Yl - a
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Latitude:
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
TL
aer
Non -Layer
Non-L
Pullets
Other
Poults
Design Current
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Longitude:
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
[:]Yes [�fNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
[:]Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes Vwo
o ❑ NA ❑ NE
[:]Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
[]Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page I of 3 21412011 Continued

tF'acili Number: Q - Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):�
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
IdNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
�o
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmenta .threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA [:a NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes UNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes gNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12 Crop Type(s): 1-s%�i C ������ ���,! 7C J= /� %i �",-,
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes Lo, o
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes o
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes o
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes fNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Renuired Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check [:]Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design [] Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stacking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

iacili Number: jDate of Ins ection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? / f ❑ Yes 2< ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check []Yes j(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
[0No
❑ NA
❑ NE
[:]Yes
dNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
[—]Yes
2(No
❑ NA
❑ NE
[:]Yes
MINo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question 4): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
t•
Y4l
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3 11101,
Phone: 'j Y�O_
Date: 12
21412011

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soll and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: Facility Status: 60*yg Permit: AWS400126 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance lnsp=tiQn Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene , Region: Wgshinaton
bate of Visit: 09/23/2011 Entry Time: OB:30 AM Exit Time: 09:15 AM Incident M.
Farm Name: Triple M Farms 3 Owner Email: lohribmadriZembaram
Owner: John B McLawhorn Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 955 Fire Sta Rd Hookerton NC 28538
Physical Address: 1237 Fire Sta Rd Hookerton NC 28538
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude. 35°26'33" Longitude: 77°30'24"
Intersection of SR 1408 and 1405 1237 Fire Station Road
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other issues
Certified Operator: John B McLawhorn Operator Certification Number. 16417
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis:
9-9-11 = .52
2-21 -11 = 1.4
soil tested 4-2011
Irr records are complete & balanced out. Freeboard & rainfall are recorded.
SS is due before end of 2011 Caliberation is due in 2012
Looks Goodl
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400126 Owner • Facility: John 8 Mci-awhorn
Inspection Date: 09123/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400126
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Wean to Feeder 4,160 3,500
Total Design Capacity: 4,160
Total SSLW: 124,800
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
lagoon ism 12/06/94 20.40 34.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWS400126 owner - Facility: John B McLawhorn Facility Number: 400126
Inspection Date: 09/23/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ IN ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes No NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large trees, severe
❑ ■ ❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑ ■ ❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑ ■ ❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑ ■ ❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400126 Owner • Facility: John B McLawhorn
Facility Number: 400126
Inspection Date: 09/23/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Bermuda Grass (Hay,
Pasture)
Crop Type 2
Corn. Wheat. Soybeans
Crop Type 3
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
16, Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
19, Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? OSO ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP? ❑
Page: 4

Permit: AW5400126 Owner - Facility: John B McLawhorn
Inspection Date: 09/23/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number : 400126
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes
No NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fall to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑
■ ❑ ❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400126 Owner - Facility: John B McLewhorn
Inspection Date: 09123/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Records and Documents
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Facility Number: 400126
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
You No NA NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon / Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewerlinspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
■
■
Page: 6

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400126 , Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS400126 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Cpmliance InspeS3igj3 Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine .__. ___.. County: Greene Region: Washonatgo
Date of Visit: 12/07/2010 Entry Time: 08:30 AM Exit Time: Incident #,
Farm Name: Triple M Farms 3 ..,._,.,._ Owner Email:
Owner: John B McLawhorn Phone:
Mailing Address: 955 Fire Sta Rd Hookerton NC 28538
Physical Address: Hookerton NC 28538
Facility Status: ■ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy-BrQwn LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°26'33" Longitude: 77°30-24"
Intersection of SR 1408 and 1405 1237 Fire Station Road
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment © Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: John B McLawhorn Operator Certification Number: 16417
Secondary OIC(s):
On-Slte Representativels): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Phone:
On -site representative Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis: soil tested 2009 & samples pulled now
9-10-10 = .71
3-22-10 = 1.4
10-23-10 = .63
iRR records are complete and balanced out. SS 2009 due 2010 unless an extension was given.
Calib. 2009 Freeboard range: 2-7-10 = 24" to 4 1 " 9-24-10
Looks Good.
Page: 1

Y
Permit: AWS400126 Owner - Facility: John B McLawhorn Facility Number: 400126
Inspection Date: 12/07/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Wean to Feeder 4,160 2,800
Total Design Capacity: 4,160
Total SSLW: 124,800
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
kgoon 15M 12/06/94 20.40 36.00
Page: 2

i
Permit: AWS400126 Owner - Facility: John B McLawhorn
Facility Number: 400126
Inspection Date: 12/0712010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges_& Stream Impacts
Yes No NA
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ M ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑ 0110
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ■ ❑
❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ 0 ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other
than from a ❑ ■ ❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes No NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

i
Permit: AWS400126 Owner - Facility: John B McLawhorn
Inspection Date: 12107/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400126
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Pasture)
Crop Type 3
Small Crain Overseed
Crop Type 4
Crap Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ Cl ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ E ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ E ❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ m ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WU P?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400126 Owner - Facility: John 8 McLawhorn Facility Number : 400126
Inspection Date: 12/0712010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? Q
Other? ❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
Q
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after n 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22, Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ ■
Q ❑
Other lssues Yes No NA N
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ m ❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ Cl
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400126 Owner - Facility: John B MCLawhorn
Inspection Date: 12/07/2010 Inspection Typo: Compliance Inspection
Other Issues
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
k
Facility Number: 400126
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

4
Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400126 _ Facility Status: Active Permit: AM40012 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 10/29/2009 Entry Time: 01 Q6 PM Exit Time: Incident M.
Farm Name: Triple M Farms 3 - Owner Email' iohnbmacirQembargm
Owner: John B McLawhorn Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 955 Fire Sta Rd
Physical Address: 1237 Fire Sta Rd Hookerton NC 28538
Facility Status: E Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brawn, LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°26'33" Longitude: 77°30'24"
Intersection of SR 1408 and 1405 1237 Fire Station Road
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: John B McLawhorn Operator Certification Number: 16417
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representatives): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Johnny McLawhorn Phone:
On -site representative Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis:
10-23-09 .63
6-24-09 .94
1-23-09 1.1
Looks Good! soil lest 3-2009 calibration 2009 sludge survey exempt
Page: 1
D

Permit: AWS400126 Owner - Facility: John B McLawhom Facility Number: 400126
Inspection Date: 10/29/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations , Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Wean to Feeder 4,160 3,953
Total Design Capacity: 4,160
Total SSLW: 124,800
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
Lagoon Ism 12/06/94 20.40 40.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWS400126 Owner - Facility: John B McLawhom Facility Number: 400126
inspection Date: 10/29/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No NA
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
■ ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
■ ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■ ❑
❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■ ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■ ❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■ ❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
S. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./large trees, severe
❑
■ ❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■ ❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■ ❑
❑
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■ ❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■ ❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■ ❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below,
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400126 Owner - Facility: John B McLawhorn
Inspection Date: 10/29/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400126
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
,Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Pasture)
Crop Type 2
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 3
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
16, Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400126 Owner - Facility: John B McLawhorn
Facility Number: 400126
Inspection Date: 10/29/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No NA
NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22, Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? ❑
■ ❑
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge surrey as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■ ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■ ❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■ ❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400126 Owner - Facility: John B McLawhorn
Facility Number: 400126
Inspection Data: 10/2912009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues
Yes No
NA
NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑ ■
❑
❑
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
00011
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ ■
❑
❑
Page: 6

t
0 Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400126 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS400126 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 1012212008 Entry Time: 12:50 PM Exit Time:
Farm Name: Triple M Farms 3
Owner: JQhn B MCLawhorn
Incident #:
Owner Email:
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 955 Eire Sta Rd hlookerton NC 28538
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Location of Farm:
Intersection of SR 1408 and 1405 1237 Fire Station Road
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Records and Documents
Integrator: Carolina Farms _
Latitude:35°26'33" Longitude:77°30'24"
Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Other issues
Certified Operator: John B McLawhorn Operator Certification Number: 16417
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On -site representative Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis
7-23-08 = 1.1 soil test 2008
2-13-08 = 1.7
looks good
Page: 1

0
Permit: AWS400126 Owner - Facility: John 8 McLawhorn Facility Number: 400126
Inspection Date: 10/22/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Q Swine - Wean to Feeder 4,160 3,500
Total Design Capacity: 4,160
Total SSLW: 124,800
Waste Structures
Type Identifler Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
[agoon 7 ism 12/06/94 20.40 43.00
` Page:2

Permit: AWS400125 owner - Facility: John B McLawhorn Facility Number: 400126
Inspection Hate: 10/22/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
C. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do'any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑ ■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑ ■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑ ■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400126 Owner - Facility: John B McLawhom
Inspection Date: 10122M08 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400126
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Pasture)
Crop Type 3
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400126 Owner - Facility: John 8 McLawhorn Facility Number: 400126
Inspection Date: 10/22/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Other? ❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Other Issues Yes No NA N
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400126 Owner • Facility: John B McLawhorn
Inspection Date: 10/22/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance inspection
Other Issues
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Facility Number: 400126
Reason for Visit: Routine
Page: 6

0
0
Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400126 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS400126 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine— County: Greene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 11/19/2007 Entry Time:02A5 PM Exit Time: Incident M.
Farm Name: Triple M Farms 3 Owner Email:
Owner: John B McLawhorn
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 955 Fire Sta Rd Hookerton NC 28538
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Location of Farm:
Integrator: Carolina Farms
Latitude: 35°26'33" Longitude: Z7°30'24"
Intersection of SR 1408 and 1405 1237 Fire Station Road
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: John B McLawhorn
Secondary OIC(s):
Operator Certification Number: 16417
On -Site Representative(s): Name Tide Phone
24 hour contact name Phone:
On -site representative Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis:
8-20-07 =1.3
4-24-07 = 1.7
soil test 4-2007
Looks Goodl
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400126 Owner - Facility: John B McLawhom
Inspection Date: 11/1912007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400126
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
O Swine - Wean to Feeder 4,160 4,106
Total Design Capacity: 4,160
Total SSLW: 124,800
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
lagoon ism 12/06/94 20.40 44.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWS400126 Owner - Facility: John B McLawhom Facility Number: 400126
Inspection Date: 11/19/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400126 Owner - Facility: John B McLawhorn
Facility Number: 400126
Inspection Date: 11/19/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN a 100/D/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Com, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Coy) atal Bermuda Grass
Crop Type 3
Fescue (Pasture)
Crop Type 4
Millet
Crop Type 5
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving craps differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■ ❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■ ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
■ ❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■ ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■ ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■ ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400126 Owner - Facility: John B McLawhom
Facility Number: 400126
Inspection Date: 11/19/2007 inspection Type: Compliance inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ 0
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? ❑ ■
❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ 01113
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ 0
❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Other Issues
Yes No
NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to property dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400126 Owner - Facility: John B McLawhorn Feel lity Number: 400126
Inspection Date: 11/19/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Page: 6

t
Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400126 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS400126 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Cornglogrigs Insgection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene Region: VasUnoton
Date of Visit: 031b212006 Entry Time: 01:00 PM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Triple M Farms 3 Owner Email:
Owner: John B McLawhorn Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 955 Fire Sta Rd _ _ _ Hookerton NC 28538
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:35°26'33" Longitude:77"30'24"
Intersection of SR 1408 and 1405 1237 Fire Station Road r
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: John B McLawhorn Operator Certification Number: 16417
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On -site representative Phone:
24 hour contact name Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary: ,
February 2005 soil test and one has been pulled in 2006, results not back yet.
Waste analyses:
2-3-06 =1.7
10-18-05 = 0.94
6-14-05 = 1.3
3-7-05 = 1.6
Looks Great!
Page: 1

c
Permit: AWS400126 Owner Facility: John B McLawhom Facility Number: 400126
Inspection Date: 03/02/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
O Swine - Wean to Feeder 4,160 4,130
Total Design Capacity: 4,160
Total SSLW: 124,800
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
lagoon 15M 12/06/94 20.40 31.00
Page: 2

0
Permit: AWS400126 Owner - Facility; John B MoLawhorn Facility Number; 400126
Inspection Date: 03/02/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance inspection Reason for Visit; Routine
Discharges & Stream Impact Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ' ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ Cl ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ■
❑ Cl
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse Impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑ ■
❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes No
NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe
❑ ■
❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■
❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑ ■
❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑ ■
❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No
NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑ ■
❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of Incorrect application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400126 Owner - Facility: John B McLewhom Facility Number: 400126
Inspection Date: 03/02/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
Total P205?
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
Outside of acceptable crop window?
Evidence of wind drift?
Application outside of application area?
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18, Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Records and Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
El
El
Cam, Wheat, Soybeans
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Small Grain Overseed
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑■❑❑
ONOO
■❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400126 Owner • Facility: John B McLawhom
Facility Number: 400126
Inspection Date: 03/02/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
0013
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? ❑
■
❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
0
■
❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑'
■ ❑
Other Issues
Yes No
NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■
❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400126 Owner - Facility: John B McLawhorn Facility Number: 400126
Inspection Date: 03/02/2006 inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? ❑ ❑ ❑
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review✓inspection with on -site representative? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
0
Page: 6

Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Eyk^ve,ro.:a:.rxvsnvr.:w-n-.en.m�er�rarm�.-�.-_apsbrm_aoe,.Mxr�vn•. k•••�••••••••-,wewocaa�-•umem,ee+•s+rr..ry
u +Date of Visit: 12-23-2002 Time; 745
i Facility Number 40 126 1
" O Not Operational O Below Threshold
r� Permitted IN Certified 0 Conditionally Certified M Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .............
Farm Name: Tlrlpla.M.k:wma............................................................................................. County: lC, mOtte............................................... WA O.......
Owner Name: ,LQbx&..Slma........................ MdAw1turn..................................... ......... !Phone No:7.U-7.4b:-25,59 ........................... ...............................
Facility Contact: .............................................................................. Title:....................................... ............. Phone No:
...............................................................
Mailing Address: Q.55..Fim.Slati:clot.RQad ...................................
Onsite Representative:,1QhnA.Sbtea............................... . Integrator- plremiwn.Stm dart:sl.F.ox t.of Niarth...........
................................................
Certified Operator:Jaha.D.................................... McLawbLom ................................... Operator Certification Number:,1b41.7..............................
Location of Farm':
Intersection of SR 1408 and 14051237 Fire Station Road ? y
Latitude � 35 � 26 �� 33 �� i Longitude 77 I ®� 3U
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse __.._ ...--...... -J i,_.. -_ .........___.__
Design Current
-f
Design Current -`--_^�1------
Design -Current T-
Swine Capacity Population
Poultry
Capacity Population Cattle
Capacity Population
® Wean to Feeder
4160
4011
10 Layer
❑ Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish
10 Non -Layer
10 Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
4,160
o;
❑ Gilts
Total SSLW
124,800
❑ Roars
Number of Lagoons 1 ❑ Subsur-Pace Drains Present 10 Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Areal
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
E
Dischar-,ges & Stream im mcts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? 0 Yes 9 No
Discharge origiriatcd at; ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If di charge is observed. wis chi; uonvcyaiw reran-111,0 ;? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is obscm!ed. did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, uoti& DWQ) El Yes ❑ No
c, ll"dischaarge is observed. what is the cstimaled flow in gal/min?
cL Doe,, discharge by pass a laagoon sxslein? (If y es. notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
War_kte Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway Cl Yes 9 No
structure I Structure 2 Sirtictllre 3 Structure 4 Sinachare 5 5trtaohare 6
Identifier:.......................................................................................................... .................
.................. ......................................................................
Frreboard (inohe:s):...............26....................................................................................................................................................................................................

5/00
Facility Number: 40-126 Date of Inspection i2-23-2002 Printed on:
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation hoses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
Continued o%h' ck
12/30/2002
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
N No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
N No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Graze) Small Grain Overseed Corn, Soybeans, Wheat Cotton
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre detennination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records car, Doc.nnienta
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ W1JP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
0.'Nd violations. or.deficien des were noted.during this visit:: You will_receive :no further
correspondence about this visit.
Comments (refer to. question #): Explain any. YES answers and/or;any.recommendations.or.any_6ther comments.
Use drawings of facility to beitec: explainsituations: (use additional pages as necessary):
Unannounced inspection. Records available for review.
Stop pump mark is — 43"
Waste analysis - 12-12-02 = 1.1 lbs, 6-6-02 = 1.3 lbs, 1-31-02 = 1.3 lbs
Soil test - 3-11-02 - Lime was put out as recommended.
Irrigation records are complete.
Freeboard levels are recorded weekly.
Continue to work on the vegetation on dike wall.
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
[p Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
Reviewer/Inspector Name

Revieler/Inspector Signature: Date: 5100
Facility Number: 40-126 Date of Inspection 12-23-2002 Printed on: 12/30/2002
Odor issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? n Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes - ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
Practice weed control in the fields and on the dike walls.
If you have any questions, contact your Technical Specialist or us @ 252-946-6481.

o�4F wArF,�Q�
r
To: Producers
From: Marlene D. Salyer
Environmental Speci
Washington Regional Office
Subject: Animal Compliance Routine Inspection
Year 2004
Michael F. Easley, Governor
Wmfsm G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Divislon of Water Quality
Coleen H, Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
Enclosed please find a copy or copies of the Compliance Site hu1=11tion(s) (as viewed in DWQ database) conducted
at the referenced facility by the Division of Water Quality from the Washington Regional Office. Please read this
inspection and keep with. all other documents pertaining to your animal operation for future inspections.
In general, these inspections included verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
(CAWNP); (2) the farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC 2H.0217, Senate Bill 1217, and
the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan; (3) the farm operation's waste management system is being operated
properly under the direction of a Certified Operator, (4) the required records are being kept; (5) there are no signs of
seepage, erosion, and/or runoff.
As a reminder, please note the following which are conditions of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan and the
general NPDES permit; therefore, these items must be implemented:
Within one kindred and twenty days of the effective date (April 9, 2003) of a COC issued under this permit, the
permittee shall install, operate and maintain devices on all irrigation pumps/egmpment designed to automatically
shop irrigation activities during precipitation. This condition does not apply to manors spreaders or other
equipment pulled by manned vehicles. The Devices to Automatically Stop Irrigation Events form must be
completed and returned to the Division of Water Quality within one hundred twenty days from receipt of NPDES
General Permit
The Animal Facility Annual Certification Form must be completed and returned to the Division of Water Quality
by March 1, 2004.
Submit the Devices to Automatically Stop Irrigation Events form and the Animal Facility Annual Certification
form to:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Non -Discharge CompliamcelEnforcement Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
cp A survey of the sludge accumulation in all lagoons is regnired within one year of receiving the NPDES general
permit and COC (by April 9, 2004) and every year thereafter. Contact your local extension office for guidance on
performing and recording the sludge accumulation survey.
cp All waste application equipment .must be tested and calibrated at least once per year. The results must be
documented on forms provided by, or approved by, the Division.
cp The permittee must maintain monthly stocking records for the facility and matte the records available for review
by the Department and EPA
(p Precipitation events must be monitored and recorded by type (rain, snow, etc.) and amount
(p The maximum waste level in lagoons/storage ponds shall not exceed that specified in the CAWMI' (lagoon
design). At a minimum, maximum waste level for waste for lagoons/storage ponds must not exceed the level that
provides adequate storage to contain 25 year, 24 hour storm event plus an additional foot of struch ral freeboard.
qp An analysis of the liquid animal waste from the lagoon shall be conducted as close to the time of application as
practical and at least within 60 days (before or after) of the date of application. This analysis shall include the
following parameters. Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Zinc and Copper.
(p Soil analysis is required annually.
943 Washington Square Mail Washington, NC 27889 252-94"481 (Telephone) 252-946-9215 (Fax)

q) The following records are required: off -site solids removal, maintenance, repair, rain fall, freeboard, animal
stocking and mortality, past inspections, applied commercial fertilizer, waste application equipment cahl ation,
sludge survey, wastelsoil analysis and land irrigation records. These records should be maintained by the facility
ownerlmanager in chronological and legible form for a minimum of three (3) years.
(p Land application rates shall be in accordance with the CAWW. In no Ole shall kind application rates MpgA the
RIM AvailabIg Yi==f r crop or t in ff an en ligation.
cp In accordance with you waste utilization plan, the inigation application events should not exceed the
hydraulic loading as specified per the loll type_and in no
_case should an_irrinatiQn event exceed ongineh per
AL
cp Waste should note be applied on land that is flooded, saturated with water, frozen or snow covered at the
time of land application.
q) All grassed waterways shall have a stable outlet with adequate capacity to prevent ponding or flooding damages.
The outlet can be another vegetated channel, an earth ditch, stabilization smicture, or other suitable outlets.
q) It is suggested to keep crop yield information for future use to update your waste management plan. You need
three years of crop yield data before your plan can be updated.
(p An inspection of the waste collection, treatment and storage structures and runoff control measures shall be
conducted at a frequency to insure proper operation but at least monthly and after storm events. For ex lagoon,
storage ponds and other structures should be inspected for evidence of erosion, leakage, damage by animals or
discharge. Any major structural repairs (to lagoons or waste storage ponds) must have written documentation from
a technical specialist certifying proper design and installation. However, if a piece of equipment is being replaced
with a piece of equipment of the identical specifications, no technical specialist approval is necessary [Le, piping,
reels, valves, pumps (if the GPM capacity is not being 'increased or decreased.), etc.].
cp The OIC has the duties to ensure that waste is applied in accordance with the CAWMP and General Permit by
properly managing, supervising, and documenting daily operation and maintenance. The OIC also has the
responsibility to certify monitoring and reporting information. The failure of an OIC to perform his/her duties can
result in a letter of reprimand, suspension of certification, or revocation of certificates.
Thank you for your assistance and cooperation during the inspection. If you have any questions, please contact your
Technical Specialist or me at 252-946-W1, ext. 321.

lim
jType of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review Q Lagoon Evaluation I
(Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 40 126 Date of Visit: 1-22-2004 Time: lO:QD
Q Not Operational O Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified 0 Conditionally Certified 13 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .................
FarmName: Txiph.M.Fams............................................................................................ County:Gr'CCxtP .............................................. WA►RO.......
Owner Name: j.Qh L&.ShcD........................ McLaw.karn ............................................. Phone No: 252:-.7.46.-Z519 ..........................................................
Mailing Address: 9.S.S. ix S.#atiQm.Road...................................................................... RUkutall.N.C...................................................... 25.53.8 .............
FacilityContact: ..............................................................................Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
Onsite Representative: Shea.McLaYxhoril.................................................................... Integrator: Erelmiulm..S1UAArd.FU.M.Qj.N. 0r.th ...........
Certified Operator.joha.%.................................. M.r.Lembar0................................... Operator Certification Number:16.41.7 .............................
Location of Farm:
ntersection of SR 1408 and 1405 1237 Fire Station Road A,
r
® Swine ❑ Poultry '❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude Longitude 7T • 30 24 �
Design Current.
Design Current
Design Current
Swine. Capacity Population-,
Poultry
Capacity Population Cattle
Capacity Population
® Wean to Feeder
4160
4140
❑ Layer
❑ Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Non -Layer I
1
10 Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
4,160
❑ Gilts
Total SSLW
124,$00
❑ Boars
Number of Lagoons 1-• 1
Discharges & Stream Imnacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify D WQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes % No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure i Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ...................................
Freeboard (inches): 31

f
1
t
Lonrtnueu
Facility Number: 40-126 Date of Inspection 1-2Z-2004
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
S. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN [:)Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Graze) Corn, Soybeans, Wheat Fescue (Hay) Small Grain Overseed
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ® No
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below []Yes ®No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
19. is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ Yes ® No
Air Quality representative immediately.
many,}
❑ Field Copy ® Final Notes
IThe COC was on site
The soil sample was pulled on 5-22-03 and lime was applied in October of 2003. Another sample was pulled in early Jan 2004
Waste analysis: 12-17-03 = 1.1
9-9-03 = 0.95
5-19-03 = 1.7
2-4-03 = 1.2
The irrigation records are complete and balanced out.
LI
.i
Reviewer/Inspector Name ;M
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
r 11
Date: f .369 D�

12112103 Continued
Facility Number: 40-126 Date of Inspection 1-22-2QQ4
Reauired Records & Documents
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ® No
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(iel WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ® No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
® No
25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
® No
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
®No
27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
®Na
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
®No
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
®No
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 3I-35)
❑ Yes
® No
31. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
❑ Yes
❑ No
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No.
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below, ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Stocking Form ❑ Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfall ❑ Inspection After V Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
looks Great!

Technical Assistance Site Visit Report
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Natural Resources Conservation Service
O Soil and Water Conservation District
O Other...
Facility Number 40 - 12fi Date: 9R2103 Time: 1 1030 Time On Farm: 50 WARO
Farm Name Triple M Farms County Greene
Mailing Address 955 Fire Station Road
Onsite
Representative Shea McLawhorn/Michele Christensen
Type Of Visit
Operation Review
Compliance Inspection (pilot only)
Technical Assistance
Confirmation for Removal
❑ No Animals -Date Last Operated:
❑ Operating below threshold
IN Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse
Design Current
Capacltv Population
® Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
4160
4160
Hookerton NC
Phone: [phone]
Integrator jPremium Standard Farms
Purpose Of Visit
® Routine
O Response to DWQ/DENR referral
O Response to DSWC/SWCD referral
O Response to complaint/local referral
O Requested by producer/integrator
O Follow-up
O Emergency
O Other...
Design Current
Capacity Population
❑ Layer
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
28538
GENERAL QUESTIONS:
1. Is waste discharging from any part of the operation and reaching surface waters or wetlands? ❑ yes ® no
2. Is there evidence of a past waste discharge from any part of the operation that waste reached
❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
28538
GENERAL QUESTIONS:
1. Is waste discharging from any part of the operation and reaching surface waters or wetlands? ❑ yes ® no
2. Is there evidence of a past waste discharge from any part of the operation that waste reached
❑ yes ® no
surface waters or wetlands?
3. Does any problem pose an immediate threat to the integrity of the waste structure (large trees,
❑ yes ® no
seepage, severe erosion, etc.)?
4. Is there evidence of nitrogen over application, hydraulic overloading or excessive ponding
❑ yes ® no
requiring DWQ notification?
5 Is there evidence of improper dead animal disposal that poses a threat to the environment
❑ yes ® no
and/or public health?
6. Is the waste level within the structural freeboard elevation range for any waste structure? ❑ yes ® no
Structurel Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier
Level (Inches) 1 38
CROP TYPES lCoastal Bermuda -graze I Icorn Soybean Wheat Small grain overseed
SPRAYFIELD
SOIL TYPES Ra
NoA
7. What type of technical assistance does the onsite representative feel is needed? (list in comment section)
03/10/03

�J
Facility Number 40 _ 126 Date:
9P22103
PARAMETER
® No assistance provided/requested
❑ 8. Waste spill leaving site
❑ 9. Waste spill contained on site
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE Needed
Provided
❑ 10. Level in structural freeboard
25. Waste Plan Revision or Amendment
❑
❑
[111. Level in storm storage
26. Waste Plan Conditional Amendment
❑
❑
27. Review or Evaluate Waste Plan wlproducer
❑
❑
❑ 12. Waste structure integrity compromised
❑ 13. Waste structure needs maintenance
28. Forms Need (list In comment section)
❑
❑
29. Missing Components (list In comments)
❑
❑
❑ 14. Over application >= 10% & 10 lbs.
30. 21i.0200
❑
[115. Over application < 10% or < 10 lbs,
re -certification
❑ 16. Hydraulic overloading
31. Five & Thirty day Plans of Action (PoA)
❑
❑
32. Irrigation record keeping assistance
❑
❑
❑ 17. Deficient irrigation records
❑ 18. Late/missing waste analysis
33. Organ izelcomputerization of records
❑
❑
❑ 19. Latelmissing lagoon level records
❑ 20. Latelmissing soils analysis
34. Sludge Evaluation
❑
❑
❑ 21. Crop needs improvement
35. Sludge or Closure Plan
❑
❑
[122. Crop inconsistent with waste plan
36. Sludge removallclosure procedures
❑
❑
37. Waste Structure Evaluation
❑
❑
❑ 23. Irrigation maintenance deficiency
❑ 24. Deficient sprayfieid conditions
38. Structure Needs Improvement
❑
❑
39.Operation & Maintenance Improvements
❑
❑
40. Marker checklcalibration
❑
❑
Regulatory Referrals
41. Site evaluation
❑
❑
❑ Referred to DWQ Date:
42. Irrigation Calibration
❑
❑
❑ Referred to NCDA Date:
❑ Other...
43. Irrigation system deslgnlinstallation
❑
El
Date:
44. Secure irrigation information (maps, etc.)
❑
❑
LIST IMPROVEMENTS
45.Operating improvements (pull signs, etc.)
❑
❑
MADE BY OPERATION
46. Wettable Acre Determination
❑
❑
1
47. Evaluate WAD certificationlrechecks
❑
❑
48. Crop evaluation/recommendations
❑
❑
purchased new irrigation pump
2,
49. Drainage worklevaluation
❑
❑
50. Land shaping, subsoiling, aeration, etc.
51. Runoff control, stormwater diversion, etc.
❑
El❑
❑
3.
52. Buffer Improvements
❑
❑
53. Field measurements(GPS, surveying, etc.)
❑
❑
4.
54. Mortality BMPs
❑
❑
55. Waste operator education (NPDES)
❑
❑
5.
56. Operation & maintenance education
❑
❑
57. Record keeping education
❑
❑
6
58. Cropfforage management education
❑
❑
59. Sail and/or waste sampling education
❑
❑
03/10/03

Facility Number 40 _ 126 Date; 1 9/22/03
MMENTS:
wu oatea May i , zuus ana on sne.
lake records available for 5 years.
Facility has secured irrigation design including parameters to match waste plan. 15.28 wetted acres pull #1=9.075 acres
nd pull #2=6.21 acres. Wetted acre recheck is complete and information will be entered into data base.
Waste analysis dated 9/9/03 nitrogen is 0.96 Ibs/1000 gallons
5/19/03 nitrogen is 1.7 Ibs/1000 gallons
2/14/03 nitrogen is 1.0 Ibs/1000 gallons
12/12/02 nitrogen is 1.1 Ibs/1000 gallons
6/6/02 nitrogen is 1.3 Ibs11000 gallons
Soil test dated 5/22103. l kmFraquirementscto be.met.fall-of 2003'for,caastal.bermudaVasture. -Cu and Zn within guidelines.
temember to take soil test for 2003 row crops and place in record book.
Need to check corn PAN rates on Norfolk soil WUP uses 125 Ibs/acre.
Commercial fertilizer deducted from IRR2 balances.
IRR2 records are complete and balanced.
Farm is well maintained.
Receiving crops in good condition.
Drops in lagoon are consistent with irrigation events.
TECHNICAL SPECIALIST Imartn McLawhorn
SIGNATURE
3 03/10/03

Division of Water Quality
'!D Divhlan of Soil.aad Water Conservation
. " 0 OthET A icy > .
IType of Visit ®'Compliance inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit tld Routine 0 Complaint Q Follow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number AID tyG bate of Visit: Time % 5
Not O erational 9 Below Threshold
Permitted 0 Certified [3 Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last OperSXILLx_l
or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: �r'ip_la M _ Fa,,:,s r. _ . - County.
Owner Name: _�JZnhrt . � cS o CLaw k-c nr t2 Phone No: 2-5 Z- -7L14 - 7-55 ej
Mailing Address: 5 Ant- � l<Lr n% $z S39
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative: 1'�d►"�
Certified Operator: 2 h ►, 1" e h --
Location of Farm:
Phone No:
Integrator: 7 5 P a IQ C'
Operator Certification Number: = ! 7
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 0a 0 " Longitude De 1 0"
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Ca acity tPo ulation Poultry Capacity Po ulation Cattle Capacity .Po ulation
Wean to Feeder j D 1 + ❑ La er FP —Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer I I JE1 Non -Dal
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑;—oars j _.
Tots
Number of Lagoons j� ' ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ La oon Area 10 S rav Field Area 1
HoldlnPonds 1'Soiiii ,TrapsE `
; . ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a, If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4, Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches):
05103101
❑ Yes IICJ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
,.�E}'�Io
L71vo
❑ Yes
No
Structure 6
Continued

5v . 3 zt
V 9. 3
zQ
Facility Number: 40 — I u Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
❑ Yes
PNo
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
❑ Yes
No
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
�,!
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
El Yes
G2 o
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
Eg o
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
No
Waste Anplication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
E<o
L4{'No
12. Crop type �� SLJJ�6­0
Cps
13. Do the receiving crops differ wit696se designated in the CertificcfAnimal Wastciltatfagement Plan (CAWMP .
❑ es
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
I5. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
[}hfo
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
0-lo
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
El Yes
CJ No
Er
18. Does the ffap�ility fail to have all corn onents of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
Oe/ Wle, checklists; desiS.ff; s, etc.)
❑ Yes
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ inrigatifreeb d to an is & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
❑ No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
92<o
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
0-90--
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
ElYes
n
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
�10
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
10
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
ElYes
05; o
10 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit,
Comments ) y YES aiiswers any recommendations or any tsther c_om a
eto
_ments. __
Use dra►viie(s of facili n. sitvat�lons. (use addit�ona
b. �h' iie#ter, ex Lati
, .ps 4ipages;as necessary) 'El Field Conv ❑ Final Notes
f a A
ACV)
4�3
1..
,S4-&r p t'`'"" ��t. aura •c-a ••- r i
1 Z-o z - I . l j 65 ; ,6 - � o z - 1. 3 1 bo I 31-o z - +. 3 l 4,s
r
1lQ�oo[v� -
Reviewer/Inspector Name ; h �•
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: -0 Z
05103101 C1 Continued

Facility Dumber: -- 12h J Date of Inspection LLE
Q.4—Or Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
2T Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ,_, 0
El Yes OX0
❑ Yes 2<o
❑ Yes Nio
ElYes - o
❑ Yes ❑ No
Additional Conimients and/orMrawin s:
r �
tr,r
VW
05103101

Type of Visit O Compliance inspection (I)Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit OO Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number qp l2h Date of Visit: 5/29/2W2 Time: 13iio
Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
E3 Permitted ❑ Certified 0 Conditionally Certified E3 Registered pate Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: lrliplc.'[.Farma.......................................................................................... .. County: Grnjap.........
V;M �Z
Owner Name: dulttLA.Sh9a........................MrLawlwm ............................................. Phone No:(252).7.46.-.2559 .......................................................
Mailing Address: 2SS.j'.Itsv.SltaA uijjb&d....................................................................... Hne wAMNG...................................................... 2853F..............
FacilityContact: .............................................................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
Onsite Representative: J9hn&SJwA.M&awJtl0.t VJAmmy.1fiK............................ Integrator: PmIatJium.Sla<Iltlard.Far m..of.N .ariti...........
Certified Operator:,Iuhm.B.. .................................. AEI'.c1.1lnhorm................................... Operator Certification Number: .16.417..............................
Location of Farm:
Intersection of SR 1408 and 14051237 Fire Station Road +
E,r
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude Longitude 77' ° 30 24 fi
Pesign Current ; Design : Current Design:. Curreui
Swine . Ca aci Po ` ul:ttion Poultry _ Ca ae t� Population Cattle Capacity PopWatfon
® Wean to Feeder
4150
0
❑ Feeler to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Fouler
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes ®No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the couveyance roan -made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is ohscrved, did it reach W at: r of the State'? (tf ycs. notify DWQ) ❑ Yes d No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaVrnin?
d. Dac d14C 1largu l?VpiltiS a lagef011 ti}`Stelri? (Ifyes rtotily DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse: impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure I Structurc 2 Sinlcturc 3 Structure: 4 Structure S Structure G
Identifier: .......................................................................................................................................................... .....................
freeboard(inches):...............3.3...................................................................

05103101
Facility Number: 40-126
Date of inspection 5/29/2002
Continued
5. Are there any inuilediate threats to the inlegrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not property addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintcuance/improvewent?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improveruent?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
I I . Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ flydraulic Overload
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Graze) Small Grain Overseed Corn, Soybeans, Wheat
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management PIan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre detennination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ic/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector tail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
[]'Yes ®No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ® No
[j No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
;a "`"� , a. ' :°z'° ,. _':. " _ -_ _ •. •.. .. _=' ....'., - - �..��::..,...m..... ... • •_.,......•�...., ...�. 's- ....-...� . ....... ... ..:f... .....,.cz...a: ^.......... o .a,..,.-a::ot-:.; iG.:kt�.,: S...xi., ... :N
❑ field Copy ❑ Final Notes
*Facility in process of being repop. at time of inspection.
*General permit and COC dated 6/20/0I and on site.
*New waste analysis taken 5/20102 no results.
*Waste analysis dated 1/31102 nitrogen is 1.3 lbs/1000 gallons
10/10/01 nitrogen is 0.65 Ibs/1000 gallons
*Soil test dated 3/11/02 lime was applied at recommended rates by GPS maps. Cu and Zu within guidelines.
*Lagoon level is recorded weekly.
Reviewerltnspector Name Martin Mcr�awho ;- i iE art E r g.
j ya.
U.—awan/rnena t"r Ctanafn�•n• llo+a•

05103101 Continued
Facility Number: 40--126 hate of Inspection 5/29/2002
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
I'Additional,.Comments'and/or.lDrawings:�'-:,:,-I::;
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yea 50 No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
*Need to rebalance PAN for corn when new waste analysis is received. Remember to deduct commercial fertilizer from PAN balances. 6
*Row crops end coastal bennuda field appear in good condition.
18. Missing irrigation design and parameters to snatch waste plan. Need to contact tech spec. Unable to complete WA recheck.
7. Need to mow/spray for weeds on inside dike walls to allow for routine and visual inspections.
*Continue to work on establishing vcg. on dike walls.

'11�
• #9j
Facility Number Date of Visit: 5/3/Z041 Time: 804 Printed on: 6/13/2001
p Not Operational p Below res o
p Permitted 0 Certified p Conditionally Certified p Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ••.....
Farm Name: Triple M Farms
County: Gr=ne............................................... .WAKO.......
Owner Name: John McLawhorn Phone No: [phone]
Mailing Address: 9.SS.Fire.Stafian.Raad....................................................................... Haokerton.NC............................................ :......... 28538 ..............
FacilityContact:...............................................................................Title:............................................................... Phone No:....................................................
Onsite Representative:,Lobuxty..McLawhorn............................................................... Integrator: L.L.Muirpihrey..C.Qmpany..................................
Certified Operator:Jab.n..S................................... McUwhnra ................................... Operator Certification Number: U417..............................
Location of Farm:
Intersection of SH 1408-and 1405 1237 Vire Station Road
® Swine p Poultry p Cattle p Horse Latitude ©• ®4 ©" Longitude ©•
Design.,,' Current -Design; Current Design ',Current
Capacity" Population Poultry-, , � Capacity Population Cattle Capacity' Population
® Wean to Feeder
p Feeder to Finisfi
p Farrow to Wean
Farrow to ee er
0 Farrow to Finis
p Gilts
p Boars
p Layer I I, , p atry
113 Non -Layer I lo on- airy
p Other
-,'Total `,D egign"Ca 0adty ` 4,160
Total SSLW,. 124,800
j'.IV­ ,� nhnr,nr.°i'.nannric {,..tl I ; { ...-,P..3 n u surface rams resent p agoon Area p pray to rc:�
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: t3 Lagoon p Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (if yes, notify D WQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
p Yes I& No
p Yes 1@ No
p Yes M No
p Yes fly No
p Yes Z No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? t7 Yes I& No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? p Spillway p Yes ® No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3- Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
1
vl
Identifier:
Freeboard(inches)a2...................................................................................................................................................................................................

e
ace ity Number: 40_ 126 Date of Inspection ® Printed on: 6/13/2001
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ❑ No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? p Yes a No
(If any of questions'4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenancelimprovement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? p Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum Iiquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes N No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes a No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding p PAN 13 HydrauIic Overload ❑ Yes H No
12. Crop type Bermuda Pasture Small Grain Overseed Corn, Soybeans, Wheat
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? p Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? p Yes ® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ®No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? 13 Yes ®No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes U N o
Reouired Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
p Yes
N No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
a No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
eg No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
p Yes
a No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
a No
23.
Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
p Yes
®No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
®No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ® No
p No violations or deficiencies were noted urmg this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about is vise .
Cominenq"E(r`e%r=#o gaesEior #)Ezplala=any E$,aaswers and/a p�y'n �hrggommenda ions�or;3any tither com ncn#s, ,; h9 , r,
Use`dawmgs of f>3cihty to _better explaui=situafioris (use additionahpages as necessary) Field Copy ❑Final No'tesr
...� .,.a, I ::.«,.i-�4•d,:� ...a.,e»......s ...�«...;._d.«...r,-��— ..., __. ........ _:.c ...r�:.J...,a:,....�,;.. n 1 ,... �.... �.�n....:� ti.4! _.wA .�:�� ,kai..x..�.. �, - _..�'. .RT�."'!R'."�'7YT� ^'_"'_':'9-v'., . u ..�
records available for review.
Naste analysis 4/24/01 '= 1.4 Ibs; 10/12/00 = 1.1 Ibs
Soil analysis up through 2001 available. Lime has been applied.
Naste plan dated 12/12100.
Field 1348 - 4A - 7(WUP) Total acres 24.9
Field 1348 - 4B - 9.9 (WUP)
rrigation records are complete and balanced out. SEE PAGE 3
Lyre B 4 on ,enrebyAn.Reviewer/Inspector Name ndl,
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

05103101
Contilulad
[Facility Number: 40126 Date of Inspection ® Printed on: 61131200.
Odor Issues
26, Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or Iagoon fail to discharge at/or below 0 Yes ® No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? t3 Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (Le. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, p Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? p Yes M No
30, Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) p Yes ® No
31, Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? p Yes a No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanentitemporary cover? p Yes p No
i� Silaai�iuti!!t; N�4"4�"&�dP.ii�3;aitttiL•`.ni.:iI.�rbcA;ria. &:..ga<Stl�C�.�a:�ti'I n�Cke-atr�iY�ti1'��L.i�Fi�it..s.4-_nr iA:rs4si�fdi€...e%3aw��a3aa7C!+�ir`.a %+w E„� roa; i- "?
Freeboard levels are'.recorded weekly-la'srequitedis - �g'
y�e#" r� �4'+?y'7•....+•«rl�i-
Records-are well organized x(r��,��
)MI. i3 } �% �
Grounds are well kept: L r� ; k" s� are�,,� yr
! 1 •� � � �.a,� ATER
rF rt•. '-i�. .. -_1 a 'r- r —r �'� •e asp -....�- .-y-r«•t+%^- ..n--� +-►•er "r i
y fidde are well established ��6r-
f r itSprai
If you have`any questions, contar�d.t_:yo echnlcal 5peclalist�or�us,atr252�946
. SY �,
.. r p ,� S'A,. rJF f .r
, , + •
Fi •t - -,6aL s.:�-s.@;.K 'F�^' w: } r`w n`' 4.+'"��oa«-t"
+ 4`}'.. I_ �!-}�7`�''kL "77'�'•s s r{y.,.''.riaw gym'++c.�'-
. r ` r ; z•: Y3 'tp,f S:.'ti:r r. v '��� ^ ''�'4" "+�('� 'i r i..�a. g- A ,may, rii Sa.-;:..�•.
,..; 1. - ' m. r.+ •,...n�� ! ..�� i ,%Y�� r.. �rp�i� r+.- a. ...r r
��~ y� a ''s.1-r• i ,S �, a
--
�'7
' _ 4 ..x � r � r a�,.,��.,�,�-,r+4r'4^.+e-'F .Yzac"z^a�. •�.��.""�° r {. Y
yrKi ,ter
-.q. .�-:-a1- .nySr�h xt''�t° qi1J-?uls7,^��•k P.rta r'vs�hita erJ -
IT,
C ,
q^r''
Zl
'�°irfw a'r r•' 7 - I
�JS'
nu
17:
w +1' y�;P 'tJn "M1,f7� fir- ly � '� f �• i�� 11. ��r'�r..M1r.S.� "Fr" .S'r "�
� `� r.•'� �� � ' ! ; � ! 7 .•c„ ?�'�il lt'�'-� � ,=,:�k"� � .fir - � j�,s,�'; � �
a
�
a ' l n i J y+3 _I, f a rat- , i-", ^'r rt _ • R.';�,`.} '�J ... '< y,}
I.f s
�p"L.ic e� F.,.-.- µ. vxa r`i.�+, � �'• � �"'y�f. rl �"" ;���.«r � rp x s u•t 3f'"'• a 1, -
It
y
IA�,rv�ryz _ Sc ..��; �,h pi � iasr� r• s�-EtT�'Ct ��,+ +�fr�, ..
� kas � - - _ 1:j i �, - _.+e,'�r �-k�z i�-iy,-y'u�''Y�p�� '- •r •Fa _- ': .t? �i� +'�'*r ..
< s +-rs er�iIt1Y'S '`nEitli-1,�'r 'it.:i'7-ar+At.„iFi �t r
} L4..r�`L +'hY�7T�3}!/r
,*.. x'
C _ ;,..- � -.ws r_ - �p•,1t �l3�.YF.grk1,�-"�•!�,..�..c.'
rv---"'--•."-..:�� .- ram•:•--�y�. ...~-:,.r!' G elY"i'St Cdr. �i�.�v',�ai I
� 4' r' r��, ��� ��t�Yn rlY��w1..t<�"Y� �t. � �4a9•wZ� _� 45V+ ��„'�'°'s 7�' ,..:_.:... ._ f
;• .�' f z ut' r '�°C! "'ryl�i t ..1. n` 1.�.,+,.. "ia. m,,. r y u

c" Division of Water'Quality
O Division of Soil aritl Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit U Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit © Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 40 126 Date of Visit 5/12/2000 Printed on: 5/16/2000
Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
© Permitted ® Certified © Conditionally Certified 13 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold; ....................
FarmName: Tr1pa£XFArWN............................................................................................ County: G.0 g!<1............................................... Al Q.......
OwnerName:,IlRbtl......................................... MfjAW.,,hmCja............................................. Phone No: { ,5��.7.91t�- S9........................................................
FacilityContact: ..............................................................................Title:................................................................ Phone No:.,.................................................
Mailing Address: Rt.j.JD[tX..SB........................... ... .. RQoker.tQa.XC...................................................... 2JR53.8 .............
Onsite Representative:,Jt�O.IY�L=jaA?Xblt?JCd#........................................................... . Integrator:CArQjjAA..#.r a....................... ........ .............................
Certified Operator: ,Jobla.D...................................XcLoxUrm ................................... Operator Certification Number:j§.417.............................
Location of Farm:
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 • 26 4 33 {' Longitude 7T •F 30 24T
Design Current
Swine Canacity Ponulation
® Wean to Feeder
4160
4160
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
Cl Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity . 4,160
Total SSLW 124,800
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ID Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds 1 Solid Traps ❑ No Li uid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Imnaets
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ®No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes IN No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ®No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:.......105121SA................................................................................................
........ .......... .......... ................... ............... ................
............
Freeboard (inches): 32

Continued on back
Facility Number: 40-12b Date of Inspection 5112/2Ut}t} Printed on: 5/16/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ® No
(if any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Yes ® No
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda Small Grain Overseed
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
0 �46•vi6lations:ordefcien:cies-Wv te;noted:during•thisvisit::Ytit>I:Will:reeeivenoiurtheir"-
correspondenceebout this•visit..... • . .......
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
vVaste analysis 0.77 Ibs.11000 gals. 3/24/00
17. Not yet permitted.
411 records of the CAWMP are complete. Irrigation records complete with nitrogen balance.
Reviewer/Inspector Name
iDanhne B. Cullom Entered by Ann Tyndall
F%_'.. G -1-7 - 00

Reviewer/inspector Signature: Date:
Facility Number: 40-126 Date of Inspection 5/12/2000 Printed on: 5/16/2000
Odor Issues
26.
Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
❑ Yes
❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27.
Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
® No
28.
Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
❑ Yes
® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29.
Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
❑ Yes
® No
30.
Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
❑ Yes
® No
31.
Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
❑ Yes
® No
32.
Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes
❑ No
mments a
J

Q Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Operation Review
Q Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Compliance Inspection
Division of Water Quality - Compliance Inspection
Q Other Agency - Operation Review
Je Routine Q Complaint Q Follow-up of DWQ inspection Q Follow-up of DSWC review Q Other �
Facility Number 40 12C Date of Inspection 6/16199
Time of Inspection 9:30 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Q Permitted ® Certified Q Conditionally Certified Q Registered U Not O erational Date Last Operated: ..........................
Farm Naine: Tritple.M.Farms................................................................................... ......... County: G.rQVXj!'! C.............................................. ARQ.......
OwnerName: dahu......................................... MCLJIWta�t�m............................................. Phone No: (2521.24-2559........................................................
FacilityContact: ..............................................................................Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
MailingAddress: I;t..RX.SQA ........................................................................................ 11RAkcCiRA1. 4N...................................................... 28.53.8 .............
Onsite Representative: Shm.lYJ.cLattxhum..................................................................... Integrator: L.L.Humbra..CQ,,..............................................
Certified Opera tor:J,9bU,B................................... 1Y,1,QL&'WhQxb,,,, Operator Certification Number:16.417
Location of Farm:
...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................I A6
Ifxttx��kiQat. nf.kt .144�i.lIt.� 4R5..
Latitude 35 a 26F-3-371, Longitude 7T ' 30 2446
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
® Wean to Feeder 4t60 4160
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Layer
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Other
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Dairy
Total Design Capacity 4,160
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons 0 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps 0 ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Imnacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes [:]No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway Yes ® No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(inches)...............43................ .............................. ......................................... .................................... .................................... ....................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on hack
Printed an 5/0/ 000

Printed on 5/9/2000
(Facility Number: 40--126 I Date of Inspection 6/16199
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Yes ® No
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Small Grain Overseed Corn
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
10 violatioris:ar:deficiencies rvere:noted:during this wisit::Y6t *i11:r0eive no furtlie'r
....correspondence about this.visit.
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
z
Reviewer/Inspector Name ,Carl Dunn Entered by Ann Tyndall
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

N Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Operation Review
© Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Compliance Inspection
0 Division of Water Quality - Compliance Inspection
0 Other Agency - Operation Review
Routine Q Complaint Q Follow-up of DWQ inspection Q Follow-up of DSWC review Q Other
Facility Number 40 l26 Date of Inspection 4/13/99
Time of Inspection 935 24 hr. (hh:mm)
13 Permitted ® Certified E3 Conditionally Certified 13 Registered Not O erational Date Last Operated: ..........................
Farm Name: Tr1p11KXFArms........................ ........ County: G.r.Qlrjgl:............................................... WAR .......
Owner Name: JttbA......................................... M!~AAwbara..................................... ... Phone No:(2521.T4b-25S9.............................. ..... ..........................
Facility Contact: ..........................
Mailing Address: ................
Onsite Representative:.Sttg&.jy,1CLILWhgxO
Title:. ..................
PhoneNo: ..........................
............................................................. loanUrxawn.. C.................................................. MOB .............
....... Integrator: L.L.Hur9bra..CA1m-Pany..................................
Certified Operator:J.&a.a................................... 1YCLAYKfJlta................................... Operator Certification Number:J,6.41.7 .............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude 357• 26 33 Longitude 7T • 30 24 46
Design Current
Swine Canacitv Ponulation
® Wean to Feeder
4160
50
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer I I❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer I J❑Non-Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 4,160
Total SSLW 124,800
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds 1 Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(inches) ............... 3.3 ................ .................................... ................................... .................................... .................................... ....... I .................... I .......
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes (9 No
seepage, etc.}
3/23199 Continued on back ,
Printed on 51411' 000

Printed on 5/9/2000
(Facility Number: 40-126 I Dale of Inspection 4/13/99
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
❑ Yes
® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
®No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
® No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
IL Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
❑ Yes
® No
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Graze) Small Grain Overseed Corn, Soybeans, Wheat
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
® Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
® No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
®No
16. is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes ®No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes ® No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes ® No
20, is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes ®No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes ® No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes ®No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes ® No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes ®No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes ®No
' No-vio1ati6fis.or deficiencies-Were'noted'd:using• thig Agit. ' Ydu' *i11'r0eeive n6 furtlie'r '
.-.,correspondence about this visit.
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
" Recommend signing up for local Neuse Rule options by 8/1 /99 with the Greene Soil & Water Conservation District +
Mailed Integrator Registration card with copy of this Review report to owner of facility
7. Monitor bare areas on dike walls particularly back comer and make efforts to vegetate if grass cover does not fill in
14. Operation did not pass 75% rule and needs both a wettable acre determination and plan amendment. When plan is amended to
wettable acres, also need to include row crops into permanent tables of waste plan
15. Rye needs to be grazed down - contact technical specialist for additional restrictions for 100 lbs PAN rates for small grain
Waste sample dated 1/8/99 at 1.5 lbs/1000 gal. Soils report dated 3/12/99 - lime has been applied
Reviewer/Inspector Name jPat Hooper 2521946-6481
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and
Natural Resources
Washington Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Mr. John McLawhorn
Triple M Farms
Rt. 1, Box 58
Hookerton, NC 28538
I !,WA
LTZ40
DENR
NC
-ROI-INA
ENVIRC )NMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
October 6, 1998
SUBJECT: Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
Triple M Farms
Fac. No. 40-126
Greene County
Dear Mr. McLawhorn:
On June 23, 1998, I conducted an Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection at the
referenced facility. Overall, the operation was found to be in satisfactory condition. A
copy of the inspection report is attached for your review.
In general, this inspection includes verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified Animal
Waste Management PIan (CAWMP); (2) the farm is complying with requirements of the
State Rules 15 NCAC 2H.0217, Senate Bill 1217, and the Certified Animal Waste
Management Plan; (3) the farm operation's waste management system is being operated
properly under the direction of a Certified Operator; (4) the required records are being
kept; (5) there are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or runoff.
The recommendations and/or comments regarding your inspection can be found in the
comment section of the attached inspection form. It is very important as the owner and
Operator in Charge that you address any noted concerns, as soon as possible. For
assistance, please contact your Technical Specialist and/or the local Soil & Water
Conservation District Office.
943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, North Carolina 27889
Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

Page 2
Triple M Farms
October 6, 1998
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance during the inspection. Should you have
further questions or comments regarding this inspection, do not hesitate to call me at
[phone], ext. 321.
Sincerely,
e) - Lai
Daphne B. Cullom
Environmental Specialist II
cc: Greene County SWCD Office
Mike Regans, Greene County NCCES
Jake Barrow, L.L. Murphrey Company
WaRO

Facility Number �_® Date of Inspection
Time of inspection � 24 hr. (hh:mm)
13 Registered E Certified p Applied for Permit p Permitted 0 Not Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: T.ripk H.Far a& ....................... ................................................. County: Greene WARO
.... ................ .
Owner Name:John........................................ M..&awhor L............................................ Phone No: 4252.).246-2559.......................................................
Facility Contact: ..................................................................... ..Title: .. Phone No:
MailingAddress: RU..Box.58............................................................................................. Haokertav aAC................................................... 2853x..............
Onsite Representative: Shea.McLawhnrn.................................................................... Integrator, LL.Murphrey.Umpany..................................
Certified Operator:JnhjLB................................... McLawhnrn ................................... Operator Certification Number: 164.1.'2..............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude ©•®6 ©46 Longitude ©• ®' ®66
A (p
�(Ei
k I
estgn urren 3 , ;r ,,3
E r,-
F.: esign urren ti, w„3 =j estgni k urren
I ...:.
`Swineilr
33 {e� 3
I - d :I.w(
CapacttyPapulatonEoultry
Capacity Papulathan'° Cattlet w; Capacity Population ,
�r ...
,f
4160
f7 airy
r.i C] on_ any
4:
�pE
r '; ,
Total Design Capacity; ,
;.
t
ri4i=
Boars
Total SSLW ,
1F!
:3Y-...... ....... ..
..
E
E i t�=r.
I �.
umberFofLagoonsl'Holdtng�Pondili �p
a
Subsurface rains Presentp agoon rea 13 pray FieldArea
�T��
o. LiquidWaste Management System
.... _,•tt.�...i.,.. :..14.Y
:h_A 3. t•.,.a r+..r..
,.... �t;,r.....u..aiW._.rr•.z.i.0 dl:.�.•�.,.,.r..��:l.1'..
•w,....:....._...w.:GA...G...,ii....a...i R.�..`rH
® can to Feeder
p Feeder to mts
� Farrow t0 Can
p arrow to Feeder
p Farrow to mtsh
p Gilts
�
General
p
ayer
p
on-
ayer
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? p Yes ® No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon ❑ Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes []No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) f7 Yes p No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) Yes p No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes ®No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? p Yes N No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require p Yes ®No
maintenance/improvement?
b. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? p Yes ®No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? p Yes ®No
7/25/97

Be ty Number: Date of Inspection
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons.Holdinp_ Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Freeboard (ft): 2.5 ft.
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
0 Yes
® No
p Yes
® No
Structure 5 Structure 6
...............................................................
p Yes
® No
p Yes
® No
p Yes
H No
p Yes
® No
p Yes
H No
15. Crop type .....Coasts 3zrmuda.Grass ............................... Rye ......................... ....... Corn.(Mage.&.Grain)..................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? p Yes ® No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only.
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
Q .. o-via ions.or erencies,were.note u"g Is Ylslt., . YonwUl.receive nor fuFMe_r-. .
Cefi�espo� a e� a�vu� :t�iiS 1'isit: .. .. .. :
p Yes H No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ® No
p Yes H No
p Yes p No
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
...a_ �;<, .,,,_ .�i'i..�.s e,€€ax.�.`�sa��.. a..�_�..�..�,�a,. �t�.��r+i�»-, rbl.. ..•x�..?,'pa°.� ,N�
Date:

Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑Other Agency `
vision of Water Quality
:::vP
10'Routine O Complaint ' O Follow-up of D«'Q inspection 0 Follow-ueof DSWC review O Other �
Date of Inspection
Facility Number 1140
_J Time of Inspection D= U 24 hr. (hh:mm)
© Registered lf—C"ertified © Applied for Permit 0 Permitted 10 Not Opera Date Last Operated: ..........................
Farm Name: .... ..i.V..yL.... vsk....�t11.�N11��-� ........................................................ County:..��R.R.�I�s..ti..r..........................
Owner Name• Phone No�L` —5
...1_._,,-,.r....�...h.............1f {�C .... .An.................... .1.1 ...... ............................... 9..................
Facility Contact:.......s.!-..1'.]l��-L!3�+ �9.4 n.. Title:......�?!�4?!ti?.................................. Phone No:...................................................
Mailing Address:-.: �....X . ��.4 .................. '�C�.QY� A..!!t i) C'......................v�. �8....
/►
Onsitc Representative: ... ...... 1!!.LC`1,................................ Integrator:... r �—�.. �? 4m..�.........,.....
❑
Certified Operator Q Operator Certification Number,,,,,......."...."... ............
Location of Farm:
1. ?S. ......... I ............. !`L.Q..... ......................................................................................................................................................... ........ ..... .... ........ ............ I ...... .............. .
Latitude Longitude.
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Sw• a Capacity Population Poultry ; Capacity Population Cattle Capacity. Population
917vean to Feeder
y 1 y i la Q 1 10 Layer I I ❑ Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish 1 10 Non -Layer I 1 10 Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total.Design CapaC[ty
❑ Gilts u
❑ Boars. Total,SSLW {� pp
.Number of Lagoons [Holding Ponds,'0 ❑ Subsurface Drains Prese�ntjr Lagoon Area I0 Spray Field Area ,
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
EK
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
(Ko
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
U-No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes
2<o
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
❑ Yes
&Ko
maintenance/improvement?
b. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
2'�o
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes
LKNo
7/25/97
Continued on hack

Facility Number:
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures La goons Iloldin Ponds Flush Pits etc.
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Stntcture 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
❑ Yes D_No
❑ Yes 52,16o,
Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(it):........... 3.0... 1M.................................................................................................... ...........
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes ' : `o
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed'? ❑ Yes No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes 'o
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13.
Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers'?
❑ Yes
'o
Waste
Application
14.
Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
L,LJ-NO
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15.
Croptype �, Gi.S- �e r�o� "++�
Yp f..............................................................a........,..,.s,..7.tnA ...,... .............. I ....... c�11V........................,�.....,,.............
16.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
El Yes
D'<
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
,_+I
Q 'ivo
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
Gk<o
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
RKO
20..
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Cl Yes
�o
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ )'es
9 o
22,
Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
Q o
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
Cl Yes
2 tvo
24,
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
DIG
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
0 No vio'latioins or deficiencies were noted during this. visit.- .Yo'u.will re'cei:ve no ftirther
correspondence about this;visit..
Corns nents.(iefer to, question #) „ Explain any YES answers and/ar'tttiv recommendations or any other comments
Usi drawings of facility to better explain situationti. (usc.additional pbges as necessary
1 �L� A t `S. :5 i113 l9s
t�s � e�.e v � � � , a �•e�tr�-�'o,,�. E +�t�a.; v� ,,�a..�n.R.�, ,p ta-�-, � � ,,--�-,'�
NC5WCC
oeiG i o.� ,reed Cav"Tl&L, v.Jj t►.�`i�2oq� �-� balLo-�elL- .
Q 7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

N Division of Soil and Water Conservation p Other Agency
p Division of Water Quality 11
19 Routine p Complaint p o ow -up of DWQ inspection p Follow-up of DSWC review p Other
Date of Inspection
Facility Number
Time of Inspection ® 24 hr. (hh:mm)
p Registered p Certified p Applied for Permit p Permitted JU Not Opera Iona Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: 1ripIA M.Far u............................................................................................ County: Greene WARO
Owner Name- John ........................................ 1?kLawhoxa............................................. Phone No: 919.-.74.6-.2M9 ..........................................................
Facility Contact: Shea-McLawhorn.........................................Title: owner.....
Mailing Address: Rt.1.Box.S8.........................................................
Onsite Representative: .........
Phone No: 9.19.1746-2559.......................
Rnakeirxaut.NC...................................................... 28538 ..............
Integrator: L.L.Muryrey.Hug.Company........................
Certified Operator: Jiah LB...£ ............................... Mel..awhDrix................................... Operator Certification Number: 16412.............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude ©�®� ©�� Longitude
esign Current Design cur1rent Design. _ urren
Swine `` "`Capacity Populationk ° Poultr`y `°; . `x Capacity '`Population Cattle �'Capa6ty!Population
® Wean to Feeder
p Feeder to Finish
p Farrow to Wean
p Farrow to Feeder
p Farrow to Finis
p ME
p Boars
Number of1agoons / HoldingERonds`' 0p Subsurface Drains resen p agoon rea 16 spray Mela Xrea�
p No Liquid Waste Management Sys em I
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? p Yes N No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes ®No
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Fietd p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes N No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes N No
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes ® No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? p Yes B No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require p Yes ® No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? p Yes ® No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? p Yes ® No
7/25/97

Vacility Number: 40_ 126
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
n Yes
® No
Structures (Lagoons, Holding Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.}
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
n Yes
® No
Structurc 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5 Structure
6
Identifier:..........................................................................................................
...................................
......................................................................
Freeboard (Pt): 2.1
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
n Yes
® No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
n Yes
® No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
n Yes
® No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
n Yes
® No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
n Yes
H No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type .... Caastal.Hermuda.(graze). ............ mall.Grain.Duerseod ....... ................. Corm.(grain)........................................ Wheat.......................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? n Yes N No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
Q . �Nyviulations. or erencies*were .nos uring is vtst . No will.receive nofurther., .
..:....'s....�.......:t�iiS. . . .: .............. : ' ... .
n Yes N No
n Yes ®No
n Yes ®No
n Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
n Yes ®No
n Yes H No
n Yes N No
[]Yes p No
Comments (refer to .question. #): ; x. plain anyNES: answers,and/or any recommendations or°any other°1cd,m, iiteno.
:Use drawings of.facility to better explain situations. (use additions[ pages as necessary)':
o subsurface drainage on site according to Mr. McLawhorn
Not required at time of certification but will need for General Permit: odor control, insect control & mortality checklists
Need to pull soil samples for 1997
Need to secure irrigation system's operating information (parameters)
Need ao secure design information/calculations for structure including operation and maintenance plan
11 /17/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name w-t7Hopper
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

R
I State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Washington Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
December 19, 1997
Mr. John Mclawhorn
Triple M Farms
Rt. 1, Box 58
Hookerton, NC 28538
SUBJECT: Animal Feedlot Operation Site inspection
Triple M Farms
Facility No. 40-126
Greene County
Dear Mr. Mclawhorn:
On October 6, 1997, I conducted an animal feedlot operation site inspection at the referenced facility. Overall, the
operation was found to be in satisfactory condition. A copy of the inspection report is attached for your review.
In general, this inspection includes verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
(CAWMP); (2) the farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC 2H.0217, Senate Bill 1217, and
the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan; (3) the farm operation's waste management system is being operated
properly under the direction ota Certified Operator; (4) the required records are being kept; (5) there are no signs of
seepage, erosion, and/or runoff.
The recommendations and/or comments regarding your inspection can be found in the comment section of the attached
inspection form. it is very important as the owner and Operator in Charge that.you address any noted concerns, as soon
as possible. For assistance, please contact your Technical Specialist and/or the local Soil & Water Conservation District
Office.
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance during the inspection. Should you have further questions or
comments regarding this inspection, do not hesitate to call me at [phone], ext. 321.
Sincerely,Q�� j�
V .]LL
Daphne B. Cullom
Environmental Specialist 11
cc: Greene County SWCD Office
Mike Regans, Greene County NCCES
Jake Barrow, L.L. Murphrey Hag Company
WaR(
943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, NC 27889 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

Q
e
ns
Facility Number
p Registered E Certified p Applied for Permit p Permitted
up of obwu review p utner
Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
in Not 0perataona Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: T.dplE.) 1arm&.................. ........ ...... .................. -....... ..._...._ .. w... County: Greene WARO
Owner Name:John...... ....... .................... NUAwhorn............. .............. ................. Phone No: ...........,............... ....... ..........
Facility Contact: ............Title:
PhoneNo: . . . . . . .................................... . .
Mailing Address: RU.BQ1.58 ............................................................................................. Haoltena LWANC.................................................. 2853R..............
Onsite Representative: JabiLbld whLojrm.&Shea.McLaarhat:a....................... Integrator: L.L.Mt rWcyflog.Gampany............. ...........
Certified Operator: Jahn.R.... ............ ............... McLawharn ................................... Operator Certification Number: 16417 ................... ........
Location of Farm:
Latitude ©a ®� ©N Longitude ©• 1 ®
k -� esign v7 urren }
,.Swine' +" �Capsr�ty 1'opielation oultry-�`'"
Y.
i
I
®
can to Feeder
[3
Feeder to
Finish
13
Farrow to
can
p
Farrow to
ee er
p
Farrow to
Finish
Gt is
p Boars
fiber of Lagoons ! Holduig Poni
Ugn n '. urren , esign Curren
acity . Population ' Cart a :6pacity 'Population
p on- ayer::J.[3 on- arty
,1[3Other r ,
" y, Total Design Capacity '4,160
i Total' SSLW , ,
o Liquid Waste Management System
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? p Yes ® No
2. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes p No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes p No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) 13 Yes p No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes ®No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? 13 Yes ®No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoonv'holding ponds) require p Yes ®No
maintenance, improvement?
5. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? p Yes ®No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? p Yes ® No
7/25/97

act r Number:40-126
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? p Yes ® No
Structures (Laaoons,Holdine Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
` 9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? p Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier: » ................ _....... ........ ..».......................... .................... ...... .......... ................................... .......... ....._........._......
...................................
Freeboard (ft): 2.8 ft.
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
p Yes
® No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
p Yes
.® No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
p Yes
® No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
p Yes
N No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
p Yes
® No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ............................... B,yia ......................... ....................... Wbeat...,....................................................
I..............
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
p Yes
N No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
p Yes
®No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
p Yes
®No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
p Yes
®No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
p Yes
®No
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
p Yes
®No
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
p Yes
®No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
p Yes
®No
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
p Yes
®No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
p Yes
® No
17.o•vta ons.fsr dencies•were.non airing is visit. . on wt .repeive norfurther.,
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date: 10 - 7n

aci i um r: 40-126 Date of Inspection
ditlon mmen o ,�t"r
pea: >wastes auto a oon, o ;exten - t e-s" :o . of 00640. o re ",D"m a+
atJ-'Rrtt.�.:. tr'Rre1 y...1+�• ra fs Y. wi--r �s�rs"s to �w[r^••� ,r t"b. r i, r- ltt, !- r y.A .-;� 1 s r �i L.." y.
•*- s+"' .r• -..+ r y'.; L ..} r,J� 3 ! vti-`2.i:yF�L. 9.. ri` r '� rt
`g i M ii •P }- Y r r
1'aSteS..s#`•'s�;:`Y' ��-.�.. `J s xTF}+3°?!+esrS�r�,uMi1�•�.r
r a t fit- S a a
S:Afi. Z ! 7J"f 'S#.t 6 IP f Ic +1-=! - wr •� a �«' t '."•} j r•e -%n; r
e'�lag n areas`' oli�be kept owedzor�g e'r"y itse coptrdlledi.and accesstble gragstdoes aot) Ow you to,conduct a x
ar' iezt' a .c .r. -z '
tg
Wti [i. a may+-fiir ;T�Ft3^5: 4 F.r4� 5¢re."tti■} Fty Ws sdi Yf� C n t •R t Mi tYit aJjNt1, L s t wk
oro�iltmspe onTbfthegoontaror}�eepage,edeut'damage,=etc .' r '�L,�
-,.r r L - _'.' �{ , .P , S ,+or
uaiysls�oft}ie�liquui�animaltvvastiMom'the lagotin�s�all be°conducted as alose'to the time of'a�p on as practical and at
�i�•y�"r try `tom-'�«:!�"' " • xJ � .� -r �: ia.r 7r a• s .„ks •, , .t r;^ 1-• -
a y r s. .tli" C• v.. :'� s^+. ..i K
eat nthu� 60 days (before.on w,-- - `.ofthe4daie;ofiappi�cahon his analysis s}►allnclude eifallowcn ^ rs�rNrtrogen;
' `- ty,.,..,,►'r k•..at,t4Sk •*=J'-•-ap:rtn� yys r K-,• .y,,� '-r - .Y.i ys
.1105 h ]ilCrrands��++,�,{,r't€�j'Z"*,, 1' w•' y�r„ } �} .Thr k ty tit "f r t
{u,; w 4 T't� ttiti I�x[-t 4iL{5Er�t ts�S}t4Ya±^#+s €r:r{{ryy77+ rtyy t�irv}a.
r MiF- '. y'��l11.1With%+nf �+�+.�SR�'�'
i '••,G*4Wr."•FF j' i .a k ir,"A
1�$Ti61�►SLi413'}I'e�lllt'ed asiiUall� �F '�4�t'-t -�''dC � 'last}�ai��, '' � Sa t s�a"d�Rk lr �l•�r',S'ts'ie �Y rw. €" •, �, r { �'y[ • A r,., "� • �' J � � + ,
Cfr� __ .�iti ,r'r�,y.-ti �[j 7 � ir• ,d �csu ..r r � �'r �1 iYir � s- .�$n 't. r3..1 ��'��_ '' �rJiri ,7 i r e C..ir� `7�' rt 'l�+s'4•v'ik',',
�'�' tr yy, eS -"� i � . r r � r -• ,�' a.. ♦* r �'r'"'�'YI 3 r-7 -1� r t
e 'ollowuigig i�ecordslare requu�ed Qagbon levelr('$��,aff-site o�d� �xetnnval,sna�ntenence �repatr,'vvaste�nd+sotl�aaays�s�nd
Iht� t y'J„-.r i !Y°. x xXr 1,+ A;..3 _ �..V4• w...'L3:.yftw �•"r.c�imp ...a
�d ungabonrrecords a'ihese records should besnamtamed by t#►e lc�rowncrl"managerl�n°�hrono'logical and legible foim for a
�' _ - ;- :sph}r[+1 ?: :^.s %. x'3� d� G `�07: `+.'S Yr �.f�- y3.V} L -'r c { air rt, r its �-tTi r: r'�'�.7" t�� f,�% to "i%tN - •�. - _. e.. - `:
tol YLi GG-ysY�}};iCI'r` J g ,d r34 i '0Vs '!5•s " '7 r �'t+ �'.L Jrc,'w., S` f{�.' -•.... r nrra t. • �� 3'4LJ' . '*� i r !
E 1 !, - : *. �.%- vH P 1 •x#'� 4� •1r , t,E.r -rn '$^?rr a 'zkF y� { t5 �r -t!Ftw�l 5, � s sT ri f.-yr J w + S a r to
r PJt.�--.� h�� �F ..sTl Nwi,sy ' i,r t �-t' .-s�� C :w>•a i r t�' �:eY xt r Y ; _� ys= 7 `,t - t+' `i 4 c ii• A `r_ -'+r .
�,4tt Lk ,x • .# .. '�+� - >' 1 rl M - �J R�Si.y �-V ,rJ;� T � te•,a rtt,-s. ' �w-✓ , -t a- f �, ! C e
.y. F:i �"YT �> ? x #• -+.. `s s r f 3 s s 3V'_,.L'. •' ti ,� a>•3r�� -`t• 7��}'{ i t-�t. kyva a�ILR%ir f ��1 F' fitz'),.r}3 ti
A,,, +.N+r _.ta. �, ic2yf lr.+s s t' r.j ■ s rJ.-3 i - !- i S - - ,•i i�G,r •crJ "c, ? 13' c'%it ,iE
'� rink p^+.tF't ti : -w (.-- P 1 -".. wr-�' ..,a 7{ 1:- x :+ �, ti• u xt.i,�t:,'; x ''j`:r' Kr.i r.-- -}'"' �' t'4
�f ,,.i {r�, a, r �,• >� ,; 1 -.�� ,,, �� � k �t'� �t � s-•� r"•r'C � - ci r ali ef'� � � ii'.,d. r •u.,. y. i :K'.
ns 'Y�.r tsrr-r z ��y� �'Y'j X s,� �, t 4 ssar'�v'� �+1�'4�t$� ;+r 3 -P ..r. a Lt z'.f�s S� z.k�S w� ..'},T••h ��� � ! '�9-- 4i �t r'a r .1 j �
r ��"SF�:s
,
r �it.'hy.����r.,ie�.'+.�k"s�.�M..„n��=��,�'���;��t�t y �'•-r.: �L, ��...�ik�i' c .�� y`N�� ' � ._�@ ],i?., r
't r++ - ; rl• .�+'.r. t?•u W'tL�r r{� �ag� 'J J i:+'. _ S
'ratiitj�� �c�sft'�'a`F '� yi=y�rs�rb.A�•�rl� •,��K •s #t�#..r�.1�.5-b.ric1110 4?'y,E^'{-�,�3�«.� •�xt;t 4 r's�� 1 « r rli�l/ •1
a-.+�,r'i �"' r' `t'r�t �'^L4 i•" �� r '� `r;rh':+ "z�'.. r ur � .'=ee•r'°y� .. ° �'i7� "+ �'�"� , •- '-
A' ;«...-y.. , r A J• Lt ir$,?�
��`� ► Yi .4`a''if -� ,� Rr'1-s�r"ti '§�(''+:" � Lu����i. r�Y"�s--ti � i� ,rr'•r•• :>r,
� "r""'.�' t7���at't wCi'F:.'°' M ?•� 1 S,!Cn ,,M,. .. .r _ - {' siv � f r-
}yy��r'' 'f�rN •..�., .• �jylrar�,�y�tur .r r r r• !rr V�^� x�.: ro r. �;. +g , 1 - s S l.,
r� ��������T* ■ ,r` > "'�t, ;� , l+aiY �,�€�� 'r' `a Yi �"' is tf. 'r-�T.1 K-
yrraaqs■
�I?1-,L� Zb.: a d i.4, Tr �7 yyY 'fl'',1 4' � � Il�.�'��F ,k 1 µ r;�. ir, ,t � _• L�,r� ~
4+, 1 .[ y cK 3+'. rt-�y17" Jr•Frti , bpi r 'te�c- YhyM1 �y,'a i� r11rs•.
�� � y� 6 xp"! ,� y+7i�„•� Rly 4` � `"} � 'n 3tr
w,+fit •a x r
'4 Fs'$�'?s .') r T T l-rk.!_°'�/� r { r'�•: i .� ++: V �!-Tn 'y -.'I'*+, tf •4-• i yt.+ r k+ ,
t"""4F,w
rl�.�,r�^•c h ,�.. Y'+9g.����?��'u���'}r�ij,�,� �1i�nt�,.,�iYh�'�r�s�.. r�?J /,�r.�{.,AI--r .k- •'sr ,�I;�,,.�,irl dt 1�r�..s°'�;r
7jtnjL
.;r M, tr fR fi�y�la'"r. k4 ��?k ti+7� fR •;y'Fr �dti1�+1 /?fi .
�,;.'' ,rt +,,y i.� S 'p?� �•.+ar '!_i :71 �` "l:tr .r,!.oi�.,rkv 31f y�� y�- � 4�'�L �� �w�r � roiri �IF"+.��rt±.r :•.r-"a.,, r "?F t,
Y'tsY.i!?x } •ram Y+` t l; a ♦Px!
,.�
-•a'�'t.,'�r�„�'G r �{1x t'a,."i.. is :'S.g.• !1 £-r 'i t' `.v l 'tl li:l. -
p�p�
�y �� �to•4�lri1.•MSdi 1.. �'t. 'S".'_ t k.. 'CF S �' ,r� •LV r� y+t� � V��1�_�.�ij 1P G�1 ..Yf� i. P r 1 �J ��f�'AY•.'L 3�"tYr� ~'Y^' ' '•S. % 'Sts }{', ksc w.vl` b: �„r t 5�.,. t r 3.'y r.t .r r " a 3 1yUN: r
�� t^'. ff " �T7"�;lr^. .:L' < •s���•-{�.1 r�; Fti! .�y '{tf,..4< � r. Sr�{j�}', nitl RI^� - f - - Jlr S ..
'+ii � �$ .# r Yl a�`+� rl �L,:,rr-'�.'�1't`. ' ar.9'r" '-'�' s6',�� . � � ��.' !^ it ti. ia�r1 Sa'T�a•.� -� T tY ++"i. s 1 .4!^� r' t
�hy� .:Rj ki '�.K �•.bt>.rs-sA.ittri.R arp'ry' ''''yx • it '� !3 ` l Z� •hnl- t� -3
. ir' ¢,iy� ; '�'1 y k~:. � ��
'i
05,
: ' 1
a}�R! g
.. x t.:-,+r
,r,.Tl�✓•-�"r��, :• av f t �' y a, 11J-r;T �� , r' ,3� i' Yq�}. �.' TN
w .t.r+•:>rF 'v = •`.nr Y�' !X r Ft v da'" -;`"t x �:.
A14 "gy i3Y4S; et.k Ir r '.H
" - ��-rut`�L* r ,r5 ^•€'r_ A •t a
1.• 1,.. 1 •r sue° xi t r
Rix • - •r{r{ , °rY 4 i,t
•rf�"Pr .,'sL� i..
Y��,L,^t`•I,�,tP�'`•'t R�•t"+ w ul.� 3 i,'r t% r el4 � r`.� wh iW-•.�i,t, pr,-
.t-h ,."L� s�0 a•. ,xr. szt r;+'ii.., '4.�4. ; ! r�{! 1. w,' ? S-
n,y��j°?YSS�i}!.'yw •wii, tyyr!,iY� ispa,14a, E�i f�{+%}}�
�. �v+� ryw+�5'i!' ri 3 c •Y-drtinY_ " ;i£•"�#rR"g -�.9 i1 •4'J�. e T {i'�ar F.:i - RJR,
jFs�trw c ,�' r.�j
.t"•>s 41`i -t rw.: x.,.s,.t°. s,�ws V _ t%n•. t1.,;z.Cy. a.= 1-
...F ui �..�r� t u.�l•' :. ...., e♦ 1; Grtr r L - ca�rr.1 l' 1. xe �}. �J,-ii tca >G'rl.•. y 4 rYS
�,,CT !i■ t y� M-^- P�Ys=,� ,� Ip',�,,.-.tjj!-i:L''a�n6'ti�,,z,.c-- Yg7' .t�. �.,F •r, i
,w� ..:i" � r*"�i' �:,t � 3t'�"":y, c•.�.' rr .ri rr•• :z �'•Y-ti t`.,_Ad • � ,�i"'�..r: w+a� i ,.lJia . -
as 1 i n .+vl+ ��' w " + ++ ri „s '¢4 a. ^ r7� t•r
�w�: t �i�`�t's;
y. h
•.H�P'ii ����k.J' �'GM�M34r J y� ��d'rl �� ��a'�1�A+'S�:�y. � '�' N'FeY 3!�! � �f` � -U.
+tom r IY pyy fn �. f T � i•. 4.
� .I� -f }.t' 4 L� -h
-:•.-- 1'yt -�e"'r-.�;�r�"rr t��' � s/�i� ���J . r•; =510
Y.��r» �f1., - 6,,.l ,Tr ' ✓�r:. r �! Tr�•�' y"�rj Ft.! � 4•sat ' "ems t «"` xI ,
�'� �ir'fiy.3{'Crt� � I�r � r I" �t� •"a{; 'i 7��"}./ 1T�'r':
,F 1
r' 4 .t<-s -,� �tS. .t"� r�� ��{'fix- t,�c5 `+,a4 w i.:- 1"!y'rlti`1 �x + �r.V, r rA �t.'i�!t41�� �• `7-1 �.€" x,E� ...I.r 'w -Sig b*•.:
Y t;' 3 � �-at�ie• ° �FV ~y °�psi�'r� � e .iz� "C't:. ��^ art f'! �'�` -,r+�r7�kr��ir ��L
'S . `•.. A�ppr, ff".+�Hs.F n- r t t� t! rt
,!-�,,•�:tf:r� ;� _',"'tk',,,t . 3 "'•ri •Ii.•.- zJ.}fr r ? 4
i- 3r,.l���p.
, 1�11 � r� Y.Yilt � �+•T i f•"!,.A .+* .e�=��•
sy t j._... tr
rti.ry"'Fi,.',.r�.� & _ i -,••+w q t�r--- :?
I�-
Mo
fY "'1.1
C ] r ' ,. P� ~`hRtt►r lq Tti�u"g x r + s st
_ � 4t :� � ... �-a' rr-t • � •-rk t , • :�G�r
rr' si7•ti�': 3�:!,tr. �. rs'.' q;��t[:�•�'�k'.'.'r}' �'.�L�Y ..'�. 'SYS .rin jf �k �S'•reeB, £fit'-�}'�. jrt�',t ,s{!!r ^,v.� f•.�.f'i'r'r 1F,���'�-"'i }j""�r�� .n
M1.s „hr; fi K"4rr - s J• yt3.'
�'is' �{.: ,C�•vr � ,?C:.,• i r � i' t�' Y�'� i�? '1`t�• r� 'sir ��t'�'' �� i .sip -. :r�sti � �. -y*!'ri'L�•:-a. �.. -ir.� s S. w:. a x„-� �t'h LI,4 Y 1'rer.iti. } .ftfr".a - w -.A } t4 L, f it
is 4 F��IH,t�'fl Tk
'L=` ��'tzr . i ^,t R L Y.a �• "S�' !.1 ?•...`p C.c H r� a .4,�1• + y- r
�8 Y yam} `}rrLJ1 .t X k T �M1 i <
f.y'�i 'T�`�yf �'� �y1:•. :i'LV�� � 4; '�Ar-�'�'�; a' 4 '�e,:'t'�'� Lrr.�`:..Se A7 r7T *s, r' .�-•"'i's�i�e= t {s. "f'!, r, ' e .i
]v+.x'{.rrr .r " '! s iM I#� PPra•. �^:t �' tr C �K.s b �h s ire tr tin. , 4 ljrT.1�'-.1.t a+'-tF.t +-,t„•� '.
Vr� a� �u' r k ` #�€ .'f•
r r- '� *!•r• .3 J..Y . ' sl a,, r• t 1, Lel-
'€+7'b:s� ru � it. - � :ice •er� Y, »w �w•= 1�+�. +r L,.ws.►t 4" - .'}� 5 - •t
n. sa.t•fa}s u ,$ � � r� ,,�Lc ^ {"� � �' �, y ,,,} Si AY i t � F r° ti -.
ji "�r •.�� ^r^" • o- ,,,':iiW"�'r .`e.'.Y, � � �:I�uiv` �ri �h� � Ty" a�tl`�i' �i':'E�.'S �r�id �{iy�"'ipL"�T{`�[i��r�c". tL
na t''"':::�+r`�-�.i�, rrr�n?��v a a +r.,trr Lr .t• •rr tr. • �- p* +aKrc ..c•r ; i.'�: L writ' yr. - w
►tir �yal` xi .,1 e "�� r-d �rlw a, 4�rrwr,! �j�, �w.li1' yam+. ,1 q^'l f �' � .}•.iP •fir .;�tt' ���t a t. $
v1Y':�r;�'�`.'t.?�',7"��2�'''i.>'�J":r .534+.s`j!,..1;:y:. :y,G.-Y,�`;�•: 1�.}�a� r�`:h �Tr�..��•;•y,�}.S r:s•-- ":r{'k->r t�E �`� '��=. u y# ��,;.Fi �h :yr���• _ ,L