400102_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environmental Qual

INSPECTIONS
. 0
INSPECTIONS
INSPECTIONS

Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number:
400102 Facility Status:
Inpsection Type:
Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit:
Routine
Date of Visit:
07/25/2017 Entry Time: 09:30 am
Farm Name:
Gay Farms
Owner:
Michael L Gay
Mailing Address:
930 Meadow Rd
Active Permit: AWS400102 ❑ Denied Access
Inactive Or Closed Date:
County: Greene Region:
Exit Time: 10:25 am Incident #
Owner Email:
Phone:
Walstonburg NC 278889340
Washington
dgay@wavele ngthm ai I. c
252-753-3667
Physical Address: 1120 Meadow Rd Walstonburg NC 27888
Facility Status: Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35° 34' 13" Longitude: 77' 40' 51"
Take NC 91 S. from Walstonburg turn left on SR 1312 Farm located 1.5 miles on right side of SR 1312.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts
Records and Documents
Waste Col, Stor, & Treat
Other Issues
Waste Application
Certified Operator: Michael L Gay Operator Certification Number: 16412
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Mike Gay Phone :
On -site representative Mike Gay 'Phone:
Primary Inspector:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Marlene Salyer
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis: soil tested: 2016
7-7-16 = 1.09
10-7-16 = .87
6-15-17 = .73
4-14-17 = 1.08
IRR records are complete & balanced out.
Reviewed: sludge survey = 30%; calibration 6l2017; freeboard/rainfall; stocking
Phone:
Date:
page: 1

Permit:
AWS400102
Owner -Facility:
Michael L Gay
Facility Number:
400102
Inspection Date:
07/25/17
Inppection Type:
Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit:
Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Wean to Feeder 4,160 3,500
Total Design Capacity: 4,160
Total SSLW: 124,800
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon 1 MG 02/09/95 19.00 25,00
page: 2

Permit: AWS400102 Owner - Facility : Michael L Gay Facility Number: 400102
Inspection Date: 07/25/17 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No Na Ne
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
0 ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■ ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
M ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
M ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection Storacie & Treatment
Yqu No Na No
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5, Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large
❑
0 ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
M ❑
❑
8, Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
M ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
M ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ M ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ M ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Permit: AWS400102 Owner - Facility: Michael L Gay Facility Number:
400102
Inspection Date: 07/25/17 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Waste Application
Yes
No Na No
Crop Type 1
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
E ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
E ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
0 ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
0 ❑
❑
18, Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na No
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
E ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
moo
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WU P?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWS400102 Owner -Facility: Michael L Gay Facility Number: 400102
Inspection Date: 07/25/17 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No Na No
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
E ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
M ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
0 ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No Na No
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
0 ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
0 ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
N ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
0 ❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
0 ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
E ❑
❑
page: 5

M Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number:
400102 Facility Status: Active
Inlasection Type:
Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit.
Routine County:
Date of Visit:
07/14/2016 Entry Time: 10'00 am Exit Time: 11:i
Farm Name:
Gay Farms
Owner:
Michael L Gay
Mailing Address:
930 Meadow Rd
Physical Address:
1120 Meadow Rd
Permit: AWS400102
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Greene Region:
I am Incident #
Owner Email:
Phone:
Walstonburg NC 278889340
Walstonburg NC 27888
❑ Denied Access
Washington
dgay@wavelengthmail.c
252-753-3667
Facility Status: 0Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35° 34' 13" Longitude: 77° 40' 51"
Take NC 91 S. from Walstonburg turn left on SR 1312 Farm located 1.5 miles on right side of SR 1312.
Question Areas:
Oischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Star, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Michael L Gay Operator Certification Number: 16412
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Re prose ntative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Mike Gay Phone
On -site representative Mike Gay Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis: soil tested: 2/4/2015
7-7-16 = 1.09
9-4-15 = .75
12-18-15 = .96
IRR records are complete & balanced out.
Reviewed: rainfall/freeboard; calibration; sludge survey at 43% in July 2016.
Frboard range: 19"1 1-1-16 to 28"16-24-16
page; 1

Permit: AWS400102 Owner - Facility: Michael L. Gay Facility Number: 400102
Inspection Date: 07/14/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifler Closed Data Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon 1MG 02/09/95 19.00
page: 2

Permit: AWS400102 Owner - Facility : Michael l-Gay Facility Number: 400102
Inspection Date: 07/14/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes No Na No
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
1100
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑ ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
❑ ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection. Storage & Treatment
Yes
No No No
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large
❑
❑ ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
❑ ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
❑ ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
❑ ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na Ne
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11, Is there evidence of incorrect application?
[] ❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
[]
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Permit: AWS400102 Owner - Facility : Michael L Gay Facility Number: 400102
Inspection Date: 07/14/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No Na No
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
❑ ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
❑ ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
[]
[] ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yas No Na No
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit read ily'available?
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWS400102 Owner -Facility: Michael L Gay Facility Number: 400102
Inspection Date: 07/14/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes N2 Na N
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
01313
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
11 ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
❑ ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
.
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first surrey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
❑ []
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes No Na No
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
❑ ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
❑ ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
❑ ❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
page: 5

0 Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number:
400102 Facility Status:
Active Permit: AWS400102
[] Denied Access
Inppection Type:
Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit:
Routine
County: Greene Region:
Washington
Date of Visit:
07/30/2015 Entry Time: 08:15 am
Exit Time: 9:00 am Incident #
Farm Name:
Gay Farms
Owner Email:
dgay@wavelengthmail.c
Owner:
Michael L Gay
Phone:
252-753-3667
Mailing Address:
930 Meadow Rd
Walstonburg NC 278889340
Physical Address:
1120 Meadow Rd
Walstonburg NC 27888
Facility Status:
C f t ❑ N .1 I'
I Murphy -Brown LLC
amp ian o omp cant ntegrator.
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35' 34' 13"
Take NC 91 S. from Walstonburg turn led on SR 1312 Farm located 1.5 miles on right side of SR 1312.
Longitude: 77* 40- 51"
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Michael L Gay Operator Certification Number: 16412
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s)
24 hour contact name
On -site representative
Primary Inspector:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Name Title
Mike Gay
Mike Gay
Marlene Salyer
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis: soil tested: 2015
7-3-15 = 1.04
3-11-15 = 1,30
1-13-15 = .68
5.9-14 = 1.24
IRR records are complete & balanced out.
Reviewed: freeboardlrainfall, stocking/mortality, sludge surrey at 48%, calibration due 2016.
Phone:
Phone:
Phone
Phone:
Date:
pages 1

Permit: AWS400102 Owner - Facility : Michael L Gay Facility Number: 400102
Inspection Date: 07/30/15 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Wean to Feeder 4,160 4,000
Total Design Capacity: 4,160
Total SSLW: 124,800
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon 1 MG 02/09/95 19.00 35.00
page: 2

Permit: AWS400102 Owner - Facility : Michael L Gay Facility Number: 400102
Inspection Date: 07/30/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No No Ne
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
0 ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑0
❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■ ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
N ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
0 ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waage Collection. Storane & Treatment
Yel No Na No
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.ed large
❑
E ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
E ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
E ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
0 ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yea No Na No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ N ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Permit: AWS400102 Owner - Facility : Michael L Gay Facility Number:
400102
Inspection Date: 07/30/15 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Waste Application
Yes No No No
Crop Type i
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
E ❑
❑
16, Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
(]
[]
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No No Na
19, Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
IN ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
E ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WU P?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWS400102 Owner - Facility : Michael L Gay Facility Number:
400102
Inspection Date: 07/30/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Records and Documents
Yob No Na No,
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
E ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
E ❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
❑
❑
25. is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
E ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: .
26. Did the facility fall to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
EEI
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No No Ne
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
N ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31, Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon 1 Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32, Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
❑
❑
CAWM P?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
0 ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
■ ❑
❑
page: 5

f
M Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400102 Facility Status:
Active Permit: AWS400102
❑ Denied Access
Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine
County: Greene Region:
Washington
Date of Visit: 07/10/2014 Entry Time: 08:30 am
Exit Time: 9:15 am Incident #
Farm Name: Gay Farms
Owner Email:
dgay®wavelengthmail.c
Owner: Michael L Gay
Phone:
252-753-3667
Mailing Address: 930 Meadow Rd
Walstonburg NC 278889340
Physical Address: 1120 Meadow Rd
Walstonburg NC 27888
Facility Status: Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm:
Latitude: 35' 34' 13" Longitude:
77' 40' 51"
Take NC 91 S. from Walstonburg turn left on SR 1312 Farm located
1.5 miles on right side of SR 1312.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Star,
& Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Michael L Gay
Operator Certification Number:
16412
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name
Title Phone
24 hour contact name Mike Gay
Phone:
On -site representative Mike, Debbie Gay
Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Soil tested 2013
Waste Analysis:
5-9-14= 1.24
2-28-14= .88
9-6-13= .67
IRR records are complete and balanced out.
Reviewed rainfall, freeboard and stocking
Calibration due in 2015
Sludge Survey due by Dec. 2014
Current sludge level at 48%
page: 1

Permit: AWS400102 Owner - Facility : Michael L Gay Facility Number: 400102
Inspection Date: 07/10/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Wean to Feeder 4.426
Total Dealgn Capacity:
Total SSLW:
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon 1 MG 02/09/95 19.00
page: 2

Permit: AWS400102 Owner - Facility : Michael l-Gay Facility Number: 400102
Inspection Date: 07/10/14 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No No No
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
E ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
0 ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
M ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection. Storage & Treatment
Yes No No No
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.eJ large
❑
0 ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
■ ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
M ❑
❑
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No No No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ M ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sltjdge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Permit: AWS400102 Owner - Facility : Michael L Gay Facility Number:
400102
Inspection Date: 07/10/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Waste Annlication
Yes No Na Na
Crop Type 1
Winter Annual
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑ M ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑ ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
[] ■ ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No Na No
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ M ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWS400102 Owner - Facility : Michael L Gay Facility Number:
400102
Inspection Date: 07/10/14 inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No Na No
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
23. if selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
N ❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
■ ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes No Na No
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
E ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
E ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
■ ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, Freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
N ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon 1 Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
0 ❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewerlinspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
❑
E ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
E ❑
❑
page: 5

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number : 400102 ^ Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS400102 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type; Compliance Insp_ec)'QR Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County; Region: YVijahioalga
Date of Visit: QQIQ712013 Entry Time. 10:15 AM Exit Time: 11:00 AM incident #:
Farm Name: -Gay Farmg Owner Email: daay0wavelengthmail
Owner: Michael L Gay Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 930 M a{gw Rd Walstonburg NC 278889340r
Physical Address: 1120 Mea�g)& Rd Waistonburg NC 27888
Facility Status: E Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC,
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35*34'13" Longitude: 77°40'51"
Take NC 91 S. from Walstonburg turn left on SR 1312 Farm located 1.5 miles on right side of SR 1312
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts © Waste Col, Stor, & Treat
Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Michael L Gay
Operator Certification Number: 16412
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name
Title Phone
24 hour contact name michael Gay
Phone:
On -site representative Mike Gay
Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer
Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400102 Owner - Facility: Michael L Gay Facility Number. 400102
Inspection Date: 06/07/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspectlon Summary:
waste analysis: soil tested: 2-2013
2-12-13 = .77
12-18-12 = .70 Looks Good!
9-20-12 = .68
7-3-12 = .76
IRR records are complete & balanced out. Rainfall, freeboard & crop yield are recorded.
Sludge survey on 11-29-2012 at 62% POA is not complet as waiting on Carl Dunn with S&W to advise.
Caliberation done in April 2013
Page: 2

Permit: AWS400102 Owner • Facility: Michael L Gay Facility Number: 400102
Inspection Date: 06/07/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
O Swine - wean to Feeder 4,160 3,600
Total Design Capacity: 4,160
Total SSLW: 124,800
Waste Structures
Type Identifier
Designed Observed
Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
kron 1 MG 02/09/95 19.00 21.00
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400102 Owner - Facility: Michael L Gay Facility Number: 400102
Inspection Date: 06/07/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1, Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
ONOO
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe
❑ ■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑ ■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ■ ❑ Cl
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400102 Owner - Facility: Michael L Gay
Facility Number; 400102
Inspection Date: 06/07/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1 Small Grain (Wheat,
Barley, Oats)
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■
❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■
❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure andlor operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
■
❑ ❑
17, Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■
❑ ❑
18, Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■
❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■
❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 5

Permit: AW5400102 Owner • Facility: Michael L Gay Facility Number: 400102
Inspection Date: 06107/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Lease Agreements? ❑
Other? ❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
■ ❑
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑
■ ❑
❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon ❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

Permit: AWS400102 Owner - Facility: Michael L Gay Facility Number ; 400102
Inspection Date: 06/07/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
OtherlSsues Yes No NA NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly. dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon 1 Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewerlinspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Page: 7

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400102 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS400102 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 07126/2012 Entry Time: 09900 AM Exit Time: 09:55 AM Incident #:
Farm Name: Gay Farms Owner Email: daagQwavelengthmaii
Owner: Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: WalstontzurgNC 278889340
Physical Address: 1120 MeadoW Rd Walstonburg NC 27888
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Location of Farm:
Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLQ
Latitude: W3415_ Longitude: 77°40'51"
Take NC 91 S. from Walstonburg turn left on SR 1312 Farm located 1.5 miles on right side of SR 1312.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts © Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Michael L Gay
Secondary OIC(s):
Operator Certification Number: 16412
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Mike Gay Phone:
On -site representative Mike Gay Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page; 1

Permit: AWS400102 Owner - Facility: Michael L Gay Facility Number: 400102
Inspection Date: 07/26/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis:
7-3-12 = .76
4-23-12 = 1.3 soil tested: 1-18-2012
IRR records are complete & balanced out. Rainfall, freeboard & stocking are recorded.
#25) this lagoon was cleaned out in April 2009 & it appears there is something not calculation correctly for the sludge to be at 43%
now.
The sludge survey in Aug. 2010 was at 43% - Carl Dunn, NCDA was contacted to conduct a sludge survey in 2011 & he didn't show
up yet. Eve Honeycutt has been on Maternity leave.
Mike has contacted another person to come out and see what is going on with the sludge.
Page: 2

Permit: AWS400102 Owner - Facility: Michael L Gay Facility Number : 400102
Inspection Date: 0712612012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Wean to Feeder 4,160 3,732
Total Design Capacity: 4,160
Total SSLW: 124,800
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
agoon 1 MG 02/09/95 19.00 40.00
Page; 3

Permit: AW5400102 Owner • Facility: Michael L Gay Facility Number: 400102
Inspection Date: 07/26/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe
❑
■ ❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■ ❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■ ❑
❑
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■ ❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■ ❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■ ❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
ONOO
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400102 Owner - Facility: Michael L Gay
Facility Number : 400102
Inspection Date: 07/2612012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No
NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to Incorporate manure/sludge into bare sail?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Small Grain (Wheat,
Barley,
Oats)
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crap Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
16, Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
OSO
❑
18, Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400102 Owner - Facility: Michael L Gay
Inspection Date: 07/26/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Records and Documents
Facility Number: 400102
Reason for Visit: Routine
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
Cl
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑ 10110
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
■ 0011
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non-compliant'sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
2011
26, Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Page: 6

Permit: AWS400102 Owner - Facility: Michael L Gay Facility Number : 400102
Inspection Date: 07126/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous lass assessment (PLAT) certification?
n*6Ie.........
❑■❑❑
28, Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field ❑
Lagoon 1 Storage Pond ❑
Other ❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
33. Did the Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ ■ 1313
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 7

I
Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number:
Facility Status: Active Permit:
II----11
AWS400102 LJ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
,-„ Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine
County: Greene
Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 07/21/2011
Entry Time: Q9:30 AM Exit Time: 10:05 AM
Incident #:
Farm Name: Gay Farms
„ ,
Owner Email: doavOwayelenothmail
Owner: Michael L Gay
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 930 Meadow Rd
yyalstQnb
g NC 27t38t39 40 _
_
Physical Address: 1=-Meadow
Rd
Facility Status: ■ Compliant
❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy
-Brown LLC
Location of Farm:
Latitude: 35°34'13"
Longitude: 77°40'51"
Take NC 91 S. from Walstonburg turn left on SR 1312 Farm located 1.5 miles on right side of SR 1312.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Waste Collection & Treatment
Waste Application
Records and Documents
Other Issues
Certified Operator: Michael L Gay
operator Certification Number: 16412
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title
Phone
24 hour contact name
Mike Gay
Phone -
On -site representative
Mike Gay
Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer
Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400102 Owner - Facility: Michael L Gay Facility Number: 400102
Inspection date: 07/21/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis:
5-31-11 = .93
3-21-11 = .84
1-20-11 = 1.1
IRR records are complete & balanced out.
Rainfall & freeboard are recorded
SS done in 2010 with 43% will be doing anothe one soon.
Looks Goodl
Page: 2

Permit: AWS400102 Owner - Facility: Michael L Gay Facility Number: 400102
Inspection Date: 07/21/2011
Waste Structures
Type
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Identifier
Reason for Visit: Routine
Designed Observed
Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
agoon 1 MG 02/09/95 19.00 49.00
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400102
Inspection Date: 07/21/2011
Owner -Facility, Michael l-Gay
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at:
Structure
Application Field
Other
a. Was conveyance man-made?
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c, What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d, Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
Facility Number: 400102
Reason for Visit:
Routine
Yes
No
NA
NE
❑❑❑❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑❑❑❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage S Treatment Yes No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑ ❑
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
Cl
5, Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large trees, severe
Cl ❑
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑ ❑
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
Hydraulic Overload?
Frozen Ground?
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
Yes No NA NE
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
0
0
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400102 Owner - Facility: Michael L Gay
Inspection Date: 07/21/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400102
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No
NA
NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14, Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
❑
❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
❑
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑
❑
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
❑
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
❑
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
❑
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
❑
❑
❑
if yes, check the appropriate box below.
WDP?
❑
Page; 5

Permit: AWS400102 Owner - Facility: Michael L Gay Facility Number: 400102
Inspection Date: 07/21/2011 inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Lease Agreements? ❑
Other? ❑
If Other, please specify
r
21, Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
❑ ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
❑ ❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
❑ ❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑
❑ ❑ ❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon ❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26, Did the facility fall to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

Permit: AWS400102 Owner - Facility: Michael L Gay Facility Number: 400102
Inspection Date: 07/21/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
28, Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge, ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field ❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond ❑
Other ❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
I
7
Page: 7

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400.102 _ Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS400102 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspe0ion Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: RoutingCounty: Greene Region:
Date of Visit: 09/24/2010 Entry Time-10740 AM Exit Time:
Farm Name: Gay Farms
Owner: Michael L Gay
Mailing Address: 930 Meadow Rd
Incident #:
Phone: [phone]
Physical Address: 1120 Meadow Walstonburg NC 27888
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35'34'13" Longitude: 77°40'51"
Take NC 91 S. from Walstonburg turn left on SR 1312 Farm located 1.5 miles on right side of SR 1312.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Michael L Gay
Secondary OIC(s):
Operator Certification Number: 16412
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Mike Gay Phone:
On -site representative michael Gay Phone:
Primary Inspector: Ronnie T Smith Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400102 Owner - Facility: Michael L Gay Facility Number : 400102
Inspection Date: 09/24/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspectlon Summary:
Waste Analysis: Soil Test:2009
7/13/10 = .96
4/30110 = 1.9
11 /20/09 = 1.2
Freeboard range:
1/7/10 = 23" - 6/19/10 = 42"
Sludge survey: 8/2010 = 43%
equipment calibration 2010
C = 421129/135/131, W = 93/123/106, SB = 92/13311491151, Co = 73/78
Page: 2

Permit: AWS400102 Owner - Facility: Michael I_ Gay
Inspection Date: 09/24/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number : 400102
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
O swine - Wean to Feeder 4,160 3,410
Total Design Capacity: 4,160
Total SSLW: 124,800
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon 1 MG 02/09/95 1900.35.00
Page; 3

Permit: AWS400102 Owner - Facility: Michael L Gay Facility Number; 400102
Inspection date: 09/2412010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ N ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection,Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large trees, severe
❑
■
❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑
■
❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes
No
NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400102 Owner - Facility: Michael L Gay Facility Number : 400102
Inspection Date: 09/24/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.? ❑
Total P205? ❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type 1 Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2 Cotton
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure andlor operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
M IR? ❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400102 Owner - Facility: Michael L Gay
Facility Number: 400102
Inspection Date: 09/24/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual sail analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? ❑ ❑
❑ ■
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Other Issues
Yes No
NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30, At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 6

Permit: AWS400102 Owner - Facility: Michael L. Gay Facility Number: 400102
Inspection Date: 09/24/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
V__ u., ua uc
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWO of emergency situations as required by Permit? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 7

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400102 _ Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS400102 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Qgmulianoe Inspection inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: gene Region: Washinaton
Date of Visit: 0810412009 Entry Time:10:00 AM__ Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Gay Farms Owner Email: ay2wave gthmail
Owner: Michae1, L Gay -, Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 930 Meadgw Rd Walstonburg NC 278889340
Physical Address: 1120 Meadow Rd Walstonbura NQ 27888
Facility Status: ■ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown, LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35*34'13" Longitude: 77°40'51"
Take NC 91 S. from Walstonburg turn left on SR 1312 Farm located 1.5 miles on right side of SR 1312,
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream impacts © Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Michael L Gay Operator Certification Number: 16412
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On -site representative Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis:
5-11-09 1.1
3-3-09 1.1 sludge 3.5
1-14-09 .98
soil Fall 2008
Note: lagoon had sludge removed Spring 2009 - records not yet balanced - waiting on Tommy Beamon to bring records to Mike Gay.
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400102 Owner - Facility: Michael L Gay
Inspection Date: 08/04/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400102
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Wean to Feeder 4,160 3,038
Total Design Capacity: 4,160
Total SSLW: 124,800
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Data Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
kagoon 1 MG 02/09/95 19.00 3T00
Page: 2

Permit: AWS400102 Owner - Facility: Michael L Gay Facility Number: 400102
Inspection Date: 08/04/2009 Inspection Type. Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? 00110
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ Cl ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■ ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■ ❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■ ❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection Storage & Treatment
Yes
No NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
130,011
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (i.e./ large trees, severe ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
1
❑
■ ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■ ❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■ ❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
001313
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400102 Owner - Facility: Michael L Gay Facility Number: 400102
Inspection Date: 08/04/2009 Inspection Typo: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? ❑
Total P205? ❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type 1 Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Records and Documents IYes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP? ❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400102 Owner - Facility: Michael L Gay Facility Number : 400102
Inspection Date: 08I0412009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Checklists?
Design?
Maps?
Other?
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Yes No NA NE
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
Cl
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Other Issues
Yes No
NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
29, Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400102 Owner - Facility: Michael L Gay
inspection Date: 08/04/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Other Issues
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Facility Number: 400102
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
❑■❑❑
❑■❑❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number : 400102 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS400102 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 10/14/2008 Entry Tlme:09:00 AM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Gay Farms Owner Email:
Owner: Miha Gay Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: Rt 2 Box 225-A Walstonburo NC 27888
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: L L Murphrey Company
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°34'15" Longitude: °
Take NC 91 S. from Walstonburg turn left on SR 1312 Farm located 1.5 miles on right side of SR 1312,
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents © Other issues
Certified Operator: Michael L Gay Operator Certification Number: 16412
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Mike Gay Phone:
On -site representative
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer
Phone:
Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis:
9-3-08 = .94
5-8-08 = 1,2
3-13-08 = 1.3
1-23-08 = 1.1
soil 1-4-08
Looks Good!
Page: 1

Permit: AWS4001 D2 Owner - Facility: Mike Gay
Inspection Date: 10/14/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number:400102
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Wean to Feeder 4,160 4,120
Total Design Capacity: 4,160
Total SSLW: 124,800
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
kgoon 1 MG 02/09/95 19.00 27.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWS400102 Owner - Facility: Mike Gay Facility Number. 400102
Inspection Date: 10/14/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? 00110
Discharge -originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■ ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■ ❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■ ❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection Stora e & Treatment
Yes
No NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400102 Owner - Facllity: Mike Gay Facility Number : 400102
Inspection Date: 10/1412006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? ❑
Total P205? ❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? Cl
Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type 1 Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■ ❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15, Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■ ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
■ ❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■ ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■ ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yea
No NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■ ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400102 Owner -Facility: Mike Gay
Facility Number: 400102
Inspection Date: 10/14/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA
NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after n 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
10
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ 01111
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? ❑ ■
❑
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑, ■
❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑ ■
❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

r
Permit: AWS400102 Owner - Facility: Mike Gay
Facility Number: 400102
Inspection Date: 10/14/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Otherissues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32, Did Reviewerllnspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
p Other Agency
Facility Number: 400102 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS400102 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene Region: Washington _
Date of Visit: 11/05/2007 Entry Time:10:00 AM Exit Time:
Farm Name: Gay Farms
Owner: Mike Gay
Incident #:
Owner Email:
I��'��►bl���I i��
Mailing Address: Rt 2 Box 225-A Walstonburg NC 27888
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:35°34'15" Longitude:77"44'38"
Take NC 91 S. from Walstonburg turn left on SR 1312 Farm located 1.5 miles on right side of SR 1312.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other issues
Certified Operator: Michael L Gay Operator Certification dumber: 16412
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Phone:
On -site representative Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis:
10-18-07 = .85
6-12-07 = 1.1
soil sample fall 2006 and pulling samples now for 2007
Looks Goodl
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400102 Owner - Facility: Mike Gay Facility Number: 400102
Inspection Date: 11/05/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Populatlon
Swine
Swine - Wean to Feeder 4,160 0
Total Design Capacity: 4,160
Total SSLW: 124,800
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
lagoon
1 MG
02/09/95
19.00
29.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWS400102 Owner - Facility: Mike Gay
Facility Number: 400102
Inspection Date: 11/05/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Via It: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
00110
Discharge originated at:
Structure -
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
00011
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other
than from a ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
8. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, Cl ■ ❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400102 Owner - Faclllty: Mike Gay Facility Number: 400102
Inspection Date: 1110512007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection . Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? ❑
Total P205? ❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type 1 Com, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
19. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No NA NE
19. Did the'facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400102 Owner -Facility: Mike Gay
Facility Number: 400102
Inspection Date: 11/05/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspecdon
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall $ monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking? ,
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? ❑ ■
❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Other Issues
Yes No
NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400102 Owner -Facility: Mike Gay Facility Number: 400102
Inspection Date: 11/05/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ ■ ❑ 0
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400102 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS400102 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 05116/2006 Entry Time:07:50 AM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Gay Farms Owner Email:
Owner: Mike Gay Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: Walstonbura NC 27888
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude: 35034'15" Longitude: 77°44' 8"
Take NC 91 S. from Walstonburg turn left on SR 1312 Farm located 1.5 miles on right side of SR 1312.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Michael L Gay
Secondary OIC(s):
Operator Certification Number: 16412
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On -site representative Mike Gay Phone:
24 hour contact name Mike Gay Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):'
Inspection Summary:
Soil tested 11-2005
Waste analyses:
3-27-06 = 1.5
10-25-05 = 0.49
6-14-05 = 1.4
Everything looks good.
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400102 Owner -Facility: Mike Gay Facility Number : 400102
Inspection Date: 05/1612006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Wean to Feeder 4,160 3,500
Total Design Capacity: 4,160
Total SSLW: 124,800
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
n
kilo
1MG
02/09/95
19.00
29.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWS400102 Owner - Fact IIty: Mike Gay Facility Number: 400102
Inspection Date: 0511612006 inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes -No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
2. is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (l.e.l large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
1113
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400102 Owner - Facility: Mike Gay
Facility Number : 400102
Inspection Date: 0511612006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Corn (Grain)
Crop Type 2
Cotton
Crop Type 3
Small Grain (Wheat,
Barley, Oats)
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ,❑ ■ ❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
18, is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below,
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit. AW5400102 Owner -Facility: Mike Gay
Facility Number: 400102
Inspection Date: 0511612006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stacking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the.permit?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Other lssues
Yes No NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400102 Owner - Facility: Mike Gay
Inspection Date: 05/16/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number : 400102
Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWO of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
m
❑.•
❑
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
❑
0
❑
❑
33. Does facility require a fallow -up visit by same agency?
❑
■
❑
❑
Page: 6

VO)
(Type of Visit 0 Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 40 102 Date ofVisit: 2-18-2004 Time: 8:30
Q Not O erational O Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified 13 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ....................
FarmName: G.ay..l'orMsi..................................................................................................... County: G.T.gRitc ................................................ WA►RO.......
OwnerName: A' ke.........................................GAY............................................................... Phone No:.252n753.73.6fi7 ...........................................................
MailingAddress: 13.Q.M.gado.1Y..R1.................................................................................... W..; t9.nhjArls..>.C............................................... 2.7.88.8 ..............
FacilityContact:..............................................................................Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
Onsite Representative: Mikc...............................................................................................Integrator:l'r�pnluxtt.S.tatid�C�.k�xm .Qt l![Qxt ...........
Certified Operator- MichuLL ............................. G,ay,.................................................... Operator Certification Number:t.64l ..............
Location of Farm:
rake NC 91 S. from Walstonburg turn left on SR 1312 Farm located 1.5 miles on right side of SR 1312. +
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 34 ' 15 6= Longitude 38
Design Current
Design Current
Design Current
Swine Cavacity Po ulation
Poultry
Capacity Population Cattle
Capacity Population
® Wean to Feeder
4160
❑ Layer
❑ Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish
JE1 Non -Layer
JE1 Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
4,160
❑ Gilts
Total SSLW
124,800
❑ Boars
Number of Lagoons 1
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. fs any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure S
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
Structure 6
Identifier: ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): 30
12112103 Continued

Facility Number: 40-1 22 Date of Inspection 2-18-2004 K
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or ❑ Yes ® No
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level ❑ Yes ® No
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ® No
[:]Excessive Pon ding ❑ PAN []Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
12. Crop type Corn, Soybeans, Wheat Cotton
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ® No
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ Yes ® No
Air Quality representative immediately.
Comnients,(refer,ta question #): Explain any YES aasvrers and/or`"any recoinmendations'or ony other comments.`
❑se,drawings of facility to better explain situatioris. (use:additional pages"as necessary):: m❑ Field Copy ® Final Notes
AL
Reviewer/Inspector Name Marlene D. Salyer
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: %Z ,/ Date: "-
12112103 `� Continued

Facility -Number: 40.-102 Date of Inspection 2-185004
Required Records & Documents
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
® No
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
® No
23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
®No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
®No
25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
® No
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
®No
27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
® No
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
® No
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
® No
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
❑ Yes
® No
31. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
❑ Yes
❑ No
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Stocking Form [:]Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfall []Inspection After V Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted daring this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Additional Comments and/or Drawings: `..:.= a
.'
Waste analysis 1-23-04 =1.6
9-29-03 = 0.74
8-6-03 = I'.1
5-6-03 = 1.1
The irrigation records are complete and balanced out.
The freeboard level is recorded weekly.
The soils test was dated 124-03 and lime was applied.
z
12112103

Technical Assistance Site Visit Report
• Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Natural Resources Conservation Service
O Soil and Water Conservation District
O Other...
Facility Number 40 - I I}2 Date: 9122103 Time: 1 900 Tlme On Farm: 70 WARO
Farm Name Gay Farms County Greene Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address Route 2, Box 225-A Walstonburg NC 27888
Onslte
Representative Mike Gay/Michele Christensen _ Integrator jPremjum Standard Farms
Type Of Visit Purpose Of Visit
Operation Review
Compliance Inspection (pilot only)
Technical Assistance
Confirmation for Removal
❑ No Animals -Date Last Operated:
❑ Operating below threshold
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse
Design Current
Cauaclty Pooulation
® Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
4160
1800
pp Routine
O Response to DWQ/DENR referral
O Response to DSWC/SWCD referral
O Response to complaint/local referral
O Requested by prod ucerlintegrator
O Follow-up
O Emergency
O Other...
Design Current
Capacity Population
❑ Layer
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
GENERAL QUESTIONS:
1. Is waste discharging from any part of the operation and reaching surface waters or wetlands? ❑ yes OR no
2. Is there evidence of a past waste discharge from any part of the operation that waste reached
❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
GENERAL QUESTIONS:
1. Is waste discharging from any part of the operation and reaching surface waters or wetlands? ❑ yes OR no
2. Is there evidence of a past waste discharge from any part of the operation that waste reached
❑ Other
GENERAL QUESTIONS:
1. Is waste discharging from any part of the operation and reaching surface waters or wetlands? ❑ yes OR no
2. Is there evidence of a past waste discharge from any part of the operation that waste reached
❑ yes ® no
surface waters or wetlands?
3. Does any problem pose an immediate threat to the integrity of the waste structure (large trees,
❑ yes ® no
seepage, severe erosion, etc.)?
4. Is there evidence of nitrogen over application, hydraulic overloading or excessive ponding
❑ yes ® no
requiring DWQ notification?
6• Is there evidence of improper dead animal disposal that poses a threat to the environment
❑ yes ® no
and/or public health?
6. Is the waste level within the structural freeboard elevation range for any waste structure?
❑ yes ®no
Structurel Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Identifier
Level (Inches) 38
CROP TYPES Cotton lCorn Soybean Wheat
SPRAYFIELD
SOIL TYPES WaB GoA NoA
7. What type of technical assistance does the onsite representative feel is needed? (list in comment section)
03/10/03

Facility Number 40 - 102 Date:
9122/03
PARAMETER
p No assistance provided/requested
❑ 8. Waste spill leaving site
❑ 9. Waste spill contained on site
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE Needed
Provided
El 10. Level in structural freeboard
25. Waste Plan Revision or Amendment
❑
❑
❑ 11. Level in storm storage
26. Waste Plan Conditional Amendment
❑
❑
27. Review or Evaluate Waste Plan wlproducer
❑
El
❑ 12. Waste structure integrity compromised
28. Forms Need in
❑
❑
❑ 13. Waste structure needs maintenance
(list comment section)
29. Missing Components (list in comments)
El
El
14. Over application >= 10% & 10 lbs.
❑ 15. Over application < 10% or < 10 lbs.
30. 21-1.0200 re-certlficatlon
❑
�
❑ 16. Hydraulic overloading
31. Five & Thirty day Plans of Action (PoA)
❑
❑
32. Irrigation record keeping assistance
❑
❑
❑ 17. Deficient irrigation records
❑ 18. Late/missing waste analysis
❑ 19. Late/missing lagoon level records
33. Organ Izelcomputerization of records
❑
❑
34. Sludge Evaluation
❑
❑
❑ 20. Late/missing soils analysis
❑ 21. Crop needs improvement
35. Sludge or Closure Plan
❑
❑
❑ 22. Crop inconsistent with waste plan
36. Sludge removallclosure procedures
❑
❑
37. Waste Structure Evaluation
❑
❑
❑ 23. Irrigation maintenance deficiency
❑ 24. Deficient sprayfield conditions
38. Structure Needs Improvement
❑
❑
39. Operation & Maintenance Improvements
❑
❑
40. Marker check/calibration
❑
❑
Reaulatory Referrals
41. Site evaluation
❑
❑
❑ Referred to DWQ Date:
42. Irrigation Calibration
❑
❑
❑ Referred to NCDA Date:
43. Irrigation design/installation
El
❑
❑ Other...
system
Date:
44. Secure irrigation information (maps, etc.)
❑
❑
LIST IMPROVEMENTS
45.Operating improvements (pull signs, etc.)
❑
❑
MADE BY OPERATION
46. Wettable Acre Determination
❑
❑
9 - installed underground irrigation
47. Evaluate WAD certificationlrechecks
❑
❑
48. Crop eve luationlrecommendations
❑
❑
new waste plan dated July 30, 2003
2.
49. Drainage work/evaluation
❑
❑
50. Land shaping, subsoiling, aeration, etc.
51. Runoff control, stormwater diversion, etc.
❑
❑
❑
❑
3
52. Buffer improvements
❑
❑
53. Field measurements(GPS, surveying, etc.)
❑
❑
4'
54. Mortailty BMPs5.
❑
❑
55. Waste operator education (NPDES)
❑
❑
56. Operation & maintenance education
❑
❑
67. Record keeping education
❑
❑
6.
58. Croplforage management education
❑
❑
59. Soil and/or waste sampling education
❑
❑
03/10/03

Facility Number 40 _ 102 Date: 9/22/03
MMENTS:
COC dated May 3, 2003 and on site. Keep records available for 3 years.
Waste plan dated 8/6103 nitrogen is 1.1 lbs/1000 gallons
5/6/03 nitrogen is 1.1 Ibs/1000 gallons
12/17/02 nitrogen is 1.4 Ibs/1000 gallons
818102 nitrogen is 1.0 lbs/1000 gallons
Soil test dated 3/21/03 Cu, Zn and ph within guidelines.
Waste plan dated July 30,2003 PAN deficit - 2,262 Ibs revised by Mike Reagan, Greene Co Extension Service.
Wettable Acre worksheet on site
Pull #12 (1.33 acres), Mr. Gay unable to make pull according to design. Due to large PAN deficit may want to delete pull
'12. Wettable Acre recheck complete. Total wetted acres 32.58 acres map and design included.
Lagoon level is recorded weekly.
Waste applied on corn stubble - 30 day pre plant for wheat.
18. There is not a current waste analysis to cover irrigation events on wheat dated 314/03 and 10/16/02. Remember to to
caste analysis 60 days before/60 days after irrigation event. No over application noted.
IRR2 records were made available with drops in lagoon consistent with irrigation events.
Need to inside dike walls of lagoon to allow for routine and visual inspection.
TECHNICAL SPECIALIST Martin McLawhorn
SIGNATURE
Date Entered: 9/25/03 1 Entered By: IMartin McLawhorn
03/10/03

/l/t'3�'
p Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
p Other Agency
Type of Visit 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Fallow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 Other p Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit: 6/4/2003 Time: 800
D Not Operationalp Below Threshold
Permitted a Certified p Conditionally Certified p Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: Gay Farms County: Greene ..................
Owner Name: Mike Gay Phone No: 252-753-3667
Mailing Address: Rou1e.2.,..Rox.225.:A............................................................................ Walstouhuxg... NC................................................ 27888 ..............
FacilityContact: ...............................................................................Title:................... ...... Phone No:
Onsite Representative: Mike.Gaylieremy.Niii/Micbele.Cltristenson............. Integrator: Pre mium.Standard..Farms..olNortb...........
Certified Operator: Micharl.L ........................... Gay .................................................... Operator Certification Number: 164.1.2.............................
Location of Farm:
a e NC 91 S. from Walstonburg turn left -on SR 1312 Farm located 1.5 miles on right si e'o
I
— e — — u_-__ Latitude Mfl 7 Ie 1 :C L 11' /�11 Longitude ram• 1 to 1 6 1 --41
Design Current.
Swine Capacity` Population
® Wean to Feeder
[3 Feeder to Finish
[3 Farrow to A can
13 Farrow to Feeder
p Farrow to Finish
p Gilts
p Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
E3 Layer Z I JE3.Dairy
p Non -Layer p, on- airy
1 er
J
ToW Design;Capacity 4,160
Total SSLW 124,800
Nuinber of Lagoons 113 Subsurface I Drains Present rea 113 Spray Ie rea
Nolding'Fonds /;,Solid Traps 13 No Liquid Waste Management. System
Discharees & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: 13 Lagoon 13 Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? 13 Yes p No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) 0 Yes p No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) CI Yes p No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? p Yes N No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? p Spillway p Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): ................ H ............... .................................... ...........

aci i y, um er: 40_102 Date of Inspection
5.. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid -level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
p Yes g No
p Yes g No
p Yes g No
p Yes g No
p Yes g No
p Yes g No
11. Is there evidence of over application? p Excessive Ponding p PAN p Hydraulic Overload p Yes g No
12. Crop type Corn, Soybeans, Wheat Cotton
r•
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? g Yes p No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? p Yes p No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ,
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
r
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes g No
p Yes g No
p Yes g No
p Yes g No
p Yes g No
13 Yes g No
p Yes g No
p Yes g No
p Yes g No
p Yes g No
p Yes g No
p No violations or deficiencies were noted urmg this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about is visit.
Comments (refer to question x am,an
( answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
I t t , .: '• '.r..:J�'.:`::Lr.-.�.b�-•+i` :i.dm-
Use`dra'wings of facilty fo bettier 'situsfiona:' "use`a'dttiotal ' es
1' ealplBin a hs nece�°
p Field Copy p Final Notes
*Facility will repop in two wee s.
*Soil test dated 1/18/02. Lime was applied at recommended rates Cu and Zn within guidelines. Suggest keeping lime receipts.
*Waste analysis dated 2/5/02 nitrogen is 1.3 lbs/1000 gallons
11/16/01 nitrogen is 1.2 Ibs/1000 gallons
**Remember to take waste analysis 60 days before /60 days after irrigation events.
*Lagoon level is recorded weekly.
F
*Waste plan dated 6115101 signed by Sonya Barber and based on wetted acres. Concern as to palls on map and actual field
easurements were not made. Cotton not included in plan. Carl Dunn DSWC correcting plan and wetted acres.
�
wer/Ins ector NameP Mara 'Mctawhornwer/Inspector
E
Signature: Date:

05103101 , Continued
ace i y Number: 40_102 Date of Inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below l7 Yes p No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? p Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring•veaetation, asphalt, p Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? p Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) p Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? p Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? p Yes p No
y.
13. Waste plan does not include cotton, PAN rate and crop windows. Contact tech spec. Be sure to follow PAN rate once new plan i
is written, '
*Coastal bermuda hay and small grain overseed have been removed from waste plan being replaced by cam, wheat, soybeans.
*Commercial fertilizer deducted from PAN on iRR2 calculations.
*Be sure to use correct waste analysis for cotton when balancing PAN.
*Use correct PAN rate for soybeans. !, {
*Need to rebalance PAN for -wheat using rate 117.5 lbslacre. No over application.
.F1
4E ,ti
ri
>J
t
.?r.
3 .
�lt �•
� rr;
r
�q
rr
�u
•tf
S .4 •
1
\'
( ...
i�

VA �•_,,,,,," t sra •„` ff I'.. ; 1 t+ !
' , r, ! E - 1 .f j \ �% '•�E - ��Y t._y � � /�// l � r � � •a S€ ' Y �� ,,r �. 3 r .t. i'.'i
1 'E # �E ii 1 i3 i1 i (C� � ; � ��� ".b '4 3� �j� � Y,�) �ep •y�/ � ' 1 OA' ? 1 _
7
ItQ1i, UX�lwl¢I3; t
f3fss s
t ;.d• i ' ei € I"¢- .«skid,. , ak.r� "Cern,MO
- �.r.....�...:..... -..
- i=, �� • wrr.:-.a. . �.................. _-r- f t [E 3�. j { E I - xi ,..
i!
! it e I.,Fp € a �c ty I I lrt •` ��1�6 �`\ i !� I ,/r S ! ,.�¢' a 7-
7,777 i E
€ I E ' i �' A E � _ !,1' •,! f � .^tau ���' =a�!f ,�a.� � I t3112� f ! � E' € ,l I a r re r tt f '
E ! r J . �t i a Er i� ri Y: 7r ! }.,.AEI - A k� k �,.A,�� � .��I 3G�, /F�^'�•=-. E 9 � Y '�
i C1 JR E-_�`'►.,a 3 °�' i Y3 E I ` !'
t �ii If. 4 if3i' a3�
7(�l
C9rrV oly ToniQ '
d _
�i
I I
i � �
y ! � � I�f ram" �� --• ,� �,�=�� � �..-�,-.:,
� t't i E 3 f€ { Ef r, g,f - "/+--^•'^.-�.:_... I _'"""" T"J � � � C6n1ti.' j� ! � .��
-E� + r'\� 3 Y i€ t If «_•- f i I ! I E kE li..� �i WEY.,,, {{++1,,���'% � ({ f',p I �M'
Y �1 19'' ' � tl te�f€��' �i,_.% 4 �
!,; Neh h Greene I i y ? - I
l ( e I i?
i �._. ! I, : ; x ...� €1 73i 1 A.✓j i _r ! .t€! f :¢Eh hry
Hnmeli Swe¢inp
/'-• \ `i�,. � `: •_ � ' i � ? li ( ! 1 � r ! � 3 .. a�i.� E ! � � I E r
� 3� b�• �... � fFc � I � ' t! �� to � i 3 !' � ! ?li it � ij I j + iii3Y i - !' �:� h El ¢' El E�f ! �� ji-f 3 i 7 � i 4 -
/ % � Y � r• 1 I i lI !. 1. '.'o � C:=�F
tj
i€ t Y 1 li giAEit fi II j_7, ri;ir i rf €¢ A i b ; liil i E,'fl...-...•,••,:,..� `.� ».:. 7c_...�.-.-;kV"� E [. t'E€ 77
jiE E t# ta,?• r•f. i !,,I�
"%(yJ� �•.' iY '"1� �.'k€ �i I PtE I'ip �a�w1L,.,.r.t:. t ..f.., 1- i _fib.€ S)' E /.� i,p....nn #fir r-if•"tw9„Y r i a ��a¢ ''�
�,wrZ , �.� 940 x E i A a ! ¢ A• ♦ y Y. �.* 4 :1 }. yI t r I .,�- yl x'19 U ,
.sr \; i �•� �� +'" I ` , >�` rsl I {I 1 \ ! �, l v � kl f i .. ' ,
-
4 • I5 f 11 ._ r if Y•.S ��y�r<-C�L:�i'' 41i+ \ �.+i3 f'r,y '! 1 `VY Y I E f E Y i 1 i 3 E ,r
il�''as. a F0fr115 •�� i �I F ' E ^3tP E t '.+' p j
l
�� f' � '� 9i �d i i I' Cemi • i `• �, i rE; �a,if 1 + .............
1� P
f €!11-fIng
rii t1 @f 1 ,;°$t E�! €t! ri.,y€ rE E `r'S€f I fd. ! fly I f,;,hrlif"Y �+•> !, i t 1 j ! • + I ! W
!�rilll✓"•'i rt is t Ea ��Y a (', vv 1 -
�." r,
� .� ,� >i u„ � �� .�. ' E iE .�' a ra V Et f ! E i . �. � -a G .: M✓
r[ 4Er la yl i .i,' b + .+_rtf a _= f� t :y,.:.
� y ` .. : t r r ( •, uqfeE,ii r f I E 1! P ij
if 3
E E k�l }..
2ALS t•.� ..f@ SA ` w i *!
- Y
E13r �IT
COmiE �l�r
ci� f31Ii i1E '
'
�1312 # N
r
r ��..,til��L^._.. �v `��. •y -� ' 7 'x'• i ! i a f,•i
yw qy ' .s 1! ¢
ril
n �I=� � rp r" �!r �'°'+.E .r:� f a31 -,:� € .. :p ! + Erl A. � � '� i jQ «. A ,.. � � O l -• +
� ��"• e� t � � r I'.� �' e, �r�.�ti ��E�, e}� _ ?35.wt�! t !'! g'.` +� j � E �� em ! �� I f E 1-�,'�.
�� � �'"3 tty ;; €` Ei! . ;! A r,� �"�a,,,,,„, � ( • E� �� � y n='!1 s a� "� li
,a
- 30
C�
fs Yl j A
cem
:.._....,..,.,.3aa
-a"q'•
*� 1 ! 1 �• I ,- Efi l "l`^ o-y i �u+taas 1i.l
` � �_ 1 � Fi�' tk g it r% � •,.. ` , i, f "I".��� •, j yR€.x1! �I r: i I F�i � >,.I ! i. ,
$ Y s ?. I 11;l €ir .y 1�, "i Y ,, +�Y! rl,; i?� t L i' if Hinson Farn
,
>>S,i €f .. € E iL«' � ,t ,N' ! E ��X N ', . � � E : i \ • ,._ � �il A 7 A . ���3.,
Name: WALSTONBURG Location: 035o 34' 16.3" N 077o 41' 08.8" W
Date: 10/30/102 Caption: Gay Farms
Scale: 1 inch equals 2000 feet
copyrignc (G) IV97, mapcecn, Inc.

11
mom
7�
.I
�I

w ArFq pG
0 �
May 21, 2001
Mr. Mike Gay
Gay Farms
930 Meadow Road
Walstonburg, North Carolina 27888
SUBJECT: Notice of Deficiency
Animal Compliance Evaluation Site Inspection
Gay Farms
Facility No. # 40-102
Greene County
Dear Mr. Gay:
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Kerr T. Stevens
Division of Water Quality
Enclosed please find a copy of the Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection (as it is viewed in DWQ database)
conducted at the referenced facility by the Division of Water Quality from the Washington Regional Office. Please
read this inspection and keep it with all other documents pertaining to your animal operation for future
inspections.
In general, this inspection included verifying that: (1) the farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15
NCAC 21-1.0217, Senate Bill 1217, the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan and/or General Permit; (2)
determine whether the waste utilization plan is based on total or actual wetted acres; (3) the farm operation's waste
management system is being operated properly under the direction of a Certified Operator; (4) the required records
are being kept; (5) there are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or runoff. The following deficiencies were noted
during the inspection.
cp In accordance with condition Il, item 4 of your General Permit, land application rates shall be in
accordance with the CAWMP. In no case shall land application rates exceed the Plant Available
Nitrogen (PAN) rate for the receiving crop or result in runoff during any give application.
cp In accordance with condition III, item 4 of your General Permit, an analysis of animal waste shall be
conducted as close to the time of application as practical and at least within 60 days (before or after) of
date of application. The analysis shall include the following parameters: Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Zinc and
Copper.
As a reminder, please note the following which are conditions of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan and the
general permit therefore these items must be implemented:
cp The maximum waste level in lagoons/storage ponds shall not exceed that specified in the CAWMP. At a
minimum, maximum waste level for waste for lagoons/storage ponds must not exceed the level that provides
adequate storage to contain 25 year, 24 hours storm event plus an additional foot of structural freeboard.
T Soil analysis is required annually
(p The following records are required: rainfall and lagoon level data, off -site solids removal, maintenance, repair,
waste/soil analysis and land irrigation records. These records should be maintained by the facility
owner/manager in chronological and legible form for a minimum of three years.
cp Land application rates shall be in accordance with the CAWMP. In no case shall land application rates exceed
the Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) rate for the receivine crot) or result in runoff during, anv vive analication.
cp Keep lagoons/storage ponds free of foreign debris including, but not limited to tires, bottles, plastic products,
light bulbs, gloves, syringes or any other solids waste.
cp The lagoon areas should be kept mowed or otherwise controlled and accessible. High grass does not allow
you to conduct a thorough inspection of the lagoon area for seepage, rodent damage, etc.
943 Washington Square Mali Washington, NC 27889 252-946-6481 (Telephone) 252-946-9215 (Fax)

Page Two
Gay Farms
# 40-102
�P It is suggested not required to keep crop yield information for future use to update your waste management
plan. You will need three years of crop yield data before your plan can be updated.
Thank you for your assistance and cooperation during the inspection. If you have any questions, please contact me at
252/946-6481, ext. 318 or your Technical Specialist.
Sincerely,
Lyn B. Hardison
Environmental Specialist
Cc: Greene NRCS
Mike Regans
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit (w/out attachments)
NCDSWC-WaRO Wout attachments)
WaRO Animal Compliance File
te

Iiype of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
'Reason for Visit (DRoutine O Complaint O Fallow up O Emergency Notification O Other © Denied Access
Facility Number 40 102 . 1)ate of Visit: 3-22-2001 'I'inte: tiD4
O Not O erational Q Below Threshold
e Permitted E Certifed E3 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:.. ...............
Farm Name: dalY..FMM........................--•...................................................... ......... County: Gr.eglllr............................................... WA1?Q.......
OwnerName: Mlle ........................................ G................................................................ Phone No: Z52-7S3.-366.7............................................................
Mailing Address: 930.1Ya.0dox.Road............................................................................. W.Uktui hmrg..NC............................................... 2.7.88.8 .............
FacilityContact:.............................................................................. Title:................................... Phone No:
Onsite Representative: tail..1 merator: ,ay...................................................................................... s B�'.pllt'!P3'..Cm ..............................................
Certified Operator:!' idwel................................. (;my ....................................................
................................. peratar Certification Number:16.412 .............................
Location of Farm:
;Take NC 91 S. from Walstonburg turn left on SR 1312 Farm located 1.5 miles on right side of SR 1312. +
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude �� �' ��� Longitude
Design Current
Design Current
Design-, ..`.Current
Swine capacity Population
Poultry
Capacity Po uladon Cattle
Capacity Po ulation
® Wean to Feeder
4160
4050
❑ Layer
I
Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Non -Layer
I
Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
4,160
❑ Gilts
Total SSLW .
124,800
❑ Boars
Number of Lagoons f _J ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Disc harms 8 Stream hapacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field []Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharae bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
nla
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
Structure 6
Identifier:...............................................................................................................................................................................
Freehoard (inches): 28
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: 40-10271 Date of Inspection 3.22-2001
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system'other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
I I . Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding [:]PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type Corn, Soybeans, Wheat Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Small Grain Overseed Cotton
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
®No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records &Documo t s
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20, Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21, Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23, Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
C] No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
i r �v K- k.- - •_ Mj� Sr , !V'a[ S. ty � 1i.1. 'I
Ons
s n
� };
Field Copy Final Notes
* Records available for review.
* Waste analysis 2-28-01 = 1.5 lbs, 10-26-00 = 0.97 lbs.
* Soil analysis for 2001 available.
Freeboard levels are recorded weekly.
* Irrigation records are complete and balanced out. However there was overapplication on Cotton last year as noted in teh DSWC
oeprational review. An NOR was issued on missing waste analysis form last summer. The overapplication was a result of using the
wrong PAN allowing unknowingly. Notice of Deficiency will be sent.
r
Reviewer/Inspector Name i.,yn B. Hardison,.
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
05103101
Continued

Facility Number: 40-102 DaIc of Inspeclion 3.22-20(I1
Printed on: 5/18/200I
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
Make sure to use the correct PAN in your records and record any fertilizer applications on the IRR2.
Vegetation on dike wail is well established.
Continue to pull waste samples quarterly.
Record every irrigation event in the records and balance the nitrogen.
Overseed must be removed by April 7, 2001.
** If you have any questions, contact your Technical Specialist or me @ 252-946-6481, ext. 318. ***
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑Yes ®No
❑ Yes ❑ No
lI
05103101
J

'State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Washington Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Division of Soil & Water Conservation
October 26, 2000
Mr. Mike Gay
930 Meadow Road
Walstonburg, North Carolina 27888
Dear Mr. Gay:
4AMM
• •
NCDENR
NORTH C,AROUNA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOWRCE5
� M M� U T M
OCT 2 i 2000
SUBJECT: Operation Review Notice of Referral for
Gay Farms, Facility Number 40-102
On October 16, 2000, an Operation Review was conducted of the Mike Gay Farm, facility
number 40-102, in Greene County. This review, undertaken in accordance with G.S. 143-
215.10, is one of two site visits scheduled for all subject animal operations during the 2000
calendar year. The Division of Water Quality will conduct a second compliance inspection.
During the operation review, the following item was noted:
- there was not a waste analysis to cover irrigation events on cotton PAN 70 lbs./acre
tract 365 field 8A, 8B from 5-15-00 through 7-16-00. Last waste analysis dated
2/2/00 with nitrogen rate at 1.4 Ibs/1000 gallons.
It was for this reason that your operation was referred to the Division of Water Quality for
further investigation and possible enforcement action. G.S. 143-215.10E requires me to notify
the Division of Water Quality and the owner/operator of these observed violations. Please
review the enclosed inspection report and comment sections for site.
On behalf of the Division of Soil and Water Conservation, I appreciate your cooperation with
this operation review. Please do not hesitate to call me at [phone] ext. 242.
Sincerely
,
5a �a�
Martin McLawhorn
Environmental Specialist II
cc: Daphne Cullom, DWQ-WaRO
Carroll Pierce, Division of Soil & Water Conservation
Greene County Soil & Water Conservation District
Jake Barrow, L.L. Murphrey
DSWC — WaRO Files
943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, North Carolina 27889 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

O Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number
Tate of Visit: 10-1ti-213DD Time: 930 Printed on: 10/24/2000
40 102
O Not Operational O Below Threshold
Permitted ® Certified 0 Conditionally. Certified 13 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold : .........................
Farm Name: G.ay..Fums.................... ..................................................... Countv: Gregiag ............................................... hY.taRO.......
OwnerName: 51jkv........................................ GAX............................................................... Phone No: 7_53-3.ft(i.7.....................................................................
FacilityContact:...................................................................... ........Title: ................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
Mailing Address: �ol�t .Z...aa.�2-A............................................. ... !'.atst!vn ur, ..J ............................................... U.N.$ ..............
Onsite Representative: Mike.,G.ay.............................
..... ......................
Certified Operator:Michad................................. GAY ....................................
Location of Farm:
Integrator: Lt.L.MUr.Phxe3'.CSL...................................
..... Operalor Certification Ntimber: 1.{gX2 .............................
fake NC 91 S. from Walstonburg turn left on SR 1312 Farm located 1.5 miles on right side of SR 1312.
®Swine ❑Poultry ❑ Gatle ❑Horse Latitude �• �� ��° Longitude �• ��
Design Current
Swine Canacity Ponulation
® Wean to Feeder
4160
4160
❑ Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Ll Farrow to tnts
Ll Gilts
Soars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 4,160
Total SSLW 124,$00
Number of Lagoons 10 Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds /solid Traps L ,J ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
V4'aste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ SpiIlway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ................................................
Freeboard(inches): ............... 3................ ............................................................................................................................................... .
5100 Continued on back

Facilitv Number: 44-102 Date of Inspection 10-16-2000 Printed o0 10/24/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
Closure plan? ❑ Yes ® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ® No
Wsiste a olieation
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ® PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ® Yes ❑ No
12. Crop type Corn, Soybeans, Wheat Cotton Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Small Grain Overseed
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Re aired Records S Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
13 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You rvill.receive no further ;
correspondence about this visit. .
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
'Greene Soil and Water Conservation is in process of developing new waste plan based on wetted acres.
'Waste analysis dated 2/21/00. Nitrogen is 1.4 lbs/1000 gallons.
'Soil test dated 3/8199. Lime applied at recommended rates.
'Remember to take soil test for this year.
'Tract 2149 field #3 had wind row in coastal bermuda field that has been cleared, need to resprig coastal in this area.
'Irrigation system is traveler.
'Lagoon level is being recorded weekly as required by permit.
IV
Reviewer/Inspector Name Martin M orn
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 2 1 A/ 5100

Facility Number: 40-102 Date of Inspection 10-16-2000Printed on: 10/24/2000
Oar lssues
26.
Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
❑ Yes
® No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27.
Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
®No
29.
Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
❑ Yes
®No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29.
is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
❑ Yes
® No
30.
Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
❑ Yes
® No
31.
Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
❑ Yes
® No
32.
Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe ar a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes
❑ No
32. Pit recharge. _A�
*Small amount of trash in lagoon.
11. Over application on cotton tract 365 field 8A and"813 in the amount of-6 lbs. nitrogen per acre. This amount is less than 10% o
PAN for cotton which is 70 lbs/acre. This over application amount was determined from IRR2 calculation using waste analysis
dated 2/21/00 with nitrogen rate of 1.4 lbs/I000 gallons. Mr. Gay was told that the waste analysis he used in these calculations was
out of date.
19. There is not a waste analysis for cotton crop that animal waste was applied on from 5-15-00 through 7-6-00. Waste analysis
must be taken 60 days before/ 60 days after irrigation event. Notice of Referral to Division. of Water Quality.
19. There is not a waste analysis to cover irrigation on soybeans tract 365 field IA. Need to take waste analysis immediately and
rebalance PAN for soybeans using new waste analysis.
*Need to record on IRR2 any commercial fertilizer that is applied to crops in waste plan and deduct this amount from PAN balance.
J
5100

a Division of Water Quality
C Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Q Other Agency
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
'Reason for Visit © Routine O Complaint O Follow up Q Emergency Notification Q Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 40 102 Date of Visit: 6Y1/2000 Time: E== Printed on: 6/15/2000
Nat Operational 0 Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified 13 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .......................
Farm Name: Gay.10.1: a .............................
............................... County: Greciag..
........ WARQ.......
OwnerName: Milit........................................GAY..............,................................................ Prone No: 7.5.3.3,b6.1.....................................................................
FacilityContact:.............................................................................. Title:............
Mailing Address: 93.4..M.qwiden:.R9Ad....................... ..........................................
Onsite Representative: Mjjkg.. ,ay ................
Certified Operator: MjghACj L........................
Location of Farm:
PhoneNo:. .......................................
W-alatQ.0AA g..NC............................................... V80 .............
Integrator: L.L.i).' UX.PlAra..C&..............................................
Operator Certification Number:16.412.............................
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude • ' « Longitude • 4 «
Design Current
Swine C'anneity Pnnisintinn
® Wean to Feeder
4160
4000
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 4,160
Total SSLW 124,800
Number of Lagoons 0 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area I0 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps 10 No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ®No
Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ..................................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): 23

Continued on back
Facility Number: 40-102 Date of Inspection 6/7/2000 Printed on: 6/15/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (id/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ®No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes M No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ®No
12. Crop type Cam, Soybeans, Wheat Coastal Bermuda
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land fapplication? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
0' No violatitiris_o"r deticiencies•were "noted'd'uripg• thig •visit: ' Wti will'receive no further '
.. corresnondence nbout this.visit. ... ...... ... . ..... .
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes IN No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes IN No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes IN No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ® No
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
Soil analysis 2/24/00, 2/15/00 J&
Waste analysis 2/21/00 - 1.4 lbs./1000 gals.
Maintaining freeboard records.
Irrigation records complete with current nitrogen balance.
Mr. Gay working with Greene Soil & Water District on new waste utilization plan on wettable acres.
Reviewer/Inspector Name
IDaphne B. Cullom Entered by Ann Tyndall {
IE1M 1014
n....,."r 'Z'7 — Qn

' Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
Facility Number: 40-102 Date of Inspection 6/7/2000 Printed on: 6/15/2000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ®No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ®No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fans) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Additional Comments and/orDrawings:
A

p uivision of aou anu water 9.unservation - vperation meview
p Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Compliance Inspection
Division of Water Quality - Compliance Inspection
p Other Agency - Operation Review
p Routine p Complaint p Follow-up of DWQ inspection p Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Permitted p Certified 0 Conditionally Certified p Registered 10 Not Opera ona Date Last Operated : ...........................
Farm Dame:.GaK.Fatms........................ . ......--......... County: Greene WARO
OwnerName: MJl�......................................... Gis�lY........................... .. Phone No: �................................................. .................................. .........
FacilityContact: ...............................................................................Title:............................................................... Phone No:
Mailing Address: �RlAtfr.��. !?JK..2.Z:E�............................................................................ .W..p�5t.4.11�t.N1Cg.................................................. VAN .............
Onsite Representative: NA.uuue.on.slate ......................................................................... Integrator:L.1 ,Murph 4.Co................................................
Certified Operator: ijqhttgj.Lt....... Gtly.................................................... Operator Certification Number:.16.412 .............................
Location of Farm:
.Nl�.�l..�..:frana..W..alskambu.rg.zuxe..lett.am.�R.I�A�...aa:na.1.acated.........naile....an.rigbt.side.nE.SR.�3.2..................................................
y
Latitude • & 44 Longitude • 4 46
Swine Capacity Population
®
Wean to Feeder
4160
p
Feeder to
Finish
p
Farrow to
Wean
13
Farrow to
ee er
p
arrow to
Finish
p
is
p
Boars
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
p Layer JE3 Dairy
p Non -Layer JE3 Non -Dairy
p Other
Total Design Capacity 1 4,160
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons 0Subsurface rams resent p agoon rea 13 pray a rea
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps 0 p No Ejquia Waste Management System
Discharses & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes p No
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes p No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) p Yes p No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes p No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes p No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? p Yes ❑ No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? p Spillway ❑ Yes p No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): 1.5 .. ............... ..............
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99
p Yes p No
Continued on back

[Facility Number: 40_ 1t12 Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(if any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
Immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? p Excessive Ponding p PAN
12. Crop type
Cl No
p Yes
p Yes
p No
p Yes
p No
p Yes
p No
p Yes
p No
p Yes
p No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Re uired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
0 :.No:violations. or:deficiencies were. noted: during this.'isit.• Vou.will receive:no: further.:: :
•:•:correspotidenceatiout�this:visit:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:�:•:-:-:�:�:�:•:�:•:�:•:•:�:•:•:•:•:
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other com
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
uate. Irrieatina on
at time of site visit to
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes I] No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
13 Yes p No
Yes p No
p Yes p No
El Yes p No
p Yes p No
13 Yes p No
Reviewer/inspector Name Oaphne B. Cullom Carl Dunn
Reviewer/inspector Signature: _ J —.A. 11A V%_ ✓- Date:

EMERGENCY ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST
Drafted September 24, 1999
Facility #Lh�_-j QZ. On -site Representative: Contact#,
Date: IQ_=52- - !!39 Inspector/Reviewer: 1l
Time: ' 3,iSPnr1 DLQ/Dam Safety Rep.:
Waste Structures:
1. Structure Integrity (circle one):
Immediate Threat Potential Threat Adequate Other
Comments(does structure need repair/extent of damage, etc.):
2. Allowable maximum lagoon level (circle):
Structure failed and is inoperable .
Immediate Threat - empty immediately
Immediate/Potential - maximum operating level
(inches from top of dike - must be initialed by DLQ/Dam Safety rep.)
w
Adequate - may operate at normal levels
3. Storm impact to lagoon (circle applicable category):
Structure inundated
(Information related to length of time submerged, etc)
Flood waters saturated outside wall
Estimated distance in inches (ie/36 inches from top):
Structure topped over
(was top of dike cut, etc.)
Flood water originated from (name of creek, river, etc.)
Circle Basin: Neuse Tar White Oak Roanoke Chowan
4. Date and explanation of remedial action taken after storm:

Other Parts of Waste Management System:
Comments (lift station, collection boxes, destroyed houses, etc.)
Waste Application System:
1. Irrigation/application system - comments, assistance needed, etc.:
2. System is (circle): Inoperable/destroyed Operable but limited Operable
3. For inoperable systems (circle):
Lost supply lines Lost hardware (reels, pivots, etc.) Lost pump No power sources
Other:
4. What is needed to repair system and length of time needed to bring back on-line?
5. Would a generator fix situation?
6. Is pump & haul equipment available?
Land Application Sites:
1. Is field(s) currently flooded and if yes, what percentage of field(s) flooded?
2. Fields are saturated but not ponded
3. Are receiving crops available? Yes No
If answered no, estimated time before next crop planted
4. Fields adequate to receive waste
5. Comments - remedial action taken after storm which may have affected spray fields:
6. Are alternative sites or third party land immediately available?

Record Keeping:
1. Records were destroyed and in need of reconstruction
2. Records partially complete
3. Records available and complete
4. Date and PAN of last waste analysis
Structure 1: 2:
5. Last lagoon level readings: 1 2
Just prior to August 1:
Just prior to August 29:
Just prior to Sept. 15
Immediately after 9115
3: 4: 5:
3 4 5 Rainfall Received
Current level j�
6. Documented volumes pumped from waste structure since Hurricane Floyd:
7. Current animal populations:__
Mortality Losses:
1. Number of animals lost:
2. Disposal method used:
3. Does facility lack a means of disposal?
Other comments; unanswered questions, etc.:
* Use back of sheet for additional comments, sketches, etc.

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt,' Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
July 6,1999
Mike Gay
Route 2, Box 225-A
Walstonburg NC 27888
/ 0 •
0WNft%M'WWWM%MW0Vft Ll
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: Compliance Inspection
Gay Farms _
Facility Number 40 - 102
Greene County
Dear Mike Gay,
On 6/16/99, Carl Dunn from the Washington Regional Office of the Division of Water Quality
conducted an inspection of your animal operation. Please review the enclosed inspection form. This
inspection form should be maintained as part of the.records for your facility. Please note any items that
maybe marked with ayes. answer and make every effort to correct these deficiencies. You are advised
that you must maintain a freeboard of at least one foot in your lagoon(s) plus a storage volume sufficient
to accommodate the rainfall and subsequent runoff from a 25 year 24 hour storm event to remain in
compliance. You should consult your lagoon design for the exact freeboard requirement. Please.
remember that you must follow your waste management plan at all times.
Thank you for your cooperation in this inspection. If you have any further questions in regard to this
matter or if I may be of any assistance, I can be contacted at [phone] ext. 208.
Sincerely,
Carl Dunn
Environmental Engineer
cc: WaRO
L L Murphrey Co.
943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, NC 27889 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled110% post -consumer paper

i , [3Divisionof Soil and'Water'Conserva�on - Op'eration Review, '
E 0 er'Conservation Compliance Ins , Division of Soil and Wat pection
,Division of Water Quality =Compliance Inspection
13,Otber Agency -'Operatk4rReview.
10 Routine Q Complaint Q Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow -tip of DSWC review O Other i
IY � I1� II YYIYYYY�YYYYYYYY�
Facility Number Q I O Date of Inspection 99
Time of Inspection 10- 24 hr. (hh:mm)
[] Permitted 0 Certified © Conditionally Certified © Registered 10 Not O erational Date Lest Operated:
ram,p �^-Q
...............
Farm Name i1{ a. Fu�.^ County...........v.............................................
OwnerName: ... C? e.................................................. ..... Phone No:...........................................................
.... .......
Facility Contact: ...................................................... ................... Title: Phone No
Mailing Address:
Onsite Representative: � t k2 A`� Integrator :........... ..........M.`".�'.:Pal...................................
................................................. /................................................. L .....
Certified Operator: ................................................... ............................................................. Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm:
.................... .............. ... ..... ............ .....................
Latitude • 6 Longitude ° 6 "
' 't' ' Design Current Design Current Design Current I
Swine Capacity Population Poultry' Ca acity Population Cattle Capacity Population
® Wean to Feeder 4416 o O 10 Layer I I ❑ Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish 10 Non -Layer I JE1 Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts,
❑Boars Total SSLW
❑
Number of Lagoons. ,, Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
HoldmgEPonds / Solid Traps E= , " ; ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
1
Discharges & Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is ohserved, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 1,No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes h3 No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes IR No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure G
Identifier:
Freeboard(inches): ......................................................................................................................................................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes 9 No
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back

Facility N6mber: Date of Inspection G-1 r7�j
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes t[ No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes 9 No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? [:]Yes No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes No
Waste AnDlication
10.
Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
[-]Yes
R No
11.
Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
❑ Yes
19 No
12.
Crop type ��r.� ,A„ COS - *-�ej 1,(AAS, ca�+0✓s SG 0111-PVJ
13.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
No
14.
a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
91 No
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
% No
Reauired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
t@ No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ic/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
9 No
19.. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
9 No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
MNo
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
Q No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
IgNo
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
9No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
No
�'Vo-yiolafigrts;ot- deficiencies iygre nQtea dar4ng �his;visit: Yoir wilE reetriye Rio fUttho • : • .
ctirres' oridence: ab'd this visit:
.. { E ...E ; ... .. i f:
Comments;(refer to 'question #f)E �Explatn any ,YES answers and/or any'. recommendations or anyEai leer comments:
Use1drawinQs of facility 'to better ex lainEsituations use adWdonaI ages as necessa (E' � a 4�� ; l t{. "E
C P ) ! "`
' 1.
k ! I .�! '1 F i o, p�
���
A.
Reviewer/Inspector Name o , � ` � � �t/� �, � � tr �; �� •� �, tr •
, , r , Ei . � . �
i . ,
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
3/23/99

Facility umber: y p — 10 2 Dale of Inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes Dq No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes 0 No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes 09 No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes Rg No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes OKNo
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent temporary cover? ❑ Yes IS No
3123/99

Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Operation Review
p Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Compliance Inspection
p Division of Water Quality - Compliance Inspection
p Other Agency - Operation Review
l* rcounne p t omptaint p ronow-up of j)wy inspection p ronow-up of uz vvu review p tuner
Facility Dumber Date of Inspecllolt ® 1
Time of Inspection ® 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Permitted p Certified E Conditionally Certified p Registered 10 Not perahona Date Last Operated:
Farut Name: Gay.Falrms.................................................................. County: Greene WARO
OwnerName- Mille ........................................ Gay............................................................... Phone No: 252t7.51-3661 ........................................................
FacilityContact: ...............................................................................Title: ...........................
PhoneNo: ..................................................
Mailing Address: Rt;.2..fox,.Z2.A..................................................................................... Walstonharg,.Y.0 ................................................ 27888 ............
Onsite Representative: Mike.Gay...................................................................................... Inleg rat or: L.L.Murtha:ey..Cumpuny ...............................
.
Certified Operator:Mjcbtaul.L............................ Gay ..................................................... Operator Certification Ntnnher:164.1.2............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude =• =, =«
urmgu %- 9 1 cin
Swine Capacity Population
® Wean to Feeder
p Feeder to Finish
p Farrow to can
13 Farrow to ee er
p Farrow to Finis
p Gilts
p Boars
At
Longitude « 4 46
uestgn current Design current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
p ayer p atry
p Non -Layer p on- airy E
t
p Other
Total Design Capacity 4,160
—77
Total SSLW 124,800
Number of Lagoons >< jp Nunsurrace uratns rresent I'p Lagoon Area IO spray rreur Arco
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps 0 0 No Liquid Waste Management System
Dischar$Zes & Stream Impacts
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes p No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes. notify DWQ) 13 Yes p No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes. notify DWQ) p Yes p No
2. is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? 0 Yes ®No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? p Spillway p Yes N No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
identifier:
.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard(inches): .2.0...............................................................................................................................................................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, 0 Yes N No
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on bui-i

Facility Number: 40_IO2 Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? p Yes N No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? p Yes H. No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? p Yes N No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and -minimum liquid level
elevation markings? p Yes N No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? p Yes N No
11. Is there evidence of over application? p Excessive Ponding p PAN C3 Yes N No
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Small Grain Overseed Corn, Soybeans, Wheat
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Rec[►rds & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Revicwer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
Q No.vitil tions or. deficiEn.cres:wre . •>n....tiuritig:this visi....0............... :.
...... .. .. .............
...coeresi)aiidenc� aboir( this:visit:........:..:::::::::::::::::::::: :
[3Yes ®No
p Yes ® No
® Yes p No
p Yes N No
p Yes N No
Yes ® No
p Yes N No
13Yes ®No
13 Yes ® No
p Yes N No
C1 Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
Comments (refer to question ##): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
Kecommend signing up for local Neuse Kule options by 811/99 with the Ureene Soil & Water Conservation District
Mailed Integrator Registration card with copy of this Review report to owner of facility
Waste sample dated 2/22/99 at 1.6 lbs/1000 gal. Soils report dated 3/8/99. Keeping weekly lagoon levels as required.
Has seeded bare areas on lagoon with vegetation establishing
Operation has design calculations, operation & maintenance plan and design layout as requested through DWQ Inspection.
4b. Operation did not pass 75% rule with row crops not included in permanent tables of plan (did have plan amendment for row
rops but not acreage - approximately 45 acres). Operation needs a wettable acre determination. Mr. Gay using estimated acreage
ror recoras. ► f
Reviewer/Inspector Name Pat Hooper 252/946-6481
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

p Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Operation Review
p Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Compliance Inspection
Division of Water Quality - Compliance Inspection
p Other Agency - Operation Review
149 Koutme 0 Complaint 0 Hollow -up of [)Wt1 inspection 0 Ihollow-up of USWC: review 0 Other
Facility Number Daw of Inspection
I'ime of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Permitted p Certified ■ Conditionally Certified p Registered in Not perationa Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: Gay.F,arzas........................ County: Greene WARO
OwnerName: Mike ....................................... Gay............................................................... Phone No: .7.51r3667..................................................................
.
Facility Contact: ..................................... ................Title: .. Phone No:
Mailing Address: Roiuxe.2,.Rox.225.7A............................................................................ Walsioithurg... NC................................................ 278.88 ............
Onsite Representative: Me.Gay..................................................................................... Integrator:L1.MurW.eyXa...............................................
Certified Operator:Michaid.I............................. Gay ..................................................... Operator Certification Number: 164.1.2............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude =r 1 �«
Swine Capacity Population
® Wean to Feeder
p Fecaer to mts
p Farrow to Wean
p Farrow to ee er
p Farrow to Finis
0Grts
p Boars
Longitude =* =& =«
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
p ayer p airy
p on- -Layer p on- airy
p Offier
Total Design Capacity 4,160
Total SSLW 124,800
r
. t
Number of Lagoons I 0 u sur ace Drains Present rem 113 Spray re rcH
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps 0 © No Liquid Waste Management System
k
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes M No
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes p No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State`? (If yes, notify DWQ) 0 Yes p No
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated Flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes p No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes ®No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? © Yes ®No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? p Spillway p Yes ®No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier
.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard(inches): ...............2.5............................................................................................................................................................................ I..................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, I7 Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on ha r

Facility Number: 40_102 Dote of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
p Yes
N No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
p Yes
H No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
p Yes
R No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
p Yes
® No
Waste Anelication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
p Yes
® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? p Excessive Ponding p PAN
0 Yes
® No
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Corn, Soybeans, Wheat Cotton Small Grain
Overseed
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
p Yes
H Nu
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
p Yes
p No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
p Yes
p No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
p Yes
p No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
p Yes
®No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
p Yes
® No
Rec aired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
p Yes
®No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
p Yes
® No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
p Yes
®No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
p Yes
®No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
p Yes
®No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
p Yes
®No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
p Yes
®No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
p Yes
®No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
Cl Yes
®No
U ; N)'vidations'©r.'deficien-cies:were woted'dut ing. tiIis :visit. ; You; wili'receive no. fui-thei r"
............. .... .. ....I...........
icorxes andence about this:visit:......::::::.::::::::::......... .
Comments (refer to question 4): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
.!
Reviewer/Inspector Name Carl Dunn
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Entered by Ann Tyndall
Date:

Printedon
aci i y um er: 40_102 Dal c of I11chectioll
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below p Yes ® No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? p Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, p Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? p Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) p Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? p Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? p Yes ® No

p uivision of Non ana water conservation - uperation meview
p Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Compliance Inspection
Division of Water Quality - Compliance Inspection
p Other Agency - Operation Review
O Routine p Complaint p Follow-up of DWQ inspection p Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number Date of hispectloll
Time; of Inspection I� 24 hr. (hh:mm)
E Permitted p Certified 0 Conditionally Certified p Registered 0 Not peratrona Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: Gay.Forms.......................................................................... County: Greene WARO
OwnerNanic: Mille ....................................... Gzy .............................................................. Phone No: ..753.3fV.................................................................
Facility Contact: .......
Title: ...
.. Phone No: ....................................
Mailing Address: Route.2,Rox.22S.-A............................................................................ Walsionhurg... NC................................................ 27988 ............
Onsite Representative: No.l=.olt.slte............................................................................ lntegrator:L1.Murpbrey..Cxi........................................... —.
Certified Operator: M,icliaul.l.,,........................... Gay ..................................................... Operator Certification Number: 164.12.................... ........
Location of Farm:
Latitude • i 46
Swine Capacity Population
® Wean to Feeder
4160
E3 Feeder to mis
13 Farrow to Wean
[3 Farrow to ee er
p Farrow to Ftnls
[3 Gilts
FE
p Boars
E.3 Ei
Longitude 0
Design urrent Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
p Layer I Ip airy
p Non -Layer 1 1 10 Non -Dairy
p Other
Total Design Capacity 4,160
E
Total SSLW 124,800
Number of Lagoons
l� E3 u sur ace Drains Present jrE3_E_ag_o_o_nXrea
rca 1
JE3 Spray re
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps
[3 No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
0 Yes
p No
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
p Yes
p No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
p Yes
p No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
p Yes
p No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
p Yes
p No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? E3 Yes
p No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? p Spillway
p Yes
p No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure
C
identifier:.................................................................................................................................................................................................................:.....
Freeboard(incites):..15............................................................................................................................................................
........................I.....1....
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (iel trees, severe erosion,
0 Yes
p No
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99
Continued
on bat

Facility Number: 40_102 Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
p Yes p No
(if any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
p Yes p No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
p Yes p No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
p Yes p No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
p Yes p No
11. Is there evidence of over application? p Excessive Ponding p PAN
p Yes p No
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
p Yes p No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
p Yes p No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
p Yes p No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
p Yes p No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
p Yes p No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
p Yes p No
Required„Records „& Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
p Yes p No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
p Yes p No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
p Yes p No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes p No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
p Yes p No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
p Yes p No
23. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
p Yes p No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
p Yes p No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
p Yes p No
No•vititatioits'or'dnfieiencies•were.noted during•this visit. ° Yau• will •receive no further ;
•.COr sparidenCe aboitl; this visit:
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
Structure integrity is adequate. Irrigating on Coastal Bermuda at time of site visit to lower freeboard level in lagoon.
Reviewer/[nspector Name Daphne B. Cullom Carl Dunn l
ReviewerAnspector Signature: Date:

Division of Soil and Water Conservation p Other Agency
p Division of Water Quality
Routine p Complaint p o ow -up ot DWQ inspection p o ow -up of DSWC review p Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection © 24 hr. (hh:mm)
p Registered ■ Certified E Applied for Permit p Permitted In Not Operationa Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: Gay.Fairxns................... County: Greene WARO
Owner Name: Mille ........................................ Gay............................................................... Phone No: 9191.7.5a-3G.62..(Saxm)...........
Facility Contact: Mike -Gay .........................................................Title: owner .................................................. Phone No: 9.191253-56211..(hame�.......
Mailing Address: Rt.2..fox.225-A.....................................................................................W.ahtoahurg..NC ................................................ 27888 ..............
Onsite Representative: Mike.Gay.,Rriaa.ShaCU1CfArd............................................ Integrator:L.L.Mucpbrey..lfog.C.ompamy........................
Certified Operator: Miclxajl.L...................... y.................... ... p ...... Gay .................... .......... Operator Certification Number: 1691.2.............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude 6C Longitude • 6 66 .
esign . current esrgn urrenDesign Current
Swine Capacity- Population .. Poultry, Capacity Population— Cattle Capacity Population
® Wean to Feeder
p Feeder to M
p Farrow to Wean
p Farrow to ee er
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑Gets
❑ Boars
❑ ayer
❑ on- ayer
❑ Other
:
Total Design Capaciity. 4,160
Total SSLW 12,
Number of1agoons / Holding Ponds ❑ M sur ace Drains Present 113 Lagoon rea jj3 Spray Fielrea
p No Liquid Waste Management System
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ® No
b. Ifdiseharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ® No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) 0 Yes ® No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes ®No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ®No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require p Yes ®No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? p Yes ®No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes ® No
7/25/97

i Facility
iy Number: 40_102
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lag_oons,Holding Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier: .......................
Freeboard (ft): 2.4
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
p Yes N No
p Yes ® No
Structure 5 Structure 6
p Yes N No
p Yes N No
p Yes ® No
p Yes N No
p Yes ® No
15. Crop hype ...... Coastal.Bej uttda.{hay.}............... mall.firaia.Oxsxsemd ....... ......................Cotton........................................ COM.4gra in.).................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? p Yes ® No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
Q . iX:o*violations.or deU ciencies-were.noted.during, this visit.,. You "I -receive nar further . .
.. ...................... . ...........
....
e�kes06njJ 4ec r �b4ti� t�iis.yisi�;:. :: .. .
p Yes ® No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ® No
p Yes Ig No
p Yes p No
Comments,(r$fe tq yuestio"n #}: € acplain any Y.ES answers and br any recommendatitigs:or anyiother comments.` i
°Ilse d rawingsj f l 011ty to. better explain `#ituatio`ns: (use addtti6nal pages,.as tikesshryj
A,
o subsurface drainage on site according to Mr. Gay
Last waste analysis taken 4/26/97 - pulled sample 11/97 but have not received results; also pulled soil samples for 1997 but haven't
received results
Not required at time of certification but will need for General Permit: odor control, insect control and mortality checklists
11 /17/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name JP a ooper
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

;a
,I State of North Carolina
STATE or
Department of Environment Ym ,
and Natural Resources`'
Division of Water Quality ,~
Washington Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
December 19, 1997
Mr. Mike Gay
Gay Farms
Rt. 2, Box 225-A
Walstonburg, N 27888
SUBJECT: . Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
Gay Farms
Facility No. 40-102
Greene County
Dear Mr. Gay:
On September 30, 1997, 1 conducted an animal feedlot operation site inspection at the referenced facility. Overall,
the operation was found to be in satisfactory condition. A copy of the inspection report is attached for your review.
In general, this inspection includes verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
(CAWMP); (2) the farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC 21-1.0217, Senate Bill 1217, and
the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan; (3) the farm operation's waste management system is being operated
properly under the direction of a Certified Operator; (4) the required records are being kept; (5) there are no signs of
seepage, erosion, and/or runoff.
The recommendations and/or comments regarding your inspection can be found in the comment section of the attached
inspection form. It is very important as the owner and Operator in Charge that you address any noted concerns, as soon
as possible. For assistance, please contact your Technical Specialist and/or the local Soil & Water Conservation District
Office.
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance during the inspection. Should you have further questions or
comments regarding this inspection, do not hesitate to call me at [phone], ext. 321.
Sincerely,
Daphne B. Cullom
Environmental Specialist II
cc: Greene County SWCD Office
Mike Regans, Greene County NCCES
Jake Barrow, L.L. Murphrey Hog Company
W aR0
943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, NC 27889 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

U
rcoutine p uompiaint p ronow-up of uwtt inspection p rouow-up of ubwu review p Utner
Date of Inspection
Facility Number
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
p Registered E Certified 0 Applied for Permit p Permitted in Not 0=
Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: Gay.F,emits.............................................................................................. County: Greene WARO
Owner Name: Milte..___. _ ..........._.. Gay............................................................... Phone No: 253-36.67 farm.............._......................................
Facility Contact: ................ ...... . ............... .... . .......... . ................. Title: .......................... .............. .......... ...... . Phone No: .751,56203mme ...................
Mailing Address: Rt2.Zax.225cA......... ................ ........ ..... ....... .» ...... ......................... ]i1.+aIStQjjhWg..NC............... ....................... ..... ,.... 2788A ..............
Onsite Representative: Mike.Gay..................................................................................... Integrator: L.L.Mnrpiu:ey..Sag.C.ampaay................ .......
Certified Operator: Michael.L............................ JGAY ..................................................... Operator Certification Number: lfx02 ..... ......................
Location of Farm:
Latitude ©• ®& ®« Longitude ©0 ®4 ©"
Svi�ine
=`
i;
®
Wean to Feeder
p
Feeder to
Finisfi
p
arrow to
We -an
p
Farrow to
ee er
11
Farrow to
mts
pGtts
Boars
'Poultry.:
,uurrent 7777. i� estgn
Population Cattle' ;Y' `;Capacity tPopulation �,
p Non -Layer
�. p Other
r ' 'Jy'Tota1 D&ign.Capacity 4,16
YE ttiSy yE} -�i (r7, _
Ti
* .O it 17A7JJ�74,800
Number of Lagoons 1 HoldtagrPands sur ace rams Presentp sgoon Area p pray FieldArea
r-
F :Liquid Waste Management ys em f
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? p Yes ® No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes N No
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes p No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes p No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow -in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) 0 Yes p No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes ®No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? p Yes ®No
S. Does any pr-t of the waste management system (other!han lagoons/ho?ding ponds) require p Yes 91 No
mainten ancelimprovement?
6. 4s facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? 13 Yes N No
'7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? p Yes ® No
7/25/97

aci i Number: _
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons.Holding Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Freeboard (11): 2.3 ft.
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
Immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste A lication
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
Structure 5 Structure 6
p Yes ® No
p Yes N No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
15. Crop type .......Cskrn.(S.Uage.& Grain) ........... .................. Cation ....................... ...... ..... ...... Wheat ................................ .... ......................... ..........
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
Q . o vialons.ocrencies-were VSI :. Op wt .receive aar u er
'0kesodnkuee .
W10 it�iis.*bit:
p Yes N No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date: 11 MQ — q 7

race um er: 40-102 Date of Inspection
m`or;a
5���,a•"'r,riw
'�riwi j7:'n
.•a;._.Y � iY
i{rrYp-'o:i7�
w fjL w•��:

Site Requires Immediate Attention: A
Facility No. ¢O- jln&
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
Date: - Z S 1995
Time: !p _
Farm Name /Owner : &Awl Z
bailing Address:
County: G Q de-') Q ..
Integrators Phone:
On Site Representative: Phones _ _(sly
Physical Address/Location: _ Wag ! a1� ,►�,�� �Co.4 /N78)t_rc c7?..J e�t. q�
Type of operation: Swine Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: r-, 3000 No. of An�maa o on Site:
DEM Certification No.: ACE DEM Certification No.: ACNEW
Latitudes Longitude: Elevation: Ft
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Ft +'25 year 24 hour
storm event? (approximately 1 Ft +__7 in) Yes or No
Actual Freeboards S Ft O Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or NIP -
Was any erosion observed? Yes or 10—
Is adequate land available for spray? 4—or No
Is the cover crop adequate? 15�"or No
Crop(s) being utilized: 0.)/4 iadj _-
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria?
200 Ft from Dwellings?r No 100 Ft from Wells? Yor No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Ft of USGS Blue Line Stream?
Yes or
Is animal waste end applied or spray irrigated within 25 Ft of a USGS Map Blue
Line? Yes or qgb—
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state b man-made ditch, flushing
system, or other similar man-made devices? Yes or
If Yes, please explain:
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure,
land applied, spray irrigated on specific a r ge with cover crop)? Yes or No
Inspector Name Sign Vlire
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
Comments & Sketch on Back of Sheet

DEM
SITE VISITATION RECORD
Page Two
Comments: Is rle /X ^r C �►i l OLD %r/y-9T eM0L/d,11db s AO
Alm) �afia•n..� C GJ47. 11L-711:ne�-
Sketch:
nnn