400070_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environmental Quai

EUTIU-Ilms

N
Division of Water Resources
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400070 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS400070
Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene Region:
Date of Visit: 07/05/2017 Entry Time: 09:00 am Exit Time: 10:30 am incident #
Farm Name: Pine Ridge Farm Owner Email:
Owner: A C Ormond Phone:
Mailing Address: PO Box 126 Hookerton NC 28538
Physical Address: 788 Ormond Farm Rd Hookerton NC 28538
Facility Status: Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35` 24' 04"
Hwy 58 south of Snow Hill. Left on SR 1091. Right on SR1430. One -mile on right
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts
Records and Documents
❑ Denied Access
Washington
252-747-2398
Longitude. 77' 34' 54"
Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Other Issues
Certified Operator: Alvin Carrol Ormond Operator Certification Number: 996891
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name A. C. & Margie Ormond Phone
On -site representative A. C. & Margie Ormond Phone
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis: soil tested: 1212015
5-30-16 = 1.19
9-26-16 = .92
3-2-17 = 1.31
6-1-17 = 1.11
IRR records are complete & balanced out, with PAN remaining.
Reviewed: rainfaillfroeboard; crop yield; sludge survey 12/2016 at 43%: calibration 912016
I
page: 1

Permit: AWS400070 Owner - Facility : A C Ormond Facility Number: 400070
Inspection Dale: 07/05/17 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine -Farrow to Wean 2,169 2.067
Total Design Capacity: 2,169
Total SSLW: 939.177
Waste Structures
Dislgnated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon 1 12/13/93 19.50 52.00
page: 2

h
Permit: AWS400070 Owner - Facility: A C Ormond Facility Number: 400070
Inspection Date: 07/05/17 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes No Na Ne
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
M ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
M ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
0 ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No Na Ne
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
0 ❑
[]
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e.1 large
❑
M ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
■ ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9_ Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
0 ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
[]
Failure to incorporate manureisludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
[]
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

L
Permit: AVVS400070 Owner - Facility : A C Ormond Facility Number: 400070
Inspection Date: 07/05/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection, Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No Na Ne
Crop Type 1 Com (Grain)
Crop Type 2 Small Grain (wheat, Barley,
Oats)
Crop Type 3 Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
E ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
❑
❑
18, Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
M ❑
0
Records and Documents
Yes No Na Ne
19, Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
20, Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ M ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
page: 4

5
Permit: AWS400070 Owner - Facility : A C Ormond Facility Number: 400070
Inspection Date: 07/05/17 Inpseclion Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Stocking?
Crop yields?
120 Minute inspections?
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-Gompfiance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fait to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon 1 Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32, Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
CAWMP?
33, Did the Reviewerlinspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Yes No Na Ne
❑■❑❑
❑■❑❑
❑■❑❑
❑
M ❑
❑
Yes No Na Ne
❑
ME]
❑
❑
MEIEI
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
M ❑
❑
page: 5

0 Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400070 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS400070 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type; Compliance Inspection Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene Region:
Date of Visit: 07/06/2016 Entry Time: 09:30 am Exit Time: 11:00 am Incident #
Farm Name: Pine Ridge Farm Owner Email:
Owner: A C Ormond Phone:
Mailing Address: PO Box 126 Hookerton NC 28538
Physical Address: 788 Ormond Farm Rd Hookerton NC 28538
Facility Status: Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude. 35° 24' 04" Longitude: 77' 34' 54"
Hwy 58 south of Snow Hill. Left on SR 1091. Right on SR1430. One mile on right.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Washington
252-747-2398
Certified Operator: Alvin Carrol Ormond Operator Certification Number: 996891
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name A. C. & Margie Ormond Phone:
On -site representative A. C. & Margie Ormond Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspectorls):
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis: soil rested: 2012 DUE in 2016
5-3-16 = 1.11
2-15-16 = 1.08
11-19-15 = .80
8-10-15 = .91
IRR records are complete & balanced out for wheat & corn.
Reviewed: crop yield; rainfall/freeboard; stocking/mortality; sludge survey at 41 %; calibration due 2017.
freeboard levels: 2-7-16 = 30" - 7-3-16 = 54"
page: 1

i
Permit: AWS400070 Owner - Facility: A C Ormond Facility Number: 400070
Inspection Date: 07/06/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Farrow to Wean 2,169 2,125
Total Design Capacity: 2,169
Total SSLW: 939,177
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon 1 12/13/93 19.50 48.00
page: 2

r
Permit: AWS400070 . Owner - Facility: A C Ormond Facility Number: 400070
Inspection Date: 07/06/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges ✓g Stream Impacts
Yes
No Na Ne
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
0 ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
M ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
0 ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection. Storage & Treatment
Yes
No Na Ne
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e_/ large
❑
0 ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
0 ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
M ❑
❑
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
M ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
M ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na Ne
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
[]
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Permit: AWS400070 Owner - Facility: A C Ormond Facility Number:
400070
Inspection Date: 07/06/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Waste Application
Yes
No Na No
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Com, wheat. Soybeans
Crop Type 3
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop andlor land application site need improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
M ❑
❑
1 B. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
0 []
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na No
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
0 ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
n
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWS400070 Owner- Facility : A C Ormond Facility Number: 400070
Inspection Date: 07/06/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na Ne
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
E ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑N
❑
❑
(NPDE;S only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related -to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
■ ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structures) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
E ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No Na Ne
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
0 ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
N ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface file drains exist at the facility?
❑
E ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
❑
❑
CAWM P?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
0 ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
■ ❑
❑
page: 5

N
0 Division of Water Resources
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
El Other Agency
Facility Number:
400070
Facility Status: Active
Permit: AWS400070
❑ Denied Access
Inpsection Type:
Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit:
Routine
County:
Greene Region:
Washington
Date of Visit:
08/04/2015 Entry Time: 09:00 am Exit Time: 10:15 am Incident #
Farm Name:
Pine Ridge Farm
Owner Email:
Owner:
A C Ormond
Phone:
252-747-2398
Mailing Address:
PO Box 126
Hookerton NC 28538
Physical Address:
788 Ormond Farm Rd
Hookerton NC 28538
Facility Status:
Compliant ❑
Not Compliant Integrator:
Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
35' 24' 04" Longitude:
77' 34' 54"
Hwy 58 south of Snow Hill. Left on SR 1091. Right on SR1430. One mile on right.
Question Areas:
Dischrge.& Stream
Impacts
Waste Col, Stor, & Treat
Waste Application
Records and Documents
Other Issues
Certified Operator:
Alvin Carrol Ormond
Operator Certification Number:
996891
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name A C Ormond Phone: [phone]
On -site representative A. C. & Margie Ormond Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s)-
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis: soil tested: 212013
11-26-14 = 1.41
1-07-15 = .93
4-07-15 = 1.24
6-3-15 = 1.04
IRR records are complete & balanced out.
Reviewed: New COC; crop yield; rainfalllfreeboard; sludge survey & calibration are due by Dec.31, 2015.
page: 1

Permit: AWS400070 Owner - Facility : A C Ormond Facility Number: 400070
Inspection Date: 08/04/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Farrow to Wean 2,169 2.117
Total Design Capacity: 2.169
Total SSLW: 939,177
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon 1 12/13/93 19.50 50.00
page: 2

Permit: AWS400070 Owner - Facility : A C Ormond Facility Number: 400070
Inspection Date: 08/04/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No Na No
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
M ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
■ ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection. Storage & Treatment
Yes No Na Ne
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large
❑
M ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑M
❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑M
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks andlor wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑M
❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11, Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ MID ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Permit: AWS400070 Owner - Facility: A C Ormond Facility Number: 400070
Inspection Date: 08/04/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No Na No
Crop Type 1 Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2 Bermuda Grass (Hay,
Pasture)
Crop Type 3 Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
0 ❑
❑
Management Pian(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or iand application site need improvement?
❑
N ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
❑
❑
1 B. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No No No
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ [] ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
[]
page: 4

U
Permit: AWS400070 Owner - Facility : A C Ormond Facility Number:
400070
Inspection Date: 08/04/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na No
Crop yields?
❑
120-Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
M ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
0 ❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑0
❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
M ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26, Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an activety certified operator in charge?
❑
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
M ❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes No Na Ne
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
0 ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
[]
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
❑
❑
CAWM P?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
M ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
0 ❑
❑
page: 5

0 Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and.Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number. 400070 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS400070
Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for visit: Routine County: Greene Region:
Date of visit: 09/20/2014 Entry Time: 09.00 am Exit Time: 9:30 am Incident #
Farm Name: Pine Ridge Farm Owner Email:
Owner: A C Ormond Phone:
Mailing Address: PO Box 126 Hookerton NC 28538
Physical Address: 788 Ormond Farm Rd Hookerton NC 28538
Facility Status: M Compliant Not Compliant Integrator Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35' 24' 04"
Hwy 58 south of Snow Hill. Left on SR 1091. Right on SR1430, One mile on right.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts
Records and Documents
❑ Denied Access
Washington
252-747-2398
Longitude: 77` 34' 54"
Waste Cal, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Other Issues
Certified Operator: Alvin Carrol Ormond Operator Certification Number: 996891
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name A C Ormond Phone : [phone]
Primary Inspector. Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Soil tested M013
Waste Analysis:
&-6-14= .84
5-9-14= 1.57
1-16-14= 1.41
8-15-14= .54
Reviewed: New C.O.C, crop yield, freeboard,rainfall, stocking and mortality.
S. Survey due 12-31-2015
page: 1

Permit:
AWS400070
Owner - Facility :
A C Ormond
Facility Number:
400070
Inspection Date:
09/20/14
Inssection Type:
Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit:
Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Farrow to Wean 2,091
Total Design Capacity:
Total SSLW:
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon 1 12/13/93 19.50
page: 2

Permit: AWS400070 Owner- Facility : A C Onmond Facility Number: 400070
Inspection Date: 09/20/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Dischar es & Stream impacts
Yes
No Na Ne
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
1101113
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
0 ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
M ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection Storage & Treatment
Yes No Na Me
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large
❑
0 ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
M ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
M ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
M ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
M ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 101/16110 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Permit: AWS400070 Owner - Facility : A C Ormond Facility Number:
400070
Inspection Date: . 09/20/14 Inpseclion Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Waste Application
Yes
No Na Ne
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
N ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
❑
❑
determination?
W. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
0 ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
11011
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No Na No
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWS400070 Owner - Facility : A C Ormond Facility Number: 400070
Inspection Date: 09/20/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No No Ne
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
0 ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No No Ne
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
0 ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
1101111
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon I Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
0 ❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewerllnspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
❑
0 ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
M ❑
❑
page: 5

Is
0 Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400070 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS400070 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Comoliance Inspeotian Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason For Visit: Routing^� County: Gregng Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 05/22/2013 Entry Time: 01:30 PM Exit Time: 03700 PM
Farm Name: Pine Ridae Farm
Owner: A C OrmQao
Incident #:
Owner Email:
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: PO Box 126 - LlookgrtQg NC 2853a
Physical Address. Ormnd-Rd
Facility Status: E Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm:
Latitude: 35°24'04" Longitude: 77°34'54"
Hwy 58 south of Snow Hill. Left on SR 1091. Right on SR1430. One mile on right.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream impacts Waste Col, Star, & Treat
Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Alvin Carrot Ormond
Operator Certification Number: 996891
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name
Title Phone
24 hour contact name A C Ormond
Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Ricky Ormond
Phone. [phone]
Primary Inspector: Mariene Salyer
Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis:
3-21-12 = 1.6
6-7-12 = .76
4-19-13 = 2.40
5-7-13 = 1.65
Sludge survey is due in 2013, but not done yet. Calibration is also due in 2013.
IRR records are complete & balanced out. All other forms are complete. Looks Good!
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400070 Owner - Facility: A C Ormond
Facility Number. 400070
Inspection Date: 05/22/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity
Current Population
Swine
Q Swine - Farrow to Wean 2,169 1,860
Waste Structures
Type
Identifier
Total Design Capacity: 2,169
Total SSLW: 939,177
Designed Observed
Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
lagoon 1 12/13/93 19.50 43.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWS400070 Owner - Facility: A C Ormond Facility Number : 400070
Inspection Date: 05/22/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field Cl
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2_ Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? ❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No
NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑ ❑
improvement?
11. is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?.
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

a
Permit: AWS400070 Owner - Facility: A C Ormond Facility Number: 400070
Inspection Date: 05/22/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason far Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.? ❑
Total Phosphorus? ❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type 1 Com, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2 Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 3 Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■ ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
■ ❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■ ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■ ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■ ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP? ❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400070 Owner - Facility: A C Ormond Facility Number: 400070
Inspection Date: 05122I2013 Inspection Type: Compliance inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? Q
Lease Agreements? ❑
Other? ❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ■ Cl Cl
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
Q
Waste Analysis?
Q
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather rode?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon ❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ ■ ❑ Q
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400070 Owner - Facility: A C Ormond
Inspection Date: 0512212013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Records and Documents
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Facility Number: 400070
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
28, Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon 1 Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Page: 6

I
0 Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400070 Facility Status: Active, Permit: AWS400070 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection _ Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Region: Washington„
Date of Visit: 06/27/2012 Entry Time: 10:00 AM Exit Time: 10:50 AM Incident #:
Farm Name: Pine Ridae Farm Owner Email:
Owner: A C Ormond Phone: 74Z-239-8747
Mailing Address: PO Box 126
Physical Address: Ormond Rd
Facility Status: E Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murohv-Brown LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°24'04" Longitude: 77"34'54"
Hwy 58 south of Snow Hill. Left on SR 1091. Right on SR1430.One mile on right.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Alvin Carrol Ormond Operator Certification Number: 996891
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name A C Ormond Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Ricky Ormond Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis: soil tested: 12-2-2011
6-4-12 = .076
3-6-12 = 1.6
10-3-11 = 1.2
IRR's are complete & balanced out. Freeboard, rainfall & crop yield are recorded.
Sludge survey is due in 2013 & calibration is due in 2012.
Looks Good!
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400070 Owner - Facility: A C Ormond Facility Number: 400070
Inspection Date: 06/27/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Q Swine - Farrow to Wean 2,169 1,851
Total Design Capacity: 2,169
Total SSLW: 939,177
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
kgoon 1 12/13/93 19.50 49. 00
Page: 2

r
Permit: AWS400070 Owner - Facility: A C Ormond Facility Number: 400070
Inspection Date: 06127/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ONOO
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWO)
❑ ■
❑ ❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWO)
❑ ■
❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than
❑ ■
❑ ❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No
NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
1100
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (LeJ large trees, severe
❑ IN
❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑ ■
❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
8_ Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or ❑ ■ Cl ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

r
Permit: AWS400070 Owner -Facility: A C Ormond
Inspection Date: 06/27/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400070
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA
NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Com, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 3
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of property operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA
NE
19, Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400070 Owner - Facility: A C Ormond Facility Number: 400070
Inspection Date: 0612712012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Lease Agreements? ❑
Other? ❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below_
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
Cl
Waste Analysis?
Cl
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑ ■
❑ ❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26, Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400070 Owner - Facility: A C Ormond Facility Number. 400070
Inspection Date: 0612712012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
f%66- V.. N'. 416 WF
28, Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29, At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30, Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon / Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32_ Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
1
1
■
Page: 6

Division of Water Quality
Facility Number J - ® 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: ���' Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: �ri� L�J Owner Email:
Owner Name: Phone: 2# " '- 3fr
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
Onsite Representative:
Phone: '56 d — Ld %F
Integrator: /"
Certified Operator: r Certification Number: al/
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Other
Certification Number:
Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Layer
Nan -La er
Design Current
Dry Poultry Canacitv Pon.
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Discharees and Stream Imoacts
ZNo
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
o
❑ NA
❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yeso
X14
❑ NA
❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
❑ Yes
o
❑ NA
❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page I of 3 21412011 Continued

Facility Number: - Date of Ins ection: -
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes Fk,4rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. [:]Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall [:]Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes � o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? [—]Yes rNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑Yes o
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
[—]Yes YNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑Yes �No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑Yes U No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑Yes �o
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑Frozen Ground ❑Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑Total Phosphorus ❑Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑Evidence of Wind Drift ❑Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s);. - / r
13. Soil Types):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑Yes o
❑ NA
NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑Yes �o
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑Yes YNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑Yes [>� o
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑Yes �No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records &Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage &Permit readily available?
❑Yes o
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑Yes rNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facility Number: jDate of inspection: —
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? Y-// /D ❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes 03'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
[ZNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
0NNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
M7 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
WNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
W
�o ❑NA ❑NE
o ❑ NA ❑ NE
'No
❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question ##): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facilitv to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
/
I T(a-//^ ,
1! i
b, Alt
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date: — 917 — �f
Page 3 of 3 � (/ 214M11

C*
0
0 Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400070 Facility Status: 6gtive Permit: AWS400070 Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 08119/201Q_ Entry Time:02:00 PM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Pine Ridge Farm , , Owner Email:
Owner: A C Ormond Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: PO Box 126 Hookerton NC 28538
Physical Address: Ormond Rd
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: MWrj2hy-grown LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°24'04" Longitude: 77°34'54"
Hwy 58 south of Snow Hill. Left on SR 1091, Right on SR1430. One mile on right.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents & Other Issues
Certified Operator: Ricky C Ormond Operator Certification Number: 19414
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Repnesentative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Ricky Ormond Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Ricky Ormond Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis:
2-21-10 = .76
6-7-10 = 1.1
soil 3-2010 lime applied
Freeboard range 2-7-10 = 20" 7-11-10 = 52"
One field with underground drain tile, next to Ricky's house see sketch in file.
Phone:
Date:
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400070 Owner - Facility: A C Ormond Facility Number: 400070
Inspection Date: 08119/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Farrow to Wean 2,169 2,250
Total Design Capacity: 2,169
Total SSLW: 939,177
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
3goon 1 12/13/93 19.50 51.0(
Page: 2

Permit: AWS400070 Owner - Facility: A C Ormond Facility Number: 400070
Inspection Date: 08/19/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (i.e./ large trees, severe
❑
■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■ ❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
01111
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? '
❑
■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

J
Permit: AWS400070 Owner - Facility: A C Ormond Facility Number : 400070
Inspection Date: 0811912010 Inspection Type. Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? ❑
Total P205? Cl
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
i
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type 1 Com, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2 Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 3 Small Grain Cover
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■
❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15, Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑ ■
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■
❑
❑
18, Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA
NE
M Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP? ❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400070 Owner - Facility: A C Ormond
Facility Number: 400070
Inspection Date: 08/1912010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22, Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? ❑
■ ❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
25, Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
Other Issues
Yes
No NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400070 Owner - Facility: A C Ormond Facility Number: 400070
Inspection Date: 08/19/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? 0 M Q
32, Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ ■ Q
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ ■
Page: 6

Permit: AWS400070 Owner - Facility: A C Ormond Facility Number: 400070
Inspection Date: 09123/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Farrow to Feeder 1,800 1,848
Total Design Capacity: 1,800
Total SSLW: 939,600
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon
1
12/13/93
19.50
50.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWS400070 Owner - Facility: A C Ormond Facility Number: 400070
Inspection Date: 09/23/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le] large trees, severe
❑
■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■ ❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
11. is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400070 Owner - Facility: A C Ormond
Inspection Date: 09/23/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Waste Application
PAN?
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
Total P205?
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
Outside of acceptable crop window?
Evidence of wind drift?
Application outside of application area?
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Facility Number: 400070
Reason for Visit: Routine
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of property operating waste application equipment?
Records and Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
11
Com, Wheat, Soybeans
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay, Pasture)
Small Grain Overseed
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400070 Owner - Facility: A C Ormond
Facility Number: 400070
Inspection Date: 09/23/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No NA
NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after> 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? ❑ ■ ❑
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
In ❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes No NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AW5400070 Owner - Facility: A C Ormond Facility Number: 400070
Inspection Date: 0912312009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWO of emergency situations as required by Permit? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

I
f.
W Division of Water Quality
Facility Number 7d 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Q Other Agency
Type of Visit 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: 7-a3 ` Arrival Time: IL.L c_{d� Departure Time: C] County: Region: "Rd
Farm Name: T 1.x2J /L .ed-O EJ ���Yt-tom Owner Email:
Owner Name: -U " Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Title: Phone No: :2 /7/2— Z3 i3 /C7_
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: -G jQ r 111.fi1 Operator Certification Number: 9
Back-up Operator:
Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: = c = & = Longitude: = o = i = [I
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
❑ Other
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Layer
❑ Non -Layer
Dry Poultry
❑ Layers
❑ Non -Layers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turke s
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy Heifer
❑ Dry Cow
❑ Non -Dairy
I
❑ Beef Stocker
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Co
Number of Structures:
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes 2 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes LVl No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3 12128104 Continued

t
Facility Number: — Q Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available? ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ElNE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? if yes, check ElYes R No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropirate box. ❑ WUP ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Other
21.
Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
d No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute inspections ❑ Monthly
and 1" Rain Inspections
Weather
Code
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
f❑
L✓
�No
El22. NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes
O NNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
24.
Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
i er ❑ Yes
LJd No
❑ NA
❑ NE
25.
Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
❑ NA
El NE
26.
Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
Elid Yes
,[;�No
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
27.
Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes
LE No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
/
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
El�,
Yes
� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes
E2 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
IJdNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
ElYes
E4
❑ NA
❑ NE
General Permit? (iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
M N
ElNA
❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
ElYes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments and/or Drawings:
12128104

0
Facility Number:Q — Q
Date of Inspection
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
❑ Yes L No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes tL/I No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? El Yes L1G NNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes Lid No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes Rj No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes O No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > I0% or l0 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Applicattiio. nn Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) � _5///�1 W—/'9t/.3d
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
5ZNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
12� o ❑ NA
[I NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination,[]
Yes
ltd No ❑ NA
❑ NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
1dN0 ❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
fiiNo ❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
/o - 0,9a-
ed-ao -dY 44L '
1•3
Reviewer/Inspector Name r�µ �r Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
12128104 Continued

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400070 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS40OQ7 IJ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 09/30/2QQ$ Entry Time:Q2:45 PM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Pine Ridge Farm Owner Email:
Owner: A C Ormond
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: PO Sox 126 Hookerton NC 28538
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant 0 Not Compliant Integrator: Carolina Farms
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°24'04" Longitude: 77°34'54"
Hwy 58 south of Snow Hill. Left on SR 1091. Right on SR1430. One mile on right.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Christy O Parker Operator Certification Number: 19415
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name
24 hour contact name Ricky Ormond
Title
Phone:
On -site representative Ricky Ormond Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis:
5-8-08 = 1.6
8-80-8 = 1.1
soil test 12-2007
Phone
Page: 1

0
Permit: AWS400070 , Owner - Facility: A C Ormond Facility Number: 400070
Inspection Date: 09130/2008 inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Q Swine - Farrow to Feeder 1,800 1,957
Total Design Capacity: 1,800
Total SSLW: 939,600
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
lagoon 1 12113193 19.50 43.00
_j
Page: 2

Permit: AWS400070 Owner - facility: A C Ormond
Facility Number: 400070
Inspection Date: 0913012008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other
than from a ❑
■ ❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large trees, severe
❑ ■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑ ■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ ■
❑
❑
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑ ■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑ ■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑ ■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400070 Owner - Facility: A C Ormond Facility Number: 400070
Inspection Date: 09/30/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? ❑
Total P205? ❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type 1 Com, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
17, Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18, Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Records and Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Small Grain Overseed
❑■❑ ❑
❑■❑❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
X
Page: 4

Pennit: AWS400070 Owner - Facility: A C Ormond
Facility Number: 400070
Inspection Date: 09/30/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
Cl
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22, Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)? ❑ ■
❑ ❑
24, Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
vac Nn
Ne NF
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ Cl ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ Q ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400070 Owner - Facility: A C Ormond Facility Number : 400070
Inspection Date: 09/30/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
31.. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ ■ ❑ Q
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ ■ ❑
Page: 6

i
Ll
Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400070 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS400070 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 08/17/2007 _ _ Entry Time:08:30 AM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Pine Ridae Fa Owner Email:
Owner: A C Ormond Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: PO Box 126 Hookerton NC 28538
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude: 35°2 '04" Longitude: 77°34'54"
Hwy 58 south of Snow Hill. Left on SR 1091. Right on SR1430. One mile on right.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Christy O Parker Operator Certification Number: 19415
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On -site representative Ricky Ormond Phone:
24 hour contact name Ricky Ormond Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analyses
1-2-07 = .92
8-2-07 = 1.1
3-5-07 = 1.7
Ricky is going to go below the stop pump mark in preparation for hurricane season, he will begin soon on the SB crop.
Don't forget the soil sample this fall.
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400070 Owner -Facility: A C Ormond
Facility Number: 400070
Inspection Date: 08117/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Farrow to Feeder 1,800 1,800
Total Design Capacity: 1,800
Total SSLW: 939,600
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon F
12/13/93 19.50 45.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWS400070 Owner - Facility: A C Ormond Facility Number. 400070
Inspection Date: 08/17/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? 11000
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
❑
■ ❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■ ❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■ ❑
❑
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■ ❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■ ❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■ ❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400070 Owner - Facility: A C Ormond
Inspection Date: 08/17/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400070
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No
NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Com, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Coastal
Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 3
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15, Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■
❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400070 Owner - Facility: A C Ormond Facility Number : 400070
Inspection Date: 08/17/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Other? ❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
Cl
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after> 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22, Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑ ■ ❑
Cl
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes No NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400070 Owner - Facility: A C Ormond
Inspection Date: 08/17/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DW4 of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Facility Number: 400070
Reason for Visit: Routine
Page: 6

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400070 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS400070 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Comolianrg_Irnspection _ Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 02/22/2006 Entry Time:07:00 AM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Pine Ridge Farm Owner Email:
�K@ uTT•TiT:
Mailing Address: PQ Pox 126_ Hookerton NC 28538
Physical Address:
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°24'04"
Hwy 58 south of Snow Hill. Left on SR 1091. Right on SR1430.One mile on right.
Longitude: 7° '54"
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator:
Secondary OIC(s):
Operator Certification Number:
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On -site representative Ricky Ormond Phone:
24 hour contact name Ricky Ormond Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste analyses:
1-31-06 = 1.9
8-15-05 = 1.4
4-15-05 = 1.9
Soil test 1-05
Page: 1

M
Permit: AWS400070 Owner - Facility: A C Ormond Facility Number: 400070
Inspection Date: 02/22/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Farrow to Feeder 1,800 1,873
Total Design Capacity: 1,800
Total SSLW: 939,600
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
lagoon 1 12/13/93 19.50 23.00
I
Page: 2

Permit: AWS400070 Owner - Facility: A C Ormond Facility Number: 400070
Inspection Date: 02/22/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes No
NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ■
❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ■
❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
0000
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑ 0.00
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes No
NA NE
4. is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le] large trees, severe
❑ ■
❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■
❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑ ■
❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑ ■
❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No
NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑ 0110
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below. ,
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400070 Owner - Facility: A C Ormond
Facility Number: 400070
Inspection Date: 02/22/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/101bs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑ .
Evidence of wind drift?
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Com, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 3
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
1 B. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400070 Owner - Facility: A C Ormond Facility Number : 400070
Inspection Date: 0212=006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and bocuments
Yes No NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ woo
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Other issues
Yes No NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those
❑ ■ ❑• ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400070 Owner - Facility: A C Ormond
Facility Number: 400070
Inspection Date: 02rM006 inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues
Yes
No NA
NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
■ ❑
❑
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
■ ❑
❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ,
❑
■ ❑
❑
Page: 6

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400070 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS400070 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 02/02/2005 Entry Time: 09:00 AM
Exit Time:
Incident #:
Farm Name: Pine, Ridge Farm
Owner Email:
Owner: A C Ormond
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: PO Box 126
Ho kerton
NC 28538
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Integrator: Carolina
Farms
Location of Farm:
Latitude: 35.401100
Longitude: 77.581700
Hwy 58 south of Snow Hill. Left on SR 1091, Right on SR1430.
One mile on right.
Question Areas:
0 Discharges & Stream Impacts 0 Waste Collection & Treatment
Q Waste Application
0 Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator:
Operator Certification Number:
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name
Title
Phone
24 hour contact name Ricky Ormond
Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Ricky Ormond
Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer
Phone:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Phone:
Phone:
Inspection Summary:
6-9-04 = 2.7
8-4-04 = 1.9
12-20-04 = 1.5
Soil Test 3/18/04 = 1/26/2005
Weekly freeboard and rain events are recorded.
March? - Please watch your dates + pull waste analysis at least 4 times a year
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400070 Owner - Facility: A C Ormond Facility Number: 400070
Inspection Date: 02/02/2005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Farrow to Feeder 1,800 1,817
Total Design Capacity: 1,800
Total SSLW: 939,600
ype Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboar
agoon 1 19.00 r 35.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWS400070 Owner - Facility: A C Ormond Facility Number: 400070
Inspection Date: 02/02/2005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Yes No SIP. NE
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from'a discharge?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
Waste Collection. Storage & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑ M ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe erosion,
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑ ❑ ❑
improvement?
Yes NQ NA NF_
Waste Application
10, Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or improvement?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload? .
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Corn (Grain)
Crop Type 2
Small Grain (Wheat,
Barley, Oats)
Crop Type 3
Soybean, Wheat
Crop Type 4
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay, Pasture)
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400070 Owner - Facility: A C Ormond
Facility Number: 400070
Inspection Date: 02/02/2005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
WaMe Application
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan(CAWMP)? ❑
0 ❑
❑
15. Does the receiving crop andlor land application site need improvement?
❑
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of property operating waste application equipment?
Documents
❑
Yes
❑
No NA
❑
Records and
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
❑
_NE
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
moo
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
❑ No
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
E ❑ ❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400070 Owner - Facility: A C Ormond
Facility Number: 400070
Inspection Date: 02/02/2005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA _UL
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ ❑ N ❑
Other lssuQss Yes No NA NF
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? 00 ❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those mortality OM ❑ ❑
rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality
representative immediately.
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑■❑❑
Page: 5

Technical Assistance Site Visit Report
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
p Natural Resources Conservation Service
p Soil and Water Conservation District
p Other...
Facility Number 40 - 70 Date: 6129/04 Time: 1100 Time On Farm: 70 WaRO
Farm Name Pine Ridge Farm County Greene Phone: [phone],
Mailing Address PO Box 126 Hookerton NC 28538
Onsite
Representative Ricky Ormond Integrator Premium Standard Farms
Tvoe Of Visit Purpose Of Visit
rm
❑ Compliance Inspection (pilot only)
❑ Technical Assistance
❑ Confirmation for Removal
❑ No Animals -Date Last Operated:
❑ Operating below threshold
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse
QQ Routine
Q Response to DWQ/DENR referral
O Response to DSWC/SWCD referral
Q Response to complaint/local referral
Q Requested by producer/integrator
O Follow-up
Q Emergency
O Other...
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Capacity Population
El
El Non -Layer
El Wean
to Feeder
El Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
® Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
[]'Gilts
❑ Boars
1800
1735
❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
GENERAL QUESTIONS:
1 Is waste discharging from any part of the operation and reaching surface waters or wetlands? ❑ yes ® no
2 I•s there evidence of a past waste discharge from any part of the operation that waste reached ❑ yes ® no
surface waters or wetlands?
3:-Does any problem pose an immediate threat to the integrity of the waste structure (large trees, ❑ yes ® no
seepage, severe erosion, etc.)?
4As there evidence of nitrogen over application, hydraulic overloading or excessive ponding ❑ yes ® no
.requiring DWQ notification?
5-'-'Is there evidence of improper dead animal disposal that poses a threat to the environment ❑ yes ® no
and/or public health?
6.-,Is the waste level within the structural freeboard elevation range for any waste structure? ❑ yes ® no
Structurel Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier
:revel (inches) 54
CROP TYPES Corn Soybeans Wheat lCoastal Berm 1coastal Bermuda-grazel Ismait grain overseed
SPRAYFIELD
SOIL TYPES NoA GoA OrA Ly
7..What type of technical assistance does the onsite representative feel is needed? (list in comment section)
03/10/03
❑ Other
GENERAL QUESTIONS:
1 Is waste discharging from any part of the operation and reaching surface waters or wetlands? ❑ yes ® no
2 I•s there evidence of a past waste discharge from any part of the operation that waste reached ❑ yes ® no
surface waters or wetlands?
3:-Does any problem pose an immediate threat to the integrity of the waste structure (large trees, ❑ yes ® no
seepage, severe erosion, etc.)?
4As there evidence of nitrogen over application, hydraulic overloading or excessive ponding ❑ yes ® no
.requiring DWQ notification?
5-'-'Is there evidence of improper dead animal disposal that poses a threat to the environment ❑ yes ® no
and/or public health?
6.-,Is the waste level within the structural freeboard elevation range for any waste structure? ❑ yes ® no
Structurel Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier
:revel (inches) 54
CROP TYPES Corn Soybeans Wheat lCoastal Berm 1coastal Bermuda-grazel Ismait grain overseed
SPRAYFIELD
SOIL TYPES NoA GoA OrA Ly
7..What type of technical assistance does the onsite representative feel is needed? (list in comment section)
03/10/03

a
Facility Humber 40 ' - 70 Date: 6/29/04
PARAMETER
❑ 8. Waste spill leaving site
❑ 9. Waste spill contained on site
❑ 10. Level in structural freeboard
❑ 11. Level in storm storage
❑ 12. Waste structure integrity compromised
1913. Waste structure needs maintenance
[114. Over application >= 10% & 10 lbs.
4 '❑ 15. Over application < 10% or < 10 lbs.
❑ 16. Hydraulic overloading
❑ 17. Deficient irrigation records
® 18. Late/missing waste analysis
❑ 19. Late/missing lagoon level records
® 20. Late/missing soils analysis
[121. Crop needs improvement
❑ 22. Crop inconsistent with waste plan
[123. Irrigation maintenance deficiency
❑ 24. Deficient sprayfieId conditions
Regulatory Referrals
❑ Referred to DWO Date:
Referred to NCDA Date:
❑ Other... Date:
LIST IMPROVEMENTS
MADE BY OPERATION
11.
purchased new irrigation reel
2.
3:
4_
16.
Q No assistance provided/requested
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE Needed
25. Waste Plan Revision or Amendment
❑
26. Waste Plan Conditional Amendment
❑
27. Review or Evaluate Waste Plan w/producer
❑
28. Forms Need (list in comment section)
29. Missing Components (list in comments)
❑
30. 21-1.0200 re -certification
❑
31. Five & Thirty day Plans of Action (PoA)
❑
32. Irrigation record keeping assistance
❑
33. Organize/computerization of records
❑
34. Sludge Evaluation
❑
35. Sludge or Closure Plan
❑
36. Sludge removal/closure procedures
❑
37. Waste Structure Evaluation
❑
38. Structure Deeds Improvement
❑
38. Operation & Maintenance Improvements
❑
40. Marker checklcalibration
❑
41. Site evaluation
❑
42. Irrigation Calibration
❑
43. Irrigation system design/installation
❑
44. Secure Irrigation information (maps, etc.)
❑
45. Operating improvements (pull signs, etc.)
❑
46. Wettable Acre Determination
❑
47. Evaluate WAD certification/rechecks
❑
48. Crop evaluation/recommendations
❑
49. Drainage worklevaluation
❑
50. Land shaping, subsoiling, aeration, etc.
❑
51. Runoff control, stormwater diversion, etc.
❑
52. Buffer improvements
❑
53. Field measurements(GPS, surveying, etc.)
❑
54. Mortality BMPs
❑
55. Waste operator education (NPDES)
❑
56. Operation & maintenance education
❑
57. Record keeping education
❑
58. Croptforage management education
❑
59. Soil and/or waste sampling education
❑
Provided
2 03/10/03

c'l
Facility Number 40 - 70 Date: 6/29/04
(COMMENTS:
Waste analysis dated 11/6/03 nitrogen is 1.1 lbs
6/9/04 nitrogen is 2.7 Ibs
0. Missing soil test for 2003
;Soil test dated 3/18/04 lime applied fall of 2003 approx. 1,000 Ibs/acre on coastal bermuda fields. sample 51, 53, 55
require one ton lime. Cu and Zn within guidelines.
Crop window for coastal bermuda changed to March -Sept from waste plan dated march 30, 1999 This is allowed by
randfathering. Talked to tech spec. Brian Tingen by phone to provide documentation.
18. There is not a current waste analysis to cover irrigation events during March 04. Remember to take waste analysis 60
days before/60 days after irrigation event.
IRR2 records reviewed.
Attempt to reach stop pump mark by Aug 31. Lagoon freeboard level at stop pump mark at time of inspection.
Lagoon freeboard level recorded weekly with drops in lagoon consistent with irrigation events.
r8. Producer requested temp. adj. to stop pump level and lagoon freeboard chart
13. Need to mow lagoon dike walls to allow for routine and visual inspection.
TECHNICAL_ SPECIALIST IMarlin McLawhorn
SIGNATURE
Date Entered: /2/04 Entered By: Imartin McLawhorn
3 03/10/03

Dir+ision of WateraQnah
QTDkvision of Sol and Water Co ervatron
Q t?ther Agency:
s
-
Type of Visit 0 Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit 0 Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit: Time: O
71
Q Not Operational O Below Threshold
0 Permitted [3 Certified [3 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .....- ..............
Farm Name: 6 ..... � ..... `J...... .. County:..: AIMI '........... ....... __.....
Owner Name:. ... .................. ................ ..Ql1ll?? ? .._... ....... Phone No: 62Y2_-112-3.....o!
Mailing Address: t....._..1,22-!`ll..... ................... ............... ........... ..._.
Facility Contact: ........ .... /............ . ..........................Title: .......................... ................... ........... Phone No:
Onsite Representative: ............... ..... ... ........ _ ......�_._�._.. �.... Integrator:. ! rQ:. .....
Certified Operator:.. f���'Y-t...� _ .� ... Operator Certification Number:.-/%.%
... . .......................... _.. ......._.�........
Location of Farm:
❑ Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude a 4 46 Longitude • 4 44
'UesxgmCuicrent Design Cu3
Swine Cabacity Ponalation PoWtry Capacity'-=Poaa
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Q
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
� - Number of Lagoons
{❑ Non -Layer
Other ^
Z`01
J.
Cattle r ,t.• ,a,C'anar�far+P
❑ Non
-
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
❑ Yes B N
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
No
❑ Yes
��To
❑ Yes
ONo
Structure 6
Identifier: ................ ............. .............................. .... ... .............. ........ .......
..W.......
Freeboard (inches):
12112103 rr
Continued

FaciNty Number: Y,0 — '704
Date of Inspection
5. Are there any. immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancerimprovement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
❑ Yes
❑ Yes 9'No
❑ Yes 0
❑ Yes 10
❑ Yes do
❑ Yes 2110�
❑ Yes Pilo
12. Crop type C_ o l " y
0
11 Do the recei ' g c ps differ with those esignated in the rtified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? [I Yes o
14, a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
E 15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes o
16. Is there a Iack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes B-11;ro—
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes aIslo
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes BTRo
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ Yes EM
Air Quality representative immediately.
Co ii 6ts (refer t©_ques6on t) Eicpimn any. YESmans►vets and/or any recommendations or —any other comments.
Use:diawnngs,of facility to Better explain sttuattous. (nse addrttonal pages as necessary} C po y ❑Final Notes
-
-,--41
• 09 0/a-3 _ o�
J10143 1
a3 •
-
Reviewer/hupector Name 9 --en?f
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
I2112103 147 Continued

Fadlity Number: d — Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
21 o
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WiJP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
2<0
23. Does r ord keeping need improvement? If yeses, check the appropriate box below.
Does
El Yes
[r No
Application ❑f eeboard [3 <te Analysis 61ioil Sampling
24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
R140
25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
2<0
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
Yes
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑
[3'//Io
27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
El Yes
Q'No
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
014o
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
[fio
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
❑ Yes
0110o
31. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
❑ Yes
❑ No
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Stocking Form ❑ Crap Yield Form ❑ Rainfall ❑ Inspection After 1" Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
12112103

Technical Assistance Site Visit Report
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Natural Resources Conservation Service
Soil and Water Conservation District
Other...
Facility Number 4D - 70 Date: /1 fi103 Time: 1 1200 Time On Farm: 70 WaRO
Farm Name Pine Ridge Farm County Greene
Mailing Address PO Box 126
Hookerton NC
Phone: [phone],
28538
Onsite
Representative Ricky onnond 1 Michele Christensen Integrator remium Standard Farms
Type Of Visit Purpose Of Visit
Compliance Inspection (pilot only)
Technical Assistance
Confirmation for Removal
❑ No Animals -Date Last Operated:
❑ Operating below threshold
IN Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse
ne
Response to DWQ/DENR referral
Response to DSWC/SWCD referral
Response to complaint/local referral
Requested by producer/integrator
Follow-up
Emergency
Other...
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
59 Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
tgpp
1787
Layer
Non -Layer
❑ Dairy
Non -Dairy
❑ Other
GENERAL QUESTIONS:
1. Is waste discharging from any part of the operation and reaching surface waters or wetlands? ❑ yes ® no
2. Is there evidence of a past waste discharge from any part of the operation that waste reached ❑ yes ® no
surface waters or wetlands?
3. Does any problem pose an immediate threat to the integrity of the waste structure (large trees, ❑ yes ® no
seepage, severe erosion, etc.)?
4. Is there evidence of nitrogen over application, hydraulic overloading or excessive ponding ❑ yes IN no
requiring DWQ notification?
5. Is there evidence of improper dead animal disposal that poses a threat to the environment ❑ yes ® no
and/or public health?
6. Is the waste level within the structural freeboard elevation range for any waste structure? ❑ yes ® no
Structurel Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier I I [ l
Level (Inches) 54
CROP TYPES m SoybeansW[Coastal Bermuda -hay lCoastal Bermud raz Isman grain overseed
SPRAYFIELD
SOIL TYPES NOA GoA OrA Ly
7. What type of technical assistance does the onsite representative feel is needed? (list in comment section)
03/10/03

Facility Number 40 - 70 Date:
9/16103
PARAMETER
Q No assistance provided/requested
❑ 8. Waste spill leaving site
❑ 9. Waste spill contained on site
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE Needed
Provided
❑ 10. Level in structural freeboard
25. Waste Plan Revision or Amendment
❑
❑
❑ 11. Level in storm storage
26. Waste Plan Conditional Amendment
❑
❑
27. Review or Evaluate Waste Plan wlproducer
❑
❑
❑ 12. Waste structure integrity compromised
© 13. Waste structure needs maintenance
28. Forms Need (list In comment section)
❑
❑
29. Missing Components (list in comments)
❑
❑
❑ 14. Over application >= 10% & 10 lbs.
❑
❑
[315. Over application < 10% or < 10 lbs.
30. 2H.0200 re -certification
[]16. Hydraulic overloading
31. Five & Thirty day Plans of Action (PoA)
❑
❑
32. Irrigation record keeping assistance
❑
❑
❑ 17. Deficient irrigation records
❑ 18. Late/missing waste analysis
33.Organizelcomputerization of records
❑
❑
❑ 19. Late/missing lagoon level records
34. Sludge Evaluation
❑
❑
❑ 20. Late/missing soils analysis
❑ 21. Crop needs improvement
35. Sludge or Closure Plan
❑
❑
❑ 22. Crop inconsistent with waste plan
36. Sludge removallclosure procedures
❑
❑
37. Waste Structure Evaluation
❑
❑
❑ 23. Irrigation maintenance deficiency
❑ 24. Deficient sprayfield conditions
38. Structure Needs Improvement
❑
❑
39.Operation & Maintenance Improvements
❑
❑
40. Marker checklcalibration
❑
❑
Reeulato!y Referrals
41. site evaluation
❑
❑
❑ Referred to DWQ Date:
42. Irrigation Calibration
❑
❑
11 Referred to NCDA Date:
Other...
43. Irrigation system desigMnstallatlon
❑
❑
Date:
4 . Secure irrigation Information (maps, etc.)
❑
❑
LIST IMPROVEMENTS
45.Operating Improvements (pull signs, etc.)
❑
❑
MADE BY OPERATION
46. Wettable Acre Determination
❑
❑
1.
47. Evaluate WAD certification/rechecks
❑
❑
48. Crop evaluationlrecommendations
❑
❑
2.
49. Drainage workievaluation
❑
❑
13.
50. hand shaping, subsoigng, aeration, etc.
51. Runoff control, stormwater diversion, etc.
❑
❑
❑
❑
52. Buffer Improvements
❑
❑
53. Field measurements(GPS, surveying, etc.)
❑
❑
4.
54. Mortality SMPs
❑
❑
55. Waste operator education (NPDES)
❑
❑
5'
56.Operation & maintenance education
❑
❑
57. Record keeping education
❑
❑
6.
58. Croplforage management education
❑
❑
59. Soil and/or waste sampling education
❑
❑
03/10/03

Facility Number 40 - 70 Date: 9/16/03
MENTS:
16/20/03 nitrogen is 2.0 Ibs/1000 gallon,
3126103 nitrogen is 2.6 lbs11000 gallons
9/12/02 nitrogen is 1.6 ibs/1000 gallons
5002 nitrogen is 2.5 Ibs11000 gallons
ad to secure new waste analysis to balance pan for irrigation events after 8/20/03.
test dated 11112102. Cu, Zn and ph within guidelines. Remember to take soil test for 2003 and follow lime
records are complete and balanced.
on level is recorded weekly with drops in lagoon consistent with irrigation events.
f to cut and remove coastal bermuda hay as soil and weather conditions permit.
sn pipe at irrigation pump was repaired morning of inspection. No runoff.
well established on dike walls.
to clean up old feed under bin tanks. Part of O&M.
is well maintained.
on at stop pump mark.
TECHNICAL SPECIALIST PAardn McLawhom
SIGNATURE
3 03/10/03

Type of Visit p Compliance Inspection p Operation Review p Lagoon Evaluaton
Reason for Visit p Routine p Complaint p Follow up p Emergency Notification p Other p Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit: 1/22/2002 Time: 1035 am
p Not Operational p Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified p Conditionally Certified p Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: Pine Ridge Farm County: Greene ............................................... ki!aIEi.Q........
Owner Name: A.C. Ormond Phone No: 252-747-2398; 252- 747-8373 - farm
MailingAddress: PO.Rox.126............................................................................................ Haokerton.N.0 ...................................................... 28538 ..............
FacilityContact: ...............................................................................Title:............................................................... Phone No:
OnsiteRepresentative: FLick Qrmond.......................................................................... Integrator: Premixim.Standard.F.armm.of.North...........
Certified Operator: Christ,y..O,.Parker ........... Ric cy-C-.Ormand....................... Operator Certification Number: 19415.1..J941.4........._._
Location of Farm:
wy 58 south of now Hill. Left on SR 1091. Right on SR1430. One mile on right. i
--I
® Swine p Poultry p Cattle p Horse Latitude o ®� ®� Longitude ©0 ®° 4
Design Current Design - Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
[3 Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
p Farrow to can
® Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
p Boars
❑ Layer
p Non -Layer
p Other
Total Design Capacity 1,800
Total SSLW 939,600
Number of Lagoons ❑ u sur ace rams resen# p agoon rea p pray ie rea
14oldrug'1'onds I Soltd Traps ' ❑ o Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes ®No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ® No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ®No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? n/a
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes ® No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? 0 Yes I& No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway p Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(inches): .46.................................................... ................................... .................................... .................................... ....................................

i
kadlity Number: 40_7o Date of Inspection FUTIMM
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, l7 Yes R No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? El Yes ®No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses as
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes N No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes H No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes N No
1 I - Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN p Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes Ig No
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Small Grain Overseed Corn, Soybeans, Wheat Bermuda Pasture
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? p Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility Iack adequate acreage for land application? [3Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes []No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? []Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20, Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(iei discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/lnsaector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by saiuc age,icy?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
[]Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes H No
❑ Yes a No
❑ Yes Ig No
Cl Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes ® No
in No violations or deficiencies were noted uring this visit. You will receive no further correspondence a out this visit.
CommentsF(refer to question #) `Explain=any°YES answers and/or any recommendations ar any otlier courments > ,.'
- -.-.:.: z..t""�;, v.,t�i.�X 9<' -,4c. �:..`i3 -C�, eaA•..;,.. .r,-'<. air �...t-��". ��r`�,r -jr:i r ��",.F 15'^�. ��xa.;-3�"� �Y:. _. '�3�',�= --.
Used awmgs of facility Eo better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary)
��� �, �� �r,� .��, �� F �, k,,� �«,55}}++����Y-�-, � ' � �� �� � , .���.� � ❑Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
s 1
f,) i ��y2�. a f n�i k9"� ,� � 'i:r �-•*�1( 1�x '. Y
.d ...� 6.`� ,(;'; �7
Records available for review.
Waste analysis - 3/19/01 = 2.9 lbs.; 7/2/01 = 2.3 lbs.; 9/24/01 = 1.7 lbs.
Soil analysis up through 2001 available. Make sure to secure a sample for this year.
Irrigation records are complete and balanced out. Hadn't irrigated since September 2001.
Freeboard levels are recorded weekly.
CAWMP - WUP, Permit, Design, Checklist Certification.
Suggest to calibrate irrigation system every 3 years. (SEE PAGE 3)
Reviewer/Inspector Name Lyri °B Hardison A :enteredby Atin Tyiidal[
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: s Date: _ z .._��

05103101
Continued
Facility Number: 4070
Date of Inspection FTITIMM
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge attor below Yes p No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? p Yes ®No
28. is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, p Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the Iagoon? p Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) p Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? p Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
p Yes p No
mtinue to address the stormwater diversion area by cleaning out the weeds and debris that would obstrui
inwater flow.
you have any questions, contact your Technical Specialist or us at 252-946-6481, extension 318 or 321.
T1

4
Fwa7-4z.
a `9 Michael F. Easley
p Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Gregory Thorpe, Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
To: Producers
From: Lyn B. Hardison
Environmental Specialist
Washington Regional Office
Date: February 11, 2002
Subject: Animal Compliance Routine Inspection
Year 2002
Enclosed please find a copy or copies of the Compliance Site Inspection(s) (as viewed in DWQ database) conducted at the
referenced facility by the Division of Water Quality from the Washington Regional Office. Please read this inspection and
keep with all other documents pertaining to your animal operation for future inspections.
In general, these inspections included verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWW)-
(2) the farm is complying with requirements of the State Riles 15 NCAC 2H.0217, Senate Bill 1217, and the Certified Animal
Waste Management Plan; (3) the farm operation's waste management system is being operated properly under the direction of a
Certified Operator, (4) the required records are being kept; (5) there are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or runoff.
As a reminder; please note the following which are conditions of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan and the general
permit; therefore, these items must be implemented:
The maximum waste level in lagoons/storage ponds shall not exceed that specified in the CAWMP. At a minimum,
maximum waste level for waste for lagoons/storage ponds must not exceed the level that provides adequate storage to
contain 25 year, 24 hour storm event plus an additional foot of structural freeboard
(p An analysis of the liquid animal waste from the lagoon shall be conducted as close to the time of application as practical and
at least within 60 days (before or after) of the date of application- This analysis shall include the following parameters:
Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Zinc and Copper.
q) Soil analysis is required annually.
cp The following records are required: off -site solids removal, maintenance, repair; waste/soil analysis and land irrigation
records. These records should be maintained by the facility owner/manager in chronological and legible form for a
minimum of three years.
cp Land application rates shall be in accordance with the CAWMP. In no case shall land application rates exceed the a Plant
Available Nitrogen AN rate for the recctvmj?,crgp or result in runoff during any p5ven-MM4cation.
cp In accordance with you waste utilization plan, the irrigation application events should not exceed the hydraulic loading as
specified per the soil type and in no case should an irri tion event exceed one inch r acre.
cp All grassed waterways shall have a stable outlet with adequate capradiv io preveni punding ur uuoding da" ages. 1 pie uuuei
can be another vegetated channel, an earth ditch, stabilization structure, or other suitable outlets.
cp It is suggested not rec]uir A to keep crop yield information for future use to update your waste management plan. You will
need three years of crop yield data before your plan can be updated
For your information, any swine facility that has a discharge to surface waters of the State will have to apply for a National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit with the Division of Water Quality, effective January 1, 2001.
Thank you for your assistance and cooperation during the inspection. If you have any questions, please contact your Technical
Specialist or meat 252-946-6481, ext. 318.
Cc: WaRO
LBH Files (inspection form only)
943 Washington Square Mail Washington, NC 278139 252-946-6481 (Telephone) 252-946-9215 (Fax)

Dn1sion of Water' Quality .
QDtvisionRof Soil aiicl Water Coservatic►n
.Or Agency':. w
the
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit OO Routine O Complaint O Follow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 40 70 Dute of Visit: 6l29/2tNf1 Tanr: 1018
-- — - -- - - -10 Not Operational • Below Threshold
0 Permitted ❑ Certified ® Conditionally Certified ® Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: PuaC.Ritlmeftip............. ............................................................................. County: Gxcear ............................................... W. .BRQ........
Omer Name: A„G.......................................... Qrmnd...................................................... Phone No: .............---...............
Mailing Address: PQ Bj.1.21i............................................................................................ Hoolip'11MN.0 ...................................................... 285,39i.............
FacilityContact:.......................................................... Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
Onsite Representative: RkJkj,Qrmoiad................... g
........................................................ Integrator. CamUnALJFarms.....................................
Certified Operator: ChrbM.................................. ruku.............................................. Operator Certification Number:19.415 .............................
Location of Farm:
4wy 58 south of Snow Hill. Left on SR 1091. Right on SR1430. One mile on right.
V
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 ° 24 04 Longitude 77 ° ®6 54 6'
Design Current
Design Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
Poultry
Capacit_v population Cattle
Capacity Population
ElWean to Feeder
❑Laver
❑ Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
® Farrow to Feeder
1800
1769
❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
1,800
❑ Gilts
Total SSLW
939,600
❑ Boars
Number of Lagoons i y❑ Subsurface Drains Present J10 Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps 10 No Liquid Waste Management System 71
Dischar ryes !& Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is obsen.-ed, was the conveyance man -wade? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flog►° in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge fiom any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 0 No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure I Structure 2 Stricture 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: .................................... .........
Freeboard (inches): ............... 4Q............. .. .

05103101
Facility Number, a0-70 Date of Inspection 6/29/2001
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4.6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Appliratic�n
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
t.onratuea
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
N Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
12. Crop type Com, Soybeans, Wheat Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Coastal Bermuda (Graze) Small Grain Overseed
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AW W? ❑ Yes N No
® No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit- You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments (refer to question # ): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary): ❑ Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
*Waste analysis dated 3/19/01. Nitrogen is 2.9 lbs/1000 gallon
8/17100 nitrogen is 1.6 lbs/1000 gallons
*New waste analysis taken on 6/15/01. Results have not been received.
*Soil test dated 4/27/01. This soil test was for year 2000. Lime requirements was less than one ton per acre. Suggest keeping lime receipts.
Remember to take soil test for this year.
*Lagoon level being recorded weekly as required by permit.
*Need to rebalance PAN for coastal bermuda after 5/19101 when new waste analysis is received.
*Discussed IRR2/waste analysis schedule
RevieweriInspector Name Martin McLawhorn
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

O5103101 Con inued
Facility Number- 40-70 1 Date of Inspection 6/29/2001
Odor Issues
26, Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge attor below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
Need to mow lagoon inner walls to allow for routine and visual inspection.
to not exceed application amount listed in WUP.which is one inch.
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
ZA

�OF YVA�9p Michael F. Easley
�O G Goveriof
William G. Ross, Jr_, Secretary
> y Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Kerr T. Stevens
Division of Water Quality
To: Producer
From: Daphne B. Cullom
Environmental Specialist
Washington Regional Office
Subject: Animal Compliance inspection
Year 2001
Enclosed please find a copy of the Compliance Site Inspection (as viewed in the DWQ database) conducted at the referenced
facility by the Division of Water Quality from the Washington Regional Office. Please read this inspection and beep it
with all other documents pertaining to your animal operation for future inspections.
In general, these inspections included verifying that (1) the farm has a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP);
(2) the farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC 21-1.0217, Senate Bill 1217, and the Certified Animal
Waste Management Plan; (3) the farm operation's waste management system is being operated properly under the direction of a
Certified Operator, (4) the required records are being kept; and (5) there are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or runoff.
As a reminder, please note the following comments, which are conditions of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan and
the General Permit; therefore, these items must be implemented:-
(p The maximum waste level in lagoons/storage ponds shall not exceed that specified in the CA %W. At a minimum,
maximum waste level for waste for lagoons/storage ponds must not exceed the level that provides adequate storage to
contain 25 year, 24 hour storm event plus an additional foot of structural freeboard_
T An analysis of the liquid animal waste from the lagoon shall be conducted as close to the time of application as practical and
at least within 60 days (before or after) of the date of application. This analysis shall include the following parameters:
Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Zinc and Copper.
W Soil analysis is required annually_ Lime is to be applied to each receiving crop as recommended by the soil analysis.
9 The following records are required: off -site solids removal, maintenance, repair, waste/soil analysis and land irrigation
records. These records should be maintained by the facility owner/manager in chronological and legible form for a
minimum of three years.
cp Land application rates shall be in accordance with the CAWMP. In no case shall land application rates exceed the Plant
Available Nitrogen rate for the receiving gM or result in runoff during any given application,
(p All grassed waterways shall have a stable outlet with adequate capacity to prevent ponding or flooding damages. The outlet
can be another vegetated Channel, an earth ditch, stabilization structure, or other suitable outlets.
(p It is s est not a requirement, to keep crop yield information for future use to update your waste management plan.
You will need three years of crop yield data before your plan can be updated
For your information, any swine facility that has a discharge to surface waters of the State will have to apply for a National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit with the Division of Water Quality, effective January 1, 2001. '
Thank you for your assistance and cooperation during the inspection. If you have any questions, please contact me at 252-946-
6481, ext. 321 or your Technical Specialist.
Cc: aaRO
DEC Files
943 Washington Square Mall Washington, NC 27889 252-946-6481 (Telephone) 252-946-9215 (Fax)

Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit OO Routine O Complaint O Fallow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility' Number 40 70 Date of Visit: 3-13-2001 Time: 9:4o am
�... — m„�.,....a....a Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
Permitted ® Certified © Conditionally Certified ® Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold : ...............
Farm Name: FIMIUdnJEa Cm.........................--...........................---------....................---- County:.Gx=ne.._............................................ .WARQ.......
Owner Name: A. .....:.... ............................. QT uxud............................................ ......... Phone No: .7.4.7.-23.98.,.74.7.-$3.7.3.r.fam........._....................
MailingAddress: PO.Aox.126................. .................................................................... ..... 1 INkpirltsttt.l c..............................._..................... 28-53A ..............
Facility Contact:............................................................... ........Title: .... Phone No:
OnsiteRepresentative: Ricly. it ant.......................................................................... Integrator: Premium.Staate'.d..............................................
Certified .
Operator: �
p.................................. Earker........................._..................... Operator Certification Number: ]9:�S _..........................
Location of Farm:
;Hwy 58 south of Snow Hill. Left on SR 1091. Right on SR1430. One mile on right.
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 ° 24 04 +4 Longitude 77 a 34 �«
Design Curren
Ca...aci =:Po iilaiiion:
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
® Farrow to Feeder
1800
1800
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
939,600
Disc es & Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes ®No
Discharge otighiated at: ElLagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance roan -made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If ycs, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estitnated floe` in gal/cuiti?
d. Does discharge b}pass a lagoon system? (lfyes. notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
I Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes 9 No

rUFLU' I
Facility Number. 40--70
Date of Inspection 3-13-2001
Continued
1
1
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Stnicture 3 Structure 4
Identifier: ...................... - ................
Freeboard (inches) ..............4............... .
❑ Yes N No
Structure 5 Structure 6
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (iel trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need mamtenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type Corn, Soybeans, Wheat Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Small Grain Overseed
❑ Yes
N No
❑ Yes
N No
❑ Yes
N No
❑ Yes
N No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
N No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes N No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
N No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
N No
17. Are rock outcrops present'?
❑ Yes
❑ No
18. Is there a water suupph' well within 250 feet of the sprayfield boundary? ❑ Unknown
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ On -site ❑ Off -site
Required Records & Documents
19. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
N No
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
N No
21. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
®No
22. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
N No
23. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
N No
24. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
N No
25. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
N No
26. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
® No
27. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
N No
Odor Issues
28. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
❑ Yes
N No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
29. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
N No

Continued
Fa
cility Number. 40-70 Date of Inspection 13-13-2001
30. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
31. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
32. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
33. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
34. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permancntttemporary cover?
Printed on: 3130/2001
0 Yes X No
[I Yes 9 No
D Yes H No
[-] Yes N No
Fol a M ff i _-," W.
E3 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
J
Comments (refer ta;;ques#Eon #) ,Explaina�ny AYES answers andtor any -recommendations or_any other cominen#s. � °m� r _
Waste analysis - last analysis in records is 8-17-00 - 1.6 lbs./1000 gals.; sample sent off 3-12-01 for analysis.
Sod analysis for 7-99 and 12-99 (for year 2000); need to sample for 2001 ASAP and send a copy of the analysis to DWQ-WaRO. Mr.
Ormond has lime ticket for 12/99 lime application.
Irrigation records complete with a nitrogen balance for Coastal Bermuda./Fall 2000; Wheat application for spring 2001 started in March. No
overapplication noted in records. *Reminder to update irrigation records with the new waste analysis.
Lagoon dike walls have been mowed. Vegetation establishing well along dike walls.
Freeboard level very good for this time of the year.
*Send a copy of the 1998 General Permit (has 1997 version) & expansion/moratorium information.
RevieweriInspector Name aipl: 61e'4-B
.... ..... .
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

I7ype of Visit O Compliance Inspection © Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Dnte of WSW8/15/2000
Facility Number Time: lt)00 Printed on: 3/8f2001
40 70
O Not Operational Q Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified © Conditionally Certified 13 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ..............
Farris Name: fte.Ridge.Farm.......................... ..................... County: Gxwxtc .............................................. W. ..&W........
Owner Name:&C......................................... Q![7tt QAid...................................----............... Phone No: 7.47z.V".1.41-8371= faxes.......-----------..............
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone No:
MailingAddress: P1; JkL..2(t....................................................................................... H001wxt!tz AC...............................................-----.. 2BS39 .............
Onsite Representative: RivIky..Armond........................................................................... Integrator: Carodlinaf..ants.......................... ......... .................
Certified Operator: Chtosty Q.............................. Patka.............................................. Operator Certification Number:. 19.415 .............................
Location of Farm:
Hwy 58 south of Snow Hi1L Left on SR 1091. Right on SR1430. One mile on right. +
t
® Swine []Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 a 24 6 04 LL Longitude 77 ° ®' ®«
- -.
Design Current Design Current Design :: Current -
Swtne
::Ca ac 'Po ulxtton. Pouftr3: _Cacity:. Population Cattle :Capac ::Population -
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
® Farrow to Feeder
18M
.1750
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts'
❑ Boars
Number of Lagoons 1 �> (❑ Subsurface Drains Present 11❑ Lagoon Area Jp Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Soltd Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes M No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed. was the conveyance ratan -made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed- did it reach Water of the State? (If ves, notify DWQ) ❑ yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in pal/min'?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes.. notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes M No
3 _ Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes M No
Structure I Stnicture 2 Structure 3 Stmeture 4 Stricture 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches):...............52..............................................................................

5/00
Facility Number. 41i-70 Date of Inspection 8/15/2000
Printed on:
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenanodimprovement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ® PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
Continued on bark
3/8/2001
❑ Yes
N No
❑ Yes
N No
N Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
N No
❑ Yes
N No
❑ Yes
N No
N Yes
❑ No
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Small Grain Overseed Corn, Soybeans, Wheat
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes N No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Dees facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
0. •No vioI'tib'hs; or:d'eficieocies were;tdoted'd' uring thii visit:; Y,66 wiHH:receive•no furttie'r:
coffesnondence about
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
Reviewerllnspertor Name Y

IReviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 51001
Facility Number: 40-70 Date of Inspection 1 8/15/2000 Printed on: 3/82001
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
to correct IRR2 PAN balance for corn with application date 613/00 with new waste analysis once this analysis is received..

Division of Water Quality
O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit © Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit 4 Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 4fl 7D Date of Visit 5/1 f/20110 Printed on: 5/18/2000
L __ O Not Operational O Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified [3 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .....................
Farm Name: P.i=.RWg0k'Arm.................................................................................... ...... County: Grt:eciac.............................................. WaRO........
Owner Name:&C..........................................(0xawd...................................................... Phone No: 2��:�4.7-?,1Q�.ZS�-z�z: �.?.�...tarm.............
Facility Contact: ..............................................................................Title Phone No:
MailingAddress: 1'Q. lPX.1�............................................................................................ HookcrimAC ..................................................... 2R53.$..............
Onsite Representative: Ri 3 .A> mRad........................................................................... Integrator: Car9jjjAg..Fgr aa..................................... ...........
Certified Operator:.C.bristy.Q............................. Earku .............................................. Operator Certification Number:"..41,5 .............................
Location of Farm:
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 ° 24 & 04 Longitude 77 ' 34 f 54 GG
Design Current
Swine Canacity Ponulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
® Farrow to Feeder
1800
1760
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer 10 Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 1,800
Total SSLW 939,600
Number of Lagoons 1 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present 110 Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at. ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway [:)Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure S Structure 6
Identifier:......L051.1.1?A....... .................................... ................................... .................................... ....................................
Freeboard (inches): 33
/r..-.i:-..._.l __ L-..l.

Continued on back
Facility Number: 40_70 I Date of Inspection 5/11/2000 Printed on: 5/18/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (iel trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ® No
(if any or questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum Iiquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ®No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Yes ® No
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda Small Grain (Rye)
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
0.. N6 •yiolations:or _def eiiencies wvtfe:noted -du :ring• this wisit:: Yon" will _receive pq further
correspondence about this •visit.
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes IN No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes CO No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
*Need IRRA forms for records. Will mail from DWQ WARD. All records of the CAWMP are complete
including irrigation records with nitrogen balance and current waste and soil analysis.
egetation efforts on dike walls coming along great! Good job!
Reviewer/Inspector Name
[Daphne B. Cullom Entered by Ann Tvndall
.,_.... G -18_ 0'lnoa

' Reviewer/inspector Signature: Date:
Facility Number: 40-70 Date of Inspection 5/11/Z000 Printed on: 5/18/2000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e_ broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
J

i0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Operation Review
Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Compliance Inspection
Division of Water Quality - Compliance Inspection
Q Other Agency - Operation Review
14PRoutine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Facility Number 40 70 Date of Inspection F 12/14/99
Time of Inspection 1 10:30 AM 24 hr. (hh:mm)
® Permitted ® Certified [3 Conditionally Certified E3 Registered 113Not O erational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: Pixtt:.Ridgc.Fauna ...............................
Owner Name:&C........................................... Ormanld....................
County: Grggxltr...
WaRO........
Phone No: 7.�k7.-22.5�.7.47.-57.3.-.iaxtn ...............................
FacilityContact: ........................................... ...................................Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
MailingAddress: I'O. ............................................................................................ RQjD Cr.jQj l.xC.......................... � ..............
........................... Onsite Representative: Ri9,kY.QrMRI1d.................................... ... Integrator:CArQjillla3l.hafiglS........................................................ ...............................
Certified Operator:OiKrihkX..Q .............................. F.Rjrker .............................................. Operator Certification Numbera,9.415
Location of Farm:
.........................................................................................................................................................................................................................
...S..sautbl.�i�S�nnili..tfx.arw.S�i.1�la.Ri x.part.S[tl.4Q..1:?ac.I�ail�.�l�.r'lxtn............................................................................................�
Latitude 35 • 24 04 K Longitude 77 • 34 ° 54 «
Design Current
Swine C'anacity Ponulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
® Farrow to Feeder
1800
1752
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer 1 1 1[3 Dairy
❑ Non -Layer I I I ID Non -Dairy
❑ Other I I I
Total Design Capacity 1,800
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons 1 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ID Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps JE1 No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes []No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes IN No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(inches)....................................................................................................................................................................................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back
Printed nn 12121/99

Printed on 12/21/99
(Facility Number: 4o-7o I Date of Inspection 12/14/99
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
❑ Yes
® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
® No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
IN No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
❑ Yes
®No
12. Crop type Bermuda Small Grain Corn, Soybeans, Wheat
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
Reouired Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
®No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
Yes
®No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
®No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
® No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
®No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
❑ No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
® No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
® No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
® No
NO•ViQlatiORs_flT defeienCles'Wk1ee,nbted dtICifigthit VlSlt::Yoti Will'receive no further
correspondence about this.visit.
Comments (refer to question #1): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (nse additional pages as necessary):
Waste analysis 10/12/99 = 1.3
Lagoon was at 50 inches before storms —21 inches after storm. Very Good .lob of lagoon management. Bermuda
was utilized very well. Has worked on establishing grass on dike wall. Some mulch has been added to bare areas and
grass is growing. Some riprap is in the drainage ditch behind house. This helps stabilize ditch. Continue to work on
vegetation.
Very Good.
T
Reviewer/Inspector Name ,Carl Dunn Entered by Ann Tyndall
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

13 Division of Sail and Water"Conservation -'Operation Review
Division of Soil and. Water-Conseivation -.Compliance Iits ection
p
- ® Division of Water'Quahty Compliance Inspection
- _
7.
[] Outer A enc - g y Operation Review: -
I© Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
•' ' Date of Inspection
Facility Number t? --%(7 3J
Time of Inspection 0 24 hr. (hh:mm)
® Permitted [3 Certified © Conditionally Certified 0 Registered JE3 Not O eratianal Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: .................. ;. P' • �.---.........Fr". ......................................... County:..........6 r e2�
............................................................... .................
....
Owner Name: ....................... r "� ........... Phone n'o:......-•-- ----
/ c..................0'- - a..................................................
FacilityContact: ......................................:....................................... Title....................... ....-----•---.......... Phone No:
MailingAddress: ............................................................................................................................................................................................
Onsite Representative: ek .......O....V................................................ Integrator. F`"
5 ...........................
Certified Operator:...,,.... f;},Z.......... '`".r� ................... . Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm:
Latitude • �° Longitude • �� G°
Design Current . Design .- Current .2. - Design Current
Swine Ca acity Po ulation Poultry _::Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
lJod
1 %5 Z
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts,
❑ Boars
_.
Number of Lagoons 10 Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area ID Spray Eield Area
Holdrng.Ponds'/Solid Traps 0 ,. ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/min'?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Stricture 5
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): 3....................................................................... ...........................
5- Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
❑ Yes K No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
[:]Yes No
❑ Yes 99 No
❑ Yes 0 No
Structure 6
❑ Yes IS No
Continued on back
3/23/99

Facility Number: 40 — % Oak of Inspection /2-iw y9
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes % No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes 19 No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes (M No
9- Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes N No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes 10 No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Yes 19 No
12. Crop type 5 G c at ^1 --w lien ,s
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
t5. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
t6. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17, Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fait to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
0: Rio.*Mhfioris or• deficiencies *&Lr , noted. during Ois'visit: • Y:oir Will•reeciye 60 fui-tlzer
correspondence. about. this visit.
Comments (refer_to-question..#):':Explain any YES answers and/or ae yrecominendations-or any oEtier comments.
Use drawings of facility to,better explain :situations. p(use additional' pages as necessary,)
❑ Yes iS No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes O No
❑ Yes Q No
❑ Yes � No
❑ Yes JR No
❑ Yes [g No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes q No
❑ Yes [Q No
❑ Yes 0 No
L � � ow . vet S •e �r i,,l s f°' c 5/-� a*- s =: 21 1: "s r
j5O
1-q50,7n
w�wn�SC ✓� '1 'i., �o^ \✓)13
r 1.i.0
r� 1. frZCC
JVee./
/� { tj�r
t/C(1Y-
I+ld
WO -ice "A e5j,y.Si�'•� d.6-
- f 1
.rC
WCwv Rnl �r'Ks. iS
�rovi��, .Sa.tit rr`J' ��P ls"
in Ct'�:'�tiS[
-ta ten. o� yt5; �i i�>r •
�ti.I�ch
Ve- L7�Cl •
Reviewer/Inspector Name 1-
Reviewer/Inspector Signature. Date:
3/23/99

Division of Soil and Water Conservation 0 Other Agency
vision of Water Quality
101toutine O Complaint O Follow-up of DNV0 inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other, I
Date of Inspection
Facility Number O '70
Time of Inspection : pp 24 hr. (hh:nun)
© Registered Certified © Applied for Permit Oermitted Not O eraiional Date Last Operated : ..............
Farm Name: �i i YI'... Countv:.....f�....................................................
nn �}
q lq -
Owner Name ....... {-1i..: .:...Orn!� .... Phone No:.7.14.7... �r ..l8................................
............................................................ ......... ............
Facility Contact: ..... ...... ................. Title:.,,tu... I(Phone
i C....7...837 J
...... ..
Mailing Address:QQx �e? ra
_>...+`............................................ ...U....;....B...S....38
Onsite Representative :........................................................................................................... Integrator:... /1p.4.iiA41,.. �!±t1 ..........
...........
Certified Operator;...L s................
.. �............F... `...ti- ........................... Operator Certification Number;...-. . �4 A -
Location of Farm:
i
. ......................................... .. ........... I......... T
Latitude ©• ®6 ®46 Longitude ©' ©f °4
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenancelimprovement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Surface eater? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gallmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
mai ntenanceli mprovement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25147
❑ Yes
R<o
❑ Yes
g<
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes03A'o
❑ Yes
ISNo
❑ Yes
GKo
❑ Yes
G o
❑ Yes
[D.v
Continued
on back

Facility Dumber: —
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes 2<0
Structures (Lagoons,11olding.i onds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes Leo
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 5
Identifier: r
Freeboard(ft): 2. ...... . �.,...............................................................................................................................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes 2Cis
2
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed'? es ❑ No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes iaKo
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers'? ❑ Yes EKTO
Waste application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? Z,rWro
'(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ) aye )
15. Crope n
type ..... �5...�...... -- 0)...i.:..........................4. ! ...1........................... t�!tR .. t�±
lb. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP) . ❑ Yes EKO
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes rfIKo
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes VNo
19. Is there a tack of available waste application equipment? ❑ Yes &KNo
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes No
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes No
22. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ Yes QIKIO
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only �
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑l Yes B No
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ;Ze
Q No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit? ❑ No
0 No.vio'lations-or deficiencies.wer'e noted during this.visit.:You.wilt receive no further
correspondence about this visit. :.:.
VW6iwings:6fhcif4 to better explain'situahons (use additional gages asrecessary}:
u;, U�11yIP Sa �ka� [)dt 1 [x '5 COYYe a o i v�ti
I1 1
p�. �rSfk _ R�
5 s t *10 0.e ,o r tkaa,s j
411
I y � 4 �
it 14.Q q �S — Ove&60,9! C �m—�� o ur _ _ e p_ DI.LDt2 � 7/25/97
-*
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date: 4-2 1 _ C[k

Facility Number:' — Date of Inspection F-[ - -L
Addittoiial:Con�ments:andlor Drawings•
«r �o�� l� � S Co� • �- �U 50: i �c�-� l.er
4-7 35
IS�z
7/25/97

jqlp Routine 0 Complaint p Follow-up of UWQ inspection p o ow -up of DSWC review p Other
Date of Inspection
Facility Number
Time of Inspection ® 24 hr. (hh:mm)
p Registered 0 Certified E Applied for Permit p Permitted In Not 0perationa Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: Pine.Ridgr.Farm....................................................................................... County: Greene
....
WaRO
Owner Name: A.C.......................................... ormoad ..................................................... Phone No: .7.4.7.-2398,.247z&3.7.3..-..farm...............................
Facility Contact: Rinky Ormand...............................................Title: managim ............................................ Phone No: 9191.7.4.7 837.3.......................
MailingAddress: PO.Hox.12fi............................................................................................ Haokert=Nc ...................................................... ZME ..............
Onsite Representative: Ricky Oremoiad.......................................................................... Integrator: Carolina.Farms.....................................................
Certified Operator: Chritsty..0............................. Parker .............................................. Operator Certification Number: 19.4J-5 ............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude ©� ° ®�� Longitude ©0 ®6 ®64
_4 Design current
Swine Capacity Population-
ean to Feeder
E3 Feeder to tms
p Farrow to Wean
® Farrow to Feeder
0 Farrow to Finish
p Gilts
p Boars
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? p Yes ® No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes N No
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes p No
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes p No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes p No
3. is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes N No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? p Yes N No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoonstholding ponds) require 0 Yes ® No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? 13 Yes ® No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? p Yes ® No
7/25/97

Facility um er: 40_70
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons,Holding Ponds Flush Pits etc.
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier: ............................
Freeboard (ft): 3.3
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
Structure 5 Structure 6
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ............ Coastal.B ermuda.................................... C=........................ .................. I... ... Rye..........................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
3 .ao�veiustiornio'slnesri.oer� �baurrtexnise.ys'iws;er� e. -noted� .u.r.in.g.this visit., . . . a. u wi .r.er.e.iv.e.noru.r.t.e.r..'. .
.r..........
p Yes N No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes N No
p Yes N No
p Yes U No
p Yes ® No
p Yes H No
p Yes ig No
p Yes U No
p Yes H No
p Yes N No
p Yes p No
Co inents.(refei• to question #) Expfstin any YES answers andCor apyrecommendations or any o#tier comments"''
-
[Ise dralof facility to ;better explain -situations (use Additional,pages as necessary)
Waste analysis has been sent; has not received new sample yet
4
Soil test will be done this month
jProducer is coming to field office to make Waste Utilization Plan field numbers match with system layout
3 7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name Wia—WI . Tinges = ='
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

W" 2 b
�. State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Washington Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
December 23, 1997
Mr. A.C. Ormond
Pine Ridge Farm
P.O. Box 126
Hookerton, NC 29523
SUBJECT: Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
Pine Ridge Farm
Facility No(s). 40-70
Greene County
Dear Mr. Ormond:
On October 15, 1997, 1 conducted an animal feedlot operation site inspection at the referenced facility. Overall, the
operation was found to be in satisfactory condition. A copy of the inspection report is attached for your review.
In general, this inspection includes verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
(CAWMP); (2) the farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC 2H.0217, Senate Bill 1217, and
the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan; (3) the farm operation's waste management system is being operated
properly under the direction of a Certified Operator; (4) the required records are being kept; (5) there are no signs of
seepage, erosion, and/or runoff.
The recommendations and/or comments regarding your inspection can be found in the comment section of the attached
inspection form. It is very important as the owner and Operator in Charge that you address any noted concerns, as soon
as possible. For assistance, please contact your Technical Specialist and/or the local Soil & Water Conservation District
Office.
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance during the inspection. Should you have further questions or
comments regarding this inspection, do not hesitate to call me at [phone], ext. 321.
Sincerely,
Daphne B. Cullom
Environmental Specialist 11
cc: Greene County SWCD Office
Mike Regans, Greene County NCCES
David Moore, Carolina Farms
WaRO V
943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, NC 27889 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Atfimiative Action Employer

p Division of Soil and Water Conservation p Other Agency '
,* Division of Water Quality
7'
JeR
ou roe p omp aint p Pollow-upofDWQ inspection p o ow -up o review p ter
Date of Inspection
Facility Number
Time of Inspection i1 c 24 hr. (hh:mm)
p Registered 0 Certified 0 Applied for Permit p Permitted in Not perattona Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: Eftw UdgeLEujn................................................................................... County: Greene WaRO
Owner Name: A.0.......................................... Oxmmd ..................................................... Phone No: .7.4.7.2398,.7.47-83.73.-..farm...............................
Facility Contact: Ricky..Ormand..............................................Title: Manager ........................................... Phone No: .7,41x27.11.................................
Mailing Address: PQ.ZQX..Ufi............................................. ............................................... Haakerlaa.NC................ .::................. I................. 28538 ..............
Onsite Representative: Ricl[y.Ormoad..................... Integrator:CarAlJm.Farms..................... ................... .......................................................
Certified Operator: Chri ty..O............................. Parker .............................................. Operator Certification Number: 194L4.............................
Location of Farm:
ay o . no.`x. t.on, on. ne.au ,ola,n ............. ..
Latitude ©• ®� ®� Longitude ©• ®®K
Swine . Capacity Population
can to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to can
Farrow to ee er
I
Finish arrow to
Gilts
Boars
95
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
12 Layer I I Dairy
p Non -Layer on- any
Other
Total Design Capacity ,
Total SSLW 939,6
Number of Lagoons ! Holding Ponds V3 Subsurface'Drains resen goon Area In pray Re rea
10 o Eiquid Waste Management System
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. 1f discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
G. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
1W
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
13Yes ®No

acr t Number: 40_70
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures(Lagoons,Holding Ponds, _Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure I
Identifier: ...... - �...............
Freeboard (ft): 4.1 ft.
Structure 2 . Structure 3 Structure 4
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
n Yes ® No
n Yes a No
Structure 5 Structure 6
15. Crop type ......................... Rye ................................. Caat.tsilage.&.Crain)....... ...... CoastalBermuda Grass......
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
19. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities On]
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
Q . o-via ttalns.or trencies-were.r o a thug rs visit: . ou. will.receive no er . • .
rerrespojaftrle� abQRt t�1i5 YiSi�:. .. .
n Yes ® No
n Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
n Yes ® No
n Yes ®No
n Yes ®No
n Yes ®No
n Yes ®No
n Yes ®No
n Yes ®No
n Yes ® No
n Yes ® No
n Yes N No
Comments;(refer to'quest!oa #) �.E=plain-any YES answers ts and/or any recommendations orany other commen
Use drawfngs_of faeiL'ty to Better explain `sitoatiori`s.°(nse additional pages as neeewa � -
y
F
=il :29-96;Rocent camp e.sent,ut ve not receivresults.
nalysis J1196 Sample to be collected thisFall 1997.
uWUl R' OL n` 01 in -needs to be revised to correspond to field numbers on irrigation forms.
All com;xmq-t ' of the certified animal waste management plan are complete. Irrigatii fps 7ete,with nitrogen balance. Update irrigation forms with results from new.sampl.;_.
k
12 - Se�►eaal ldaie spots dilcewall. - , . - _ _:
on -
The following item's are conditions of iie Certifie Animal Waste MsnagementPiap ii d'the:general permW ercfm these items
b�
1L4t C implemented _ _ _ , r7%�`� , ��� vk •k ::
3.
Keep lagoons/storagepa cls free of'foreign debris including, but~noi limited to tires.:bottles,'plastic products, light bulbs, �i35i 7
Reviewer/Inspector Name Daphne B Callotti'" x�
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: , Date:

m
L,
41
V 'per w
',r: ��'
,� � � ,✓ w
it
k
k z
_
� ""'ilk � ���. .1 ..••��
'qIt
"{"•
?
'
' ' ,1t( t J •'�+ .
•
3f !. • .�Y 1 �
,
'
'�,r4
i. t;r�
1, • r
r� ��ilr, 1 � � i> 14"I. . r .(�
,
f+ �f
' j' f,-
' !� ,'' t
I i' :. 1
�
� � �; 1.' ' ,��f � 1 _
•
rj'i �� $"i
J. '
r
`l, ' �
'
� ;',
'� � t,.�.E lti�
{',,�{ ii�:.'� , f; t• ��
"•fQ
- Y� r'
:,t ' ' 'F; •r, f
• { it r '}
I } t
kr`I � � .
r�' Fy b; t t rN r t }r ; f. r
'f'''
µµµ`
,('li`
.{
"IK cal i?, >r
'9,]1t 5t{! �1•��y•11 �• ,f ��i'
i (• µy 'L 1,.. : i, ��Ikr
; 11
. }3} �n
r J �,t
,. -
P.i .(r 1 ,7 r
f qL 4� I
TS'
Ty i. Itl, r,
,'I.
�' 1 y�;sL`'s 1- z ''�,` �« 5;, i.'I+
�i+., x5 1 yy{ : •1 t,r, + ��"•, 1,
1 v�Y�l'l4J r, '•I '' i �.l. I
rL
s�7
iY.�,, e� � r•!E�
1��� - I;� 1 ti i•.1 fN� I, .�r
r�l�
111 �, i
'� ;�1 �?
1 � �I.�.',,,'
°
'!
.'
'x
� 4.. i5
� .'� i�lti��•;•� `I:f'�ryt� Sr {l+ ►
'�A,t 1' F. 3{ I .s • � .�fiK •• � t
, �
�
��R
�j I' ��pp ,•N��' '•�� �'
! � •,rr♦�}i ' �� '+o O
4J� ',
}ai
1
'1 4.{?f''r'
`. } t'
'r
t�' i 'f��}4 2s-k•
S�' � i
'�'FI}.
f-vi�,��A"'�?; ''°i�f
��
41 I1! -:ii 1
gar �J �� �, �ii� •°,�'�'''-..
..
'•Fr
•,• ctr
'>. .
.s•/,t
1'
- ,, ,.
..}f 1 ��i�,`'
i I i ' i M•1=! '� aE _ }
1 �. 'j`�?'i� ��"�f �' 4
tu.,
'�
'd }� _r ij yl' Y • ' '1�q�� a7
� w-�` 1 }�...�i � rr•G�l'�'^y+1 .7".w !�1
t i�t 1='i s. ;
' I, ,w
�i ' :� r
�, 1
� '_
� '
.. ,i . _'
•, �
•• „r .. f i} �} � � :y; A, 1;. w
,r hi.t �f� •''y�1 �.:
n'A
�g
}'«'
;;�
'
_ {ter,,
;i; 'p..+,, ! M "4y ,�
t Lt�:;iiCQ, �.;i � 41;;0
yp i It�tt.HH i�yI J kll
�
_
iM ;'r ;
p„l•'
, lif{' •1
.I N.: '•, -
'
1. 7
V, +h:,«. ..
I . .
't'
`tA� �
t ','� 1! rl
.. r , ;,.,�fIg� �,� t41 G,
, ,.l' .•�', } ,.�F44•-f�n� i• W � 14!}
`i; -1,!'!�y•rT� 1,�;,s'
- 14 ,,�. •r4'�, � L I'
�11
#��
I � •�.�rnjh��� A ��t,
SJ �n •�
! �"'�_�. f •I
•I
, .1. J�3��'•, „.,'
;
'i
.� f Lr jr
r.f
'F
ylF
t � ktM1' i' r•
r
��
{� i
k`�
i »-
�.
y. t f i t},r�•t�g�
,i S
I �;►L,�� �� f�;A`'" I' :,ts��v � E�
+•�V }_, � 'r �� ,�'
'py3;, F14
1 1
� ' ��• y:�•
� 0 6 � • n
��
Rom` .
•'• • Zi'�'��1 �,•,
' <: r N t., .
`•
1'
1 y�
. � �r.���iti' ` •
. � 1 ..
I�}�'11
� 1. �,�� . I r sir �' 1 . �j•I
� ;II':t�.��r' ���:i '� 5 f, y`�IL '
>f', ,•. r 4' yyyy�• � 4fy$
•
I r I 'yI
t�
.�
�.•�M}�y� 11
Po
}r�(,�t�+•+ .�
: 1}'4i'�. i'i._t �+{� _
...Y,�'� }h u , : t, +'•��
SFi-j't�
'•I , r '[Pt ! ;
I.' ••�!'fr !F
,0 "5� }'
„•�if,'1, it
'I'
I 'lir ,' 1
:l,,r: '
j'`'"'F f� •+ �4`]����i 1f
!1.- 1' idNf„ ;il- l'.E:7 �: a. ��1� 11�rl;r;�'•
�' �:
,�y+� , p
,,Q '4 � �� �y
'tlayl
.�,;I
,.. �;'ra' r
.. ;�'r�'
'
.a,e• ��;}fin. ��,l..�i ,. .:�
, i '� I� �l� �'f �(y�a��}I�lti (
•�,
� tVl ,11
r .! C.,y.A� � a `
�).�+ r �f i
E�'`'• 'F,
.i if.+• .r•
i-
,.V
'itt' r
1
.
r,,, i
1
_�• � rrVIJ{'Ri!'-='7jrJ �jE�,'.{,;1 iil� ���:
. -.p�ttA11<, �y,I'r r�: �
�a,
fit.
8• r •}�
n
Zy pV �'�� rrA�� i p
�7'�. �1��'r�n•': [ ;��.: ,� �
••. •' , •'
'
r ' �
1 f,
•• t, T Ir�,.-xSlr i�l,.
g1 i
'1 a{'Y, ,;i', r, li'it�+f �e ri- 1i' t3 t'
�t: r- t kL- '' t1' �L� �l�c ' '
.'�"'.+„�,�
'���
n�
_ 3� '�..t 'A� � { � e�
� r ~
1
`
�fi��;,
�{ !�
I ✓�;^+ sr sta�!„� Cri I ��•(L 1,� ; (. .,: ,:
�
�J'�
i 1-
�,,
b T� I b i
. Q, �
•'D,fr
8
z
L
d f=
`
• 1.
,I
1
f.l'
••,} •:,}&ro•t
r r tr g�. k
' � }J �E } .
!�-''
d
��
Ji��� ra •,'�
$� A}v r m •v 6.�!? ,d,
q�
�� �• Q� �1
��+T
�
't ,.
f r
3-�r
"S
'"'
�`iy�j r .
i
I•
eir� y �1 �{� �I f�f r r
I' rT �t�'Ij'�Ir� `7 �113L,
,� }�' �'J' . ��1�4y'F�}�'#Y1��; jlrS� ��'.4����f i
Ai�
•
-�
T• �y � � I � •�-� �� a -O
��r •��,�{IY�; �b! d1��/II. I},'ii

Site Requires Immediate Attention:
Facility No. 4W - 70
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
Date: P -36 , 1995
Time: /:og
Farm Name/Owner:, rLeFK f-
t,.. Q ►'vka
Mailing Address: -} 1 $W Z�45 - LRA_ oN h1L 295 3SF
County: YY-ULd. -
Integrator: Phone:
On Site Representative: ;tic O h Phone: 7
Physical Address/Location: c F S =i¢3 a
f
Typt of Operation: Swine Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: jQab sew No. of An lima s on Site: 1-1-7o 0,*,v s "" 7, 4"
DEM Certification No.: ACE DEM Certification No.: ACNEW
Latitude: Longitude: Elevation: Ft
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficieneboard of 1 Ft + 25 year 24 hour
storm event? (approximately 1 Ft + 7 in) a or No
Actual Freeboard: !!7— Ft Q Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or
Was any erosion observed? Yes or No
Is adequate land available for spray? Ye or No
Is the cover crop adequate? re or No
Crop(s) being utilized: r K
Does the facility meet inimum setback criteria?
200 Ft from Dwellings? Yes or No 100 Ft from Wells? or No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Ft of USGS Blue Line Stream?
Yes ort)
Is animal wasted applied or spray irrigated within 25 Ft of a USGS Map Blue
Line? Yes or o '
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state an -made ditch, flushing
system, or other similar man-made devices? Yes or o
If Yes, please explain:
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records -(volumes anure,
land applied, spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Ye or No
T. -7�ka4 ; L. k('41' cSok 'T T e'� -
Inspector Name Signature.
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
Comments & Sketch on Back of Sheet

DEM
SITE VISITATION RECORD
Page Two,
Comments:
E
Sketch: