400062_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NORTH CAROLINA .�
Department of Environmental Qua

77
F ,k_ - -
-3a '��= .5•-.:may J T'"�"'�C` -� �rL_ _ � � -. �3 r�:F� � � .3'�!
_ f
q

M Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number:
400062 Facility Status: Active
Permit. AWS400062
❑ Denied Access
Inpsection Type:
Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit:
Routine County:
Greene Region:
Washington
Date of Visit:
0312912017 Entry Time: 01:20 pm Exit Time: 1:43
pm Incident #
Farm Name:
Chris Murphy Swine Farm
Owner Email:
[e-mail]
Owner:
Chris Murphy
Phone:
252-747-3290
Mailing Address:
25 Ham Town Rd
Snow Hill NC 285808977
Physical Address:
2085 Warrentown Rd
Snow Hill NC 28580
Facility Status:
0Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Maxwell Foods LLC
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
35' 25' 52" Longitude:
77° 45' 00"
Hyw. 135 toward Goldsboro from Snow hill, take SR 1146 to left, go to first crossroads take left on SR 1149. Farm located approx.
112 mile on right.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, 8 Treat
Waste Application
Records and Documents
Other Issues
Certified Operator: Alton C Murphy Operator Certification Number: 16419
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Chris Murphy Phone:
On -site representative Chris Murphy Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s);
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis:
1-28-16 = 1.68
4-29-16 = 2.59
6-3-16 = 1,72
10-1-16 = 1.21
1-31-17 = 1.57
soil tested: 2013
IRR records are complete 8 balanced out with PAN remaing
Reviewed: freeboard/rainfall; stocking; sludge survey 12/2016 at 42%; calibration 1112016
page: 1

n
Permit: AWS400062 Owner - Facility : Chris Murphy Facility Number: 400062
Inspection Date: 03/29/17 Inssection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 21000 900
Total Design Capacity: 2,000
Total SSLW: 270,000
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon STRUCTURE 1 32.00
page: 2

9
Permit: AWS400062 Owner - Facility : Chris Murphy Facility Number: 400062
Inspection Date: 03/29/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
Na Na -No
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑0
❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
0 ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
E ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
0 ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No Na No
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
N ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (l.eJ large
❑
0 ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
0 ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
0 ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
0 ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na Ne
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance aItem atives that need
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN 7 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Permit: AWS400062 Owner - Facility : Chris Murphy Facility Number: 400062
Inspection Date: 03/29/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No Na Ne
Crop Type 1
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Pasture)
Crop Type 3
Cotton
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
0 ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
N ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
0 ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
N ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
El
0 ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na Ne
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
E ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
N ❑
El
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
[l 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWS400062 Owner - Facility : Chris Murphy Facility Number: 400062
Inspection Date: 03/29/17 Inssection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na Ne,
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
N ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
0 ❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
E ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
E ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■ ❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No Na Ne
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
E ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
E ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
0 ❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss reviewfinspection with on -site representative?
❑
E ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
0 ❑
❑
page: 5

'l
M Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number:
400062 Facility Status: Active
Permit: AWS400062
❑ Denied Access
Inpsection Type:
Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit:
Routine County:
Greene Region:
Washington.
Date of Visit:
03/22/2016 EntryTime: 11:00 am Exit Time: 11:40 am Incident #
Farm Name:
Chris Murphy Swine Farm
Owner Email:
[e-mail]
Owner:
Chris Murphy
Phone:
252-747-3290
Mailing Address:
25 Ham Town Rd
Snow Hill NC 285808977
Physical Address:
2085 Warrentown Rd
Snow Hill NC 28580
Facility Status:
Compliant El Not Compliant Integrator:
Maxwell Foods LLC
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
35° 2552" Longitude:
77` 45' 00"
Hyw. 135 toward Goldsboro from Snow Hill, take SR 1146 to left, go to first crossroads lake
left on SR 1149. Farm located approx.
1/2 mile on right.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat
Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Alton C Murphy Operator Certification Number: 16419
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Chris Murphy Phone
On -site representative Chris Murphy Phone
Primary Inspector:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Marlene Salyer
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis: soil tested: 11-2013
1-28-16 = 1.68
12-19-15 = 1.19
9-4-15 = 1.25
6-1-15 = 1.14
IRR records are complete & balanced out. Need to add amendment for overseed to records - from Eve Honeycutt.
Reviewed: rainfalllfreeboard; stocking; calibration: sludge survey at 44% on 8-27-15
FS range: 26" on 11-11-15 to 31" on 3-16-16
Phone:
Date:
page: 1

y Permit: AWS400062 Owner - Facility : Chris Murphy Facility Number: 400062
Inspection Date: 03/22/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 21000 1,514
Total Design Capacity: 2,000
Total SSLW: 270,000
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon STRUCTURE 1 32.D0
page: 2

Permit: AWS400062 Owner - Facility : Chris Murphy Facility Number: 400062
Inspection Date: 03/22/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges $ Stream Impacts
Yes
No Na Ne
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
■ ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
0 ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑ '
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■ ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
M ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No Na Ne
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le] large
❑
M ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
M ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
0 ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑M
❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na Ne
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ M ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

v` Permit: AWS400062 Owner - Facility : Chris Murphy Facility Number: 400062
Inspection Date: 03/22/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes
No Na Ne
Crop Type 1
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
cotton
Crop Type 3
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Pasture)
Crop Type 4
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
0 ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
M ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
M ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
0 ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na Ne
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑M
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

�t Permit: AWS400062 Owner - Facility : Chris Murphy Facility Number: 400062
Inspection Date: 03/22/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No Na Ne
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
23, If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
■ ❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
E ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
N ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? .
❑
■ ❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No Na Ne
28, Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
0 ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29, At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
N ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
N ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
0 ❑
❑
CAWM P?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewfinspection with on -site representative?
❑E
❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
0 ❑
❑
page: 5

t
I
M Division of Water Resources
El Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Other Agency
Facility Number: 40DO62 Facility Status: Active
Permit: AWS4D0062
Denied Access
Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection
inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County:
Greene Region:
Washington
Date of Visit: 02/19/2016 Entry Time: 09:30 am Exit Time: 9:55 am Incident #
Farm Name: Chris Murphy Swine Farm
Owner Email:
[e-mail]
Owner: Chris Murphy
Phone:
252-747-3290
Mailing Address: 25 Ham Town Rd
Snow Hill NC 285808977
Physical Address: 2085 Warrenlown Rd
Snow Hill NC 28580
Facility Status: Compliant Not Compliant Integrator:
Maxwell Foods Inc
Location of Farm: Latitude:
35' 25' 62" Longitude:
77° 45' 00"
Hyw. 135 toward Goldsboro from Snow Hill, take SR 1146 to left, go to first crossroads take left on SR 1149. Farm located approx.
112 mile on right.
Question Areas:
® Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat
Waste Application
® Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Alton C Murphy
Operator Certification Number:
16419
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name
Phone:
On -site representative Brent Mitchell
Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer
Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis: soil tested: 11/2013
2-10-15 = 1.94
12-9-14 = 1.21
8-15-15 = 1.39
2-26-14 = 2,66
IRR records are complete & balanced out.
Reviewed: new COC, rainfall, freeboard, Sludge survey - at 43%, calibration dated 8-2014
WUP dated June 2011
page: 1

4
Permit: AWS400062 Owner - Facility : Chris Murphy Facility Number: 400062
Inspection Date: 02/19/15 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity
Current promotions
Swine
® Swine - Feeder to Finish 21000 1,400
Total Design Capacity: 2,000
Total SSLW: 270,000
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon STRUCTURE 1 30.00
page: 2

Permit: AWS400062 Owner - Facility : Chris Murphy Facility Number: 400062
Inspection Date: 02/19/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No Na Ne
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
Cl
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
■ ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
W ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■ ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
M ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No Na Ne
4, Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e.l large
❑
❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
00
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
S. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
0 ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
0 ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na Ne
10, Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ M ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Permit: AWS400062 Owner - Facility : Chris Murphy Facility Number:
Inspection Date: 02/19/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
400062
Routine
Waste_ Application
Yes
No Na Ne
Crop Type 1
Corn, Wheat,
Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Pasture)
Crop Type 3
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 4
Cotton
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
E •❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
0 ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
E ❑
❑
1.8. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na No
19, Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
N ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
E ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Sail analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page:
4

Permit: AWS400062 Owner -Facility: Chris Murphy Facility Number: 400062
Inspection Date: 02/19/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection, Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na Ne
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
0 ❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
E ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
N ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No Na Ne
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
0 ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the lime of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
E ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
E ❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
❑
■ ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
0 ❑
❑
page: 5

r
e
Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400062 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS400062 _ ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection _ — - Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene Region: Wa hin ton
Date of Visit: VJJ912014 Entry Time: 11 Q0 AM Exit Time: 11:55,AM Incident #:
Farm Name: Chris Murphy Swine Farm Owner Email: mmfarmsiWembara.co
Owner: Chris Murphy _ Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 25 Ham Town Rd Snow Hill NC 285808977
Physical Address: 2085 Warrentown Rd _ __ Snow Hill NC 28580 _
Facility Status: E Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Maxwell Foods Inc
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°25'52" Longitude: 77°45'00"
Hyw. 135 toward Goldsboro from Snow Hill, take SR 1146 to left, go to first crossroads take left on SR 1149. Farm located approx. 1/2
mile on right.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Alton C Murphy Operator Certification Number: 16419
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Chris Murphy Phone:
On -site representative Chris Murphy Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis: soil tested: 11/2013
8-26-13 = .94
7-8-13 = 1.37
1-17-13 = 2.10
8-7-12 = 1.24
IRR rescords are complete & balanced out. Rainfall, freeboard & stocking were reviewed. Calibaraion 8l2012 & SS 712012 at 42%
Page: 1

V
Permit: AWS400062 Owner - Facility: Chris Murphy Facility Number: 400062
Inspection Date: 02119/2014 Inspection Type: Compliance inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 2,000 1,347
Total Design Capacity: 2,000
Total SSLW: 270,000
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
kgoon STRUCTURE 1 26.00
Page: 2

permit: AWS400062 Owner -Facility: Chris Murphy Facility Number; 400062
Inspection Date: 02/19/2014 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ Q ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ Q Q
G. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
Q
■
Q
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than
❑
■
❑
❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe
Q
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400062 Owner -Facility: Chris Murphy
Inspection Date: 02/19/2014 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400062
Reason for Visft: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No
NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
Q
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Pasture)
Crop Type 2
Com, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 3
Cotton
Crop Type 4
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ m
fl ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■
0 ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■
El ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
1100
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ IN
Q ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WU P? ❑
Page: 4

d
a
Permit: AWS400062 Owner -Facility: Chris Murphy Facility Number: 400062
Inspection Date: 02/19/2014 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Lease Agreements? ❑
Other? ❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑ 0
❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ WOO
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑ MOO
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
Q
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
Q
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
Q
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400062 Owner - Facility: Chris Murphy Facility Number: 400062
Inspection Date: 0211912014 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report ❑ ■ ❑ []
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon / Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
■
■
■
Page: 6

Division of Water Quality
Facility Number - ® O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit: ® Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review p Structure Evaluation Q Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: ® Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: -(p - /3 Arrival Time: Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: [jJ
Owner Name:
Mailing Address: ,3—
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: C ;2 Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
Owner Email:
Phone:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number: 1/q
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish ja OD
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Other
Layer
Non -La er
Design Current
Dry Poultry Capacity Pon.
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
.lLayers
Turkey Poults
Other
Design Current
Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
Discharses and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes i�
❑ Yes rNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3 21412011 Continued

F'
Faciti Number: - I Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? [:]Yes M"No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): ' _
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environment threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes fNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes 5Z(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 2 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind. Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
r r�
12. Crop Type(s): c: 7- 43 G� /D� �Sf� _boa ���3�-/��a S' =5a
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
E(N o
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
E�No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
� o
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
:No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
[J� o
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
fNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? [:]Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? [:]Yes Yo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412011 Continued

Facili Number: W - I Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? —O Z_❑ Yes [2/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check [:]Yes 2No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document [-]Yes CO/No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? if yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes ENo
❑ Yes W(NNo
[:]Yes CO/No
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question f: Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
/ - % % -
ERR
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone:?-5-
Date: g-6 -- 11
2/4/2011

E Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400062 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS400062 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: gomoliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine _ , County: treene Region. (Washington
Date of Visit: 03/13/2012 Entry Time: 08:00 AM Exit Time: 08:30 AM Incident #:
Farm Name: Chris Murphy Swine Farm Owner Email: mmfarmsi__em¢ ra.co
Owner: Qbds Murphy Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 25 Mom Town Rd Snow Hill NC 285808977
Physical Address: 2085 Warrentown Rd Snow Hill NC 2§5§0
Facility Status: N Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Maxwell n
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°25'5Z' Longitude: 77"45'00"
Hyw. 135 toward Goldsboro from Snow Hill, take SR 1146 to left, go to first crossroads take left on SR 1149. Farm located approx. 112
mile on right.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Alton C Murphy Operator Certification Number: 16419
Secondary OiC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Phone:
On -site representative Brent Mitchell Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature. n Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste anallysis: soil tested:12-2011
3-8-12 = 1.8
11-21-11 = .75
8-22-11 = .85
6-14-11 = 2.1
IRR records are complete & balanced out. Freeboard & rainfall are recorded.
Caliberation due in 2012. SS at 24% on 8-4-11
Note: Bare dike on back side has concerns, & check on pipe at pump.
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400062 Owner - Facility: Chris Murphy Facility Number: 400062
Inspection Date: 0311312012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Q Swine -Feeder to Finish 2,000 1,600
Total Design Capacity: 2,000
Total SSLW: 270,000
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
agoon STRUCTURE 1 30.0(
Page: 2

Jt
Permit: AWS400062 Owner - Facility: Chris Murphy
Inspection Date: 03/13/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at:
Structure
Application Field
Other
a. Was conveyance man-made?
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
Facility Number. 400062
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ Cl ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? 00110
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? ❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.eJ large trees, severe ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
S. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, 1101111
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance altematives that need maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

61
Permit: AWS400062 Owner - Facility: Chris Murphy
Facility Number: 400062
Inspection Date: 03/13/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Pasture)
Crop Type 3
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■
❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑ ■
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■
❑
❑
20, Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

I%
i
Permit: AWS400062 Owner - Facility: Chris Murphy Facility Number: 400062
Inspection Date: 0311312012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Lease Agreements? ❑
Other? Cl
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
23. if selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑
■ ❑ ❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400062 Owner - Facility: Chris Murphy
Inspection Date: 03/13/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Records and Documents
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT-) certification?
Facility Number. 400062
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
28_ Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29_ At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWO of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field ❑
Lagoon 1 Storage Pond ❑
Other ❑
If Other, please specify
32- Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
33. Did the Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

0
0
Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency " Facility Number : 400062 Facility Status: &tiLfe Permit: AWS400062 _ ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: CCgmpliance In$pection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene Region: WashiRgjpn
Date of Visit: 09/07/2011 Entry Time: Q8EQ0-Atd Exit Time: Q0:30 AM Incident #:
Farm Name: Chris Murphy S}mine Farm _ _ _ Owner Email: mmfarmaQembara.co
Owner: Chris Murphy Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 25 Ham Town Rd Snow Hill NC 285808977
Physical Address: 20Q5 Wilugntown Rd Snow Hill NC 28580
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Maxwell Foods Inc
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°25'52" Longitude: 77'45'00"
Hyw. 135 toward Goldsboro From Snow Hill, take SR 1146 to left, go to first crossroads take left on SR 1149. Farm located approx. 112
mile on right.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Alton C Murphy Operator Certification Number: 16419
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name
Title
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s).
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis:
8-17-11 = 1.0
6-14-11 = 1.8
1-20-11 = 2.3
soil tested: 12-2010
IRR records are complete & balanced out.
Freeboard & rainfall are recorded.
SS done in 2011 - paperwork pending
Looks Good!
Date:
Phone
Page: 1

a
Permit. AWS400062 owner - Facility: Chris Murphy
Inspection Date: 09/0712011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400062
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 2,000 1,300
Total Design Capacity: 2,000
Total SSLW: 270,000
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
I.
F1971on STRUCTURE 1 38.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWS400062 Owner - Facility: Chris Murphy Facility Number: 400062
Inspection Date: 09/07/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges $ Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure Cl
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
1101313
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑ ❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than
0111111100
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes
No
NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe U ■ U U
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

0
Permit: AWS400062 Owner -Facility: Chris Murphy
Facility Number: 400062
Inspection Date. 09/07/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1 Corn (Silage)
Crop Type 2 Small Grain (Wheat,
Barley, Oats)
Crop Type 3 Soybean (Silage)
Crop Type 4 Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay, Pasture)
Crop Type 5 Small Grain Cover
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■
❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■
❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
■
❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■
❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■
❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
1100
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Page: 4

0
Permit: AWS400062 Owner - Facility: Chris Murphy Facility Number: 400062
Inspection Date: 0910712011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
WUP? ❑
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Lease Agreements? ❑
Other? ❑
If Other,.please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon ❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400062 Owner -Facility: Chris Murphy Facility Number: 400062
Inspection Date: 09/07/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ ❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge. ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon 1 Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Page_ 6

G
5
Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400062 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS400062 t_I Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: RoUtiae County: Region: Wshinaton
Date of Visit: 09/15/2010 Entry Time:08:30 AM Exit Time:
Farm Name: Chris MWMhy,Swine Farm
Owner: Chris Murphy
Incident #:
Owner Email: mmfarms a0embara.00
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 25 Ham Town Rd Snow Hill NC 2§5508977
Physical Address: 20§5_ZWrr20(Q+yn Rd Snow Hill NC 205M
Facility Status: E Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Maxwell Foods Inc
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°25'52" Longitude: 77°45'00"
Hyw. 135 toward Goldsboro from Snow Hill, take SR 1146 to left, go to first crossroads take left on SR 1149. Farm located approx. 112
mile on right.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Alton C Murphy Operator Certification Number. 16419
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Phone:
On -site representative Brent Mitchell Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis: soil tested 2010
9-13-10 =1.6
4-26-10 = 1.6
1-20-10 = 1.5
Freeboard range:
3-14-10 = 27" -- 9-12-10 = 42"
records are complete and balanced out. Looks Good.
Page: 1

I
Permit: AWS400062 Owner - Facility: Chris Murphy
Inspection Date: 09/1512010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400062
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Q Swine - Feeder to Finish 2,000 3,856
Total Design Capacity: 2,000
Total SSLW: 270,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
kgoon STRUCTURE 1 43 00
Page: 2

r
Permit: AWS400062 owner - Facility: Chris Murphy Facility Number: 400062
Inspection Date: 09115/201 o Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? 1101111
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ■
Cl
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ 01111
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑ ■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (LeJ large trees, severe ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed andlor managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ E ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
11000
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■ ❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■ ❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
Cl
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

F,
Permit: AWS400062 Owner - Facility: Chris Murphy Facility Number: 400062
Inspection Date: 0911512010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? ❑
Total P205? ❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type 1 Com, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
Pian(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Records and Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Pasture)
Small Grain Overseed
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
00011
Page: 4

l
Permit: AWS400062 Owner - Facility: Chris Murphy
Facility Number: 400062
Inspection Date: 09/15/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
Q
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after> 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
Q
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑ Q
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? ❑
■ ❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑ Cl
25, Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
Q
■ ❑ Q
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■ Q ❑
Other Issues
Yes No
NA N
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those
❑ ■
❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
Q ■
Q ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400062 Owner - Facility: Chris Murphy Facility Number: 400062
Inspection Date: 09/1512010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? ❑ ■ ❑ Cl
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? DMOD
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Page: 6

x
Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400062 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS400062 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 09/16/2009 Entry Time: 11725 AM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Chris Murphy Swine Farm Owner Email: mmfarmsCembaro.co
Owner: Chris Murphy Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 25 Ham Town Rd __ Snow}iill NC 285808977
Physical Address: 2085 Warrentown Rd Snow Hill NC 28580
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Maxwell Foods Inc
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°25'52" Longitude: 77"45'00"
Hyw. 135 toward Goldsboro from Snow Hill, take SR 1146 to left, go to first crossroads take left on SR 1149. Farm located approx. 1/2
mile on right.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Alton C Murphy Operator Certification Number: 16419
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Phone:
On -site representative Brent Mitchell Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspectortlsj:
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis:
6-24-09 1.9
2-19-09 2.2
11-17-09 1.9
soil tested Feb 2009 Caliberation 2008 Sludge S. 2009
looks good
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400062 Owner- Facility: Chris Murphy Facility Number: 400062
Inspection Date: 09/1612009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 21000 3,600
Total Design Capacity: 2,000
Total SSLW: 270,000
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
lagoon STRUCTURE 1 39.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWS400062 Owner - Facility: Chris Murphy Facility Number: 400062
Inspection Date: 09116/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ Cl ❑
Discharge originated at
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) 11000
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a ❑ ■ ❑ I]
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA NE
4. is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
Cl
■
❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
110110
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

J
Permit: AWS400062 Owner - Facility: Chris Murphy Facility Number: 400062
Inspection Date: 09/16/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? ❑
Total P205? ❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Records and Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Pasture)
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
Small Grain Overseed
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
0
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400062 Owner -Facility: Chris Murphy
Facility Number: 400062
Inspection Date: 09/16/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA
NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after> 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)? ❑ ■
❑
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ ■
❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑ ■
❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? if yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400062 Owner - Facility: Chris Murphy Facility Number: 400062
Inspection Date: 09/1612009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Page: 6

C
0 Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency II��II
Facility Number: 400062 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS400062 ElDenied Access
Inspection Type: Comoliance In ion Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 11/19/2008 Entry Time:09:00 AM _ Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Chris Muri)hvi Owner Email:
Owner: Chris Murphy
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 25 Ham Town Rd Snow Hill NC 285808977
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Ggldj¢grg Hgq Farms Inc
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35*25*52" Longitude: 77°45'00"
Hyw. 135 toward Goldsboro from Snow Hill, take SR 1146 to left, go to first crossroads take left on SR 1149. Farm located approx. 112
mile on right.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other issues
Certified Operator: Alton C Murphy Operator Certification Number: 16419
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Rep rosentative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Phone:
On -site representative Brent Mitchell Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspectors):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis:
9-3-08 = 1.6
11-17-08 = 2.8
6-10-08 = 2.5
2-13-08 = 2.2
soil test 2-13-08
Looks Good!
Date:
Page: 1

I
0
Permit: AWS400062 Owner - Faculty: Chris Murphy
Inspection Date: 1111912008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400062
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Q Swine - Feeder to Finish 2,000 600
Total Design Capacity: 2,000
Total SSLW: 270,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
kgoon STRUCTURE 1 30.00
Page: 2

L
Permit: AWS400062 Owner - Facility: Chris Murphy Facility Number: 400062
Inspection Date: 11/19/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the Slate other than from a ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection,_ Storage & Treatment
Yes No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (i.e./ large trees, severe
❑ ■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ ■
❑
❑
S. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑ ■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑ ■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑ ■
0
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

c
Permit: AWS400062 Owner - Facility: Chris Murphy
Inspection Date: 1111912008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400062
Reason for VisIt: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA
NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Com, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Pasture)
Crop Type 3
Small Grain
Overseed
Crop Type 4
Cotton
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
1& Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

n
Permit: AWS400062 Owner - Facility: Chris Murphy
Facility Number. 400062
Inspection Date: 11/1912008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No NA
NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
m ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)? ❑
■ ❑
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■ ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous lass assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■ ❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■ ❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400062 Owner - Facility: Chris Murphy
Facility Number: 400062
Inspection Date: 11/19/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
11 ■ ❑ Q
Page: 6

0
r
Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency �-I
Facility Number: Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS400062 , ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene _ Region: Washington _
Date of Visit: 08/26/2007 Entry Time:11730 AM Exit Time: Incident #:
Faun Name: Chris Murphy Swine Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Chris Murohv Phone. [phone]
Mailing Address: 25 Ham Town Rd Snow Hill NC 285808977
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude: 77°4 ' '
Hyw. 135 toward Goldsboro from Snow Hill, take SR 1146 to left, go to first crossroads take left on SR 1149. Farm located approx. 112
mile on right.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Alton C Murphy
Secondary OIC(s):
Operator Certification Number: 16419
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On -site representative Chris Murphy Phone:
24 hour contact name Chris Murphy Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste analyses:
4-24-07 = 1.6
2-20-07 = 1.9
soil tested in 2007
Date:
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400062 Owner - Facility: Chris Murphy Facility Number : 400062
Inspection Date: 08/26/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 2,000 2,000
Total Design Capacity: 2,000
Total SSLW: 270,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
lagoon STRUCTURE 1 33.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWS400062 Owner - Facility: Chris Murphy Facility Number: 400062
Inspection Date: 08/26/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑ ❑
S. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
Cl
■
❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance altematives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400062 Owner -Facility: Chris Murphy Facility Number : 400062
Inspection Date: 0812612007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.? ❑
Total P205? ❑
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type 1 Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Pasture)
Crop Type 2 Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 3 Cotton
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
13000
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■
❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
■
❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■
❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■
❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■
❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
W UP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AW5400062 Owner - Facility: Chris Murphy Facility Number: 400062
Inspection Date: 08/26/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
Annual sail analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
■
❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
Q ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■
❑ ❑
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■
❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those
❑
■
❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
❑
■
❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

f
Permit: AW5400062 Owner -Facility: Chris Murphy
Inspection Date: 08/26/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Otherlssues
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewerlinspector fail to discuss reviewfinspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Facility Number: 400062
Reason for Visit: Routine
Page: 6

0 Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400062 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS400062 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Insgection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine _ County: Q=ne Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 12/11/2006 Entry Time:09735 AM Exit Time:
Farm Name: Chris Murohv Swine Farm
Owner: Chris Murohv
Incident #:
Owner Email:
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 25 Ham Town Rd Snow Hill NC 285808977
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°25'52" _ Longitude: 77°45'00"
Hyw. 135 toward Goldsboro from Snow hill, take SR 1146 to left, go to first crossroads take left on SR 1149. Farm located approx. 112
mile on right.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Alton C Murphy Operator Certification Number: 16419
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On -site representative Chris Murphy Phone:
24 hour contact name Chris Murphy Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: _
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis:
11-22-06 = 1.1
8-18-06 = 1.4
6-9-06 = 5.3 sludge
3-27-06 = 2.6
Soil test 2006
Date:
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400062 Owner - Facility: Chris Murphy
Facility Number : 400062
Inspection pate: 1211112006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity
Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 2,000 2,000
Total Design Capacity: 2,000
Total SSLW: 270,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
[ag,on STRUCTURE 1 30.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWWO062 Owner- Facility: Chris Murphy Facility Number: 400062
Inspection Date: 1211112006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other D
a. Was conveyance man-made? D ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) D ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage 8r Treatment
Yes No
NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large trees, severe
❑ ■
❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management D ■
❑ D
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑ ■
❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑ ■
❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No
NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑ ■
❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400062 Owner -Facility: Chris Murphy
Inspection Date: 12J1112006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400062
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Com (Grain)
Crop Type 2
Bermuda Grass (Hay,
Pasture)
Crop Type 3
Cotton
Crop Type 4
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
20, Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400062 Owner - Facility: Chris Murphy Facility Number: 400062
Inspection Date: 12l11I2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Other? ❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
■
❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■
❑ ❑
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■
❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to property dispose of dead animals within 24 hours andlor document and report those 0000
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400062 Owner- Facility: Chris Murphy
Inspection Date: 12/11/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400062
Reason for Visit: Routine
Otherlssues
Yes
No NA
NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
■ ❑
❑
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
■ ❑
❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
■ ❑
❑
Page: 6

OF WATER Vchael F. Easley, Governor V14 1,6
tf Q NfIMM G. Ross. Jr., Secretary
Ei Depart rent of Environment and Natural Resources
�} Nan W. KAmek, P.E. Director
> —{ Dlvislon of Water Quality
a 'C
Coleen H. SuMns, Deputy Director
3 Mslon of Water Quality
To: Producers
From: Marlene D. Salyerp�
Fmniromnentat $
Washington Regional Office
Subject Animal Compliance Routine inspection
Year 2004
Enclosed please find a copy or copies of the Compliance Site Inspection(s) (as viewed in DWQ database) conducted
at the referenced facility by the Division of Water Quality from the Washington Regional Office. Please read this
inspection and keep with all other documents pertaining to your an operation for future inspections.
In general, these inspections included verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
(CAWM>M; (2) the farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC 2R0217, Senate 13M 1217, and
the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan; (3) the farm operation's waste management system is being operated
properly under the dirucrion of a Certified Operator; (4) the required rewords are being kept; (5) there are no signs of
seepage, erosion, and/or nmoff.
As a reminder, please note the following which are conditions of the Certified Animal Waste Managernertt Plan and the
general NPDES permit; therefore, these items must be implemented:
cp Within one hundred and twenty days of the effective date (April 9, 2003) of a COC issued under this penult, the
permrttee shall insUA operate and maintain devices on all irrigation pwnps/cluipnwm designed to automatically
stop irrigation activities during precipitation. This condition does not apply to manure spreaders or other
equipment pulled by manned vehicles. The Devices to Automatically Stop Irrigation Events form must be
completed and returned to the Division of Water Quality within one hundred twenty days from receipt of NPDES
Genet Permit.
(p The Animal Facility Annual Certification Form must be completed and returned to the Division of Water Qua)ay
by March 1, 2004.
cp Submit the Devices to Automatic ally Stop Irrigation Events form and the Animal Facility Annual Certification
form to:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Section
Nan -Discharge CompliancelLorcernent Ux&
1617 Marl Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
cp A survey of the sludge accumulation in all lagoons is required within one year of receiving the NPDES general
permit and COC (by April 9, 2M4) and every year thmufkx. Caatact your local extension office for guidance on
performing and recording the sludge acaumilatkaa survey.
(p All waste application equipment must be tested and calibrated at least once per year. The results must be
do=1ented on forms provided by, or approved by, the Division.
cp The permittee must maintain monthly stocking records for the facility and make the records available for review
by the Department and EPA-
(p Precipittion events must be monitored and recorded by type (rain, snow, etc.) and amount
W The maximum waste level in lagoons/starage ponds shall not exceed that specified in the CAWMP (lagoon
design). At a minimum, maximum waste level for waste for lagoons/storage ponds must not exceed the level that
provides adequate storage to contain 25 year, 24 hour storm event plus an additional foot of structural freeboard.
cp An analysis of the liquid animal waste from the lagoon shall be conducted as close to the time of application as
practical and at least within 60 days (before or after) of the date of application. This analysis small include the
following parameters: Nitrogen, Phosphorus, T= and Copper.
cp Soil analysis is required annually.
943 Washington Square Mali Washington, NC 27689 252-946-6481 (reiephone) 252-946-9215 (Fax)

(p The following records are required: off -site solids removal, anamtenanee, repw, rain f0l, fmboard, animal
sWddug amd may, past irgections, applied commercial fertilizer, waste application equipment calibration,
sludge survey, wastelsoal analysis and land irrigation records. These records should be maintained by the facility
owner/manager in chronological and legible form for a minimum of three (3) years.
(p Land application rates shall be in accordance with the CAWMP. In no case $hall land application IUW exceed the
Plant Available N' rate &!Lft mgwM Mp or result in runoff during any gM apblication.
(p In accordance with you waste utilization plan, the irrigation application events should not exceed the
hydraulic loading as specked per the soil type and in no ewe shopld an imiQation event exceed are inch per
acre.
q) Waste should note be applied on land that is flooded, saturated with water, frozen or snow covered at the
time of land application.
q) All grassed waterways shall bane a stable outlet with adequate capacity to prevent pondmg or flooding damages.
The outlet can be another vegetated channel, an earth ditch, stabilization structure, or other suitable outlets.
(p It is suggested to keep crop yield information for future use to update your waste management plan. You need
three years of crop yield data before your plan can be updated-
(p An inspection of the waste collection, treatment and storage structures and runoff control measures shall be
conducted at a frequency to insure proper operation but at least monthly and after storm events. For ex. lagoon,
storage ponds and other structures should be inspected for evidence of erosion, leakage, damage by ammals or
discharge. Any major strucdual repairs (to lagoons or waste storage ponds) must have written documentation from
a technical specialist catfying proper design and installation. However, if a piece of equipment is being replaced
with a piece of equipment of the identical specifications, no technical specialist approval is necessary [Le. piping,
reels, valves, pumps (if the GPM capacity is not being increased or decreased.), etc.].
cp The OIC has the duties to ensure that waste is applied in accordance with the CAWMP and General Permit by
properly managing, supervising, and documenting daily operation and maintenance. The OIC also has the
responsibility to certify monitoring and rgxrling information The failure of an OIC to perform his,4= duties can
result in a letter of reprimand, suspension of certification, or revocation of certificates.
Thank you for your assistance and cooperation during the inspection If you have any questions, please contact your
Technical Specialist or me at 252-946-6481, ext. 321.

`4
Type of Visit O• Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit 0 Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other © Denied Access
Facility Number 40 62 Date of Visit: 2-4-201)4 Time: 8:30
O Not Operational O Below Threshold
® Permitted IffCertli ed-- [] Conditionally Certified r] Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: Cbrk.b1uxPhy.Swiac.Fnxu.................................................................... County: Gxeciat .............................................. W.AERO.......
Owner Name: Cbrk ....................................... MI1rR11J........_.............................................. Phone No: 5-2�.4..515� str. 42:.7.4.7.:.4.fe0 .......................
Mailing Address:S.Ra]n1.low]a.RQasi.......................................................................... SAQsr.Idili..lw....................................................... 5Q..............
Facility Contact:.............................................................................. Title: Phone No:
Onsite Representative: Cx,~urge. lr7kluS.. tot7iS.......................................................... Integrator: G.Q1dshQxQ.HaagEar=.......................................
Certified Operator:,AljQU.0.................................. lY"ro'ly............................................ Operator Certification Number:1.6.4X2.............................
Location of Farm:
Hyw. 135 toward Goldsboro from Snow Hill, take SR 1146 to left, go to first crossroads take left on SR 1149. Farm located
pprox. 1/2 mile on right.
®Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude Longitude 77 • 45 00 u
Design Current
Design Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
Poultry
Capacity population Cattle
Capacity Population
[2Wean to Feeder
I0 Layer
❑ Dairy
N Feeder to Finish
2000
1781
10 Non -Layer
IQ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
2,000
❑ Gilts
Total SSLW
270,OO
❑ Boars
Number of Lagoons 1
Discharges & Stream impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ} ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes N No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes N No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes N No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ............................................................................ .................... .
Freeboard (inches); 30
12112103
Continued

Facility Number: 40-62
Date of Inspection 1 2-4-2004
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6, Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
r
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
8.06es any part of the waste managemen hem other -ffi-arwaste—gtrrai cturemquire-mamtenmmehmprovement7 azs--l�l-Ne -
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level ❑ Yes ® No
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground [:]Copper and/or Zinc
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Graze) Cotton Corn (Silage & Grain) Small Grain OverSeed
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ® No
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ® No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ❑ No
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ Yes ® No
Air Quality representative immediately.
Comments ..(refer to question #) Explaen any YES answers andLor any,recommendations or any other comments
Use drawings'of facility to better explaln;situatioits (use addrt�onal pages as necessary) p Field Copy ® Final Notes `
The soil test was dated 2-6-03 with no lime needed.
Irrigation equipment calibration dated 9-4-03.
he irrigation records are complete and balanced out.
analysis: 12-8-03 = 1.4 lbs.
8-6-03 = 1.1 lbs
5-28-03 = 2.0 lbs
3-18-03 = 2.0 lbs
1-16-03 = 1.3 lbs
Reviewer/Inspector Name Marlene D.'Salyer
Reviewer/InspectorSignature: Date:-//% -og
12172103 Continued

Focht Number: 40---62 Date of Inspection 2-4-2004
"IReauired
Records & Documents
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
® No
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(iet WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
® No
23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
®No
25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
®No
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
® No
27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
®No
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
®No
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
® No
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
❑ Yes
®No
31. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
❑ Yes
❑ No
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Stocking Form ❑ Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfall [:]Inspection After V Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
12112103

Technical Assistance Site Visit Report
4D Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Natural Resources Conservation Service
p Soil and Water Conservation District
O Other...
Facility Number 40
fit
Date: 915103
Time: 1 1230
Time On Faun: 65 WARO
Farm Name Chris Mur h
Swine Farm
County Greene
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address 25 Ham Town Road
Snow Hill NC
Onsite
Representative Chris Murphy , Integrator Goldsboro Hog Farms
Type Of Visit
Compliance Inspection (pilot only)
Technical Assistance
Confirmation for Removal
❑ No Animals -Date Last Operated:
❑ Operating below threshold
IN Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse
Design Current
Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
2000
2000
Purpose Of Visit
O Routine
O Response to DWQ/DENR referral
O Response to DSWC/SWCD referral
O Response to complaint/local referral
O Requested by producer/integrator
O Follow-up
O Emergency
O Other...
Design Current
Capacity Population
❑ Layer
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
28580
GENERAL QUESTIONS:
1. Is waste discharging from any part of the operation and reaching surface waters or wetlands? ❑ yes ® no
2. Is there evidence of a past waste discharge from any part of the operation that waste reached ❑ yes ® no
surface waters or wetlands?
3. Does any problem pose an immediate threat to the integrity of the waste structure (large trees, ❑ yes ® no
seepage, severe erosion, etc.)?
4. Is there evidence of nitrogen over application, hydraulic overloading or excessive ponding ❑ yes ® no
requiring DWQ notification?
6• Is there evidence of improper dead animal disposal that poses a threat to the environment ❑ yes ® no
and/or public health?
6. Is the waste level within the structural freeboard elevation range for any waste structure? ❑ yes ® no
Structurel Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier
Level (Inches) 1 37
CROP TYPES lCoastal Bermuda-grazel ISmall grain overseed Cotton
SPRAYFIELD
SOIL TYPES WaB
AuB
7. What type of technical assistance does the onsite representative feel is needed? (list in comment section)
03/10/03
❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
28580
GENERAL QUESTIONS:
1. Is waste discharging from any part of the operation and reaching surface waters or wetlands? ❑ yes ® no
2. Is there evidence of a past waste discharge from any part of the operation that waste reached ❑ yes ® no
surface waters or wetlands?
3. Does any problem pose an immediate threat to the integrity of the waste structure (large trees, ❑ yes ® no
seepage, severe erosion, etc.)?
4. Is there evidence of nitrogen over application, hydraulic overloading or excessive ponding ❑ yes ® no
requiring DWQ notification?
6• Is there evidence of improper dead animal disposal that poses a threat to the environment ❑ yes ® no
and/or public health?
6. Is the waste level within the structural freeboard elevation range for any waste structure? ❑ yes ® no
Structurel Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier
Level (Inches) 1 37
CROP TYPES lCoastal Bermuda-grazel ISmall grain overseed Cotton
SPRAYFIELD
SOIL TYPES WaB
AuB
7. What type of technical assistance does the onsite representative feel is needed? (list in comment section)
03/10/03
❑ Other
28580
GENERAL QUESTIONS:
1. Is waste discharging from any part of the operation and reaching surface waters or wetlands? ❑ yes ® no
2. Is there evidence of a past waste discharge from any part of the operation that waste reached ❑ yes ® no
surface waters or wetlands?
3. Does any problem pose an immediate threat to the integrity of the waste structure (large trees, ❑ yes ® no
seepage, severe erosion, etc.)?
4. Is there evidence of nitrogen over application, hydraulic overloading or excessive ponding ❑ yes ® no
requiring DWQ notification?
6• Is there evidence of improper dead animal disposal that poses a threat to the environment ❑ yes ® no
and/or public health?
6. Is the waste level within the structural freeboard elevation range for any waste structure? ❑ yes ® no
Structurel Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier
Level (Inches) 1 37
CROP TYPES lCoastal Bermuda-grazel ISmall grain overseed Cotton
SPRAYFIELD
SOIL TYPES WaB
AuB
7. What type of technical assistance does the onsite representative feel is needed? (list in comment section)
03/10/03

40 - 62 Date:
9/5/03
F4Facilityber
ER
© No assistance provided/requested
ste spill leaving site
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE Needed
Provided
❑ 9. Waste spill contained on site
25. Waste Plan Revision or Amendment
❑
❑
❑ 10. Level in structural freeboard
26. Waste Plan Conditional Amendment
❑
❑
❑ 11. Level in storm storage
27. Review or Evaluate Waste Plan w/producer
❑
❑
❑ 12. Waste structure integrity compromised
28. Forms Need (list in comment section)
❑
El
❑ 13. Waste structure needs maintenance
29. Missing Components (list in comments)
❑
❑
[114. Over application >= 10% & 10 lbs.
30. 2H.0200
❑
❑
❑ 15. Over application < 10% or < 10 lbs.
re -certification
❑ 16. Hydraulic overloading
31. Five & Thirty day Plans of Action (PoA)
❑
❑
32. Irrigation record keeping assistance
❑
❑
❑ 17. Deficient irrigation records
❑ 18. Latelmissing waste analysis
33. Organize/computerization of records
❑
❑
❑ 19. Late/missing lagoon level records
34. Sludge Evaluation
❑
❑
[120. Late/missing soils analysis
❑ 21. Crop needs improvement
35. Sludge or Closure Plan
❑
❑
❑ 22. Crop inconsistent with waste plan
36. Sludge removallclosure procedures
❑
❑
37. Waste Structure Evaluation
❑
❑
[123. Irrigation maintenance deficiency
❑ 24. Deficient sprayfield conditions
38. Structure Needs Improvement
❑
❑
39.Operation S Maintenance Improvements
❑
❑
40. Marker check/calibration
❑
❑
Re ulato Referrals
41. Site evaluation
❑
❑
❑ Referred to DWQ Date:
42. Irrigation Calibration
❑
❑
❑ Referred to NCDA Date:
El Other...
43. irrigation system design/installation
El
❑
Date:
44. Secure irrigation information (maps, etc.)
❑
❑
LIST IMPROVEMENTS
45.Operating improvements (pull signs, etc.)
❑
❑
MADE BY OPERATION
46. Wettable Acre Determination
❑
❑
1
47. Evaluate WAD certification/rechecks
❑
❑
48. Crop evaluationlrecommendations
❑
❑
2.
49. Drainage work/evaluation
❑
❑
50. Land shaping, subsoiling, aeration, etc.
51. Runoff control, stormwater diversion, etc.
❑
❑
❑
❑
3
52. Buffer improvements
❑
❑
53. Field measurements(GPS, surveying, etc.)
❑
❑
4.
54. Mortality BMPs
❑
❑
55. Waste operator education (NPDES)
❑
❑
5'
56. Operation & maintenance education
❑
❑
57. Record keeping education
❑
❑
6.
58. Croplforage management education
❑
❑
59. Soil and/or waste sampling education
❑
❑
03/10/03

Facility Number 40 - 62 Date: 9/5103
ENTS:
COC dated May 1, 2002 and on site.
Records need to be made available for 3 years.
Waste analysis dated 816/03 nitrogen is 1.1 lbs11000 gallons
5/28/03 nitrogen is 2.0 Ibs/1000 gallons
3/18103 nitrogen is 2.0 Ibs11000 gallons
1/16/03 nitrogen is 1.3 Ibs/1000 gallons
11/1/02 nitrogen is 1.4 Ibs/1000 gallons
718/02 nitrogen is 1.9 Ibs/1000 gallons
Soil test dated 2/6/03 Cu, Zn and ph within guidelines.
IRR2 records are complete and balanced.
Lagoon level and rainfall recorded weekly.
Farm is well maintained.
Continue to establish veg. on top of lagoon dike walls.
Planning to overseed coastal bermuda pasture within next two weeks.
Receiving crops in good condition.
TECHNICAL SPECIALIST IMartin McLawhom
SIGNATURE
..
03/10/03

Type of Visit p Compliance Inspection p Operation Review p Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit p Routine p Complaint p Follow up p Emergency Notification p Other p Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit: 2/6l2402 Time: F llald sm
p Not Operational p Below Threshold
■ Permitted E Certified p Conditionally Certified ® Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:....... ......•
Farm Name: Chris Murphy Swine Farm _ County: Grt:,en,e............................................... ..WARO.......
Owner Name: Chris
Murphy
Phone No: 252-747-5460
Mailing Address: ?,S.Haw..owii.Roati........................................................................... Snot+:.Hi.II... C....................................................... 2858.0 ..............
FacilityContact: ............................................... - .............................. Title: ............................................................... Phone No:
Onsite Representative: C1trh Murphy,.George.Pefttts........................................... Integrator: Galdsbnm.HogXarms.......................................
Certified Operator: Altaa.C,............. ............. ,.. Murphy............................................ Operator Certification Number: 164.LQ-............................
Location of Farm:
go to first crossroads take test on
rox.1/2 mile on right.
N Swine p Poultry p Cattle 13 Horse Latitude ®e ®' ©�� Longitude ©• ®° ®u
-Design;
Swine ..Capacity
[3 Wean to Feeder
11 Feeder to mts
p arrow to Wean
[3 Farrow to Feeder
p Farrow to Finish
p Gilts
p Boars
C
r
`<,r
7
sultry C
0
ign ;Current;
Cattle
.city 1'opulatibq
sign. -Current
acity -" Populition.
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes N No
Discharge originated at: I3 Lagoon ❑ Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes p No
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) 0 Yes p No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gallmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes p No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes ®No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ®No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? p Spillway p Yes ®No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ...................................................................... .
Freeboard(inches): ............... a1................ ............................... I..--- ................................. ............................ ......... .................................... ....................................

ace ity Number: 40--62 Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? -
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
S. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding p PAN p Hydraulic Overload
p Yes N No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Pasture) Small Grain Overseed
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? p Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? p Yes p No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
t5. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
Yes Ig No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
Yes H No
❑ Yes N No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes N No
p Yes ® No
p o violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit You will receive no lurther correspondence about this visit.
Comments {refer to ques ion # Explarrt any ES answers and/or any recommendat�ous of any other commentsr
;
Use drawings of facd�ty tosbetter.eaplam:situahons Ouse additional pages as=necessary)
z _ . p Field Copy p Final Notes
Waste analysis 1/31/02 - 1.5 lbs/1000 gals.
Soil analysis 3/20/01; Fall 2001 samples have been sent to Raleigh for analysis; lime as results suggest.
Irrigation records complete with nitrogen balance; no ovetapplication noted.
Freeboard levels recorded weekly.
Reviewer/Inspector Name ,DaphneB "Cullom _. entered b Ano ndalL ' - y= t
y n'
_ - h
Reviewer/Inspector Signatur Date: _ 11 _ t�7M�

OV03101 Continued
act sty Number: 40_62 Date of Inspection FTXMWI
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes p No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? i7 Yes a No
28, Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, p Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? p Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) p Yes M No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? p Yes g No
32. Do the flush tanks Jack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? p Yes p No
rt~'i �'nY'r3 *-�.. •try._, _ -'ffi. 'Slr att.•-w2 tws3t�•I�..'-�.Y•. s'��.�3Z wi '••a'.ri :ram -
��+; �i ^T •! [! +-�'�e�r'��� n�-r�d..;^�_•
Cr -h. i T �'!G
Zf s Y- - =yL'
Y �t _A _
u[' - -1 1. _ •'•":r.Y... 1, j✓n=.
r i }2�' -
- j^• k -=1._ - .z—a r-- r- .. ..
1
_.. _
- -
J F
y
'1b �"tt- ^y��iY
sL
if - T i -..y; - 9 }3 cL ri .] 'h' C •.
✓.[� f"�..
<�Y
- i i.

v (- .w,.`°`�.. F't. -:` 4i-=-r ' =• SST...-.,t�i[YYi�unzo�i�it`.ater-Qualify-�'- y, .,--a _ :.�;' "".,
� � ,�,''„ �� � �--"�� •r'+�f$�b�1 O�`�����4W$kCl'!�Off�Cl'V�ti�{1l1 r � _ • '
(Type of Visit p Compliance Inspection p Operation Review p Lagoon Evaluation I
Reason for Visit p Routine p Complaint p Follow up p Emergency Notification p Other
p Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit: 2/6/2002 Time: 11:30 am
p Not OperVional p Below ThreshoM
Permitted 0 Certified p Conditionally Certified p Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ............
Farm Name: Best House Farm
Owner Name: Chris & Rusty Murphy
County:!Grrmm .................................................WARD........
Phone No: 252-747-2024
Mailing Address: 25.13am.Iowa.R.aad........................................................................... Sooty.Hill... NC....................................................... 2858.Q..............
FacilityContact: .................................................. ------ Title: ................ ............................................... Phone No:....------.......----...............................
Onsite Representative: Cbris.Dd inlay.,.lGenrgc.P.e1tus........................................... Integrator: lGaldabjam.Hog.]E+arms.......................................
Certified Operator: Altan..C................................. Marphy ............................................ Operator Certification Number: 1fi4.14.............................
Location of Farm:
right SR 1143 go 1/2 mile and turn right located on the right w
H Swine 13 Poultry p Cattle [3 Horse Latitude ©• ®� 7� Longitude ©• r ®�
_ Design Current` - ` Design - Current _Design . Current --
Swine ' Capacity Topnlation =` Poultry =- ' ' Capacity Population-' •Cattle Capacity. Population
p Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
13 Farrow to Fee er
p Farrow to Finish
p Gilts
p Boars
In Layer I in airy
p Non -Layer JE3 Non -Dairy
Other
_ Total Design Capacity 4,000
` Total SS LW 540,000 -
-s
L Number'of Lagoons ,y ❑ u
Holding Ponds lidTraps, == o
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: Lagoon l3 Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a Iagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
p Yes ® No
Yes 13 No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? p Yes N No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? 13 Spillway p Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:.................................................... ................. ...................................
Freeboard (inches) . ............... R................ :

aci i um er: 40-43
Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (iel trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? p Excessive Ponding p PAN p Hydraulic Overload
p Yes ® No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
❑ Yes ® No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda Wheat Small Grain Overseed
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? p Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? p Yes p No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (iel irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23'. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
p Yes p No
❑ Yes p No
p Yes ®.No
p Yes ONO
p Yes ONO
13 Yes ONO
❑ Yes ® No'
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ® No
p Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
p Yes R No
p Yes ® No
p o violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no turther correspondence about this visit.
Comments{refer to;gnestiou #i) Eaplam.any YES answers•and/or any'recbmmendat�ons or,•any o#her comments �`�a :"p
.'m'.�^.'xs..s-- -rr'. " . e..-+.7:-...� -..-. �:3 r. . v--.:".`� ,P�...::-a'."-"�-.. ,�r,-s.. -r «;.c..:s;- : e's.�-�. "" s; r^=^1�,::'"�_'a'^�•': , n:..: � .... ".,, .... -._. , _
p rieia L opy p
JLG aLLalj'JAJ 1/J 11VL - 1.0 IV31 A VVV Sa1J.
1 analysis 3/2001 - Fall 2001 samples sent to Raleigh for analysis; lime as results suggest.
eboard levels recorded weekly.
gation records complete with nitrogen balance; no overapplication noted.
Reviewer/Inspector Name Daphne B:;CuI[om entered°bykAnu i�iidall r.. '"
Reviewerllnspector Signature: e) o 06, Date. — 1 L — C) 7 `

05103101
r '
Continued
Facility Number: 40_43
Date of Inspection 27672002
Odor Issues
26.
Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
Yes
p No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27.
Are there any dead animals not disposed of property within 24 hours?
p Yes
® No
28.
Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
p Yes
® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29.
Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
p Yes
®No
30.
Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (Le. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
p Yes
M No
31.
Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
0 Yes
®No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
p Yes p No
y
,
��
'
�
A
`
��� � °.fir=_
u� �'� a
�•1� t _ .- _
- �f ' :ef a
ss
` _<
f
�
y�
.h

[Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection Q Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation I
Reason for Visit OO Routine O Complaint O Follow up Q Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 40 62 Date or visit:: 6/21/2001 Time: 1130
O Nut Operational O Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified 13 Conditionally- Certified jQ Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ............
Farm Name: CJhxh lktuxphy..Sn:inc.FArm ............................... County: GrmAc .............................................. W RO.......
Owner Name: Chrix................................ ....... Murphy . Phone No:=-IAM.460 ..........................................................
Mailing Address: 25.HaM.T9.yM.jclAA............................. .......... ................................... SmijaN.C....................................................... 285.80 .............
FacilityContact:.............................................................................. Title:.......
Onsite Representative- Chris.Murphy.........................................................
.................................... Phone No:
Integrator: Guldsbox.e.HoA.Fama.......................................
Certified Operator: A119ja.......................... ............. UU=hY......................................... I... Operator Certification Number: .16419.............................
Location of Farm:
Hvw.135 toward Goldsboro from Snow Hill, take SR 1146 to left, go to first crossroads take left on SR 1149. Farm located l
ipprox. 112 mile on right.
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 °F 25 , 52 Longitude F _00­1 GL
-. —
:Design :Current :...::.... ,. .. Design : C�prrenf Design Cuirreht .
a�rte.::-Ca
........
ac'
. _.
i:Po ulation.:...:Cattie, :'
Ca ac s : Po ula#ion ` .
;'.
❑ Wean to Feeder
:.
❑ Layer
❑ Dairy
® Feeder to Finish
2000
1500
❑ Non -Layer
ElNon-llairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
..:.::. ... .......
❑ Farrow to Feeder
: ❑ Other
-
❑Farrow to Finish
:"
Total De�tgn Capacity;
2,000
::
❑ Gilts
......:.
:` ......::Total-SSLW::
270,000
❑ Boars
I _ ce Drains Present I'❑ Lagoon Area J© Spray Field Area j
Number of La oops 1 Subsurface 1
g
Holdine Ponds / Salid,Traps n No Liawd Waste Management Svstem
Discharges & Stream Impacts
I . Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes ®No
Discharge; originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge: is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is obsetv4d, did it reach Water of the Stale? (1f'yes_ notify` DWQ) ❑yes ❑ No
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in galhnin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoou sj stern? (If yes, uolifj- DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Stncture 6
Idculilicr:..................................................... ................... ................................ .........
Freeboard(inches): ...............34..............................................................................................

05103101
Facility Number: 40-62
Date of Inspection 6/21/2001
ContWued
5. Are there anv immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, eta)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not property addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notifv DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need mainteuance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuc.-tures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
I I . Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type corn Coastal Bermuda (Graze) Small Grain Overseed
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14, a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes Q No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16, is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21, Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ic/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23- Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24- Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes tR No
❑ Yes ®No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
25- Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ® No
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
❑ Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
*Weeds in spray field need attention. (Dog Fennels).
*Waste analysis dated 4124/01 nitrogen is L5 lbs / 1000 gallons
1/19/01 nitrogen is 1.8 lbs/1000 gallons
*Soil test dated 3/20/01. Lime applied in Feb 2001 at recommended rates. Suggest keeping time receipts.
19. Missing soil test for year 2000 as noted in DWQ inspection. Permit requirement is to take soil test annually and follow time
level being recorded weekly as required by permit.
- -
Reviewer/lnspector Name Marten Melawhora= _ -
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

L - V 1
05103101 Continued
Facility Number. 40-62 1 pate of Inspection 6121120Q1
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge atlor below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. is there any evidence of wind drift daring land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill'pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
are well organized.
to establish vegetation on bare areas on dike walls.
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
J

O�O� W AT 4 g9
co r
�_ --1
May 21, 2001
Mr. Chris Murphy
Chris Murphy Swine Farm
25 Ham Town Road
Snow Hill, North Carolina 28580
SUBJECT: Notice of Deficiency
Animal Compliance Evaluation Site Inspection
Chris Murphy Swine Farm
Facility No. # 40-62
Greene County
Dear Mr. Murphy:
t4i,ha�el F, t sl y
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Kerr T. Stevens
Division of Water Quality
Enclosed please find a copy of the Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection (as it is viewed in DWQ database)
conducted on March 13, 2001 at the referenced facility by the Division of Water Quality from the Washington
Regional Office. Please read this inspection and keep it with all other documents pertaining to your animal
operation for future inspections.
In general, this inspection included verifying that: (1) the farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15
NCAC 2H.0217, Senate Bill 1217, the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan and/or General Permit; (2)
determine whether the waste utilization plan is based on total or actual wetted acres; (3) the farm operation's waste
management system is being operated properly, under the direction of a Certified Operator; (4) the required records
are being kept; (5) there are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or runoff. The following deficiency was noted during
the inspection.
cp In accordance with condition III, item 3 of your general permit, you are required to conduct an annual
Standard Soil Fertility Analysis, including pH, copper and zinc. Could not locate a soil analysis for year
2000 during the inspection or on the NCDA website. Make sure to have the results of the soil analysis
available for future inspections.
As a reminder, please note the following which are conditions of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan and the
general permit therefore these items must be implemented:
tp The maximum waste level in lagoons/storage ponds shall not exceed that specified in the CAWMP. At a
minimum, maximum waste level for waste for lagoonststorage ponds must not exceed the level that provides
adequate storage to contain 25 year, 24 hours storm event plus an additional foot of structural freeboard.
cp Soil analysis is required annually
tp The following records are required: rainfall and lagoon level data, off -site solids removal, maintenance, repair,
wastelsoil analysis and land irrigation records. These records should be maintained by the facility
owner/manager in chronological and legible form for a minimum of three years.
cp land application rates shall be in accordance with the CAWMP. In no case shall land application rates exceed
the Plant Available Nitronen (PAN) rate for the receiving crop or result in runoffthe Plant Available rate for the receiving crop or result in runoff during give a��licationgive a��lication.
cp Keep lagoons/storage ponds free of foreign debris including, but not limited to tires, bottles, plastic products,
light bulbs, gloves, syringes or any other solids waste.
cp The lagoon areas should be kept mowed or otherwise controlled and accessible. High grass does not allow
you to conduct a thorough inspection of the lagoon area for seepage, rodent damage, etc.
9 It is suggested notLrequired to keep crop yield information for future use to update your waste management
plan. You will need three years of crop yield data before your plan can be updated.
943 Washington Square Mall Washington, NC 27889 252-946-6481 (Telephone) 252-946-9215 (Fax)

s
� a
Page Two
Chris Murphy Swine Farm
# 40-62
Thank you for your assistance and cooperation during the inspection. If you have any questions, please contact me at
252/946-6481, ext. 318 or your Technical Specialist.
Sincerely,
Lyn . Hardison
Environmental Specialist
Cc: Greene MRCS
George Pettus
Mike Regans
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit (w/out attachments)
NCDSWC-WaRO (w/out attachments)
WaJW Animal Compliance File
H files

r
a � y
Type of Visit Q Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 4(} 62 gate or `'icit: 3-13-2001 Time: 1310
O Not Operational O Below Threshold
Permitted 0 Certified 0 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:. ..
Farm Name: CltlriS. ' rtxAbJ: xYiuxc.k axxlu............. -- - ........ County: Gjmt:....... '.A RO .......
Owner Name: ChrjA....... ..... --.....-...... mul-.p.hy.----.-........................................... Phone No: 2S.2-N-S4.60...............................................------.....
MailingAddress: 25.11tlJtll..x:uat.Road......................... ......... ........ .................. ....... Sm.w-BALNC ...................................................... WOO..-........
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone No:
Onsite Representative: Cb�iS. uxRFx3..�i. i .P..eta........................................... Integrator: Goldsbaro.Rog'E'a 1ls......................................
Certified Operator:Allun....................................... Ruaby ........................................... Operator Certification Number:1641Q.............................
Location of Farm:
Hyw. 135 toward Goldsboro from Snow Hill, take SR 1146 to left, go to first crossroads take left on SR 1149. Farm located A.
approx. 1/2 mile on right. 'Wr
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ horse Latitude 35 • 25 52 Longitude 77 • 45 ®11
Design
Current
Design Current ' - ' ' Design ` - Current:
Switie CaDacitv
Population Poultry
Capacity Po ulation Cattle - .
Ca0acity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Layer
❑ Dairy
® Feeder to Finish 2000
2000 10 Non -Layer
❑ Non -Dairy
Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
2,000
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Total SSLW
270,000
Number of Lagoons 1 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present 110 lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area
Holding PondsJ.Solid Traps ID No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges 8 Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Dischar=e originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed. was the conveyance man-made? El Yes ®No
b. If discharge is observed. did it reach water of the State? (If ye-. notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ® No
c. If discharie is observed. what is the estimated flow in �,al/min? n/a
d_ Does discharge bypass a lagcxm sysiem? (If ves. notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ® No
2. is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
V1"aste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑Yes ®No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ................................... ................................... .................................... ................................... ......................................................................
Freeboard (inches): ?
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: 40-62 Date of Inspection 3-13-2001
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(if any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenancelimprovement?
S. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
WaM Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenancelimprovement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? [:]Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Graze) Small Grain Overseed Cotton Corn (Silage & Grain)
13, Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16_ Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ic/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
I9. Does record keeping need improvement? (iel irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(i& discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewerlinspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit
-, :, r El Field Copy ❑Final Notes
c S}. �,-.:.4 ✓� r! iJ� Si
* Records available for review.
• Waste analysis 1-19-01 = 1.8 1bs; 11-13-00 = 1.2 lbs
19 - 2000 Soil anlaysis - not available (couldn't find). Make sure the results are alway available for future inspections.
* Irrigation records are complete and balanced out.
* Vegetation on dike wall is well established.
• Cover crop is established
* Freeboard levels are recorded as required.
ont. on Page 3
Reviewer/Inspector Name Lyn B. ardison
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: �,, _ j . ? I Date: L%
05103101 ✓ Continued

,
Facility !Number: 40-62
Date of Inspection 3-13-2001
Printed on: 5/21/2001
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
Grounds are well kept.
Continue to shrub the downslope of the dike wall.
" If you have any questions, please contact myself or Daphne @ 252-94Cr6481, ext. 318 or ext. 321.
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
AA
05103101
J

Division of Water Quality
O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
[Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation O Other
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 40 62
Date of Visit 3-28-20p0 Printed on: 3/31/2000
O Not O erational O Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified 0 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ................ ........
Farm Name: Cluj,&.HUx.P1t3:.$.wiU...Far..M.......................... .................... County: Gxccxtc .............................................. V1ARO.......
OwnerName: Cb ria....................................... muraby ...................................................... Phone No: 7.47.-5.46R..... I .... ...............................
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone No:
Mailing Address: ............................... Sxi9 Y.1U11..NC............................ ... 1S.580 .............
.............................................. .......................
Onsite Representative: 1j , KR F, ,Cpgg „)'QttU ........................ Integrator:
Qldskl?� Q. ta>;apt......................................
Certified Operator: ,lX!?A................................... r4UICphy............................................ Operator Certification Number:JL6.419 .............................
Location of Farm:
....................................................................................................................................................................................................................
® Swine []Poultry []Cattle ❑ Hor Latitude 35 ° 25 52 Longitude F 00
Design Current
Swine Canacitv Ponulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
2000
�2004
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Cavacitv PoiDulation Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 2,000
Total SSLW 270,000
Number of Lagoons I 1 1 10 Subsurface Drains Present IFO Lagoon Area JE1 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream I-mpacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b, if discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 0 No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes 0 No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: .................................... .................................... ................................... .................................... .................................... ....................................
Freeboard (inches): 30

Continued on back
Facility Number: 40-62 Date of Inspection 3-28-2000 Printed on: 3/31/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes N No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes N No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes N No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ®No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes N No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Yes N No
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Graze) Cotton Corn Small Grain Overseed
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes N No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
0 d•yi61_ati0ns:or:deficiencies.were-noted:during.thi9wigit; Y_6u-Will -receiveitafurther,
corresnondence about this.visit..... - .... - ..... .. ... - .. .. .
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
r'Lll
omments (refer to question ft Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
se drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
records of the CAWMP are complete including the irrigation records with a nitrogen balance; current waste & soil analysis.AL
T
Reviewer/Inspector Name Daphne B. Cullom

Revi�.wer/lnspector Signature: Date:
Facility Number: 40-62 Date of Inspection 3-28-2000 Printed on: 3/31/2000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge attor below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28. is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ®No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No

0 WvRion of Sot! and Water Consei*atioii - Operation Review
0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Compliance Inspection
Division of Water Quality - Compliance Inspection
0 Other Agency - Operation Review
10 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number 40 62 Date of Inspection 12/7/99
Time of Inspection 11:45 AM 24 hr. (hh:mm)
® Permitted 0 Certified D Conditionally Certified 13 Registered [3 Not OperationalOperationall Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: CJltri.&.HuxPhy..Swin.t.Ear.ni..........
County: G.rcejae......................... !'.!'.ii► Q.......
......................
Owner Name: Q&....................................... miar y............................................. Phone No: ..
...... �7- . ...............................
FacilityContact: .............................................................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No:..............
Mailing Address: �Qut+ , ,Q7�. S..............
Sino!'.HUM ...................................................... 2>AM .............
Onsite Representative: Cl1CI5.Mjjrpby............................................................................. Integrator: G.QW5bparQ..UIzP,.k:airjt>,Si......................................
Certified Operator:Alloin-C.................................. Murphy ........................................... Operator Certification Number:16.419 .............................
Location of Farm:
K9xJ/Z..najk9. ,r! t1t.......................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Latitude 35 • 25 52 Longitude 77 • 4S 00 "
Swine
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population poultry Capacity Population
❑ Layer
2000 2000 ❑ Non -Layer
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
[I Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
[I Boars
❑ Other
Design Current
Cattle Ca acit Population
[I Dairy I I �j
❑ Non -Dairy
Total Design Capacity 2,000
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons 1 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds 1 Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharp_es & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 0 No
Discharge originated at: [I Lagoon [3 Spray Field [I Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? El Yes 0 No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes 0 No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? El Spillway ❑ Yes 0 No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): ...............3.7...................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes 0 No
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back
Printed on 121201M

Printed on 12/20/99
Facility Number: 40-62 Date of Inspection I217/99
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ®No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ®No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Yes ® No
12. Crop type Corn, Cotton Bermuda pasture Small Grain
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes (j No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
Nb-- iolatid is:or deficiencies-Woeee'noted'd'uring-th6 v AL'YdtiWill'r4 teeive nQ further' •'
correspondence about this .visit. -• .. . . . . .... . . . .. . ... . ... .
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes []No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
Naste analysis 11/17/99 = 1.8 lbs.
Veed to remove weeds on the backside of the lagoon.
Reviewer/Inspector Name Carl Dunn Entered by Ann Tyndall
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

Division of Soil and Water"`Conservation- Operation Review
13 Division of Soil and -Water Conservation ­Compliance-iuspection
in Division -of Water Quality - Compliance Inspection
Other Agency -Operation Revrew
0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow -tip of DSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number 1#D 2 Date of Inspection ?--9g
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
0 Permitted [3 Certified © Conditionally Certified © Registered 10 Not Operational Date Last Operated
Farm Name: ..............0...........`...:V.Y....... .1""`� County: 6 n.e.e
s
Owner Narne:............................................. "... 1'.q.................................................................. Phone No:
FacilityContact: .............................................................................. Title: ................................................................ Phone No:
MailingAddress: ................................................... ..............................._............................................... ..........................
Onsite Representative:.......... �" . y....... �....r.. g
Into rator.....................................................
Certified Operator:................. :y........ . pt`/......................... ....... ... Operator Certification Number:..........................................
.......... .....
Location of Farm:
r
................................................... ........................................................................................ ..................................................................................... I........_................ w
Latitude Longitude
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine-. Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
2000
2000
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts,
❑ Boars
- f11(umber of:Lagoons 10 Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes M No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min'?
d. Dees discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes (g No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(inches): 31�...................................................................... ..... ......... ...................... ............. I--................. ................................... ...................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, [] Yes 19 No
seepage, etc.)
3123/99 Continued on back

Facility Number: L40 — &1 Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
12. Crop type ,..,.
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
. (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24, Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes 10 No
❑ Yes 10 No
❑ Yes O No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes MNo
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes [ No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes El No
❑ Yes [6 No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes R No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes [9 No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes W No
.......................
K6,* 1ati6 is or• deheiendves *'ere noted• Aix°ifng ihis;visit; Yoe will receive Rio further ; ;
correspondence. abauL this :visit. • • • • ---
Comments (refer.to"question #): Explain any YES aasrvers-and/or any recommendations or anyother comments.'
Use drawings,of.facility to better.explainsituations. (use additional pages as necessary):
Neel +-p ire -awe- L,,a,ek) o, 4t-,e- 6-As- L 1 A�'- ,
Reviewer/Inspector Name 1 777 t_
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: l�
Date:
3/23/99

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and
Natural Resources
Washington Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
CDE RNortDEPARTMENT OF
ENvtiRONMENT ANr> NATURAL RF-,s64..IRGES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
October 6, 1998
Mr. Chris Murphy
Chris Murphy Swine Farm
Rt_ 3, Box 85
Snow. Hill, NC 28580
SUBJECT: Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
Chris Murphy Swine Farm
Fac, No. 40-62
Greene County
Dear Mr. Murphy:
On June 30, 1998, I conducted an Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection at the
referenced facility. Overall, the operation was found to be in satisfactory condition. A
copy of the inspection report is attached for your review.
In general, this inspection includes verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified Animal
Waste Management Plan (CAWMP); (2) the farm is complying with requirements of the
State Rules 15 NCAC 2H.0217, Senate Bill 1217, and the Certified Animal Waste
Management Plan; (3) the farm operation's waste management system is being operated
properly under the direction of a Certified Operator; (4) the required records are being
kept; (5) there are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or runoff.
The recommendations and/or comments regarding your inspection can be found in the
comment section of the attached inspection form. It is very important as the owner and
Operator in.Charge that you address any noted concerns, as soon as possible. For
assistance, please contact your Technical Specialist and/or the local Soil & Water
Conservation District Office.
943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, North Carolina 27889
Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

Page 2
Chris Murphy Swine Farm
October 6, 1998
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance during the inspection. Should you have
further questions or comments regarding this inspection, do not hesitate to call me at
[phone], ext. 321.
Sincerely,
. l.kX—LG.k�
Daphne B. Cullom
Environmental Specialist II
cc: Greene County SWCD Office
1VEke Regans, Greene County NCCES
Jake Barrow, L.L. Murphrey Company
WaRO

Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection � 24 hr. (hh:mm)
p Registered E Certified p Applied for Permit p Permitted n of Operational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: Chris.Mnrphy.Srvjne.lEarm..................................................................... County: Greene WARO
OwnerName: Chxis ....................................... Murphy ..................................................... Phone No: 147-5.4.6D.............................................
Facility Contact: ...............................................................................Title: ..... Phone No:
MailingAddress. RQ...> wL.85........................................................................................... Snot-HUL.NC..............................................-----•... Z8580 ..............
Onsite Representative: Chris.Murphy............................................................................ Integrator- L.L.Murpbucy..Company..................................
Certified Operator: Alban.C................................. Murphy ............................................ Operator Certification Number: lU.LQ_............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude ©. ©� ©u Longitude ©•
� estgn urren
esaagctn Po Auurlraetn�o
estgnurre•n Cattl
'wine a PS
klati oult�Ca n, e Capac?ty opu P lation
PT p f3' p
t3
..� .._ . 4o -
x , _ -
.„:
µ ayes ¢' p any
M p on- -Layer p on- airy
s ro '�: r_
s -
t'
-'`
p er z
a
S
`" X Total DesigW'tip c ty
j
_ `Totaf.SSLW00
270,0
�.' "'-"'�•8� ii'u- .-., -Z �- .. _- -yam.- � a. '� l="
r 1Vumber of La oohs / Holdm Ponds= k ❑Subsurface rains resent p goon rea p pray �e Area
g g
_ f
'� _ p o Liquidment System x
can ceder er
ot
F:En
rrow to
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b_ If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes.. notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than Iagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No

aei ety Number: 4U_62 Date of Inspection
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
p Yes
N No
Structures a oons Holding Ponds Flush Pits etc.
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
p Yes
® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5 Structure
6
Identifier: ................. .................. .......
Freeboard (ft): 2.7 ft.
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
p Yes
® No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
p Yes
® No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
p Yes
N No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
p Yes
H No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
p Yes
® No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ..................••••••Rye...................... ........ jCnastal.Bm:muda.Grass...... ................................. ................................................................. ...................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? . p Yes ® No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19, is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
a. vt¢ tions.ar ciencies*were.note urbot [s visit:. ou. wY .receive no u er .:.
..ezespoi�e>ae� abQu �tiis f�si�:.. _ .................................
p Yes N No
p Yes H No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ® No
13 Yes p No
Reviewer/Inspector Name [DA,Obb-67R Cullom , .7 _ : - p
•
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

JLL-14-1995 15: 32 FROM OEf '. < T E� QUALITY SECTION TO
P . 02/02
Site Requires Immediate Attention:Q
Facility No- fe - G
Dr isio,T OF ENvIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: ' ( ,1995
Time: i2�4-0
Farm Name/Owner:
Mailing Address:
County: C
for:. . - — -- — — Phone:
On Site Representative: !ham_ �x.�2 .-chi Phone: _
Physical Add=wLocatiori.
Type of Operation: Swine
Poultry Cattle
"dl5r-
115`
Design Capacity: �2,jQ0 Number of Animals on Site:
DEM Certification Number: ACC DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: ' Longitude: " Elevation: Feet
CiWe Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon ha57 i,$ieient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm everit
(approximately I Foot + 7 inehee No Actual Freeboard:. -Ft. Inche
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes 06as any elusion observed. Yes No
Is adequate land available for spray? Yes or No Is the cover crop adequate? Yes ar No
Crop(s) being utilized.
Does the facility meet SCS r mine- a se back criteria? 200 Feet from DwelIin s Y " or No
100 Feet from Wells?
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 10;) Feet of USGS Blue Line Siz =
Is animal waste land applied or spt -y irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes or No
Is animal waste discharged into war rs o;Uhe state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes T"a If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate, waste management records (volumes of manure, Land applied,
spray irrigated on spc4 c acrev.ge wih cover crop)? Yes or No
Additional Comments: Z_L,. - M �r-p 9&rF.
6&r� h �„
Inspector Name
cc. Facility Assessment Unit
Signature
Use Attachments if Needed.
TOTAL P.02

71

p Division of Sail and Water Conservation 0 Other Agency
p Division of Water Quality
JeRoutme p omp aint p o ow -up o inspection p o ow -up o review p Other
Date of Inspection
Facility Number
Time of Inspection ®24 hr. (hh:min)
n Registered ■ Certified p Applied for Permit p Permitted 113 Not Operatiana ©ate Last Operated:
Farm Name: Chris.Mnrpbx.Swjue.Farm........................................ ........................ County: Greene WARO
OwnerName: Cbrk...................................... Blurphy ..................................................... Phone No: .7.4.7.-S4.C:4...................................................................
Facility Contact:....................................................................... .Title: .... Phone No:
Mailing Address: RiA.M axAS........................................................................................... saaw.Hill... NC ................................................ ...... I Z858fl ..............
Onsite Representative: Chris.]lour'.phy........................................................................... Integrator: LL.Murphrey_Hag.Comps]p,y........................
Certified Operator:,ltan.0. ................................ Murphy ............................................ Operator Certification Number:l64L4.............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude ©• ©' ©�6 Longitude ©• ®` ®64
esign urren estgn.. -.current'. 'Design urren,
Swine Capacity -Population :x Poultry. ::Capacity Population: Cattle Capacity Population
13 Wean to Feeder
H Feeder to Finish
E3 Farrow to can
13 Farrow to ee er
p Farrow to Finis
p Gilts
p Boars
Number of Lagoons Y Holding Ponds, . p u sur ace rains resen p agoon rea p pray herea
a
p o igai a e anagement ys em
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? p Yes ® No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes N No
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes p No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes p No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ) n Yes p No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes ®No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? p Yes ®No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require p Yes ®No
maintenance/improvement?
b. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? p Yes ® No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? p Yes ®No
7/25/97

ace i Number: 40_G2
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
p Yes
H No
Structures (Lagoons,Holding Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
p Yes
H No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (ft): 3.5
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
p Yes
® No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
p Yes
H No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
p Yes
N No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
p Yes
N No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
p Yes
a No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type......Csaastal.Bmniuda.(etay.�............................................................................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
p Yes
® No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
p Yes
®No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
p Yes
®No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
p Yes
®No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
p Yes
®No
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
0 Yes
® No
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
p Yes
®No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Onlv
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
p Yes
®No
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
p Yes
®No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
p Yes
p No
Q . , . o mar tions. or �ckncies •were ante during rs vtsrt:. ou .reacei ve ne< u er . • .
. Orrespojaj] ►Oel� bQt>l t i$ Y�Si : _ • :.: :.:. .:. .
Comrnents Refer to dbestion #) Explain. any YES answers andtor aiiy'recommepdatious or any other c6nitne-A
Use iirawings.afiacility fo bettee �explai© situations (use; additional pages as:necessary)
as certified animal waste management plan; has lagoon plan; and Operation and Maintenance Plan
p to date waste analysis; soil samples up to date
Minor bare spots - no problem
11 /18/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name J onald=M.-Smit
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

is
10 Koutine p c ompiamt p roiiow-up or uwtt inspection p rc
Facility Number1
p Registered g Certified p Applied for Permit p Permitted
up of vaw%_ review p timer
Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
in Not 0perationa Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: Chris.Murphy.Swjne.Farxn..................................................... County: Greene WARO
OwnerName: Chris ....................................... Murphy ..................................................... Phone No:.7.4.7.-5460......................................................-•-•--------.
FacilityContact: ...............................................................................Title:
PhoneNo: ....................................................
MailingAddress: RU...Bax..85........................................................................................... Sao.w..Hill...N.c ....................................................... Z858.Q ..............
Onsite Representative: Chris.Murphy........................................................................... Integrator: LL.Murphrcy..Hog.Company........................
Certified Operator:A.ttou.C.................................. Murphy............................................. Operator Certification Number:1.64L4.............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude ©• ©' ©cc Longitude ©• ®4 ®"
i=
ti esign - urren —: estgq
vine _ - Capacity aPopulation Poultry Capacitj
[3 Wean to Peeder
® Feeder to mis
E3 Farrow to Wean
[3 Farrow to Feeder
p Farrow to Finish
p Gilts
p Boars
d
p Other
T©tAI D
u
estga urren 77
�Catde ^h Capacity Population
je r3 airy
`- 3 on- airy
gn Capacity;2,000
� Rz
COta1 nW ,fiflik
F T e
tln Laiwon Area n Drav to rea _
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? p Yes ® No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes p No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (if yes, notify DWQ) p Yes p No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes p No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes ®No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? p Yes ®No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require p Yes ® No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? p Yes ®No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? p Yes ®No
7125/97

ac If i ty um er: 40_b2
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons,Holding Ponds, Flush Pits etc.
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3
Identifier: ...........
Freeboard (ft): 3.2 ft.
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
Structure 4 Structure 5
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenancelimprovement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ...... oastal3ermmuda Gmss............................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
p Yes H No
p Yes ® No
Structure 6
p Yes
N No
p Yes
® No
p Yes
®No
p Yes
®No
p Yes
®No
Q . . o-viations.or ccencies'were-note unng t [s visiv . tan rer-eive no urter . .
. ,Qor>respoxlMce
Reviewer/Inspector Name
p Yes N No
p Yes N No
p Yes ®No
p Yes H No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes N No
p Yes N No
p Yes ® No
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date: 10 -- 2 4 -- 4 `7

EMM L
241
wr,
`45
i6 IT
Al.
ie
Z CD
K-4r�41;,41 'ZO m,
. 4,-54;
Mt
kW
ro��l M6V t�,;j
x.
­ �.tj
"�T
Jj E: V, x A
t-v �w 11 T. 4PTIQ�-,! "Ire;Uy
P
77
P.71
4L.,
LL
g A
rf
oi
jjil
.464
4 V