400061_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NUH I H UAHULINA
Department of Environmental Qual

� �` x
.� � t a _
� - _. s . T �
4' � ��
�, � �i � � �a`3a �_..�� ':wad moo. � �,-r.� � � �-+�_
g � � a � �r a � -� � �
® , � ,� s � �
g � �� � � � � � s�

1r
M Division of Water Resources
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Other Agency
Facility Number:
400061 Facility Status: Active
Inpsection Type:
Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit:
Routine County:
Date of Visit:
08/09/2016 Entry Time: 10:15 am Exit Time: 11:(
Farm Name:
George Bailey Farms (Galloway Farm)
Owner:
George Herbert Bailey
Mailing Address:
PO Box 10
Physical Address:
2068 Spring Branch Church Rd
F Stat
Permit: AWS400061
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Greene Region:
I am Incident #
Owner Email:
Phone:
Walstonburg NC 278880010
Walstonburg NC 27888
❑ Denied Access
Washington
252-753-5407
acr rty us. Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator.
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35' 38' 35" Longitude: 77' 42' 17"
Located at intersection of Road 1308 and 1307 - northern tip of Greene county.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: George Herbert Bailey Operator Certification Number: 16409
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name George Bailey Phone :
On -site representative Phone : [phone]
Primary Inspector:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Marlene Salyer
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis: soil tested: 2015
2-3-16 = 1.34
10-26-15 = 1.45
IRR records are complete & balanced out on wheat.
Reviewed: rainfall, freeboard; sludge survey at 42%; calibration
Freeboard range: 24" on 114116 to 37" on 8-8-16
Phone:
Date:
page: 1

t
r Permit: AWS400061 Owner - Facility : George Herbert Bailey Facility Number: 400061
Inspection Date: 08/09/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 1,757 1,300
Total Design Capacity: 1,757
Total SSLW: 237,195
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon GBi 05/22/96 19.00 36.00
page: 2

t
} Permit: AWS400061 Owner - Facility : George Herbert Bailey Facility Number: 400061
Inspection Date: 08/09/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
YjL_K9
Na Ne
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
[]
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
M ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
M ❑
❑
Z Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
0 ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No Na No
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large
❑
❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not property addressed and/or managed through a
❑
■ ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
0 ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
MEI
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na Ne
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance altematives that need
❑ ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
[]
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

d
Permit: AWS400061 Owner - Facility : George Herbert Bailey Facility Number: 400061
Inspection Date: 08/09/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No Na No
Crop Type 1 Com, wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2 Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
0 ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
0 ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
N ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na Ne
19, Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑0
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑0
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
It yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

01
' Permit: AWS400061 Owner - Facility: George Herbert Bailey Facility Number:
Inspection Date: 08/09/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
400061
Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na No
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
0 ❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
■ ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first.survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
E ❑
❑
27, Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No Ns Ne
28. Did the facility fail to property dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑a
❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface file drains exist at the facility?
❑E
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
[]
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
N ❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
■ ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
E ❑
❑
page: 5

V h
Division of Water Resources
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Other Agency
Facility Number:
400061 Facility Status:
Active Permit: AWS400061
El Denied Access
Inpsection Type:
Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for visit:
Routine
County: Greene Region:
Washington
Date of Visit:
07/30/2015 Entry Time: 10:30 am
Exit Time: 10:45 am Incident #
Farm Name:
George Bailey Farms (Galloway Farm)
Owner Email:
Owner:
George Herbert Bailey
Phone:
252-753-5407
Mailing Address:
PO Box 10
Walstonburg NC 278880010
Physical Address:
2068 Spring Branch Church Rd
Walstonburg NC 2788E
Facility Status: 13 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35' 38' 35"
Located at intersection of Road 1308 and 1307 - northern tip of Greene county.
Longitude: 77' 42' 17"
Question Areas:
Q Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat ® Waste Application
[� Records and Documents ® Other Issues
Certified Operator: George Herbert Bailey Operator Certification Number: 16409
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Reprosentative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name George Bailey Phone
On -site representative George Bailey Phone
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
No waste analysis, since no irrigation in 2015.
Last animals on site April 2013.
Rainfall & freeboard are recorded.
Remember to do a sludge survey & calibration before placing animals on site
page: 1

,4W
Permit: AWS400061 Owner - Facility : George Herbert Bailey Facility Number: 400061
Inspection Date: 07/30/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
�] Swine - Feeder to Finish 1,757 0
Total Design Capacity: 1,757
Total SSI-W: 237,195
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon 13131 05/22/96 19.00 42.00
page: 2

Permit: AWS400061 Owner - Facility : George Herbert Bailey Facility Number: 400061
Inspection Date: 07/30/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No Na No
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
13 ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
El 11
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
L1 ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
®❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
11 ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
0 ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No Na Ne
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
V ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large
❑
11 ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
U ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
El ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
El ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
0 ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na Ne
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ El ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Permit: AWS400061 Owner - Facility : George Herbert Bailey Facility Number:
Inspection Date: 07/30/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
400061
Routine
Waste Application
Yes
No Na No
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
®❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
®[]
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
®❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
0
Ll ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
EJ ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yer No Na No
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
©❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
Q ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
©❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWS400061 Owner - Facility : George Herbert Bailey Facility Number: 400061
Inspection Date: 07/30/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na Na
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
[]
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
❑
❑
23. if selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
El ❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
11
❑ ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑ ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
11 11
❑
Other Issues
Ycs
No Na Ne
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
Q ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? if yes,
❑
11 ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWO of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
13 ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31, Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
El ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below_
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
El ❑
❑
CAWM P?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
❑
93 ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
El ❑
❑
page: 5

r 6
0 Division of Water Quality
n Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400061 Facility Status: Active Permit: A 1WS1 400061 T_ ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 12/12/2013 Entry Time: 11:15 AM Exit Time: 12:15 PM _ Incident #:
Farm Name: George Bailey Farms (Galloway Farm) Owner Email:
Owner: eorge Herbert Bailey Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: PO Box 10 Walstonbura NC 278880010
Physical Address: 20�nring Branch Church Rd _ Walstonbura NC 27888
Facility Status: 0 Compliant n Not Compliant Integrator: J C Howard Farms
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35038'35" Longitude: 77°42'17"
Located at intersection of Road 1308 and 1307 - northern tip of Greene county.'
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: George Herbert Bailey
Secondary OIC(s):
Operator Certification Number: 16409
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name George Bailey Phone:
On -site representative George Bailey Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis:
8-8-13 = 1.01
3-26-13 = 2.52
1-16-13 = 1.92
IRR records are complete & balanced out. Rainfall, freeboard & crop yields are recorded.
April 1, 2013 last animals were removed. Sludge survey done 1212013 Calib. 2012
Looks Good!
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400061 Owner - Facility: George Herbert Bailey
Facility Number: 400061
Inspection Date: 12112/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason far Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Q Swine - Feeder to Finish 1,757 0
Total Design Capacity: 1,757
Total SSLW: 237,195
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
lagoon GB 1 05/22/96 19.04 1 40.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWS400061 Owner - Facility: George Herbert Bailey Facility Number : 400061
Inspection Date: 12/1212013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ N ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than ❑ ■ C! ❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
ONOO
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.ed large trees, severe
❑ ■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
Q ■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, 0000
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
improvement?
11. is there evidence of incorrect application?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
Hydraulic Overload?
Frozen Ground?
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
❑■n❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400061 Owner - Facility: George Herbert Bailey Facility Number: 400061
Inspection Date: 12/12/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? ❑
Total Phosphorus? ❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type 1 Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14, Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Records and Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
Small Grain Overseed
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑■❑❑
❑■❑❑
Yes No NA NE
❑■❑n
00110
❑■
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400061 Owner - Facility: George Herbert Bailey Facility Number: 400061
Inspection Date: 12/12/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Lease Agreements? ❑
Other? ❑
If Other, please specify
21, Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application? ❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute, inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑ ■
❑
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑ ■
❑
❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 5

• . .
Permit: AWS400061 Owner - Facility: George Herbert Bailey Facility Number: 400061
Inspection Date: 12/12/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ M ❑ ❑
Otherlssues Yes No NA NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report Cl ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon / Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
I■�
LK
Page: 6

L
N Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400061 Facility Status: Active _ Permit: AWS400061 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: ComRJjggce Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine _ - _ County: Greene _ Region: Yyashinaton
Date of Visit: 07/19/2012 Entry Time: 10:00 AM Exit Time: 10:4,5 AM Incident #:
Farm Name: George Bailey Farms {Galloway Farm) Owner Email:
Owner: Georae Herbert Bailey _ _ Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: PQ Box 10 Walstonburg NC 27888QQ10
Physical Address: 2068 Spring Branch Church Rd _ _ _ Walstonbura NC 27888
Facility Status: Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: d C, Howard Farms
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°38'35" Longitude: 77°42'17"
Located at intersection of Road 1308 and 1307 - northern tip of Greene county.
Ouestion Areas:
Dischrge & stream Impacts © Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: George Herbert Bailey Operator Certification Number: 16409
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name George Bailey Phone:
On -site representative George Bailey Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400061 Owner - Facility: George Herbert Bailey Facility Number: 400061
Inspection Date: 07/19/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis:
7-2-12 = 1.7 soil tested: 11/2011
3-22-12 = 2.3
12-28-11 = 1.6
IRR records are complete & balanced out.
Rainfall & Freeboard are recorded.
Remember to do the sludge survey & caibration by Dec. 2012.
Looks Good!
Page: 2

Permit: AWS400061 Owner - Facility: George Herbert Bailey Facility Number: 400061
Inspection Date: 0711912012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 1,757 1,350
Total Design Capacity: 1,757
Total SSLW: 237,195
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
agoon GB1 05/22/96 19.00 44.00
Page: 3

permit: AWS400061 Owner - Facility: George Herbert Bailey Facility Number: 400061
Inspection Date: 07119/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason far Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? ❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large trees, severe ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
11 _ Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400061 Owner - Facility: George Herbert Bailey
Facility Number: 400061
Inspection Date: 07/19/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 100/o/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1 Com, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2 Small Grain Cover
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP? ❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400061 Owner - Facility: George Herbert Bailey Facility Number: 400061
Inspection Date: 0711912012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Lease Agreements? ❑
Other? ❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
24, Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
Cl ■ ❑ ❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon ❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

Permit: AWS400061 Owner - Facility: George Herbert Bailey Facility Number. 400061
Inspection Date. 07/19/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for VisIt: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ ■ 110
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon / Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
1
1
1
Page: 7

Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400061 _ Facility Status: Agtive Permit: AWS40QQQ1❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Cgmpliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Qreene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 08118/20 J 1,— Entry Time: 10:45 AM Exit Time: 1130 AM
Farm Name: Qj"r a BijjjQv F$Irms fGalloway Farm) _
Owner: Georae Herbert Bailey
Incident #:
Owner Email:
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: PO Box 10 Walstonbura NC 278880010
Physical Address: 2Q§8 Spring Branch Church Rd Will.§tgnburg NC 27888
Facility Status: N Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Bunting Farms
Location of Fans: Latitude: 35°38'35" Longitude: 77°42'17"
Located at intersection of Road 1308 and 1307 - northern tip of Greene county.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: George Herbert Bailey Operator Certification Number: 16409
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name George Bailey Phone:
On -site representative Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis:
5-9-11 = 3.0
10-11-10 = 1.3
soil tested 2010 Ssurvey in 2010 @ 37% Calib. due in 2012
IRR records are complete & balanced out.
Freeboard & rainfall are recorded.
Looks Good!
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400061 owner - Facility: George Herbert Bailey
Inspection Date: 08/18/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400061
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 1,400 1,450
Total Design Capacity: 1,400
Total SSLW: 189,000
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
[_,q,on GB 1 05/22/96 19.00 38.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWS400061 Owner - Facility: George Herbert Bailey Facility Number; 400061
Inspection pate: 08/18/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ Cl
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ONOO
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.eJ large trees, severe ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ Cl
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? Cl
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400061 Owner - Facility: George Herbert Bailey
Inspection Date: 08/18/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400061
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN a 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Com, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
DMOO
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? 1100 ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Y
Permit. AWS400061 Owner - Facility: George Herbert Bailey Facility Number. 400061
Inspection Date: 0811812011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Lease Agreements? ❑
Other? ❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
23_ If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑ ■ ❑
❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon ❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an activeiy certified operator in charge? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400061 Owner - Facility: George Herbert Bailey Facility Number. 400061
Inspection Date: 08/1 W011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
2& Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field ❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond ❑
Other ❑
If Other, please specify
32, Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400061 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS400051_ ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 08/31/2010 Entry Time:09:20 AM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Georae Bailey Farms (Galloway Farm) Owner Email:
Owner: George Herbert Bailey Phone: [phone]_ _
Mailing Address: PO Box 10 Walstonbura NC 278880010
Physical Address: 2068 Spring Branch Church Rd Walstonbura NC 27888
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Bunting Farms
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°38'35" Longitude: 77°42'17" _
Located at intersection of Road 1308 and 1307 - northern tip of Greene county.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: George Herbert Bailey Operator Certification Number: 16409
Secondary OICls):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name George Bailey Phone:
On -site representative George Bailey Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis:
5-27-10 = 2.2
3-02-10 = 1.8
12-15-10 = .50
soil tested 2010 SS due 2010 Calilb. due 2010
Freeboard range 2-15-10 = 23" — 8-9-10 = 45"
records are complete & balanced out. Looks Good
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400061 Owner - Faclllity: George Herbert Bailey Facility Number: 400061
Inspection Date: 08/31/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 11400 950
Total Design Capacity: 1,400
Total SSLW: 189,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
koon GB1 06/22/96 19,00 43,00
Page: 2

Permit: AWS400061 owner - Facility: George Herbert Bailey Facility Number: 400061
Inspection Date: OW112010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Cl ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■ ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■ ❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■ ❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage +& Treatment
Yes
No NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ M ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■ ❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
D
■ ❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■ ❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400061 Owner - Facility: George Herbert Bailey Facility Number: 400061
Inspection Date: OWl/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
Is PAN 5 10%/10 lbs.? ❑
Total P205? ❑
Failure to inoorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type 1 Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2 Small Grain Cover
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■ ❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■ ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
■ ❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
0 ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■ ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■ ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

i
Permit: AWS400061 Owner - Facility: George Herbert Bailey Facility Number : 400061
Inspection Date: 08131/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design?
Maps?
Other?
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
■ ❑
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
❑
❑
26, Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■ ❑
❑
27, Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■ ❑
Cl
V..
U. rJ6
fJG
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

a
Permit: AWS400061 Owner - Facility: George Herbert Bailey
Inspection Date: OM112010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Other Issues
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
ri
Facility Number: 400061
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

0 Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 40OQ61 Facility Status: egliye Permit: AWSQ0061 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 12/15/2009 Entry Time:09:30 AM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: George Bailey Fawns (Galloway Farm) Owner Email:
Owner: Georae Herbert Bailey Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: PO Box 10 Walstonbura NC 278880010
Physical Address: 2068 Spring Branch Church Rd _ ^� WalstgPburgNC 278§8
Facility Status: E Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: sunting,Farm, ,$
Location of Farm:
Latitude:35°38'35" Longitude:77°42'17"
Located at intersection of Road 1308 and 1307 - northern tip of Greene county.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: George Herbert Bailey Operator Certification Number: 16409
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(sl: Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name George Bailey Phone:
On -site representative Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
WASTE ANALYSIS:
4-27-09 1.6
samples pulled in NOV
soil tested fall 2008 sludge survey 10/2009
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400061 Owner - Facility: George Herbert Bailey Facility Number: 400061
Inspection Date: 12/15/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Q Swine - Feeder to Finish 1,400 1,400
Total Design Capacity: 1,400
Total SSLW: 189,000
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
�agoon GH 1 05/22/95 19.00 31.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWS400061 Owner - Faculty: George Herbert Bailey Facility Number; 400061
Inspection Date: 12/15/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) 11000
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
i. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400061 Owner - Facility: George Herbert Bailey Facility Number: 400061
Inspection Date: 12115/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? ❑
Total P205? ❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑
Evidence of wind drift?
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type 1 Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ Q ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ E ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? ❑ E ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? ❑ E ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP? ❑
Page: 4

Permit. AWS400061 Owner - Facility: George Herbert Bailey
Facility Number: 400061
Inspection Date: 12/15/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? ❑
■
❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fait to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Cl
■
❑ ❑
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? .
❑
■
❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AW5400061 Owner - Facility: George Herbert Bailey Facility Number: 400061
Inspection Date: 12/1512009 inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ ■ ❑ 0
Page: 6

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400061 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS400061 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Comoliance InsRgctiL)n Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine _ County: Greene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 11/04/2008 Entry Time: 10*00 AM Exit Time: Incident #:
Fame Name: Georae Bailey Farms (Galloway Farm) Owner Email:
Mailing Address: PQ Box 10 _ _ n
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Location of Farm:
Phone: [phone]
Integrator: Bunting Fauns
Latitude:35°38'35" Longitude:77"42'17"
Located at intersection of Road 1308 and 1307 - northern tip of Greene county.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: George Herbert Bailey - Operator Certification Number: 16409
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Hate:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400061 Owner - Facility: George Herbert Bailey Facility Number: 400061
Inspection Date: 11/0412008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis:
7-23-08 = 1.7
2-27-08 =2.4
soil test 2008
#19 COC needs to be changed to reflect feed to finish - has all the needed papers except New WUP and has spoken with Tech. Sp.
and should have WUP by Thursday 11-0-08. This info will all be mailed to Raleigh ASAP
Note: Copy of packet received in Washington Regional on 11-25-08.
Note: Lagoon #1 was cleaned out and closed in March 2008, there is one remaining lagoon in operation.
Page: 2

Permit: AWS400061 Owner - Facility: George Herbert Bailey Facility Number. 400061
Inspection Date: 11/04/2008
Regulated Operations
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Design Capacity
Reason for Visit: Routine
Current Population
Swine
Q Swine - Feeder to Finish 1,750
Total Design Capacity:
Total SSLW:
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon GB1 05/22/96 19.00
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400061 Owner - Facility: George Herbert Bailey Facility Number: 400061
Inspection Date: 11/04/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? 00011
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (LeJ large trees, severe
❑
■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
000
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■ ❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overioad? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 4

Permit: AW$400061 Owner - Facility: George Herbert Bailey
Inspection Date: 11/04/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400061
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes
No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type i
Winter Annual
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑
■ ❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
■
❑ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400051 Owner - Facility: George Herbert Bailey
Facility Number: 400061
Inspection Date: 11/0412008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after> 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Other Issues
Yes No NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
0 ■ ❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to property dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 6

Permit: AWS400061 Owner - Facility: George Herbert Bailey Facility Number: 400061
Inspection Date: 11/0412008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 7

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400061 Facility Status: Active Permit: ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: RoWtine County: Greene Region: Washington _
Date of Visit: 11/07/2QQ7- Entry Time:03:30 PM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: age Bailey Farms (GaligWay Fann) Owner Email:
Owner: George Herbert Bailey
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: PO Box 10 Walstonburg NC 278880010
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35"38'35" Longitude: 77°42'17"
Located at intersection of Road 1308 and 1307 - northern tip of Greene county.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: George Herbert Bailey Operator Certification Number: 16409
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name George Bailey Phone:
On -site representative Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis:
10-18-07 = 1.5
5-25-07 = 3.1
2-20-07 = 2.6
Soil test 11-2006
Looks Good!
Date:
Page: 1

Permit: AWS40D061 Owner - Facility: George Herbert Bailey Facility Number: 400061
Inspection Date: 11/07/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Farrow to Wean 548 548
Total Design Capacity: 548
Total SSLW: 237,284
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
goon GB 1 05Q2196 19.00 40.00
Page: 2

I
Permit: AWS400061 Owner - Facility: George Herbert Bailey Facility Number: 400061
Inspection Date: 11/07/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? 0000
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No NA NE
4. is storage capacity less than adequate? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? ❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9_ Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance altematives that need maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
Hydraulic Overload?
Frozen Ground?
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
Page: S

L
r
® Division of Water Quality
Facility Number Q Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Q Other Agency
Type of Visit 0 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit ® Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: ,36 1 Departure Time: County: Region:
i
Farm Name: Owner Email:
Owner Name: _Q'�1 a rrlQ� t1�7�/1..�_e�l�- Phone: ` 96. �i —,��O "%
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title: pPhho�ne No:
Onsite Representative: Integrator: ifZ]'/�I
Certified Operator: Operator Certification Number:
Back-up Operator:
Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: = e 0 6 = it Longitude: 0 ° 0 ` 0 "
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
❑ Other
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population
❑ Layer
❑ Non -Layer
Dry Poultry
❑ La ers
❑ Non -La ers
❑ Pullets
❑ Turkeys
❑ Turkey Poults
❑ Other
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is -any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Dairy Cow
❑ Dairy Calf
❑ Dairy Heifej
❑ Dry Cow
EI_Non-Dairy
❑ Beef Stocket
❑ Beef Feeder
❑ Beef Brood Co
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
Number of Structures:
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes 2 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA
❑ NE
El Yes
❑No El NA
❑NE
❑ Yes
❑ No ❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
Noo I El NA
El NE
El Yes
LiX O_ ❑ NA
❑ NE
12128104 Continued

;p I Facility Number: 0—
Date of Inspection / D
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
❑ Yes Eallo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes .❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 5 Structure 6
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
through a waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental) eat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ;/No
❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? El Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks) ,�,�
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes L� No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application ,�
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need El Yes LI No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop
/Window El Evidence of Wind Drifl ElApplicationOutside of Area
12. Crop type(s) %�� �! r I l jza:
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
❑ Yes
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?[] Yes
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes
WNo ❑ NA
ErNNo ❑ NA
L N El NA
Z0,
El NA
[� ❑ NA
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
d'V
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
❑ NE
Reviewer/Inspector Name er Phone: ������3��
Rev iewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

Facility Number: Date of Inspection
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropiate box. ❑ Wup ❑ Checklists ❑ Design ❑Maps ❑Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes �No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Annual Certification
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rain Inspections ❑ Weather Code
❑ Yes 5qo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes [No ❑ NA ❑ NE
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes [Sg'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
[I NE
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
El Yes
FNo ElNA
ElNE
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
o ❑ NA
❑ NE
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
El Yeso
❑ NA
❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
El Yes
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document ❑ yes 53/1 o ElNA ElNE
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ElYes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by ❑ Yes dl4o ❑ NA ❑ NE
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative? ❑ Yes YNo
o ElNA ❑ NE
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ElYes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
12128104

I
1
Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number : '400061 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS400061 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 05(2412006 Entry Time:09:30 AM Exit Time:
Farm Name: Georae Bailey Farms (Galloway Farm)
Owner: George Herbert Bailey
Incident #:
Owner Email:
Phone. [phone]
Mailing Address: PO Box 10 .. Walstonburg NC 278880010
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude: 35'38'35" Longitude: 77°42'17" .
Located at intersection of Road 1308 and 1307 - northern tip of Greene county.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other issues
Certified Operator: George Herbert Bailey
Secondary OIC(s):
Operator Certification Number: 16409
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On -site representative George Bailey Phone:
24 hour contact name George Bailey Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Soil test 12/05
Waste analyses:
4-5-06 = 2.3
1-31-06 = 2.4
9-26-05 = 1.4
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400061 Owner - Facility: George Herbert Bailey Facility Number: 400061
Inspection Date: 05/24/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Farrow to Wean 548 540
Total Design Capacity: 548
Total SSLW: 237,284
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
lagoon GB 1 05/23/96 19.00 30.00
Page: 2

a
Permit: AWS400061 Owner - Facility: George Herbert Bailey Facility Number. 400061
Inspection Date: 05/24/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Dischar eS & Stream impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑ ❑
2. is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e.l large trees, severe
❑
01111
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed andlor managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
0110
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400061 Owner- Facility: George Herbed Bailey
Inspection Date: 05/24/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400061
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Corn (Grain)
Crop Type 2
Soybeans
Crop Type 3
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type i
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
0000
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400061 Owner - Facility: George Herbert Bailey
Facility Number: 400061
Inspection Date: 05/24/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? ❑
■
❑
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
❑
■
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑
■
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■
❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concem? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400061 Owner - Facility: George Herbert Bailey Facility Number : 400061
Inspection Date: 05/2412006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
n+hor lac.— Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? ❑ ■ Q Q
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss reviewfinspection with on -site representative? ❑ 0 it
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
■
Page: 6

T�
IType of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit *Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 40 61 E?ateofvisit: 721-2004 Time: 8:30
O Not Operational O Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified 0 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: ........................................... County: GXCCjjr ............................................... W' A1RQ.......
OwnerName: GcQrge.................. I................ JUteY.......................................................... Phone No: ZS2-753:5.407........................ ....... .............................
MailingAddress: 1'QjDgX.1.Q............................................................................................. W.71Stt1.ftbMl:g..NC........................................... ... U.N.8 ..............
Facility Contact: fa.01=..............................................................Title:................................................................ Phone No: M-540.7 afflict...................
Onsite Representative:.GcjQrZc................................................................................ ..... Integrator: L.ta.NUrPhuy..CQx[1my..................................
Certified Operator:.GgArggmeJChut................. MIAC'y................................................ Operator Certification Number:16.4Q9.................
Location of Farm:
Located at intersection of Road 1308 and 1307 - northern tip of Greene county.
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 • 38 1 35 K Longitude 77 • 42 & 17 u
Design - Current
Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
® Farrow to Wean
548
540
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
[]Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry CaDacitv Po ulation Cattle Capacity Po ulation
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer JE1 Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 548
Total SSLW 237,284
Number of Lagoons` 1 Subsurface Drains Present Spray FieldArea
lolding Ponds 1,'5Q11d Trans
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ®No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If d ischarge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gat/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): 40
12112103 Continued

Facility Number: 40-61 Date of Inspection 4-21-2004
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? -
S. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
12. Crop type Corn, Soybeans, Wheat
❑ Yes
®No ,
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
®No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ® No
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge attor below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ Yes ® No
Air Quality representative immediately.
Comments (referto question.#} , ExpEain'ay YES �ansvvers and/or any recommendations or any other commenis
Use drawmgs,of facility to better eiipEam situaton- use additionaE pages as necessary) ❑ Field Copy ® Final Notes
COC on site
Waste analysis: 3-1-04 = 2.2 ; 12-8-03 = 2.2; 8-19-03 = 2.0; 4-21-03 = 2.0; 2-18-03 = 2.3
test was taken in the fall of 2003
irrigation records are complete and balanced out.
Reviewer/Inspector Name Marlene D. Salyer
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: u�

Facility Number: 4 1 Date of Inspection 4-21-2004
teauired Records & Documents
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
® No
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
® No
23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard [:]Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
® No
25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
® No
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
® No
27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
® No
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
®No
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
® No
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit7(If no, skip questions 31-35)
❑ Yes
®No
31. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
❑ Yes
❑ No
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Stocking Form ❑ Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfall ❑ Inspection After 1" Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
[] No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
dditional Cominents-a.ndfor:Drawings:14
=_
12172103

i Technical Assistance Site Visit Report
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Natural Resources Conservation Service
O Soil and Water Conservation District
O Other...
Facility Number 40 - 61 Date: 9110103 Time: 1 1000 Time On Farm: 60 WARO
Faun Name George Bailey Farms (Galloway Farm) County Greene Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address PO Box 10 Walstonburg NC 27888
Onsite
Representative George Bailey Integrator LL Mur h
Type Of Visit Purpose Of Visit
® Operation Review
❑ Compliance Inspection (pilot only)
❑ Technical Assistance
❑ Confirmation for Removal
❑ No Animals -Date Last Operated:
❑ Operating below threshold
IN Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse
Design Current
Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
® Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
548
548
OO Routine
Q Response to DWQ/DENR referral
O Response to DSWC/SWCD referral
O Response to complaint/local referral
O Requested by producer/integrator
O Follow-up
O Emergency
O Other...
Design Current
Capacity Population
❑ Layer
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
GENERAL QUESTIONS:
1. Is waste discharging from any part of the operation and reaching surface waters or wetlands? ❑ yes ® no
2. Is there evidence of a past waste discharge from any part of the operation that waste reached
❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
GENERAL QUESTIONS:
1. Is waste discharging from any part of the operation and reaching surface waters or wetlands? ❑ yes ® no
2. Is there evidence of a past waste discharge from any part of the operation that waste reached
❑ Other
GENERAL QUESTIONS:
1. Is waste discharging from any part of the operation and reaching surface waters or wetlands? ❑ yes ® no
2. Is there evidence of a past waste discharge from any part of the operation that waste reached
❑ yes ® no
surface waters or wetlands?
3. Does any problem pose an immediate threat to the integrity of the waste structure (large trees,
❑ yes OR no
seepage, severe erosion, etc.)?
4. Is there evidence of nitrogen over application, hydraulic overloading or excessive ponding
® yes ❑ no
requiring DWQ notification?
5• Is there evidence of improper dead animal disposal that poses a threat to the environment
❑ yes ® no
and/or public health?
6. Is the waste level within the structural freeboard elevation range for any waste structure?
❑ yes ® no
Structures Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Identifier active inactive
Level (Inches) 34 60+
CROP TYPES 1com Soybeans Wheat
SPRAYFIELD
SOIL TYPES NoA WaB
7. What type of technical assistance does the onsite representative feel is needed? (list in comment section)
03/10/03

Facility Number 40 - 61 Date:
9/10103
PARAMETER
Q No assistance provided/requested
❑ B. Waste spill leaving site
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE Needed
Provided
❑ 9. Waste spill contained on site
❑ 10. Level in structural freeboard
25. Waste Plan Revision or Amendment
❑
❑
❑ 11. Level in storm storage
26. Waste Plan Conditional Amendment
❑
❑
27. Review or Evaluate Waste Plan wlproducer
❑
❑
❑ 12. Waste structure integrity compromised
El 13. Waste structure needs maintenance
28. Forms Need (list in comment section)
❑
El
29. Missing Components (list in comments)
❑
❑
014. Over application >= 10% & 10 lbs.
❑
❑
[115. Over application < 10% or < 10 lbs.
30. 21-1.0200 re -certification
❑ 16. Hydraulic overloading
31. Five & Thirty day Plans of Action (PoA)
❑
❑
32. Irrigation record keeping assistance
❑
❑
❑ 17. Deficient irrigation records
❑ 18. Late/missing waste analysis
33. Organizelcomputerization of records
❑
❑
❑ 19. Late/missing lagoon level records
34. Sludge Evaluation
❑
❑
❑ 20. Late/missing soils analysis
[121. Crop needs improvement
35. Sludge or Closure Plan
❑
❑
❑ 22. Crop inconsistent with waste plan
36. Sludge removal/closure procedures
❑
❑
37. Waste Structure Evaluation
❑
❑
❑ 23. Irrigation maintenance deficiency
[124. Deficient sprayfield conditions
38. Structure Needs Improvement
❑
❑
39. Operation & Maintenance Improvements
❑
❑
40. Marker checkicalibration
❑
❑
Reaulatory Referrals
41. Site evaluation
❑
❑
❑ Referred to DWQ Date: 9/11 /2003
42. Irrigation Calibration
❑
❑
❑ Referred to NCDA Date:
43. Irrigation design/installation
El
El
El Other...
system
Date:
44• Secure irrigation information (maps, etc.)
❑
❑
LIST IMPROVEMENTS
45. Operating improvements (pull signs, etc.)
❑
❑
MADE BY OPERATION
❑
❑
46. Wettable Acre Determination
1
47. Evaluate WAD certificationtrechecks
❑
❑
48. Crop evaluationlrecommendations
❑
❑
2.
49. Drainage work/evaluation
❑
❑
50. Land shaping, subsolling, aeration, etc.
51. Runoff control, stormwater diversion, etc.
❑
❑
❑
El3
52. Buffer improvements
❑
❑
53. Field measurements(GPS, surveying, etc.)
❑
❑
4.
54. Mortality BMPs
❑
❑
55. Waste operator education (NPDES)
❑
El5.
56. Operation & maintenance education
❑
❑
57. Record keeping education
6.
58. Croplforage management education
❑
❑
59. Soil and/or waste sampling education
❑
❑
03/10/03

Facility Number 40 _ 61 Date: 1 9/10103
MMENTS:
: OC dated May 1, 2003 and onsite.
knimal Waste Management Plan Certification dated 1/28103 for 548 farrow to wean.
Naste Plan dated 10/10/02 based on 548 farrow to wean plan deficit -2,064 gallons
Naste analysis dated 8/19/03 nitrogen is 2.0 lbs/1000 gallons
4/21/03 nitrogen is 2.0 Ibs/1000 gallons
2/13/03 nitrogen is 2.3 Ibs11000 gallons
11/25/02 nitrogen is 2.0 Ibs/1000 gallons
6/6/02 nitrogen is 4.0 lbs/1000 gallons
Soil test dated 1/15/03 this is for 2002 crop year. Cu, Zn and ph within guidelines. Remember -to -take soil test fog 2003-an
Maintain proper soil ph.'_�—
.&14. Over application on tract 3182 field #4; crop corn PAN 92 Ibslacre, date of over application was June 13-2003,
mount over applied was -12.30 Ibslacre. _Notice -of- Referral -to. DWQ-WaRO.-- Producer- used -wrong -waste analysis from
keeping and made corrections to IRR2 using correct waste analysis to determine over application.
Inactive Lago Need to maintain proper veg. ar�d prevent.growth of woody veg. At time of inspection, inside dike walls
were covered in honey suckle veg. /This needs to be removed and proper grass veg. established. During 2002, produced
noticed -ground -hogs -tunneling -in -dike walls and hired -private -trapper to eradicate rodents. Due to heavy honey suckle-veg.
un fe.to-determine if rodent activity continues. WiII revisit facility during winter'months"to-determine,if rodent activity is '!
p� ent�Need to maintain proper lagoon freeboard -level __r."_— ._ - - -
TECHNICAL SPECIALIST Martin Mciawhorn
SIGNATURE
Date Entered: 9/11/03 entered By: IMartin McLawhorn
3 03/10/03

Kchaei F. Easley
Governor
WHarn G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Departrnerd d Fnv'vormient. and Natural Resources .
. < . - `Karr T. Staveris
Owsfori of Water Quaidy
To: Producer V
From- Scott �iins'MJr
Enviranm emei'r
Washington Regional Office
Subject: Animal Compliance Inspection
Year 2002
Enclosed please find a copy of the Compliance Site inspection (as viewed in the DWQ database) conducted at the refereacced
facility by the Division of Water Quality from the. Washington Regional Office.' Please read this inspection and keep it
r
wrth'al1 other daeniaeuts pertaining to your anmial operation for suturespedtons.
:. In general, these inspections included verifying that: (1) the farm bar a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP);
(2) the farm is complying with requirements of the State Risks I5 NCAC 2 L0217, Senate Bill 1217, and the Certified Animal
Waste Management Plan; (3) the fairs operation`s waste management system is being operated properly under the direction of a
Certified Operator, (4) the required records are being lccM and (5) there are no. signs of seepage, erosion, and/or nmo$
As a reminder, please note the Wowing comments, which are cmditiens of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan and
the General Permit; therefore, these items must be implemeated:
(p The maximum waste level in lagoons/storage ponds shall not exceed that specified in the CAWMP. At a minimum,
maximum waste level for waste for lagoons/storage ponds must not exceed the level that provides adequate storage to
contain 25 year, 24 hour storm event plus an additioml foot of structural freeboard.
cp An analysis ofthe liquid animal waste fim fife lagoon shall be conducted as close to the time of application as practical and
at least within 60 days (before or after) of the date of application. This analysis shall include the following parameters:
Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Zinc and Copper.
(p Soil analysis is required annually. Lime is to be applied to eachreceiving crop as recommended by the soil analysis.
cp The following records are required off -site solids removal, maintenance, repair, wastdsoil. analysis and land irrigation
records: These records should be maintained by the faciiliV owner/manager in chronological and legible form for a
minimum of dirge years.
cp Land application rates shall be in accordance with the CAWMP. In no case snail land lMlication rates exceed the Plant
Available Niftwen (PAN) rate for the receiving crop or result in nmo$' during anv eiven analiratien.
cp All grassed waterways shall have a stable outlet with adequate capacity to prevent ponding or flooding damages. The outlet
can be another vegetated channel, an earth ditch, stabilization structure, or other suitable outlets.
cp It is suggested, not a reciuirement. to keep crop yield information for fuuxe use to update your waste management plan.
You will need three years of crop yield data before your plan can be updated
For your information, any swine facility that has a discharge to surface waters of the State will have to apply for a National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit with the Division of Water Quality, effective January 1, 2001.
Thank you for your assistance and cooperation during the inspection. If you have any questions, please contact me at 252-946-
6481, ext. 209 or your Technical Specialist.
Cc: WaRO Files
SAV Files
943 Washington Square Mall Washington, NC 27889 252-946-Ml ('telephone) 252-948-9215 (Fax)

Facility Humber Date of Visit: 12/11/2002 Time: 10:00
p Not Uperationalp Below Threshold
Permitted ■ Certified p Conditionally Certified p Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: George Bailey Farms County: Greene ............................................... WARO.......
Owner Name: George Bailey Phone No: 252-753-5407
Mailing Address: P..Q..Box.10.............................................................................................. Walstonhuxg...N.0 ................................................ 1798R ..............
FacilityContact:...............................................................................Title:............................................................... Phone No:
Onsite Representative: G:eoxg Raaley............................................................................. Integrator: ludegend=d............................................................
Certified Operator: G.eoxge.11aherf................Railey ................................................ Operator Certification Number: 1b9I1Q.............................
Location of Farm:
® Swine ❑ Poultry p Cattle p Horse Latitude ©a ®� ©�� Longitude ©• ®� F77-1.;
Destgn Current,x�- 3�' , Destgn ' Current DestgnCurTent
�i-,�.cts..r.-i:�. i -t^r' yi- ,ice..: e_5 7 -a - 4M -- -;•i: a^ x ':�'r'i�g,,.' .'
Swine r Ca act Po Ulafton poultry Capacity Populattonr �Caftle�3CapacityPopulation
a rMZ
�erto
e ceder ❑ Layer
In Dairy
mis p on- ayer J;i��.Jr on airy
kf 113 Farrow to WeanM,� ?
Oth
er '
® arrow to Fee er K „�,Y ,w
p u' - t.n -;, rw y"1
p Farrow to Finish��T Total Design Capadiy„;` 900
13 ;= [3Gilts I " � M� Tota1 SSLW 237,600
Boar1+y.1 : EC'L§��.''4��-51 .F..3.=�+,���y.M���e�_� i'a�:.�.Yh�Y �.. r.1i. .i�3 v?���S �r�•
�` r ent I3Lagoon Area —In pray ie rea
Number of Lagoons M u surface rams res
Holdeng PondslSoLd Traps p o LiquidWaste Management ys em
a
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes Cl No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes 1€ No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? [3 Yes a No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? p Spillway p Yes ENO
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:.......................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard(inches): .................5............ ........................................ .............................. ..... ............ ............... I ........ ....................................

W
aci ity um er: 40_61
Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(if any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
4. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding p PAN p Hydraulic Overload
p Yes ® No
® Yes []'No
p Yes 1p No
p Yes ®No
p Yes I& No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ONO
12. Crop type Corn, Soybeans, Wheat
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? p Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? p Yes p No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste'Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
14. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified A WMP?
p Yes © No
13 Yes U No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes fn No
❑Yes L,No
p Yes ® No
p Yes L,. No
p Yes 1% No
13 Yes ®No
p Yes U No
p Yes LINO
p Yes 18i No
p o violations or deficiencies were noted urmg this visit. You will receive no turther correspondence about this visit.
Coinnients'(f:efer to question #} aplaia+any �YES.answers�and/nr any=recommendationsior any.other�comments.`.
Y _s�'s
y�ta 6ette explatu srtuattot►s �{use:addtt�ionai�pages as.,necessary - �
��
��se��ra�nngsaffacili ie C p Final Note
�t FS c
y p
* Lagoons have been mowed.
* 6) Old "inactive" lagoon onsite at farm. No problems. Keep efforts up to keep rodents from tunneling on lagoon wall.
* Waste 11/25/02 with 2.0 lbsN/1000gal.
6/6/02 with 4.1 lbsN/1000gal.
* Soils 2/8/01 with no lime required. Samples taken in winter 2000.
Soils 3/4/02 with 1.3 T/ac lime required in one sample. Lime was applied.
w
Reviewer/Inspector Name Scott',Vmson
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: t73

05103101 Continued
ace ity Number: 4U_61 Date of Inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below 13 Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? [3 Yes p No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, [3 Yes L1 No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? p Yes U No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) p Yes rp No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? p Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? p Yes []No
�'J

s FDrv#s water Qnd alrty
t� Dsvrsic►n of So�l.aWater Cervatiot� µ
11�11 � Other Aged
of Visit O Compliance Inspection © Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit OO Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: 7/9f20D2 Time: 11011
Facility Number 40 61
ro—N—otoperational 0 Below Threshold
F1 Permitted 5 Certified [j Conditionally Certified ® Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ....................
Farm Name: Ccoxge-BaitleyFArm ..................... County: G.twitc .............................................. W.ARQ....
OwnerName: Gcoxge................................... Bailey -.............. ................. ......................... Phone No: 252.:753--5401....................................... ..................
MailingAddress: P-A..Box.10......................... ................ ......... ......... -....... ................... ••-- WakUtubturg.-KC....... ........................ ................. 17. .............
FacilityContact: .............................................................................. Title: ............................. 1........................ .. Phone No:
On site Representative: Ge9=2aft......................................... ..................... Integrator: ItttftoWent.....................
Certified Operator: jGcnWcH rj................ B,aft............ _...... . Operator Certification Number: 1 9119.....................
Location of Farm:
Located at intersection of Road 1308 and 1307 - northern tip of Greene county.
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 ° �. 3$ 35 u Longitude 77 ° 42 17
Design Current
Swine Canacity Ponulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
600
❑ Farrow to Wean
® Farrow to Feeder
300
450
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boats
Number of Lagoons 1
Holding Ponds / Solid 3'raps
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity PopulationCattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
Q Non -Layer L::I[] Non -Dairy
❑ Other
_�-Total Design Capacity 900
Total SSLW 237,600
Subsurface Drains Present
No Liquid Waste
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
Lagoon Area IN Spray Field Area
b. If discharge is obsctY4 did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes. not4 DVdQ)
c- If discharge is observed, what is the estunated flow in gallmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify- DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes N No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Stnucture 6
Ideulifier' jw.&.c......... ............. inaoliyr.............................................. .................................... ............... .................... ....................................
Freeboard (inches): ..............A............... ..............2:-'.�..........

05103101 Continued
Facility Number: 40—f►1 Date of Inspection 7/9/2002
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie(trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ®No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ®Yes [I No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenanmVimprovement? ® Yes ❑ No
S. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes N No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes N No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenanceJimprovement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes N No
12. Crop type Corn, Soybeans, Wheat
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes N No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
N No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
N No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
N No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
N No
16_ Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
® No
l & Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
N No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
N No
20_ Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
N No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
N No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
N No
23. Did Reviewerllnspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
N No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
N No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes N No
113 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
❑ Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
aste plan being amended by Carl Damn, DSWC to change pull # 1 from 90 degree are to 270 degree arc. 'There are mobile homes
scent to this pull and Mr Bailey in process of securing signed agreement from home owners for animal waste to be applied within 50 ft of
*Wetted acre determination completed by Carl Dunn, DSWC on 10/10/01.
27. Burial at present time_ Incinerator has been ordered.
*Waste analysis dated 6/6/02 nitrogen is 4.1 lbs/1000 gallons
2/5/02 nitrogen is 3.0 lbs/1000 gallons
7112/01 nitrogen is 1.9 lbs/1000 Gallons qV
I Reviewerllnspector Name Martm Mcuwhorn
a
Y
�nvimm�r�iinaruu.fn� Qirtn o*a�ra• IN utn•

05103101 Continued
Facility Number: 40-61 Date of Inspection r 7/9/2002
Odor issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of property within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
3 L Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanenthemporary cover?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Continue to monitor inactive lagoon for rodents. There has been some trapping of ground hogs in past year.
Al test dated 3/4/02 lime requirements for spray fields are less than one ton per acre. Cu and Zn within guidelines_
agoon level is being recorded weekly.
words are complete and balanced.
Need to mow lagoon dike walls to allow for routine and visual inspection.
[r Bailey wanted to know if swine could graze corn fields due to drought conditions and poor crop yields? Will check with DWQ and
e information to him.

p Division of Water Quality
Divisio t of. Soil and. Water Conservation
a Other Agency -
Type of Visit p Compliance Inspection p Operation Review p Lagoon Evaluation I
Reason for Visit p Routine p Complaint p Follow up p Emergency Notification p Other p Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit: 6/27/2001 Time: 1000
p Not Operational p Below Threshold
Permitted N Certified p Conditionally Certified p Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: George Bailey Farms County: Greene ............................................... W_&RQ.......
Owner Name: George Bailey Phone No: 252-753-5407
Mailing Address: P.Q..Box.10.............................................................................................. Walstoxth rg.NC................................................ MISR ..............
Facility Contact: ...............................................................................Title:............................... .......................... Phone No:
..........................................................
Onsite Representative: G.eorgaBailey............................................................................ Integrator: IndeliendnU ............................................................ ..........................................
Certified Operator: Gcorge................................... Bailey ................................................ Operator Certification Number: M409 ......................
Location of Farm:
Locatedat intersection of Roadan - northern tip of Greene county.
® Swine 13 Poultry Cl Cattle p Horse Latitude Longitude ©• ®� ©��
Design Current Design Current Design . Current
Swine Capacity. Population Poultry Capacity :Population Cattle Capacity- Population
pWean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
p Farrow to Wean
® Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
p Gilts
p Boars
[3 Layer
E3 Non -Layer
pOther
Total Design Capacity
`Total SSLW .�
Number'of.Lagoons ® u
Holding.. Ponds / Sofid Traps_ p o
900
237,600
spray Fieldrea
Discharges & Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: 0 Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes p No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) E3 Yes 13 No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes p No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? 13 Yes N No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? 13 Spillway p Yes N No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(inches): ............... aO ............... .................................... ... . ......................................... ......................... ................................... .....................................

Facility Number: 40--61
Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? p Excessive Ponding p PAN p Hydraulic Overload
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
® Yes p No
p Yes ONO
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
12. Crop type Corn, Soybeans, Wheat
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? p Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? p Yes p No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes ® No
13 Yes ® No
p Yes N No
p Yes ® No
p Yes N No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes N No
p Yes N No
p Yes H No
p o violations or deficiencies were noted uring this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about is visit.
Com►nents (refer:t© question #I): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendation&or any other comments
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary) [3 Field Copy p Final Notes p
*Discussed IRR2/waste analysis schedule.
#
*In process of having plan amended to include wetted acres.
* Waste analysis dated 4112/01 nitrogen is 2.91bs/1000 gallons
1/10/01 nitrogen is 4.3 lbs/1000 gallons
10/25/00 nitrogen is 2.2 lbs/1000 gallons
*Soil test dated 218/01. time requirements were less than one ton pr acre. Need to keep lime receipts.
*Need to secure new waste analysis and rebalance PAN for soybeans dated 6/22/01.
Reviewer/Inspector Name €Martin McLawhorn - _ _ :.
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

O5103101 Continued
Facility Number: 40_61 Date of Inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge atlor below 13 Yes © No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? p Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, p Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? p Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) p Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? p Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes p No
*Need to use correct PAN rate from WUP for corresponding fields, wheat field 2A should be 144 lbs nitrogen per acre not 96 lbs
nitrogen per acre.
*Lagoon level being recorded weekly as required by permit.
7. Need to mow lagoon inner walls to allow for routine and visual inspection.
4

Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit @ Routine O Complaint Q Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 40 61 Date or visit. 3-8-2001 Time: llltlo
Operational Q Below Threshold
E Permitted e Certified [3 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: -.- ................
Farm Name: County: Missae............................................... WARO .......
Owner Name: �`ict11E_........___ _ .ICY._.... ...._.... ............. - - - Phone No: 2 2r.7.S--S40.7.................. .......... .............................
MailingAddress: EO..11ox.10............ -- ........ ....................................................... . WA5toIlkm g..NC................................................ 27888.............
FacilityContact: .............................................................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No:.....................
Onsite Representative: Gw.rgc.Bai1cy............................................................................ Integrator: JRdcjWlusicml............................................................
Certified Operator.Go.rge.................................... Mile ................................................ Operator Certification Number:16!49.........
Location of Farm:
Located at intersection of Road 1308 and 1307 - northern tip of Greene county.
rN
Y i
® Swine [I Poultry [I Cattle El Horse Latitude 35 • 38 35 Longitude 77 42 17 «
Design Current
Swine Canarity Ponulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
600
❑ Farrow to Wean
® Farrow to Feeder
300
456
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design : Current
Poultry Capadty Population Cattle. Capaciti Population
❑ Layer ] Dairy
❑ Nan -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 900
Total SSLW 237,600
Number of Lagoons 10 Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ® Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds/.Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed. was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ® No
b. If discharge is observed- did it reach Water of the State? (if yes. -notify DWQ) [] yes ®No
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gallmin? n/a
d. Does discharge bvpass a lagoon system? (If yes. notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ® No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ®No
Waste Collection &: Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ®No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: Nest ............. .....Old...................................--.............................................................. ...................................
Freeboard (inches): 33 60
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: 40•-61
Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (iel trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenancelimprovement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste &pplication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type Corn, Soybeans, Wheat
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
IN Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ VPJP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
(] No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
�0as
- _� ❑ Field Copy ❑ Final Nates
* Records availalbe for review.
* Waste analysis 10-25-00 = 2.2 lbs, 1-10-01 = 4.3 lbs.
• Soil anlysis up thru 2000 available, dated 2-8-01 (< 1 ton of lime is recommended)
* Irrigaiton records are complete and balanced out. NOTE: Please review the PAN allowance in the waste utilization plan of each crop
and make sure to use the correct PAN in the computations on teh IRR 2 forms. Wheat on field 2A is 144 lbs not 96 lbs.
* Please note that if a winter crop is not to be harvested the PAN allowance is ONLY 50 lbs.
* Woods behind old lagoon has been logged. Continue your efforts to establish the desired vegetation and level the ground.
ont. to Page 3
Reviewer/Inspector Name iynZ.jjardiion
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: � �_,1't.. Date:—y
05103101 / Continued

Facility Number: 40-61 Datc of Inspection F3 2001
(Tinted on: 5/21/2001
QQ-r- Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
29. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
7 - Continue to shrub the dike walls and establish a good vegetative cover.
` If you have any questions, please contact myself or Daphne @ 252-946-6481, ext. 318 or ext. 32 L
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
it
05103101
J

(Type of Visit (WCompliance Inspection Q Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
IReason for Visit Grl�outine O Complaint O Follow up Q Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date or visit: 3— 1Q i Time:
0 Not Operational O Below Threshold
[Permitted 13rCertified 0 Conditionally Certified [] Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: ..'} .. tv� 5 County:.....t!r!....................................
?r....._...............�........................ ...
Owner Name: .............c4wq!� ............. ....... g . .. .. Phone No...... {a 2—................................
Facility Contact:
Title:........
Mailing Address: ....... Ro...... ..4.....l 0
...........................................................................
Onsite Representative:...... �_ �,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, �'�-�.
. , i ...................................................
Certified Operator:..... 4�,prc.......... ik .... tl ,
........ ..... .............................
Location of Farm;
Phone No:
xcLl o• bt,�r 0 G 2L-1?*g
...............................................................
Integrator: ,.
Operator Certification Number: ..... 1(p, -( ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Ea/swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude ' 1 « Longitude ' 4 •4
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑Other
❑ Farrow to Finish Total.Design Capatity
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars TotaI'SSLW
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / SoLd Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? IF
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes 9No
❑ Yes
EJ No
❑ Yes
❑,No
$4 JA
❑ Yes
S-Iqo
Cl Yes
&No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes 9-K
01/01/01 Continued

Facility Number: L40— b ( Date of Inspection
.1
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3
Identifier: otv'
...................................'. .....................
Freeboard(inches)...........t33............................ .........................................
ire
❑ Spillway ❑ Yes E(N-o
Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? []Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN [:]Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated/in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14, a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
...s ?*yr T1t11�1%it�:;Ahlfi�.�ltll:Iara.�.--- On -site- El Off -site
Required Records & Documents
19. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
21. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigates, frecbood, waste analysis & soil sample -reports)
22. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
23. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
24. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
25. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
26. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
27. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
Odor Issues
28. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
29. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
01/01/01
❑ Yes [IRO
❑ Yes [+ No
914(es ❑ No
❑ Yes 2-14o
❑ Yes G to
❑ Yes 19-No
❑ Yes E 3<0
❑ Yes �:Ko
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ES -No
❑ Yes ©-K
es No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes [a'l_o
❑ Yes 0"<_
❑ Yes L9' 0
❑ Yes Q-N-o
❑ Yes �No
❑ Yes MNo
❑ Yes U44o
❑ Yes M No
❑ Yes [a No
❑ Yes (rNo
Continued

' Facility Number: — / Date of inspection
30. is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
31. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
32. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ,
33. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
34. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
Printed on: 1/4/2001
❑ Yes .[D10
❑ Yes Gq'Fio
❑ Yes allo
❑ Yes �o
❑ Yes ❑ No
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
;Com en,c gaExpin ayYFSVanswers and/or any -f-iemn
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations a(use adcLtianal pages as necessary .
a Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
c Y -74
�Lccv A-tr-late be" h�.r1.0p�-
Wa-4�UC V-O-A r- To - t D- Z5 ­00 - 'j.
.>QrC.fJ LJe4.(.t Gt A e
,74-4- q 4P E � � • - - � �
P,cd"
nn _�
40
40 47/ 74 .3 &-r-
Review,er/Inspector Name "-�_-
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
A
01/01/01

_
_
+�r�✓�.: �lX.:�.�..-'lam. •�?
(Type of Visit O Compliance inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facilityhate of visit: 3-8-2001 Time: 1000
40 61 .
Number 0 Not Operational Q Below Threshold
® Permitted E Certified [3 Conditionally Certified © Registdred Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ......-....
Farm Name: Geww-BaRCY.k:».......................... _ . . _ ,.... County: Greene.............................................. WA RO.......
OwnerName: CxeRt;=................................ B.Ailex ........ ....... .............................. ........... Phone No: 252:1S.1S407............................................................
Mailing Address: ipQ.. QtK.iO_.__... .......................................... .... WA1S.1!?.i),bmrg..NC................................................ 2:1.M.............
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone No:
Onsite Representative: Glr9txge.bailey............................................................................ Integrator: ...........................................................
Certified Operator:..Gvmme.................................... Baiky ................................................ Operator Certification Number:16.40Q .......................
Location of Farm:
Located at intersection of Road 1308 and 1307 - northern tip of Greene county.
1-W
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude Longitude 77 • 42 17 «
Design Current
Swine Canacitv Ponulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
600
❑ Farrow to Wean
® Farrow to Feeder
300
456
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Currant
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer I 1 1[:] Dairy
❑ Non -Layer I Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 900
Total SSLW 237,600
Number of Lagoons IN Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds I Solid Traps JE1 No Liquid Waste Management System = ;
Discharges ,C Stream ImpacLs
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes No
Discharge originated ar ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a_ If discharge is observed. was the conveyance man-made`? ❑ Yes N No
h. If discharge is observed. did it reach Water of the State? (if ves. nntifv DWQ) ❑ Yes ® No
c. li'discharge is nhserved, what is the estimated flow in ,al/min? n/a
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If ves. notify DIA'Q)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
1Yaste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier. ............. Ntw............. .............. 41d.............. .................................... ................................... ................................... ...
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
Structure 6
Freeboard ( inches): 33 _ 60
05103101
Continued

Facility Number: 40--61
1)aic• (ir Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? Oe/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(if any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenancelimprovement?
S. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancetimprovement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimuin liquid level
elevation markings?
Wastg ApplicAtion
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type Com, Soybeans, Wheat
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
® Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
®No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
®No
❑ Yes
® No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14_ a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Rc tired Rvcar& & Doe im n s
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18, Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
113 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
� � rr _� [] Field Capy ❑Final Notes
r � - f _ �:.�
* Records availalbe for review.
* Waste analysis 10-25-00 = 2.2 lbs, I-10-01 = 4.3 lbs.
* Soil anlysis up thru 2000 available, dated 2-8-01 (< 1 ton of lime is recommended)
* Irrigaiton records are complete and balanced out. NOTE: Please review the PAN allowance in the waste utilization plan of each crop
and make sure to use the correct PAN in the computations on teh IRR 2 forms. Wheat on field 2A is 144 lbs not 96 lbs.
* Please note that if a winter crop is not to be harvested the PAN allowance is ONLY 50 lbs.
* Woods behind old lagoon has been logged. Continue your efforts to establish the desired vegetation and level the ground.
Cont. to Page 3
Reviewer/Inspector Name Lyn B.Ijjardison
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: , J ;�-;�Y1_ Date:
05103101 t/ Continued

,14
Facility Number: 4o-61 I)atc of inspection 3-&2(i0I
Printed on: 5/21/2001
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of property within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e, broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
__ .Y -_7
7 - Continue to shrub the dike walls and establish a good vegetative cover.
** If you have any questions, please contact myself or Daphne @ 252-946-6481, ext. 318 or ext. 321.
05103101

. I.
o�oF wArF9PG
r
❑ 'C
To: Producers
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Kerr T. Stevens
Division of Water Quality
From: Lyn B. Hardison
Environmental Specialist
Washington Regional Office
Date: May 21, 2001
Subject: Animal Compliance Routine Inspection
Year 2001
Enclosed please find a copy or copies of the Compliance Site Inspection(s) (as viewed in DWQ database) conducted at the
referenced facility by the Division of Water Quality from the Washington Regional Office. Please read this inspection and
peep with all other documents pertaining to your animal operation for future inspections.
In general, these inspections included verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP);
(2) the faun is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC 214.0217, Senate Bill 1217, and the Certified Animal
Waste Management Plan; (3) the farm operation's waste management system is being operated properly under the direction of a,
Certified Operator; (4) the required records are being kept; (5) there are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or runoff -
As a reminder, please note the following which are conditions of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan and the general
Permit; therefore, these items must be implemented:
cp The maximum waste level in lagoons/storage ponds shall not exceed that specified in the CAWMP. At a minimum,
maximum waste level for waste for lagoons/storage ponds must not exceed the level that provides adequate storage to
contain 25 year, 24 hour storm event plus an additional foot of structural freeboard.
(p An analysis of the liquid animal waste from the lagoon shall be conducted as close to the time of application as practical and
at least within 60 days (before or after) of the date of application. This analysis shall include the following parameters:
Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Zinc and Copper.
cp Soil analysis is required annually.
cp The following records are required: off -site solids removal, maintenance, repair, wastelsoil analysis and land irrigation
records. These records should be maintained by the facility owner/manager in chronological and legible form for a
minimum of three years-
cp Land application rates shall be in accordance with the CAWMP. In no case shall land application rates exceed, the Plant
Available Nitrogen (PAN) rate for the receiving crop or result in runoff during anv given application.
(p All grassed waterways shall have a stable outlet with adequate capacity to prevent ponding or flooding damages. The outlet
can be another vegetated channel, an earth ditch, stabilization structure, or other suitable outlets.
tP It is suggested. not reguired, to keep crop yield information for future use to update your waste management plan. You will
need three years of crop yield data before your plan can be updated.
For your information, any swine facility that has a discharge to surface waters of the State will have to apply for a National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit with the Division of Water Quality, effective January 1, 2001.
Thank you for your assistance and cooperation during the inspection. If you have any questions, please contact your Technical
Specialist or me at 252-946-6481, ext. 318.
Cc: �aRO
LBH Fifes (inspection form only)
943 Washington Square Mall Washington, NO 27889 252-946-6481 (Telephone) 252-946-9215 (Fax)

0 Division of Water Quality
0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 40 61 Date of Visit: 6I131Z000 Time: f0:Z0 AM Printed on: 6/15/2000 rO Not —Operational 0 Below Threshold
® Permitted 0 Certified 0 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: tiRJCf .l �111iy.. �IC>xls................................................................................. County: G.rcclic .............................................. W."0.......
OwnerName: Cjaoxgg................................... Bailey .......................................................... Phone No:=-T53r.S40............................................
...............
FacilityContact: .................Title:................................................................ Phone No: ...................................................
Mailing Address: ft?..i.Rx.x.0.............................. ... W.ab.tA.lttmrg..NC:.............................. ........ 2.78N8 .............
............................................................ . .........
Onsite Representative: GeQrge.R,tilley............................................................................. Integrator: Ltldlj&jafde10.1;...........................................
................
Certified Operator:.Gjmrgc.H. ............................ Bailey................................................. Operator Certification Number:164Q9 .............................
Location of Farm:
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 • 3f3 i 35 K Longitude 77 • 42 I7
Design Current
Swine C`_anneity Pnnniatinn
❑ Wean to Feeder
0 Feeder to Finish
600
0
❑ Farrow to Wean
® Farrow to Feeder
300
375
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Cai)acitv Po ulation Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer po
Dairy
❑ Non -Layer Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 900
Total SSLW 237,600
Number of Lagoons 1 ® Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area IN Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a_ If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ®No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: .......................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): 42 >4

Continued on back
Facility l4umber: _40-61 1 Date of Inspection 6/13C1000 Printed on: 6/15/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
❑ Yes
® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
❑ Yes
® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
®No
Waste Agl2lication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
®No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
®No
12. Crop type Corn, Soybeans, Wheat
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
®No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ® No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ic/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ❑ Yes ® No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes M No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ® No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes ® No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes ® No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes ® No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ®No
❑. P4,6-*i6 lati0is4r deiiciencies-were_ _niDted:dWrfi1 -th6 viAt.; oti will receive n6 further
. - correspondence about this-visi .t.
Comments (refer to ques-don #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
3/17/00 - waste analysis - 2.7 lbs./l 000 gals.
Soil analysis Fall 1999 - 2/15/00
Irrigation records complete with nitrogen balance.
Mr. Bailey has new irrigation design by Brock Irrigation and is seeking assistance from Greene Soil an
Water District for installation of the irrigation system.
New certification form should be submitted changing facility from 300 farrow to feeder, 600 feeder to
finish to total farrow to feeder operation. Submit this information to DWQ/Raleigh.
Reviewer/Inspector Name JDaphne B. Cullom Entered by Ann Tvndall
n ... ... .li..-.. -a ,. C:.-....a..- R �i _ 0^^— il..a 1 ~ Z [ - 4%fD

Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
)Facility Number: 40--61 Date of Inspection 61I312000 Printed on: 6/15/2000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes R No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not Iocated near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes R No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes R No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes R No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No

p viviswn of aou ana water k ouservation - wperation iceview
p Division of Soll and Water Conservation - Compliance Inspection
Division of Water Quality - Compliance Inspection
p Other Agency - Operation Review
O Complaint O rouow-up
Facility Number
O
0 Permitted 0 Certified p Conditionally Certified p Registered
up of uawu review 0 Uther
Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection :ifs 24 hr. (hh;mm)
in Not Operationa Date Last Operated: ...........................
Farm Name: Gearg"ailey.F.arms.................................................................................. County: Greene WARO
Owner Name: 1 .Cjrg w................................... JB.@i!CY .......................................................... Phone No: 7 Qa7...................._.._.
-------------------------------------------
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone No:
Mailing Address: ...................................................... ��'gl1SRQ �ll4..N..G................................................ U&N .............
.......................................
OnsiteRepresentative: Nn,one.on.site................._.......................................................... Integrator:.......................................................................................
Certified Operator: ,Qf,.9.#g.T..............................11U................................................ Operator Certification Number:.i..4Q,9.............................
Location of Farm:
lstca�ted.at xxectinn. Q�aad.a3II8. and.t3Q.7..:.rtantltezn.Iila.na Greene.county...................................................... -.............
•.
Latitude ©• ®& ©� Longitude ©• ®4 ©�
Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population
p Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
600
p Farrow to Wean
® arrow to Feeder
300
p V arrow to Finish
o I is
p Boars
p Layer
p N-Layer
Cattle Capacity Population
:3 Dairy
p on- airy
G1311er
Total Design Capacity 900
Total SSLW 237,600
Number of Lagoons 1 ® u sur ace Drains Present I p agoon Xrea JU Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps p oLiquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? 0 Yes p No
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes p No
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes E3 No
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ) p Yes p No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes p No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? p Yes p No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? p Spillway p Yes (3 No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:.............................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): 21::
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (iel trees, severe erosion, 0 Yes p No
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back

. 1
Facility Number: 40-61 Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelimprovement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? p Excessive Ponding p PAN
12. Crop type
l�J
13 No
13 Yes
Yes
O No
p Yes
p No
p Yes
p No
p Yes
p No
Cl Yes
p No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(iel WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
..No: violations, or. deficiencies were noted; durili this: visit.::Yoa :will receive: no: further.:: :
:cOrespWidence About •this: visi#.• :::
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other commet
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
to amount
13 Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
Cl Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes 13 No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
IReviewer/Inspector Name Daphne B. Cullom Carl Dunn
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: C , , : _6, Date:

�­ e y
EMERGENCY ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST
Drafted September 24, 1999
Facility # Lam{ - (g I - On -site Representative: Contact#
Date: w - —!a i Inspector/Reviewer:`
Time:y 5 P N DLQ/Dam Safety Rep.:
Waste Structures:
1. Structure Integrity (circle one):
Immediate Threat Potential Threat Adequate Other
Comments(does structure need repair/extent of damage, etc.):
2. Allowable maximum lagoon level (circle):
Structure failed and is inoperable .
Immediate Threat - empty immediately
Immediate/Potential - maximum operating level
(inches from top of dike - must be initialed by DLQ/Dam Safety rep
Adequate )ay operate at normal levels
3. Storm pact to lagoon (circle applicable category):
Structure inundated
(Information related to length of time submerged, etc)
Flood waters saturated outside wall
Estimated distance in inches (ie/36 inches from top):
t
ture topped over
top of dike cut, etc.)
Flood water originated from (name of creek, river, etc.)
Circle Basin: Neuse Tar White Oak Roanoke Chowan
4. Date and explanation of remedial action taken after storm:

Other Parts of Waste Management System:
Comments (lift station, collection boxes, destroyed houses, etc.)
Waste Application System:
1. Irrigation/application system - comments, assistance needed, etc.:
2. System is (circle): Inoperable/destroyed Operable but limited Operable
3. For inoperable systems (circle):
Lost supply lines Lost hardware (reels, pivots, etc.) Lost pump No power sources
Other:
4. What is needed to repair system and length of time needed to bring back on-line?
5. Would a generator fix situation?
6. Is pump & haul equipment available?
Land Application Sites:
1. is field(s) currently flooded and if yes, what percentage of field(s) flooded?
2. Fields are saturated but not ponded
3. Are receiving crops available? Yes No
If answered no, estimated time before next crop planted
4. Fields adequate to receive waste
5. Comments - remedial action taken after storm which may have affected spray fields:
6. Are alternative sites or third party land immediately available?

Record Keeping:
1. Records were destroyed and in need of reconstruction
2. Records partially complete
3. Records available and complete
4. Date and PAN of last waste analysis
Structure 1: 2: 3: 4: 5:
5. Last lagoon level readings: 1 2 3 4 5 Rainfall Received
.lust prior to August 1:
Just prior to August 29:
Just prior to Sept. 15
Immediately after 9115
Current level
6. Documented volumes pumped from waste structure since Hurricane Floyd:
7. Current animal populations:
Mortality Losses:
1. Number of animals lost:
2. Disposal method used:
3. Does facility lack a means of disposal?
Other comments; unanswered questions, etc.:
* Use back of sheet for additional comments, sketches, etc.

❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation [3Other Agency
56ivision of Water Quality
JIVRoutine O Com laint O Follow-up of DWQ ins ection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other j
Date of Inspection 57- —mot
Facility Number
�// Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
® Registered 12'Certified [a Applied for Permit [3 Permitted 10 Not Operational Date Last Operated :............
Farm Name: County: .............................................. .
.....&-eD.. . ..T... .�... �...................I....... y
Owner Name:........Gneb cQ...................
.................. I ...... ............... ...
FacilityContact: ................................................................................ Title:.........................
Phone No: 5. 7. 3.'.?. .Z...........I—.
Phone No:......
MailingAddress: .....�t :0.:. Box- 1d W- S^ %_ l}s ...t: .................... 7g ........................................._..................................................... .... I......................
Onsite Representative: .... :gr�� Integrator:....
...........................................................................
Certified erator;�Number;..--- O ....2 0 ....... ..........
p Operator Certification b q o9
Location of Farm:
tecm�.......C:....t....i.......................................................................................................................
.... -.. .. ................................................................................ ... -------.................
Latitude © ° ®' © " Longitude ©° �' © "
Design ;: Current. Design Current
Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle „C
❑ Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
japQ
❑ Farrow to Wean
LYParrow to Feeder
3�
v
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area S ra Field Area
Number of Lagoons ! Holding Ponds ® g P Y
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
General
1.
Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
9N0
2.
Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
2<0
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
3.
Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
j]--d//No
4.
Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes
["No
5.
Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
❑ Yes
E No
maintenance/improvement?
6.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
EdI NNo
9
7.
Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes
No
7125/97

Facility Number: Q p — (p 1
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes 910
Structures (Lagoons,Holding Ponds, Flush_ Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes 64<0
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
t
Identifier:t
......... ........... ....... .............. ............................ ................................................................
Freeboard (ft): ........ ..IY.)...................5.. .k......... .
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes LKNo
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes O"No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvernent? ❑ Yes 12<0
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑ Yes {>�lo
Waste ADDlication
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes B o
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of f(the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type .�r{.�rt . ... iI�.Q 0. ....... :!Q 4. .........................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management an (AWMP)? ❑ Yes Bl o
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to'have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
No.violations•oc deficiencies were noted during this,visit.- You:will recei"Ve•no•fur_#tier
ct*resOhdebce Ab:oid -this'visit:.
❑ Yes B'No
❑ Yes 2'1�o
❑ Yes [a'Ko
❑ Yes ®-lo
❑ Yes 9-<o
fjR'Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes (�o
❑ Yes UK
❑ Yes ❑ No
3
.-o
�v 2c�C " i ✓ +�i c�io ►ti Ca rt�b „ V 5�� �A new V� p 4-4-- : r1r1
fQ-corcQ.s dvc5� i� t6s .
7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: %.`�r}�. .� l:j. �' � VV, Date: {

10 fcoutine 0 t ompiaint 0 ronow-up of DvvV inspection 0 rorfow-up of tn!PWU review 0 Vtber
I Date of inspection
Facility Number
Time of Inspection © 24 hr. (hh:mm)
p Registered 0 Certified p Applied for Permit p Permitted in Not 0peratfona Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: Gearge.Bailey..Farxn................................... .............................................. County: Greene WARO
OwnerName: George ................................... Maley .......................................................... Phone No: .73a.:54.Q7....................................................................
Facility Contact: George.Bailey.................................................Title: oxner .................................................. Phone No: 9191.75a-5.407 .......................
MailingAddress: P.O..Box.10 .............................................................................................. Walstonhurg...N.0 ................................................ 7.7888 ..............
Onsite Representative: G,eorge..bailey .....................„..... ..... Integrator:..................
Certified Operator:G.eorge.T1 G.eorge.JEL ............................ Bailey .......................
Location of Farm:
Operator Certification Number:1C409 ............................
Latitude Longitude ©• ®©°
Design Current_ = esfgn : urren esign Current
Swine _ Capacity : Populatio>t ; Poultry Capacity PopulationN Cattle Capacity, Population'
[3 Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
® Farrow to Feeder
p Farrow to Finis
p Gilts
p Boars
Nufnber of Lagoons 1 Holding Ponds ®Subsurface rains resen p Lagoon Area pray FieldArea
❑ No Eiqui3 waste Management System
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes N No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon l] Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ® No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ® No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes ® No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes N No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ®No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes N No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes ®No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? p Yes ®No
7/25/97

Facility um er: 40_61
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
p Yes
® No
Structures (La oons,Holding Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
p Yes
N No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure
6
Identifier: ... Pxup ary.(=W)... .........Existing ..................
Freeboard (ft): 4.0+ 4.5
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
p Yes
® No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
R Yes
p No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
® Yes
p No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
p Yes
® No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
p Yes
® No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop ........................C,azn..........................................
P type ......Wheat. ...................... .................... ns aybea........................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
p Yes
® No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
p Yes
®No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
p Yes
®No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
p Yes
N No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
p Yes
®No
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
p Yes
® No
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
p Yes
® No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
p Yes
N No
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
p Yes
®No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
rl Yes
rl No
Q .. o-vio tions.or ciencies*were.note wring this visit; -You wi receive no urt er . .
�er>res�ioi�dene� �bQdt xi>tis •visa:' .......:...:. :. . . • . • .:.. - . - : � . - . - - - .: .
Comments referto_Wuestion ( T q #a•e=Egptain any. YES.answers:sndLor any recommendations- or any other comments:
Use -drawings of facility to better -explain situations. (use additional: pages as necessary) =
Has new lagoon and has not had to pump for 1997
• Not required at time of certification but will need for General Permit: odor control, insect control and mortality checklists
agoon 1 - all waste enters new lagoon. Lagoon 2 - existing structure (waste does not enter structure); will maintain
I 1-12. Three eroded areas on new lagoon need to be repaired and stabilized - contact Greene Conservation District technical
pecialist for assistance. I` u
12/5/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name t gaper -
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

{ 1
p Division of Soil and Water Conservation 13 Other Agency
Division of Water Quality
hr
Le Routine p Complaint p o ow -up of DWO inspection o c
Facility Number
13 Registered N Certified p Applied for Permit p Permitted
-up of DSWC review p Other
Date of Inspection U
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
ra Not Operatiana Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: GcDrgeBsiley.Earms...................... ....... -................................................. County: Greene WARO
Owner Name: Gearge_. _-._.. ____.. Bailey.._ .......... ......... -.._._....,....... .............. Phone No: 75�-�4Q7 _ _,` �---....._..----. ... — •......
FacilityContact: ...................................Title............................... _.... ._........ -._......... . Phone No: _... ........... ......... ......... .............
Mailing Address: 2.0...Banc.10................................ ._._........................................... .L'V.alston>Burg..NC............. ......... ......................... 27888 ..............
Onsite Representative: Georgia.Baffey ........................_----. Integrator:
Certified Operator: George.IL......... .................. Bailey ...................... ........................ Operator Certification Number: 1b411Q..... _..... ..............
Location of Farm:
Latitude ©•®' ©" Longitude ©• ' ®"
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? p Yes N No.
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
M Discharge originated at: 13Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, -notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow.in gal/min? `.''
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation.
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?, "
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenancelimprovement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
p Yes ® No
p Yes p No _
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
13 Yes ® Nc
p Yes :® No` "
p Yes N No
p Yes N No
p Yes ® No

acility N um er: 40_61
' 8. Are there Iagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? p Yes ® No
Structures (Lagoons,Holding Ponds. Flush Pits, etc.
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? p Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
identifier: ............................... ......I =t;g Lagoon.................................................................. .....
Freeboard (ft): 5 ft. 5 fL
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? p Yes ® No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? p Yes ® No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
13 Yes
® No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
p Yes
® No
Waste_ Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
❑ Yes
® No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type .......Com.(S.ilage.&Grain)........................... Soybitaw.....................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
p Yes
® No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
® No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
p Yes
® No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
p Yes
a No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
®No
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
p Yes
H No
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
p Yes
® No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Onl
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
®No
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
p Yes
®No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
❑ Yes
p No
Q..o*vio hons.or erendes•were.note ringt rsvtsit:. da reeetv�na er.:.
:14e�'>CeS�iaal�eAe� a�citi� X�US•YiSI...........................
.
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: _M1 Q (E� _ - Date: -�� _ , � _ �-7

m
:v
p
`•►

V�
Facility Number (d
Date of Inspection [� a -
Time of Inspection =e30 24 hr. (hh:mm)
© Registered © Certified 13 Applied for Permit © Permitted 113 Not O erational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: ...lit? t?K. .. 'C?41!'.�'t 5...............................I...... Connty:.......0M.-ep,.R..................................................
Owner Name:..........? ...... .............. .................................................. Phone No:......l. q...r.75 3 — ..5�.°.7.................
Facility Contact:
.............................................................................. Title:.............................................................. Phone No: ........................
MailingAddress:........J?....�i....:..k...? Q.%........kU........................................................ ........ .. tt f .. N.C:............ 27j!86.6
Onsite Representative:..... Q.t(.. Integrator :............... .......................
.............................
Certified Operator: .................... ....... . Operator Certification Number:......t.% d ........
Location of Farm:
... ..... .....�...................................................................................................................................................................................................
A.
s.. ....l..L}.. ...- .... .......... ....... .......... ...... T
Latitude a ®4 ©46 Longitude ©0 ®4 ©"
Design;:; Current... Design Gureent,
Capacity Population a:: Poultry Capacity :Population Cattle
❑ an to Feeder
[?'Feeder to Finish
(a 0 C)
Q
❑ F ow to Wean
EjrFarrow to Feeder
p330
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
General
1. -Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a- If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system`? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7125/97
❑ Yes
0
❑ Yes
2<0
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
0 No
❑ Yes
LDS No
❑ Yes
63<0
❑ Yes
5 tvo
❑ Yes
N
ElYes
No
Continued on back

Facility Number: 0 —
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes lD
Structures fl,a oons 11oldin Fonds Fiush Pits etc.
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes 2rNo
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ...... E_....
Freeboard(ft): ..... S.. f4'..'..............................................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes 21T 0
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes 2<0
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes 2/No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑ Yes O No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes (o
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the Sta notify DWQ)
/�1 C
15. Crop type ............ 1,.,,..�l—vA...................... � J Lt !. �l�l„#�5........................................ �........................................................................... ...
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the imal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑ Yes E2<0
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes I,.,id� O
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes l3divo
l9. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? ❑ Yes 62'1�0
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes G1,<o
21. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes EKO
22. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ Yes 21' o
For Certified or Permitted Facilities_O_nly
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑ Yes (�No
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes glo
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑-No.violationsor deftciencies.werenoted-detring this;visit.- You.'wiH ieceive-ito-ftirlttiei,
c &Ospondeitce Eihoitt this'visit:-";:-: :-
As OC&_&CQ v0-1
al ,
; �m.-�-
s � n,w
W uuU v2s/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name ' 'n.
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date: to - Zzz -G7

Site Requires Immediate Attention:
Facility No.
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT.
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIO S SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: 7 , 1995
Time: / 0 0 D
Farm Name/Owner:
Mailing Address:
County:
Integrator:
On Site Representative:
Physical Address/Location:
Type of Operation: Swine Poultry Cattle
Phone:
Phone:
24, 4
Design'Capacity: 27,3D Number of Animals on Site:
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: 23 S ° 3b' -St s" Longitude: 7_° +2, Aqc, " Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) Qe or No Actual Freeboard: 3 Ft. C7 Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes oraWas any erosion observed? Yes or I�
Is adequate land available for spray? 0-or No Is the cover crop adequate?<:0 or No
Crop(s) being utilized: s'%,eau.
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings? -Gor No
100 Feet from Wells? 1'gDor No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? laor No
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes or
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes or& If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes or No
'OP. 7'4�,X 4-4-0
Inspector Name
cc: Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed.

�,
I
q
L
po
V
M
1,
Aj
I
tg-
00
a
w
y
�
�
�
L
o
x
0
a�
V}
0
f
Ci
ca
Li

--------------------
Rigistration Date
C�rtiiicatioapate °
D9'M Regiy
004084
coml itiunal pays
ondlitional rriga on ystem
Rk ' ' �menis Higher Yields
egi�
Vegetation
° o =E3 Acreage
"d a Other
p Request to be removed p Removal Confirmation Recieved
Comments Basin Name: INeuse
Regional DWQ Staff Date Record Exported to Permits Database