400061_ENFORCEMENT_20171231

NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environmental Quaff

ENFORCEMENT
ENFORCEMENT
ENFORCEMENT

Water Resources
l:nrirOnmenttil Qualiy
May 12, 2017
George H. Bailey
Galloway Farm
POBox 10
Walstonburg, North Carolina 27888
Subject: Notice of Deficiency - Freeboard Level
Galloway Farm #40-61
AWS400061
Greene County
NOD-2017-PC-0171
Dear Mr. Bailey:
ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
secretar•r
S. JAY ZiMMERMAN
Director
Thank you for your recent call regarding the freeboard levels at your facilities. On April 25,
2017 during a telephone conversation with staff of the NC Division of Water Resources (DWR),
you reported a high freeboard level (18.5 inches) in the primary lagoon.
Please be advised that failure to maintain waste levels in your lagoon/storage ponds in
accordance with the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan and with Condition V.
2. of NC Swine Waste System General Permit could result in other actions being taken by the
Division in response to compliance matters.
Deficiency 1:
On April 25, 2017, a lagoon/storage pond level was documented at 18.5 inches of freeboard at
the primary lagoon. A level of 19 inches is the maximum level allowed by your permit and
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
Corrective Action for Deficiency 1:
Thank you for submitting a 30-day Plan of Action on April 25, 2017. Take all necessary
additional steps to insure lagoon levels remain in compliance with Section 2 of your permit.
"L`Nothing Compares
State of North Carolina l Environmental Quality i Water Resources -Water Quality Regional Operations Section -Washington Regional Office
943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, North Carolina 27889
252-946-6481

U.S. Postal Service a� � ' �
KAI
CERTIFIED M` 11lTr., RECEIPT
(Abmestic hfai! Only; No Insurance Coverage ProvidetlJ
IF,o'rdelivery information visit our werssite at--usps.comu
Ln WJ u it
m
Posmge $
0
Cer#W Fee
Fl
o[
�j P,
0
o
Retum Receipt Fee
Here cam\
M
Reatrk:ted pegvery Fee
{Eneoraernern Required
O
!Cog Z
M
a
m
a
Total Postage & Fee$
s. 3 a
1 $
,1
Ev MR GEORGE BAILEY 88LZ
© PO BOX 10----------
� apo WAISTONSBURG NC 27888
Y

Please work to ensure that your facility is managed in a way to maintain compliance with permit
and animal waste management plan requirements. Failure to comply with conditions in a permit
may result in a recommendation of enforcement action, to the Director of the Division of Water
Quality who may issue a civil penalty assessment of not more that twenty-five thousand
($25,000) dollars against any "person" who violates or fails to act in accordance with the terms,
conditions, or requirements of a permit under authority of G.S. 143-215.6A. To minimize the
potential for any possible future compliance matters attributable to prolonged wet weather
conditions, you may wish to review your animal waste management system design, as well as the
waste plan itself, for any potentially beneficial modifications and/or improvements.
If you have any questions concerning this letter, please contact me at (252)-948-3939.
Sincerely,
.
David May
Water Quality Regional Operations Supervisor
Washington Regional Office
Cc: DWR-WQROS-CAFO Unit -Central Office
Greene County Soil and Water Conservation District
NCDSWC - WaRO
)&1sRO:C5mpliance Aiumal=Files
mds Files

O'40F WA7- ,g Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
p Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Chuck Wakild, PE, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION
December 2, 2008
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
CM# 7008 1300 0001 0435 0709
Mr. George Bailey
PO Box 10
Walstonsburg, North Carolina 27888
RE:
Notice of Violation
Galloway Farm
Facility Number 40-61
Permit NO. AWS400061
Greene County
NOV# NOV-2008-PC-0818
Dear Mr. Bailey:
This letter is to notify you that facility number 40-61 is in violation of its Certified Animal Waste
Management Plan {CAWMP} and North Carolina Administrative Code Subchapter 15A NCAC 2T
Section .1300. The referenced facility, Galloway Farm, is located at the intersection of SR 1307 and
1308, in Greene County, North Carolina. On November 4, 2008 a compliance inspection was
conducted by the Division Water Quality, at which time it was identified that the animal type the facility
was populated with did not correspond to that covered in the Certificate of Coverage. Such an action
is a specific violation of the following condition:
1. In accordance with the Animal Waste Operation Permit Condition i, No.4; Any
proposed increase or modification to the annual average design capacity from that
authorized by the COC will require a modification to the CAWMP and the COC prior to
the modification of the facility.
Our office is aware that an application was submitted to the Aquifer Protection Central Office in
Raleigh to modify the COC and that modification has since been issued. If you wish to respond to this
notice with any additional informationlcomments, please do so within 30 days, and send to:
Mr. David May
Division of Water Quality -Aquifer Protection Section
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, North Carolina 27889
North Carolina Division of Water Quality Internet: www,ncwaterquality_or-g
943 Washington Square Mall Phone [phone]
Washington, NC 27889 Fax [phone]
One
NorthCarolina
Awmally
An Equal OpporlunitylAffirrnalive Action Employer — 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper

Page 2 of 2
December 2, 2008
Galloway Farm
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in your Certificate of
Coverage (COC), the General Permit or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of your COC, or
penalties in accordance with the North Carolina General Stature 143-215.6A through 143-215.6C
including civil penalties, criminal penalties and injunctive relief.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact me at 252-948-3939, or Marlene
Salyer, 252-948-3846.
Sincerely,
David May
Aquifer Protection Regional Supervisor
Washington -Regional Office- - ---- - -
Cc: Bunting Swine Farms
Greene County Soil and Water Conservation District
NCDSWC-WaRO
Aq Protection Animal Central Files
Jffa-RO Compliance Animal Fifes
MDS Files

F NN A
� 9 Michael F. Easley, Governor
A) QWilliam G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
y Department of Environment and Natural Resources
j 2 _ Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.
Acting Director
a Division of Water Quality
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
7003 3110 0002 06031238
November 16, 2004
Mr. George Bailey
Galloway Farm.
PO Box 10
Walstonburg, North Carolina 27888
RE: Notice of Recommendation of Enforcement
Galloway Farm
Facility Number 40-61
Greene County
--Dear-Mr.-Bailey-----_,__ ._�.�----------_-__- ---
This letter is to notify you that the Washington Regional Office of die Division of Water Quality is considering
sending a recommendation for enforcement action to the Director of die Division of Water Quality. The
recommendation concerns the violations of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1(a)(1) for discharging animal waste
into waters of the State without a permit.
The Galloway Farm, facility no. 40-61. is located on SR 1308, near intersection with SR I')OT north of Hwy-
264_ in Greene County. On November 9, 2004. Mr. Scott Vinson observed waste in the shvamp area located behind
farm which drains to an unnamed tributary to Little Contentnea Creek. The discharge occurred as a result of a rupture to
a recycle line running across the top of the lagoon.
Please provide this office -Mth your explanation for this violation and corrective actions taken to prevent such
violations from occurring in the future mithin ten (10) days after receipt of this Notice. Your explanation will be
re%riewed and if an enforcement action is still deemed appropriate- your e\planation will be forwarded to the Director
with the enforcement package for his consideration.
If you have any questions concerning this matter. please contact me at 252-948-3939 or Scott Vinson at 252-948-
3848.
Sincerely,
0a,'W 1- �
David May
Regional Supervisor,
Aquifer Protection Section
cc: Greene County Soil and Water Conservation District
NCDSWC-WaRO
APS- Animal Compliance Group
WaRO
SAV Files
943 Washington Square Mail Washington, NC 27889 252-946-Ml (Telephone) 252-946-9215 (Fax)

Type of Visit e0 Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint 0 Follow up O Referral 0 Emergency O Other .❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 40 bl Date of Visit: 111$/2004 Time: 6:15
O Not Operational O Below Threshold
® Permitted ®Certified 0 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .................
FarmName: ........................................... . County: QrCti3c ................................................ WARO.......
OwnerName: G.tQjrgg................................... Jbitc3:.......................................................... Phone No: 25.2-751: S40...............................................
Mailing Address: P.0..BQx.10............................................................................................. Wal5b.tlxiMxg.Ac............................................... 218AU ..............
FacilityContact: .............................................................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
Onsite Representative: Gpor .Ulty .... Integrator: .............
Certified Operator:GeQrg%.Hcnccrt................. Batty..................... „ Operator Certification Number:a,6.4Q9,,,,,...........,
Location of Farm:
Located at intersection of Road 1308 and 1307 - northern tip of Greene county.
T
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ horse Latitude 35 • 38 35 GL Longitude 77 •F 42 6 17
Design Current
Design Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity population
Poultry
Capacity Population Cattle
Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Layer
JE1 Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Non -Dairy
® Farrow to Wean
548
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
548
❑ Gilts
Total SSLW
237,284
❑ Boars
Number of Lagoons 1 Subsurface Drains Present S ray Field Area
Holding Po ndsLSojj Trang
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ® Yes ❑ No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ O
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ® No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ® Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes. notify DWQ) ® Yes 0 No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure b
Identifier: ............'.......................................................... ............................... ..... ........ I.......................... ................................... .......... I........................
Freeboard (inches): 43
12112103 Continued

Facility Number: 40`—Gl Date of Inspection 11/8/2004
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
` seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or ❑ Yes ® No
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ® Yes ❑ No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level ❑ Yes ® No
elevation markings?
Waste Ap )lotion
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑.No
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc > 3000
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
14, a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ❑ No
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ❑ No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ Yes ❑ No
Air Quality representative immediately.
Camnients (refer'to question #}; Explain any YES answers and orany recommendations or.:any othercomments ..,
Use drawl ngs-of facility to. better explain situations.`(dse additional pages as necessary}; , ❑Field Copy ❑Final Notes
1) On 11/8/04 Mr. Bailey's farm employee notified him of a rupture in the recycle line at the farm. It was evident that the rupture was A
caused by a bullet and called the Sheriffs Department to investigate the vandalism. The recycle line runs across the top of lagoon wall
towards hog houses. It seems that a hunter was illegally shooting from the road towards deer on lagoon wall sometime Saturday, 11 /6/04
afternoon or evening. Mr. Bailey called DWQ-WaRO and spoke to Lyn Hardison on 1118/04 around 4:14pm to report the discharge that
occurred as a result of the shot recycle line.
Waste discharged from recycle line to nearby ditch/culvert running between the current and `old" lagoon towards swamp.
) lust need to repair line before recycling continues.
Reviewer/Inspector Name Scott
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date:
12112103 Continued

Fatility Number: 40'-61 Date of Inspection ll/8/2004
Required Records & Documents
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
[I Waste Application ❑ Freeboard [I Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
31. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain.gauge?
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment?
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Stocking Form ❑ Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfall ❑ Inspection After 1" Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
❑ Yes ❑ No.
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
12112103

Type of Visit Compliance inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint © Follow up O Referral O Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: 11/91Z1}04 Time: $:15
Facility Number 40 bl
O Not O erational O Below Threshold
N .Permitted N Certified [3 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ..... ...............
Farm Name: �a Q1[��. ax1eY..k'�ruaS.iGatlQtx '.'airxul........................................... County: Galmar............................... ................ W.A►R .......
Owner Name: Gm ge.................................... Ralley................................ ......... Phone No: 152. 75154l17............................... ................. ..........:..................
Mailing Address: IPA?...B.Qx.IQ............................................................................................. W-Als.tauturg-Ac ............................................... 27.80.8 .............
facility- Contact:_ .......................-___ _._.. - - - - - - -Title: ... - ... - .. _ _.._.._._......W Phone No; ...................................................
.:..............................................................................................
Onsite Representative: (jeorgc.bailey......................... .... Integrator:
...............................................
Certified Operator: Gm.ramlirhoirt................ BeAvy ............................................... Operator Certification Number:t,fi49.............................
Location of Farm:
Located at intersection of Road 1308 and 1307 - northern tip of Greene county. +
N Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 • 3$ ' 35 ;' Longitude 77 ! 42 i7
Design Current
Design
Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
Poultry Capacity
Population Cattle
Cavacitv Po ulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Layer
❑ Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish
ID Non -Layer
10 Non -Dairy
N Farrow to Wean
548
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
548
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Total SSLW
237,284
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? N Yes ❑ No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ 0
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes N No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) N Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) N Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes N No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes N No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes N No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ................................... .............................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): 43
12112103 Continued

Facility Number: 40-61
Date of Inspection 11/9C1004
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6.' Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
1 L Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc > 3000
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified A.nimaI Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes [:]No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within' 24 hours?
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional
Air Quality representative immediately.
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Q Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments (refer to:q. eid #): Explain any..YES.answers aridlor'any recommendations or any other com_ ments...:,. _
Use drawings!of Niffity.to better explain situations. (use additional page`s as necessary): ❑Field Copy ❑Final Notes
Waste did discharge to the swamp behind the farm that drains to a unnamed tributary to Little Contentnea Creek.
The area that the waste discharged to is currently being dammed by beavers and the water has risen to areas not usually under
standing water.
Mr. Bailey is working on getting a back hoe to help dig a hole, to pump from, in order to collect as much discharged waste as possible.
IT. Bailey has acquired additional hose and pumps to pump waste back to lagoon.
Mr. Bailey estimates that about 2 inches of waste from the lagoon were lost to the grassed drainage way and wetlands located behind
rm. Mr. Bailey is working on getting aluminum pipe laid fromjust up from the beaver dam in the low area to pump waste and surface
ater back to his lagoon with his irrigation pump.
Reviewer/Inspector Name ,Scott
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Marlene D.
Date: /I
12112103 Continued

Facility Number: 40-61 Date of Inspection 11/9/2004
Required Records & Documents
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(iel WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
31. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
33, Did the facility, fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment?
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Stocking Form ❑ Crop Yield Form [:]Rainfall ❑ Inspection After 1" Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections . ❑ Annual Certification Form
❑ Yes [:)No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
12112103

Type of Visit QQ Compliance Inspection .O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O• Follow up Q Referral O Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 40 61 Date of Visit: 1I/10/2004 Time: 2:30
O Not Operational O Below Threshold
® Permitted Iff Certified E3 Conditionally Certified E3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
FarmName: ........................................... County: Gntar................................. ............. WAR .......
OwnerName: G.CQxgc.................................... B.Aacy .......................................................... Phone No: ZS,2-7.53-S4A7...... ......................................................
MailingAddress: P.Q.. a.1Q............ ................................ .... ............................................. V4A1s19.0.iA g..NC...................------....................... UM ..............
FaciftyContact: ...................... :............................. .......................... Title:................................................................ Phone No: ......................................... I..........
Onsite Representative: GccArgc.DAdcy , Integrator:_, ..............
....................................................................................................................
Certified Operator:.Gmime..]F exhort ................. Bafty ................................................ Operator Certification Numbera6.4QQ.................... ........
Location of Farm:
Located at intersection of Road 1305 and 1307 - northern tip of Greene county. +
N Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 • DET 35 Gi Longitude 77 ' 42 4 17 «
Design Current
Design, Current
Design Current ,
Swine Capacity Population
Poultry
Capacity population Cattle
Capacity Population .
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Layer
Dairy
po
Feeder to Finish
❑ Non -Layer
Non -Dairy
® Farrow to Wean
548
❑ Farrow to Feeder
Other.
❑ Farrow to Finish
L
Total Design Capacity
548
❑ Gilts
1-
Total SSLW
237,284
❑ Boars
Number of Lagoons 1 Subsurface Drains Present Spray Field Area
Hoid*nL7 Pond Solid Trans
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes N No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ O
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes. notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
N Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
Structure G
Identifier: ...................................................................... ................................... .................................... ......................................................................
Freeboard (inches): 42
12172103 Continued

Facility Number: 4D-61
Date of Inspection I I/i0/Z004
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not property addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4.6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
[]Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN [:]Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc > 3000
12. Crop type
[:]Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
[]No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
_6)-Does t-he facility need a wettable acie ed termmatu`on'?�--
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of property within 24 hours? ❑'Yes ❑ No
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ❑ No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? if yes, contact a regional ❑ Yes ❑ No
Air Quality representative immediately.
Commentsrefer to:question ans
wers and/orany recommendationsw. any other comments:
Use drawings' -of facilityto better ea lark"situations, (use additional pages as *necessary): El Field Copy ❑Final Notes
Bailey is pumping waste and surface water mixed in beaver pond back up to his lagoon. He will continue to try and reclaim as much
Le as possible. Be careful not to fill lagoon too much to allow for winter storage that is needed.
Reviewer/Inspector Name Scott V' o
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: i la o y
12112103 Continued

Facility Number: Date of Inspection 11/10/2004
,Re uired Records & Documents
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
❑ No
23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
❑ No
25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
❑ No
27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30. Is the facility covered under aNPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
❑ Yes
❑ No
31. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑Yes
❑ No
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
❑ Yes
❑ No
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Stocking Form [:]Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfall ❑ Inspection After V Rain
120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
C] No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Additioha_ Comments and/or Drawings
12112103

Type of Visit 0 Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for.Visit O Routine O Complaint OO Follow up O Referral O Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access
L�
Facility Number 4p 61 Date of Visit: 11/16111}04 Time: 8:15
0 Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified [3 Conditionally Certified E3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:..........................
FarmName: .......................................... County: Cixt xte.............................................. WARO.......
OwnerName: G.CQKgg................................... 1.albcy.......................... ................................ Phone No: 252-:................_........................
MailingAddress: 1' ?..fax.l�.......................... .......:........................... ................................ ............................................... 2.7.65.8 .............
FacilityContact: ............................................................................. Title:............................................................. Phone No:...................................................
Onsite Representative: G�l�lD1:g(K,Bacy,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, lntearator:
................................................ p......................................................................................
Certified Operator:.Gear K,Hlrt'but................ Bliky ............................................... Operator Certification Number-.16.409 .............................
Location of Farm:
Located at intersection of Road 1308 and 1347 - northern tip of Greene county. AL
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 • 38 35 �° Longitude 77 • 4Z 17 u
Design Current
Swine Canscity Pnoulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
® Farrow to Wean
548
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer I ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer I I IE]Non-Dairyl
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 548
Total SSLW . 237,284
Number of Lagoons. 1 Subsurface Drains P resent—ii Spray Field Area
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. - Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ 0
a. if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? []Yes []No
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from'a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus'storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
❑ Yes []No
❑ Yes ❑ No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes 0 No
Structure 6
Identifier:•...................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): 35
12112103 Continued

Facility Number: 40-61
Date oflnspection 11/16/2004
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DW%
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc > 3000
12. Crop type
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
1 S. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge attor below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ❑ No
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ❑ No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ Yes ❑ No
Air Quality representative immediately.
Commeii­nts ('refer to,question #) Expla►n any:YES answers'and/or. ariy recommendations o_ r any other coinments.
Use.dra' s of faeilrty'to..better eicplaitssituatiions. (use, additional pages as necessary): ❑Field Copy ❑ Final�Notes
Bailey pumped waste and water mix back from the beaver pond until the water being pumped was clear and appeared free from
aste. Mr. Bailey brought the amount of liquid in his lagoon from 43 inches of freeboard up to 35 inches in order to reclaim as much
aste as possible.
Bailey has oats sewn as a cover, but is planning on planting wheat as soon as possible.
Mr. Bailey has fixed the ruptured recycle line.
Reviewer/Inspector Name Scott
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date:
12112103
Continued

-[Facility Number: 40-61 Date of Inspection 11/16/2004
. Required Records & Documents
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? -
❑ Yes
❑ No
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan- readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
❑ No
23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
❑ No
25, Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
❑ No
27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30. is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
❑ Yes
❑ No
31, If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
❑ Yes
❑ No
34, Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Stocking Farm ❑ Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfall ❑ Inspection After 1" Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
dditiona!,Commerits.afid/or-Drawings:
12112103

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and
Natural Resources
Washington Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
4•M
NCDENR
NpRTH C.AROLINA QEP'ARTMENT OF
ENviRp3VMENT ^mn NAcruR.4L RESOLJRCEs
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
January 28, 1999
Mr. George Bailey
George Bailey Farms
P.O. Box 10
Walstonburg, North Carolina 27888
SUBJECT: Notice of Deficiency
Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
George Bailey Farms
Facility No. 40-61
Greene County
Dear Mr. Bailey:
On November 12, 1998, 1 conducted an Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
at the George Bailey Farms in Greene County. A copy of the inspection report is
attached for your review.
In general, this inspection included verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified
Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP) and the General Permit; (2) the farm
is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC 2H.0217, Senate Bill
1217, the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan and the General Permit; (3)
the farm operation's waste management system is being operated properly under
the direction of a Certified Operator; (4) the required records are being kept; (5)
there are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or runoff. The following deficiencies
were observed during the inspection.
➢ Failed to have the required waste analysis. The wastewater must be
sampled within sixty (60) days of application. It is suggested to collect a
sample for analysis every 120 days to meet the requirement.
943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, North Carolina 27889
Telephone 252/946-Ml FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

l�.
Page Two
George Bailey Farms
Facility No. 40-61
January 28, 1999
It is very important as the owner and the Operator in Charge that you resolve
these aforementioned deficiencies and any other problems that may arise, as
soon as possible. For additional assistance, please contact your Technical
Specialist. Nothing in this letter should be taken as absolving this facility of the
responsibility and liability of any violations that have resulted or may result from
these deficiencies.
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance during the inspection. Should
you have further questions or comments regarding this inspection, do not
hesitate to call at [phone], ext. 321.
Sincerely,
6 . --
Daphne B. Cullom
Environmental Specialist
cc: Greene County SWCD Office
Greene County NCCES Office
DSWC-WaRO
gompliance
Group
RO

Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of Inspectiou 24 hr. (hh:mm)
13 Registered M Certified 0 Applied for Permit. p Permitted 113 Not peratlona Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: George.Railey.larm..................... ._ County: Greene WARO
OwnerName: George ................................... Bailey .......................................................... Phone No: 75a54112....................................................................
FacilityContact: .............................................. Title: ............................................................... Phone No: ....................................................
Mailing Address: P.Q...Box.10............................................................................................. Walstonhurg.NG................................................ zMa ..............
Onsite Representative: Gceorge.BaileSy............................................................................. Integrator: Indepcudeni............................................................
Certified Operator:G.eoxge.M............................ Bailey ................................................ Operator Certification Number: 16411.R.............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude ©. ®� ©��.. Longitude ©. ®' ©u
ipu litj
13 Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to mts
13 Farrow to Wean
® Farrow to FURIFF
330
p Farrow to Finish
p Gilts
❑ Boars
General
esign 7 --urren ,- estgn e; :; P urren
Poultry °Capacity :Poliulation V rCattle M : Capacity Population;
p Other d- _ s
-' Total Design Capacity^930
=� -
TotaTSSLW=253,260
_� -
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man --made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of.the State other than from a discharge?
S. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
N No
p Yes
N No
p Yes
p No
p Yes
p No
p Yes
p No
p Yes
N No
p Yes
® No
p Yes
® No
Yes ® No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
p Yes ® No

Facility Number: 40_61 Dale of Inspection
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? p Yes N No
Structures La oons Holdin Ponds Flush Pits etc.
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? p Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: .......... .._..................... .. ...:`.EL'..............
Freeboard (ft): 2.3 5
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? p Yes a No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? p Yes N No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenancehmprovement? p Yes H No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? p Yes N No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? p Yes N No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type....CauL................................ ................2tl �t..................................------.5jaybeaus....------....................................................................
••--...............
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? p Yes H No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? p Yes ® No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? p Yes ®No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? p Yes ®No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? p Yes H No
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? p Yes H No
22. Does record keeping need improvement? ® Yes p No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? p Yes ®No
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? p Yes ® No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit? p Yes p No
1.. viQ tions.ar deficiencies -were -na a u"g t o ypit:. You. will.rerelve no further.*
....'s....... abo>aii....v�s� :: ' ..................................
Coritmepts (refer ©q�te tion`#) pla�n;any YES answers an or anyfrecomm6nd$tions;arNan + otllerrAmmerits." ` - " `.
;Use dii wiags of fhchity to better'rzplai_n 5_iivatioi K.(dse�additional pages as necessa )
Reviewer/Inspector Name f a
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date: i-►Z-�tF