400055_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NUH fH UAHULINA
Department of Environmental Qual

jl � •.+.Y � - ice' ,;,"f�4 'az.':i „r± ��n4n.s s� ,y .F :�?x;,
� a
"fit � -rye �s_ r�'.e� r-�[;�x.�� +varl � :min .� .: �� i ^�'""
y�� � di L� � � r ,�{}k�Jt� � �s� ��}J�Rr ell i
1� � F��:\�j +�R§'W ewvblffi�>. 1 .i►"'�%�3�� 'Aar '� ..S7J�S � � y 'M
y�a W n.l".S 16 g �'� 1y�� � � � "�
�� �� � -�' 49^li Cy I*� ICU 3' R � f1 'd +��:. l
.\� .�}. �"=il..n:.KS'y@'ys.'-% '��rw.:A`i' Fr� �� �4ek._ �Ti inR:�. b

r
0 Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400055 Facility Status: Active
Inssection Type: Compliance Inspection
Permit: AWS400055 [] Denied Access
Inactive nr Clnsed Date -
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene Region:
Date of Visit: 08./24/2016 Entry Time: 11:25 am Exit Time: 12:20 pm Incident #
Farm Name: Holloman Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Square One LLC Phone:
Mailing Address: 3623 N Main St Farmville NC 27828
Physical Address: 340 Craft Rd Walstonburg NC 27888
Facility Status: 0Compliant Not Compliant Integrator: J C Howard Farms
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
35° 37' 42"
Washington
252-717-3662
Longitude: 77° 41' 01"
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Jake Barrow Operator Certification Number: 1002237
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Jake Barrow Phone : [phone]
On -site representative Jake Barrow Phone : [phone]
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis: soil tested; 2014
7-8-16 = .96
3-16-16 = .81
12-18-15 = .67
9-3-15 = .62
IRR records are complete & balanced out.
Reviewed: rainfall = 37.74"/year; freeboard Feb. 23% 39" Aug.1 sludge survey due in 2019
stocking
page: 1

4
r Permit: AWS400055 Owner -Facility: Square One LLC Facility Number: 400055
Inspection Date: 08/24/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit; Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
swine - Farrow to Wean 2,600 2,515
Total Design Capacity: 2,600
Total SSLW: 1.125.800
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed mate Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon 1 01/06/94 39.00
page: 2

IL
Permit: AWS400055 Owner -Facility: Square One LLC Facility Number: 400055
Inspection Date: 08/24/16 lnssection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
You No Na No
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
0 ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
M ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ).
❑
M ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection Storage & Treatment
Yes No Na Ng
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large
❑
0 ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑0
❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
,
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■ ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
0 ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ M ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN a 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

A
Permit: AWS400055 Owner - Facility : Square One LLC Facility Number:
400055
Inspection Date: 08/24/16 Inssection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Waste Application
Yes No Na No
Crop Type 1
Corn, Wheat, soybeans
Crop Type 2
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 3
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑ M ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ 0 ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑ ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ M ❑
❑
18, Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No Na No
19, Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
01111
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page:
4

t.
Permit: AWS400055 Owner - Facility : Square One LLC Facility Number: 400055
Inspection Date: 08/24/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na No
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
M ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
M ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
MOD
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑M
❑
❑
27, Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑M
❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No Na No
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
M ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
0 ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
page: 5

r
\. d
M Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
13 Other Agency
Facility Number: 400055 Facility Status: Active
Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene Region: 9
Date of Visit: 09/15/2015 Entry Time: 09:00 am Exit Time: 9:30 am
Farm Name: Holleman Farm
Owner: Square One LLC
Mailing Address: 3823 N Main St
Permit: AWS400055
inactive Or Closed Date:
❑ Denied Access
Washin ton
Incident fk
Owner EmaIt:
Phone: [phone]
Farmville NC 27828
Physical Address: 340 Craft Rd Walstonburg NC 27888
Facility Status: Compliant ❑ Not Compliant integrator. J C Howard Farms
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35' 37' 42" Longitude: 77° 41' 01"
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Jerry A Carraway Operator Certification Number: 26038
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
Phone :
Primary Inspector:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector($):
Inspection Summary:
Waste Analysis:
9-3-15= .62
6-24-15= .88
4-24-15= .84
1-1-15= 1,15
Soil Tested 2014
Marlene Salyer
iRR records are complete and balanced out on CB, Wheat and (08)Rye
Reviewed: Rainfall/Freeboard; stocking/ mortality; updated WUP- 5.7-16,sludge survey due 2019, calibration 812015.
Phone:
Date:
page: 1

rA
Permit: AWS400055 Owner - Facility: Square One LLC Facility Number: 400055
Inspection Date: 09/15/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Farrow to Wean 2,600 2,476
Total Design Capacity: 2,600
Total SSLW: 1,125,800
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon 1 01/06/94 34.00
page: 2

Permit: AWS400055 Owner - Facility : Square One LLC Facility Number: 400055
Inspection Date: 09/15/15 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No No No
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
M ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
011
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection Storage & Treatment
ygg
Ng No yg
4. is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./large
❑
M ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
M Cl
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
0 ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
0 ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No No Na
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ M ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
[]
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Permit: AWS400055 Owner - Facility : Square One LLC Facility Number: 400055
Inspection Date: 09/15/15 Inssection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit, Routine
Waste Application
Yes No Na Ne
Crop Type 1
Coastal Barmuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 3
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
0 ❑ ❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
N ❑ ❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
0 ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
0 ❑ ❑
Records and Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
N ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
E ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
n
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
Stocking?
❑
page:
4

P,
Permit: AWS400055 Owner - Facility : Square One LLC Facility Number:
400055
Inspection Date: 09/15/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Records and Documents
Yea No Ng Ne
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
0 ❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
M ❑
❑
25, Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
0 ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
M ❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No Na Ne
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
■ ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
M ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
[�
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
0 ❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the RevieweNlnspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
0 []
❑
page: 5

0
0 Division of Water Resources
El Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number:
400055 Facility Status:
Active Permit: AWS400055
Denied Access
Inpsection Type:
Compliance Inspection
inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for visit:
Routine
County: Greene Region:
Washington
Date of Visit:
08/06/2014 Entry Time: 12:10 pm
Exit Time: 12:35 pm Incident #
Farm Name:
Holloman Farm
Owner Email:
Owner:
Square One LLC
Phone:
252.717-3662
Mailing Address: 3623 N Main St Farmville NC 27828
Physical Address: 340 Craft Rd Walstonburg NC 27888
Facility Status: 0Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator. J C Howard Farms
Location of Farm:
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts
Records and Documents
Latitude: 35° 37' 42"
Longitude: 77° 41' 01"
Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Other Issues
Certified Operator: Bryan Leland Barrow Operator Certification Number: 985110
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Jake Barrow Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Jake Barrow Phone : [phone]
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Soil tested Jan. 2014
Waste Analysis:
'6-30-14= A I
Irrigation events on CB were balanced out.
Rainfall and freeboard were recorded,
page: 1

Permit: AWS400065 Owner - Facility : Square One LLC Facility Number: 400055
Inspection Date: 08/06/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Farrow to Wean 1,431
Total Design Capacity:
Total SSLW:
wa$te Structures
Disignated Observed
Type identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Frooboard
Lagoon 1 01/06/94
page: 2

Permit: AWS400055 Owner - Facility : Square One LLC Facility Number: 400055
Inspection Date: 08/06/14 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes No Na No
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
0 ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
❑
❑
3, Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
0 ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection Stora a & Treatment
Yes
No Na No
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le.! large
❑
❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
M ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7, Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■ ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Xes No No N
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑
■ ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Permit: AWS400055 Owner -Facility: Square One LLC Facility Number: 400055
Inspection Date: 08/06/14 Inssection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No Na No
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Records and Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WU P?
Checklists?
Design?
Maps?
Lease Agreements?
Other?
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
Weekly Freeboard?
Waste Analysis?
Soil analysis?
Waste Transfers?
Weather code?
Rainfall?
Stocking?
❑■❑❑
❑■❑❑
❑ N ❑ ❑
❑■❑❑
❑■❑❑
Yes No Na Ne
❑■❑❑
❑ E ❑ ❑
❑ E ❑ ❑
page: 4

Permit: AWS400055 Owner - Facility : Square One LLC Facility Number:
400055
Inspection Date: 08/06/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na No
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
N ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
0 ❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
01113
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
E ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
E ❑
[]
Other Issues
Yes
No Na No
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
28. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
E ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
N ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
N ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
❑
❑
page: 5

i
■ Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400055 Facility Status: Active
Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Date of Visit: 08106/2014 Entry Time: 12:10 pm Exit T
Farm Name: Holloman Farm
Owner: Square One LLC
Permit: AWS400055 ❑ Denied Access
Inactive Or Closed Hate:
County: Greene Region: Washington
12:35 pm
252-717-3662
Mailing Address: 3523 N Main St Farmville NC 27828
Physical Address: 340 Craft Rd Walstonburg NC 27888
Facility Status: 0Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: J C Howard Farms
Location of Farm:
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts
Records and Documents
Latitude: 35° 37' 42"
Incident #
Owner Email:
Phone:
Longitude: 77° 41' 01"
Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Other issues
Certified Operator: Bryan Leland Barrow Operator Certification Number: 985110
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Jake Barrow Phone : [phone]
On -site representative Jake Barrow Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary inspector(s):
Marlene Salyer
Inspection Summary:
Soil tested Jan, 2014
Waste Analysis:
`6-30-14= .11
Irrigation events on CB were balanced out.
Rainfall and freeboard were recorded.
Phone:
Date:
page: 1

r
11
Permit, AWS400055 Owner - Facility : Square One LLC Facility Number: 400055
Inspection Date: 08/06/14 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Farrow to Wean 1.431
Total Design Capacity:
Total SSLW:
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon 1 01/06/94
page: 2

,Y
r
Permit: AWS400055 Owner - Facility : Square One LLC Facility Number: 400055
Inspection Date: 08/06/14 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No Na No
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
M ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
M ❑
❑
2. is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
01111
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection. Storage & Treatment
Yes No Na No
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large
❑
013
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
■ ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
❑
❑
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑M
❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
M ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na Ne
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ M ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
[]
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

.a
Permit: AWS400055 Owner -Facility: Square One LLC Facility Number: 400055
Inspection Date: 08/06/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yea No Na Na
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
E ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
❑
[]
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
0 ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
0 ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No Na No
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
01111
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
m ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
E ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWS400055 Owner - Facility : Square One LLC Facility Number:
400055
Inspection Date: 08/06/14 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Records and Documents
Yea No Na Ne
Crop yields?
❑
120 !Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
0 ❑
❑
(NPDE=S only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
■ ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
0 Cl
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
N ❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No Na No
28, Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
0 ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
E ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑0
❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
0 ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
[]
0 ❑
❑
page: 5

I
Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: AQQQ55 Facility Status: Active � Permit: AWS40005 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compllg,0 ge Inspection___ inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine _ County: Greene Region: W1;:h'notgn
Date of Visit: 10/29/2013 Entry Time: 01:35 PM Exit Time: 02:20 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: Holbrnap Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Souare One LLQ Phone, 252-Z117-5662
Mailing Address: 3623 N Main St FarmAlle NC 27828
Physical Address:
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude:.5Q°•37'42" Longitude: 77°41'01"
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Bryan Leland Barrow
Secondary OIC(s):
Operator Certification Number: 985110
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Bryan Barrow Phone. [phone]
On -site representative Bryan Barrow Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis:
9-20-12 = .72
IRR events in 2012 are complete & balanced out.
Rainfall & freeboard are recorded. Soil tested: 7/2011
Sludge survey is due 2014.
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400055 Owner - Facility: Square One LLC Facility Number : 400055
Inspection Date: 10/29/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
LN Swine - Farrow to Wean 2,600 0
Total Design Capacity: 2,600
Total SSLW: 1,125,800
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
kgoon 1 01/06/94 36.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWS400055 owner • Facility: Square One I LC Facility Number : 400055
Inspection Date: 10/29/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for visit:
Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No
NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑ SOD
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ■
❑ ❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ■
❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than
❑ ■
❑ ❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No
NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe
❑ ■
❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑ ■
❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
00011
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■ ❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■ ❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■ ❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

I
Permit: AWS400055 Owner • Facility: Square One LLC Facility Number : 400055
Inspection Date: 10/29/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.? ❑
Total Phosphorus? ❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■
❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■
❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fall to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
■
❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■
❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■
❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA NE
19, Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■
❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400055 Owner - Facility: Square One LLC Facility Number : 400055
Inspection Date: 1012912013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Lease Agreements? ❑
Other? ❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑
❑
23. if selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
■ ❑
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑
■ ❑
❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon ❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? DODO
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400055 Owner - Facility: Square One LLC
Inspection Date: 10129/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Records and Documents
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
nay..,. ���......
Facility Number: 400055
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
❑■❑❑
Yes No NA NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWO of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon I Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewertinspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a fallow -up visit by same agency?
Page: 6

0 Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency I-1
Facility Number: 40005.5_ Facility Status: 6gljye Permit: AWS400055 Q Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection - Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene Region: Washington
Date of.Visit: 04/30/2012 Entry Time: 07:30 AM Exit Time: 0&15 AM Incident #:
Farm Name: Holloman Farm Owner Email:
Owner: L L Murohrev Comoanv Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 39 Vand 'ford -Thomas Rd _ Fgrmville NC 27828
Physical Address: 340 Craft Rd Walstonburg NC 27888
Faculty Status: M Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: L L MgcphrQy Company
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°37'42" Longitude: 77°41'01"
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Edward Keith Walston
Secondary OIC(s):
Operator Certification Number: 26859
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Keith Walston Phone:
On -site representative Keith Walston Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis:
1-6-12 = 1.2
8-17-11 = 2.0
4-18-11 = 2.5
soil tested 7-13-2011
Date:
IRR records for 2011 are complete & balanced out waiting on waste analysis to balance 2012 events.
Freeboard, rainfall & crop yields are recorded. Caliberation due 2012 & sludge survey due 2014.
Looks Good!
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400055 Owner - Facility; L L Murphrey Company facility Number : 400055
Inspection Date: 04/30/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Q Swine - Farrow to Wean 2,600 2,272
Total Design Capacity: 2,600
Total SSLW: 1,125,800
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
lagoon 1 01 /06194 23.00
Page: 2

Permit: AW5400055 Owner - Facility: L L Murphrey Company Facility Number: 400055
Inspection Date: 04/30/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
C. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ 0
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? ❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le.l large trees, severe ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400055 Owner - Facility: L L Murphrey Company
Inspection Date: 04/30/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number. 400055
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA
NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Corn. Wheat.
Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Coastal Bermuda
Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 3
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
0011
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400055 Owner - Facility: L L Mufphrey Company Facility Number: 400055
Inspection Date: 04/30/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Checklists?
Design?
Maps?
Lease Agreements?
Other?
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Yes No NA NE
❑'
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ MOO
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDFS only)?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structures) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400055 Owner • Facility: L L Murphrey Company Facility Number : 400055
Inspection Date: 04/30/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes
No
NA
NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■
❑
❑
Other issues Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report
❑
■
❑
❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional
❑
■
❑
❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (Le,, discharge,
❑
IS
❑
❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon 1 Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
in
Page: 6

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400055 _ Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS400055 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date;
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene Region: Zashinaton
Date of Visit: 06/09/2011 Entry Time:08.OQ AM Exit Time; QQ*N 6bd _ Incident #:
Farm Name: Holloman Farm Owner Email:
Owner: L L Murohrey Company Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: Farmville NC 27828
Physical Address: 340 Craft Rd YVilstonbura NC 27888
Facility Status: N Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Location of Farm:
Integrator: L L Mumhrey Comfy
Latitude:35°37'42" Longitude: 77°4V01"
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator. Jerry A Carraway Operator Certification Number: 26038
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Keith Walston Phone:
On -site representative Keith Walston Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis: Soil tested: 2-2010
4-18-11 = 2.5
10-15-11 = 1.4
IRR's are complete and balanced out. Rainfall & freeboard levels recorded.
Crop yield recorded WUOP dated 11-2003
Calibration 423GPM on 6-2010 SS Due in 2014 at 27%
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400065 Owner - Facility: L L Murphrey Company
Inspection Date: 06/09/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400055
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Q Swine - Farrow to Wean 2,600 2,773
Total Design Capacity: 2,600
Total SSLW: 1,125,800
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
koon 1 01/06/94 35.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWS400055 Owner - Facility: L L Murphrey Company Facility Number: 400055
Inspection Date: 06/09/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) 001111
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than
❑
■
❑
❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures.observed (LeJ large trees, severe ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, ' ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Ap lication Yes No NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400055, Owner - Facility: L L Murphrey Company
Facility Number: 400055
Inspection Date: 06/09/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN a 10%/10Ibs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop andfor land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Records and Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
If yes, check the appropriate box below,
WUP?
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Way)
Small Grain Overseed
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
ONOO
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
n
Pages 4

Permit: AWS400055 Owner - Facility: L L Murphrey Company Facility Number: 400055
Inspection Data: 0610912011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
00011
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPOES only)?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑
0110
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Ndn-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400055 Owner - Facility: L L Murphrey Company Facility Number: 400055
Inspection Date: 0610912011 Inspection Type. Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No NA
NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■ ❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No NA
NE
28, Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report
❑
■ ❑
❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional
❑
■ ❑
❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30, Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge,
❑
■ ❑
❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon ! Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32, Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
■
■
■
Page: 6

r
Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400055
Facility Status: Permit: AZQ400055
❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Comrnllancg Inspection
- Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine
County: Greene _
Region:
Date of Visit: 07a017010
Entry Time:0§0" AM Exit Time:
Incident #:
Farm Name: Halioman Farm
Owner Email:
Owner: 1 I_ Mutnhrey Company
_
Phone: Z5.2--j53-5361 _
Mailing Address: 39_yano'
omas Ed FaarmvjlLQ
NC 27828
Physical Address: 340 Craft Rd
► alstgriburq_NC
27688
Facility Status: N Compliant
❑ Not Compliant Integrator: t_ i_ Mur2hrey
Comoanv
Location of Farm:
Latitude: 35°37'42"
Longitude: Z7°41'01"
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Edward Keith Walston Operator Certification Number: 26859
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Keith Walston Phone:
On -site representative Keith Walston Phone:
Primary Inspector, Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary,
waste analysis
6-15-10 = 2.1
3-31-10 = 1.9
1-7-10 = 1.3
soil tested 2-2010 SS 2014 calib. 6/2010
Freeboard range: 3/10/10 = 16" - 7/16/10 =45"
Page: 1

Permit, AWS400055 Owner - Facility: L L Murphrey Company
Inspection Date: 07/20/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400055
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Farrow to Wean 2,600 2,587
Total Design Capacity: 2,600
Total SSLW: 1,125,800
Waste Structures
Typo Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
kgoon 1 1()1/06/94 44.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWS400055 Owner - Facility: L L Murphrey Company
Facility Number: 400055
Inspection Date: 07120/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yea
No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ,
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
00011
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
13000
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other
than from a ❑
■ ❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collections Storage & Treatment
Yes
No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yea
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400055 Owner - Facility: L L Murphrey Company
Inspection Date: 0712012010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400055
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay, Pasture)
Crop Type 3
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■ ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
■ ❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■ ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■ ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■ ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WU P?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400055 Owner - Facility: L L Mlurphrey Company
Facility Number : 400055
Inspection Date: 0712012010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below,
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after> 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ MOO
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Other Issues Yes No NA N
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400055 Owner - Facility: L L Murphrey Company
Inspection Date: 07/20/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspeclion
Other Issues
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Facility Number: 400055
Reason for Visit: Routine
Page: 6

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS400055 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: CoM21jance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 07/21/2009 _ _ Entry TIme:1Q:20AM _ Exit Time:
Farm Name: Holloman Farm
Owner: L L Murohrev Comoanv
Incident #:
Owner Email:
Mailing Address: - Famtville NC 27828
Phone: [phone]
Physical Address: 340 Craft Ed_ _ ____ yValstonburg NC 27888
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: L L Idurg,h[ey Cgmoanv
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude: 77°41'01"
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection 8 Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Edward Keith Walston Operator Certification Number: 26859
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative Is)- Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Keith Walston Phone:
On -site representative Keith Walston Phone:
Primary inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: __.. Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis:
5-20-09 2.2
2-23-09 2.5
soil tested 2-2009
Looks Good!
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400055 Owner- Facility: L L Murphrey Company Facility Number: 400055
Inspection Data: 07/21/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Farrow to Wean 2,600 2,600
Total Design Capacity: 2,600
Total SSLW: 1,125,800
Type identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon 1 01l06194 34.04
Page: 2

Permit: AWS400055 Owner - Facility: L L Murphrey Company Facility Number: 400055
Inspection pate: 07/21/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ M ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) OMOD
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
00013
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe
❑ MOO
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ ■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑ ■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑ ■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑ ■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400055 Owner - Facility: L L Murphrey Company
Inspection Date: 07/21/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400055
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil?
❑ ,
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay, Pasture)
Crop Type 3
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14, Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15, Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
16, Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
17, Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400055 owner - Facility: L L Murphrey Company Facility Number: 400055
Inspection Date: 07/21/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Other? ❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after a 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
SOO
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
■
❑
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■
❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■
❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours andlor document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ Cl ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400055 Owner - Facility: L L Murphrey Company Facility Number: 400055
Inspection Date: 07/21/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Via It: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? ONOO
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
0
Page: 6

i
0 Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400055 Facility Status: Permit: AWS400055 . u Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Region: Washinaton
Date of Visit: OBIZQi2008 Entry Time: 08:30 AM Exit Time: 08:31 AM Incident #:
Farm Name: Holloman Farm
Owner: LLt4urphLgy Company
Owner Email:
���•i�bb�cII•�cIcii �
Mailing Address: 39Vggdiford-Thomas Rd Farmville NC 27828
Physical Address: a40 Craft Rd , Walstonburg NC 27888
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: L L Murphrey Company
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°37'42" Longitude: 77°41'01"
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Edward Keith Walston Operator Certification Number: 26859
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representatives): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Keith Walston Phone:
On -site representative Keith Walston Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis
6-26-08 = 2.3
4-11-08 = 2.5
12-21-07 = 2.1
soil test 4-1-08 & lime applied as needed
Page: 1

I
Permit: AWS400055 Owner - Facility: L L Murphrey Company
Inspection Date: 08/20/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400055
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
O Swine - Farrow to Wean 2,787
Total Design Capacity:
Total SSLW:
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
k9oon 1 01/06/94
Page: 2

Permit: AWS400055 Owner - Facility: L L Murphrey Company Facility Number: 400055
Inspection Date: 08/20/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream impacts Yes No NA NE
1, Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ M ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large trees, severe
❑
■ ❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■ ❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■ ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■ ❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■ ❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■ ❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400055 Owner - Facility: L L Murphrey Company
Inspection Date: 08/20/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400055
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN ? 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total P2057
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Bermuda Grass (Hay,
Pasture)
Crop Type 3
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
1100 ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? 1100 ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400055 Owner -Facility; l 1. Murphrey Company
Facility Number: 400055
Inspection Date: 08/20/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)? ❑ ■
❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Other Issues
Yes No
NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AW5400055 Owner -Facility: L I-Murphrey Company
Inspection Date: 08/20/2008 inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400055
Reason for Visit: Routine
Otherissues
Yes
No NA
NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
■ ❑
❑
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
■ ❑
❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
■ ❑
❑
Page: 6

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400055 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS400055 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Cgmpiiance Inspection inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: QQf2212007 Entry Time:08:00 AM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Holloman Farm
Owner: L L Murphrev CgWgany
Owner Email:
Phone: - -
Mailing Address: 39 Vandiford-Thomas Rd Farmvillg NC 27828
Physical Address: 340 Craft Rd Walstonburn NC 27888
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°37'48" Longitude: 77°44'03"
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Jerry A Carraway Operator Certification Number: 26038
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Keith Walston Phone:
On -site representative Keith Walston Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis"
6-12-07 = 2.3
3-28-07 = 1.96
1-9-07 = 1.5
soil test 3-21-07
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400055 Owner - Facility: L L Murphrey Company Facility Number : 400055
Inspection Date: 08/22/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
O Swine - Farrow to Wean 2,600 2,694
Total Design Capacity: 2.600
Total SSLW: 1,125,800
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
�agoon 1 01106/94 43.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWS400055 Owner - Facility: L L Murphrey Company Facility Number: 400055
Inspection Date: 08/22/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No
NA
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
0
❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erasion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste ApplicatIon
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? Cl
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400055 Owner - Facility: L L Murphrey Company Faculty Number : 400055
Inspection Date: 08/22/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
Is PAN a 10%110 lbs.? ❑
Total P205? ❑
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type 1 Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay, Pasture)
Crop Type 2 Corn (Grain)
Crop Type 3 Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Sail Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■
❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
■
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
0
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
0
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400055 Owner - Facility: L L Murphrey Company
Facility Number: 400055
Inspection Date: 08/22/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for VisIt: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Farm (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? ❑
■
❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑ Cl
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■
❑ ❑
A11__,__.___
Yon
No
NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400055 Owner - Facility: L L Murphrey Company
Inspection Date: 08/22/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Facility Number: 400055
Reason for Visit: Routine
Page: 6

I . y
Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400055 Facility Status: Active Permit: NCA240055 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date. -
Reason for Visit: Routine , , County: Region: Uyashington
Date of Visit: 01/11/2006 Entry Time;08:48 AM _ , Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Holloman Farm Owner Email:
Owner: L L Murphrey (,moan Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: aQ ndiford-Thomas Rd Egrmv!lle NC 27828 _
Physical Address:
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm:
Latitude:35°37'48" Longitude:77"44'03" _
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection $ Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Jerry A Carraway Operator Certification Number: 26038
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Jerry Carraway Phone:
On -site representative Jerry Carraway Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspectlon Summary:
Waste analysis:
11-7-05 = 1.4
8-4-05 = 1.8
5-20-05 2.1
2-23-05 = 2.2
12-20-05 =2.0
Soil2-23-05 good
Looks Great!
Page: 1

Permit: NCA240055 Owner - Facility: L L Murphrey Company Facility Number : 400055
Inspection Date: 01/11/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
O Swine - Farrow to Wean 2,600 2,451
Total Design Capacity: 2,600
Total SSLW: 1,125,800
W�a4a Corn Pin rOd
Tvoe Identifier Closed Date Start Date Desloned Freeboard Observed Freeboard
koon 1 01/06/94 27.00
Page: 2

Permit: NCA240055 Owner - Facility: L L Murphrey Company Facility Number: 400055
Inspection Date: 01/11/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ - ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) 00.00
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse Impacts to Waters of the State other than from a ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe
❑
■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■ ❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
0000
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
i
Page: 3

Permit: NCA240055 Owner - Facility: L L Murphrey Company
Inspection Date: 01/11/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400055
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Com, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2 -
Bermuda Grass (Hay,
Pasture)
Crop Type 3
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Orangeburg
Soil Type 2
Norfolk
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the Irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
19. Did the Facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: NCA240055 Owner - Facility: L L Murphrey Company
Facility Number: 400055
Inspection Date: 0111112006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ 0013
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? ❑ ■
❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
26, Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Other issues
Yes No
NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
29, Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: NCA240055 Owner - Facility: L L Murphrey Company Facility Number : 400055
Inspection Date: 01/11/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page. 6

]Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
I ReasonforVisit *Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 40 55 Date of Visit: 4-7-Z004 Time:
O Not Operational O Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified 0 Conditionally Certified 13 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: U0.110xtlARYUM............................................................................................ County: Grujac ............................................... WARQ........
OwnerName: ................................................... LL..XuICFIxrgy..HAg.Co..................... Phone No: 2 r.7 3-5.' ...........................................................
Mailing Address: 2..Y.,�ms�i Qxd-�btsttt>tgS. o,>tsl......................................................... k.8jr.M:i11r..NC........................................................ 2.7.8Z8 ..............
FacilityContact: Jorr.X..CArraw:aY........................................... Title:................................................................ Phone No:.... .........................................
OnsiteRepresentative: acrxy.A.Mill............................................................................Integrator:CArgill.......................................................................
Certified Operator:,la1Cc........................................ U4.rrQ.W ............................................ Operator Certification Number:1.6&l.............................
Location of'Farm:
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 ' 37 Longitude F 77 • 44 0u
Design Current
Design Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
Poultry
Capacity Population Cattle
Canacitv Po ulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
I0 Layer
❑ Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Non -Layer
ID Non -Dairy
® Farrow to Wean
2600
2578
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
2,600
❑ Gilts
Total SSLW
1,125,800
❑ Boars
Number of Lagoons 1 Subsurface Drains Present Spray Field Area
Discharges &Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ®No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c, If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
Structure 6
Identifier: ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): 27
12112103 Conthrued

Facility Number: 4055 Date of Inspection 4-7-2004
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Excessive Ponding . ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
N No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
®No
❑ Yes
N No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Coastal Bermuda (Graze) Small Grain Overseed Corn, Soybeans, Wheat
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes N No
14; a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? . ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes N No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes N No
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes N No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ Yes N No
Air Quality representative immediately.
Comments' refer to . uestian # Ex _lain; YE answers any-ree6r'm"' endahons or any other comments
(.. q } P
Use drawings of.iacihty to better explain i tuations. (use`addiflonal pages as necessary): [� Field Copy ®Final Notes
Reviewer/Inspector Name Marlene D. Salyer
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: X Date: 1/—/,'— 041'
IV1.1/yI Continued

Facility Number: 40-55 Date of Inspection 4-7-2004
,.Required Records & Documents
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(iel WUP, checklists, ddsign, maps, etc.)
23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ,
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
31, if selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment?
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below
[_-]Stocking Form [:]Crop Yield Form ❑ Rainfall ❑ Inspection After 1" Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ® No
[:]Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ENO
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ® No
12112103

Information contained in this database is from non agency sources and is considered unconfirmed
Animal Operation Telephone Log
DWQ Facility Number ® — 55
Farm Name lHolloman Farm
Caller's Name lierry Carraway
© Reporting 0 Complaint
Caller's Phone #
Access to Farm
Farm Accessible
from main road 10 Yes 0 No
Animal Ponulation
Confined 10 Yes 0 No
Depop 0 Yes 0 No
Feed Available 10 Yes O No
Mortality 10 Yes Q No
Sere-• Availability
Pumping
Equipment
10 Yes O No
Available
JOYes Q No
Fields
Date 5/30/2003
Time :38 pm
Control Number 13108
Region jWaR0
Lagoon Ouestions
Breached
10 Yes 0 No
Inundated
10 Yes Q No
Overtopped
10 Yes O No
Water on
0 Yes O No
Outside Wall
Dike Conditions
10 Yes Q No
Freeboard Level
Freeboard
Plan Due Date Date Plan Date Freeboard
Inches
Q equals blank) Received Level OK
Lagoonl 19
1112003
Lagoon2
C�
Lagoon3
�1J
Lagoon4l E
Lagoons
Lagoon8
0

Technical Assistance Site Visit Report
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Q Natural Resources Conservation Service
0 Soil and Water Conservation District
0 Other...
Facility Number 4l7 - 55 Date: 11/13/03 Time: 1 1100 1 Time On Farm: 6Q WaRO
Farm Name Holloman Farm
Mailing Address 39 Vandiford-Thomas Road
County Greene Phone: [phone]
Farmville NC 27828
Onsite
Representative Jerry Carraway/Keith Walston Integrator ILL_Murphrey Farms
Type Of Visit Purpose Of Visit
Operation Review
Compliance Inspection (pilot only)
Technical Assistance
Confirmation for Removal
f ❑ No Animals -Date Last Operated: El
I Operating below threshold
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse
pO Routine
O Response to DWQ/DENR referral
O Response to DSWC/SWCD referral
O Response to complaint/local referral
O Requested by producer/integrator
O Follow-up
O Emergency
O Other...
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Capacity Population
❑ Layer
[INon-Layer
El
Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
® Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
zsoo
2600
❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
GENERAL QUESTIONS:
1. Is waste discharging from any part of the operation and reaching surface waters or wetlands? ❑ yes ® no
2. Is there evidence of a past waste discharge from any part of the operation that waste reached ❑ yes ® no
surface waters or wetlands?
3. Does any problem pose an immediate threat to the integrity of the waste structure (large trees, ❑ yes ® no
seepage, severe erosion, etc.)?
4. Is there evidence of nitrogen over application, hydraulic overloading or excessive ponding ❑ yes ® no
requiring DWQ notification?
5. Is there evidence of improper dead animal disposal that poses a threat to the environment ❑ yes ® no
and/or public health?
6. Is the waste level within the structural freeboard elevation range for any waste structure? ❑ yes OR no
Structure) Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier prima
Level (Inches) 37
CROP TYPES Coastal Bermuda -hay I Icoastal Bermuda-grazel Corn Soybeans—W—h—ea—tj Ismail grain overseed
SPRAYFIELD
SOIL TYPES OrB NoB
7. What type of technical assistance does the onsite representative feel is needed? (list in comment section)
11.19Y [+11119i
❑ Other
GENERAL QUESTIONS:
1. Is waste discharging from any part of the operation and reaching surface waters or wetlands? ❑ yes ® no
2. Is there evidence of a past waste discharge from any part of the operation that waste reached ❑ yes ® no
surface waters or wetlands?
3. Does any problem pose an immediate threat to the integrity of the waste structure (large trees, ❑ yes ® no
seepage, severe erosion, etc.)?
4. Is there evidence of nitrogen over application, hydraulic overloading or excessive ponding ❑ yes ® no
requiring DWQ notification?
5. Is there evidence of improper dead animal disposal that poses a threat to the environment ❑ yes ® no
and/or public health?
6. Is the waste level within the structural freeboard elevation range for any waste structure? ❑ yes OR no
Structure) Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier prima
Level (Inches) 37
CROP TYPES Coastal Bermuda -hay I Icoastal Bermuda-grazel Corn Soybeans—W—h—ea—tj Ismail grain overseed
SPRAYFIELD
SOIL TYPES OrB NoB
7. What type of technical assistance does the onsite representative feel is needed? (list in comment section)
11.19Y [+11119i

Facility Number 40 - 55 Date:
11/13/03
PARAMETER
Q No assistance provided/requested
❑ 8. Waste spill leaving site
❑ 9. Waste spill contained on site
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE Needed
Provided
10. Level in structural freeboard
25. Waste Plan Revision or Amendment
❑
El❑
[Ill. Level in storm storage
26. Waste Plan Conditional Amendment
❑
❑
27. Review or Evaluate Waste, Plan wlproducer
El
❑
❑ 12. Waste structure integrity compromised
28. Forms Need
❑
❑
❑ 13. Waste structure needs maintenance
(list In comment section)
29. Missing Components (list In comments)
❑
❑
❑ 14. Over application >= 10% & 10 lbs.
❑
❑
❑ 15. Over application < 10% or < 10 lbs.
30.21-1.0200 re -certification
❑ 16, Hydraulic overloading
31. Five & Thirty day Plans of Action (PoA)
❑
❑
32. Irrigation record keeping assistance
❑
❑
❑ 17. Deficient irrigation records
❑ 18. Late/missing waste analysis
❑ 19. Late/missing lagoon level records
33.Organ ize/computerization of records
❑
❑
34. Sludge Evaluation
❑
❑
❑ 20. Late/missing soils analysis
❑ 21. Crop needs improvement
35. Sludge or Closure Plan
❑
❑
❑ 22. Crop inconsistent with waste plan
36. Sludge removal/closure procedures
❑
❑
37. Waste Structure Evaluation
❑
❑
❑ 23, Irrigation maintenance deficiency
❑ 24. Deficient sprayfield conditions
38. Structure Needs Improvement
❑
❑
39.Operation & Maintenance Improvements
❑
❑
40. Marker check/calibration
❑
❑
ReaulatorV Referrals
41. Site evaluation
❑
❑
❑ Referred to DWQ Date:
42. Irrigation Calibration
❑
❑
❑ Referred to NCDA Date:
43, Irrigation designlinstallation
❑
❑
❑ Other...
system
Date:
44, Secure Irrigation information (maps, etc.)
El
❑
LIST IMPROVEMENTS
45. Operating improvements (pull signs, etc.)
El
❑
MADE BY OPERATION
❑
❑
46. Wettable Acre Determination
1
47. Evaluate WAD certificationlrec hoc ks
48. Crop evaluation/recommendations
❑
❑
2.
49. Drainage workievaluation
❑
❑
50. Land shaping, subsoiling, aeration, etc.
51. Runoff control, stormwater diversion, etc.
❑
❑
❑
❑
3
52. Buffer Improvements
❑
❑
53. Field measurements(GPS, surveying, etc.)
El
❑
4'
54. Mortality BMPs
❑
❑
55. Waste operator education (NPDES)
❑
❑
$
56. Operation & maintenance education
❑
❑
57. Record keeping education
❑
❑
6.
58. Croplforage management education
❑
❑
59. Soil and/or waste sampling education
❑
❑
03/10/03

•
Facility Number 40 _ 55 Date; F 11/13/03
(COMMENTS:
'Installed rain breaker on irrigation pump.
'Lagoon dike walls maintained and mowed.
'COC dated April 9, 2003 and on site.
`Secure lagoon sludge and calibrate irrigation reel.
'Waste plan amended to include additional acreage tract 313 field #1 corn, wheat and soybeans acres 17.97 plan dated April
17, 2003. Waste plan being revised at time of inspection to include all fields that animal waste is applied and complete WAD
computations. Deficiencies noted during 2002 operation review WA recheck are being corrected.
'Waste analysis dated 10/10/03 nitrogen is 1.1 Ibs/1000 gallons
8/6/03 nitrogen is 1.6 Ibs/1000 gallons
5/28/03 nitrogen is 1.4 Ibs/1000 gallons
3/19/03 nitrogen is 1.4 lbs/1000 gallons
12/3/02 nitrogen is 1.7 Ibs/1000 gallons
'Soil test dated 2/17/03 Cu, Zn and ph within guidelines.
'IRR2 records are complete and balanced. *Lagoon freeboard level and rainfall recorded weekly with drops in lagoon
consistent with irrigation events.
'Rainfall events > 1" are being recorded including visual inspection of lagoon.
'Animal pop. recorded monthly.
'Need to record crop yields.
46. Need to complete WAD recheck.
" On 12/1/03 new waste plan was received at WaRO. Plan dated 11/17/03 includes map with pulls, additional pulls #11 and
412. Calculations include arc angles for traveler, pull 3B has been deleted, field data and computational worksheet included
n waste plan. Total wetted acres 62.11 PAN balance -3486 lbs
TECHNICAL SPECIALIST IMartin McLawhorn I Betsy Gerwig
SIGNATURE
Date Entered: 12/29/03
Entered By: Imartin McLawhorn
03/10/03

�OF W A TFgQ
�O G
� r
>_
To: Producer
From: Daphne B. Cullom
Environmental Specialist
Washington Regional Office
Subject: Animal Compliance Inspection
Year 2002
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
Enclosed please fund a copy of the Compliance Site Inspection (as viewed in the DWQ database) conducted at the referenced facility
by the Division of Water Quality from the Washington Regional Office. Please read this inspection and keep it withh all other
documents pertaining to your animal operation for future inspections.
In general, these inspections included verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP); (2) the
farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC 21L0217, Senate Bill 1217, and the Certified Animal Waste
Management Plan; (3) the farm operation's waste management system is being operated properly under the direction of a Certified
Operator; (4) the required records are being kept; and (5) there are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or runoff.
As a reminder, please note the following comments, which are conditions of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan and the
General Permit; therefore, these items must be implemented:
cp The maximum waste level in lagoons/storage ponds shall not exceed that specified in the CAWMP. At a minimum, maximum waste
level for waste for lagoons/storage ponds must not exceed the level that provides adequate storage to contain 25 year, 24 hour storm
event plus an additional. foot of structural freeboard.
cp An analysis of the liquid animal waste from the lagoon shall be conducted as close to the time of application as practical and at least
within 60 days (before or after) of the date of application. This analysis shall include the following parameters: Nitrogen,
Phosphorus, Zinc and Copper.
cp Soil analysis is required annually. Lime is to be applied to each receiving crop as recommended by the soil analysis.
cp The following records are required: off -site solids removal, maintenance, repair, waste/soil analysis and land irrigation records.
These records should be maintained by the facility owner/manager in chronological and legible form for a minimum of three years.
(p Land application rates shall be in accordance with the CAWMP. In no rase shall land application rates exceed the Plant Available
Nitrogen -PAN) rate for the receiving crop or result in runoff during any piv_en application.
(p All grassed waterways shall have a stable outlet with adequate capacity to prevent ponding or flooding damages. The outlet can be
another vegetated channel, an earth ditch, stabilization structure, or other suitable outlets.
It is Mggested, not &E21utremento keep crop yield information for future use to update your waste management plan. You will
need three years.of crop.yield.data.before your...plm..can be.updated._ ........_ ........ . .... _ _ . .
For your information, any swine facility that has a discharge to surface waters of the State will have to apply for a National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit with the Division of Water Quality, effective January 1, 2001.
Thank you for your assistance and cooperation during the inspection. If you have any questions, please contact meat 252-946-6481, exL
321 or your Technical SpecialisL
Cc: u4aRO
DBC Files
943 Washington Square Mali Washington, NC 27889 252-946-6481 (Telephone) 252-946-9215 (Fax)

A 4
Type of Visit p Compliance Inspection p Operation Review p Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit p Routine p Complaint p Follow up p Emergency Notification p Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit: 2/12/2002 Time: 3:05 pm
0 Not Operationalp Below Threshold
Permitted E Certified p Conditionally Certified 13 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:.........................
Farm Name: Holloman Farm County: Greene ............................................... WaRO........
Owner Name: L.L. Murphrey Hog Co. Phone No: 252-753-5361
Mailing Address:A9..V.andi:fjard.T.howu.Raad.......................................................... Fartuxil.11C.NC ........................................................ 27R28 ..............
FacilityContact: ...............................................................................Title:.............................. ..... Phone No:
Onsite Representative: Keitb.. .a.lstoa,.Berry..Carrarvay.,.Sony.a..Baxber...... Integrator: L.L.Marphr.ey-Ga................................................
Certified Operator:Bake........................................ Harrow............................................. Operator Certification Number: 1661.1...................... I......
Location of Farm:
® Swine p Poultry p Cattle p Horse
Swine ,
c3 Wean to Feeder
[31,eeclertolinisH
® arrow to Wean
p Farrow to
p Farrow to
Latitude a 6 44 Longitude • 4 «
}• ^ ' " ' Deslgn"'piCurrent Design "'Gurrent;.:
Catkle
Capactty ;Population
0 .. airy .
.' E3 N on -Dairy
p Uter
w Total Design Capacify 2,600
Total SLW 1,125,800
Y Capacity
�Populatton
p Layer
p Non.Layer
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes IN No
Discharge originated at: I] Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes p No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) 0 Yes p No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) 13 Yes p No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? C3 Yes H No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? 13Yes N No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? p Spillway p Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
...................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard(inches): ............... 26................ .................................... ................................... .................................... .... ................................ ....................................

ace i y Number: 40-55 Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum, and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? p Excessive Ponding p PAN 13 Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Graze) Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Small Grain Overseed
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16, Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of.design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22, Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24, Dues -facility r'equic•e-a-follow-up-visit-by
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
'
I
J
p Yes
H No
p Yes
® No
p Yes
®No
p Yes
®No
p Yes
®No
p Yes
® No
p Yes
®No
p Yes ® No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes H No
p Yes N No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes N No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
Its No violations or deficiencies were noted uring this visit. You will receive no turther correspondence about is visit.
1
Eom°inenfs'r'efe�ratouestioii'# Eir lain'an 'YES answersi'a`nd/o`r'an"' re'commendations or:a'n otltier com`mentsk i` t"=tip'' , "'
":.'t ki°(":i_a':.:IGx �91q.F "A'.-'�vr73..
Est €``i`""rv'`'`"I`'"";":'l''„,1"t�!#ti'°',4'+'':
�to�bettere�la�n useadditiosialf 'a
rawia offacilit' ifu'ations asiaspnecess�trY.
Used cgs' 3L Y„
?ly„ �,i ��F yi rl,�:�r �u �re�� �a��� ���{°iJMp:`, Via° ° 1����,r���a:;��° #XC] Feld Copy ❑ Final Notes ,��,���1,
.y.,��1'��r+ � �,�����, ,p:
��f+E P�t SWId�°��!S�'it��pC:!ah@;°
Waste analysis 1217 01 - 2.1 s 1000ga s.
Soil analysis 1/24/02 (Fall 2001 samples); lime as suggested.
Irrigation records complete with nitrogen balance; no overapplication noted.
Freeboard levels and rainfall data recorded weekly.
Lagoon design for this facility is part of CAWMP.
* Trash removed from lagoon.
* Discharge pipe with leak noted in DSWC Operation Review, 12/11/01, has been repaired.
-.' i• -_ ° -.-'.."R -"' F
Reviewerllnspector Name Daphne 1g _Cullom ' ' ,. by Ann Tyndall Y.:ii,
, ,entered
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: v�� Date:

S
05103101 Continued
.� aci i y Number: 40_55 Date of Inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below 0 Yes ® No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, p Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? p Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ONO
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? p Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? p Yes ® No
J

0 Division of Water Quality
O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection © Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit a0 Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date ofvisit: 12/11/2Q111 Time: 8110
Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
Permitted ❑ Certified [3 Conditionally Certified ® Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: HallatOttm.) um............................................................................... .............. County: Gmm ............................................... W?4RQ........
OwnerName: ................................................... ".AUrph ey..Hag.Ca ..................... Phone No: 7537530 ....................................................................
Mailing Address: .Vamrl axd-�hamtms. a,d.......................................................... Fj=yWe.N.0 ........................................................ 178211.............
FacilityContact: .............................................................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No: ...................................................
Onsite Representative:]fxith.W..,ablon,%nya_Rubeir.Jerry.CurtiLw.ay........... Integrator: L.L.Mw::phrley..Ga................................................
Certified Operator: 3f1I......................................... eArro.w ............................................. Operator Certification Number:16.611 .............................
Location of Farm:
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude ° 4 °• Longitude
Design Current
Design Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
Poultry
Capacity Population Cattle
Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
10 Layer
1
10 Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Non -Layer
1
1
1[3 Non -Dairy
® Farrow to Wean
2600
2600
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
2,600
❑ Gilts
Total SSLW
1,125,800
❑ Boars
Number of Lagoons JCR Subsurface Drains PreNcn!JICI Lagoon Area JNSprayFieldArea
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps 10 No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
l . Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Magoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was (lie conveyance inan-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Watcr of the Slate? (It yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is (lie estimated flow in gaVmui?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, riotii}v DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection &s Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure I Struclurc 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
identifier: .......... p jrLI ty..........
Freeboard (inches): 42 ...............

05103101
Continued
Facility Number: 40-55 Date of Inspection 12/11/2001
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
❑ Yes
® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
El Yes
®Na
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
® Yes
❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
® No
Waste Analication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
11. 1s there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
® No
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Graze) Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Small Grain Ovcrseed
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Wasic Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
Required Rec(wds & Documents
17. fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
® No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
® No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
® No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
® No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
® No
22. fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
® No
23. Did Reviewer/]nspeetor fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
® No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
® No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ® No
® No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary): ❑ Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
*Jake Barrow was onsile representative also. *Incinerator for
dead animal disposal installed November 2001.
*Small grain oversecd has been planted.
7. Need to remove trash from inside lagoon (plastic) and dispose of properly.
7. PVC collar on last discharge pipe is leaking and causing minor erosion on inside dike wall. Needs to be repaired.
*Vegetation on dike wall is well established.
*"There are a few weeds in coastal bermuda pasture that need attention before coastal bermuda emerges in spring of 2002. Then continue to
monitor after weeds are under control.
Reviewer/Inspector Name Pat Hooper 252-946-6481 Martin McL.awhorn
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

05103101 Continued
Facility Number: 40-55 Date of Inspection 12/11/2001
Odor ls-mes
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the: lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the [lush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanenthemporary cover?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
"Waste analysis dated 12-10-01 nitrogen is 2.1 lbs/1000 gallons
9-24-01 nitrogen is 1.3 lbs/1000 gallons
7-3-01 nitrogen is 1.7 lbs/1000 gallons
"Soils test dated 3-05-01. Lime was applied at recoimnended rates from soil test. Sample #4 for coastal bermuda pasture required 1.5
tons lime per acre and lime requirements were met. Zinc and copper within acceptable range.
*Lagoon level is recorded weekly.
*Waste plan dated 12-11-01 with overall PAN deficit 967.70 lbs.
*Be sure to use most current waste analysis when calculating MR2 balances.
"IRR2 records are complete and balanced,
J

h* + 4 ;n ` • _ . (� .t - /_ _ i r f"- �70V�Rlor. a
- r CSar• � :,tf j. r.t, i+: �,.: � S''� Wi8lii G. Ross, Jr..
a �;,,��• :+_ ' :«� Department d i`nwrorsment and Natural Rest r {
r 9:�j, 3'� �y,}V9, - '_+r �� +- MS. ' 4' t �, , •r5-44,>'- S -%^ 1� J.ps •i�+ - fi `,' {�I• a �f :"
Kw T"•`. .�r Y_.l
. Stevens .
Division ii Water puaGty
To: Producer
From: Daphne B. Cullom
Environmental Specialist
Washington Regional Office
Subject: Animal Compliance Inspection
Year 2001
Enclosed please find a copy of the Compliance Site inspection (as viewed in the DWQ database) conducted at the referenced
facility by the Division of Water Quality from the Washington Regional Office. Please read this inspection and keep it
with all other documents pertaining to your animal operation for future inspections.
In general, these inspections included verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP);
(2) the farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC 2H.02I7, Senate Bill 1217, and the Certified Animal
Waste Management Plan; (3) the farm operation's waste management system is being operated properly under the -direction of a
Certified Operator, (4) the required records are being kept; and (5) there are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or runoff.
As a reminder, please note the following comments, which are conditions of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan and
the General Permit; therefore, these items must be implemented:
cp The maximum waste level in lagoons/storage ponds snail not exceed that specified in the CAWMP. At a minimum,
maximum waste level for waste for lagoonslstarage ponds must not exceed the level that provides adequate storage to
contain 25 year, 24 hour storm event plus an additional foot of structural freeboard
cp An analysis of the liquid animal waste from the lagoon shall be conducted as close to the time of application as practical and
at least within 60 days (before or after) of the date of application. This analysis shall include the following parameters:
Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Zinc and Copper.
(p Soil analysis is required annually. Lime is to be applied to each receiving crop as recommended by the soil analysis.
(p The following records are required: off -site solids removal, maintenance, repair, waste/soil analysis and land irrigation
records. These records should be maintained by the facility owner/manager in chronological and legible form for a
minimum of three vears.
cp Land application rates shall be in accordance with the CAWMP. In no case shall land application rates exceed the Plant
Available Nitrogen (PAN) rate for the receiving Crop or result in runoff' during anv Given application. T
cp All grassed waterways shall have a stable outlet with adequate capacity to prevent ponding or flooding damages. The outlet
can be another vegetated channel, an earth ditch, stabilization structure, or other suitable outlets.
( It is suggested, not a requirement, to keep crop yield information for future use to update your waste management plan.
You will need three years of crop yield data before your plan can be updated.
For your information, any swine facility that has a discharge to surface waters of the State will have to apply for a National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit with the Division of Water Quality, effective January 1, 2001.
Thank you for your assistance and cooperation during the inspection. If you have any questions, please contact me at 252-946-
6481, ext. 321 or your Technical Specialist:
Cc: 'YxRO
DBC Files
943 Washington Square !Shall Washington, NC 27889 252-946-6481 (Telephone) 252-94Cr9215 (Fax)

2� +1 Dnof Water Qiis 5
tv)aiin
Division of Sofa and Water Conservation 'x
�Ns.• yD.1 y-s�. O,0Cr ��p
�: b-� J
,. v z %Ms 4 " rr +, uw. y as
r xnr x ntv.s,:- Ya'. RS�,,'.
Type of Visit OO Compliance Inspection Q Operation Review Q Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
i Facility Numher AO SS Date of Visit; Time; 3-27-2tN11 12:00 pm
I O Not Operational 0 Belau' Threshold
0 Permitted 0 Certified C) Conditionally- Certified ❑ Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ..................
Farm Name: 11011A.1 UR.EArm................... .............. C.ounty:.�r1t==.................................. 1�i'.�tR,{�........
............................................................ . .............
OwnerName: ............. . .................................. L.LMU1hrey.Hog..Co...................... Phone Nip: .753:S3.Ga....................................................................
Mailing Address: 9.'.�t7dl�t1CS1-��lAi�laS.Rflidltl..... _.................................................... EarMAAC.N.C......................................................... 27.NZ8 ..............
FacilityContact: ...............................................................................Title:............................................................... Phone No: ....................................................
Onsite Representative: Dam is.Zc&man..5ojriya.BarbAr......................................... integrator, L.LMmrph et..Cu...............................................
Certified Operator: Jake ........................................ B.arrow....................... ...................... Operator Certiiicution Number: 166.11 ............................
Location of Farm: .
I�
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude Longitude • U J==
i Design Current Design 'Current Design Current I
. Swine Capacity PopulatioPoultry Capacity PopulationCattle Capacity Population �
r
r
l
1
I
�❑ Wean to Feeder
M Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
2600
2600
❑ Farroxv to Feeder
�❑ Farrow- to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
❑ Laver ❑ Da
in'
1❑ Non -Laver J❑ Non -Dais° i
❑ other
Total Design Capacity 2,600 t
f
Total SSLW - 1,125,800 }
Number of Lagoons .� ® Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Areu IMSprity Field Area
Holding Po A L;Solid Traps '� ❑ No Liquid Waste Management S,%stern
Diwhar`,ues & Stream Impacts
1. 1s any discharge obsenled from an), part of the operation? Ej Yes EI No
Discharge or•igurated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If disci wee is observed, was the con`vevance elan -made? fD Yes ❑ No
b. U'discharge iG obs :rued. did ii reacl; Water of the State" 0f } C . ootiA- D\X,Qj ❑ Yes ❑ No
;,- Il. discharge is oh;er'ed- what is the estimated #ton° in gal/min'
d. Doos discharge hypash a lagoon.•stem? (ll'ves. notify DN,'Q)
2. is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes ❑ No
D Yes L No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? Yes Z{ No

u1ju.ful
Fac[11 Number. 40-55
Date of Inspection 3-27-2001
Continued
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ........._--•................ ...-.—.............. ................. ................. ... ..............
Froeboard2 ............. _.__.._.._............................................._...._.................._..................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?" (ie/ trees, severe erosion
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid.level
elevation markings?
Waste. Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Graze) Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Small Grain Overseed
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes 9 No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes [K, No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? U Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
g No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
17- Are rocl; outcrops present?
❑ Yes
❑ No
18. Is there a n•ater sappy, well within 250 feet of the s-prayiield boundan-? ❑ Unknown
;J Yes
❑ No
❑ On -site ❑ Orr site
Reouired Records & Documents
19. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
® No
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
® No
21. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
® No
22. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
® No
23. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
® No
24. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems. over application)
❑ Yes
0 No
25. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
g No
26. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
9 No
27. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
® No
Odor lames
28. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
❑ Yes
No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
29. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
No

01/01/01
FacHity Number. 40--55 Date of Inspection 3-27-2QU1
30. Is there arty evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
31. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
32. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan bells. missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
33. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
34. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
Conj�'pued
Printed on: 4/11=01
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
❑ Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
*WA Certification received byDWQ on 2-22-2001.
*Good vegetation established on lagoon dike walls. Well maintained.
4. Freeboard level adequate. Freeboard levels maintained per General Permit.
15. Receiving crop of small grain looks good; reminder to harvest prior to heading of small grain to prevent shading of Coastal Bermuda for
weed management.
21. Waste analysis 1-18-01, 1.7 lbs./I000 gals.; Soil analysis 3-5-01; lime being applied at time of inspection. Irrigation records complete
with no overapplication noted.
23. Note: If Mr. Beaman is overseeing all of the irrigation activities, it is suggested that he be designated as this faciltiy's certified operator
in charge, to ensure that the responsibilities of the OIC for this facility are fulfilled.
you have any questions and/or need further quidance. please call me at [phone], ext. 321 or LN111 Hardison at exit. 318.
Reviewer/Inspector Name D,
loin
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: j l.. t 1 V V 8 Date: 4-11—

IType of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation I
Reason for Visit OO Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 40 gg Datc of Visit: 10r261Z0o0 Time. 945 Printed on: 3127I2001
O Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
E3 Permitted ❑ Certified [3 Conditionally Certified E3 Registered Date Last Operated c►r Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: Holloman.]FA= ............................................................................................ County: iar"Ite............................................... . .a,RQ........
.........................................................................
OwnerName:................ ................................... Jl,.L.Mmrphny.,Uap,.C% ..................... Phone No: 7.51-53.6.1 ....................................................................
Facility Contact: .............................................................................. Title: ............... Phone No:
Mailing Address: 39.VAadKard-..1ka ta&.Rua,d.......................................................... FAMville.NC........................................................ 27M .............
Onsite Representative: AlCnnia.BrapnoW5.onya.BArbcr........................................... Integrator: L L.b2LtIMhroy..Co................................................
Certified Operator:lake........................................ Harro x............................................. Operator Certification Number: .16.6U.............................
Location of Farm:
®Swine ❑ poultry
❑ Cattle
❑ Horse Latitude �°
�� �46 Longitude �° �4
-
Design
Current ...
Design Current,,
Design Current
Swine :; :. '_:....:Ca
sett
..
: 'Poult
Po � ulation _ , .. r3:` ......::.Ca
:::...... ,:.::.
act : Pa t,lation .. Cattle
Ca acit ` Po ulation..:'
❑Wean to Feeder
❑Layer
❑Dairy
❑Feeder to Finish
;'
❑ Non -Layer
Non -Dairy
® Farrow to Wean
2600
1600
❑ Farrow to Feeder
::
❑Other
❑Farrow to Finish
Total Des, n Ca aci
i P tY '
2,fiQtJ
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars _..
-
?
::......... T4t�l ssLw
1,125,800
Disc�es & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes M No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a, If discharge is observed. was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes ❑ Na
b. 1.1'discharge is observed, dial it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ) [:]Yes ❑ No
c. II'discharge is observed- what is the estimated flow it] gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a. lagoon system? (If yes. notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes M No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes M No
Waite Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes M No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
ldcutificr:................................... .......................... ...........
Freeboard (inches):...............43................

5/00
Facility Number: 40-55 Date of Inspection 10/26/2000 Printed on
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, ete.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do anv of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelimprovement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gaugers markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Small Grain Overseed Coastal Bermuda (Graze)
Continued on back
3/27/2001
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
® Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
OR No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes X No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, cte.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
•No violatibris:6r:defici6ncies-were;noted:duHitg tliis`visit:; You will:receive no further:
0 :
' correspondence about this.visit.'
.Coastal fields need weed control.
Waste plan dated 6/18/99,
Waste analysis dated 9/25/00. Nitrogen is 1.7 lbs/1000 gallons.
Soil test dated 4/28/00. Be sure to follow lime requirements which are greater than one ton per acre.
Lagoon level being recorded weekly as required by permit.
Records are well organized.
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
►•I
Reviewer/Inspector Name �� � 1' � _ it i' .Try ". �1.. 1�.;1� �, `!1 ati" "� it ,al ,; r! "? , r�:.', E TS 4 "F I

Division of Water Quality
O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 40 55 Date of Visit: 6-21-2000 Time; 10:23 am Printed on: 7/3/2000
Not O erational O Below Threshold
® Permitted M Certified Q Conditionally Certified (3Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:.. ....................
Farm Name: 110),lomix.harm................................
County: G.rcame............................................... WaliO........
OwnerName: ._ ................................................ L.L Millxpltrey..Hog.CA,,.................... Phone No: 7.5.�:5�4.1....................................................................
FacilityContact: .............................................................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
Mailing Address: 39..Y..ajadiiQxd.Th.QMA1.Bead.......................................................... F.8jrmyill�e..N ............................ ... 2.. 81&.............
.........................
OnsiteRepresentative: ,R>x01S. �alplalAs. Qlnya. A�bieA......................................... Integrator: L.L.HurPhra..C.Q...............................................
Certified Operator:j.alte......................................... )1arrom............................................. Operator Certification Number:.1.66.11..............................
Location of Farm: _
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑Florae Latitude �• �� r.��+ Longitude �• �� �u
Design Current
Swine Canacitv Pnnulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
® Farrow to Wean
2600
2430
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer I I ❑Dairy
❑ Non -Layer I I❑Non-Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 2,600
Total SSL,W 1,125,800
Number of Lagoons r�� ® Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ® Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps �� ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Dischnrees & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: .............................................................................. ..................................................
.......................... .........................
Freeboard (inches): 45
❑ Yes ® No
Structure 6

Continued on back
Faeility Nhmber: 40-55 Date of Inspection 1 6-21-2000 1 Printed on: 7/3/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ®No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ® No
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Small Grain Overseed
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ®No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
0' �Vo�yiolatitiris:or deficien�cies•were�n:oted �d�uriing• this t::Ytiu: will:receive no further
.. correspondence about this.viA .... • ... • ...... .. ... .
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes IN No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
Comments (refer to question ##): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations, (use additional pages as necessary):
Waste Analysis - 5/24/00, 2.2 lbs./1000gals.
Soil Analysis - 4/28/00
Irrigation records complete with a nitrogen balance. Freeboard records maintained per General Permit requirements.
*Design part of CAWMP. J I
Reviewer/Inspector Name I'Daphne B. Cullom

Reviewer/inspector Signature: Date:
w-
Facility Number: 40-55 Date of Inspection 6-21-2000 !Tinted on: 7/3/2000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28.
Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
❑ Yes
® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29.
Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
❑ Yes
® No
30.
Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
❑ Yes
® No
31.
Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
❑ Yes
® No
32.
Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes
❑ No

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, -Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
July 6,1999
L.L. Murphrey Hog Co.
Rt 1 Box 242
Farmville NC 27828
IT 1 0 •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: Compliance Inspection
HoIloman Farm
Facility Number 40 - 55
Greene County
Dear L.L. Murphrey Hog Co.,
On 6/21/99, Carl Dunn from the Washington Regional Office of the Division of Water Quality
conducted an inspection of your animal operation. Please review the enclosed inspection form. This
inspection form should be maintained as part of the. records for your facility. Please note any items that
may marked with a yes answer and make every effort to correct these deficiencies. You are advised
that you must maintain a freeboard of at least one foot in your lagoon(s) plus a storage volume sufficient
to accommodate the rainfall and subsequent runoff from a 25 year 24 hour storm event to remain in
compliance. You should consult your lagoon design for the exact freeboard requirement. Please
remember that you must follow your waste management plan at all times.
Thank you for your cooperation in this inspection. If you have any further questions in regard to this
matter or if I may be of any assistance, I can be contacted at [phone] ext. 208.
Sincerely,
Carl Dunn
Environmental Engineer
cc: WaRO
L L Murphrey Co.
943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, NC 27889 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer pager

0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Operation Review
© Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Compliance Inspection
■ Division of Water Quality - Compliance Inspection
0 Other Agency - Operation Review
149-Routine Q Complaint Q Follow-up of DWQ inspection Q Follow-up of DSWC review Q Other
Facility Number 40 55 Date of Inspection 6/21/99
Time of Inspection 8:30 24 hr. (hh:mm)
■ Permitted © Certified 0 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Mot Operation Date Last Operated: ..........................
Farm Name: Holm[llaxt.Farm..............................................
County: Crec7ue............................................... WARO........
Owner Name: ................................................... LL.lVUrPhra-Hog.Co,,.................... Phone No: 7.5.3-52ift....... I ... I ............... .........................................
FacilityContact:.............................................................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
MailingAddress: lit..1..j3.Q&2.4.2.......................................................................................... F8x=yU1V..N.0 ........................................................ VU& .............
Onsite Representative: ,Idlte.ZOJCro.IY............................................................................... Integrator: L.L.Hur.099y..CRti..............................................
Certified Operator:,lajke......................................... B&rrp.w ............................................. Operator Certification Number:1.6AI.1.............................
Location of Farm:
a
i
T ,
Latitude �° �� ��� Longitude �° �4 46
Swine
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Population Poultry capacity Population
❑ Layer
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
® Farrow to Wean
2600
2300
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑Gilts
1
❑ Boars
L:�
❑ Other
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Dairy
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
2,600
1,125,800
Number of Lagoons ® Subsurface Drains Present 110 Lagoon Area IN Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (1f yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes to No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(inches): ............... 2& ............... .................................... ................................... .................................... .................................... ....................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back
Printed nn 612t1121100

Printed on 6/20/2000
Facility Number: 44-55 Date of Inspection 6/21149
6. Are there structures on -site which are.not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Yes ® No
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Coastal Bermuda (Graze) Small Grain
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ®No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ®No
Renuired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes ® No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes ®No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes ®No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes ® No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes ® No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes ❑ No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes ® No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes ®No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes ® No
Nowiolations:or de iiddi. cies•wer . oted "d.'uriiig- this AMC,' Yoa' will receive po further '
correspondence about this.visit.
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
Reviewer/Inspector Name iCarl Dunn Entered by Ann Tyndall
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

■ Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Operation Review
Cl Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Compliance Inspection
13 Division of Water Quality - Compliance Inspection
Other Agency - Operation Review
Routine OComplaint Q Follow-u of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review Q Other
Facility Number 40 55 Date of Inspection 1 4/28/99
Time of Inspection F-8-30­1 24 hr. (hh:mm)
® Permitted ® Certified Q Conditionally Certified Registered 113 Not O erational Date Last Operated: ..........................
FarmName: HAJloxuxt.JArm......................................................................................... ... County: Guejac .............................................. W..aR0........
Owner Name: ]. L,.Xulrphrey..Hag..Co,,.................... Phone No: 2�2-25�.:S�b�1.............................. .............................
Facility Contact: JAlitBArJrow........................... ..Title: Phone No:...................................................
...........................................................
Mailing Address: it.1.&X 292..........................................................................................>FarjtlY.illle.NC........................................................ VMS .............
Onsite Representative: CjjgrjC5.j),ArJ.QW........................................................................ Integrator: L.L1Y.1.uJrVItrrY..CQM};It1y..................................
Certified Operator:jajkg........................................ Harro x............................................. Operator Certification Number:16ie11.............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude a 6 66 Longitude ' 6 �u
Design Current
Swine Canacitv Ponulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
® Farrow to Wean
2600
2300
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer FE] Non-Dai
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 2,600
Total SSLW 1,125,800
Number of Lagoons L...J ® Subsurface Drains Present 1101,ngoonArea IN Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ®No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ®No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: #1
Freeboard(inches): ............... 24 ............... ..................................... ................................... .................................... .................................... ....................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back
Printed an fi=12=

Printed on 6/20/2000
Facility Number: 40-55 Date of Inspection 4/28/99
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
❑ Yes
® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
®No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
❑ Yes
® No
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Graze) Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Small Grain Overseed
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
®No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
® Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
®No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
® No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
® No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
® Yes
❑ No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
® No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
® No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
IN No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
®No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes ® No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ®'No
�' No•violatigris:o'r deficiencies•we�-e_noted :duriing•tliis •v�slt::'Y'oa_rvill;receive np further
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
* Recommend signing up for local Neuse Rule options by 8/1/99 with the Greene Soil & Water Conservation District +
* Given Integrator Registration card
* Last waste sample dated 2/17/99 at 1.4 Ibs/1000 gal.
* Keeping weekly lagoon levels as required by Permit.
* According to design, stop pumping elevation is 45 inches down from top of marker
7. Low areas on dike walls have been filled and shaped
14b. Operation is subject to a wettable acre determination - all spray fields exceed 75% rule. Once wettable acres are determined,
plan will need to be amended to a wettable acre basis. Winter annual code for field 4 needs to be changed to small grain overseed oL
Reviewer/Inspector Name Pat Hooper 252/946-6481
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

Printed on 6/20/2000
Facility Number: 40-55 Date of Inspection 41Z8199
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ❑ No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ❑ No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ❑ No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ❑ No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
15. Small grain overseed needs to be removed by end of month (PAN rate is 50 lbs/acre)
19. Last soil test report dated I M 3/97 - soil samples taken February 1999 but has not received results - need to be taken annually
Printed on 6120/2000

Date of Inspection
Facility Number
Time of Inspections 24 hr. (hh:mm)
0 Registered Certified © Applied for Permit L'l Permitted 113 Not O erational Date Last Operated:..........................
Farm Name: .........`i-l� �Or? .S?X�,.......1..4 4'3'......................................................... County:...,.. .�.�,..................... .
Owner Name: t �p /l
L....:.. ...:....U.Sl1 J�,► Y 1. Qa. Phone No: ���aA..........................................
. .:........... ........... ...........................
FacilityContact:............. ..... &�......... Title: ........................ I .............. I ........................ Phone No:...................................................
�� ........................... Mailing Address:...............'.- .a .. VVI. �►A.. ..,
16
aa�,,
OnsiteRep resentative:. ' Integrator:.....U:..� * ...... .......
......................................... .. f... .. YYlUV.
Certified Operator; ................................................... ........................... Operator Certification Number,........�7
Location of Farm:
Latitude .�• L_rr_r _ J` l ��s Longitude �• ����
Design Current
Swme Capacity :Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ F der to Finish
B'Farrow to Wean
Z(p(DO
aOQ
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
,
Number of Lagoons 1 Holding Ponds Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field Area
r ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System , r
.,
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
``
,,�No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
Q No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaUrnin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
'' No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes
EfNo
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
❑ Yes
R No
maintenancelimprovement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
El Yes
No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes
L KO'
7/25/97
Continued on Lack

LE acility Number: 4� —
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed'?
❑ Yes , o
Structures (Lagoons,11olding Ponds, Flush Pits. etc.)
9. is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3
Identifier:
..............................................................................................................
Freeboard (ft): ...... . jj�RS.a,n.: ..............
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes Ga-KO
Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed'?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
..............................................................................
❑ Yes &Ko
Cl Yes E o
❑ Yes Ga",N"O
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑ Yes tyQ,vo
Waste -Annlic•ation 'Ye
Ltd��
14. Is there physical evidence of over application'? s ❑ No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters. of the State. notify D^WQQ))
15. 44 �..L .�Q ?vC1IS ,.,f.................. �f��'1..r.........................................................................
Crop type ............ }............. U
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑ Yes E' O
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
Q-<o
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
21 No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment'?
❑ Yes
��
E;Y o
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
callo
21. Did Rev iewer/lnspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
No
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
El Yes
,�
�yd'lvo
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
[R Nvoo
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
jy�No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
0 No.violations or deficiencies were noted'during this.visrt..You4ill receive no further
correspondence aihoitt this visit:,
Cnmtnents (refer to question #): Explain any YES ans`vvers and/or any recommendations or any other comments ri i 4
Use drawings of facility to better explain
-situations, (us' additional Pages as necessary
t a .i vt vas :dLe 6 ���¢. vial n] `tb D�
a� a-
IC)�c1- I q
Ll I SA , (0A)
7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name 57
t.F
ReviewerAnspector Signature: -&—m—doyn Date:

❑ D WC Animal Feedlot Operation Review q
Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection i s l p p ,.
I4FRoutitte O Complaint O Follow-un of DWO inspection O Follow-urs of I)SWC review O Other
Date of inspection tD—fa--`1
Facility Number. �O Time of Inspection 1 =C�gW1 24 hr. (hh:mm)
0 Registered 44 ��C}}errrti`fied 13 Applied
.�for
. Permit Permitted CJ Not Operational Date Last Operated..............., .............
Farm Name: `t-Ct) l t�tYlQ1 V1..........► 3!.. County �,�+r�tt .. ;!�'�!�'�'
...... ...... .....
Owner Name:........... - :.-.:.,....LJt`n!`�l? ... 4 ?.,......... Phone No:....('�.� 5�....�........................
Facility Contact: ...��-?. ........ 1�r 4h�.Q�?.. Title: ...........................'............ .... Phone No: ...................................................
Mailing Address: + �..,,...., E-rJl.1 vvlN Lt'_ Qc, F782 .. I ............... i ........,.t.....,................................... .........
I.
-yam ..
Onsite Representative..........�,]m.�, ,1LQ,,. Intel orator :............. .
``�� ... ........................
Certified Operator;.......,,,.�j., ]q, �� q,�... ....... Operator Certification Number;....... iO. .. . ......................... .... .
Location offarm;
1SYe..�...�........... .�.................................................................................................................................................................... .............................
Iv ... .. ....................................................... .............................................................................I...................I........
Latitude ®' L 64 Longitude ©• ©4 ©44
Swine Capacity Population
Wean to Feeder
Fe der to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Dion -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other 7771
Total Design Capacity I a t"pp
Total SSLW 1 I 1 ZS
Number of Lagoons 1 Holding Ponds ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
&/NNo
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation'?
❑ Yes
2<0
Discharge ori,inated at; ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a, If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b. If dischar-u is observed. did it reach Surface Water'? (II' yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flaw in galhnin?
d, Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
El Yes
❑ No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation`'
❑ Yes
M No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge'?
❑ Yes
+(J/ No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
❑ Yes
[ZNo
maintenance/improvement?
G. is facility in
IN,
not compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
B
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
❑ Yes
7/25/97 Continued on back

Facility Number: —
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed'? ❑ Yes
Structures (Lagoons,Holdine Ponds Flush fits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes M.Al0—
Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
...................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (ft): ..... tj,........ ...........
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes B O
l 1..Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed'? ❑ Yes z No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes 21<0
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑ Yes ;, o
VVaste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes 6Q No
(If in excess of WMP, or runo entering waters of the State, otify DWQ)
15. Crap type Q� li. vvtl�JC' !O..r............................................ .. ...........................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)'? ❑ Yes L 1<01
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes GR<o
t8. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes (40
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? ❑ Yes I"No
20, Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes ON-
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes 05o
22. Does record keeping need improvement'? ❑ Yes fi?'�o
For Certified or Perntifled Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑ Yes 92*'�o
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes U� l�o
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit? ❑ Yes 0<0
0 No violations or deliciencie's4ere noted touring this.. visit. :You,will receive -no further..
correspondence about this:visit.-:.
Comments (refer:to question #): Explain:any YES answers and/or any recommendations or:any.'other comments.
hY
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
U 6t-e. AAaV
;S54
eo t�.t 5 - Cs�-o�. ,z —L wa;to-.
.sue ,ems e- Wt
7/25/97
T
. ..,..Y .. _- -.-,. .. ... ,,..... "N...._,... .. ,.. ....a .,,...,,.. �_.,
Reviewer/Inspector Name 1
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: tO -7 q%

Division of Soil and Water Conservation p Other Agency
p Division of Water Quality
ou ine p Compiaint p Follow-up of DWQ inspection p Follow-up of DSWC review p Other
Date of Inspection 11/17/97-1
Facility Number
Time of Inspection ® 24 hr. (hh:mm)
p Registered ■ Certified p Applied for Permit 0 Permitted In Not Op=Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: HnllomaaEarm ..................... County: Greene WaRO
OwnerName:... ................................................ L..L..Murphrey. Hog.Co.................... Phone No: .7.S.1-S3.61....................................................................
Facility Contact: ,lake..Barrow...................................................Title: C)peralians.Manager................... Phone No: 9191.751-53.61........................
MailingAddress: Rt.1..lox.242.......................................................................................... Far axilleAC........................................................ 27828 .............
Onsite Representative: Jake.Barraw..Brian.Shaekleford..................................... Integrator: L.L.Murphxey..Hog.Copt}tatty........................
Certified Operator: Jake ........................................ Barrm ............................................. Operator Certification Number:16611.............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude 0 4 44 Longitude a 6 «
Design - Current.; µ esign Current Design: 77urrent
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
p Wean to Feeder
p Feeder to mis
® Farrow to can
13 Parrow to Feeder
p Farrow to Fmis
[3 Gilts
p Boars
p ayer .,. E3 Dairy
p Non -Layer " p Non -Dairy
. p Other n
Totah Design Capacity, 2,600
Total SSLW:. 4
Number of Lagoons / Holding Ponds, ®Subsurface Drains Present 11[3 Lagoon Area IN spray Field Area
... Liquid
age System
o i Waste Management .
t-.cncrai
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? p Yes N No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'? p Yes ® No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes H No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) Cl Yes N No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? p Yes ® No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require Cl Yes ® No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? p Yes ® No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? [3 Yes ® No
7/25/97

Facility Number: 40_55
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures La oons,Holdine Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
13 Yes ® No
p Yes N No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
...................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (ft): 2.6
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(if any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(if in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ...... C,aastal.H.e muda.(hay.)..............Small.Grain.UYersead..................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
Q .. •o •via tons.or eiencies'were.na a during is Vis>< . You will.receive norfurther.,.
,gOtesp6niderie� riW t3iis�v1AV - . • .
p Yes ® No
p Yes N No
N Yes Cl No
p Yes N No
13 Yes H No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
omments,(re er to ques'tioi ' ). xp aiwa�n'' , answers an cai or any renmen ations or any othcer comments: '.
Use drawings'of faeilitytu better explain sitnatiot s: (use additional pages ai necessary):
Subsurface drain the present in front fields; tile removed during construction in lagoon area
12. Need some shaping near irrigation pump and hydrant to divert storm water - problem does not pose a threat to structure
* Need to secure irrigation system's operating information (parameters)
11/17/97
Reviewertinspector Name Fit -Hooper
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

i..
j .�-
fw t 1,
Division oWater Conservation Other Agency E
Division of Water Quality
�j�r 0
■
Routine1 0 Complaint 0 11ohow-up of DWQ inspection ^0 Pollow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection�1
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
p Registered N Certified p Applied for Permit 0 Permitted 10 Not Operationa Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: JRWWman..l?.art i............................................................................................. County: Greene WaRO
OwnerName: ................................................... L..L..Marpbxey..Hog.Go.................... Phone No:.751-5341 ....................................................................
Facility Contact: .................................................... ...Title: .... Phone No:
MailingAddress., RU..Rox.242.......................................................................................... Farm.villeM......................................................... 2782R ..............
OnsiteRepresentative: Jake.Barraw.............................................................................. Integrator:.......................................................................................
Certified Operator: Jake ........................................ Rarriaw ............................................. Operator Certification Number: 16i61.1.............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude ©• ©' ®66
esign u
Swisic. y'CAp&iciity "Popi
iSieef _ z c_2 td_
Longitude ©• ®� ®��
kresign urren F 4 esr
Poi}^ry v, 'Ca acit � ;'Po pulation- j`' Cattle ,, , .Capps
� 3st., ., ..ult.,�'.,.r b�4 ..-.p �',
,a.{
13 Wean to Feeder
r3 Feeder to mis
® Farrow to can
13 Farrow to ee er
p Farrow to Finis
p Gilts
p Boars
on-
fif 1— 1 1 � � -•-`,i _
Totalbesign�
-T t
' C , .;f yap r :S."
i 1 1'K
s'
SCity
;LW 1,125,800
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? p Yes ® No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes p No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes p No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) yes p No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? p Yes ® No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/bolding ponds) require 13 Yes ® No
maintenance/improvement?
6. is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? t3 Yes ® No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? p Yes ® No
7/25/97

Facility Number: 40_55
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
13 Yes
N No
Structures Lagoons,Holding Ponds, Flush Pits. etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
p Yes
®No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5 Structure
6
Identifier:.............................................................................................................................................
...................................................................
Freeboard (ft): 38 in.
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
p Yes
N No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
p Yes
N No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
p Yes
® No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
p Yes
® No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
p Yes
® No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type Coastal. ormu�da..Grass............................... Rye ......................... ......................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management flan (AWMP)? p Yes H No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
is .. o•via ions -or dencies•were-no a zOgg fps vlsl . ion wl .receive nafurther,,,
: ee�es�iopde�iee a
p Yes N No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
0 Yes ®No
Comme�itsR(re er #o q�"estion+#) zp am any°YES t#nswers;and or:any�recomtnetidahpps ar, alit' other cq�me is � "
Use
tea vangst if-facilit to better explaia situat4aus (use idditiotlal,pages`astttecessair ; o ;A
.: .n4 k,...,.x2 ..x .t . yyq. Jbr......w^ '-. Ps - _ b 'a. $• JMt f�.k+. .a:. �3 p..TL...9.�. e.1.., rv!._.
--- - -
II
A�
" t9yAlW .. '' •si i.'ap t - gya
' red` �' "
r�
.. e. Taxi.
`
oven o e c to anagemen
plan are complete„" i crib aF I
'g •o � o tti,q '� it�p en ' ce r. ,,
,3,� r,�u, �,
`
P
co 'ti ns otbe t dim '
aste�lM agemen 11re geneilexmat, reface thes t s ;
`�
ee i its 1
_ 0 h} d • i�o �i ,t lo�,�,
Reviewer/Inspector Name Dap"p nF C-cu'llom� , r a�4j ,A e
�:1
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: 0 VVA Date: b �� _ C17

raclikty wumner: 40_55 Date of Inspection

Site Requires Immediate Attention: 'YfS
Facility No. 4�2 -SS--
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT.
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: , 1995
Time: 9 ,4 n,
Farm Name/Owner: Z " L • MvW1re.J lL%
Mailing Address:
County: r�
Integrator. Phone:
On Site Representative: Phone: _ Za =,s36 /
Physical Address/Location: Lb- lvka A� of 51? / 30
�a r o, , �s � �' Yse� -� ✓ S'� 3I o
Type of Operation: Swine Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: 2-6 Oo -w*4")�umber of Animals on Site: x 1 so s
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: 35- 3i ' -" Longitude: =' _4 — 0-3 Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches) Yes oo Actual Freeboard: - L - Ft. O Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or No Was any erosion observed? Yes or No .
Is adequate Iand available for spray? C&or No Is the cover crop adequate? �r No
Crop(s)being utilized:
r��d�
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from DweUingsz:9 or No
100 Feet from Wells?9 or No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or No
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes or
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes 03� If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? es r No
Additional Comments: f'+'x i rri a g' 6' _ 5v c — �'ra�e�r'�y
n _ �
Inspector Name Sign e
cc: Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed.

-rf-Dlo-�
08%
O/y--z