400047_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environmental Quaff

1
4
Division of Water Resources
` acility Number ®- © O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency k
Type of Visit: • Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review O Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: /f`—/'� Arrival Time: Q ; Departure Time: County:_ Region:
Farm Name:
Owner Name:
'Z
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:Title:
Onsite Representative:�L9�2/
Certified Operator:
67
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
0
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Other
Owner Email:
Phone: rig w _ %Y9 ` 2;Zjp! 3
Phone:
Integrator:]
Certification Number: 512 Zf rd '
Certification Number:
Latitude: Longitude:
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Layer
Non -La er
rou
Non-L
Pullets
Other
Design Current
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? _
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Bcef Brood Cow
❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes [z�No
❑ Yes �(No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

S
lFacility Number: #0 - Date of Inspection: 5
I
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. if yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in): 3d
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes 6No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? [:]Yes dNo [] NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes TdNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes 2 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes 5No 0 NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [�'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):2
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
o
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
YNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
o
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
M"No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
[] Yes
r�lo
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
FiNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists [:]Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ElYes 1� No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

i
Facili Number: - Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ';10%�_ ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25, Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes D3 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below. WAS
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey []Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes �(No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes M No
❑ NA
❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes E2t/No
❑ NA
❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32, Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34, Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
[] Yes E�Z No
❑ Yes V/No
❑ Yes E2�No
[:]Yes V
o
❑ Yes o
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional cages as necessarv).
13r1��1.�1
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
v`2d 1d—
Phone: OZ5g-7'3�7 9,RIL�
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: 7 Date: '`MZ%
Page 3 of 3 21412015

,* Division of Water Resources
. Facility Number - 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
.0 Other Agency /0"__
Type of Visit: l® Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: e Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: / .I-T Arrival Time: v Departure Time: County: Region:
Farm Name: a"" J 1__4 y Owner Email:
Owner Name: j � 4z� Phone: _9s;9 —
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: Title:
61/
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Boars
Other
Other
Latitude:
Integrator: j6L AL ..
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
H1 Layer
Non -La er
Design Current
Dry Poultry Capacity Pop.
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
I. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Longitude:
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
.Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
❑ Yes M o ❑ NA ❑ NE
D Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes o
❑ Yes No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facili •+Number: jDate of Ins ection: — S
VWaste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes dNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. if yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes IdNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environment threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes rNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures
require ❑ Yes dN o
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground
❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs, ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure
to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into
Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift
❑ Application Outside of/Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): G /a,T�.� 7 %yi�./00 cS,U = l�4
G,e —/Y ASd
13. Soil Type(s):
14.
Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
o
❑ NA
❑ NE
15.
Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
Y/No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16.
Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
rNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17.
Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
o
❑ NA
❑ NE
18.
Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required
Records & Documents
19.
Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage &Permit readily available?
❑Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? if yes, check
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ WUP ❑Checklists [:]Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21.
Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
d No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑
Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Weather
Code
❑
Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute inspections ❑Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑ Sludge Survey
22.
Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
o
❑ NA
❑ NE
23.
If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page 2 of 3
21412015 Continued

Facili ITNumber: - Date of Inspection: /
�YNo
2�t. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?,�/�
❑ Yes o
❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance wi h permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check
❑ Yes
❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below. J)_e1X f C_�-Q /
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes o
❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
❑ Yes YNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
❑ Yes No
❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air duality concern?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately,
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes U
No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes L o
❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes o
❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes dNo
❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
ReviewerAnspector Signatui
Page 3 of 3
Phone: ZD 3�
Date:
21412015

;\SA
PAT MCCRORY
l lfirmam
AN,
h1ater Resources
t_N YI R ON ME NI AL 0 U A LI I
April 11, 2016
Renea G. Welch
Ginn Farm
3504 Wedgewood Drive
New Bern, North Carolina 28562
Subject: Notice of Deficiency - Freeboard Level
Ginn Farm #40-47
AWS 400047
Greene County
NOD-2016-PC-0061
Dear Ms. Welch:
DONA1 D R. VAN DER VAART
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
We have noted chronic rainfall events in North Carolina that are historic rainfall totals in some
areas. Thank you for your recent call regarding the freeboard levels at your facilities On
February 25, 2016, during a telephone conversation with staff of the NC Division of Water
Resources (DWR), you reported a high freeboard level (18 inches) in the primary lagoon.
Please be advised that failure to maintain waste levels in your lagoon/storage ponds in
accordance with the facility's Certified Animal Waste Management Plan and with Condition V.
2. of NC Swine Waste System General Permit could result in other actions being taken by the
Division in response to compliance matters.
Deficiency 1: On February 25, 2016, a lagoon/storage pond level was documented at 18 inches
of freeboard at the primary lagoon. A level of 19 inches is the maximum level allowed by your
permit and Certified Animal Waste Management Plan.
If you have not submitted your 30-Day Plan of Action please do so as soon as possible. Take all
necessary additional steps to insure lagoon levels remain in compliance with Section 2 of your
permit.
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Water Resources —Water Quality Regional Operations —Washington Regional Office
943 Washington Square Mail, Washington, NC 27989
252.946.6481

April 11, 2016
Ginn Farm
Cont. Page Two
Please work to ensure that your facility is managed in a way to maintain compliance with permit
and animal waste management plan requirements. Failure to comply with conditions in a permit
may result in a recommendation of enforcement action, to the Director of the Division of Water
Quality who may issue a civil penalty assessment of not more that twenty-five thousand
($25,000) dollars against any "person" who violates or fails to act in accordance with the terms,
conditions, or requirements of a permit under authority of G.S. 143-215.6A. To minimize the
potential for any possible future compliance matters attributable to prolonged wet weather
conditions, you may wish to review your animal waste management system design, as well as the
waste plan itself, for any potentially beneficial modifications and/or improvements.
1f you have any questions concerning this letter, please contact me at (252)-948-3939.
Sincerely,
David May
Water Quality Regional Operations Supervisor
Washington Regional Office
Cc: DWR-WQROS-CAFO Unit -Central Office
Greene County Soil and Water Conservation Disrict
NCDSWC - WaRO
WaRO Compliance Animal piles
mds Files

r
r
0 Division of Water Resources
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400047 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS400047
lnpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene Region:
Incident #
Owner Email:
Phone:
Date of Visit: 11/18/2014 Entry Time: 08.30 am Exit Time: 9:10 am
Farm Name: Della Ginn Farm
Owner: Renea G Welch
❑ Denied Access
Washington
252-635-1745
Mailing Address: 3504 Wedgewood Dr New Bern NC 28562
Physical Address: 763 Fort Run Rd Snow Hill NC 28580
Facility Status: Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator. Maxwell Foods Inc
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35° 28' 33" Longitude: 77° 44' 33"
Route 70 to Goldsboro. Make a right onto Wayne Memorial Drive and go past the Hospital. Take Wayne Memorial hospital
approximately 13 miles, Farm will be on right
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: James Eric Capps Operator Certification Number: 999805
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Jim Lynch Phone
On -site representative George Pettus Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis: soil tested: 2-15-13
10-10-14 = 1.08
8-744 = ,76
6-9.14 = 2.18
4-4-14 = 2.70
2-6-14 = 1.95
IRR records are complete & balanced out, with PAN remaining.
reviewed rainfall, freeboard, stocking records.
sludge survey & calibration due in 2014.
page: 1

:1
i
Permit: AWS400047 Owner - Facility : Renea G Welch Facility Number: 400047
Inspection Date: 11/18/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 2,880 2,317
Total Design Capacity: 2,880
Total SSLW: 388,800
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon #1 07/28194 19.00 45.00
page: 2

A
I
Permit: AWS400047 Owner - Facility : Renea G Welch Facility Number: 400047
Inspection Date: 11/18/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharaes & Stream Impacts
Yes
No Na No
1, Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
n
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
■ ❑
❑
b, Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
M ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■ ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
0 ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
X22 tjy Na No
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
[]
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I,e.l large
❑
❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
M ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
M ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
■ ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
M ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na Ne
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ M ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ M ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

r
V
Permit: AWS400047 Owner - Facility : Renea G Welch Facility Number: 400047
Inspection Date: 11/18/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No No No
Crop Type 1 Soybeans
Crop Type 2 Corn (Grain)
Crop Type 3 Coastal Bermuda Gross
(Hay)
Crop Type 4 Cotton
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
M ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
0 ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No No Ne
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
(] 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WU P?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below,
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWS400047 Owner - Facility : Renea G Welch Facility Number: 400047
Inspection Date: 11/18/14 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yea No Na No
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22, Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
N ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
■ ❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
■ ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
E ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■ ❑
❑
Other issues
Yes No Na No
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
0 ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
E ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
0 ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
■ ❑
❑
page: 5

0
Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400047 Facility Status: Permit: AWS40004Z _,-, ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date.
Reason for Visit: Routine _ County: Greene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 10QII2013 Entry Time: 08:35 AM Exit Time: Q2;ZQ AM
Farm Name: Della Ginn Farm _
Owner: deg G Welch
Incident #:
Owner Email:
Mailing Address: 35Q4 jNedaewood Or _ New Bern NC 28562
Physical Address: 763 Fort Run Bd Snow Hill NC 28580
Facility Status: ■ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Maxwell Foods Inc
Phone: [phone]
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°28'33" Longitude: 77°44'33"
Route 70 to Goldsboro. Make a right onto Wayne Memorial Drive and go past the Hospital. Take Wayne Memorial hospital
approximately 13 miles. Farm will be on right
Question Areas:
Dischrge & stream Impacts
Records and Documents
Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Other Issues
Certified Operator: Jason Luke Hobbs Operator Certification Number: 25246
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Jim Lynch Phone:
On -site representative Jim Lynch Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis:
10-7-13 = 1.56 soil tested: 2-2013
8-5-13 = 1.79
6-5-13 = 1.51
4-13-13 = 3.01
2-8-13 = 2.10
10-3-12 = 1.28
IRR records are complete & balanced out. Rainfall, freeboard & stocking are recorded.
Sludge survey & caliberation due in 2014. Looks Good!
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400047 Owner • Facility: Renee G Welch
Inspection Date: 10/31/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400047
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine -Feeder to Finish 2,880 2,938
Total Design Capacity: 2,880
Total SSLW: 388,800
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Type Idontifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
koon #1 M28I94 19.00 41 A0
Page: 2

f
Permit: AWS400047 Owner - Facility: Renee G Welch Facility Number : 400047
Inspection Date: 10/31/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ m ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ■
❑ ❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ 0
❑ ❑
2, Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ 0
❑ ❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than
OSO
❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No
NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
❑ ■
❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑ ■
❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ 0
❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑ ■
❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑ ■
❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes No
NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
ONO
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

C
I
Permit: AW5400047 Owner - Facility: Renea G Welch Facility Number: 400047
Inspection Date: 10/31/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
Total Phosphorus?
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
Outside of acceptable crop window?
Evidence of wind drift?
Application outside of application area?
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18, Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Records and Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
Corn (Grain)
Soybeans
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Cotton
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑■❑❑
❑1
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400047 Owner - Facility: Renee G Welch
Inspection Date: 10/31/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Records and Documents
Facility Number : 400047
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ 01111
23, If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑ MOO
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400047 Owner - Facility: Renea G Welch
Inspection Date: 10/31/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facliity Number: 400047
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Otherissues Yes No NA NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? ❑ In ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon ! Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Page: 6

Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency II----�t
Facility Number: Facility Status: Actives _ Permit: AWS400047 U Denied Access
Inspection Type: Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: County: Greene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 08/16/2012 Entry Time: 11:0Q AM Exit Time: 11:45 AM incident #:
Farm Name: Owner Email:
Owner: Renea G Welch Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 3504 We0upwood Dr flew Bern NC 28562
Physical Address: 763 Fort Buo Rd Snow Hill NC 28580
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Maxwell Foods Inc
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°28'33" Longitude: 77°44'33"
Route 70 to Goldsboro. Make a right onto Wayne Memorial Drive and go past the Hospital. Take Wayne Memorial hospital
approximately 13 miles. Farm will be on right
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Jason Luke Hobbs Operator Certification Number: 25246
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Jim Lynch Phone:
On -site representative Jim Lynch
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer
Inspector Signature.
Secondary Inspector(s):
Phone:
Phone:
Date:
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis: soil tested: 12/2011
8-6-12 = 1.16
6-7-12 = 2.8
4-10-12 = 2.5
2-13-12 = 2.4
IRr records are complete & balanced out. Rainfall, freeboard, stocking & crop yields are recorded.
SS due in 2014 & calib. due in 2012.
Looks Good!
Page: 1

r
Permit: AWS400047 owner - Facility: Renea G Welch Facility Number: 400047
Inspection Date: 08/16/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Q Swine - Feeder to Finish 2,880 2,905
Total Design Capacity: 2,880
Total SSLW: 388,800
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Type identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
agoon #1 j 07/26/94 19.00 23.50
Page: 2

Permit: AW:S400047 Owner - Facility: Renea G Welch Facility Number : 400047
Inspection Date: 0811612012 Inspection Type. Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ M ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ M ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ M ❑ ❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage $ Treatment Yes No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? 00100
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? ❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑ .
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400047 Owner • Facility: Renee G Welch
Facility Number : 400047
Inspection Date: 08/16/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Corn (Grain)
Crop Type 2
Soybeans
Crop Type 3
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 4
Cotton
Crop Type 5
Winter Annual
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Records and Documents Yes No NA N5
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP? ❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400047 Owner - Facility: Renea G Welch Facility Number : 400047
Inspection Date: 08/16/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑ ■
❑ ❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Page: 5

y
Permit: AWS400047 Owner - Facility: Renea G Welch Facility Number : 400047
Inspection Date: 08/16/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Otherlssues Yes No NA NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge, 01111111100
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon / Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
IS
Page: 6

0
e
0 Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number. 400047 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS400047 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance In§peS3ign Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine I County: Greene _ Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 09/08/2011 Entry Time: 01130 PM Exit Time: 02130 PM Incident #:
Farm Name: Qella Ginn Farm - Owner Email:
Owner: Renea G WelchL Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 3504 Wedgewood Dr _ New Bern NC 28562
Physical Address: 763 Fort Run Rd Snow Hill NC 28580
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Maxwell Foods Inc
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°28'33" Longitude: 77`44'
Route 70 to Goldsboro. Make a right onto Wayne Memorial Drive and go past the Hospital. Take Wayne Memorial hospital
approximately 13 miles. Farm will be on right
Question Areas:
© Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection $ Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other issues
Certified Operator: Jason Luke Hobbs Operator Certification Number: 25246
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary lnspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis: soil tested: 11-2010
8-1-11 = 1.2
6-1-11 = 2.9
4-1-11 = 2.7
2-1-11 = 2.7
IRR records are complete & balanced out.
Rainfall & freeboard are recorded as well as crop yield.
Looks Goodl
Date:
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400047 Owner • Facility: Renea G Welch
Inspection Date: 09/08/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400047
Reason for Visit: Rouline
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 2,880 2,880
Total Design Capacity: 2,880
Total SSLW: 388,800
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
lagoon #1 07/28/94 19.00 37.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWS400047 Owner -Facility; Renea G Welch Facility Number: 400047
Inspection Date: 09/08/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ❑ ❑ 0
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? ❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe ONOO
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? 00011
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400047 Owner - Facility: Renea G Welch
Inspection Date: 09/08/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400047
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA
NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
Q
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 3
Cotten
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑
Q
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
ONO
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
18, Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Q ■ ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400047 Owner - Facility: Renea G Welch
Inspection Date: 09/08/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Records and Documents
Facility Number : 400047
Reason for Visit: Routine
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Lease Agreements? ❑
Other? ❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stacking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
23, If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑
Nan -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon ❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400047 Owner • Facility: Renea G Welch
Inspection Date: 09/08/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Records and Documents
Facility Number : 400047
Reason for Visit: Routine
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
Otherlssues Yes No
NA
NE
28, Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report
❑ ■
❑
❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional
0111111111100
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge,
❑ ■
❑
❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon / Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Page: 6

0
0 Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS400047 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance 10§12gction Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Qrgjne Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 01 /20/2010 Entry Time:08:30 AM Exit Time:
Farm Name: Delia Ginn Farm
Owner: Renea G Welch
Mailing Address: 3504 Wedaewood Dr
Physical Address:
Incident #:
Owner Email:
Phone: [phone]
Facility Status: E Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Maxwell Fogds I
Location of Farm:. Latitude: &R° '33" Longitude: 77°44'33"
Route 70 to Goldsboro. Make a right onto Wayne Memorial Drive and go past the Hospital. Take Wayne Memorial hospital
approximately 13 miles. Farm will be on right
Question Areas:
© Discharges & Stream impacts © Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: John Hugh Tyndall Operator Certification Number: 986073
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name George Pettus Phone:
On -site representative George Pettus Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis:
10-01-10 = 1.6
6-02-10 = 1.7
6-01-10 2.7
3-29-10 = 2.3
1-22-10 = 2.3
r
soil tested 2009 & samples pulled Nov. 2010
SS ext. 2014 Calib, 2010
fields look good winter annual coming up good.
Date:
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400047 Owner - Facility: Renea G Welch Facility Number: 400047
Inspection Date: 01120/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Vislt:'Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine -Feeder to Finish 2,880 2,929
Total Design Capacity: 2,880
Total SSLW: 388,800
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Deslaned Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon #1 07/28/94 19.00 49.00
0
Page: 2

Permit: AWS400047 Owner - Facility: Renea G Welch Facility Number: 400047
Inspection Date: O112012010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ M ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? 11000
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ M ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑ ■
Cl
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
❑ ■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑ ■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ ■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑ ■
110
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑ ■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑ ■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

Permit: AW5400047 Owner - Facility: Renee G Welch
Inspection Date: 01/20/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number. 400047
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
Is PAN n 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Corn (Grain)
Crop Type 3
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 4
Cotton
Crop Type 5
Winter Annual
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ Cl
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ N ❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400047 Owner - Facility: Renea G Welch
Facility Number: 400047
Inspection Date: 01/20/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA
NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? ❑ ■
❑
❑
24. Did the facility fall to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ ■
❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑ ■
❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400047 Owner - Facility: Renea G Welch
Inspection Date: 01/20/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Other Issues
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Facility Number. 400047
Reason for Visit: Routine
Page: 6

0 Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 4QQQ47 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS400047 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: CoMpljgnce inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Rgutine County: Greene I Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 11/12/2009 Entry Time:09A5 AM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Della Ginn Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Berea G Welch Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 3504 Wedgewood Dr New Bern NC 28562
Physical Address:
Facility Status: E Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Maxwell Foods Inc
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°28'33" Longitude: 77°44'33"
Route 70 to Goldsboro. Make a right onto Wayne Memorial Drive and go past the Hospital. Take Wayne Memorial hospital
approximately 13 miles. Farm will be on right
Question Areas:
© Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment © Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: John Hugh Tyndall Operator Certification Number: 986073
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name George Pettus Phone:
On -site representative George Pettus Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis:
9-28-09 1.8
7-30-09 2.6
5-29-09 2.6
3-31-09 2.8
1-27-09 2.6
soil tested 10-02-2009
calibration 2008 sludge survey 2009
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400047 Owner - Facility: Renea G Welch Facility Number: 400047
Inspection Date: 11/12/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 2,880 2,501
Total Design Capacity: 2,880
Total SSLW: 388,800
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Data start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
Lgoon
#1
07/28/94
19.00
43,00
Page: 2

Permit: AWS400047 Owner- Facility: Renea G Welch
Inspection Date: 11/12/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400047
Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No NA
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
■ ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
■ ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWO)
❑
■ ❑
❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWD) ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
2, Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
❑
■ ❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
0110
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
WOO
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■ ❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
MOO
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■ ❑
❑
improvement?
11. is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400047 Owner - Facility: Renea G Welch
Inspection Date: 11/12/200D Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400047
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Cam, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 3
Winter Annual
Crop Type 4
Cotton
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
Cl ■ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP? 1
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400047 Owner - Facility: Renee G Welch
Facility Number: 400047
Inspection Date: 11/12/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No NA
NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below,
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? ❑ ■ ❑
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes No NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to property dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately,
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400047 Owner - Facility: Renea G Welch
Inspection Date: 11/12/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Other Issues
31, Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
3Z Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Facility Number: 400047
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
OMOO
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

0
n
Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400047 _ ^- Faculty Status: Permit: MS400047 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 12/08/2008 Entry Time:08A7 AM Exit Time:
Farm Name: DeRa-G'nri Farm
Owner: Renea G Welch
Incident #:
Owner Email:
Mailing Address: 3504 Wedgewood Or New Bern NC 28562
Physical Address:
Facllity Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Goldsboro Hog Farms Inc
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°28'33" Longitude: 77°44'33"
Route 70 to Goldsboro. Make a right onto Wayne Memorial Drive and go past the Hospital -.Take Wayne Memorial hospital
approximately 13 miles. Farm will be on right
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection 8 Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Rod Harvey Vinson Operator Certlfication Number: 26081
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name George Pettus Phone:
On -site representative George Pettus Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis:
11-19-08 = 2.2
9-17-08 = 1.6
7-16-08 = 2.2
5-29-08 = 2.9
3-26-08 = 2.2
1-30-08 = 2.8
soil test 9-26-08
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400047 Owner - Facility: Renea G Welch Facility Number : 400047
Inspection Date: 12/08/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Q Swine - Feeder to Finish 2,880 2,511
Total Design Capacity: 2,880
Total SSLW: 388,800
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
kgoon #1 07/28/94 19.00 42.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWS400047 Owner - Facility: Renea G Welch Facility Number: 400047
Inspection Date: 12108/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
C. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■ ❑
Q
Z Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■ Cl
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■ ❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I,ed large trees, severe ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■ ❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■ ❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■ ❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400047 Owner - FacIIlty: Renea G Welch
Inspection Date: 12/08/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400047
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P2O5?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Corn (Grain)
Crop Type 2
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Pasture)
Crop Type 3
Cotton
Crop Type 4
Winter Annual
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving craps differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400047 Owner- Facility: Renee G Welch
Facility Number: 400047
Inspection Date: 12/08/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA
NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?'
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? ❑ ■
❑
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ ■
❑
❑
Other issues
Yes No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑ ■
❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400047 Owner - Facility: Renea G Welch
Facility Number : 400047
Inspection Date: 12/08/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewefllnspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

E Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400047 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS400047 LJ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 07117! 02Q_7_ Entry Time:09:30 AM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Della Ginn Farm Owner Email: [e-mail]_
Owner: Della M Ginn Phone: [phone]
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: " Longitude: 77°44'33"
Route 70 to Goldsboro. Make a right onto Wayne Memorial Drive and go past the Hospital. Take Wayne Memorial hospital
approximately 13 miles. Farm will be on right
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Rod Harvey Vinson Operator Certification Number: 26081
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On -site representative George Pettus Phone:
24 hour contact name George Pettus Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: _
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
soil tested 2006
waste analysis:
5-23-07 = 2.0
3-28-07 = 2.6
1-31-07 = 2.0
11-29-06 = 1.3
looks good
Date:
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400047 Owner - Facility: Della M Ginn
Facility Number : 400047
Inspection Date: 07/17/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine -Feeder to Finish 2,880 2,457
Total Design Capacity: 2,880
Total SSLW: 388,800
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
kgoon #1 07/28/94 19.00 38.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWS400047 Owner - Facility: Della M Ginn Facility Number: 400047
Inspection Date: 07/17/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges &„Stream Impacts
Yes
No
NA
NE
1, Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
M
❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0011
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
S. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400047 Owner - Facility: Della M Ginn
Inspection Date: 0711712007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number : 400047
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
■
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Corn (Grain)
Crop Type 2
Cotton
Crop Type 3
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 4
Winter Annual
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■
❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
■
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fall to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
W UP? ❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400047 Owner- Facility: Della M Ginn
Facility Number: 400047
Inspection Date: 07/17/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑ ❑
23, If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? ❑
■
❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑ ❑
27, Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■
❑ ❑
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■
❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30, At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air 00011
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400047 Owner - Facility: Della M Ginn
Facility Number: 400047
Inspection Date: 0711712007 Inspection Typo: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

0
■ Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency II ---II
Facility Number: 400047 Facility Status: Permit: NCA240047 u Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance InjoectJon Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine _ County: Greene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 03/30/2006 1 Entry Time:10:00 AM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Della Ginn Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Della Ginn Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 3504 Wedgewood Or New Bern NC 28562
Physical Address.
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°28'33" Longitude: 77"44'
Route 70 to Goldsboro. Make a right onto Wayne Memorial Drive and go past the Hospital. Take Wayne Memorial hospital
approximately 13 miles. Farm will be on right
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Rod Harvey Vinson
Secondary OIC(s):
Operator Certification Number: 26081
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On -site representative George Pettus Phone:
24 hour contact name George Pettus Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Date:
Page: 1

Permit: NCA240047 Owner - Facility: Della Ginn
Facility Number: 400047
Inspection Date: 03/30/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Soil 10-28-2005
Waste analyses: IbsN11000gal
2-1-06 TA
11-30-05 1.8
9-28-05 2.0
7-27-05 2.0
5-25-05 1.8
3-30-05 1.8
all records balanced out and looking Great!
Page: 2

Permit: NCA240047 Owner - FaclIIty: Della Ginn
Inspection Date: 03/30/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400047
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine -Feeder to Finish 21880 3,091
Total Design Capacity: 2,880
Total SSLW: 388,800
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon #1 07/28/94 19.00 45.00
Page: 3

Permit: NCA240047 Owner - Facility: Della Ginn Facility Number: 400047
Inspection Date: 03/30/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No
NA
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
■
❑
❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
■
❑
❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
■
❑
❑
❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
■
❑
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
■
❑
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
■
0011
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage &_Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (i.e./ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage; etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
0130
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 4

Permit: NCA240047 Owner -Facility: Della Ginn Facility Number: 400047
Inspection Date: 03/30/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? ❑
Total P205? ❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type 1 Corn (Grain)
Crop Type 2 Winter Annual
Crop Type 3 Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■ ❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure -and/or operate per the Irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
■
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 5
h

Permit: NCA240047 Owner - Facility: Della Ginn
Facility Number : 400047
Inspection Date: 03/30/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?-
❑
■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? ❑
■ ❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
25, Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
27. bid the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
Other Issues
Yes
No NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 6

Permit: NCA240047 Owner - Facility: Della Ginn Facility Number : 400047
Inspection Date: 03/30/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other issues Yes No NA NE
31, Did the facility fail to notify regional DWO of emergency situations as required by Permit? ❑ m ❑ ❑
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Page: 7

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency ------------------------------
Facility Number: 400047 Facility Status: Active Permit: NCA240047 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 100�,_0212005 Entry Time: 09:20 AM Exit Time:
Farm Name: Della Ginn Farm
Owner: Della Ginn
Incident #:
Owner Email:
Mailing Address: 958 Fort Run Rd Snow Hill NC 28580
Physical Address:
Phone: [phone]
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Goldsboro Hog Farms Inc
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35,475800 Longitude:
Route 70 to Goldsboro. Make a right onto Wayne Memorial Drive and go past the Hospital. Take Wayne Memorial hospital
approximately 13 miles. Farm will be on right
Question Areas:
Q Discharges & Stream Impacts 0 Waste Collection & Treatment 0 Waste Application
0 Records and Documents 0 Other Issues
Certified Operator: Rod Harvey Vinson Operator Certification Number: 26081
Secondary OIC(s).
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name George Pettus Phone: [phone]
On -site representative George Pettus Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Phone:
Phone:
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis:
1-26-05 = 1.3
11-24-04 = 1.4
9-22-04 = 1.2
7-23-04 = 1.3
5-26-04 = 1.1
3-31-04 = 2.2
1-30-04 = 1.4
Soil Test 2004
lime in spring 2005
Looks good
Page: 1

• Permit: NCA240047 Owner -Facility: Della Ginn
Inspection Date: 02/09/2005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400047
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 2,880 2,880
Total Design Capacity: 2,880
Total SSLW: 388,800
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Data Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
Lagoon #1 19.00 42.00
Page: 2

Permit: NCA240047 Owner -Facility: Della Ginn Facility Number: 400047
Inspection Data: 02/09/2005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ❑ Cl
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑ ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑
Ygs
0 ❑
No NA
❑
NE
Waste Collection. Storage & Treatment
4, Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe erosion,
❑
M ❑
❑
seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
❑
❑
❑
closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks
❑
0 ❑
❑
and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
❑
❑
improvement?
)haste Annlicatinn
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or improvement?
Yes No NA NE
❑ woo
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ M ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Pending?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total P2O5?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of appileation area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 2
Corn (Grain)
Crop Type 3
Small Grain (Wheat,
Barley, Oats)
Crop Type 4
Page: 3

Permit: NCA240047 Owner -Facility: Della Ginn
Facility Number: 400047
Inspection Date: 02/09/2005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Crop Type 5
Yes
No NA
NE
Crop Type 6
Soi! Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan(CAWMP)? ❑
■ ❑
❑
i5. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
110
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
■ ❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■ ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Records DorumPnts
❑
Yes
■ ❑
No NA
❑
NF
and
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■ ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
moo
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfa8 & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
■ ❑
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■ ©
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■ ❑
❑
Page: 4

Permit: NCA240047 Owner -Facility: Della Ginn
Facility Number: 400047
Inspection Date: 02/09/2005 Inspection Type. Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA- NIF
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous lass assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ M ❑ ❑
Othpr Isgiips Yps No NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours andlor document and report those mortality ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality
representative immediately.
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 5

Technical Assistance Site Visit Report
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Natural Resources Conservation Service
O Soil and Water Conservation District
O Other...
Facility Number 40 - 47 Date: 12/9104 Time: 1404 Time On Farm: 30 WaRO
Farm Name Della Ginn Farm County Greene
Mailing Address 958 Fort Run Road
Snow Hill NC
Phone:
Onsite
Representative George Pettus Integrator Goldsboro Hog Farms
Type Of Visit
Operation Review
Compliance Inspection (pilot only)
Technical Assistance
Confirmation for Removal
❑ No Animals -Date Last Operated:
❑ Operating below threshold
In Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse
Design Current
Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
p Farrow to Feeder
[3 Farrow to Finish
C ]'Gilts
❑ Boars
2880
0
Puri2ose Of Visit
pa Routine
Q Response to DWQ/DENR referral
O Response to DSWC/SWCD referral
O Response to complaint/local referral
O Requested by producer/integrator
O Follow-up
O Emergency
O Other...
Design Current
Capacity Population
❑ Layer
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
919-747-2163
28580
GENERAL QUESTIONS:
1 ! Is waste discharging from any part of the operation and reaching surface waters or wetlands? ❑ yes ® no
2. Is there evidence of a past waste discharge from any part of the operation that waste reached ❑ yes ® no
surface waters or wetlands?
3. Does any problem pose an immediate threat to the integrity of the waste structure (large trees, ❑ yes i no
seepage, severe erosion, etc.)?
4. Is there evidence of nitrogen over application, hydraulic overloading or excessive ponding ❑ yes ® no
. requiring DWQ notification?
5 ..Is there evidence of improper dead animal disposal that poses a threat to the environment ❑ yes ® no
`'and/or public health?
6: Is the waste level within the structural freeboard elevation range for any waste structure? ❑ yes ® no
Structurel Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
-Identifier
Level (Inches) 42
CROP TYPES lCorn, Grain inter Annual 1coastal Bermuda -hay Ismail grain overseed
SPRAYFIELD
SOIL TYPES NoA GyC2 Jo
7. What type of technical assistance does the onsite representative feel is needed? (list in comment section)
03/10/03
❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
919-747-2163
28580
GENERAL QUESTIONS:
1 ! Is waste discharging from any part of the operation and reaching surface waters or wetlands? ❑ yes ® no
2. Is there evidence of a past waste discharge from any part of the operation that waste reached ❑ yes ® no
surface waters or wetlands?
3. Does any problem pose an immediate threat to the integrity of the waste structure (large trees, ❑ yes i no
seepage, severe erosion, etc.)?
4. Is there evidence of nitrogen over application, hydraulic overloading or excessive ponding ❑ yes ® no
. requiring DWQ notification?
5 ..Is there evidence of improper dead animal disposal that poses a threat to the environment ❑ yes ® no
`'and/or public health?
6: Is the waste level within the structural freeboard elevation range for any waste structure? ❑ yes ® no
Structurel Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
-Identifier
Level (Inches) 42
CROP TYPES lCorn, Grain inter Annual 1coastal Bermuda -hay Ismail grain overseed
SPRAYFIELD
SOIL TYPES NoA GyC2 Jo
7. What type of technical assistance does the onsite representative feel is needed? (list in comment section)
03/10/03

Facility Number 40 - 47 Date: 12/9/04
PARAMETER
❑ 8. Waste spill leaving site
❑ 9. Waste spill contained on site
❑ 10. Level in structural freeboard
❑ 11. Level in storm storage
❑ 12. Waste structure integrity compromised
❑ 13. Waste structure needs maintenance
[114. Over application >= 10% & 10 lbs.
t [115. Over application < 10% or < 10 lbs.
❑ 16. Hydraulic overloading
❑ 17. Deficient irrigation records
,,. ❑ 18. Late/missing waste analysis
❑ 19. Late/missing lagoon level records
❑ 20. Late/missing soils analysis
[121. Crop needs improvement
❑ 22. Crop inconsistent with waste plan
❑ 23. Irrigation maintenance deficiency
❑ 24. Deficient sprayfield conditions
ReaulatoEy Referrals
] Referred to DWO Date:
I Referred to NCDA Date:
] Other... Date:
LIST IMPROVEMENTS
MADE BY OPERATION
1.
2.
3.
4.
16.
O No assistance provided/requested
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE Needed
25. Waste Plan Revision or Amendment
❑
26. Waste Plan Conditional Amendment
❑
27. Review or Evaluate Waste Plan w/producer
❑
28. Forms Need (list in comment section)
❑
29. Missing Components (list in comments)
❑
30. 21-1.0200 re -certification
❑
31. Five & Thirty day Plans of Action (PoA)
❑
32. Irrigation record keeping assistance
❑
33.Organize/computerization of records
❑
34. Sludge Evaluation
❑
35. Sludge or Closure Plan
❑
36. Sludge removal/closure procedures
❑
37. Waste Structure Evaluation
❑
38. Structure Needs Improvement
❑
39.Operation & Maintenance Improvements
❑
40. Marker checklcalibration
❑
41. Site evaluation
❑
42. Irrigation Calibration
❑
43. Irrigation system design/installation
❑
44. Secure irrigation information (maps, etc.)
❑
45. Operating improvements (pull signs, etc.)
❑
46. Wettable Acre Determination
❑
47. Evaluate WAD certificationtrechecks
❑
48. Crop evaluationlrecommendations
❑
49. Drainage worklevaluation
❑
50. Land shaping, subsolling, aeration, etc.
❑
51. Runoff control, stormwater diversion, etc.
❑
52. Buffer Improvements
❑
53. Field measurements(GPS, surveying, etc.)
❑
54. Mortality BMPs
❑
55. Waste operator education (NPDES)
❑
56. Operation & malntenance education
❑
57. Record keeping education
❑
58. Croplforage management education
❑
59. Soil and/or waste sampling education
❑
Provided
2 03/10/03

v.
Facility Number 40 - 47 Date: 1219/04
COMMENTS:
*Waste analysis dated 11/24/04 nitrogen is 1.4 lbs
9/22/04 1.2 lbs
7/23/04 1.3 lbs
5/26/04 1.1 lbs
3/31 /04 2.2 lbs
1 /30/04 1.4 lbs
11 /26/03 1.1 lbs
*Soil test for 2004 taken no results.
`Wheat has been planted in good condition.
*Sludge survey conducted 1/13/04 aver thickness 2.14'
*Irrigation calibration for 2004 complete see master chart in record book.
*Reviewed IRR1 and IRR2 records.
*lagoon freeboard/rainfall recorded weekly with drops in lagoon consistent with irrigation events. Need to record rainfall
events > one inch and inspect structure.
*Reviewed stocking and mortality records.
TECHNICAL SPECIALIST Martin McLawhorn
SIGNATURE
Date Entered
12/13/04 1 Entered By:
Martin Mci_awhorn
3
03/10/03

Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 40 47 pate of Visit: 12/04/2003 Time: 1000
---• O Not Operational O Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified 13 Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: Ud1a-Gi7[4iaZi.rim.......................................................................................... County: fjrgeAlli............................................... Wa>3Q........
OwnerName: O.dla........................................Ginja........................................... ............. Phone No: 91%747-2163.............................. ............ ..... .... .............
Mailing Address: 9S.#..>;'.Qxt.Rtx0.lioaA............................................................................ S'naW'.Hill.1YC........................................................ :a5AQ..............
FacilityContact: .............................................................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No:..................................................
Onsite Representative:..Gwrl;091tto............................................................................ Integrator: �iRldSl�9xR. Qg axlilS..............................
Certified Operator:Hpd.Harxcy........................ vinsm .............................................. Operator Certification Number:Z6Q$,j..............................
Location of Farm:
toute 70 to Goldsboro. Make a right onto Wayne Memorial Drive and go past the Hospital. Take Wayne Memorial hospital
approximately 13 miles. Farm will be on right
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattla ❑ horse Latitude 35 " 28 41 33 " Longitude 77 "F 447, 33 "
Design Current
Design Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
Poultry, ..Capacity..
Poulation Cattle
Capacity. Po ulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Layer
airy
FC]Non-Dairy
® Feeder to Finish
2880
1440
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
2,880
Cl Gilts
Total SSLW
388,800
❑ Boars
Number of Lagoons L_-�_..� ❑ Subsurface Drains Present 110 Lagoon Area JEI Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds 1 Solid Traps JE1 No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/nun?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Stricture 6
Identifier: ........................................................................................................................................................................... I.... ...................................
Freeboard (inches): 40
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: 40-47 Date of inspection 12/04/2003
5, Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑Yes ®No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Application
10, Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11, Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload [ ❑ Yes ® No
12, Crop type Corn (Silage & Grain) Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Small Grain Overseed Winter Annuals
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? i ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? , ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? E
Required Records & Documents
17, Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19, Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
,.I::i 1 i � - t +:
Comments (refer to #) Explain any YE$; answers and/or anyr recommendations oraany other, comments ', U,
,question.
Z 1 V
[Ise drawings of factlity .better explain situations' (dsj "ddrtional pages as necessary} t _ El Field Copy El Final Notes 1' 4
b 'ail h -pt iA PA Ti n ill 'l A _ —
l_'� �. '•. I, �_ �_.. L..... M r w In.: '.,''1
._ w.';wf 1 -,. Y .v s, 1_ y -:� .. .I ,,..__,.�1 .. ..-'..... {..i ,C .'� 1'„ -,n h1'v ..%. , x,. L } ,
Records Available.
Waste Analysis:
11 /26/03 1.11 lbs
9/25/03 0.871bs
7/23/03 1.0 lbs
5/29.03 1.7 lbs
3/26/03 1.9 lbs
1/29/03 1.1 lbs
Reviewer/Inspector Name Lyna' Pprdison :: " . , -. Entered by Portia Peaden:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
O5103101 U Continued

tiI Facility Number: 40-47 Date of Inspection ]2/04/2003
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
Soil analysis up thru 2003 available - there are some lime requirements.
Small grain has been drilled and emerging.
Irrigation records are complete and balanced out.
Rainfall and freeboard levels are recorded as required.
Stocking/mortality records are kept using approved forms.
Storm diversion areas are in great shape. Has been re -graded and vegetation is well established.
[_-]Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
05103101

Michael R Easley
Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
To: Producer
From: Daphne B. Cullom
Environmental Specialist
Washington Regional Office
Subject: Animal Compliance Inspection
. Year 2002
Enclosed please find a copy of the Compliance Site inspection (as viewed in the DWQ database) conducted at the referenced facility
by the Division of Water Quality from the Washington Regional Office. Please read this inspection and keep it with all other
documents pertaining to your animal operation for future inspections.
In general, these inspections included verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP); (2) the
farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC 2110217, Senate Bill 1217, and the Certified Animal Waste
Management Plan; (3) the farm operation's waste management system is being operated properly under the direction of a Certified
Operator; (4) the required records are being kept; and (5) there are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or runoff.
As a reminder, please note the following comments, which are conditions of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan and the
General Permit; therefore, these items must be implemented:
cp The maximum waste level in lagoons/storage ponds shall not exceed that specified in the CAWMP. At a minimum, maximum waste
level for waste for lagoons/storage ponds must not exceed the level that provides adequate storage to contain 25 year, 24 hour storm
event plus an additional foot of structural freeboard.
9 An analysis of the liquid animal waste from the lagoon shall be conducted as close to the time of application as practical and at least
within 60 days (before or after) of the date of application. This analysis shall include the following parameters: Nitrogen,
Phosphorus, Zinc and Copper.
cp Soil analysis is required annually. Lime is to be applied to each receiving crop as recommended by the soil analysis.
9 The following records are required: off -site solids removal, maintenance, repair, wastelsoil analysis and land irrigation records.
These records should be maintained by the facility owner/manager in chronological and legible form for a minimum of three years.
(p Land application rates shall be in accordance with the CAWMP. In no case shall land application rates exceed the Plant Available
Nitrogen (PAN) rate for the receiving crop or result in runaff_during any ;given application.
cp All grassed waterways shall have a stable outlet with adequate capacity to prevent ponding or flooding damages.. The outlet can be
another vegetated channel, an earth ditch, stabilization structure, or other suitable outlets.
(p It is suggested, not a requirement to keep crop yield information for future use to update your waste management plan. You will
._iteed-dw& years'bfctV yield data -before your -plan can be updated __.... ...___. _....... _. ___ _:....
For your information, any swine facility that has a discharge to surface waters of the State will have to apply for a National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit with the Division of Water Quality, effective January 1, 2001.
Thank you for your assistance and cooperation during the inspection. If you have any questions, please contact me at 252-946-6481, ext.
321 or your Technical Specialist.
Cc: AaRO
DBC Files
943 Washington Square Mall Washington, NC 27889 252-946-Ml (Telephone) 252-946-9215 (Fax)

Facility Number Date of Visit: Z1181ZOOZ Time: 10:45 am
p o perationa p Below Threshold
0 Permitted N Certified p Conditionally Certified p Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: Della/Ullman Ginn Farm County:.CxrxAtne................................................ .W.a.RQ........
Owner Name: Della & Ullmon Ginn
Phone No: 919-747-2163
MailingAddress: P..O,,.)Q)00.009..................................................................................... Go.ldab.Qr.Q,.NC ..................................................... Z7532 ..............
FacilityContact: ...............................................................................Title............................. ......... Phone No:
Onsite Representative: George..P.ettas............................................................................ Integrator: Gaidsb.ora Hag.Farms.......................................
Certified Operator:,Iason...................................... Habbs ................................................ Operator Certification Number:25.246.............................
Location of Farm:
ttoute fu to uolusnoro. MaKe a rignt onto Wayne iviemoriai lirive ana go past the tiospitai. ratce wayne iviemoriai nospitai A
approximately 13 miles. Farm will be on right
N Swine p Poultry p Cattle p Horse Latitude ©• Longitude
' Design ;;:C
Swine Capacity Po
p Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to tnis
❑ Farrow to can
IN
p Farrow to Feeder
p Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design ±Current Design Current,
Poultry Capacity, Populatibiv, Cattle Capacity: Population;
p ayeg
p airy
p on- airy
p ter
TotalkDesign Capacity2,880
€ TotaI=SSLW 80 388,0
p Non -Layer
r
m IE3zotiosuriaccurainsirresent ja oon f►rea a ra r iew wrea
,I LI 4 _ __._ � ❑ a iqu�- as a ana amen s em
<< Holdm Ponds'� �
Discharges &Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes ®No
Discharge originated at: 0 Lagoon ❑Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes p No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes p No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes p No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes ®No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? 0 Yes ®No
Waste Collection &Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? p Spillway 13 Yes ®No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure b
Identifier:
Freeboard(inches): ...............3I...............,.................................... .......... ........................ .................................... .................................... ...........,........................
m IE3zotiosuriaccurainsirresent ja oon f►rea a ra r iew wrea
,I LI 4 _ __._ � ❑ a iqu�- as a ana amen s em
<< Holdm Ponds'� �
Discharges &Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes ®No
Discharge originated at: 0 Lagoon ❑Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes p No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes p No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes p No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes ®No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? 0 Yes ®No
Waste Collection &Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? p Spillway 13 Yes ®No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure b
Identifier:
Freeboard(inches): ...............3I...............,.................................... .......... ........................ .................................... .................................... ...........,........................

Vacility Number; 40_47 Date of Inspection ® r
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, [3 Yes ® No f
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there, structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes R No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes U No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Application
10, Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? p Yes H No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ® No
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Small Grain Overseed Cotton
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? p Yes ®No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes p No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? p Yes ®No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ® No
Reauired Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
IN No
18,
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
®No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
®No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
N No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
®No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
13 Yes
N No
23,
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
H No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
®No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
p Yes
®No
p No violations or deficiencies were noted uring this visit. You will receive no lurther correspondence about is visit.
Coma tints {/r'efer to ' uestion'# ;'Ez`fain$anV YES ahswers andlor an r""ecommendations ortan ";otti"er comments` �',.rs
"'.�'ts 14bb:.m~ :la✓i5_-`t`.#'f, r.''I;[�'Yi rp°d; j„'" '^Tq?;Y:tf;.i "aa'. •^s�� :��:�'.I'r.c ''.F,i:e'JE�,tul:F�:.:'..�i;kl'A'�;.'.Sh'ira ..t '".}��I�ti. ,;i-.r•'# y y'}y Es,i;:: �""� «.'[• 3 ��'1`I ;«,I,3,
d g .' a. yP.
UseE rawm s of facilit to better exam situattons a use add►t�pna! a es as ne Field Co �! Final Notes �r#,r l;1>
gypp�Pfl,I !h4}���,�r�g. ""^ s �; r'_",ghikj.�< A�'y�.i{. 'i''F.� Art t�,Y,". t C"s�;h�k-'n A��'d x�:fIv.e"Y-r? 4� �� k 3',:J ,{�,Yj �:ti,.�t - .: I� pJ ❑ I{ iyi n+r,�..�
�1'I� .I�;��':'n. �+: ��lx ��G��':?S ..
YE i3 b B .?
Waste analysis 1 /31 02 - 1.8 s 000 gals.
Soil analysis 9/13/01; lime as suggested.
Freeboard levels recorded weekly per General Permit.
Irrigation records complete with nitrogen balance; no overapplication noted.
Reviewer/Ins ector Name „' { ,
p Dap' h'n Cullom ', entered 6y Ann.Tyndall y ,Y
Reviewer/inspector Signature: Date:

r
7 1 05103101 Continued
aci y um er: 40_47 Date of Inspection
Odor Issues
26.
Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
Yes
® No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27.
Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
p Yes
® No
28.
Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
p Yes
®No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29.
Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
p Yes
® No
30.
Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
p Yes
®No
31.
Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
p Yes
®No
32.
Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
p Yes
p No

[Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection *Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
IReasonforVisit O Routine O Complaint Q 1*ollow up O Emergency Notification O Cther ❑ Denied Access
Date of Visit: 8123/2llt)1 Time: 415
LL Facility Number 40 47
O Not Operational O Below Threshold
® Permitted in Certified 13 Conditionally Certified [3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold : .........................
Farm Name: ACU[ IWilk.Gi1an1arm......................... ..... County: Grgems...
.. WaRo........
OwnerName.- DrJ1a.&.0 txun.................. Ginxt............................................................. Phone No: ..........................................................
Mailing Address: Raate.4.Aox.3Q1................................................................................. Sp W.UWNG........................................................ 2,B5B11:.............
Facility Contact: .............................................................................. Title: .. Phone No:
Onsite Representative:.GcQr=,Pektus............................................................................. Integrator: Goldsbox%Hog.Farms .......................................
Certified Operator:Ja,9lottl.................... I.................. WWI ............................................... Operator Certification Number:25246 ..............................
Location of Farm:
Route 70 to Goldsboro. Make a right onto Wayne Memorial Drive and go past the Hospital. Take Wayne Memorial hospital
approximately 13 miles. Farm will be on right
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 2I3 33 I,i►ngitudc 77 44 f 33
:Current-
Desrg>n Current :: :::: :' : ° .:::
1Destgn.....::Current
:.: Ca ac : Pti ulatinn
Pc►ult ry;:
::
Ca act ::P� ulattoo : Ca.. ....
t Po ulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
_
.':' ❑ Layer
;',
❑ Dairy
® Feeder to Finish
2880
2160
❑Non -Layer
❑Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
..... ..........
.... ........
..
ElFarrow to Feeder
❑Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Dent g n Cu aCt
_. P ty-„
2,880
❑ Gilt.,
'l ........'
...
:.:...... Total SSt-W
388,800
❑ Boars
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is ohsen-cd, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed., did it reach Water of the State'? (il`ycs. notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is ob,,ci-%,4 what is the estimated flow in gal/nun?
d..Does discharge bypass a lagoon cystcm? (Ifyes, aotifj• DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) Iess than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Struclure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
............................... .............................
F rceboard (inclics): ............... 4.0....... --...
.

05103101
Facility Number: 40-47
Date of Inspection 1 8/23/2001
Continued
5. Are there auv immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need mainionancelimprovement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuclures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Cotton Small Grain Overseed
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ®No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWM13)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c)'i'his facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement'?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available`?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ic/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, frexeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ® No
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
❑ Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
*Spray field arc in good condition and free of weeds. _
*Waste analysis dated 6127/01. nitrogen is 1.5 1b411000 gallons
4/25/01 nitrogen is 2.2 lbs/I000 gallons.
*Soil test dated 10/2/00. Sample # I received 1.1 tons lime per acre. Soil test are being taken at this time in all spray fields. Be sure to
follow lime requirements.
*Lagoon level is being recorded weekly as required by permit.
*Records are well organized.
*Lagoon walls have good vice,. .•
Reviewertinspector Name IV
Reviewer/lnsnector Signature:
Date:

o�o wArF9pc
r
>
t7 'C
To: Producers
From: Lyn B. Hardison '
Environmental Specialist �; r
Washington Regional Office •'
Date: May 18, 20D1
Subject: Animal Compliance Routine Inspection
Year 2001
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Kerr T. Stevens
Division of Water Quality
Enclosed please find a copy or copies of the Compliance Site Inspection(s) (as viewed in DWQ database) conducted at the
referenced facility by the Division of Water Quality from the Washington Regional Office. Please read this inspection and
keep with all other documents pertaining to your animal operation for future inspections.
In general, these inspections included verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP);
(2) the farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC 2H.0217, Senate 13iif 1217, and the Cer[ified,Animal
Waste Management Plan; (3) the farm operation's waste management system is being operated properly under the direction of a
Certified Operator; (4) the required records are being kept; (5) there are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or runoff.
As a reminder, please note the following which are conditions of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan and the general
permit; therefore, these items must be implemented:
cp The maximum waste level in lagoons/storage ponds shall not exceed that specified in the CAWMP. At a minimum,
maximum waste level for waste for lagouns/storage ponds must not exceed the level that provides adequate storage to
contain 25 year, 24 hour storm event plus an additional foot of structural freeboard.
tp An analysis of the liquid animal waste from the lagoon shall be conducted as close to the time of application as practical and
at l.,ast within 60 days (before or after) of the date of application. This analysis shall include the following parameters:
Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Zinc and Copper.
p Soil analysis is required annually.
(p The following records are required: off site solids removal, maintenance, repair, wastelsoil analysis and land irrigation
records. These records should be maintained by the facility owner/manager in chronological and legible form for a
minimum of three years.
to Land application rates shall be in accordance with the CAWMP. In no case shall land ap2lication rates exceed the Plant
Available Nitrot=_en (PA.NI rate for the receiving crop or result in runoff during anv given aonlication.
cp All grassed waterways shall have a stable outlet with adequate capacity to prevent ponding or flooding damages. The outlet
can be another vegetated channel, an earth ditch, stabilization structure, or other suitable outlets.
cp It is suggested. not required, to. keep crop yield information for future use to update your waste management plan. You will
need threeyears of crop yield data before your plan can be updated.
For your information, any swine facility that has a discharge to surface waters of the State will have to apply for a National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit with the Division of Water Quality, effective January 1, 2001.
Thank you for your assistance and cooperation during the inspection. If y6u have any questions, please contact your Technical
Specialist or me at 252-946-6481, ext. 318.
Cc: 140
LBH Files (inspection form only)
6eoT ?kons
943 Washington Square Mali Washington, NC 27BBP 252-946-6461 (Telephone) 252-946-9215 (Fax)

h
•
Q1P
lDlvwion of Soa and Water Consetrvatimn ,� Y � • F �, s � -
■ ;.q. C,_ A?!t:. - Z +,i• yt:+- _ •t ;. t. �.-:ic .f•., yr r- __4 1
Type of Visit OO Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit © Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility N4U 47 Dote of visit: 3-13-StKll Time:
Number 11:32 sm
----umbe0 Not O erational 0 Below Threshold
Permitted Iff Certified ❑Conditionally Certified ❑ Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ............
Farm Name: ..................... ............................ County- .G.ICRjntr............................ 7"".... .......... Wtt.RQ........
Owner Name: D&a.&UUmn .................. Gitnm............................................................. Phone No: y22-741-.2t.Ct3............................................. ..............
Mailinh Address: )P.!0.B.Q�.1QUlf9................................................. ............................... Guldxboxxi�NC..................................................... 27532 .............
Facility- Contact: ........................................ Title:................................................................ Phone No: ...................................................
Onsite. Representatives Gtaa P.+rkttuti............... ........ .......... _......................................... integrator: Gnldsltuita.Hai.harata.......................................
Certified Operator:.Chxis....................................... CmIuk ................................................ Operator Certification Number: 2200.6 .............................
Location of Farm:
Route 70 to Goldshoro. Make a right onto Wayne Memorial Drive and go past the Hospitat. Take Wayne Memorial hospital I
approaimateiv 13 miles. Farm will be on right
®Swine ❑Poultry ❑Cattle ❑ Fkorse Latitude °_ 35 I• ? 28 !• I 33 ''• Un;�itudc 77 • 44 l� ': 33
Design Current
Design Current
Design Current
Swine Ca achy Population
Poultry
Ca acitV Population Cattle
Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Laver
❑ Dairy
i
® Feeder to Finish
2880
2200
❑ Non -Layer
10 Non-Dain'
I
II
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Other
❑ Farrom' to Finish
Total Design Capacity
2,880
❑ Gills
Total SSLW
388,800
❑ Boars
Number of Lagoons 10 Subsurface Drains Present Itp Lagoon Area ❑ Sprsv Fidel Area
Holding Ponds 1 Solid Traps L___ ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges d Stream lm acts
l . Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Dischar!-L br-lginaied at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If di5eitargc is ob�e��'ed, rt as the convc} ance niun-ruade'? ❑ Yes ® No
h. If discharge is observed. did ii reach Water of the State:? (If yes. notify- DWQ) ❑Yes ®No
c, ff disohai-g;: is obs:i-vcd, what is the e:lunatcd floe' ill galltuui? n/a
d. Does disJia ve hrpass a imoon SN"A :m? (ff vcs. notiN DIA Q) ❑ Yes ® No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Wales. of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Wastc Coliection et Treatment
4. is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Sinicture 4 Structure 5 Structure G
Identifier: ....................................................................... ...........
FTUO)oard (incite:):

051031u1
Facility Number. 40-47
Dale of Inspection 3-13-2001
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintcnance/unprovement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adcquate. gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers. that need maintenanw improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Colton Small Grain Overseed
Continued ,r
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
13, Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management flan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
[K No
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
[K No
Required
Records 4, Doirument% .
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
® No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps. etc.)
❑ Yes
ER No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
g= No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
[K No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
9 No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems. over application)
❑ Yes
® No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
0 No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
® No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ® No
No violations or defciencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments OF to uestion - Explain any YES answers andlor.any recommendations or any other comments.:
Use m.
draws of fac i to better explain situations. udditional page! as necsa
g T- — ---( se a- p - 'es - �j'❑ Field Copy ® Final Notes
Records available for review.
k Waste analysis: 2-28-01 = 2.2 lbs. 11-29-00 = 1.3 lbs
k Soil analysis (10-2-00) up to date. Make sure to pull a sample for this year.
° Irrigation records are complete and balanced out.
" Freeboard levels are recorded as required.
k Vegetation of diek wall is well established.
Small grain is established.
Reviewer/inspector Name Lyn B. Hardison
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
9
Date: j _ j

L
OSIO3101 Continued
Facility Number. 40--47 Date of Inspection 3-13-200I Printed on: 5/17/2001
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28, Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt.
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29, Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes Z No
❑ Yes 19 No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes JR No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes X No
[:]Yes Zi No
Overall, the farm appears to he well mnanged. yl
If you have any questions, contact your Technical Specialist or me n 252-946-6481. ext. 318. Ajl

r , _rL
• Division of Water Quality
O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation O Other
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 40 47
Date of Visit 3-27-2000 Printed on: 3/31/2000
ro Not Operational Q Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified © Conditionally Certified 13 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ......................
Farm Name: ......................................................................... County: Grccxtc .............................................. WARO........
Owner Name: Q.Cjltt.&..VJlMj).0..................Ginla............................................................, Phone No: ...........................................................
FacilityContact............................................................................. .. Title: ................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
Mailing Address: >IiR11:k�.4..lEi�oX. A2................................................................................. SOIR�.kllll.r]........................................................ ;0.580 .............
Onsite Representative: GeQrgc.�E XuS............................................................................. Integrator: Satjdfib0X.Q.HQg.11'Oxl11.S.......................................
Certified Operator:G6lrIS>io9jjex.C.................... C-01(lc.
Location of Farm:
.riglltk.o.0 o..W.aytic
Operator Certification Number:22QQ6...
®Swine []Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Hor Latitude 35 ° 28 1 33 64 Longitude 77 ° 44 33 «
Design Current
Swine Canacitv Ponulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
—750
® Feeder to Finish
2880
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer I 1 ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 2,880
Total SSLW 771
Number of Lagoons ❑ -Su bsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps r� ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ®No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ®No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ®No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ..............................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): 30

,.
06 Continued on back
Facility Number: 4tl- 47 Date of Inspection 3-27-200 Printed on: 3/31/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ® No
(if any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ®No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Yes ®No
12. Crop type Cotton Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Small Grain Overseed
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
0 �io•violations:or defitienties-Wtte:noted:d'uring�this visit::Y6ti*ill:receive no further
corresondence about this.visit. • . ....... .. ..... .... .... ....
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
8. Improvements have been made to the stormwater diversion areas.
11. No overapplication noted in irrigation records.
19. Waiting for results from 1999 soil analysis collected in Nov. -Dec. 1999.
Animals only in one house; facility not completely full; Mr. Pettus will submit a certification to change the type of operation from
finishing to nursery.
Reviewer/Inspector Name !Daphne B. Cullom
r►...... 3 -5 1 —zpGU

Rev#wer/lnspector Signature: Date:
Facility Number: 40--47 Date of Inspection 3-2772000 I Printed on: 3/31/2000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge attor below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28.
Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
❑ Yes
® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29.
Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
❑ Yes
®No
30.
Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
❑ Yes
® No
31.
Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
❑ Yes
®No
32.
Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Additional omments and/orDrawings:

13 Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Operation Review
13 Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Compliance Inspection
Division of Water Quality - Compliance Inspection
13 Other Agency - Operation Review
14D Routine_ 9 Complaint Q Follow-up of DWQ inspection Q Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number 40 47 Date of Inspection 12/7/94
Time of Inspection 10.30 AM7 24 hr. (hh:mm)
® Permitted ® Certified 0 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered 113 Not Opera Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: D9.1 1.V1<M4ja.Gai0jt..F'ArM............................................................. ............ County: Gueu ............................................... W.ARQ........
Owner Name: DjCJIa.&..VUMQ.0.................. Ging ............................................................. Phone No: 919.-7,47-Z163 ...........................................................
Facility Contact ..Title: ............................................ Phone No:...................................................
............................................................................. ....................
MailingAddress:li9109.4.AQN.2102................................................................................. siftQW.11JUNC ........................................................ MAD..............
Onsite Representative: GI.Qrge.Petju5............................................. ... .... Integrator:F`i.RlldS�AXR.l4(l�.i+�XJIt1S..................... ...
.... ..................... .... ..........
Certified Operator:.AA.......................................... Lialom ............................................... Operator Certification Numbcr:Z3A$5 .............................
Location of Farm:
1iQute.7.0!.tQ.. nldsblaura,...Made.�t.xagbt>.n�txQ.. !'.ayn.�.l►'Iet�tQrialLt?r.1re.and. gat.ptasx.thtw.ktns ital,...T.>Itk�..W..aYa�. e�narial.ha�Aftal A.
,raxinnatea ..t .nailes,...ka�m.�ill.be.Qn.r.' 1�t.........................................................................................................................................................................
Latitude 35 • 2$ 33 Longitude 77 • 44 33 '�
Design Current
Swine Canaeity Pnnulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
2880
0
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer I❑ Dairy
I I --d
❑ Non -Layer JE1 Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 2,880
Total SSLW 388,800
Number of Lagoons 0 ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Arca ❑ Spray Ficld Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps 0 ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
DischarL,es & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated Flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(inches)...............44...................................................................................................................................................................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
3123/99 Continued on buck
Printed on 12120M

Printed on 12/20/99
(Facility Number: 40-47 1 Dale of Inspection I2/7/99
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
❑ Yes
® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
®No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
® No
Waste Annlication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
®No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
❑ Yes
®No
12. Crop type Cotton Bermuda Small Grain
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
®No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
®No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
® No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WtlP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes ® No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes ®No
20.
is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes ®No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes ®No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes ❑ No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes ® No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes ®No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes ®No
N,6-vi6lati6ns4r;deficienci6•wete:noted"duringthis visit::You:will:receive nb furtherr
corresaondence about this.visit . . . . . . . • • • • • • • • • . . ....... - • • • • • • • . •
Co"tnmetits �r�far'to question #,): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use ,drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
Naste analysis 1016/99 = 1.4 lbs.
Some ruts were made on right side of lagoon. The outside of the wall where the rats are located needs to be reshaped
)nd seeded.
w
Reviewer/Inspector Name Carl Dunn Entered by Ann Tyndall
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

0 Division of Soil and ,Water Conservation - Operation. Review
t-, '0 Division of Sod -and Water- Conservation Compliance Inspections
t� Division of Water Quality -`Compliance Inspection' �
,
Other Agency - Opeltl0l1 `ReVAeW
! D Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow -tip of DSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection E 2-iR ate)
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Permitted [3 Certified © Conditionally Certified [3 Registered 10 Not Operational Date Last Operated: .............
FarmName county: ..............................................................
Owner Name: .............. .........� 11" U 1 1 Mtn G.i:`'`.. Phone No:.......................................................................................
............................ ............................
Facility Contact: ............................ :.................... ........... .................. Title: Phone No
Mailing Address:
Onsite Representative: ............G..vr.....�................nt�.��� .... ........... Intel;rator:....... ��. t.���af.......`....?.........................................
Certified Operator:.. ...:.............................................A Z'���°^ Operator Certification Number:..........................................
... ....................
Location of Farm:
............................... ........................ .. .... .. ......
Latitude 0 4 '1 Longitude • 4 4&
Design Current
'Swine Canacity Ponulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
2.dg1
0
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts,
❑ Boars
Design Currerif Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population;
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
`Number of Lagoons ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area JEJSpray Field Area
Holdrrig Ponds /Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
0
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made"
h. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of tic Statc? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Dues discharge bypass a lagoon system? (Il'yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:
Freeboard(inches): .... ......�LI............................................................................................................................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99
❑ Yes Ig No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes [9 No
❑ Yes [Z No
❑ Yes 59 No
Structure b
❑ Yes M No
Continued on back

Facility Number: t'fDate of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? El Yes � No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes M No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Yes C9 No
12. Crop type Co 14. , S 6
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application`?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17, Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25, Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
To viola itj>�s o clefciencies mere n¢te� d�rring thls:viS.. Yoh will receive ijq u>j-t t?r
corres oridence: abaU .this visit.: -
❑ Yes �M No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes t9 No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes 9 No
❑ Yes Ej No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes P 'No
Cotnments;( "refer to.jues`ti6n #). 9"Xpiatn' any YES' answers and/or `any'recommendations `o`r iiny other comments. ' P I
Uwjdrawiings, of facility to better explain :situations.' (use additionafoa'ges as necessary).
a
W tSk �,�.Iys S 10/61yy Z t• W-
So irtl5 true_ WN.,IL O.A rf) 4
giti y..�re Y"� rJs at^i IOc...�� Ntle +�c rrrs�.Ytt Ltd
I�;• I'1 Reviewer/Inspector Name ij
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: .may Date: f
3/23/99

apr ivisian vi:�ou anu rvaier � onservauoo vpernuou!neview,T - s - ;
'I�„--"��':u+°<':.r.+7..S a(�n:�.' _ '�-,... -`--,'iasgraw�#' a cv's
0_1,�;N� y t..
}�._,.
E .� ,.. , �w �p Dtvisionof Sotl and�W,ater Conservation CompltanceFInspection, tr , - ,Z'
"u•ii'. ' -i1 `� '
q .� 7 .,;f -
" �• t of Water$.Quali Inspection,
,J,; �.DIv>Sian yL tCompliaace
" tither>Agency,= Op ra on R�r+iew
` '
-
Routine p Complaint o Follow-up ofDWQ inspection p Follow-up
of DSWC review p Other
Facility Number
Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection ® 24 hr. (hh:mm)
p Registered X Certified p Applied for Permit 0 Permitted
JZ3 Not 0perationa Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: Dell"Il main..Liam.Eaxta.........................................................................
County: Greene WaRO
Owner Name: Ileila &..I1]Inxoa................. Gina ............................................................ Phone No:............----...........................
Facility Contact: Genrge.P.e2tus.................................................Title: EnYironmental.Manages;........... Phone No: 919:.7.28:31311.......................
Mailing Address: P 0 .Brix110.009 ..................................................................................... GoJdab.ara,.SIG..................................................... 2753Z ..............
Onsite Representative: Eax.1.Jogexs,.GeargaY.etxus................................................ Integrator: Galdsborn.Hog.Farms.......................................
Certified Operator: Alfred.J. ............................... Liatan ............................................... Operator Certification Number:18625.............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude ' ©. ®4 ©46 Longitude ©• ®6 ©66
❑ can to Feeder
® Feeder to mis
❑ Farrow to can
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Nu niber'6f;Lago6ns'./'1
'Design- urren
esign urren
Pou try
Capacity Population: Cattle E
'Capacity, Populandn
d-•.
❑ Layer
Dairy
;,j
❑
Non -Layer
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑Yes ®No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes ®No
Discharge originated at: ❑Lagoon p Spray Field ❑Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes ®No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ®No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? n/a
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ®No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑Yes ®No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑Yes ®No
5. Does any part of the waste management system {other than lagoons/holding ponds} require ®Yes ❑ No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? p Yes ®No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑Yes ®No
7/25/97 Continued an back

8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Laaoons.Holding Ponds Fl0sh_Pits, eta
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(ft): .............. •3 0----------•......................................................................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? p Yes B No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? p Yes ® No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ® Yes p No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? p Yes ® No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? p Yes N No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ...... Co=a1Barmuda Grass....... Steall,.Grain.4.W1=t Barizy....................... Cotton ................. .................... WlaeaL.sayhean.............
n 1"e'Q
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated mJe Aniatms)al Waste Management Plan (A WMP)? p Yes ®No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
a • 11I0VIUM Ll41l1J•Vi iA G13Li1i311i:lGA VY Gi•C •11V LC�,I •U711111 �' Llll, V1.11 L. Z• Vil• rilll •1 G�iGIVG tau 2UILHVI.
+corres�oncIerice about tliis visit ...............................................
p Yes ® No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes N No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
17 Yes p No
Reviewer/Inspector Name ynBs Hardison�� _ , �t 0z r=
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: � � � r�� Date: 1 / , q Y Cf

Longitude 0° ' "
Poultry ' Capacity Population Cattle ,Capacity,. I
Y t ® Division of Soil and Water Conservation ®Other Agency x
Division of Water Quality
® Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWQ ins action Q Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
Date of Inspection jl-
Facility Number � ��
Time of Inspection t l � `CJ 24 hr. (hh:mm}
13Registered ItCertified ® Applied for Permit [3Permitted IDNotOperational I Date Last Operated:
e
Farm Name: ............... .'. Kh........ G�YIx....................................................................... County:....<<f`'C......I................................. .... ..
Owner Name:..... {.� ........7....... .......................... .... .... Phone No: ....................
Facility Contact: .... &..... ... �.......................... Title:................................................................ Phone
!Mailing Address: :2:4?...... i- o4.... .............................. -C-. !r?1d4. k .........: zve ................
Onsite Representative ... . .' �...... .4:.......go ;S ............... Integrator: ...........C�
.......................................................
Certified Operator--.A+raa.............J. i..Y., ....................... Operator Certification Number,..... . Le.4.2-1?
Location of Farm:
Latitude
F Design. Cal
Swine RA3 ' Capacity -Pope
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish 0-" ;,j
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
4 ❑ Boars
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ® No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes JJ ® No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ® No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes M No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require [9 Yes ❑ No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes 14 No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes iA No
7/25/97

Facility Number: [gyp -- .4 ' I
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes ® No
Structures (Laeoons.Holding 1'oatds. Flush Pits. etc.l
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ,® No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(t't):.....,..,.��Z.........................................................................................................................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ® No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenancelimprovement? YeO
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑ Yes [3 No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes ® No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type . bM .... �"' .. f .....�..� a.t:4.� ..............
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑ Yes 0 No
17.
Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
® No
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
j.No
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
No
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
[ No
22.
Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes
No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities -Only
23.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
® No
24.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
© No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
❑ Yes
❑ No
13: No.vio'lations:or dericiencies.were.noted-during this'.visit.• You.will receive:no'slirtlier.::
:. cQrres'p6hd6nO about fhis:visit'.:� ::.: ;
lam,/9y.
�,.t'v��" /•�►,�� ,1,�-ems ✓� v� &c� � a��u,� �G�� �.�`
7 g7
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date:

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
December 29, 1997
Mr. Ullmon L. Ginn
Della & Ullmon Ginn Farm
Route 4, Box 302
Snow Hill, North Carolina 28580
SUBJECT: Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
Della & Ullmon Ginn Farm
Facility No. #40-47
Greene County
Dear Mr. Ginn:
I-
A
STATE"
W�(1�
On September 16, I997,1 conducted an Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection at the reference facility
and the inspection report is enclosed for your reference. This report reflects the information that was
entered into the Division database and is shared with the Division of Soil and Water and the County's
NRCS office.
In general, this inspection included verifying that: (I) the farm has a Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan (CA WMP); (2) the farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC 2H.0217, Senate
Bill 1217, and the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan; (3) the farm operation's waste management
system is being operated properly under the direction of a Certified Operator; (4) the required records are
being kept; (5) there are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or runoff.
Please review this report and correct all deficiencies that were described, if any, in the commend section of
this report. It should also be noted that the responsible party should consider any recommendations that
were made and make appropriate adjustments. For operational and technical assistance, it is suggested to
please contact your Technical Specialist.
Thank you for your assistance and cooperation during the inspection. If you have any questions pertaining to
the inspection or anything, please contact me at 919/946-6481, ext. 318.
Sincerely,
Lyn B. Hardison
Environmental Specialist
Cc: George Pettus
Greene Co. NRCS
Mike Regans
6--WaRO

IC 9. gEt:Y • 3-yA:S.;ID:ii^7 '.:"'°td'S;e i.'3°^dYIy'—�41�W:i :r w&"�+ y
- Division of Soil and Water Conservation
......iw....M'_.«i^"Yd�fl:�°n.o-e�"".a::i�
13 Other Agency
R" k. wg3 Division of Water Quality
y Routine p Complaint p Follow-up o inspection p Fc
Facility Number��'��
p Registered © Certified p Applied for Permit p Permitted
Farm Name: Dlella/.Llllman.G.inn.EHrM......................................................
Owner Name:lJlella.&.1711znan................. Ginn................
Facility Contact: ...............................................................................Title:
up of DSWC review p Uther
Date of Inspection-�"
Time of Inspection ® 24 hr. (hh:mm)
in Not Operationa Date Last Operated:
........ County: Greene WaRO
........ Phone No:74.7.-59S1...................................................
PhoneNo:... .................................................
MailingAddress: Rt.4..fox.302.......................................................................................... snow-HRIBC ........................................................ 28580 ..............
Onsite Representative: Ullmxtn..Gixtn,.Br:entA itehAll............................................. Integrator: Gnldsbaza.Hog.Farms.......................................
Certified Operator: Ullm=J............................... Gitta ................................................... Operator Certification Number: 2024.............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude ©. ®' ©44 Longitude ©• ®4 ©66
„ i , , esign ~ urren
f Swine N 'FCapacit -Population � 'Poultr
..
I
❑We -an to Feeder
® •ee er to inis
❑ Farrow to can
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
O aye:
p on -
esagnCurrent, esign Current
Capacity Population +'Cattle' .Capacity Population '
❑ Dairy
ayer IJ. ❑ on- at y
Total Des><gn' Capaq i 2,975
r ° Total SSLW 4U1,625
iSNumber of ""goons /�HoldmgiPo'nd� ; �;o p u sur ace rains Present Q . Lagoon rea p 'pray a Are
3•rcrn
& ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
kiencral
f. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes H No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes H No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ® No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? n/a
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ®No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes N No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes ® No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes H No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? p Yes ® No
7/25/97

aci i y Number: 40-A7
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Strdetures (Lagoons,Holding Ponds Flush Pits etc.
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier: ................................... ..........
Freeboard (ft): 2.17
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14 Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
p Yes ®No
p Yes R No
Structure 5 Structure 6
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
® Yes p No
p Yes H No
p Yes ® No
15. Crop type ....... Corn.(Silage.&..Grain)............. CAasW.Rerawda.Grass...... Sinn l-Grain.(Wheat 3arley.............................................................
Milo o)
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plaan (AWMP)? p Yes ® No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
a(. 5:5.vialations.
eres�o aeor atrci�etn�iciies•iw$ie;re.nna uijggis visit., on i receive no further
�basY. . ..
.'Ki.
p Yes ® No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
H Yes p No
Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes N No
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
.'i
, ti a' az :T
t.'.. 7
Date: �'� / L 9

aci ity Number: 40_47 Date of Inspection
AdL�i�lOnB 'i'amment9�and/OriDraWin $:'
.�". ixr•.�, "as�,!.&..aaii i. 3 i °C.€ il Wlfi E V ;q 11+i ,
ips-$ "c 5 : =f3 x; E,Fair ,tr I.• t('iil,t4�:E�;ir'";3€:.,
�a r. I �., 3 . �.E�it;�Y��rl-., .� IYE.a si:. r_iYii I �. ar. �rfi;7l: .. Ali. •. , !r� <«,t ' .�.: .
T dlo tclontamin'Ate' Aso � a e wy ' YnnsT b a remove Jan spouse ipr,,oypeusrs y!;�T e'm consl erationro a antegoty;o e e
lk+'''i�a Btayrx4'3 p .xpl�'yiip,r^ a,�. ��" i...+,�s.�l?'ia�,•�sJ,+.'d! ! r+.'? r'i4y r . TC'rr +re.vY� ?tsi4�.3. i'M+ki "TSie',y ,. s .she-,r.:=t. yVa ,x swn r. r
all when removin the`coR&flinated1soi1 jj1 bistarea must be restored to,,it properfstafe z , • ,� -� ,
.a'e Ji sr' A ii``�i',y-"� r.� aX.p•'.�r "'�trr.E �i>7!
+ w sky u}•,!.r:> k' n.s'4.i f L !yi#^�tt'• t.s•r '-
Lrt' AW,h+r }C i'Tc iiYA�l� fdiklS �f`f 5 4{.�i;•} '11 * is a ,'i 9 6" h'i lSA x! j '! !ij• {1'����;'iyi liiF•Y�a f r, i r M r. w - 7
} �xXd4 -, Syr Sr L�. as31.-
. •.3 F a P �. r�`;,7;3+s�i• 4. �i-;1.5'h� + - e i; � y • `d'
s you•are:dwafe the w&te ihd;soil anilysi§land irnga�ion'recorFds'are required now!however once you receive your General Permit
.�,' ?'.4,.qr OT I-.-�'ny� iu�.M'"5Sr #RMIM r r. '' l,+,f .fiV> E,, rNt.sk }?V4 •� 'r�' :pt'••` ;,5. r, '" J+='r :tk'S' >ti:-M-Z'.y�tM ,
auifill data and,lagoonilevels;{maintenance+records,and of'siteisolids/residua' removal from thefla--oon wsll be required as well
t ''t''�"'''ir`rr; s=i. ar fs f}�t saltt•t
porijrecelvmg.the:permit; readjthrough=aticomp1eGy„and=ifyoi have,any quest ons contactrme°at;919`7946.6481;"?'ext �3�18
�%v%tis1� i,rW-201,
Y .pi+ e.followilig�items`areconditions of`the'Certlfied Animal Waste�M aan gement Plan and1are conditins;fth'e generai permit;€ eur''`
lr};..�E•:S4r''�!S`.�''�?Y4�!'i'�V�.:'��f.:: ��`�i�tN�l7i',!(�"{�R.Yd'?'2��'�!�3}�'>��-.lvrr!r�!�v��M,'x.lyre � ti _r�.• J.y". �. �}fi,�FA�.
eiefOIe'these,ltem5"mUSt;be•iiii lemented'rl`
3 �`• c a �• P 31t. Yj r R i •.K •,•' ....r i :i xi. `• `iA� P ,rr 1 r.ia.i�r..�
tKeep'l�ag� to agelpondsfieeof o�jieinblis ulclud gbutnolmit d�l�llti esbo lspl�t cproductslg}i4'bulbs g1es'y
}!ri11ge5iOr any other sohdS WaSte'ri,�pra� , 4!
Y:t"F A .�: ��.•°t&:nJ •+.�,.rre rLL�., j 4-�i�•o�,�f��! ,ya •$i�iY
Pia disc iar in .wastes into the4la aan slibuldrbe•extended, beneath'th6sdeic- ,7&.thell aon t¢o avoid releasln < asesifrom
:' ii55t6 rY HI�Pa A�• x{ ri JAj a!i ti rr� � �'�7:� Ij� `0. � �^^�yi�4 � $ ri} 3f �y k€1�t�YF'rf f���k!3!]�, ' dt I. ��� rwfrPi 'ti4 �iritf Yr 4, !�ha�
a Itated.wastes � � }.. li i� � r, i" J :• j^� a? 5 i w + r{7 e
5 H . ? �,. Sih'+)+rkc 'S` fj .• kt 'if�r.� ¢7 H 'i-�5•,
�k+fara'`M. �1�4 k siz� �! �� _. i ` : wlr.. a M,.�.i;
rThe'lagoon,areas should be�kept mowed,or otherwise controlled;andraccesslble�Iigh,grass}does not allow,youito conduct a�+=
�ri`�/ff�LF -��'�it� ��lt':n�$I�,S•'�i;�!,�'�%f�rt�'i•,,,f.�;k,s,_i��ry Ys�i��' �$,�'3� ��,rf ? �t •�Mnn� r> tf�s�rxz � ` �,�:.i�;��^°-1`�'•`�"� _t r , ..
orough mspection•of the'lagoon area for seepage, rodent damage, etc.
'tA ana sis of thfe;lq d�?EanTi ttal wasfefro'e"laoo�sh llibexconcudl'as�icla3e taitlie4imeofiaSice ones" raaicaliiandtat�
:a Y g w PP rP tr
"r� $a MOM-17 ' � r� s Tii� ^��it
least withinydays (before or,afteD.ofithejjdaWInwa",
lic Won. jµ1Thls analysis'shall include, a followmg parameters yNitrogen +
KY ;�ri:■ f it a .a ,{ T-Iit i '4• Ct µittyfraY �it3hw�� , ?+t,d rY':% :;i;• ihosphorus Zinc+antippe} �- •'+,' �, •a ri�rP'Fr L ,�, �al 313�19e llued`annually 9 .:i.
' ''tt. ��' �1 i' '!!'2'� . S 'FL 1 r`f"9j p'R,? r5,s i"�<iA^' �..•,Y r3, S"§
'yTa�s�'r.+�! ��n 41`.�'`A.;._.� ..ri.�
"�The•following,r"eco ds�are�re uiiedt rain a11'and•iagoon leveled"ata' off=site sohdss>emoval;;maintenance`, repairxwaste and'soll t `;
i33n'�a��a� I�rzi'" 4£` �`t�`��+`#s�h`"Ea�=;#?''`ivt14
R.
alysis•and=land irrigationlirecord. Tbiese'records:shouldlbe.matntauied�bythe facilityowner/manager,m,chronological arid-legilile..
S. i�IX'6 I #ii n- :,y111- R :$ r.Ctf i i`fl it r '••-+xl RI 1 ,'li' `S �i-w"p�ar�,'2 rY` r ti,t i H.•p 1� •f�•r s 1
�r n`d' d.. e i Y yr" r
formifor a•minimmurn � f t}iree�cars Wt7t i
.'�iM'r;..4•1���,11�46r�.'+Y'ss•ty);.My:17S�ii1 f w„ Mrr� 1;'!•'-"'�lt��.i�'P.�R3.'LA,yrYj�.
k��I-t is suggestedsto keep:crop •yieldriiifarmation for future use;to update;your wasteimanagement plan nyou will need three, years rof
V •w 'tt? r �drk li q rJ > ..1�'t!1 J rt
` a . t r••�s'. iti «t xTx s,FY {�YJt Fi,
ro lelclbefore our lan can be?u dated ' r x A i
P Y y. P Pt ITRI; i 1 " •x13'e CY L'a4 iyi Jti T
tI]$��yviyfir�
-1qg;+ t a€�k R (t•C
� - l9 '. } � i _�; •-i11'i�yjr�` � �. r- i _r �'a �i f $ rr }n,,�{i x r,��`eli �j1}• w�iVm'l��j,..
y '` �. � Y Y }' i{. � .;• f �'� � � Y W� . `f F.T M 1. PSA'°i' f�• �.i4•�i`'. .
Jli1 rV�,`,,�II��F
s rc, t. + t, cy. YIarS °��s ,W� 1 1 s ir^ cC' jx• 'a� s
$ a
A„•t. i': � I �� � �*. :+. ` �i4uF� V E, �;'�� -f' �••* - ,'
1,
e, �' r `.� - A s A" t �i•.. � 21��.,�i, a"[' li r _t T i}, 3 �'+il?I' � - p' r�+l• ;r..:1ij5 �'F S`'-• ''
•► � '�'+ i a Ali, ' .r '�•1 � Y y': _k
'�„t.#, r • I
..j; � � _ YYr�1• !4 r St =,.r' . r`51 .r Y�S Ar r�: ''Fs s
a .. i
tA. •� T� ..�„j 4 ...Sri »t<, i- t r �a ," .� L� �>'��I,��.FL� I�
�" r • .. u, .�] � w „: t �; � I f k1f,.S i '�+ �;{'� �`#fin `w� �,�f j�� ..i`ki
0`iw �. Y.i'` ���w•T•KS; S -•,� 'r•�•;
.m n• � ='�d3N t ems.. =.•!•T'�+S�f"ISr ^,i �' �r "d 'yf '•4x. 55nrr v<. .—v_r^4:�:$i�.+„r� *cfirY;+�d��s Sri r i �-,
l.
- i �7jl.lr! �." �1 i � S +� �i,�• yy ) J _ � f ii• N � - �•
iSs"M~ •T r •#' �'rI4 3 r 'i" '�►.1 $.�) �Yf �� y�i'f i"11 �{l: i°l- _-.tY•-«r+J!•6�r,)r. .E-.
',$h• Yc xrG.`� p ,i v,.'�crr:'ic.jlYLit`��fl� , 'h"r�" '�Geq 7�`r r r tY r. �"t sal Pr .Fi.= ,iri 7i"••'` ,rj ;.
4 V ,f 'Sf e�?g� 3+a'T rY1• `irF'si ¢h L�kr`r.. 1..�'`ilah:
rF 1, A,n •' P ! } K .T#-d F milli fAe 'fit r vt l�&zi iia: ••
C �� ,t '•7i 45t"'a �. rf� �.,,,�!'e,: y41 +a.' Y^.1 frr ,Y h r.„.."'�iis .r
' a`.i rf k i, aX�p 4 ,f i�
nit�•' i _„8 IR �s� ,9� !� w i ii 4°i i}yr7j tC1if4
0.e t tM5
yyr,.,a` . itt.a
'���`'h ':.i a Td" .,S,E Sa� . "" s kf+ Slw�'r �' � I� • 4 �� . � k ':r„� *�fI 1 _ irri.. „rN11
Tt 3{Y" �
A• I' ,j . rni ,i �!e "4P i" �.1 i i�v,l r ,? ', �'�r' a v r�f-41 o,
k 4# ry ,lA k • 'M �� '.1i,,� ) 1 L.,� r. �: S 'i$ MY y
� ,�
til � A ' ;�,. 1 }'ESrJ �, F'.1'�iaf�4ljZ. � i�" L ,r�i1�`1» .ill,' i .5 ���� °3� 1� �R - • �^�'1G.�� �• 1�fSH1a,`+„�+,,�14�4�,, iV':i,
i• t �'• � } i� Y '�9`y� ��,s.�
'�i7� " r•.� ...'C ,yi. r-a�s.r' , y �., j rer,r !jai}..s. rly,'nr, r Ii�(,,1;(r�++fi•,J_7�fS 'a. ia.tn t,.it,.'�r7>,1."xti �`Fi,s'k 5't Sr-,.
aksygy�
>�4 f3.•'',. .''�." � �3"" '�.f �f j #,�j,��� [: 1 �'� i �^e �,n 3 1�` r1,,,e
r; 5 a - e �jr1 f :i .+.Kii>5• 1 4 f ,t��K Tt i,iaS •*
.T... R
r-��• • ��i��?`Y� 'Kepi �� 1: •df 3 >�ji ^�r d71,Y t•3- '. r r r�F4 � , +rA � ,w '�'^
yya .ry .,. M .,•lr •1 Y i �'}r 'dip ". v:•,�' rVrL �s� _ �€r-
.'1y..�'•i•�•"�t.rY��, r r 7., a t? W � r 1 j1� r �t � rS ,:+ r-r� s � �n •s J t - Si r r -
:!n' 7G M.J„i[�12�1�,t�75a�I f-„���AKr$t• 4�4 �.4 x i'�'s �r 4?r i.'ra. y} �,,i A-r. Irir%.i_' 4 Y .lY L .� r.
�.. i 4� "� >,t <�� � n��ft�'?'••�,.%�C��" P•—`-: �..'� ..�}�.F 't�t�`���..sik $; ',.f �` ''�trt � k���*"-��,�'.t,�`�i,',r, ir3 �k�;Y �"x�r i :- � i, :�:;
,{ '•:: �! F tR ..i •r+ : i. ,;j<. •- $ !'}%ivy i rc`.h Yr t%�2 »i J kiq.� tads Z �n..Y�+:�yF:�;:�,:?� T W��Y.:.
�"'1` ,'!' tt'i i la.. Py .s,•ri� T ti t`1 7� .o.; ` "*�}y ..fu'�=?tZ� ;�
�.; - �.+ �, •� ,� ,� +� fir;' -
R.� s �' �,� s,? +T;• � �� � _ r f�'_Y:FjiY.L��i� � �'f � �� � �� ' �� +��•, i �:als�i�S,�r �- .e?
nuyT.'.l�,�n -:i. -f.. �, cr ut S S }1 �• �,,}i+o o-` r ��,y
• �' J'F' T i . . }� '� P +/`!l � �r .::.�,- .•,3,..`-•_• �.E ��F�`}."#r 17.r fr 'i '
YOFl �57� 5� S r?i yy 1 �� rJ Rlk` 1 ` hY,•' p$i • •�� i�
,Y �n "t �i• � fl 8,Y Aiy ,r .� � Y ,
•s+,t ...'er" :r ' r ,r .i ti' 1 7� ,r Q� �'LI. • �� jt • ''# { r:+1;Ci: r � ! ���` A;d r 5
��� ''V'�" r rr� #�s !. ,i � '� � L ���� w��. .�5'.i• a �{t �, � sst -s K ,Cv w•i 71
'� t rl �:' �x a� 1.7�•�ff �q, [�a Y>i��'1 � �r1.1'".'.,'11,�i;iG•• � � �' i �t, .•,x,>;t:i,��'r-^'�.�
.:rrM s.,.�.#, r !. �.. N , • r� .1i�I,+1,y+{dr ;� lr ��,�� tl, i!�'! ,. s.> y rr _� �',11}•1� � �1.�A' , ��€t� C�,'�..-t �'r � rn,
r. 4f,gr•�A.1�!}�,"s F4 r. ;i: SF.. t�y7� r§t-LV�?' �i •is FCi.�,"fa{�.€„ 7.yi4,tFa' r 1,"y� -r 7 s�v''+.} i -`F ♦+j,,' -•r ;r
-
.,f.7 r.h..;i'AY"!C�A-..et '['r y A7_"'�i lflf�1 5"10W.£1..4y lAO rrVF�iiSr.'Ttl r'L., F..I.:i'.... 4 .j..!•,ivifi'vRk�',,L+:S f:r,:t lL .rS'}..3r x•..��

S
{❑DSWC Animal Feedlot Operation Review
s;
ILL
DWQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
�®
Ctoutine 0 Com laint 0 Follow,-u of t)Wt ins ection O Follow- uU of DSWC review O Other
Date of Inspection to-4
Facility Number 4•.D 7
Time of Inspection [:::� 24 hr. (hh:mm)
(a Registered ® Certified 0 Applied for Permit 0 Permitted [3 Not Operational Date Last Operated:
Fatttt name:..�.�.si..�...�J. i�.he4ar>.......� iCounty .!r...........!'.'ta......................... Y..e,~.h..Q................,............... w�l•LCi
Owner Name: `
.....�.�..�,as........�.,
t ...ti..�..1.�.!!t4Q,x-�.........�I.M.--.% ..................................... Phone No: ..... Q.�g..-..f1..`.�--�1..-..��.1.5......,............................
FacilityContact: ........................... Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
Mailing Address: .�,.............................................. �......................IAG................28.�.��..
Onsite Representative:..{..!har,.... l.. N.,.... .e ...... ,. „� �............ Integrator:..GQ.��SbAra......k.s �•rL—
Certified Operator:..1� jl,".tl, 4.......................C-,?..r..........................._......... Operator Certification Number:.....��?.7-`�
Location of Farm:
c
Latitude a I it Longitude ` 4 4`
Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
00 Feeder to Finish
21
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Number of Lagoons / Holding Ponds
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer I ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area I0 Spray Field Area
❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
General
I. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement'? ❑ Yes 9No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation'? ❑ Yes IN No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed. was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed; what is the estimated flow in gal/mini?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes QNo
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes IN No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes UNo
maintenance/i mprovement7
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design'? ❑ Yes F&No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge'? ❑ Yes XNo
7/25/97 Continued on back

1 ,
Facility Number: —
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Structures (La2oons,11oldine Ponds, Flush fits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes IS No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure .3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
............I......................................................................................................................................... I., ........ I.............. ...................................
it
heeeboard(ft.): ..........2_........................ .................,....................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes [$-No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed'? ❑ Yes [9No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? Yes ❑ No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑ Yes B.No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes KNo
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type........C,..Q.jr-ly, .............................. ...............................4P � ... Ch o'!+ st y......
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑ Yes B No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? 4-4,, ,1 ❑ Yes B.No
18.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
RNo
19.
Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
®.No
20.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
ER No
21.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
[jg No
22.
Does record keeping need improvement?
J?] Yes
❑ No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23.
Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
❑ Yes
® No
24.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
Ed No
25,
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit`?
❑ Yes
[3 No
0 No.violations or. de'ficieneie's,were noted -daring this'visit.-.You,rwill re'ceive-no farther
eorrespotideitce about this;visit.
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/oe any recommendations or any other comments.:
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as'necessary) 4 ,
CA-W 1W P cwa i 1 u.bl er aA czN.A� 64at tj �L6 1 e - •
-J�,,,r-; a, - r-e_� a.r e Ltp +� h i �-fi —a-k-L n1,c ► oc�c-1- l��a #
�IQ 3.
.1R-JL d� 4-c. wu.e l G.ae a wt.cQ i,`s� �oQ� s
*, ,�xeA ,a,a-;�k a cQ [�e� , �
A,,J- o-t�.�-* , �-u- t�.u+c,(, cA� PA dd - .4.t_ d$ d t.k.t, 7/25/97
Reviewer/InspectorName
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:a. Date: q -

County
reene
Owner
Vella & U11mon IGinn
manager
Address
Location
Certified
Farm Name
I uena/uuman c,inn rarm
Phone Number
1747-5951
Lessee
Foldsboro Hog Farms
Region
O ARO O MRO O WAKU O WSRU
O FRO O RRO O WIRO
......... .... ..........................
Certified Operator in Charge Pinion L. Finn Certification #
Backup Certified Operator Certification #
Comments
QpeI4 AQ!D ................... Date inactivated or closed
0 Swine p Poultry p Cattle p Sheep p Horses p Goats p None
Design Capacity
Latitude Longitude

Registration Date
Certification Date
DEM Reply
Certification # 000316
Conditional Days
Conditional ❑ irrigation Nystem
Requirements ❑ Higher Yields
❑ Vegetation
❑ Acreage
❑ Other
p Request to be removed G Removal Confirmation Recieved
comments I IAl Basin Name:lNeuse
Regional DWQ Staff I',', Date Record Exported to Permits Database

Division of Soil and Water Conservation p Other Agency
p Division of Water Quality
I* tcoutme p Lumpiaint p ronow-up of uwy inspection
Facility Number
Farm Status: 17 Registered p Applied for Permit
■ Certified p Permitted
in Not Uperational, Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: Della/Ullman Ginn Farm
Owner Name: Dells..&.)Ullman................. G.ittn......................................
Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection ® 24 hr. (hh:mm)
County:Grrccne............................................... .WAL Q........
PhoneNo:.7.4.7.-SQS1....................................................................
Facility Contact: De1hL.&.1[JA=a.Gina.................................Title: ox[Lers ................................................ Phone No: 9,1917.4.7. 210.......................
MailingAddress: RtABor.a02.......................................................................................... Snow.HillNC........................................................ Z850 ..............
Onsite Representative: Della.&..Ullma Gin:tt,Brent.Mi:tchell........................... Integrator: Gi)jlcbara.Hog.Fseats.............. I........................
Certified Operator:l 11moru.L.............................. taint .................................................. Operator Certification Number:Z002.4 .............................
Location of Farm:
a;
+�r
Latitude ©• ®� ©�� Longitude ©•
arrow
®1k
n
Design, Current Design Current Design' Current'
Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
p Myer
' 3 Non -Layer
Total Design -Capacity,
Total SSLW 401,6
,
" Number of Lagoons / Holding Ponds : p u sur ace rains resen p Lagoon rea p pray ie rea
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? p Yes N No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon 13 Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes ® No
b. if discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) 0 Yes N No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) Cl Yes N No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes N No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? p Yes ® No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require p Yes N No
4/30/97 maintenance/improvement?

Facility Number: 4 _47
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? p Yes ® No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? p Yes ® No
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? p Yes ® No
Structures (Lagoons and/or Holding Ponds)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? p Yes ® No
Freeboard (ft): Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
................2.5.................................................................................................................................................................................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? p Yes ® No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? p Yes ® No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ® Yes p No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? p Yes N No
Waste_ Application
14. is there physical evidence of over application? p Yes ® No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ...... C.aasLal.Hcar uda.Gxass...............................Ry.a................................ Catx 4Si1age.&.GxzW....... 5mall.Graia.(Wheat,.Bar1ey,.
Milo. flats)
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? p Yes ® No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? p Yes ® No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ® Yes p No
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? p Yes ®No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? p Yes ®No
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? p Yes ®No
For Certified Facilities Only
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? p Yes ®No
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified A WMP? p Yes ® No
24. Does record keeping need improvement? p Yes ®No
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES' answers and/or any recommendations or any otter comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary);
...... ...., _
o dram tie on accor mg to Mr, Gtnn.
Waste analysis was pulled in 2/97 ; needs to pull again in 8/97 - waste analysis needs to be taken within either 60 days before or
fter pumping event. Need to pull soil samples by 12/97. `
Need to balance nitrogen on HM land application form.
Need to secure either irrigation operating parameters or calibration information.
12. Shape and vegetate eroded areas on dike walls; follow routine mowing schedule to allow bermuda to establish and not be
rhaded out by native vegetation.
8. In field #7 continue to work at establishing bermuda grass/ use weed management and contact technical specialist for assistance
Reviewer/Inspector Name8ODper
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

Site Requires Immediate Attention:
Facility No. - *;Z
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
Date: 'a 7-1 , 1995
Time: ' Do
Farm Name /Owner : -n irk rYY, / D eta, z VC l k yy o n 6 : n ,n
Mailing Address: {
County:
Integrator: - Phone:
On Site Representative: Phone:
Physical Address/Location: !! 1 5B
Type of Operat : Swine � Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: 7-°[-7S _ No. of An a s on Site:
DEM Certification No.: ACE DEM Certification No.: ACNEW
Latitude: 35 F 57 Longitude: -7i Elevation: Ft
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Ft + 25 year 24 hour
storm event? (approxi tely 1 Ft + 7 in) Yes or No
Actual Freeboard: Z Ft Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)?
Was any erosion observed? Coy or No
Is adequate land available for spray?
Is the cover crop adequate?
Crop(s) being utilized:
Yes or No
Yes a No
Yes or No�
Does the facility meet Sinimum setback criteria?
200 Ft from Dwellings? Ye or No 100 Ft from Wells? es or No
Is the imal waste stockpiled within 100 Ft of USGS Blue Line Stream?
Yea orO
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Ft of a USGS Map Blue
Line? Yes or No ~7
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state Pff-yppn-made ditch,
system, or other similar man-made devices? Yes or No
If Yes, please explain:
flushing
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure,
land applied, spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? You or No
Inspector Name Signature
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
Comments & Sketch on Back of Sheet

1
i
DEM
SITE VISITATION RECORD
Page Two
Comments: t'S
i.WP -
�i-
Sketch: