400045_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NORTH CAROLINA ...�
department of Environmental Qual

MEM
r '�'iA ."'v±x,.� `k+ .ra:xs:� I`sy"9•'^" �? r:'a6'� :�.�i Y�� '�"v.::a

Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400M Facility Status: ,Active
Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection
Permit: AWS400046 [] Denied Access
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 09/06/2017 Entry Time: 01:30 pm Exit Time: 2:15 pm Incident #
Farm Name:
Jimmy Dail Farm .�
Owner:
Jimmy A Dail
Mailing Address:
745 Middle School Rd
Physical Address:
2349 NC 123 N
Owner Email: [e-mail]
Phone: [phone]
Snow Hill NC 28580
Hookerton NC 28538
Facility Status: Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35` 27' 12" Longitude: 77' 34' 50"
From Snow Hill take 258 Hwy. North toward Farmville and turn Rt. on 903 North and go to Maury. Turn Rt. on 123 South and go 2
miles and the farm is on the right.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Cot, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Jimmy A Dail Operator Certification Number: 16410
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representativels): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Jimmy Dail Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Jimmy Dail Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Marlene Salyer
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis: soil tested: due 2017
4-28-17 = 1.09
8-8-17 = .631.50
2-25-16 = 1.03
IRR records are complete & balanced out.
Reviewed: sludge survey @49% on 12-2-16; free boardlrainfall; crop yield
Phone:
Dale:
page: 1

Permit: AWS400045 Owner - Facility: Jimmy A Dail Facility Number: 400045
Inspection Date: 09/06/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Hate Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon 1 23.00
page: 2

Permit: AWS400045 Owner - Facility : Jimmy A Dail Facility Number: 400045
Inspection Date: 09/06/17 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No Na No
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
0 ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the Slate (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■ ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collections Storage & Treatment
Yes
No Na No
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
Cl
M ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large
❑
M ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
MEI
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
N ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
0 ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na Ne
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
0000
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ❑ i❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%110lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Permit: AWS400045 Owner - Facility : Jimmy A Dail Facility Number: 400045
Inspection Date: 09/06/17 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste ARplication Yes No Na Ng
Crop Type 1 Coastal Bermuda Grass
(May)
Crop Type 2 Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
E ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
E ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
0 ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Cl
0 ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na No
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
0 ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
N ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWS400045 Owner - Facility : Jimmy A Dail Facility Number: 400045
Inspection Date: 09/06/17 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na Ne
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
M ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
0 ❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■ ❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No Na No
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
0 ❑
❑
and report mortality. rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
0 ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or ❑ ❑ ❑
CAWM P?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? [] M ❑ ❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
page: 5

0
❑
❑
Division of Water Resources
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Other Agency
Facility Number:
400045
Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS400045
Denied Access
Inpsection Type:
Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit:
Routine
County: Greene Region:
Washington
Date of Visit:
09/12/2016 EntryTime:
10:00 am Exit Time: 10:35 am Incident #
Farm Name:
Jimmy Dail Farm
Owner Email:
Owner:
Jimmy A Dail
Phone:
252-747-2424
Mailing Address:
745 Middle School Dr
Snow Hill NC 28580
Physical Address:
2349 NC 123 N
Hookerton NC 28538
Facility Status:
Murph
y
Certified Operator: Jimmy A Dail Operator Certification Number: 16410
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Jimmy pail Phone : [phone]
On -site representative Jimmy Dail Phone : [phone]
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer - Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste Analysis: soil tested: 2016
2-25-16 = 1.03
6-28-16 = 1.06
IRR records are complete & balanced out.
Reviewed: crop yield; rainfall/freeboard: sludge survey at 47% in 2015; tract 1479 field 1-6 used 1001b window extension,
calibration Aug. 2015.
Freeboard range: 16" 2-19-16 ti 34" 9-9-16
page: 1

1
Permit: AWS400045 Owner - Facility: Jimmy A Dail Facility Number: 400045
Inspection Date: 09/12/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 3,000 3,084
Total Design Capacity: 3,000
Total SSLW: 405,000
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon 1 34.00
page: 2

Permit: AWS400045 Owner - Facility : Jimmy A Dail Facility Number: 400045
Inspection Date: 09/12/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No Na No
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
0 ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
M ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
0 ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection Stara e & Treatment
Yes
No No No
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large
❑
0 ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
M ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
M ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
0 ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
r] ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below,
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%110 Ibs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Permit: AWS400045 Owner - Facility : Jimmy A Dail Facility Number: 400045
Inspection Date: 09/12/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes
No Na No
Crop Type 1
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
M ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?.
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
M ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the,facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na No
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
M ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

i Permit: AWS400045 Owner - Facility : Jimmy A Dail Facility Number: 400045
Inspection Date: 09/12/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na Ne
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
■ ❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
0130
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related*to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
■ ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and dale of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
N ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
No
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No Na Ne
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
0 ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately,
30, Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon 1 Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32, Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
0 ❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
N ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
0 ❑
❑
page: 5

A
M Division of Water Resources
El Division of Soil and Water Conservation
El Other Agency
Facility Number: 400045 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS400045
Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reasonforvisit: Routine County: Greene Region:
Date of Visit: 09/08/2015 Entry Time: 09.30 am Exit Time: 10:00 am
Farm Name: Jimmy Dail Farm
Owner: Jimmy A Dail
Incident #
Owner Email:
Phone:
❑ Denied Access
Washington
252-747-2424
Mailing Address: 745 Middle School Dr Snow Hill NC 28580
Physical Address: 2349 NC 123 N Hookerton NC 28538
Facility Status: Compliant C3 Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35° 27' 12" Longitude: 77° 34' 50"
From Snow Hill take 256 Hwy. North toward Farmville and turn Rt. on 903 North and go to Maury. Turn Rt. on 123 South and go 2
miles and the farm is on the right,
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other issues
Certified Operator: Jimmy A Dail Operator Certification Number: 16410
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
Phone:
Primary Inspector, Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste Anaylsis:
8-10-15= .79
5-13-15= 1.27
Soil Tested 2013
IRR records are complete and balanced out on BH with PAN remaining,
Reviewed freeboard & rainfall. calibration/sludge survey=47%
Crop yield= 303,000lbs., new COC.
Fields look good
page: 1

Permit: AWS400045 Owner -Facility: Jimmy A Dail Facility Number: 400045
Inspection Date: 09/08/15 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 3,000 3,087
Total Design Capacity: 3,000
Total SSLW: 406,000
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon 1 39.00
page: 2

Permit: AWS400045 Owner - Facility : Jimmy A Dail Facility Number: 400045
Inspection Date: 09/08/15 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes No No No
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■ ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
M ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection. Storage & Treatment
Yes No Na No
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large
❑
M. ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed andlor managed through a
❑
E ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
M. ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
M ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
■ ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ M ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ M ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

I
Permit: AWS400045 Owner - Facility : Jimmy A Dail Facility Number:
400045
Inspection Date: 09/08/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Waste Application
Yes _No Na-He
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
0 ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
❑
❑
18. is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
M ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No Na No
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
[]
Waste Transfers?
[]
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWS400045 Owner - Facility : Jimmy A Dail Facility Number: 400045
Inspection Date: 09/08/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No Na Me
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
M ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑ ❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
❑ ❑
25. is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
M ❑ ❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
0 ❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
0 ❑ ❑
Other Issues
Yes
No Na Ne
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
01113
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
0 ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
0 ❑
❑
page: 5

l
0 Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400045
Facility Status: Active permit: AWS400045
C] Denied Access
Inpsectlon Type: Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine
County: Greene Region:
Washington
Date of Visit: 09/25/2014 Entry Time: 11:30 am Exit Time: 12:05 pm Incident s
Farm Name: Jimmy Dail Farm
Owner email:
Owner: Jimmy A Dail
Phone:
252-747-2424
Mailing Address: 745 Middle School Dr
Snow Hill NC 28580
Physical Address: 2349 NC 123 N
Hookerton NC 28538
Facility Status: Compliant ❑
Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm:
Latitude: 35' 27' 12" Longitude:
77" 34' 50"
From Snow Hill take 258 Hwy. North toward Farmville
and turn Rt. on 903 North and go to Maury. Turn Rt. on 123 South and
go 2
miles and the farm is on the right.
Question Areas:
Dischrge 8 Stream Impacts
Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents
Other Issues
Certified Operator: Jimmy A Dail Operator Certification Number: 16410
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Jimmy Dail Phone : [phone]
Primary Inspector:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Marlene Salyer
Inspection Summary:
Soil tested: 1012013
Waste Analysis:
9-16-14= .59
5-22-14= 1.10
9-13-13= 1.07
IRR records are complete and balanced out, with PAN remaining.
Reviewed calibration, need Sludge Survey for 2014. crop yield, rainfall and freeboard.
Remember to get a Sludge Survey before Dec.2014
Phone:
Date:
page: 1

i
Permit: AWS400045 Owner - Facility : Jimmy A Dail Facility Number: 400045
Inspection Date: 09/25/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 3,122
Total Design Capacity:
Total SSLW:
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon 1
page: 2

Permit: AWS400045 Owner - Facility : Jimmy A Dail ' Facility Number: 400045
Inspection Date: 09/25/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Ye$
No Na No
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
01111
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
0 ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection. Storage & Treatment
Yes
No No No
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large
❑
M ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
❑
❑
S. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
■ ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yea _NoN� No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11, Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ M ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?�
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN n 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

r
Permit: AWS400045 Owner -Facility: Jimmy A Dail Facility Number:
400045
Inspection Date: 09/25/14 inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Waste Application
Yes No Na No
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
0 ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
0 ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yea No Na No
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
E ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
E ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WU P?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
[]
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4`

Permit: AWS400045 Owner - Facility : Jimmy A Dail Facility Number: 400045
Inspection Date: 09/25/14 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yea No No No
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
N ❑
❑
23, If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
0 ❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
H ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
2T Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■ ❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No Na Ne
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
0 ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon ! Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
❑
❑
page: 5

I
Division of Water Quality
Division of Soll and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400045„ — Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS400045 U Denied Access
Inspection Type: (,compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 09/04/2013 Entry Time: M30, AM Exit Time: jQ120 AM Incident #:
Farm Name: Jimmy Dail Farm -� Owner Email:
Owner: Jimmy A_Qail Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 745 Mioolg QShool Dr Snow Hill NC 28580
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ■ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Muro -Brown LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°27'12" Longitude: 77°34'50"
From Snow Hill take 258 Hwy. North toward Farmville and turn Rt. on 903 North and go to Maury. Turn Rt. on 123 South and go 2
miles and the farm is on the right.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Jimmy A Dail Operator Certification Number: 16410
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Re prosentative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Jimmy Dail Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Jimmy Dail Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400045 Owner - Facility: Jimmy A Dail Facility Number. 400045
Inspection Date: 09/04/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis:
9-20-12 = 1.41 Soil tested: 2011
4-25-13 = 2.19 & sludge =5.05
IRR records are complelet & balanced out. Crop yields, rainfall, & freeboard are recorded.
Sludge removal in May 2013 - IRR records were balanced out with a waste analysis of 11.82 but no supporting record in the records
by Jason Beamon OIC # 28944
Last of June 6126 to July 5th had 9 in. of rain recorded.
Looks Good.
Page: 2

J
Permit: AWS400045 Owner - Facility: Jimmy A Dail Facility Number: 400045
Inspection Date: 09/04/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operatlons Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 3,000 742
Total Design Capacity: 3,000
Total SSLW: 406,000
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
agoon 1 45M
Page: 3

li
Permlt: AWS400045 Owner - Facility: Jimmy A Dail Facility Number: 400045
Inspection Date: 09/04/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ONOO
Discharge originated at,
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ■
❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑ ❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than
❑
■
❑ ❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes
No
NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe
Cl
■
❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑
■
❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■ ❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■ ❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■ ❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400045 Owner -Facility: Jimmy A Dail
Inspection Date: 09/04/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400045
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA
NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift? •
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Coastal Bermuda
Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 3
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
OSO
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400045 Owner • Facility: Jimmy A Dail Facility Number: 400045
Inspection Date: 09/04/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: routine
Records and Documents
Yes No NA
NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
25. 1s the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑ ■ ❑
❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon ❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

Permit: AW5400045 Owner - Facility: Jimmy A Dail
Inspection Date: 09/04/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Records and Documents
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Facility Number: 400045
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
ONOO
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon / Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
10
Page: 7

h
Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400045 Facility Status: Agtive Permit: AWS400045 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: F3gutine County: Region: Wa hington
Date of Visit: 08/1312012 Entry Time: 10:00 AM Exit Time: 10:55 AM Incident #:
Farm Name: Jimmy Dail Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Jimmy A Dail Phone: [phone]
L161i•Ita±In&-Ra..I� , ► :r
Physical Address:
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Wurrghv-Brown LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude; 55' 27'12" Longitude: 7Z°34'50"
From Snow Hill take 258 Hwy. North toward Farmville and turn Rt. on 903 North and go to Maury. Turn Rt, on 123 South and go 2
miles and the farm is on the right.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Jimmy A Dail Operator Certification Number: 16410
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Jimmy Dail Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Jimmy Dail Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector:
Inspector Signature:
Marlene Salyer
Secondary Inspector(s):
Phone:
Date:
Page: 1

ll�
Permit: AWS400045 Owner • Facility: Jimmy A Dail Facility Number; 400045
Inspection Date: 08/13/2012 inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary;
Waste analysis:
8-1-11 = .86 Soil tested: 2011
10-5-11 = .60
IRR records are recorded but not balanced out - waiting on sample records to balance, not enough applications to go over PAN..."'
Remember to pull waste samples every 3-4 months.
Rainfall & freeboard are recorded.
Pigs were sold in March 2012 with the tearing down of old houses and new construction beginning then, no animals have been on site
summer 2012.
Page: 2

Permit: AW5400045 Owner - Facility: Jimmy A Dail
Inspection Date: 08/13/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400045
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Q Swine - Feeder to Finish 3,000 0
Total Design Capacity: 3,000
Total SSLW: 405,000
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
agoon 1 26.00
Page: 3

i
Permit: AVVS400045 Owner - Facility: Jimmy A Dail Facility Number : 400045
Inspection Date: 08/13/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges $ Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■ ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
1100
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■ ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the Stale other than
❑
■ ❑
❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
❑
■ ❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑
■ ❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400045 owner -Facility: Jimmy A Dail
Inspection Date: 08/13/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number : 400045
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA
NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Coastal Bermuda
Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 3 •
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
0011
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 5

r
Permit: AWS400045 Owner - Facility: Jimmy A Dail
Inspection Date: 08113/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400045
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
. ❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑
IN ❑ ❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a PDA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

Permit: AWS400045 Owner - Facility: Jimmy A Dail
Inspection Hate: 08/13/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Records and Documents
Facility Number: 400045
Reason for Visit: Routine
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Other Issues Yes
No NA
NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report
❑
■ ❑
❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? if yes, contact a regional
❑
■ ❑
❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge,
❑
■ ❑
❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field ❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond ❑
Other ❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
33. Did the Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
r
Page: 7

k
.y
Division of Water Quality
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency En --I
Facility Number : Facility Status, &Z'ye _ Permit: Il Denied Access
Inspection Type: Q2moliance Inspgction Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine _ County: Greene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 07/27/2011 Entry Time:09120 AM Exit Time: 10:00 AM Incident #:
Farm Name: Jimmy Dail Faa Owner Email:
Owner: Jimmy Dail Phone: 252-Z4Z-2424
Mailing Address: 745 Middie School Dr SngV Holt NC 28580
Physical Address:
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35'27'12" Longitude: 77'ZA'50"
From Snow Hill take 258 Hwy. North toward Farmville and turn Rt. on 903 North and go to Maury. Turn Rt. on 123 South and go 2
miles and the farm is on the right.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Jimmy A Dail Operator Certification Number: 16410
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Jimmy Dail Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Jimmy Dail Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400045 Owner - Facility: Jimmy A Dail
Facility Number:400045
Inspection Date: 0712712011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis:
11-9-2011 = .52
1-29-10 = 1.2
sample sent off now
soil tested: Oct. 2010
Field 2 - 3 application March- May
" 3- 3 applications in May applications are outside of a sample window to cover them.
When sample analysis comes back - please balance IRR sheets using the highest N level.
Remember to do a Sludge Survey by Dec. 2011
Calib. is due 2012.
Page: 2

Permit: AWS400045 Owner - Facility: Jimmy A Dail Facility Number : 400045
Inspection Date: 07127/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
O Swine - Feeder to Finish 3,000 2,377
Total Design Capacity: 3,000
Total SSLW: 405,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Deslaned Freeboard Observed Freeboard
koon 1 27. 00
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400045 Owner - Facility: Jimmy A Dail Facility Number: 400045
Inspection Date: 07/27/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Via It: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
I Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
❑
■
130
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
0110
8, Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application
You
No
NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400045 Owner - Facility: Jimmy A Dail Facility Number: 400045
Inspection Date: 07/27/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? ❑
Total Phosphorus? ❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type 1 Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2 Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 3 Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■ ❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■ ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
■ ❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■ ❑
❑
16. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■ ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■ ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■ ❑
❑
1f yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400045 Owner - Facility: Jimmy A Dail Facility Number: 400045
Inspection bate: 07127/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Lease Agreements? ❑
Other? ❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement? . ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ moo
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
25. is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon ❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

Permit: AWS400045 Owner - Facility: Jimmy A Dail
Inspection Date: 07/27/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance inspection
Facility Number: 400045
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No NA
NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■ ❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No NA
NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report
❑
■ ❑
❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional
❑
■ ❑
❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWO of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge,
110
❑
❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field ❑
Lagoon 1 Storage Pond ❑
Other ❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
33. Did the Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
34, Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 7

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400045 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS400045 0 Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection , Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 11/03/2010 Entry Time; 10:55 AM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Jimmyj2ail Fa[M _ Owner Email:
Owner: Jimmy A Dail Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 745 Middle School Dr Snow Hill NC 28580
Physical Address: 2349 NQ 123 N Hookertgn NC 28Q§,,,_,,,,,,
Facility Status: E Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Mur j} &gwn LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: N'27'12 Longitude: 77°34'50"
From Snow Hill take 258 Hwy. North toward Farmville and turn Rt. on 903 North and go to Maury. Turn Rt. on 123 South and go 2
miles and the farm is on the right.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other issues
Certified Operator: Jimmy A Dail Operator Certification Number: 16410
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Jimmy Dail Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Jimmy Dail Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400045 Owner - Facility: Jimmy A Dail Facility Number: 400045
Inspection Date: 11/03/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis:
1-29-10 = 1.1
6-15-10 = 1.6
sample was pulled - some applications in Sept/ Oct need balancing out,
soil tested 10/2009 and soil samples have been pulled
#24 has flow meter at this time to do caliberation.
#25 SS has been done by Carl Dunn but there is no copy in the records.
#21 received an application extension for bermuda hay until Oct. 30, 2010 by Louie Johnson.
Freeboard range: 2-6-10 = 17" to 9-25-10 = 42"
Page: 2

Permit: AWS400045 Owner - Facility: Jimmy A Dail
Inspection Date: 11/03/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number:400045
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
O Swine -Feeder to Finish 3,000 1,532
Total Design Capacity: 3,000
Total SSLW: 405,000
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
k—'o'-
1 35.00
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400045 Owner - Facility: Jimmy A Dail
Facility Number: 400045
Inspection Date: 11/03/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other
than from a ❑ MOD
discharge?
Waste Collection Storage S Treatment
Yes No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7, Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■ ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■ ❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■ ❑
❑
improvement?
Waste_Applicatlon
Yes
No NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■ ❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400045 Owner - Facility: Jimmy A Dail
Inspection Date: 11/03/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400045
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No
NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 Ibs,?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manuretsludge into bare soil?
❑
,
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Coastal
Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 3
Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■
Cl ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■
❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■
❑ Cl
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below,
WUP?
❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400045 Owner - Facility: Jimmy A Dail
Facility Number : 400045
Inspection Date: 11/03/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No NA
NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after> 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? ❑
■ ❑
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■ ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■ ❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No NA
NE
28, Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■ ❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 6

Permit: AWS400045 Owner - Facility: Jimmy A Dail
Inspection Date: 11/03/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Otherlssues
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Facility Number: 400045
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑■❑D
❑■❑D
Page: 7

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency II��1
Facility Number: 400045 Facility Status: Active_ Permit: AWS400045 t__.i Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance InsRection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine _ County: Greene Region: Washinaton
Date of Visit: 10f49/2,Q09 Entry Time:09:00 6M Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Jimmy, Qail Farm— Owner Email:
Owner: Jimmy A Dail _ Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 745 Middle School Dr ,Snow Hill NC 28580
Physical Address:
Facility Status: E Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°27'12" Longitude: 77°34'50"
From Snow Hill take 258 Hwy. North toward Farmville and turn Rt. on 903 North and go to Maury. Turn Rt. on 123 South and go 2
miles and the farm is on the right.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Jimmy A Dail Operator Certification Number: 16410
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Jimmy Dail Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Jimmy Dail Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis:
2-25-09 1.8
7-15-09 1.2
soil test 2009 rememeber to do a sludge survey in 2009
Phone:
Date:
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400045 Owner - Facility: Jimmy A Dail
Facility Number: 400045
Inspection Date: 1010912009 ' Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 3,000 2,998
Total Design Capacity: 3,000
Total SSLW: 405,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
kgoon 1 35.50
Page: 2

Permit: AWS400045 Owner - Facility: Jimmy A Dail Facility Number: 400045
Inspection Date: 10/0912009 inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
Q
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■ ❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
11000
discharge?
Waste Collection Stora e & Treatment
Yes
No NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.ed large trees, severe
❑ ■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑ ■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ ■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑ ■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑ ■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑ ■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400045 Owner - Facility: Jimmy A Dail Facility Number: 400045
Inspection Date: 1010912009 Inspectlon Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? ❑
Total P205? ❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type 1 Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2 Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 3 Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■
❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■
❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
■
❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■
❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■
❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■
❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
D
Page: 4

Permit: AWS400045 Owner - Facility: Jimmy A Dail
facility Number: 400045
Inspection Date: 10/09/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? ❑
■
❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■
❑ ❑
Other issues
Yes
No
NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■
❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?.
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400045 Owner - Facility: Jimmy A Dail
Inspection Date: 10109/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400045
Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues
Yes
No NA
NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
■ ❑
❑
32, Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
■ ❑
❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
ONOO
Page: 6

n
N Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400045 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS400045 _ ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Egutine County: Greene Region: Washinaton
Date of Visit: QQ11112008 Entry Time: 01 Q0 PM Exit Time:
Incident #:
Farm Name: Jimmy Dail Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Jimmy A Dail
Mailing Address: 745 Middle School Dr Snow Hill NC 28580
Physical Address:
'��•I•i��Lt6kY��
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: premium Standard Farms Of North Carolina Inc
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35°27'12" Longitude: 77°34'50"
From Snow Hill take 258 Hwy. North toward Farmville and turn Rt. on 903 North and go to Maury. Turn Rt. on 123 South and go 2
miles and the farm is on the right.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection a Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other issues
Certified Operator: Jimmy A Dail
Secondary OIC(s):
Operator Certification Number: 16410
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On -site representative Jimmy Dail Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector:
Inspector Signature:
Marlene Salyer
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis:
7-28-08 = 1.7
5-21-08 = 2.5
soil test Feb 2008 and lime applied
Looks good!
Phone:
Date:
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400045 Owner - Facility: Jimmy A Dail
Inspection Date: 09/11/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400045
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Q Swine -Feeder to Finish 3,000 2,873
Total Design Capacity: 3,000
Total SSLW: 405,000
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
Lagoon 1 30,00
Page: 2

Permit: AWS400045 Owner - Facility: Jimmy A Dail Facility Number: 400045
Inspection Date: 09/11/2008 Inspection Typo: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit. Rouline
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ (D❑
c, Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
MOO
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400045 Owner - Facility: Jimmy A Dail
Inspection Date: 09/11/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number : 400045
Reason for Via It: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No
NA
NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%110 Ibs,?
❑
Total P205?
Q
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Corn, Wheat,
Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Coastal
Bermuda Grass
(May)
Crap Type 3
Small Grain
Overseed
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■
❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? Cl ■
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■
❑
❑
20, Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AW5400045 Owner - Facility: Jimmy A Dail Facility Number: 400045
Inspection Date: 09/51/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Other? ❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)? •
❑
■
❑
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
Q
■
❑
Q
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■
❑
Q
Other issues Yes
No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■
❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ONOO
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit. AWS400045 Owner - Facility: Jimmy A Dail
Facility Number: 400045
Inspectlon Date: 09/1112008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number : 400045__ Facility Status: Actovg Permit: AWS400045 _ ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: QQmoliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Greene Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 0911212007 Entry Time:11:00 AM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Jimmy Dail Farm Owner Email:
Owner: jimMy.6 D@il Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 745 Middle School Dr Snow Hill NC 28580
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35'27'12" Longitude: 77°34' 2"
From Snow Hill take 258 Hwy. North toward Farmville and turn Rt. on 903 North and go to Maury. Turn Rt. on 123 South and go 2
miles and the farm is on the right.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Jimmy A Dail Operator Certification Number: 16410
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On -site representative Jamie Dail Phone:
24 hour contact name Jamie Dail Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary lnspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis:
1-24-07 = 2.1
B-3-07 = 1.8
soil test 3-2007 & lime was applied
#21) waste analysis - did not cover the April 17,18,23,25,&29, 2007 irrigation events an analysis of 2.1 was used from the test in
January 2007. Field 3 had a balance of 289.1 PAN and field 5 had a balance of 193.6 PAN
`*Please remember to pull a current waste analysis for all irrigation events. Preferably one should be pulled every quarter (3 months)!
Page: 1

Permit: AWS400045 Owner • Facility: Jimmy A Dail Facility Number: 400045
Inspection Dale: 09/12/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
G Swine - Feeder to Finish 3,000 2,858
Total Design Capacity: 3,000
Total SSLW: 405,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed freeboard Observed Freoboard
Lagoon 1 28.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWS400045 Owner - Facility: Jimmy A Dail Facility Number: 400045
Inspection Date: 09/12/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
WOO
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks,'or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS400045 Owner - Facility: Jimmy A Dail Facility Number : 400045
Inspection Date: 09/12/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
IS PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? ❑
Total P205? ❑
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type 1 Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
Crop Type 2 Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Way)
Crop Type 3 Small Grain Overseed
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■
❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■
❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
■
❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■
❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■
❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■
❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AW5400046 Owner - Facility: Jimmy A Dail
Facility Number; 400045
Inspection Date: 09/12/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
E
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? ❑
■
❑ ❑
24, Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
0
❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
E
❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■
❑ ❑
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■
❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWS400045 Owner - Facility: Jimmy A Dail Facility Number: 400045
Inspection Date: 09/12/2007 inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Page: 6

r
E Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 400045 Facility Status: Active Permit: NC$240045 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Comnliance_Insoection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 02/21/2006 Entry Time:02000 PM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Jimmy Dail Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Jimmy A Dail w Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 745 Middlg Sphool Dr Snow Hill NC 28580
Physical Address:
Facility Status: E Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 35027'12" Longitude: 77034'52"
From Snow Hill take 258 Hwy. North toward Farmville and turn Rt. on 903 North and go to Maury. Turn Rt. on 123 South and go 2
miles and the farm is on the right.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream impacts Waste Collection r3< Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Jimmy A Dail Operator Certification Number: 16410
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On -site representative Phone: [phone]
24 hour contact name Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: NCA240045 Owner - Facility: Jimmy A Dail Facility Number: 400045
Inspection Data: 02/21/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Soil sample 10-18-05 & lime was applied.
Waste analysis: Only one sample was taken in 2005
8-22-05 = 1.2 , May 31, was the first date of application in 20051
The fallowing irrigation events were not covered by a current waste analysis: however on all fields there was a PAN balance that
should have covered a high reading of N on any sample that "should" have been pulled in the spring of 2005:
Field Date PAN
2 5-31 19.8
2 5-31 22.8
5 6-8&17 20.2
4 6-9 18.0
3 5-31 & 6-14 20.4
Page: 2

Permit: NCA240045 Owner - Facility: Jimmy A Dail Facility Number: 400045
Inspection Date: 02/21/2006
Regulated Operations
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Design Capacity
Reason for Visit: Routine
Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 3,000 2,996
Total Design Capacity: 3,000
Total SSLW: 405,000
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon 1 24.50
Page: 3

Permit: NCA240045 Owner - Facility: Jimmy A Dail Facility Number : 400045
Inspection Date: 02/21/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? 110011
Discharge originated at:
Structu re ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ 0
❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑ ■
❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage 8- Treatment
Yes No
NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
Cl
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large trees, severe
❑ IN
❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■
❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
Cl ■
❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet slacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑ ■
❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No
NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑ ■
❑ ❑
improvement?
11, Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 4

0
Permit: NCA240045 Owner - FaclIIty: Jimmy A Dail
Inspection Date: 02/21/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 400045
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA
NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Com, Wheat,
Soybeans
Crop Type 2
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay)
Crop Type 3
Small Grain
Overseed
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
16, Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 5

Permit: NCA240045 Owner - Facility: Jimmy A Dail
Facility Number : 400045
Inspection Date: 02/21/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑ Cl
23, If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? ❑
■
❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■
❑ ❑
Other issues
Yes
No
NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■
❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 6

Permit: NCA240045 Owner - Facility: Jimmy A Dail
Inspection Date: 02/21/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Other Issues
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32, Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewfiinspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Facility Number: 400045
Reason for Visit: Routine
Page: 7

IType of Vlslt *Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
IReason for Visit *Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 40 45 Date of Visit: 212G121}o4 Time: 1:30
NNot Operational Q Below Threshold
® Permitted -® Certified- [3 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
FarmName:,IAmmy.]}.n.II..I;.ara.................................:................................
OwnerName: Am.RxXA ................................ D?aAl........................................
Mailing Address: 7.4S.Mjddlc.,5sihQaLD?rxxjq ..........................................
Facility Contact: dxtlAW ................................................................Title:...
Onsite Representative: Jimmy......................................................................
County: Ga.Ct~CMC............................................... W.A►RQ.......
Phone No: 251-741-1424.................
S,nD.W.MI1AC........................................................ Z8.55.0 ..............
.................................... Phone No: 714.-92j9.6 ................................
Integrator: t emAtlzn.�Slan�larcl.a�m.QD.�TQst ...........
Certified Operator: Jilgl my.& .............................. VA11.................................................... Operator Certification Number:lG.410..............................
Location of Farm:
From Snow Hill take 258 Hwy. North toward Farmville and turn Rt. on 903 North and go to Maury. Turn Rt. on 123 South +
tnd go 2 miles and the farm is on the right. rr
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 35 • 27 f 12 Li Longitude 77 • 346 F-52-1iL
Design Current
Design Current
. Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
Poultry
Capacity Population Cattle
Capacity Population
0 Wean to Feeder
❑ Layer
❑ Dairy
® Feeder to Finish
3000
3076
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
3,000
❑ Gilts
Total SSLW
405,000
❑ Soars
Number of Lagoons 1L Subsurface Drains Present Spray Field Area
HoldinLy Ponds/ Solid - Traps
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure S Structure 6
Identifier: ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): 22
12112103 Continued

Facility Number: 40-45 Date of Inspection 2/26/2004
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
12. Crop type Corn, Soybeans, Wheat Coastal Bermuda (Hay)
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ®No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
®No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ® No
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge actor below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ Yes ® No
Air Quality representative immediately.
comments (refer to question #}i..Explain'arly YES answers and/or any;recommendations or any other'comments ,t
Use drawings of facility to better explain situaiions. (use' additional pages as 'necessa.ry)::: ❑Field Copy ❑Final Notes
Reviewer/Inspector Name Marlene D. Salyer
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
12112103 U Continued

Facility Number: 40-45 1 Date of Inspection Z126/2004
. Required Records & Documents
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
® No
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
® No
23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
N No
25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
N No
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
®No
27. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
N No
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
N No
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
N No
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
® Yes
❑ No
31. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
N No
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
❑ Yes
N No
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes-
N No
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
N No
❑ Stocking.Fbrm ❑ Crop Yield Farm []Rainfall []Inspection After 1" Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
113 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
dditional Comments and/or` Drawings:
he soil sample was dated 11-25-03rd
analysis: 8-26-03 = 1.4 lbs
5-6-03 = 2.0 lbs
freeboard levels are recorded weekly.
irrigation records are complete and balanced out.
12112103

Technical Assistance Site Visit Report
• Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Q Natural Resources Conservation Service
Q Soil and Water Conservation District
Q Other...
Facility Number 40 - 45 Date: 9122103 Time: 1 1400 Time On Farm: 50 WARO
Farm Name Jimmy Dail Farm County Greene
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address 745 Middle School Drive Snow Hill NC 28580
Onsite
Representative Jimmy Dail/Michele Christensen Integrator 1premium Standard Farms
Type Of Visit Purpose Of Visit
Operation Review
Compliance Inspection (pilot only)
Technical Assistance
Confirmation for Removal
❑ No Animals -Date last Operated:
❑ Operating below threshold
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse
Design , Current
Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
3000
3000
O Routine
O Response to DWQ/DENR referral
O Response to DSWC/SWCD referral
O Response to complaint/local referral
O Requested by prod ucerlintegrator
O Follow-up
O Emergency
O Other...
Design Current
Capacity Population
❑ Layer
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
GENERALQUESTIONS:
1. Is waste discharging from any part of the operation and reaching surface waters or wetlands? ❑ yes ® no
2. Is there evidence of a past waste discharge from any part of the operation that waste reached ❑ yes Ono
surface waters or wetlands?
3. Does any problem pose an immediate threat to the integrity of the waste structure (large trees, ❑ yes ® no
seepage, severe erosion, etc.)?
4. Is there evidence of nitrogen over application, hydraulic overloading or excessive ponding ❑ yes ® no
requiring DWQ notification?
6• Is there evidence of improper dead animal disposal that poses a threat to the environment ❑ yes ® no
and/or public health?
6. is the waste level within the structural freeboard elevation range for any waste structure? ❑ yes ® no
Structurel Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier
Level (Inches) 1 26
CROP TYPES 1corn Soybeans Wheat lCoastal Bermuda -hay I Ismail grain overseed
SPRAYFIELD
SOIL TYPES NoA Jo Lu
7. What type of technical assistance does the onsite representative feel is needed? (list in comment section)
03/10/03
❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
GENERALQUESTIONS:
1. Is waste discharging from any part of the operation and reaching surface waters or wetlands? ❑ yes ® no
2. Is there evidence of a past waste discharge from any part of the operation that waste reached ❑ yes Ono
surface waters or wetlands?
3. Does any problem pose an immediate threat to the integrity of the waste structure (large trees, ❑ yes ® no
seepage, severe erosion, etc.)?
4. Is there evidence of nitrogen over application, hydraulic overloading or excessive ponding ❑ yes ® no
requiring DWQ notification?
6• Is there evidence of improper dead animal disposal that poses a threat to the environment ❑ yes ® no
and/or public health?
6. is the waste level within the structural freeboard elevation range for any waste structure? ❑ yes ® no
Structurel Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier
Level (Inches) 1 26
CROP TYPES 1corn Soybeans Wheat lCoastal Bermuda -hay I Ismail grain overseed
SPRAYFIELD
SOIL TYPES NoA Jo Lu
7. What type of technical assistance does the onsite representative feel is needed? (list in comment section)
03/10/03

Facility Number 40 - 45 Date:
9122/03
PARAMETER
Q No assistance provided/requested
❑ 8. Waste spill leaving site
❑ 9. Waste spill contained on site
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE Needed
Provided
❑ 10. Level in structural freeboard
25. Waste Plan Revision or Amendment
❑
❑
❑ 11. Level in storm storage
26. Waste Plan Conditional Amendment
❑
❑
27. Review or Evaluate Waste Plan wlproducer
❑
❑
❑ 12. Waste structure integrity compromised
❑ 13. Waste structure needs maintenance
28. Forms Need (list in comment section)
❑
El
29. Missing Components (list in comments)
❑
❑
[114. Over application >= 10% & 10 lbs.
❑
El❑
15. Over application < 10% or < 10 lbs.
30. 2H.0200 re -certification
❑ 16. Hydraulic overloading
31. Five & Thirty day Plans of Action (PoA)
❑
❑
32. Irrigation record keeping assistance
❑
❑
❑ 17. Deficient irrigation records
❑ 18. Late/missing waste analysis
33. Organ izelcomputs rization of records
❑
❑
❑ 19. Late/missing lagoon level records
34. Sludge Evaluation
❑
❑
❑ 20. Late/missing soils analysis
❑ 21. Crop needs improvement
35. Sludge or Closure Plan
❑
❑
❑ 22. Crop inconsistent with waste plan
36. Sludge removal/closure procedures
❑
❑
37. Waste Structure Evaluation
❑
❑
❑ 23. Irrigation maintenance deficiency
❑ 24. Deficient sprayfield conditions
38. Structure Needs Improvement
❑
❑
39. Operation & Maintenance Improvements
❑
❑
40. Marker checklcalibration
❑
❑
Regulatory Referrals
41. Site evaluation
❑
❑
❑ Referred to DWQ Date:
42. Irrigation Calibration
❑
❑
❑ Referred to NCDA Date:
43. irrigation designlinstailation
❑
❑
El Other...
system
Date:
44. Secure irrigation information (maps, etc.)
❑
❑
LIST IMPROVEMENTS
45. Operating Improvements (pull signs, etc.)
❑
❑
MADE BY OPERATION
46. Wettable Acre Determination
❑
❑
9 - installed waterway in tow crop field to prevent
47. Evaluate WAD certificationlrechecks
❑
❑
48. Crop evaluationlrecommendatlons
❑
❑
ponding of rain water
2.
49. Drainage worklevaluation
❑
❑
60. Land shaping, subsolling, aeration, etc.
51. Runoff control, stormwater diversion, etc.
❑
❑
❑
❑
3
52. Buffer Improvements
❑
❑
53. Field measurements(GPS, surveying, etc.)
❑
❑
4.
64. Mortality BMPs
❑
❑
65. Waste operator education (NPDES)
5'
66. Operation & maintenance education
❑
❑
57. Record keeping education
❑
❑
6.
58. Croplforage management education
❑
❑
59. Soil and/or waste sampling education
❑
❑
03/10/03

Facility Number 40 - 45 Date: 9/22/03
COMMENTS:
*Coastal bermuda spray field in good condition.
A6
*Veg. well established on dike walls however producer had infestation of grub worm and veg. on top of dike on west side was
destroyed. Planning to reseed as weather and soil conditions permit.
*Lift station is working properly.
*Waste analysis dated 516103 nitrogen is 2.0 Ibs11000 gallons
8/26/03 nitrogen is 1.4 Ibs11000 gallons
*Rain break installed on irrigation pump.
*Soil test for 2002 and 2003 crops in record book. lime was applied to spray requiring more than one ton. Cu and Zn within
guidelines.
55.. reviewed NPDES and producer needs to start recording information on new forms.
*COC needs to be in book.
*Make records available for 5 years.
*Be sure to use the most current waste analysis to balance PAN. Waste analysis should be taken 60 days before160 days
after irrigation event.
*Lagoon level is recorded weekly with drops in lagoon consistent with irrigation events.
*Farm is well maintained
*Need to lower lagoon as soil and weather conditions permit. Follow guidance from waste plan.
TECHNICAL SPECIALIST IMartin McLawhorn
SIGNATURE
Date Entered: 9/25/03
Entered By: IMartin McLawhorn
03/10/03

of Visit © Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation ,
Reason for Visit @ Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
{:f.eve.�.r-ae.e-a.e.sac.-....�-,•�.s.zvavas:evYae.'--+t•....4. �f -.-- :.-reaan.u-._-•r+siu-.asr�ns4 �
u facility Number 40 45 s
DOt of visit: 12-18-2ooz Time: 1120
�e .:._.: _,y<,,-,.:_,�,� �,�._, �.,� u: •:u, a, ...,,. ,:_...a�.u.�x.. Q Not Oarational Q .Below Threshold
Permitted Certified ❑ Conditionally Certded 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ............
Farm Name-, J7lpa yDaUmlntn........................................................................I.....I.......... County: .G=Xlg............................................... WA.i G.......
Owner Name: dxmtuoty..................................... Jj#11............................................................ ... Phone No: 25Z-24.1-2424 ..........................................................
Mailing Address: 745..M.irtdk.&.ehaa1.DAyx................................................................. SaQwZU1N.0 ........................................................ WHO
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative: no -once...........
Certified Operator:JittuGtly?.A............................... DAI.............
Location of Farm:
Title:................................................................ Phone No:
Integrator: Pram1um.S1aa>idard.F&m&.of1Nm rkb............
Operator Certification Number: 16.4 0.............................
a Snow Hill take 258 Hwy. North toward Farmville and turn Rt. on 903 North and go to Maury. Turn Rt. on 123 South
go 2 miles and the farm is on the right.
A,
T
® Swine [I Poultry [3 Cattle ❑Horse Latitude 35 °
.27 Longitude t77 34
.��
Design
Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish 3000 3000
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy _
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 3,000
Total SSLW 405,000
Number of Lagoons 1 M Subsurface Drains Present [! Lagoon Area JXSpray.FietdArest
Holding Ponds 1 Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
'bi _a 5a_a a SIra apap RlnLlr k
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon []'Spray Field ❑ Other
a. [f discharge is observed, was thy cotiveyauce man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is ob.eis,-cd, did it reach Water of the State'? (li'ves. notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is obsorvcd, what is the eslirnaled flow in gal/ivan''
d. Does discharge bypa„ a lagoon systvin? (If.yes, notili DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes M No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes M No
Waste 0illectiun & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes M No
structluv I ShIlChsre 2 Strm;turc 3 Structtirc 4 Straactnrc 5 Structure C
Ideutilier:................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard(anehes); ......3.0................ .................................. .........................................................................................................

v.uvJivl
Facility Number: 407T7771 Date of Inspection 12-18-2002
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintmance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste. ArInlication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type Corn, Soybeans, Wheat Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Small Grain Overseed
❑ Yes M No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes N No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? t ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes N No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes N No
Required Records _& Du utt tints
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ® No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) [ Yes ® No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ❑ Yes ® No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes ® No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes N No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes N No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? 0 Yes ❑ No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes 0 No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes N No
13 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit. -
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any eecommeudations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary): ' ❑Field Copy ❑Final Notes
Unannounced inspection by DWQ
Records were not available.
Please send the following records to 943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, NC 27889: current waste utilization
plan, irrigation records from October 2001 thru present, soil analysis for 2002 with date of lime applications, waste
analysis from October 2001 thru present and freeboard level records from October 2001 thru present. Upon receipt and
review of the requested records this inspection can be completed
The grounds are well kept.
Reviewer/Inspector Name L,
Reviewer/Inspector Signature-
B. Hardison .
Date: �o�9—/d''0.2

_ .A
05103101 Continued
Facility Number: 40-45 Date of Inspection 12-18-2002
Odor lsaues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Additional omments antior, rawings:
The lift station is working satisfactory.
If you have any questions contact us @ 252-946-6481,
Records received 12-30-02:
Waste analysis 12-4-02 = 2.5 lbs, 4-8-02 = 3.0 lbs.
Soil analysis 3-28-02, lime put out on 4-18-02.
agoon levels are recorded weekly.
Irrigation records are complete and balanced out. However, there is questions about the cropping in the WUP. It is
suggested to revise your WUP to match the cropping used, i.e. Tract 1479, field 6 in accordance to-V UP there is 1
ac. of com and 3.52 ac of bermuda however the 1RR2 indicate 4.52 ac of Bermuda. Field 5 has similar decrepancies.
If the irrigation records are correct this will increase the available PAN @ your farm.

\
i
1
O Division of Water Quality
/
and Water COnserVatton�`
u
i< �.
it ' _. O Ot1lerAge Cyl
f�
It h 3 �{¢
Fi9�
.r ¢
J
.,>•5x..r
d h°.i.'�tl i 'tl',a„ i 91
itrd ,.,.rs_..T.nY.-'�;! i Ins'.- fAR'.$ 111E
IJ [ �: irn'f r
L.i Y.i
1
dd
(Type of Visit O. Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation I
Reason for Vis'st OO Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 40 45 Date of Visit: 12-18-2D02 Time: t tao
O Not Operational O Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified 0 Conditionally Certified E3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: d]]tinmy.DA11.EArm......................................................................................... County: G."gXIC ............................................... WAl3.O.......
Owner Name: Jip7truly..................................... Dail............................................................... Phone No: 252-:1.4.7x2424 ..........................................................
Mailing Address: 745.Middle.Scha9l.D.raye................................................................. SnoW.RULNIC ........................................................ 2,85.8Q .............
FacilityContact: .............................................................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
Onsite Representative: Alit-Que..................................................................
Certified Operator:,Liraw.A............................... DA R......................
Location of Farm:
Integrator: >Prcm1um S1=dartl.Farau.Q1t.N.atth...........
Operator Certification Number:,1041Q .............................
From Snow Hill take 258 Hwy. Northtoward Farmville and turn Rt. on 903 North and go to Maury. Turn Rt. on 123 South AL
ind go 2 miles and the farm is on the right.
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle [:]Horse Latitude F —35--1 ° 27 [ 12 Longitude 77 ° 34 6 52 64
Design Current
Design Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
Poultry_
Capacity Population Cattle
Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Fecdcr
❑ Layer
I
1
❑ Dairy
® Feeder to Finish
3000
3000
❑ Non -Layer
I
I❑
Nou-Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
[3Fan-owto Feeder
❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
3,000
❑ Gilts
Total SSLW
405,000
❑ Boars
Number of Lagoons ® Subsurface Drains Present IFO Lut;a,n Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps 10 No Liquid Waste Management System
Aischarp_es & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance than -made?
b. Il'discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (I1'yes, notily DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, uotify I)WQ)
2. Is there evidence; of past discharge from any part of the operation?
v Field Area
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? [:]Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Stmoture 5 Structure 6
Identifier: .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (incbes): ..............30"..............

05103101 Continued
Facility Number: 40-45 Date of Inspection 12-18-2002 t ry
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑Yes ®No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenauce/iuiprovement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any strictures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
H . Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ❑ No
12. Crop type
l3. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
l4. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop nerd improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
Be quircd Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
❑ No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
❑ No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
❑ No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
❑ No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
® Yes
❑ No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
❑ No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary): ❑Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
Unannounced inspection by DWQ
Records were not available.
Please send the following records to 943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, NC 27889: current waste utilization
plan, irrigation records from October 2001 thru present, soil analysis for 2002 with date of lime applications, waste
analysis from October 2001 thru present and freeboard level records from October 2001 thru present. Upon receipt and
review of the requested records this inspection can be completed
The grounds are well kept.
I Reviewer/InspectorName ,. 7__.—
Lyn B. Hardison
Reviewer/Inspector Slenature: /D5 /�/1lY//.Q.d�� Date: `, /,?-0 2,

O5103101 Continued
Facility Number: 40-45 Date of Inspection 12- 8--2002
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Additional omments and/or Drawings:
e lift station is working satisfactory.
f you have any questions contact us @ 252-946-6481.
4

I x ,•ice r� � 4 r r a'. yr a�-x r '�Q�Y� t`4�ti.Q' r" �h rtl� *,�,,L#� p� � ` x f�
of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Date III, Visit: 3-26-2041 Time: 143$
Facility Number 40 4S.
Q Not Operational Q Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified ❑ Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ..............
.
Farm Name: .1ka lay.Daril.lt`orm........................................................................................ County- Qr.eggc ............................................... �'.A�R .......
OwnerName:,1jMMy .....................................Dau ............................................................... Phone No: 25.2:-7.47,-Z4Z4 ...........................................................
Mailing Address: 7.41.Mjddlf.5choal.DrjyR....................................................... ... Sinow- RA NC................................. .. U58.0.............
Facility Contact:..............................................................................Title:....................... Phone No:
Onsite Representative: .............................................................. integrator: L.L.�urpbrry..Co,..............................................
p .ilqualts:..ail....................
Certified Operator: JIMMY .................................... iE AU.................................................... Operator Certification Number:164l0.............................
Location of Farm:
From Snow Hill take 258 Hwy. Northtoward Farmville and turn Rt. on 903 North and go to Maury. Turn RL on 123 South +
and go 2 miles and the farm is on the right.
®Swine ❑ Poultry []Cattle []Horse Latitude 3S • 727 i 12bt Longitude 77 • 1 34 1 F 52 «
Design Current
Swine Canacity Ponulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
3000
2850
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer I I❑Dairy
❑ Non -Layer I ry
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 3,000
Total SSLW 405,000
Number of Lagoons J® Subsurface Drains Present jEl Lagoon Area 10 Sprat' Field Area I
Holding Ponds 1 Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharzes & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge oriRinaied at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. 1f discharge is observed, was the convevance man-made.' ❑ Yes ® No
b. li' discharge is observed. did it reach Water of• the State? (11' ves. notify DWQ) ❑Yes ®No
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in cal/min? n/a
d. Does discharge hypass a Egoon system? (Il' ves, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ® No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure G
Identifier:................................... ................................................................................................................................................................................
hreehoard (inches): 28
05103101
Continued

Facility Number: 40-45
Date of Inspection 3-26-200I
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? Oe/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Wastc Rplication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenancelimprovement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? [:)Excessive Ponding []PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type Corn, Soybeans, Wheat Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Small Grain Overseed
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Reyuired_Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25, Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
et2xg11QA�.Yp�laln?BQT�i�i�'L�0�I1mf�A(OI1SfA c k
y{"0,uiil—AIR rwq�
{1serltgt:` expiaituafiPAs,usearY�iu>agessas `3t: y,' ❑ Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
{ofaisilty',t,dter
.•-...Yi:At.i�"..:.rl+..k�. !'...R�sn_:r--.fF�..'.�.,-. .:�.k�- .....;SA-.,.,. ...�.h. .Y'.h.-.�. :!. :1 F... ;ay'. !-+h w'k2 :ac: �'� t
* Records available for review.
* Hadn't irrigated since Oct. 2000 - No irrigation records to review since last inspection.
_+
* Last waste sample 10-17-00 = 1.5 lbs. Plan to pull another sample very soon.
* Awaiting soil results from NCDA lab. Pulled samples in early Feb. 2001
* Manual/records are well organized.
* Vegetation on dike wall is well established.
* Not planning to grow corn this year. Bermuda hay has been planted. contact your Technical Specialist to revise your waste utilization
lan. Cont. Page 3
Reviewer/Inspector Name Lyn B. ardison
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: , �� Date:
05103101 V Continued

s'
Facility Number: 40-45 Date of Inspeclion 3-26.2001
Printed on: 5/21/2001
O
Qdrir Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
* Practice weed control upon need.
* Suggest to calibrate the irrigation system every 3 years.
* Suggest to check the accuracy of the lagoon marker.
* * If you have any questions, please contact myself or Daphne @ 252-946-6481, ext. 318 or ext. 321.
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
05103101
J

I I I "
otci
oF w A rE9oG
� y
o �
To: Producers
From: Lyn B. Hardison
Environmental Specialist
Washington Regional Office
Date: May 21, 2001.
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Kerr T. Stevens
Division of Water Quality
Subject: Animal Compliance Routine Inspection
Year 2001
Enclosed please find a copy or copies of the Compliance Site Inspection(s) (as viewed in DWQ database) conducted at the
referenced facility by the Division of Water Quality from the Washington Regional Office. Please read this inspection and
keep with all other documents pertaining to your animal operation for future inspections.
In general, these inspections included verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAW T);
(2) the farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC 2H.0217, Senate Sill 1217, and the Certified Animal
Waste Management Plan; (3) the farm operation's waste management system is being operated properly under the direction of a
Certified Operator,, (4) the required records are being kept; (5) there are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or runoff.
As a reminder, please note the following which are conditions of the Certified Animal Waste Management flan and the general
permit; therefore, these items must be implemented:
cp The maximum waste level in lagoons/storage ponds shall not exceed that specified in the CAWMP. At a minimum,
maximum waste level for waste for lagoons/storage ponds must not exceed the level that provides adequate storage to
contain 25 year, 24 hour storm event plus an additional foot of structural freeboard.
cp An analysis of the liquid animal waste from the lagoon shall be conducted as close to the time of application as practical and
at least within 60 days (before or after) of the date of application. This analysis shall include the following parameters:
Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Zinc and Copper.
cp Soil analysis is required annually.
cp The following records are required: off -site solids removal, maintenance, repair, waste/soil analysis and land irrigation
records. These records should be maintained by the facility owner/manager in chronological and legible form for a
minimum of three years.
cp Land application rates shall be in accordance with the CAWMP. In no case shall land application rates exceed the Plant
Available Nitrogen (PAN) rate for the receiving crap or result in runoff during any given application.
tp All grassed waterways shall have a stable outlet with adequate capacity to prevent ponding or flooding damages. The outlet
can be another vegetated channel, an earth ditch, stabilization structure, or other suitable outlets.
(p It is suggested. not required, to keep crop yield information for future use to update your waste management plan. You will
need three years of crop yield data before your plan can be updated.
For your information, any swine facility that has a discharge to surface waters of the State will have to apply for a National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit with the Division of Water Quality, effective January 1, 2001.
Thank you for your assistance and cooperation during the inspection. If you have any questions, please contact your Technical
Specialist or me at 252-946-6481, ext. 31 S.
Cc: 0
LBH Files (inspection form only)
943 Washington Square Mall Washington, NC 27889 252-946-6481 (Telephone) 252-946-9215 (Fax)

L
Facility Number 40 45 Date of visit: 61t 4/2t1d2 Time: 801t
O Not O erationai O Below Threshold
E3 Permitted El Certified 13 Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: dtit> my.DaAE.arm-------- ------ .............................................. County: GMT=................................................Y.4ARO.......
OwnerName:Jimmy ..................................... RUK .............................................................. Phone No: 252:.7.4. A424..........................................................
Mailing Address: z.45.jWddjC.RChQQjjj:W&................................................................. Sa w.HiI1.NC........................................................ 285so .............
Facility Contact:.............................................................................. Title: ... Phone No:
Onsite Representative: diugmy..D.allll!'1CixlbeJk.G.hdaikgi:eat...................................... Integrator: P rcn iu=.S1wWard.Fax=.9f.N.Qrth............
Certified Operator: ,jjm..&.............................. DAH........................ ....... Operator Certification Number: ,16.410.....................
..................... ........
Location of Farm:
From Snow Hill take 258 Hwy. Northtoward Farmville and turn Rt. on 903 North and go to Maury. Turn Rt. on 123 South All,
and go 2 miles and the farm is on the right.
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude Longitude F 52 u
Design Current :,Design Current. Design Current .
Swine : Capacity::Po ulation : Poultry :.' . Capacity Population- Cattle : Cairacity - .Po Whition
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
3000
600
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to I eeder
❑ Farrow to I-'iuish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Othcr
a. If'discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge; is observed, did it reach Water of the: Slate? (If yes. notify DWQ) ❑ yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/mill?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (Ifycs, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impact~ or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ®Pro
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure; 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: .................................... .................................... ................................... .................................... .................................... ....................................
Freeboard(inches): ............ _.4Q...........................................•----...................................... --.----.... .--- ............---................ ...................................

11
05103101 Continued
Facility Number: 40-45 Date of inspection 6/14/2002
5. Are there anv immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ic/ trexss, severe erosion, []Yes N No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑Yes N No
(if any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes N No
& Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes N No
9. Do any stucturcs lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes N No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes N No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Pending ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes N No
12. Crop type Corn, Soybeans, Wheat Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Small Grain Overseed
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes N No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application'?
❑ Yes
N No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
N No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination'?
❑ Yes
19 No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
N No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
N No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yus
® No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ic/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
N No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ic/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
N Yes
❑ No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
N No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge'?
❑ Yes
IS No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ic/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
N No
23, Did Reviewerfinspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
N No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
N No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes N No
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
77
❑ Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
Coastal bermuda fields in good condition and free of weeds.
Waste plan dated 4/4/99.
Soil test dated 3/28/01. Lime applied by GPS according to recommendations. Soil test for 2002 results at farm office. Need to put copy
oil test in record book. Lime was applied at recommended rates according to Mr. Dail.
Waste analysis taken in April 02 with copy at Greene Co. Extension. Analysis was 3.0 lbs/1000 gallons. Need to place copy in record
*Waste analysis dated 12/4/01 nitrogen is 2.5 lbs/1000 gallons
7/3/01 nitrogen is 11 Ibs/1000 gallons. P,
iE i€ �a4 ,-r � ��k 1.1 =M;:J �} ri ;thin {Ff r- ' 6 -L', i , J 4 E;; f i f+. i
Rev iewerllnspector Name " t ` t-
Martin McLawhorn_ � = .:>. T, r � ...1 .... I � -�:,,:
Aaviwavni•lin onanfnM Cionaln M.. lla4n•

O5103101 Continued
Facility Number: 40-45 Date of Inspection 6/14/2002
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge atlor below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
*Lagoon level is recorded weekly.
19. there is not a current waste analysis for irrigation events on coastal bermuda from 9/3/01 thru 10/4/01. No over application noted.
remember to take waste analysis 60 days before/60 days after irrigation events.
*Farm is well maintained.
**Row crops in good condition.

Division of Water Quality
O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Fallow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 40 A5 Date of Visit: b1812000 Time: 12:0o PM Printed on: 6/12/2000
ro Not Operational Q Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified 0 Conditionally Certified 13 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ..............
FarmName:,IAll2mly.J2AljlXUJR........................................................................................ County: G.rujar ............................................... 1?1'ARQ.......
OwnerName: djMMy..................................... 111AJ11............................................................... Phone No: 2.U.-141-2424 ..........................................................
FacilityContact: ..............................................................................Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
MailingAddress: .................................................................. ............... S�nra&Ri I NC........................................................ WIN .............
Onsite Representative:,JjmMy„Palil......................
Certified Operator:,lilalialy..A............................... VAjj .......................
Location of Farm:
Integrator: L.L.li UrP11X9y.CA,. ...............................
Operator Certification Number:a,641Q.............................
CM Swine [3 Poultry ❑ Cattle [3 Horse Latitude 35 • 27 12 Longitude 77 • 34 4 S2
Design Current
Design
Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
Poultry Capacity
population Cattle
capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Layer
10 Dairy
® Feeder to Finish
3000
3000
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
3,000
❑ Gilts
Total SSLW
405,000
❑ Boars
Number of Lagoons 0 ® Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharaes & Stream Impacts
t. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ®No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: ............................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): 35
❑ Yes ® No
Structure 6
.� ».,.... _ ..... ,..... F.

Continued on back
I''ac!141 Number: 40-45 I Date of Inspection 6/8/2000 Printed on: 6/12/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes IN No
12. Crop type Corn, Soybeans, Wheat Coastal Bermuda Small Grain (overseed)
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Reuuired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
0. �4*'W_ao6 is"or d6,60encies•were'noted "during this visit: ' Yoti ryiII -receiive nu further
. _ corresnonclenee about thI .vI I ..... ....... ... ......... . .. .
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
Adequate freeboard level.
Irrigation records complete with nitrogen balance.
Waste analysis 4/13/00 - 1.9 lbs./1000 gals. Soil Analysis 5/00.
Lime applied in March.
Freeboard records maintained for 2000, however no records maintained from Sept. 99 - Dec. 99.
k Well maintained facility.
Reviewer/Inspector Name Qaphne B. Cullom Entered by Ann Tyndall

Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
,,
Facility Number: 40-45 Date of Inspection 6/8/2000 Printed on: 6/12/2000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28.
Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
❑ Yes
®No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29.
Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
❑ Yes
®No
30.
Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
❑ Yes
® No
31.
Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
❑ Yes
® No
32.
Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes
❑ No
Additional Comments an orDrawings:

p uivision of sou and water conservation - uperation Review
p Division of Sol] and Water Conservation - Compliance Inspection
■ Division of Water Quality - Compliance Inspection
p Other Agency - Operation Review
p Routine p Complaint p o ow -up of DWQ inspection p Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection--�$'-'4-
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
■ Permitted 0 Certified p Conditionally Certified p Registered D Not Operan;WaqDate Last Operated: ...........................
Farm Name: Jib 94-Rail.FarM......................................................................................... County: Greene WARO
OwnerName: JIMMy..................................... (?#11.............................................................. Phone No:9.1.M.4272424 ..........................................................
FacilityContact................................................................................Title:...................................... .. Phone No:
Mailing Address: HRIAft.J..O&K.3.19............................. . S.P.QW.RUING........................................................ 2.8HO .............
Onsite Representative: N:a.otte.on.sitr............................................................................ Integrator: L.L.Mu.rphrey.Cry,................................................
Certified Operator: .IISl1[iiY.t1............................... V,gel.................................................... Operator Certification Number:,16,41.Q .............................
Location of Farm:
I!?JifA. �lQYY. tt G..... YlY+. .Q Rhl4k'...A�IiA►l 'r.flAl . R.tll... �.Qtl.......!?.. .,t}IA .ER. Q. A.pAy.�....lAlll... �.QIIs.
3ilASl.g!?.. IIJll1:CS. t11kf� .��i�. 9lt �ll.lS..Rl�.l llc.t �blt.................................................................................................................................................................................
Latitude ©• ©� ©� Longitude ©• ®� ©u
Swine Capacity Population
p
Wean to Feeder
®
Feeder to
Finish
3000
p
Farrow to
Wean
p
Farrow to
Feeder
13
Farrow to
Finis
o
13
Boars
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
p ayer p Dairy
p Non -Layer p N on- airy
p Other
Total Design Capacity 1 3,000
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons jig subsurface urains I -resent 1113L2goonArea in spray VICIU Area I
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps p No Liquid Waste M-anagement system
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes p No
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes I] No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) 0 Yes p No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes p No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes p No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? p Yes p No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway p Yes p No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: .......................................................................................................... .........................................................................................................
Freeboard(inches): ....................................................................................................................... ........................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, p Yes (3 No
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back

facility Wumber: 40_45 Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
Immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? p Excessive Pending p PAN
12. Crop type
p No
p Yes
p Yes
p No
p Yes
p No
p Yes
p No
p Yes
p No
p Yes
p No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CA WMP)? p Yes p No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? p Yes p No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? p Yes p No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? p Yes 17 No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? Cl Yes Cl No
16. is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes p No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? p Yes p No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
la •ado.yiolations.or•deiiciencies were,noted. during this. visit...You.will receive: no.fikher
cotrespondepce About this: visit:::: ::::::::: ....::: ::: :::
omments refer to question ): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other commen
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
Facility is adequate. Coastal Bermuda fields satisfactory.
Freeboard: 14"
Land Quality noted one area that should be revisited on dike wall.
p Yes p No
Cl Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
13 Yes p No
13 Yes p No
Reviewer/Inspector Name `Daphne B. Cullom Lindy Leonard - Div. LQ
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

Facility Number 40 45 Date of Inspection 9-28-99
Time of Inspection 1345 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Permitted M Certified 13 Conditionally Certified 13 Registered 113 Not O erational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: dui[ninny.RAREArm......................................................................................... County: Grecirte ............................................... W. AXA.......
Owner Name: Jimmy ..................................... Dal ............. r:............................................ .... Phone No: 9.19:-.j t1.!2.424.....
FacilityContact: .......................................................................::..... Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
...."... ...... Z85.80............. Mailing Address:)Z.a>xtr.)l..l�ax.32Q....................................................................... .. Snag.�t1l.NC..................................................
Onsite Representative: No-olle.Q7a.sift.....................................
Certified Operator: ,Iirnrn,y-A .............................. Rail .............
Location of Farm:
..... Integrator: la.UiN.Lugpbrcy-co..............................
Operator Certification Number:.16.410.............................
F.ruin..S�nuty.Hi]<1.Ian.,2S.>�.Hxvy...Naxt1<txnxt�,ard.)Fau:n�x�ll�.aid.kurn.�z..nn.9�,3.Naz�tlr.a�nd.ga.:tp.lY�as�cy..T�urrt.A�,.nta..l,2�..S�a�ukh....,.... �
and .gu. 2.milcs.ancl the.larm.is.,an.the .right ...................................................... ............ .......................................................................................... I ...............
...... rr
Latitude 35 • 27 12 �� Longitude 77 ' 34 52 ��
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of th9 operation?. r" '
Discharge originated at: []Lagoon ❑ Spray Field [] Othet
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of Me State? (If yes, notify D WQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the esti ated #low in gallmin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon sptem? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?. r
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment ;
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 *ucture 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier:.............
............................:..............................................................................................
Yes [] No
Yes El No
0 Yes [l No
❑ Yes ❑ No
F1 Yes R No
0 Yes ® No
❑ Yes []No
Structure 6
Freeboard (inches): ................................... .............................
S. Are there an immediate threatk the integrity of an of the structures observed? ie/ trees, severe erosion,
Y + ; >�' ry Y (� [j Yes � [,) No
+• „ . seepage, etc.)
, x
3/23/99 Continued on hack

FacilityN,N n ficr: 40-45 Date of Inspection 4-28-99
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ❑ No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?- ❑ Yes ❑ No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes El No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ ExcQssive Ponding ❑ PAN E] Yes ❑ No
12, Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes 0 No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? 0 Yes ❑ No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. 1- ail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management PI
An'readily available?
(iel WUP, checklists, design,maps, etc.)
19. Does recocd,keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design"?;
21, Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in -charge?
22. Fail to notify,regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ic/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did I2eviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does, facility require a followp: visit by same agency?
25. Were a''•additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
•No•vi ti6ns:6r:diirci6ricici-ivcie:rioia:du' ing t --viiit:: Youw' flfr6 eiv]e:no hirA&:
;,
.Corse%6a'dtdce abbot •this• v-i'sit......................... ;: ............ ' .
❑ Yts ❑ No
�
Q Yes [j No
[]'Yes ❑ No
0 Yes ❑ No

i
EMERGENCY ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST
Drafted September 24, 1999
Facility # ' Q - On -site Representative: Oo ova_ o - ' Contact#
Date - Zg - qq Inspector/Reviewer: """ t :
Tirne: DLQIDam Safety Rep.: 1�
Waste Structures:
1. Structure Integrity (circle one):
Immediate Threat Potential Threat Adequat Other
Comments(does structure need repair/extent of damage, etc.):
2. Allowable maximum lagoon level (circle):
Structure failed and is inoperable .
Immediate Threat - empty immediately
Immediate/Potential - maximum operating level
(inc m top of dike - must be initialed by DLQIDam Safety rep.)
Adequate - ay operate at normal levels
3. Storm impact to lagoon (circle applicable category):
4.
> Structure inundated
(Information related to length of time submerged, etc)
Flood waters saturated outside wall
Estimated distance in inches (ie136 inches from top):
Structure topped over
(was top of dike cut, etc.)
Flood water on from (name of creek, river, etc.)
Circle Basin: IVY se Tar White Oak Roanoke Chowan
Date and explanation of remedial action taken after storm:

Other Parts of Waste .Management System:
Comments (lift station, collection boxes, destroyed houses, etc.)
Waste Application System:
1. Irrigation/application system - comments, assistance needed, etc.:
d t<
2. System is (circle): Inoperable/destroyed Operable but limited Operable
ft
3. F6r inoperable systems (circle):
Lost supply lines Lost hardware (reels, pivots, etc.) Lost pump No power sources
Other:
4. What is needed to repair system and length of time needed to bring back on-line?
5. Would a generator fix situation?
6. Is pump & haul equipment available?
1S ::
Land Application Sites:
1. Is field(s) currently flooded and if yes, what percentage of field(s) flooded?
2. Fields are saturated but not ponded
3. Are receiving crops available? 9 No�Q I
If answered no, estimated time before next cro641anted
4. Fields adequate.'';to` receive waste/,__
5. Comments - remedial action taken after storm which may have affected spray fields:
'.; 6. Are alternative sites or third party land immediately available?

Record keeping:
1. Records were destroyed and in need of reconstruction
2. Records partially complete
3. Records available and complete
4. Date and PAN of last waste analysis
Structure 1: 2: 3: 4: 5:
5. 'jrast lagoon level readings: 1 2 3 4 5 Rainfall Received
Just prior to August 1:
Just prior to August 29:
Just prior to Sept. 15
Immediately after 9115
Current level` .
1
6. Documented volumes pumped from waste structure since Hurricane Floyd:
t' 7. Current animal populations.
Mortality Losses:
1. Number of animals lost:
Y 2. Disposal method used:
3. Does facility lack a means of disposal?
" Use back of sheet for additional comments, sketches, etc. �� S� ,� 6 _

`"
�,p.S-{� �.ct, —

_A
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
July 6,1999
Jimmy Dail '
Route 1, Box 329
Snow Hill NC 28580
W
• 12.
AAN%ft WW0%
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA'DEPARTMENT Or
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURGEs
Subject: Compliance Inspection
Jimmy Dail Farm
Facility Number 40 - 45
Greene County
Dear Jimmy Dail,
On 6/24/99, Carl Dunn from the Washington Regional Office of the Division of Water Quality
conducted an inspection of your animal operation. Please review the enclosed inspection form. This
inspection form should be maintained as part of the.records for your facility. Please note any items that
may be marked with a yes answer and make every effort to correct these deficiencies. You are advised
that you must maintain.a freeboard of at least one foot in your lagoon(s) plus a storage volume sufficient
to accommodate the rainfall and sdbsequent runoff from a 25 year 24 hour storm -event to remain in
compliance. You should consult your lagoon design for the exact freeboard requirement. Please
remember that you must follow your waste management plan at all times.
Thank you for your cooperation in this inspection. If you have any further questions in regard to this
matter or if I may be of any assistance, I can be contacted at [phone] ext. 208.
S incerely,
Carl Dunn
Environmental Engineer
cc: WaRO
L L Murphrey Co.
943 Washington Square Mail, Washington, NC 27889 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled110% post -consumer paper

3':. 0 Division of Soil and Water' Conservatioia `- Operation,Review'
4 U Division of Soil and Water 'ConservationCana fiance Ins ection �
P P : ' a
®'DIVISiOn•of Water Quality =.Compliance Inspection i di
13 Other Agency ;-0' eration3Review:3'; .'
® Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-uE of DSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number L Date of Inspection b-- - 9
Time of Inspection • D 24 hr. (hh:mm)
© Permitted [3 Certified [3 Conditionally Certified © Registered [3 Not Operational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: T.�.. a' �... Fw County:......... ......
f........................................................ _EA__. 4.................................................
OwnerName: .......................... ..... ........ Q�.J.................................................... Phone No:.......................................................................................
FacilityContact: .......................Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
Mailing Address: ...............................
Onsite Representative: ....l ��.Y..... l..... ..................... Integrator:Li........nu ,h.
.:.... ...­y ............................
Certified Operator:...... 7 + "' ""'� .....OA; f Operator Certification Number: ...............................
.............................
.... ......... ...... ..............
Location of Farm:
....................................... ....... ...................
Latitude �• �� Longitude �• �� ���
Design Current Design Current Design Current $'
Swine
' Capacity Population 'Poultry.:''Capacity Population :Cattle , : Capacity Population,',.,
❑ Wean to Feeder ❑Layer ❑Dairy
Feeder to Finish 3�oV -moo �" ❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑Other
OF
arrow to Finish M.......
Total Design Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars Total"SSLW
i
4Number of Lagoons �. ❑ Subsurface Drains Present 10 Lagoon Area ID Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps I0 No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impac
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
h. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (It' yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c, II' discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (I1'yes, notil'y DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes %No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure h
Identifier:
Freeboard(inches):................................................................................................................................................................. I .............
.
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes guf No
seepage, etc.) IM
3/23/99 Continued on back

Facility _; umber: i4 Date of Inspection
(0 2 ^y
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed andlor managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
❑ Yes
No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
T Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
[_—]Yes
No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
19 No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
"No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
❑ Yes
No
12. Crop type corv' �,..k._4- ems 6V AX7 ov"e_V< -
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes
KNo
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
tNo
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
No
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
E�No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
Oc/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
❑ No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
No
10 yiola4iQris'oi deficiencies rv�re inQted dprirtg �bis.visit. • Yoi>E wits �ectriye o:
coeresQondeh 'e. ab' f this .visit. •
u
FU�s�e�awings of facility, to better explain situathans (use additional pages as ne ess a y):.r or any other comments E =, , €s
ents (refer to ' u tion # E p lain an YES { swers andlor any g'recom
ecessary)
9
Reviewer/Inspector Name .,�,
/ i,. .�� '.
�.
_ ,"� t'
f h
l
t E
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
[ L�Q "�,,,_.
Date:
$1
3/23/99

FteilitytI�l tuber: `f 0 — � Date of .Inspection G-2�—°iT
Odor .Issues
26.
Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
❑ Yes
M No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27.
Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
12LNo
28.
Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
❑ Yes
t No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29.
Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
❑ Yes
MNo
30.
Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
❑ Yes
19 No
31.
Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
❑ Yes
V9,No
32.
Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes
'KNo
3/23/99

c
utine p
uivision of son ana water conservation - operation tceview
p Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Compliance Inspection
p Division of Water Quality - Compliance Inspection
p Other Agency - Operation Review
aint p ronow-up of uwy ins
I Facility Number I
■ Permitted E Certified p Conditionally Certified p Registered
Farm Name:Jixnmy..DlaAFatatt ...............................
w-up 01 UJWU review o
Date of Inspection
Tinie rrt Iirspeetion © 24 hr. (hh:mm)
to Not 13perational Date Last Operated:
.............. County: Greene WARO
Owner Name:Jixnxny..................................... Dail .............................................................. Phone No: 252-14.1-2424 .........................................................
Facility Contact : ................................ ....Title: .. Phone No:
MailingAddress: Route..1...Box.329.................................................................................. Saow.Hill.NC.............................. .......................... 2858f1............
Onsite Representative:,limmy..Daill................................................................................. Integrator: L.L.Murpha:ey-CAmpany. ............... ..... I ......... .
Certified Operator:Jilt) my..A............................... Dail..................................................... Operator Certification Number: l64.1.0............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude ©� ©& ©°
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
p Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
13 Farrow to A can
[3 Farrow to Feeder
p Farrow to Finis
13 Gilts
p Boars
Longitude ©•
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
p ayer p airy
p Non -Layer [3 Non -Dairy
p ter
Total Design Capacity 3,000
Total SSLW 405,000
qr
Number of Lagoons
I
®
u
sur ace
Drains
resen p
Lagoon Area
® pray ie ea
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps L
Sys em
rl
No
Liquid Waste
Management
Discharges & Stream lnlpacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes N No
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Field 13 Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes p No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) Yes p No
c, if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes p No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? f] Yes H No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? p Spillway p Yes N No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
]dent i I icr:
Frccboard (inches): ...............2A.....................................................
................................. ................................... .............................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
3/23/99 seepage, etc.)
p Yes ll No
Continued on hail

r
Facility Number: 40-45 I?ate of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
p Yes
N No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
p Yes
® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
p Yes
® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
p Yes
® No
Wasic Annlication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
p Yes
N No
11. Is there evidence of over application? p Excessive Ponding p PAN
p Yes
® No
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Hay) Small Grain Overseed Corn, Soybeans, Wheat
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
p Yes
®No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
p Yes
N No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
p Yes
®No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
p Yes
®No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
0 Yes
®No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
p Yes
®No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
p Yes
® No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
p Yes
® No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
p Yes
®No
20. is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
p Yes
®No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
p Yes
®No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
p Yes
®No
23. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
p Yes
®No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
p Yes
®No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
p Yes
®No
�'No"661ations.or deficiencies.wereuoted-dut*14t6* visit..'f�u,wiil:rereivn na further.:
........ ...... ..... ... ... ...... .. .. ........... .
.orxesparidence: aKoir#this:visit::::::::::::.:.: :.:.: :: :
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
Kecommend signing up for local Neuse Kule options uy 2S/ llyy wan the ureene foil & water conservation District. A
* Given Integrator Registration card.
* Operation utilizing two different waste utilization plans (WUP) because of row crop rotation and —80 acres of tobacco is rotated
through acreage.
14b. Operation has a design map by Crockett Irrigation with D1 information contained within the WUPs with plan based on pulls
and wetted acres. Operation is not subject to a wettable acre determination.
* Waste sample dated 3/26/99 at 2.5 lbs/1000 gal.
* Soils report dated 5/14/98 with lime applied in February 1999
ReviewerlInspector Name Pat Hooper 252/946-6481
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

e O t-omplani
Facility Number
p Division of bon ana water Conservation - tperation meview
p Division of Soil and Water Conservation - Compliance Inspection
Division of Water Quality - Compliance Inspection
p Other Agency - Operation Review
po
■ Permitted M Certified p Conditionally Certified p Registered
Farm Name: Jimmy..Dait.Farm................
-up of Dawi review p
Date of Inspection
Ti file of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
in Not herahaita Date Last Operated:
Count),: Greene WARO
OwnerName: Jimxn)t..................................... Dail.............................................................. Phone No: 9.19=24.1-=4 ........................................................
FacilityContact:...............................................................................Title: ............................................................... Phone No:
Mailing Address: Ronle.L.Rox.329:................................................................................. Sa w-Hill.NC........................................................ 2858ja............
Onsite Representative:,Llmmy..Itail................................................................................. In tegrator: L.L.Marta.cyXa,.............................................
Certified Operator:diupmy.A.............................. Dail..................................................... Operator Certification Number: l�i MAIO ............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude ©• ©z ©4�
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
p Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
[3 Farrow to Wean
[3 Farrow to Feeder
13 Farrow to Finis
p Gilts
p Boars
Longitude ©• ®©°°
V .rp. -...rug -. rp. . GP -
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
p ayer [3 Datry.
p Non -Layer 113 Non -Dairy
p Other
Total Design Capacity 3,000 k
i
Total SSLW 405,000
Number of Lagoons 0 ® u sur ace Drains resen p Lagoon Area In NprayFie]rea
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps r= [3 No Liquid Waste Management Sys em
Dis_c_hart;es & Strean► Impact
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? [3 Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? [3 Yes [3 No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) 0 Yes p No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. 17oes discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) [3Yes [3No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes ® Ncl
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? 13 Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? 13 Spillway p.Yes ®Nu
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): ...............34....................................................................................................... ......................................
..................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (iel trees, severe erosion, [3 Yes ® No
seepage, etc.}
3/23/99 Continued on bun

Facility Number: 40-45 I)alc or Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
p Yes
g No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
13 Yes
g No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
p Yes
g No
9. Do any stuctures tack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
n Yes
g No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
p Yes
g No
11. Is there evidence of over application? p Excessive Ponding p PAN
p Yes
g No
12. Crop type Corn, Soybeans, Wheat Bermuda Small Grain Overseed
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CA WMP)?
p Yes
g No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
p Yes
p No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
p Yes
p No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
p Yes
p No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
p Yes
g No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
p Yes
g No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
p Yes
® No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
p Yes
g No
19, Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
p Yes
g No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
p Yes
g No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
13 Yes
g No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
p Yes
p No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
p Yes
g No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
p Yes
g Nee
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
p Yes
g No
a • N.o.viotations:or• deficienvies•were-noted ;during. this visit.: You' will receive na further. - . - .
......... ............ ... ... ...... ...................
ieorT606ndence: Obirt this:visit::::::::::::::::: :: :
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other commi
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
rE
-V)
Reviewer/Inspector Name Carl Dunn Entered by Ann Tyndall
Reviewerllnspector Signature: Date: l

Printed on 615/20
aer y um er: 40_45 D'Ite o1' Inslicction
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below p Yes ® No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? p Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, p Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? 13 Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) p Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? p Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? p Yes ® No

%..? , .. 1
wh R-,�,
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and
Natural Resources
Washington Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Mr. Jimmy Dail
Jimmy Dail Farm
Rt. 1, Box 329
Snow Hill, NC 28580
4 •�
CDENt
NOR4P'
ENVIRONMENT ANO NA-,rURAL RESGURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
January 21, 1999
SUBJECT. Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
Jimmy Dail Farm
Fac. No. 40-45
Greene County
Dear Mr. Dail:
On June 26, 1998, I conducted an Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection at the referenced facility.
Overall, the operation was found to be in satisfactory condition'. A copy of the inspection report is attached
for your review.
In general, this inspection includes verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified Animal Waste Management.
Plan (CAWMP); (2) the farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC 2H.0217, Senate
Bill 1217, and the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan; (3) the farm operation's waste management
system is being operated properly under the direction of a Certified Operator; (4) the required records are
being kept; (5) there are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or runoff.
The recommendations and/or comments regarding your inspection can be found in the comment section of the
attached inspection form It is very important as the owner and Operator in Charge that ybualdress any noted
concerns, as soon as possible. For assistance, please contact your Technical Specialist and/or the local Soil &
Water Conservation District Office:
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance during the inspection. Should you have further questions or
comments regarding this inspection, do not hesitate to call me at [phone], ext. 321.
Sincerely,
Daphne B. Cullom
Environmental Specialist II
cc: Greene County SWCD Office
J�ake�arrow, L.L. Murphrey Company
,> °�`O
943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, North Carolina 27889
Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

Facility Number Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection � 24 hr. (hh:mm)
o Registered N Certified p Applied for Permit 13 Permitted Ia Not 0peratlona I)ate Last Operated:
Farm Name:.Jimmy..Dail.Farm......................................................................................... County: Greene WARO
OwnerName: Jimmy ..................................... Dail .............................................................. Phone No: 9190.4.-142.9...........................................................
Facility Contact: ................................ ..............Title: ... Phone No:
Mailing Address: Rt.l..l ox.329.......................................................................................... SaAh:.kJi11NC......................................................,. 2858-Q .............
Onsite Representative: Jimmy..Dail................................................................................. Integrator: L.L.Murphxey..Campany..................................
Certified Operator: Jimmy.A.............................. Dail..................................................... Operator Certification Number: 16414.............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude ©.©� ©« Longitude ©• ®& ©64
Ca acts
p.._
p-Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to FimsF
E3 arrow t0 ean
E3 Farrow to Feeder
13 arrow to Finis
13 G11ts
p Boars
esign r urren ; E f;� : Design
ultry ` Capacity, Population` . Cattle =; CapacityPo,
ry1 p Non -Layer :f E p Non- airy
a, f a NE
Des>Ign Capacity4�
4 T0 SS 405,00
•q -:i t I i,Y.l•
} '1g ` ;
iAyV .
usurace Drains
Presen
p...
go., on a
re-a
prayiP
p�
ea�
I I•$p..�.:, . �Ld,. Y .a
.
o Liquid aste
._ ..
ana ement
..a. .r...e
System10
1 I; ait. ^
I �_
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: 13 Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a Lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
p Yes ® No
13 Yes ® No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
13 Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No

ac, y Number: 4p_45 Date of Inspection
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? p Yes N No
Structures (La2oons,Holding Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? la Yes H No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (ft): 2.7 ft.
10. is seepage observed from any of the structures? 0 Yes N No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? p Yes ® No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? p Yes ® No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? p Yes N No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? p Yes N No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ...... Coauall l ainuda.0mas............. Cam4Silage.&.aaui)....... ....................... Meat ..................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? p Yes ig No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
w�-
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
a. oviar ions.or �erencies'were.nn a uring this visa You willreceive no urt er . .
. coir<>responhiiee'sb�d�'tiiis v;sit::
Reviewer/Inspector Name
t3 Yes ® No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes R No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ® No
p Yes N No
p Yes p No
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date: 16 _' e� - Cs

p utvislon of nion ana water conservation E utner Agency
p Division of Water Quality
ieounne p tlompiaint p roiiow-up of Dwy inspection p rc
Facility Number
p Registered E Certified p Applied for Permit p Permitted
Farm Name: Jimmy..11ail.Farm........................................................
Owner Name: Jimmy ..................................... Dail..............................
Facility Contact: ...............................................................................Title:...
Mailing Address: Rt.1-Hol,3.29....................................................................
Onsite Representative: dimmy.J?ail............................
p utner
Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection ® 24 hr. (hh:mm)
in Not Op=Date Last Operated:
County: Greene WARO
Phone No: 919.-.7.4.7.:2424..........................................................
.. Phone No: ....................................................
Saaw.hill.NC........................................................ 285811..............
Integrator: L.L.Murphrey.Hog.Company.......................
Certified Operator:,fimnay.A ............................... hail..................................................... Operator Certification Number: 16410 ............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude ©• ©� ©�� Longitude ©• ®` ©
esign Current
SWthe Capacity Poopulation
[3 Weanto Feeder
® Fee3er to F in­i_sTi7_
--79MT—
_=�L]
p Farrow to can
p Farrow to Feeder
13 Farrow to Finis
13Gits
p Soars
Design , Lurrel t Design v,urrent
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
13.ayer [3 Dairy
p Non -Layer 113 on- airy
C] Other
Total Design Capacity 3,000
Total. SSLW ,, 405,0
umber o Lagoons / Holding Ponds 1 1 1p bunsuriace Drams rresent llp
Lagoon Area
1p spray riela Area
l
[3 No Liquid Waste Management System
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
p Yes
® No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
p Yes
® No
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
p Yes
p No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
p Yes
p No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
p Yes
p No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
p Yes
®No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
p Yes
®No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
p Yes
®No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
p Yes
®No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
p Yes
®No
7/25/97

Facility Number: 40_45
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons,Holding Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier . ................................... .
Frccboard (ft): 2.1
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenanceAmprovement?
(If any of questions 9-I2 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
p Yes N No
p Yes ® No
Structure 5 Structure 6
p Yes H No
p Yes N No
p Yes N No
p Yes N No
p Yes ® No
15. Crop type......Cnastal.ft=da..(hay.�............. Small,kimia.DX@XSeeA....... ......................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? p Yes ® No
17, Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
a(. ao•vieiasiiones�i.oer� �bucr�eitnhciiSeYs'iwsie�r:.e..nuanngrs visit.. en will.receive nor further .
C• .
p Yes ® No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes 13 No
Comments (refer to questio. n #) 'Explain any YES answers and/or -,any recommendations tins or any other comments.
Use drawings dfYacility to better explain, situations. (use additional pages" as necessary):
subsurface drainage farmer states
aste analysis 10/8/97. Soil test not back yet,
ill weeds inside slope will be cut.
igation records slight error will be corrected.
ill get copy of certification form to Mr. Dail.
wration very neat. Hydrant system in place.
11 /21 /97
.Il
Reviewer/Inspector Name (Tlonald'1VI: Smith
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

y, State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Washington Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
December 19, 1997
Mr. Jimmy Dail
Jimmy Dail Farm
Rt. 1, Box 329
Snow Hill, NC 28580
SUBJECT: Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
Jimmy Dail Farm
Facility No. 4045
Greene County
Dear Mr. Dail:
On October 1, 1997, 1 conducted an animal feedlot operation site inspection at the referenced facility. Overall, the
operation was found to be in satisfactory condition. A copy of the inspection report is attached for your review.
In general, this inspection includes verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
(CAWMP); (2) the farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC 2H.0217, Senate Bill 1217, and
the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan; (3) the farm operation's waste management system is being operated
properly under the direction of a Certified Operator; (4) the required records are being kept; (5) there are no signs of
seepage, erosion, and/or runoff.
The recommendations and/or comments regarding your inspection can be found in the comment section of the attached
inspection form. it is very important as the owner and Operator in Charge that you address any noted concerns, as soon
as possible. For assistance, please contact your Technical Specialist and/or the local Soil & Water Conservation District
Office.
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance during the inspection. Should you have further questions or
comments regarding this inspection, do not hesitate to call me at [phone], ext. 32).
Sincerely,C�� S i
• 4 Atli
Daphne B. Cullom
Environmental Specialist 11
cc: Greene County SWCD Office
Mike Regans, Greene County NCCES
Jake Barrow, LL. Murphrey Hog Company
i a—T
943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, NC 27889 'Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

le ecoutine p Lompiaint p ronow-up of uwv inspecrion p ronow-up of u�,wc, review p Inner
Facility Number Date of Inspection - -
Time of Inspection 1-5-1324 hr. (hh:mm)
p Registered 0 Certified p Applied for Permit p Permitted in Not Uperationa Date Last Operated:
Farm Name; JJxnmy.Da,i JEarnx........................................................................................ County: Greene WARO
OwnerName: Jimmy .................................... Dail .............................................................. Phone No: 911.7.41- 424..........................................................
FacilityContact: ...............................................................................Title:............................................................... Phone No: ....................................................
Mailing Address: RU..Box.329.......................................................................................... SRow.HillNC................................................ 285811..............
Onsite Representative: Jimmy.-Dail................................................................................. Integrator: LI.Murpli :ey.liog.Company........................
Certified Operator: Jimmiy.A,. ............................. Dail..................................................... Operator Certification Number: 16410 ............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude • ©4 ©64 Longitude ©• ®& ©"
esign, • urren
Swine Capacity Population
p
Wean to Feeder
®
Feeder to
finis
p
arrow to
can
p
arrow to
ee er
p
arrow to
trus
p
Gilts
13 Boars
esign L;urrent Design Current
.Poultry °'Capacity °Poptifation 1Cattle' .Capacity Population
1] airy
p Non -Dairy
p er
Tota[Design Capacity 3,000
Total SSLW ,
ayer
Number of Lagoons 1 Holding Ponds � 1 J; p�bsurf,
n
p o tqu
General ,
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
- b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated ilow,in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
p Yes
®No
0 Yes
®No
p Yes
p No .
p Yes
p No
. p Yes
p No
• p Yes
®No
p Yes
®No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holdingpopds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/47
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ®No

ace y um er:46-45
I
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
p Yes
®No
Structures (Laaoons,Holding Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
1
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
p Yes
®No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (ft): 2.1 ft.
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
p Yes
® No
11, Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
p Yes
® No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
p Yes
R No
(if any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13, Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
p Yes
® No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
p Yes
®No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ......Cona.(%laga.&..Grain)............... Uastal.HernutdaJm)i........ Small.jaraia.(Wheat,.Barley,.........................................
.......
Milo a )
I6. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management p anjAWMP)?
p Yes
® No
IT Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
p Yes
®No
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
p Yes
®No
19. is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
p Yes
® No
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
p Yes
®No
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
p Yes
®No
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
p Yes
®No
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
p Yes
®No
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
p Yes
®No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
p Yes
®No
Q. owiulations.or erenctes-were.noo nring rsvist . ou Will .relreiveno further.'
Cet'�espolt�leRe� �but�iis :
Comments.F(refer-Ao,question #) ,.Explain any ,VES, answers and/orjany�recommendations otanyother comments i,.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use add�tion al�pages as neccssary)s
v h
Certified amnia waste management plan needs certification form, waste analysis, & soil analysis...
Irrigation records'(IRR-2) need to be recalculated
� ' 4 .,�,y .s.,, .� : _ ..: ••� .. �_..^ ..r LL.7 • .• ' r+d`' e S X�. ,w '. ,.^t a ... �" i'. `m.'� a� � � S,. _ -
� -vf'- ,.. _ Cz'f { y.r _ �ti , . �S �{, � "'r,^+' _ .m _ i.,> - rh w:. "T�C� ..� rr.w - * '• '
e following it6ms'*e"condition's of the'Certwed'Animal Waste Management`P1an and tfie'ge 'eralpermFtrtlierefore-these items
must be implemented: . ; ;.
Keep lagoons/storage ponds free of foreign debris including, btit not'Urnited to tires, -bottles, plastic Oroducts, light bulbs, gloves,
syringe5'or any other solids -waste: - - 7/25/97
Reviewer/lnspectorhome VD Iige B ;Cullom '" _, rtw 1 "' ` "
Reviewer/InspectorSignature: �."1.1, 6 , 0e&�C_ Date: 10 - Ze- 9 :2

Facility"NumSer: 40-457 Date of Inspection r-'TU-T-37-1
lAdditional Comments 1;��A.14;1�,,- I.J, , - - ..
--r!Y�r`Drawlnwls-,�,
kqt
19ases from
i'The'lagoon ,areas ihou4'be-kiept mowed orb6erwiselcontroll6d and accessiblet sigh gross,does ,'not oflowy6u,td'c,6idfict a
ihor mspecdopof_ he lagoon area -fors,ee—age,-rc -nt7da6 An analysis,ofh'il'quwastc�fbnk i�lagoon shallbe: coRu as,coseto' eti 6'o"applicadon,as
practical
ind it
least within 60 -days ,(before 'or �iftr)-d the diii cdapplication. 'This, abilysis shill, in'clude the toilowii�g,-p�ieters: Nitrogen,
kO;jli61
x
an ysis is required
:S�i 1, al annually i
The following records are -re'q'u1red.-,-.kg'oon repair, waste and soil analysis and
land inigation'r&or&--',-Ibese recoidi-sho'uld be'Maintaifi'ed b0iifacility, 6wnerhniL*er'jfi chr6nologic'al and legible -form for a
IMMUM
Ir
-xq
VLOf
L zz—, . :,
71
L ,
yrr Win.
4,AS
T7 T. ..... . .
'i M,
71.
lrl-2-171` "I',
z4
. .... .....
7.
X
F,
4.7
7
-Ha
A
7
Z
J.
;:Erl WOW

W
Site Requires Immediate Attention: No
Facility No. 46_A:!
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
Date: 7-/8 , 1995
Time:
Farm Name/Owner; �� N, v Q _� �.�,� -0
Mailing Address:
County: G rzcEoj c,
Integrator: Phone:
On Site Representative: Phone:
Physical Address/Location:
Type or operation: wi 3doo P
Design Capacity: c-jo No. o
DEM Cert. No.: ACE DEM
Lat : 35. _ 3 7 Zug Long: _�
Ca
f Animals o S te:
Cert. No.: ACNEW
(67? Elevation:
Circle Yes or No
e
Ft
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Ft + 25
year 24 hour storm event? (approx. 1 Ft + 7 in) Yes or No
Actual Freeboard: 3 Ft 0 Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or 4o - Was any
erosion observed? Yes or §�Is adequate land available for
spray? or No Is the cover crop adequate? Cgie or No
Crop(s) being utilized:
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria?
200 Ft from.Dwe11ings? Y-e- _or No 100 Ft from Wells? or No
Is the animal wade stockpiled within 100 Ft of USGS Blue Line
Stream? Yes or Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated
within 25 Ft of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes o Is animal waste
discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditrc.4. flushing
system, or other similar man-made devices? Yes or N
If Yes, please explain:
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records
(volumes of manure, land applied, spray irrigated on specific
acreage with cover crop)? Yes or
Tio A �� U
Inspector Name Slgnatur
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
Comments & Sketch on Back of Sheet

tr�
DEM
SITE VISITATION RECORD'
Page Two
Comments:
Sketch: