The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About370018_INSPECTIONS_20171231NUH I H LAHULINA Department of Environmental Qual INSPECTIONS. r ]: . . - .. .1 ❑ DSWC Animal Feedlot Operation Review K: DWQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site InspectionPER y� 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other Date of Inspection !O -2`97 Facility Number 3-7 i£� Time of Inspection ! 3 ' oU 24 hr. (hh:mm) Total Tillie (in fraction or flours Farm Status: Registered ❑ Applied for Permit (ex.1.25 £or 1 hr 15 min)) Spent on Review ❑ Certified ❑ Permitted or Inspection (includes travel and processing) Not O perational Date Last Operated: ............................................................................................................................................ Farm Name............ 5. �.5. �!.L! 4.......... 5.1 .I.: ............... .:.'^s .. County':...........,........,.......................................... .................. OwnerName: 50A �,' c S { �N�,•-S T-e. plume \o:.......................................................... .�. I............ .............................................. I... i .................... ............................. ........ Facility Contact: �' } �rda.. Title ............................ Phone No:................................................... MailingAddress: ................. ................................................................................................... ..................................................................................... .......................... OnsiteRepresentative:.......... .^.................................................................................. Integrator: ...................................................................................... Certified Operator:................................................................ ... Operator Certification Number:. Location of Farm: Latitude ° 4 �:4 Longitude ° _ :c Type of Operation Design Current Swine Capacity Population ❑ Wean to Feeder ❑ Feeder to Finish ❑ Farrow to Wean Farrow to Feeder 450 O ,[-]Farrow to Finish ❑ Other Design Current Design Current' Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population ❑ Layer --]❑Dairy ❑ Non -Layer 10 Non -Dairy Total Design Capacity Total SSLW Number of Lagoons / Holding Ponds J❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area JE1 Spray Fie.. ld Area General 1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No 2. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes Pd No Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other a. If dischan-,e is observed, was the conveyance roan -made? ❑ Yes ❑ No b. Udischarce is observed. did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gal/min? d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes ❑ No 3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 2q No 4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes 81 No 5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require Yes ❑ No 4/30/97 maintenance/improvement? Continued on back Facility Number: 6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? 7_ Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? 8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed'? Structures tLazoons andlor Holdin2Ponds) 9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? Freeboard (ft): Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 3, 5 ................................................................................................................................................... 10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? 11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? 12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? (If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) 13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or'maximum liquid level markers? Waste Application t4. Is there physical evidence of over application? (If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes IN No ❑ Yes No 1A Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes 0 No Structure Structure 6 ....... ...................................... ... ...................... ... ❑ Yes `� No ❑ Yes ,� No ❑ Yes No 15. Crop type........................................................................................................................................................ 16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWTW)? 17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? 18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? 19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? 20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? 21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fait to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? For Certified Facilities Only 22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? 23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? 24. Does record keeping need improvement? Reviewer/Inspector Name 19 Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes %No VYes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No Reviewer/Inspector Signature: c9i Date: /c2- L-f) cc: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit 4130/97 MSMINGTnRECE)VEDnrc IV F DSWC Animal Feedlot Operation lZeview DWQ Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection E M 1* Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up (if MW inspection 0 FollowF-tie of DSAVC reviem. 0 Other r- Date of inspection L Fac�ilityv Number 37 Time of inspection 24 hr. (Iihmim) Total Tinie (in fraction of hours Farm Status: E9 Registered ❑ Applied for Permit (ex. 1..2-; for I hr 15 min)) Spent on Review [:) Certified ❑ Permitted or Inspection (includes travel and processing) JUNot Operational I Date Last Operated: ..... . M. A �.qq4 . . .................................................................. I .................................. Farm Name: ... FAAm, S... . ..................... ................... .................................. .............. ....................... Owner Name:..... Phone No-1d.-.(V .. ................................... ...................... Facility Contact: .................. Title: ................................................................ Phone N o: 7qAl MailingAddress: ...... &X .... ....................................................... ...... ............. ..................... .......................... Onsile Representative: ............................................................... Certified ......... Location of Farm: .... - ....... -- ..... Integrator: ...................................................................................... ........................ Operator Certification Ntimber:.,20.20.0 .... ........... ........................ .................. I ....................... ............ I ........ .............. I ...... - .......... -1.1 ....... ............ I-- ................. I ....... ............ ............... ,a ... otv P4( 4&W.4 ...&. ..... .................. Latitude 0 C '4 Longitude 0 ;4 Tvpe of Operation Ij Swine 0 Wean to Feeder El Feeder to Finish -- El Farrow to Wean P Farrow to Feeder 0 Farrow to Finish 0 Other Design Current Design Current Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population El Layer ID Non -Layer Design Current Cattle Capacity Population IEl Dairy I E] Non -Dairy Total Design Capacity ?Op q Total SSLW ,,?3? II Number of Lagoons /lIolding Ponds U� F]—S—ubsurface Drains Present 10Lagoon Area I[] Spray Field Area Geller -al 1, Are there any butlers that need rTiairiteiititceliniproveiiient? 2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation'.' Disch.irge originated it: 0 Lagoon El Spray Field El Other a. 11-discharge is observed, was the conveyance nian-made? h. It'discharoe is, observed. did it Surface Water?(It'ves, notify 1� 1 y DWQ) c. If di,-,,:hari,-e is observed. what is the estitilated flow in galinlill'? I d. 0 3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? 4. NVere there any adverse inipacts to the waters of the State other than frorn a discharge? 5. Does any part of the waste rnanageinentsystern (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require 4/30/97 El Yt:,; 0 No El Yes CA No 0 Yes C1 No El Yes [I No El Yes El No El Yes M No El Yes R1 No 1K Yes 0 No Continued an back laacilityNumber: 37 6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design'? ❑ Yes ® No 7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes ® No 8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes F) No Structures (Lagoons and/or Holding Ponds) 9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes ® No Freeboard (ft): Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 ..... . .......... ................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes No 11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ® Yes ❑ No 12. Do any of the structures need maimen ance/improve men t? R Yes ❑ No (If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ) 13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? M Yes ❑ No Waste Application 14. is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes ❑ No (If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ) 15. Crop type............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑ Yes ❑ No 17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No 18. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No 19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No 20, Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes ❑ No 21. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes JS3 No For Certified Facilities Oni 22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No 23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes ❑ No 24. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No IO SaSSUAFACE f/NA6E &5( 111X JDA&4 )• � Tf1iS 016A4710N Nos ,W ItAll," 9LS 4Ar Loc,+nely 14I" #,e T/naE Of".eEYIE/,+J . 7. E RArin.4ts 6v&7t'e L4sT SrbGKBv �N 7�'�s OAS rem /yt�9 i o� /99G . S MxD APoL1,-, A7//OAI Or ItAS'Xs' )960r" IRe L/Y�A✓ !S A 6W6,E;;W /Ir 2W (J/EeATiaV a4r7iAVu�5 JAI Ar Ty%f ram, surf c/tw7- MAIO I X64¢(,E IS ,te7- 4A,A144" AM 7!E NHS or T� QPE,e97ivtl /b�Q /5" Ak�G�rd/n.(G c,EoP Ef3"r4Bccs/><e�. XOAI Il. rH ARE iu b ARMS 6F kE� � A4sv fir- Bu.FouGtl G�4S ��P A�'v� /i2 14A,' INIA &rr S.sbricd 'CEPA1"A Ja?_ cE.7 rT�� i/ - Cc: UMS[on of water Vhratay, water Livattty Jection, racitlty eissessnrent unit 4/30/91 Facility Number: j 7 - ig Date of Inspection -x Fdjk�o,iViDr, a ! � q u � rQ£[� /4T TIME Of �✓1�u1. G�li�L 6E" kEqu�/lED WIC Cf,�TiFfC.477at1 � � R� Cu.UCAJ r 40AS iZ' IM I)VA6!'MEv 7 - &.qA1 /N EFFEGT 147- 9WI5 TIME ZC -/rlUyTianl TRIti'ES �l cf A Gc.%jiP (,�iL c� 6C �2E<luIREv, "S` Lr lq&LlC- 7/-M) EG?u�Pme,t� /.S A✓,gi��St� p �lis QPEG4�oN fi�oL�WEc/Et'' G�.vri4 7�/C Ac.CEAGE~ ,¢AI,b &GCOV6 CRoP /9RE l VXX, ' du 14H,6 14i141,4770A✓ Gv/� 6� 1}/FFicu�l Iq I154SE (,iW1771 Fi A^5 ) s AIV&774!�-t a)PI-i oAl Tf/AT 4Vy 6E Iq ✓,� Icy 6�, 4/30/97