370003_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NORTH CAROLINA
Qepartment of Environmental Quality
INSPECTIONS
INSPECTIONS
• Division of Water Resources D
D
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Other Agency
Facility Number: 370003 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS370003 -----
Ina clive Or Closed Date: lnpsection Typo: Structure Evaluation
Reason for Visit: Routine ~~----------County: _G_a_te_s _____ Region:
Date of Visit: 06/09/2016 Entry Time: 11:20 am Exit Time: 11:30am Incident#
Farm Name: George Lang Farm Owner Email:
Owner: George Lang Jr Phone:
Mailing Address: 160 US Hwy 158 W Gatesville NC 279389437
Physical Address: Honey Pot Rd
Facility Status: D Compliant D Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy-Brown LLC
D Denied Access
Washington
252-357-1072
Location of Farm: Latitude: 36' 26' 15" Longitude: 76' 42' 26" -----
Question Areas:
• Dischrge & Stream Impacts • Other Issues
Certified Operator: George L Lang Operator Certification Number: 19368
Secondary OIC(s):
On-Site Representstlve(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name George Lang Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary lnspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
No animals on site since June 2015.
Freeboard is being maintained.
Good stank of grass in pasture to irrigate on if needed.
page:
Permit: AWS370003 Owner-Facility : George Lang Jr Facility Number:
Inspection Date: 06/09/16 lnpsection Type: Structure Evaluation Reason for Visit:
Waste Structures
Typo Identifier Closed Date Start Date
Dislgnated
Freeboard
I lagoon I PRIMARY 1 06/08/94
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at:
Structure
Application Field
Other
a. Was conveyance man-made?
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
State other than from a discharge?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon I Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
19.00
370003
Routine
Observed
Freeboard
Yes No Na Ne
Yes No Na Ne
23.00
ooo•
D
D
D
page: 2
Facility Number: 370003 -----
• Division of Water Resources D
D Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Other Agency
Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS370003
inactive Or Closed Date: lnpsection Type: Compliance inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine ~~-----------------County: _G_a_t_es _____ Region:
Date of Visit: 09/30/2015 Entry Time: 09:00 am Exit Time: 10:15am Incident#
Farm Name: George Lang Farm Owner Email:
Owner: George Lang Jr Phone:
Mailing Address: 160 US Hwy 158 W Gatesville NC 279389437
Physical Address: Honey Pot Rd
Facility Status: D Compliant D Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy-Brown LLC
0 Denied Access
Washington
252-357-1 072
Location of Fann: Latitude: 36o 26' 15" Longitude: 76" 42' 26" ------
Question Areas:
• Dischrge & Stream impacts • Waste Col, Stor. & Treat • Waste Application
• Records and Documents • Other issues
Certified Operator: George L Lang Operator Certification Number: 19368
Secondary OIC(s):
On-Site Representative(&): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name George Lang Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
. inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary lnspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Note: officially "shut down" this operation on June 1, 2015. However the lagoon is still active. Since no plans to have animals on
site again, the houses are being torn down.
Waste analysis:
5-12-15 = 1.33
11-01-14 = 1.14
Irrigation records need to be balanced out.
soil tested in 2015, reviewed rainfall records. Freeboard level was 18" on 10-8-2015.
page:
..
Permit: AWS370003
Inspection Date: 09130115
Regulated Operations
Swine
I • Swine ·Wean to Feeder
Waste Structures
Type Identifier
!Lagoon I PRIMARY
Owner-Facility : George Lang Jr Facility Number: 370003
lnpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Design Capacity Current promotions
Closed Date
1 06106/94
7,000
Total Design Capacity:
Start Date
Total SSLW:
0\signated
Freeboard
19.00
0
7,000
210,000
Observed
Freeboard
26.00
page: 2
Permit: AWS370003
Inspection Date: 09/30/15
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Owner-Facility: George Lang Jr
lnpsection Type: Compliance Inspection
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at:
Structure
Application Field
Other
a. Was conveyance man-made?
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
Facility Number:
Reason for Visit:
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection. Storage & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./large
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Aoplication
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Pending?
Hydraulic Overload?
Frozen Ground?
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
PAN?
Is PAN> 10%/10 lbs.?
Total Phosphorus?
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
Outside of acceptable crop window?
Evidence of wind drift?
Application outside of application area?
370003
Routine
Yes No Na Ne
Y" No Na NB
•ooo
D
o•oo
Yes No Na Ne
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
page: 3
Owner-Facility : George Lang Jr Facility Number: Permit: AWS370003
Inspection Date: 09/30/15 lnpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Waste Apolicatlon
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Records and Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Penmit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
Checklists?
Design?
Maps?
Lease Agreements?
Other?
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
Weekly Freeboard?
Waste Analysis?
Soil analysis?
Waste Transfers?
Weather code?
Rainfall?
Stocking?
370003
Routine
Yea No Na Ne
Corn, VVheat, Soybeans
Fescue {Hay, Pasture)
yea No Na Ne
D
D
D
D
D
D
•ooo
• D
D
D
D
D
D
D
page: 4
Owner-Facility: George Lang Jr Facility Number: Permit: AWS370003
Inspection Date: 09/30/15 lnpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Records and Documents
Crop yields?
120 Minute inspections?
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintBin a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
(i.e., discharge .. freeboard problems, over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon I Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
370003
Routine
Yes No Na Ne
0
0
0
0
o•oo
o•oo
0
0
0
Yes No Na Ne
0
0
0
page: 5
Facility Number: 370003 ---'----
lnpsectlon Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
• D
D
Division of Water Resources
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Other Agency
Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS370003
Inactive Or Closed Date:
--------------------------County: _G_a_te_s _________ Region:
Date of Visit: 06/11/2014 Entry Time: 01:00pm Exit Time: 2:20pm , Incident t#
Farm Name: George Lang Farm Owner Email:
Owner: George Lang Jr Phone:
Mailing Address: 160 US Hwy 158 W Gatesville NC 279389437
Physical Address: Honey Pot Rd
Facility Status: • Compliant D Not Compliant Integrator. Murphy·Brown LLC
D Denied Access
Washington
252-357-1072
Location of Farm: Latitude: 36o 26' 15" Longitude: 76o 42' 26"
Question Areas:
• Dischrge & Stream Impacts • Waste Col. Stor, & Treat
• Records and Documents • Other Issues
Certified Operator: George L Lang
Secondary OIC(s):
On-Site Roprosontativo(s): Nama
24 hour contact name George & Joan Lang
On-site representative George & Joan Lang
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer
Inspector Signature:
Secondary lnspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis:
5-30-14 = 1.03
3-4-14= 1.30
11-6-13 = .90
8-20-13 = .78
soil tested March 2013
4-11-13 = .80 IRR records are recorded & partially balanced out with PAN available.
Sludge survey Oct. 2013 Calibration 6/2014
Lime was applied in April2014
LOOKS GOODI
-----------
• Waste Application
Operator Certification Number: 19368
Title Phone
Phone:
Phone:
Phone:
Date:
page:
Permit: AWS370003
Inspection Date: 06/11/14
Regulated Operations
Swine
I • Swine~ Wean to Feeder
Waste Structures
Typo Identifier
I Lagoon I PRIMARY
Owner-Facility: George Lang Jr Facility Number: 370003
lnpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Design Capacity Current promotions
Closed Date
1 06/08/94
7,000
Total Design Capacity:
Start Date
Total SSLW:
Dlsignated
Freeboard
19.00
7,891
7,000
210,000
Observed
Freeboard
24.00
page: 2
'·
Permit: AWS370003
Inspection Date: 06/11/14
Discharges & Stream lmoacts
Owner-Facility : George Lang Jr
lnpsection Type: Compliance Inspection
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at:
Structure
Application Field
Other
a. Was conveyance man-made?
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
Facility Number:
Reason for Visit:
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection. Storage & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./large
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does ariy part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Pending?
Hydraulic Overload?
Frozen Groulid?
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
PAN?
Is PAN> 10%/10 lbs.?
Total Phosphorus?
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
Outside of acceptable crop window?
Evidence of wind drift?
Application outside of application area?
370003
Routine
Yes No Na Ne
Yes No Na Ne
Yes No Na Ne
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
page: 3
Owner-Facility : George Lang Jr Facility Number: Permit: AWS370003
lnspeclion Date: 06/11/14 lnpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Waste Application
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Records and Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Penmit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
Checklists?
Design?
Maps?
Lease Agreements?
Other?
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
Weekly Freeboard?
Waste Analysis?
Soil analysis?
Waste Transfers?
Weather code?
Rainfall?
Stocking?
370003
Routine
Yes No Na Ne
Corn, \Nheat, Soybeans
Fescue (Hay, Pasture)
Yes Np Na Ne
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
page: 4
Owner-Facility : George Lang Jr Facility Number: Permit: AWS370003
Inspection Date: 06/11/14 lnpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Records and Documents
Crop yields?
120 Minute inspections?
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fall to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
~5. Is the facility' out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT} certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly.dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon I Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
370003
Routine
Yes No Na Ne
D
D
D
Yes No Na Ne
D
D
D
page: 5
Division of Water Resources • D
D
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Other Agency
Facility Number: 370003 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS370003 ------
Inactive Or Closed Date: lnpsection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine ~~-----------------County: _G_a_te_• _____ Region:
Date of Visit: 06/04/2013 Entry Time: 10:00 am Exit Time: 11:20 am Incident#
Farm Name: George Lang Farm Owner Email:
Owner: George Lang Jr Phone:
Mailing Address: 160 US Hwy 158 W Gatesville NC 279389437
Physical Address: Honey Pot Rd
Facility Status: • Compliant D Not Compliant Integrator. Murphy-Brown LLC
D Denied Access
Washington
252-357-1072
Location of Farm: Latitude: 36o 26' 15" Longitude: 76" 42' 26"
Question Areas:
• Dischrge & Stream Impacts • Waste Col, Stor, & Treat
• Records and Documents • Other Issues
Certified Operator: George L Lang
Secondary OIC(s):
On·Site Representative( a}: Name
24 hour contact name George & Joan Lang
On-site representative George & Joan Lang
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(&):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis:
1-17-12 = .88
4-24-12 = 1.8
8-30-12 = .63
2-01-13 = .85
soil2012 & 31712013
---------
• Waste Application
Operator Certification Number:
Title Phone
Phone:
Phone:
Phone:
Date:
4-11-13 = .80 IRR records are recorded. Reviewed rainfall, freeboard & crop yields.
'calibration & sludge survey are due in 2013.
New WUP dated May 15, 2013
19368
page:
Permit: AWS370003
Inspection Date: 06/04/13
Regulated Operations
Swine
I • Swine • Wean to Feeder
Waste Structures
Type Identifier
I lagoon I PRIMARY
Owner-Facility : George Lang Jr Facility Number: 370003
lnpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Design Capacity Current promotions
7,000 5,079
Total Design Capacity: 7,000
210,000
Closed Date Start Date
1 06/08/94
Total SSLW:
Disignated
Freeboard
19.00
Observed
Freeboard
21.00
page: 2
Permit: AWS370003
Inspection Date: 06/04/13
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Owner-Facility: George Lang Jr
lnpsection Type: Compliance lnspectiorl
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at:
Structure
Application Field
Other
a. Was conveyance man-made?
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
Facility Number:
Reason for Visit:
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection. Storage & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures r_equire
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Pending?
Hydraulic Overload?
Frozen Ground?
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
PAN?
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
Total Phosphorus?
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
Outside of acceptable crop window?
Evidence of wind drift?
Application outside of application area?
370003
Routine
Yes No Na Ne
yes No Na Na
yes No Na Ne
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
page: 3
Owner-Facility : George Lang Jr Facility Number: Permit: AWS370003
Inspection Date: 06/04/13 lnpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Waste Application
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Records and Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
Checklists?
Design?
Maps?
Lease Agreements?
Other?
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
Weekly Freeboard?
Waste Analysis?
Soil analysis?
Waste Transfers?
Weather code?
Rainfall?
Stocking?
370003
Routine
Yes No Na Ne
Corn, VVheat. Soybeans
Fescue (Hay)
yes No Na Ne
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
page: 4
Facility Number: Permit AWS370003
Inspection Date: 06/04/13
Owner-Facility: George Lang Jr
lnpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Records and Docur11ents
Crop yields?
120 Minute inspections?
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon I Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
370003
Routine
Yes No Na No
D
D
D
Yea No Na N&
D
D
D
page: 5
,
• Division of Water Quality
O Division of Soli and Water Conservation
D Other Agency
Facility Number: ~37LJO.!!.Ot~~0~3 ____ Facility Status: e,A!<Icta:.iv:!!e ____ _ Permit: AWS370003 0 Denied Access
Inspection Type: Cgmp!jance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for VIsit: Region: Washjnqtgn
Date of VIsit: 06(26/2012 Entry Time: 1 O·OO AM Exit Time: JQ-50 AM Incident#: --------
Fann Name: George Lang Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Geome Lang Jr Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 160 US Hwv 158 W Gatesyjl!e NC 279389437
Physical Address: tH!!;ownlll•Y.vl:P:~<o!!_t jjROld _______________ _
Facility Status: • Compliant 0 Not Compliant Integrator: Myrohy-Brown LLC
Location of Farm; Latitude: 36°26'15" Longitude: 76°42'26"
Question Areas:
iii Dischrge & Stream Impacts
ljl Records and Documents
iii Waste Col, Star, & Treat
iii Other Issues
iii Waste Application
Certified Operator: George L Lang Operator Certification Number: 19368
Secondary OIC(s):
On-Site Representative(&): Name
24 hour contact name
On-site representative
George & Joan Lang
George & Joan Lang
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer
Title
lnspectorSignature: -------------------------
Secondary lnspector(s):
Phone
Phone:
Phone:
Phone:
Date:
Page: 1
i
Permit: AWS370003 Owner~ Facility: George Lang Jr
Inspection Date: 06/26/2012
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis: .
7-13-11 = 1.5
1-11-12 = .88
4-18-12 = 1.8
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
soil tested: 4-13-2012
IRR's are complete & balanced out on wheat-one irrigation event on the corn is balanced out.
Rainfall & freeboard are recorded. Stocking form is complete.
Facility Number : 370003
Reason for Visit: Routine
Sluldge survey was done on Oct. 2011, average sludge at 42.4"-the form is not completed, waiting on assistance, will finish by the
end of July & fax to WaRO.
Looks Good!
Page: 2
,
Permit: AWS370003
Inspection Date: 06/26/2012
Regulated Operations
Swine
Iii Swine -Wean to Feeder
Waste Structures
Type
[a goon
Owner· Facility: George Lang Jr Facility Number: 370003
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for VIsit: Routine
Design Capacity Current Population
7,000 3,581
Total Design Capacity: 7,000
210,000
Identifier Closed Date Start Date I PRIMARY 1 06/08/94
Total SSLW:
Designed
Freeboard
19.001
Observed
Freeboard
23.001
Page: 3
Permit: AWS370003 Owner-Facility: George Lang Jr
Inspection Date: 06/26/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at:
Structure
Application Field
Other
a. Was conveyance man-made?
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
Facility Number: 370003
Reason for VIsit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
O•OO
0
0
0
O•OO
O•OO
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) 0 • 0 0
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? 0 • 0 0
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than 0 • 0 0
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? 0 • 0 0
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? 0
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./large trees, severe 0 • 0 0
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on-site that are not prope~y addressed and/or managed through a waste management 0 • 0 0
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? 0 • 0 0
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, 0 • 0 0
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or 0 • 0 0
improvement?
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or 0 • 0 0
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? 0 • 0 0
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Pending?
Hydraulic Overload?
Frozen Ground?
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
0
0
0
0
Page: 4
'
Permit: AWS370003
Inspection Date: 06/26/2012
Waste Application
PAN?
Is PAN> 10%110 lbs.?
Total Phosphorus?
Owner· Facility: George Lang Jr
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
Outside of acceptable crop window?
Evidence of wind drift?
Application outside of application area?
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
Facility Number : 370003
Reason for VIsit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
0 • DO
0 • DO
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? 0 • DO
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Records and Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
0 • DO
0 • DO
Yes No NA NE
0 • DO
0 • DO
0
Page: 5
Permit: AWS370003 Owner· Facility: George Lang Jr Facility Number : 370003
Inspection Date: 06126/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance inspection Reason for VIsit: Routine
Records and Documents
Checklists?
Design?
Maps?
Lease Agreements?
Other?
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
Weekly Freeboard?
Waste Analysis?
Soil analysis?
Waste Transfers?
Weather code?
Rainfall?
Stocking?
Crop yields?
120 Minute inspections?
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
box( es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
Yes No NA NE
0
0
0
0
0
D•DD
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 • DO
0 • DO
0 • DO
0 • DO
0
0
0
D•DD
Page: 6
Permit: AWS370003 Owner-Facility: George Lang Jr Facility Number : 370003
Inspection Date: 06/26/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for VIsit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? 0 • 0 0
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report 0 • 0 0
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the lime of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional 0 • 0 0
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge, 0 • 0 0
freeboard problems, over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon I Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
O•OO
0
0
0
O•OO
O•OO
O•OO
Page: 7
• Division of Water Quality
0 Division of Soli and Water Conservation
D Other Agency
Facility Number: ,.37LJO.t>o,.o,.3 ____ Facility Status: cA,.ct.,jy,.e ____ _ Permit: 8WS370003 0 Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compljance lnspectjon Inactive or Closed Date: --------
Reason for VIsit: .I:IQ!.Ill[llL _____________ County: ;;,Gillatllieiiis ____ _ Region: Washjngtpn
Date of VIsit: 0711412011 Entry Time: 11·00 AM Exit Time: 11·55 AM Incident#: --------
Farm Name: Gegrge Lang Farm Owner Email: --------
Owner: Gegrae Lang Jr Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 160 US Hwy 158 W GatesyWe NC 279389437
Physical Address: LJH.!.!O!Jlne<lvwP:.~o.utJ:Ril<dL--------------­
Faclllty Status: • Complianl 0 Not Complianl Integrator: Murphy-Brown LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 36.26'15" Longitude: 76°42'26"
Question Areas:
Iii Discharges & Stream Impacts
ii Records and Documents
Iii Waste Collection & Treatment
Iii Other Issues
Iii Waste Application
Certified Operator: George L Lang
Secondary OIC(s):
On-Site Representative(&): Name
24 hour contact name
On-site representative
George & Joan Lang
George & Joan Lang
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer
Inspector Signature:
Secondary lnspector(s):
Operator Certification Number: 19368
TIUe Phone
Phone:
Phone:
Phone:
Date: ---------
Page: 1
'
Ponnlt: AWS370003 Owner. FacUlty: George Lang Jr
Inspection Date: 07/14/2011
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis:
7-7-11 = 1.5
3-21-11 = 1.7
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
soil tested: April2011
#25-Sludge survey -lagoon levels taken -calculations not completed will do soon.
IRR records are complete and balanced out.
Crop yields are recorded.
Caliberation due 2012
Looks good.
Facility Number: 370003
Reason for VIsit: Routine
Page: 2
Permit: AWS370003
Inspection Date: 07114/2011
Waste Structures
Type
~agoon
Owner. Facility: George Lang Jr
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Identifier Closed Data Start Date
I PRIMARY 1 06/06/94
Facility Number: 370003
Reason for VIsit: Routine
Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
19.001 28.001
Page: 3
Penni!: AWS370003 Owner. Facility: George Lang Jr Facility Number: 370003
Inspection Date: 07/1412011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for VIsit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at:
Structure
Application Field
Other
a. Was conveyance man-made?
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./large trees, severe
erosion, seepage, etc.)? ·
Yes No NA NE
D•DD
0
0
0
0 • DO
0 • DO
0 • DO
0 • DO
0 • DO
Yes No NA NE
0 • DO
0
D•DD
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management 0 • DO
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
0
0
• DO
• DO
9. Does any part of the waste management system· other than the waste structures require maintenance or 0 • 0 0
improvement?
Waste Aeellcatlon Yes No NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or 0 • 0 0
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of ·,ncorrect application? 0 • 0 0
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Pending?
Hydraulic Overload?
Frozen Ground?
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
0
0
0
0
Page: 4
Penni!: AWS370003
Inspection Date: 07/1412011
Waste Application
PAN?
Is PAN> 10%/10 Jbs.?
Total Phosphorus?
Owner~ Facility: George Lang Jr
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
Outside of acceptable crop window?
Evidence of wind drift?
Application outside of application area?
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type.1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
Facility Number: 370003
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
0 • DO
0 • DO
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? D•DD
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
1 B. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Records and Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
0 • DO
0 • DO
Yes No NA NE
0 • DO
0 • DO
0
Page: 5
Penni!: AWS370003 Owner. Facility: George Lang Jr Facility Number : 370003
Inspection Date: 07/14/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for VIsit: Routine
Records and Documents
Checklists?
Design?
Maps?
Lease Agreements?
Other?
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
Weekly Freeboard?
Waste Analysis?
Soil analysis?
Waste Transfers?
Weather code?
Rainfall?
Stocking?
Crop yields?
120 Minute inspections?
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
Sludge Survey
22. Did tlie facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the penn it?
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
box( es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non~compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
Yes No NA NE
0
0
0
0
0
D•DD
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 • DO
0 • DO
0 • DO
0 • DO
0
0
0
D•DD
Page: 6
Permit: AWS370003 Owner. Facility: George Lang Jr Facility Number: 370003
Inspection Date: 07114/2011 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for VIsit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? 0 • 0 0
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report 0 • 0 0
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional 0 • 0 0
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge, 0 • 0 0
freeboard problems, over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon I Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any add~ional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on~site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
O•OO
0
0
0
o.oo
O•OO
O•OO
Page: 7
•
• Division of Water Quality
0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
D Other Agency
Facility Number: ><3.1-'7011!0.!l.OI>l3'----Facility Status: c:Ailictwiv'"e'-----Permit: AWS370003 0 Denied Access
Inspection Type: Cgmptjance lnspectjon Inactive or Closed Date: --------
County: ,.G .. a.,te.,s ____ _ Region: Washjngtgp
Date of Visit: 071121201 o Entry Time:10·00 AM Exit Time:----Incident#: --------
Farm Name: Georae Lang Farm Owner Email: --------
Owner: Geome Lang Jr Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 160 US Hwy 158 W Gatesyj!le NC 279389437
Physical Address: ~Hu.own.s;tey_y.r:P:~~o:Lt rsR!!d _______________ _
Facility Status: • Compliant 0 Not Compliant Integrator: Myrohy-Browo LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 36'26'15" Longitude: 76'42'26"
Question Areas:
ii Discharges & Stream Impacts
~ Records and Documents
ii Waste Collection & Treatment
ii Other Issues
ii Waste Application
Certified Operator: George L Lang
Secondary OIC(s):
On-51te Representative(&): Name
24 hour contact name
On-site representative
George Lang
George & Joan Lang
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(&):
Operator Certification Number: 19368
Title Phone
Phone:
Phone:
Phone:
Date:
Page: 1
Permit: AWS370003
Inspection Date: 07/12/2010
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis:
one pulled now
3-18-10 = 2.8
1-21-10 = 2.3
soil tested 11-2009 ss 2009
Owner-Facility: George Lang Jr
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Calib. due in 2011 (new reel)
Need a calculated Sludge survey before Dec. 31, 2010
Freeboard range Jan. 24, 10 = 20"-May 19,10 = 34"
Looks Good!
Facility Number : 370003
Reason for VIsit: Routine
Page: 2
Permit: AWS370003
Inspection Date: 07/12/2010
Regulated Operations
Swine
iii Swine -Wean to Feeder
Waste Structures
Type
~agoon
Owner· Facility: George Lang Jr Facility Number: 370003
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for VIsit: Routine
Design Capacity Current Population
7,000 4,695
Total Design Capacity: 7,000
210,000 Total SSLW:
Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
I PRIMARY 1 06/08/94 19.00 1 25.00 1
Page: 3
Permit: AWS370003 Owner-Facility: George Lang Jr Facility Number: 370003
Inspection Date: 07112/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for VIsit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at:
Structure
Application Field
Other
a. Was conveyance man-made?
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge f~om any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./large trees, severe
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
Yes No NA NE
D•DD
0
0
0
D•DD
D•DD
0 • DO
0 • DO
0 • DO
Yes No NA NE
0 • DO
.0
0 • DO
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management 0 • 0 0
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Pending?
Hydraulic Overload?
Frozen Ground?
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
D•DD
D•DD
D•DD
Yes No NA NE
D•DD
D•DD
0
0
0
0
Page: 4
Permit: AWS370003
Inspection Date: 07/12/2010
Waste Application
PAN?
Is PAN > 10%/1 0 lbs.?
Total P205?
Owner-Facility: George Lang Jr
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
Outside of acceptable crop window?
Evidence of wind drift?
Application outside of application area?
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
Facility Number: 370003
Reason for VIsit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
0 • DO
0 • DO
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? 0 • DO
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? 0 • DO
18. Is there a lack of properly operating wasle application equipment? 0 • DO
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? 0 • DO
20. Does the facilily fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? 0 • DO
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP? 0
Page: 5
Permit: AWS370003
Inspection Date: 07/12/2010
Owner. Facility: George Lang Jr
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 370003
Reason for VIsit: Routine
Records and Documents
Checklists?
Design?
Maps?
Other?
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
120 Minute inspections?
Weather code?
Weekly Freeboard?
Transfers?
Rainfall?
Inspections after> 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
Waste Analysis?
Annual soil analysis?
Crop yields?
Stocking?
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to prope~y dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
Quality representative immediately.
Yes No NA NE
0
0
0
0
D•DD
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 • DO
0 • DO
0 • DO
0 • DO
0 • DO
0 • DO
Yes No NA NE
0 • DO
0 • DO
0 • DO
Page: 6
Ponnlt: AWS370003
Inspection Date: 07/12/2010
Other Issues
Owner. FacUlty: George Lang Jr
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? "'
Facility Number: 370003
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
D•DD
D•DD
D•DD
Page: 7
'
• Division of Water Quality
0 Division of Soli and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Facility Number : ,.3"'70o~~080"'3 ____ Facility Status: c:A ... ct.,jy.,.e'-----Permit: &WS370003 0 Denied Access
Inspection Type: Comp!jance Jnspectjon Inactive or Closed Date: --------
Region: Washjnqton
Date of Visit: 05/2712009 Entry Tlme:12'30 PM Exit Time:----Incident#: -------
Farm Name: Georae Lang Farm Owner Email: --------
Owner: Geome Lang .Jr Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 160 US Hwy 158 W Gatesyjlle NC 2793§9437
Physical Address:--------------------
Facility Status: • Compliant 0 Not Compliant Integrator:-----------------
Location of Farm: Latitude: 36°26'15" Longitude: 76'42'26"
Question Areas:
iii Discharges & Stream Impacts
~ Records and Documents
Certified Operator: George L Lang
Secondary OIC(s):
iii Waste Collection & Treatment
iii Other Issues
On-Site Representatlve(s): Name
24 hour contact name
On-site representaf1ve
George Lang
Joan Lang
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer
Inspector Signature:
Secondary lnspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis:
5-7-08 = 2.1
8-10-08 = 1.8
1-12-09= 1.7
3-13-09 = 1.7
Soil tested 2008 & 2009
Looks Good
iii Waste Application
Operator Certification Number: 19368
Title Phone
Phone:
Phone:
Phone:
Date:
Page: 1
'
Ponnlt: AWS370003
Inspection Date: 05/27/2009
Regulated Operations
Swine
il Swine -Wean to Feeder
Waste Structures
Typo
~agoon
Owner-Facility: George Lang Jr Facility Number: 370003
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for VIsit: Routine
Identifier
I PRIMARY
Design Capacity Current Population
7,000
Total Design Capacity:
Total SSLW:
5,188
7,000
210,000
Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
1 06/08/94 1 19.001 28.001
Page: 2
\
Pennlt: AWS370003 Owner· Facility: George lang Jr Facility Number: 370003
Inspection Date: 05/27/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for VIsit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at:
Structure
Application Field
Other
a. Was conveyance man~made?
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
Yea No NA NE
D•DD
0
0
0
D•DD
D•DD
D•DD
0 • DO
D•DD
Yes No NA NE
0 • DO
0
0 • DO
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management 0 • 0 0
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
D•DD
D•DD
9. Does any part of the wast'e management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or 0 • 0 0
improvement?
Waste Application Yea No NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ri1aintenance or 0 • 0 0
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? 0 • 0 0
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Pending?
Hydraulic Overload?
Frozen Ground?
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
0
0
0
0
Page: 3
Permit: AWS370003
Inspection Date: 05/27/2009
Waste Application
PAN?
Is PAN> 10%/10 lbs.?
Total P205?
Owner. Facility: George Lang Jr
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge ·Into bare soH?
Outside of acceptable crop window?
Evidence of wind drift?
Application outside of application area?
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
Facility Number: 370003
Reason for VIsit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
Cotton
0 • DO
0 • DO
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? D•DD
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? 0 • DO
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? 0 • DO
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? 0 • DO
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? 0 • DO
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP? 0
Page: 4
Permit: AWS370003 Owner-Facility: George Lang Jr Facility Number : 370003
Inspection Data: 05127/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for VIsit: Routine
Records and Documents
Checklists?
Design?
Maps?
Other?
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
120 Minute inspections?
Weather code?
Weekly Freeboard?
Transfers?
Rainfall?
Inspections after> 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
Waste Analysis?
Annual soil analysis?
Crop yields?
Stocking?
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
Quality representative immediately.
Yes No NA NE
0
0
0
0
D•DD
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 • DO
0 • DO
0 • DO
0 • DO
0 • DO
D•DD
Yes No NA NE
0 • DO
0 • DO
0 • DO
Page: 5
Permit: A WS370003
Inspection Date: 05/27/2009
Other Issues
Owner· Facility: George Lang Jr
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Facility Number: 370003
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
0 • DO
0 • DO
0 • DO
Page: 6
• Division of Water Quality
0 Division of Soli and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Facility Number: >~.371.J0.!10~.~o0~3 ____ Facility Status: oA .. ctwiY"'"'-----Permit: 8WS370003 0 Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance !nspectjon Inactive or Closed Date: -------
County: ;;G,;aa.~~;tea.s ____ _ Region: Washjngton
Date of Visit: 0510612008 Entry Time: 11·30 AM Exit Time:----Incident#: -------
Fann Name: Geprae Lang Farm Owner Email: -------
Owner: Gegrae Lang Jr Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 160 US Hwv 158 W Gatesyjl!e NC 279389437
Physical Address:------------------
Facility Status: 0 Compliant 0 Not Compliant Integrator: -----------------
Location of Farm: Latitude: 36'27'15" Longitude: 76'42'30"
Question Areas:
Iii Discharges & Stream Impacts
li Records and Documents
Iii Waste Collection & Treatment
Iii Other Issues
Iii Waste Application
Certified Operator: George L Lang Operator Certification Number: 19368
Secondary OtC(s):
On-Site Representative(&): Name
24 hour contact name
On-site representative
George Lang
George Lang
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer
Title
Inspector Signature: ------------------------
Secondary lnspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis"
4-4-07 = 2.3
8-15-07 = 1.2
11-19-07 = 1.2
soil test 03-03-08
Phone
Phone:
Phone:
Phone:
Date: ----------
#25. they could not find 2007 sludge survey results, however George remembers taking the survey. Please take lhe 2008 survey
ASAP.
Page: 1
Permit: AW$370003
Inspection Date: 05/06/2008
Regulated Operations
Swine
Iii Swine ·Wean to Feeder
Waste Structures
Typo
~agoon
Owner· Facility: George Lang Jr Facility Number : 370003
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for VIsit: Routine
Design Capacity Current Population
7,000 5,500
Total Design Capacity: 7,000
210,000 Total SSLW:
Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
I PRIMARY 1 06/08/94 19.00 1 24.00 1
Page: 2
Ponnlt: AWS370003 Owner~ Facility: George Lang Jr
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 370003
Inspection Data: 05/06/2008 Reason for VIsit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at:
Structure
Application Field
Other
a. Was conveyance man-made?
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./large trees, severe
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
Yes No NA NE
D•DD
0
0
0
D•DD
D•DD
0 • DO
0 • DO
0 • DO
Yes No NA NE
0 • DO
0
0 • DO
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management 0 • 0 0
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Pending?
Hydraulic Overload?
Frozen Ground?
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
D•DD
D•DD
D•DD
Yes No NA NE
D•DD
D•DD
0
0
0
0
Page: 3
Pennlt: AWS370003
Inspection Date: 05/0612008
Waste Application
PAN?
Is PAN> 10%/10 lbs.?
Total P205?
Owner-Facility: George Lang Jr
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
Outside of acceptable crop window?
Evidence of wind drift?
Application outside of application area?
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
Facility Number: 370003
Reason for VIsit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Corn, Wheat, Soybeans
Co«on
0 • DO
0 • DO
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? 0 • DO
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Records and Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Pennit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
0 • DO
0 • DO
Yes No NA NE
0 • DO
0 • DO
0
Page: 4
Permit: AWS370003 Owner· Facility: George Lang Jr Facility Number : 370003
Inspection Date: 05/06/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Checklists?
Design?
Maps?
Other?
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
120 Minute inspections?
Weather code?
Weekly Freeboard?
Transfers?
Rainfall?
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
Waste Analysis?
Annual soil analysis?
Crop yields?
Stocking?
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Did the facility fail to ccnduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-ccmpliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
Quality representative immediately.
Yes No NA NE
0
0
0
0
D•DD
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 • DO
0 • DO
0 • DO
0 • DO
0 • DO
0 • DO
Yea No NA NE
0 • DO
0 • DO
0 • DO
Page: 5
Ponnlt: AWS370003
Inspection Date: 05106/2006
Other Issues
Owner-Facility: George Lang Jr
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Facility Number : 370003
Reason for VIsit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
o.oo
o.oo
D•DD
Page: 6
.•
• Division of Water Quality
0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
D Other Agency
Facility Number: il.37u0"'0"'0"'3 ____ Facility Status: "A"ctwiv"'e'-----Permit: AWS370003 0 Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compljaoce lnspectjoo Inactive or Closed Date: --------
Reason for Visit: l:lllJ.IlUJll.. _____________ _ County: ~G .. a,.te.,s._ ___ _ Region: Washjngton
Date of Visit: 06112/2007 Entry Time: 11·00 AM Exit Time: ___ _ Incident#: --------
Farm Name: George Lang Farm Owner Email: --------
Owner: Georae Lang Jr Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 160 US Hwy 158 W Gatesyjlle NC 279389437
Physical Address:--------------------
Facility Status: 0 Compliant 0 Not Compliant Integrator: -----------------
Location of Farm: Latitude: 36'27'15" Longitude: 76'42'30"
Question Areas:
~ Discharges & Stream Impacts
ii Records and Documents
Iii Waste Collection & Treatment
Iii Other Issues
Iii Waste Application
Certified Operator: George L Lang
Secondary OIC(s):
On-Site Representatlve(s): Name
On-site representative
24 hour contact name
Joan Lang
George Lang
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer
Inspector Signature:
Secondary lnspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analyses:
1-2-07 = 1.8
4-4-07 = 2.3
soil analyses in 2006
Looks good!
Operator Certification Number: 19368
Title Phone
Phone:
Phone:
Phone:
Date:
Page: 1
Permit: AWS370003
Inspection Date: 06/12/2007
Regulated Operations
Swine
iii Swine -Wean to Feeder
Waste Structures
Type
~agoon
Owner· Facility: George Lang Jr Facility Number: 370003
Inspection Typo: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Design Capacity Current Population
7,000 6,500
Total Design Capacity: 7,000
210,000 Total SSLW:
Identifier Closed Date Start Date · Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
I PRIMARY 1 06/08/94 19.00 I 29.00 I
Page: 2
Permit: AWS370003 Owner· Facility: George Lang Jr Facility Number : 370003
InspectiOn Date: 06/12/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at:
Structure
Application Field
Other
a. Was conveyance man-made?
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. Estimated volume reaching'surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
Yes No NA NE
D•DD
0
0
0
D•DD
D•DD
0 • DO
0 • DO
0 • DO
Yes No NA NE
0 • DO
0
0 • DO
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management 0 • 0 0
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect applica.tion?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Pending?
Hydraulic Overload?
Frozen Ground?
Heavy metals (Cu. Zn, etc)?
D•DD
D•DD
D•DD
Yes No NA NE
D•DD
D•DD
0
0
0
0
Page: 3
Permit: AWS370003
Inspection Date: 06/1212007
Waste Application
PAN?
Is PAN> 10%/10 lbs.?
Total P205?
Owner· Facility: George Lang Jr
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
Outside of acceptable crop window?
Evidence of wind drift?
Application outside of application area?
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
Facility Number: 370003
Reason for VIsit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Com, Wheat, Soybeans
0 • DO
0 • DO
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? 0 • DO
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? 0 • DO
1 B. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? 0 • DO
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? 0 • DO
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? 0 • DO
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP? 0
Page: 4
Permit: AWS370003 Owner. Facility: George Lang Jr Facility Number: 370003
Inspection Date: 06/12/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Checklists?
Design?
Maps?
Other?
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
120 Minute inspections?
Weather code?
Weekly Freeboard?
Transfers?
Rainfall?
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
Waste Analysis?
Annual soil analysis?
Crop yields?
Stocking?
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
Quality representative immediately.
Yes No NA NE
0
0
0
0
D•DD
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 • DO
DO • 0
0 • DO
0 • DO
0 • DO
0 • DO
Yes No NA NE
0 • DO
0 • DO
0 • DO
Page: 5
Permit: AWS370003
Inspection Date: 06/12/2007
Other Issues
Owner· Facility: George Lang Jr
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Facility Number : 370003
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
D•DD
D•DD
D•DD
Page: 6
I Facility Number IJ? II • Division of Water Quality H -3 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit e Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit e Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other D Denied Access
Date of Visit: 11-6'.1-tZ I Arrival Time: l/t1 :O() I Departure Time: L.I ___ ...JI County: <::/jA?y/ Region: kJa@
Farm Name: gf?"J6k ;fa~ ..:,;(&•~
Owner Name: ell~ {7 b;J?> ~·
Mailing Address: /tz tJ 1./..5 <i(~ /<£>){ ttJ
Owner Email: -------------
Physical Address:----------------------------------------
Facility Contact: _____________ Title: Phone No:---------
Onsite Representative: -----------------Integrator: $A-J//1-
Certified Operator: s:t!/7-' >(7 0perator Certification Number: /936 L
Back-up Operator: --------------------Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: D "D'D" · D"D'D" Longttude:
~
-....
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Wet Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
J[] Wean to Finish ~
10 La~er I I I
D DairvCow
118:1 Wean to Feeder '"'")I fn/JOO D DairvCalf D Non-La~er
Feeder to Finish D Dairv Heifer
Farrow to Wean Dry Poultry D DrvCow
Farrow to Feeder D Non-Dairv I D Lavers Farrow to Finish
D Non-Lavers
D Beef Stocker I
Gilts D Beef Feeder I
D Pullets Boars D Beef Brood Cow li
D Turkevs ~ --
Other D Turkev Poults !
Dl '
ID Other I I II D Other Number of Structures:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? DYes l:lf~o DNA ONE
Discharge originated at: D Structure D Application Field D Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made? DYes 0No DNA ONE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) DYes 0No DNA ONE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notifY DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of3
DYes 0No
DYes ~: DYes
12128104
DNA ONE
DNA ONE
DNA ONE
Continued
1
,;' j'F_a_ci-lity_N_u_m_b_e-r:-1..3..,..2-:---J--=----, Date oflnspection I f-Ol~;:t;i
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
DYes ~ DNA ONE
DYes 0No DNA ONE
Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:------------------------------------
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):------------------,-------------------
Observed Freeboard (in): __,..3=-'f._ ___ ------------,,..-------------------
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(ie/large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
through a waste management or closure plan?
DYes ~ DNA ONE
DYes ~ DNA ONE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
I 0. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
maintenance/improvement?
DYes ~o DNA ONE
DYes ~ DNA ONE
DYes ~ DNA ONE
DYes ~ DNA ONE
II. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. DYes 9'No DNA D NE
D Excessive Pending D Hydraulic Overload D Frozen Ground D Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
D PAN D PAN> 10% or 10 lbs D Total Phosphorus D Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
D Outside of Acceptable Crop Window D Evidence of Wind Drift D Application Outside of Area
12. Crop type(s) -tt.,....<~-p.ll.;.zf" ___ --~,.Ua..l<!-:-'fll:q:... ____ ...,Cl;~l?L---4(,.?uft==-----_;C,~-_.f3~---
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CA WMP? DYes ~0 DNA ONE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? DYes ii2f'No D NA D NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination ? DYes ~0 D N~ D NE
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? DYes ~0 DNA ONE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? DYes ~0 DNA ONE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
fr~7-tJ(p =-1 ~tu~ ~ ~--·; ;$---5f-~:~orr.s-t-'"' 1-
3. 3-tJ(p ::: f). (p ~~ ,f}tJtJ0
ri~~~~-r~--4-: ctM4J/
~
Reviewer/Inspector Name I)J1.~ rlen r c...S12 ?v e. r [Phone: ~-91,/,T"-~)[-116
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: /17_,._. / "-'1 L/_;:;; _, Date: "'l.-1M. -t2. ~
Pa e 1 o 3 g if (/ 12/18/04 Continued
•~' .. ..
~--------~--~ I Facility Number'(;' 2 -3 Date oflnspection 11· M ·Ok I
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Pennit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box. 0 WUP 0 Checklists 0 Design 0 Maps 0 Other
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
DYes ~ DNA ONE
DYes ~ DNA ONE
DYes ~o DNA ONE
0 Waste Application 0 Weekly Freeboard 0 Waste Analysis 0 Soil Analysis 0 Waste Transfers 0 Annual Certification
0 Rainfall 0 Stocking 0 Crop Yield 0 120 Minute Inspections 0 Monthly and I" Rain Inspections 0 Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rain breakers on irrigation equipment?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the pennit?
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the penni!?
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the pennit orCA WMP?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report the mortality rates that were higher than nonnal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Additional Comments and/or Drawings:
Page 3 of3
DYes ~0 DNA ONE
DYes ~o ~A ONE
DYes :i:o DNA ONE
DYes ~DNA ONE
DYes 0 DNA ONE
DYes ~0 ~ ONE
DYes ~: DNA ONE
DYes DNA ONE
DYes 'No DNA ONE
DYes ~0 DNA ONE
DYes ±: DNA ONE
DYes DNA ONE
"" J-
t-;
12128104
( . I Facility Number 1.32 II
• Dhision of Water Quality
Hoi 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit • Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit • Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Vi~t ~ Arrival Time: I 8/.¢; 00 fgJparture Time: I
I
I county:~ Region: lcJ12/(0
Farm Name: /{~e_, ~-~
OwnerName: &~ ~ ~ Owner Email: --------------
Phone: ?£2-352-;IJ?,;L
~/6) ft/(j :J'J<l.3lT
'
Mailing Addres:LdtLS Wu~ dl:f
Physical Address:----------------------------------------
Facility Contact: _____________ Title:----------Phone No: ________ __
Integrator: /!1/3 -1//b Onsite Representative: ------------------
Certified Operator: r/1 '~'-< h ~if"· Operator Certification Number: l!l_3<;> XC
Back-up Operator: --------------------Back-up Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude:
Design Current Design Current
Swine Wet Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
10 La~er I I I 0 Dairy Cow ' I
I
:0 Non-La~er 0 Dairy Calf li
0 Dairy Heife1 I
Dry Poultry 0 Dry Cow II
0Non-Dairy I
0 Layers '
0 Beef Stockel I 0 Non-Layers 0 Beef F ceder
0 Pullets 0 Beef Brood Cow I 0 Turkeys
0 Turkey Poults II []] D Other ~~~ Number of Structures:
Other
/D Other .1.
Discharges & Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? DYes ~ DNA ONE
Discharge originated at: 0 Structure 0 Application Field 0 Other
a. Was the conveyance man-made? DYes 0No DNA ONE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) DYes 0No DNA ONE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State
other than from a discharge?
DYes d:o
DYes~
0 Yes No
12128104
DNA ONE
DNA ONE
DNA ONE
Continued
,,
Date of Inspection
:
J Facility Number;_3 2
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is siorage capacity (structural plus stonn storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
DYes ~0 DNA
DYes 0No DNA
ONE
ONE
Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:------------------------------------
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in): ------,,.----------------------------------
Observed Freeboard (in): -~J-'-2"'---------·------------------;r-----~ DYes DNA ONE 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
(ie/ large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures ori-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed
through a waste management or clostire plan?
DYes ~ DNA ONE
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? DYes ~ DNA D NE
8. Do any of the stuctures lack adequate markers as required by the pennit?
(Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
DYes ~ DNA ONE
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
maintenance or improvement?
DYes ~ DNA ONE
Waste Application
I 0. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
maintenance/improvement?
II. Is there evidence of incorrect application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
DYes
D Excessive Ponding D Hydraulic Overload D Frozen Ground D Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
~0 DNA ONE
D PAN D PAN> 10% or 10 lbs D Total Phosphorus D Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
D Outside of Acceptable Crop Window D Evidence of Wind Drift D Application Outside of Area
12. crop type(s) ---4.( ........... --....,j .... J""5 ____ 4 ( .... .<,/_:-1-+-,tf,__ ____ .,,J..,.t;""'----l-'j"""2""'c ________ _
13. Soil type(s)
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CA WMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
DYes
DYes
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre detennination!D Yes
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
DYes
DYes
~0 z :E
Comments (refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
DNA ONE
DNA ONE
DNA ONE
DNA ONE
DNA ONE
Continued
I Facility Number: 3 2 -CJJ I
Required Records & Documents
Date of Inspection i, b -@
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropirate box. D WUP D Checklists D Design D Maps D Other
DYes
DYes
~0
~0
DNA ONE
DNA ONE
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. DYes D No DNA D NE
D Waste Application D Weekly Freeboard D Waste Analysis D Soil Analysis D Waste Transfers D Annual Certification
D Rainfall [!]Stocking D Crop Yield D 120 Minute Inspections D Monthly and I" Rain Inspections D Weather Code
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rain breakers on irrigation equipment?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the pennit?
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
and report the mortality rates that were higher than normal?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately
31. Did the facility fail to notify the regional office of emergency situations as required by
General Permit? (ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
rr. :and/or •
DYes~
DYes 0No
DYes 0No
DYes 0No
DYes ~0
DYes 0No
DYes ~0
DYes ~0
DYes ~
DYes ~0
DYes ~ DYes
12128104
DNA
~A
e(NA
~A
DNA
~A
DNA
DNA
DNA
DNA
DNA
DNA
ONE
ONE
ONE
ONE
ONE
ONE
ONE
ONE
ONE
ONE
ONE
ONE
•
• Division of Water Quality
0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
D Other Agency
Facility Number : ,.3e~.7:..00~0003._ ____ Facility Status: .c;A,.c'""tjy,..,e,_ ___ _ Permit: AWS370003 0 Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compljance lnspectjon Inactive or Closed Date: --------
Reason for Visit: l:S.I!ltll~--------------County: _.G,.a~te~s,_ ___ _ Region: Washjngtoo
Date of Visit: 0810512005 Entry Time: 12·01 PM Exit Time:----Incident#: --------
Farm Name: Georae Lang Farm Owner Email: --------
Owner: Gegrae Lang Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 160 US Hwv 158 W Gatesyj!le NC 279389437
Physical Address:--------------------
Facility Status: • Compliant 0 Not Compliant Integrator: -------------------
Location of Farm: Latitude: 36"27'15" Longitude: 76"42'30"
Question Areas:
II Discharges & Stream Impacts
II Records and Documents
Certified Operator: George L Lang
Secondary OIC(s):
On-Site Representative(s): Name
On·site representative
24 hour contact name
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer
II Waste Collection & Treatment
II Other Issues
II Waste Application
Operator Certification Number: 19368
Title Phone
Phone:
Phone:
Phone:
Inspector Signature: ------------------------Date:
Secondary lnspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Soil sample was just mailed off today for 2005, March 2004, good.
Waste analysis:
7-1-05 =not back from lab
2-14-05 = 2.0
11-4-04= 1.6
Composting dead animals.
Phone:
Phone:
Page: 1
Permit: AWS370003
Inspection Date: 08/05/2005
Regulated Operations
Swine
!iii Swine-Wean to Feeder
Waste Structures
Type
llagoon
Owner· Facility: George Lang Facility Number: 370003
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Design Capacity Current Population
7,000 5,000
Total Design Capacity: 7,000
210,000 Total SSLW:
Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
I PRIMARY
Page: 2
·I
Permit: AWS370003 Owner· Facility: George Lang
Inspection Date: 08/05/2005 Inspection Type: Compliance inspection
Qjschames & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at:
Structure
Application Field
Other
a. Was conveyance man-made?
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
Facility Number : 370003
Reason for Visit: Routine
yes No NA NF
0
0
0
o•oo
o•oo
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
o•oo
o•oo
o•oo
Waste Collection Storage & Treatment Yes Nq NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? 0 • 0 0
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? 0
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./large trees, severe erosion, 0 • 0 0
seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on-site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or 0 • 0 0
ctosure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? 0 • 0 0
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks 0 • 0 0
and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or 0 • 0 0
improvement?
Waste Appljcation
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Pending?
Hydraulic Overload?
Frozen Ground?
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
PAN?
Is PAN> 10%/10 lbs.?
Total P205?
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
Outside of acceptable crop window?
Evidence of wind drift?
Application outside of application area?
Crop Type 1
Crop Typo 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Yes No NA NF
o•oo
o•oo
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Com, Wheat, Soybeans
Page: 3
I'
Permit: AWS370003
Inspection Date: 08/05/2005
Waste Appljcatjon
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
Owner. Facility: George Lang Facility Number: 370003
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes Np NA NE
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan(CAWMP)? o•oo
o•oo
o•oo
o•oo
o•oo
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a Jack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Records and pacl!ments
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
Checklists?
Design?
Maps?
Other?
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
120 Minute inspections?
Weather code?
Weekly Freeboard?
Transfers?
Rainfall?
Inspections after> 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
Waste Analysis?
Annual soil analysis?
Crop yields?
Stocking?
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain breaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
yes Ng NA NE
0
0
0
0
0
o•oo
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o•oo
oo•o
oo•o
oo•o
o•oo
oo•o
Page: 4
I ,
Permit: AWS370003 Owner· Facility: George Lang Facility Number: 370003
Inspection Date: 08/05/2005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues yes Nq NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? 0 • 0 0
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those mortality 0 • 0 0
rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality 0 • 0 0
representative immediately.
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? D • 0 0
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? 0 • 0 0
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? 0 • 0 0
Page: 5
0 Division of Water Quality
0 Division of Soli and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit ..8 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for VIsit ®-Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 Other D Denied Access
I Facility Number I 3;z H i I I Date of Visit: I ~1//, f df I Time: I II : ~J: I
IO Not Ooerational 0 Below Threshold I
~Permitted
Farm Name:
[] Registered
Owner Name:--------------------------------------------PhoneNo: ------------------------------
Mailing Address:
Facility Contact: I> Title:
Onsite RepresentativeG::.?e£:~!:,-.~_::!__.., J.l:.li-...1!!!~-..1)1-.,CJ~~------­
Certified Operator: ---------------------------------------
Location of Farm:
Phone No: -----------------
Integrator: --/-!!1~-:..L,i!:J.!..-t·--l.1Ao... ____ _
I J
Operator Certification Number:
Jtf Swine D Poultry D Cattle 0 Horse Latitude I l·c=J·I I·' Longitude c=J•I I· I , ..
Current Design Current Design Current Design
Swine Cana~itv Pooulation Poultrv Cana~ltv Ponulation Cattle Cana~itv Ponulatlon
Wlf Wean to Feeder I ~"""0 I (,.. tHv. ' ID Laver I I I ID Dairv I I I
J"lleeder to Finish ! ID Non-Laver I I I, ID Non-Dairv I I I
0 Farrow to Wean
ID Other I I I' D Farrow to Feeder
D Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity I I
D Gilts I I D Boars Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons I I ID Subsurface Drains Present liD Lagoon Area ID SJ!rax Field Area I
Holding Ponds I Solid Traps l ID No Liguid Waste Management S~stem I,
Discharges .&, Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: D Lagoon D Spray Field D Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Docs discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
~ Collection !lk Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? 0 Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
DYes WNo
DYes DNo
DYes DNo
DYes DNo
DYes ~No
DYes No
DYes ~No
Structure 6
Identifier: --~~~----------------------------------
Freeboard (inches): 3Y
05/03/01 Continued
!Facility Number: 37 -_3 Date of Inspection l(oJj,,/b V I
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
II. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
PAN D Hydraulic Overload D Frozen Ground D Copper and/or Zinc
12. Crop type lrJJ
DYes ~0
DYes ~No
DYes ~No
DYes ~No
DYes ~No
DYes ~No
DYes J:tl No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CA WMP)? DYes .ll:l No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Odor~
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge atlor below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional
Air Quality representative immediately.
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
12112/03
DYes DNo
DYes DNo
DYes DNo
DYes AJNo
DYes ftJNo
DYes ~No
DYes P{No
DYes &)No
Continued
I Faciftty Number: '30 -3 I Date oflnspection 16/t QQ 'f I
I
Required Records & Document•
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
D Waste Application D Freeboard '\xrwaste Analysis D Soil Sampling
24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified A WMP?
NPI>ES Permitted Facilities
30. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
31. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment?
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
D Stocking Form D Crop Yield Form D Rainfall D Inspection After I" Rain
D 120 Minute Inspections D Annual Certification Form
DYes~No
DYes4No
jffes DNo
DYes 1:\J No
DYes ~No
DYes Jlt'No
DYes~No
DYes ~No
DYes J:\TNo
No
No
0]€s
DYes EINO
...CJ Y:es D ?io
Technical Assistance Site VIsit Report
e Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Natural Resources Conservation Service
0 Soil and Water Conservation District
0 Other ...
Facility Number J 37 J -LJ ____:3:;...___. Date: J1i23/04
Farm Name George Lang Farm
Mailing Address 160 US Hwy 158 W
Onsite
Representative George and Joan Lang
Tvoe Of VIsit
!XI Operation Review
D Compliance Inspection (pilot only)
D Technical Assistance
D Confirmation for Removal
D No Animals-Date Last Operated:
D Operating below threshold
JIXI Swine D Poultry D Cattle D Horse
!XI Wean to Feeder
D Feeder to Finish
D Farrow to Wean
D Farrow to Feeder
D Farrow to Finish
OGilts
D Boars
Design
C It apactlY
7000
GENERAL QUESTIONS:
Current
P I II opu a on
5000
I
1
0 Layer
D Non-Layer
IODairy
ONon-Da1ry
JD Other
Time: 1400 J Time On Farm:
County ..::G:::a:::te:::s _____ Phone:
Gatesville NC
Integrator !Murphy Brown
Puroose Of Visit
@Routine
0 Response to DWQ/DENR referral
0 Response to DSWC/SWCD referral
0 Response to complaint/local referral
0 Requested by producer/integrator IQ Follow-up
0 Emergency
OOther ...
Design
Capacity
Current
Population
I I
I I
1. Is waste discharging from any part of the operation and reaching surface waters or wetlands?
2. Is there evidence of a past waste discharge from any part of the operation that waste reached
surface waters or wetlands?
3. Does any problem pose an immediate threat to the integrity ofthe waste structure (large trees,
seepage, severe erosion, etc.)?
4. Is there evidence of nitrogen over application, hydraulic overloading or excessive pending
requiring DWQ notification?
5. Is there evidence of improper dead animal disposal that poses a threat to the environment
and/or public health?
6. Is the waste level within the structural freeboard elevation range for any waste structure?
Structure1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier
Level (Inches) J 31
70 WaRO
252-357-1 072
27938
Dyes 181 no
Dyes 181 no
Dyes 181 no
Dyes 181 no
Dyes 181 no
Dyes 181 no
Structure 5
CROP TYPES !cotton llcorn Soybeans Wheat I,__ _____ ___, '-----------'L---------l
SPRAYFiELD
SOIL TYPES CrA
7. What type of technical assistance does the ensile representative feel is needed? (list in comment section)
1 03/10/03
Facility Number 37 -3 Date: 1/23/04
PARAMETER @ No assistance provided/requested
0 8. Waste spill leaving site TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE Needed Provided 0 9. Waste spill contained on site
25. Waste Plan Revision or Amendment D D 010. Level in structural freeboard
26. Waste Plan Conditional Amendment D D 011. Level in storm storage
27. Review or Evaluate Waste Plan w/producer D D
012. Waste structure integrity compromised 28. Forms Need (list In comment section) D D 013. Waste structure needs maintenance
29. Missing Components (list In comments) D D
014. Over application>= 10% & 10 lbs.
30. 2H.0200 re-certification D D 015. Over application< 10% or< 10 lbs.
016. Hydraulic overloading 31. Five & Thirty day Plans of Action (PoA) D D
0 17. Deficient irrigation records 32. Irrigation record keeping assistance D D
~ 18. Late/missing waste analysis 33. Organize/computerization of records D D 0 19. Late/missing lagoon level records
0 20. Late/missing soils analysis 34. Sludge Evaluation D D
0 21. Crop needs improvement 35. Sludge or Closure Plan D D
0 22. Crop inconsistent with waste plan 36. Sludge removal/closure procedures D D
0 23. Irrigation maintenance deficiency 37. Waste Structure Evaluation D D
0 24. Deficient sprayfield conditions 38. Structure Needs Improvement D D
39. Operation & Maintenance Improvements D D
40. Marker check/calibration D D
Regulato!)£ Referrals 41. Site evaluation D D
D Referred to DWQ Date: 42. Irrigation Calibration D D D Referred to NCDA Date: 43. Irrigation system design/Installation D D DOther ... Date: D D 44. Secure Irrigation Information (maps, etc.)
LIST IMPROVEMENTS 45. Operating Improvements (pull signs, etc.) D D
MADE BY OPERATION 46. Wettable Acre Determination D D
1. 47. Evaluate WAD certification/rechecks D D
facili~ in 3 ;tear no-till era~ ~roeram 48. Crop evaluation/recommendations D D
2. 49. Drainage work/evaluation D D
50. Land shaping, subsolllng, aeration, etc. D D
3. 51. Runoff control, stormwater diversion, etc. D D
52. Buffer Improvements D D
53. Field measurements(GPS, surveying, etc.) D D
4. 54. Mortality BMPs D D
55. Waste operator education (NPDES) D D
5. 56. Operation & maintenance education D D
57. Record keeping education D D
6. 58. Crop/forage management education D D
59. Soli and/or waste sampling education D D
2 03/10/03
..
Facility Number I 37 . I 3 Date· 1/23/04
COMMENTS:
COC dated May 1, 203 and on site.
~Waste analysis dated 10/6/03 nitrogen is 1.1 lbs/1 000 gallons
2/19/03 nitrogen is 1.81bs/1000 gallons
Waste plan needs to be amended to include wheat being grown for harvest . Contact tech spec. Current plan written for
wheat as cover.
18. There is not a current waste analysis to cover irrigation events on corn. Unable to determine if over application exist.
Remember to take waste analysis 60 days before/60 days after irrigation event.
18. There is not a current waste analysis to cover irrigation events on soybeans for 2003 crop year.
~Wheat has been planted. Good stand. Need to secure new waste analysis if waste applied to wheat.
*IRR2 records were made available for review.
~Lagoon level is recorded weekly with drops in lagoon consistent with irrigation events.
Soil test dated 5/6/03 Cu, Zn and ph within guidelines.
Soil test for 2004 taken no results.
...
1-
-...
TECHNICAL SPECIALIST !Martin Mclawhorn 11~------------~~~~------------~1
SIGNATURE
Date Entered: cl2:..:i2::..:i0:;.:4 ______ .J Entered By: !Martin McLawhorn
3 03/10/03
o Division of Water Quality
·e Division of Sol!; and WaterConservatioii
,r o Other Agency , ,· ..
Type of Visit o Compliance Inspection li) Operation Review o Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit 0 Routine o Complaint o Follow up o Emergency Notification o Other
I 01130/2003 I Timer I 1400
o Denied Access
L----------------~----...J~Date ofVisitr Facility Number Ll _;3:..:7_JHL_::....__J • lo Not dperalwnal o below I hreshold
• Permitted • Certified a Conditionally Certified a Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ....................... ..
Farm Name: George Lang Farm County: Gates. ................................................. , .W.aRO ....... .
Owner Name: George Lang, Jr. Phone No: 252-357-1072
Mailing Address: 16!l.DS.Hwy..l.S8. . .W. ............................................................................ Gat.es.v.Ule.NC ........................................................ 2.79.38 ............ ,,
Facility Contact: ............................................................................ , .. Title: ............................................................... Phone No: .................................................. :.
Onsite Representative: Jnan.Lang................................................................................... Integrator: Car.r.oll:s . .Eonds..of.:VA..lnc •.............................
Certified Operator: G.eorge .. L .............................. Lang.Jr............................................ Operator Certification Number: 19.368 ............................ .
Location of Farm:
~ L------------------------------;L:at:it:u~d:e-;=;3;6~1:•;1=;27;:~1'~1~l~S~~~ .. ~~L~o=n~g~it:u:d:e-;=7~6~~~.~~~4;2~1~'~1:;J;U~I" 11 Swine o Poultry o Cattle 0 Horse . . . . . . . . . .
Poultry Capacity Popullition ~attle, , Capacity Population
I~ ~:~~ayer I I I·
j~ Other
Total Design Capacity
. ' ' ., "'
l)isch•rges & Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: []Lagoon []Spray Field []Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? []Spillway
o Yes l!iiNO
o Yes oNo
0 Yes 0 No
oYes 0 No
oYes !Ill No
oYes II!! NO
oYes llliNo
Stmcture I Stmcture 2 Stmcture 3. Stmcture 4 Stmcture 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): .............. 24:: .................................................. , .............................................................................................................................................. .
' '·
1Faclhty Number: 37-3 Oatc of Inspection I 01730120031
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
I 0. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
II. Is there evidence of over application?
12. Crop type Com, Soybeans, Wheat
0 Excessive Ponding o PAN o Hydraulic Overload
Cotton
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CA WMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & l)ocuments
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified A WMP?
oYes !Iii No
oYes ll!l No
oYes !!!I No
oYes ll!!No
oYes 1!11 No
oYes II!INo
oYes 11!1 No
oYes 11!1 No
oYes 0 No
oYes 0 No
oYes 0 No
oYes 1!!1 No
oYes II!INo
oYes ll!l No
oYes !!II No
oYes I!!! No
oYes !!II No
oYes !!II No
oYes !!II No
oYes ll!!No
oYes 1m No
oYes II!INo
Ia 1~0 VJOJanons or aenc•encJes were notea aurmg lOIS VJS!t. rou wm receiVe no rurmer corresponaence aoou1 lOIS VISit.
C~~men~.(r~f~r to que~t~o~:#J: .•. ~xplain ~nyYE~ ans1",ers an.dl?r ~~r ~e~?~ID.!n.d~.ti~n~. or a~y othe~ c~111":1ent~. , , . ,:; . , }\~.;,', •. :'• ·
Use.~ra:.mg~r.facilit~lto b~tter,exJ!I:in sita~ions,.(l!se.addit•o~alpag.e~·~s ~-·~~ssar~)=.:. .IIJ Field ~o~y .. o ~i~al ~~te• ..• :::J'~ :::: .... ·.
*S01l test datea 3!4102 lime was appuea at rate or 1/2 ton per ~ere on spray tJelcts rece1vmg a01ma1 waste. • -*Integrator change: Browns of Carolina Will send change card.
*Waste analysis dated 11119/02 nitrogen is 2.1Jbs/JOOO gallons
711/02 nitrogen is 2.3 lbs/1000 gallons
*Time to secure new waste analysis.
*Irrigation records are complete and balanced with drops in lagoon are consistent with irrigation events.
*Commercial fertilizer was applied to spray fields and commercial nitrogen was deducted from PAN balances.
*Lagoon level is recorded weekly. -....
Reviewer/Inspector Name fi\i'':t',. i'M"'b R1"h'' H~hliljJ!''··"'i ·l'!l".h>:i'i~·,(',,~i, r·iJ.,: ,,,
'''t ... -~
·' ~"Ti~~w;p~r:)'-~l··~·:~:~~;j _,,. ar ;In --~',·a'! o~.n ·r··L.-_,.-.,:. _ _., ·,;, :, .' ~<': , '-\. ,, . ,. , , '•" ·' .. f. • '• \ ,M' ~. , • . ' .. ,,,., ·-,_,_
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
•
05103101
1 Facthty Number: 37_3 I>ate of Inspection ! 0113012003!
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a pennanent/temporary cover?
Continued
[J Yes [J No
[J Yes IBI No
[J Yes IBI No
[J Yes IBI No
[J Yes IBI No
oYes 1111 No
[J Yes 0 No
~Wheat will be chemtcallY. burned, deduct ammal waste nitrogen applied to wneat rrom PAN balance on followmg crop ...
. · .,
I'
• ..
,,.
'
I .,
( ,.
'
v
lR•••••on for Visit ® Routine o Complaint o Follow up o Emergency Notification o Other c Denied Access
l __ .:..:::::::.:.:.::~===:::~==\1==~--J' Date of Visit: _ Facility Number I 37 H w • lo Not Operahonal o Below 'I hreshold
• Permitted • Certified a Conditionally Certified a Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ........................ .
Farm Name: George Lang Farm County: Gate£ .................................................. .W.a.RO ...... ..
Owner Name: George Lang, Jr. Phone No: 252-357-1072
Mailing Address: 16li.US .. Hwy..158. . .W. ............................................................................ Ga.t.es.v.ille.NC ........................................................ 2.7.9.3.8 ............. .
Facility Contact: ............................................................................... Title: ............................................................... Phone No: ................................................... .
Onsite Representative: George..&.J.aa.n.La.ng............................................................. Integrator: Mur.ph,y..F.amily.F..arms .................................... ..
Certified Operator: G.eorge.L .............................. Laug..Jr............................................ Operator Certification Number: 19.368 ............................ .
Location of Farm:
.... I
= ! ... :
L----------[J-H_o_rs_e __ -;L-::a:;ti;::tu:-:d;-:e:-;!=3;:;6:::;!;:•-;!::::;;2;;;7::::;-!,~!;::::;:15;=:;!;:-"--;L-::o:-n::gi;::tu:::d;-:e:-;::::;;,;:;;6::::;-!:-•-;!=;4:;;:2:::;:!,~! =3;;0;=:;!"
Discharges & Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: [J Lagoon 0 Spray Field o Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Wllste Collection &Treatlilenf -·· ·· -·· ---- - -· .. .. --~--• .. • ---
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? 0 Spillway
[J Yes 111 No
o Yes o No
o Yes oNe
o Yes oNo
[J Yes a No
oYes aNa
---· ...
0 Yes 111 No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): ............... 3.3. ................................................................................................................................................................................................ ..
1Fac1hty Number: 37-3 Date of Inspection I 7130/i002 I
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity or'any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
. seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? (If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
·10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
II. Is there evidence of over application? [J Excessive Ponding [J PAN [J Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type Com, Soybeans, Wheat Cotton
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CA WMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
!6 .. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
up
[J Yes a No
[J Yes a No
[J Yes a No
eYes a No
[J Yes a No
[J Yes a No
[J Yes a No
[J Yes a No
[J Yes [JNO
[J Yes oNo
[J Yes [JNO
[J Yes a No
[J Yes a No
0 Yes a No
[J Yes a No
[J Yes a No
0 Yes a No
[J Yes a No
[J Yes a No
[JYes aNo
[J Yes a No
o Yes a No
Waste 7/1102 with 2.3 lbs N/1000 gal. for "broadcast" which falls in the range for the farm's past "irrigation"
(Mr. Lang only uses a traveling gun to irrigate crops).
Waste 11/20/01 with 1.6lbs N/1000 gal for "irrigation".
Records are well maintained.
'l:',i.'::·l'>,;', ,.,,,,,'
,:••,., .. Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
~
; •
05/03/01
') I Fac1hiy Number: 37_3 Date oflnspection 713012002
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e.-broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
Continued
oYes oNo
oYes a No
oYes a No
oYes a No
oYes a No
oYes a No
oYes oNo
l'',f ,• ,h ' ,, I'' C' '' ',,
Type of Visit o Compliance Inspection ®Operation Review o Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit ® Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up o Emergency Notification o Other
' ..
0 Denied Access
1.----------------~----__.11)" I< of Vi> it; L....;2;_/rt4~/2~0;:0:;2:;i;r;i";'c~: ~I :;::;:t=I~02~:;;~===,......, Facility Number Ll _3_7_.JHL ___ .J Jo Not dperaiwnal 0 lie low I hreshold
• Permitted • Certified a Conditionally Certified a Registered Date Last Operated or· Above Threshold: ........................ .
Farm Name: George Lang Farm County: Gates. .................................................. :W.aRO. ...... .
Owner Name: George Lang, Jr. Phone No: 252-357-1072
Mailing Address: l6.0.ll.S .. Hwy..l58..:W. ............................................................................ Gat.e.s.v.ille .. NC. ....................................................... 2.79.3/L .......... .
Facility Contact: ............................................................................... Title: ............................................................... Phone No: .................................................. ..
0 nsitc Rep res en Ia t ive: Juan.Langi.Geor.ge..Lang....................................................... In leg ra tor: Mur.(lh.y..Eamilr.E.arms .................................... ..
Cert ilicd Operator: George.L. ............................. Lang.Jr............................................ Operator· Cer·ti!ication N urn bcr: 19.368 ............................ .
Location of Farm:
11 Swine 0 Poultry 0 Cattle o Horse Latitude
Swine ....
rrent
Poultry ''capacity' Ponirllati1nn Cattle Capacity Population
II ~E~..,.,~r::"::,..,~~""'ay""'e=-r lf-----+1---il t~:~:Darry I I I '0
Nun\berof La1:oor1S
~olding .P<inds/Solid;Traps:'
Discharges & Stream Impacts
io Other
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Total Design Capacity
TotafSSbW
Discharge originated at: 0 Lagoon 0 Spray Field 0 Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, nc.tify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
7,000
210,000
o Yes 11 No
o Yes oNo
0 Yes oNo
0 Yes oNo
0 Yes 11 No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
W<1stc Collection & Tre:Jtmcnt
eYes 11 No
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? 0 Spillway oYes 11No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Jdcntilicr:
freeboard (inches): ............... Jl.. ............................................................................................................................................................................................... ..
!Facohty Number: 37-3 Dale of Inspection I :Z/14/:ZOO:Z I
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? (If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenant;e/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
\Vastc Apnlication
I 0. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? 0 Excessive Ponding 0 PAN 0 Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type Com, Soybeans, Wheat Cotton
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CA WMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & l)ocuments
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
oYes 1B1No
oYes 1B1No
0 Yes 1B1 No
0 Yes 1B1 No
0 Yes 1B1 No
o Yes 1B1 No
0 Yes 1B1 No
o Yes 1B1 No
0 Yes 1B1 No
0 Yes 1B1 No
o Yes 1B1 No
o Yes 1B1 No
o Yes 1B1 No
o Yes 1B1 No
0 Yes 1B1 No
0 Yes 1B1 No
0 Yes 1B1 No
0 Yes 1B1 No
0 Yes 1B1 No
0 Yes 1B1 No
o Yes 1B1 No
o Yes 1B1 No
Ia No voolatoons or dellcoencoes were noted durmg thos vosn. You will receove no lurtner correspondence aboutthos vosll.
Comme,nts.(refcr,to question.#):,. E;wlain.any, YES answers ~hd/or ~ny.•recommeritlatidns ()r:any.otheniimmerits. • .... ,, .. · 'll '··
ps~. d~&,,":i~gs. of. f~cili!~,t~,~~tt~r,e~~l~i~ ~itp~ti~~§· :t~sf .. ~,!!diti~~:al.~~g~s as n~~fs~~~y):, ·, ,~~Fieictc'o-py oFinarN~te~ ·--~LJ .·
,. ' ', '. . , , ., . i · : :' · '· 1 · , , .. ' i . ·, ~"m1.,.'Yt'l""'1~:-;"'•~":":"~"f"'"'"'":-v7~'!'1~. · ;i
*General Permit dated 1/15/01 and on stte.
*Lagoon level is being recorded weekly.
*Waste analysis dated 11/19/01 nitrogen is 1.6 lbs I 1000 gallons.
*Records are complete and balanced.
*Spray fields (wheat) in good condition.
*New waste analysis taken on 2/11101 no results.
27. Compost mixed with chicken litter.
, .. . '
Reviewer/Inspector Name ~<;;1~'~'!"'i'~"'''lf'~ij ... """'!'1"'!'""lj''1~~"';lll"'t't1,;'..,..,.,-:",.,';''T7"""'li1'"!~;::;.!""1"'"r•!:'...,':-""~"~'~'-"'"~"'"'"·\''C:f
' .. ,,,,! 1Martin,McLawho'rn ·. ·. . ·:... '. , ' ' . ·:' ·"' .. ·:: ' :i·
,~,, .;• ' '" :.,:·: . '. ' '' ' .•. ' •• '•· ••.•• ,I,"' ·• '\ _, ___ ,_., '"'" -~ .. ,_ .r.:.·.
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
"
.A -
-....
·-05/03/01
1 Fac1hiy Number: 37_3 Date of In~qwrtion 271472002
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
*Wheat will be chemically burned, need to deduct nitrogen applied to wheat crop from corn crop for 2002 on IRR2.
*Soil test taken on 12/10/01. No results. Follow lime requirements.
*Continue to monitor for erosion from stonn runoff around houses.
*There is some veg. on dike walls however it is evident that weeds are present so continue to spray for weeds.
Co11ti11ued
lJ Yes IJNO
lJ Yes llilNo
lJ Yes llilNo
lJ Yes llilNo
lJ Yes llilNo
lJ Yes llilNo
lJ Yes IJNO
",;',, l,l ,q•, ...
Type of Visit 0 Compliance Inspection ® Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit ® Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 other D Denied Access
5/21/2001 I Time: I 920 I Printed on: 9/21/2001
[_ Facility Number I 37 H 3 IO Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
fl!i Permitted ll8 Certified [J Conditionally Certified C Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ........................ .
Farm Name: G.i:u.Qt~ . .l.olll~.F.arm...................................................................................... County: G.3t~L ............................................... WIIRO. ....... .
Owner Name: G.i:u.Qte... ...........................•..... Lang,J.r •............................................... :.... Phone No: 252."3.51"10.7.2. ......................................................... .
Mailing Address: HiD .. US.H:w,>:.l.5li.W............................................................................. G.aics:v.ilk.NC........................................................ 2.7.938 ............. .
Facility Contact: .............................................................................. Title: ................................................................ Phone No: .................................................. .
Onsite Representative: .Gen~.&..Joan.Lan~.............................................................. Integrator: Mw:phy..F.amily . .F.IU1IIS. .................................... .
Certified Operator: .Gelltlll\ ................................... ~.................................................. Operntor Certification Number: .1!/Jii.ll ........................... ..
Location of Farm:
.... = ,.
181 s . w1ne OP It DC ttl OH ou ry a e orse Latitude 36 I• I 27 I• I 15 I" Longitude 76 I • I 42 I· I 3o 1 ..
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacitv Population
~Wean to Feeder 7000 6800 IDLayer I I I ID Dairy I I I
D F ceder to Finish ID Non-Layer I I J ID Non-Dairy I I I
D Farrow to Wean
IDOtber I I I D Farrow to Feeder
D Farrow to Finish Total Design fapacity I 7,000 I D Gilts I I D Boars Total SSLW 210,000
.... · -NumberofLagoons I 1 I jD Subsurface Drains Present liD Lagoon Area ID Spray Field Area I
. Holding Ponds I Solid·Traps ·I I ID No Liquid Waste ManaRement System I·
Discharges & Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: D Lagoon D Spray Field D other
a. If discharge is obse1ved, was the conveyance man-made?
b. It' discharge is obsctved, did it reach Water of the State 'I (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'' (If yes, noti~y DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adwrse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Cnllcctiun & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? D Spillway
Stmcture I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
ldcntilier:
35
DYes 181No
DYes DNo
DYes DNo
DYes DNo
DYes ~No
DYes ~No
DYes ~No
Structure 6
05103101 Continued
I Facility Number: 37-J Date of Inspection 5/21/2001 Printed on: 9/21/2001
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Arc there structures on-site which aTe not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
DYes jgJ No
closure plan? DYes jgJ No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
I 0. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
II. Is there evidence of over application?
12. Crop type Com, Soybeans, Wheat
D Excessive Ponding D PAN D Hydraulic Overload
Cotton
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Managemc'lll Plan (CAWMP)'I'
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Docs the facility uccd a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
'Rcyuircd Rct.~ords & Dut·umcnts
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Pem1it readily available?
18. Docs the facility fail to have all components oftl1e Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Docs record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboaTd, waste analysis & soil SliTllple reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notifY regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ dischaTge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
24. Does lacility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified A WMP?
DYes
DYes
DYes
DYes
DYes
DYes
DYes
DYes
DYes
DYes
DYes
DYes
DYes
DYes
DYes
DYes
DYes
DYes
DYes
DYes
c No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments (refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Usc drawings offacility to better explain situations. (use ·additional pages as necessary): j D Field Copy D Final Notes .
*Facility is with Murphy FliTills as of 4/24/01.
*Facility empty from 11/30/00 thru 4/24/0 I.
*Discussed IRR2/waste analysis schedule.
• Soil test dated 5/10/0 I. No lime required.
*Waste analysis dated 3/23/01 nitrogen .JRHL lagoon is 3.4lbs/JOOO gallons
1/02/0 I nitrogen was 3.4 lbs/1000 gallons.
jgJ No
jgJ No
jgJ No
jgJ No
jgJ No
jgJ No
DNo
DNo
DNo
jgJ No
jgJ No
jgJ No
jgJ No
jgJ No
jgJ No
jgJ No
jgJ No
jgJ No
jgJ No
jgJ No
I
*Lagoon level being recorded weekly as required by penni!, however during time period when facility was empty there were several weeks
when lagoon level not recorded. Pennit requires lagoon recording weekly.
r----,, -·-··--·---------. -··--.. -.. ---. ------~-----,
Reviewer/Inspector Name :Martin McLawhorn .. '
• . " . ,
RPviPw-Pr/lncnPI'tnr S.ionAtn-! nAfP!
~
-...
· · OJ/0310/ Continued
J Facility Number: 37--3 Date of Inspection 5/21/2001 Printed on: 9/2112001
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confmement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon'/
30. Were any major maintenance problems with tlte ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
1 Auuttwnat Lomments anwor urawlngs:
*Mr. Lang considering putting in coastal bermuda graze and fescue graze. Consult tech. Spec.
*Time to take new waste analysis.
*IRR2 needs to be balanced.
DYes jgJ No
DYes jgJ No
DYes jgJ No
DYes jgJ No
DYes jgJ No
DYes jgJ No
DYes DNo
I~
\
IR<ea!mn for Visit ®Routine o Complaint o Follow up o Emergency Notification o Other a Denied Access
l--~F-=~·~~· .:.:::~=-~==.l=?=::::~~==.l==~--J~ Date of Visit: act tty urn er 1 . . • 9/26/2001 I Time: I 9:15am I Printed on: 10/1/2001
lo Not Operabonal o Uelow rhreshold
• Permitted • Certified a Conditionally Certified a Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ·························
Farm Name: George Lang Farm County: Gates. .................................................. Wa.RO ....... .
Owner Name: George Lang, Jr. Phone No: 252-357-1072
Mailing Address: .t6ll.US . .Hwy..l.58..W ............................................................................ Gat.es.v.ille.NC. ....................................................... 27.9.38 ............. .
Facility Contact: ............................................................................... Title: ............................................................... Phone No: ................................................... .
Onsite Representative; George..&.J.aan.Lang............................................................. Integrator: Mur.p.by..F.amey . .Farms. .................................... .
Certified Operator: George ................................... Lang.................................................. Operator Certification Number: 19.368 ............................ .
Location of Farm: ..
L-----------~==~~~~~~~~~~~T Latitude 36 1•1 27 1' 1 IS I" Longitude 76 1•1 42 1' 1 30 1" 1111 Swine a Poultry a Cattle a Horse . . . . . . . . . .
Paultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
I~ ~:~~ayer I I I-~~ g:~:Oa•ry I I I
·. t'lumberof,Lagrioris ·
Holdi~gPondsiSolid Traps
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Ia Other
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Total Design Capacity
TotalSSLW
Discharge originated at: 0 Lagoon a Spray Field a Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
7,000
210,000
a Yes 1111No
a Yes 1111No
a Yes 1111 No
na
a Yes 1111No
a Yes 1111No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
a Yes 1111No
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? a Spillway aYes 1111No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): ............... J.L ............................................................................................................................................................................................... .
I JFac1hty Number: 37-3 Date of Inspection I 912612001 I Printed on: 0/1/2001
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management r
closure plan? (If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improveme t?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
I 0. Are there any buffers that need maintenancelimprovement 0
II. Is there evidence of over application? lJ Excessive Ponding lJ PAN lJ Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type Corn, Soybeans, Wheat Cotton
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (C 1 WMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily nvailable?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) 1
19 Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation freeboard waste analysis & soil sample repo s) , ,
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(iei discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
lJ Yes a No
lJ Yes aNa
a Yes oNo
lJ Yes aNa
lJ Yes a No
lJ Yes a No
lJ Yes a No
lJ Yes a No
lJ Yes lJ No
lJ Yes lJ No
lJ Yes lJ No
lJ Yes a No
lJ Yes a No
lJ Yes a No
lJ Yes a No
lJ Yes a No
lJ Yes a No
lJ Yes a No
lJ Yes a No
lJ Yes a No
lJ Yes a No
lJ Yes aNa
a No v1otatoons or aetoc1enc1es were notea aurmg thiS VISit. Y au Will rece1ve no further corresp naence aoout !hiS VISit.
_co~~ents;{rerer-·:~o~'que.~tiQii~to:~~;-~xpla,Iri1 ·aDy;~Y:ES"B~SW'¢fs~il'ild(~r._~~Y,:-:~#~-9~!n'~~d~tio~·s,hr _a.Rj o_~he~.~c~o,m_m~rit~~:~~-~-~;ld;~::·f~(:~-? :?r;·:~;-\_~: Use;d~awlril!s'o'ft~~~Iity:to·tiJtter;expl~ih'~it~:tioo's;:(use"au<liti6~al·.~liges asn'e~~~'ar}>)':':,~:.::::::, .. :. f '' · ''''"' ''·:•:~ ... ;.~~.,q~,, r .. ,:,,. ,,;:,~·E ;,, ·:/~; ::··";:!{,~ .. : ,.~:d ->;t~·.f;:>K::.\:~:;<:. :·-:_!;.: .. ~-,~;:·,-~' 1:,:;;:. ~ _.:~:·{;;·.r'_~:;~~-~~~;;;·~~--~: .. :·:i:~=.::~;~;~~~--~'Jt;; ,;:j::.:; ;~:·:;i ·,~~~;_:1-::~. ::;.~--~::·"~~t~~~ :.:·:;\~:~~:-~l~~;:>;:?. ~ .;:;~~: ::;~i.~ --~~-e.~, ·-l~\-~~~,p--~ •• FL~~~,~~?~:~. -· . , .. , ·:~:~~ ·x.·--
Records available for rev1ew. ...
Waste analysis 6/22/01 = 2.2 lbs; 3/23/01 =3A lbs; 1/2/01 =3.3 lbs.
Soil analysis for 200 I available.
Irrigation records are complete and balanced out.
Freeboard levels are recorded weekly as required.
7. Need to continue managing the grounds around the houses and lagoons via mowing etc.
Rainfall data is recorded.
If you have any questions, contact your Technical Specialist or me at 252-946-6481, e tension 318. T
Reviewer/Inspector Name Lyn B. fjardison
~
entered by Ann: Tyndall. I
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: /~ 1-6 .J-k, A~UJ.:rV Date: /0' ,2-0 1
' --~ ....
05/03/0/ Continued
1 Facohty Number: Date of Inspection 912612001 Printed on: 10/1/2001
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
,.•.·
',. ~·' '
[J Yes oNo
[J Yes IB1 No
[J Yes IB1 No
[J Yes IB1 No
[J Yes IB1 No
[J Yes IB1 No
[J Yes o No
. ;<.;;.;,,:, ,., • ...
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Rosa, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Kerr T. Stevens
···:-, •. ,,.,_ ==·~::·· Division of Water Quality
To: Producers
From:
Date:
Subject:
Lyn B. Hardison ~
Environmental Specialist -·.·w/,
Washington Regional Office I ~
October 3, 2001
Animal Compliance Routine Inspection
Year 2001
Enclosed please find a copy or copies of the Compliance Site lnspection(s) (as viewed in DWQ database) conducted at the
referenced facility by the Division of Water Quality from the Washington Regional Office. Please read this inspection and
keep with all other documents pertaining to your animal operation for future iDSJiections.
In general, these inspectious included verifYing that: (I) the fann has a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP):
(2) the farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC 2H.0217, Senate Bill 1217, and the Certified Animal
Waste Management Plan; (3) the fann opemtion's waste management system is being opemted properly mtder the direction of a
Certified Opemtor; (4) the required records are being kept; (5) there are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or runoff.
As a rentinder, please note the following wltich are conditions ofthe Certified Animal Waste Management Plan and the general
pemtit; therefore, these items must be implemented:
<p The maximum waste level in lagoonsistomge ponds shall not exceed that specified in theCA WMP. At a tuirtimwn,
maxintum waste level for waste for lagoons/storage ponds must not exceed the level that provides adequate stomge to
contain 25 year, 24 hour storm event plus an additional foot of structural freeboard.
<p An analysis of the liquid mtimal waste from the lagoon shall be conducted as close to the time of application as pmctical and
at least within60 days (before or after) of the date of application. Tltis mJalysis shall include the following parameters:
Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Zinc and Copper.
<p Soil mJalysis is required mmually.
<p The following records are required: off-site solids removal, maintenance, repair, waste/soil analysis and land irrigation
records. These records should be maintained by the facility owner/manager in chronological and legible fonn for a
ruittimwn of three years.
<p Lmtd application rates shall be in accordmtce with theCA WMP. In no case shall land aoolication mtes exceed the Plmtt
Available Nitrogen (PANl rate for the receiving crop or result in runoff during anv given application.
<p All grossed waterways shall have a stable outlet witlt adequate capacity to prevent ponding or flooding dmnages. The outlet
can be anotlter vegetated chmme~ an earth ditch, stabilization structure, or other suitable outlets.
<p It is suggested, not required to keep crop yield infomtation for future use to update your waste management plan. You will
need three years of crop yield data before your plan can be updated
<p The OIC has the duties to ensure that waste is applied in accordance with theCA WMP and General Pemtit by properly
managing, supervising, mtd documenting daily operation and maintenance. The OIC also has the responsibility to certiJY
monitoring and reporting infomtation. The failure of an OIC to perform \tis/her duties can result in a letter of reprimand
suspension of certification, or revocation of certificates.
For your infomtation, mzy swine facility that ltaS a discharge to surface waters of the State will have to apply for a National
Pollutant Discharge Elintination System (NPDES) pemtit with the Division of Water Quality, effective January L 200 I.
Thank you for your assistmtce and coopemtion during the inspection. If you have any questions, please contact your Teclutical
Specialist or me at 252-946-&181, ext. 318.
Cc: WaRO
LBH Files (inspection form only)
943Washington Square Mall Washington, NC 27889 252-946-6481 (Telephone) 252-946-9215(Fax)
e Division of Water Quality
0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency ------
Type of Visit ®Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit ® Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 Other 0 Denied Access
.. ---------------------..1~ Date of Visit: Facility Number I 37 H .... _:;:.3_..J .
9/5/2000 I Time: I 13:00 I Printed on: 9/6/2000
!0 Not Operational 0 Below Threshold I
C Permitted B Certified C Conditionally Certified C Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ....................... ..
Farm Name: G.eor~ .. J..li.Og.F.ru:m..................................................................................... County: G.11tes .................................................. W.11RO. ...... ..
Owner Name: G.e!lrJ:~ .................................... Lllng..Jr..................................................... Phone No: lS.hl51.:l.OJl ......................................................... ..
Facility Contact: .............................................................................. Title: ................................................................ Phone No: .................................................. .
Mailing Address: 160 .. US.HlV)' .. lS.li.W. ............................................................................ G.lltesxille.NC ........................................................ l1.9.J.ll ............. .
Onsite Representative: G~.urge/J.!Ill.ll.I..JI.og ................................. :................................. Integrator: WiUiams.F.».r.ms.g.(.NC,.Jn~ ........................... .
Certified Operator:(i~g.r.ge.L. ............................. l..li.Og.J.r............................................. Operator Certification Number:J.9.J.Iill ............................ .
Location of Farm: r-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------•• 1
1815 . w1ne OP It OC ttl OH ou ry a e orse Latitude 36 I• I 27 I• I 15 I" Longitude
Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle
181 Wean to Feeder 7000 D Layer I I I IDDairy
--!
.,..;
76 I• I 42 I· I 3o I"
Design Current
Capacity Pooulation
I I
D Feeder to Finish D Non-Layer I I I ID Non-Dairy I J
D Farrow to Wean
ID Other I I I D Farrow to Feeder
D Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity 7,000
D Gilts
D Boars TotaiSSLW 210,000
Number of Lagoons I ID : Drains Present no Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area I
Holding Ponds I Solid Traps ID No Liquid Waste M: I
Discharges & Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? DYes 181 No
Discharge originated at: D Lagoon D Spray Field D Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? DYes DNo
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) DYes DNo
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) DYes DNo
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? DYes 181No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
~Collection & Treatment
DYes 181 No
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? D Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): 17
Structure 5
181 Yes DNo
Structure 6
5100
jFacility Number: 37-3 Date of Inspection 9/5/2000
Continued on back
Printed on: 9/6/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any ofthe structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
I 0. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
II. Is there evidence of over application? D Excessive Ponding D PAN D Hydraulic Overload
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notifY regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
D Ni/:vi~I~tio~~ ~r d~fi~i~ncies•w~~e noted dtiriiig:this •visit; :vti~ witi re~ei~¢ h~ flirthe~:::: ........... d ........•. ' ' ......................................................................... . . cor.respon ence about th1s .v1s1t. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
DYes 181 No
DYes 181No
DYes 181No
DYes 181No
DYes 181 No
DYes 181 No
DYes 181 No
DYes 181 No
DYes 181 No
DYes DNo
DYes DNo
DYes 181No
DYes 181 No
DYes 181 No
DYes 181No
DYes 181No
DYes 181No
DYes 181No
DYes 181 No
DYes 181No
DYes 181No
DYes 181 No
Comments (refer to question#): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
Farm lagoon has just gone under 19 inches. Must notify DWQ when less than 19 inches. Call DWQ
weekly to report levels until back greater than 19 inches.
Suggest using a marker that is gauged to the top of the lagoon wall.
I Reviewer/Inspector N.ame !carl Dunn Entered by Ann Tyndall I
"--·~---· ... -"-.. --.. ·--6:'----···--·
....
-
-,.
Facility Number
24 hr. (hh:mm)
[] Permitted [] Certified [] Conditionally Certified [] Registered~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~===~
Farm Name: .......... Y.t?..tz..r::f.:::. ................. ~:::.~ ............. .f":.~................................... County: .................................................................................... .
Owner Name: .................. ?~.~~.t.:: ............ -~-~~-························································ Phone No: ...................................................................................... .
Facility Contact: .............................................................................. Title: ................................................................ Phone No: .................................................. .
Mailing Address: .................................................................................................................... .
Onsite Representative: ........ ?..~.~.':)!, .... /:f.:?.::':::.: ............... ~ .................................. . Integrator: ........ ~~.!.!.~~?. ...... ~.::-!.. ... :?..£ ........ t!f: ......... .
Certified Operator: ................ ~ .. ~.~.:.~ .............. ~-··············································· Operator Certilication Number: ......................................... .
Location of Farm:
Latitude I Longitude
· ··· · ·· ·· · : Design · · Cur~e~t"' · . Design · .. ctir"r:e~t:· :·· •!..• .. ·.··; :' ·· ,. .. , •. ·Design · ··current : : ::':ri:S::w~in:-:e-· ;..;· :_. '-:-='".· _· :--.·..::c,::·a=p•ac:':i . .:L;ty•r· p..::'o""p .. -"1.;1:;;. a'""ti"'o"'tn . Poultry Capacity Popul:itlon ' Cattle :' •: :::.:tapaciJ: ~bp.;l;ti~n·:
1
._,1,18..WeantoFeeder ?Cl_(}O .IDLayer I I .'.IDDairy I I l,;j, I: .• :;DFeedertoFinish ·,IDNon-Layerl I ·'"IDNon-Dairyl I 1';,
1 "~.-. :l§~=:=::.:.::.:;;_;::.:-o::-:=e~7::..r+---+------l ID Other . · . 'I •.... ..... -r::·:..::: ·::.::::i'.::r:;'i: :<~;~;::";• ;!::;•:-:·. · : .• :::
· J Farrow to Finish '.· •. , .•. " _·.· 'J~t~I Oesig~; ¢~r~~itt{l ...... 1,.'
~c·· B ~~:s -... ;·.. . ·.·.·}:::::::.:;::t;~~:~~B~,:;:.I 1.-·
.••' . , . 'Number of Lagoons · .. :. -~~ =:::::!==:jj': , .::::•:;ID Subsurface Drains Present UD Lagoon Area
:: , .· :!Jolili\'gP~~ds/ SolldTra~~ J I' : , : <JD No Liquid Waste Management System
ID Spray Field Area r:::
I~,::~:::;·:~-~:;:::'. ~-~._ ·_;·;.:; :;~;;;:·::! :-:~::~:~:·:.
Discharges & Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? DYes ~No
Discharge originated at: D Lagoon D Spray Field D Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? DYes DNo
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) DYes DNo
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated tlow in gal/min?
d. Docs discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) DYes DNo
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? DYes fi11No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? DYes ~0
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? (k..t?M~Yes .o
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3
D Spillway
Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): ........... L.J .................................................................................................................................. ; ................................................................ ..
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99
DYes '121 No
Continued on back
!Facility Number: n -J Date of Inspection I 9-~ -~J
6. Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? DYes iiSl No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management System other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
I 0. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
II. Is there evidence of over application? D Excessive Ponding D PAN
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Cenified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there· a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documentc;
17 .. Fail to have Cenificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample repons)
20; Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified A WMP?
IQ: i'!i«i :-vij}J~tk>~s :&r: U(!Ocie:.i~i~& :~j.~ iiiit~4,: uilf:il)g tliis:v;5;i;: :\':o~ :W:ii1 :~e~dv~ ~~ t:titi~(!~ :: :: : ........• :...: 'd .. 'ab' .. h' .••......................................................................... . . corres..,on ence. outt JS .v1s1t. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
DYes qg'"No
DYes (8No
DYes d»No
DYes giNo
DYes dia._ No
DYes ~No
DYes ~No
DYes DNo
DYes DNo
DYes ~No
DYes ~No
DYes ~No
DYes rz9-No
DYes QNo
DYes BNo
DYes 1!31!No
DYes fi! No
DYes .lSI., No
DYes Iii! No
DYes eg_No
~~~~~~~; :(r~r~~;_t?~ ~.~~d-~~-.''~),t?~xP.I~~~-~~nS::.i~~~, ~~-~·r~·-.~~~.Of~.a~-y~~1e~~~in~~.a~~~ns--~~·~'a·~~-"~·~;~E~~.,-~,~rits·~r.:.:: ·;~~-:r_.1 i il ~-:-. :t·<r! ·-~ 1
-U~_;dra.~ngs of··faci~~tY,.to·be~~-r~e~plam_sJ~.atio_~• (use add!ti.o_~aJ pages aS;Jl~C~~ry): ~ 1-:\· .... \'-'1}: r:t:.:·:~! ~\L.~t\'ur"' ,J L ..• ~:~ :+,.~f~·"· -,-t ~ _: ~ V\' ··' ,.,_.,..! '' ;; (·, -f!-->.·' >,_,,.,,,~,; .. ,_-q\ '·•"<•·-•· ko ,, ... 1 ••\1 ,,;"~•-·•;·41'"·"·'1.-'·-i.·+·"'! h· ,. , -,\_,.,\,!1·'.>._",··1-,_~\1 ,P/t,,,,;,lj·'<, 1 ,-1Jl".,1 ,:,,~,,~h}>"
fw,.. ~A} J''+ 7"'~(. lA ~<I(!(' /"'' i•c"-'-~. M~"' "'" -1 : .r )' ovq ...
~ k5s -\-I,... ... .A 1"1 ,~,..c ~ t5 ~ C ... II ova w-4fkl/ -Jo ~(',..\-
k oil' Is "'"'~ n l? .. <k ~~J.,. 4--\..."" 14.
5\7"}-;.-\.< 'jl "j "' .... ~,.f<:y ~+-)' 5 '.,.~,~d +" .J1._ ·l ~I'
o+ -+k . 1 .. )"-' ..... ...,..., I I,
"'
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
C Division· of Soil ~'!d Water !Z.onse'n;!!tion ::qperaiion Re~.ew, <' : ·'.:•;:' •' . • . '' ,: : •' :::.~i.!:
C Division of Soil a'!d Wa!er Co,hse~atiori,-,Compliance~iJSpecti,o'l· . • ,
1
:;" ••• '. •:H' , '. i'
SDivisionofW"terQ\ullitji-CompUaricelnspectiori .: ,·:.,;· .. ·:,·• · •. · :.· .. :,, •. , '.:'· · COtherAgencycOpe..,;_tion.~eview' ·.· ., · "::::· _1:, .::'., :'•, ., , ·''.:
!e Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Date of Inspection 12"-19-'iq I Facility Number I 37 H 3
Time of Inspection I /2!0 124 hr. (hh:mm)
C Permitted II Certified C Conditionally Certified C Registered !C Not Operational! Date Last Operated: ........................ ..
~:::~~~~: ·.·.· .. :· .. ·.~::: ... ·t::;·.·.·~= ........................ · .. ·.·.· ... · ... ·.· .............. · Ph:::::: ·~~~~;·;··;.~;·~············~--~···
Facility Contact: .............................................................................. Title: ................................................................ Phone No: .................................................. .
Mailing Address: ... l..l.:,.D ....... IJ .. $ .. ~~ .. J.~.B. ... W.:t::(i;± ..................................... GaJ.:e£..lfi .. IJt ............ f.Y...l;, ............ ~7.'1 .. 3. ... 8
Onsite Representative: ...... .1.t:P.X~k. ... ~ ......... :~ ..... 1.f.:~ ... ~.................. Integrator: .... IA/i..!l..i~.5. ...... F.:.~IX! .. 7. .. t:!fJ ..... N. .•. f.: ..
Certified Operator: ........ CJ.e.P.:r..?.?.: ........ 4: .. , .............. ~ ..... ,J; .. :...................... Operator Certification Number: ..... !..'J..~f?. .. t?.. ............. .
Location of Farm:
l ~
Latitude I Longitude
Design Current. Design Current Design Current . ,
Swine Capacity Population · Poultry Capacity Population · Cattle Capacity Population . ·"'B]:;;'::W-:-e-an-t~o-::F:-ee-d:-e-r ..,::.:1::~:<>;.;:;•"=,...,..:-==:.=, ID Layer I I I ID Dairy I I I ·
· D Feeder to Finish ; ··ID Non-Layer I I I. JD Non-Dairy I I 1. •; .. ~~~Ett¢:=::::I=:;::::::=:=z::··. · ··i ·,,:§:::~::~::~:r Jt:J~;~~; ''Y . I I .. . , :::,::
.r D Farrow to Finish ::::!I: :r::'1: !' ;;,:1 ii'. :;l i;i'j:iii 1':1 f~~1t r)~~ig~ ~~padty I qi
'• ,. § ~~:~ :' :: ; ": '• .· :: : , : : ·' :· · :· : ) " · ·. : · Tot~I ssdv I :j'
: \ ~?mber of Lagoons
Holding Ponds I Solid Traps
ID Subsurface Drains Present liD Lagoon Area ID Spray Field Area I
. ' ID No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impact~
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: D Lagoon D Spray Field D Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'!
h. If discharge is ob~crvcd, did it rca!;h Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Docs discha~gc bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
DYes (iij No
DYes g'No
DYes [8No
'h(<t,.,
DYes 3No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? 8Yes D No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? DYes (;li!:'No
Waste Collection & Treatment Lft/J
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? D Spillway ~ ~No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard (inches): /\.. Jl-II ....... ':': ......... ~ ............ .
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99
DYes 1111 No
Continued on back
jFacility Number: 37 -3 Date of Inspection l5-l'l-<1"1l
6. Arc there structures on-site which arc not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
· immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
\Vaste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? D Excessive Pending D PAN
DYes
13 Yes
fiiij:Yes
DYes
DYes
DYes
12. Croptypc CtrrV\ 0ho,J ~ w6..;cxf ~bu.., !.a{u.f
DYes 13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CA WMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? DYes
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre detennination? DYes
c) This facility is pendcd for a wettable acre determination? DYes
15. Docs the receiving crop need improvement? DYes
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? DYes
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? DYes
18. Docs the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) DYes
19. Docs record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigati
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setb~a"'ck:==cr:;i;:tc:;ri:a:.:iJ.n~c;ff;e::ct..:a=:t:th~e;;;. time of design?
jg'Yes
DYes
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? DYes
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) DYes
·23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative? DYes
24. Docs facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? DYes
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? DYes
ID: i\1{} vi~I~tlQ~s :6i 4~i;c;~ni:i¢& :~i-¢ ~i>(e(l: 4~il'li(t:tiis:v;5;i;: :Yo~ :W:iil:.:e~dt~ iJ~ t~.:t~~~:::::
: · : · correspinidence: abinlt: tMs :Vlslt~ · : · : · : · : · : · : · : · : · : · : · : · : · : · : · : · : · : · • · : ·: · : · : · : · : · : ·: ·: ·: ·: · : · : · : ·: · : · : · :
IS No
DNo
DNo
[!;t No
~No
QS.No
[;;!'No
l!!j.No
~No
~No
~No
li1'f No
DNa
3No
DNa
j8No
IB,No
(&No
ll!!l No
8No
[dNa
C~mmen~~' \r~fer ,t~.~~estio\1 #): ·j<:~pl~il) ~"~'~!':~ ~~wers ~~dlo~ an~.recomll)endations orlany otlter.~'!m11n~l)!"• ·t; . ·,~ ,, :r .,
Use drawmgs offac1hty to bette~ explam Situations, (use additional pages as necessary): . , , 1 · • • r . · ' '' ~ '
Q ~ ' ' ' ·'·, ' .,
Willi~<; •0 t-~.e-.l.t.r..M.$ :£l...0 ~-.. m..-. ~ ~~ . ...
$2-1)1..._-.k. ,~J' ~p;IIS 1
1
1A J.-.9.w;es, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ d1vut ~ ~' {)) ~o-v-.-~ ~ JL j J,.'f-3, ~itf)_ ~ r..u...LA '
...-4-L~' 'lq···--p~ ~ ~ ~ _rw ~,g .. t·'~+ ~ tU ~F -il1~ jw:u;h 'i""-Ill{)~ -.ut;O,n .,h, b.L, ~~ ~ "'"S"'l..."""' !M:~W<U.t
J,l, 8 _ ~ i><...~· ~ l!t• .. , {, (),AL ~ ll.L<J~ ~/ttv ~ wiYr<1.
N uJ_ .k ~ ~ M.la-8 5o ~ .i:4 ~_,,, J, . .J.., &J a-u. ~ f'.rr .... :;.,..Q 1-
T
Reviewer/Inspector Name il.,'l.··. Lv~ I ~~:· A~ cns;:;_-;:nr71i" : i ·::• 1.,. '• ' ;; :.,,'-i' :·,· r:, .'f' ·., :' • .• ··;,,
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: \. f> /.:JtM)/J11A Date: 5'-JtJJif
• 3/23/99
j Facility Number: 31-3 Date of Inspection 15"-1 q -If<'! I
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to djscharge at/or below DYes Bl.No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation? -fltJvtV<o.; "-S "'-o -~ /d.J2.Jb ~<;
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on n~ighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan bladc(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
~·
f»-' kb t' £_ ~
z_ 5 J -'1 tj../,; -& l.f-/1 I
f
0 Yes .J!$fNo
DYes li[No
DYes 12[No
DYes ~0
DYes ~No
DYes Eij!.No
...
In
3/23/99
!e Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-UJ> of DWQ inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number I 37 H 3 Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection
9t17t9s I
11:00 124 hr. (hh:mm)
C Registered rn Certified C Applied for Permit C Permitted JC Not Operational Date Last Operated: ......................... .
Farm Name: G.llllrge.Lan~:,.F.arm...................................................................................... County: Gales .................................................. W.a.RO. ....... .
Owner Name: G.llllrge... ................................. Lan~:,............................................................ Phone No: 3.57.~101.2 ................................................................... .
Facility Contact: .............................................................................. Title: ................................................................ Phone No: .................................................. .
Mailing Address: Rt.l.Bnx.9.l... .......................................................................................... G.alesl'me.N.C. ....................................................... 27.9.38. ............ .
Onsite Representative: .Ge!l[!:,e .. Lllng............................................................................... Integrator: ..................................................................................... .
Certified Operator: .Gell[!:,e.L .............................. Lang.J.r............................................ Operator Certification Number: .19.36.8 ............................ .
Location of Farm:
1, .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ::::::1~
Latitude I 36 lo I 27 I• I 15 I" . Longitude I 76 lo I 42 I• I 30 J"
Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle
jgJ Weanlo Feeder 7000 5000 ID Laver I I I ID Dairy I
D F ceder lo Finish :D N~n-Laycr : :D Non-Dairy :
D Farrow to Wean
ID Other I I I D Farrow to Feeder
D Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity ·I
D Gills
D Boars Total SSLW I
Nu.;,ber ofLago;,~s /Holding Ponds I I I ID Subsurface Drains Present liD Lagoon Area
ID No Liquid Waste Management System
General
I. Arc there any butlers lhal need maintenancc/in>provemenl?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge origiualed at: D Lagoon D Spray Field D Other . .
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed. did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, nolily DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed .. what is the estimated tlow in gal/min?
d. Docs discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notili• DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part oflhe operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the Slate other than from a discharge?
5. Docs any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the lime of design?
7. Did the facility faillo have a certified opera lor in responsible charge?
7/?'i/Q7
Design Current
Capacity Population
I I
7,000 I
210,000 I
ID Spray Field Area I
I
DYes jgJ No
DYes jgJ No
DYes DNo
DYes DNo
DYes DNo
DYes jgJ No
DYes jgJ No
DYes jgJ No
DYes jgJ No
DYes jgJ No
Lununueu un ouc" I Facility Number: 37-3 Date of Inspection 9/17/98
8. Arc there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoml<,Holding Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus stonn storage) less than adequate?
Structure I Stmeture 2 Structure 3
Identifier:
DYes jgl No
DYes jgl No
Structure 4 Structure 5 Stmclurc 6
Freeboard (ll): ................. 2 .................................................................................................................................................................................................. ..
10. Is seepage obseJVed from any of the structures?
II. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Wast'-" Aoplication
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
DYes jgl No
DYes jgl No
DYes jgl No
DYes jgl No
DYes jgl No
15. Crop type ....................... Cil.UilM ............................... C!l.m..(Silag,~.&..fmliuL ...... .S.r.uall.Qr».iu..(.w.b~ll.t .. B.II.l'lcy., ....................... S.m;li.~w .................. ..
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (A WMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need in1provcment?
19. Is there alack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
22. Docs record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Fncilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified A WMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Pem1it?
0 No: viohitions. or:deficiendes were noted: dtiri.rig this visit:: .You :wm: i-eceiv.e .no furthe.r::: :
.. :. :ciu'res'pinide'nce about this: visit'.·:.:-:.:.: :. :. :. :-:-:.:-:-:.:-:.:-:-: :. :-:-: :-:.:.:.: :-:-: : :. :. :. :
DYes
DYes
DYes
DYes
DYes
DYes
DYes
DYes
DYes
DYes
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings offacility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
jgl No
jgl No
jgl No
jgl No
jgl No
jgl No
jgl No
jgl No
jgl No
DNo
The plan is done for the whole !'ann covering 47 +acres even though all acres are not required. Some of this land is currently planted in
peanuts (I of6 eight+ acre pulls). The plan needs to show the maximum amount of the land that can be planted with peanuts or the
correct rotation to ensure that ~:..-nought nitrogen will be taken up.
~ --~ ---· --------·
...
1-
v
Reviewer/Inspector Name .f~,~l, ~.~.n~.-.r~\ ,.1l\',;,,;,i:. , I', .~i\. ~. ~·~j;, , ... 1~1 II 'I ~.;, ~~ <. 'Jt~ "II •'< •L!\> ' ' ' I ' ' " .' I ' ' II ' l 1 ... ~ 1 i I ' II ''. ·A~t q._:~. !\, j\, .. h . ' H.',\ 1•, ., ~i '1 ,j_,~.,;~, I~ ·•t.'il, 11,_11
Reviewer/lnsoedor Si2nature: Date:
Facility Numher 37 H 3 Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection
6t22t9s I
1200 124 hr. (hh:mm)
[] Registered ~ Certified [] Applied for Permit [] Permitted !C Not Operational Date Last Operated: ........................ ..
Farm Name: G.~or)IG.Ll!ng..l!.llrm...................................................................................... County: G.atea .................................................. W.a.RO ....... .
Owner Name: G.~r~~e .................................... Lllng............................................................. Phone No: 351.,107.2 ................................................................... .
Facility Contact: G.~r~~e.Lllng. .................................................. Title: .11!-"llU.................................................. Phone No: 252/.J.S2,107.L ................... .
Mailing Address: RU.BM9.1... ......................................................................................... G.atGsYllle.IS.C ........................................................ 27.9.38 ............. .
On•ite Representative: .Ge.Q~:~te..&.J.QIUI.LDng.............................................................. Integrator: W.illill.llla.F.II.f.IIM .. IIf.IS.C • .J.o~ •.............................
Certified Operator: .Gen~:~te..l. .............................. La.!Jli.Jr............................................ Operator Certification Number: .19.36.8 ............................ .
Location of },arm:
........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... I ~~
Latitude I 36 I• I 27 I• I IS I" Longitude I 76 lo I 42 I• I 30 I"
Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle
181 Wean to Feeder 7000 7000 ID Layer I I I ID Dairy I
D Feeder to Finish :D Non-Layer : :D Non-Dairy:
D Farrow to Wean
D Farrow to Feeder ID Other I I I
D Farrow to Finish Total Design Capacity I D Gilts I D Boars Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons I Holding Ponds I 1 I ID Subsurface Drains Present liD Lagoon Area
ID No Liquid Waste Management S~·stem
General
I. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge obsetved from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: D Lagoon D Spray Field D Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man~ made?
b. II" discharge is obsctved. did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notiJY DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated t1ow in gaVmin?
d. Docs discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, noli!)' DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. We-re there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State othe-r than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at tliC time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/?'i/Q?
Design Current
Capacity Population
I I
7,000 I
210,000 I
ID Spray Field Area I 0
I
DYes jgl No
DYes 181 No
DYes DNo
DYes DNo
DYes DNo
DYes 181 No
DYes 181 No
DYes 181 No
DYes 181 No
DYes 181 No
L-Ontmueu un out'"
j Facility Number: 37-3 Date of Inspection 6/22/98
8. Arc there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (LngoonsJ!olding Ponds, Hush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure I Stmcturc 2 Structure 3
Identifier: ............... #.1 .............. .
DYes jgj No
DYes jgj No
Structure 4 Structure 5 Stmcture 6
Freeboard (fi): ............... 23. ................................................................................................................................................................................................. .
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
II. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Ap11licution
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notifY DWQ)
DYes jgj No
DYes jgj No
jgj Yes D No
DYes jgj No
DYes jgj No
15. Crop type ....................... CQJtQ!I ............................... CimlilillY.lwms/.Wh~nL ......................................................................................................................... .
16: Do the receiving crops diffe-r with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (A WMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on·site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitt<d Fncilitics Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP'/
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
D_ No vi_olations or deficienCies: were:noted:d_uri_rig this:visit:: You :wilh-eceiv_e :no furthe.r::::
:. :. :cin'res'pinide'nce about this:visif.·:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:':.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:
DYes
DYes
DYes
DYes
DYes
DYes
DYes
DYes
DYes
DYes
Comments (refer to question#): Explaili any YES anSwers and/Or 'any recOmmendations ·or any othc·r comnients.
Use drawings offacility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
• Waste utilization plan needs to be amended to include wheat (did make one pull over wheat)
• Need to secure design for Ullderground lines and hydrants and operating parameters for traveling gun system
jgj No
jgj No
jgj No
jgj No
jgj No
jgj No
jgj No
jgj No
jgj No
DNo
12. Need to mow as part of routine maintenance; need to remove foreign materials (ic/ plastic bottles, etc.) from inside of lagoon; need
to establish vegetation in bare areas on dike walls (minor erosion evident)-some attempt has been made to establish fescue on dike
walls -continue efforts
....
-
....
;piifH~p-~~: .;-,.:,h~.:·~·:-H· i~~'l\ ~~ -,,, ~ ~. -,-i'l: •1: ''];,'.11, ·~"i,.l\\.··,, :·'jlj ;;; .. ;, i,",_.",,''l' ' ;;;-;-i·1· ·:•·.: \\, ~;~;1,1 I( . \' ",." ~;·r~, ''"''1f'~'. '\·ij~'"i" ,' .~'lji! Reviewer/Inspector N arne "
"
Reviewer/Inspector Sienature: Date:
1:11 Division or Soil and Water Coit'servation-Compliance lnspe1:tioll!
.\~
• Division or Water Quality-Compliance Inspection
Other Agency ,
Facility Number I 37 H 3
a Registered • Certified a Applied for Permit a Permitted
Farm Name: Ge.orge.Lang.E.arm .. ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,.,, ..... ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,. County: Gates WaRO
Owner Name: Ge.orge,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Lang,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Phone No: 35:7.,101.2..,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ............. .
Facility Contact: '""""""""""""'"""'""'""'"""""'"""""'"""""'"'Title: ""'""""""'""""""""""""'""""'"'"""" Phone No: ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, .........
Mailing Address: RU.Bo.x.9.L ...... ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Gates.v.Ule.NC ...... ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 2.7.9.38 .............. .
On site Representative: George.Lang,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Integrator:"""'"'""""'"""""""'""'"""'""'""""""""""""'"""""'
Certified Operator:George.L,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, LangJr ....... ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Operator Certification Number: 19.368,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Location of Farm:
~:~;;,~~;=::~~~~~:~~:···· ~·P~o;u'~it~r'y~'·_:__~~~~~~~~ .. • :cattle ... ; "'" ·CapacitY.' Population .
E-===,.,.=:h+---+----1:.1~ t:~~ayer I '1··1~ e:~:Datry I
'lc Other
:r,o~al Design Capacity
Total SSL W ~:::;n;r:
I. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: [] Lagoon [] Spray Field [] Other . . .
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is th~ estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
[]Yes
[]Yes
[]Yes
c Yes
[]Yes
[]Yes
[]Yes
[]Yes
eYes
[]Yes
a No
a No
[]NO
[]NO
[]NO
a No
a No
a No
a No
a No
1Facthty Number: 37_3 Date of Inspection I 9117198 I
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons, Holding Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3
Identifier:
Freeboard (ft): 2
I 0. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
Structure 4
I I. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
{If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
{If in excess ofWMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
Structure 5
eYes aNo
eYes aNo
Structure 6
eYes aNo
eYes a No
eYes a No
eYes aNo
eYes aNo
15. Crop type ....................... Cotton .............................. C.Om.(Silagc..&.G.rain) ....... Small.Gr.aia.Cw.heat,.B.a.rley ...................... So,y.b.eans ................... .
. . , h d . · . I MilohOat~) ) 16. Do the recetvmg crops dif1er with t ose estgnated in the Amma Waste Management rran lA WMP? eYes llll No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
Jl· ~o:v~~~t!ll~~·~~ tle_tl!-!~e~II~S:wer.~.~t~~ ·~~ryJ!Jr.l!J~S :V!S!l~ · l'O~ ~I! ·':eCI?I'ft: J!O: 1"!'1!1~~ ·: ·:
· :-: ~6rtespo.nilerie¢ itlxiu:Oiiis·visit:: ·: ·: ·: ·: ·: ·: ·:-: ·:-:-:-:-: ·: ·: ·: ·: ·: ·: ·: ·: ·: ·: ·:-: ·: ·: ·: ·: ·: ·:-: ·: ·: ·: · . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
eYes
eYes
eYes
eYes
eYes
eYes
eYes
eYes
eYes
Cof1!mcnts,(re{~~· t(/ qq,estiol! .f#):;, E~plai,n,any YtES answers llndlor•any recommendliti6iill or.:arty·otli.ef comments;·
a No
a No
a No
a No
a No
a No
a No
a No
eNo
'" '. '"'
'IJsl!drawing;·of facilitY to beit~r e~plain sit~ations. (use additiona.! p~ges,~s nec~~~m:):,, ,, , , , , , , , ;., ,',, . . ,,, 'i,'•!••'.' ' ,, -''"''·~·''"·} .,, ..... '·"·':'.l_'<.i.•',<i •,fj',•,f.t·'''-'',t1'•,jl'· }''L,; .,,,·,,, .. ,,.,i'Fij ,~, .. ,i ·;·••j''! A, j .II., '', '' .l '·: ' ,'
[he plan IS done for the whole farm covermg 47 +acres even though all acres are not requtred. Some of this land is currently
planted in peanuts {I of 6 eight+ acre pulls). The plan needs to show the maximum amount of the land that can be planted with
peanuts or the correct rotation to ensure that enough! nitrogen will be taken up.
Reviewer/lnspector Name r£~ .. ~rJ?~,1J.~1 ,;, ,!· ,t•.·:,.;;( "·" ,;,, .'"y'i"" .... : /;,,,~\i\· .. ,.:,,, .J,:,:, ··"•t. } .:::i'•ili•, ... , ., ' l·,vi, ,:,!;,'/ I,' -,~;'1•i',,.'·.;!i'l;\i/v>li ; .. , '.,, :'~'
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
'
l
... -
-...
• • a Division of Soil and Water Conservation -Compliance lnspeciion,
a Division ofWater·Quallty-Compliance Inspection .
a Other Agency-Operation Review . , , · ,. . -•
Facility Number I 37 H 3
a Registered • Certified a Applied for Permit a Permitted
l>ate of Inspection
Time uf Inspection
Ia Not dpcrahonal
Farm Name: Ge.arge.Lang..F.arm ................................................................................... .. County: Gates
6722798 1
1200 124 hr. (hh:mm)
l>ate Last Operated:
WaRO
Owner Name: Ge.orge .................................. :· Lang............................................................ Phone No: l57.,1012. .................................................................. .
Facility Contact: Ge.arge.Lang ................................................... Title: o.w.ner .................................................. Phone No: 2.52./l51,.10.7.2 ....................... .
Mailing Address: Rt.l.Bo.x.9.1... .......................................................................................... Gates.v.Uie.NC ........................................................ 2.7.9.38 ............. .
Onsite Representative: Geor.ge..&.J.oan . .Lang............................................................. Integrator: :W.ilUams . .F.ar.m.s..of.NC •. lnc ............................ .
Certified Operator:G.eo.r.ge . .L ................ J: .......... LangJr............................................ Operator Certification Number: 19.368 ............................ .
I
Location of Farm:
. ~Wi"De .. ., .. ues1gn ..... '-~rren• :· · .. ··: .. " ues1gn · Lurren. .. : ues1gn .... urren•
·: Capacity· ·P~pulation ·· Poult<y .. Cattle Capacity ·Population ...
1111 wean to r eeoer /UUU /UUU' ' le ~ayer I I I : ~~ ~:~:Oa1ry I
I
e r eeoer to r m1sn ·· .:e-on-[ayer
e rarrow to wean
le Oilier I I I ' e r arrow to r eeoer •"••'
. '
e Farrow to F1msn .. Total Design Capacity I e Gilts
..
" ' Total SSLW. I e Boars .... ''·''".' .. ..
;:.'• N'uniliel' oftagoons/ Hohlirig l'onds. 1 I n" ,,.,1',,'"1••,.:'1'.1'1'·\' /'. ',,,,t,\"''•i·N1t,' ~','', ".,J .. :!"'"''
:>t" ,), ,.·:\\::,-. ·::· 'j' ;·. ',\;,: :· .. ': ·:::··:.:·i.' .. _t:,·_\•.':;.,'<::,/:::· ',\,. ' ' :)., ' .-:,.·-~;::~. \:f:::.:t;!:·~: :
He Su6surlace IJrams Presenl lie [agoon Area
!,,· ~-., i '.'' le No [JquJd Waslc Management Syslem ..
'I' 1
General
I. Are there any buffers that need maint~nance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: e Lagoon e Spray Field e Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
Capacity P,opulati~n
I I
..
7,000 I
210,000 I
lc Spray F 1ela Area t .·
1·'"· .. · ,,,;; 1':;,. ,_ .. ,\ ,' , .1 •'
eYes IIIJNO
eYes 111JNO
eYes eNo
eYes eNo
eYes eNo
eYes 111JNO
eYes 111JNO
eYes IIIJNO
eYes IIIJNO
eYes 1111No
1Fac•hty Number: 37 _3 l>atc of Inspection I 6722198 I
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons,Holding Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure I • Structure 2 Structure 3
Identifier: ............... #.1.. ............ .
Freeboard (ft): 2.3
I 0. Is seepage observed from any ofthe structures?
Structure 4
II. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(!fin excess ofWMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
Structure 5
eYes ll!lNo
eYes ll!lNo
Structure 6
eYes ll!lNo
[]Yes ll!lNo
ll!lYes cNo
eYes ll!INO
[]Yes ll!lNo
15. Crop type ...................... .Cotto.n .............................. C.Om/.So:.heansi.W.h.eat.. ......................................................................................................................... .
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (A WMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on-site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified A WMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
13:. :N:o :violat!O~~·~~ ~e:IJ~I:e~Ies :we:r.t:·':Wte'! ·~~~~IP!'~s :V!S!t:. ~ ou. ~ll.r:e~ery~ ~0: t~rt"~~.: . :
· · · · ~ortespti.ni:leneil itbQuJ tlii$ ·Visit·· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...........................................................
[]Yes ll!lNo
[]Yes ll!INO
[]Yes ll!lNo
[]Yes ll!lNo
[]Yes ll!lNo
[]Yes ll!lNo
[]Yes ll!lNo
[]Yes ll!INO
[]Yes ll!lNo
[]Yes []NO
9·~~e~Js (re~~r t~ question #);' E'pl!l,in jmy.,Y.ES answers and/or.l\ny'ci:'ec(>mmen~a(ioDS or an)?'Other comments. ·,·; . '·: 'I• • . "
~~~ d!~~i~gs ~1Jaf!II.~Y,.,~o bett~~ e~~1~i,n ·*~~tio~~:. <u•~.~~!litionar, ~ag~s !!s.ne~e~~m).; , , .<, , · , · .·· , : ,. . , .:. o •\' · • •• n!• : , ,
• Waste utilization plan needs to be amended to include wheat (d1d make one pull over wheat) .... -• Need to secure design for underground lines and hydrants and operating parameters for traveling gun system
12. Need to mow as part of routine maintenance; need to remove foreign materials (ie/ plastic bottles, etc.) from inside oflagoon;
need to establish vegetation in bare. areas on dike walls (minor erosion evident) -some attempt has been made to establish fescue on
dike walls -continue efforts
.
-
"'
Reviewer/Inspector Name r.~_tJ~oq(!~~i,,j(_·t:,~';'l .. ]\;~, ''',·, ',;j'''~'':.l~:,\.,q?_.,· ' . :,,•;1-·t· !1,, ,,tA/: '.(J'•-:1 :\M·r•.q ·'j•' ,-··;)3ti;•, ~J:~I\' :':1"!, ,,, e~'~1 :·,:.\_'''if,., •v ,',. 11 !~:r•~i !''-~ ''·'' '!'''/. ,., " --'•
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: