270008_INSPECTIONS_20171231

Ow
NUH I H UAHULINA
Department of Environmental Qual

INSPECTIONS
INSPECTIONS
INSPECTIONS

a
4
Type of Visit Q Compliance Inspection Q Operation Review Q Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit OO Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification Q Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number
U Permitted ® Certified [] Conditionally Certified © Registered Date of Visit 3-23-2000
140 Not Operational O Below Threshold I Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: - -9 ..... .. .
Farm Name: S? 1lAata.E1deQt..Oxaiady..F.ArM................................................................ County: Qw.rituck ......................................... WA}ZQ.......
Owner Name:.W..J19alat.................................. Grandy ...................................................... Phone No: Z5Z-,4$3,-A3,3Z ..........................................................
Facility Contact: ...............................................................................Title:............................................................... Phone No:
....................................................
MailingAddress: l'Q..ljtrx..7.5............................................................................................... Graindy...NC...................................... ..................... 2.793.9..............
Onsite Representative: Q.ctiat~.sv>a. lk��............................................................................ Integrator:......................................................................................
Location of Farm:
k�t,.�.a�t 2AR.3 axds.,..Qt.Jx...d'laza.Qn xiglxt,..............................................................................................................................................................................
................. ........................................... .............................................. ................... .......................................................................................................................................... I...
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Worse
Design Current
Swine Cauacity Population
® Wean to Feeder
500
0
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
® Farrow to Feeder
55
0
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design ' Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer I I ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer El Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 555
Total SSLW 43,71.0
Number of Lagoons 2 'Holding Ponds /Solid Traps .
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Waste Collection & Treatment
Please see attached Lagoon Field Data Sheets
Reviewer/Inspector Name Lyn.Hardison Daphne
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
n/a
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
Printed on: 5/12/2000

.Facility Number 27 — 8 Lagoon Number Q.Q....... Lagoon Identifier.5.m.ajJ..........................................................
O Active # Inactive Latitude F367 F1 47 144
Waste Last Added 1..-.1.-:..........................................
Determined by: ❑ Owner ® Estimated
Surface Area (acres): ........................
Embankment Height (feet): 1.J.1..........................
Longitude 75 53 17
By GPS or Map? IN GPS ❑ Map7
GPS file number: IL032315A 1
Distance to Stream: O <250 feet r0 250 feet - 1000 feet O >1000 feet
By measurement or Map? ❑ Field Measurement ® Map
Down gradient well within 250 feet? O Yes (*No
Intervening Stream? O Yes *No
Distance to WS or H©W (miles): O < 5 O 5 - 10 * > 10
Overtopping from Outside Waters? O Yes O No OQ Unknown
Spillway O Yes O No Adequate Marker O Yes O No
Freeboard & Storm Storage Requirement (inches):
inspection date 3-23-2000
appearance of O Sludge Near Surface
lagoon liquid O Lagoon Liquid Dark, Discolored
0 Lagoon Liquid Clear
O Lagoon Empty Freeboard (inches): 36
embankment condltion # poorly Built, Large Trees, Erosion, Burrows, Slumping, Seepage, Tile Drains, Etc.
O Construction Specification Unknown But Dam Appears in Good Condition
O Constructed and Maintained to Current NRCS Standards
outside drainage OO Poorly Maintained Diversions or Large Drainage Area not Addressed in Design
O Has Drainage Area Which is Addressed in Lagoon Design
O No Drainage Area or Diversions Well Maintained
liner status Oi High Potential for Leaking, No Liner, Sandy Soil, Rock Outcrops Present, Etc.
O No Liner, Soil Appears to Have Low Permeability
O Meets NRCS Liner Requirements
lication equipment fall to make contact
and/or sprayfleld O Yes O No OQ Unknown with representative *Yes O No
unavallabie
comments Uneven top dike walls.

Facility Number 27 -- 8 Lagoon Number Q,Q�,..,, Lagoon Identifier urge..........................................................
0 Active © Inactive
Waste Last Added..-.1.-...........................................
Determined by: ❑ Owner ® Estimated
Surface Area (acres):
Embankment Height (feet):
Distance to Stream:
By measurement or Map?
Down gradient well within 250 feet?
Intervening Stream?
Distance to WS or HQW (miles);
Overtopping from Outside Waters?
Latitude F367 F 47 44.
Longitude 75 d_1 17
By GPS or Map? 19 GPS ❑ Map
GPS fife number: IL032315A
Q.1.1.9 ........................
Q................................
0 <250 feet © 250 feet - 1000 feet 0 >1000 feet
❑ Field Measurement ® Map
0 Yes p No
0 Yes 0 No .
0<5 05- 10 Q> 10
O Yes O No *Unknown
Spillway O Yes O No Adequate Marker O Yes O No
Freeboard & Storm Storage Requirement (inches):
Inspection date 3-23-2000
appearance of 0 Sludge Near Surface
lagoon liquid 0 Lagoon Liquid Dark, Discolored
0 Lagoon Liquid Clear
0 Lagoon Empty Freeboard (inches): 24
embankment condition (0 Poorly Built, Large Trees, Erosion, Burrows, Slumping, Seepage, Tile Drains, Etc.
0 Construction Specification Unknown But Dam Appears in Good Condition
0 Constructed and Maintained to Current NRCS Standards
outside drainage O Poorly Maintained Diversions or Large Drainage Area not Addressed in Design
0 Has -Drainage Area Which is Addressed in Lagoon Design
0 No Drainage Area or Diversions Well Maintained
liner status 0 High Potential for Leaking, No Liner, Sandy Soil, Rock Outcrops Present, Etc.
0 No Liner, Soil Appears to Have Low Permeability
0 Meets NRCS Liner Requirements
ration equipment fall to make contact Yes NO
and/or Sprayfleld 0 Yes O No0 Unknown with representative
unavailable
comments

® Division hif Soil soil Water Cnservaiipn -,Operation RevicN
{ " £
^M
E3 Division of Soil and Water Conservation- Compliance Inspection
k�
❑Division of Water Quality - Compliance Inspection
..` •
® Other Agency -Operation Review
.;R-
14P Routine Q Complaint Q Follow-up of DWQ inspection Q Follow-up of DSWC review Q Other
Facility Number 27 g Date of Inspection 6-3-99
Time of Inspection 1330 24 hr. (hh:mm)
13 Permitted E9 Certified [j Conditionally Certified Q Registered 0 Not O erational Date Last Operated: ..........................
Farm Name: Williami.Elden..G.randy.Eat'm................................................................. County: Curdtucic........................................ W. ARQ.......
OwnerName: WMam.................................. Grandy ....................................................... Phone No: 251-.45M3,3Z ..........................................................
FacilityContact: .............................................................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
MailingAddress: P.O.Bus..7S................................................................................................CRcaudB...N.C........................................................... 179,39 .............
Onsite Representative: ..W.illiam..A,nd.Bnddy.Graudy............................................... integrator: ala.inkii. kivit....................................................
Certified Operator: William.E............................. Gxandy.,3r...................................... Operator Certification Number: .19.36..6.............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude 36 ° 14 3fi A Longitude 75 ° 54 1 12
Design Current
Swine Capacity Ponulation
N Wean to Feeder
500
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
® Farrow to Feeder
55
q25
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Number of Lagoons
Holding Ponds / Solid Ti
Design Current Design Current
Poultry capacity population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer I I❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer I 1 10 Non -Da iry
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 555
Total SSLW 43,710
Subsurface Drains Present 110 Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area
Dischareex & Stream impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any pail of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the Slate? (If yes, nobly DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow at gaVnuu?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If ves, nolify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge'?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: ................................... . ............................................................................................................................................ . Freeboard (inches): .............. 24................... .............. 3.4................. ................................... .................................... .................................... .
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99
[]Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
n/a
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
Structure 6
■ Rn
Continued on back

Printed on 4/312000
Facility Number: 27--8 I Date of Inspection
6-3-99
6. Are there structures on -site which arc not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
❑ Yes
® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings'?
[:]Yes
® No
Waste Ar)plication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
11. Is there evidence; of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
❑ Yes
® No
12. Crop type Wheat Milo
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes
® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
® No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
® No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
Required Records & Documents
IT FaiI to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ic/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, ctc.)
❑ Yes
® No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ic/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
® Yes
❑ No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
® No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
® No
22. Fail to notify regional 13WQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
® No
23. Did Reviewer/lnspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
® No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
® No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
IN No
violations:or:deficiencies..... oted:dui'ing tliis•v... You will:receive'no furltier;
'
correspondence about this.visit.-
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
Records available for review.
Irriagtion design by Reveilles: 4.8 wetted acres.
Waste plan is based on 4.0 acres. It is suggested to revise plan to match the irrigation design
IRR-2 forms given at time of inspection. Use these forms to balance the applied nitrogen.
The GPM for full circle is 16.3 gpm, half circle is 7.2 (/) gpm)
Awaiting waste analysis. Wher you receive the results, balance the nitrogen for the applied waste for this year.
Keep in mind, wheat irrigation window is Sept. thru March and Millet is in June
"Plan to go out of business sometime this year.
v
Reviewer/Inspector Name Lyn B. Hardison
RnviPwprlinennvtnr Rianntnrae
nfltP. 6 .3 41

Printed on 41312000
Facility Number: 27--5 Date of Inspection 6-3-99
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to The storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ® No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public properly)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
31. Do lite animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permancnt/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ® No
oil sampling is required annually.
aste sampling is required within 60 days of application (before or after)
beat need to be harvested, and the milo with be planted soon.
actice weed control upon need, some weeds noted ini sprayf fields.
you have any questions, contact me at 252-946-6481, ext. 318.

Drvisioh of Soil and Water Conservatioli Operation'°Review
.!. - ' , f hE'! f v3w jPl',• i 1.. I` Y p1 E - - - --. K '
Division of Soil an¢ Water C©nservation' Compliartce'lnspection
� 1 err F nI t n
. i F'i r i; r li1V1911in Of Water Quallt3Cnmpfiahee Inspection' � ` ' 1 r 3 N'
Other A enc O eration ReviewAiTa° 3 { -
13 �.g y`, P
Routine
Follow-up of DWQ ins
Facility Number 27 S
❑ Registered ® Certified E3 Applied for Permit [3 Permitted
ow -up of DSWC review Q Other
Date of Inspection 11/6198
Time of Inspection 15:OU 24 hr. (hh:mm)
0 Not O erational Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: W.illi&m.EldwL.Graaft.F;Arm................................................................. County: Curdtu,pit......................................... WARA.......
Owner Name: W.illi.................................. .C,►r nd3
PhoneNo: AM, ..........................................
FacilityContact:.............................................................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
MailingAddress: P.Q.BU.:I.S............................................................................................... Grandy ...N.C........................................................... 2.7.2,32.............
Onsite Representative: ,yyjdlit m.Grandy.......... ................................
Certified Operator: Wi ialxt..fir............................. Grandy.Jr........
Location of Farm:
Latitude F 36 ° F I T 3G
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
® Wean to Feeder
500
200
❑ feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
® Farrow to Feeder
55
35
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Number of Lagoons / Holding Ponds I __ _?
............... Integrator: ......
Operator Certification Number:1936.6.............................
Longitude 75 ° 54 4 12 Li
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ I..ayer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -layer ❑Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 555
Total SSLW 43,710
.. . . . .I
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Subsurface Drains Present
No Liquid Waste Manaacn
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. li'discbarge is observed.. did it reach Surface Water'? (Ifycs. notily DWQ)
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated Clow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes. notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Lagoon Area J❑ Spray Field Area
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not incompliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
71? 5197
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes []No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
- . . .

uonunueu on nacn
Facility Number: 27-8 Date of Inspection 11/G/98
8. Arc there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed'?
Structures 1 Latoons,NoldinL Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
Freeboard (11): ................�h .................. .�
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
Structure 5 Stnicture 6
...............................................................
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
[:]Yes
® No
15. Crop type ,S1A1ti .S7Jf�lA.t y l�Al,. ,ttA1C�}..................................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvemeut?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
O •No.violntitins or.deficiencies.were•ntited;dturing this.visit.. Yo...ill.' ' ive nt- further
• : • :correspondence about -this' visit., :..: .
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
22. Need to keep record of total N applied.
9
Reviewer/Inspector Name Carl Dunn `
Reviewer/Inspector Sienature: Date:

of
Facility Number 27 -R I
0 Registered ❑ Certified 0 Applied for Permit 13 Permitted
ance I inspection
w-up of DSWC review O Other
Date of Inspection 10/5/98
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
0 Not Operational I Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: W..ilU&M.Elxlnn..Cirandx.EarM................................................................. county: ciurdituck......................................... WARD
OwnerName: William .................................. GJrARdY ....................................................... Phone No: 453..IU3.2 ....................................................................
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone No:
MailingAddress: P0..Box..7S............................................................................................... Gramly..NC........................................................... 27.9,39 .............
OnsiteRepresentative:Vdtaa.Grad3:............................................................................... Integrator:......................................................................................
Certified Operator:.W.Illwm.E............................. GraAdy.dry...................................... Operator Certification Number: .1936..6.............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude 36° 14 36Longitude 75 ° 54 12
Swine Capacity Population Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
N Wean to Feeder
500
400
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
N Farrow to Feeder
55
37
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gills
❑ Boars
Number of Lagoons / Holding Ponds
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 555
Total SSLW 43,710
Drains Present
General
1. Are there any buffers dial need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of die operation?
Discharge originated at ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. 1f discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (Ifyes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gaUmht?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon sysienr? (If yes, notilp DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/7i/Q7
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes []No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes N No

i,ununuea on naex
Facility Number: 27-8 Date of Inspection 1 10/5198
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons,Holdinn Ponds, Flush Pits. etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier:
1 reehoard (11):
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenancelimprovement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste ApPlicatiou
14, is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
Structure 5 Structure 6
...............................................................
15. Crop type ........ .................................wo ........................ ................. ...................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management flan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Onl3,
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
.No.violationsor-de' iciencies.were-noted•during this.visit.• You.willr '-ive'no further.,.
correspondence About this'visit::... .... :........ .
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
Comments (refer to question #):''Explain any YES'answers and/or any recommendations 'or'any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
Reviewer/Inspector Name Mike Dotey
Reviewer/Inspector Siunature: Date:.

.r
We', R a
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Washington Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
December 30, 1997
Mr. William Grandy
P O Box 75
Grandy, NC 27939
Subject: Annual Compliance Inspection
Facility Number 27-8
Currituck County
Dear Mr. Grandy:
On 11/21/97, Carl Dunn from the Washington Regional Office of the Division -of Water
Quality conducted an inspection of your swine operation. This inspection is one of two annual
inspections as required by Senate Bill 1217. The Division of Soil and Water Conservation will also
conduct an inspection of your intensive livestock operation during the 1997 calender year.
Please review the enclosed inspection form. This inspection form should be maintained as part
of the records for your facility. Take special notice to any items that may marked with a yes answer.
You are advised that you must maintain a freeboard of at least one foot in your lagoon(s) plus a storage
volume sufficient to accommodate the rainfall and any subsequent runoff from a 25 year 24 hour storm
event to remain in compliance.
Thank you for your cooperation in this inspection. If you have any questions in regard to this
letter or if I may be of any assistance, I can be contacted at [phone] ext. 208. Please do not
hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
Carl Dunn
Environmental Engineer
cc: WaRO Files
Currituck County NRCS
943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, North Carolina 27889 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

16 tcoutme p t:omptaint p roitow-up of uwV inspection p rc
EFacilityNumber
0 Registered p Certified t3 Applied for Permit o Permitted
up of libwu review p utner
Date of Inspection
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
p Not Upe Date Last Operated:
Farm Name: Udon.Grandy..Hag.Farm......................................................................... County: Currituck WARO
OwnerName: William ................................. Grand y ....................................................... PhoneNo- . - 3....... __... .................................
Facility Contact: ................................................................................Title:........................ Phone No:
MailingAddress: IP.O.Hoyt.7.5 ............................................................................................... Granoy...NC.............................. ............................... 27939..............
Onsite Representative: Eldon.Grandy................................................................ ....... Integrator:..................
Certified Operator:W!Uiam.&........................... Grandy..Jx........... -...................... ... Operator Certification Number: I93.66............. -._...........
Location of Farm:
Latitude ®• ®� 6 Longitude ©• ®' ©"
es�gnE� ; uaren �� es�gn777 rren,�"`�,: R estgn $ _ urren
wine ' w r,, ' Capactty.:Popnlation :Pottltry - .
;Capacity Papulattt►rt Cattle t Capacity Populati, j
__u..a..�+r..:se..as:ac_.trvr-rt�a��n.cL'.:-k:-.M.
�•p.
i ayer
;. airy
;; p on- ayer
p on- airy
pt ernes
r Total Design Capacity_;
�.:.
T '�R .'y'-"�'_'Y-""li fit`"..'.� .i"}
Number of3l.agoons�/�Hotdtng Poods p u
'
su ace rains risen p agooa Area p pray ie Area
Yr -rt ,�S _.eat .� r'S 1 ti,
.1
L ro t o
LiquidWaste ManagementSystem r h�
M
p Wean to Feeder
p Feeder to m�s
p arrow to
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? p Yes ® No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes p No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surfade-Water? pfyes; notify DWQ) p Yes p No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) 0 Yes p No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a disWir ? p Yes H No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require p Yes ig No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? - p Yes Ig No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? p Yes ® No
7/25/97 1

Facility ity Number: 27_8
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures lagoons,Holding�Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier: .......primary.................secondary.......
Freeboard (ft): 2 6
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
U. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
I4. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
Structure 5
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
Structure 6
p Yes IS No
p Yes N No
p Yes is No
® Yes p No
p Yes ® No
15. Crop type ........................................ ... ........
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated to the' Anlm)al Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? p Yes ® No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
R . o •vtor tions-or rrencies'were.note unng t is vls� , -You willxeeetve ncr u er .
. ceirKesponOeAc� about 04-Y64.:
El Yes ® No
® Yes p No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ®No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ®No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
p Yes p No
Reviewer/Inspector Name Carl°Dunn
1ci'�:a::,...�4�
t
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date: