210031_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NUH I H UAHULINA
Department of Environmental Qual

<Sw.� �: 1YJ. '„a! - YSl:i m':;lhs,, } �y��W Ih l �iZP:ry,^
-1; -� lz.r\'� 2 ;�ii'/k�.� �, >:.,_�-+shyY' �'•r 'v''n+—s',� 3 `� :i
"� I h ��. �
`�� Im l� ��}- �� x�� '..l�c'}ar.3 f � 'Y� I � �� ,� ��3'in.
- [. � .r.�msY^ -� ,:.'ti:�c"!�� "x,ci;rrp G_ ,:�' �:���� sL .i :arnl7t�
^vK_;z _�:-: mrti *mac r?'�.�-sanA "Ys,� s r-=w►
!>

I
• Division of Water Quality
O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection Q Operation Review Q Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint Q Follow up O Emergency Notification Q Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 21 31
13 Permitted (3 Certified Q Conditionally Certified © Registered Date of Visit 4/6/2400
t♦ Not Operational O Below Threshold I Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: Itlig ,,,,,,,,,,,,
FarmName: RUYArMa.............................................................................................
Owner Name:.0111........................................... D7ataS�iAel�l......................................
Facility Contact: .............................................................
Mailing Address: 705&HapPY..UQ1ne.>id............
_Title: ..............
County: ClIm a ............................................. .W.ARO.......
Phone No: 221-Q�1.6 ...............................
PhoneNo: ..... ..............................................
................... Tyur.AC .................
....... 2.7,980..............
OnsiteRepresentative: ........................................................................................................... Integrator.......................................................................................
Location of Farm:
1209................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
...............................M............1:U::......:::;:1: N:1:1:::. .. .............................................................it' .. .. 't' t:.......m t............. MU . .
........................
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse
Design Current
Swine Canacity Pnnulatinn
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
® Farrow to Feeder
20
0
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Soars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 24
Total SSLW 10,440
Number of Lagoons Q Holding Ponds 1 Solid Traps
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at. ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Waste Collection & Treatment
Please see attached Lagoon Field Data Sheets
Reviewer/lnspector Name ,Carl Dunn Entered by Ann Tyndall
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
Printed on: 4/12/2000

Fagility.Number 21 _ 31 Lagoon Number .1............ Lagoon Identifier Behind..Hog..Hou.s.es................
0Active p Inactive Latitude ®©
Waste Last Added 1,11195.
Determined by: ❑ Owner M Estimated
Surface Area (acres): 0.25.......................
Embankment Height (feet): a ......................
Longitude
By GPS or Map? ® ❑ ap
GPS file number:
Distance to Stream: p <250 feet p 250 feet - 1000 feet p >1000 feet
By measurement or Map? ® Field Measurement []Map
Down gradient well within 250 feet? p Yes g No
Intervening Stream? O Yes *No
Distance to WS or HQW (miles): O < 5 O 5 - 10 O > 10
Overtopping from Outside Waters? O Yes p No *Unknown
inspection date 4/6/2000
appearance of O Sludge Near Surface
lagoon liquid O Lagoon Liquid Dark, Discolored
p Lagoon Liquid Clear
p Lagoon Empty Freeboard (inches): 36
embankment condition ® Poorly Built, Large Trees, Erosion, Burrows, Slumping, Seepage, Tile Drains, Etc.
p Construction Specification Unknown But Dam Appears in Good Condition
p Constructed and Maintained to Current NRCS Standards
outside drainage p Poorly Maintained Diversions or Large Drainage Area not Addressed in Design
O Has Drainage Area Which is Addressed in Lagoon Design
p No Drainage Area or Diversions Well Maintained
liner status p High Potential for Leaking, No Liner, Sandy Soil, Rock Outcrops Present, Etc.
O No Liner, Soil Appears to Have Low Permeability
O Meets NRCS Liner Requirements
lication equipment fail to make contact
and/or Sprayfield p Yes p No O Unknown with representative O Yes p No
unavailable
comments Low corner of lagoon - 3 ft. freeboard.
Heavy vegetation.

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources •
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor~�
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary � E H N R
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
July 11, 1997
Mr. Bill Mansfield
B&PFarms
Route 1, Box 464 AA
Tyner, NC 27980
SUBJECT: Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
B&PFarms
Facility No. 21-31
Chowan County
Dear Mr. Mansfield:
W1 vp—z
On May 15, 1997, I conducted an Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection at B & P Farms in
Chowan County. The operation was found to be out of operation. A copy of the inspection report
is attached for your review.
In general, this inspection includes verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified Animal Waste
Management Plan (CAWMP); (2) the farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15
NCAC 21-1.0217, Senate Bill 1217, and the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan; (3) the farm
operation's waste management system is being operated properly under the direction of a Certified
Operator; (4) the required records are being kept; (5) there are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or
runoff.
The inspection revealed that the referenced farm is registered. You indicated that your farm has not
been operational in 3 or 4 years and that you are unsure of your plans for the farm.
As a reminder, all registered livestock operations are required to have a certified animal waste
management plan by the end of this year. A designated Technical Specialist or a Professional
Engineer must certify this plan. You may request to be inactivated from the registration database if
you no longer plan to be in operation. I have enclosed a request for removal from the database
letter. Please contact your local Soil & Water Conservation District Office for further assistance.
943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, NC 27889 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled 110% post -consumer paper

i
Mr. Bill Mansfield
B&PFarms
July 11, 1997
Page 2
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance during the inspection. Should you have
further questions or comments regarding this inspection, do not hesitate to call me at
-[phone], ext. 321.
Sincerely,
4L, . W��AA-
Daphne B. Cullom
Environmental Specialist II
cc: Chowan County SWCD Office
DSWC-WaRO
Compliance Group
W Central Files
XaRO

+a .
U
I* Routine p Complaint p roliow-up of vwt2 inspection p roiiow-up of uawC review p tuner
Date of Inspection
Facility Number
Time of inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Farm Status: Registered
Farm Name: BM.Xarms...................................................................................................... County: Chowan WARO
Owner Name: Bill. Mansfidd .................................................. Phone No: 221-4216.............
MailingAddress: Rx..1..Box.464AA................................................................................... Tymex..NC'............................................................... 2.79RO .............
Onsite Representative: Mt;..11ill.Ma.nsfw1d................................................................... Integrator: NIA .............................................................................
CertifiedOperator: .................................................. .............................................................. Operator Certification Number:.........................................
Location of Farm:
Latitude Longitude 17-710
INNot Operational Date Last Operated: .11 IN...............................................................................................................................................
Type of Operation and Design Capacity
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? p Yes ®No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
a. if discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there -evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenancelimprovement?
p Yes ® No
p Yes N No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
p Yes N No
p Yes N No

' •6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria? p Yes ® No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge (if inspection after 1/l/97)? p Yes p No
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? p Yes p No
Structures (Lagoons and/or Holding Ponds)
9. Is structural freeboard less than adequate? 13 Yes N No
Freeboard (ft): Lagoon I Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3 Lagoon 4
...............4.ft...................................................................................................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
p Yes
® No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
p Yes
® No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
p Yes
® No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
Immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adquate markers to identify start and stop pumping levels?
p Yes
13 No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
p Yes
p No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type.........•..........................................................................................................................................
16. Do the active crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan?
p Yes
p No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
p Yes
p No
18. Does the cover crop need improvement?
13 Yes
p No
19. Is there a lack of available irrigation equipment?
13 Yes
p No
For Certified Facilities Only
20. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
p Yes
13 No
21. Does the facility fail to comply with the Animal Waste Management Plan in any way?
p Yes
p No
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
p Yes
p No
23. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
13 Yes
® No
24. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with owner or operator in charge?
p Yes
® No
is farm was not operational. Mr. Mansfield indicated that the term has not been operational for approximately 3 - 4,years. Mr.
Mansfield is unsure of his plans for the farm. Please note the following comments:
'I -"Firm is not operational,
8, #l3 - #22 - Questions can not be answered; farm is registered and currently not operational. -
14
Reviewer/InspectorName ;M,< ti •`,!�. u�,oa,� �w:,$
Reviewer/inspector Signature: L7 , Q c Date:

Site Requires Immediate Attention:
Facility No. - BI
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
Date: , 1995
Time:
Farm Nam
Mailing
County:
Integrat
On Site Represent
Physical Address
ative: Phone: ,2,aj L4alIre
/I,vcation: i , &_Iri n - Tunny A An fix` ,'�R, 1���
Type of Operation: Swine s_S� Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: �[� No. of An— m� on Site: _ i_r ��
DEM Certification No.: ACE BEM Certification No.: ACNEW
Latitude: Longitude: Elevation: Ft
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient reeboard of 1 Ft + 25 year 24 hour
storm event? (approximately 1 Ft + 7 in) Yes or No
Actual Freeboard: Ft nches o0 n
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or No r�
Was any erosion observed? Yes or No
Is adequate land available for spray? Yes or No
Is the cover crop adequate? Yes or N
Crop(s) being utilized: 00-�on f _l� W� .
Does the facility meet SC 1nimum setback criteria?
200 Ft from Dwellings? Ye or No 100 Ft from Wells? S
or No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Ft of USGS Blue Line Stream?
Yes or No
Is animal waste�nd applied or spray irrigated within 25 Ft of a USGS Map Blue
Line? Yes or No
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state b man-made ditch, flushing
system, or other similar man-made devices? Yes or Ho
If Yes, please explain:
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manur
land applied, spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes or No
,l . ��,1 S-So,nes
Inspector Name Si nature
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
Comments & Sketch on Back of Sheet

DEM
SITE VISITATION RECORD
Page Two
Sketch:
Y)
3
m �f, 00A0