210018_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NUH I H UAHULINA
Department of Environmental Qual

IN3
,{trne�- Immh�..�Tlu

r
a p }Y
t "i 4u .T'iw
W
ad
Type of Visit ® Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Z Date of Visit: Z' Time: I % OO
10 Not O verational 0 Below Threshold c�
O Permitted ® Certified 13Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: _Lg4 e s Dn-e_ PtO7 L POV-k -- - -- _ Counts. G&�t"irl
Owner Name: `TP,10�2 Cop e (AI1 L' _ Phone No: a 5'_A -,cam
Mailing Address: 7 `fS �++� e l Q 7 9 Z O
Facility Contact: t�rnP��►l� Title: ,(%L✓✓?�r' -_ Phone No:
Onsite Representative:
Integrator:
Certified Operator: 1 �r ��' VAA _ Operator Certification Number:
Location of Farm:
/Dv C oK n �y .� me .. , �m�'lc �o h f.(v y,..uy T 7
3-
0 Swine ❑ poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude E= Longitude ®a _�h� �l•
Design Current
swine Uai)acltV Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Design Current Design Current
Pou try Capacity Population ' Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Laver I I ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer I JE3 Non-Dai
❑ other
Total Design Capacity A,2.3 y3
Total SSL W
Member of Lagoons I / I I❑ Subsurface Drains Present f I❑ Lagoon Area I❑ Spray Field Area I • I
Aoldifg Ponds 1 Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Manazement System
- - •-sus: z:..,..�� ..a.,c,
1-Is-any discharge-obgerved-frorim-any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
MAR — 5 2003 ❑ Yes J1 No
b, If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, MMQ�'VARO
c. If.discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Wage Collection & Treatment
4, Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure l Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure S
Identifier: (.JMd, 3411
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 11 No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Structure 6
Freeboard (inches):
05103101 Continued

Facility Number: — / e I Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? '
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
Immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes I'No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ENo
❑ Yes ® No
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes WNo
11. is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ® No
U. Crop type K^14k
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes jVNo
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes U No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ® No '
Reguir . Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑ Yes ❑ No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(iel WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.) ❑ Yes ❑ No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (iel irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ❑ Yes ❑ No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes ❑ No
21, Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes ❑ No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes ❑ No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes ® No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes J@ No
[3—No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
�h td oh (xeli=`r �a ila anon` )F 1F xplaiiv any l S. ait�Ncr �ittj/or any t eporrtr�end tiolrs ar an , atiie�Toinmeto � ; . ^` w Y
eke dir�a�iiirig"I bi f�itytR tter �e�.xpaii► Aiqiips:.(use altiiHortal:poes as,nece§sary�F . ". El Field Cony Final Notes
D/1 -_s i /r► s�PC v� G,l s �Br/
h>` $ -fP✓1 per Cam,f 61 X, s �Dr dJ1 Me TArovi
Tk,/r e-Av-c S [' S h s 070 t r�vc✓„' awl i s A-,-"->^
Reviewertinspector Name 'l K - : ' 0' a
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Bela A aL== Date:
05103101 f Continued

Quill
Q^Division'of Soil and Wat M CanSe!'Vation
r ed e.
Q Other Agency
of Visit O Compliance inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit OO Routine O Complaint O Follow up Q Emergency Notification 0 Other
❑ Denied Access
E: Facility Number 21 18
[] Permitted 91 Certified © Conditionally Certified © Registered Date of Visit I/3f12111lU
Q Not Operational Q Below Threshold Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: 116196 ............
Farm Name: ...........
Owner Name: Jeff .......................................... Crap imul---.
.......................................... County: CltONAW...................................... .........WARO......
................. Phone No: 29.7-2.731 ...........
FacilityContact:...............................................................................Title:............................................................... Phone No:....................................................
MailingAddress: 245..BylNW.Boad................................................................................ lymrric .............................................................. 27980 .............
Onsite Representative: ganjjy..Capd ,,,
Integrator: .........................................................
Location of Farm:
Ltaa<erJ.n>a.�iCR.JQIl2.Countx.a �irre.Iinad..arA.Cbelx�n .CouiaXx.side...Appx�.al2.ior>ile.atautbt.A1 Htvx..7..aincJ.NCSR .XlRil2..............
infersiedlua...............................................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
® Swine ❑. Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse
Design Current
Swine Canacitv Ponulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
® Farrow to Feeder
160
0
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer I I ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer I I Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 160
Total SSLW 83,520
Number'uf Lagoons 0 Holding Ponds / Solid Traps
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ®No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. Ifdischarge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? -]Yes ❑ No
b. ifdiscliarge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes Co No
3. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
Please see attached Lagoon Field Data Sheets
Reviewerlinspector Name Carl Dunn ,
Reviewer/inspector Signature: Date:
.. • . . A 14 0 nnnn

Facility Number 21 -- 18 Lagoon Number .1............ Lagoon Identifier
O Active Do Inactive Latitude 36 17 18
Waste Last Added 6,(1fi........................................... Longitude 76 34 27
Determined by: 0 Owner ❑ Estimated
Surface Area (acres): 0_59.......................
Embankment Height (feet): 2................................
By GPS or Map? ® GPS ❑ Map
GPS file number: 1.
Distance to Stream: 0 <250 feet 0 250 feet - 1000 feet Oo >1000 feet
By measurement or Map? ® Field Measurement ❑ Map
Down gradient well within 250 feet? O Yes 0 No
Intervening Stream? O Yes Q No
Distance to WS or HOW (miles): 0 < 5 0 5 - 10 Q > 10
Overtopping from Outside Waters? O Yes Oo No O Unknown
inspection date 1 /31 /2000
appearance of 0 Sludge Near Surface
lagoon liquid 0 Lagoon Liquid Dark, Discolored
0 Lagoon Liquid Clear
O Lagoon Empty Freeboard (inches): 48
embankment condition 0 Poorly Built, Large Trees, Erosion, Burrows, Slumping, Seepage, Tile Drains, Etc.
O Construction Specification Unknown But Dam Appears in Good Condition
O Constructed and Maintained to Current NRCS Standards
outside drainage O Poorly Maintained Diversions or Large Drainage Area not Addressed in Design
O Has Drainage Area Which is Addressed in Lagoon Design
0 No Drainage Area or Diversions Well Maintained
liner status O High Potential for Leaking, No Liner, Sandy Soil, Rock Outcrops Present, Etc.
Q No Liner, Soil Appears to Have Low Permeability
0 Meets NRCS Liner Requirements
application equipment fail to make contact
and/or Spra�eld 0 Yes 0 No 0 Unknown with representative O Yes 0 No
unavailable
comments

, "®DEals�ioh of Water Quality
yx,s�C Other `Agency Opeiratlon l
Routine O Comt)laint O Follow-un of D►1'
I Facility Number y I
Registered 9 Certified 0 Applied for Permit ©Permitte
Farm Name: )—nhesn�c Fi.-L rFk
Owner Name: .......................�2-1.
.................................................
Facility Contact:
.. Title:
Follow-up of DS W C review O Other
Date of inspection �!-2 , 1t�
-11
Time, of inspection I I '00 24hr. (hh:mm)
d Not Operational Date Last Operated: ...............
.............. County:........C.�'...��....................................... ...................
MailingAddress: ..........................................................................................................
Onsite Representative: .............. 7.�....... ( 1-l-: •.
Certified Operator; .................. !�' ,► ,
P.........................0....................................
Location of Farm:
PhoneNo: .......................................................................................
....I........................... Phone No:...................................................
Integrator: ......................................................................................
Operator Certification Number; .........................................
Latitude • ' " Longitude • ' i'
N�mberaf La oohs /Hdld Ponds ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field Area
la .. g 0.
�.:. ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If dischargers observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gai/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 10 No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes '® No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/hoIding ponds) require ❑ Yes No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes ® No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes 10 No
7125/97 Continued on back

Facility Number: 2-— 1$
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures (Lagoons.Holding Ponds. Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3
Identifier:
Freeboard(ft):..............6..............................................................................
10. is seepage observed from any of the structures?
❑ Yes RI No
❑ Yes Ef No
Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure b
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
�Cr
..................................................................................
El Yes M No
�� n
15. Crop type.........................................................................................................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for.land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19, Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Pernutted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
0 Ndviola'donsor, deficiencie's.were noted-duri_ng this. visit.- Yoitl4ill i'ecei:ve'no•further:
: correspondence dbout this:visit:; ;
6-J
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes IN No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes 9 No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes P9 No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes M No
❑ Yes ff No
❑ Yes ❑ No
7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name £�'� ����
rsi, 'G?''.. A#�..1"F,,.3' �,•4'�',,�
r ��
4
> M.
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date: Date:

Site Requires Immediate Attention:
Facility No. ,2%_— I!'
DIVISION,OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOZ OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
Date: , 1995
Time: l6. I�A<M
Farm Nam
Mailing
County:
Integrat___
On Site Represent
Phypical Address/
► �. �• -WERE
Type df aeration: Swine � Pftltry Q Cattle
Design Capacity: L4 No. of Animals on Site:
DEM Certification No.: ACE DEM Certification No.: ACNEW -
Latitude: Longitude: Elevation: Ft
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient reeboard of 1 Ft + 25 year 24 hour
storm event? (approximately 1 Ft + 7 in) Yes or No
Actual Freeboard: Ft nches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes or No
Was any erosion observed? Yes or Ho
Is adequate land available for spray? Yes or No
Is the cover crop a
Crop(s) being utili:
noes the raciiity meet sc nimum setback criteria:
200 Ft from Dwellings? Ye or No 100 Ft from Wells? Ye or No
Is the Aimal waste stockpiled within 100 Ft of USGS Blue Line Stream?
Yes or UO
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Ft of a USGS Map Blue
Line? Yes or No
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state b man-made ditch, flushing
system, or other similar man-made devices? Yes or No
If Yes, please explain:
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure,
land applied, spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover op)? Yes or NoOALAZWV1
Pa LOA
Inspector Name Signature LUI)
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
Comments & Sketch on Back of Sheet

DEM
SITE VISITATION RECORD
Page Two
Comments:
Sketch: