Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout210013_INSPECTIONS_20171231NORTH CAROLINA J Department of Environmental Qua �•Pi _�-�' � �Y, Ar/f�YKiteR 3:'k'i'!^ail`- y 4.j'.�-'i+`_+p'+�A, � i3 '��„t. �� 4L�Cft7=� .:! [J..xr, a>> •�'z'�K:� -� ^`�;,«i,3y?" � r.�. n�,�,�;,r"; � rE �f: ^vd�, "t�� �-wv�r,�i ��y'�c � may �•?�:ra: � �,���s� 'Ls S�-s,.:,a�a.. (� Division of Water Quality . Q Division of Soiland Water Conservation Q Other Ageney.. ., Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access Facility Number 2l 13 0 Permitted O Certified 0 Conditionally Certified [3Registered Date of Visit 3/16/2000 Q Not Operational erational Q Below Threshold I Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: 611191G Farm Name: SwAREairin .......................... County:Chommi............................................. ..WA�RO...... ........................................................................... OwnerName:.ClAltdp.................................... SMUM ........................................................... Phone No:•4$2-4fi2.3................................................................... FacilityContact:...............................................................................Title:............................................................... Phone No:.................................................... Mailing Address: Z5j,.W]liidcat.jj08rl............................................................................... EidentaR.N.0 ........................................................... 179,32 ............. OnsiteRepresentative:.ClAudg.5maR.............................................................................. Integrator:...................................................................................... Location of Farm: !'l�il�dcrat Rd,.#.X . R.sbnu�t S.�t>ai� . taxXlt.s�f Rd�nxa�n,.............................................................................................................................................................. ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ . -----------------------................................. -.-.......... ...................................................... .............. ® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Design Current Swine Canacitv Ponulation ❑ Wean to Feeder ® Feeder to Finish 600 0 ❑ Farrow to Wean ❑ Farrow to Feeder ❑ Farrow to Finish ❑ Gilts ❑ Roars Design Current Design Current Poultry Capacity Population Cattle_ Capacity Population ❑ Layer ❑ Dairy ❑ Non -Layer 10 Non-Dairy ❑ Other Total Design Capacity 600 Total SSLW 81,000 Number of Lagoons Holding Ponds / Solid Traps Discharges & Stream Impacts I - Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other a. II'discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? b- If discharge is observed. did it reach Water of the State`? (If yes, notify DWQ) c. lf' discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min'? 2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? 3. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway Waste Collection & Treatment Please see attached Lagoon Field Data Sheets Reviewer/Inspector Name :Carl Dunn .. Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ No Cl Yes ® No ❑ Yes ® No .. A 14 onnnn Facility Number 21 — 13 Lagoon Number .1............ Lagoon Identifier smaJI....................................................... Q Active Oo Inactive Latitude 35 P--] 15 Waste Last Added 61.]L96........................................... Longitude 76 38 42 Determined by: ® Owner ❑ Estimated By GPS or Map? IN GPS ❑ Map GPS file number: Surface Area (acres): ..„......... Embankment Height (feet): 12............................ Distance to Stream: 00 <250 feet Q 250 feet - 1000 feet O >1000 feet By measurement or Map? 0 Field Measurement ❑ Map Down gradient well within 250 feet? Q Yes 0 No Intervening Stream? Q Yes Q No Distance to WS or HQW (miles): 0 < 5 Q 5 - 10 Q > 10 Overtopping from Outside Waters? 0 Yes O No Q Unknown inspection date 3/16/2000 appearance of * Sludge Near Surface lagoon liquid 0 Lagoon Liquid Dark, Discolored Q Lagoon Liquid Clear Q Lagoon Empty Freeboard (inches): 24 embankment condition (0 poorly Built, Large Trees, Erosion, Burrows, Slumping, Seepage, Tile Drains, Etc. O Construction Specification Unknown But Dam Appears in Good Condition Q Constructed and Maintained to Current NRCS Standards outside drainage O Poorly Maintained Diversions or Large Drainage Area not Addressed in Design Q Has Drainage Area Which is Addressed in Lagoon Design Q No Drainage Area or Diversions Well Maintained liner status Q High Potential for Leaking, No Liner, Sandy Soil, Rock Outcrops Present, Etc. Q No Liner, Soil Appears to Have Low Permeability Q Meets NRCS Liner Requirements cation equipment and/or sprayfield Q Yes unavailable comments fail to make contact Yes * No Q No Q Unknown with representative Facility Number 21 -- 13 Lagoon Number 2........... Lagoon Identifier big.. O Active 0 Inactive Latitude F367 0 15 Waste Last Added .61.1( 0... ............................... Determined by: ® Owner ❑ Estimated Surface Area (acres): .0...5........................... Embankment Height (feet): 15.............. Longitude 76 38 42 By GPS or Map? FM—GPS ❑ Map GPS file number: Distance to Stream: 00 <250 feet 0 250 feet - 1000 feet 0 >1000 feet By measurement or Map? ® Field Measurement ❑ Map Down gradient well within 250 feet? O Yes OO No Intervening Stream? O Yes Do No Distance to WS or HQW (miles): 0 < 5 0 5 - 10 @ > 10 Overtopping from Outside Waters? 0 Yes Do No O Unknown inspection date 3/16/2000 appearance of O Sludge Near Surface lagoon liquid O Lagoon Liquid Dark, Discolored O Lagoon Liquid Clear DQ Lagoon Empty Freeboard (inches): 150 embankment condition 0 poorly Built, Large Trees, Erosion, Burrows, Slumping, Seepage, Tile Drains, Etc. 0 Construction Specification Unknown But Dam Appears in Good Condition O Constructed and Maintained to Current NRCS Standards outside drainage O Poorly Maintained Diversions or Large Drainage Area not Addressed in Design 0 Has Drainage Area Which is Addressed in Lagoon Design # No Drainage Area or Diversions Well Maintained liner status 0 High Potential for Leaking, No Liner, Sandy Soil, Rock Outcrops Present, Etc. 0 No Liner, Soil Appears to Have Low Permeability O Meets NRCS Liner Requirements ration equipment fail to make contact and/or SprayFeld 0 Yes 0 No 0 Unknown with representative O Yes (0 NO unavailable comments 01/18/2000 12:152 SlS-715-6048 DWO NON DISCHARGE BR Tattlal Evaluation 1 O Follow-up Evaluation 0 Denied Access 0 Does Facility Require a Follow-up Facility Number )3 _ Date of Evaluation `gip _j "lime rfi Evaluation 11 v o 24 hr. (hh:mm) 0 Permitted 13 Certified * Registerd r] Non -Registered Fff Inactive Facility Date Last Operated: FarmName: ............ .....................................,urn^1........................... _..........._.._.._....._...... County.............. ..: �::.e»�..,.».......,,....... .............. _..................... OrrnerName; ......... I' ....».C�ati�e__S.`""'.,......W......... »._.......................... Fba+�e a:.... ».ZS2....`... L23......W..........a FacilityContact: ..... ....... ...L i ...... �............. TitJe:........................»................................,.... Phone No: . ................ __ _ ....... r Mailing Addrew: ,........................................................................................................................ ....... .....».»................. ._._._........... ........ .......... ,..... Onsite Reprw-Mativo:.................G,.a�..� ............ .». SM........... ............. _...... ................. Integrator ...................................................... »............... J »........ Location of Farm: Fc a es & Strea 1. Is Any discharge Aerve:d from any lagoon? ❑ Yes dNo J 1 a. If discharge is observed, was the convoyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No bz If discharge is obsmed, did it reach Water of the State,? (If yes, nonfy DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in galhnisi? 2. is there evidence of past discharge from any lagoon? ❑ Yes M No Waste cQuection & ea e t 3. Estimate Freeboarl Level: ❑ Spillway ❑ Ycs U4 No Structure, 1 Styructuro 2 StruaUlt 3 SUUctura 4 Strucauo S Structure b Ii1e111'il1CT: ...«.a ^1�.............. ...»..i................ ... ..... ............ .... .......... ..................................................................................... I ........... ....».. Freeboard(inches): ! ......................................_ J_S v......................................................................................................_....»«..»........................................ ��"—'+. {: { i{i{run 1"iFl.rd� Rr•:if' �rer y{cr i.. !" _ _ •"r''r:i=",,'!�"an^_ {.r.. TURN .w� ^ Bey ;l�n :ts,� T.:�femn•ft Reriewerllns ector a1,� �a.!, µh NrT f1 amC .t _ai�w Qu'-WV" {I4111 . _ c ! •,: ` .W 3 3:�d..a ��ri �! , t� �f L^• =i� Reviewerllnspector', lgnnture: _— �"`�� pate: 3 i ��-0,? ILEF 1/ 12/00 1 t 01/18/2000 12t52 919-715-6048 DWO NON DISCHARGE BR PAGE 03/08 i Site Sketch Showing All Active and Inactive Lagoons IUF . 111214b 2 if MW 01/18/2000 121:52 919-715-6048 DWO NON DISCHARGE BR Inactive Lagoon Field Data Sheet Latitude 36 6 ®' IS Longitude ']b 3�' ' CPS [I Map 4. Waste Last Added (MnVyy) ❑ Owner ❑ Estimated (, q&= 5. Estimate of lao!-),o 1 surface area (acres) i 2-5 6. Effective height bf embankment (feet) i 2 7. Distance to Bliie Line or Intermittent Stream (feet) lg<250 ❑ 250 - 1000 ❑ > 1000 92 Determined From Field Measurement ❑ Map 8. Down Gradient Well a. Is there a down gradient well located within 250 feet? ❑ Yes No b. Is an interveni'pg stream not located between. any part of the lagoon. and the nearest well? 0 Yes N8 9. Distance to W� waters or HQW (tni.) ❑ c 5 ❑ 5. 10 ❑ > 10 10. Inactive Lagoon Number. Does the representative lcztow o1: overtopping from outside waters? 11. Appearance of Lagoon Liquid it, Sludge Neer' Surface b. Lagoon Liquid Dark, Discolored c. Lagoon Liquid Clear 1 12. Embankment� Condition a. Poorly Built, 4-arge'l'rees, Erosion, Burrows, slumping, Seepage, Tile Drains, etc. b. Gansttuatiori Specification Uown But Dam Appears in Good Condition c. Constructed 4d Maintained to Current NRGS Standards 13. Outside Draiijagc Area a. Poorly Maintained Diversions or Large Drainage Area not Addressed in Design b. kIag Drainage Area Which is Addressed in Lagoon Design c. No Drainage Area or Diversions Well Maintaixtied 14. Liner Status a. High Potentiall for leaking, No Liner, Sandy Soil, Rock Outcrops Present, etc, b. Na Liner, Soil' Appears to Have Low Permeability c. Meets NRCS Liner Requirements tl 15. Application Fquipi7tlent and/or Sprayfield Not Available 16. Contact Gou.! tact be made with on -site representative PAGE 04/08 ❑ Yes No ❑Unknown 4M I A��4 Yes Wa ❑ [701cpown ❑ Yes Callo II,FAS 1/1210O ,i � 01/18/2000 12:52 919-715--5048 DWO NON DISCHARGE BR # It PAGE 05/08 Comments (Refcrto Question #): F-xplain any Yes answer and/or any other comment. 11 V1voo 2 % M 01/18/2000 12 52 919-715-6048 DWO NON DISCHARGE BR PAGE 04/08 Inactive Lagoon Field Data Sheet Facility Number 21 - 13 Inactive Lagoon Number: Latitude I � 1 : j ; LongitudeDO 9 ' `t2 ® GPS ❑ Map 4. Waste Last Added (mm/yy) ❑ Owner ❑ Estimated 5. Estimate of iujl.;urt surface area (acres) 6. Effective height'of embankment (feet) 7. Distance to Bliie Line or Intermittent Stream (feet) Determined From Field Measurement ❑ Map S. Down Gradient, Well 254 ❑ 2.50 - 1040 ❑ > 1000 a. Is there a dowlt gradient well located within 250 feet? ❑Yes No b. Is an interveni"g stream not located between any part of the lagoon and the nearest well? ID Yes M No 9. Distance to WS waters or HQW (nr .) ❑ c S ❑ S - 10 ❑ > 10 10. Doethe repres entative know of overtopping from outside waters? 11. Appearance of Lagoon Liquid a. Sludge Near Surface b. Lagoon Liquid Dark, Discolored c. Lagoon Liquid Clear 1 12. Embankment' Condition I a. Poorly Built, 4arge Trees, Erosion, Burrows, Slumping, Seepage, Tile Drains, etc. b. Construction Specifeston UnYnown But Dam Appears in Good Condition c. Constructed a'd Maintained to Current NRCS Standards 13. Outside Draiinage Area a. Poorly Maintained Diversions or Large Drainage Area not .Addressed in Design is. Kag Drainage Area Which is Addressed in Lagoon Design c. No Drainage Area or Diversions Well Maintained 14, Liner Status a. High Potential for Leaking, No Liner, Sandy Soil, Rock Outcrops Present, etc. b. No Liner, Soil' Appears to Have Low permeability e. Meats NRCS Liner Requirements s 15. Application Equipment and/or Sprayfield Not Available 16. Contact coin E zaar be made with on -site representative ❑ Yes ESNo ❑ Unlmown 51 dot L I 0 0 Yes. �O No ❑ UDlwown ❑ Yes 2'No JUD5 1112/00 1 01/18/2000 12:52 919-715-6048 DWQ NON DISCHARGE BR PAGE 05/09 Comments (Refcr;to Question #)' F-xplain any Yes answer and/or any other comment. n.FD5 !' 1/1.2/00 2 j Site Requires Immediate Attention: ' Facility No. a?(-k-g DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT. ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD DATE: -71 Z 6 , 1995 Time: 1 spin 3; ,gym. Farm Name/Owner: wyr-a — eaaJ iy- s) Mailing Address: !1 _C. .►/ cs V46 - 2 r. m 15IC .. 'Vr7'TZ _... T County: Integrator: QJf7QG�. G.n. Phone�_012 V-4 5 - -P6 7,6 On Site Representative: Phone: f?/4l elf Z 94r.23 Physical Address/Location: rrom se .3 In �# ir7�rScc rY, S2 ,,.a0 a-.-S, Type of Operation: Swine C/ Poultry Cattle Design Capacity: , 0 n Number of Animals on Site: S 0 0 DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW Latitude: to Longitude: 0" Elevation: Feet Circle Yes or No Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event (approximately I Foot + 7 inches) Yes oK0 Actual Freeboard: F[. Inches Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes org; Was any erosion observed? KTC?or No Is adequate Iand available for spray? Yes o�O Is the cover crop adequate? Yes or No Crop(s) being utilized: Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings` M; or No 100 Feet from Wells? E26r No Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or(NV Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes ore) Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other similar .man-made devices? Yes or(p If Yes, Please Explain. Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied, spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes orED Additional Comments: Srn--4 ct 6t,6kw's is fX df sa/.' l,s /e)w cr1.7�i. Inspector Name Signature cc: Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed. R Fo F ju­ -' State of North Carolina Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources Washington Regional Office James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary Nancy Smith, Regional Manager DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT Water Quality Section August 1, 1995 Mr. Claude Small Rt. 3, Box 41 Edenton, North Carolina 27932 Subject: Animal Waste Lagoon Facility No. 21-13 Chowan County Dear Mr. Small: Staff from the Washington Regional Office of the Division of Environmental Management inspected the lagoons serving your animal feeding operation on July 26, 1995. It was observed that the primary lagoon located behind the hog houses had an insufficient amount of freeboard, water level in relation to the lowest point of your dike wall. You should maintain a minimum of nineteen inches of freeboard in the lagoon. This letter is written to bring your attention to this situation and to ask you to begin pumping wastewater to the second lagoon, spray irrigating wastewater or taking the appropriate action necessary to reduce the level of your primary lagoon immediately. Please note that a buffer of twenty- five feet from ditches, swales, canals, and streams must be maintained while spray irrigating from your lagoons. Although the lagoon was not overflowing on the day of the inspection, evidence of overflows from an area approximately 25 feet from the southeast corner of the primary lagoon into a swampy area beyond the dike was noted. Please be aware that it is a violation of North Carolina General Statutes to discharge wastewater to the surface waters (farm ditches, creeks, streams, etc) of the State without a permit. The Division of Environmental Management has the authority to levy a fine of not more than $10,000 per day for the unpermitted discharge of wastewater into the surface waters of the State. At some point in the future, staff will reinspect your facility. Lagoon dikes should be mowed so they can be visually inspected. 1421 Carolina Avenue, Washington. North Carolina 27889 Telephone 919-946-6481 FAX 919-975-3716 An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 6M recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper If you have any questions in regard to this letter I can be contacted at (919) 946-6481. Sincerely, Ed Warren WWTP Consultant cc: Carlton Perry D'anne Wilburn VAN file A:\FREEBRD.SML {{,,O1�PER_ATIONS gw BRANCH - WQ Fax:919-715-6048 Jul 21 '95 11:45 P.03/04 �tIL- -86 U1,03 [MA 909 Rol FAA M 2197 M81 ,emu a r�r,um�u �-�-- SMEVIOV710, R= D Aws V1[w. Opeft • 4w ■ ��!'wWMVN ___ w.a��n..u.:�wt�w++�r�wllw rrl r• +�..rrF*� Malt AddrM Y Type of confon: . 5wfne PC" � Cdi b Dr tail Cgadtr. NumWcUdmmb on Ob: .� Lacs W" W + Umoor heip qMMt WOW 411 Foot-45 YaoM W flan sWt 1200d WY 1 Foal f 7 lathe* Yes a No A alFreebae�; ,.�.— FW 'For ho On,ab mate IN* en$ tae0M OOMOMM�e a '18000 ' fise�08rd usdariha wM any seepage dw from ft Iva(v Yes or WMW&Mftdfi6dW. YQO or 1sB&qu&landarrayamebrland applaaW Yc& or Wheamempahqu Yes a Alo — -- I 1 II"•"'�'-q I Y • �1�l�� II . 1 ..41w��1 I I �� I Fab M19) 7154550