HomeMy WebLinkAbout210013_INSPECTIONS_20171231NORTH CAROLINA J
Department of Environmental Qua
�•Pi _�-�' � �Y, Ar/f�YKiteR 3:'k'i'!^ail`- y 4.j'.�-'i+`_+p'+�A, � i3 '��„t.
�� 4L�Cft7=� .:! [J..xr, a>> •�'z'�K:� -� ^`�;,«i,3y?" � r.�. n�,�,�;,r";
� rE �f: ^vd�, "t�� �-wv�r,�i ��y'�c � may �•?�:ra: � �,���s� 'Ls S�-s,.:,a�a..
(� Division of Water Quality .
Q Division of Soiland Water Conservation
Q Other Ageney.. .,
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 2l 13
0 Permitted O Certified 0 Conditionally Certified [3Registered
Date of Visit 3/16/2000
Q Not Operational erational Q Below Threshold I Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: 611191G
Farm Name: SwAREairin .......................... County:Chommi............................................. ..WA�RO......
...........................................................................
OwnerName:.ClAltdp.................................... SMUM ........................................................... Phone No:•4$2-4fi2.3...................................................................
FacilityContact:...............................................................................Title:............................................................... Phone No:....................................................
Mailing Address: Z5j,.W]liidcat.jj08rl............................................................................... EidentaR.N.0 ........................................................... 179,32 .............
OnsiteRepresentative:.ClAudg.5maR.............................................................................. Integrator:......................................................................................
Location of Farm:
!'l�il�dcrat Rd,.#.X . R.sbnu�t S.�t>ai� . taxXlt.s�f Rd�nxa�n,..............................................................................................................................................................
........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ .
-----------------------................................. -.-.......... ......................................................
..............
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse
Design Current
Swine Canacitv Ponulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
600
0
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Roars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle_ Capacity Population
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer 10 Non-Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 600
Total SSLW 81,000
Number of Lagoons Holding Ponds / Solid Traps
Discharges & Stream Impacts
I - Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. II'discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b- If discharge is observed. did it reach Water of the State`? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. lf' discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min'?
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Waste Collection & Treatment
Please see attached Lagoon Field Data Sheets
Reviewer/Inspector Name :Carl Dunn ..
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Cl Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
.. A 14 onnnn
Facility Number 21 — 13 Lagoon Number .1............ Lagoon Identifier smaJI.......................................................
Q Active Oo Inactive Latitude 35 P--] 15
Waste Last Added 61.]L96........................................... Longitude 76 38 42
Determined by: ® Owner ❑ Estimated
By GPS or Map? IN GPS ❑ Map
GPS file number:
Surface Area (acres): ..„.........
Embankment Height (feet): 12............................
Distance to Stream: 00 <250 feet Q 250 feet - 1000 feet O >1000 feet
By measurement or Map? 0 Field Measurement ❑ Map
Down gradient well within 250 feet? Q Yes 0 No
Intervening Stream? Q Yes Q No
Distance to WS or HQW (miles): 0 < 5 Q 5 - 10 Q > 10
Overtopping from Outside Waters? 0 Yes O No Q Unknown
inspection date 3/16/2000
appearance of * Sludge Near Surface
lagoon liquid 0 Lagoon Liquid Dark, Discolored
Q Lagoon Liquid Clear
Q Lagoon Empty Freeboard (inches): 24
embankment condition (0 poorly Built, Large Trees, Erosion, Burrows, Slumping, Seepage, Tile Drains, Etc.
O Construction Specification Unknown But Dam Appears in Good Condition
Q Constructed and Maintained to Current NRCS Standards
outside drainage O Poorly Maintained Diversions or Large Drainage Area not Addressed in Design
Q Has Drainage Area Which is Addressed in Lagoon Design
Q No Drainage Area or Diversions Well Maintained
liner status Q High Potential for Leaking, No Liner, Sandy Soil, Rock Outcrops Present, Etc.
Q No Liner, Soil Appears to Have Low Permeability
Q Meets NRCS Liner Requirements
cation equipment
and/or sprayfield Q Yes
unavailable
comments
fail to make contact Yes * No
Q No Q Unknown with representative
Facility Number 21 -- 13 Lagoon Number 2........... Lagoon Identifier big..
O Active 0 Inactive Latitude F367 0 15
Waste Last Added .61.1( 0... ...............................
Determined by: ® Owner ❑ Estimated
Surface Area (acres): .0...5...........................
Embankment Height (feet): 15..............
Longitude 76 38 42
By GPS or Map? FM—GPS ❑ Map
GPS file number:
Distance to Stream: 00 <250 feet 0 250 feet - 1000 feet 0 >1000 feet
By measurement or Map? ® Field Measurement ❑ Map
Down gradient well within 250 feet? O Yes OO No
Intervening Stream? O Yes Do No
Distance to WS or HQW (miles): 0 < 5 0 5 - 10 @ > 10
Overtopping from Outside Waters? 0 Yes Do No O Unknown
inspection date 3/16/2000
appearance of O Sludge Near Surface
lagoon liquid O Lagoon Liquid Dark, Discolored
O Lagoon Liquid Clear
DQ Lagoon Empty Freeboard (inches): 150
embankment condition 0 poorly Built, Large Trees, Erosion, Burrows, Slumping, Seepage, Tile Drains, Etc.
0 Construction Specification Unknown But Dam Appears in Good Condition
O Constructed and Maintained to Current NRCS Standards
outside drainage O Poorly Maintained Diversions or Large Drainage Area not Addressed in Design
0 Has Drainage Area Which is Addressed in Lagoon Design
# No Drainage Area or Diversions Well Maintained
liner status 0 High Potential for Leaking, No Liner, Sandy Soil, Rock Outcrops Present, Etc.
0 No Liner, Soil Appears to Have Low Permeability
O Meets NRCS Liner Requirements
ration equipment fail to make contact
and/or SprayFeld 0 Yes 0 No 0 Unknown with representative O Yes (0 NO
unavailable
comments
01/18/2000 12:152 SlS-715-6048 DWO NON DISCHARGE BR
Tattlal Evaluation 1 O Follow-up Evaluation 0 Denied Access 0 Does Facility Require a Follow-up
Facility Number )3 _ Date of Evaluation `gip
_j "lime rfi Evaluation 11 v o 24 hr. (hh:mm)
0 Permitted 13 Certified * Registerd r] Non -Registered Fff Inactive Facility Date Last Operated:
FarmName: ............ .....................................,urn^1........................... _..........._.._.._....._...... County.............. ..: �::.e»�..,.».......,,....... .............. _.....................
OrrnerName; ......... I' ....».C�ati�e__S.`""'.,......W......... »._.......................... Fba+�e a:.... ».ZS2....`... L23......W..........a
FacilityContact: ..... ....... ...L i ...... �............. TitJe:........................»................................,.... Phone No: . ................ __ _ .......
r
Mailing Addrew: ,........................................................................................................................ ....... .....».»................. ._._._........... ........
.......... ,.....
Onsite Reprw-Mativo:.................G,.a�..�
............ .». SM........... ............. _...... ................. Integrator ...................................................... »...............
J »........
Location of Farm:
Fc a es & Strea
1. Is Any discharge Aerve:d from any lagoon? ❑ Yes dNo
J
1
a. If discharge is observed, was the convoyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
bz If discharge is obsmed, did it reach Water of the State,? (If yes, nonfy DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in galhnisi?
2. is there evidence of past discharge from any lagoon? ❑ Yes M No
Waste cQuection & ea e t
3. Estimate Freeboarl Level: ❑ Spillway ❑ Ycs U4 No
Structure, 1 Styructuro 2 StruaUlt 3 SUUctura 4 Strucauo S Structure b
Ii1e111'il1CT: ...«.a ^1�.............. ...»..i................ ... ..... ............ .... .......... ..................................................................................... I ...........
....»..
Freeboard(inches): ! ......................................_ J_S v......................................................................................................_....»«..»........................................
��"—'+. {: { i{i{run 1"iFl.rd� Rr•:if' �rer y{cr i.. !" _ _ •"r''r:i=",,'!�"an^_ {.r.. TURN .w� ^ Bey ;l�n :ts,�
T.:�femn•ft
Reriewerllns ector a1,� �a.!, µh NrT
f1 amC .t _ai�w Qu'-WV"
{I4111 . _ c ! •,: ` .W 3 3:�d..a ��ri �! , t� �f L^• =i�
Reviewerllnspector', lgnnture: _— �"`�� pate: 3 i ��-0,?
ILEF
1/ 12/00 1
t
01/18/2000 12t52 919-715-6048 DWO NON DISCHARGE BR PAGE 03/08
i
Site Sketch Showing All Active and Inactive Lagoons
IUF .
111214b 2
if MW
01/18/2000 121:52 919-715-6048 DWO NON DISCHARGE BR
Inactive Lagoon Field Data Sheet
Latitude 36 6 ®' IS Longitude ']b 3�' ' CPS [I Map
4. Waste Last Added (MnVyy) ❑ Owner ❑ Estimated (, q&=
5. Estimate of lao!-),o 1 surface area (acres) i
2-5
6. Effective height bf embankment (feet) i 2
7. Distance to Bliie Line or Intermittent Stream (feet) lg<250 ❑ 250 - 1000 ❑ > 1000
92 Determined From Field Measurement ❑ Map
8. Down Gradient Well
a. Is there a down gradient well located within 250 feet? ❑ Yes No
b. Is an interveni'pg stream not located between. any part of the lagoon. and the nearest well? 0 Yes N8
9. Distance to W� waters or HQW (tni.) ❑ c 5 ❑ 5. 10 ❑ > 10
10.
Inactive Lagoon Number.
Does the representative lcztow o1: overtopping from outside waters?
11. Appearance of Lagoon Liquid
it,
Sludge Neer' Surface
b. Lagoon Liquid Dark, Discolored
c. Lagoon Liquid Clear
1
12. Embankment� Condition
a. Poorly Built, 4-arge'l'rees, Erosion, Burrows, slumping, Seepage, Tile Drains, etc.
b. Gansttuatiori Specification Uown But Dam Appears in Good Condition
c. Constructed 4d Maintained to Current NRGS Standards
13. Outside Draiijagc Area
a. Poorly Maintained Diversions or Large Drainage Area not Addressed in Design
b. kIag Drainage Area Which is Addressed in Lagoon Design
c. No Drainage Area or Diversions Well Maintaixtied
14. Liner Status
a. High Potentiall for leaking, No Liner, Sandy Soil, Rock Outcrops Present, etc,
b. Na Liner, Soil' Appears to Have Low Permeability
c. Meets NRCS Liner Requirements
tl
15. Application Fquipi7tlent and/or Sprayfield Not Available
16. Contact Gou.! tact be made with on -site representative
PAGE 04/08
❑ Yes No ❑Unknown
4M
I
A��4
Yes Wa ❑ [701cpown
❑ Yes Callo
II,FAS
1/1210O ,i �
01/18/2000 12:52 919-715--5048 DWO NON DISCHARGE BR
# It
PAGE 05/08
Comments (Refcrto Question #): F-xplain any Yes answer and/or any other comment.
11
V1voo 2
% M
01/18/2000 12 52 919-715-6048 DWO NON DISCHARGE BR PAGE 04/08
Inactive Lagoon Field Data Sheet
Facility Number 21 - 13 Inactive Lagoon Number:
Latitude I � 1 : j ; LongitudeDO 9 ' `t2 ® GPS ❑ Map
4. Waste Last Added (mm/yy) ❑ Owner ❑ Estimated
5. Estimate of iujl.;urt surface area (acres)
6. Effective height'of embankment (feet)
7. Distance to Bliie Line or Intermittent Stream (feet)
Determined From Field Measurement ❑ Map
S. Down Gradient, Well
254 ❑ 2.50 - 1040 ❑ > 1000
a. Is there a dowlt gradient well located within 250 feet? ❑Yes No
b. Is an interveni"g stream not located between any part of the lagoon and the nearest well? ID Yes M No
9. Distance to WS waters or HQW (nr .) ❑ c S ❑ S - 10 ❑ > 10
10. Doethe repres
entative know of overtopping from outside waters?
11. Appearance of Lagoon Liquid
a. Sludge Near Surface
b. Lagoon Liquid Dark, Discolored
c. Lagoon Liquid Clear
1
12. Embankment' Condition
I
a. Poorly Built, 4arge Trees, Erosion, Burrows, Slumping, Seepage, Tile Drains, etc.
b. Construction Specifeston UnYnown But Dam Appears in Good Condition
c. Constructed a'd Maintained to Current NRCS Standards
13. Outside Draiinage Area
a. Poorly Maintained Diversions or Large Drainage Area not .Addressed in Design
is. Kag Drainage Area Which is Addressed in Lagoon Design
c. No Drainage Area or Diversions Well Maintained
14, Liner Status
a. High Potential for Leaking, No Liner, Sandy Soil, Rock Outcrops Present, etc.
b. No Liner, Soil' Appears to Have Low permeability
e. Meats NRCS Liner Requirements
s
15. Application Equipment and/or Sprayfield Not Available
16. Contact coin E zaar be made with on -site representative
❑ Yes ESNo ❑ Unlmown
51 dot L
I
0
0 Yes. �O No ❑ UDlwown
❑ Yes 2'No
JUD5
1112/00 1
01/18/2000 12:52 919-715-6048 DWQ NON DISCHARGE BR PAGE 05/09
Comments (Refcr;to Question #)' F-xplain any Yes answer and/or any other comment.
n.FD5 !'
1/1.2/00 2
j Site Requires Immediate Attention:
' Facility No. a?(-k-g
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT.
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: -71 Z 6 , 1995
Time: 1 spin 3; ,gym.
Farm Name/Owner: wyr-a — eaaJ iy- s)
Mailing Address: !1 _C. .►/ cs V46 - 2 r. m 15IC .. 'Vr7'TZ _...
T
County:
Integrator: QJf7QG�. G.n. Phone�_012 V-4 5 - -P6 7,6
On Site Representative: Phone: f?/4l elf Z 94r.23
Physical Address/Location: rrom se .3 In �# ir7�rScc rY, S2 ,,.a0 a-.-S,
Type of Operation: Swine C/ Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: , 0 n Number of Animals on Site: S 0 0
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude: to
Longitude: 0" Elevation: Feet
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately I Foot + 7 inches) Yes oK0 Actual Freeboard: F[. Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes org; Was any erosion observed? KTC?or No
Is adequate Iand available for spray? Yes o�O Is the cover crop adequate? Yes or No
Crop(s) being utilized:
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from Dwellings` M; or No
100 Feet from Wells? E26r No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes or(NV
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes ore)
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar .man-made devices? Yes or(p If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes orED
Additional Comments: Srn--4 ct 6t,6kw's is fX df sa/.' l,s /e)w cr1.7�i.
Inspector Name Signature
cc: Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed.
R Fo F ju
-' State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Washington Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Nancy Smith, Regional Manager
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
Water Quality Section
August 1, 1995
Mr. Claude Small
Rt. 3, Box 41
Edenton, North Carolina 27932
Subject: Animal Waste Lagoon
Facility No. 21-13
Chowan County
Dear Mr. Small:
Staff from the Washington Regional Office of the Division of
Environmental Management inspected the lagoons serving your animal
feeding operation on July 26, 1995. It was observed that the
primary lagoon located behind the hog houses had an insufficient
amount of freeboard, water level in relation to the lowest point of
your dike wall. You should maintain a minimum of nineteen inches of
freeboard in the lagoon. This letter is written to bring your
attention to this situation and to ask you to begin pumping
wastewater to the second lagoon, spray irrigating wastewater or
taking the appropriate action necessary to reduce the level of your
primary lagoon immediately. Please note that a buffer of twenty-
five feet from ditches, swales, canals, and streams must be
maintained while spray irrigating from your lagoons.
Although the lagoon was not overflowing on the day of the
inspection, evidence of overflows from an area approximately 25
feet from the southeast corner of the primary lagoon into a swampy
area beyond the dike was noted. Please be aware that it is a
violation of North Carolina General Statutes to discharge
wastewater to the surface waters (farm ditches, creeks, streams,
etc) of the State without a permit. The Division of Environmental
Management has the authority to levy a fine of not more than
$10,000 per day for the unpermitted discharge of wastewater into
the surface waters of the State. At some point in the future, staff
will reinspect your facility. Lagoon dikes should be mowed so they
can be visually inspected.
1421 Carolina Avenue, Washington. North Carolina 27889 Telephone 919-946-6481 FAX 919-975-3716
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 6M recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper
If you have any questions in regard to this letter I can be
contacted at (919) 946-6481.
Sincerely,
Ed Warren
WWTP Consultant
cc: Carlton Perry
D'anne Wilburn
VAN file
A:\FREEBRD.SML
{{,,O1�PER_ATIONS gw BRANCH - WQ Fax:919-715-6048 Jul 21 '95 11:45 P.03/04
�tIL- -86 U1,03 [MA 909 Rol FAA M 2197 M81
,emu a
r�r,um�u �-�--
SMEVIOV710, R= D
Aws
V1[w.
Opeft
• 4w
■ ��!'wWMVN ___ w.a��n..u.:�wt�w++�r�wllw rrl r• +�..rrF*�
Malt AddrM Y
Type of confon: . 5wfne PC" � Cdi b
Dr tail Cgadtr. NumWcUdmmb on Ob: .�
Lacs W" W + Umoor heip qMMt WOW 411 Foot-45 YaoM W flan sWt
1200d WY 1 Foal f 7 lathe* Yes a No
A alFreebae�; ,.�.— FW
'For ho On,ab mate IN* en$ tae0M OOMOMM�e a '18000 ' fise�08rd usdariha
wM any seepage dw from ft Iva(v Yes or
WMW&Mftdfi6dW. YQO or
1sB&qu&landarrayamebrland applaaW Yc& or
Wheamempahqu Yes a Alo
— -- I 1 II"•"'�'-q I Y • �1�l�� II . 1 ..41w��1 I I ��
I
Fab M19) 7154550