210010_INSPECTIONS_20171231

2 V
NUH I H UAHULINA
Department of Environmental Qual

ILI r
LIN
vim:
'•J4'e!"'f° N&! �11�": ��"d's-X1'lF.'r"1� 1':2 ��1 '�.^.��' �Y La 3r'.:.'.4n�"

i'�
Division of Water Resources
Division of Soil. and Water Conservation
Other Agency
Facility Number:
210010 1 Facility Status: Active
Inpsection Type:
Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit:
Routine
Date of Visit:
09/28/2016 Entry Time: 08:15 am Exit Time
Farm Name:
A.J. Smith & Sons Inc
Owner:
A J Smith & Sons Inc
Mailing Address:
601 Greenhall Rd
Physical Address: '
430 Greenhall Rd
Facility Status•
Permit: AWS210010 Denied Access
Inactive Or Closed Date -
County; Chowan Region:
9:25 am Incident #
Owner Email:
Phone:
M Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude:
4 mile north of Edenton. 2 miles north of Hancock Station on SR 1316.
Edenton NC 27932
Edenton NC 27932
Murphy -Brown LLC
Washington
252-482-8977
36' 07' Longitude: 76' 37' 57"
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other issues
Certified Operator: Fred R Smith Operator Certification Number: 17748
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Fred Smith Phone
On -site representative Fred Smith Phone:
Primary Inspector; Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis; soil tested: 2015
9-20-16 = .68
2-12-16 = 1.13
9-3-15 = .80
5-25-15 = 1.13
IRR records are complete & balanced out.
NOTE: SF are bringing in feed to finish stock before changing COC as requested by Fred Smith in Sept. 2016.
Reviewed: freeboardlrainfall; sludge survey 312016 at 11%; crop yield; POA for freeboard of 13"
fb range: 13" an 9-24-16 after 18" of rain to 36" on B-27-16
page: 1

f
Permit: AWS210010 Owner - Facility : A J Smith & Sons Inc Facility Number: 210010
Inspection Date: 09/28/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 0
Total Design Capacity:
Total SSLW:
Waste Structures Observed
Disignated
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon 1
page: 2

i_• Permit: AWS210010 Owner -Facility: A J Smith & Sons Inc Facility Number: 210010
Inspection Date: 09/28/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Cl
M. ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
[]
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
0 ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
[]
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
M ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No Na No
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large
❑
M ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
M ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
[]
M ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
M ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
0 ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application,
Yel No Np No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance altematives that need
❑ M ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

r Permit: AWS210010 Owner - Facility : A J Smith & Sons Inc Facility Number:
210010
Inspection Date: 09/28/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit;
Routine
Waste Application
Yes No Na No
Crop Type 1
Peanuts
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
0 ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
N ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
N ❑
❑
determination?
17, Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■ ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No Na Ne
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
0 ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
E ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

1, Permit: AWS210010 Owner -Facility: A J Smith & Sons Inc Facility Number: 210010
Inspection Date: 09/28/16 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na No
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
N ❑
[]
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
0 ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
(]
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
N ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes No Na No
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
E ❑
Cl
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
E ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
N ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
0 ❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
0 ❑
❑
page: 5

Division of Water Resources
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number:
210010
Facility Status: Active
Permit: AWS210010
❑ Denied Access
Inpsectlon Type:
Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit:
Routine
County:
Chowan Region:
Washington
Date of Visit:
09/23/2015 EntryTime: 09:30 am Exit Time: 10:20 am Incident #
Farm Name;
A.J. Smith & Sons Inc
Owner Email:
Owner:
A J Smith & Sons Inc
Phone:
252482-8977
Mailing Address:
601 Greenhall Rd
Edenton NC 27932
Physical Address:
430 Greenhall Rd
Edenton NC 27932
Facility Status:
Compliant ❑
Not Compliant Integrator:
Murphy -Brown I-I_C
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
36" 07' Longitude;
76' 37' 57"
4 mile north of Edenton, 2 miles north of Hancock Station on SR 1316
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col. Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Fred R Smith Operator Certification Number. 17748
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Fred Smith Phone:
On -site representative Fred Smith Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis: Soil tested: 8/2015
8-28-15 = .80
5-25-15 = 1.13
7-14-14 = 1.1
IRR records are complete & balanced out.
Reviewed:New COC for gilts; new WUP; crop yield-sage,wheat,trlticale; sludge survey at 11%: rainfall/freeboard
page: 1

Permit: AWS210010 Owner -Facility: A J Smith $ Sons Inc Facility Number: 210010
Inspection Date: 09/23/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 2,700
Total Design Capacity:
Total SSLW:
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freoboard
Lagoon 1
page: 2

Permit: AWS210010 Owner - Facility : A J Smith & Sons Inc Facility Number: 210010
Inspection Date: 09/23/15 Inssection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yea
No No No
1, Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure -
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
M ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
2, Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection. Storage & Treatment
Yes
No No No
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
M ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5, Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (LeJ large
❑
M ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
0 ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
0 ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Al2plication
Yea No Na No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ M ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN a 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Permit: AWS210010 Owner - Facility : A J Smith & Sons Inc Facility Number.
Inspection Date: 09/23/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
210010
Routine
Waste Application
Yes No Na No
Crop Type 1
Winter Annual
Crop Type 2
other
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
0 ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
M ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
0 ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
M ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na No
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
0 ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
El
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
N ❑
[]
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWS210010 Owner - Facility : A J Smith & Sons Inc Facility Number:
210010
Inspection Date: 09/23/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No No No
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22, Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
E ❑
Cl
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
IN ❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fall to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
E ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■ ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
0 ❑
❑
atherlssues
Yos No Na No
28, Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
E ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
0 ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30, Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below,
Application Field
❑
Lagoon ! Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
E ❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
0 ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
0 ❑
❑
page: 5

1
0 Division of Water Resources
El Division of Soil and Water Conservation
11 Other Agency
Facility Number: 210010 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS210010
Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Chowan Region:
Date of Visit: 09/11/2014 Entry Time: 08:30 am Exit Time: 9:05 am Incident #
Farm Name; A.J. Smith & Sons Inc Owner Email:
Owner: A J Smith & Sons Inc Phone:
Mailing Address: 601 Greenhall Rd Edenton NC 27932
Physical Address: 430 Greenhall Rd Edenton NC 27932
Facility Status: ECompliant El Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC
❑ Denied Access
Washington
252-482-8977
Location of Farm: Latitude: 36' 07' Longitude: 76' 37- 57"
4 mile north of Edenton, 2 miles north of Hancock Station on SR 1315.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues'
Certified Operator: Fred R Smith Operator Certification Number: 17748
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Fred Smith Phone :
On -site representative Fred Smith Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Soil tested 7/25/14
Waste Analysis:
7/22114= 1.01
IRR records complete and balanced out on triticale and sage.
Reviewed: freeboard, rainfall, crop yield. stocking and mortality
Looks good.
page: 1

.4
Permit: AWS210010 Owner - Facility : A J Smith & Sons Inc Facility Number: 210010
Inspection Date: 09/11/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
LESwine - Feeder to Finish 2.500
Total Design Capacity;
Total SSLW:
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Data Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon 1
page: 2

Permit: AWS210010 Owner -Facility: A J Smith & Sons Inc Facility Number: 210010
Inspection Date: 09/11/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Dtscharnes & Stream Impacts
Yes
No Na Ne
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
(]
[]
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
0 ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
(]
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
0 Cl
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes No No No
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
M ❑
[]
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large
❑
0 ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
■ ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
MEI
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
M ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
YesNo-No No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%M0 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Permit: AWS210010 Owner -Facility: A J Smith & Sons Inc Facility Number: 210010
Inspection Date: 09/11/14 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No Na Ne
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
M ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
❑
❑
16, Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
0 ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
0 ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of property operating waste application equipment?
❑
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yea No Na Ne
19, Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
No
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
S ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WU P?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
Maps?
[�
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
[]
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
[�
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

e
Permit: AWS210010 Owner - Facility : A J Smith & Sons Inc Facility Number: 210010
Inspection Date: 09/11/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na No
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
E ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
N ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
E ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
N ❑
❑
Other Issues
Yea No Na Ne
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
E ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
E ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
E ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon 1 Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
E ❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
0 ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
W ❑
❑
page: 5

0 Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 210010 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS210010 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Chowan Region: Washington
Date of Visit: gg/26/2013 Entry Time: 08130 AM Exit Time: 09145 AM
Farm Name: a I, Smith & Sons Inc
Owner: AA! Smith &_yS.Qn§ Inc
Incident #:
Owner Email:
Malling Address: 601 Grgpnhijil jjd Edenton NC 27932
Phone: [phone]
Physical Address: 430_Greenhall Rd Edenton NC 27932
Facility Status: E Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 36°O7'21 Longitude: 76"37'57"
4 mile north of Edenton, 2 miles north of Hancock Station on SR 1316.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Star, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Fred R Smith Operator Certification Number: 17748
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representativo(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Alfred Smith Phone:
On -site representative Fred Smith Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis: soil test: 2013
5-7-13 = 1.18
1-11-12 = .90
6-14-12 = 1.2
IRR records are complete & balanced out. Rainfall, freeboard & stocking are recorded.
Looks Good! sludge survey: March 2013 c@ 11 %
Page: 1

�J 1
Permit: AWS210010 Owner - Facility: A J Smith & Sons Inc Facility Number: 210010
Inspection Date: 09126/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 6,216 2,700
Total Design Capacity: 6,216
Total SSLW: 839,160
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
kgoon 1 33.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWS210010 Owner - Facility: A J Smith & Sons Inc Facility Number : 210010
Inspection Date: 09/26/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■ ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
ONO
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
1100
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than
❑
■
❑
❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not.properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑ ■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑ ■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑ ■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

w
Permit: AWS210010 Owner - Facility: A J Smith & Sons Inc Facility Number: 210010
Inspection Date: M26I2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.? ❑
Total Phosphorus? ❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type 1 Peanuts
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■
❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15, Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑ ■
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
ONO
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

r�.
Permit: AWS210010 Owner - Facility: A J Smith & Sons Inc Facility Number: 210010
Inspection Date: 09/26/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Lease Agreements? ❑
Other? ❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
D■❑❑
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
■ ❑
❑
24, Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑
❑
25. is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑
■ ❑
❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon ❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS210010 Owner • Facility: A J Smith & Sons Inc Facility Number: 210010
Inspection Date: 09/2612013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Otherlssues Yes No NA NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ ■ ❑ Cl
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon 1 Storage Pond
Other
if Other, please specify
32, Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
i
Page: 6

Division of Water Resources
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 210010 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS210010
Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for visit: Routine County: Chowan Region:
Date of visit: 08/24/2012 Entry Time: 08:30 am Exit Time: 10:00 am Incident #
Farm Name: A.J. Smith & Sons Inc Owner Email:
Owner: A J Smith & Sons Inc Phone:
Mailing Address: 601 Greenhall Rd Edenton NC 27932
Physical Address: 430 Greenhall Rd Edenton NC 27932
Facility Status: Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy-Brown.LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 36° 07' Longitude: 76' 37' 57"
4 mile north of Edenton, 2 miles north of Hancock Station on SR 1316.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
❑ Denied Access
Washington
252-482-8977
Certified Operator: Fred R Smith Operator Certification Number: 17748
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Alfred Smith Phone:
On -site representative Alfred Smith Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis:
6-14-12 = 1.2
1-11-12 = .90
soil tested: 2011 & 312012
IRr records are complete & balanced out. Rainfall, freeboard & crop yield are recorded.
Remember to do the calibration in 2012.
Sludge survey done in March 2012.
page: 1

L_
Permit: AWS210010 Owner - Facility : A J Smith & Sons Inc Facility Number: 210010
Inspection hate: 08/24/12 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Cattle
10 Cattle - Beet Feeder
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 2,072
Total Design Capacity:
Total SSM
Waste Structures
Dlsignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon 1
page: 2

Permit: AWS210010 Owner -Facility: A J Smith 8 Sons Inc Facility Number: 210010
Inspection Date: 08t24/12 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yos No Na Na
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
M ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWO)
❑
❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that'reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
M ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
■ ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yea No Na No
4, Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (LeJ large
❑
0 ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
M ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑M
❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yea No Na No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

1
Permit: AWS210010 Owner - Facility : A J Smith 8 Sons Inc Facility Number:
210010
Inspection Date: 08/24/12 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
s
Waste Application
Yea No Ne No
Crop Type 1
Peanuts
Crop Type 2
Other
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
❑ ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
❑ ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yea
No Na Ne
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
N ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
If Other, please specify
21, Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
[]
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWS210010 Owner - Facility : A J Smith & Sons Inc Facility Number: 210010
Inspection Date: 08/24/12 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yea _No Na Ne
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
01313
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? if yes, check the
❑0
❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
M ❑
❑
Otherlssues
Yes No Na Ne
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours andlar document
❑
M ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29, At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
M ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
M ❑
❑
(i.e.. discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon l Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
M ❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewerlinspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
■ ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
■ ❑
❑
page: 5

M !Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 210010
Facility Status: Active
Permit: AWS210010
❑ Denied Access
Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine
County:
Chowan Region:
Washington
Date of Visit: 07/12/2011 EntryTime: 09:00 am Exit Time: 11:00 am Incident #
Farm Name: A.J. Smith & Sons Inc
Owner Email:
Owner: A J Smith & Sons Inc
Phone:
252-482-8977
Mailing Address: 601 Greenhall Rd
Edenton NC 27932
Physical Address: 430 Greenhall Rd
Edenton NC 27932
Facility Status: Compliant ❑
Not Compliant Integrator:
Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
36' 07' Longitude:
76` 37' 57"
4 mile north of Edenton, 2 miles north of Hancock
Station on SR 1316.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts
Waste Col, Star, & Treat
Waste Application
Records and Documents
Other Issues
Certified Operator: Fred R Smith
Operator Certification Number,
17748
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name
Title Phone
24 hour contact name Fred Smith
Phone
On -site representative Fred Smith
Phone
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer
Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):-
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis:
soil tested: 2010
6-23-11 = .96
3-19-10 = 1.1
11-1-10 = .74
IRR records need to be balanced out.
Crops look good!
page: 1

Permit: AWS210010 Owner - Facility : A J Smith & Sons Inc Facility Number: 210010
Inspection Date: 07/12/11 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 6,216 2,683
Total Design Capacity: 6.216
Total SSLW: 839.160
Waste Structures
Dlsignated • Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon 1 41.00
page: 2

Permit: AWS210010 Owner - Facility : A J Smith & Sans Inc Facility Number: 210010
Inspection Date: 07/12/11 inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes No Na Na
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
■ ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
0 ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■ ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
❑
❑
3, Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
0 ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yea
No Na Ne
4, Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large
❑
0 ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■ ❑
Cl
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
M ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 1IM10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Permit: AWS210010 Owner -Facility: A J Smith & Sans Inc Facility Number: 210010
Inspection Date: 07/12/11 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes
No Na No
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
❑
❑
16. Did the facility tail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
M ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
0 ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yee No Na No
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
20, Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ E ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below,
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWS210010 Owner - Facility : A J Smith & Sons Inc Facility Number: 210010
Inspection Date: 07/12/11 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
_No Na_N�
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
0 ❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24, Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
0 ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
N ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
N ❑
❑
Other Issues
Yas
No No No
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
0 ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
■ ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31, Do subsurface the drains exist at the facility?
❑
E ❑
Cl
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32, Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
0 ❑
❑
CAWMP?
33, Did the Reviewertinspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
0 ❑
Cl
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
0 ❑
❑
page: 5

x
Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Other Agency
Facility Number: 210010
Facility Status: Active _ Permit: NCA221010 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type:
Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: $q itiag
County:
Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 0710712010 _
Entry Time:1000 AM Exit Time:
Incident it:
Farm Name:
Owner Email:
Owner: A J 5mith $ Sons
Inc _ _ _ _
Phone: - -
Mailing Address: 601 Qreenhali
Rd _ _ _
Physical Address: 430 Greenhall
Rd _ _
Facility Status: E Compliant
❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
_
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
36°07'21" Longitude: 76°37'57"
4 mile north of Edenton, 2 miles north of Hancock Station on SR 1316.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Waste Collection & Treatment
jj Waste Application
Records and Documents
Other Issues
Certified Operator: Fred R Smith
Operator Certification Number: 17748
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Fred Smith Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Fred & daughters Smith Phone:
Primary Inspector. Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste anaiysis:
3-19-10 = 1.1
1-14-09 = 1.3
6-2-09 = 1.4
soil tested 7-15-09 SS 2/2/10 Calib. 5/10
Freeboard range = Feb.5 = 23" - July 2 = 36"
Looks Good!
Date:
Page: 1

Permit: NCA221010 Owner - Facility: A J Smith & Sons Inc
Inspection Date: 07/07/2010 inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 210010
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
Q Cattle - Beef Feeder 60 5
Swine
Q Swine - Feeder to Finish 6,216 2,400
Total Design Capacity: 6,276
Total SSLW: 887.160
Waste Structures
Type identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
koon 1 36.00
Page. 2

Permit: NCA221010 Owner • Facility: A J Smith & Sons Inc Facility Number: 210010
Inspection Date: 07/0712010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) 13 ■ 0 ❑
2. is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3, Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5, Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.ed large trees, severe
❑
■ ❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
B. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management Cl
■ ❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■ ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
WOO
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■ ❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
• ❑
■ ❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

Permit: NCA221010 Owner - Facility: A J Smith & Sons Inc
Inspection Date: 07/07/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 210010
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA N✓=
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Small Grain Cover
Crop Type 2
Soybeans
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■
❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
m
Q
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
Cl
■
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

r
Permit: NCA221010 Owner - Facility: A J Smith & Sons Inc
Facility Number : 210010
Inspection Date: 07107/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
0
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after a 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)? ❑ ■ ❑
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes No NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑ ■ ❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: NCA221010 Owner - Facility: A J Smith & Sons Inc
Facility Number: 210010
Inspection Date: 07/07/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32, Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ ■ ❑ Cl
Page: 6
0

0
Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 210010 Facility Status: Active Permit: NCA221010 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: ,Somaiiance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine _ _ _ County: Chowan Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 07/17/2009 Entry Time:09:00 AM Exit Time:
Incident #:
Farm Name: Owner Email:
Owner: A J Smith & Sons Inc_ _ Phone:
Mailing Address: 601 Greenhall Rd EdentonnJC 27932
Physlcal Address: 4aO Greenhall Rd Edenton NC 27932
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murghv-Brown, LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 36'07:21"_ _ Longitude: 76'37'57"
4 mile north of Edenton, 2 miles north of Hancock Station on SR 1316.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Fred R Smith Operator Certification Number: 17748
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Fred Smith Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Fred & daughters Smith Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis:
6-9-09 1.4
1-14-09 1.3
soil tested 3-17-09
Looks Good
Page: 1

Permit: NCA221010 Owner - Facility: A J Smith & Sons Inc Facility Number: 210010
Inspection Date: 07/17/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 6,216 2,200
Total Design Capacity: 6,216
Total SSLW: 839,160
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
[ag-00,
J- 1 48,00
Page: 2

Permit: NCA221010 Owner - Facility: A J Smith & Sons Inc Facility Number: 210010
Inspection Date: 07/17/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges _& Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
C. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ ■
❑
❑
3, Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑ ■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
OMOD
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large trees, severe
❑ ■
❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑ ■
❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑ ■
❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑ ■
❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes No
NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑ ■
❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

Permit: NCA221010 Owner - Facility: A J Smith & Sons Inc
Inspection date: 07/17/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 210010
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No
NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 Ibs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Small Grain Cover
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■
❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: NCA221010 Owner • Facility: A J Smith & Sons Inc
Facility Number; 210010
Inspection Date: 07/1712009 Inspection Typo: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
Cl
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after ? 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? Cl
■
❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑ ❑
26, Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
Cl
■
❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■
❑ ❑
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■
❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: NCA221010 Owner - Facility: A J Smith & Sons Inc Facility Number: 210010
Inspection Date: 0711712009 Inspection Type. Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 210010 Facility Status: Active Permit: UQA221010 , ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Chowan Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 08/01/2008 Entry Time:08:30 AM Exit Time:
Farm Name: A.J. Smith & Sons Inc
Owner: 6 J Smith & Sons Inc
Incident #:
Owner Email:
Mailing Address: 601 Qfgenhall Rd Edenton NC 27932
Phone:[phone]
Physical Address: 430 Greenhall Rd Edenton NC 27932
Facility Status. ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: murohv-Brown. LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 36°07'21" _ Longitude: 76*37'57"
4 mile north of Edenton, 2 miles north of Hancock Station on SR 1316.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Conection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Fred R Smith Operator Certification Number: 17748
Secondary OIC(s).
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Fred Smith Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Fred & daughters Smith Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis:
11-02-07 = 1.0
5-13-08 = 1.7
records were recorded on old forms, pointed out the new NPDES forms that he should be using and requested that he switch
immediately.
sludge survey current as well as soil tests.
Page: 1

Permit: NCA221010 Owner - Facility: A J Smith 8 Sons Inc Facility Number: 210010
Inspection Date: 08101/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 6,216 2,700
Total Design Capacity: 6,216
Total SSLW: 839,160
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon 1
Page: 2

Permit: NCA221010 Owner - Facility: A J Smith & Sons Inc Facility Number: 210010
Inspection Date: 08/01/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■ ❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural Freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (i.eJ large trees, severe
❑
■ ❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■ ❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■ ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■ ❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■ ❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■ ❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

Permit: NCA221010 Owner - Facility: A J Smith & Sons Inc
Inspection Date: 08/01/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number : 210010
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Small Grain Cover
Crop Type 2
Peanuts
Crop Type 3
Other
Crap Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Sail Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: NCA221010 Owner - Facility: A J Smith & Sons Inc Facility Number: 210010
Inspection bate: 0810112008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
' If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
Q ■
❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■
Q ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Other Issues
Yes No
NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those
❑ ■
❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: NCA221010 Owner - Facility: A J Smith & Sons Inc
Facility Number : 210010
Inspection Date: 08/01/2008 Inspectlon Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yea No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWO of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
33, Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 210010 Facility Status: Active Permit: UCA221010 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: CornUliance Inagection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: falpMn Region: Washinaton
Date of Visit: 07/10/2007 Entry Time: 10:00 AM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: A.J. Smith & Sow Inc Owner Email:
Owner: A J Smith & Sons Inc Phone: [phone]
Physical Address: 430 Greenhall Rd Edenton NC 27932
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm:
4 mile north of Edenton, 2 miles north of Hancock Station on SR 1316.
Latltude:36°07'10" Longitude:76°37'55"
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Fred R Smith
Secondary OIC(s):
Operator Certification Number: 17748
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On -site representative Fred & daughters Smith Phone:
24 hour contact name Fred Smith Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis
5-9-07 = 1.8
1-23-07 = 1.4
Soil sampled
Looks Good!
Page: 1

Permit: NCA221010 Owner - Facility: A J Smith & Sons Inc
Facility Number : 210010
Inspection Date: 07/10/2007 Inspection Typo: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
�agoon 1
Page: 2

Permit; NCA221010 Owner - Facility: A J Smith & Sons Inc Facility Number: 210010
Inspection Date: 07110/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (foot applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

Permit: NCA221010 Owner - Facility: A J Smith 8 Sons Inc
Facility Number: 210010
Inspection Date: 07/10/2007 Inspection Type; Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Winter Annual
Crop Type 2
Peanuts
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Records and Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑■❑❑
Yes No NA NE
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
101
Page: 4

Permit: NCA221010 Owner - Facility: A J Smith & Sons Inc
Facility Number: 210010
Inspection Date: 0711012007 Inspection Type: Compliance inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■
❑ ❑
if yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after> 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)? ❑
■
❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
Cl
■
❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■
❑ ❑
naV__
Vau
Nn
NA NF
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30, At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: NCA221010 Owner - Facility: A J Smith & Sons Inc Facility Number : 210010
Inspection Date: 07110/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? ❑ E ❑ ❑
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss reviewrnspection with on -site representative? ❑ m ❑ ❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Page: 6

0 Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 210010 Facility Status: Active Permit: ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Chowan Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 08/01/2006 Entry Time: 11:Q,5 AM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: A.J. Smith & Sons Inc Owner Email:
Owner: Fred R Smith Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 601 Greenhall Rd Edenton NC 27932
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 36°07'10"
Longitude: 76°37'55"
4 mile north of Edenton, 2 miles north of Hancock Station on SR 1316.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Fred R Smith
Secondary OIC(s):
Operator Certification Number: 17748
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On -site representative Fred & daughters Smith Phone:
24 hour contact name Fred Smith Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste analyses:
7-26-06 = 1.9
3-30-06 = 1.9
10-27-05 = .76
Everything looks Great!
Page: 1

Permit: NCA221010 Owner - Facility: Fred R Smith
Inspection Date: 08/01/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 210010
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regutated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Q Swine - Feeder to Finish 6,216 2,700
Total Design Capacity: 6,216
Total SSLW: 839,160
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
I. noon 1 27.00
Page: 2

Permit: NCA221010 Owner - Facility: Fred R Smith Facility Number: 210010
Inspection Date: 08/01/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
DischargeS &Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage $ Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
n
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
Cl
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
n
■
❑
❑
dry stacks andlor wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or ,
n
A
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11, Is there evidence of incorrect application?
n
v
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? n
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? fl
Page: 3

Permit: NCA221010 Owner - Facility: Fred R Smith
Facility Number. 210010
Inspection Date: 08/0112006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No
NA NE
PAN?
n
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
n
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
OL1tSide of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
n
Crop Type 1
Cotton
Crop Type 2
Soybeans
Crop Type 3
Herb (Basil, Sage, etc.)
Crop Type 4
Milo
Crop Type 5
Small Grain Cover
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
SoJ Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? n ■
❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
18, Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
n
❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
n ■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: NCA221010 Owner - Facility: Fred R Smith Facility Number : 210010
Inspection Date: 08/01/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Other? ❑
21. Does recnrd keeping need improvement? n ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
n
Woekly Freeboard?
[i
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after n 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
n
A^Inual soil analysis?
rl
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22, Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
®❑
❑
23, If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
©❑
❑
24 Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fad to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■
❑ ❑
Othor Issues
Yes
No
NA NE
28. Vdere any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
n
❑ Cl
29. rid the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those
❑
■
❑ ❑
mor,-ility rates that exceed normal rates?
30. P.t the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air
❑
■
❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: NCA221010 Owner - Facility: Fred R Smith
Facility Number : 210010
Inspection Date: 08/01/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number : 210010 Facility Status: Active Permit: NCA221010 Denied Access
Inspection Type: Coingliance In2pection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 05/24/2005 Entry Time: 12_, 50 PM_ _ Exit Time: I Incident #:
Farm Name: A.J. Smith & Sons Inc
Owner Email:
Owner: Fred R Smith
Phone: 2§2-482-8977
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ■ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude:
36'07'10" Longitude: 76°37'55"
4 mile north of Edenton, 2 mites north of Hancock Station on SR 1316.
Question Areas:
0 Discharges & Stream Impacts Q Waste Collection & Treatment
Waste Application
0 Records and Documents Other issues
Certified Operator: Fred R Smith
Operator Certification Number: 17748
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Re pressntative(s): Name
Title Phone
On -site representative Fred & daughters Smith
Phone:
24 hour contact name Fred Smith
Phone: [phone]
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer
Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Phone.,
Phone:
Inspection Summary:
Soil test was dated 4-22-2005.
The rainfall & lagoon levels were recorded weekly.
Waste analysis:
3-2-05 = 1.5 7-7-04 = 1.4 3-17-04 = 1.6
The irrigation records are complete and balanced out.
Everything looks great!
Page: 1

Permit: NCA221010 Owner - Facility: Fred R Smith Facility Number: 210010
Inspection Date: 05/24/2005 inspection Type: Compiiance Inspection Reason far Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
0 Swine - Feeder to Finish 6,216 2,700
Total Design Capacity: 6,216
Total SSLW: 839,160
Waste Structures
We Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboar
agoon 1 24.0C
Page: 2

Permit: NCA221010 Owner - Facility: Fred R Smith
Facility Number: 210010
Inspection Date: 05/24/2005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Imparts Yes No NA NF
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ E ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑
Yes
❑ ❑
No NA NE
i1S a5JU Collpctior_ Storage & Treatment
4, Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large trees, severe erosion,
❑
❑ ❑
seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
❑
❑ ❑
closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks
❑
❑ ❑
and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑ ❑
improvement?
Yes
No NA NE
Waste_Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or improvement?
❑
❑ ❑
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Herb (Basil, Sage, etc.)
Crop Type 2
Milo
Crop Type 3
Small Grain (Wheat,
Barley, Oats)
Crop Type 4
Com (Grain)
Crop Type 5
Page: 3

Permit: NCA221010 Owner • Facility: Fred R Smith
Inspection Date: 05/24/2005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 210010
Reason for Visit: Routine
Wa5ti;k Anblicatinn
Crop Type 6
Yes
No NA NE
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan(CAWMP)? ❑
❑ ❑
15. Does the receiving crop andlor land application site need improvement?
❑
❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
Yes
■ ❑ ❑
No NA NF
Records and Qncuments
19. Did the facility fall to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
N ❑ ❑
20, Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21, Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
No
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
E ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
E ❑
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
E ❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑
❑
Page: 4

Permit: NCA221010 Owner - Facility: Fred R Smith
Facility Number: 210010
Inspection Date: 05/24/2005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other ISsLIPs Yes No NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those mortality ❑ ■ © ❑
rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air Quality
representative immediately.
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ ■ ❑ O
Page: 5

01
wArE9QG
� r
>_
To: Producer
From: Daphne B. Cullo954A,
Environmental Specialist
Washington Regional Office
Subject:. Animal Compliance Inspection
Year 2002
LV l9Z
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Ailing Director
Division of Water Quality
Enclosed please find a copy of the Compliance Site Inspection (as viewed in the DWQ database) conducted at the referenced facility
by the Division of Water Quality from the Washington Regional Office. Please read this inspection and keep it with all other
documents pertaining to your animal operation for future inspections.
In general, these inspections included verifying that. (1) the farm has a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP); (2) the
farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC 2110217, Senate Bill 1217, and the Certified Animal Waste
Management Platt; (3) the farm operation's waste management system is being operated properly under the direction of a Certified
Operator, (4) the required records are being kept; and (5) there are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or runoff
As a reminder, please note the following comments, which are conditions of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan and the
General Permit; therefore, these items must be implemented:
(p The maximum waste level in lagoons/storage ponds shall not exceed that specified in the CAWMP. At a minimum, maximum waste
level far waste for lagoons/storage ponds must not exceed the level that provides adequate storage to contain 25 year, 24 hour storm
event plus an additional foot of structural freeboard.
(p An analysis of the liquid animal waste from the lagoon shall be conducted as close to the time of application as practical and at least
within 60 days (before or after) of the date of application. This analysis shall include the following parameters: Nitrogen,
Phosphorus, Zinc and Copper.
q) Soil analysis is required annually. Lime is to be applied to each receiving crop as recommended by the soil analysis.
cp The following records are required: off -site solids removal, maintenance, repair, waste/soil analysis and land irrigation records.
These records should be maintained by the facility owner/manager in chronological and legible form for a minimum of three years.
(p Land application rates shall be in accordance with the CAWMP. In no case shall land application rates exceed the Plant Available
Nitro en_WAM rate for the receiving crop or result in runoff during any given application.
cp All grassed waterways shall have a stable outlet with adequate capacity to prevent ponding or flooding damages. The outlet can be
another vegetated channel, an earth ditch, stabilization structure, or other suitable outlets.
cp It is suggested, not a requirement, to keep crop yield information for future use to update your waste management plan. You will
need three years of crop yield data before your plan can be updated.
For your information, any swine facility that has a discharge to surface waters of the State will have to apply for a National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit with the Division of Water Quality, off6five January I, 2001.
Thank you for your assistance and cooperation during the inspection. If you have any questions, please contact me at 252-946-6481, ext.
321 or your Technical Specialist.
Cc: �RO
DBC Files
943 Washington Square Mall Washington, NC 27889 252-946-Wl (Telephone) 252-946-9215 (Fax)

Facility Number Date of Visit: 8/8/2002 Time: 4:00 pm
p Toperational oBelowThreshold
■ Permitted N Certified p Conditionally Certified p Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:
Farm Name: A.J. Smith & Sons Inc County: Charyaxt............................................. j?VARQ.......
Owner Name: Fred Smith Phone No: 252-482-8977
Mailing Address: 60I.Grmnhall.- d............................................................................... Edenton ... NG.......................................................... 27932 ..............
FacilityContact: ...............................................................................Title:............................................................... Phone No:
Onsite Representative: Fred.Sm tb....................................................."".......................... Integrator: Rro..w.a!s.•gf.i`:airalina,.Inc..................................
Certified Operator:F.reid.R................................... Smith................................................. Operator Certification Number: 1.7.748.............................
Location of Farm:
® Swine p Poultry p, Cattle p Horse Latitude ®• ©4 ®66 Longitude ®a ©4 ©{6
r Current`'
Dessgn Current 1'3 Design ' 'Current
Caesign
Swi ne �„ pacity Population
hPo'ultry "�
Capacity ,Popilati' 't Cattle Capacity' Population
.
p can to Feeder
` `/ ja airy
® on -Da"
p er
Total Design Capacity . 6,276
',' a' Ttital�SSLW°. 887,160
d 4 Number of Lagoons
pSubsurface
rams resen p agoon rea l7 pray se rea
P • , !
i Holding Ponds 1 So1�d Wraps o
❑
�qu� as a anagemen ys em ,1
® Feeder to m�s
p arrow to can
p arrow to ee er
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑Gilts
❑ Boars
p
Layer
❑
Non -Layer
Discharges &Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑Yes ®No
Discharge originated at: p Lagoon [3 Spray Field (3 Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑Yes p No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? {If yes, notify DWQ} [3 Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flaw in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑Yes p No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes ®No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? (3 Yes ®No
Waste Collection &Treatment
—'" 4. i§ storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage)"]ess"than adequate7— p"Spillway'�'---��"''�`'------'"--------- p Yes ®No"` �-
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure S Structure b
Identifier:...............................................................................................................................................................................................
....................
Freeboard(inches)................a4...................................................................................................................................................................................................

acl i Number: 21_lo Date of Inspection
® rt
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, Yes g No
.seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? p Yes ®No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? p Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? p Yes g No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? p Yes g No
Waste Allplication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? p Yes g No
11. Is there evidence of over application? p Excessive Ponding p PAN p Hydraulic Overload 0 Yes g No
12. Crop type Sage, Milo, Soybeans Small Grain Overseed Cotton
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? p Yes g No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? p Yes p No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? p Yes p No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? p Yes p No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? p Yes B No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Cehificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
p Yes g No
p Yes ® No
p Yes ® No
g Yes ❑ No
Cl Yes g No
Cl Yes IS No
p Yes g No
p Yes g No
p Yes g No
p Yes g No
p o violations or deflcjencies were noted uring this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about is vise .
'Goiia "enis' refer�:t pit tid r fateq' anions ar.` as 'atlirl`cominentsa"=q ''i":' ` 1 °jR;s',
9lse drawiuglof*facltya'better explatn atio situnsue+add�irona ages aR gcessar)Yx '�
p Field Copy p Final Notes
Revision Mor crops P- 7 22 ; sheet added to WUP dated8 3 9.
A,
Waste analysis and soil analysis - check internet for last submittal of samples. See previous DWQ inspection.
Complete irrigation records with new waste analysis results.
o soil analysis for 2001; last waste analysis 6/26/00.
10-10-02 - Soil Analysis for 2001 and last Waste analysis for 8-12-02 submitted to, WaRO on August 28, 2002.
*Reminder: Collect soil samples for 2002 and place results in your CAWMP; Reorganize CAWMP records prior to
�I
nil P
4 �, rG a 7r�r h,
Reviewer/Inspector Name Daphae,B 1Cullom +, j, ; en#ered�,by Anne Tyndall; i� , y fN , + a � rvi_ ,
4„ • ,a',k
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: _ t 0 _ o Z

y. i �: � : a a.-�; � •,��.� s-M t�i''L _ �t�] y � �sP to % i... +i. , Ji }�'�a � ��+ t
.l � ' p y ' -. O •�- 'AA�� - ' �� �"f 1• I :1 t•. Y . -i 4Y i / '�' �p�,, ��yj a �•' �� rf�/�"' c � 1 w'..-.. ,.l�.Le.+.�.....3.wa^� d� � he[� � a \- -.>ye c,�y:�x_ �� i �;.,� �sxte iea,�av n,
�� ]L"��'�.M_,� .n.�-_�x�...i'd•�"'�.t _�_, s >: �.., �� 14 -� .. . _'k_ _ ,sg�'�.""_-,-7�%'i.•- ".T'"`i`__..'."�,.. _._ �3:_w ��t- k _ L �..a-� 4 Y, •;"T+j�lc .�..;,,1�. �,,�vwFi..
(Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review Q Lagoon Evaluation I
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Fallow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 21 IO Date of Visit: 12I19/2DD0 Time: Io:35 Printed on: 12/=000
Q Not O erational Q Below Threshold
® Permitted 0 Certified E3 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ..................
FarmName: ............................................................................... County: Cjjg.WArL ............................................ !'!'.! RO.......
OwnerName: Fred ......................................... Smith ........................................................... Phone No: 25.2-.452.B9.7.7............................................................
FacilityContact: ..............................................................................Title:........................................................I....... Phone No:...................................................
MailingAddress: 6OX..GrCC h8jj..,Rd..........................••-..................---.................---........ Edel t.w..NC......................................................... Z7932 ..............
Onsite Representative: Fx:ej..S.fill.ilh................................................................................... Integrator: CArx.l11'&.).9.0.dN..Q.EY..A,.txtc..............................
Certified Operator:Fr.td................... S.Miitft................ ,,,,,........................... Operator Certification Number:J.7.7.4$ .............................
Location of Farm:
mile north of Edenton, 2 miles north of Hancock Station on SR 1316. +
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 36 ! �� 10 µ Longitude 76 • 37 S5 s�
Design Current
Design' Current, -
�
Design'' Current.
Swine CHDII&V Population
Poultry
Capacity Population Cattle
Capacity, Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
10 Layer
❑ Dairy
IN
® Feeder to Finish
6216
2700
10 Non -Layer
Non -Dairy
60
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
6,276
❑ Gilts
.
Total SSLW
887,160
❑ Boars
Number o("goons- . 1 ^ ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds /Solid Traps �° Y ❑ No Liquid Waste Management SystemA
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 0 No
Discharge ori-inated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes 0 No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes 0 No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ® No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 0 No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure S Structure 6
Identifier: .........................................
Freeboard (inches). 37

5/00 Continued on back
Facility Number: 21-10 Date of Inspection I 12/19/2000 Printed on: 12/22/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ HydrauIic Overload ❑ Yes ®No
12. Crop type Sage, Milo Corn, Peanuts Onion Wheat
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ® Yes ❑ No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
I5. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
Q i�Ta yiolatioas'or deficiencies•wete:noted'd'elring•this visit.:Yd.u: Wi11:r0eiv0 na further : •
comes ondence aboirt this -visit. .. - ... .. .. ..
Records available for review.
Grounds are well kept.
Waste analysis. 6/26/00 = 1.2 Ibs; 2/9/00 = 0.96 Ibs
Soil analysis up through 2000 available.
Irrigation records are complete and balanced out.
Waste plan needs to be revised to reflect the correct crops. Onions are not grown (13.)
Freeboard levels are recorded weekly.
Rainfall is recorded and has been for the past 5 years. SEE PAGE 3
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
IReviewer/Inspector Name sLyn Hardison _ Entered by Ann,Tyndall 77 L
n............�rt�........a..� C:......a..�... �_ � �1.:+ �+4l.LJ�.� .�it"r•�` l.J:� ►w_J� tl..a,..

LReliewerllnspector Signature: Date: $/QQ 1
Facility Number: 21-10 Date of Inspection 12/19/2000 Printed on: 12/22/2000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Overall, the farm is well managed.
If you have any questions, contact me at 252-946-6481, extension 318.
J
Sinn

• Division of Water Quality
17 O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 21 11
Permitted ® Certified 0 Conditionally Certified E3 Registered Date of Visit 1 1/31/2000
i♦ Not Operational Q Below Threshold Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: l,l, /9.6..........
Farm Name: t'iigs..P10.10jr.M......................................................... County: Cha.:aa............................................. .W.I&PQ........
Owner Name:LgMjs..% ............................... NANAM....................... ................................... Phone No: Z51-22I.R578 ..........................................................
Facility Contact: ...............................................................................Title:............................. Phone No:
......................................................................................
Mailing Address: Kt..l... .fax..291................................... ... Eftatm.M .....................
2,7932 ..............
OnsiteRepresentative: ........................................................................................................... Integrator:......................................................................................
Location of Farm:
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse
Design Current
Swine C'anneity Ponnintion
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
® Farrow to Feeder
625
0
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer 1 ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 625
Total SSLW 326,250
Number of Lagoons 0 Holding Ponds / Solid Traps
Discharges & Stream Im acts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ®No
Waste Collection & Treatment
Please see attached Lagoon Field Data Sheets
Reviewer/Inspector Name ,Carl Dunn Entered by Ann Tyndall
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
Printed on: 4/12/2000

Facility Number 21 — 11 Lagoon Number .1........... Lagoon Identifier 1nua ted..C-shaped....................
0 Active p Inactive
Waste Last Added 1.1/.11.9.6.......................................
Determined by: ® Owner ❑ Estimated
Latitude ® ®
Longitude ®®
By GPS or Map? IN [].Map
GPS file number:
Surface Area (acres): 72 .........
Embankment Height (feet): A.5............................
Distance to Stream: 0 <250 feet 0 250 feet- 1000 feet p >1000 feet
By measurement or Map? []Field Measurement M Map
Down gradient well within 250 feet? 0 Yes * No
Intervening Stream? *Yes pNo
Distance to WS or HQW (miles): 0 < 5 0 5 - 10 * > 10
Overtopping from Outside Waters? 0 Yes *No 0 Unknown
inspection date 1131 /2000
appearance of 0 Sludge Near Surface
lagoon liquid *Lagoon Liquid Dark, Discolored
0 Lagoon Liquid Clear
0 Lagoon Empty Freeboard (inches). 60
embankment condition 0 poorly Built, Large Trees, Erosion, Burrows, Slumping, Seepage, Tile Drains, Etc.
* Construction Specification Unknown But Dam Appears in Good Condition
0 Constructed and Maintained to Current NRCS Standards
outside drainage 0 Poorly Maintained Diversions or Large Drainage Area not Addressed in Design
0 Has Drainage Area Which is Addressed in Lagoon Design
* No Drainage Area or Diversions Well Maintained
liner status O High Potential for Leaking, No Liner, Sandy Soil, Rock Outcrops Present, Etc.
* No Liner, Soil Appears to Have Low Permeability
0 Meets NRCS Liner Requirements
cation equipment fail to make contact
and/or Sprayfield 0 Yes pNo 0 Unknown with representative O Yes pNo
unavailable
comments

.J
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary,
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Fred Smith
601 Greenhall Rd
Edenton NC 27932
Dear Fred Smith,
I T1 06TLWA •
A2
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
June 3,1999
Subject:Compliance Inspection
A.J. Smith & Sons Inc
Facility Number 21 - 10
Chowan County
On 5/27/99, Carl Dunn from the Washington Regional Office of the Division of Water Quality
conducted an inspection of your animal operation. Please review the enclosed inspection form. This
inspection form should be maintained as part of the records for your facility. Please note any items that may
be marked with a yes answer and make every effort to correct these deficiencies. You are advised that you
must maintain a freeboard of at least one foot in your lagoon(s) plus a storage volume sufficient to
accommodate the rainfall and subsequent runoff from a 25 year 24 hour storm event to remain in
compliance. You should consult your lagoon design for the exact freeboard requirement. Please remember
that you must follow your waste management plan at all times.
Thank you for your cooperation in this inspection. If you have any further questions in regard to this matter
or if I may be of any assistance, I can be contacted at [phone] ext. 208.
Sincerely,
Carl Dunn
Environmental Engineer
cc: W aRO
Carroll's Foods Of Va Inc
943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, NC 27889 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]

Revised April 20, 1999
JUSTIFICATION & DOCUMENTATION FOR MANDATORY WA DETERMINATION
Facility Number 2 - Operation is flagged for a wettable
Farm Name: A S S,­'J k s acre determination due to failure of
On -Site Representative: -4 SS., 1'4� Part 11 eligibility item(s) F1 F2 F3 F4
Inspector/Reviewer's Name: C111 0%A^/1
Date of site visit: 5-2'1- 079
Date of most recent WUP:
Annual farm PAN deficit:
pounds
Operation not required to secure WA
determination at this ti based on
exemption E1 E2 E3 E4
Operation pended for wettable acre
determination based on P9 P2 P3
.r •-
Irrigation System(s) - circle #: t. hard -hose traveler; 2. center -pivot system; 3. linear -move system;
'4. stationary sprinkler system w/permanent pipe; 5. -stationary sprinkler system wlportable pipe;
6. stationary gun system w/permanent pipe; 7. stationary gun system w/portabiepipe
PART 1. WA Determination Exemptions (Eligibility failure, Part 11, overrides Part I exemption.)
El Adequate irrigation design, including map depicting wettable acres, is complete
and signed by an I or PE.
E2 Adequate.D, and D�D,, irrigation operating parameter sheets, including map
depicting wettable acres, is complete and signed by an I or PE.
E3 Adequate D, irrigation operating parameter sheet, including map depicting
wettable acres, is complete and signed by a WUP.
E4 75% rule exemption as verified in Part III. (NOTE: 75 % exemption cannot be
applied to farms that fail the eligibility checklist in Part Il. Complete eligibility
checklist, Part,]I - F1'F273, before completing -computational -table in Part.111).
PART 11. 75% Rule.Eligibility,Checklist and:Documentation of WA Determination
Requirements. WA Determination required_becausemperation_fails -one .ofthe eligibility
requirements listed. -below.
_ F1 Lack.ofacreage-which-rexulted:in:over�pplication-of�vastewater.._(PAN) on -spray -"-
field
(s):accordingto:farm`sdast-two_years_ofdrrigadon-Tecords -n,.:
- F2 Unclear,-illegible;-or.:#ack-bf-.information/map. _ .
�F3 -... Obviousfelddimiiatibr sIn_i6merou'6'- ches �ailurefo_de'ductxe6bired _�-. ,'
bufferlsetback:acreage,wor_25�'cFbftbtal:acreage dentffjddin�P CAWM::includes
small,-irregbierlyzhapedfbid s Rfieldsless1'ha`_5=acres#orAravele.rs:or:lessfhan
2 acres-for-�§tationar"pririklers)
F4 WA determination required because CAWMP credits field(s)'s`acreagein excess
of 75% of the respective field's total acreage as noted in table in Part I11.

Revised April 20, 1999
Facility Number -
cart i11. l-ima oy rlela umermination
oT
1 ow CXempxion Kum Tor vYA uetermination
TRACT
NUMBER
FIELD
NUMBEW-2
TYPE of
IRRIGATION
SYSTEM
TOTAL
ACRES
CAWMP
ACRES
FIELD
%
COMMENTS3
I
FIELD NUMBER'
- hvdrant.-oull. zone. or Doint numbers may be used in Dlace of field numbers denendina on CAWMP
and type of irrigation, system: If pulls; etc: cross -more than one field, -inspector/reviewer will have to combine fields to
calculate 75% field by field determination for exemption; -otherwise operation will be subject to WA determination.
FIEI_D.NUMBERF-.:= must beclearly delineated -on map: .
COMMENTS'.-' back-up.fields with CAWMP_acFeage.exceeding.75°% of its total -acres and, having received less1han 50%
of its-annual.PAIV as. documented in thefarm's-previous two years'..(1997 &1998) of irrigabonTecords, cannot -serve asfhe _
sole basis forxequirin g-a WA Determination._E3ack-up.fields-must:be noted in -the -comment-section and must be -accessible _ ..
by irrigation:system ::
Part IV:'Pending=WADeterminations-�-
P'i '. ' Plan-lacksfollowing-information_ .....
P2�-'Plan-revision -maysatisfy`75%,rulebased=on-adequate:overa11 PAN deficit-andd-by
adjusting-allfield:ac reage�o:below;75%useTate
P3 ' Other (ieAn process -of .instaliing:-new irrigation system):

Y r
13 Division of Soil and?Water.Operation
Division of Soil and-Water�Conservadon'- Cpl'Review
+ hon'- Compliance Inspection y i
.:KDlvision of Water Qualitym Compliance Inspection ? a
s ` :Other Agency
..-Dpearation:Revrew,
® Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up of DWQ inspection 0 Follow -tie of DSWC review 0 Other
Facility Number Date of Inspection - '91
Time of Inspection 4: 3p 24 hr. (hh:mm)
© Permitted Q Certified Q Conditionally Certified 0 Registered JE3 Not Operational I Date Last Operated .
AJ S ��n �...SO^S Count Ck,w.a.,
r
FarmName: ......................................."......................... y:............... ....
Owner Name:..........,....... ....F�.e....................... S'^'�.'........... Phone No:
....................................................................................... ............. .........................................
FacilityContact: .......................................... Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
MailingAddress:.......................................................................................................................................................... ..........................
Onsite Representative:...... r....... N Inte};rator:............`.„",.1 J....................................................
............ ........................................................................... S
Certified Operator: r " $"'. ........ ..................... Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm:
........................ ... .. .. ................ .........................T i
Latitude Longitude
Design Current
Swine Canacity Ponnlatinn
❑ Wean to Feeder
ElFeeder to Finish
2
p
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts,
❑ Boars
., , . , Design Current,, Design Current
Poultry :..:.,; . ,Capacity . Population Cattle Capacity Po
pulation
ulation
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ICENon-Dairy 1 60
❑ Other
, Total Design. Capacity
Total SSLW
�Number. of Lagoons ID Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area 10 Spray Field Area
Holding,Ponds/'Solid Traps '0 ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
L .. .. ..... . .....
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made'?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min'?
d. Discs discharge bypass a lagoon system'? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier;
Freeboard(inches): .......... .0........................................................................................................................... .............................
❑ Yes I�No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes )gNo
❑ Yes 9No
❑ Yes �9 No
Structure 6
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99
❑ Yes 5TNo
Continued on back

Facility Number- 7. 1 - p Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan'?
❑ Yes
N No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
❑ Yes
53 No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
1?S No
11, Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
❑ Yes
�No
12. Crop type Sti e_ 42_An�4s
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
CKNo
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
VNo
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
M No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
NNo
Reauired Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
[—]Yes
1XNo
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
Yes
9No
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
J,No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
ZNo
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
� No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
Yes
N No
(ic/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
ZNo
24,
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
25 No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
ZNo
Rio yiolatiQns'ai cic'cienc ps •Were hofeO• 00ift this'visitf - 'Y;oit ' ill 4, e$iye Rio futftt
corresponcieRce. about this .visit.
Comments,(refer,;to questions#): E_ xplaimanviYES,a//nswers and/or any recommendations or. any'othercomments`
facility.explain . ( d < ag6s�as necessary)
Use drawings of faciht to better situations. use additional p
`� I
H4 4a5 't�VIf yQar io m,fIvvl �Ai Rol^r c6o5 n� i^e �+�C pn � 5 . 1,l� AL
,74�, Y,,.s h,,- w% wi l ogek 4o kv. ye., 5 )-3 L17n..yr� �tciwK wo
4 on y!r �•in' t�� •n g
Reviewer/Inspector Name
s
Reviewer/Inspector Signature. Date.
3/23/99

Facility Number:Date of inspection % 9
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below WYes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of ;properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes VNO
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑Yes No
roads, roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes [{'No
30.- Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes VNo
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes IF No
32. Do the Hush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes �(No
Additional om n ents and/or Dtawings:
AI
3/23/99

Routine
Follow-up of
Facility Number I !C7 i
F
© Registered WCertif ed © Applied fo'r Permit 13 Permitted
S.
Farm Name: ...................... y^:....
........ . �.............".5......................
OwnerName:......................f.'t Al............ 1 ...`...................................................
[low -up of DSWC review O Other
Date of Inspection Fti, 2a-�tp
Time of Inspection 14 4 24 hr. (hh:mm)
113 Not Operational I Date Last Operated:
• County:........... Gam ^........................
......... Phone No:
Facility Contact:............................................................. ... Title Phone No
Mailing Address:
Onsite Representative:................� r`..........c.'"`.a��'................................................... Integrator:.....................................................................
Certified Operator; ................... rr`�, ti' ......................... Operator Certification Number;,................. ........................
Location of Farm:
Latitude 0 6 « Longitude • 4 64
4Design Current
Design
Currentx=
Design Cu�nrent y
Swine Capacity Poptilati+�n
n . t.
;,Poultry "Capacity
Population, Cattle >Capactty`1'bpulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Layer
Dairy
❑ Dai
'
Feeder to Finish
tat 16
Z O
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Nan -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
a
❑ Other
;
r
❑ Farrow to Feeder
�A
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total }eSigll'CdaClty.`,
❑ Gilts
"SSLW
❑Boars
,Total
Number of.Laggons / Holding Ponds � ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area
❑ Spray Field Area
[] No Lirluid Waste Management System
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes 19 No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 19 No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If dischargc is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 19 No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes 0 No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes No
maintenance/improvement?
b. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes 0 No
7/25/97 Continued on back

Facility Number:
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes 19 No
Structures (Lagoons,Holding Ponds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes *N No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
...................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard(ft): ................. 3 3..............................................................................................................................................................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes 19 No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenancelimprovement? ❑ Yes No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers? ❑ Yes N3 No
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application? ❑ Yes 04 No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type ...............! .}`:tp......... I;f, ......o.!,`.v, s................................................................................_........_.................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)? ❑ Yes OR No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
(3; No.vioIatioits.ot' deficieRcie's:rvere.noted-during this:visit:, You:w'ill; receive.no.ftirth:er,::
:. corrOO&idepce A out•this:visit:•: .. :
ZZ. NuA - +,, keep w1-v_c k+Y f,V- �OA'4 feed rj50
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes Q No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
KYes ❑ No
❑ Yes 51 No
❑ Yes 14 No
❑ Yes ❑ No
7/25/97
Reviewer/Inspector Name
TO .k s'a
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:_ ^�.., Date: ��• Zr�—G/j�

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
June 3,1999
Fred Smith
601 Greenhall Rd
Edenton NC 27932
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject:Compliance Inspection
A.J. Smith & Sons Inc
Facility Number 21 - 10
Chowan County
Dear Fred Smith,
On 5/27/99, Carl Dunn from the Washington Regional Office of the Division of Water Quality
conducted an inspection of your animal operation. Please review the enclosed inspection form. This
inspection form should be maintained as part of the records for your facility. Please note any items that
may be marked with a yes answer and make every effort to correct these deficiencies. You are advised
that you must maintain a freeboard of at least one foot in your lagoon(s) plus a storage voliiine sufficient
to accommodate the rainfall and subsequent runoff from a 25 year 24 hour storm event to remain in
compliance. You should consult your lagoon design for the exact freeboard requirement. Please
remember that you must follow your waste management plan at all times.
Thank you for your cooperation in this inspection. If you have any further questions in regard to this
matter or if I may be of any assistance, I can be contacted at [phone] ext. 208.
Sincerely,
Carl Dunn
Environmental Engineer
cc: Wgko
Carroll's Foods Of Va Inc
943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, NC 27889 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

j Site Requires Immediate Attention:
Facility No. �Z[ -�
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT,
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATIONS SITE VISITATION RECORD
DATE: , 1995
Time: l ; o
Farm Name/Owner:
Mailing Address:
County:
33
L V7'r
/- O
Integrator. 4rr6 Il.s rac�5 0*::. ]�,r-5, n ; � Tom - Peuf� hone: � — 83?- 0�96 �
On Site Representative: Phone:) Q/S2 5 f'Z- ,3.5.3�
r
Physical Address/Location: S2 1314, 2 ff"'gC /, 9 „nt . ne�-1
West- 5'�As. 0( )3Je. bE4 �� meAV -Pcn•.-- 6tli d n
Type of Operation: Swine ✓ Poultry Cattle 16.
Design Capacity: _ 1'a 62 5-6 Number of Animals on Site: �2 70d
DEM Certification Number: ACE DEM Certification Number: ACNEW
Latitude:
Longitude:
Circle Yes or No
Elevation: Feet
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficient freeboard of 1 Foot + 25 year 24 hour storm event
(approximately 1 Foot + 7 inches)(S;76r No Actual Freeboard: S Ft. Inches
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes 005~Was any erosion observed? Yes or0r
lop I
Is adequate Iand available for spray?�or No Is the cover crop adequate? Y r No
Crop(s) being utilized: 000 a res . Cbr t.r gvh.2t c o ort S � .r
Does the facility meet SCS minimum setback criteria? 200 Feet from
IM
100 Feet from Wells? �Y r No
Is the animal waste stockpiled within 100 Feet of USGS Blue Line Stream? Yes oro
Is animal waste land applied or spray irrigated within 25 Feet of a USGS Map Blue Line? Yes o�
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other
similar man-made devices? Yes or 0 If Yes, Please Explain.
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure, land applied,
spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes org
Additional Comments:
Inspector Name
Signature
cc: Facility Assessment Unit Use Attachments if Needed.