210008_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NORTH CAROLINA .�
Department of Environmental W6

IN
j�'1i@".°fe::Y_iTn&[b.H 'P'a.S:w,¢.rf^OPL%wo ION,
%mrP.`
INZPP ..Ul N
,"'TyFu.

• , }., Division of Water Quality r
O Division of Soil and Water'Conservation
QOther.Ageney, `:.. '.e, -M , -4W. • -' :a
of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review •O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
EFacitity Number 21 8
0 Permitted 0 Certified 0 Conditionally Certified (] Registered Dote of Visit t131/2[i00
Q Not Operational Q Below Threshold Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: 1/11.95............
Farm Name: W.Milli8M.-Eazf.1!I;m ............................... ... County: ChaW'.an..............................................WA►RO.......
Owner Name: J3!Miann.................... NitWAL.......................................................... Phone No: 221. 43.48...........
FacilityContact: ...............................................................................Title:............................................................... Phone No:....................................................
Mailing Address: 3D3k.Rovk1:.l1AclCYBd ..........................• .... Edemtiall..KC.......................................................... Z72,32 .............
OnsiteRepresentative: ...................................... .................................................................... Integrator:......................................................................................
Location of Farm:
Fran Ed,�atnn NC.kakcQ.32.�Yntth.ga.abnut.�.mil�a.xa E��k az.Ra+:l;y Nask.Raad 1222..get.abau�t.iontl�a.Hsrg.ka�an.��n a�i�t..............
acrnss.�finoim. E. Niaon.l3'iel+liug auuuti Nsrdxrare--.............
.........................................•.............................................................................................................
...........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean 1000 0
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer I I F-1
Dairy
❑ Non -Layer Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 1,000
Total SSLW 433,000
Number of Lagoons 3 Holding Ponds / Solid Traps
Discharges & Streams Impacts
l . Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes ®No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. IPdischarge is observed. was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. li'discharge is observed: did it reach Water of the Statc? (if yes, notity DWQ) [] Yes ❑ No
c. li'discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gaUinin?
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
1 Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? Cl Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
Please see attached Lagoon Field Data Sheets
Reviewer/inspector Name Car! Dunn
Reviewerlinspector Signature: Date:
.. . A140~%nn

Facility Number 21 — 8 Lagoon Number 1............ Lagoon Identifier 1..................................................................
O Active O Inactive Latitude 36 12 0
Waste Last Added.7L11.............................. Longitude 76 42 29
Determined by: ❑ Owner ® Estimated
Surface Area (acres): Q.22.........................
Embankment Height (feet): 5................................
By GPS or Map? ❑ GPS ® Map
GPS file number:
Distance to Stream: O <250 feet Q 250 feet - 1000 feet O >1000 feet
By measurement or Map? ® Field Measurement ❑ Map
Down gradient well within 250 feet? O Yes Q No
Intervening Stream? O Yes Q No
Distance to WS or HOW (miles): O < 5 O 5 - 10 ®> 10
Overtopping from Outside Waters? O Yes O No O Unknown
inspection date 1 /31 /2000
appearance of 0 Sludge Near Surface
lagoon liquid O Lagoon Liquid Dark, Discolored
O Lagoon Liquid Clear
O Lagoon Empty Freeboard (inches): 48
embankment condition # Poorly Built, Large Trees, Erosion, Burrows, Slumping, Seepage, Tile Drains, Etc.
O Construction Specification Unknown But Dam Appears in Good Condition
O Constructed and Maintained to Current NRCS Standards
outside drainage O Poorly Maintained Diversions or Large Drainage Area not Addressed in Design
O Has Drainage Area Which is Addressed in Lagoon Design
0 No Drainage Area or Diversions Well Maintained
liner status p High Potential for Leaking, No Liner, Sandy Soil, Rock Outcrops Present, Etc.
O No Liner, Soil Appears to Have Low Permeability
O Meets NRCS Liner Requirements
cation equipment
and/or Sprayfield Q Yes
unavailable
comments
fail to make contact *Yes O No
O No O Unknown with representative

Facility' Number 21 --- 8 Lagoon Number 2........... Lagoon Identifier 2................................................
O Active Q Inactive
Waste Last Added.1L1195--------------------------------•--........
Determined by: ❑ Owner ® Estimated
Surface Area (acres): 0,1 ............................
Embankment Height (feet): 5..,
Latitude 36 12 0
Longitude 76 42 21
By GPS or Map? ®GPS ❑gap]
GPS file number:
Distance to Stream: O <250 feet Qo 250 feet - 1000 feet O >1000 feet
By measurement or Map? ® Field Measurement ❑ Map
Down gradient well within 250 feet? O Yes Qo No
Intervening Stream? O Yes Oo No
Distance to WS or HQW (miles): O < 5 Q 5 - 10 Qo > 10
Overtopping from Outside Waters? O Yes Qo No O Unknown
inspection date 1 /31 /2000
appearance of *Sludge Near Surface
lagoon liquid O Lagoon Liquid Dark, Discolored
O Lagoon Liquid Clear
O Lagoon Empty Freeboard (inches): 48
embankment condition O0 Poorly Built, Large Trees, Erosion, Burrows, Slumping, Seepage, Tile Drains, Etc.
O Construction Specification Unknown But Dam Appears in Good Condition
O Constructed and Maintained to Current NRCS Standards
outside drainage O Poorly Maintained Diversions or Large Drainage Area not Addressed in Design
O Has Drainage Area Which is Addressed in Lagoon Design
Oi No Drainage Area or Diversions Well Maintained
liner status 0 High Potential for Leaking, No Liner, Sandy Soil, Rock Outcrops Present, Etc.
O No Liner, Soil Appears to Have Low Permeability
O Meets NRCS Liner Requirements
cation equipment fail to make contact and/or Sprayfield Q Yes Yes O No O Unknown with representative O No
unavailable
comments

Facility Number 21 -- 8
Lagoon Number 3........... Lagoon Identifier 3......................................................
o Active 0 Inactive
Waste Last Added.:11.1L.95...........................................
Determined by: ❑ Owner ® Estimated
Surface Area (acres):
Embankment Height (feet):
Distance to Stream:
By measurement or Map?
Down gradient well within 250 feet?
Intervening Stream?
Distance to WS or HOW (miles):
Overtopping from Outside Waters?
Latitude 36 12 2a
Longitude 76 42 21
By GPS or Map? JZ GPS ❑ Map
GPS file number:
A,.1.5........................
2................................
0 <250 feet 0 250 feet - 1000 feet 0 > 1000 feet
® Field Measurement ❑ Map
O Yes 0 No
0 Yes 0 No
0<5 05-10 ©>10
O Yes 0 No O Unknown
inspection date 1 /31 /2000
appearance of 0 Sludge Near Surface
lagoon liquid 0 Lagoon Liquid Dark, Discolored
0 Lagoon Liquid Clear
0 Lagoon Empty Freeboard (inches): 42
embankment condition 0 poorly Built, Large Trees, Erosion, Burrows, Slumping, Seepage, Tile Drains, Etc.
O Construction Specification Unknown But Dam Appears in Good Condition
O Constructed and Maintained to Current NRCS Standards
outside drainage 0 Poorly Maintained Diversions or Large Drainage Area not Addressed in Design
O Has Drainage Area Which is Addressed in Lagoon Design
0 No Drainage Area or Diversions Well Maintained
liner status 0 High Potential for Leaking, No Liner, Sandy Soil, Rock Outcrops Present, Etc.
O No Liner, Soil Appears to Have Low Permeability
0 Meets NRCS Liner Requirements
cation equipment fail to make contact *Yes o No
and/or Sprayrield (0 Yes O No 0 Unknown with representative
unavailable
comments

Site Requires Immediate Attention:
Facility No. '
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
ANIMAL FEEDLOT OPERATI NS SITE VISITATION RECORD
Date: iJ 1995
Time:
Farm dress:
Mailingng Address:
County:
Integrator:
On Site Representative:
Physical Address/Location:
-51e 12 ZS Doi ?�i .5
Type of Opetat`ion: Swine _L,.e' Poultry Cattle
Design Capacity: 1006 No. of Anima s on Site:-�_
DEM Certification No.:ACE DEM Certification No.: ACNEW
Latitude: Longitude: Elevation: Ft
Circle Yes or No
Does the Animal Waste Lagoon have sufficieneeboard of 1 Ft + 25 year 24 hour
storm event? (approximately 1 Ft + 7 in) Ye� or No
Actual Freeboard: 3 Ft inches -�
Was any seepage observed from the lagoon(s)? Yes o No
Was any erosion observed? Yes o No
Is adequate land available for spray? Yeo or No
Is the cover crop adequate? Yes or No
Crop(s) being utilized:
Does the facility meet S nimum setback criteria?
200 Ft from Dwellings? Yeses r No 100 Ft from Wells? Yes or No
Is the prr4- al waste stockpiled within 100 Ft of USGS Blue Line Stream?
Yes or (No 7
Is animal waste d applied or spray irrigated within 25 Ft of a USGS Map Blue
Line? Yes or No
Is animal waste discharged into waters of the state
system, or other similar man-made devices? Yes o3
If Yes, please explain:
--made ditch, flushing
Does the facility maintain adequate waste management records (volumes of manure,
land applied, spray irrigated on specific acreage with cover crop)? Yes or No
GTE L i Cr. vd Sov� .J
Inspector Name 4igKature
cc: Facility Assessment Unit
Comments S Sketch on Back of Sheet

DEM
SITE VISITATION RECORD
Page Two
Comments: f aw re S 'ie- r O w�y Yt -Fi) . + OK r e ,s
X -�nr
Sketch:
�0
\ 5
s a .
� 5
LG
OM