210004_INSPECTIONS_20171231

NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environmental Quai

INSPECTIONS
INSPECTIONS
INSPECTIONS

Division of Water Resources
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
El
Other Agency
Facility Number: 210004 Facility Status: Active
Permit: AWS210004
[] Denied Access
Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County:
Chcwan Region:
Washington
Date of Visit: 06/2212017 Entry Time: 10.30 am Exit Time: 11:20 am Incident #
Farm Name: Stallings Family Farm
Owner Email
[e-mail]
Owner: Cheryl F Stallings
Phone:
919-602-8976
Mailing Address: 2009 Abbey Knoll Dr
Apex NC 27502
Physical Address: 18370
Belvidere NC 27919
Facility Status: Compliant Not Compliant Integrator
Murphy -Brawn l-l-C
Location of Farm: latitude:
36' 19' 34" Longitude:
76' 34' 15"
Located SR 1002 (County Line Rd.), approximately 1 mile north of intersection of NCSR
1301 and NCSR 1002, Farm path is
located on the left side when going north.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste col, stor, & Treat
Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Michael D Nixon
Operator Certification Number:
17741
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representativo(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact namo C,F & Cheryl Stallings
Phone
On -site representative Mike Nixon
Phone : [phone]
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer
Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis: soik tested: June 2017
1-5.17 = .37
6-21-17 = .18
IRR records are complete & balanced out.
Reviewed: rainfalllfreeboard; sludge extension until 2019
Need to harvest pasture if no animals are going to be onsile.
page: 1

Permit: AWS210004
Inspection Date: 06/22/17
Regulated Operations
Owner - Facility : Cheryl F Stallings Facility Number: 210004
Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Design Capacity
Current promotions
Swine
. Swine - Gilts 462 408
Total Design Capacity: 462
Total SSLW: 69.300
Waste Structures
Dlslgnated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon
PRIMARY
19.00
20 0
10
Lagoon
SECONDARY
19.00
28.00
page: 2

Permit: AW5210004 Owner - Facility : Cheryl F Stallings Facility Number: 210004
Inspection Date: 06/22/17 lnpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yos
No Na No
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other]
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
0 ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■ ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
0
M ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
■ ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No Na No
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large
❑
No
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6, Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
0 ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
[]
M ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
0 ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidenco of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Permit: AWS210004 Owner -Facility: Cheryl F Stallings Facility Number:
210004
Inspection Date: 06122/17 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Waste Application
Yes
No Na No
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Pasture)
Crop Type 2
Fescuo (Pasture)
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14, Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
■ ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
0 ❑
❑
determination?
17, Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
E ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
011
❑
Records and Documents
Yov
No Na No
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
0 ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below,
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
Cl
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
[]
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
[]
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

Permit; AWS210004 Owner - Facility : Cheryl F Stallings Facility Number: 210004
Inspection Date: 06122/17 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na No
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
[]
22, Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26, Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
N ❑
❑
27, Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
NO
❑
Other Issues
Yos
No Na No
28, Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
N ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately,
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
N ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field ❑
Lagoon 1 Storage Pond ❑
Other ❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or ❑ IN ❑ ❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ 0 0 ❑
page: 5

0
0
Division of Water Resources
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Other Agency
Facility Number: 210004 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS210004 Denied Access
In-sectlon Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive Or Closed Date-
Reason for visit: Routine County: Chowan
Date of Visit: 08/15/2016 Entry Time: 10:15 am Exit Time: 11:30 am
Farm Name: Stallings Family Farm
Owner: Cheryl F Stallings
Mailing Address: 2009 Abbey Knoll Dr Apex NC 27502
Physical Address: 18370 Belvidere NC 27919
Facility Status: E Compliant Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC
Region:
Incident #
Owner Email:
Phone,
Washington
[e-mail]
919-602-8976
Location of Farm: Latitude: 36' 19' 34" Longitude: 76° 34' 15"
Located SR 1002 (County Line Rd.), approximately 1 mile north of intersection of NCSR 1301 and NCSR 1002. Farm path is
located on the left side when going north.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified operator: Claxton F Stallings Operator Certification Number: 17749
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Cheryl F. Stallings Phone:
On -site representative C.F & Cheryl Stallings Phone
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis: soil tested: 5-2016
2-15-16 = 1.34
11-03-15 = 1.09
7-16-15 = 1.12
4-29-15 = 1.33
A waste analysis was due in May to cover events in May -June, will sample ASAP. IRRs were complete & balanced out.
Reviewed: calibration by Scott Alons; called Christine Lawson regarding sludge survey extension, she will e-mail letter to Cheryl;
stocking/mortality
page: 1

Permit: AWS210004 Owner - Facility ; Cheryl F Stallings Facility Number: 210004
Inspection Date: 06/15/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
Swine -Gilts 462 450
Total Design Capacity: 462
Total SSLW: 69,300
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Ciosed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
Lagoon
PRIMARY
19.00
33.00
Lagoon
SECONDARY
19,00
::::3:6:0:0:]
page: 2

Permit: AWS210004 Owner - Facility : Cheryl F Stallings Facility Number: 210004
Inspection Dale: 08/15/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: - Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
You
No Na No
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
[]
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
0 ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
3, Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
M ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection. Storage & Treatment
Yes
No Na No
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
M ❑
D
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large
❑
M ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
M ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
0 ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yea No Na Ne
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
[]
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN a 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Permit: AWS210004 Owner - Facility : Cheryl F Stallings Facility Number:
210004
Inspection Date: 08/15/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Waste Application
Yes
No Na Ne
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Pasture)
Crop Type 2
Fescue (Pasture)
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
M Cl
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
M ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na No
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■ ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWS210004 Owner -Facility: Cheryl F Stallings Facility Number 210004
Inspection Date: 08/15/16 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yee
No Na No
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
0
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fall to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
M ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
0 ❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
M ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge surrey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑
❑
Other Issues
YQe No Na No
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
0 ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
110110
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
■ ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field ❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond ❑
Other ❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or ❑ ❑ ❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ ❑ ❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
page: 5

a
0 Division of Water Resources
❑Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Other Agency
Facility Number:
210004 Facility Status:
Active permit: AVVS210004
Denied Access
Inppection Typo:
Compliance Inspection
Inactive Or Closed Dale:
Reason for visit:
Routine
County: Chowan Region:
Washington
Date of Visit: 06/29/2015 Entry Time
Farm Name: Stallings Family Farm
11:00 am
Exit Time: 12:30 pm
Incident #
Owner Email:
[e-mail]
Owner: Cheryl F Stallings
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 2009 Abbey Knoll Dr
Apex NC 27502
Physical Address: 18370
Belvidere NC 27919
Facility Status: Q Compliant ❑
Not Compliant Integrator:
Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm:
Latitude:
36' 19' 34" Longitude: 76' 34' 15"
t.ocated SR 1002 (County Line Rd.), approximately
1 mile north of intersection of NCSR
1301 and NCSR 1002. Farm path is
located on the left side when going north.
Question Areas:
Q Dischrge & Stream Impacts
® Waste Col, Stor, & Treat
® Waste Application
Q Records and Documents
0 Other Issues
Certified Operator: Claxton F Stallings Operator Certification Number: 17749
Secondary OIC(s):
on -Site Reprose ntative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Cheryl F. Stallings Phone
On -site representative C,F & Cheryl Stallings Phone
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector 5ignaturo: Dale:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis: soil tested: 2/12115
4-21.14 = 1,25
7-15-14 = 1.37
10-29-14 = 1.39
2-2-15 = 1,22
4-29-15 = 1.33
IRR records were complete & balanced out.
[Reviewed: rainfall & freeborad, Now WUP; Now COC; calibrtaion - due by Dec. 31, 2015; stocking/mortality-burial; Sludge survey
3-2014 @ 11 % with request for extension sent to Raleigh, but has not received any respones.
page: 1

Permit: AWS210004 Owner - Facility : Cheryl F Stallings Facility Number: 210004
Inspection Date: 06/29M5 Inpsection "type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
® Swine - Gilts 462 450
Total Design Capacity: 462
Total SSLW: 69.300
Waste Structures
Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Froeboard Freeboard
Lagoon
PRIMARY
19.00
28.00
Lagoon
SECONDARY
19.00
28.00
page: 2

Permit: AWS210004 Owner- Facility : Cheryl F Stallings Facility Number:
210004
Inspection Date: 06/29/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No Na No
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
El ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
[]
Other
[D
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
❑ ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
L] ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
Ej ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yos
No Na No
4, Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large
❑
0 ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
❑ ❑
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
0 ❑
❑
to roofed piss, dry slacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
El ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste AUplication
Yas No Na No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ 11 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
[]
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/14 lbs.?
Total Phosphorus?
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
page: 3

Permit: AWS210004 Owner - Facility : Cheryl F Stallings Facility Number: 210004
Inspection Date: 06/29/15 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No Na No
Crop Type 1 Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Pasture)
Crop Type 2 Fescuo (Pasture)
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
13❑
❑
Management Pian(CAWMi
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
®❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
El El
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
U ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
El ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No Na No
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
El ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have atl components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
1100
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
[]
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
❑ ❑ ❑
if yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
[]
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

Permit: AWS210004 Owner - Facility : Cheryl F Stallings Facility Number: 210004
Inspection Date: 06/29/15 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No No No
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
®❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
El ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
0 ❑
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
(]
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26, Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
D
El ❑
❑
OlhorIssues
Yes No No No
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
El ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29, Al the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
❑ ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface toe drains exist at the facility?
❑
0 ❑
❑
if yes, check the appropriate box below
Application Field
❑
Lagoon 1 Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
El ❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewerllnspectof fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
U ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
El ❑
❑
page: 5

N
Division of Water Resources
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
El Other Agency
Facility Number: 210004 Facility Status: Active
Inpsection Type: Compliance inspection
Permit: AWS210004
Inactive Or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Chowan Region:
Date of Visit: 07/14/2014 Entry Time: 10:15 am Exit Time: 11:45 am
Farm Name:
Stallings Family Farm
Owner:
Cheryl F Stallings
Mailing Address:
2009 Abbey Knoll Or
Physical Address:
18370
Apex NC 27502
Incident #
Owner Email:
Phone;
Belvidere NC 27919
❑ Denied Access
Washington
cfsphd®bellsouth.net
919-602.8976
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 36° 19' 34" Longitude: 76' 34' 15"
Located SR 1002 (County Line Rd.), approximately 1 mile north of intersection of NCSR 1301 and NCSR 1002. Farm path is
located on the left side when going north.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Cal, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Claxton F Stallings Operator Certification Number: 17749
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Cheryl F. Stallings Phone:
On -site representative Cheryl F. Stallings Phone :
Primary Inspector:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Marlene Salyer
Phone:
Date:
Inspection Summary:
Soil tested 2014
Waste Analysis:
4-21-14= 1.25
7-8-13= 1.01
IRR records are balanced out using the 2 samples listed- Please take waste samples more often to cover all irrigation events.
#21 Weekly freeboard was only recorded one lime from June 30, 2013 until July 14, 2014, however, the rainfall was recorded.
#15 NOTE: Pasture needs immediate attention- either mow/bale or move cattle in to graze.
Need an updated WUP and change of operation/change of ownership
Sludge survey dated June 2014 @ 11% sludge.
page: 1

Permit: AWS210004 Owner - Facility : Cheryl F Stallings Facility Number: 210004
Inspection Date: 07/14/14 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated operations Design Capacity Current promotions
Swine
FE Swine - Gilts
Total Design Capacity:
Total SSLW:
waste Structures Disignated Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
,agoon PRIMARY 19.00
.agoon SECONDARY 19.00
page: 2

Permit: AWS210004 Owner - Facility : Cheryl F Stallings Facility Number: 210004
Inspection Date: 07/14/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges S Stream Impacts
Yes No Na Ne
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
M ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
M ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
M ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the
❑
■ ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection Storage & Treatment
Yes
N2 He NNe
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large
❑
013
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
013
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
❑
❑
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
0 ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No Na No
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ M ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
page: 3

Permit: AWS210004 Owner - Facility: Cheryl F Stallings Facility Number:
210004
Inspection Date: 07/14/14 Inpsection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
Routine
Waste Application
Yes No Na Ne
Crop Type 1
Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Hay, Pasture)
Crop Type 2
Fescue (Hay, Pasture)
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑ 0 ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑ 0 ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yea No No Ne
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
0 ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
Waste Analysis?
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
page: 4

a
Permit: AWS210004 Owner - Facility : Cheryl F Stallings Facility Number: 210004
Inspection Date: 07/14/14 Inppection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No Na No
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
rl
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑ ❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
0 ❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
0 ❑ ❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
0 ❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
0 ❑ ❑
Other Issues
Yes
No Na No
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
0 ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? if yes,
❑
E ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon ! Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
0 ❑
❑
CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
M ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
M ❑
❑
page: 5

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 21QQ04 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS210004 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: (',.pmoliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: RQutinj County: Chowan Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 07/08/2013 Entry Time: 11:00 AM Exit Time: 12:01 PM
Farm Name:
Owner: DorothyStallings
Incident #:
Owner Email:
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: Belvidere NC 279199622
Physical Address:
Facility Status: 0 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 36'19'34" Longitude: 76°34'15"
Located SR 1002 (County Line Rd.), approximately 1 mile north of intersection of NCSR 1301 and NCSR 1002, Farm path is located
on the left side when going north.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents © Other Issues
Certified Operator: Claxton F Stallings
Secondary OIC(s):
Operator Certification Number: 17749
On -Site Re prosentative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name C. F. Stallings Phone -
On -site representative Cheryl F. Stallings Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AWS210004 Owner - Facility: Dorothy Stallings Facility Number: 210004
Inspection Date: 07/08/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis:
7-1-13 = ?? Soil test is due NOW
11-29-12 = .67
IRR records are balanced up until Feb. 2013 - waiting on lab for current analysis to complete.
NOTE: Cheryl Stallings is assisting her brother, C. F. (OIC) and will be changing farm status, ownership, etc. ASAP.
Sludge Survey is due in 2014 and caliberation in 2013.
Need to take a waste analysis every quarter at least, also farm needs a current soil sample.
Need to change design capacity to Gilts and have WUP amended.
Page: 2

Permit: AWS210004 Owner • Facility: Dorothy Stallings Facility Number: 210004
Inspectlon Date: 07/0812013 inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
❑ Swine - Feeder to Finish 1,100
Q Swine -Gilts I 1 600
Total Design Capacity: 1,100
Total SSLW: 148,500
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
agoon
PRIMARY
19.00
21.00
agoon
SECONDARY
19.00
21.00
Page: 3

Permit: AWS210004 Owner - Facility: Dorothy Stallings Facility Number: 210004
Inspection Date: 07/08/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? ❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large trees, severe ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑ ■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑ ■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑ ■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS210004 Owner -Facility: Dorothy Stallings
Facility Number : 210004
Inspection Date: 07108/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%110 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1 Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Pas(ure)
Crop Type z
Fescue (Pasture)
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? 130 ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
1 B. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP? ❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS210004 Owner -Facility: Dorothy Stallings
Inspection Date: 0710812013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Records and Documents
Facility Number: 210004
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑
■ ❑ ❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? .0000
Page: 6

Permit: AWS210004 Owner - Facility: Dorothy Stallings Facility Number: 210004
Inspection Date: 07/08/2013 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Other Issues Yea No NA NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon 1 Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
IN
Page: 7

0 Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 210010 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS210010 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine - - County: Chowan Region: Wgshinaton
Date of Visit: 08/24/2012 Entry Time: 08:30 AM Exit Time. 10:00 AM Incident #:
Farm Name: P.J. Smith & Sons Ing._. Owner Email:
Mailing Address: 601 Greenhall Rd. Edgaton NC 27932
Physical Address: 430 Greenhall Rd _ _ E.deotonN.0 27932
Facility Status: N Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Mur{ahv-Brown LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 36°07'21" Longitude: 76°37'57"
4 mile north of Edenton, 2 miles north of Hancock Station on SR 1316.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Fred R Smith Operator Certification Number: 17748
Secondary O1C(s):
On -Site Representative(s); Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Alfred Smith Phone:
On -site representative Alfred Smith Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s);
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis:
6-14-12 = 1.2
1-11-12 = .90
soil tested: 2011 & 312012
IRr records are complete & balanced out. Rainfall, freeboard & crop yield are recorded.
Remember to do the calibration in 2012.
Sludge survey done in March 2012.
Page: 1

Permit: AWS210010 Owner - Facility: A J Smith & Sons Inc
Facility Number: 210010
Inspection Date: 08/24/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Cattle
❑ Cattle - Beef Feeder 60
Swine
O Swine - Feeder to Finish 6,216 2,072
Total Design Capacity: 6,276
Total SSLW: 887,160
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
koon 1 35.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWS210010 Owner - Facility: A J Smith & Sons Inc FacilityNumber : 210010
Inspection Date: 08/24/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? ❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
B. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, . ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
if yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS210010 Owner - Facility: A J Smith & Sons Inc
Inspection pate: 08/24/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 210010
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 Ibs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Peanuts
Crop Type 2
Other
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
16, Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
1300 ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
19, Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS210010 Owner • Facility: A J Smith & Sons Inc Facility Number. 210010
Inspection Data. 08/24/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
Checklists? ❑
Design? ❑
Maps? ❑
Lease Agreements? ❑
Other? ❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to Install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS210010 Owner - Facility: A J Smith & Sons Inc Facility Number : 210010
Inspection Date: 08/24/2012 inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ M ❑ ❑
P%&L..-- ono Idn WA Ma
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon 1 Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
33, Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewlinspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
is
Page: 6

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 210004 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS210004 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: RouUne County: Chowan I Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 07/09/2012 Entry Time: 10:00 AM Exit Time: IZ40,PM _ Incident #:
Farm Name: Claxton Stallings & Son Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Dorothy Stallings Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 249 Whitehouse JSU Belvidere NC 279199622
Physical Address: 18370 Belvidere NC 27919
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown LUG
Location of Farm: Latitude: 36'19'34" Longitude: 76°34'15"
Located SR 1002 (County Line Rd.), approximately 1 mile north of intersection of NCSR 1301 and NCSR 1002. Farm path is located
on the left side when going north.
Question Areas:
© Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Claxton F Stallings
Secondary OIC(s):
Operator Certification Number: 17749
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Cf Stallings Phone:
On -site representative C. F. Stallings Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Page: 1

Permit: AWS210004 Owner - Facility: Dorothy Stallings Facility Number : 210004
Inspection date: 07/09/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Waste analysis:
no current 2012 samples were taken, used past average for balancing records. Soil tests were taken in Aug. 2010 & lime was applied,
will try to pull samples in July 2012.
Lagoon looks good!
Calibration is due in 2012 & Sludge survey is due in 2014.
Rainfall & freeboard are recorded through June 24, 2012 and in the records, Mr. Allen Ray has the other readings with him.
This facility did a total clean out of houses & animals were brought back on site in May 2012.
1 gave C. F. a list of things to complete in 2012.
NOTE: In November 2012 C.F. had a liver transplant and will be in the Duke/Raleigh area for several months. I am working with his
family to try to arrange for the overseeing of the environmental issues at this facility.(mds11-16-12)
Page; 2

Permit: AWS210004 Owner - Facility: Dorothy Stallings
Inspection Date: 07/09/2012 Inspection Typo: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number : 210004
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Q Swine - Feeder to Finish 1,100 600
Total Design Capacity: 1,100
Total SSLW: 148,500
Waste Structures
Designed Observed
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Freeboard Freeboard
agoon
PRIMARY
19.00
32.00
agoon
SECONDARY
19.00
30.00
Page: 3

Permit: AW5210004 Owner - Facility: Dorothy Stallings Facility Number: 210004
Inspection Date: 07/09/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? 00110
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field Cl
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b, Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural -freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
❑
■ ❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑
■ ❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■ ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■ ❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
0.000
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
00011
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below,
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS210004 Owner - Facility: Dorothy Stallings
Facility Number: 210004
Inspection Date: 07/09/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Appiicatlon
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1 Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Pasture)
Crop Type 2 Fescue (Pasture)
Crop Type 3-
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■
❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■
❑
❑
16, Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑ ■
❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■
❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■
❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 5

Permit: AW5210004 Owner -Facility: Dorothy Stallings
Inspection pate: 07/09/2012 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Records and Documents
Facility Number : 210004
Reason for Visit: Routine
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21, Does record keeping need improvement?
■ ❑
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
■
Soil analysis?
■
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1"Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22, Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the appropriate
❑ ■
❑ ❑
box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
Cl
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■
❑ Cl
Page: 6

Permit: AWS210004 Owner -Facility; Dorothy Stallings Facility Number: 210004
Inspection Date: 07109/2D12 Inspection Type: Compliance inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ M ❑ ❑
^&L--- i.......... Van Mn NA NF'
28, Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? (i.e., discharge, ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
Lagoon / Storage Pond
Other
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
s
■
■
Page: 7

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 210004 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS210004 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Chowan Region: Washington
Date of Vlsit: 07/07/2010 Entry TIme:12115 PM Exit Time:
Farm Name: Claxton Stallings & Son Farm
Owner: Dorothy Stallhas
Incident #:
Owner Email:
��7��►�yD��ftL=''
Mailing Address: 249 Whitehouse Rd Belvidere NC 2,79199622
Physical Address: 18370 Belvidere NC 27919
Facility Status: E Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Murphy -Brown, LLC
Location of Farm: Latitude: 36°19'34" Longitude: 76'34'15"
Located SR 1002 (County Line Rd.), approximately 1 mile north of intersection of NCSR 1301 and NCSR 1002. Farm path is located
on the left side when going north,
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Claxton F Stallings Operator Certification Number: 17749
Secondary OIC(sj:
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Dorothy Stallings Phone:
On -site representative Cf Stallings Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Date:
Page: 1

Permit: AWS210004 Owner - Facility: Dorothy Stallings Facility Number: 210004
Inspection Date: 07/07/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis:
6-16-2010 = .60
3-19-10 = 1.4
1-8-10 = .77
soil tested 2009 & lime applied
Freeboard range 12-23-2009 = 23" - 5-30-10 = 25"
#24 - Check on the calibration of equipment SS 2009 and removal of sludge April 2009
Looks Good!
Page: 2

Permit: AWS210004 Owner -facility: Dorothy Stallings
Inspection Date: 07/07/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number : 210004
Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Swine - Feeder to Finish 1,100 750
Total Design Capacity: 1,100
Total SSLW: 148,500
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon
PRIMARY
19.00
19.00
agoon
SECONDARY
19.00
24.00
Page: 3

Permit: AWS210004 Owner - Facility: Dorothy Stallings
Facility Number: 210004
Inspection Date: 07/07=10 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No NA_
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
■ ❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
M ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■ ❑
❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■ ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■ ❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other
than from a ❑
■ ❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑ ❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
ONOO
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Pon ding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS210004 Owner -Facility: Dorothy Stallings Facility Number: 210004
Inspection Date: 07/07/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? ❑
Total P205? ❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type 1 Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Pasture)
Crop Type 2 Fescue (Pasture)
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑
■ ❑
❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
■ ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
❑
■ ❑
❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■ ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
■ ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No NA
NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
■ ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below,
WUP?
❑
Page: 5

Permit: AWS210004 Owner • Facility: Dorothy Stallings
Facility Number: 210004
Inspection Date: 07/07/2010 Inspection Type; Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No NA
NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
Q
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
Q
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after> 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■ ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? ❑
■ ❑
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■ ❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■ Q
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■ ❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■ ❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 6

Permit: AWS210004 Owner- Facility: Dorothy Stallings
Inspection pate: 07/07/2010 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Other Issues
31, Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
32, Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
Facility Number: 210004
Reason for Visit: Routine
Yes No NA NE
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
00013
00013
Page: 7

0
Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 210004 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS210QQA ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Coing1jan2g Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine _ County: Chowan Region: Was inatan
Date of Visit: 06/23/2009 Entry Time:10;00 AM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Claxton Stallings & Son Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Dorothy Stallinas
. a 6 A -_ irilib.LI .
T . , ; . L9Cf�ia►`C+1F�k]i�'I'I�Y�►
Physical Address:
Facility Status: E Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 36°19'34" Longitude: 76°34'15"
Located SR 1002 (County Line Rd.), approximately 1 mile north of intersection of NCSR 1301 and NCSR 1002. Farm path is located
on the left side when going north.
Question Areas:
0 Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
ij Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Claxton F Stallings Operator Certification Number: 17749
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Cf Stallings Phone:
On -site representative Cf Stallings Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis:
6-10-09 = .28
3-11-09 = 1.1
12-5-08 = ,93
sludge removed April 13, 2009 and applied to pre -plant corn land and coastal bermuda. Balanced sludge applications.
soil tested August 2008
Looks Great!1
Page: 1

a
Permit: AWS210004 Owner- Facllity: Dorothy Stallings
Inspection Date: 06/23/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 210004
Reason for Via it: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Q Swine -Feeder to Finish 1,100 1,033
Total Design Capacity: 1,100
Total SSLW: 148,500
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon
PRIMARY
19,00
30.00
agoon
SECONDARY
19.00
29.00
r
Page: 2

Permit: AWS210004 Owner - Faclifty: Dorothy Stallings Facility Number: 210004
Inspection Date, 06/23/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ Cl ❑
Discharge originated at
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? 11000
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? DMOD
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection Storage & Treatment You No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? ❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe
❑ ■
❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑ ■
Cl ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
S. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑ ■
❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
00011
improvement?
Waste Application Yes No
NA NE
10, Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑ ■
❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ M ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
(]
Heavy metals (Cu. Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

0
Permit: AWS210004 Owner - Facility: Dorothy Stallings Facility Number : 210004
Inspection Date: 06/23/2009 Inspection Type. Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? ❑
Total P205? ❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type 1
Crop Type 2
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Records and Documents
19, Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
20, Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
I
Page: 4

Permit: AWS210004 Owner - Facility: Dorothy Stallings
Facility Number: 210004
Inspection Date: 06/23/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall 8 monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual sail analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22, Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
23, If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES only)? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
26, Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Other Issues
Yes No NA NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30, At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWS210004 Owner - Facility: Dorothy Stallings Facility Number: 210004
Inspection Date: 06/23/2009 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? 0000.
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ ■ Q
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? 0000
Page: 6

E Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 210004 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS21000 I ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Chowan Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 07131/2008 Entry Time: 12:45 EM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Claxton Stallings&Son Farm
Owner: Dorothy Stallings
Owner Email:
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 249 Whitehouse Rd_- _ Belvidere NC 279199622
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 36°19'34" Longitude: J6°34'15"
Located SR 1002 (County Line Rd.), approximately 1 mile north of intersection of NCSR 1301 and NCSR 1002. Farm path is located
on the left side when going north.
Question Areas:
Discharges & stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certifled Operator: Claxton F Stallings Operator Certification Number: 17749
Secondary OICjs):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Cf Stallings Phone:
On -site representative Cf Stallings Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
waste analysis:
6-18-08 = 1.2
3-13-08 = 1.5
soil test 8-1-07
Looks Good!
Page: 1

Permit: AWS210004 Owner -Facility: Dorothy Stallings
Facility Number : 210004
Inspection Date: 07/31/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity
Current Population
Swine
Lkswine - Feeder to Finish 1,100 1,000
Total Design Capacity: 1,100
Total SSLW: 148,500
Waste Structures
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
Lagoon
PRIMARY
19.00
21.00
agoon
SECONDARY
19.00
21.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWS210004 Owner - Facility: Dorothy Stallings Facility Number, 210004
Inspection Date: 07/31/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■ ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■ ❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■ ❑
❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I,eJ large trees, severe ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■ ❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■ ❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■ ❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■ ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

1
Permit: AWS210004 Owner - Facility: Dorothy Stallings
Facility Number: 210004
Inspection Date: 07/31/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No
NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
Cl
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Fescue
(Pasture)
Crop Type 2
Coastal
Bermuda Grass
(Pasture)
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Sail Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■
❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS210004 Owner -Facility: Dorothy Stallings
Facility Number. 210004
Inspection Date: 07/31/2008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA
NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ ■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after> 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■
❑
❑
23, if selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? ❑ ■
❑
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑ ■
❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes No
NA
NE
28. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑ ■
❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately,
Page: 5

Permit: AWS210004 Owner - Facility: Dorothy Stallings
Facility Number: 210004
Inspection Date: 07/3112008 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues
Yes
No NA
NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
■ ❑
❑
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
■ ❑
❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
001111
Page: 6

I
Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Faculty Number: 210004 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS210004 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine County: Chowan Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 10/18/2007 Entry Time:10:10 AM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Claxton Stallings & Son Farm Owner Email:
Owner: Dorothy Stallinas Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 249 Whitehouse Rd Belvidere NC 279199622
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 38"19'40" Longitude:
Located SR 1002 (County Line Rd.), approximately 1 mile north of intersection of NCSR 1301 and NCSR 1002, Farm path is located
on the left side when going north.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Claxton F Stallings
Secondary OIC(s):
Operator Certification Number: 17749
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On -site representative Cf Stallings Phone:
24 hour contact name Cf Stallings Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Waste analyses: Soil test 2007
2-27-07 = 1.5
9-20-07 = 0.97
#11) Irrigation events occurred from April through August on the Fescue Pasture; however, the acceptable crop window -for Fescue is
Sept. through March. There is a remaining PAN balance on the 2 fields that have Fescue, Field #1 = 17 lbs. and Field #2 = 60 lbs.
#21) There were 8 irrigation events between May and July 20, 2007 that were not covered by a current waste analysis. " Remember
to pull a waste sample about every 3 monthsl
#25) Remember to do another sludge survey in 2007.
Page: 1

Permlt: AWS210004 Owner - Facility: Dorothy Stallings Facility Number . 210004
Inspection Date: 10I1812007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current Population
Swine
Q Swine -Feeder to Finish 1,100 900
Total Design Capacity: 1,100
Total SSLW: 148,500
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon PRIMARY 19.00
agoon SECONDARY 19.00 25.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWS210004 Owner - Facility: Dorothy Stallings Faculty Number: 210004
Inspection Date: 10/18/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Via It: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ ■
❑ ❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other -than from a
❑ ■
❑ ❑
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes No
NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
S. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large trees, severe
❑ ■
❑ ❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management ❑ ■
❑ ❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? {Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑ ■
❑ ❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑ 0110
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No
NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑ ■
❑ ❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
■ ❑
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS210004 Owner - Facility: Dorothy Stallings Facility Number: 210004
Inspection Date: 10/18/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application Yes No NA NE
PAN? ❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? ❑
Total P205? ❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑
Outside of acceptable crop window? ■
Evidence of wind drift? ❑
Application outside of application area? ❑
Crop Type 1 Fescue (Pasture)
Crop Type 2 Coastal Bermuda Grass
(Pasture)
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fall to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Records and Documents Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP? ❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS210004 Owner - Facility: Dorothy Stallings
Facility Number: 210004
Inspection Date: 10/18/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes No
NA NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
■ ❑
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
■
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crap yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? ❑ ■
❑ ❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
25, Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous lass assessment (PLAT) certlfication?
❑ ■
❑ ❑
Other Issues
Yes No
NA NE
28, Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑ ■
❑ Cl
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

0
Permit: AWS210004 Owner - Facility: Dorothy Stallings
Facility Number : 210004
Inspection Date: 1011812007 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues
Yes
No NA
NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
■ ❑
❑
32. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
M ❑
❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
■ ❑
❑
Page: 6

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 210004 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS210004 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Insoection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Rooytjnp County: Chowan Region: Washington
Date of Visit: 08/25/2006 Entry Time:09:30 AM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Claxton -Stallings & Son Farm
Owner: Dorothy Stallings
Owner Email:
Phone:
Mailing Address: 249.WhitehgWs@ Rd Belvidere NC 279199622
Physical Address:
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 36"19'40" Longitude: 76°34'00"
Located SR 1002 (County Line Rd.), approximately 1 mile north of intersection of NCSR 1301 and NCSR 1002. Farm path is located
on the left side when going north.
Question Areas:
Discharges & Stream Impacts Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: Claxton F Stallings Operator Certification Number: 17749
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
24 hour contact name Cf Stallings Phone:
On -site representative Cf Stallings Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Inspection Summary:
Soil sample - need to pull one by the first of December.
Waste analyses:
7-13-06 = 8.6 sludge
7-7-06 = 1.4
2-2-06 = 1.3
Irrigation events are complete and balanced out.
Everything looks good.
Page: 1

Permit: AWS210004 Owner - Facility: Dorothy Stallings
Facility Number: 210004
Inspection Date:,0812512006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity
Current Population
Swine
Q Swine- Feeder to Finish 1,100 1,100
Total Design Capacity: 1,100
Total SSLW: 148,500
Waste Structures
Type Identifler Closed Date Start Date Designed Freeboard Observed Freeboard
agoon
PRIMARY
19.00
29.00
agoon
SECONDARY
19.00
34.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWS210004 Owner - Facility: Dorothy Stallings Facility Number : 210004
Inspection Date: 08/25/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No
NA
NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
■
❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
■
❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
■
❑
❑
3, Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a
❑
■
❑
Cl
discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage &_Treatment
Yes
No
NA
NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Led large trees, severe
❑
■
❑
❑
erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management
❑
■
❑
❑
or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits,
❑
■
❑
❑
dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
Waste Application
Yes
No
NA
NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or
❑
■
❑
❑
improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below
Excessive Ponding? ❑
Hydraulic Overload? ❑
Frozen Ground? ❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑
Page: 3

Permit: AWS210004 Owner • Facility: Dorothy Stallings
Inspection Date. 0812512006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number: 210004
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P205?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?.
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Bermuda Grass (Hay,
Pasture)
Crop Type 2
Fescue (Pasture)
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Records and Documents
Yes No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑ ■ ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Page: 4

Permit: AWS210004 Owner - Facility: Dorothy Stallings
Facility Number: 210004
Inspection Date: 08/25/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No
NA
NE
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
■
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after> 1 inch rainfall 8 monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
■
❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment (NPDES
only)? ❑
■
❑
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fail to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
■
❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
■
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
■
❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No
NA
NE
26. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or CAWMP?
❑
■
❑
❑
29. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document and report those ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
30. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional Air ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Quality representative immediately.
Page: 5

Permit: AWS210004 Owner -Facility: Dorothy Stallings Facility Number: 210004
Inspection Date: 08/26/2006 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Other Issues Yes No NA NE
31. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
32. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss reviewhnspection with on -site representative? ❑ 0 0 ❑
33. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
Page: 6

Division of Water Quality
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 210004 Facility Status: Active Permit: AWS210004 ❑ Denied Access
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Inactive or Closed Date:
Reason for Visit: Routine I County: Chowan Region: WasNnaton
Date of Visit: 05/25/2005 Entry Time: 01 Q0 PM Exit Time: Incident #:
Farm Name: Claxton Stallings & Son Farm Owner Email:
Owner:
Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address: 249 Whitehouse fad, _ __ Belvidere NC 27919 _
Physical Address:
Facility Status: N Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude: 36°19'40" Longitude: 76°34'00"
Located SR 1002 (County Line Rd.), approximately 1 mile north of intersection of NCSR 1301 and NCSR 1002. Farm path is located
on the left side when going north.
Question Areas:
Q Discharges & Stream Impacts Q Waste Collection & Treatment Waste Application
Records and Documents
Certified Operator: Claxton F Stallings Operator Certification Number: 17749
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone
On -site representative Cf Stallings Phone:
24 hour contact name Cf Stallings Phone:
Primary Inspector: Marlene Salyer Phone:
Inspector Signature: Date:
Secondary Inspector(s):
Phone:
Phone:
Inspection Summary:
Note for #21: Please be careful to take a waste sample more often and remember to change the PAN on the irrigation records.
Soil sample was pulled and came back on 4-12-05 as a nematode report. Mrs. Dorothy had written to the lab requesting information
on the reason for this, but she had not heard from them.
The rainfall and lagoon levels were recorded weekly.
Waste analysis: 2-11-05 = 1.3 7-9-04 = 0.50
The records were much improved this year and every thing looks great at the lagoon and pastures.
Page: 1

Permit: AWS210004 Owner -Facility: Dorothy Stallings
Inspection Date: 05/25/2005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Waste Structures
Facility Number : 210004
Reason for Visit: Routine
Type Identifier Closed Date Start Date Designed freeboard Observed Freeboard
Lagoon
PRIMARY
19.00
40.00
Lagoon
SECONDARY
19.00
46.00
Page: 2

Permit: AWS210004 Owner -Facility: Dorothy Stallings
Facility Number: 210004
Inspection Date: 05/25/2005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason far Visit: Routine
Discharges 8, Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ N ❑ ❑
Discharge originated at:
Structure ❑
Application Field ❑
Other ❑
a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ ■ ❑ ❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ 0 ❑ ❑
c. Estimated volume reaching surface waters?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑
Yes
0 ❑
No NA
❑
Nt=_
Waste Cnllsctinn. Stnranp & TrPatmPnt
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level Into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (I.e./ large trees, severe erosion,
❑
❑
❑
seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
❑
❑
❑
closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks
❑
0 ❑
❑
and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require maintenance or
❑
0 ❑
❑
improvement?
Yes
No NA
NE
Waste Aa_olir•.atinn
10, Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need maintenance or improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total P2O5?
❑
Failure to Incorporate manurelsludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Coastal
Bermuda
Grass
(Pasture)
Crop Type 2
Fescue (Pasture)
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Page: 3

Permit: AWS210004 Owner -Facility: Dorothy Stallings
Facility Number: 210004
Inspection Date: 05/25/2005 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Waste Appleratann
Crop Type 6
YYs
No NA
NE
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14, Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan(CAWMP)? ❑
❑
❑
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre determination?
00
❑
❑
17, Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
■ ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of property operating waste application equipment?
❑
Yes
■ ❑
No
❑
NF
Records and Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
00
_NA
❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
[IN
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below,
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Other?
❑
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Transfers?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Inspections after > 1 inch rainfall & monthly?
❑
Waste Analysis?
■
Annual soil analysis?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Annual Certification Form (NPDES only)?
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
E
❑ ❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on Irrigation equipment (NPDES only)?
❑
❑
❑
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
❑
❑
25. Did the facility fall to conduct a sludge survey as required by the permit?
❑
❑
❑
26. Did the facility fail to have an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
0
❑ ❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑
■ ❑
Pag e: 4

WW4
�y � � t,:,� ? S - : .. - a»p', °e, o � � �r ye? �t 4 ` art v � Y�. J � -•�
41J
.. �{�si...l�. i »�dY:�".: � - .> ."' a.✓a... • � _ .- .ram _Y ,- r. �� � r �.l_K- «7 ,:-�i. ..'F ,_ „s+� fit �
(Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
(Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access I
IDateorvisit- 6-29-2DD4 Time: ID:DD
Facility Number 21 4
0 Not Operational Q Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified [3 Conditionally Certified 13 Registered pate Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
FarmName: .............................................................. County: Chma.n...... ........... ........................... «a13o........
OwnerName: Isarathy..................................sEaUings........---........................................... Phone No: 29.-2.R16..-.-..................----.........................................
Mailing .Address: 1.4,9.Rbit.chmasc.Rd.................
behidu.e..NC....
2.7.91.9..............
FacilityContact:.............................................................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No: _ ............................ ....................
Onsite Representative:
Integrator: Carr .............................................
Certified Operator:.ClAx pia.f.............................. StAjMngsjr,........................ ............ Operator Certification Number:1.7.7..49....... _....................
Location of Farm:
Located SR 1002 (County Line Rd.), approximately 1 mile north of intersection of NCSR 1301 and tiCSR 1002. Farm path i
located on the left side when going! north.
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 3b ' 19 40 ., Longitude 76 • 34 00 u
Design Current
Design Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
Poultry
Capacity Population Cattle
Ca aci Po ulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
JCI Laver
❑ Dairy
® Feeder to Finish
1100
1100
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
10 Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
1,100
❑ Gilts
Total SSLW
14$,500
❑ Boars
EE1
Number of Lagoons 2
Trans I
Discharges S Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge on+tzinated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field. ❑ Other
a. If discharge is obsen-ed, nvas the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed. did it reach Water of the State? (If yes. notify D�' Qj ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discltaroe is observed. xhat is the estimated floe in cal `min`.'
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If es. notify D"'Q) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection S Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes ® No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure - Structure 4 Structure Strucrure G
Identifier: ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard (inches): 33
11/1 9/Ill rn...:_....,r

Facility Number: 21-4 Date. of Inspection 6-24-2004
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? Ge/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage,, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed througb a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DVF'Q)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required. maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Nydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Graze) Fescue (Graze)
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWVIP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑Yes % No
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at,or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a rezional []Yes ®No
Air Quality representative immediately.
,Comments (refer-to,question #):- Mplain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any,other cotnments:r ;
'Use dFsMbgs; of facility, to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary): f] Field Copy ®Final Notes
The COC is on site.
test dated 8-4-03 & lime was applied.
analysis: 5-6-04 = 1.8 lbs./1000 gal.
Reviewer/Inspector Name Marlene Salyer
Re-,lewer/Inspector Signature: Date:

12172103 Continued
Facility Number: Date of Inspection t}Z9_2i184
Reouired Records & Documents
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
® No
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
® No
23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
® Yes
❑ No
® Waste Application ® Freeboard ® Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
® No
25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ -Yes
® No
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
® No
27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
® No
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
® Yes
❑ No
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AVRAP?
❑ Yes
® No
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30. Is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
❑ Yes
® No
31. If selected, did the. facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
❑ No
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge survey?
❑ Yes
❑ No
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Stocking Form ❑ Crop Yield Form [:]Rainfall ❑ Inspection After V Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this tzsit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
freeboard is not recorded as it should be.
should be more frequent waste analysis.
waste application records show overapplaction however the spray fields do not show that is the case. I think it is just a lack of
vledge on how to keep the records.
Tote: Mr Claxton Stallings passed away in the late fail of 2003 and C. F. Stallings has been very ill recently, therefore the records we
of getting the attention that should have been given.
have a meeting scheduled with C. F. Stallings, Mrs. Dorothy Stallings and their farm employee on July 7, 2004. We hope to get the
,cord keeping off to a better start for the irrigation events on Coastal Bermuda and Fescue in the fall.
Everything on the farm looks great! There is no evidence of overapplication. They have planted lots of trees around the houses &
ditches that help to take up Nitrogen and cool the buildings.

Technical Assistance Site Visit Report
Division of Soil and Water Conservation
Natural Resources Conservation Service
Soil and Water Conservation District
Other...
Facility Number 21 - ® Date: 9125103 Time: 1 11:30 j Time On Farm: 20 WaRO
Faun Name Claxton Stallings & Son Farm county Chowan
Mailing Address 249 Whitehouse Rd Belvidere NC
297-2076
27919
Onsite
Representative Claxton Stallings_ _ _ Integrator
Type Of Visit
Operation Review
Compliance Inspection (pilot only)
Technical Assistance
Confirmation for Removal
❑ No Animals -Date Last Operated:
❑ Operating below threshold
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse
Design Current
Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
1100
1100
Phone:
Purpose Of Visit
O Routine
O Response to DWQ/DENR referral
O Response to DSWC/SWCD referral
O Response to complaintllocal referral
O Requested by producer/integrator
O Follow-up
OO Emergency
O Other...
Design Current
Capacity Population
❑ Layer
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Dairy
:q
I
❑ Other
GENERAL QUESTIONS:
1. Is waste discharging from any part of the operation and reaching surface waters or wetlands? ❑ yes ❑ no
2. Is there evidence of a past waste discharge from any part of the operation that waste reached ❑ yes ❑ no
surface waters or wetlands?
3. Does any problem pose an immediate threat to the integrity of the waste structure (large trees, ❑ yes ❑ no
seepage, severe erosion, etc.)?
4. Is there evidence of nitrogen over application, hydraulic overloading or excessive ponding ❑ yes ❑ no
requiring DWQ notification?
6- Is there evidence of improper dead animal disposal that poses a threat to the environment ❑ yes ❑ no
and/or public health?
6. Is the waste level within the structural freeboard elevation range for any waste structure? ®yes ❑ no
Structure1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier #1 #2
Level (Inches) 12 15
CROP TYPES
SPRAYFIELD
SOIL TYPES
7. What type of technical assistance does the onsite representative feel is needed? (list in comment section)
03/10/03

Facility Number 21 - 4 Date:
9/25/03
PARAMETER
Q No assistance provided/requested
❑ 8. Waste spill leaving site
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE Needed
Provided
❑ 9. Waste spill contained on site
010. Level in structural freeboard
25. Waste Plan Revision or Amendment
❑
❑
011. Level in storm storage
26. Waste Plan Conditional Amendment
❑
❑
27. Review or Evaluate Waste Plan wlproducer
❑
❑
❑ 12. Waste structure integrity compromised
❑ 13. Waste structure needs maintenance
28. Forms Need (list in comment section)
❑
❑
29. Missing Components (list In comments)
❑
❑
❑ 14. Over application >= 10% & 10 lbs.
❑
❑
❑ 15. Over application < 10% or < 10 lbs.
30. 2H.0200 re -certification
❑ 16. Hydraulic overloading
31. Five & Thirty day Plans of Action (PoA)
❑
❑
32. Irrigatlon record keeping assistance
❑
❑
❑ 17. Deficient irrigation records
❑ 18. Late/missing waste analysis
33. Organize/computerization of records
❑
❑
❑ 19. Late/missing lagoon level records
34. Sludge Evaluation
❑
❑
❑ 20. Late/missing soils analysis
❑ 21. Crop needs improvement
35. Sludge or Closure Plan
❑
❑
❑ 22. Crop inconsistent with waste plan
36. Sludge removaliclosure procedures
❑
❑
37. waste Structure Evaluation
❑
❑
[123. Irrigation maintenance deficiency
❑ 24. Deficient sprayfield conditions
38. Structure Needs Improvement
❑
❑
39. Operation & Maintenance Improvements
❑
❑
40. Marker check/calibration
❑
❑
Regulatory Referrals
41. Site evaluation
❑
❑
® Referred to DWQ Date: 9-25-2003
42. Irrigation Calibration
❑
❑
❑ Referred to NCDA Date:
El Other...
43. Irrigation system designlinstailation
El
❑
Date:
44. Secure Irrigation Information (maps, etc.)
❑
❑
LIST IMPROVEMENTS
45. Operating Improvements (pull signs, etc.)
❑
❑
MADE BY OPERATION
46. Wettable Acre Determination
❑
❑
1
47. Evaluate WAD certificatlon/rechecks
❑
❑
48. Crop evaluationlrecommendations
❑
❑
2.
49. Drainage worklevaluation
❑
❑
50. Land shaping, subsoiling, aeration, etc.
51. Runoff control, stormwater diversion, etc.
❑
❑
❑
❑
3
52. Buffer Improvements
❑
❑
53. Field measurements(GPS, surveying, etc.)
❑
❑
4.
54. Mortality BMPs
❑
❑
56. Waste operator education (NPDES)
❑
❑
5'
56. Operation & maintenance education
❑
❑
57. Record keeping education
❑
❑
6.
68. Croplforage management education
❑
❑
59. Soil and/or waste sampling education
❑
❑
03/10/03

Facility Number 21 - ® Date: 9/25/03
COMMENTS:
" Emergency site visit conducted as part of hurricane damage assessment efforts.
, 10 & 11. Lagoon 1 in structural freeboard and lagoon 2 in storm storage elevations. Mr. Stallings was instructed to
ontact Lyn Hardison with DWQ.
OTE: DSWC confirmed with DWQ staff that Mr. Stallings did call in and report levels.
No wind damage to buildings noted. Farm operating on electrical power.
Structures were not inundated by outside floodwaters.
TECHNICAL SPECIALIST ICarl Dunn
SIGNATURE
Date Entered: 10/1/03 Entered By: IPat Hooper
3 03/10/03

f- r
�0� Wa.N
WA?—z
Michael F- Easley
Governor
>I
,o
r' WMaYn G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting DhWor
,.Dh&ion of Water Quality
To: Producer
From: Daphne k CWIOM'
Environmental Specialist
Washington Regional Ofiim
Subject: ln Animal Compliance spectiad
_ Year 2002
Enclosed please find a'copyofthe _Compliance Site iaspectiom(as viewed in.theDWQ database), conducted at the referee Q facility;
bytbeDivision�of Water Q`49rty fro®tjjjjrijjjW44joL-e'p
Washmgton'Regianal Of ices Please read this inspectio>Q and 'keep rtywicth sD other-, '
aocmmenis�io 'ram x ,f
T in general, tbese ir4ebtib 15 mcluded Yerlfysng`>}rat" (1) the farm has a Cen ed Animal' Waste Managemment Plan.(CAWMP)(2) fire
faun is complying' riffi a m m®ds ofthe State Rules 15 NCAC 2H.0217, Senate Bill'1217, and the Certified Aninoal;Waste'
' . Whagement Plan; (3) the farm operation `s waste management system is being operated properly.rmdcr the directicei" of a Certified
Operator, (4) the required rem* are being kept; and (5) there are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or nmoi£,
As a reminder, please note the following comp eats, which are conditions of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan and the
General Permit; therefore, these items must be implemented:
(p The maximum waste level in lagoms/stoaageponds shallnot exceed thin specifiedin the CAWMP. At aminimum, maximum waste
level for waste for Iagoms/Acrage ponds must not exceed the level that provides adequate storage to contain 25 year, 24 hour storm
event plus an additional foot ofstrudural freeboard.
q) An analysis of the liquid animal waste from the lagoon shall be conducted as close to the time of application as practical and at least
within 60 days (before or after) of the date of applicaticaL This analysis shall include: the following parameters: Nitrogen,
Phosphorus, Zinc and Copper.
9 Soil analysis is required annually. 'Lime is to be applied to each receiving crop as recommended by the soil analysis.
q The following records are required: off -site solids removal; maintenance, repair, wastelsoil analysis and land irrigation records.
These records should be maintained by the facility owner/manager in chronological and legible form for a minimum of three years.
(p Land application'rates shall be in accordance with the CAWMP. In no case shall land IMlication rates exceed the Plant Available
Nitrogen TAM rate for the receivinggap or vesult in runoff cluing any jiven application. T
q) All grassed waterways shall have a stable outlet with adequate capacity to prevent ponding or flooding damages. The outletcan be
another vegetated charmel, an earth ditch, stabilization structure, or other suitable outlets.
up It is sweated, not a requirement- to keep crop yield information for future use to update your waste management plan_ You will
need three years of crop yield data before your plan can be updated
For your information, any swine fatality that has a disdiarge. to surFace waters of the State will have to apply for a National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit with the Division of Water Quality, effective January 1, 2001.
Thank you for your assistance and cooperation during the inspection. If you have any questions, please contact me at 252-946-6481, exL
321 or your Technical Specialist
Cc: waRO
DBC Files
943 Washington Square Mall Washington, NC 27889 252-946-6481 (Telephone) 252-946-9215 (Fax)

F:
Hate of visit: : S/02-002 Time: 111:45 am
EFacility Number
p o Operational p Below Threshold
1
Permitted p Certified p Conditionally Certified
p Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: Claxton'Stalliugs & Son Farm
County: Cb.QNAn.... :........... ................................ .aRO........
Owner Name: Claxton Stallings
Phone No: 252-297-2076
Mailing Address: Advidera.AC............ ........................... :. I9.19............
Faciifity Contact: ..'Phone No: .._. .............. ...............................
j�
Onsite Representative: tin ... ............................. ...........................__ Integrator: Carxoll's.F.Dads.Ins.................................... .........
,Certified Operator:Stanings<..hr..................................... Operator Certification Number: 1174.9........... ..................
!
Location of Farm:
a (Countyine., approximately
nooesecion o anoca arm path
ris located on the left side when going north.
® Swine p Poultry p Cattle p Horse Latitude ®• ®' ®" Longitude •,®� ®«
Desegn Curreiif: = - 'Design:, ,� iCuTrent jq `4 "R� design `Cutaeia#
°�Capa �opu7afion
=Pnultr' "Capacrf� , ,: ,Cap�cIty ?Population 7
mPcipulationfCatfCe
s�ayer
Ir
5�,p
IeTee:eErto
on- ayer ; p on- airy
_.;�aotai
Desk Capac�#y 1,100
{�§SL1as,"
�
of!-agoons
u su ace rams resen a Don res ra k res k.Number
i] t7 g F yp
oldmg
o iquias a anagemen
ee
ut2s
© arrow to Wean
p arrow to ee er
p Farrow to Finis
Gilts
C] Boars
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: 0 Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes p No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes p No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes p No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts orpotential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? 13yes ®No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? p Spillway pYes ®No
Structure 1 - Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ......Flo. �.s.taJ2.........................................
Freeboard(inches) 1.9-............. ...............a1..................................................................................................................................

aci ity Number. 2t_4 Date of Inspection
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes N No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes N No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid Ievel
-elevation markings? �, _ ' .
❑ Yes
No
1
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
4 " '
Excessive Pondin PAN H draulic Overload
11. Is there evidence of over application?„ p g la y ,
❑ Yes
p No
Croptype,,,. Coastal Bermuda (Pasture) . • SmalI•Grain Overseed.:
:a `7
w .. .• ,..
` 13 - DBtlie receiving crop§ differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
❑ No
14.' a) Does the facility Zack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
13 No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
13 Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
® No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
Required Records & Documents
. 17. Fail to have Certificate -of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
p No
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes
❑ No
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
❑'No
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
13 Yes
® No
' 22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
r (iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
s..
13 Yes
p No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
❑ No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
® No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
❑ No
p No violations or , e Eciencies were noted uring this visit. You will receive no rurtber correspondence about is visit.
�`..
p r ima copy ❑
15. Monitor weed growth in pasture.
Please send a copy of your most recent soil analysis, waste analysis, irrigation records and freeboard records to the
DWQ-WARD.
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signatur to a (�L� .n Date: $ —� _ o

4
A,:
A
47.
RR
�V
r.
H
Arr
� j
M
F. Easley_.
or
William G/`loss Jr.,,, Secretary -
tj6d N iid Resources ,Department of Envlrofiftiin
i o
yl
Divislond
X- 4
ZJ1
To� sty Fr&Ucei"
From:'j Dap6B.
Enviroftm&ital Specialist',
fti6nd OfficeWashington
Animal Compliance Insp6cti6n Sii�ject:, — p
'Veii 2001
Enclosed please find a copy of the C ' 6mpliance Site Inspectiop (as viewed in the DWQ database) _con'ductid. at the refeienced facility
by the Divisio6lof Watir'Quality froini-the Washington Regional (jffice." Please read this i' sip'ectio'n' and keep it with all other.
documents I stioil &r. future
pertaining to your animal operation e mspectionL
1)'tlie firm has'a Certifi'
raiii ]SAL;ij"i Plan (C;kWNV)',' (2) th In general, these inspeciio'n's includedyeri�g that Certified Animal NN
Wait
re- -di fi4Aniikale
quir-e"mi�66*of�i6Stat'eRWi!i-ISNCAC�k621'7,"S'eriateBiUl2l7,'an e Certified
Management Plan, (3) the &in operation's waste management sy4em is being operated properly, tin -der 6e direction of a Certified
Operator; (4) the required records are be' kept; and (5) there are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or runoff
being
As a reminder, please note the following comments, which are conditions of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan and the
General Permit; therefore, these items must be implemented:
(p The maximum waste level in lagoonststorage ponds shall not ei ceedlhat specified in the CAViW. At a minimum, maximum waste
level for waste for lagoons/storage ponds must not exceed the level that provides adequate storage to contain 25 year, 24 how storm
event plus as addfticfial foot of structural freeboaTd.
(p An analysis of the liquid animal waste from the lagoon shall be conducted as close to the time of application as practical and at least
within 60 days (before or after) of the date of application. This analysis shall include the following parameters: Nitrogen,
Phosphorus, Zinc and Copper.
(p Soil analysis is required annually. Lime is to be applied to each receiving crop as recommended by the soil analysis..
q) The following records are required: off -site solids removal, maintenance, repair, wasteJsoil analysis and land irrigation records.
These records should be maintained by the facility owner/manager in chronological and legible form for a'minimum of three years.
9 Land application rates shall be in accordance with the CAWNT. In no case shall land application rates exceed the Plant Available
Nitrogen (PAl a rate for the receiving crop or result in runoff during any given application.
(p All grassed waterways shall have a stable outlet with adequate capacity to prevent ponding or flooding damages. The outlet can be
another vegetated channel, an earth ditch, stabilization structure, or other suitable outlets.
q) It is s9g&L!sted.'not a requirement, to keep crop yield information for future use to update your waste management plan. You will
need three years of crop yield data before your plan can be updated.
For your information, any swine facility that has a discharge to surface waters of the State will have to apply for a National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit with the Division of Water Quality, effective January 1, 200 L
Thank you for your assistance and cooperation during the inspection. If you have any questions, please contact me at 2 52-946-6481, ext.
321 or your Technical Specialist.
Cc: wfoll'
DBC Files
943 Washington Square Mall Washington, NC 27889 252-94643481 (Telephone) 252-946-9215 (Fax)

Facility Number Date of Visit: F 11/8/2001 Ti,,: 10:25 am
r(FT-0,Mperational p Below Threshold
a Permitted E Certified a Conditionally Certified a Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ........................•
Farm Name: Claxton Stallings & Son Farm County: Chown ............................................I .W.aRQ........
Owner Name: Claxton Stallings Phone No: 252-247-2076
Mailing Address: 249..Whi:iehonscAaad....................................................................... BidyidereLAC ........................................................ 279.19 ..............
FacilityContact: ...............................................................................Title:............................................................... Phone No:
Onsite Representative: CF..StaUiug&............................................................................. Integrator: lCarxoll's..................................................................I
Certified Operator.0axia[LE............................. Stalliug&Jx.................................... Operator Certification Number: 1.7.7.49 ............................
Location of Farm:
oca a (County Line , approximately I mile north of intersection of NCSR 1301 and NCSR 1002. arm pa
s located on the left side when going north.
® Swine p Poultry p Cattle p Horse Latitude ®• ®1 ®11 Longitude ®• ®®«
Design :Current _ Design Current ; Design> Current
Swme�; Ca aci Population Ca aci Fo ulahon� Cattle Ca act
P- h' . P P ty .P m - ty. Population ,
0 Wean to Feeder
® 14eeder to mis
[3 Farrow to Wean
p Farrow to ee er
p Farrow to Finis
p Gilts
p Boars
agoons.,.
,-
p
Layer
pLDairy
4
p
Non -Layer
p Non -Dairy
0
Other
Ifa
%
t
ii,i >'r
y
Total Design'Capacity -
1,100�11"
-
TotlYssLw . lassoo
p No Liquid Waste YlanageRren
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? 13 Yes N No
Discharge originated at: 13 Lagoon p Spray Field p Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? p Yes p No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) 13 Yes p No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) p Yes p No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? p Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? 0 Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? p Spillway p Yes ® No
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:......Fjo.cs.ta.#.2...... ................................... .................................... ..................................I ...
Freeboard(inches): ................ U............... ............... SIB. ............... ................................... ....................................

Date of Inspection
lKocility Number: 21-4
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
I] Yes
® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? (If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
p Yes
® No
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
p Yes
N No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
p Yes
R No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
p Yes
N No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
p Yes
® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? p Excessive Ponding p PAN p Hydraulic Overload
[3 Yes
® No
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda Small Grain Overseed
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
p Yes
® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
p Yes
p No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
p Yes
p No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
p Yes
p No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
p Yes
®No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
p Yes
®No
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
p Yes
p No
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
p Yes
®No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
p Yes
N No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
p Yes
®No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
p Yes
® No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
p Yes
®No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
p Yes
®No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
p Yes
® No
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
p Yes
N No
p o violations or deliciencies were noted uring this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about is visit.
Commenfs (refer'to guestion #) ri 01iiihi jW , YES hiW-crs and/pr any. recomiliiendations9or any wither tom. irients W'� f
iFse;raw»tgs o[ fact�ty toiliette egpla�u stttia#ions (use additonals a es inecessa w-''--�
�`)'
W � ;as p Feld Cop ❑ Final Notes
Irrigation records complete with nitrogen balance.
Waste analysis 10/30/01 - Lagoon 1 - 1.6 lbs/1000 gals.; Lagoon 2 - 1.4 lbs/1000 gals.
Soil analysis 4/25/00 - Lime applied each year as suggested to increase soil pH.
Freeboard sheets must be completed weekly when General Permit is issued. Freeboard level is good range for
winter time.
Reviewer/Inspector, Name Daphne B Ciillom �' �} entered b Anq(Tyndal!`5� 'S , � `_
y
_
Reviewer/Inspector Signatur • Date:

05103101
Continued
Facility Number: 21_4
Date of Inspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below [3 Yes 13 No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? p Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e, residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, p Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? © Yes ® No
30, Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blades), inoperable shutters, etc.) p Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? p Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? p Yes p No
r�awinp;.�
-.-,,:Z',:.. '� _ ,�,-' _ - -....k ..�-.. � .n'..�...�C ...k..: s"a i , ti�a..�U ...,r ..ta•i, M.:�o- ,'A.r� . �# . .��...� .. 0. ' �...d._d^
q3^zif"'t'0.r�F"i4r" i "j xcsy ,.x a-- +.: �}; K' s tca• rA. ;
7 ssf- 1�+' �� + )r 4$ n 7;t , X r. v 1t'{' t F r.:.... r'
i `�}��tk5 i lS 1 ���}t. 61� t to r1 T u t S 3 f e r��r t o c S
* n ;t .-S
�'t{x + 7 w 5 ']`, •-n w �yy-..7r t s" .!F_ •�[. x•" .t. 5 �.., ^'.f _
-,a 1.1 Yq !_ �, .f
A 74s
a
rv,
to a ttt
rig
i (t5 t�. _ {t+. Y'Y4 ' 4"�rstdY iR! S.fp' ,L : •iy 5 ZT�`F.1N'y T- t, �' - -Y ��T '1 K w
• _ 1
4 4rr j.E 4}
1
.,4 ," � - � rr •i �' � s.`� a .e' �.r.�.y i xwR.s3."yli�,�i'��"••(' e .�. _ �. �" {� . �+.. �• � S.� L .�
�u' y items* a �i r �` +�
' F .•..dry�e e{- .+t
l � ♦r ,i Y v--s "-,-.'r'.
w trYtT F S�YT;A S
-5,a€'«3
-. - •4s f t Lb' .. -
i
eaj. �r t�^S.x' i * Y.j �,`S,�e x«p, d`�„ � Y • � WJ � � ;a..
J

s
�1 1�HT
i
Q Division of Water Quality t
�. SEP =14 2001'��kF �,�
t �-`R
Division of Soil and Water Conservation r` '
l f,, fit.
O Other.Agency
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection ® Operation Review Q Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit ® Routine O Complaint O Follow up Q Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number Date of Visit: w/A-di Time: D Q Printed on: 7/21/2000
Q Not Operational O Below Threshold
® Permitted 13 Certified © Conditionally/ Certified [] Registered Date Last Operated our Above Threshold:
C�L� p (' i S Count .......C:.A bG✓&*'?
FarmNante: ................... .. .... ..................`L' /.. .... ..... ..... �. Y' �.............. ................ I..............
r I ,
Owner Name: C Iti�e Q✓ ...... J L If /. �.. Phone No: .......... I...... ....I.... ...
FacilityContact: ....................................................Title:................................................................ Phone No:..................................................
Mailing Address: a...q_q...... AA.1.. `�/1t�US.e...... 40.4................ .......... .1..v1..As!. K.. ... ................ .. .. �..1.....
Onsite Representative: G•l"t....,J. �It..^. .5.. ... Intel;rator:...�.1`�f!�Y?.��5....................................................
Certified Operator: ......... �.tc {✓� .� Operator Certification Number:.... Z.�.,,7.Y.�2,,..........
Location of Farm:
koc-ca mv. (�' ,z, T i �y� �H'7: �c s r r> d f c�u �' +
2Swine [:]Poultry []Cattle []Horse Latitude • 4 4i Longitude "7� • ° (9�}
Design Current
Design Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
Poultry
Capacity Population Cattle
Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Layer
I
I
❑ Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish
co
JE3 Non -Layer
I
1
10 Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
El Farrow to Feeder
❑Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
El Gilts
Total SSLW
El Boars
Number of Lagoons I❑ Subsurface Drains Present JI❑ Lagoon Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
'❑ Spray Field Area
Discharges & Stream Imaacts
1. Is any discharge observed from,any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
W No
Discharge originaled at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ No
1), II'discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/ruin?
d. Does discharge hypass a lagoon system? (Il'yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
IN No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes
*No
Waste Collection & Treatme.nt
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
❑ Yes
DNo
Struct.re I StrUCturo 2 Structure 3Structure 4 Structure 5
Structure 6
Identifier:........... 1.1.............. .
Freehoard (inches):
5100
Continued on buck

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection /42' Printed nn: 7/21/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes 10 No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes 4*No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes INNo
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ItNo
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes IN No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN []Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes *No
12. Crop type f 9, m Gce1A_, %G 4 G LG-G
13. Do the receiving crops diff6r with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? []Yes iff No
14.
a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
41 No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
P No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
'a No
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
41 No
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
® No
Required
Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? P/ A-
❑ Yes
❑ No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑ Yes
No
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
[I Yes
No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
40 No
21,
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
jo No
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
*No
23.
laid Reviewer/]nspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes
ip No
24,
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes
*No
25,
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
0 No
�1+*IolaiiQtijs:o de#iciencies Were noted• dufing •this:visit; - Yoo *iii-.te.b.K0.6.f.ufthOe
CO!' s dence; about. this visit.
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
'a� A�
Reviewer/Inspector Name /3 4c .,t6/
Reviewer/Inspector Signatures Date: /0 O 5100

'Facility
Number: Z
Date of Inspection Printed
on: 7/21/2000
Odor Issues
26,
Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
❑ Yes
MNo
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27.
Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes
OB No
28,
Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
❑ Yes
4Vo
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29.
Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
❑ Yes
WNo
30.
Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
❑ Yes
11 No
31.
Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
❑ Yes
is No
32.
Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover?
❑ Yes
AD No
and/or Drawings:
; i, iona,. Comments ..
1!5k 1� ) W 0/ /A. A UAe.0(7
P &Z Ovol-� 42 qc-k
Le/ 6,to riv el
16e WoSk 6or►t�Q1Lf 4�JOuI ��;1'xle�S a—� I"'
:J

(rDtvision of Water Quality
Q'Division of'Soiland Water Conservation`
Other Agency '.4:t t
z
t
Type of Visit O'Compliance Inspection Q Operation Review Q Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit Q<outine Q Complaint Q Follow up Q Emergency Notification Q Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number ' Date of Visit: t -G� Tune: i Printed on: 7/21/2000
Q Not Operational Q Below Threshold
0 Permitted 'Certified ❑ Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: ...................•.....
Farm Name: ...... .1.GX.,X V. !..... :. { .......` .............''1...... ...... -l. County:.....i`�lS�!!.t<l r! .............................
Owner Name: .......C.to'. ' .. ....... (:(.r..►�.�s ............ Phone No:.....�J�r�.'.��1..`��..7�.................... ...........
FacilityContact: .............................................................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
�p ,
Mailing Address: ...........................�...... ...... �..3..ir......................................... ......... {a .Y..1.. ! ............L ! C............... A.I.`.e.. �.`'�....
OnsiteRepresentative: ........................................................................................................... Integrator:.................................................................................
Certified Operator:..... ... ... -f ry ............................... l.1 r.t.. Qom........ Operator Certification Number:...j.;-..-.7.. ..............
Location 'of Farm: 0
A.]
❑ Swine [] poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude • 4 46 Longitude * ' '°
C Design Current
Design Current Design Current
..5 ...... .:.: .. .... capacity Po ulation
Poultry
Capacity Population Cattle �Capacjty Po ulation
Wean to Feeder
❑ Layer
❑ Dairy
eeder to Finish Q
❑ Non -Layer
❑Non -Dairy
Farrow to Wean
„- Farrow to Feeder
❑Other
Er... Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
Gilts
y Boars
Total Ssm
Number of Lagoons ' ❑ Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lag—n Area ❑Spray Field Area
...
lEitoldfug poads /Solid' Traps ` ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System '
b •'
Discharges & Stream Im acts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [RNo
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes j o
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State'? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes [9-No
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min? -"14,
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes P-No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes [. No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes D-No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes Q-14
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure S Structure 6
Identifier: ..........................................................................................
................. .................................... .................................... ....................................
Freeboard (inches): ;Ztt iL+
5100 1 Continued on back

Facility Number: �?,� Date of lnspectiou I?.. Printed on: 7/21/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes EKO
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes CNo
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes M-16
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes M N6
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings'? ❑ Yes ©<
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenancelimprovement'? ❑ Yes EII o
11. Is there evidence of over application'? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ❑ No
12. Crop type ��.5 C- i �� •� 2 r t 31
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes 9,No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application'? ❑ Yes allo
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination'? ❑ Yes P-No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ET'&o
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement'? ! ❑ Yes O'Tio
16. is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?�+{� ❑ Yes QNo
Reuuiretl Records & Documents
17.
1 C
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available? �-��._
❑ Yes
❑ No
19.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available'?
Yes
Oe/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑
2"Ro
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? ( -irri Tat' n, freeboard, ste ana sis & soil sample reports)
Rl�es
❑ No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
[j�-No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge'?
❑ Yes
[}NO
22.
Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freehoard problems, over application)
❑ Yes
2 No
23.
Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative'?
❑ Yes
[;I -No
24.
Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency'?
❑ Yes
GkNo
25.
Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes
G-No
No yiol'aficjr.. . dgfc.. .. s mere noted dur'itig (bis'visit} :Y:oit ' iti re eiye d. #'urt. . .
corres• oiicieiice'abatit'this visit: • •
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
LiA f — lv- "tT _ 1. 1 1 hS C ,q6 No$ 3'-11-0a Y
�` P � � Jtrt�•.4_ �1-t GG�-Z ��` ` �9.0 -+i eJ-- e-a e—A
C.0 - � .�L.1ry.�1.� r V-r- 04-"r � tJ�-BYc � Q I.�� �I ✓t (0 A:-
tj� r-rh&4_J� JA) 1 3.95 1 b A4
Reviewer/]nspector Name
Reviewer/inspector Signature:
Date: i ;l - 1 �_6 d 5100

Facility Number: — Date of Inspection ' Z-t _toD Pri►ttcd on: 7/21/2000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge Wor below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours'? ❑ Yes M-No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes [1N0
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ["To
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes MAO
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes 51- o
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged 011 pipe or a perm anenthemporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
Additional Comments an or rawings:
i ►�—�-�-a.L�,r . .�.�i� r i 14-v
4 h ,
-etc
.,ems. C-rd� ,�.. fh►-r,�
t V\ Kam' r
CL "
5/00

0 Division of Water Quality M
O Division of 'Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit O Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 21 —� DOC of Visit: 9/27l2000 Time: 8:311 Printed on: 121712000
Q Not Operational Q Below Threshold
[] Permitted ® Certified 13 Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: ClailR11..St,Erllln.gs.&SAtl..l:,>71Cm.......................
County: c'jwwaa............................................. .&RRI7........
Owner Name: ClaxtMIX.................................. 514lfun .......................... Phone No: 2.52-29.7.-2Q.7.�......................._.....
.......................... ..............................
FacilityContact: .............................................................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
Mailing Address: Rt.3..Dux..138 ............................. ... Bjdy1 Get:Q..NC.......................... ...... 17919 .............
.......................................................... .......................
OnsiteRepresentative: integrator: ........................................................................................................... .......................................................................................
Certified Operator: CLuJoict................... .. Stallidnaa.................. .... Operator Certification Number:.177.4.9.................... ............. ..................... ..........
Location of Farm:
:ocated SR 1002 (County Line Rd.), approximately 1 mile north of intersection of NCSR 1301 and -NCSR 1002. Farm path is
ocated on the left side when going north.
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 36 ° 19 40 u Longitude 76 ° 34 ' 00 u
Design Current
Design Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity Population
Poultry
Capacity Population Cattle
Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Layer
10 Dairy
® Feeder to Finish
1100
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
1,100
❑ Gilts
Total SSLW
148,500
❑ Boars
Number of Lagoons 1 2 ` JLJ Subsurface Drains Present +❑ Lagmn Area JU Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. if discharge is observed, was the conveyance roan -made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed_ did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. Ifdischarge is observed, what is the estimated flow ui galhnin?
d., Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if}=cs. notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Stnucture 2 Stnicture 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
❑ Yes ® No
Structure G
Identifier:
...................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard(inches) : ............... 1.8:................ ..............3.p.................. ................................... .................................... .................................... ,...................................

5100
Facility Number: 21-4 Date of Inspection 9/27/2000 Printed on:
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the strictures need maintenance/improvement?
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
11. Is there evidence; of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
Continued on back
12/7/2000
❑ Yes H No
❑ Yes H No
❑ Yes
H No
❑ Yes
H No
❑ Yes
H No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
H No
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Hay) fescue (Hay)
B. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application'?
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
]••No Violation',ord'''Nkiie'ies•were:noted:during'thk'-W it:; You will:receive''no further;
.corresaondence about this -visit.---
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
agoons look good - keep maintaining for rodents
Lagoon is near full due to heavy rainfall - lower lagoon for winter months
.'lump records OK - recommend pumping records for Bermuda & Fescue seperate
Permit Application mailed to DWQ but has not received certification
❑ Yes ®No
❑ Yes H No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes H No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes H No
❑ Yes H No
❑ Yes H No
❑ Yes H No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes H No
❑ Yes H No
❑ Yes H No
Reviewer/Inspector Name : _ _ -- - - - -- _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ _ _-- -____. -. —.7-J

Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 5/00
Facility Number: 21-4 Date of Inspection 9/27/2000 Printed on: 12M2000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ® No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes IN No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ® No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ® No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanenthemporary cover? ❑ Yes ® No
J

Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency a
3 Division of Water Quality
.. t*My"#rc` sc.'r 3 sKz 'Y .;sV �,,ka treytt
�'.b�,,,. 2?�i,.'��"�" .��'� \. ;��. .sue., a.�'w�", 1.�..t#s�iz'+�' 2 � � �'<�.e:�-."�
10 Routine O Complaint O Follow-up of DWO inspection O Follow-up of DSWC review O Other
� Date of Inspection
Facility Number � I . — _ _j Time of Inspection 4 DO 24 hr. (hh:mm)
0 Registered IM Certified © Applied for Permit 13 Permitted 1 Not Operational Date Last Operated:
G Farm Nome �,� County ,.
Owner............................................................ Phoa�e No:. .. i .,.. .. ".... r. ........... ...........
Facility Contact: ,C,,• ', ;� ;, s . Title: , Phone No:
Mailing Address: U � . I.' ...�� p.;..... �....�
apt �.......� ....x..../.�3. ............................. ./......................,..........................1..................../ ..........................
OnsiteRepresentative:..�r..Y.....�i.. ��:� .� L�........ ........ Integrator:...,..��P/,.l.Ad/"5........ A.../ .... J.� .................
J � /
Certified Operator;.... ........ ....... hx......... i ..........I ............................. Operator Certification Number; ... Z.77.f..;F.............
Location of Farm:
Q.f�F.......... t1...........{':?../T.. �/bGr...... .fit j.....: 5.7-:1'7:<<.:l........ .V4.03. ' ...... !4:1c'.l:.f..g7s,
. .... . ..... .. .
.... .. .... ..............................................................T
Latitude �• ®� / ��
Designs Xui
❑ Wean to Feeder
ZFeeder to Finish
HOD
rJ
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Giits
❑ Boars
General
Longitude
n ;= Design-, 4 ,.Current _ ; .. <.
Design Curremt' .,
sultry ;" ,Capacity Population :> Cattle -_,-,`,Capacity.
Population :.
Layer
❑ Dairy
Non -Layer
❑ Non -Dairy
i.
Other
n
Total Design Capacity
/lo o
r
�F
w
V
,SSLW.S'
�7
,Total
I. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, dill it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
7/25/97
❑ Yes KNo
• Yes AND
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ;P No
❑ Yes JW No
❑ Yes ;K No
❑ Yes RNo
❑ Yes [� No
Continued on back

Facility Number:
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structure (La oons Holdin Ponds Flush fits etc.
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Structure 1 Structure 2
Identifier:„t iy�
�f� ,3.......5....,....Inl3
• +r
Freeboard (ft):......).:`"........... ........ ...........DJ..�•r
.............
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
Structure 3
Structure 4
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(I€ in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes [&No
❑ Yes 1� No
Structure 5 Structure 6
15. Crop type .��.xt'1.1 fr.. ....rf.. �.........................................................................................................
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Onl
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
0 No.vialationsvr deFciencies. were, noted;d'dk this:visit., .Y.oiu.will receive: no:ftiriher : :
. correspondence Ahoui this: visit:: . ::. : :. :.::.: :..: .: . . : .
❑ Yes NNo
❑ Yes ERNo
❑ Yes 15d No
❑ Yes P No
❑ Yes [A No
..........................................
❑ Yes
[7%fto
❑ Yes
'Q1.1 No
❑ Yes
E9 No
❑ Yes
[�tNo
❑ Yes
RLNo
❑ Yes
ER No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes KNo
❑ Yes [3 No
❑ Yes EA No
,'C r c.o,mon z.vOl 1V c4 S)v r e y ji, D� u�oO ,�D �'/1 i it j ; v�� o '?
FOSS 14l< a,t a er o 57 cr7-j
(J 3
c- �� p
7/25/97
Reviewerllnspector Name
Revieµer/Inspector Signature 5 Date: - L

1 ® Division of Soil and Water Conservation ® Other Agency ,
4 s
Division of Water Quality-
's- �`'3 is £ #Z 4.",
KRoutine 0 Com laint 0 Follow-up of DW2 inspection 0 Follow-up of DSWC review 0 Other
Date of Inspectiux�=2FT�1g
Facility Number i. Ti te, of Inspc•ctioss 24 hr. (hh:mm)
®Registered ®Certified ® Applied for Permit 0 Permitted 10 Not Operational I Date Last Operated:
Farm Name 95x'.. 5Yl1„�.5......{'...5�` �w�. County:...........C� ................................................
OwnerName: � !�Y.. '."........... 5g,�? �� �. s................... .. Phone No:.......................................................................................
.......................... ...... ...............................
Facility Contact: .............
Mailing Address: .............
Onsite Representative: -
Certified Operator;.,......,
Location of Farm:
........................................................ Title:....................
.�tl.ylr. ............5....................................
C. .......... s.�.° t r�:a..........................................................
................ Phone No:....
............. I ......................................... I.................`�:..... .........................,
Integrator:.......C��•" I..... ... . �, .! ..,.......
Operator Certification Number, .........................................
=11111 M C
1 � iii � G
Latitude 0 ' 46 Longitude ° 6 C°
SWme
Des..gn
Capacity:. F
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
...
Number•of Lago©n"s 1 Holding Ponds''�� �1 ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑ Lagoon Area IDSpray Field Area
y ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
o
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes f,No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. 1f discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes t4 No
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require ❑ Yes 19 No
maintenance/improvement?
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design? ❑ Yes I? No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge? ❑ Yes ftNo
7/25/97

Facility Number: 2k —
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed? ❑ Yes No
Structures (Laeoons,lioldine fonds, Flush Pits, etc.)
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Yes No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure G
Identifier: rr S -
Freeboard (ft): Z .
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures? ❑ Yes H No
l I- Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ® No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenancelimprovement? ❑ Yes 14 No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses
an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
Waste Application
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type LJo M..�.� I'.c!..
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19. Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
For Certified or Permitted Facilities Only
23. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
24, Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Permit?
:3� No.vio'lations ar. deficiencies were: noted,dur'ing this.. visit.' 66", ili i-ece'i:ve-n' 6-further
correspondence 6466t this'visit:: .'
22. VQ Imo,, N s f A, ly s ".5 , O.,-cc- Q,�ery y �„ n4it's,
Neap O kQR� 1�5hjIfpn VOCJ' AT D� .� Tie - 2 ,
I's tAq(C 4-o kwp `tt N f 1�+��4-► �� �4n �.
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes 56 No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes 9 No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes M No
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes No
j� Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes IM No
❑ Yes 6 No
❑ Yes ❑ No
7125197
Reviewer/Inspector Name..
t
x' ., ,
,,.
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date: / f• l o r `r g

R
D5WC Animal Feedlot Operation Revlew , w"�`�N1NcroOPPy
ce
'.+'Yeti
' ❑DWQ Animal Feedlot Operatioin Site'Inspectlon f1 1997
Routine OComplaint Q Follow-up of DWQ inspection C Follow-ug of DSWC reviel, O Other,...
Facility Number
Date of Inspection Z7-9 7
�� �'y Time of Inspection 24'hr. (hh:mm)
Total Time (in fraction of hours
Farm Status: ❑ Registered ❑ Applied for Permit (ex:1.25 for I hr .I5 min)) Spent on Review®
,g Certified ❑ Permitted or Ins section includes travel andprocessing)
❑ Not Operational Date Last Operated: ...................................................................... ....... .......................... ............... ....,...
Farm Name:�,Q��L4?f�...._.. Sa'��!»,.. �� .ti ...!�i . County: _............... ....
Land Owner Name: '+ Zqq
.7 r' rr .... ..................:6` ...1.,°�.5 ,....»................. Phone No:. ...._1...4�.
Facility Conctact:...�...»l ••„-.....»...�! .l. r.1...1 i.�. ...... Title: ................................................ Phone No:................ »_..........._ .... »......
Mailin Address:..L.�...L. .l D .. _3..........................._......., /. .IVI. l .r'...C'.:.C"......».........z..7...�........
g t. ....». p..... ,! f..
Onsite Representative: .. ..... .......».................................. Integrator: 1�f1 .. i .% ..w.!t i Ir�:!`r..�...............
Certified Operator:....:..(»..�....... 2b41 .n5 ...... fir.. ...... ........ .»........... Operator Certification Number: .................
Location of Farm:
........ fa CryR .. ... �C1i .1l� ....t�wQM?ra
:%J '�„..
......... ..
�.... .... .....f. ... .G A.i. A.%:!r .......... .....
Q
............................... .... ...._............... ... .......... .............. ................. ..................... ................... ................ ..... ...................... ..
Latitude Longitude ®•0
f
Type of Operation and Design Capacity
�# rir, $w Designer r'Current y aaDesignCurrcnt DesignCurrenE
Swine a. Pouft Cattle ,
w kCa iicf PoulatlunW� �7' �. ` a a i o uTittian a.... :: a cf :a o "la on .
:.
❑ Wean to Feeder La r m Da'
.,.
Feeder to Finish ❑ Non -La er ❑ Non -Dairy
t - s. s u�t2 3z• y, ,.#.
Farrow to Wean'
Farrow to FeederrTotal DesignCt3paCltya tt
Farrow to Finis" h
(yam � � �Y ;,��'�
❑ Other ,�' hw}� 3 �+'�#•�* Y_S $-- ki�ir�,µ �yy3}
N
......
`'Number of Lagoons ! Holdlag fonds ❑ Subsurface Drains Present sw
a ,
` �`RY" �. rr �� Lagoon Areas I[] Spray Field Area
0 � �, �'pA� # :,�:���� �: ` u ,ter .V � }��,�r , .. •�� ��.. ., r,,
General
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoons/holding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
4/30/97
❑ Yes P No
❑ Yes p No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes No
r
❑ Yes No
❑ Yes JA No
Continued on back

Facility Number: .........._
6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge?
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
Structures
9. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate?
Freeboard (ft): Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3
...._ .. ....».....»...... ............................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
Structure 4
11, Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
12. Do any of the structures need maintenancerimprovement?
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
Immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adequate minimum or maximum liquid level markers?
❑ Yes % No
❑ Yes [A No
❑ Yes 50 No
❑ Yes fA No
Structure 5 Structure 6
14. Is there physical evidence of over application?
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15. Crop type %.�.......r S.C.............. .................................. _....»».._....... ......... .... ..........
».....»
16. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan (AWMP)?
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
18. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
19, Is there a lack of available waste application equipment?
20. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
21. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
22. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
23. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
24. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑ Yes [%No
❑ Yes 19 No
❑ Yes 10 No
i
❑ Yes WNo
i
❑ Yes PNo
i
❑ Yes IN(No
❑ Yes ErNo
A Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes XNo
❑ Yes ANO
❑ Yes EfNo
❑ Yes JO No
❑ Yes ® No
JB Yes ❑ No
Comments (refer to; queskion, #) lxplain�any YES'`answers and/oi".any recommendations`or any other comments'
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations: (use additional pages .as recess
�Y),;
ape- f e.)� o beyr" vJA— Fa, It dvQ- 4,o k Q
Of O-c; c�.�' Li nL tv _ Ae.8 0�-ccvrc## \3
`0 Sol I S� o 5 ,/ i �S
Reviewer/Inspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date: 6 - t -) - cl
:c: Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section, Facility Assessment Unit
4130/97