210004_ENFORCEMENT_20171231

NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environmental quaff

ENFORCEMENT
ENFORCEMENT
ENFORCEMENT

° o
® LA'.Wri�Y1111 ����
°
�
[LU11
m
FNC� AL
USE
-r
Postape $
m
Certified Fee
os
s
Q
Q
Retum MR ReceiptRequiFee
{Endo.=red)
FI
0
1 '
Restrloted bellwry Fie a
(Endorsement Requlmd)
q.
�
L I f •. J, I i J
G
-
rU
Total Poatage & Fees
I'' I y
lJ'� I,J'I., t17..j I-L.r
MS DOROTHY STALLINGS
C3
Sire 249 WHITEHOUSE RD
""""""
, J J 1 � i ;
BELVIDERE NC 27919
--------
J. .1 _.J J. 1
., : S •L .i ., I � J. J I o J r J L' J 1. J J I }
J •,,
_j i , J t ,�- �J 1 .L L 1 , J. .l J . • .L
J. IJ J J
A
.I I 1 .f
a J I I J r J J 1 .LJ l,J , 1 �•
t . 1 L J
61

i
249 Whitehouse Road
Belvidere, N. C. 27919
November 7, 2007
Mr. David May
Division of Water Quality
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, North Carolina 27889
RE: Notice of Violation
Nov-2007-PC-0720
Claxton Stallings and Son Farm
Facility Number 21-04
Permit No. AWS210004
Chowan County
Dear Mr. May:
This is in reply to your certified letter dated October 22,
2007 which stated that I was in two (2) violations during an
inspection recently by Ms. Marlene Salyer.., Below is my expla-
nation:
1. Irrigation occurring from April through August
was done on the Bermuda Field; however it was
recorded through error on the Fescue sheet.
2. I failed to send in this waste analysis.
I apologize for these errors, but they were strictly an
over -sight.
With kind regards, I am
NOV ° 1 3` 2007 E
"3TON RECIONA, 0MCE
OV:0 ,
-. ♦ -.,-.ram- � .. _ _
Yours very truly,
9e W. ' J
Doroth W. jta� gs

W A rFq Michael F. Easley, Governor
0t QG William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
�- North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
p Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Chuck Wakild, PE, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION
October 22, 2007
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
CM# 7007 0220 0003 1480 6750
Ms. Dorothy Stallings
249 Whitehouse Road
Belvidere, North Carolina 27919
RE: Notice of Violation
NOV-2007-PC-0720
Claxton Stallings and Son Farm
Facility Number 21-04
Permit NO, AWS210004
Chowan County
Dear Ms. Stallings:
This letter is to notify you that facility number 21-04 is in violation of its Certified Animal Waste
Management Plan (CAWMP) and North Carolina Administrative Code Subchapter 15A NCAC 2T
Section1300. The referenced facility, Claxton Stallings and Son Farm, is located on State Road 1002,
County Line Road, in Chowan County, North Carolina. On October 19, 2007, Marlene Salyer of North
Carolina Division of Water Quality (DWQ) conducted a routine compliance inspection. The following
specific violations are as follows:
1. Irrigation events occurred from April through August on Fescue Pasture; however the
acceptable crop window for Fescue is September through March. In accordance with the
Animal Waste Operation Permit Condition II, No. 1 and 2; The collection, treatment, and
storage facilities, and the land application equipment and fields shall be properly operated and
maintained at all tirrmes. (2) A vegetative cover shall be maintained as specified in the facility's
CAWMP on all land application fields and buffers in accordance with the CAWMP. No waste
shall be applied upon areas not included in the CAWMP.
2. There were eight irrigation events between May 1, 2007 and July 20, 2007 that were not
covered by a current waste analysis. In accordance with the Animal Waste Operation
Permit Condition III, No. 5; An analysis of the animal waste shall be conducted in accordance
with recommended laboratory sampling procedures as close to the time of application as
practical and at least within sixty (60) days (before or after) of the date of application. Every
reasonable effort shall be made to have the waste analyzed prior to the date of application as
close to the time of waste application as possible.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality [ntemet: www,ncwateNualitv,org One
943 Washington Square Mall Phone [phone] NO hCarollina
Washington, NC 27889 Fax [phone] �i7atimal J�/
An Eeual oppwunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper i� YYY �I L �/

Please provide this office with an explanation of the violations within 30 working days after receipt
of this Notice to:
Mr. David May
Division of Water Quality
943 Washington Square Mail
Washington, North Carolina 27889
Your explanation will be viewed and if an enforcement action is deemed appropriate, your
explanation will be forwarded to the Director with the enforcement package for his consideration.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in your Certificate of
Coverage (COC), the General Permit or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of your COC, or
penalties in accordance with the North Carolina General Stature 143-215.6A through 143-215.6C
including civil penalties, criminal penalties and injunctive relief.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact me at 252-948-3939, or Marlene
Salyer, 252-948-3846.
Sincerely,
David May
Aquifer Protection Regional Supervisor
Washington Regional Office
Cc: Carroll's Foods INC
Chowan County Soil and Water Conservation District
NCDSWC-WaRO
Aquifer Protection Animal Central Files
WaRO Compliance Animal Files
MDS Files

,- WATF Lire
`0� RQG Michael F: Easley
Governor
CO William William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
7
Department of Environment and Nature! Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
�Z. �o OW7, 1-66 4i 31.5 October 0, 2002
Mr. Claxton Stallings
Claxton Stallings & Son Farm
249 Whitehouse: Road.
Belvidere, NC 27919
SUBJECT: NOTICE OF VIOLATION
Animal Feedlot Operation: Compliance Inspection
Claxton Stallings.&.Son Farm
Facility No. 21-4.
Chowan County
Dear Mr. Stallings:
This letter is to notify you that the subject facility is in violation of its Certified Animal Waste Management Plan, General
Permit, Title 15A North Carolina Administrative Code, Subchapter 2H, Section .0217(d) and N.C.G.S. 143-215.1.
On August 8, 2002, Daphne Cullom from the Washington Regional Office of the Division of Water Quality conducted an
Animal Feedlot Operation Compliance Inspection at the Claxton Stallings & Son Farm in Chowan County. A copy of the
inspection report is attached for your review.
In general, this inspection was to determine that: (1) the farm has a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP);-(2)
the farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC 2H.0217, Senate Bill 1217, and the Certified Animal
Waste Management Plan; (3) the farm operation's waste management system is being operated properly under the direction
of a Certified Operator; (4) the required records are being kept; and that (5) there are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or
runoff. The following violations were observed during the inspection:
➢ Over application of animal waste in excess of the Plant Available Nitrogen Rate & Hydraulic Loading as set out in your
CAWMP for the receiving crop(s) was noted in the irrigation records (IRR-1 & IRR-2) for the 2001-2002 receiving crop
of small grain and/or Coastal Bermuda. You are advised to review your current WUP for the PAN rate of each
receiving crop as well as the application windows.
➢ The current WUP should be revised to include the correct receiving crops in the fields and to correspond with the
irrigation design. You are advised to contact your Technical Specialist for assistance. The WUP should reflect the
actual cropping scheme of the farm.
➢ Your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan and irrigation records did not include a current waste analyses for
irrigation events in 2002. In Section III. Monitoring and Reporting Requirements, item number 4 of the General
Permit, it is a requirement that a waste analysis be conducted as close to the time of application as practical and at
least within 60 days (before or after) of the date of application. Further, this waste analysis is necessary to complete
your irrigation records and to ensure that over application does not occur. This was previously noted in a Notice of
Deficiency dated June 3, 1999 and February 22, 2001.
➢ The irrigation records of your Certified Animal Waste Management Plan are incomplete and have not been correctly
--maintained- at this facility . It is the responsibility of the Certified Operator in Charge to complete the irrigation records.
943 Washington Square Mall Washington, NC 27889 252-946-6481 (Telephone) 252-946-9215 (Fax)

Page Two
Notice of Violation
October 10, 2002
Claxton Stallings & Son Farm
The irrigation records should correspond with the acreage, fields, and PAN per receiving crop in the waste utilization
plan. irrigation activities should also be conducted in accordance with your Irrigation Design. In Section III.
Monitoring and Reporting Requirements, item number 5 of the General Permit it is a requirement that land
application records be maintained by the PermMee in chronological and legible form for a period of three years. This
has been previously noted in Inspection Reports and Notice of Deficiencies dated July 14, 1997, November 20,
1998, and June 3, 1999.
Please review the attached inspection report for further comments. It is very important as the owner and/or the Operator in
Charge that these aforementioned violations and any other problems that may arise be resolved, as soon as possible. For
additional assistance, please contact your Technical Specialist.
You are requested to respond in writing to this notice within 15 days of receipt, outlining the corrective actions that have been
undertaken and/or have been planned to address these violations and any further actions taken to prevent future violations
of this nature from occurring. The effectiveness of your response will be a factor in the consideration of future enforcement.
Please be advised that this letter does not prevent the Division of Water Quality from taking enforcement actions for past
or future violations.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in you Certificate of Coverage (COC), the
General Permit or the CAMP may result in the revocation of the COC, or penalties in accordance with NCGS 143-
215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties, and injunctive relief.
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact me at
252-946-6481, ext, 212 or Daphne Cullom at ext. 321.
Sincerely,
Ji ulligan
Regional Supervisor
cc: Carroll's Foods, Inc..
Chowan County SWCD Office
Chowan County CES Office
Carl Dunn, P.E., NCDSW WaRO (w/out attachments)
NSposcharge Compliance Group (w/out attachments)
aRO
DBC Files

Type of Visit O. Compliance inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit O Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
IacilifV Number 21 4 Date of Visit: S�anoo2 'Time: 10:45 am
0 Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
Permitted ® Certifed © Conditionally Certified © Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold:. .........................
Farm Name: IkjaUavLSjaUjnga.&.;59zt.FArM ............................ .. Countt•: Cjmw;m....... :..................................... WaRlD..... ...
Owner Name: 1 j&xtart.................................. 5181 ttgi..................................................... Phone No. MZ-29.T-20.7.6..........................................................
Mailing Address: j4%3NWte wusgLRmd....................................................................... B9.t 1dffx.f! C....................................................... 17919 .............
FacilityContact: ............................................................................. Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
Onsite Representative: >.! owasa.t>Itt ilxe.................... ... Integrator: CA rxull i.Fwdfi.J=..................
Certified Operator:.Cl tttl.FR............................ StAIRT1 AIr..................................... Operator Certification Number: .177.4.t` .............................
Location of Farm:
Located SR 1002 (County Lime Rd.), approximately 1 mile north of intersection of NCSR 1301 and NCSR 1002. Farm path is #
ocated on the left side when going north. qF
® Swine [3 Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 36 • 19 ' 40 �s Longitude 76 • 34 ' 007 64
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish 1100 —1100
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
® No
Discharge origniated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is obsen ed, was the com.-cyance man-made?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b. If discharge is obsctvcd, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes. notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in sal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes
❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑ Yes
®No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
❑ Yes
® No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) Iess than adequate? ❑ Spillway
❑ Yes
® No
Structit re 1 Structure 2 Stnicture 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Stricture 6
Ideutil'ier:......F atxsxo.#2........................................................................................................................................................................................
Freeboard(inches)' ...19.............................. 3.1............... ................................................................................. ..................

Facility Number: 21 '4 Date of Inspection 8/8/2002 =r"
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑Yes ®No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑Yes ®No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenancetimprovement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding N PAN ® Hydraulic Overload ® Yes ❑ No
12. Crop type Coastal Bermuda (Graze) Small Grain Overseed Fescue (Graze)
13. Do the receiving crops dyer with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)7 ❑ Yes N No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for laud application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? 0 Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WLJP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ic/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria is effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes N No
® Yes ❑ No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ® Yes ❑ No
113 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
❑ Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
Freeboard level adequate.
IS. Monitor weed growth in pasture.
Please send a copy of your most recent soil analysis, waste analysis, irrigation records and freeboard records to the
DWQ-WARO.
10-10-2002, D. Cullom - Requested records were submitted to the DWQ-WaRO on 8-28-2002 for review.
11, 19, & 25. Soil Analysis dated 8-27-2002; lime as suggested. Waste Analysis dated 8-12-2002, Sample 1 - 7.9
ReviewerlInspectorNamett< ?' ",",crier
I�n�riawa�I�nnnanln� Citrnafa�m•� ���
narP. 1p _I O d Z

isio 01
. p
Facility Number: 21-4 Date of Inspection F 8I8/2002
Continued
Odor Issues
26, Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours?
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon?
30, Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanenthemporary cover?
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
I �pp VAS/i4p�tp f.Y Vr A 641 y of k C ;E - '' S 4 C }i i4 ", A15{R 1 1211 r,V i R 5k2
95�_�1� SSE1'-r IV'A ad�y _3157 fat d� C"`,'ek� -,L pL�iay�..:;'� .,fie.e!�".:_aft S�C.-YS-'y 57�'.'npP)ti^:cCs.'c"M�f
n..wIR- i .--.I.h6v
lbs./1000 gals. & Sample 2 - 0.66 lbs./1000 gals. It is suggested to resample the lagoon that sample 1 came from due
o the high level of the sample. The irrigation records submitted were for Coastal Bermuda. No irrigation records
were submitted for Fescue or Small Grain, however waste applications were noted during the winter months on
Coastal Bermuda, which should have been an overseed. Your Waste Utilization Plan does not have Small Grain
Overseed listed as a receiving crop. Therefore, you had small grain overseed as a receiving crop and need to add it to
our Waste Utilization Plan or irrigation occurred on Coastal Bermuda when it was dormant. Both of these situations
is a violation of your Waste Utilization Plan and General Permit. Your current Waste Utilization Plan allows you to
irrigate on Coastal Bermuda from April - August and all receiving crops must be a part of your Waste Utilization
Ian.
e review of the irrigation records showed that the waste applications for Small Grain & Coastal Bermuda are
calculated on the same sheet. It is suggested to keep IRR-1 and IRR-2 forms for each recieving crop with the
appropriate PAN rate listed in the WUP. This was been suggested in previous DWQ inspections to prevent
overapplication from occurring for each recieving crop. It was also noted that the same waste analysis was used for
all application events. As advised in previous inspections, a waste sample must be collected within 60 days of waste
application.
was also noted that when calculating your irrigation records you divide the total flow rate of 16.3 gal/min/sprinkler
y 7 to equal 2.32 gal/min/sprinkler and you do the same when you use 9 sprinklers to get 1.81 gal/min/sprinkler.
r
This is incorrect; when calculating your irrigation records you should use the total number of gal/min. for each
sprinkler to complete the irrigation records. According to your irrigation design' each sprinkler applies 16.3 gal/min.
erefore, this is the correct number to enter into column 6 on the IRR-2 forms. According to the review of your
irrigation records, they have been incorrectly calculated, therefore significant overapplication and hydraulic overload
as occurred.
You are advised to recalculate your irrigation records as noted above. You are further advised to use the correct
acreage/field, crop irrigation window, current waste analysis, number of sprinklers, and total gallons/minute in the
completion of your irrigation records.
As a result of these violations and review, your Waste Utilization Plan, Lagoon Design, and Irrigation Design are
being forwarded to Carl Dunn, P.E., with the NC Division of Soil & Water for further review.This facility will reciev
a Notice of Violation for the aforementioned violations of the General Permit and CAWMP. A follow-up inspection
will be conducted to review your corrected irrigation records. Please contact your County Extension Office and/or
Technical Specialist for assistance. If you have further questions, please call me at 25 2-946-64 8 1, ext. 321.

P + T
„rLn D 0
1 +.IT -`Y
m
0 F F
Q C 0 A
L
tIr
m
Postage
$ . tt I'1
NC
M1
Milled Fee
2.
��('JK
�' pC� �a
Return Recalpt Fee
'
r
d„n
o
0
{Endorsement Required)
�}`
O
ReaWW Delivery Fes
p
(Endorsement Requhed)
7btel Postw A Foss
$ �1(, S
u sP
MR CLAXTON STALLINGS
0
249 WHITEHOUSE ROAD
----- ----
a
BELVIDERE NC 27919
d_...._
.............
I
'

■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
■ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
t. Article Addressed to:
PAIR CLAXTON STALLINGS
249-WHITEHOUSE ROAD
BELVIDERE NC 27919
4
J
A. Signature
X ❑ Agent
Addressee
S. Received by (Prrn d Name) C, Fbat. gl LWAZ
D. Is defiverp.ziidns differer,s froriTitem 1? ❑ Yes
If YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No
3. Sepfce Type
Certified Mail
❑ Express Mail
❑ Registered
❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise
❑ Insured Mail
❑ G.O.D.
4, Restricted Delivery? {Extra Fee) ❑ Yes
z 70O2-0460 oaa2 7585 9315
PS Form 3811, August 2001 Domestic Return Receipt 102595-02-M-1s40

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
First -Class Mail
Postage & Fees Paid
111111 USPS
Permit No. G-1 D
• Sender: Please print your name, address, and ZIP+4 in this box •
MR JIM MULLIGAN
DWQ
943 WASHINGTON SQUARE MALL
WASHINGTON NC 27889
1rj7 13E1E111EE11111111E1111iIM 114lIEl11111111itW1i11111E1it411

tr
W &X-b
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Rose, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Kerr T. Stevens
Division of Water Quality
February 22, 2001
Mr. Claxton Stallings
Claxton Stallings & Son Farm
Route 1, Box 138
Belvidere, North Carolina 27919
SUBJECT: Notice of Deficiency
Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
Claxton Stallings & Son Farm
Facility No, 21-4
Chowan County
Dear Mr, Stallings:
Enclosed please find a copy of the AnimaaI Feedlot Operation Site Inspection (as it is viewed in DWQ database) conducted
at the referenced facility by the Division of Water Quality from the Washington Regional Office. Please read this
inspection and keep it with all other documents pertaining to your animal operation for future inspections.
In general, this inspection included verifying that: (1) the farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC
21-1.0217, Senate Bill 1217, the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan and/or General Permit; (2) determine whether
the waste utilization plan is based on total or actual wetted acres; (3) the farm operation's waste management system is
being operated properly under the direction of a Certified Operator; (4) the required records are being kept; (5) there arc
no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or runoff. The following deficiencies were noted during the inspection.
(p In accordance with condition III, item 4 of your General Permit, an analysis of animal waste shall be conducted
as close to the time of application as practical and at least within 60 days (before or after) of date of application.
The analysis shall include the following parameters: Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Zinc and Copper.
As a reminder, please note the following which are conditions of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan and the
general permit therefore these items must be implemented:
cp The nttaximum waste level in lagoons/storage ponds sluall not exceed that specified in the CAWMP. At a minimum,
maximum waste level for waste for lagoons/storage ponds must not exceed the level that provides adequate storage to
contain 25 year, 24 hours stonn event plus an additional foot of structural freeboard
(p Soil analysis is required annually
c) The following records are required: rainfall and lagoon level data, off -site solids removal, maintenance, repair, waste/soil
analysis and land irrigation records. These records should be maintained by the facility owner/manager in chronological
and legible form for a minimum of three years.
(p Land application rates shall be in accordance with the CAWMP. In no case shall land apRl cation rates exceed the Plant
Available Nitrogen AN) rate for the receiving_crop or result in runoff during any_ Wye amlication.
cp Keep lagoons/storage ponds free of foreign debris including, but not limited to tires, bottles, plastic products, light bulbs,
gloves, syringes or any other solids waste.
T The lagoon areas should be kept mowed or otherwise controlled and accessible. High grass does not allow you to conduct
a thorough inspection of the lagoon area for seepage, rodent damage, etc.
cp It is suggested not required to keep crop yield information for future use to update your waste management plan. You will
need three years of crop yield data before your plan can be updated
943 Washington Square Mall Washington, NC 27889 252-946-6481 (Telephone) 252-M-9215 (Fax)

Cont. Stallings
Page Two
Thank you for your assistance and cooperation during the inspection. If you have any questions, please contact meat 252/946-
6481, ext. 318 or your Technical Specialist.
Sinter ly,
Lyn son
Environmental Specialist
Cc: Chowan NRCS
Non -Discharge Compliance Unit (w/out attaclvnents)
NCDSWC-WaRO (w/out attachments)
V(VaRO
LBH files

r
Type of Visit S Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit S Routine O Complaint Q Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 21 4 Date of Visit: 12/18/2000 Time: 12:25 Printed on: 1212212000
PJ Not Operational 0 Below Threshold
0 Permitted ® Certified 0 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
FarmName: .............................................................. County: QQ.yyan ............................................. FARO........
OwnerName: Qq;itan..................................$11111wg$..................................................... Phone No: 252-2 2- Q.7............................................................
FacilityContact: ..............................................................................Title:................................................................ Phone No:
MailingAddress: Rt.j.BRX..l3.S.......................................................................................... U0jYjdart.NC................................
Onsite Representative: ......................
Integrator:
Z.7.9].9..............
Certified Opera tor:ClAxtoA..................................&AIJARgs........................................... Operator Certification Number:17.7.49 .............................
Location of Farm:
Located SR 1002 (County Line Rd.), approximately 1 mile north of intersection of NCSR 1301 and NCSR 1002. Farm path i
located on the left side when going north.
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 36 19 40 Longitude 1 76 34 00
Design Current
Swine Canneity Pnnulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
® Feeder to Finish
1100
0
❑ Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design . Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity 1,100
Total SSLW 148,500
Number of Lagoons 2 j ❑ Subsurface Drains Present 110 Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps I ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes 0 No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes ® No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes 0 No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: ............................................................................................................................................................................
❑ Yes ® No
Structure 6
Freeboard (inches): 24 43
e inn

v
5/00 Continued on back
Facility Number: 21-4 Date of Inspection 12/18/2000 Printed on: 12/22/2000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenancelimprovement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ❑ No
12. Crop type Fescue Bermuda
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ® No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ® No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ® No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ®No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Re aired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
0' iVo violations:or defcieacies we . . 'a' .ed:durin this visit: Yott:wilt. . . .v. . . further
. - corresvondence about #his xisit. - . ,
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes IN No
Cmments refer'to,�uestion # : Explain an YES answers and/or ab •recomznendattonso.r an ether comments
Use drawings of facfhty to better explain si uaati6hs. (use ndditional.oages as necessary) �y.. •; < , ; r r.. '.
Records available for review._
Waste analysis: 10/4/00 = 1.1 lbs, 0.90 lbs; 3/16/00 = 2.2 lbs, 2.0 lbs
Waste samples must be collected so that each irrigation event is covered by a sample. In other words,
within 60 days of the sample, before or after. Suggest to collect samples quarterly.
Waste plan indicates Bermuda grass with 325 lbs of nitrogen allowed.
The growing season is from April to August, therefore, irrigation between this period is deducted from
325 lbs. Small grain overseed season is September through April -allows 50 lbs of nitrogen.
SEE PAGE 3 w
Reviewer/Inspector Name Lyn Hardison Entered by Ann Tyndall
— .. ir_____._..__ n!__. ...-. II . . n. . , le e.. . . fi',._ 71..a... ..

'0• .
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 51001
Facility Number: 21— 4 Date of Inspection 12/18/2000 Printed on: 12/22/2000
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes ® No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes ®No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes ®No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
S/On

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
.June 3,1999
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Claxton Stallings
Route 1 Box 138
Belvidere, NC 27919
Ll
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT ANo NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: Notice of Deficiency
Claxton Stallings and Son Farm
Facility Number 214
Chowan County
Dear Claxton Stallings,
On May 27, 1999, Carl Dunn from the Washington Regional Office of the Division of Water
Quality conducted an inspection of your animal operation. Your farm records were found to be deficient
during this inspection. Specifically, you must start keeping your irrigation records on Form IRR-2 as
instructed in your certified waste operators training manual. Also, you must take a waste analysis within
sixty days before or after a waste application event.
In addition to the above deficiencies, the rye grass in your bermuda grass field should be cut as soon'
as possible to prevent damage to the bermuda grass. Also, you need to address the problems, on your lagoon
bank caused by rodent tunneling.
During the inspection of your farm, your waste application system was inspected_.for, compliance
with proper application of waste at agronomic rates. However, this inspection was not completed due to a
lack of irrigation parameters that should be contained in your irrigation design. Please contact your irrigation
designer and provide to this office a map of the fields being irrigated including the actual acreage contained
within the irrigation design. Please provide the irrigation design information to this office no later than June
27,1999. If this information is not provided to this office, your farm will be subject to a full wettable acres
termination that must be completed by a technical specialist or professional engineer.
Thank you for your cooperation in this inspection. If you have any further questions in regard to
this matter or if I may be of any assistance, I can be contacted at [phone] ext. 208.
Sincerely,
a149-1-.—
Carl Dunn
Environmental Engineer
cc: WaRO
CompliancelEnforcement
Chowan County NRCS
Carroll's Foods of Va Inc
943 Washington Square Mail, Washington, NC 27889 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]

Revised April 20, 1999
JUSTIFICATION & DOCUMENTATION FOR MANDATORY WA DETERMINATION
Facility Number )q - I Operation is flagged for a wettable
Farm Name: cl.'A, 51011.1, .4 5--po acre determination due to failure of
On -Site Representative:_CP 54, if, k 15 Part 11 eligibility item(s) F1 F2 F3 F4
Inspector/Reviewer's Name: Cti 1 i —
Date of site visit: S--2-7- til
Date of most recent WUP:
Annual farm PAN deficit:
pounds
Operation not required to secure WA
determination at this tibased on
exemption E1 E2 E . E4
Operation pended for wettable. acre
determination based on P1 P2 P3
Irrigafion.System(s) - circle #: 1. Lard -hose traveler, 2. center -pivot system; 3. linear -move system;
4. stationary sprinkler system w/permanent pipe; 5. stationary sprinkler system w/portable pipe;
6. stationary gun system w/permanent pipe; 7. stationary gun system w/portable pipe
PART 1. WA Determination Exemptions (Eligibility failure. Part 11, overrides Par',] exemption.!
E1 Adequate irrigation design, including map depicting wettable acres, is complete
and signed by an I or PE.
E2 Adequate D, and D)D3 irrigation operating parameter sheets, including reap
depicting wettable acres, is complete and signed by an I or PE.
E3 Adequate D, irrigation operating parameter sheet, including map depictinc
wettable acres, is complete and signed by a WUP.
E4 75% rule exemption as verified in Part Ill. (NOTE: 75 % exemption cannot be
applied to farms that fail the eligibility checklist in Part 11. Complete eligibility
checklist, Part I1- F1, F273, before completing computational table in Part 111).
PART If. 75% Rule..Eligiibility.Checklist and Documentation of WA Determination
Requirements. WA Determination required.because,operation -fails-one of the elioibiiity
requirements Jisted:below:
F1 Lack.ofacreage-which7esulted in:over-mpplicabon-of-wastewater-(PAN) on -spray -
field (s):according:to:farm'sdast- woyears_ofirrigation-Tecords:=.
F2 Unclear,- ill egible;-or-lack-ofinformation/ma p.
_F3 ObWous-field limitatiorasp(rirlmerous�ditches;fail ure:tozleductTequired�::
bufferlsetbacl<_acreage,:of=25Jo ofiotal:acreageddentifted.iri_CAWNIP_irfdu'des
smal1,jrreguladyzhapedfelds - fieids:less-than:5=acresforAra_ velers-orJess�an
2 acres for:§tationarytgpririklers).
F4 WA determination required because CAWMP credits fields j's acreage in excess
of 75% of the respective field's total acreage as noted in table in Part 111.

Revised April 20, 1999
Facility Number -
Part Ill. Field by Field Determination of 75% Exemption Rule for WA Determination
TRACT FIELD TYPE of TOTAL, CAWMP FIELD COMMENTS3
NUMBER NUMBER1,2 IRRIGATION ACRES ACRES %
SYSTEM
i
4
1
1
f
L
FIELD NUMBER' - hydrant, -pull, zone, or point numbers -may be used in place of field numbers depending an CAWMP
and type of irrigation, system., If pulls,, etc. cross more than one field, inspector/reviewer will have to combine fields to
calculate 75% field by field determination for exemption; -otherwise operation will be subject to WA determination.
FIELD NUMBERS - must bexiearly delineated -on map::
COMMENTS' back-up fields with CAWMP.acieage exceeding 75% of its total acres and having received less -than 50%
of its annual PAN as documented in#hefarm'sprevious-two years'. (1997. &1998) of irrigation'records,-cannot7serve as the .
sole basisfor_Tequiring•a WA Determirration:_Back up fieldsmust:beroted in-themomment-section-and must bemccessible
by irrigation:system:::.
Part IV: Pending -WA-Determinations
PI Plan-] acks following information:
P2 Plan -revision may_3atisiy?5%,rile based :on -adequate -.overail PAN.deficitand by
adjusting -all feld:adreage�obelow:75% use Tate
P3 Other (ie/in-process -of .installing,new irrigation system):__ _ _

0 Division of Soil and' Water Conservation '.operationIReview
Division of Soil and Water Conservation' _ 6mpiiance',Inspettionl,
Division of Water Quality Compliance Inspec4on k•,� „��
Other Agency -Operation Review 1
J® Routine O Complaint Q Follow-up of DWQ inspection Q Follow -tie of DSWC review Q Other
Facility Number 2 Mite of Inspection 5-27— 9
Time of Inspection - 24 hr. (hh:mm)
© Permitted ,Certified ❑ Conditionally Certified © Registered Not O erational Date Last O crated:
P
FarmName : ............C.1 ^. x+',.........5.. ......� 5..f.............................,. F.'.�, -. ,......... County:...............C. ���1........................ .......................
OwnerName:................I... ........................ S'� I r Pone o........................................................................................
............................................... b N
FacilityContact : ................................. --... ........ ............................. Title:.......................................... Phone No: ...............
MailingAddress:.................................................................................................................................................................................. ..........................
Onsite Representative: r S "1 ^ I.............5's ....... Integrator:.......... `'1.:' .,....................................................
Certified Operator:_ .............C..F.........."YS..............�..r:.................. ....... Operator Certification Number:..........................................
Location of Farm:
................................. ................................................................................................ ................
Latitude Longitude �• ��«
Design Current '" " °` Design Current Design Current,
—Swine. ,: Capacity Population `' Poultry v ''CaOicit , Population' Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder " ❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
Feeder to Finish f 00 aD ❑ Non -Layer 1 10 Non -Dairy
❑ Farrow to Wean
El Farrow to Feeder
❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish j Total Design, Capacity
❑ Gilts
❑Boars Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons ❑Subsurface Drains Present ❑Lagoon Area ❑Spray Field Area
Holding Potids / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes P<No
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field []Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance tnan-made'? ❑ Yes ❑ No
h. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (If' yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/thin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (Il'yes, notify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes PTNo
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes WNo
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway ❑ Yes *No
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier:
Freeboard(inches): ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes XNo
seepage, etc.)
3/23/99 Continued on back

'f Facility Number: — Date of Inspection
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed'and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes V No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? KYes ❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes % No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes 21 No
Waste Anolication
10.
Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
KNo
11.
Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN
❑ Yes
'06No
12.
Crop type & M Ok4 rig ck<
13.
Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)?
❑ Yes
CKNo
14.
a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
Yes
❑ No
15.
Does the receiving crop need improvement?
,Yes
❑ No
16.
Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
9No
Required Records & Documents
17.
Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
18.
Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
Yes
No
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
❑
19.
Does record keeping need improvement? (ic/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
MYes
❑ No
20.
Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes
21 No
21.
Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes
25 No
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, Freeboard problems, over application) ❑ Yes ❑ No
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes No
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ Yes No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes �No
E.. . . yioy (ioiis;ok- deficiencies Were pgted. O(Witrtg 4his:visit; - Y:oit Will-teeeiye 00 futt�gr: - : -
corres' oiid<ence: albout: this vtisit'
Comments (refer to uesfion #) Explain' an YES (swcrs a 'r any other comments' Y i q � � y ndlor any�recommendations o
Use, drawings of facility to better ex lain situations. use additional, a es as necessary)
-7 � P P g l
,/ . Mxj 4 CJ I N^ r'r�n � "7 r-iKSk rA45 ci_A ro;4-e s, �
eEJ
'` � 'T iJ V
rA �Q!
5fr' ^ kC r_-
or ed
' ,z
Ci Lre I
y �iy_
+
S'ys Q'^ "
RQYrI
war
havt q�i
q4rtrt,1rr1
�iQ2d TJ
+o D /Q
� ��rt.
V1V1SioA
0-t
vvOizir J%Ami,:�
N,�d 40
do
Q43
In/'jA,',*., J1 , NC
27YYCI
r- r
Reviewer/Inspector Name
,E
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Date: 5--27, 91
3/23/99

.0
Facility Number: I)atc of lilspection
Odor Issues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below []Yes 'Wio
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours'? ❑ Yes N"No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes 'P*No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes KNo
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted`? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes XNo
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes tSrNo
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/lemporary cover? ❑ Yes UNo
Additional Comments and/orDrawings: y I 4 }
Mzed` c, rem 4. ry o rI T tvi�l K�'11 yv�ae CG., �
Gf . Will vtg[ - n Q v tir4,54C > a ,..,r,1� i T
P � � � �' 7!L- /� "7ei 1 a .a Q jv,— O ^
3/23/99

REVELiE' AGRI PRODUCTS, INC.
P.O. BOX 68
508 WEST BROAD STREET
M[TRFREESBORO. NORTH CAROLINA 57855
TELEPHONE [phone]
PROPOSAL FOR
CLAXTON STALLINGS
RT. 1, BOX 138
BELVIDERE,-NC 27919
OCTOBER 30, 1992
k, pq
JUN
I
WASHINGTON REGIONAL OFFICE
DWO

Mr. Claxton Stallings
Rt. 1, Box 138
Belvidere, NC 27919
October 30, 1992
DDnnncar_
1 - Solid Set Irrigation System to consist of nine (9) sprinklers
rated at 16.3 gpm to give a total of 147 gpm for the whole
system
Irrigation pumping unit with Berkeley centrifugal pump and a 10 HP,
240 volt, single phase electric motor to provide 147 gpm at 185 TDH.
Approximate acres to be_irrigated with this proposal is 5.1 acres.
3

■
4

tiff. � -f• S � afs�..... .1�- _ �. �, s � � °,�i�L., ,.
tt' •� :ti,S` �{ /} tr ti .1 i ",: �. s .:v clif �l c? .Ik•Y� n`SL+Y', t ��-� .%fxt+Ap*ra
�'. \ }ZLt .�� ,.tom �.i:.�i. l;' H. !'"k-ti J•.'N'x.h ++ •ti,r :K ,\ `�j(�� ��a�/�y ' t.
-' '1i � �' '•� �+.� Sa i�i {�i� ('4 +. r� tips�71 FW o• �.. 1' rJ� w r'c \c l`� 1 _
.4 �: 'r,1� �__� �..�„�: ♦ � .` [.! er!, ,�' ,1 s� ..q, 3t.r1�"t .4 . i tal!.-,tom � rx �.� - rr. � �X��:
,r � � + .�:j xtwt[ i •.-'"«�*'7 �''. .,sue'-„ :�' ! �• a •ti- �t [ r •� � � _ . F � h�► _ � a;..
,� 'r d ;:w ] - .;L���.;-. ,C'. '',i ► ,� a - �� •w,. 1�`r � `' )A ' 7 \ tiu�si-x " ti � �t wS � r
- L �tY � � . ., •` t t �L i` F,[ .t s� 4 r" �,� 7. �'LX f _ 3 .M ! -.\t 7[}�aY.
• "l ,: s•rh � �� i •:� SY'r�'l�1 f�Y� h xrt � ti t;j_ -� '\ -} i • !-,;, .
> tir• • !"".,r
Mv
� � - � + 1 7 � - .87. �"'•�� rF�Yi ~q �b� it s�+ i� #�=L'Y.� rr -. L,;�?, � "� .y if��'�i'
• L ,....=�??...iar..;: � �.i��' - _ •• �,: Y T' ' y t�l s, }.s j-�. (+� -' � ' L �j � � j , �n•r
d•` r n i \ �•'�.hS� t s�r r' � r r4f.-yyt` +�. -e. � �+S:c.
';• ' y ii ' +' � � �•* r 'ti ::. L r v `) !.tier d � r, a.w ve 3. `C'�•
.i! s� ,..may i {:. ^.•+ V�`t' • ••. r • '`'. -- :y�" f t ��f �+" .r..,,^�
_�,• S •�^p -. � _ ..A ��. _ eiF Lt -;t �- ISiI:J•1,
�'r�i :.S � a ti •� a i,Y'iti� � z ':+l�s�L' � �': � � I'�' [L rt;i��7L
r � +If;- -. ' � fvL,f �'4� ♦r Z'�*�Y` ¢� f'c r.....' AS'-{ fc �"}� �k_C. •.rr ;`�:i
s t -1: ti_:7 '.L,� 3 'S � •�; '.: '• . ,_i -'i, ��f, �`r.'�� �;�y�t r -, \�v. y.. �r A'�h.'.
r : '. s' �;.; ak y,� ' '�S�%r.1y �$i yy �..;� •'�!' �� r�� �-,3''�� M�.y'` G - t t* .�"^:�'" i�'':
:l. \� i• l i, ► � 'S± .,� •F� . .� � . 'S .fir! Y�,� w - �a r
'Zrw ,'s •.'r ✓" Syr 'Zy:,� i
i�:fE' `i' ye Ir- '� "•.�t•r'`,:., 'y,-•,�,Rd"'`� ,.Si '' _ � 'ti 't't
L� [ .i'Jpr - _ �t`''{ f�i 5, .fyf �: yA. i•. s� 1,+t�� I
1 7� rf�� A�:!•'!T % 1 c f :7F ��5 •T�y�{'•T: �.i+� Iri } f ,r, \ f�,� ��.�'i. yi r - '� 'h�'i :S JrS • � � r '
-y+'y, �y Y:.! �` 4 •)�'' L ,�' Tr,j,` .la, !' �r:t, Ly 'i '•+"•`•.s 1 ry„� v,
-v'- r,4 S�" � S] t:-� a• ^T,St r}y�1 f �`�! r"♦ r-�. >-r, e.; ,�y1Z # n. J t �— •`.�=t: i �: :i,z! .
:r�� r?��,,.7• • t+� .4' r t ij�;"�•7}+{?;7�5 _ fi`:;:`� _ �r ;c��stm.�. •y,,l%� �c s} 1+p- �', v�''.
- *� al'i� 1 � i Ay},w' '�..'�:. y ' � :/ � �'l`j:':..7r LiF' ,�-f�_ii�y�, ..7 � + r ����6 �` y+• ; L
C kx3". F A`�_1'i a; '3 I �; �� r ,si t r'1(t $1.3� {` 1 a- 3?'ya ` ♦}-`F . { -'' }�1•. :
LI
.,.r`rr.',%:f �� �-� ti "iL� - .sf, �s !� 4� 1"' �� r! f - • �?�[ f i �i � � ♦, ��',� �-a- r � 1} r 4
�^'-"•.+�' �.n7•{!1 Z`'�,
rY Y
� •,red-h'yti•�ak .r,Tk 1�1! • L �.,•.=.F � Yr
S
Y4A
{ �} 'r yL.`rIt'}•, ^S') i c.p j yy- >>.f i yx_ f. t !Y f .4w +f. t 7 ♦� ! t.l fir. �r-�� '"` - ;
ti �"' �! t tir i , .%}r•�r•t'r;,r,"►ir`�a7''a ~.t��+ r' ��� ''� Yif'��i y H• -, -t ;,rYP �, q ',.
.��r � r�v "'T Ff .t:''�, 1�•' Yx M, e�� f f:�`F'- 'h �!.y'Ft��..�'.�' l�J.��'"t •�1S+� n,'£,LT''��'„ �p� '�` x:.
_r}y��t� �x:, t iF+_'i! 7} i# pyr•`>4;��+�ft.:'� c+, 'Li�s.f i -+ '�"'r�„ 'Ri a �" ?V'�4-'ir'•`
:•Y.�y't Y' r + � 7 ti r t r f t fr' !/ - �, . ,��µy..� y :,�Y�� f h , ks i i f �'�. ~ ti+k.'�4+r,, � �o s ' r •;,';
r _R � F � '. •i-l.ar. �iY- 2 s-' ...l .1 • L ',n;' ..�+
-- s ;��J� r t '� >k� � a sr :• °� i'� �wr - t �y �': 7��' is `+`°�-� °fi
�.Y �` °�r,j''*,^rah y ��„ fr,[wT �I r•,1; .t�1,L •3:
/(era r';L d'1- + ,t y t' :�1i ,
+`_ r - `' :•Y _ r t . J erg ' �,, t s
i lrL-:1, J"-J—}JhQ't K*t�y'1:'!�n �., �i` ��� �*^l:y`� �i•p q���t�
�}'J il• rT ri.�i..z �y}•�iV7:� ,i' .�" r:.. ��rj'�`�, R:�"l •� �•�f 'r
� ft } r .'iL i $;� 4. f+'` .. r'7'. .ati � i i..� ar$f�.•a�.��t. ��.�+'�;'`{"�2:�� ,�;, , r �'��..•-. .tea= � V :�t�_, . ,��` i
�.''S�'-' - �'"'�`'4=�\c� (�` yi �..� t•a.'ti_.�'nl - +,gin' •'!i
�a. �" .�:ai ^7iF\ S:. t• ��+�� �� yY //It t 1 •K --ff'hs f`.
.�/} !�� Ft r lj�Jpl�7�'1] .'1 • \1�� ^ �,.. R S__;`S v'i
/: .:Ir 17 ./-y�3Ya�-F �.- •. ~r•rf � ��. •1 ��� tiYr.
- r r r[ [ •,r�G i ;4":.. +.l f„ �. 1 'Jol. i' -` • r 1 _U'.
x '1

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
July 14, 1997
Mr. Claxton Stallings
Claxton Stallings & Son Farm
Route 1, Box 138
Belvidere, NC 27919
SUBJECT: Notice of Deficiency
Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection
Claxton Stallings & Son Farm
Facility No. 21-4
Chowan County
Dear Mr. Stallings:
A��
IDEHNR
Vv f\(�-D
On April 17, 1997, Daphne Cullom from the Washington Regional Office of the Division of
Water Quality conducted an Animal Feedlot Operation Site Inspection at the Claxton Stallings &
Son Farm in Chowan County. Overall, the operation was found to be in satisfactory condition. A
copy of the inspection report is attached for your review.
In general, this inspection included verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified Animal Waste
Management Plan (CAWMP); (2) the farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15
NCAC 2H.0217, Senate Bill 1217, and the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan; (3) the farm
operation's waste management system is being operated properly under the direction of a Certified
Operator; (4) the required records are being kept; (5) there are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or
runoff. The following deficiencies were observed during the inspection
1. The Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP) did not contain all of the
required components. Please find attached a list of the required components. The
only components of the plan that were available for review were the waste
utilization plan and waste analysis (11/7/96). Please compile the remaining
components of the plan. You are required to maintain a copy of this plan on site.
2. Maximum and minimum pump markers need to be installed in the lagoon. These
markers are to be installed to show the top and bottom elevations of the temporary
Storage (pumping volume) of the lagoon. Pumping should be managed to maintain
943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, NC 27889 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled / 1 D% post -consumer paper

Mr. Claxton Stallings
Claxton Stallings & Son Farm
July 14, 1997
Page 2
the liquid level between the markers.
3. Irrigation records need to be kept. Please find attached copies of IRR-1
and IRR-2 forms.
It is very important as the owner and the Operator in Charge that you resolve these
aforementioned deficiencies and any other problems that may arise, as soon as possible.
For additional assistance, please contact your Technical Specialist and/or the local Soil &
Water Conservation District Office. Nothing in this letter should be taken as absolving
this facility of the responsibility and liability of any violations that have resulted or may
result from these deficiencies.
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance during the inspection. Should you have
further questions or comments regarding this inspection, do not hesitate to call Daphne
Cullom at [phone], ext. 321.
Sincerely,
Roger Thorpe
Water Quality Supervisor
cc: Chowan County SWCD Office
DSWC-WaRO
Compliance Group
ACentral Files
RO

16 xoutme p L ompfa}nt p ronow-up of 1Jwt2 inspection p ro{iow-up of uNwt, review p utner
Date of Inspection
Facility Number
Time of Inspection 24 hr. (hh:mm)
Farm Status: Certified 1 �3
Farm Name: 1CbWon Stallings.&.San.Farm ............................................................... County: Chowan WaRO
OwnerName: Claxton ................................. Stallings..................................................... Phone No: 29.7.-.207.6 ...................................................................
MailingAddress: RU.Bux.118..................................................................................... Belvidet:e..NC....................................................... 2.7919 .............
Onsite Representative: Mr...Claxtna.Stallings,Jr...................................................... Integrator: Erank-Willisms n.(VA..BeaXW .............
Certified Operator:ClAxton.F............................. Stalliagair..................................... Operator Certification Number: 1.7.74Q..............................
Location of Farm:
Latitude ®• ®' ®- Longitude ®• ®6 ®11
pNot OperationalDate Last Operated: ......................................................................................................................................................
Type of Operation and Design Capacity
Ceneral
1. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? p Yes ® No
2. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Surface Water? (If yes, notify DWQ)
c. if discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
3. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
4. Were there any adverse impacts to the waters of the State other than from a discharge?
5. Does any part of the waste management system (other than lagoonstholding ponds) require
maintenance/improvement?
p Yes M No
p Yes M No
p Yes N No
p Yes ® No
p Yes M No
p Yes ® No
p Yes M No

6. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria?
p Yes
M No
7. Did the facility fail to have a certified operator in responsible charge (if inspection after 1/l/97)?
13 Yes
M No
8. Are there lagoons or storage ponds on site which need to be properly closed?
p Yes
M No
Structures (Lagoons and/or Holding Ponds)
9. Is structural freeboard less than adequate?
p Yes
M No
Freeboard (ft): Lagoon I Lagoon 2 Lagoon 3
Lagoon 4
.............2.5. ft............... ............... a. ft............................................................................................
10. Is seepage observed from any of the structures?
p Yes
® No
11. Is erosion, or any other threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
p Yes
M No
12. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
n Yes
M No
(If any of questions 9-12 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
13. Do any of the structures lack adquate markers to identify start and stop pumping levels?
a Yes
p No
Waste_ Application
14, Is there physical evidence of over application?
p Yes
® No
(If in excess of WMP, or runoff entering waters of the State, notify DWQ)
15, Crop type ....... I ...... Coasdal.Bcxmuda Grass ............. ............................. FPscue..... I........................
16. Do the active crops differ with those designated in the Animal Waste Management Plan?
p Yes
N No
17. Does the facility have a lack of adequate acreage for land application?
p Yes
M No
18. Does the cover crop need improvement?
p Yes
®No
19. Is there a lack of available irrigation equipment?
p Yes
®No
For Certified Facilities On Iv
20. Does the facility fail to have a copy of the Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
p Yes
®No
21. Does the facility fail to comply with the Animal Waste Management Plan in any way?
® Yes
p No
22. Does record keeping need improvement?
® Yes
p No
23. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
p Yes
®No
24. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with owner or operator in charge?
p Yes
®No
o sus ace ams are present on a arm co acrdmg to Mr. Sta mg:
iulownia trees for odor control. Please note the following comments:
3 - Maximum (start) and minimum (stop) pump markers need to be installed in the secondary lagoon. This is required due to the
tified status of the farm. The markers are necessary to determine the appropriate tunes to irrigate and not to irrigate and measure
eboard level.
1 & #22 - The certified animal waste management plan (CAWMP) was incomplete. A copy of the waste�utilization plan and a
ste analysis (11/7/96) were available for review. This farm is certified and all records are required to be maintained on site at the
Reviewer/Inspector Name
r14
w
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: IS , p,-V-) Date: z