150011_ENFORCEMENT_20171231

NORTH CAROLINA
Department of Environmental Qua

ENFORCEMENT
ENFORCEMENT
ENFORCEMENT

FRANK I WILLIAMS' FARMS
[phone] P.O. BOX 7100
[phone] 5021 MORRIS NECK ROAD
FAX [phone] VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA 23457
February 4, 2005
David May
regional Supervisor
Aquifer Protection Section
Dear Mr. May:
This letter is in response to the Notice of Violation received for the Belcross
Farm, in Camden County. The farm is owned by Frank T. Williams, and was leased to,
and operated by Northeast Carolina Farms. Mr. Williams had no control over the
management of these farms. 14
Northeast Carolina Farms abandoned the farm in August 2005, essentially leaving
Mr. Williams with a mess. Mr. Williams has decided to close the farm for good. He is
currently dismantling the buildings and is working with Jimmy Munden, of the Camden
County NRCS to close down the lagoon. Bids for the closure have been received and cost
mare funds should be allocated by February 15.
If this letter does not address your concerns, please contact me at 757-334-3145.
Sincerely,
Jc s S,
eph J. Balok
Frank T. Williams Farms
F 4
t FEB 1 4 2005

co
m �� �° G'b .• • . .•
furn
n p m
0 US E71
o aeseoe $ _ 3
oCertiW Fee Z, 3 D
G11 Redept Fee '71 124ti,
(Endorsement Required) a
� {En rd Required) o��� Pntlnna A Fua Q .'m MR. FRANK WILLI oBELCROSS FARM
PO PO BOX 7100
VIRGINIA BEACH VA 23457 """""

■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
■ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
1. Article Addressed to:
❑ Addressee
B Received by (Prrn ame} C. Dat f De!'
1 1 2FJ 5
D. Is delivery address drfierent from Rem 1? 'O Yes
If YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No
AMR. FRANK WILLIAMS
BELCROSS FARM
PO BOX 7100 3. service Type
VIRGINIA BEACH VA 23457 12- edA&II ❑ Express Mail
❑ RegZ ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise
❑ -ins it ❑ C.O.D.
Restricted ivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes
2. Article Number '`' 7 Q 3 31 ;., v Q i? 6 Q 3 2389
--
(&ans(r rrar� service labeg
PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt
102595-02-M-1540

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE First -Class Mail
Postage & Fees Paid
USPS
Permit No. G-10
• Sender: Please print your name, address, and ZIP+4 in this box •
�n
� North Carolina ❑eparttnent of Environment and
Natural Resources!lAquifer Protection
Washington Regional Office
N 943 Washington Square Mall
z Washington, North Carolina 27889
_ Q
d � fll�llFlli�3ll:t�iEli�l�Fl1}��111}illllilEi'i�11EfiEf�iSFI�Ft1

�0F WA rFgp Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
co 7
r North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
p Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Watcr Quality
Aquifer Protection Section
January 14, 2005
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
7003 3110 0002 0603 2389
Mr. Frank Williams
Belcross Farm
PO Box 7100
Virginia Beach, VA 23457
SUBJECT: NOTICE OF VIOLATION
Animal Feedlot Operation Compliance inspection
Belcross Farm
Facility No. 15-11
Camden County
Dear Mr. Williams:
This letter is to notify you that the subject facility is in violation of its Certified Animal Waste Management Plan, General
Permit, Title 15A North Carolina Administrative Code, Subchapter 2H, Section .0217(d) and N.C.G.S. 143-215.1.
On November 12, 2004, Scott Vinson from the Washington Regional Office of the Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
conducted an Animal Feedlot Operation Compliance Inspection at the Belcross Farm in Camden County. A copy of the
inspection report is attached for your review. In general, the Compliance Inspection was to determine if: (1) the farm has a
Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP); (2) the farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15
NCAC 2H.0217, Senate Bill 1217, and the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan; (3) the farm operation's waste
management system is being operated properly under the direction of a Certified Operator; (4) the required records are
being kept; and that (5) there are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or runoff. The following violations were observed during
the inspection:
9 There were no waste analysis to cover irrigation events from November through December of 2003 on wheat nor in May
of 2004 on corn. Remember to take a waste analysis within 60 days of irrigation events. In accordance with condition
III, item 4 of your General Permit, an analysis of animal waste shall be conducted as close to the time of application as
practical and at least within 60 days (before or after) of date of application. The analysis shall include the following
parameters: Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Zinc and Copper.
9 The lagoons are in need of mowing to allow for routine visual inspections. In accordance with condition 11, item 10 of
your General Permit, a protective cover shall be established and maintained on all lagoon/storage pond embankments
(outside toe of embackment to maximum pumping elevation), berms, pipe runs, and surface water diversions. Trees,
shrubs, and other woody vegetation shall not be allowed to grow on the lagoon/waste storage pond embankments. All
trees shall be removed in accordance with good engineering practices. Lagoon/waste storage pond areas shall be
accessible, and vegetation shall be kept mowed.
1po` ma
J1�aCarotural�lt�
North Carolina Division of Water Quality Washington Regional Office Phone [phone] Customer Service
intemet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us 943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, NC 27889 FAX [phone]
A,n Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50'% Recycled/10°% Post Consumer Paper

Page Two
Notice of Violation
January 14, 2005
Beicross Farm
It is very important as the owner and/or the Operator in Charge that these aforementioned violations and any other problems
that may arise be resolved, as soon as possible. For additional assistance, please contact your Technical Specialist.
You are requested to respond in writing within ten (10) days of receipt of this Notice, outlining the corrective actions that
have been undertaken and/or have been planned to address these violations and any further actions taken to prevent future
violations of this nature from occurring. Your explanation will be reviewed and if an enforcement action is still deemed
appropriate, your explanation will be forwarded to the Director with the enforcement package for his consideration. Please
be advised that this letter does not prevent the Division of Water Quality from taking enforcement actions for past or future
violations.
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact me at
252-948-3939 or Scott Vinson at 252-948-3848.
Sincerely,
r"J _
David May
Regional Supervisor
Aquifer Protection Section
cc: Camden County SWCD Office
DSWC-WaRO
APS, Animal Feeding Operation Compliance and Enforcement Unit
WaRO Files
--SAV Files
DMlsav

I
r. .. a '�k"t � k ..h - � 'i•: i!- "h L • �� � "''- „ ;� �—'i "S x C' s � - ice`.. ,+.�'� 'i �1.�'" � �+..
r��' �•d .��� � s. jY � DIVIS140 Af WatErQualttyxf W + ra r a',: a r � � �� r- r ...-.e'+,� w+, 5 *�-.. �, t� �"�..�e.
Sgil and Wate
V' 'w Q Division o
;,:,:
s �� ofr Conservation
a.;t+ r ;{(� +• T ,k�e�,r >. Frc. YH:7i rr ,, ii ait
0 ther.Agency ` r•�r 4 i --.L r r - ; Fc i �_ ",s t A s µ` ti +
„i ."�a ..�.ti •,y� ",.�`' i i. �'r•'• aa +- r
�,-.. c �.:$'. 3 .a.. .s^� ..tu .+t-i.�:.+� xi �r.-,R.a..;L..fse r,.!•e..s.,�.. - •nas6.r��-. .i,
Type of Visit © Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit @ Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Referral O Emergency O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 15 11 Date of Visit: 11/12/Zf104 Time: 12:30
Q Not Operational Q Below Threshold
® Permitted ® Certified © Conditionally Certified E3 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: Mcr.Qss.Faxm........................... .... County: Cai11<drill............................................. WARQ.......
Owner Name: 1W11111a1AlS.FArlgl&..RI.LRrXb.................. Phone No: 2S�-S�-.4.15..tYt........7r�r..4�r.6.-(tz�...................
Mailing Address: zU ..1'►'est.Farm..1?...ay......................................................................... G.Astain..NC............................................................ 2.7.832 ..............
Facility• Contact: ..............................................................................Title:................................................................ Phone No:...................................................
Onsite Representative:J.oslCphjDajak.............................................................................. littegrator:W.iUiAuu.IFa3Cim.Q.f.NC.,.Ilac.............................
Certified Operator:,IQscpbj................................ ftlok................................................. Operator Certification Number:15M.............................
Location of Farm:
1 mile east of Belcross in Camden Co. on east bound rt. 158 +
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude 36 • 21 00 Lonbitude 7ti • 08 12
Design
Current Design
Current
Design Current
Swine Capacity
Population Poultry Capacity
Population - Cattle
Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Layer
❑ Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Non -Layer
JE1 Non -Dairy
® Farrow to Wean 1240
0
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
1,240
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Total SSLW
536,920
Number of Lagoons
]
Discharges & Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed, did it reach Water of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed, what is the estimated flow in gal/min?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5
Identifier: ................................................................................................................................................................................ ......
Freeboard (arches): 33
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
❑ Yes
® No
Structure 6
12112103 Continued

Facility Number: 15-11 Date of Inspection 11/12/2004
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or ❑ Yes ® No
closure plan?
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ® Yes ❑ No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level ❑ Yes ® No
elevation markings?
Waste Application
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ®No
11. Is there evidence of over application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ®No
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Copper and/or Zinc > 3000
12. Crop type Corn, Soybeans, Wheat
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes ®No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment? ❑ Yes ®No
Odor Issues
17. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge at/or below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
18. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? ❑ Yes ® No
19. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
20. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, contact a regional ❑ Yes ® No
Air Quality representative immediately. .
Comments (refer to question #) ,Explain any YES answers and/or anyhrecommendatioas or any ottierrcomm ents. "
Use drawings of facilityX to .better explain 'situations (use additional pages as necessary);- ❑ Field Copy ❑ Final Notes
* Waste 7/19/04 w/ 0.98 lbsN/ I 000gal. AL
2/10/04 w/ 0.98
6/2/03 w/ 1.2
3/24/03 w/ 1.0
* Soils 11/13/03 with up to 1.1 Vac lime required on some fields.
3) Missing waste analysis to cover irrigation events on Wheat in Nov. & Dec. of 2003.
23) Missing waste analysis for corn crop applications in May of 2004. No overapplication noted.
Remember to take waste analysis within 60'days of irrigation events. This resulted from Dr. Cunningham's unwillingness to follow
regulations and lack of funds for proper farm management. Since, Dr. Fred Cunningham has filed bankruptcy and has left the State.
* Had wanted to add Fescue to waste plan and fescue was planted but Dr. Fred Cunningham did not pay Ronald Sneed to supply the
nished work. Fescue has become overgrown with weeds.
) Lagoon needs to be mowed to allow for routine visual inspections. Lagoon is planned to be mowed this winter.
Frank Williams is now in control of farm and is considering closing the lagoon out.
Reviewer/Inspector Name Scot V' so `' . '` -~� A'
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: u /—
12112103 Continued

Facility Number: 15—t t Date of Inspection 11/12/2004-
Required Records & Documents
21. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
22. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(iel WUP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
23. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Waste Application ❑ Freeboard ® Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Sampling
24. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
25. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
26. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
27. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
28. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
29. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
NPDES Permitted Facilities
30. is the facility covered under a NPDES Permit? (If no, skip questions 31-35)
31. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
32. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
33. Did the facility fail to conduct an annual sludge'survey?
34. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment?
35. Does record keeping for NPDES required forms need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below
❑ Stocking Form [_-]Crop Yield Form []Rainfall [:]Inspection After I" Rain
❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Annual Certification Form
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
12112103

Michael F. Easley
Governor
_co (L) r-
> y
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
0 `C Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
September 21, 2004
Fred L. Cunningham, Ms, D.V.M.
Northeast Carolina Farms, Inc.
203 West Farm Way
Gaston, NC 27832
SUBJECT: Check Receipt and Remission Request
Belcross Farm
Camden County
Farm # 15-11
PC 04-007
Dear Dr. Cunningham:
CERTIFIED MAIL,
RETURN RECEIPT_ REQUESTED
This letter is to acknowledge receipt of your check No. 874 in the amount of $500.00 on July
14, 2004. Please excuse the lateness of this acknowledgement. We recently moved to a new
building and the check receipt paperwork was misplaced.
I also received your request for a reduction of the fine but did not receive the waiver or the
justification for remission forms that were included with the penalty assessment. In order for the
Director to consider remission of the civil penalty, please send in the completed forms to:
Steve Lewis
DWQ
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
Duplicate forms are attached for your convenience. Thank you for your attention to this
matter. If you have any questions, please call me at [phone].
l� S E P 2 7 2004
Sincerely,
Steve Lewis
Animal Operations Permits and Compliance
One
---� No Carolina
--WAS111NGTCtI REGi[i?;AL OFFlCE Naturally
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 1636 Mail service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1636 Phone [phone] Customer Service
Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us 2728 Capital Blvd. Raleigh, NC 27604 FAX [phone]
An Equal OpportunitylAHirmative Action Employer- 50% Recyded110% Post Consumer Paper

Dr. Fred Cunningham
Page 2
September 24, 2003
ATTACHMENTS
cc iWavia--Miy,.APS Acting Regional Supervisor
Scott Vinson, WARO
File # PC 04-007 wl attachments
APS Central Files w/ attachments

o=o w A r�94G Michael F. Easley
Governor
rWilliam G. Ross Jr., Secretary
7 -1 Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Coleen H. Sullins, Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
June 11, 2004
Dr. Fred Cunningham
203 West Farm Way
Gaston, NC 27832
SUBJECT: Assessment of Civil Penalties
for Violations of Permit Conditions
Farm # 15-11
Camden County
File No. PC 04-007
Dear Dr. Cunningham:
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
,SUN 18 2004
DWQ-WARD . t
This letter transmits notice of a civil penalty assessed against Williams Farms of North Carolina,
Inc. in the amount of $4,417.99 which includes $217.99 in investigative costs. Attached is a
copy of the assessment document explaining this penalty.
This action was taken under the authority vested in me by delegation provided by the Secretary
of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources and the Director of the Division of
Water Quality. Any continuing violation(s) may be the subject of a new enforcement action,
including an additional penalty.
Within thirty days of receipt of this notice, you must do one of the following three items:
1. Submit payment of the penalty -
Payment should be made to the order of the Department of Environment
and Natural Resources. Payment of the penalty will not foreclose further
enforcement action for any continuing or new violation(s). Do not include
the attached waiver form if making payment.
Please send payment to the attention of:
Mr. Steve Lewis
DWQ
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
�i0a
11 OENR
Customer Service: Mailing Address: Telephone [phone] Location:
1-877-623-6748 1617 Mail Service Center Fax [phone] N. Salisbury St.
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 State Courier #52-01-01 Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
50 % recycled / 10% post -consumer paper
hnp://h2o. enr.stata. nc. us

2. Submit a written request for remission or mitigation including a
detailed justification for such request:
A request for remission or mitigation is limited to consideration of the reasonableness
of the amount of the penalty and is not the proper procedure for contesting the
accuracy of any of the statements contained in the assessment letter. Because a
remission request forecloses the option of an administrative hearing, such a request
must be accompanied by a waiver of your right to an administrative hearing and a
stipulation that there are no factual or legal issues in dispute. You must execute and
return to this office the attached waiver form and the attached "Justification for
Remission Request" which should describe why you believe:
(a) one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in G.S. 143B-282.1(b)
were wrongfully applied to the detriment of the petitioner;
(b) the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting from
the violation;
(c) the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident;
(d) the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations;
(e) payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining necessary
remedial actions.
Please submit this information to the attention of:
Mr. Steve Lewis
DWQ
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
•
3. Submit a written request for an administrative hearing:
If you wish to contest any portion of the civil penalty assessment, you must request an
administrative hearing. This request must be in the form of a written petition to the
Office of Administrative Hearings and must conform to Chapter 150B of the North
Carolina General Statutes. You must file your original petition with the:
Office of Administrative Hearings
6714 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-6714

Mail or hand -deliver a copy of the petition to:
And to:
Mr. Dan Oakley
NCDENR
Office of General Counsel
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1601
Mr. Steve Lewis
DWQ
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
JUN 18 2004
DWQ-WAR®
Failure to exercise one of the options above within thirty days, as evidenced by a date stamp (not
a postmark) indicating when we received your response, will result in this matter being referred
to the Attorney General's Office with a request to initiate a civil action to collect the penalty.
Please be advised that additional assessments may be levied for future violations which occur
after the review period of this assessment.
If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Steve Lewis at [phone], ext. 539 or Ms.
Linda Fitzpatrick at [phone], ext. 526.
Sincerely,
�Ieffrey O_Poupart, Supervisor
Non -Discharge Compliance and Enforcement Unit
JOP/scI
ATTACILMENTS
cc: dittflGlulligaan, Washington Regional Supervisor w/ attachments
Scott Vinson, WARO w/ attachments
File # PC 04-007 w/ attachments
Central Files w/ attachments
Susan Massengale, PIO w/ attachments

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
COMMISSION
COUNTY OF CAMDEN
IN THE MATTER OF ASSESSMENT ) WAIVER OF RIGHT TO AN
OF CIVIL PENALTIES AGAINST ) ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING AND
WILLIAMS FARMS OF ) STIPULATION OF FACTS
NORTH CAROLINA INC. )
FILE NO. PC 04-007
Having been assessed civil penalties totaling $4,417.99 for
violation(s) as set forth in the assessment document of the Director of the Division of Water Quality
dated — _ June 10, 2004 , the undersigned, desiring to seek remission of the civil
penalties, does hereby waive the right to an administrative hearing in the above -stated matter and
does stipulate that the facts are as alleged in the assessment document.
The undersigned further understands that all evidence presented in support of remission of
this civil penalty must be submitted to the Director of the Division of Water Quality within thirty
(30) days of receipt of the civil penalty assessment. No new evidence in support of a remission
request will be allowed after thirty (30) days from the receipt of the civil penalty assessment.
This the day of .20
SIGNATURE
01 8 C
TELEPHONE

JUSTIFICATION FOR REMISSION REQUEST
DWQ Case Number: PC 04-007 County: Camden
Assessed Party: Williams Farms of North Carolina, Inc.
Permit No. (if applicable): AWG 100000 Amount Assessed: $4,417.99
Please use this form when requesting remission of this civil penalty. You must also complete the
" Re uest For Remission Waiver of Right to an Administrative Hearing, and Stipulation o
Facts" form to request remission of this civil penalty. You should attach any documents that
you believe support your request and are necessary for the Director to consider in evaluating
your request for remission. Please be aware that a request for remission is limited to
consideration of the five factors listed below as they may relate to the reasonableness of the
amount of the civil penalty assessed. Requesting remission, is not the proper procedure for
contesting whether the violations) occurred or the accuracy of any of the factual statements
contained in the civil penalty assessment document. Pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 143B-282.1(c),
remission of a civil penalty may be granted only when one or more of the following five factors
applies. Please check each factor that you believe applies to your case and provide a detailed
explanation, including copies of supporting documents, as to why the factor applies (attach
additional pages as needed).
(a) one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in N.C.G.S. 143B-282.1(b)
were wrongfully+ applied to the detriment of the petitioner (the assessment factors are listed in
the civil penalty assessment document);
(b) the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting from the
violation (i.e., explain the steps that you took to correct the violation and prevent figure
occurrences);
— (c) the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident (i.e., explain why the
violation was unavoidable or something you could not prevent or prepare far);
(d) the violator had not been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations;
(e) payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining necessM
remedial actions (i.e., explain how payment of the civil penalty will prevent you from performing
the activities necessary to achieve compliance).
EXPLANATION (attach additional „Rages as necessary):

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND
NATURAL RESOURCES
COUNTY OF CAMDEN
File No. PC 04-007
WILLIAMS FARMS OF )
NORTH CAROLINA, INC. )
} FINDINGS AND DECISION
FOR NON -DISCHARGE GENERAL } AND ASSESSMENT OF
PERMIT VIOLATIONS ) CIVIL PENALTIES
Acting pursuant to delegation provided by the Secretary of the Department of
Environment and Natural Resources and the Director of the Division of Water Quality, I, Jeffrey
O. Poupart, Supervisor of the Non -Discharge Compliance and Enforcement Unit of the Division
of Water Quality (DWQ), make the following:
I. FINDINGS OF FACT:
A. Williams Farms of North Carolina, Inc. (Williams Farms) is a corporation
organized and existing under the laws of the State of North Carolina.
B. Williams Farms owns and operates Belcross Farm, a swine operation in Camden
County.
C. Williams Farms was issued Certificate of Coverage AWS 150011 under General
Permit AWG100000 for Belcross Farm on May 1, 2003, effective May 1, 2003,
with an expiration date of October 1, 2004.
D. Condition No. V. 3. of the General Permit states in part that "The maximum waste
level in lagoons/storage ponds shall not exceed that specified in the Certified
Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). At a minimum, maximum waste
level for lagoons/storage ponds must not exceed the level that provides adequate
storage to contain the 25-year, 24-hour storm event plus an additional one (1) foot
of structural freeboard."
E. The 25-year, 24-hour storm event for the facility's location is seven (7) inches
according to National Weather Service, Technical Paper 40, Rainfall Frequency
Atlas of the United States, 1961.

F. Based on the 25-year, 24-hour storm event of seven (7) inches and one foot of
required structural freeboard, the waste Ievel for adequate storage in the lagoon
for Belcross Farm is nineteen (19) inches.
G. Condition No. M. 6. e. of the General Permit requires that the permittee shall
report by telephone to the appropriate Regional Office as soon as possible, but in
no case more than 24 hours following first knowledge of the occurrence of failure
to maintain storage capacity in a lagoon/storage pond greater than or equal to that
required in Condition V. 3. of the issued permit.
H. Division of Soil and Water Conservation (DSWC) staff from the Washington
Regional Office notified Division of Water Quality (DWQ) staff on March 8,
2004 that the waste level of the lagoon at Belcross Farm had been recorded as less
than 19 inches on four (4) occasions beginning in June 2003. DWQ requested a
copy of the farm's freeboard records and observed that the waste Iev_el of the
lagoon was less than 19 inches on four separate occasions. The first occasion was
from June 9 through July 10 of 2003 with freeboard elevations ranging from 15 to
18 inches. The second occasion occurred on November 3, 2003 with a freeboard
elevation of 16 inches. The third occasion occurred on December 29, 2003 with a
freeboard elevation of 18 inches. The fourth occasion occurred from January 21
through February 23 of 2004 with the freeboard elevations ranging from 14 to 18
inches.
I. The Washington Regional Office did not receive notification from Belcross Farm
that the waste level exceeded the level specified in the CAWMP for any of the
above -mentioned time periods.
J. The costs to the State of the enforcement procedures in this matter totaled
$217.99.
Based upon the above Findings of Fact, I make the following:
H. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW:
A. Williams Farms is a "person" within the meaning of G.S. 143-215.6A pursuant to
G.S. 143-212(4).
B. A permit for an animal waste management system is required by G.S. 143-215.1.
C. The above -cited failures to maintain the liquid level in the lagoon at the level
specified in the CAWMP violated Condition No. V. 3. of the General Permit.

D. The above -cited failures to report by telephone to the appropriate Regional Office as
soon as possible, but in no case more than 24 hours following first knowledge of the
occurrence of failure to maintain storage capacity in a lagoon/storage pond greater
than or equal to that required in Condition No. V. 3 violated Condition No. III. 6. e.
of the General Permit.
E. Williams Farms may be assessed civil penalties pursuant to G.S. 143-215.6A(a)(2)
which provides that a civil penalty of not more than twenty-five thousand dollars
($25,000.00) per violation may be assessed against a person who violates or fails to
act in accordance with the terms, conditions, or requirements of a permit required by
G.S. 143-215.1.
F. The State's enforcement costs in this matter may be assessed' against Williams Farms
pursuant to G.S. 143-215.3(a)(9) and G.S. 143B-282.1(b)(8).
G. The Supervisor of the Non -Discharge Compliance and Enforcement Unit, Division of
Water Quality, pursuant to delegation provided by the Secretary of the Department of
Environment and Natural Resources and the Director of the Division of Water
Quality, has the authority to assess civil penalties in this matter.
Based upon the above Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, I make the following:
III. DECISION:
Williams Farms is hereby assessed a civil penalty of:
$ 1,800.00 for 3 of four violations of Condition No. V. 3. of the
General Permit by failing to maintain the liquid level in the
lagoons at the level specified in the CAWMP
$_ 2,400.00 for 4 of four violations of Condition No. III. 6. e. of
the General Permit by failing to report by telephone to the
appropriate Regional Office as soon as possible, but in no
case more than 24 hours following first knowledge of the
occurrence of failure to maintain storage capacity in a
lagoon/storage pond greater than or equal to that required
in Condition No. V. 3
4,200.00 TOTAL CIVIL PENALTY
$ 217.99 Enforcement costs
$ 4,417.99 TOTAL AMOUNT DUE

As required by G.S. 143-215.6A(c), in determining the amount of the penalty I
considered the factors listed in G.S. 143B-282.1(b), which are:
(1) The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to the public
health, or to private property resulting from the violation;
(2) The duration and gravity of the violation;
(3) The effect on ground or surface water quantity or quality or on air quality;
(4) The cost of rectifying the damage;
(5) The amount of money saved by noncompliance;
(6) Whether the violation was committed willfully or intentionally;
(7) The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with programs
over which the Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority;
and
(8) The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures.
/o f 0 -
(Date) *rey O. Poupart, Supervisor
Non -Discharge Compliance and Enforcement Unit
Division of Water Quality

M
`O�0F W A r,�QG Michael F. Easley
Governor
y 7� William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
April 2, 2003
Mrs. Brenda Cunningham
Northeast Carolina Farms, Inc.
Post Office Box 865
Moyock, NC 27958
RE: Check Receipt Acknowledgement and
Payment Schedule for Civil Penalty
Case DV 00-029
Farm #15-11
Camden County
Dear Mrs. Cunningham:
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
APR 1 0 2003
DWQ-WARO
You have requested a schedule for making partial payments toward the $5,571.72 civil
penalty that was assessed by the Division of Water Quality on October 30, 2001. The Division is
agreeable to a schedule of four (4) payments at 30-day intervals beginning with your check for
$1,392.93 dated March 21, 2003.
Please sign the attached payment schedule and send it back with your next payment.
Make a copy of the payment schedule for your records. Please make the payments by check
payable to the Department of Environment and Natural Resources and mail them so they are
received by the last day of April, May and June 2003.
Failure to make the monthly payments in accordance with this schedule will cause
the entire unpaid balance of the civil penalty to be due and payable and subject to
collection through a civil action in the superior court.
NCDENR
Customer Service: Malling Address: Telephone [phone] Location:
1-877-623.6748 1617 Mail Service Center Fax [phone] N. Salisbury St.
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 State Courier #F52-01-01 Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative. Action Employer
50% recycled/ f 0% post -consumer paper
httpJ/h2o. enr.state.nc. us

Mail your payments to the address shown below to make sure that they are properly
recorded.
Mr. Steve Lewis
DWQ
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
If you have any questions, please call Mr. Steve Lewis at [phone], ext. 539 or Ms.
Linda Fitzpatrick at [phone], ext. 526.
Sincerely,
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Director, Division of Water Quality
cc: Jim Mulligan, Regional Supervisor w/o attachment
Daphne Cullom, WIRO
[`Lyn Haardison,. WIRO',
`File DV 00-029 w/ attachment
Central Files w/o attachment

;fir' I State of North Carolina
pLY TO: Francis W. Crawley
G Y
ROY COOPER Department of Justice Environmental Division
ATTORNEY GENERAL P. O. BOX 629 [phone]
RAy[L�{ EIG�yH [phone]
Dr. Fred Cunningham, President CERTIFIED MAIL MICR 5 2003
Northeast Carolina Farms, Inc. RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
358 Mason Lane rr�'
Moyock, North Carolina 27958 sr
RE: Assessment of Civil Penalties Against Northeast Carolina Farms, Inc.,
DV 00-029
Dear Dr. Cunningham:
You will find enclosed the Final Agency Decision of the Environmental Management
Commission assessing civil penalties and investigative costs as set forth in the decision document.
Accordingly, your company must submit payment of the civil penalty assessment and
investigative costs to the Department of Environment and Natural Resources within 30 days of receipt of
this final agency decision by mailing a bank or certified check. The check should be made payable to the
Department of Environment and Natural Resources and the mailing envelope addressed as follows:
Mr. Shannon Langley
Water Quality Section
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
If your company fails to pay the penalty within 30 days of receipt of the final decision document,
the Department will seek to collect the amount due through a civil action commenced in Superior Court.
Very truly yours,
M W.
Francis W. Crawley
Special Deputy Attorney General
Commission Counsel
FWC/j lb
Enclosure
cc: Steve Lewis
, Jennie Hill
�M�

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF CAMDEN
IN THE MATTER OF:
Assessment of Civil Penalties }
Against )
Northeast Carolina Farms, Inc. )
(Belcross Farm)
BEFORE THE
REMISSION COMMITTEE OF THE
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
COMMISSION
DV 00-029
FINAL DECISION
THIS MATTER came before the Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions of the
Environmental Management Commission, pursuant to N.C.G.S. §143-215.6A and §143B-282.1,
on February 13, 2003 upon recommendation of the Director of the Division of Water Quality for
entry of a final decision on the assessment of civil penalties and investigation costs against
Northeast Carolina Farms, Inc. in the amount of $5,571.72 ($5,000.00 plus $571.72 investigative
costs). Dr. Fred Cunningham, President of Northeast Carolina Farms, Inc., informed the
Committee that Northeast Carolina Farms, Inc. had leased the facility from Williams Farms of
North Carolina, Inc. and was operating the farm at the time the violations occurred. Northeast
Carolina Farms, Inc.'s request for remission was presented to the Committee on Civil Penalty
Remissions for consideration. The Division of Water Quality was represented by Mr. Jim
Mulligan, Regional Supervisor in the Washington Regional Office, and Northeast Carolina
Farms, Inc. was represented by its President, Dr. Fred Cunningham.
Having considered the record and the factors set forth in N.C.G.S. § 143B-282.1(b) and
(c), the Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions finds the facts contained in the Director's
Findings and Decision and Assessment of Civil Penalties as stipulated by Northeast Carolina
Farms, Inc., that the Findings of Fact support the Conclusions of Law, and that the Director

-2-
properly applied the criteria set forth in N.C.G.S. §143B-282.1 in determining the amount of the
civil penalties. The Committee considered the petitioner's actions to install two pumps in the lift
station and to remove and replace contaminated soil after the wastewater overflow but finds that
there are no G.S. §143B-282.1(c) grounds shown for remission or reduction of the penalties
assessed by the Director for violation of G.S. §143-215.1 on or about October 3, 2000 by making
an outlet of wastes to the waters of the State without the required permit and for violating
Condition No. III. 6. b. of the General Permit by failing to report within 24 hours the failure of
the animal waste treatment system.
Upon duly made motion and vote, the Committee finds that the assessment of civil
penalties and costs in the amount of $5,571.72 ($5,000.00 civil penalty plus $571.72
investigation costs) should be upheld.
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED:
1. That the assessment of civil penalties and costs in the amount of $5,571.72 against
Northeast Carolina Farms, Inc. is AFFIRMED.
2. That this Final Decision and Order be served upon Northeast Carolina Farms,.Inc.
and upon receipt hereof, the amount of $5,571.72 be paid to the Department of Environment and
Natural Resources within thirty days.
This the day of February, 2003.
David oreau, Chairman
Environmental Management Commission
4;
4►

a
s
-3-
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
This is to certify that I have this day served a copy of the foregoing FINAL DECISION on
the parties listed below by the methods indicated:
Dr. Fred Cunningham, President CERTIFIED MAIL
Northeast Carolina Farms, Inc. RETURN RECEIPT
358 Mason Lane
Moyock, North Carolina 27958
Mr. Jim Mulligan COURIER MAIL
Regional Supervisor
Washington Regional Office
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, North Carolina 27889
This the 4th day of March, 2003.
ROY COOPER
Attorney General
rancis W. Crawley
Special Deputy Attorney General
N.C. Department of Justice
P. O. Box 629
Raleigh, NC 27602-0629
919/716-6600

zc�

°Ga'LPZ� 0 Q 4 pp6x reucor?aJ S r a4(VV- TWP 'e9Q7C (�A-J-B"Cl7t Q
a5,5,upFal
-a Q Wig
YV
air- �z� �41Nz)
z�Rw �h �gx 4
. . r - - ..tp
-
SSOJ� � III

SC.At
No�TN ►sT-CAUCLINA rAUAAS, INC.
203 WEST FARM WAY, GASTON, NC 27832
.. 252-519-11 01 (office) •- 252-519-111 Q (fax)
March 19, 2004 F.CFOV1ED
Mr. Jim Mulligan
Division of Water Quality - MAR 2004
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, North Carolina 27889 DWQ-WARD
Dear Mr. Mulligan,
In response to your letter dated March 9, 2004 and received on March 12, 2004.
We have always and routinely notified DWQ when our lagoon level entered into the
storm zone. We submitted Plans of Action for the Belcross Farm in both March and
April of 2003. It was my understanding that once we reported our lagoon level and
submitted a Plan of Action that we were on the "watch list" until we reported that the
lagoon was out of the storm zone.
We have continued to battle the lagoon level and the saturated soil since October
of 2002. We have not been in the "green" for any length of time during this period
where we felt comfortable enough to notify the DWQ to cancel the last Plan of Action.
Whenever we made progress with the lagoon level it was short lived and followed by
large quantities of rain such as 4.9 inches in May, 4.3 inches in June and 6.0 inches in
July. We made good progress in August but were hit with 9.0 inches of rain in
September, which negated any progress we had made. The biggest problem, from
which we only recently recovered, was the 9.9 inches of rain we received in December.
We feel that we have notified the DWQ of the ongoing problem at Belcross and
continued to operate under the Plan of Action submitted in April.
We took additional steps of voluntarily lowering the inventory of the farm by more
than half so that all the sows would fit into one building. We also incurred the additional
expense of installing water nipples in each gestation crate in that building so that water
consumption would be at a minimum.
We were not trying to hide anything as we recorded our lagoon levels weekly as
required. There would no advantage to us by not reporting the farm. If I misinterpreted
the regulations then it is entirely my fault. We have worked very hard at this farm in the
face of numerous problems and challenges to do the right thing. Please consider the
efforts that we have made at this facility before you decide to 'go forward with
enforcement or a fine.
Sincerely,
�u
Fred L. Cunningham! M
President, Northeast Carolina Farms

Northeast Carolina Farms 2003/2004
Jan
level
Freeboard
1
21
2
2
23
4
3
22
3
4
20
1
Februa
1
22
3
2
20
1
3
22
3
4
21
2
March
1
20
1
2
17
-2
3
18
-1
4
21
2
April
1
20
1
2
16
-3
3
21
2
4
25
6
May
1
25
6
2
27
8
3
25
6
4
21
2
2-Jun
21
2
9-Jun
18
-1
16-Jun
17
-2
26-Jun
16
-3
30-Jun
15
-4
level
Freeboard
3-Jul
15
-4
10-Jul
16
-3
16-Jul
21
2
28-Jul
24
5
5-Au
28
9
11-Au
26
7
19-Au
25
6
25-Au
31
12
1-Se
31
12
8-Sepi
29
10
18-Sep
23
4
23-Sep
23
4
29-Sep
22
3
6-Oct
21
2
15-Oct
20
1
21-Oct
20
1
27-Oct
19
0
3-Nov
16
-3
10-Nov
19.5
0.5
17-Nov
24
5
24-Nov
28
9
1-Dec
28
9
8-Dec
26
7
15-Dec
20
1
22-Dec
19
0
29-Dec
18
-1
level
Freeboard
5-Jan
22
3
12-Jan
19
0
21-Jan
18
-1
27-Jan
16
-3
3-Feb
15
-4
9-Feb
15
-4
16-Feb
14
-5
23-Feb
14
-5
1-Mar
23
4
8-Marr
21
2

Northeast Carolina Farms
Rainfall by Month -Summary
2003
January
2.80
February
7.80
March
5.00
April
7.40
May
4.90
June
4.30
July
6.00
August
4.80
September
9.00
October
4.10
November
1.60
December
9.90
Total 2003
67.60

Date Amount inch
3-Sep
0.80
4-Sep
0.50
12-Sep
2.50
18-Sep
4.00
22-Sep
0.60
29-Sep
0.60
Total Set
9.00
Date Amount inch
14-Oct 0.60
28-Oct 3.50
Total Oct 4.10
Date Amount inch
7-Nov
0.30
18-Nov
1.30
Total Nov
1.60
Date Amount inch
7-Dec
1.50
11-Dec
3.00
14-Dec
2.40
17-Dec
1.00
23-Dec
2.00
Total Dec
9.90
Date Amount (inch)
5-Jan
0.30
18-Jan
0.40
27-Jan
1.00
Total Jan
1.70
Date Amount inch
7-Feb
0.30
13-Feb
0.60
Total Feb
0.90

Date Amount finchl
3-May
1.30
6-May
0.30
18-May
1.20
22-May
1.60
26-May
0.60
Total May
4.90
Date Amount (inch)
7-Jun
0.70
9-Jun
2.10
10-Jun
0.20
16-Jun
0.60
19-Jun
0.70
Total June
4.30
Date Amount (inch)
9-Jul
0.90
12-Jul
0.70
14-Jul
2.10
17-Jul
1.40
24-Jul
0.90
Total July
6.00
1
- 7
Date Amount (inch)
4-Aug
0.50
6-Aug
2.00
9-Aug
0.50
12-Aug
0.50
18-Aug
1.30
Total Aug4.80

Northeast Carolina Farms
Rainfall by day
2003
Date Amount (inch)
29-Jan
1.00
30-Jan
1.80
Total Jan
2.80
Date Amount (inch)
6-Feb
1.30
10-Feb
0.80
15-Feb
0.70
17-Feb
3.00
18-Feb
0.10
23-Feb
0.60
26-Feb
0.30
27-Feb
1.00
Total Feb
7.80
Date Amount (inch)
1-Mar
1.00
4-Mar
0.70
5-Mar
0.80
11-Mar
0.30
16-Mar
0.60
21-Mar
0.80
30-Mar
0.80
Total Mar
5.00
Date Amount (inch)
6-Apr
0.40
7-Apr
1.80
8-Apr
0.80
9-Apr
1.50
10-A r
0.70
11-Apr
0.70
26-A r
1.50
Total Apr
1 7.40

WILLIAMS FARMS OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC.
RAINFALL AND FREEBOARD DATA SHEET
MONTH OF: ,-, o03
EF;ARMAME
'i oss
FACILITY NU BER:
-�
TOTAL RAINFALL:
DATE
RAINFALL (IN
COMMENTS
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
LAGOON 1
LAGOON 2
LAGOON 3
12
WEEK 1
13
%; MMENTS:
14
15
LAGO N 1 LAGOON 2 LAGOON 3
16
WEEK 2
17
COMMENTS:
18
19
L.LAGOON 1 I LAGOON 2 ILAGOON 3
20
WEEK 3
21
COMMENTS:
22
23
LAGOON 1 LAGOON 2 LAGOON 3
24
WEEK 4 fl
25
COMMENTS:
26
27
LAGOON 1 I LAGOON 2 LAGOON 3
28
WEEK 5
29
/1 o
COMMENTS:
30
j •Y
31

NORTHEAST CAROLINA FARMS, INC.
RAINFALL AND FREEBOARD DATA SHEET
MONTH OF: r a
FARM NAME:
Gps s
FACILITY NUMBER:
TOTAL RAINFALL:
DATE
RAINFALL
(IN)
COMMENTS
1
'
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
LAGOON 1 LAGOON 2
11
WEEK 1
12
COMMENTS
13
14
15
WEEK 2 1 LAGOON 1 LAGOON 2
16
COMMENTS Z 1,0
17
18
19
WEEK 3 LAGOON 1 LAGOON 2
20
COMMENTS 3?r
21
22
23
,
WEEK 4 LAGOON 1 LAGOON 2
24
COMMENTS 1 2--
25
26
r.
27
/.a
l.
WEEK 5 LAGOON 1 LAGOON 2
28
COMMENTS
29
30 ,
31

NORTHEAST CAROLINA FARMS, INC.
RAINFALL AND FREEBOARD DATA SHEET
111�101111111
FARM M
FACILITY NUMBER:
TOTAL RAINFALL:
DATE
RAINFALL
(IN)
COMMENTS
1
,D
'
2
3
4
•7
6
7
8
9
10
LAGOON 1 LAGOON 2
11
r3
WEEK 1 n
12
COMMENTS
13
14
15
WEEK 2 LAGOON 1 LAGOON 2
16
,
COMMENTS -z
17
18
19
WEEK 3 LAGOON 1 LAGOON 2
20
COMMENTS 112
21
22
23
WEEK 4 LAGOON 1 LAGOON 2
24
COMMENTS 2--25
26
27
LAGO
WEEK 5 ON 1 LAGOON 2
28
COMMENTS
29
30
31

NORTHEAST CAROLINA FARMS, INC.
RAINFALL AND FREEBOARD DATA SHEET
FARM NAME:
FACILITY NUMBER:
TOTAL RAINFALL:
DATE
RAINFA
L (IN)
COMMENTS
1
2
3
4
6
„
7
,
8
,
9
.1 •�
10
LAGOON 1 LAGOON 2
11
• "]
WEEK 1
12
COMMENTS
13
14
15
WEEK 2 LAGOON 1 LAGOON-2-
16
COMMENTS
17
18
19
WEEK 3 LAGOON 1 LAGOON 2
20
COMMENTS Z-
21
22
23
WEEK 4 LAGOON 1,1 LAGOON 2
24
COMMENTS
25
26
t
27
WEEK 5 LAGOON 1 LAGOON 2
28
COMMENTS
29
30
31

NORTHEAST CAROLINA FARMS, INC.
RAINFALL AND FREEBOARD DATA SHEET
FAR %ME.
s
FACILITY NUMBER:
TOTAL RAINFALL:
DATE
RAINFALL
IN
COMMENTS
1
2
3
4
5
6
,3
7
8
9
10
LAGOON 1 LAGOON 2
11
WEEK 1
12
COMMENTS
13
14
15
WEEK 2 ILAGOON1 LAGOON 2
16
COMMENTS a7
.17
•18
19
WEEK 3 LAGOON 1 LAGOON 2
20
COMMENTS c,
21
22
23
WEEK 4 LAGOON 1 LAGOON 2
24
COMMENTS c2
25
26
27
WEEK 5 LAGOON 1-1-LAGOON 2
28
COMMENTS
29
30
31

NORTHEAST CAROLINA FARMS, INC.
RAINFALL AND FREEBOARD DATA SHEET
MONTH OF: g7vw
FARM NA E:
Ci'ns s
FACILITY NUMBER:
TOTAL RAINFALL:
DATE
RAINFALL
(IN)
COMMENTS
2
3
4
6
7
,,
8
9
10
Z
LAGOON 1 LAGOON 2
11
WEEK 1
12
COMMENTS U
13
14
15
WEEK 2 LAGOON 1 LAGOON 2
16
COMMENTS
17
18
19
,
LAGOO
WEEK 3 N 1 LAGOON 2
20
COMMENTS 1
21
(�
22
23
WEEK 4 1 LAGOON 1 LAGOON 2
24
COMMENTS
.25
(v _�zb
.26
27
WEEK 5 1 LAGOON 1 LAGOON 2
28
COMMENTS
29
6, -
30
31

NORTHEAST CAROLINA FARMS, INC.
RAINFALL AND FREEBOARD DATA SHEET
MONTH OF: tX4
�
FARM NAME:
cYnsS
FACILITY NUMBER:
TOTAL RAINFALL:
DATE
RAINFALL
{I
COMMENTS
1
;
2
3
4
6
7
8
9
1a
LAGOON 1 LAGOON 2
11
WEEK 1 � _f
12
i
COMMENTS
13
.-
14
15
WEEK 2 LAGOON 1 LAGOON 2
16
COMMENTS 1
17
18
19
WEEK 3 1 LAGOON-ij LAGOON 2
20
COMMENTS 1
21
-�
22
23
WEEK 4 LAGOON 1 LAGOON 2
24
`
COMMENTS
25
7- 1 JT
26
27
WEEK 5 LA OON-1-1 LAGOON 2
28
COMMENTS
'.29
'30
31

NORTHEAST CAROLINA FARMS, INC.
RAINFALL AND FREEBOARD DATA SHEET
MONTH OF:
FARM NAME:
s
FACILITY NUMBER:
o
TOTAL RAINFALL:
ATE
RAINFALL
IN
COMMENTS
2
3
4
7
0
,9
a
10
LAGOON-1-1 LAGOON 2
11
WEEK 1 Z�
12
a
COMMENTS
13
14
15
WEEK 2_j LAGOON 1 LAGOON 2
16
COMMENTS
17
18
42
19
WEEK 3 LAGOON 1 LAGOON 2
20
COMMENTS 5-
21
8/9
22
_
23
WEEK 4 LAGOON 1 LAGOON 2
24
COMMENTS j
25
.•
26
27.
WEEK 5 LAGOON 1 LAGOON 2
'28
COMMENTS
29
30
31

NORTHEAST CAROLINA FARMS, INC.
RAINFALL AND FREEBOARD DATA SHEET
MONTH OF:
FARM NAME:
�r s�
FACILITY NUMBER:
TOTAL RAINFALL:
DATE
RAIN ALL
IN
COMMENTS
1
2
3
4
,!
6
7
8
9
10
LAGOON-1-1 LAGOON 2
11
WEEK 1
12
Vt IT -
COMMENTS
13
"14
WEEK 2 LAGOON 1 LAGOON 2
COMMENTS
$_20
J
WEEK 3 LAGOON! LAGOON 2
COMMENTS z3
22
23
WEEK 4 LAGOON 1 LAGOON 2
24
COMMENTS Z-3
25
26
27
WEEK 5 ILAGOON1 LAGOON 2
28
COMMENTS
29
, la
.. Z
30
31

NORTHEAST CAROLINA FARMS, INC.
RAINFALL AND FREEBOARD DATA SHEET
MONTH OF: des
FARM A
CY4fs
FACILITY NUMBER:
TOTAL RAINFALL:
DATE
RA NFA
L IN
COMMENTS
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
LAGOON 1 LAGOON 2
11
WEEK 1 2-1
12
COMMENTS
13
/a-
14
, (r
15
WEEK 2 LLAGOON 1 LAGOON 2
16
COMMENTS
17
�d-j_j
18
19
WEEK 3 LAGOON 1 LAGOON 2
20
COMMENTS
21
a- Z' j
22
23
WEEK 4 LAGOON 1 LAGOON 2
24
COMMENTS 1
25
v'z
26
27
WEEK 5 LAGOON 1 LAGOON 2
28
,
COMMENTS
29
30
31

NORTHEAST CAROLINA FARMS, INC.
RAINFALL AND FREEBOARD DATA SHEET
MONTH OF:, -
FARM NAM :
FACILITY NUMBER:
TOTAL RAINFALL:
DATE
RAINFALL
IN
COMMENTS
1
'
2
3
4
6
7
8
9
10
LAGOON 1 LAGOON 2
11
WEEK 1
12
COMMENTS
13
14
15
WEEK 2 LAGOON 1 LAGOON 2
16
COMMENTS
17
-��
18
19
WEEK 3 1 LAGOON 11 LAGOON 2
20
COMMENTS
21
-►>
22
23
WEEK 4 LAGOON 1 LAGOON 2
24
COMMENTS z
25
r- Z
26
27
WEEK 5 LAGOON 1 LAGOON 2
28
COMMENTS
29
30
31

NORTHEAST CAROLINA FARMS, INC.
RAINFALL AND FREEBOARD DATA SHEET
MONTH OF:
FAR AN E:
7 / .y
FACILITY NUMBER:
5 /
"TOTAL RAINFALL:
DATE
RA NF
L I
COMMENTS
.3
4
5
6
7�
8
�9
10
LAGOON! LAGOON 2
11
J
WEEK 1 �,
12
COMMENTS
13
z -1
14
15
WEEK 2 LAGOON 1 LAGOON 2
16
COMMENTS
17
/, o
18
19
WEEK 3 LAGOON 1 LAGOON 2
20
COMMENTS
21
22
23
�
WEEK 4 LAGOON 1 LAGOON 2
24
COMMENTS
25
26
z7
5 LAGOON 1 LAGOON 2
-28
_WEEK
COMMENTS
.29
30
31

NORTHEAST CAROLINA FARMS, INC.
RAINFALL AND FREEBOARD DATA SHEET
MONTH OF: =aowo
FARM A E:
r
oil b Ss
FACILITY NUMBER:
J � /
TOTAL RAINFALL:
ky
r
DATE
RAINFALL
(IN)
COMMENTS
1
,
2
3
4
6
6
7
8
9
10
r
LAGOON >1= i,LAGOON12.
11
.c`
WEEK 1 <° . •
12
f
COMMENTS
13
14
WEEK 2 LAGOO 1. GOO N 12..
16
COMMENTS
17-
�.
K
' 19
WEEK 3 I LAGOON-1j., LAGOON2
20*
COMMENTS
21
23 :
WEEK 4 LAGOON. T 1,,LAGOON 2 r
:.24
COMMENTS
25
v ' ..
t: ,r26
R
-
WEEKS GOON.. , LAGOON. 2
:`',28;';
-r'
COMMENTS _, ; .
1,29.
i
30
j

NORTHEAST CAROLINA FARMS, INC.
RAINFALL AND FREEBOARD DATA SHEET
MONTH OF: �o
FARM A
I �F'b S S
FACILITY NUMBER:
TOTAL RAINFALL:
DATE
RAINFALL
IN
COMMENTS
1
'
2
3
4
6
7
'
,g
10
LAGOON 1 LAGOON 2
11
WEEK 1 r,
12
COMMENTS
13
(�
z.- 3
14
15
WEEK 2 LAGOON 1 LAGOON 2
16
COMMENTS
17
-Z
18
19
WEEK 3 LAGOON 1 LAGOON 2
20
COMMENTS
21
22
23
WEEK 4 LAGOON 1.1 LAGOON 2
24
COMMENTS /
25
z� y3
26
27
WEEK 5 1 LAGOON 2
28
±LAGOON
COMMENTS
29
30
31

NORTHEAST CAROLINA FARMS, INC.
RAINFALL AND FREEBOARD DATA SHEET
FARM NAM:
Czt/Jss
FACILITY NUMBER:
TOTAL RAINFALL:
DATE
RAINFALL
IN
COMMENTS
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
LAGOON 1 LAGOON 2
11
WEEK 1
12
COMMENTS -
13
14
15
WEEK 2 LAGOON 1 LAGOON 2
16
COMMENTS
17
3-;'
18
1
19
WEEK 3 LAGOON 1 LAGOON 2
20
COMMENTS
21
22
23
WEEK 4 LAGOON 1 LAGOON 2
24
COMMENTS
25
26
''
27
WEEK 5 LAGOON 1 LAGOON 2
28
COMMENTS
29
30
31

FORM A
Lagoon i_igUid irrigawn Fields Record
For Recording Irrigation Events on Different Fields
Farm Owner
Irrigation Operator L'r�
Facilily Number -
Tract #
Field #
Date
nini/dd/r
CraT
Field Size
acres
Irri alion Tirne
Number of
S rrinklers (� eraiin
-
g
/p.ype
-%/
_:Z Oro
-
J
C-.j
-z -rry
I
33
- -
5/
!
3 /
r 3 o
/0 "7-)
Si0
- -
_
_� 3G
Z-Z Y-o
_
4,6
i
2")J--0
I
30
5 -�.:
-� �
6cc

FORM -1 Lagoon Liquid IrrigZ:a,,jn Fields Record
For Recording Irrigation Events on Different Fields
Farm Owner
Irrigation Operator
Facility Number
Tract #
Field #
Dale
mrrddd/ r
Crop Type
Field Size
acres
Irrigation Time
Number of
Sprinklers Operating
/ /4y
L 0
%- 30 -- _Y
12-15
�eAl3.Z7_03
' 2dL_1
}• ci
- `2
Y-
n
''
Is as
3.�
.2_:�

FORM. A Lagoon Ligriid Irrigation Fields Record
For Recording irrigation Events on Different Fields
Farm Owner ' / /d,•��
Irrigation Operator
Facility Number
Tract #
Field #
Date
rnrrilddl r
Crop Type
Field Size
acres
lift anon Time
NLIMber of
S vinklers Operating
v--,7-1
3 !-ic
3 & J
/
�j
— ,�
r p-'
yE?C)
_
�f1
-v3
3. o
A
7ff-r7j7
i7. c7
�7Zr3�
7y� C
-
-
0
31 J
7,ry,
/:s 0
oZ K<
J--a7-o�
?,C7
iv'U
y; 49;;
-3
i

FORM -I
Lagoon Liquid Irriganon Fields Record
For Recording Irrigation Events on Different Fiekls
Farm Owner 711 c-
Irrigation Operator Cx���•t
Facility Number
Tract #
Field # . _
Date
mrr�/dd/ r
Crop Type
Field Size
acres
kri alion Time
Nmiiber of
Sprinklers O eralin
-
ZZ
3.;7 Z)--
713
3-r
3
1: ov
!e -1)
5 00
3 v
kc
3 Ca
/: fJ
3 J
Y�
Cc rp
3 �?
Z�� ��
30 c,
1 _
i
-2
4-
_ - _
60
l
/�,9
c -,P
<<.
�J

., . ,
�. ..
.. ,�
r
.•
`1<`'
�ry
.
!,
1
�
� � �
1
S
F
:i �
�.
�
ii
�iI
�
`,. � � '
,i

FORM IRR-1
Farm Owner
Irrigation -Operator
Lagoon Liquid Irrigation Fields Record
For Recording Irrigation Events on Different Fields
zr�.S
Facility !Number 1 /J - I J
Tract
Feld #i!
Date Crop Type
fmmldd 1
Field Size
acresl
Irrigation Time
Number of
Sprinklers Operating
Start 7Coe
Endm
Total klhut2g
i
/'la —Ls
A_ 0
I�
s' 3 i✓
7
,-3 =�3
. J
2 , 3 1.
e- : �
3
/
- 02
G
3 3�
i
.
3.
3
-z�
�..�
z ��
7. '��
So
/
a»
/$7'
'1' 3 v
a-6-may
3.
:3z>
Z
6 C
:2? J
-213
. I
- z!�
r+
/ t'J
'j''.
bJ
J.
7-
3—/
3. /'
3.'
91'�J
360
i
.3 . /
�t3
v w
3.D

FORM IRR-1
Farm Owner
Irrigation. Operator
Lagoon Liquid Irrigation Fields Record
For Recording Irrigation Events on Different Fields
Facility Number I - I //
Tract # Field #
Date
(mmiddlvr
Crop Type
Field Size
acres)
lrrieation Time
Number of
Sprinklers Operating
Start Time
EndTotal
MinuteS
e-2
I d 1 J-0
Is 0
/
' a
j/6 ozL'i
3.3
��
6P '�
z.
3 •
w-�
~'
-01-
AVP
• Lam)
L/ • ,1i
V
1�11
-��, _o
w
a
X2
y:�2,10
r
V`�
2- -
r clA
//-
/. j ;,
,� ��
210
/
�/
♦ L - 4.
Gel
L>
z.
L
/
3.0
/-z-
3_ G
Jc"'���
/:
/

1'IOLi1ATER AGRONOMIGS, INC. F. T. WilliaE»s Farm
P. o. Box 311 �p�2 Morris Neck Rd.
CAMDElY, N. C. 2f9t►w.,� 7s n Virgina Beach, VA'. 23457
LfML' PAAP

NCDA Agronomic Division
4300 Reed Creek Road Ralei
h, NC
27607-6465
[phone] Grower: Currituck Grain
Report No: 0� '2
P 5
Field Information
lied Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo
Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N P205 &0
Mg Cu
Zn
B
Mn
See Note
15W No Crop
1st Croo: Corn Grain
0
120-160 0 0
0 0
0
0
3
2nd C, co:
Test Results
Soil Class HM% WN CEC
BS%
Ac pH P-1
K-1
Ca%
Mg%
Mn-1 WAI (1)WAI (2) Zn-1
Zn-Al
Cu-1
S-1
SS-1
Na-N NHr-N
Na
MIN 0.66 1.13
7.0
86.0
1.0 6.1 83
199
50.0
23.0
43 41 48
48
34
29
0.2
Field Information
Applied
Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo
Yr T/A
Crop or Year
lime
N P205 KO
Mg Cu
Zn
B
Mn
See Note
16W No Crop
102002
0.
1st Crca Corn Crain
0
120-160 30-50 0
0 2
0
0
3
2nd Crca
Test Results
Soil Class HM% WN CEC
BS%
Ac pH P-1
K-1
CA
Mg%
Mn-1 Mn-Al (1)Mn-AI (2) Zn-1
Zn-AI
Cu-1
S-1
SS-1
N&N NH-N
Na
MIN 0.66 1.13
7.2
88.0
0.9 6.1 44
160
48.0
29.0
35 36 29
29
19
34
0.3
Field Information
Applied
Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo
Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N P205 KO
Mg Cu
Zn
B
Mn
See Note
16X No Crop
102002
O.
1st Crop: Corn Grain
-S
.6T
120-160 90.110 0.20
0 0
0
0
3
2nd Croo:
Test Results
Soil Class HM% WN CEC
BS%
Ac pH P-1
K-1
Ca%
Mg%
Mn-I Mr. -AI (1)Mn-A1(2) Zn-1
Zn-AI
Cu-1
S-1
SS-1
Na-N Nfb-N
Na
MIN 0.66 1.14
6.6
80.0
1.3 5.5 16
72
49.0
25.0
41 42 51
51
54
29
0.1
Field Information
lied Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo
Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N W5 KO
Mg Cu
Zn
B
Mn
See
Note
17D No Crop
1st Crop: Corn Grain
0
120-160 120.140 20-40
0 0
0
0
3
2nd Croo:
Test Results
Soil Class HM% WN CEC
BS%
Ac pH P-1
K-1
Ca%
Mg%
Mn-1 Mn Al (I)Mn-Al (2) Zn-1
Zn-AI
Cu-1
S-1
SS 1
Na-N NH-N
Na
MIN 0.66 1.12
6.9
86.0
1.0 5.9 8
56
62.0
19.0
203 140 32
32
33
40
0.1
Field Information
Applied
Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo
Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N Pe05 KO
Mg Cu
Zn
B
Mn
See
Note
17G No Crop
1st Crop- Corn Grain
0
120.160 110-130 0-20
0 0
0
0
3
2nd Crofl:
Test Results
Soil Class HM% WIV CEC
BS%
Ac pH P-1
K-I
Ca%
Mg%
Mn-1 Mn-AI (1)Mn-AI (2) Zn-1
Zn-Al
Cu-1
S-1
SS-1
Na-N NHi-N
Na
MIN 0.71 1.10
9.0
90.0
0.9 6.2 11
73
65.0
21.0
197 132 69
69
46
39
0.2

NCDA Agronomic Division
4300 Reedy Creek Road Raleigh, NC 27607-6465
[phone] Grower: Currituck Grain
Report No: 0911% Pg 4
Field Information
Applied
Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo
Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N W-5 I¢0
Mg Cu
Zn
B
Mn
See Note
11G No Crop
102002 0,
1st Crop: Carn Grain
0
120-160 0 0
0 0
0
0
3
2nd CFOD:
Test Results
Soil Class HM% WN CEC
BS%
Ac pH P-1
K-1 Ca%
Mg%
Mn-1 Mn-Al (7)Mn-Al (2) Zn-1
Zn-Al
Cu-1
S-1
SS-1
Na-N NIh-N Na
MIN 0.76 1.10
8.4
86.0
1.2 5.9 114
235 52.0
21.0
50 49 37
37
61
43
03
Field Information
Applied
Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo
Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N P2O5 *0
Mg Cu
Zn
B
Mn
See Note
12W No Crop
10
2002 O.E
1st Crop: Corn Grain
0
120-160 0 0
0 0
0
0
3
2nd Croo:
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V CEC
BS%
Ac pH P-1
K-1 Ca%
Mg%
Mn-I WAI (1)Mn AI (2) Zn-1
Zn-AI
Cu-1
S-1
SS-1
Na-N NH-N Na
MIN 0.71 1.15
TS
90.0
0.8 6.2 101
208 52.0
25.0
42 39 39
39
47
36
0.4
Field information
Applied
Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo
Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N P205 W
Mg Cu
Zn
B
Mn
See Note
13W No Crop
1st Crop: Corn Grain
0
120=160 0 0
0 0
0
0
3
2nd Crop:
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V CEC
BS%
Ac pH P-1
K-1 Ca%
Mg%
Mn-1 Mn-Al (1)Mn-AI (2) Zn-1
Zn-AI
Cu-1
S-1
SS-1
Na-N NH-N Na
MIN 0.66 1.21
8.4
90.0
0.8 6.2 87
229 54.0
22.0
45 41 39
39
42
31
0.3
Field Information
Applied
Lime
Recommendations
i Sample No. Last Crop
Mo
Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N P205 KO
Mg Cu
Zn
B
Mn
See Note
13X No Crop
102002
1-C
1st Crop: Corn Grain
.S
AT
120-160 50-70 0
0 0
0
0
3
2nd Crop:
i est Results
Soil Class HM% W/V CEC BS% Ac pH P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg% Mn-1 Mn-Al (7)Mn-Al (2) Zn-1 Zn-AI Cu-1 S-1 SS-1 N&N NH-N Na
MIN 0.6 1.18 7.0 81.0 1.3 5.7 34 102 50.0 25.0 38 40 28 28 70 35 0.2
Field Information
Applied Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year Lime N P2Os KO Mg Cu Zn B Mn See Note
14W No Crop
102002 0.
1st Crop: Corn Grain 0 120-160 20-40 0 0 0 0 0 3
2nd Crop:
Test Results
Soil Class HM% WN GEC BS% Ac pH P-1 K-1 Ca% Mg% Mn-1 Mn-AI (7) Mn-Al (2) Zn-1 Zn-Al Cu-1 S-1 SS-1 NCB-N NH,-N Na
MIN 0.51 1.17 7.3 86.0 1.0 6.2 46 96 50.0 30.0 35 35 32 32 35 54 0.4

NCDA Agronomic Division
4300 Reedy Creek Road Raleigh, NC 27607-6465~
[phone] Grower: Currituck Grain
Report No: 091762
P 3
Field Information
lied Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo
Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N W5 1O
Mg Cu
Zn
B
Mn
See Note
07G No Crop
102002 1.
1 st Crop: Corn Grain
AT
120-160 0 0
0 0
0
0
3
2nd Crop:
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V CEC
BS%
Ac pH P-1
K-1
Ca%
Mg%
Mn-1 WAI (7)WAI (2) Zn-1
Zn-Al
Cu-1
S-1
SS-1
NCY-N NHr-N
Na
MIA' 0.6 1.13
6.9
75.0
1.7 5.4 76
170
49.0.
14.0
84 67 60
60
32
48
0.2
Field Information
Applied
Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo
Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N WS KO
Mg Cu
Zn
B
Mn
See
Note
08W No Crop
102002 1.
1st Crop: Corn Grain
7
120-160 0 0
0 2
0
0
3
.7T
2nd Crop:
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V CEC
BS%
Ac pH P-1
K-1
Ca%
Mg%
Mn-1 Mn-AI (7) Mn-AI (2) Zn-1
Zn-AI
Cu-1
S-1
SS-1
Na-N Nli-N
Na
,MIN 0.86 1.13
6.4
78.0
1.4 5.4 82
192
50.0
13.0
137 99 123
123
25
45
0.1
Field Information
Applied
Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo
Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N W5 KO
Mg Cu
Zn
B
Mn
See Note
09W No Crop
102002 0.
1 st Crop: Corn Grain
CH)
120-160 0. 0
0 0
0
0
3
2nd Crop:
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V CEC
BS%
Ac pH P-1
K-1
Ca%
Mg%
Mn-1 Mn AI (7) Mn AI (2) Zn-I
Zn-Al
Cu-1
S-1
SS-1
Na-N NIA-N
Na
MIN 0.76 1.11
7.8
81.0
1.5 5.7 79
133
55.0
18.0
105 80 84
64
48
55
0.2
Field Information
Applied
Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo
Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
Al PX 5 kO
Mg Cu
Zn
B
Mn
See Note
10W No Crop
102002
0.
1 s€ Crop: Corn Grain
;5
.7T
120 i60 0 0
0 0
0
0
3
2nd Crop:
Test Results
Soil Class HM% WN CEC
BS%
Ac pH P-1
K-1
Ca%
Mg%
Mn-1 Mn-AI (7)Mn-Al (2) Zn-1
Zn-AI
Cu-1
S-1
SS-1
Na-Al NH-N
Na
MIN 0.76 1.10
7.7
82.0
1.4 5.4 82
157
48.0
23.0
53 49 42
42
40
45
0.3
Field Information
Applied
Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo
Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N W5 KO
Mg Cu
Zn
B
Mn
See Note
11 D No Crop
102002
If
1st Crop: Corn Grain
.7T
120-160 30-50 0-20
0 0
6
0
3
2nd Crap:
Test Results
Soil Class HM% WN CEC
BS%
Ac pH P-1
K-1
_ Ca%
Mg%
Mn-1 WAI (7)WAI (2) Zn-1
Zn-Al
Cu-1
S-1
SS-1
Na-N NH-N
Na
MIN 0.72 1.10
7.0
80.0
1.4 5.4 44
83
52.0
22.0
50 47 25
25
49
39
0.2

fiL
19j .
NCDA A ro omic Division 4300 ReedyCreek Road Raleigh, NC 27607-6465
[phone] Grower: Currituck Grain
Report No: 0916
Pg 2
Field information
Applied
Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo
Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N P205 !h0
Mg Cu
Zn
B
Mn
See Note
04W No Crop
102002
1.
1st Crop: Corn Grain
.9T
120-160 30-50 0
0 0
0
0
3
2nd Cr-CD:
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V
. CEC
BS%
Ac pH P-1
K-1
Ca%
Mg%
Mn-1 Mn-AI (7)Mn-Al (2) Zn-1
Zn-AI
Cu-1
S-1
SS-1
Ala-N NH-N
Na
MIN 1.02 1.08
6.0
72.0
1.7 5.4 43
128
49.0
13.0
74 61 42
42
34
55
0.1
Field information
Vplied
Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo
Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N W5 &0
Mg Cu
Zn
B
Mn
See Note
05D No Crop
102002
0.
1st Crop: Corn Grain
't -
.8T
120-160 80-100 0
0 0
0
0
3
2nd Croo:
Test Results .
Soil Class HM% W/V
CEC
BS%
Ac pH P-1
K-1
Ca%
Mg%
Mn-1 Mn-Al (1)WAI (2) Zn-1
Zn-Al
Cu-1
S-1
SS-1
Na-N NHr-N
Na
MIN 0.92 1.07
6.4
72.0
13 5.5 19
87
5&0
16.0
45 44 42
42
29
52
Q.l
Field Information
lied Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo
Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N W 5 W
Mg Cu
Zn
B
Mn
See
Note
05G No Crap
102002
1.
1st Crap: Corn Grain
.7T
120-160 0-20 0
0 0
0
0
3
2nd Croo:
Test Results
Soil Class HM% WN
CEC
BS%
Ac pH P-1
K-1
Ca%
Mg%
Mn-I Mn-AI (1)Mn-AI (Z) Zn-1
Zn-AI
Cu-1
S-1
SS-1
Na-N NH-N
Na
MIN 1.37 1.04
8.1
78.0
1.8 5.6 60
151
53.0
16.0
51 48 37
37
43
50
0.2
Field Information
lied Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo
Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N W 5 Ik0
Mg Cu
Zn
B
Mn
See
Note
06W No Crop
102002
0.
1st Crop: Corn Grain
AT
120-160 0 0
0 0
0
0
3
2nd Cron:
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V
CEC
BS%
Ac pH P-1
K-1
Ca%
Mg%
Mn-1 Mn-AI (1)Mn-AI (2) Zn-1
Zn-Al
Cu-1
S-1
SS-1
Nch-N NH-N
Na
MIN 1.08 1.06
10.0
86.0
1.4 5.8 121
157
59.0
20.0
72 60 42
42
54
55
0.2
Field Information
Applied
Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo
Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N Pr05 k0
Mg Cu
Zn
B
Mn
See
Note
07D No Crap
102002
1,
1 st Crop: Corn Grain
S
6T
120160 30 50 0
0 0
0
0
3
2nd Croo:
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V
CEC
BS%
Ac pH P-1
K-1
Ca%
Mg%
Mn-I W AI (1) WAI (2) Zn-1
Zn-Al
Cu-1
S-1
SS-1
Na-N Nf*-N
Na
MIN 0.71 1.11
7.5
80.0
1.5 5.6 43
137
54.0
17.0
62 54 39
39
43
47
0.1

NCDA Agronomic Division
4300 Reedy Creek Road Raleigh,
NC 27607-6465
`(�19) 733-2655
Report No: 09'f d
Grower.
Currituck Grain
Copies to: County
Extension Director
=
461 Currituck Hwy
Tidewater Agronornics Inc.
Moyock, NC 27958
oil
Test
Ro ort
�
_
Farm:
11/13/03 SERVING N.C. CITIZENS
FOR OVER 50
YEARS
Camden County
Agronomist Comments:
A 3
Field information
Applied Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N
P105 KO
Mg Cu
in
B.
Mn
See Note
01 W No Crop
102002 Q
1st Crop: Corn Grain
.6T
120-160
30-50 20-40
0 0
0
0
3
2nd Crop. -
Test Results
Soil Class HM% WN CEC BS%
Ac pH P-1
K-1 Ca% Mg%
Mn-1 WAI (7)Mn-Al (2) Zn-1
Zn-Al
Cu-1
S-1
SS-1
Na-N Nfh-N Na
MIN 0.71 1.13
6.3 78A
1.4 5.6 41
58 58.0 16.0
108
82 39
39
44
41
0.1
Field Information
Applied Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Pgre
N
W5 1¢o
Mg Cu
Zn
B
Mn
See Note
02W No Crop
102002 0.
1st Crop: Corn Grain
51
120-160
30-50 30-50
0 0
0
0
3
2nd CroD:
Test Results
Soil Class HM% WN CEC BS%
Ac pH P-1
K-1 Ca% Mg%
Mn-1 Mn-Al (I)Mn-Al (2) Zn-1
Zn-A!
Cu-1
S-1
SS-1
Na-N Nh-N Na
MIN 0.92 1.14
6.8 76.0
1.6 5.7 44
52. 56.0 16.0
66
57 30
30
46
41
0.1
Field Information
Applied Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N
W5 W
Mg Cu
Zn
B
Mn
See Note
03D No Crop
102002 1.
1st Crop: Corn Grain
�5 .7T
120-160
10-30 40-60
0 0
0
0
3
2nd Croo:
Test Results
Soil Class HM% WIT CEC BS%
Ac pH P-1
K-1 Ca% Mg%
Mn-1 Mn-AI (1)Mn-AI (2) Zn-1
Zn-Al
Cu-1
S-1
SS-1
N&N Nh-N Na
MIN 1.08 1.14
6.1 75.0
1.5 5.5 51
43 56.0 17.0
39
40 31
31
44
58
0.1
Field Information
Applied Lime
Recommendations
Sample No. Last Crop
Mo Yr T/A
Crop or Year
Lime
N
P205 W
Mg Cu
Zn
B
Mn
See Note
03G No Crop
102002 1.0
ist Crop: Corn Grain
e.
> .3T
120-160
20-40 0-20
0 0
6
0
3
2nd Croo:
Test Results
Soil Class HM% W/V CEC BS%
Ac pH P-1
K-1 Ca% Mg%
Mn-1 Mn-Al (7) Mn-Al (2) Zn-1
Zn-AI
Cu-1
S-1
SS-1
Na-N NHi-N Na
MIN 0.76 1.13
7.1 82.0
1.3 5.8 47
84 57.0 19.0
53
49 22
22
41
44
01

`NCD33>;ronomic lion 4300 Reedv Creek Road Raleigh, NC ?7607-66� ig19) 7' '635 Report No: a'Oq''
vrouer.• N illiams Farms of N.C. Copies To:
c/o 'Northeast Carolina Farms
PO Boa 865
'i-Movock K 27958
ol'h
:,�.. * :. List nal is G �i•L Fann: Beleross I� l l I
1!16/O3 Camden County
;Sample Info._
I Laboratory Results (parts per million unless otherwise noted)
?Sample ID:
1
N
I P K Ca
Akz S
Fe Mn Zn
Cu B
Mc — Cl C I
Total 243
59.1 352 136 37-1 28.2 3.53 0.42 0.68 0.18 0.89
IN -A'
Waste Code:
-AW4
;.BLS
-NO3
Na ;1"i Cd
Pb 31
Se Li Ih
SS CA,
_
D:4f°E CCP°S 3LEIK:aI) I
13S
6.98
I
iDescripthon:
OR-N
Shine Lagoon Liq.
Urea
:Recommendations:
-Nutrients Available for First
Crop
Ibs11000allots
10ther Elements
IbS110OO gallons
:Application Method
N P--05 K2tl
Ca mg S Fe
:4in _ Zn
Cu B _110 Cl
Na Ni Cd
Pb 41 Se Li
Irrigation -
1-0 0.79 2.8
0.79 0.22 0.16 0.02
T T
T 0.01
12
I
The pH of the lagoon liquid is below the ideal range for bacterial action and waste treatment. Gradually adjust phi by adding 1 lb. of agricultural lime per 1000 cu. ft. of liquid remaining in the lagoon. Sample the lagoon
rmnthiv and continue to adjust pH until it is within the desired range of 7.0-8.0.

L ► 1.,1 Vi1U1111t: ulublun -t3UU KCt:UV t,rcch tcoau Kaletgn. 1\L 51U(li-b tU7 [i►`)? I�j=_'b»
_ Grower: Williams Farms of N.C.
c;�o Northeast Carolina Farms
PO Box S65
llosock. NC 37955
•
caste Analysis R effort Faun: Belcross 15-11
3
3P-4,03 Camden Countv
Report `To: WO-10- V'
Copies To:
:Sam le Info.
Laboratory Results (parts per million unless otherMse noted)
Sample 1D.
1
Waste Code:
Description:
5nine La von Lia.
f N
P K ca M2 S
Fe
Mn Zn
Cu B
.tfo C1 C
Toral 249
-NO3
OR -A"
Dell
45.6 343 102 25.3 24.4 1.91 0.24 0.71 0.21 0.s6
Ind :Yi Cd Pb 41 Se Li pH SS C:Y
DAM CCP o ALEIK1 n.!i
1 i 5 7.18
:Recommendations:
Nutrients Available for First Crop —
- lbs/_7000gallous
(Other Elements
-
lbsi1000gallons
application.�letbod
i Irrization
_
;V Pb; R;4
1.0 0.61 2.7
Cu mg Fe AM DI
0.60 0.15 0.14 0.01 T T
Cu B
-T 0.01
Jfa d
Na,Yi Cd
0.96
Pb V Se Li

NCDA Agronomic Division 4300 Reedy Creek Road Raleigh, NC 27607-6465 [phone] Report No: W09573 W
Grower: Northeast Carolina Farms Copies To. -
PO Box 865
:i Moyock. NC 27958
rite naYsZs eoYt Farm: Belcross i5-11
512103 Camden County
Sample Info. Laboratory Results (parts per million unless otherwise nosed)
Sample 1D: N P K Ca MO S Fe Mn Zn Cu B Mo Cl C
i Total 291 51.7 369 159 43.4 27.7 2.32 0.36 0.91 0.30 0.66
1N -N
Waste Code: -NH4
Al_S _NO3 Na Ni Cd Pb Al Se Li oN SS C.N DM% CCE% ALE(Koal)
Description. OR-N 1 32 7.65
Swine Lamor. Lia, Urea
Recommendations: Nutrients Available for First Crop _ lbs11000 gallons 10ther Elements lbs17000 gallons
Application Method N P20z K20 Ca Mg S Fe Mn Zn Cu 8 MO Cl Na Ni Id Pb Al Se Li
lrriaation 1.2 0.69 3.0 0.93 0.25 0.16 0.01 T 0.01 T T' �.1

NCDA Agronomic Division 4300 Reedy Creek Road Raleigh, NC 27607-6465 [phone] Report No: W06075 W
Grower: Williams Farms of NC, Inc. Conies To. -
do Northeast Carolina Farms, Inc.
202 Wesi Farm Way
Imion, NC 27832
)wste nalysis effort Farm. Beicross 15- 1
2110/04 Northampton County
Sample Info. I Laboratory Results (parts Rer million unless otherwise noted)
Sample ID: N I P K Ca Ma S Fe Mn Zn Cu B Mo Cl C
1 Total 7-36 49. 299 138 34.2 23 0 1.55 0.33 0 49 0.08 0.51
1N -N
Waste Code: -NH4
ALE -NO3 Na Ni Cd Pb AI Se Li off SS C:N DM'c CCE°4 ALE(Kcal)
Description: OR-N i 1 z 7.29
JMra Laxon Lio. Urea
Recommendations: _ Nutrients Available for First Crop lbs17000gallon5 10ther Elements lbs/7000 gallons
olr rion McMod N P205 K20 Ca Mg S Fe Mn Zn Cu B MO Cl I Na Ni Cd Pb Al Se ' L!
it ti tiara 0.96 0.67 2.3 0.61 0.2C 0.' 3 0.01 T T T T 0.96

FORM t. •2
Tract 9
Field Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owner's Address
Owner's Phone 1t
Lagoon Irrigation . gelds Record
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycie
%3 Field # (,
Facility Number /-3-1
I.
Irrigation Operator A:
Irrigation Operator's
Address
Operator's Phone It
From Waste Utilization Plait
Crop Type Recaruucndcd PAN Loarltnu j
(ttrracte) = 181 / U.
m M (91 141 (51 t5l 0) (a) f91 11M (Ill
()ale
mrNdkvyr
Irrigauan
Waste Analysis PAN `
(Ibri000 qai}
PAN Applicel
(ltrldcre)
(a) • (0)
raoa
Nerngar (latancc r
{ll:(acre) _
{E3j • {1o)
Start Time
End Time
Total
Minutes
{J} - {2j
1 ar Sp1lnkleti
operalurq
Flaw Rate
f9av(`unj
Total a
(gallons)
(tij • (5) • (4)
VOlrlrlle
per Acre
{gauaue)
171
(A)
Z-z
S
27- • 7
(_� z . 93
Crop Cycle Totals
Owner's Signature
Certified Operator (Print)
Operator's Signature
Operator's Certification No.
NCOA Waste Anaylysis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 633.
Enter the value received by subtracting column (10) (tarn (13). Continue subtracting calurtnil (10) from ca11.11nn (11) following each irrigation evert(,

Fom 1. •2
Tract It
Field Size (acres) = (A)
Lagoon Irrigation 1 lelds Record
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
Facility Number
Farm Owner �C./. % Irrigation Operator
Owner's Address Irrigation Operator's
Address
Owner's phone 9 Operator's Phone It
��sa1
[
From Waste Utilization Plan
Crop Type rieconuneaded PAN Loaamg h
(lWacrc) _ (ti) V
(31 MI r51 r61 f71 181 (9) Hal H 11
Date
mrnrddryr
Irfigauon
Waste Analysis PAN '
{IW t000 gall
PAN Applies!
(lblacic)
-& • r91
Nitrogen Ualance'
(IWrclu)
{©y • (10)
Sta[t Time
End Time
Total
Minules
(3) • (2)
i or spf"er3
operawg
FlowRaft)
(9a
Total Vptume
(gallons)
(6) - (5) . (4)
Volunre
per Acre
(yallaae)
(71
(A)
' -t
z L,:)
L
v a'
. 5 Z-
��r
&O
/1
72,vdo
Z z•-/o
. S3 -jg A
. 7CP
(cc , {�
Mo
�c7�1�
r /�/�
2—D
3 %. lam? %
Crop Cycle Totals
Owner's Signature Operator's Signature
Certified Operator (Print) Operator's Certification No.
1 NCDA Waste Anaylysis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate. Technical Guide Section 633.
' Enter the value received by subtracting column (10) from (8). Continue subtracting column (10) from column (11) following each irrigalion even(.

FORM r. .2
Tract u
Field Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owner's Address
Owners Phone #
Lagoon irrigataun I gelds Record
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
Facility Number
1 �
Irrigation Operator
Irrigation Operator's
Address
Operator's Phone i; I
From Waste Utilization Plan
Crop -Typo Iteconuuended PAN Loading U� —
(iblacsc) _ (U)
r1t 01 i71 141 151 f51 M f81 191 flat 11 ll
Date
mrnlddlyr
Irrigatr4n
Waste Analysis PAN'
{lW i000 gall
PAN Apphed
(It✓acre)
881 _ 01
IQQO
Pftlrcgcn 19alancc'
(Rdacc)
(0} (tfl)
Start Time
End Time
Total
Minutes
(3) - (2)
1 of Sponklers
operating
fk)w Rate
(galGnin)
Total Volume
(gallons)
(8) • (5) • (4)
Volume
per Aae
(gauaue)
_474
fA)
��
l LJ
'J4ao
z 3
r_
6,v
/2-27
y`(o too
2-
.2 L-
] �.
�Lj
Crop Cycle Totals I _
Owner's Signature
Certified Operator (Print)
Operalor's Signature
Operator's Cetlificalion No.
1 NCOA Waste Anaylysis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate. Technical Guide Section 633.
a Enler the value received by subtracting column (10) from (8). Continue subtracting column (10) from column (11) following each irrigalion event.

FORM 1. .2
Tract k
Field Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owner's Address
Owner's Phone 9
Lagoon Irrigation r telds Record
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
Facilily Number
Irrigation Operator !
Irrigation Operalor's
Address
Operator's Phone #
Front Waste Utilization Plan
crop Type Retoelulended PAN Laallinq / 7
Owatse) = ta1 / eqO
en rn fit f-11 1S1 161 M ref r91 11m 11 i1
Dale
nn1rrjd,y 1
y
Wigatlon
Waste Analysis PAN '
(Itr<tC00 gal)
PAN Apphed
(SWaae)
—LB)
t400
Nilrogun UW kiiCu
(IWaclu)
(Ell(101 •
(
Stars Time
End Time
jowl
Minutes
lr of Sprinklers
Operaluig
Fk)%v Rate {galrrnrn)
Talal Vorulne
{gallons)
(6) • (5) _ (4)
Vo1l1n1C
pet Act e
(gellaue)191
17L
(A)
ev
6'G'.2
(,0J
%
72-ca a
24K6
i ��
ZZ. 7 6,
Lt,
Crop Cycle Totals I _ _i
Owner's Signature
Certified Operator (Print)
Operator's Signature
Operator's Cel titication No.
l NCOA Waste Anaylysis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 633.
' Enter the value received by subtracting column (10) from (8). Continue subtracting column (10) from column (11) followinrd each irriraatioll evenl.

FORM 1. 2
Tract 4
Field Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owner's Address
Owner's Phone #
Lagoon Irrigation. telds Record
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
Facility Number
Irrigation Operator
Irrigation Operator's
Address
Operator's Phone it
From Waste Utilization Plan
Crop Type Reconnended PAN ( Loading
4-) u (twac) 2 (b)
$11 (21 (3) t41 (5) 16) (7) (8) ig) 001 (111
Date
mrrvddlyr
luigabon
waste Analysis PAN '
(OritDOD gal)
PAN Applied
L) r (91
1000
Nitrogen Balance
(Vicre)
(El) • 00)
SEart Time
End Time
Total
Minuses
(3) - (2)
i of sprinklers
operaling
Flow Rale
(galfrn in)
Total Volume
Total
(gallons)
(6) ' (5) • (4)
Volurne
¢u AUc
(gauaue)
M
(A)
Z-
G :
_-R C. YOn
1 Z--
1, lad
5V .
o
/GVo�
.�?
�.j31
J
Crop Cycle Totals i j
Owner's Signature
Certified Operator (Print)
Operator's Signature
Operator's Certification No.
I NCGA Waste Anaylysis or Gctuivaieni or MRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 633.
r Enter the value received by subtracting column (10) frorn (B). Continue subtracting coltnnn (10) from colurr:n (11) following each irrigalioll event.

FORM 1. 2
Tract #
Field Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owner's Address
Owner's Phone #
Lagoon Irrigation r ields Record
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
Facility Number''—/
Irrigation Operator /L.',-v ""
Cc
Irrigation Operator's
Address
Operator's Phone It
Froin Waste Utilization Plan
Crop Type Recommended PAN Loarlrny
(Lracre) = (ti) Qg
r n r7t Ml (41 151 46) (75 181 (91 (101 (til
Date
MnVd.0 r
y
lrrigalian
'.Jasie Analysis PAN'
(lWlCl50 gal)
PAN Applied
(lWdue)
�1 - (91
(OQQ
Nrlrogeu (5alancu `
(1waue)
[41 (la)
Slarl Time
End Time
Tolai
Mimrles
(3) - (2)
1 of Sprinkicis
operaiing
Flow Rate
(gaUmin)
Total Valurna
(gallons)
(5) 1 (5) • (4)
Volume
per Acrc
{gatraae)
[71
(A)
;2_r%Q��'
Crop Cycle Totals f I
Owner's Signature
Certified Operator (Print)
Operator's Signature
Operator's Cetlifcalion No.
NCDA Waste Anaylysis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 633.
r Enter the value received by subtracting column (10) from (B). Continue subtracting colun5n (10) from coluain (11) following each irrigalion event.

FORM 1. -2
Tract iV
Field Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owner's Address
Owner's Phone f$
Lagoon Irrigation I fields Record
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
Facility Number
Irrigation Operator O >
Irrigation Operator's
Address
Operator's Phone It
From Waste Utilization Plan
Gap Type rle[anuncnded PAN Loa�lurq
> A-)(luacfc) _ (ti)
rn M fit 141 f51 161 M (61 f9l nob f t ll
Dale
mrrJtldryr
Ilri9auan
Waste Analysis PAN '
(IW l000 rgab)
PAN Applied
(luacle)
�l4 L
Nrtrutjcn 0i lancu'
(luauu) ,
I©) (Io)
Sbarl Time
End Time
Total
Minutes
(3) - (2)
or sprinklefs
Operaliug
_ Rate
Flow
Total Valurne
(gattons)
(6) • (5) + (4)
V�lurte
per Ante
(gduacre)
f71
(A)
t L�
—2S�7y'
ICJr3ra
�alGn
/2d
r�-�J
ii OJ
�rc].
ly
Crop Cycle Totals
Owner's Signature
Certified Operator (Print)
Operator's Signalure
Operator's Certification No.
b NCDA Waste Anaylysis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 633.
7 Enter the value received by subtracting column (10) from (5). Continue subtracting column (10) from colutnn (11) following each irrirgalion event.

FORM 1. •2
Tract #
Field Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owner's Address
Owner's Phone W
Lagoon Irrigation . gelds Record
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
CDC Field 9
O
Facility Number /
Irrigation Operator {J.,
Irrigation Operator's
Address
Operator's Phone it
From Waste Utilization Plan
Crop Type ltccornmended PAN Loading
{11daue) _ (E1) (�
rn rn nr rn rs1 f61 r71 181 (91 Hot fill
Date
nUTVa%V i
y
In igauon
waste Analysis PAN
{lUto00 gal)
PAN Applied
(ti,lauc)
18L r9t
1000
Nrtiogeu tualancc'
(ltrl;rue)
(t7) - [l0)
Slant lime
End Time
Total
Minrilas
(3) (2)
a at sprinklers
operatuig
Ftaw Rate
(gatlrnin)
Total Vaiirrne
(gallons)
(6) • (5) • (4)
Volume
per Acre
(galraue]
17)
(A)
bob
v
Z3.o�'`
,� e
2
a
c;v�
�`Ia'
- I %
`%�,5,'
Crop Cycle Totals i j
Owner's Signaturea
Certified Operator (Print)
Operator's Signature
Operator's Ceitification No.
NCOA Waste Anaylysis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 633.
= Enter the value received by subtracting column (10) (coin (8). Continue subtracting coltlnul (10) from column (11) following each irri9alion even(.

FORM I. .2
Tract 4
Field Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owner's Address
Owner's Phone Y
Lagoon Irrigation r fields Record
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
r /Ova Field tt
j Z
3�
Facility dumber
Irrigation Operator
Irrigation Operator's
Address
Operator's Phone 0
From Waste Utilization Plat)
Crop Type Reconuncruled PAN loadituj
( iLj (twacre) = (I!) I /0
r11 171 M (41 r51 [GI M 181 (91 1101 till
Dale
mmrddryr
In igation
Wasle Analysis PAN '
(IW 1000 gal)
PAN Applied
pijidcre)
�81 • 0
19Q0
Nrlrogun Utklauce '
(lWaclu)
{D) • (!U)
Start Time
End Time
Total
Minutes
13Y t�Y
0 or Sprinklers
operating
Flow Rale
{gakrrnin}
Total Volume
(gallons)
(6) • (5) • (4)
Volume
per AGe
(gaVaGe)
[71
(A)
a, 60,o
J d
j7
Y2
Crop Cycle Totals
Owner's Signature
Certified Operator (Print)
Operator's Signalure
Operator's Cellificalion No.
NCDA Wasle Anaylysis or Equivalent or MRCS Estimate. Technical Guide Section 633.
2 Enter the value received by subtracting column (10) from (S). Conlinue subtracting column (10) from column (11) following each irrigation event.

FORM 1. 2
Tract 1)
Field Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owners Address
Owner's Phone u
Lagoon Irrigation n telds Record
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
Facility Number /
Irrigation Operator
Irrigation Operator's
Address
Operator's Phone 11
Frain Waste Utilization Plan
Gap Type EiCConuucucled(PAN
cre)ad{t)
rit 01 Ml 141 (5) (fit (7) (et (4) ilol (Ill
Date
nurVdLY r
y
Irrigation
Wasle Analysis PAN '
(IhliCCo gal}
PAN Applied
(Itrrauc)
�t • r9l
I000
N1lrogcn liakancc'
(Itdjue)
(p) - (f0)
Start Time
End Time
Taal
Minuses
(3).(2)
/ of Spanklus
operating
Flaw Rate
(galJrrun)
Total Valnunc
(gallons}
(6) • (5) x (4)
Volume
per Aue
{yaPaue)
(7)
(A)
jt
Crop Cycle Totals I
Owner's Signature
Certified Operator (Print)
Operator's Signature
Operator's Celtirfcation No.
l NCDA Waste Anay[ysis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 633.
7 Enter the value received by subtracting column (10) [rorn ([3). Continue subtracting colultut (10) from column (1 1) following each irrirgalion event.

FORM L 2
Tract #
Field Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owner's Address
Owner's Phone k
Lagoon Irrigation r gelds Record
One Farm for Each Field per Crop Cycle
Facility Number -
Irrigation Operator
irrigation Operator's
Address
Operator's Phone it
From Waste Utilization Plan
trap Type �� RccauvireraJed PAN LaarlJH) 1/0 Is
j
111 f21 (71 (41 (5) (6) (7) (81 (9) r101 fill
Dale
Mnuddlyr
lrrigauon
Waste Analysis PAN '
{lW1CC0gaO
PAN Applied
(IWdcre)
-g1 f''f
tCDU
Ndrogurl 04tancc '
(IWaCrc)
(a) (t0)
Start Time
End Time
Toter
Minuses
M • M
l °! 5 lni�lers
pf
operathrg
Flow Rate
{gallirun)
(gallons} 7o1�Vohuna
(6) , (5) , (`)
V°Irulfe
(gallaaper Acre) e
+rs
(A)
4
2—
. 03?
Crop Cycle Totals I
Owner's Signature
Certified Operator (Print)
Operator's Signature
Operator's Certification No.
1 NCDA Waste Anaylysis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 633.
Enter the value received by subtracting column (10) from (8). Continue subtracting column (10) from column (11) following each irtigalion event.

FORM 1. -2
Tract #
Field Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owner's Address
Owner's Phone 9
Lagoon Irrigation i lelds Record
One Form for -Each Field per Crop Cycle
Facilily Number /
Irrigation Operator -n- T
Irrigation Operator's
Address
Operator's Phone 1�
From Waste Utilization Plan
Ceop Type Recaiuuended PAN Loading
(!placic) = tu) L�
r n 121 (21 (41 (51 (6) 17) (8) (4) 1la) fill
Date
mrrsldJlyr
Hr ig atlon
Waite Anaiysis PAN'
(IL1)coo gal)
PAN Applied
pWacre)
t83 -
I000
Nilrogen f341anc'; �
([Lr:iue)
(©t • (10}
siarl Time
End Time
Total
Minutes
A or sponidera
OperdlurtJ
Flew R810
(gaWnin)
Total Vo)ierna
(ga0ons)
Volume
per Aue
(geuarsa)
(A)
Crop Cycle Totals
Owner's Signature
Certified Operator (Print)
Operator's Signature
Operalor's Ce[tification No.
NCOA Waste Anaylysis or Equivalenl or MRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 633.
7 Enter the value received by subtracting column (10) from (8). Continue subtracting cohlmn (10) from cotu(lu) (11) following cacti ifrirgation event.

FOFiM IRR-2
Lagoon Irrigation Felos Record
One Form for Each Feld per Crop Cycle
Trail 003 Feld ff
Feld Size (acres) = (A) /
Farm Owner % _ C-Z�
Owner's Address
Owner's Phone #
Facility Number // 1 -
Irrigation Operator
Irrigation Operator's
Address
Operator's Phone #
From Waste Utilization Plan
Crop Type Recommended PAN Loaning d
{1} 0 (3) (4) i5} {61 M (a) (9) (10) M1)
Date
mmIddlyr
Irrigation
Waste Analysis PAN'
(Mill gaQ
P eied
cbiac�={g}-
1000
{ritroq Qalance _
M - 00)
Start Time
End Time
Total
trrurmnes
ar Sprinklers
Operating
Plow Rate
(gall—)
Total Volume
(gall—)
Volume
per Arse
(gaflaae)
(a
-27v-
330.
: v
Gov
/?
7ri zoo
,,rs`%�'
Crop Cycle Totals
Owner's Signature
Certirned Operator (Print)
Operator's Signature
Operatoes Certification No.
NCOA Waste Anaylysis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 633.
7 Enter the value received by subtracting column (10) from (8). Continue subtracting column (10) from column (11) following each irrigation event.

FoFim lulu-2
'tract #
Feld Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owner's Address
Owner's Phone #
Lagoon irrigation Fields Record
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
e!d # /� Facility Number
Irrigation Operator
Irrigation Operator's
Address
Operators Phone #
From Waste Utilization Plan
Crop Type Recommended PAN lma6ng J
wacre) = A ( -
rn rzt r3l tat (M 191 m tat t9t (IM fill
/--�c 3
F
3
Date
mmlddlyr
Irrigation -
Waste Analysis PAN'
(1b11DD0 gafj
-
PAN Applied
(Vacre)
8��}
jma
ff"en Baiance=
{lw=e)
(B) • 00)
Start Time
End Tune
Taha!
Minc'tes
(3) - (2)
a of Sprinklers
Operating
Flow Rate
(gallmin)
Total Volume
(gins)
(sl x (Sl x (a)
Volume
per Aae
(galla¢e)
-0—
A
Loy
2 Z 6
. 7
Crop Cycle Totals
Owner's Signature
Certified Operator (Print)
Operator's Signature
Operator's Certification No.
s
t NCDA Waste Anaylysis or Equivalent or MRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 633.
z Enter the value received by subtracting column (10) from (B). Continue subtracting column (10) from column (11) following each irrigation event

Font iRA-2
Tract #
Feld Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owner's Address
Owners Phone #
Lagoon Irrigation Fielos Record
One Farm for Each Field per Crop Cycle
/per Feld
Facility Number
Irrigation Operator
Irrigation Operator's
Address
Operators Phone #
From Waste Utilization Plan
Crop Type Reconunended PAN Loading
(tbla—) = (B)
rii PA M1 la fm On rn I%n fm rsM �,..
Owe
mr¢SlCd yr
Irrigation
waste is PANPAN Applied
(ip aae)
(It]1100Q gal)��
5000
Nitrogen Balance =
{IblaQe)
(g) - {t0)
Stan T0*
End Time
Total
i
(3) - (2)
r of Sprinklers
Operating
Flow Rate
)
1 oral Volume
(C,altOr:s)
(s) x (5) x (4)
Volume
per Acre
(gallaaej
�_
(Al
9-2-7 -0
7 'ems
s ,�
,�
�s'v
:Z J 2.2- 4 .—
1 7 . s'7
2_ l
i
Owners Signature
Certified Operator (Print)
II
Crop Cycle Totals
Operators Signature
Operators Certification No.
i NCDA Waste Anaylysis or Equivalent or MRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 633.
2 Enter the value received by subtracting column (10) from (E). Continue subtracting column (10) from column (11) following each irrigation event.

FORM IRR-2
Lagoon Irrigation Felas Record
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
Tract. 1ec•3 Feld #
Feld Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owner's Address
Owner's Phone
Facility Number - j --//
Irrigation Operator a F„r,�
Irrigation Operator's
Address
Operator's Phone #
From Waste Utilization Plan
Crop Type Recommended PAN Uaffng
(1) 0 M (a) M M . M f81 (gl
rigs rill
Owe
mmfdC'yr
iniyation -
Waste Analysis PAN'
(I l 000 SM
-
PAN Applied
MI—e)
Ml 0
1000
Mdmgen ealance=
¢Mace)
Start Tame
End Tune
Total
rdernaes
F� - t'z)
y of Spriniders
Operatsr:g
Flow Fate
[gauanan)
Tatef voiume
(gan�3
(6) _ (5) _ (a)
Vohune
per Acre
(saVaie)
M
A
l:j
160)
64d,
2-0
yod
G sue'
f •
32 , i
'
I
Crop Cycle Totals t j
Owner's Signature
Certified Operator (Print)
Operator's Signature
Operator's Certification No.
I NCDA Waste Anaylysis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 633.
Enter the value received by subtracting column (10) from (13). Continue subtracting column (10) from column (11) following each irrigation event

FORM (RR-2
'tract #
Feld Size (acres) _ (A)
Farm Owner
Owner's Address
Owner's Phone #
Lagoon Irrigation Felts Record
One Form for Each Field per Crap Cycle
Feld #
T CI-1
Facility Number
Irrigation Operator
Irrigation Operator's
Address
Operator's Phone #
From Waste Utilization Plan
Crap Type Recommended PAN Loading
{Ib/—) _ (B)
rtl M f31 fal M (sl m (a) M lta) fill
Date
n=dd yr
Irrigation
Waste Analysis PAN
{tbft Opp gal)
PAN Fppled
ovacre)
. [ )
t000
N'drogen Balance"
(Wacre)
{B} {t0)
Start Tama
End Time
Total
Adurutes
of Sprinklers
Operating
ow )
FlBata
Total Volume
(gallaru)
Volume
per Arne
le)
A
3
36.,;'o
11&13
3. y
Crop Cycle Totals I 1
Owner's Signature
Certified Operator (Print)
Operator's Signature
Operator's Certification No.
I NCOA Waste Arayiysis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 633.
2 Enter the value received by subtracting column (10) from (B). Continue subtracting column (10) from column (11) following each irrigation event-

FORM IRR-2
Lagoon Irrigation Felts Record
One Farm for Each Field per Crop Cycle
Tract ; Feld #
Feld Size (acres) = (A)
Fans Owner
Owner's Address
Owner's Phone ;f
Facility Number 7—/ -
Irrigation Operator
Irrigation Operators
Address
Operator's Prone #
From Waste Utilization Plan
Crop Type Recommended PAN Loading / l�
—arnz ¢grave) = (e) G
f11 (2) Cat (4) M f6l M fat (91
f101 fill
Date
=Vddyr
Imgatson _
Waste Analysis PAN'
(lhriQOQ gaq
PAN Appfed
tbl�el
L x
1000
If"en Balance t
pWavej
(B) {tor
-
start Time
End Time
Tate!
(3) - C2)
Y of sprinklers
Operating
Raw Rate
(gaitun)
TV
otal Volume
(gallons)
(6) x (5) x (4)
volwne
per Aare
(gavacre)
�.
r
_ 2l-V3
v
8 1 ���
3:�
.i:'�
�o�
�
/�
_a���
z Lai,
I . �
�
• v .-c5
I
I
I
Crop Cycle Totals
Owner's Signature
Certified Operator (Print)
Operator's Signature
Operator's Certification No.
I NCDA Waste Anaylysis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 633.
2 Enter the value received by subtracting column (10) from (8). Continue subtracting column (10) from column (11) following each irrigation event.

FORM MR-2
Tract R
Feld Size (acres) = (A)
Lagoon irrigation Fields Record
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
Facility Number
Farm Owner lrrigation Operator
Owners Address Irrigation Operator's
Address
Owner's Phone Operator's Phone #
f bwj
From Waste Utilization Plan
Grip Type / Recommended PAN Loading
I wape) + M C
rst 1e1 rs tit M tat f91 rtrn n,ti
Oats
mmiddiyr
anigatian
Waste Analysis PAN'
llnit000 ga(}
PAN Appried
wage)
LM . M)
t000
DFrtrogen Balance _
Qhlave)
(s) - IZa)
Start Tame
End Time
Total
i�Ainutes
(3) ' M
Y of Sprinklers
Operating
Flow Rate
��)
Total Volume
(gallons)
(9) " (5 " (a)
Voawne
per Acre
(_gaUaae)
JD —
A
vJ
G��
Z�
.lv�
I • 3
l
Crop Cycle Totals L__
Owner's Signature
Certified Operator (Print)
Operator's Signature
Operator's Certification No.
s
NCDA Waste Anaylysis or Equivalent or MRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 633-
' Enter the value received by subtracting column (t 0) from (8). Continue subtracting column (i a) from column (1 i) following each irrigation event_

FORM IRIa-2
Tract #
Feld Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owner's Address
Owner's Phone #
Lagoon Irrigation Fie1Gs Record
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
I /o� 1 Feld # g
3�
Facility Number ! -/ -
Irrigation Operator -
Irrigation Operator's
Address
Operator's Phone #
From Waste Utilization Plan
crap Type Recommended PAN Loading /
(ln/acre) _ (B) /[4
nt rr Ini rat rst rst rn ral f91 (tm rill
Oats
mmldd'yr
Irrigation
Waste Analysis PAN'
(It?l100o gal)
PAN Applied
M/aae)
t F
typo
N""en Balance 1
ptVacre)
(e) - (10)
Stag Time
End Time
Total
f,+lirnttes
(3)- (2)
Y of Spnnklers
operating
Flow Rate
(gall—)
Total Volume
(gailoru)
(6) : (s) x (4)
Volume
per AQe
{gaUaQe}
71
of
L)
/L
`/�
y ?v
I /. L
,? z
.Z. 7.?—
Crop Cycle Totals I I
Owners Signature
Certified Operator (Print)
Operators Signature
Operator's Certification No.
1 NCt7A Was'e Anaylysis or Equivalent or NFICS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 633_
a Enter the value received by subtracting column (10) from (8). Continue subtracting column (10) from column (t 1) following each irrigation event

FORM I. 2
Tract #
Field Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owner's Address
Owner's Phone #
Lagoon Irrigation . gelds Record
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
Facility Number
Irrigation Operator
lrrigalion Operator's
Address
Operator's Phone #
From Waste utilization Plan
Coop Type Recomanended PAN Loading /
(IWacru) = (B)
tit 121 (31 (4) (5) M (7) (B) (gi 1101 till
Date
mnvOdlyt
Irrigation
Waste Analysis PAN `
(ilr/1000 gal)
PAN Applied
(lWacre)
1000
NolrOgeu Balancc
(Vacoe)
M ' (10)
Start Time
tend Time
Total
lr MICS
(3) - (Z)
if of Sprinklets
operafiowj
Flow Rate
(gavrnin)
Total Volume
(gallons)
(5) . (5) " (4)
Volume
per Aue
(gatlaue)
...f?L
(A)
= d
13
Crop Cycle 'totals I I
Owncr's Signature
Certified Operator (Print)
Operator's Signature
Operator's Cellificalion No.
I NCDA Waste Anaylysis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate. Technical Guide Section 633.
2 Enter the value received by subtracting column (10) from (B). Contintre subtracting column (10) from column (11) following cacti irriga(iori. even(.

FORM IRIS-2
Lagoon Irrigation Felas Record
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
Tract # �03 Feld #
Feld Size (acres) = (A) KD .
Farm Owner r
Owner's Address
Owner's Phone##
Facility Number
Irrigation Operator
Irrigation Operator's
Address
Operator's Phone #
From Waste Utilization Plan
crop Type Recommended PAN Loading
r11 tm r31 (4) r51 f6l M 181 f41 tin) rill
INEM
Waste Analysis PAN
0., .
PAN Applied
ODD
ra
Total Volume
a.
u
Crop Cycle Totals 1 j
Owner's Signature
Certified Operator (Print)
Operator's Signature
Operator's Certification No.
1 NCDA Waste Anaylysis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 633.
2 Enter the value received by subtracting column (10) from (B). Continue subtracting column (10) from column (11) following each irrigation event

FORM IFIR-2
Tract #
Feld Size (acres) = (A)
Farris Owner
Owner's Address
Owner's Phone #
Lagoon Irrigation Fiews Record
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
/oo Feld #] / J
7. 14
FacilityNumber -
Irrigation Operator aS
Irrigation Operators
Address
Operator's Phone #
From Waste Utilization Plan
Crop Type Recommended PAN Loafing
(Iblacre) = (B) I & 11
ft) f21 (3) (4) (5) (6) M (a) (9) (10) ft1)
Date
mWddlyr
Irrigation
Waste Analysis PAN'
(Ih/t 000 gaf)
PAN Applied
(ISyrarre)
9 "
low
rrilrogen Balance=
Wacre)
Stara Time
End Time
Total
Afmirtes
(3) - R
# of Sprinklers
Operating
Flow Rate
(9ay )
Total Volume
W )
(� " (`) x (4)
Volume
per Acre
(gallacre)
M
A
�ye7
. _ z -�,'
3��o
z, �
lvf�o
/
/Z.�
z_ot✓
G ov
_ �
' /.G�
��. �
Crop Cycle Totals i 1
Owner's Signature
Certified Operator (Print)
Operator's Signature
Operator's Certification No.
t NCDA Waste Anaylysis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 633.
2 Enter the value received by subtracting column (10) from (8). Continue subtracting column (10) from column (11) following each irrigation event.

FORM IRR-z
Lagoon Irrigation Fields Record
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
Tract # Go' Feld #
Feld Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owner's Address
Owner's Phone #
Facility Number / 1.
,1
Irrigation Operator
Irrigation Operators
Address
Operator's Phone #
From Waste Utilization Plan
Crop Type Recommended Para taadng �� v
Wa—) = (s)
of rzr (31 rat M (s) m (a) M 001 (11)
Date
mrsJddtyr
Irrigation
Ware A,nafysis ?Ala'
(>br1 Ooo ga!)
P A ?ed
m
1000
4oaQejme'
start r.n,e
Erd tuna
Total
Mirnste3
# of Spsinkfers
ae�,g
� Aare
g—)
ro(g lions)
{ga(tans)
Volume
per.—e
(9alfaae)
A
o
./2 v
%Loos
2—
Crop Cycle Totals I j
Owners Signature
Certified Operator (Print)
Operators Signature
Operators Certification No.
r NCDA Waste Anaylysis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate. Technical Guide Section 633.
2 Enter the value received by subtracting column (10) from (B). Continue subtracting column (10) from column (11) following each irrigation event.

FORM IRR-2
Tract #
Feld Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owner's Address
I
Owner's Phone #
Lagoon irrigation Fiews Record
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
Facility Number
Irrigation Operator 7---- _
Irrigation Operatoes
Address
Operator's Phone #
From Waste Utilization Plan
Crop Type Recommended PAN Loading
list% pNacre} _ (e}
fl) (2) (31 (4) (5) (e) (7) (81 (9) (70} rill
Date
mmldd/yr
Irrigation
waste Analysis PAN'
(Ib110oo gat}
PAN A?pried
{1Ulacre}
O- (
Witrogen Balance'
(Iblaae}
(B) - (10)
Start Time
Erxl Time
Totw
Minutes
!� of S ririlders
P
operas ng
Flow
)
TOW Volume
{gallons)
(6) x (5) x (4)
Volume
(g �e
7
ace
.23.
/ J G 6
9 LCv-e
L ` L;
'at3
of
r]
J
/0
Crop Cycle Totals
Owner's Signature
Certified Operator (Print)
Operators Signature
Operator's Certification No.
F NCCA Waste Anaylysis or Equivaleni or NRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 633.
$ Enter the value received by subtracting column (t 0) from (B). Continue subtracting column (10) from column (11) following each irrigation event

FORM IRR-2
Lagoon Irrigation Fields Record
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
Tract # /pv Feld # //. Facility Number 1 //
Feld Size (acres) = (A)
Faun Owner r r Irrigation Operator
Owner`s Address Irrigation Operator's
Address
Owner's Phone # E Operator's Phone #
6 irl1
From Waste Utilization Plan
Grip Type Recommended PAN Lading
(lb/acre) = (3)
M W M f91 M fM M fins n11
Dale
mmiddjrr
Irrigation
Waste Analysis PAN'
{Ib1t000 Saf1
PAN Applied
(!blase)
1000
Nitrogen Balance'
(iblacre)
(B)- 00)
Start Time
End T'�rne
T°
Minutes
I of Sprinklers
operating
Flow Rate
f5aVm1n)
Total Volume
(gaiions)
(s) - (S) - (4)
Volume
per Acre
(gallace)
i�i_
A
QQ
`
`f
2f0
roc]
J
G'O
/2i0
e76 Jt7
Zc9�P
L
[
31, �_
-2L
i Z 'w
Gov
/
1v
7
I
4
I
Crop Cycle Totals
Owners Signature Operators Signature _
Certified Operator (Print) Operator's Certification No.
t NCDA Waste Anaylysis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 633.
z Enter the value received by subtracting column (10) from (8). Continue subtracting column (10) from column (t 1) following each irrigation event

FORM IRR-2
Tract #
Feld Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owners Address
Owner's Phone #
Lagoon Irrigation Felos Record
One Form for Each Feld per Crop Cycle
ipo Feld # rZ/r
. 7
Facility Number
Irrigation Operator
Irrigation Operator's
Address
Operator`s Phone #
From Waste Utilization Plan
Crop Type Recommended PAN Loading
ice) = (a) 16 c�.
111 (n rat rst m tin M rat AM n m r, .
Date
mrrdddlyt
Irrigation
waste Analysis PAN'
pb11000 gal)
PAN ?ied
1000
�(ILJaae=
(s) - 00)
Start Time
End Time
Tots!
hfiinutes
(3)- (2)
rt of Sprinklers
Operating
Ftpw Rate
(gavm;nj
Total Volume
((gallons)r)
(6) x (5) x (4)
Volume
per Arne
(9Warse)
�)_
La
41v
A 2--
. 7-0
7 7�aD v
d�.1/.f
Z
y
'
660
G cd
L
' ,1.
', a
Crop Cycle Totals I I
Owner's Signature Operator's Signature
Certified Operator (Print) Operator`s Certification No.
I
1 NCOA Waste Anaylysis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 633.
: Enter the value received by subtracting column (10) from (8). Continue subtracting column (10) from column (f 1) following each irrigation event

FORM IRR-2
Tract ##
Feld Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owners Address
Owner's Phone #
Lagoon Irrigation Fields Record
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
/da3 Fie}d # /L Facility Number
a
Irrigation Operator
Irrigation Operator's
Address
Operators Phone #
From Waste Utilization Plan
Crop Type Fiecammended PAN Loading
tom} = A �� d
it) (21 191 W fm (91 M fm (91 1101 ,„l
Crop Cycle Totals I 1 I 1
Owner's Signature Operator's Signature
Certified Operator (Print) Operator's Certification No.
s
i NCQA Waste Anaylysis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 633.
2 Enter the value received by subtracting column (10) from (B). Continue subtracting column (10) from column (11) following each irrigation event.

FORM IRR-2
Tract #
Feld Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owner's Address
Owner's Phone #
Lagoon Irrigation Fields Record
One Form for Each Feld per Crop Cycle
Facility Number
Irrigation Operator
irrigation Operator's
Address
Operators Phone #
From Waste Utilization Plan
Crap Type Remmmended PAN Loading
I7) (P) (3) (4) ts) (0 M M) (9) (toi If11
MM
= ra
O
Crop Cycle Totals ! i
Owner's Signature
Certified Operator (Print)
Operators Signature
Operator's Certification No.
I NCOA Waste Anaylysis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 633,
s Enter the value received by subtracting column (1 D) from (8). Continue subtracting column (10) from column (11) following each irrigation event.

FORM IRR-2
Lagoon Irrigation Fields Record
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
Tract # Feld !#
Feld Size (acres) = (A) J
Farm Owner (� `
Owner's Address
Owner's Phone #
Facility Number
Irrigation Operator
Irrigation Operator's
Address
Operator's Phone #
From Waste Utilization Plan
Cusp Type —�� Recommended PAN Loafing
(IClaae) _ (8) � 4
rn r� M a► M r6 m (e) (s) nm rs»
tgyzm��
now
Crop Cycle Totals i j
Owner's Signature
Certified Operator (Print)
Operator's Signature
Operator's Certification No.
z NCCA Waste Anaylysis or Equivalent or MRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 633.
Enter the value received by subtracting column (10) from (B). Continue subtracting column (10) from column (11) following each irrigation event

FORM IRR-2
Tract #
Feld Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owner's Address
Owner`s Phone #
Lagoon Irrigation Fields Record
One Farm for Each Field per Crop Cycle
/cog Feld # C
r T� 1111a.114
Facility Number IA
Irrigation Operator s
Irrigation Operator's
Address
Operator's Phone #
From Waste Utilization Plan
Crop Type Recommended PAN Loafing
(wlacre) = (a) T �0 4
rn rat M rdl (M (M M (M (9) (IM rt�l
•
11k
11�
,
•
per
Crop Cycle Totals 1 _ 1 f _ _ 1
Owner's Signature Operator's Signature _
Certified Operator (Print) Operator's Certification No.
I NCOA Waste Anaylysis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 633.
2 Enter the value received by subtracting column (10) from (B). Continue subtracting column (10) from column (11) following each irrigation event.

FORM IRF
Tract #
Field Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owner's Address
Owner's Phone #
Lagoon lrrigatio,, , ic!as Record
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
Facility Number /
Irrigation Operator
Irrigalion Operator's
Address
Operator's Phone II
From Waste Utilization Plan
Crop Type Reconvnended PAN loading %
C,J� (IWaue) = (R) ! GAT
red rn rat Nl r51 f61 (71 Hit i91 1101 fill
Dale
mn>✓dd7yr
IuigaGon
Wasle Ana"is PAN '
{1Gr1000 oaf)
PAN Applied
(lulacre)
LLt`?L
1000
Ndrogull balance '
(IWacie)
04 • (10)
Slarl Time
End Time
Tula!
}rliruries
(3)(2)
Ior sprinklers
Operating
Flow Rale
(gall,nin)
Total VuG,ma
(gallons)
(g) + (5) _ (4)
Volume
per Arse
(gallaae)
_.tZL
(A)
Crop Cycle Totals
Owner's Signature
Certified Operator (Print)
Operator's Signature
Operator's Certification No.
i NCDA Waste Anaylysis or Cduivalent or MRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 633.
7 Eoler the value received by subtracting column (10) from (8). Conlinue subtracting column (10) from column (11) following each irrigation event.

FORM IRR-2
Tract #
Feld Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owner's Address
Owners Phone #
Lagoon Irrigation Fielos Record
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
Reid #
Facility Number
Irrigation Operator
Irrigation Operator's
Address
Operators Phone #
From Waste Utilization Plan
Crop Type Recommended PAN Loading
LCr Wit—) = (s)
n, m rm rdi M rm M IM t9% rtrn
Date
=Vddlyr
Irrigation
Waste Analysis PAN'
(Ib11000 gal)
-
PAN Applied
Wane)
^�1
1000
r, bWen Balance =
(Wave)
�) - It e)
Start Tm,e
End Time
Total
Mouesigalbr�s)
/ of Sprinklers
Operating
Flow Rate
(gailmin)
TOW Volume
(6) x (5) x (4)
Votume
per Acre
(9aVacre)
—E
A
/L J
3-1 YOO
2 `/
. c:
0-
5
�,�d�
yU
/ L*�
Oa,
C'
3
3 e-e--n
i
/ 0
/ 3
7s
Crop Cycle Totals 1 1
Owners Signature Operators Signature
Certified Operator (Print) Operators Certification No.
N1
i NCDA Waste Anaylysis or Equivalent or NFICS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 633.
2 Enter the value received by subtracting column (10) from (B). Continue subtracting column (10) from column (11) following each irrigation event.

FORM IRR-2
Lagoon Irrigation Fielas Record
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
Tract # j dv-J Feld #
Feld Size (acres) = (A) /
Farm Owner
Owner's Address
Owner's Phone #
Facility Number
Irrigation Operator r
Irrigation Operator's
Address
Operator's Phone #
From Waste Utilization Plan j}
Crop Type j RecommendedP N Ukae g
(1) fZ (3) r4) fs) (6) M 0 (9) t101 n,t
Date
mmlddlyr
Irrigation
Waste Analysis PAN ,
(lbl1000 gat)
PAN Qp;ed
f } 7e)
"
1000
I Titrog balance 1
((b - {t a)
Start Tune
End Time
Total
KnuLes
P) - �
of Sprinklers
Operating
Flow Rate
(gaUrtim)
Total Volume
{6}(galfons)(4)
Votume
per Acre
acre)
J-
A
-e 3
3•2 O a
/a
-j
Af -qL0
360
Z)
Z3"
7
Crop Cycle Totals ! _
Owner's Signature
Certified Operator (Print)
Operator's Signature
Operator's Certification No.
I NCDA Waste Anaylysis or Equivalent or NaCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 633.
2 Enter the value received by subtracting column (10) from (8)_ Continue subtracting column (10) from column (11) following each irrigation event

FORM IRFt-2 Lagoon Irrigation Felos Record
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
Tract #
Feld Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owners Address
Owners Prone #
10 Feld # r
Facility Number /
Irrigation Operator 0
irrigation Operators
Address
Operators Prone #
•/
(Alf ye,
From Waste Utilization Plan
Crop Type Recommended PAN Loafing U
gat-) = 03)
/Tt M n% All /51 rat - in an Im nrn ly ii
..I
�t�r���
• ��
Owners Signature
Certified Operator (Print)
f
Crop Cycle Totals 1 1
Operators Signature
Operators Certification No.
r NCOA Waste Anaylysis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 633.
2 Enter the value received by subtracting column (10) from (B). Continue subtracting column (10) from column (11) following each irrigation event

FORM EAR-2
Tract #
Feld Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owner's Address
Owners Phone #
Lagoon Irrigation Felas Record
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
-10 Feld #
Facility Number
Irrigation Operator A110 r .
Irrigation Operators
Address
Operators Phone #
From Waste Utilization Plan
Crop Type Recommended �taadi�
rrt rm rst rat r5l rst rn rat t9t ntn n,t
Date
m ate
irrigation
Waste Analysis PAN'
(1h17 0QD gal}
PAN aae)ed
F
Ooo
0
Lance
If"�aae a
Start Time
End Time
6Ai OW
(3} -
/ of Sprir+klers
OP�ti"9
Flow Rate
(gaumirr}
Iota! Volume
(g��)
(6) x (5) x (a)
Vohmra
per AGM
t9
A
Owners Signature
Certified Operator (Print)
i
t
Crop Cycle Totals 1 1
Operators Signature
Operators Certification No.
t NCDA Waste Anaylysis or Equivalent or MRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 633.
s Enter the value received by subtracting column (10) from (B). Continue subtracting column (10) from column (11) following each irrigation event

FORM 1Rp-2
Tract #
Feld Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Ownees Address
Owner's Phone #
Lagoon Irrigation Fielas Record
One Form for Each Feld per Crop Cycle
pv� Feld # ]A
ce,
Facility Number / .! - //
Irrigation Operator ,r Lam.
Irrigation Operator's
Address
Operator's Phone #
From Waste Utilization Plan
It Grog Type Recommended PAN lnadng 7
VWacre) _ (B) G 6
fit rm rm ray rfi On rn (RI r9t nm till
Datmm/d a
fnigation -
Waste PAN '
Wl om Ij
-
-
PAN Applied
Waae)
L9L
low
i�rat wen Balance
(alace)
Stara Tune
End Turn
Tana!
woute5
P) - 0
= of n
Flow Rate
a
� )
Tote! Voh"O
WaDws)
(6) x (s) x (4)
Vohrme
per Acre
(yayacre)
M
A
.70
-
_�- o ••03
/F.'c*�
/- 001.02
J loco
-��
iz
Za
3 744e)
Crop Cycle Totals i _ _
Owner's Signature Operator's Signature
Certified Operator (Print) Operator's Certification No.
I
1 NCDA Waste Anaylysis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 633.
Enter the value received by subtracting column (10) from (B). Continue subtracting column (10) from column (11) following each irrigation event.

FORM iRR-2
Tract #
Feld Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owner's Address
Owner's Phone #
Lagoon irrigation Fielas Record
One Farm for Each Field per Crop Cycle
/pV Feld #
Facility Number
Irrigation Operator
Irrigation Operator's
Address
Operator's Phone #
From Waste Utilization Plan
Crop Type Recommended PAN Loafing D
AIEW—) = ta)
fil 121 131 141 M 0 (ill Im M1 1101 rt�l
IR
MO
W''Mm
o
MEWW
•
Owner's Signature
Certified Operator (Print)
�I
Crop Cycle Totals I I
Operators Signature
Operator's Certification No.
t NCDA Waste Anaylysis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 633.
: Enter the value received by subtracting column (10) from (B). Continue subtracting column (10) from column (11) following each irrigation event

FORM ERR-2
Tract #
Feld Size (acres) = (A.)
Farm Owner
Owner's Address
Owner's Phone #
Lagoon Irrigation Fielas Record
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
Facility Number -
Irrigation Operator
Irrigation Operator's
Address
Operator's Phone #
From Waste Utilization Plant
Crop Type Recommended PAN Loac5n
Wacre) = (s)
(11 M (3) (41 fs) (61 M (8) (S) (10) rtyl
Date
mrrVddl
Irrigation _
waste Analysis PAN'
(db/1 Ooo gaq
PAN Applied
(Wave}
[8}
1000
N'drogen &-lance :
(rblacre]
(&)' (t0)
Start %ne
End Tone
Tatar
NGnut�
(3) - (21
# of Sprinklers
Operating
Flow Rate
(gauminJ
Total Vorume
(gallons}
t6?) x (5) x (4)
vohtme
per Aue
L9aVaae}
f71—
I J
1
O
Sq. i—
'0Z. d'
/�
/
/-30
�loyG,�
a%J ��
q��o
/IOJ
t7
/
3
6 c73
x7J
/
/ Z J
O 0
O a-)
- J
% O• d
--2--
3. L03
jI p
c
j'ov
4--20
j L,=J
i 2r,
"' o
Crop Cycle Totals
Owner's Signature
Certified Operator (Print)
Operator's Signature
Operator's Certification No.
1 NCDA Waste Anaylysis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 633.
2 Enter the value received by subtracting column (10) from (B). Continue subtracting column (10) from column (11) following each irrigation event.

FORM IRR-2 Lagoon Irrigation Fields Record
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
Tract #
Feld Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owner's Address
Owner's Phone #
47,; Feld #
Facility Number - I " /
Irrigation Operator s
Irrigation Operators
Address
Operator's Phone #
— C
From Waste Utilization Plan
crop Type Recommended PAN Long
L o pblacre) _ (e) (]
ril r91 r41 (l1 r51 f n M rsl r91 11M r�tt
Date
mmldd!yr
hrigation
waste Analysis PAN'
(tWl000 gan
PAN Nacre) Applied
�gL
1000 -
IT"en Balance
�) - (lay
Start Tir"
Es1d Tcne
Total
Mim7les
(3) - R
Not Sprinklers
Operating
��)
Total vohrme
(gallons)
(6) x (5) x (4)
volume
per Acre
{Waore)
JZ_
_ J
7 0-1
Z 0
S G a o
.S�Xo o
Z
v
z -10
G •,g
3 30
I
z 0
3 60 0
X—
DICL�
:tom
s'
.?
2r3
Crop Cycle 'totals f
Owner's Signature Operators Signature
Certified Operator (Print) Operators Certification No.
t
1 NCDA Waste Anaylysis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 633.
x Enter the value received by subtracting column (10) from (8). Continue subtracting column (10) from column (11) following each irrigation event.

FORM IRR-2
Tract #
Feld Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owner's Address
Owners Phone #
Lagoon Irrigation F'telas Record
One Form for Each Feld per Crop Cycle
e
Facility Number f -
—771
Irrigation Operator f
Irrigation Operator's
Address
Operator's Phone #
From Waste Utilization Plan
Crop Type / ' . Recommended PAN Loading Q�
ill rm M 14111 Al rm rn ran ran nm .,,.
AC01? Feld #
.J
-
i r
[ YJ
tI
irt•''=
_-_
- =rem
—iMrssr
�rlr�'a+r
.�/
"=ram---M
Mail
4
Owner's Signature
Certified Operator (Print)
r
Crop Cycle Totals L J
Operator's Signature
Operator's Certification No.
1 NCCA Waste Anaylysis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 633.
2 Enter the value received by subtracting column (10) from (8). Continue subtracting column (10) from column (11) following each irrigation event.

FORM IRR-2 Lagoon Irrigation Felas Record
One Form for Each Feld per Crop Cycle
Tract # �/O- Feld #
Feld Size (acres) _ (A) _ 0 41
Farm Owner
Owner's Address
Owners Phone #
Facility Number - I //
Irrigation Operator* 1
Irrigation Operators
Address
Operator's Phone #
From Waste Utilization Plan
Crop Type Recommended PAN Loafing
(mlaae) = Is) -
fii 171 ra 141 M 1n m rat (M 11M fill
. . . . . . . . . ... I -,
-- - - I
Crop Cycle Totals 1 J
Owners Signature Operators Signature
Certified Operator (Print) Operators Certification No.
N
I NCDA Waste'Anaylysis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 633.
2 Enter the value received by subtracting column (10) from (9). Continue subtracting column (10) from column (11) following each irrigation event

FORM (13R-2
Tract #
Feld Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owner's Address
Owner's Phone #
Lagoon Irrigation Fields Record
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
pJ Feld #
.0
C�
FacilityNumber
Irrigation Operator a• C'«,
Irrigation Operator's
Address
Operator's Phone #
.From Waste Utilization Plan
Crop Type Rewmmended PAN Loa 3ng
C% Wage) = (B)
(1) (2) (3) (4) (6) M (B) (9) (101 f11)
Date
mrrJddlyr
Irrigation
Waste Analysis PAN
(Vj 000 gat}
P t Applied
-�--M
1000
Ndrog Balance =
(B) - (10)
Stan Tine
End Time
Total
]mutes
�
of sprinklers
Operating
Flow Rate
(gaVmiri)
Total Volume
{gallons)
(6) x (5) x (4)
Volume
per Acre
(gaVarre)
J7)_
A
-0z
iCv
.7'v�
.�
/30
.� o�7,62J
--oj
330
/L�
.3 bov
.-too
a
zr
t"I
E1911
-9.13
/ Zo
Z, -.i-
Crop Cycle Totals I _ .. I
Owners Signature
Certified Operator (Print)
Operators Signature
Operators Certification No.
NCDA Waste Anaylysis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 633.
' Enter the value received by subtracting column (10) from (8). Continue subtracting column (10) from column (11) following each irrigation event

FORM IRA-2 Lagoon Irrigation Felcs Record
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
Tract # Reld # ro Facility Number - /
Feld Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner Irrigation Operator trr 7��,�,�,
Owner's Address Irrigation Operator's
Address
Owner's Phone # Operator's Phone #
From Waste Utilization Plan
Crop Type Recommended PAN Loadng
(Vacre) a (t3) +�
fit M r'f1 (Al M (M - M M (91 ftnl
Date
mmlddlyr
Irrigation
Waste Analysis PAN'
f W1000 gal)
PAN �sied
fal ip00
b'�,aen g e�'c 1
(8} - (t0}
Start Tune
Tu
End ne
Total
Mi nutes
Y of Sprinklers
Operating
low Ra
i )
Total Voiume
[gallons)
(6) x (5) x (4)
Volume
per Ape
(gaV—e)
A
Z
57L
3&oo o
Jz0oc>
/• �
J Z.c7
:
J?
/
y),too
/ csa
�0->
��-�
3fJdxx)
%2.000
YL—
.•a3
: a'
7: r.>-)
3 cv
z.0;)v
. v
Jr 2—
Crop Cycle Totals I - I
Owner's Signature
Certified Operator (Print)
Operator's Signature
Operatoes Certification No.
z NCDA Waste Anaylysis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 633.
2 Enter the value received by subtracting column (10) from (B). Continue subtracting column (10) from column (11) following each irrigation event-
• g4��

FORM IM;-2
Lagoon Irrigation Fields Record
One Form for Each Feld per Crop Cycle
Tract # Feld #
Feld Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner W
Owner's Address
Owner's Phone #
Facility Number
Irrigation Operator
Irrigation Opera S
Address
Operator's Phone #
From Waste Utilization Plan
Crap Type Recorfvnended FAN loafing
C U (Iblacm) = (B)
(1) (Z1 r31 (4) M (6) M (a) (91
(101 fill
Date
mmldd/yr
- Imgafial
Waste Analysis FAN'
pbl1000 94
-
PAN Applied
(Iblaae)
�L
1000
N'drogen Balance =
(IgfaQe)
(B) - 00)
Start Tme
End Time
Total
Idinutes
(3) - {z)
i of Sprinklers
dP� 9
Flow Rate
(gaurrw,)
Total Volume
(6) x14 ) x (4)
voturne
per Acre
aae)
A
7: o
O'oa
/ v
/3 n
Ya
7�vv
/. J
7 S
L
12 Z
119 Vf-
o-d3
Crop Cycle Totals I
Owner's Signature
Certified Operator (Print)
Operator's Signature
Operator's Certification No.
l NCDA Waste Anaylysis or Equivalent or MRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 633.
2 Enter the value received by subtracting column (1 d) from (B). Continue subtracting column (10) from column (11) following each irrigation event.

FORM IRR-2 Lagoon Irrigation Fields Record
One Form for Each Feld per Crop Cycle
Tract #
Feld Size (acres) = (A)
Faun Owner
Owner's Address
Owners Phone #
Feld #
Facility Number
i
Irrigation Operator
Irrigation Operator's
Address
Operators Phone #
c3
_ T aj r
From Waste Utilization Plan
Crop Type Recommended PAN lrasrmg
f11 M (31 141 r61 f61 rrt (8) (M riot n„
Date
mrNddlyr
Irrigation
Waste Analysis FAN'
(1b11000 gaq
PAN aaa)�
� M ��
1000
biRrogen cr e)
(iLJar(1 )
(g) - (tO)
Stag Time
End Time
Total
Minutes
(3) - (2)
M of Sprinklers
Operating
Flow Rate
(gaftin)
Total Volume
(gallons)
(6) x (s) x (4)
volume
per Acre
(gallacre)
M_
A
z_
/Jv
a 3 od
7 0 odf
1 2,0
r z-3LO L
/0, a-
Y
0
130
1 a
9io-,
0
•,
4
Crop Cycle Totals I _
Owner's Signature
Certified Operator (Print)
Operators Signature
Operators Certification No.
r
t NCDA Waste Anaylysis or Equivalent or MRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 633.
2 Enter the value received by subtracting column (10) from (S). Continue subtracting column (10) from column (11) following each irrigation event

FORM IRR-2
Lagoon Irrigation Fields Record
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
Tract #i
O 3 Feld #
Feld Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owner's Address
Owner's Phone #
Facility Number -
Irrigation Operator c r cu
Irrigation Operator's
Address
Operator's Phone It
From Waste Utilization Plan
Crop Type Recommended PAN Loading
pwaele) _ (a)
r,) t� ts► (4) (5) (61_ m (M (s) rtrn ran
Date
mrDate r
Irrigation
waste Analysis PAN'
(I i wo gar)
I .
PAN �p;ed
1g—e
1000
N -i en Balance
(B) - re))
Start Time
End Time
Total
Mutes
P) - (2)
y of Sprinklers
Operating
Flow Rate
(gaUmin)
Total VoWrne
(gallons)
(6) x (5) x (4)
Volume
per Acre
(gatlaae)
_ M
A
'Z
i o
i
i�
a�
SAX
a
Z
-a,-? z.
j ,J?, 3
� �[�' J
2 / J
Z o
0,2 7 300
/ 2-0
3 0
oo
/, v
l0-
,•J
IV 3
•
3' 0
3
z.dJ
i ot�
v
/PI
%Irw
Crop Cycle Totals
Owner's Signature
Certified Operator (Print)
Operator's Signature
Operator's Certification No.
a NCDA Waste Anaylysis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 633.
z Enter the value received by subtracting column (10) from (S). Continue subtracting column (10) from column (11) following each irrigation event

FORM IRR-2
Tract #
Feld Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owners Address
Owners Phone #
Lagoon Irrigation Fields Record
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
/paw Feld #1 72-9
.J 44
' r �
Facility Number / � -
41
Irrigation Operator e
Irrigation Operators
Address
Operators Phone #
from Waste Utilization Plan
Crop Type / Remmmended PAN L.oacring
rn FA rat rat M rsti rn ref rsl rtaa rill
ME
OW=
O
wlrl
S�mOEM
nil: j
P
LWAaM
K-A t1-V
l �E
�iWEEmu
Crop Cycle Totals I J
Owner's Signature Operators Signature
Certified Operator (Print) Operators Certification No.
Ii
! NCDA Waste Anaylysis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 633.
Enter the value received by subtracting column (l0) from (B). Continue subtracting column (10) from column (11) following each irrigation event_

FORM IRR-2
Lagoon Irrigation Fields Record
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
Tract # /oj Feld #
Feld Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner "r
Owner's Address
Owner's Phone #
Facility Number 77
Irrigation Operator. s
Irrigation Operator's
Address
Operator's Phone #
From Waste Utilization Plant
Crop Type Recommended PAN Loading
(t) M (3) (4) (5) (61 M (a) (B) tic) rill
Date
mntld
Irrigation
Waste Analysis PAN'
(lb/1 DOD gal)
PAN Applied
(Ib/acre)
x-__Li_
1000
Nitrogen Batanre =
(Iblacre)
(B) - (70)
Start Time
End Time
Total
Knutes
M- M
# of Sprinklers
p t�ti
Flow Rate
(gaftn)
Total Volume
(gallons)
(6) x (5) x (4)
Volume
per Acre
(gavacre)
M
A
le
j LOf
U.3
/. 0
7 t'
L
,2,D
3 -03
/ • vim
3
12-4am
lo Uad
�_ J
� O.
7
/ d.
-pro
:��
3 i✓
l
/
OD
Y.
1
Crop Cycle Totals
Owner's Signature
Certified Operator (Print)
Operator's Signature
Operators Certification No.
i NCDA Waste Anaylysis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 633.
z Enter the value received by subtracting column (10) from ($). Continue subtracting column (10) from column (11) following each irrigation event

}
FORM IRR-2
Tract #
Field Size (acres) _ (A)
Farm Owner
Owner's Address
Owners Phone #
Lagoon Irrigation Fields Record
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
770a? Feld #
J
Facility Number J'— I - F /
Irrigation Operator
Irrigation Operators
Address
Operators Phone #
From Waste Utilization Plan
Crop Type - Recommended PAN Laming
C.v �t'F r4 h pblacm) - (e)
fit rm rat rat M% im M mt Ml 11M
Date
mddryr
waste Analysis PAN *
t t� gat)
PAN Appried
(tvacre)
IDDO
Nitrogen Balance i
Oblacre)
(B) - (10)
Start Time
End Tune
Total
Minutes
(3) - (2)
: of Sprinklers
operating
Flow Rate
)
Total Volume
(galons)
(6) x (5) x (4)
Volume
per Acre
tgaVacre)
M_
A
a/a
/
�. 0:)
oD
v
—2. :e3
2 ; i�
�: v3
3 Sv
/
/Lo
lo��!�
3•- v-c
/0"r:.
/,00
9'0
baa
2,470
•7, 2—
v3
'e>
o�
= -0
Crop Cycle Totals I J
Owner's Signature
Certified Operator (Print)
Operator's Signature
Operators Certification No.
I NCDA Waste Anaylysis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 633.
2 Enter the value received by subtracting column (10) from (B). Continue subtracting column (10) from column (11) following each irrigation event

FORM IRR-2
Lagoon Irrigation Fields Record
One Farm for Each Field per Crop Cycle
Trail # /oOJ Feld #
Feld Size (acres) = (A) 3, 'D
Farm owner _ j
Owner's Address
Owner's Phone #
Facility Number
Irrigation Operator a
01
Irrigation Operator's
Address
Operator's Phone #
From Waste Utilization Plan
Crop Type Recommended PAN Lowing
(1) (2) (3) (4) M (61 M (M (9) 00) fill
Date
�dd�
lrrigadorm
waste Analysis PAN'
(Ib/1000 gal)
PAN Applied
(►6dacre)
1- (91
NRrogen Balance'
(lblacre)
(B) " (10)
Stan Tune
End �uae
Total
Minutes
A) - (2)
y of Sprinklers
operating
Flow Rate
(9offun)
Total Volume
(garlons)
(6) x (5) x (4)
Volume
per Acre
(gallacre)
�L
v
3 a Yoe
I /
_ J
o
e,-f,
I /3,IA=
1. a
. z--
.3
.,A)
am'
lit Z
>
Crop Cycle Totals L I
Owner's Signature
Certified Operator (Print)
Operator's Signature
Operator's Certification No.
1 NCDA Waste Anaylysis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 633.
2 Enter the value received by subtracting column (10) from (B). Continue subtracting column (10) from column (11) following each irrigation event.

FORM IRR-2
Tract #
Feld Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owners Address
Owners Phone !#
Lagoon Irrigation Fields Record
One Form for Each Field per -Crop Cycle
Feld ##
u
Facility Number -
Irrigation Operator a c 1
Irrigation Operators
Address
Operators Phone it
From Waste Utilization Plan
Crop Type Recommended PAN loading
L'a r44=30 (lb,laae) = (B) - cre
fft rn M fay Fa rM - M f l IM fin$ „t
Dale
mmlddJyr
Irrigatiaii
waste Analysis PAN'
()till o0o gall
PAN Applied
(falacre)
�1000
N-"en Balance =
p acre)
(B) (10)
Start Time
End Ttme
Total
Minutes
(3) - M
/ ar Sprinklers
ope rating
�-�
Tota! Volume
(gallons)
(6) x (5) x (4)
Volume
per Acre
(gallacre)
M
A
/G J
c7
/
/ 2v
i
7
Crop Cycle Totals
Owners Signature Operators Signature
Certified Operator (Print) Operators Certification No.
1 NCDA Waste Anaylysis or Equivalent or NFICS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 633.
z Enter the value received by subtracting column (10) from (B). Continue subtracting column (10) from column (11) following each irrigation event.

FORM IRR-2
Tract #
Feld Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owners Address
Owners Phone #
Lagoon Irrigation} Fields Record
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
cv3 Feld #
a
Facility Number
Irrigation Operator
Irrigation Operators
Address
Operators Phone #
From Waste Utilization Plan
Crop Type Recommended PAN Loading
.�
m M r31 141 r9 r61 rA (M M (1 m
Date
mrNddlyr
Irtigation
Waste PAN'
Analysis
(>fr/7 pop galj
-
PAN Applied
Wacre)
�
9006
Ntrogen Balance'
(lblar re)
�) - t1B)
Start T
Time
Totaloperating
lWrnates
(g) - (2}
if of Sprinklers
Flow Rate
(gam)
Total Volume
(gallons)
(6) x (5) x (4)
Vohrme
per acr a
(galraae)
M
'1 -0
`
r
o� / o
vo
3,30
J
Z 2
4V'0
1149 KOO
[7
: 3
3z
Y
Crop Cycle Totals
Owners Signature Operators Signature
Certified Operator (Print) Operators Certification No.
I
NCDA Waste Anaylysis or Equivalent or MRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 633.
z Enter the value received by subtracting column (10) from (8). Continue subtracting column (10) from column (11) following each irrigation event.

FORM IRR-2
Tract #
Feld Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner
Owner's Address
Owner's Phone #
Lagoon Irrigation Fields Record
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle-
i o�r3 Feld # ,d
.J
CA)
( r �.--
Facility Number
trrigation Operator I -1-Ir
Irrigation Operators
Address
Operator's Phone #
From Waste Utilization Plan
Crop Type Recommended PAN loading
tom} = {el --I�
en eat rat e41 fm em m (Al M% rtrn r+i%
Rate
mrNddlyr
Waste Analysis PAN'
OW1000 gall
PAN nacre} d
��
i000
N'trogeo 8a3artre'
M War-re)
Start Time
End Time
Tote!
V wtes
(3) - �
11 fll Sprinklers
O�b^9
Flow Rate
(gaUrnrn}
Total Volume
(9 1
(6) x (5) x (4)
Volume
per Aae
t�+a«ei
M-
A
3.3
Za
(oco
ov
/, v
7
. •v
;w
j �.�
3 as
/�
6E�
i Z oQrJ
I �
`�
Crop Cycle Totals i (
Owner's Signature Operator's Signature
Certified Operator (Print) Operators Certification No.
2 NCDA Waste Anaylysis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 633.
2 Enter the value received by subtracting column (10) from ($). Continue subtracting column (10) from Column (11) following each irrigation event
0- /

FORM IRR-2
Lagoon Irrigation} Fields Record
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
Tract # T o � Feld #
Feld Size (acres) = (A) I J
Farm Owner Jj r 7r,w.,
Owner's Address
Owner's Phone
Facility Number 1 - 1 /
Irrigation Operator r
Irrigation Operator's
Address
Operator's Phone #
From Waste Utilization Plant
Crop Type Recommended PAN Loading
LIU ,c C '1 ova=) _ (e)
(1) 0 (3) (4) (5) 161 . M (8) (9)
(10) till
r
�
�
�����
�
ti �
r/mil•«/�
r
Crop Cycle Totals I I
Owner's Signature
Certified Operator (Print)
Operator's Signature
Operator's Certification No.
NCDA Waste Anaylysis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 633.
Enter the value received by subtracting column (10) from (B). Continue subtracting column (10) from column (11) following each irrigation event

FORM IRR-2
Lagoon Irdga#ion Fields Record
One Form for Each Field per Crop Cycle
Tract # Gv 3 Feld # Facility Number
Feld Size (acres) = (A)
Farm Owner irrigation Operator / ,r
Owner's Address Irrigation Operator`s
Address
Owner's Phone # Operator's Phone #
From Waste Utilization Plan
Cmp Type / Recormnended PAN Load -mg
rT► M► MI ray M rm M I'm m5 nrn
a.
���
-
per
Crop Cycle Totals I
Owner's Signature Operator's Signature
Certified Operator (Print) Operator's Certification No.
i NCDA Waste Anaylysis or Equivalent or NRCS Estimate, Technical Guide Section 633.
2 Enter the value received by subtracting column (10) from (S). Continue subtracting column (10) from column (1 1) following each irrigation event
�IJPf'

VIXI?10
Michael F. Easisy
Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Kllmek, P,E. Director
Division of Water Quality
CERTIFIED MAIL
JtETURMCEIP T REQUESTED
70031680 0000 5403 7253
March 9, 2004
Mr, Fred Cunningham
203 West Farm Way
Gaston, North Carolina 27832
RE: Notice of Recommendation of Enforcement
Belcross Farms
Facility Number 15-11
Permit No. AWS 150011
Camden County
Dear Mr. Cunningham:
. This letter is to notify you that the Washington Regional Office of the Division of Water Quality is considering
sending a recommendation for enforcement action to the Director of the Division of Water Quality. The recommendation
concerns violation of conditions iri your Swine Waste Operation General Permit, Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
and North Carolina Administrative Code Subchapter 15A ,0217.
The referenced facility, Belcross Farm, is located 1 mile east of Belcross on Hwy 158 in Camden County,North
Carolina. On March 9, 2004, Mr, Martin McLawhorn of NC Division of Soil and Water notified Mr. Scott Vinson of NC
Division of Water Quality of the following violations that he observed during the operational review inspection that was
conducted on March 5, 2004.
The lagoon level records were observed to read 18 inches in the lagoon on June 9, 2003 with the lagoon
remaining in the storm zone through July. The waste level in the lagoon rose back into the storm zone noted on
November 3, 2003 at 16 inches, December 9, 2003 at 18 inches, and from January 21 through February 23, 2004
ranging from 18 to 14 inches. This is a violation of condition V, item 3 of your NPDES General Permit, for
failing to maintain the maximum waste level in lagoons/storage ponds as specified in the CAWMP. At a
minimum, maximum waste level for waste for lagoons/storage ponds must not exceed the level that provides
adequate storage to contain a 25 year, 24 hour storm event plus an additional foot of structural freeboard.
2. You failed to notify the Washington Regional Office DWQ staff that the lagoon level had entered back into the storm
storage zone(greater than 12 inches but less than 19 inches). This is a violation of condition III, item 6(e) of your
General Permit, for failing to report by telephone to the appropriate Regional Office within 24 hours of first
knowledge of the aforementioned violation.
Please provide this office with an explanation of the violations and a copy of freeboard, irrigation, waste and soil
records for 2003-2004 within five (5) working days from receipt of this Notice to:
Mr. Jim Mulligan
Division of Water Quality
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, North Carolina 27889
943 Washington Square Mall Washington, NC 27889 252-946-6481 (Telephone) 252-946.9215 (Fax)

Page Two
Belcross Farm
Facility 15-11
Your explanation will be reviewed and if an enforcement action is deemed appropriate, your explanation will be
forwarded to the Director with the enforcement package for his consideration.
Please be advised that any violation of the terms and conditions specified in your Certificate of Coverage (COC), the
General Permit or the CAWMP may result in the revocation of your COC, or penalties in accordance with the North Carolina
General Statute 143-215.6A through 143-215.6C including civil penalties, criminal penalties and injunctive relief.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact me at 252-946-6481, ext. 212 or Scott Vinson, ext.
208.
cc: Frank Williams, Williams Farm of North Carolina
Camden Caurrty Soil and Water Conservation District
NCDWQ-GW-WaRO
NCDSWC-WaRO w/out attachments
Non -Discharge C:onV fiance Unit w/out attachments
WQ Calera) Files
WaRO
SAV Files
Sincerely,
A --Jim Mulligan
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
`n aa0amI
m
I
Postage S
Im Certlfled FeeIn
,
4 Retum Recfept Fee 2788
(Endorsement Required)
4 Restricted Oe[Tvo Fee O {+trdoraement Required) (,5 Total Postaoe 6 Fees it 4, 'f y
rn J
3 r
c3 MR FRED CUNNINGHAM
wa 203 WEST FARM WAY ----
ciry ' GASTON NC 27832
I

Technical Assistance Site Visit Report
• Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Natural Resources Conservation Service
O Soil and Water Conservation District
O Other...
Facility Number 15 11 Date: 3/5/04 Time: 1 1330 Time On Farm: 60 WARO
Farm Name Belcross Farm
County Camden Phone: [phone]
Mailing Address 203 West Farm Way Gaston NC 27832
Onsite
Representative Joe Balok Integrator INortheastern Carolina Farms
Type_ Uisit Purpose Of Visit
® Operation Review
❑ Compliance Inspection (pilot only)
❑ Technical Assistance
❑ Confirmation for Removal
❑ No Animals -Date Last Operated:
❑ Operating below threshold
IN Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse
Design Current
Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
® Farrow to Wean
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
t 240
497
outine
Response to DWO/DENR referral
Response to DSWC/SWCD referral
Response to complaint/local referral
Requested by producer/integrator
Follow-up
Emergency
Other...
Design Current
Capacity Population
❑ Layer
❑ Non -Layer
❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
GENERAL QUESTIONS:
1. is waste discharging from any part of the operation and reaching surface waters or wetlands? ❑ yes ® no
2. Is there evidence of a past waste discharge from any part of the operation that waste reached
❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
GENERAL QUESTIONS:
1. is waste discharging from any part of the operation and reaching surface waters or wetlands? ❑ yes ® no
2. Is there evidence of a past waste discharge from any part of the operation that waste reached
❑ Other
GENERAL QUESTIONS:
1. is waste discharging from any part of the operation and reaching surface waters or wetlands? ❑ yes ® no
2. Is there evidence of a past waste discharge from any part of the operation that waste reached
[]yes ® no
surface waters or wetlands?
3. Does any. problem pose an immediate threat to the integrity of the waste structure (large trees,
❑ yes ® no
seepage, severe erosion, etc.)?
4• Is there evidence of nitrogen over application, hydraulic overloading or excessive ponding
❑ yes ® no
requiring DWO notification?
3- is there evidence of improper dead animal disposal that poses a threat to the environment
❑ yes ® no
and/or public health?
6. Is the waste level within the structural freeboard elevation range for any waste structure?
[:]yes ® no
Structures Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Identifier
Level (Inches) 22, IF IF 11
1
CROP TYPES corn Soybeans Wheat 7711
SPR�LD
SOI�$
7, What type of technical assistance does the onsite representative feel is needed? (list in comment section)
03/10/03

Facility Number 15 - 11 Date;
3/5/04
PARAMETER
O No assistance provided/requested
❑ 8. Waste spill leaving site
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE Needed
Provided
❑ 9. Waste spill contained on site
25. Waste Plan Revision or Amendment
❑
❑
10Level in structural freeboard
❑ .
Conditional
❑
❑
❑ 11., Level in storm storage
26. Waste Plan Amendment
27. Review or Evaluate Waste Plan w/producer
El
❑
❑ 12. Waste structure integrity compromised
28. Forms'Need (list in comment. section)
❑
❑
❑ 13.. Waste structure needs maintenance
29. Missing Components (list in comments)
❑
❑
❑ 14. Over application >= 10% & 10 lbs.
30.21i.0200
El
El
15. Over application < 10% or < 10 lbs.
re -certification
❑ 16. Hydraulic overloading
31. Five & Thirty day Plans of Action (PoA)
❑
❑
32. Irrigation record keeping assistance
❑
❑
❑ 17. Deficient irrigation records
®1S. Latelmissing waste analysis
33. Organize/computerization of records
❑
❑
❑ 19. Late/missing lagoon level records
34. Sludge Evaluation
❑
❑
❑ 20. Late/missing soils analysis
❑ 21. Crop needs improvement
35. Sludge or Closure Plan
❑
❑
❑ 22. Crop inconsistent with waste plan
36. Sludge removallclosure procedures
❑
❑
37. Waste Structure Evaluation
❑
❑
❑ 23. irrigation maintenance deficiency
❑ 24.. Deficient sprayfield conditions
38. Structure Needs Improvement
❑
❑
39. Operation & Maintenance Improvements
❑
❑
40. Marker check/calibration
❑
❑
Regulatory Referrals
41. Site evaluation
❑
❑
❑ Referred to DWO Date:
42. Irrigation Calibration
❑
❑
❑ Referred to NCDA Date:
❑ Other...
43. Irrigation system design/installation
❑
❑
Date:
44. Secure irrigation Information (maps, etc.)
❑
❑
'LIST IMPROVEMENTS
45. Operating Improvements (pull signs, etc.)
❑
❑
MADE BY OPERATION
46. Wettable Acre Determination
❑ '
❑
1
47. Evaluate WAD certification/rechecks
❑
❑
48. Crop evaluation/recommendations
❑
❑
2
49. Drainage worklevaluation
❑
❑
50. Land shaping, subsoiling, aeration, etc.
51. Runoff control, stormwater diversion, etc.
❑
❑
❑
El3
52. Buffer improvements
❑
❑
53. Field measurements(GPS, surveying, etc.)
❑
❑
4.
54. Mortality BMPs
❑
❑
55. Waste operator education (NPDES)
❑
❑
5.
56. Operation & maintenance education
❑
❑
57. Record keeping education
❑
❑
6.
58. Croplforage management education
❑
❑
59. Soil and/or waste sampling education
❑
❑
03/10/03

Facility Number 15 - 11 Date: 1 3/5104
COMMENTS:
*Waste analysis dated 2/10104 nitrogen is 0.98 lbs/1000 gallons
6/2/03 nitrogen is 1.2 Ibs/1000 gallons
3/24/03 nitrogen is 1.0 Ibs/1000 gallons
`Soil test dated 11/13/03 Cu, Zn and ph within guidelines. Lime was applied at recommended rates during Oct 2002.
"Wheat crop in good condition.
1.8. Missing waste analysis to cover irrigation events on wheat for Nov. 03 and Dec 1-9 03. Unable to answer #4 concerning
over application for this. crop.
18. Missing waste analysis to cover irrigation events after Aug 2, 2003.
"See DWQ insopection dated 6/26/03 referring to waste analysis and soybean crop.
"IRR1 and IRR2 records were made available for review.
"Lagoon level is recorded wekly.
"Lagoon level < 19" and not reported to DWQ.
6/9103 18"
6/16/03 17"
6/26/03 16"
6/30/03 15"
7/10/03 16"
11/3/03 16"
12/9/03 18"
1 /21 /04 18"
1 /27/04 16"
2/3/04 15"
219/04 15"
2/16/04 14"
2/23/04 14"
TECHNICAL SPECIALIST IMartin McLa horn
SIGNATURE
Date Entered: 3/9/04 Entered By: Martin McLawhorn
3 03/10/03

■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
A. Sig ature
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
■ Print your name and address on the reverse
❑ Agent
X [ti-0 Addressee
B. Received by (Prr ed Nam C. Dat of Delivery
�,lf 1+X
[ U
so that we can return -the card to you.
faA Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
D. Is delivery address different ern 1? ❑ Yes
If YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No
1. Article Addressed to:
MR FRED CUNNINGHAM
203 WEST FARM WAY
GASTON NC 27832
PS Form 3811, August 2001
3. Type
Certified Mail ❑ Express Mail
❑ Registered ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise
❑ Insured Mail ❑ C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? aDrtra Fee) ❑ Yes
Domestic Return Receipt
102585-M-M-1540

V
UNITED STATES POSTAL $ERVl6E� f' lass fVlai- ss Mai }
x First-C
P1
v Postag
II ,..e-_ & Fees-Paid
USPS
Permit No"G-16-
• Sender. Please print your name, address, and ZIP+4 in this box •
North Carolina Department of En%ironment
& Natural Resources
Washington Regional office
Division of Water Quality
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington North Carolina 27889
�� itEil�!E!!"rl�tiiEil�lili!!!illliiii'illliEiliEl:fli:Itiikii

F INAr
Michael F. Easley, Governor
�a 9Q
G
Wiliam G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
�O
rAlan
W. Kimek, P.E. Director
7
Division of Water Quality
a �
July 30, 2003
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
7002 2410 0006 2026 8686
Mr. Franc Williams
Williams Farms of North Carolina, Inc.
5021 Morris Neck Rd.
Virginia Beach, NC 23457-1399
SUBJECT: NOTICE OF VIOLATION
Animal Feedlot Operation Compliance Inspection
Belcross Farm
Facility No. 15-11
Camden County
Dear Mr. Williams:
Thank you for your recent submittal of the information requested in our NOV letter dated April 16, 2003. Upon review and
consideration of the information submitted, the Washington Regional Office has determined that an NOV is appropriate
due to the unsatisfactory operation and maintenance of the waste treatment system. This letter is to notify you that the
subject facility is in further violations of its Certified Animal Waste Management Plan, General Permit, Title 15A North
Carolina Administrative Code, Subchapter 2H, Section .0217(d) and N.C.G.S. 143-215.1.
On June 26, 2003, Scott Vinson from the Washington Regional Office of the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) conducted
an Animal Feedlot Operation Compliance Inspection at the Belcross Farm in Camden County. A copy of the inspection
report is attached for your review. In general, the Compliance Inspection was to determine if: (1) the farm has a Certified
Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP); (2) the farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC
21-1.0217, Senate Bill 1217, and the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan; (3) the farm operation's waste management
system is being operated properly under the direction of a Certified Operator; (4) the required records are being kept; and
that (5) there are no signs of seepage, erosion, and/or runoff. The following violations were observed during the.inspection:
➢ The corn crop had not been planted as in accordance with the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP).
In accordance with condition 11, Rem 2 of your General Permit, a vegetative cover shall be maintained on all land
application fields and buffers in accordance with the CAWMP. The failure to plant a corn crop has lead to the
overapplication of Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN). The CAWMP allows for the preapplication of waste 30 days prior
to planting. There were numerous irrigation events in March, April, and May on multiple fields that did not have a crop
planted. Only until July 3, 2003 when soybeans were planted was there a crop available for the uptake of PAN. All
waste application events from March of 2003 until June 3, 2003 are to be considered as overapplication of PAN.
There are 15 fields ranging in overapplication from 26 lbs.PAN/acre to 73 Ibs.PANlacre. Also in accordance with
condition II, item 4 of your General Permit, land application rates shall be in accordance with the CAWMP. In no case
shall land application rates exceed the Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) rate for the receiving crop or result in runoff
during any give application.
W Wash inaton Sauare Mail Washinaton. NC 27889 [phone] (Telephone) [phone] (Few)
AM
7-i_�frl4
Customer Service

Page Two
Notice of Violation
July 30, 2003
Belcross Farm
it is very important as the owner and/or the Operator in Charge that these aforementioned violations and any other problems
that may arise be'resolved, as soon as possible. For additional assistance, please contact your Technical Specialist.
You are requested to respond In writing within ten (10) days of receipt of this Notice, outlining the corrective actions that
have been undertaken and/or have been planned to address these violations and any further actions taken to prevent future
violations of this nature from occurring. Your explanation will be reviewed and if an enforcement action is still deemed
appropriate, your explanation will be forwarded to the Director with the enforcement package for his consideration. Please
be advised that this letter does not prevent the Division of Water Quality from taking enforcement actions for past or future
violations.
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance. If you have any questions conceming this matter, please contact me at
252-946-6481, e4 212 or Scott Vinson at ext. 208.
Sincerely,
oil- Jim ulligan
Regional Supervisor
cc: Dr. Fred Cunningham, Northeast Carolina Farms, Inc.
Camden County SWCD Office
DSWC-WaRO
Non -Discharge Compliance and Enforcement Unit
.
DWQ Central Files
WaRO
-'S)W Files
!cocn
o
ll:A�.►.r
VL.'7UlJUUU�-,
�l.am.�7�.! �+LA_'i1D
ru
., FNCIAL USE
ru
o
cedned fee
C3
©
i
Retum R-lept F-
(Endomement RequW)
O
�
(EndoraemeM�Requlredj s�'OI��
.
tL
Total P[mtwnn R Fa . Q: N.IN
ru
o
FRANK WILLIAMS
r'
Ngji- WILLIAMS FARMS OF NC ________-
wPof 5021 MORRIS NECK ROAD
cfti: m VIRGINIA BEACH VA 23457 1399 """""""."

Type of Visit Q Compliance Inspection O Operation Review - O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit 4 Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Faro lilt; NungbGr 15 11 d)-Ite of Visit.- ObC2blZ003 Time: 2:15
10 Not O peratiuuai Q Below Threshold
Permitted ON Certified 0 Conditionally Certified 13 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold : .........................
Farm Name: B91CMJ.1AM........... ».................................................................................. County: C.#Mdcn ............................................ W.K.Q.......
OwnerName:......... ......................................... W.[UMMA.F"M9.01.NoAb................... Phone No: 251-:53,7 153..........................................................
M.....ng /kddresv: 2Q rWUtF.arM.WAy...................... ............................. r..................... Mon...ilC......... ................... ....................... ..... 27832 .............
£'acuity- coii' ict: N1atrltt Mt.ICaiavb&.Ft .. ...............'1"i;&.: JAMJM ................................................. I'luaw No: ?.Z-.M.7-.4253......................
Eitu,ite ]oft.QnC.OwItA............................................................................... lategrator:KjDrt1im1.1:R71WWAJ afail..jxr.....................
Certified Operator;joficph.d. ............................... BAJQk ................................................ Operator Cei ttrication Number: 2521M .............................
i iali:aai of 14�r:Cl:
_................_...._...—_......._._....._.__.—._......._..._.....,..__......._..-----•-'--• ...._._._.........__.__.._ .............
,1 mile east of Belcross in Camden Ca on east bound rt. 1S8
i�
®Swine [Poultry [Cattle ❑Horse --- _.�' ._W z . __.._-.�"` ` __` E
Qat.sae+i: 3b 00 l.(In �itud. 7b OS l2
Design Current
swine Capacity Population
i❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder.to Finish
N Farrow to Wean 1240 ?
❑ Farrow to Feeder_
❑ Farrow to Finish
D Gilts —
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle_ Capacity Population
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ other
Total Design Capacity 1,240
Total SSLW 536,9Z0
Number of Lagoons. 1 [3 Subsurrace Drains PrescnLJjC1 Lagoon Area JCI Spray Field Area �
Holding Ponds 1 Solid Traps 10 No Liquid Waste Management System
,.Ic��;c_'e:�ssls`•:, ar: �€ra:ar.wt� i;s_ Iwg�:V
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? L] Yes L� No
Discharec originated at: -j Lagoon ,�- Spray Field ijl Other
n. If discharge is observed. was the conveyance ivan-made? ❑ Yes L j No
b. it'dischargc: is obsvrvad, (lid it ivaclj Water oftlw State'? (Ifyes.. notili, DWQ) ❑Yes ❑ No
c. If discharge is obscrvcd, what is the cstimalcd flog in Qathnin`.'
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon �y tcm? (If yes, uotify DWQ) ❑ Yes ❑ No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes Ld' No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? ❑ Yes N No
:s, �'.•4.'.�i�.'. G�Yl Y�''IFt
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? Cj Spillway P Yes i.._i No
1 Sin i,--!iiiv, `', 1i111LfiiYi: + Swl; tilr��4 °+tt'Ii0iHi o,' swil(tIoro(f
inllifiv:.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................
l rci tloaad (iuuia��':. ..I .

Facility Number. 15-11 Oate of Inspection 06lZ61Z003
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, t] Yes 9 No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? El Yes 9 No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintcnance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stucttues lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? 0 Yes Z No
W,mge A Ika#iurr
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement? I] Yes 0 No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ® PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload & Yes ❑ No
12. Crop type Corn; Soybeans, Wheat
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? D Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?-
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Reggired Revords & Dou•uments
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
19. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ WUP, checklists, design, traps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (it/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(iel discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
® Yes [] No
I] Yes i;Q No
0 Yes ®t No
r Yes ® No
C Yes No
i Yes No
© Yes t No
Yes No
❑ Yes El No
9 Yes 0 No
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? 0 Yes �nj No
.0 No violations or deficiencies were noted daring this visit- You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
Comments (refer to question'#)f Explain, any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments. j
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
❑ Field Copy [I Final Notes i
0 Add.Info. records were sent into WaRO on 5/6/03, 5115/03, & 7/23/03.' Final record review occurred on 7/24/03.
Before entering the farm I have tailed and left a message on Joe Balok's voice mail, 207-9633, and I called the main office t#
52-435-6930 and received no answer. After speaking with Joe on a later date, the NE Farm's address and phone# has changed.
WaRO was notified by Joe Balok on 5/14/03 that the owner of the fields, Frank Williams, was going to be late planting the corn and was
rely to plant soybeans instead. Today fields are being plowed. No crops have been planted yet.
OTE: 2002-2003 wheat crop failed and was chemically burned down to prepare for next crop.' (30 lbsN limit should be deducted from
sxt cmn.)
Reviiewer/Inspedor Name Scott Vinson
ReviewerAnspector Sianature: '� � Date: ' 'U�

05103101 Continued
• Facility Number: 15-11 Date of Inspection 06/26/2003
. Odor lssues
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge attor below []Yes [l No
liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24 hours? Yes ® No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes ® No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? (_j Yes 0 No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) Cl Yes 19 No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes 9 No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanenthemporary cover? ❑ Yes ❑ No
11 & 15) There have been no crops planted within 30 days of applications of waste, Corn was supposed to have been planted back in
Aril. On April 14, 2003 WaRO was notified by Joe Balok of high freeboard level in lagoon of 16" with POA to pump on fields that
be planted with corn. On 5/14/03 Joe Balok notified WaRO that freeboard was 25" and was OK, however corn was not planted and
were most likely to be planted.
1 & 15) I called and spoke with Joe Balok on 7/16/03 at 3:45pm. Joe told me that soybeans were planted on July 3, 2003. 1 told Joe
iat all the waste applications prior to June 3, 2003 this year would be considered overapplication and an NOV would be sent to both
?.Fred Cunningham, President of Northeast Farms, Inc. and Mr. Frank Williams, owner of Williams Farms of North Carolina, Inc..
)e said they are still having communication problems with Mr. Williams' field crews regarding what to plant and when it needs to be
Balok's new cell phone# : [phone]
Need to submit an updated Plan of Action (30 day) to address the high freeboard as well as the cropping problems. I need to know
crop will be planted.
The lagoon needs to be mowed to help with the routine visual inspections.
Waste analyis dated 6/2/03 with 1.2 lbs.N / 1000gal.
9) Upon reviewing irrigation events on Soybeans in July, the waste analysis used to determine PAN balance was an old one of 1.0
rsN/1000gaL Please start over with new irrigation forms for this year's bean crops. Correct the waste analysis used to reflect the most
urrent analysis of 1.21bs.N/1000gal. as well as the need to clean up and reorganize irrigation forms. Only apply any irrigation events
nor after June 3, 2003* to those fields that are planted in soybeans. (* Pre -applications for beaus planted on* July 3, 2003.)
FJ

Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
May 29, 2003 R C ` VED
JUN - 4 2003
MRS BRENDA CUNNINGHAM
NORTHEAST CAROLINA FARMS INC p Q-WARa
P O BOX 865 U�
MOYOCK NC 27958
SUBJECT: Acknowledgement receipt letter
Civil Penalty Assessment of Violation
Case # DV 00-029
Farm # 15-11
Camden County
Dear Mrs. Cunningham:
This letter is to acknowledge receipt of your check No. 7206 in the amount
of $1,392.93 received on May 28, 2003. The balance of the penalty is $1,392.93
Payment of this penalty in no way precludes further action by this
Division for future violations of the State's environmental laws.
If you have any questions please call Steve Lewis at [phone]
extension 539.
Sincerely,
t jSteve Lewis
Non -Discharge Compliance/Enforcement
SL:sw
-----------------------
CCW ashington-Regional-Of fice
Enforcement File: DV 00-029
Central Files
NCID E R
Customer Service: Mailing Address: Telephone [phone] Location:
1-877-623-6748 1617 Mail Service Center Fax [phone] N. Salisbury St.
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 State Courier #52-01-01 Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
50% recycled / 10% past -consumer paper
h ttp://h2o. a nr. s to te. nc. us

0� WArF9
P�
April 24, 2003
Mrs. Brenda Cunningham
Northeast Carolina Farms, Inc.
P.O. Box 865
Moyock, NC 27958
RE: Acknowledgment of Receipt of Payment
Case No. DV 00-029
Farm # 15-11
Camden County
Dear Mrs. Cunningham:
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
� MMA
APR 2 8 2003
DWQ-WARO
This letter is to acknowledge receipt of your check No. 7055 in the amount of $1,392.93 on
April 24, 2003. The balance of the penalty is $2,785.86.
Payment of this penalty does not preclude further action by this Division for violations of the
State's environmental laws. If you have any questions, please call me at [phone], ext.
539.
Sincerely,
Steve Lewis
Non -Discharge Compliance and Enforcement
cc:,", Y:5hington_Regional.Office
File # DV 00-029
Central Files
NU)ENR
Customer Service: !Nailing Address: Telephone [phone] Location:
1-877-623.6748 1617 Mail Service Center Fax [phone] N. Salisbury St.
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 State Courier #52-01-01 Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
50% recycled / 10% post -consumer paper
httpJlh2o. enr. state. nc. us

April 16, 2003
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Williams Farms of.North Carolina, Inc.
PO Box 865
Moyock NC 27958
SUBJECT: Notice of Violation
Request for Information
Inadequate Freeboard
Belcross Farm
#15-11
Camden County
Dear Sir or Madam:
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
I!,
{�. _r�-5};-i•, ,T� Lim
APR 2 3 2003
On March 6, 2003, a representative of your animal operation informed the Division of
Water Quality (DWQ) that there was inadequate freeboard in the lagoon(s) serving this facility.
This lack of adequate freeboard is in non-compliance with the Certificate of Coverage
issued to this facility on April 2, 1999. In addition to this Notice of Violation (NOV), this non-
compliance is subject to an appropriate enforcement action by DWQ. This action can consist of
one or more of the following: a civil or criminal enforcement action; an injunction; and/or a
requirement to apply for coverage under an individual permit. The action chosen will be based
on complete evaluation of all factors that resulted in the inadequate freeboard; the actions taken
to restore the -needed freeboard; and the actions being proposed to prevent the problem from
reoccurring.
To assist us in our review, please provide the Washington Regional Office with an
evaluation of the reasons for the freeboard violation(s) and a strategy to prevent future freeboard
violation(s). This evaluation and strategy must include but is not Iimited to the following:
Current Freeboard level(s)
Freeboard level records in the lagoon(s) for the past 12 months up to the date of submittal
Spraying records for the past 12 months up to the date of submittal
*A
HCDENR
Customer Service: Mailing Address: Telephone [phone] Location:
1-877-623-6748 1617 Mail Service Center Fax [phone] N. Salisbury St.
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 State Courier #52-01-01 Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
50% recycled / 10% post -consumer paper
http://h2o.enrstate.nc. us

Inadequate Freeboard
Page 2
Rainfall records for the past 12 months for this site up to the date of submittal (if
available)
Cropping system and PAN specified in the CAWMP. if the cropping system was not in
compliance with the facility's CAWMP, provide details of the cropping system in place
for the past 12 months.
A summary of actions taken to restore the needed freeboard in the lagoon(s) including but
not limited to removal of animals from the site, delay of restocking of animals, pumping
and hauling waste to another site (specify site), securing additional irrigation equipment,
and securing additional spray sites.
A description of water conservation measures in use at the facility and the date(s)
installed.
If the lagoon level(s) are still in violation of the facility's CAWMP and Permit, provide
an updated Plan of Action as to how the facility will return to compliance.
Provide a detailed description of the actions taken or proposed to be taken to insure that
there are no further freeboard violations at this facility.
This information must be received by the Washington Regional Office at the following
address no later than 10 days following receipt of this letter.
Division of Water Quality
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, NC 27889
Once this information is received and evaluated by the DWQ staff, a determination will
be made as to the appropriate compliance/enforcement actions to be taken. Each case will be
evaluated on its own merit. The efforts by the owner/producer to notify DWQ of the problem,
efforts made to resolve the problem once identified, and efforts proposed to prevent future
problems will be positive factors in this determination.
Nothing in this letter should be taken as removing from you either the responsibility or
liability for this non-compliance or future cases of non-compliance. If you have any questions
regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact our Washington Regional Office Staff at
[phone].
Sincerely,
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Director
cc: Washing on.Regional Office
Non -Discharge Compliance/Enforcement Unit
Central Files

O=0� W A T �RpG
r
y
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
1 Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
' Division of Water Quality
January 29, 2003
JAN 3 12003
MEMORANDUM DVVQ-WARD
TO: Members
E nmental Management Commission
FROM: t Alan W. Klimek
SUBJECT. February 13, 2003 Civil Penalty Remission Committee Meetings
Please be advised that Chairman Moreau has appointed the following members to serve on
the Civil Penalty Remission Committees, which will meet on February 13th, 512 N.
Salisbury Street. Archdale Building, Raleigh, North Carolina. The Committees will convene
immediately following the EMC business session.
Enclosed for your information is the complete agenda package for the Civil Penalty
Remission Committee Meetings. .
Group I 91h Floor Conference Room - 917
David H. Moreau, Presiding
Don Abernethy
Anne C. Barnes
Daniel V. Besse
Will B. Fowler
E. Leo Green, Jr.
Greg Jennings
Robert G. Ray
Kenny Waldroup
Group I1: Ground Floor Hearing Room
Charles H. Peterson, Presiding
Delilah Blanks
Donnie W. Brewer
Marion Deerhake
Tommy Jenkins
Reese Lasher
Kevin C. Martin
Frank S. Shaw
Frederick B. Starr
Larry Jordan
Should you have any questions, please call Jennie Hill at [phone] - Ext. 202 (voice
mail) or email [e-mail].
Enclosure
AWK/jh
cc: Bill Ross Section Chiefs
Frank Crawley Regional Supervisors
cprcm
sag
NM E —NR
N. C. Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 [phone] Customer Service
1 800 623.7748

AGENDA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
CIVIL PENALTY REMISSIONS COMMITTEE MEETING
GROUP I
512 North Salisbury Street
Archdale Building Ninth Floor Conference Room - Room 917
Raleigh, North Carolina
February 13, 2003
(Immediately following EMC Business Session)
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
R�CZllWED
Executive Order No. One mandates that the Chair inquire as to whether any
member knows of any known conflict of interest or appearance of conflict with
respect to niatters before the Commissioai. If arty member- knows of a conflict of
interest or appearance of conflict, please so state at this time.
David H. Moreau, Chairman, Presiding
03-01 Request for Remission of Civil Penalty by
Avery Acres Mobile Home Park (LV 02-I54)*
Buncombe — Asheville Regional Office
03-02 Request for Remission of Civil Penalty by
Avery Acres Mobile Home Park (LV 02-189)*
Buncombe -- Asheville Regional Office
03-03 Request for Remission of Civil Penalty by
Williams•Fanns/Belcross Farm (DV 00-029)
Camden — Washington Regional Office
03-04 Request for Remission of Civil Penalty by
Jimmy McKenzie/McKenzie Swine Farm (PC 02-00I )
Sampson — Fayetteville Regional Office
03-05 Request for Remission of Civil Penalty by
Knightdale MHP Ltd. (LM 02-016)
Wake — Raleigh Regional Office
03-06 Request for Remission of Civil Penalty by
Knightdale MHP Ltd. (LV 02-287)
Wake — Raleigh Regional Office
JAN 3 12003
DWQ-WARO
CP: $1,500.00 Page # 2
IC: S 105.50
Remit: $0.00
CP: S500.00 Page #
IC: $105.50
Remit: $0.00
CP: $5,000.00 Page # 20
IC: $571.72
Remit: $0.00
CP: $5,000.00 Page # 59
IC: $667.55
Remit: $0.00
CP: $300.00 Pace # 110
IC: $43.93
Remit: $0.00
CP: $500.00 Page # III
IC: $43.93
Remit: $0.00
* Without objection, only one presentation of facts will be heard for entities with multiple cases before the
Committee. Each case will receive a separate decision.
Page 1

JAN 3 12003
DWQ-WA,RO
CIVIL PENALTY REMISSION COMMITTEE MEETING
OF THE
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
GROUP I
512 N. Salisbury Street
Archdale Building — Ninth Floor Conference Room
Raleigh, North Carolina
February 13, 2003
(Immediately following EMC Business Session)

W
AGENDA ITEM: 03- O 1 Reguestfor Remission of Civil Penalty by
Avery Acres Mobile Home Park WWTP (LV 02-154)
Buncombe County
EXPLANATION: On May 17, 2002, Forrest Westall, Division of
Water Quality Regional Water Quality Supervisor
for the Asheville Region, assessed a total penalty of
$1,605.50 ($1,500.00 civil penalty, plus $105.50
investigative costs) against the Avery Acres Mobile
Home Park WWTP for violations of NPDES Permit
No. NCO022811 and G.S. 143-215.1(a)(6).
On May 30, 2002, Mr. H. B. Stroup requested
remission and waived the Avery Acres Mobile
Home Park WWTP's right to an administrative
hearing and stipulated that the facts were as alleged
in the assessment document.
RECOMMENDATION: The Division of Water Quality opposes any
remission or mitigation of the penalty.
The recommendation is made for the following
reason:
1. The Director considered information
submitted in suppori of the Avery Acres
Mobile Home Park WWTP's request for
remission of civil penalties in accordance
with G.S. 143-215.6A(l) and did not find
grounds to modify the initial penalty
assessment of $1,605.50.

1`
AGENDA ITEM: Request for Remission of Civil Penalty by
Avery Acres Mobile Home Park WWTP (LV 02-189)
Buncombe County
EXPLANATION: On May 20, 2002, Forrest Westall, Division of
Water Quality Regional Water Quality Supervisor
for the Asheville Region, assessed a total penalty of
$605.50 ($500.00 civil penalty, plus $ I05.50
investigative costs) against the Ave Acres Mobile
Home Park WWTP for violations of NPDES Permit
No. NCO022811 and G.S. 143-215.1(a)(6).
On May 30, 2002, Mr. H. B. Stroup requested
remission and waived the Avery Acres Mobile
Home Park WWTP's right to an administrative
hearing and stipulated that the facts were as alleged
in the assessment document.
RECOMMENDATION: The Division of Water Quality opposes any
remission or mitigation of the penalty.
The recommendation is made for the following
reason:
1. The Director considered information
submitted in support of the Avery Acres
Mobile Home Park WWTP's request for
remission of civil penalties in accordance
with G.S. 143-215.6A(t) and did not find
grounds to modify the initial penalty
assessment of $605.50.
W

,14
Cases LV 02-154 & LV 02-189
The remission requests for these two cases were
combined in one document by the respondent,
therefore these cases are presented together and only.
one copy of the remission request is provided. Copies
of both assessment documents are included in this
package.

poi 0-i%�u02
4
MCDEN'R
Wrth Gwohna Denartment of Environment and Natural Resources
��irirc,�l iI',c�'.,•)'.linvrcnc��
WATER QUALITY SECTION
May 17, 2002
CERTIFIED NAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
mrz H . B . .t t. rc,�scz
Av:;s-y AL:rC.? Mobi c Home Park
Office ce Box 62'16
1&I",evi_EP, North Carolina 28816
P HGyL U
11
rl�4(
1
WiM4111(.i, Itn,s, jr, 'i+:,:rcl,n}'
Gte gory J. '1.1m„Ioc, I't,. H.
Actiue- Dircei c'
Division of %V-mrt• Otiuliiv
SUBJECT: NOTICE OF VIOLATION and AS5E34M.EN7
OF CIVIL PXNALTY for
N.C. General Statute 143-21,S 1;a
and NPDES Permit NCO022811
Avery Acres MHP
Case No. LV 02�-154
combe County
Le,,�ter transmits a Notice of Violation and assessment of
it; the amount of $1,605.50 ($1,500.00 civil penalty o, $!05. 5:0
F::.c;::•rcr��Pilt r.cst.$) against Avery Acres MHP.
t-is asscssment- is based upon the following facts: a review has .,ep::
of the discharge monitoring report (I)MR) submitted by Av�:rr
,v,�!'es r-RP for the month of December, 2001. This review has shown t.h�
facility tc be in violation of the discharge limitations
n.,ini-Loring requirements found in NPDES Permit 14C0022811. The viola�_�.ar,r,
�rli.i c:ll c)c:ci.o--rred in December 2001, are summarized in Attachment A to tli.i _,
k:,ron the above facts, I conclude as a matter of law that Aver,
Aux - a MHP V101aLed the terms, conditions Or requirements of NPDRi ► Mz,i,�
-l-
115-

rjc 'M t; 2 811 ar:f N . c_ . c; . S . 143 -215 .1($) (6) in the manner and ext—emr_ shop,. � v
A;J-i�-hment A- l,ui-.suant to N.C.G.S'. 143-215.6A(a) (2) , a civil penalty c .
;3•-t ;�r:� e thLirl t.wer,ty-five thousand dollare ($25,000.00) may be asseg9ed
);sr!iori who violates the terms conditions or requi.remente of a
pt-i,ii0t rccpii---e-d by N.C.G.S. 143-215.1(a).
B,3sNd upon the above findings of fact and conclusions of law, and .i.,
with authority provided by the Secretary of the Department. of
Em,arn.-mient: anci Natural Resources and the Director of the Division (,)"
watu.r Gunl. iry, i, Forrest R. Wpstall, Division of Water Quality Regional
SuL)ervi.su'z for the Asheville Region, hereby make the following criv-'!
pen. d .t y assesHtiit rnt, against
$ 7,000.00 For _1of the 1 violations of G.S. 143-
--'� 215.1 (a) (6) and NPDES Permit No. NCO0228'2 .t ,
by discharging waste into the waters of LhE-
State in violation of permit monthly average
effluent limits for total suspended solids.
500-00 _ For 2 of the 3 violations of G.S. 143-
215.1(a)(6) and NPDES Permit No. Ni;O22811,
by discharging waste into the waters of t1:=-
State in violation of permit daily maxinnirr.
effluent limits for total suspended scuds.
ti � s�5.50
TOTAL CIVIL MALTY
Enforcement costs.
TOTAL MOUNT Dt rX
-Z-
,r+

dr
4�L
Avery Acres MHP
NPDES Number NCO022811
Case Number LV 02 •'t54
Limit Violations, December 2001
Monthly Average Limit Violations
Parameter Reported Value Lima# units
T S S 49.3 30.0 mg/l
Daily Maximum Limit Violations
F'ararrjetar Date Reported Value Limit
T S S
12/12/01
52.3
45
T S S
12; 1 9/01
70.7
46.0
i SS
12/27/01
84.6
45.0
-7-
Units
mg/i
mg/i
mg/I

ern
NCDENR
North Carolina Deoartment of Environment and Natural Resources
Michael F. Easley. Governor
WATER QUALITY SECTION
May 21, 2002
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. H. B. Stroup
Avery Acres Mobile Home Park
Post Office Box 6276
Asheville, North Carolina 28816
Dear Mr. Stroup:
W illiarn G. Ross, Jr.. Secretary
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.
Acturg Director
Division of water Quality
SUBJECT: NOTICE OF VIOLATION and ASSESSMENT
OF CIVIL PENALTY for Violations of
N.C. General Statute 143-215.1(a)(6)
and NPDES Permit N00022811
Avery Acres MHP
Case No. LV 02 - 189
Buncombe County
This letter transmits a Notice of Violation and assessment of civil
penalty in the amount of $605.50 ($500.00 civil penalty + $105.50
enforcement costs) against Avery Acres MHP.
This assessment is based upon the following facts: a review has been
conducted of the discharge monitoring report (DMR) submitted by Avery
Acres MHP for the month of January,2002. This review has shown the
subject facility to be in violation of the discharge limitations and/or
monitoring requirements found in NPDES Permit NC0022811. The violations,
which occurred in January 2002, are summarized in Attachment A to this
letter.
Based upon the above facts, I conclude as a matter of law that Avery
Acres MHP violated the terms, conditions or requirements of NPDES Permit
-1-
0

1 N00022811 and N.C.G.S. 143-215.1(a)(6) in the manner and extent shown in.
Attachment A. Pursuant to N.C.G.S. 143-215.6A(a)(2), a civil penalty of.
not more than twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000.00) may be assessed
against a person who violates the terms, conditions or requirements of a
�- permit required by N.C.G.S. 143-215.1(a).
Based upon the above findings of fact and conclusions of law, and in
accordance with authority provided by the Secretary of the Department of
Environment and Natural Resources and the Director of the Division of
Water Quality, I, Forrest R. Westall, Division of Water Quality Regional
Supervisor for the Asheville Region, hereby make the following civil
penalty assessment against:
$ 500.00
For 2 of the .2 violations of G.S. 143-
215.1(a)(6) and NPDES Permit No. NCOO22811,
by discharging waste into the waters of the
State in violation of permit weekly,average
effluent limits for fecal coliform.
$ 0 For 1 of the 1 violations of G.S. 143-
215.1 (a) (6) and NPDES Permit No. NCO022811,
by discharging waste into the waters of the
State in violation of permit weekly average
effluent limits for total suspended solids.'
$ 500.00 TOTAL CIVIL PENALTY
$ 105.50 Enforcement costs.
$ 605.50 TOTAL AMOUNT DUE
-2-

Pursuant to G.S. 143-215.6A(c), in determining the amount of the
penalty I have taken into account the Findings of Fact and
Conclusions of Law and the factors set forth at G.S. 143B-282.1(b),
which are:
(1) The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of
the State, to the public health, or to private property
resulting from the violation;
(2) The duration and gravity of the violation;
(3) The effect on ground or surface water quantity or quality
or on air quality;
(4) The cost of rectifying the damage;
(5) The amount of money saved by non-compliance;
(6) Whether the violation was committed willfully or
intentionally;
(7) The prior .record of the violator in complying or failing to
comply with programs over which the Environmental Management
Commission has regulatory authority; and
(8) The cost 'to the State of the enforcement procedures.
Within thirty days of receipt of this notice, you must do one of
the following:
1. Submit payment of the penalty:
Payment should be made directly to the order of the Department
of Environment and Natural Resources (do not include waiver
form). Payment of the penalty will not foreclose further
enforcement action for any continuing or new violation(s).
Please submit payment to the attention of:
Point Source Compliance/Enforcement Unit
Division of Water Quality
Mail Service Center 1617
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
OR
2. Submit a written request for remission or mitigation
including a detailed justification for such request:
A request for remission or mitigation is limited to
consideration of the reasonableness of the amount of the
penalty and is not the proper procedure for contesting the
-3-
Ni

accuracy of any of the statements contained in the
assessment letter., Because a remission request forecloses
the option of an administrative hearing, such a request
must be accompanied by a waiver of your right to an
administrative hearing and a stipulation that there are no
factual or legal issues in dispute. You must execute and
return to this office the attached waiver and stipulation
form and a detailed statement, which you believe
establishes whether:
(a) one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors
in G.S. 143B-282.1(b) were wrongfully applied to the
detriment of the petitioner;
(b) the violator promptly abated continuing environmental
damage resulting from the violation;
(c) the violation was inadvertent or a result of an
accident;
(d) the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any
previous violations;
(e) payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for
the remaining necessary remedial actions.
Please submit this information to the attention of:
Point Source Compliance/Enforcement Unit
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
OR
3. Submit a written request for an administrative hearing:
If you wish to contest any statement in this assessment letter,
you must request an administrative hearing. This request must
be in the form of a written petition to the Office of
Administrative Hearings and must conform to Chapter 150E of the
North Carolina General Statutes. You must File your original
petition with the:
Office of Administrative Hearings
6714 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-6714
Mail or hand -deliver a copy of the petition to
-4-
ll

Mr. Dan Oakley, General Counsel
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
Failure to exercise one of the options above within third days, as
evidenced by a date stamp (not a postmark) indicating when we received
your response, will result in this matter being referred .to the Attorney
General's office with a request to initiate a civil action to collect the
penalty.
Please be advised that any continuing violation(s) may be the subject
of a new enforcement action, including an additional penalty. If you have
any questions about this civil penalty assessment, please contact Mr.
Roger C. Edwards of the Asheville Regional Office, phone [phone].
rrest 1. Westall
ater Quality Regional Supervisor
Asheville Region
Division of Water. Quality
ATTACHMENTS
CC: Roger Edwards w/ attachments
Compliance/Enforcement File w/ attachments
Central Files w/ attachments
Sk

de
ATTACHMENT A
Avery Acres MHP
NPDES Number NCO022811
Case Number LV 02 -189
Limit Violations, January 2002
Weekly Average Limit Violations
Parameter Date Reported Value Limit
Fecal Coliform
1/2/02
790/100
400/100
Fecal Coliform
1 /15/02
1210/100
400/100
TSS
117/02
50.0
45.0
-7-
/3
Units
ml/l
ml/l
mg/I

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
COUNTY OF BUNCOMBE
IN THE MATTER OF ASSESSMENT
OF CIVIL PENALTIES AGAINST
AVERY ACRES MHP
PERMIT NO. NC 0022811
WAIVER OF RIGHT TO AN
ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING AND
STIPULATION OF FACTS
FILE NO. LV 02 - 154
Having been assessed civil penalties totaling $1,605.50 for violation(s) as set forth in the
assessment document of the Division of Water Quality dated May 17, 2001, the undersigned,
desiring to seek remission of the civil penalties, does hereby waive the right to an
administrative hearing in the above -stated matter and does stipulate that the facts are as
alleged in the assessment document.
This the i 71--* day of,��� , 2002.
_4�0
BY
�-y25-57- W70
TELEPHONE
.+
-9-

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
w AND NATURAL RESOURCES
COUNTY OF BUNCOMBE
IN THE MATTER OF ASSESSMENT }
OF CIVIL PENALTIES AGAINST )
AVERY ACRES MHP )
PERMIT NO. NC 0022811 }
WAIVER OF RIGHT TO AN
ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING AND
STIPULATION OF FACTS
FILE NO.
f6�'`7
f ('05,50
Having been assessed civil penalties totaling $if,605.50 for violation(s) as. set forth in the
assessment document of the Division of Water Quality dated May 17, 2001, the undersigned,
desiring to seek remission of the civil penalties, does hereby waive the right to an
administrative hearing in the above -stated matter and does stipulate that the facts are as
alleged in the assessment document.
This the / �' day of,�.� , 2002.
BY
'0�t 0 /`r �
P.O.,7
Ag- he V) • C
ADDRESS
�Z8 v2 70
TELEPHONE
Lv
L i !1
1-

James & James Environmental Management, Inc.
PO BOX 13$4 MOUNTAIN HOME, NC 29759
OFFICE: [phone] FAX: [phone]
May 30, 2002
Point Source Compliance / Enforcement Unit
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Mr. H. B. Stroup
Avery Acres, MHP, Inc.
PO Box 6276
Asheville, NC 28816
Re: Violation of DMR Permits December 2001 and January 2002
Dear Mr. Oakley,
On May 20' and 24'h respectively, Mr. Stroup received the above noted assessment of civil
penalties. In this letter, I hope to clarify why this situation occurred and respectfully request a remission of
these penalties.
Mr. Stroup had, near the end of 2001, made the decision to sell the Mobile Home Park. He did not
want to make it a hardship on the varied population that lived in this park, so he gave them eight months
notice the beginning of December that the park had been sold and that it would be necessary for them to
relocate. He also informed them that he would give them a monetary bonus if they could relocate within
the next six months. From the owner's perspective, this is a fair offer. Apparently from the renter's
perspective, this was a very poor opportunity. Many of the renter's live paycheck to paycheck and would
be hard pressed to relocate.
A few of the renter's took this as a personal blow and were focused on getting "revenge" on Mr.
Stroup. It was about this time that the well flows were obviously higher than normal. We searched the
park for leaks in the main lines as well as under homes. None were found. We were informed at a later
time that a few of the renters had turned on the water taps inside the home as they were vacating. This
obviously sent a bulk load to the wastewater facility. From information received from Mr. Alan Lee,
manager of the mobile home park, this occurred an several occasions.
This response was not expected nor anticipated. There were no precautions that could have been
in place to deter this response. Until this point, the treatment facility had been operating very well. There
were only the basic timely repairs that were necessary and were completed. Mr. Stroup has always been
very receptive to any updates or repairs that'were deemed necessary to maintain compliance. This was not
a repair that was ignored, nor an operational item that was overlooked. This situation was clearly beyond
the control of W. Stroup and our operator, Steve Nanney. We respectfully request that you take this into
consideration.
Many efforts were made on the part of Mr. Nanney to overcome the problems that he was so
quickly thrown into. There is not an equalization basin on site and has never been a need for one.
Therefore, the vast amount of continuous flow that the facility was receiving could not be diverted to
/p

r
another location. Alum was used to help settle the basin, and soda ash was used to maintain a happy
environment for the bacteria while ensuring that the pH was stable. The time clocks were set so that the
v. plant could settle as much as possible without the air lift station overflowing from the excess water. This
was a difficult problem to balance. It is better to send partially treated wastewater on downstream, than to
clean up a spill of untreated sewage, especially with many children present. The judgment was made to
accommodate the excess flow and attempt to get the cleanest water leaving the facility.
From the weekend of December 9, 2001 until the week of January 13, 2002 many corrections and
considerations were made to regain control of this system. As you can see, the TSS peaked the 10 of
December and began a steady decline until compliance was regained the week of January 1 P. An excess
of chlorine was added during this time frame so that the water leaving would not have bacteria adding to
the problem. The week of the 2e proved that the TSS was under control and it was decided to reduce the
chlorine dosage so that there would not be a negative environmental impact. Unfortunately, this decision
was made slightly prematurely.
This unpredictable circumstance is an operating nightmare for the ORC. It is equally troubling for
the owner. We apologize that it took this long to regain compliance. If this had occurred only once,
compliance would have been obtained much quicker. The fact that this was a reoccurring incidence only
aggravated the problem.
While it is easy to empathize with the renter's predicament, it is admirable that the owner was
willing to offer compensation. The decision to sell was a wise business move and the results of his
proclamation are unfortunate. We hope that you will take these facts into consideration. The owner,
operator, and operations firm strive diligently to preserve compliance at this and every facility. When there
are extenuating circumstances it grows rather difficult rather quickly.
We would appreciate your review of the two fines Case No. LV02-189 and Case No. LV02-154 in
regard to the above information. We truly believe that had the situation not occurred, neither you nor I
would have had to pen these letters. The facility typically operates wonderfully. If you can negate the
fines, it would be most appreciated. With highest regards, we are
��QJVic� ly � m�O
Harry and Juanita James
Cc: Mr. HB Stroup

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
AUG 2 6 2002
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
70001530 0002 2100 4483
Mr. H. B. Stroup
Avery Acres Mobile Home Park
P. O. Box 6276
Asheville, NC 28816
r••
NCDENR
NoFmH CARoum DaF'ARTM6Nr or
ENvi ioNmF_ r ^No N/RuRAL RasouR=
Subject: Remission Request of Civil Penalty Assessments
Avery Acres Mobile Home Park
NPDES Permit Number NCO022811
Cases LV 02 - 154 & LV 02 - 189
Buncombe County
Dear Mr. Stroup:
T have considered the information submitted in support of your request for remission in
accordance with G.S. 143-215.6A(f) and have not found grounds to modify the civil
penalty assessments of $2,211.00.
Should you choose to pay the assessed penalty, payment should be tendered to me at the
letterhead address within thirty (30) days of the receipt of this letter. Please make checks
payable to the Department of Environment and Natural Resources.
You also have the option of presenting your request to the Committee on Civil Penalty
Remissions, which is comprised of members of the Environmental Management
Commission. The Committee may consider such requests and render final and binding
decisions in these matters. You may argue your request before the Committee, and the
Division Staff will argue against any reduction of the assessments.
ti
v
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699.1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Atnrmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

.I
Should you choose to present your request to the Committee, please notify me at the
letterhead address within thirty (30) days of the receipt of this letter. Your request will be
scheduled to be heard on the agenda of the next scheduled Committee meeting, and you
will be notified of the date and time. If the Division does not receive a response
regarding this notice, Division staff will automatically place your case on the agenda for
an upcoming Committee meeting.
If you have any questions about this letter, please contact Robert Farmer at 919n33-
5083, extension 531. 'hunk you for your cooperation in this matter.
Cc: Asheville Region WQ Supervisor
Enforcement File
Central Files
/f
Sincerely,
A4-VI— 90���
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.

AGENDA ITEM: b3 -D �k Request for Remission of Civil Penalty by
Northeast Carolina Farms, Inc. (DV 00-029)
Camden County
EXPLANATION: On Oct. 30, 2001, Jeffrey O. Poupart, Supervisor of
the Non -Discharge Compliance and Enforcement
Unit of the Division of Water Quality, assessed a
civil penalty of $5,571.72 ($5,000.00 civil penalty
and $571.72 investigative costs) against Williams
Farms (registered owner of Belcross Farm) for,
violation of G.S. 143-215.1.
On December 17, 2001, Northeast Carolina Farms.
Inc., the lessee of Belcross Farm, requested
remission and waived their right to an
administrative hearing and stipulated that the facts
were as alleged in the assessment document.
RECOMMENDATION: The Division of Water Quality opposes any
remission or mitigation of the penalty.
The recommendation is made for the following
reason:
1. The Director considered information
submitted in support of Northeast Carolina
Farm' s request for remission of civil
penalties in accordance with G.S. 143-
215.6A(f) and his delegation provided by the
secretary and did not find grounds to modify
the assessment.
FM

6.
is
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
ldichael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Williams Fanus of North Carolina, Inc.
Post Office Box 4I6
Moyock, NC 27958
Dear Sirs:
A
••
�q
'f
NCDENR
r4oFr7M CARouw. DO-&M Mff.P r OI
EtivrRcNMCNT ANO NXIM- l- PC35C JRCry
October 31, 2001
CERT=D 1NLAJL
RMIMN RECEIPT REQ99STED
SUBJECT: Assessment of Civil Penalties for
Making a Outlet to Waters of the
State without a Permit
Farm - 15-11
Camden County
File No. Dv 00-029
T-his Iette: transr its notice of a civil penalty assessed against Belcross Farm in the
amount of S5.571.72 which includes S371.72 in investigative costs. Attac :ed is a copy of the
assessment docum-ert explaining this penalty.
This action was taken under the authonry vested in me by delegation provided by the
Secretary of the Deparment of Environment and `arural Resources and the Director of the
Division of Water Qualityy. Any continuing violation(s) may be the subject of a new enforcement
action, including an additional penalr-.
Within thirry days of receipt of this notice, you must do one of the following:
1. Submit payment of the penalty:
Pa,v7nent should be made directly to the order of the Department of
Environment and Natural Resources (do not include wai:•erform).
Payment of the penalr: will not foreclose further enforcernenE action for
any continuing or new violadon(s).
.flailing .-address: Telephone (919) 733-- 033 Location:
16,7 Mail Service Center Fax (919) 7=3-00=9 512 N. Salisbury St.
R_�eigh. North Carolina '_;699-161-1 State Courier T=2-01-01 Raleigh. `C 27699-1617
.411 Equal OFporrunir► lAffirmarive.4criorr Errpio}•er
505'c rr- -c.ed / 1O1c post-eonsuiver paper
j.:. enrsrare.nC.us
oG /

.,
Please submit payment to the attention of:
Mr. Steve Lewis
NCDEti'R
DWQ
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
MO
2. Submit a written request for remission or mitigation including a detailed
justification for such request:
A request for remission or mitigation is limited to consideration of the
reasonableness of the amount of the penalty and is not the proper procedure for
contesting the accuracy of any of the statements contained in the assessment
letter. Because a remission request forecloses the option of an administrative
hearing. such a request must be accompanied by a waiver of your right to an
administrative hearing and a stipulation that there are no factual or legal issues in
dispute. You must execute and return to this office the anached waiver and
stipulation form and a detailed statement which you believe establishes whether:
(a) one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in G.S. 143B-282. 1 (b)
were wrongfully applied to the detr:Lment of the Fetitioner;
(b) the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting
from the violation.
(r) the violation was inadve-ena or a result of an accident;
(d) the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations;
(e) payment of the civil pe. alty wi11 prevent payment for the remaining
necessary rem:edia.l actions.
Please submit this information to the attentien of:
Mr. Steve Lewis
N CDENR
DWQ
161 7 bail Se:ti-ice Center
Raleigh. North Carolina 27699-16I7
M
3. Submit a written request for an administrative hearing:
If you wish to contest any portion of Ene civil penalty assessment. you must
request are administrative heann-e. This request rnust be in the form of a written
Petition to the Office of Adminis:rstive Hearings and must conform to Chapter
150B of the North Carolina General S:at res. You must file your original petition
with the:
0212—

Office of Administrative Hearings
6714 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-6714
AND
Mail or hand -deliver a Copy of the petition to:
Mr. Dan Oakley
NCDENR
Office of General Counsel
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1601
Failure to exercise one of the options above within thirty days, as evidenced by a date
stamp (not a postmark) indicating when we received your response. will result in this matter
being referred to the Attorney General's Office with a request to initiate a civil action to collect
the penalty. PIease be advised that additional assessments may be levied for future violations
which occur after the review period of this assessment -
If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Steve Lewis at [phone], ext. 539 or
Mr. Jeff Poupar, at [phone]. ex:_ 537.
Sincerely,
.jeffrey O. Pou ar, Supervisor
-Non-Discharge Compliance and Enforcement Vnit
ATTACILNMN7S
cc: Jim Mulligan, Waslungton Regional Supervisor w-/ attachments
Daphne Cullom. NVARO w•/ attach -.rents
Lvn Hardison, «:ARO w/ attachr eats
File 1"r DV 00-029 w/ attachments
Central Files w-/ attachments
Public Information Officer w•/ artacriments
Elm

s
STATE OF NORTH CAROL I A EN-VIRO-X.'V �YTAL MANL AGEMENT
CONDVnSS]04
COUNTY OF CAMDEN
r' THE MATTER OF ASSESSMENT ) WAIVER OF RIGHT TO AN
OF CIVIL PE�iALTIES AGAINST ) AMMISTRATWE HEARLNG AND
PERMIT NO. __N/A ) STIPULATION OF FACTS
FILE NO. DV 00-029
Having been assessed civil penalties totaling S5.57I.72 „ for
violation(s) as set forth in the assessment document of the Division of Water Quality dated,
October 30. 2001 - , the undersigned, desiring to seek remission
of the civil penalties, does hereby waive the right to an administrative hearing in the above -stated
matter and does stipulate that the facts are as alleged in the assessment document.
This the day of , 2001.
SIG`ATURE
ADDRESS
TELEPHONE
a�

.-
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF CAMDEN,
Ly' THE MATTER OF )
WILLIAMS FARMS OF }
NORTH CAROLINA, INC. )
FOR IYIA .IING AN OUTLET TO THE )
WATERS OF THE STATE OF' )
NORTH CAROLINA )
WITHOUT A PER IIT AND }
VIOLATION OF GEN-ERAL PERMIT )
AWG 100000 )
NORTH CAROLLVA
DEPART1,!F-N7 OF Eti v9RON-MENT AND
NATURAL RESOURCES
File No. DV 00-029
FRNMCiGSAND DECISION
A --ND ASSESSMENT OF
CIVII. PENALTIES
Acting pursuant to delegation provided by the Secretary of the Depar .ezt of
Environrcent anal .Natural Resources and the Director of the Division of Water Quality, I. Jeffrey
O. Poupart, Supervisor of the Non -Discharge Compliance and Enforcement Unit of the Division
of Water Quality (DNVQ), make the following:
I. FL`-DD GS OF FACT:
A. Williams Fares of North Ca* En Lc. («'iiliarns F--=) is a corporation
organized and existing under the Ix.vs of t2he State of Nor-,h Carolina.
B. Williams Farms owns and operates Be?cross Farm. a swine operation located
a?ona US Highway 158 in Camden Cou. :-v.
C. Williams Farms was issued Cer-.ifieate of Coveraize AWS 150011 under General
Permit AWG I00000 for BeIcross Farrn on April 2. 1999, effective April 2. 1999,
w•itrh an expiration date of April 30. 2003. T'nis permit does not allo,,v the
discharge of waste to waters of the State.
D. On October 3, 2000, DWQ staff observed evidence that a discharge of wastew•ater
by Belcross Farm from a lift station had reached an unnamed tributa..-v of
Irdianto%m Creek, whLich are Class C SQL' waters of the State wit:lin the
Pasquotan- River Basin.
E. Williams Farms had no valid permit for the above -describe? activity.
.5

..I
W
F. Condition No. III. 6. b. of the General Permit requires in part that the Permittee
shall report by telephone to the appropriate Regional Office as soon as possible,
bui in no case more than 24 hours following first knowledge of the occurrence of
any failure of the animal waste treatment and disposal system that renders the
facility incapable of adequately receiving, treating or storing the animal waste.
G. Williams Farms failed to notify DWQ of the failure of the animal waste treatment
and disposal system within the required 24 hours after discovery.
H. The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures in this matter totaled S571.72.
Based upon the above Findings of Fact, I make the following:
II. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW:
A. Williams Fauns is a "person" within the meaning of G.S. 143-215.6A pursuant to
G.S. 1-43-212(4).
B. An unnamed tributary to Indiantow-n Creek constitutes waters of the State within
the meaning of G.S. 143-215.1 pursuant to G.S. 143-212�6).
C. The above -cited discharge constiruted making an outlet to waters of the State for
purposes of G.S. 143-215.1(a)(I), for which a Fe, -Mir is required by G.S. 143-
215.1.
D. T e above -cited failure to reoor. the failure of the waste treatment system violated
Condition No. III. 6. b. of the General Pe.:nit.
E. «iI?ia n-is Farms may be assessed civil penalties in this matter pursuant to G.S.
1=3-? 15.6A(a)(2). which provides char a civil penalty of ncc more Than twenty-
five thousand dollars (S25,000.CO) per violation may be assessed ag=inst a person
wl-o is required but fails to apply for or to secure a Fe.^'�t required by G.S. 143-
21= 1
F. WiIh ms Farms may be assessed civil penalties in this matter pursuant to G.S.
I43-215.6A(a)(2), which provides that a civil penalty of not more than twenty-
five thousand dollars (S25,000.00) per violation may be assessed against a person
who fails to act in accordance with the terms, conditions. or requirements of a
pe.:nit required by G.S. I43-215.1.
G. The State � enforcement costs in this matter may be assessed against Wllli: ms
pursuant to G.S. 143-215.3(a)(9) and G.S. 143B-232.1(b)(8).
a(

r
J
Ke
H_ The Supervisor of the Iron -Discharge Compliance and Enforcement Unit,
Division of Water Quality, pursuant to delegation provided by the Secretary of the
Department of Environment and Natural Resources and the Director of the
Division of Water Quality, has the authority to assess civil penalties in this matter.
Based upon the above Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, I make the following:
DECISION:
Accordingly,/�yWiWams Farms is hereby assessed a civil penalty of:
S 0V for making an outlet to the waters of the State without a
permit as required by G.S. 143-215.1.
r
S �G for violating Condition No. M. 6. b. of the General Permit
by failing to report by telephone to the appropriate Regional
Office as soon as possible, but in no case more than 24
hours following first knowledge of the occurrence of any
failure of the animal waste treatment and disposal system
that renders the facility incapable of adequately receiving,
t=eatina or storme the anin al waste
5 571.72 Enforce:- ent cosy
S s7Z L TOTAL J0,I0L-N_-T DL-E
As required by G.S. 1.13-215.6ACc), iz, deter-._ ni s t`:e annou n, of the pe:,a itv I have
considered the factors listed i.-: G.S.1T3B-2S2.lto), which-
(1) The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to &,e public
health. or to private progeny resulting from the vioIation.
(2) The duration and gravin- of the violation:
(3) The erect on ground or s::race water quantity or quality or on air quality:
(4) The cost of rectifying tl a darnage: I
(5) T- a arnount of money saved by noncornpliance:
(6) N%-hetrer the violation was corm.^ tted willfully or intentionally:
(7) The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with programs
over which the Environs mental ` =azernent Corrmussion has reguIatory authority;
(8) The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures.
2./45 �_
Ci
(Date) } O. PeavulrSupnce ^\Di Compliisor
aa d Enforce::!e:,t Unit
Division of Water Quality
a7

V
• Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
A_ Received by (Please Print
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
V
• Print your name and address on the reverse
C. 4 naarre
so that we can retum the card to you.
• Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on tt-e front if space permits.
'' r
t. Article ACdnmmpd to:
is delivery aderess d"ferent -torn merit 1?
tl YES. enter delivery address below. Cl No
Lo-IkI14r-rxS
�r�
ToType
Mby V 4 D, ] Q I v
3 LAC en fled Mail ❑ E�Fr+ess Mail
0 Registered RMm Receipt for Mertltanc
❑ Insured Mail 0 C.Q.Q.
4. Refft t:ted Delivery?. (Free Fee% ❑ Yes
2- Article Number (Copy .torn service label}
ZP
PS Form 3811..luly 1999 Domesyc Retum Feceipr 10253� ]al�Fp):
C
r
31, S;i .
J
C Casai ?esea;e 3 =irs
C
1 l
`
...`.'L�
�
IIL
i Y C- 1�7ZS t
r
aV

NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
Violator: Williams Farms of North Carolina. Inc.
County: Camden Case Number: DV 00-024
Permit Number: AWS 150011
ASSESSMENT FACTORS
1)
The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to the public health, or
to private property resulting from the violation;
( )not significant 00moderarely significant ( )significant
( )very significant
( )extremely significant,�'e"
2)
The duration and gravity of the violation;.
( )not significant )moderately significant ( )significant
( )very significant
( )extremely signific t ... 0A f r d dyS '
3)
The effect on ground or surface water quantity or quality or on air quality;
Nnot significant ( )moderately significant ( )significant
( )very significant
( )extremely significant
4)
The cost of rectifying the damage;
(not significant ( )moderately significant ( )significant
( )very significant
( )extremely significant
S)
The amount of money saved by noncompliance;
not significant ( )moderately significant ( )significant
( )very significant
)extremely significant
6) Whether the violation was committed willfully or intentionally;
( )not significant Xmoderately significant { )significant ( )very significant
( )extremely significant ,
�,lvle to Reparr
7) The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with programs over,
which the Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority; and
Xnot significant ( )moderately significant ( )significant ( )very significant
( )extremely significant
8) The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures.
OkInot significant ( )moderately significant ( )significant ( )very significant
( )extremely significant
OCr 0 j
Date y O. oupart
REMISSION FACTORS
() Whether one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors were wrongly applied to the
detriment of the petitioner;
(} Whether the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting from
the violation;
() Whether the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident;
() Whether the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations; and
O Whether payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining necessary
remedial actions.
Date Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.

W
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
December 7, 2000
TO: Steve Lewis, Environmental Specialist
DWQ Compliance and Enforcement
THROUGH: Jim Mulligan, Water Quality Supervisor
Washington Regional Office
FROM: Carl Dunn, Environmental Engineer �.r--
Washi.ngton Regional Office
SUBJECT: Enforcement Action .
Belcross Farm
Facility No. 15-11
Camden County
INTRODUCTION:
Belcross Farm is owned and operated by Williams Farms of North Carolina. The facility
is located on US Highway 158 approximately one mile east of Belcross in Camden County. The
facility has been permitted as a 1240 farrow to wean operation.
I— *z*-ytW
On September 29, 2000 the Washington Regional Office received a complaint of a
possible discharge of animal waste from the Belcross facility due to a faulty lift station. Because
of limited staff resources within the office aerial reconnaissance of the farm was done on October
2, 2000. The aerial surveillance showed that there was a possibility that the farm did have a
problem with the lift station and that ground truth work would need to be preformed. On
October 3, 2000 Carl Dunn of the Washington Regional Office conducted a site investigation
with Mr. David Oldham, who was the certified operator of the facility. The site investigation
revealed that the lift station located between two animal houses used to convey waste to the
lagoon had indeed had a failure. A drain used to convey surface water runoff was located within
three feet of the lift station. The drain was plugged at the time of the inspection with a PVC pipe.
There were signs of watermarks on the Iift station and the PVC pipe that indicated that the waste
level had risen above the level of the lift station indicating that the lift station had had a recent
failure. Also the watermark on the PVC pipe indicated that the level of waste ponded above the
drain had been approximately one foot deep. Waste was still ponded above the drain
approximately three to four inches deep. The only outlet for the waste that had been ponded
above the drain was to either go through the drain or be pumped.back into the now working lift
station. Mr. Oldham was not aware of anyone pumping the ponded waste back into the lift
statioh nor was he aware that the PVC plug had been removed from the drain_
wal

Y
Samples were collected froth within the drainage system and the outlet ditch for the drain.
The results of the samples are in the table below.
Drain
Drainage Ditch
Fecal (co1J100ml)
360,000
76,667
NH3 (mg/L)
84
81
TKN (mg/L)
92
100
NO2 plus NO3 (mg/L)
0.08
0.24
Total P (mg/L)
29
25
The results of the samples indicate a presence of animal waste within the drainage system used to
carry surface water away from the area around the lift station as well as the receiving drainage
ditch. The conclusion from the results is that the lift station had failed and the animal waste
released from the failed lift station had passed through the drainage system and entered into the
farm's drainage ditches. The drainage ditches on the farm drain to Indiantown Creek and its
connecting canals, which are classified as C SW waters of the State.
3f

i♦ Division ofrW-a�terY+aity r
Q I(itVLSiOt6 ailt JViI� a�py 1►2kC= W111� on i r'
T Y
i , Q Otiber
7.
r
Type of Visit O Compliance inspection O Operation Review Q Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit © Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number 1� 11 Date of visit: ZOl3f2000 Time: 10:00
O Not Operational Q Below Threshold
Permitted ■ Certified 13 Conditionally Certified 13 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .................. _
Farm Name: Ra1crsl,5.5.E&=.— -------- . ..._......... ..... » ....__. _ . ....._ . County: Cxmdcu ............... _....... _ ... WA►.f O �.
Owner Name:
Facility Contact:
Title:
Phone No: 252. 435.-693.Q......._
Phone No:
Mailing Address: l�QD)0&Aj6r.... - ..._ _ . Mtu+at k-NC.._—__
Onsite Representative: �?�YixlId_ .„ .. _... _ .... _ .� .� Integrator: [�+illi.F.ItS.sJC,.�Atc
Certified Operator: ayj�..._._. .. _.......... O]dham._...................................... Operator Certification Number: ZQ3.SQ........ ..........
_.
Location of Farm:
1 mile east of Belcross in Camden Co. on east bound rt-158
® Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude ®• 21 • 1 00 .. Longitude 76 •F OS , 12 46
Design Current
Design Current
Design Current
Swine Ca acii Po ulation
Poultry
Ca achy population Cattle
Capacity Population
❑ Wean to Feeder
I
I[] Laver I
❑ Dairy
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Non -Layer
ICI Non -Dairy
® Farrow to Wean
1240
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Other
❑ Farrow to Finish
Total Design Capacity
1,240
❑ Gilts
Total SSLW
536,920
❑ Boars
Number of Lagoons [ 1 [ [❑Subsurface Drains Preseat [[❑ Lagoon Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is observed, was the conveyance man-made?
b. If discharge is observed. did it reach Water of the State? (If yes, nettity DWQ)
c. If discharge is observed. what is the estimated flow in gathnin?
d. Does discharge bypass a lagoon system? (If yes, notify DWQ)
Spray Field Area [
❑ Yes ® No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
?. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? ®yes ❑ No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge?, ❑ Yes ® No'
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Identifier........................................................................ _W..._. ...
Freeboard finches): 20
5/00
❑ Yes ® No
Structure 5 Structure 6
Continued on back

Facility Number: 15-11 Date of inspection 10 M000
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion, ❑ Yes ® No
seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? ❑ Yes ® No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement? ❑ Yes ® No
9. Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
elevation markings? ❑ Yes ® No
Waste Aaplication
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenancerimprovement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
11. Is there evidence of over application? [].Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Yes ❑ No
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops differ with those designated in the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)? ❑ Yes []No
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination? ❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement? ❑ Yes ❑ No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
Required Records _& Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit readily available?
18. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(ie/ Vi UP, checklists, design, maps, etc.)
19. Does record keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports)
20. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
21. Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
22. Fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
23. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
24. Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
25. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
0' �Q •yiQla�i�tis'o� dgfcien�ii� •rv�re �Qre�• �i1�i1g this'visit; • Yoh w><ee�iye �q I�uirth�r • .
correspondence: abailt: this visit ................................... .
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to'better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
0 Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
Possible discharge from sump pump failure. Appears sump filled with waste and thus waste discharged from the back of the house next A.
.o the sump because waste could not flow into the sump. Samples were taken to help confirm the discharge event. No reporting of
lischarge event had been done to DWQ.
Reviewer/Inspector Name Carl Duvw
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date: 5100

V
34�

y4
c f
r
� •� :yelp : � `� � -

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
CERTIFIED MAEL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Williams Farms of NC, Inc.
P0Box 416
Moyock, NC 27958
kk-zo
NCDENR
NoRrH CA.RoumA DepAwrMENr ofs
ENVIRONMMMT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
October 18, 2000
Subject: Notice of Recommendation of Enforcement
Belcross Farm
Facility Number 15-11
Camden County
Dear Sirs:
This letter is to notify you that the Washington Regional Office of the Division of Water Quality
is considering sending a recommendation for enforcement action to the Director of the Division
of Water Quality. The recommendation concerns the violation of North Carolina General Statute
143-215.1(a)(1) for discharging animal waste in waters of the State without a permit and for the
violation of Swine Waste Operation General Permit Condition IU.6. for not reporting to the
DWQ Regional Office a failure of a component of your waste collection system.
The Belcross Farm is located on Highway 158 approximately one mile east of Belcross in
Camden County. The Belcross Farm is permitted to operate as a 1240 farrow to wean facility.
An inspection of the facility was conducted on October 3, 2000 by Carl Dunn of the Washington
Regional Office. Evidence was found to show that the lift station used to transfer waste from
animal houses to the waste lagoon failed to operate properly resulting in a discharge of animal
waste to waters of the State.
If you have an explanation for these violations, as well as any corrective action taken, that you
wish to present, please respond in writing to the Washington Regional Office within ten (10)
days after receipt of this Notice. Your explanation will be reviewed and if an enforcement action
is still deemed appropriate, your explanation will be forwarded to the Director with the
enforcement package for his consideration.
r7
943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, NC 27889'Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

=I
1f you, have any questions concerning this matter, please contact me at [phone], ext.212
or Carl Dunn, Environmental Engineer, at [phone], ext. 208.
Sincerely,
F
Mulligan
Quality Supervisor
cc: Compliance/Enforcement Group
Central Files
Camden County MRCS
P Hooper - DSWC WARO
V;WARO .
W5
w

tiePoo, 0
` Np
.�
.07
lop
't,s`iak�
3 �dP*N- p
FRa�� by (Psi° Prim
sq t1- tewt'h urn �--• -
i3t we to the beak at the
a Attact, his
ot or, tt,e font R Space P �
1. ArtiC>a Add
i tii ARMS 0
k Mo CKNC 2195%
•• �rorn servw=�•tatx�3
PS Bairn 3511, ,holy i9ss
3?
R, ,s aw— a — - . g
K YES, a,,ter detW" add
9. Se o i1 d ass Matt t foc melc"20 `
[7 R®roan RecaiA
,ag.►�n-,ram

STATE OF NORTH CAROLLNA
COUNTY OF C vIDEN-
LN THE MATTER OF ASSESSMENT
OF CIVIL PFANALTIES AGAINST
PERMIT NO. MA
w
ENVIRONMF—%TAL MANAGEMENT
COMMISSION
WAIVER OF RIGHT TO AN
ADNUINISTRATIYE HEARING A.ND
STIPULATION OF FACTS
FILE NO. Dv M922
Having been assessed civil penalties totaling _ S5.571.72 ,_, for
violation(s) as set forth in the axsessmcnt document of the Division of Water Quality dated,
Qgtcber 30. 2NI , the undersigned, desiring to sock remission
of the civil penalties, does hereby waive the right to an adrninistrarive hearing in the above :stated
matter and does stipulate that the facts are as alleged in the assessment document.
This the f dayof _ �? n2 , 2001. .
L e � 2/2z-�
SIG`ATU
ADDRESS
TELEPHOi E
4D

M
Northeast Carolina Farms. Inc.
R, o. Box 865, Moyock, NC 27958
[phone] office(252)435-2387 fox
December 10, 2001
Mr. Steve Lewis
NCDENR. DWQ
1671 Mail Service Center DEC 17 20
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699_1617 4yArE7! dilaLfiY SECTION
Ncn-Discharge Compliance Ed
Dear Mr. Lewis,
In reference to file No. DV 00-029, farm #15-11 we are requesting remission or mitigation of the proposed fine.
This problem occurred due to the failure of a pump in the lift station, which caused the lift station to overflow. The pipe
that was installed at the request of the local conservation department, located next to the lift station had already been
cemented shut prior to this incident This was done so if the lift station failed no waste would escape from between the
buildings. Your sample indicates there was an increased Coliform count where this pipe would have entered the ditch.
Since the pipe had been cemented shut we did not consider the possibility waste could reach the ditch.
Since the inspec;icn we have spent over S6000.00 redesigning the lift station system. We have designed and
installed a special pump that uses a boat propeller to move both wastewater and solids to the lagoon. We have installed
an additional pump that series as a back up to the primary pump and is tied to an afarrn that sounds inside the buildings
when the second pump turns on but before there is a problem.
In addition the site between the buildings has had the too 12 inches of sail removed and ccrzpcst_d. It has t;e_n
replaced with sail and sand. The farm has been inspected twice since this incident and passed with no problems. The
pipe that leads tc the ditch has been dug up completely eliminating the possibility of any fLture problems.
I would propose to use the money that would be due for the fire to install water ripples in the gestation building
that is the primary water source for this lift station. We have done this on three farms in the Gaston. NC area at a cost cf
S15.CC0. This has cut ourwater usage in half and rnade lagoon management much easier and more able to be planned. 1
have included a copy of the bill for the first set of equipment excludirg labor cost for the water nipples. I would estir-ate
that it would cost S10 per gestation crate to buy and install water nipples. This building has approximately 550 gestation
crates, which would make the cost SSSC0.00. The ultimate plan would be to install nippies in the breeding building, which
flows directly to the lagoon, but that would require an additional 55CC0 and cash flow would not allow that at this time.
I have enclosed three pictures of the area in question. Picture #1 is of the general area. You can see the primary
pump, which consists, on a five horsepower electric pump that drives a shalt with a propeller attached. It is a 6-inch pipe
that contains the propeller. This pump has been very effective in not getting clogged with the solid waste from the
buildings. The area around the lift station is clean and dry.
Picture T2 is of the primary pump. Picture #3 is of the primary pump in the lift station, along with the'back up pump in
place. This pump is automatically activated if the level of the lift station exceeds the safe level of the primary pump. An
alarm is also activated when this pump is energized.
We certainly did not design this system but inherited it when we leased the farm. We have already invested a !ct
of money on clean up and improvements so that the system can operate properly and efficiently. I hope you will let us
invest additional money in improvements instead of a fine. Thank you for your ccnsideratfcrn in this matter.
Sincerely,,
Fred L. Cunningham Ms. DVI41
211

N

Northeast Carolina Farms
File Number DV QQ-Q29
. Farm Number 15-11
Picture ##2 Primary Pump
�3 i

Northeast Carolina Farms
File Number DV 00-029
Farm Number 15-1 1
Picture #3 Primary Pump Pipe - Bank Up Pump Hooked to Alarm

-
G & M SALES OF EASTERN N.C., INC.
wa1 .rir: ?A& 3em: P:w Cwrtavacs $.,rdCi Al G41-1r 5dK!'
r�r.� •y: i i :. �7kS
Wv C;XSALE C:3Tp;vu7 Rri •F]a TL-{x:
a C� I= 2eee.'STAY CconT �... .9ri M-MA
.-J GOLt' F+0. H.G. 27Wa " ;ara =--Vzg
FLEASE RE-W7T0: P.O. SOX 1776 - GGLDS8CRO, MC: 2?533-t 74 d
SCLO -
To
North East Farms
c/o Dr. Fred Cuyl!rsin0ham
PC box 865
Mcyac k , !'*O 27958
320E307: 1 s/27/a2 ; e23800 101 'IDS f 288072RIH
104a0.009e
iaea.aase
zBae . 22QB
i
=a.aeea
i
i
1220. 03417
:r71G2'. �0�k
-La'.. 0Sd3=3
162.02g�
rcaaee :- mars
RE�'JAM T:LLrT'r+CE CCaT yry-,
raTid,Mr TC +4+ixc PER dip
TC T7.;R Aamokinr
TERVS: ►+SET 15 D eS, S
SHIP
TG
Nor_h East Farms
c/o Dr. Fred Cunningham
Po Box 865
Morock. NG 27958
INSTALL
10e3.4800': 166.12X36G
2.0900eGl
EA
!nipple. 1/2" %36" Galvanized
<
2.goo. 03
1093.30@�`99.351311
.615OeO;EA
Eltaw. 92o--2/2" Galvanized
615.93
ard
!
1Z-Be.0203:525.12517
2.&22029,
EA i
Waterer, N;.�r._e 47:5
2.830.9a
20?ti. 00eO: 207. RC12
I. 2432 ea•
SA
Clarip. s /2" randv.::
!
2. 430.Oa
20_:b3eZ' 99.441011
3.e aaea`
EA ;
01 1 YT V c D e - 1/ 4 Mt.
I
}
L+
5 1. 4 vz
ae9aeZ
EA
Clia+_.: Hose 412
630.+3F
4oae_20c3: 16?,-2757
.A8O022-
F3
Hc*e. -3/d • Gre--n Uj-ta-.
252'/rl
=. 920.22
I99195877
.352d22`,
EA
I
! T eYt PVC 3/ 4" SYS1r-T
356.90
�v22. Zr332: 99 L7755i _ 2=aaea; EA
A.aC.rgr, .4ylcn-I115e't- -F'iae la••�.80
40.2ac4;99.3M1107 .752323,EA
Tse. Galvanized 1/2" JP Ward 32.2B
a1.v'ZeU 525.13774 1.4o2a20 EA
f u-Pc1t. w/Nu: F'kc 233 63
qw so go.
� FEB 0 , 2-00 Posito
!
i •
atGC nw . - 7 ' '•2y
M A00.7" CO . aw.. ..
la.srrki[r.x r• I ��'L:'c�� T_S
NEVER Fiv 1.
C A. V C .
4. Li --AT s T Kr.
TRY A!:.AlN.
a.rns a :o.
TEAMS
44s
SALE su01.71T
11 . 2:a. PO
L-SOR CrLkAGES
- =50. 9;"
FREiGMT
6='
SA; Z5TAX
TOM.
673. 50
AJVCLNTREC :VED
15. 15i.5a
SALAMC9 auE
. 02
i_. 153.Go

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of water Quality .
NlichaeI F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Dr. Fred Cunningham
Northeast Carolina Farms, Inc.
P.O. Box 865
Moyock, NC 27958
Dear Dr. Cunningham:
M-% XWOMMOMfto Novo
NCDENR
NoRTm CARouw. DcRARrrgrr 4cr
F-M%nRO?4MCNT AND riAmvt I. R rscuRces
December 19, 2001
RE: Remission Request"
Belcross Farm
Farm ## 15-11
Camden County
File 'rDV 00-029
This letter is to acknowledge receipt of your request for remission of the civil penalty levied
against the subject facility. This request will be reviewed at the next scheduled conference in
January 2002, and you will be notified about the Division's decision concerning remission. If
you have any questions, please call me at [phone], ext. 539.
Sincerely.
Steve Lewis
`on -Discharge Compliance & Enforcement
cc: Jim Mulligan, Washington Regional Supervisor w•/attachment
Lyn Hardison, WARO w/attachment
Daphne Cullom, WARO w/attachment
Central Files
File #r DV 00-029 w/ 3 attachments
Mailing Address: Telephone [phone]
1617 `WI Sertiice Center Faxx [phone]
Raleigh. North Carolina 27699-1617 State Courier #52-0I-01
An Equal Opporn+nlrv/Affirmance Acrion Employer
50% recycled /!0% post -consumer paper
h np. M I -) 0. e n r.srarC.ne.les
Location:
312 N. Salisbury St.
Raleigh. NC 27699-16I7
Jr
�6

0
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
-vUchael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Dr. Fred Cunningham
Northeast Carolina Farms, Inc.
P.O. Box 865
tiioyock, INC 27968
Dear Dr. Cunningham:
NCDENR
Nor:-ri or
DC"FICHMMW ANC N.:rl lift- FtLSCURCE.j`
March 7, 2002
CERTIFIED MAIL
R=rR-N RECEIPT REQUESTED
RE: Request for Remission of Civil Penalry
Belcross Farm
Fz.-m T-'- 15-11
Camden County
File ==DV CO-029
In accor arse xith Nor"i Carolina Geatr=l Star ce 123-215.6A(f), I considered the
i..fornat:on Vol: submitted in suppon of your request for remission andl did not :=nd grot:::d5 to
t-cdify the Civil penalty assessment of 55,571.72.
T. e:e are wo options available to you. You may pay ti:e civil penalty assess._.enc or you may
rresent your re zest for remission to the Co on Civil Penn-Iry Rer=.ssions of the
Enyironrn enul Manazement Commission. If you choe_e to pay the penalty, please r-_akc youz check
^arable to *the Denartment of Environment and `arural Resources and reference the case number.
Send pa-, ..ent within 30 days of your receipt of this Iener to the attention of:
Mr. Steve Lewis
DWQ
1617 `iaiI Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
ailing .address: Telephone (919) %i. -508
1-6 17 `Tail Sen ;ce Center Fax (919) 73 _ -Ct: 9
Raleigh. Ncrh Carolina 2763a-1617 Satz Comer �_ _-01-01
fir. Equa! 0ppor...run•/.{_;.rn:e:::e.dc:ion £.:: iorrr
0% rec- cled / 10% post-cons.tmer pr..: er
h.:,x//lt?o. enns. a. e.nc-. its
Locarian:
S 12 N. SaIis ury Sr.
Raleigh. NC 27699-16I7

You also have the option of presenting your request to the Committee on Civil Penalty
Rerissions, which is comprised of members of the Environmental Management Commission. You
or your representative will be allowed approximately five minutes for your presentation. A
representative from the Division of Water Quality will present the case against remission. The
Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions will render a final and binding decision in accordance with
NCOS 143B-282.1(c).
If you choose to present your request to the committee, please notify me at. the address above
within 30 days of receipt of this Ietter- Your request will be scheduled on the agenda of the next
scheduled committee meeting and you will be notified of the date and time. If a response is not
received by the Division regarding this notice, your request will be automatically scheduled on the
agenda for an upcoming committee meeting.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. If you would like a receipt that your check was
received, please send it via certified mail. Please contact Steve Lewis at [phone], ext. 539
if you have any questions.
Sincerely.
cc: Jim Mulligan. `yasaington Resicn-al Supervisor
Dash: e Cullom. %V.A-RO
Lyn Hardison. W ARO
File r DV 00-029
Central Files
V

r7
.......................................
.................................... ..............
�/f

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Dr. Fred Cunningham
Northeast Carolina Farms, Inc.
P.O. Box 865
Moyock, NC 27958
March 15, 2002
1 • •
NCDENR
Ncwl" CARoww+ De or
Etmitommexs Amo N.srumm. RW_7oLncG5
CERTIFIED MAIL
RECEIPT REQUESTED
SUBJECT: Request for Remission of Civil Penalty
Pursuant to N.C.G.S. 143-215.6A(f)
Belcross Farm
Camden County
Case Number DV 01-029
Dear Dr. Cunningham:
Your request for remission has been placed on the agenda for the April 11, 2002 meeting of the
Environmental Management Commission's Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions. The
Committee will convene immediately following the close of the regularly scheduled business
meeting of the Environmental Management Commission in the Ground Floor Conference Room of
the Archdale Building, 512 N. Salisbury St., Raleigh, North Carolina (see enclosed directions). You
should arrive no later than 11:00 a.m.
The factors to be considered by the Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions are whether:
(a) one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in G.S. 143B-282.1(b) were
wrongly applied to the detriment of the petitioner;
(b) the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting from the
violation;
(c) the violation was inadvertent or the result of an accident;
(d) the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations;
(e) payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining necessary
remedial actions.
Afailing Address: Telephone [phone] Location:
1617 Mail Service Center Fax [phone] N. Salisbury St.
Raleigh. North Carolina 27699-1617 State Courier #52-0I-01 Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
An Equal Opportunity /Affirmatiti a Action Employer
50`7c recrcled/ 10% post -consumer paper
hnP:l/ aenratare.nt:us
St

L
You or your representative will be allowed approximately five minutes for your presentation.
A representative from the Division of Water Quality will present the. case against remission. The
Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions may remit none of the penalty, a part of the penalty, or the
entire penalty. The entire amount of the penalty can only be remitted when the violator has not been
assessed civil penalties for previous violations, and when payment of the civil penalty will prevent
payment for the remaining necessary remedial actions.
You also have the option of paying the civil penalty of $5,571.72 if you decide not.to request
remission. If you choose to pay the penalty, please call Steve Lewis at [phone], extension
539, so that we can remove the case from the schedule. Please make your check payable to the
DVartment of Environment and Natural Resources and reference the case number. Send payment
within 30 days of your receipt of this letter to the attention of. -
Mr. Steve Lewis
DWQ
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
If you are unable to attend on this date, please notify us at least 10 working days in
advance and your hearing will be rescheduled. Exceptions to the 10-day notice will be made in
the event of emergency situations. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free
to contact me at [phone], extension 539.
cc: Jim Mulligan, Washington Regional Office
File DV O1-029
Sincerely,
Steven C. Lewis

WA rIRQG Michael F. Easley
Governor
yWilliam G. Ross Jr.. Secretary s
>_ r-y Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
November 12, 2002
Dr. Fred Cunningham
Northeast Carolina Farms, Inc.
P. O. Box 865
Moyock, NC 27958
RE: Rescheduling of Request for Remission of Civil Penalty
Belcross Farm (Farm #15-11)
Camden County
Case Number DV 00-029
Dear Dr. Cunningham:
Your remission request hearing for the referenced civil penalty has been rescheduled for
December 12, 2002. I apologize for any inconvenience that the cancellation of the October
remissions hearing may have caused. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at
(9I9) 733-5083, extension 539.
Sincerely,
Steven C. Lewis
cc: Jim Mulligan, Washington Regional Supervisor
File # DV 00-029
NCDENR
Customer Service: Malling Address: telephone [phone] Location:
1-877-623-6748 1617 Mail Service Center Fax [phone] N. Salisbury St.
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699.1617 State Courier #52-01-01 Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
An EqualOppommfty/Affirmative Acdon Employer
50% recycled / 10 % post-cansumer paper
httpJ1Vo. enr state:r=us
_S.2--

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr-, Secretary
Gregory J. Thorpe, PhD., Director
Dr. Fred Cunningham
Northeast Carolina Farms, Inc.
P. O. Box 865
Moyock, NC 27958
Dear Dr. Cunningham:
f
NCDENR
NORTH CAROU A DORW TMENT oA'
Emmnommemr wno NeruRat ResouRces
April 5, 2002
RE: Rescheduling of Remission Conference
Belcross Farm
Farm # 15-11
Camden County
File #DV 00-029
Thank you for your call today regarding your schedule conflict with the April I 1 h
remission hearing. Your remission request has been rescheduled for the May 9, 2002 meeting_
will notify you by mail before that date to confirm. If you have any questions, please call rrie at
[phone], ext. 539.
Sincerely,
Steve Lewis
Non -Discharge Compliance & Enforcement
cc: Jim Mulligan, Washington Regional Supervisor
Lyn Hardison, WARO
File # DV 00-029
dlailingAddress: Telephone [phone]
1617 Mail Service Center Fax [phone]
Raleigh. North Carolina 27699-1617 State Courier #52-01-01
An Equal Opporrunity /Affirmarive Acrion Employer
50% renrled / 10% posy -consumer paper
hnp://7z2o. en aware. nc. us
Location:
512 N. Salisbury St.
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
5 -3

�0t0�
GJ r
luQchaet F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross Jr-, Secretary
Deparizrserrt of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek. P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
July 12, 2002
Dr. Fred Cunningham
Northeast Carolina Farms, Inc.
P. O. Box 865
Moyock, NC 27958
RE: Rescheduling of Request for Remission of Civil Penalty
Belcross Farm (Farm #15-11)
Camden County
Case Number DV 00-029
Dear Dr. Cunningham:
As we discussed this week, your remission request hearing has been rescheduled for
October 10, 2002. I will send you another letter before the meeting as a reminder.
Please forgive my oversight in omitting your case from this month's agenda. I'm sorry for
any inconvenience this may have caused you. If you have any questions, please feel free to call
me at [phone], extension 539.
Sincerely,
��� Z., z 4
Steven C. Lewis
cc: Jim Mulhean, Washington Regional Supervisor
File # DV 00-029
Customer Service: Mailing Address: Telephone [phone]
1-87 7-623-6748 1617 (Mail Service Center Fax [phone]
Raleigh. North Carolina T699-1617 State Courier #52-01-01
An Equal C'FperWniry/Aifimrative Action Employer
50 : recycled / 10% post -consumer paper
hMp '4h2o.enr sraatenc. us
�T
i1�L1
NCDEN.R
Location:
512 N. Salisbury St.
Raleigh. NC 27899-1817
or

`O�OF W A rFR pG Michael F. Easley
Ccvemor
co
r William G. Ross Jr.. Secretary
- i Department of Environment and Natural Resources
DU QL
A -C Alan W. )Gmek. P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
November 12, 2002
Dr. Fred Cunningham
Northeast Carolina Farms, Inc.
P. O. Box 865
Moyock, NC 27958
RE: Rescheduling of Request for Remission of Civil Penalty
Beicross Farm (Farm #15-11)
Camden County
Case Number DV 00-029
Dear Dr. Cunningham:
Your remission request hearing for the referenced civil penalty has been rescheduled for
December 12, 2002. I apolo je ze for any inconvenience that the cancellation of the October
remissions hearing may have caused- If you have any questions, please feel free to call.me at
[phone], extension 539.
Sincerely,
Steven C. Lewis
cc: Jim Mulligan, Washington Regional Supervisor
File # DV 00-029
NCDEN'R
Customer Service: Mailing Address: Telephone [phone] Location:
1-a77-623-6743 1617 Mail Service Center Fax [phone] N. Salisbury St.
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-161: State Courier #52-ot-ot Raleigh, NO 27659-1617
An Equal CFper:undy/A'SmMHve Acffon Emplcyer
50 : recycled/ 10%Past-cor�sumerpaper
ht�11►t2o.enrstate.ncus

oF VkJ A rERpG
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
0 -'r Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
December 6, 2002
Dr. Fred Cunningham
Northeast Carolina Farms, Inc.
P. O. Box 865
Moyock, NC 27958
RE: Rescheduling of Request for Remission of Civil Penalty
Belcross Farm (Farm #15-11)
Camden County
Case Number DV 00-029
Dear Dr. Cunningham:
Your remission request hearing for the referenced civil penalty has been tentatively
rescheduled for February 13, 2003 due to the necessity of your attendance at the National Pork
Producers Council meeting on December 12th. When the Environmental Management
Commission's 2003 calendar is announced, I will notify you as to the exact date. ,If you have
any questions, please feel free to call me at [phone], extension 539.
Sincerely, ,
Steven C. Lewis
cc: Jim Mulligan. Washington Regional Supervisor
File # DY 00-029
17
A
NCDE+`,R
Customer Service. MaHing Address_ Telephone [phone] Location:
1-87-623-67-18 1617 Mail Service Center Fax [phone] N. Salisbury St.
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 State Courier 1152-01-01 Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
An Equal Gppdrtunity/Affiirmative Action Employer
50°a racycled / 10% past -consumer paper
hopJ/h2c. enr statexe. us
S�
r+

■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complet��
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. .-
VI
■ Print your name and address on the reversL
so that we can return the card to you..
■ Attach this card to the batik of the mailpiece, J Z-
or on the front if space permits.
1.AArticle Addressed to:
�1J�• (_-j
Nt 4 {'zQ4 Carv�t.�aJ
&0]
A)C. t9,)959
A. Received by (Please Print Clearfy) I B. pate of Delivery'
41>--
C 1gnature Ot�'
❑Agent
Mt ❑ Addressee
D. Is delivery address different em 17 ❑ Yes
If YES, enter delivery add Iaw: ❑ No
3. Se ce Type
i�ertified Mail ❑ Express Mail
❑ Registered ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise
❑ Insured Mail ❑ C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Fee) ❑ Yes
2. Article Number (Copy from service labeO
J �zo 6/15_ 3s�
PS Form 3811, July 1999 Domestic Return Receipt 102595.00•M-0952
a
rr'i
r�
Car,�ti2C -ed
P-v .
Fecec. c.e I w•e
RegL
t_3 Res:- -a Delwe�. zee
0 JEn=C Serrert Regt, r=z i
Q Total Postage & Fees S
17
S Recipient's Name a.se=rm Ca;". re .'cr._:e�?__. T3r1Q•
m
cr-
Er
............. ..............................
acry. care. .............•---.............--....._._.-_...
r�
Sao. Fetnwy 20M
157

0 WAr�RQG
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Department at Environment and Natural Resources
-9C Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
Dr. Fred Cunningham
Northeast Carolina Farms, Inc.
P. O. Box 865
Moyock, NC 27958
January 15, 2003
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
RE: Rescheduling of Request for Remission of Civil Penalty
Belcross Farm, (Farm #15-11)
Camden County
Case Number DV 00-029
Dear Dr. Cunningham:
This is to confirm that your remission request hearing for the referenced civil penalty has
been scheduled for February 13, 2003- The Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions will
convene immediately following the close of the regularly scheduled business meeting of the
Environmental 'Marlaaement Commission in the Ground Floor Conference Room of the
Archdale Building, 512 N. Salisbury St., Raleigh, North Carolina (see enclosed directions).
You should arrive no later than 11:00 a.m. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me
at [phone], extension 539.
Sincerely,
Steven C. Lewis
cc: Jim Mulligan. Washington Regional Supervisor
mile # DV 00-0?9:,
VXY
NCDEI`:R
Customer Service: Mailing Address: Telephone [phone] Location:
1.877.623-6748 1617 Mail Service Center Fax [phone] N. Salisbury$t.
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 State Courier #52.01-01 Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
An Equal Opportunity/Atrrmative Action Employer
50% recycled / 10% post -consumer paper
htrp:1/h2o.enrstate.nc. us
W
•

AGENDA ITEM: Request for Remission of Civil Penalty by
Jimmy McKenzie (PC 02-001)
Sampson County
EXPLANATION: On June 4, 2002, Dennis R. Ramsey, Assistant
Chief of the Non -Discharge Branch of the Water
Quality Section, Division of Water Quality,
pursuant to delegation by the Director of the
Division of Water Quality assessed a civil penalty
of $5,667.55 ($5,000.00 civil penalty and $667.55
investigative costs) against Jimm McKenzie for
violation of conditions of a permit required by
G.S. 143-215.1.
On September 26, 2002, Frankie McKenzie on
behalf of Jimmy McKenzie) requested remission
and waived the right to an administrative hearing
and stipulated that the facts were as alleged in the
assessment document.
.RECOMMENDATION: The Division of Water Quality opposes any
remission or mitigation of the penalty.
The recommendation is made for the following
reason:
1. The Director considered information
submitted in support of Jimmy McKenzie's
request for remission of civil penalties in
accordance with G.S. 143-215.6A(f) and his
delegation provided by the secretary and did
not find grounds to modify the assessment.
159

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
'Division of Water Quality
Mchael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Mr. Jimmy McKenzie
1137 White Oak Church Road
Clinton, NC 28328
Dear Mr. McKenzie:
NCD-ENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMIEW of
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
June 7, 2002
CERT.CFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
SUBJECT: Assessment of Civil Penalties for
Violation of Conditions of Animal
Waste General Permit
Farm # 82-650
Sampson County
File No. PC 02-001
This letter transmits notice of a civil penalty assessed against McKenzie Faun in the
amount of $5,667.55 which includes $667.55 in investigative costs. Attached is a copy of the
assessment document explaining this penalty.
This action was taken under the authority vested in me by delegation provided by the
Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources and the Director of the
Division of Water Quality. Any continuing violation(s) may be the subject of a new enforcement
action, including an additional penalty.
Within thirty days of receipt of this notice, you must do one of the following:
Submit payment of the penalty:
Payment should be made directly to the order of the Department of
Environment and Natural Resources (do not include waiver form).
Payment of the penalty will not foreclose further enforcement action for
any continuing or new violation(s).
Mailing Address: Telephone [phone]
1617 Mail Service Center Fax (919) 733-W59
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 State Courier #52-01-01
/a
. An Equal Opportunity /Affirmative Action Employer
50% recycled / 10% post -consumer paper
http://h2o. enr.state.nc. us
Location:
512 N. Salisbury St.
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
r

7
Please submit payment to the attention of:
Mr. Steve Lewis
NCDENR -
DWQ
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
OR
2. Submit a written request for remission or mitigation including a detailed
justification fdr such request:
A request for remission or mitigation is limited to consideration of the
_ reasonableness of the amount of the penalty and is not the proper procedure for
contesting the accuracy of any of the statements contained in the assessment
letter. Because a remission request forecloses the option of an administrative
hearing, such a request must be accompanied by a waiver of your right to an
administrative hearing and a stipulation that.there are no factual or legal issues in
dispute. You must execute and return to this office the attached waiver and
stipulation form and a detailed statement which you believe establishes whether:
(a) one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in G.S. 143B-282.1(b)
were wrongfully applied to the detriment of the petitioner;
(b) the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting
from the violation;
(c) the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident;
(d) the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations;
(e) payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining
necessary remedial actions.
Please submit this information to the attention of:
Mr. Steve Lewis
NCDENR
DWQ
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
OR
Submit a written request for an administrative hearing:
If you wish to contest any portion of the civil penalty assessment, you must
request an administrative hearing. This request must be in the form of a written
petition to the Office of Administrative Hearings and must conform to Chapter
150B of the North Carolina General Statutes. You must file your original petition
with the: 1 /

f'
Office of Administrative Hearings
6714 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Caiolina 27699-6714
AND
Mail or hand -deliver a Copy of the petition to:
Mr. Dan Oakley
NCDENR
Office of General Counsel
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1601
Failure to exercise one of the options above within thirty days, as evidenced by a date
stamp (not a postmark) indicating when we received your response, will result in this matter
being referred to the Attorney General's Office with a request to initiate a civil action to collect
the penalty. Please be advised that additional assessments may be levied for future violations
which occur after the review period of this assessment.
If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Steve Lewis at [phone], ext. 539 or
Ms. Linda Fitzpatrick at [phone], ext. 526.
Sincerely,
ex�
Dennis R. Ramsey, P.E.
Assistant Chief
Non -Discharge Branch
ATTACHMENTS
cc: Paul Rawls, Fayetteville Regional Supervisor w/ attachments
Bob Heath, FRO w/ attachments
File # PC 02-001 w/ attachments
Central Files w/ attachments
Public information Officer w/ attachments
C/o 47

i
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
COMMISSION
COUNTY OF SAMPSON
IN THE MATTER OF ASSESSMENT ) WAIVER OF RIGHT TO AN
OF CIVIL PENALTIES AGAINST ) ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING AND
PERMIT NO. AWG100000 ) STIPULATION OF FACTS
FILE NO. PC 02-001
Having been assessed civil penalties totaling $5,66755 ^�
for violation(s) as set forth in the assessment document of the Division of Water Quality dated,
June 4.2002 , the undersigned, desiring to seek remission of the -
civil penalties, does hereby waive the right to an administrative hearing in the above -stated
matter and does stipulate that the facts are as alleged in the assessment document.
This the day of , 2002.
ADDRESS
TELEPHONE
SIGNATURE

t
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF SAMPSON -
IN THE MATTER OF
JIMMY MCKENZIE
FOR VIOLATIONS OF CONDITIONS
OF THE NON -DISCHARGE
GENERAL PERMIT AWG100000
NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND
NATURAL RESOURCES
File No. PC 02-001
}
}
FINDINGS AND DECISION
AND ASSESSMENT OF
CIVIL PENALTIES
Acting pursuant to delegation provided by the Secretary of the Department of
Environment and Natural Resources and the Director of the Division of Water Quality, I, Dennis
R. Ramsey, Assistant Chief of the Non -Discharge Branch of the Water Quality Section of the
Division of Water Quality (DWQ), make the following:
I_ FINDINGS OF FACT:
A. Jimmy McKenzie owns and. operates McKenzie Farm, a swine operation in
Sampson County.
B. Jimmy McKenzie was issued Certificate of Coverage AWS820650 under General
Permit AWG 100000 for McKenzie Farm on March 26, 1999, effective March 26,
1999, with an expiration date of April 30, 2003.
C. Condition II. I. of the issued permit states "The collection, treatment, and storage
facilities, and land application equipment and fields shall be maintained at all
times and properly operated."
D. On April 21, 1998, staff with the Division of Soil and Water Conservation
(DSWC) inspected the McKenzie Farm and noted in the inspection report "Need
to address spray field conditions (Water-Ponding Problem)."
E. On September 3, 1998, staff with DWQ inspected the McKenzie Farm and noted
in the inspection report "The spray field has a problem with standing water due to
no drainage outlet. Need to consult with a drainage expert for correction action."
MA
W

F. On or about September 14, 1998, DWQ sent a Notice of Deficiency to Jimmy
McKenzie regarding the September 3rd inspection that stated in part "It was
observed that the waste application field has a severe drainage problem with water
ponded in approximately25 percent of the field. ... The inspection revealed that
the waste application field is depressional in the center resulting in water standing
approximately 12 inches in depth. ... It is strongly recommended that you
contact a technical specialist for assistance concerning the deficiencies noted
above."
G. On April 22, 1999, DSWC staff inspected the McKenzie Farm and noted in the
inspection report "After talking with Sampson Soil and Water Conservation about
the field drainage problems, they stated they had no plans in the works for
repairing the drainage in the spray field. This part of the field was standing in
water and the fescue was non existent."
H. On September 24, 1999, DSWC staff inspected the McKenzie Farm and noted in
the inspection report "Spray fields have had water ponding problems for the last
two or three years. Severe competition with other grasses and weeds noted in
spray field. Contact NRCS for assistance with spray field issue."
I. On December 30, 1999, DWQ staff inspected the McKenzie Farm and noted in
the inspection report "The wet area in spray field takes up quite a few acres that
can't be sprayed on."
J. On February 2, 2000, DWQ staff inspected the McKenzie Farm and noted in the
inspection report "Spray field was saturated in some areas."
K. On July 11, 2000, DSWC staff inspected the McKenzie Farm and noted in the
inspection report "Spray field has a severe drainage problem."
L. On November 29, 2000, DWQ staff inspected the McKenzie Farm and noted in
the inspection report "The farm has an area in the waste application field (approx.
3 to 4 acres) that has standing water year round that has not been addressed."
M. On January 9, 2001, DWQ staff inspected the McKenzie Farm and noted in the
inspection report "At the time of this inspection a thorough inspection of waste
application field was conducted due to evidence of recent waste application. Due
to difference between lagoon levels observed Jan 2 2001 and Jan 9, 2001 of
approximately 3 inches which egtWs approximately 326,160 gallons. Waste was
ponded in the field in several areas, in addition to a ponded area." Staff also
observed wastewater in the diversion ditch between the lagoon and spray field as a
result of a leak at the pump or pump connection to the subsurface system.
N. On April 3, 2001, DSWC staff inspected the McKenzie Farm. It was noted in the
inspection report "The irrigation hookup at the lagoon appears to be leaking
during irrigation events. The waste looks to be running toward the spray field.
&5

r�
Make sure to repair this hookup. Waste was ponded around this area." It was
also noted that "During a revisit to the farm on 4-5-01 and 4-6-01, there was waste
standing in a large majority of the spray field behind the lagoon. DWQ was called
and notified on 4-6-01 of the ponding waste in the spray field. ... The fescue
stand was very poor due to a large majority of the spray field being under water.
This has been noted for several years."
O. Condition No. 1. 2. of the General Permit incorporates by reference the Certified
Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP) for a facility and states that any
violation of the CAWMP shall be considered a violation of the general permit.
P. A waste utilization plan (WUP) is a required component of an animal waste
management plan in accordance with G.S. 143-215.10C(e). An approved animal
waste, management plan certification including a waste utilization plan (WUP) for
McKenzie Farm was received by DWQ on or about August 11, 1995.
Q. The WUP for McKenzie Farm states in part "Do not apply waste on saturated
soils or on land when the surface is frozen."
R. On April 6, 2001, DWQ staff inspected the McKenzie Farm as a result of
notification from DSWC staff. DWQ staff noted in the inspection report "Site
visit to farm after Trent Allen referred farm for failure to meet on two (2)
occasions for operation review. At the time of inspection an unknown individual
was setting up irrigation on a saturated field. Returned at 3:30 PM to observe
irrigation in process. No run-off observed. Returned at 6:30 to observe
wastewater ponded over the majority of the sprayfield where irrigation occurred
and wastewater was running off the sprayfield into a pond area (approx. 8 acres).
This area (pond) is dammed at the property line and discharges into a canal (blue
line stream). (see pictures). A walk of the waste application fields found
wastewater ponded over the majority of fields. Wetland plants were observed in
several areas of the sprayfields (see pictures)."
S. On April 9, 2001, DWQ staff collected water samples from the area of ponded
wastewater in the sprayfield and from the, wastewater runoff from the spray field
to the ponded area. Laboratory analysis determined that the ponded wastewater
contained 22,000 fecal coliform colonies per 100 milliliters. and the wastewater
runoff sample contained 440 fecal coli form colonies per 100 milliliters.
T. On or about April 18, 2001, DWQ sent -a Notice of Violation/Notice of Intent
(NOV/NOI) to Jimmy McKenzie. The notice stated in part "During the follow-up
inspection on January 9, 2001, the waste application fields were observed to have
waste water ponding from a recent irrigation event. ... The waste application
fields have been observed, over the past four (4) years, to have a Iarge area (6 to 8
acres) with ponded waste and surface water which is unsuitable for waste
,application."
wza.

r
U. Condition No. M. 2. of the issued permit states in part "Waste lagoon and storage
pond level shall be recorded weekly on forms supplied or approved by the DWQ."
V. On November 29, 2000; and April 9, 2001, DWQ staff inspected the McKenzie
Farm. The facility did not have weekly waste lagoon level records on appropriate
forms.
W. In the NOV/NOI dated April 18, 2001 (item T above), DWQ requested that a copy
of the waste lagoon level records from January 1, 2000 to April 18, 2001 be
submitted to the Fayetteville Regional Office before April 27, 2001. Mr.
McKenzie did not respond to this request.
X. Condition No. III 3. of the issued permit states "A representative Standard Soil
Fertility Analysis, including pH, copper, and zinc, shall be conducted annually on
each application field receiving animal waste. The results of these tests shall be
maintained on file by the Permittee for a minimum of three years and shall be
made available to the DWQ upon request."
Y. Condition No. M. 5. of the issued permit states "Records, including land
application events and removal of solids to an off -site location(s) records, shall be
maintained by the Permittee in chronological and legible form for a minimum of
three years. These records shall be maintained on forms provided or approved by
the DWQ and shall be readily available for inspection."
Z. On December 30, 1999, DWQ staff inspected the McKenzie Farm. DWQ
requested copies of the waste lagoon levels, soil test results, and land application
events. These records were not readily available for review.
:4.A. On or about June 25, 2000, DWQ sent a letter to the McKenzie Farm requesting
that copies of the facility's required records (lagoon levels, irrigation records, soil
test results, etc.) be submitted to the Fayetteville Regional Office before duly 5,
2000. Mr. McKenzie did not respond to this request.
BB. In the NOV/NOI dated April 18, 2001 (item T above), DWQ requested that a copy
of the facility's irrigation records from January 1, 2000 to April 18, 2001 be
submitted to the Fayetteville Regional Office before April 27, 2001. Mr.
McKenzie did not respond to this request.
CC. On October 24, 2001, DWQ staff inspected the McKenzie Farm. Waste lagoon
levels and soil test results were not available.
DD. Condition No. V. I of the issued permit states in part that "The maximum waste
level in lagoons/storage ponds shall not exceed that specified in the Certified
Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP). At a minimum, maximum waste
level for lagoons/storage ponds must not exceed the level that provides adequate
storage to contain the 25-year, 24-hour storm event plus an additional one (1) foot
of structural freeboard."
9-0

EE. The 25-year, 24-hour storm event for the facility's location is between six and
one-half (6.5) and seven (7) inches according to National Weather Service, Vol
Technical Paper 40, Rainfall Frequency Atlas of the United States, 1961.
FF. Based on a 25-year, 24-hour storm event of six and one-half (6.5) inches and one
foot of required structural freeboard, the waste level in the lagoon for the
McKenzie Farm shall not exceed eighteen and one-half (18.5) inches.
GG. DWQ staff inspected the McKenzie Fans on September 5, 2000 and January 2,
2001 and observed the waste levels of the lagoon to be 17.5 inches and 18 inches,
respectively, which exceeded the level specified in the CAWMP.
HH. Condition No. 1I1.6. of the issued permit states that "The Perrrtittee shall report by
telephone to the appropriate Regional Office as soon as possible, but in no case
more than 24 hours following first knowledge of the occurrence of any of the
following events: ... e. Failure to maintain storage capacity in a lagoon/storage
pond greater than or equal to that required in Condition V. (3) of the issued
permit."
11. The Fayetteville Regional Office had not received notification from the McKenzie
Farm that the waste level exceeded the level specified in the CAWMP within 24
hours of either date noted in item FF above.
JJ. Condition No. V. 2. of the issued permit states "The Permittee shall designate a
certified animal waste management system operator to be in charge (OIC) of the
animal waste management system. The animal waste management system shall
be operated by the OIC or a person under the OIC's supervision."
KK. During the inspections on April 22, 1999, December 30, 1999, July 11, 2000, and
April 3 and 6, 2001, DSWC and DWQ staff noted that there was no certified OIC
for the farm.
LL. On or about February 21, 2001, Mr. McKenzie was notified by letter from the
Technical Assistance and Certification Unit of DWQ that the designated operator
for the farm was no longer certified. A response was requested by April 1, 2001.
Mr. McKenzie did not respond to this request.
MM. According to DWQ records, no certified operator in charge of the animal waste
management system is designated at the McKenzie Farm as of April 19, 2002.
NN. The costs to the State of the enforcement procedures in this matter totaled
$667.55.

r
'' Based upon the above Findings of Fact, I make the following:
II. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW:
A. Jimmy McKenzie is a "person" within the meaning of G.S. 143-215.6A pursuant
to G.S. 143-212(4).
B. A permit for an animal waste management system is required by G.S. 143-215.1.
C. The above -cited failures to maintain land application equipement and fields
violated Condition No. II. 1. of General Permit No. AWG100000.
D. The above -cited application of waste to saturated soils violated Condition No. 1. 2.
of General Permit No. AWG 100000.
E. The above -cited failures to record waste lagoon levels on appropriate forms
violated Condition No. M. 2. of General Permit No. AWG100000.
F. The above -cited failures to make available a representative Standard Soil Fertility
Analysis violated Condition No. M. 3. of General Permit No. AWG100000.
G. The above -cited failures to make available records of land application events
violated Condition No. III. 5. of General Permit No. AWG100000.
H. The above -cited failures to maintain the liquid level in the lagoon at the level
specified in the CAWMP violated Condition No. V. 3. of General Permit No.
AWG100000.
I. The above -cited failures to report by telephone to the appropriate Regional Office
as soon as possible, but in no case more than 24 hours following first knowledge
of the occurrence of failure to maintain storage capacity in a lagoon/storage
greater than or equal to that required in Condition V. 3. of the General Permit
violated Condition No. III. 6. e. of General Permit No. AWG100000:
J. The abovd-cited failures to designate a certified animal waste management system
operator to be in charge (OIC) of the animal waste system violated Condition No.
V. 2. of General Permit No. AWG100000.
K. Jimmy McKenzie may be assessed civil penalties pursuant to G.S. 143-
215.6A(a)(2) which provides that a civil penalty of not more than ten thousand
dollars ($10,000.00) per violation may be assessed against a person who violates
or fails to act in accordance with the terms, conditions, or requirements of a
permit required by G.S. 143-215.1.
L. The State's enforcement costs in this matter may be assessed against Jimmy
McKenzie pursuant to G.S. 143-215.3(a)(9) and G.S. 143B-282.1(b)(8).
6Q

A
M. The Assistant Chief of the Non -Discharge Branch of the -Water Quality Section,
Division of Water Quality, pursuant to delegation provided by the Secretary of the
Department of Environment 'and Natural Resources and - the Director of the
Division of Water Quality, has the authority to assess civil penalties in this matter.
Based upon the above Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, I make the following:
III. DECISION:
Jimmy McKenzie is hereby assessed a civil penalty of:
$� O
for violating Condition No. II.- 1. of General Permit No.
AWG100000 by failing to maintain land application
equipment and fields
$ 000
for violation of Condition No. I. 2. of General Permit No.
AWG100000 by applying waste to saturated soils
$ S o O
for of two violations of Condition No. III. 2. of
General Permit No. AWG100000 by failing to record waste
lagoon levels on appropriate forms
$ O b
for of three violations of Condition No. III. 3. of
General Permit No. AWG100000 by failing to make
available a Standard Soil Fertility Analyses
$ .
for (_ of three violations of Condition No. III. 5. of
General Permit No. AWG100000 by failing to make
available land application records
$
for % of two violations of Condition No. V. 3. of
General Permit No. AWG 100000 by failing to maintain the
liquid level in the lagoon at the level spedified in the
CAWMP
$ -Sa D for / of two violations of Condition No. M. 6. e. of
General Permit No. AWG100000 by failing to report the
failure to maintain storage capacity in a lagoon/storage
greater than or equal to that required in Condition V (3) of
the General Permit
M

ft
$ �` for violating Condition No. V. 2. of General Permit No.
AWG 104000 by failing to designate a certified animal
waste management system operator to be in charge (OIC)
of the animal waste system
$ 667.55
$ S. �G7.SS
Enforcement costs
TOTAL AMOUNT DUE
As required by G.S. 143-215.6A(c), in determining the amount of the penalty I considered
the factors listed in G.S. 143B-282.1(b), which are:
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to the public
health, or to private property resulting from the violation;
The duration and gravity of the violation;
The effect on ground or surface water quantity or quality or on air quality;
The cost of rectifying the damage;
The amount of money saved by noncompliance;
Whether the violation was committed willfully or intentionally;
The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with programs
over which the Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority;
and
The cost to the State of the enfgNement procedures.
a- C2,2
(Date)
AJ�71�1 La11L 41JJL1
Non -Discharge Branch
Water Quality Section
Division of Water Quality
Il

Ln
TZI
s
.a
Ln
r4
C,7
O
C7
O
r+T
rr
Ir
_ I r O@tmalK
Return Fieceict Foe I Here
IEnoorsement Pecuirecl
Restricted Deliven, Fe
(Endorsement ckecuiredl
Total Postage 5 Fees
' e !Please Prn! +r (to C m lered by rle.•;
A
•� _
$treE : e:p:. i•'C.: Cf GO -n (JLl y-ti -�
l 7ti.._. iG-------------!
Cityy$t�,F-,
�................ k i
jl'

NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
Violator: Jimmy McKenzie
County:Sampson Case Number: PC 02-001
Permit Number: AWS820650
ASSESSMENT FACTORS
1) The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to the public health, or
to private property resul ' g from the violation;
( )not significant ( toderately significant ( )significant { )very significant
( )extremely significant
2)
The duration and gravity of the violation;
( )not significant ( )moderately significant
(ificant
( )very significant
( )extremely significant- -
-
3}
The effect on ground ors ace water quantity or quality or on air quality;
( )not significant ( oderateiy significant
( )significant
( )very significant
( )extremely significant
4)
of rectifying the damage;
ThKotossitgnificant
( )moderately significant
( )significant
( )very significant
( )extremely significant
5)
The amount of money saved by noncompliance;
( )not significant ( )moderately significant
{ significant
( )very significant
( )extremely significant
6)
Whether the violation was committed willfully or inte(tonally;
( )not significant ( )moderately significant
( ignificant
( )very significant
( )extremely significant
7) The prior record of the violator in complying or failing t omply with programs over
which the Environmental Management Commission Ihds regulatory authority; and
( )not significant ( )moderately significant ( significant ( )very significant
( )extremely significant
$) The cost to the State of enforcement procedures.
( )not significant ( moderately significant ( )significant ( )very significant
( )extremely significant
Date Dennis R. Ramsey, P.E.
REMISSION FACTORS
(} Whether one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors were wrongly applied to the
detriment of the petitioner;
(} Whether the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting from
the violation;
{) Whether the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident;
O Whether the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations; and
O Whether payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining necessary
remedial actions.
Date .
-�73 1-

DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
February 11, 2002
MEMORANDUM/'�
TO: Jeff Poupart
Non-Disch a Compliance ;;��. A ';,•
.Y
THRU: Paul Rawls
_ 'Ffa
Water Qualry egi al Supervisorrrce
:
Fayetteville Regional ffice
FROM: Robert F. Heath
Environmental Specialist II
Fayetteville Regional Office
SUBJECT: Enforcement Package
Mckenzie Farm
Facility No. 82-650
Sampson County
Please find enclosed a fast track enforcement package pertaining to the discharge of
animal waste at the subject facility.
Thank you for your cooperation regarding this matter. If you have any further questions
or need clarification on any of the details, please contact me.

1. Date of . • . -N•. ••. December 30.1-99.9.-Febru= 2.2000. September
.. rl 1. Oclobtr 24,rl
2. Regional Office: Fayetteville, �Yalgr Quillity Section
3. Name of Owner Of Property: Jimmy 1�i g =ie (Copy of Deed atiKhed)
5. • •. White Oak Churchi•.•
Clinton,
7. Description of Facility Location, Map excerpt attached.
Travel from Clinton on Highway 24 West to Bonnettsville. turn right on SR1233. go
=12roximately four miles to the intersection with SR1322,_turn Eight and farm on the rLgl
gpp� roximately one-half milt.
8. Date this facility began operation: The farm has been in full operalign since I W
9. Date of last expansion: Not Qp 'cable
10. Has the facility registered with DWQ?• YES-X NO_
If yes, date of registration 11/24193
11. Does the facility have an approved Animal Waste Management Plan YES NO_
Is one required? YES NO_
Date Approved: -March 13, 1996
12. Has this facility received a CAFO Designation? YES_ NO X
If yes, date issued:
13. Type,of Operation: Swine, Eeederto,Finis
h
14. - Number and type of livestock: The- facil' js-designed and_permitted foz4825 hogs per cycle.
15. Length of time animals have been, are, or will be stabled, or confined and fed or maintained
in any 12 month period. TwQlyg(12) mollihs.

16. Are crops, pasture, or post harvest residues sustained in the normal growing season over any
portion of the lot or facility? -y_e5. the farm was designgdjo have approximately acre _gf
land on which to apply The c-ertified waste management plan calls.for a fescue crop
.At the time of the inspprtion,_E=e portions of the snt'ay f jds had a wheat or rye crop
overseeded _over fescue. Approximately -acres, is inundated with a. combination of
wastewater_arid surface water.
{a M10bra • i oil !_ a !•a !• U-� !•u j•a • r • !
•••rITMIOMP•a•r !r arr.• • •! ••••r ! •u r r
18. Description of other animal operations in immediate vicinity and proximity to same or other
surface waters: It was noted that no swine farm are located in the immediate vi.ciinity,
Kettrell Siricklannd-Q=tes_a_swine farm locate approximately one (1) mile South from the
wasteMcKenzie Farrn-facilit�. Ibis facility app&5
McKenzie Farm facility application site.
19. Proximity of facility to neighboring houses, wells, etc.: It was noted that.several resideuces
are locate approximately 200 feet from the south portion of the waste application
fj Ids.
20. Approximate depth of ground water table in the area of the facility or discharge: Ljnknown
21. Proximity of facility to surface waters: Facility (edge of lagoons) s located
approximately 50 feet from a manmade ditch (canal) flowing to surface, waters, dilien.
the waste application fields are adjacent to the canal.
22. Animal waste discharged. Swine
pollutants23. Are discharged in the waters of the State? N-Q
If so, how? Eyvj�ence gf prior discharges haye been observe-d- njimerous times duling
inspections by identif�dag Vgnded WastCWajer gd.jgrCH=he cgnal Md below a small dam -
created by the gwrier. This dam resulted in ponded fresh water and waslewater in the
g2rayfield that flg2dgd:gpproximately-4 -to 6 acres -of the -waste applicatign field. -WasWwater
was observed elitering this floQded area gf the yzaste-al2plication field D-n-at least tw
gccasions.rrrl a i- Hurricant Floyd and again •! April. tl r •
h •
2
-26

r
between24. Do or have discharges occurred in response to a storm event less severe than the 25-year,
hour storm? NP.-The &gilily was observed to ha-ve -appled-wastg tg a wage appligation field
Janu= _ 2001 and Janu= '. 2001 resulti .plication .l! ••1.+ 1g 1
1+1! a ggnal ditch that connectsto g bjj& linett •1 •# ' 2001 due IQ •!t• •
waste in a eroded channel that discharizes into the canj] ditch, In addilion- the lagoon I "yj
on January 2. 2QQ1 was observed to be less than tbf,.=-uired 22 inches of freeboard as
required by the lagoon design for this fagility. The lagoQti lgvel on Januga 2. 2001 was 18
inches,
25. What is the degree and 'extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to public health,
or to private property resulting from the violation?: The discharge has caused the
introduction of nutrients into the receiving surface waters, that will cause or add to the
possibility of algal blooms and accelerated eutrophication of the slow moving waters of the
pond. Also, samples taken indicate elevated fecal coliform levels in the pond.
Sample results:
,11. • , +1 . • # • a •ut _ C•� �, :.i111.1
•_ - W1 A/_•_• 00100my 1 11#
2. Pond-ID#01 WE42432
440
9
J.2 3.1
***PLEASE SEE ATTACHED
COMPLETE
LAB
RESULTS
AND PHOTOGRAPHS FOR MORE INFORMATION***
1
f! ...! + t+-
R41TWITMET1
If
+ !•
1 t o
iI •
Dr. M.A.
Carolina
Agrigulture
based
commen15+It
1{
o!North
Doartment
of
-on
26. What is the duration and gravity of the violation?:
Ll��i�i111 - . • 1 �L•-Z�ij{�sri{�fi��.Y�+�i1i11[•�'lilll��i��f�6�+I�9�[i�lii��I•�t�•Y+�!{��711 - - - t
3
-177

28. What is the cost of •. 1_,s• , The writer observed
removal of all wata and drainin2 of this area to include the removal of tht-dam adiggent to
1" coal, There has been 1• p•l of dgwn=garn imlaacts • •' the are�-of,
investilzatiolL
29. What is the amount of money saved by noncompliance?: Based on obsmations madC
during the ii3yeatigations. the -cost savings to co=rt the field drainage aad land planing of
jhp waste application fidds I ' - irface water drainage is significant. -In addition.
thC $oils -in the field are heamy clay -and needing --aaalban dur, to compaction fromjt&
livestgck that are Maintained •} jhp•
1. Was the violation committed willfully or f
i
Explain: Although it does S99M I lat theirfigatioi3 eQuipment operator should havr, ingreased
l s.•.. th' la f 1 !. , ..,� •s :.}�.. r 11 1-f surface
Thedid not ! 1! haytjUmified=rator
which probably contributed to the 12r-Qblem-due to lack of Imowledge al3d training,
31. What is the prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with programs over
which Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority?: The McKenzie
Fad- have been uncooperative with the DWQ and the D-S&W overAhe past five (5) years.
with n4__imprQvements during the period. The ,&11owing_is an abbreviated- list of the
deficiencies and, violations observed by this ages;
IM
1. The CAWMP does not include maps of the waste application fields.
2. The waste application fields have not been harvested and no livestock are on site.
3. No irrigation equipment was available at the time of inspection.
IM
I. The waste application field has a depressional area with standing (ponding) which
requires correction to prevent future discharges.
2. The waste application fields have a poor stand of fescue in several areas and the soil is
compacted and needs aeration.
3. Weekly lagoon levels are required to be maintained.
4. Need a map of the waste application fields with irrigation set ups for record keeping.
I&S!A
Lagoon level was at 14 inches and farm was irrigating on a flooded field.

December 1999
1. Need technical assistance to address large wet area in application field. This area takes
up several acres.
2. Need to work on weeds in the application field.
3. Need to put a copy of the General Permit and COC in the box at the farm.
4. Need to take soil samples once a year. Need to keep waste analysis samples current.
5. No irrigation records were available on site.
6. There is no operator in charge listed for the facility.
1. 3une 26.2000, letter requesting irrigation records for completion of routine inspection
of 1999. Note: no response received from McKenzie Farm.
2. September 5_2000, iaeoon ev-aluation obsmed the freeboard at 1.55 inches which is less
3. September 12. 2000, NOV/NQIe a" othe-required
4. November 29.2000
5. The farm has an area in the waste application field that has standing water year round that has
not been addressed.
6. Need to keep lagoon levels weekly on the approvdd form.
7. Need a copy of odor, insect, and mortality checklist.
2.QU
Januam2, 204L. lagoon evaluation observed the freeboard at 18 inches which is less than
the minimum of 22 inches required for this facility. (See Photo)
Janurary 9. 2001. reinspection conducted:
1. Lagoon had been lowered approximately 3 inches without a certified operator in charge.
2. Wastewater was ponded in fields and in a diversion ditch adjacent to the waste
application field.
April 6. 2001, Referral from the DS&W for failure to meet for inspection on two (2)
occasions and wastewater ponded in the waste application fields.
April 6.2001. site visit by DWQ
1. Irrigation equipment set up in front waste application field.
2. Inspector observed irrigation in process. Discharge of wastewater confirmed at 6:30 PM
into a wetland pond on -site. Wastewater ponded in this field and most areas of all waste
application fields. (See Photos).
April 2. 2001,
1. Wastewater was ponded in the waste application field and samples were collected.

r
32. What is the cost to the State for the enforcement procedures?:
Regional Costs are as follows:
Photo, film and developing:
$
6.00
Mileage: $0.23 per mile for 100 miles:
$
23.00
Fecal Colifoi-in ($25.00 per sample) * 2:
$
50.00
Ammonia ($14.00 per sample) * 2
$
28.00
TKN ($16.39 per sample) * 2
$
32.78
Nitrate/Nitrite ($18.37 per sample) * 2
$
36.74
Total Phosphorus (16.29 per sample) * 2
$
32.58
pH 403 (5.88 per sample) * 2
$
11.76
Robert Heath @ $ 20.01/hr
3 hours - Drive Time (two (2) trips) $ 60.03
1.5 hours - Investigation $ 30.01
8 hours - Report Development $ 160.08
hours 12.5 JO.Laj $ 250.12
John Hasty @ $19.77/hr
1.5 hours - investigation $ 29.65
Paul Rawls @ $ /hr
hours -1 =a1 j 31.87
Greg Thorpe - 1 hour (Supervisory Review) $
Central Office Review ' $ 100.00
Total $ 667.55
33. Type or general nature of business: Swine, feeder to Finish
• ' 1 • • 1 ' .
• 1 1 11 • • • . . 1
• •1} 1 • 1 • • lil •
1' • �• _ 11 • - 4 1 ! 1 • 11 1 " • • ! 7• • 1 1 • 1 • •! 1 • 11#111KI " •
1 • 1 •10 1 • • 1 • WPM* • ■ • 1 • / • 11 • 1 • 11 1 • 1
• •• i VIM • 1 • • • • "11 !- 1 -! 1 " 1l_ _ 111 : 1 11 = • 1
6

3i
-d arge the facility did not hgve an Operator -in Charge ftsignate-,&br-the facility. Higb
with this -facility Luling past site vi its -In addi�on, a review of the land apl2lication-recods for
2001 did 1. ! 1 sr., •1 fv-ent5 thatoccurred . 1 .1 .Qit ._!, .1 .3
.1. pmaibly fabscated with aleast two.1• 1 application events in 211 having heen
omitted,
35. Are there any Mitigating Circumstances?: NQ
36. Assessment Factors:
1Leif1 1 + 1 + 1 • 1 + ! • + : .1 + _!f 1
b. Receiving Stream: gice (Bye) Swa ._Clash"B -SW
c. Damage Yes ! No X (Based on observations at the time of the investigation)
If YES, include report from Wildlife Resources Commission.
37. Ineludea_eopy o any DeAgpation letter 5igned by the Director.
38. Recommendations Made to Owner/Operator:
l - Immediatt, y cease pgm�jng--waate on tothe _fields.
2- Take immediate action to prgvgnt any future discharge of waste,
3- Contact NRC to obtain technical assistance if necessary.
39. Recommendations for further DWQ Action:
- Notice of Violation Forwarded April IS, 2001)
_,.Enforcement Action
Reinspeclion
TA Mif
compliance _ 1 theirGeneral Permit numerous tip over 1= +e_ 1 d +i 1
land.wet area-where1 ,b. •1 :Ir . 01 1.d / ! pr+r converted.1�
MAW"
+ 11 -- • 1 +- • 1 1 _ 11 _+ 11 re Miai= Tlimmff• 11. 1 1 1- -1 MIN, R 1 1 '++1 e_1+ + •

ti
m D�

r1 t �;; r•''•l � r � s
� .-^.... � ���. - � .'.bait" w`� _ _ - "�+'Li �. "� •r. �.�., . -_.
I� 1i r 5 f
,,;'•.: ��~ SKr. :f .._ '' r�, ,
�.Jt.�rr K-'�i � + y`" �tll���'x��N ± � !'E 1.J'r�=;Y ti '•�, ; � ar�':�i,,iA •t ,
.'l•�i .t t;i�S� i1'Ts A�' n 4 1` }t r ;�' j:�, r r.
•''II x f 't!J`� t + �;I i •j1 i ffy`�••�• I 'A� � � ., }} I II � •"
T i �

�. r. - - ar ►n .,'� ,�.••, j`''-"jam;
r fIL-
i. � p fit( ��.E'.. f� r .�t� i. 1 � � ✓r .,.
r

• i •gam 1 t►' •'F iI4i4 i JY_\� '••R •"•`
s .i»•. 'Yl1 .IM �►'. ur lrwH.�.M i, 'S"'r.T�'�Gl'i'f:k'�..; +G -r.1 e<"' Nt '•�; �..' alai. �' , ..
a_i—
z —_ is '� ''�• fir;•.;: '` ^'',' ��L _ � = � '", -�

'IAA,
-lr ir
71,
A
A
4 6101

NCDENR
-North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Michael F. Easley, Governor William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
' - Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.
Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
November 19, 2001
U a t UkIV 4. 1.W 2 111 t
Mr. Jimmv McKenzie
1137 White Oak Church Road
Clinton, NC 28328
Subject:
McKenzie Farm
Facility No. 82 - 650
Permit No. AWS 820650
Sampson County
Dear Mr. McKenzie:
You are hereby notified that, having been permitted to have a non discharge permit for the subject animal
waste disposal system pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H .0217, you have been found to be in violation of your 2H
.0217 Permit.
On October 24, 2001 staff from the Fayetteville Regional Office of the Division of Water Quality
conducted an annual inspection of the McKenzie Farm located in Sainpson County: The inspections revealed
that the lagoon levels were not being maintained weekly as required by General Permit condition 111.2. which
states: "Waste lagoon and storage pond levels shall be recorded weekly on forms supplied or approved
by the DWQ." In addition, soil samples need to be collected within 365 days of the previous samples; and
the wettable acres determination had not been completed as required. Also, the irrigation records document
waste application occurred outside the crop windows designated in the CAWMP.
The Division of Water Quality requests that the following items be addressed:
1 Contact the local NRCS agency or a private company for assistance in conducting a Wettable Acres
Determination.
2. Begin immediately recording the lagoon freeboard level weekly as required by your General Permit.
3. Collect soil samples -annually as required by the General Permit.
4. Review the CAWMP for the correct application m indwxs for the fescue crop.
Failure to comply with the above conditions may result in the facility losing its General Permit and being
required to obtain an individual non discharge permit for the facil4.
-01
Fayetteville Regional Office
225 Green Street — Suite 714, Fayetteville, North Carolina 28301-5043
Phone: [phone]/FAX: [phone]ntemet: www.enr.state. usl�R
An Equal Opportunity l Affirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled 110% Post Consumer Paper

4
Page 2
McKenzie Farm -
November • 19, 2001
Please be advised that this notice does not prevent the Division of Water Quality from taking enforcement
actions for this violation for any pastor future -violations. Furthermore, the Division of Water Quality has
the authority to levy a civil penalh, of not more than $25.000.00 per day per violation.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact either myself or
]vir.Robert Heath; Environmental Specialist at [phone].
Sincerely.
Paul E. Rawls
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
RFH/ bh/ PER
CC.' Sonya Avant -Compliance Group
Wilson Spencer -Sampson Co. MRCS
Trent Allen-DSWC Favetteville Office
John Bizic-Murphy-Bro«n
Central Files -Raleigh
i

• North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural ResourcesLT
Division of Water Quality
1•f
� Fayetteville Regional Office
NCDENR
Michael F. Easley,Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
April I8, 2000I
Mr. Jimmy McKenzie
1137 White Oak Church Road
Clinton, NC 28328
SUBJECT: Notice of Violation/Notice of Intent
McKenzie Farris
Facility No. 82-650
Permit No. AWS820650
Sampson'County
Dear Mr. McKenzie:
You are hereby notified that, having been permitted to have a non discharge permit for the
subject animal waste disposal system pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H .0217, you have been found to be in
violation of your 2H .0217 Permit.
On November 29, 2000, January 2, 2001, January 9, 2001, April 9, 2001, staff from the
Fayetteville Regional Office of the Division of Water Quality, performed inspections of the McKenzie
Farm located in Sampson County. The inspections revealed that the lagoon levels were not being
maintained weekly as required by General Permit condition III.2. which states: "Waste lagoon and
storage pond levels shall be recorded weekly on forms supplied or approved by the DWQ". In
addition, on January 2, 2001, the lagoon level was observed to have less than the required freeboard
(18 inches) for the facility by General -Permit condition III.6.e. which states: "The Permittee shall
report by telephone to the appropriate Regional Office as soon as possible, but in no case more
than 24 hours following first knowledge of the occurrence of any of the following events: e.
Failure to maintain storage capacity in a lagoon/storage pond greater than or equal to that
required in Condition V(3) of this Permit." Also, the lagoon design calculations and as built plans or
drawings and checklist for insect, odor, and mortality were not available on the farm at the time of the
annual inspection. During the follow-up inspection on January 9, 2001, the waste application fields
were observed to have waste water ponding from a recent irrigation event. In addition, waste water
225 GREEN STREET - SUITE 7141 SYSTELBUILDING / FAYETTEVILLE. NC 29301-3443
PHONE [phone] FAX [phone] YOM ENR.STATF.NC-USIENRI
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% POST CONSUMER PAPER
DENR TOLL FREE HOTLINE: [phone]

Mr. McKenzie
April 18, 2001
Page 2
was ponded in the diversion ditch between the waste application field and the lagoon. The waste
application fields have been observed, over the past four (4) years, to have a large area (6 to 8 acres)
with ponded waste and surface water which is unsuitable for waste application. Due to the surface
water ponding, this farm is anticipated to have a shortage of suitable acreage for waste application.
Please conduct a wettable acres determination immediately. On April 6, 2001, the Division of Soil
and Water referred your facility to the Division of Water Quality for failure to meet for an inspection
and concerns observed at the time of the visit, primarily wastewater ponded in the spray fields. An
irrigation event was observed on April 6, 200I, at which time wastewater was observed again ponding
in the waste application field. The waste application fields were observed to have wastewater ponding
in all areas of the farm and several of these areas have what appeared to be wetland plants (cattails)
growing in the fields. In addition, the prevailing soil type (rains) is a clay soil with a shallow water
table and is believed to be compacted as a result of cattle grazing which has exacerbated the soil
infiltration problem. Also, the McKenzie Farm does not have an Operator in Charge (OIC) designated
as required.
The Division of Water Quality requests that the following items be addressed:
1. Contact the local NRCS agency or a private company for assistance in conducting a Wettable
Acres Determination.
2. Contact the local NRCS agency for a copy of the lagoon storage calculations and as built
drawings. Also, a copy of the checklist for insect, odor and mortality should be available from
this agency.
3. Begin immediately recording the lagoon freeboard level weekly as required by your General
Permit.
4. Submit an explanation of what occurred on April 6, 2001, that resulted in the discharge to the
pond adjacent to the waste application field as required by your General Permit.
5. Submit a copy of freeboard records from January 1, 2000 to April 18, 2001,
6. Submit a copy of the irrigation records from January 1, 2000 to April 18, 2001.
Failure to comply with the above conditions may result in the facility losing its General Permit
and being required to obtain an individual non discharge permit for the facility. Please be advised that
this notice does not prevent the Division of Water Quality from taking enforcement actions for this
violation or any past or future violation.

Mr. McKenzie
April 18, 2001
Page 3
You are hereby notified that based on the above information, the Fayetteville Regional Office
of the Division of Water Quality is considering forwarding recommendation to the Director for
consideration of enforcement for this violation. Furthermore, the Division of Water Quality has the
authority to levy a civil penalty of not more than $25,000.00 per day per violation.
If you have an explanation for these violations that you wish to present to this office, please
forward a detailed explanation, in writing, of the events noted and why you feel that this office should
not proceed with recommendation for enforcement. This response should be received by this office on
or before April 27.2001. .
Information provided to this office will be reviewed and if enforcement is still deemed
appropriate, your explanation will be forwarded to the Director with the enforcement package for his
consideration.
If you ave any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact either Mr
Bob Heath, Environmental Specialist, or me at 910-486-1541.
Sincerely,
Paul E. R wls
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
RFH:PERIbs
cc: Sonya Avant - Compliance Group
Wilson Spencer - Sampson County NRCS
Trent Allen - DSWC, Fayetteville Office
John Bizic - Murphy -Brown
Central Files - Raleigh
91

■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired. .
■ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
1. Article Ad47ssed to. -
Mr Jittuily McKenzie
1137 White Oak.Church Rd
Clintort NC 28328
82-650
2. Article Number from sece
7099 340 J011-1134rvil 588
A- Received by {Please Prfnt Clearly} B. Date of Delivery
/ o/z
C. Sign tune
X ❑ Agent
rli1.. A1Q'1 ❑ Addressee
D. Is delivery address different from item 17 ❑ Yes
If YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No
3. Service Type
XXCertfied Mail ❑ Express Mail
❑ Registered ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise
❑ insured Mail ❑ C.O.O.
14. Restricted Delivery? Xxfre Fee) ❑ Yes
102595.00•M•0952

V
,orth Carolina
.)epartment of En-vironment and Natural Resources
ater Pollution Control System Operator Certification Commission
lichael F. Easley, Governor
%illiam G. Ross Jr., Secretary
aleen H. Sullins, Chairman
February 2I, 2001
Jimmy McKenzie
1137 White Oak Church Road
Clinton NC 28328
SUBJECT: Designation of Operator in Charge
Farm Name: McKenzie Farm
Facility ID ": 82-650
County: Sampson
Dear Mr. McKenzie:
NCDENR
Senate Bill 12I7, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study Commission on Agricultural
Waste, was enacted by the 1996 North Carolina General Assembly. This legislation requires owner of a certified
operator for each animal waste management system that serves 250 or more swine, 100 or more confined cattle,
75 or more horses, 1,000 or more sheep, or 30,000 or more confined poultry with a liquid waste management
system.
Our records indicate that the operator designated as the Operator In Charge (OIC) for your animal waste
management system is no ]onner certified. Therefore, you must designate a properly certified animal waste
management system operator as the OIC for your facility. The enclosed designation form must be returned to this
office by April 1, 2001. This office maintains a list of certified operators in your area if you need assistance in
locating a certified operator.
Failure to designate a properly certified Operator in Charge for your facility is a violation of N.C.G.S. 90A-47.2
and 15A NCAC 8F .0201(a) and may result in the initiation of enforcement action. Please be advised that nothing
in this letter should be taken as resolving you of the responsibility and liability for any past or future violations for
your failure to have a properly certified Operator in Charge designated for your animal waste management system.
If you have questions concerning this matter, or if this office can be of further assistance, please call Beth
Buffington at [phone], extension 313.
Sincerely, -
Dwight Lancaster, Supervisor
Technical Assistance and Certification Unit '
Enclosure
cc: TAC Files
Non -Discharge Compliance/Enforcement Unit
Fayetteville Re-ionai Office
Central Files 2j
1618 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1618
Phone: 919 — 733-0026 1 FAX: 919 — 733-1338
AN EQUAL 0PP0RT1JrNrry %AFF1RNtATrVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/ 105%, POST CONSUMER PAPER

4CDENR
JAMES B. HUNT JR..
GOVERNOR.
PILL HOLMAN
SECRETARY
YERR T. STEVENS
DIRECTOR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
FAYeTTEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
September 12, 2000
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mr. Jimmy McKenzie
1137 White Oak Church Road
Clinton, NC 28328
Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION AND
RECOMMENDATION FOR ENFORCEMENT
Administrative Code 15A NCAC 2H .0217
McKenzie Farm
Facility No. 82-650
Sampson County
Dear Mr. McKenzie:
You are hereby notified that, having been permitted to have a non
discharge permit for the subject animal waste disposal system pursuant to 15A
NCAC 2H .0217, you have been found to be in violation of your 2H .0217 Permit.
On September 5, 2000, staff from the Fayetteville Regional Office of the .
Division of Water Quality conducted an inspection of your swine farm located
off SR 1322 in Sampson County. During that inspection it was noted that the
lagoon level was less than that required by your General Permit (Condition V,
item 3). In addition, the Division of Water Quality has not received notice of the
lagoon freeboard violation as required by your General Permit (Condition III, item
6, e.) which states, "failure to maintain storage capacity in a lagoon/storage
greater than or equal to that required in Condition V(3) of this General Permit."
1. Lower the lagoon level on the waste application fields as soon as
possible when weather conditions and field conditions are acceptable in
preparation of potential storms and maintain below the pump on level. In
addition, notify the DWQ at the address below when the required lagoon
freeboard has been re-established.
1000000F�7T�T
_i
225 GREEN STREET, SUITE 714 / SYSTEL EILD. FAYETTEVILLE. NORTH CAROLINA 28301-5043
PHONE [phone] FAX BIO-406-0707
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY ! AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 80% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER

Mr. Jimmy McKenzie
September 12, 2000
Page 2
The Division of Water Quality requests that the following items be addressed:
Failure to comply with the above conditions may result in the facility losing its General
Permit and being required to obtain an individual non discharge permit for the facility.
Please be advised that this notice does not prevent the Division of Water Quality from
taking enforcement actions for this violation or any past or future violation. Furthermore, the
Division of Water Quality has the authority to levy a civil penalty of not more than $25,000.00
per day per violation.
You are hereby notified that the Fayetteville Regional Office of the Division of Water
Quality is considering sending a recommendation for enforcement action to the Director of the
Division of Water Quality. The Recommendation concerns the failure of this farm to comply
with the proper operation and maintenance of the lagoon, monitoring and reporting
requirements, and the regional notification requirements of your General Permit.
If you have and explanation for this violation that you wish to present, please respond to
this office by September 29.2000. Your explanation will be reviewed and if an enforcement
action is still deemed appropriate, your explanation will be forwarded to the Director with the
enforcement package for his consideration.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact either
myself or Mr. Robert Heath, Environmental Specialist, at [phone].
i el ,
Paul : Rawls
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
cc: Wilson Spencer - Sampson Co. NRCS
Trent Allen - DSWC Fayetteville Office
Central Files - Raleigh
Garth Boyd - Murphy Farms
rm
r

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION -�+r��w.wrrlr N OF WATER QUALITY
NCDENRFAYETTEvILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
_ DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
�.iAMEG.9Y6-`HUNT JR}'�;%'�_'.
GOVERNOR
June 26, 2000
PIL1 HOLMANCERTIFIED MAIL
SECRETARY RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Mrs ,jimmy Mckenzie
(1lRECTOR � J
130 White Oak Church Rd.
Clinton, NC 28328
Dear Mrs. McKenzie:
-; On December 30, 1999, staff from the Fayetteville Regional Office
attempted to perform an inspection of the McKenzie Farm in Sampson County.
The visual inspection was completed with you however, you did not have any of
the paper work, as required, to complete the inspection.
The Division of Water Quality requests that you provide the Fayetteville
Regional Office with a copy of the farm's CAWMP and all required records and
documents (irrigation records, freeboard records, certifications, General Permit,
BMP's, etc.). These records are to be received by the Fayetteville Office on or
before July 5. 2000.
If you have any questions concerning this matter please feel free to contact
me at [phone].
Sincerely,
John C. Hasty, Jr.
~' = Environmental Specialist
GROUNDWATlR®
225 GREEN STREET, SUITE 714 / 8YSTIEL OLD. FAYETTEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 29301.5043
PHONE: [phone] FAX: [phone]
•;a!uri,. > .- AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 60% RECYCLED / 10% POST-CONiUMiR PAPER
a uyu DENR TOLL FREE HOTL3NE1 1.877.623.6748
-...'lii.`.r'�::,�'•:; is yi.

NCDENR
JAMEa B. HUNT JR:=
.GOI/E:RItOR 44
. • .
'v.
•WAYNE McoxvI-.Fr ..;�
56CRiTARY
rld�5•-
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
FAYETTEVILLE REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
September 14, 1998
Mr. Jimmy McKenzie
1137 White Oak Church Road
Clinton, NC 28328
SUBJECT: NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY
McKenzie Swine Facility
Registration No. 82-654
Sampson County
Dear Mr. McKenzie:
On September 3, 1998, staff from the Fayetteville Regional Office of the
Division of, Water Quality inspected the McKenzie swine facility. It was
observed that the waste application field has a severe drainage problem with
water ponded in approximately 25 percent of the field. In addition, the
fescue pasture has a poor to nonexistent stand in some areas. A written
record of weekly lagoon levels is required on all permitted facilities.
The inspection revealed that the waste application field is depressional in
the center resulting in water standing approximately 12 inches in depth. This
condition is not acceptable and could result in future discharges if
corrections are not implemented. It is strongly recommended that you
contact a technical specialist for assistance concerning the deficiencies noted
above.
Please notify this office in writing on or before October 15, 1998 at the
address below as to the actions taken or proposed to be taken to resolve this
deficiency. Nothing in this letter should be taken as absolving this facility of
the responsibility and liability of any violations that have or may result from
these deficiencies.
9'7'
225 GREEN STREET, SUITE 714, FAYETTEVILLE. !NORTH CAROLINA 20301-5042
PHONE [phone] FAX 01 O-4e8-0707
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /AF►IRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% R=CYCLED/10% PoST-CONiUMER PAPER

a
Nis. Jimmy McKenzie
Page 2
September I4,I998
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please call Bob Heath, at"(910) 486-154I.
Sincerely,
Step n A Barnhardt
Acting Regional Supervisor
cc: Operations Branch
Central Files
Audrey Oxendine - FRO DSW
Wilson Spencer - Sampson Co. MRCS

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Fayetteville Regional Office
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
e��
1DP."NFZ
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
May 12, 1997
Mr. Jimmy McKenzie
1137 White Oak Church Road
Clinton, NC 28328
SUBJECT: NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY
McKenzie Swine Facility
Registration No. 82-650
Sampson County
Dear Mr. McKenzie:
On May 6, 1997, staff from the Fayetteville Regional Office of the Division of Water
Quality inspected the McKenzie swine facility. It was observed that the Certified Animal
Waste Management Plan was not complete in that no maps of the property and the application
field were attached and no third party contract for waste application or no irrigation
equipment was available as required by the certification form on or before September 16,
1997.
The inspection revealed that the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan (CAWMP)
contained an exclusion for irrigation equipment purchase for up to 180 days after stocking
and that the application field was to be planted within that time frame. The CAWMP also is
calculated for graze and no cattle, sheep, or goats are in the application field. Based on this
information the facility should immediately comply with the CAWMP by installing irrigation
equipment to insure adequate storage is maintained in the lagoon. It is strongly recommended
that you contact a technical specialist for assistance concerning the deficiencies noted above.
Please notify this office in writing on or before June 6, 1997 at the address below as to
the actions taken or proposed to be taken to resolve this deficiency. Nothing in this letter
should be taken as absolving this facility of the responsibility and liability of any violations
that have or may result from these deficiencies.
Wachovio Bulldn0, Suite 714, FayetteWe �� FAX 91Q-4 "707
North Carollno 28301-5043 Nff C An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
Voice 910-486-1541 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Page 2
Mr. Jimmy McKenzie
May 12, 1997
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please call Ed Buchan or Bob Heath, at
(910) 48&1541.
Sincerely,
cc: Operations Branch
Central -Files
Audrey Oxendine - FRO DSW
Wilson Spencer - Sampson Co. " NRCS
,9a
Kerr T. Stevens
Regional Supervisor

W
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
COMMISSION
COUNTY OF SAMPSON
IN THE MATTER OF ASSESSMENT } WAIVER OF RIGHT TO AN
OF CIVIL PENALTIES AGAINST ) ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING AND
PERMIT NO. AWG100000 ) STIPULATION OF FACTS
FILE NO. PC 02-001
Having been assessed civil penalties totaling _ $5,667.55
for violation(s) as set forth in the assessment document of the Division of Water Quality dated,
June_4. 2002 ___, the undersigned, desiring to seek remission of the
civil penalties, does hereby waive the right to an administrative hearing in the above -stated
matter and does stipulate that the facts are as alleged in the assessment document.
This the 4x! _ day of , 2002.
ADDRESS
TELEPHONE
SIGNATURE

NN

r ic

��ot WA r�RQG Michael F. Easley
Governor
� William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
>_ Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alah W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
Mrs. Frankie McKenzie
1137 White Oak Church Road
Clinton, NC 28328
RE: Remission Request
McKenzie Farm
Farm # 82-650
Sampson County
File # PC 02-001
Dear Mrs. McKenzie:
October 18, 2002
r
This letter is to acknowledge receipt of your request for remission of the civil penalty Ievied
against the subject facility. This request will be reviewed, at the next scheduled conference on
December 4, 2002, and you will be notified about the Division's decision concerning remission.
If you have any questions, please call me at [phone], ext. 539.
Sincerely,
Steve Lewis
Non -Discharge Compliance & Enforcement
cc: Paul Rawls, Fayetteville Regional Supervisor w/attachment
Bob Heath, FRO Regional Office w/attachment
Central Files
File # PC 02-001 w/ 3 attachments
XPWI
NCD£NR
Customer Service: !Nailing Address: Telephone [phone] Location:
1-M-623-6748 1617 Mail Service Center Fax [phone] N. Salisbury St.
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 State Courier *52-01.01 Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
An Equal Opportunity IAfflm►afive Action Employer
50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper
http: I"o. snr. s fate. nc. us
/D411
r

Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
D Alan W. Mimak, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
Mrs. Frankie McKenzie
1137 White Oak Church Rd.
Clinton, NC 28328 -
Dear Mrs. McKenzie:
December 6, 2002
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
RE: Request for Rernission of Civil Penalty
Jimmy McKenzie Farm
Farm #82-650
Sampson County
File No. PC 02-001
In accordance with North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6A(f), I considered the information
you submitted in support of your request for remission and did not find grounds to modify the
civil penalty assessment of $5,667.55-
There are, two options available to you. You may pay the civil penalty assessment or you may
present your request for remission to the Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions of the
Environmental Management Commission. If you choose to pay the penalty, please make your
check nav_able to the Department of Environment and Natural Resources and reference the case
number. Send paymt nt within 30 days of your receipt of this letter to the attention of:
Mr. Steve Lewis
DWQ
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
You also have the option of presenting your request to the Committee on Civil Penalty
Remissions, which is comprised of members of the Environmental Management Commission.
You or your representative will be allowed approximately five minutes for your presentation. A
representative from the Division of Water Quality w-iIl present the case against remission. The
Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions will render a final and bindins decision in accordance
with NCGS 143B-282. I (c).
VXF
NCDEM
Customer Service: Mailing Address: Telephone [phone] Location:
1-877-623.6748 1617 Mail Service Center Fax [phone] N. Salisbury St.
Raleigh. North Carolina 27699.1617 State Courier #52-01 -01 Raleigh. NC 27699-1617
An Equal OFportunfty/AftBmairveAclion Employer
50% recycled / 10 : past -consumer paper
httpJ/h2o. enrstate.nc. us
10S

If you choose to present your request to the committee, please notify DWQ within 30 days of
receipt of this letter at the same address as above. Your request will be scheduled on the agenda
of the next scheduled committee meeting and you will be notified of the date and time. If a
response is not received by the Division regarding this notice, your request will be automatically
scheduled on the agenda for an upcoming committee meeting.
Thank you_ for your attention to this matter. If you would like a receipt that your check was
received, please send it via certified mail. Please contact Steve Lewis at [phone], ext.
539 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
AWKlscl
cc: Paul Rawls, Fayetteville Regional Supervisor
Bob Heath, FRO Region
File x PC 02-001
Central Files

09
n
Is Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
Item 4 N Restricted Delivery is desired.
H. Print your name and address on the reverse
so that We can return the card to you.
■ Attach this card to the back of the mail piece,
or on the front if space permits.
1. Article Addnm3ed to:
- �VI�S• �l�C'� ��..iE I I�C..�cr�'
A. Received by (Please Print Cleaq) ! 9/2tgpt.Qeliv�gr
C. Signgture - - [l��L-
/ ]� ❑ Agent
X �CGc.�-� ' J, �', - 0 Addressee
D. Is delivery address dMeren, f7orn item t? ❑ Yes
if YES, enter delivery address below: ❑ No
3. ServiC
er .,d Mail ❑ Express Mall
❑ Registered ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise
❑ Insured Mail ❑ C.O.D.
a. Restricted Delivery? (Extra Feel ❑Yes
2. Articl umber (C�Opy from service labeo
1j
PS Form 3811, July 1999 Domestic Return Receipt 102595 04•M 0952 #
pasta[ SeMce
CERTIFIED
r r
a
e, 1
cc r
ru
CO
I
Postage
S
cerzdiea Fee
Return `nece'el Fee
Ln
SEJecfserne•+t Reauiredl
Ras're:e= ::eiivery Fee
tEneer3ef. er^t RecLiredi
l
l�
O
Total Postage & Fees S
A + is Neme i 'ease'-•: ie.
••
} $tree.. i1=: .. of POCr—
• .:' ' 71.:._
�}-•�
o
r"
/6 7

warl�'RpG
r
� y
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
0 Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
. Division of Water Quality
January 15, 2003
Mrs. Frankie McKenzie CERTIFIED MAIL
1137 White Oak Church Rd.-. RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Clinton, NC 28328
SUBJECT: Request for Remission of Civil Penalty
Pursuant to N.C.G.S. 143-215.6A(f)
Jimmy McKenzie Farm
Sampson County
Case Number PC 02-001
Dear Mrs. McKenzie:
Your request for remission has been placed on the agenda for the February 13, 2003 meeting
of the Environmental Management Commission's Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions. The
Committee will convene immediately following the close of the regularly scheduled business
meeting of the Environmental Management Commission in the Ground Floor Conference Room
of the Archdale Building, 512 N. Salisbury St., Raleigh, North Carolina (see enclosed
directions). You should arrive no later than 11:00 a.m.
The factors to be considered by the Conunittee on Civil Penalty Remissions are whether:
(a) one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in G.S. 143B-282. I (b) were
wrongly applied to the detriment of the petitioner;
(b) the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting from the
violation;
(c) the violation was inadvertent or the result of an accident;
(d) the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations;
(e) payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining, necessary
remedial actions.
h1CDENR
Customer service: !Nailing Address: Telephone [phone] Location:
1-877-623-6748 1617 Mail Service Center Fax [phone] N. Salisbury St.
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699.1617 State Courier #52-01-01 Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
50% recycled / 10`5 post -consumer paper
h ttpYMc- enr. sta te. nc. us
/D �/
io-

4.
�., You or your representative will be allowed approximately five minutes for your presentation.
A representative from the Division of Water Quality will present the case against remission. The
Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions may remit none of the penalty, a part of the penalty, or
the entire penalty. The entire amount of the penalty can only be remitted when the violator has
not been assessed civil penalties for previous violations, and when payment of the civil penalty
will prevent payment for the remaining necessary remedial actions.
You also have the option of paying the civil penalty of $5,667.55 if you decide not to request
remission. if you choose to pay the penalty, please call Steve Lewis at [phone],
extension 539, so that we can remove the case from the schedule. Please make your check
vavable to the Devartment of Environment and Natural Resources and reference the case
number. Send payment within 30 days of your receipt of this letter to the attention of:
Mr. Steve Lewis
DWQ
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
If you are unable to attend on this date, please notify us at least 10 working days in
advance and your hearing will be rescheduled. Exceptions to the 10-day notice will be made
in the event of emergency situations. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please
feel free to contact me at [phone], extension 539.
cc: Paul Rawls, Fayetteville Regional Office
File PC 02-001
/a 9
Sincerely,
Steven C. Lewis

AGENDA ITEM: ja3- &:E Reduest for Remission of Civil Penalty by
Knightdale MHP Limited Partnership (LM 02-016)
Wake County
EXPLANATION: On July 31, 2002, Ken Schuster, Division of Water
Quality Regional Water Quality Supervisor for the
Raleigh Region, assessed a total penalty of $343.93
($300.00 civil penalty, plus $43.93 investigative
costs) against the Knightdale MHP Limited
Partnership for violations of NPDES Permit No.
NCO040266 and G.S_ 143-215. 1 (a)(6).
On September 4, 2002, Harvey Murphrey requested
remission and waived the Knightdale MHP Limited
Partnership's right to an administrative hearing and
stipulated that the facts were as alleged in the
assessment document.
RECOMMENDATION: The Division of Water Quality opposes any
remission or mitigation of the penalty.
The recommendation is made for the following
reason:
1. The Director considered information
submitted in support of the Kniahtdale MHP
Limited Partnership's request for remission
of civil penalties in accordance with G.S.
143-215.6A(t) and did not find grounds to
modify the initial penalty assessment of
$343.93.
JID

AGENDA ITEM. 03 - n4 Request for Remission of Civil Penalty,by
Knightdale MHP Limited Partnership (LV 02-287)
Wake County
EXPLANATION: On July 31, 2002, Ken Schuster, Division of Water
Quality Regional Water Quality Supervisor for the
Raleigh Region, assessed a total penalty of $543.93
($500.00 civil penalty, plus $43.93 investigative
costs) against the Knightdale MHP Limited
Paartnershin for violations of NPDES Permit No.
NC0040266 and G.S. I43-215.1(a)(6).
On September 4, 2002, Harvey Murphrey requested
remission and waived the Knightdale MHP Limited
Partnership's right to an administrative hearing and
stipulated that the facts were as alleged in the
assessment document.
RECOMMENDATION: The Division of Water Quality opposes any
remission or mitigation of the penalty.
The recommendation is made for the following
reason:
1. The Director.considered information
submitted in support of the Knightdale MHP
Limited Partnership' request for remission
of civil penalties in accordance with G.S.
143-215.6A(f) and did not find grounds to
modify the. initial penalty assessment of
$543.93.

Cases LM 02-016 & LV 02-287
As the content of the remission requests is identical,
remission information regarding these two cases is -
being provided only once. Copies of both assessment
documents are included in this package.
4

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment A4V01
and Natural Resources
IA
Raleigh Regional Office
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
NOrmi G►RCUNA Dp�AiiTM�NT or
DIVISION OF WATW �Q[7ALITY 11, RcsouRccs
Mr. Harvey Murphrey
Knightdale Estates MHP, Limited Partnership
808 Eagle Rock Road
Wendell, NC 27591
Dear Mr. Murphrey:
July 31, 2002
Notice of Violation and Assessment of Civil Penalty
for Violations of N.C. General Statute 143-215.1(a)(6)
and NPDES Permit NCO040266
Knightdale Estates Mobile Home Park
Case No. LM 02-016
Wake County
This letter transmits a Notice of Violation and assessment of civil penalty in the amount of
$343..93 (300.00 civil penalty + 43.93 enforcement costs) against Knightdale Estates Mobile
Home Park WWTP.
This assessment is based upon the following facts: a review has been conducted of the discharge
monitoring report (DMR) submitted by Knightdale Estates Mobile Home Park WWTP for the
month of January 2002. This review has shown the subject facility to be in violation of the
discharge limitations and/or monitoring requirements found in NPDES Permit NC0040266. The
violations which occurred in January 2002 are summarized in Attachment A to this letter.
Based upon the above facts, I conclude as a matter of law that Knightdale Estates Mobile Home
Park WWTP violated the terms; conditions or requirements of NPDES Permit NCO040266 and
N.C.G.S. 143-2I5.1(a)(6) in the manner and extent shown in Attachment A. A civil penalty may
be assessed in accordance with the maximums established by N.C.G.S. 143-215.6A(a)(2).
Based upon the above findings of fact and conclusions of law, and in accordance with authority
provided by the Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources and the
Director of the Division of Water Quality, I, Kenneth Schuster, P.E., Division of Water Quality
Regional Supervisor for the Raleigh Region, hereby make the followin civil penalty assessment
against Knightdale Estates Mobile Home Park WWTP:
' r OCT
11-3
1628 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 276994623 -
An Equal opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycledli b% post -consumer papa

Knightdale Estates Mobile Home Park WWTP
Page 2
$ ZSD For 1 of the violation of G.S. 143-.
215.1(a)(6) and NPDES Permit No. NC0040266, by
discharging waste into the waters of the State in
violation of permit daily maximum effluent limits for
fecal coliform.
$ For ! of the failure to monitor for pH in
violation of G.S. 143-215.1(a)(6) and the terms of
NPDES Permit No. NC0040266.
$ 350
$ 14s,g3
$ •��
TOTAL CIVIL PENALTY
Enforcement costs.
TOTAL AMOUNT DUE
Pursuant to G.S. 143-215.6A(c), in determining the amount of the penalty 1 have taken
into account the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and the factors set forth at G.S. 143B-
282.1(b), which are:
(1) The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to the public health,
or to private property resulting from the violation;
(2) The duration and gravity of the violation;
(3) The effect on ground or surface water quantity or quality or on air quality;
(4) The cost of rectifying the damage;
(5) The amount of money saved by noncompliance;
(6) Whether the violation was committed willfully or. intentionally;
(7) The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with programs over
which the Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority; and
(8) The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures.
k-

Knightdale Estates Mobile Home Park WWTP
Page 3
y Within thirty days of receipt of this notice, you must do one of the following:
1. Submit payment of the penalty:
Payment should be made directly to the order of the Department of Environment
and Natural Resources (do not include waiver form). Payment of the penalty will
not foreclose further enforcement action for any continuing or new violation(s).
Please submit payment to the attention of:
Point Source Compliance/Enforcement Unit
Division of Water Quality
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
MW
2. Submit a written request for remission or mitigation including a detailed
justification for such request:
A request for remission or mitigation is limited to consideration of the reasonableness
of the amount of the penalty and is not the proper procedure for contesting the accuracy of
any of the statements contained in the assessment letter. Because a remission request
forecloses the option of an administrative hearing, such a request must be accompanied by a
waiver of your right to an administrative hearing and a stipulation that there are no factual or
legal issues in dispute. You must execute and return to this office the attached waiver and
stipulation form and a detailed statement which you believe establishes whether:
(a) one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in G.S. 143B-
282. 1 (b) were wrongfully applied to the detriment of the petitioner;
(b) the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage
resulting from the violation;
(c) the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident;
(d) the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous
violations;
(e) payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining
necessary remedial actions.
Please submit this information to the attention of:
Ms. Coleen Sullins
Water Quality Section Chief
Division of Water Quality
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535

,j,
Knightdale Estates Mobile Home Park WWTP
Page 4
Please note that all information presented in support of a request for remission
must be submitted in writing. The Director of the Division of Water Quality
will review the information during a bimonthly enforcement conference and
inform you of his decision in the matter of the remission request. His response
will provide details regarding case status., directions for payment and
provision for further appeal of the penalty to the Environmental Management
Commission's Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions. Please be advised that
the Committee cannot consider information that was not part of the original.
remission request considered by the Director and therefore, it is very
important that you prepare a complete and thorough statement in support of
your request for remission.
MI;
3. Submit a written request for an administrative hearing:
If you wish to contest any statement in this assessment letter, you must request
an administrative hearing. This request must be in the form of a written
petition to the Office -of Administrative Hearings and must conform to Chapter
150B of the North Carolina General Statutes. You must
File your original petition with the
Office of Administrative Hearings
6714 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-6714
and
Mail or hand -deliver a copy of the petition to
Mr. Dan Oakley, General Counsel
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
Failure to exercise one of the options above within Ibi* days, as evidenced by a date
stamp (not a postmark) indicating when we received your response, will result in this matter
being referred to the Attorney General's Office with a request to initiate a civil action to
collect the penalty.
}

v,
i
Knightdale Estates Mobile Home Park WWTP
Page 5
Please be advised that any continuing violation(s) may be the subject of a new
enforcement action, including an additional penalty. If you have any questions about this
civil penalty assessment, please contact the Water Quality Section staff of the Raleigh
Regional Office at 919-571-4700.
3t
(Da e)
ATTACHMENTS
Kenneth Schuster, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Raleigh Region
Division of Water Quality
cc: Regional Supervisor w/ attachments
Compliance/Enforcement File w/ attachments
Central Files w/ attachments

Parame=
Fecal Coliform
Attachment A
Knightdale Estates Mobile Home Park WWTP
January 2002
r
a.. r 1wil f M-
�t
i/ offs . . • - - 1 1
Weekly
Parameter Location D2ate
pH effluent 12/31/01 - 1/4/02
*= limit'violations that were assessed a civil penalty
�l d
Limit Units
200.0 # / 100ml
Location
Effluent
Number of
Insufficient Valdes
I
L�

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Raleigh Regional Office
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Secretary
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
NCDENR
Nom" Guaouw" DvwarMewr of
�IVVIRQNM�HT ANO NmvRAL ResouRces
DMSION OF WATER QUALITY
Mr. Harvey Murphrey
Knightdale Estates MHP, Limited Partnership
808 Eagle Rock Road
Wendell, NC 27591
Dear Mr. Murphrey:
July 31, 2002
Notice of Violation and Assessment of Civil Penalty
for Violations of N.C. General Statute 143-215.1(a)(6)
and NPDES Permit NCO040266
Knightdale Estates Mobile Home Park
Case No. LV 02-287
Wake County
This letter transmits a Notice of Violation and assessment of civil penalty in the amount of
$543.93 (500.00 civil penalty + 43.93 enforcement costs) against Knightdale Estates Mobile
Home Park WWTP.
This assessment is based upon the following facts: a review has been conducted of the discharge
monitoring report (DMR) submitted by Knightdale Estates Mobile Home Park WWTP for the
month of February 2002. This review has shown the subject facility to be in violation of the
discharge limitations and/or monitoring requirements found in NPDES Permit NC0040266. ' The
violations which occurred in February 2002 are summarized in Attachment A to this letter.
Based upon the above facts, I conclude as a matter of law that Knightdale Estates Mobile Home
Park WWTP violated the terms, conditions or requirements of NPDES Permit NCO040266 and
N.C.G.S. I43-215.1(a)(6) in the manner and extent shown in Attachment A. A civil penalty may
be assessed in accordance with the maximums established by N.C.G.S. 143-215.6A(a)(2).
Based upon the above findings of fact and conclusions of law, and in accordance with authority
provided by the Secretary of the Department of.Environment and Natural Resources and the
Director of the Division of Water Quality, I, Kenneth Schuster, P.E., Division of Water Quality
Regional Supervisor for the Raleigh Region, hereby make the following;' . -penalty assessment
against Knightdale Estates Mobile Home Park WWTP:
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
1 � r 0,
i T 7.
L'v l 20UZ
L_.
50% recyc1410% poat-consumer paper

Knightdale Estates Mobile Home Park WWTP
Page 2
For Z of the Ze violations of G.S. 143-
215. 1 (a)(6) and NPDES Permit No. NC0040266, by
discharging waste into the waters of the State in
violation of permit daily maximum effluent limits for
fecal coliform.
TOTAL CIVIL PENALTY
Enforcement costs.
TOTAL AMOUNT DUE
Pursuant to G.S. 143-215.6A(c), in determining the amount of the penalty I have taken
into account the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and the factors set forth at G.S. 14313-
28 2. 1 (b), which are:
(1) The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to the public health,
or to private property resulting from the violation;
(2) The duration and gravity of the violation;
(3) The effect on ground or surface water quantity or quality or on air quality;
(4) The cost of rectifying the damage;
(5) The amount of money saved by noncompliance;
(6) Whether the violation was committed willfully or intentionally;
(7) The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with programs over
which the Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority; and
(8) The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures.
Within thirty days of receipt of this notice, you must do one of the following:
Submit payment of the penalty:
Payment should be made directly to the order of the Department of Environment
and Natural Resources (do not include waiver form). Payment of the penalty will
not foreclose further enforcement action for any continuing or new violation(s).
Please submit payment to the,attention of:
Point Source Compliance/Enforcement Unit
Division of Water Quality
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
1,20

Knightdale Estates Mobile Home Park WWTP
Page 3
w
2. Submit a written request for remission or mitigation including a detailed
justification for such request:
A request for remission or mitigation is limited to consideration of the reasonableness
of the amount of the penalty and is not the proper procedure for contesting the accuracy of
any of the statements contained in the assessment letter. Because a remission request
forecloses the option of an administrative hearing, such a request must be accompanied by a
waiver of your right to an administrative hearing and a stipulation that there are no factual or
legal issues in dispute. You must execute and return to this office the attached waiver and
stipulation form and a detailed statement which you believe establishes whether:
(a) one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in G.S. 143B-
282.1(b) were wrongfully applied to the detriment of the petitioner;
(b) the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage
resulting from the violation;
(c) the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident;
(d) the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous
violations;
(e) payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining
necessary remedial actions.
Please submit this information to the attention of:
Ms. Coleen Sullins
Water Quality Section Chief
Division of Water Quality
P.O. Box 29535
Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535
Please note that all information presented in support of a request for remission
must be submitted in writing. The Director of the Division of Water Quality
will review the information during a bimonthly enforcement conference and
inform you of his decision in the matter of the remission request. His response
will provide details regarding case status., directions for payment and
provision for further appeal of the penalty to the Environmental Management
Commission's Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions. Please be advised that
the Committee cannot consider information that was not part of the original
remission request considered by the Director and therefore, it is very
important that you prepare a complete and thorough statement in support of
your request for remission.

Knightdale Estates Mobile Home Park WWTP
Page 4
0
3. Submit a written request for an administrative bearing:
If you wish to contest any statement in this assessment letter, you must request
an administrative hearing. This request must be in the form of a written
petition to the Office of Administrative Hearings and must conform to Chapter
150B of the North Carolina General Statutes. You must
File your original petition with the
Office of Administrative Hearings
6714 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-6714
and
Mail or hand -deliver a copy of the petition to
Mr. Dan Oakley, General Counsel
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1601
Failure to exercise one of the options above within IhirLy days, as evidenced by a date
stamp (not a postmark) indicating when we received your response, will result in this matter
being referred to the Attorney General's Office with a request to initiate a civil action to
collect the penalty.
PIease be advised that any continuing violation(s) may be the subject of a new
enforcement'action, including an additional penalty. If you have any questions about this
civil penalty assessment, please contact the Water Quality Section staff of the Raleigh
Regional Office at 919-571-4700.
� -'ekl 4 .1�
� 3 1 'LCAZ
(Date) Kenneth Schuster, P.E.
Water Quality Regional Supervisor
Raleigh Region
ATTACHMENTS Division of Water Quality
cc: Regional Supervisor w/ attachments
Compliance/Enforcement File w/ attachments
Central Files w/ attachments

Attachment A
Knightdale Estates Mobile Home Park WWTP
Parameter Date R=arted Value Llmft i Tniz
Fecal Coliform 2/8/02 13800 200.0 # / loom[
Fecal Coliform 2/26/02 6000 200.0 # I I ooml
*= limit violations that were assessed a civil penalty
12..3

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF WAKE
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
IN THE MATTER OF ASSESSMENT ) WAIVER OF RIGHT TO AN
OF CIVIL PENALTIES AGAINST ) ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING AND
PERMIT NO. NCO040266 ) STIPULATION OF FACTS
KNIGHTDALE ESTATES MHP WWTP
FILE NO. LM 02-016
Having been assessed civil penalties totaling 343, -111 3 for violation(s) as set
forth in the assessment document of the Director of the Division of Water Quality Regional
Supervisor dated 3 J Mr-2— , the undersigned, desiring to seek remission of the civil
penalties, does hePebwiive the right to an administrative hearing in the above -stated matter and
does stipulate that the facts are as alleged in the assessment document. The undersigned further
understands that all evidence presented in support of remission of this civil penalty must be
submitted to the Director of the Division of Water Quality within 30 days of receipt of the notice
of assessment. No new evidence in support of a remission request will be allowed after 30 days
from the receipt of the notice of assessment.
This the 36 �f�� day of 20e ;—
BY
ADDRESS
d
^_y
C 9 7. 77
TELEPHONE
ql� - 3�� a led
.

t
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF WAKE
IN THE MATTER OF ASSESSMENT }
OF CIVIL PENALTIES AGAINST }
PERMIT NO. NCO040266 )
KNIGHTDALE ESTATES MHP WWTP
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
WAIVER OF RIGHT TO AN
ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING AND
STIPULATION OF FACTS
FILE NO. LV 02-287
Having been assessed civil penalties totaling ! �.15 for violation(s) as set
forth in the assessment document of the Director of the Division of Water Quality Regional
Supervisor date o 2_ the undersigned, desiring to seek remission of the civil
penalties, does h reb waive the right to an administrative hearing in the above -stated matter and
does stipulate that the facts are as'alleged in the assessment document. The undersigned further
understands that all evidence presented in support of remission of this civil penalty must be
submitted to the Director of the Division of Water Quality within 30 days of receipt of the notice
of assessment. No new evidence in support of a remission request will be allowed after 30 days
from the receipt of the notice of assessment.
This the day of &, 20i:�' �-
�'i4
BY U.
ADDRESS .
sz t &46= )& __64/
4, /,6LJ_ ) A, ;;ej 7/
TELEPHONE

Knightdale Estates MHP Limited
808 Eagle Rock Road
Wendell, NC 27591
919-366-2700
August 31, 2002
,NC. Alan W. Klimek, P. E., Director
DENR, DWQ
c/o Ms. Coleen Sullins, Chief-DWQ
P. 0. Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
Request for Remission
Notice of Violation, NPDES Permit N
Knightdale Estates MHP
Case No. LW 02-287
Wake County
Dear Mr. Klimek: .
Partnership
St; 2"-
�; Q` A iTY
SECTION
We request a remission of the Civil Penalties outlined in the above Notice of
Violation from Kenneth Schuster, P.E., based on the information furnished
herein.
Since you have not been involved in the previous penalties, correspondence,
environmental committee meetings and pleadings regarding our facility, I am
enclosing copies of correspondence for your review.
We purchased Knightdale Estates in 1991 and had NO penalties through June
2000 except for a flow violation which occurred following the big snow storm in
late January 2000. Guido Carrara operated our plant in compliance from August
1997 through June 2000 except for the one flow violation. John Boykin's
Envirolink operated it from June 2000 to May 2001, ouI of compliance every
month. From May 2001 to April 2002 our operators were independents, licensed
by your department, but were out of compliance over 50% of the time.
In May 2002 we rehired Guido Carrara, G. C. Environmental and since then the
plant has been in total compliance again and we expect it will be in compliance
hereafter.
r

•,
Mr. Klimek, i cannot say that there is an error in the Notice of Violation but, as
Kenneth Schuster said yesterday about the plants operation in general, there
could have been a sampling error regarding the fecal. And as has been the case
in all the, violations since June 2000, the operators, licensed by your department,
have been negligent.
Yes, you can say, as we have been told over and over, that we as the Permitee
are the ones who are responsible. Please understand that we have been trying
our very best to comply with all the rules and laws. But it's as if we are getting
the speeding ticket when someone else is doing the driving.
So, Mr. Klimek, F am asking you to remit these penalties based on all the
information included here, not merely as a black and white decision but a
decision based on compassion. As a small family business, we are struggling
now trying to pay enormous previous penalties.
Your cooperation will certainly be appreciated.
Enclosures
Sin rely,
Betty MWrphrey
General Partner
i.27

_.
Knightdale Estates MHP Limited Partnership
113 East Merlin Drive
Knightdale, NC 27545
919-217-1700
July 3, 2000
Ms. Coleen Sullins
Water Quality Section Chief
Division of Water Quality
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
SUBJECT: Notice of Violation and Assessment of Civil Penalty
for Violations of N. C. General Statute 143-215.1(a)(6)
and NPDES Permit NC0040266
Knightdale Estates MHP Limited Partnership, WWTP
Case No. LV 00-166
Wake County
REQUEST FOR REMISSION
Dear Ms. Sullins:
We request a remission of the Civil Penalty outlined in the above Notice of Violation based
on the following uncontrollable circumstances:
• During the month of January a history -making record snowfall of 17.90' fell on January
25, 2000. A monthly record snowfall for January amounted to 25.80`. Also during the
month of January record low temperatures occurred on January 26, 27, 28 and 29 of 13
degrees,10 degrees, 1 degree and 7 degrees respectively, and continued to fall below
freezing through February 11 except for one day.
• It is our understanding from our WWTP operator that the influent flow is based on a
percentage of the amount of water that is actually used from the well meter.
• Even though we encourage our tenants to insulate their water pipes adequately and we
discourage their leaving water running to prevent frozen pipes, many of the tenants
leave their faucets running without regard to our recommendation.
• Please note that during the latter part of January when the heavy snow and low
temperatures prevxai led, the fbow wios higher because at the beg innirig of February the
tenants were still trying to protect their water pipes. After the weather and
temperatures returned to normal, the flow returned to normal also.
• Sheets from WRAL-TV Weather Center showing the January Climate
Extremes/Records and January and February Weather Observations at RDU, as well as
DEM Form MR-1 for January 2000 are enclosed for review.
JdZF
a

1L
• Based on the 8 factors set forth on Page 3 of the Notice of Violation we offer the
following
responses:
1.
We believe the degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to
the public health, or to private property resulting from the violation to be none.
2.
The duration of the violation was only a few days and the gravity very low.
3.
There were no negative effects on ground or surface water quantity or quality or on
air quality.
4.
There has been no cost to the State for rectifying the damage.
5.
There was no money saved by noncompliance - our expenses for management,
chemicals and electricity remained the some or they were probably higher because
of the increased water flow.
6.
Theviolation was definitely not committed willfully or intentionally and was merely a
result of severe weather.
7.
For several years our plant has been operating in compliance with our permit.
B.
If the Director feels it is necessary to collect the $45.84 for preparation of the
hlotice of Violation letter, we will remit that amount promptly upon notification.
Please also be advised that although several years ago there were some months when
the WWTP was not compliant, we have worked very hard and spent many thousands of
dollars to have our plant compliant urrtiI January 2000. Our operator signed the January
form and gave an explanation of the non-compliance. Based on the confidence we have
had in the operator in the past, when he presented the MR-1 checked "Compliant" in
early March 2000 for signature, Harvey did not check the figures on the front. It is
now our belief that the operator intentionally made sure that the February MR-1 was
personally signed by us as both protection for himself and as a rebuke to us.
The NCDOT has surveyed a portion of our mobile home park and unless major changes
are made to their plans for the Highway 64 Bypass east of Raleigh, they have advised us
that the highway will be taking out this treatment plant. They have recently notified us
that no decision has been made as to how they are going to handle the wastewater from
our community. However, we reiterate that we are diligently. working to keep this plant
in compliance with NPDES Permit N00040266.
We believe that the above information establishes that the violation was inadvertent and we
will appreciate a remission of the Civil Penalty assessed of $1,000.00.
Thank you for your consideration.
Enclosures
Sincerely,
Betty Murphrey
Registered Agent
/0�9

IKnightdale Estates MHP Urnited Partnership
808 Eagle hock Road
Wendell, NC 27591
919-366-2700
May 21, 2001
Ms. Coleen Sullins VIA Certified Return Receipt
Water Quality Section Chief
Division of Water Quality
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
SUBJECT: Notice of Violation and Assessment of CMI Penalty
for Violations of N. C General Statute 143-215.1(a)(6)
and NPDES Permit NCO040266
Knightdale Estates MHP Limited Partnership, WWTP
Case No. LV D 1-074
Wake County
REQUEST FOR REMISSION
Dear Ms. Sullins:
We request a remission of the Civil Penalty outlined in the above Notice of Violation from
Kenneth Schuster, P.E. based on the information furnished herein.
From August 1997 through May 31, 2000 we had only one violation and that violation was totally
weather related: record -breaking snowfall and record -breaking freezing temperatures.
We hired a new contractor to manage our wastewater facility beginning June 1, 2000 and since
that date we have had several flow violations. Each month I contested to the operators that they
were reading the flow wrongly. They responded to me that they sincerely hoped they'were
wrong and that I was right. The operators even asked Kent Penny of Wake County to check the
readings.
However, after the flow_mete[jM installed and calibres, accoa ing-to-the PM meter versus
the Prior reading. the recorded flow dropped drastically from the previous readinos. At this point
instead of outright admitting that obviously they were in fact reading the flow wrong, the
operators spent many man hours walking the property looking for ghost leaks and did not find
any anywhere.
It must be extremely difficult to admit that the prior readings were incorrect — the flow meter
proves that point but it still seems that no one will accept that fact.
Enclosed is a list of the flow meter readings since its installation to today's date. You will notice
that the averaae flow is .018 MGD, well below the permit limit
Following are two k4ters fmm DOT that will explain why we delayed installation of the flow
meter. The DOT has already marked our treatment plant to be taken out when the 64 Bypass is
constructed. You will notice that the first letter dated March 6, 2000 was an Introductory letter
and included the phrase "now ready to begin right of way acquisition" and 'will accomplish the
acquisition of your property". After that letter I had several meetings with Sheryl Crouse and her
supervisor. At the very first meeting I was told that construction would be under way on our
property by summer 2001. We received a map of the proposed roads and interchanges and
were told that the DOT was trying to decide what to do about wastewater facilities for our
community.
13o
.A

DWQ, DENR
May 21, 2001
Page 2
Then after a couple of months when the DOT stopped contacting us, we spoke with Aydren
Flowers and he advised us that the part of the project involving us had,been pushed back. We
asked for that in writing and his letter follows also.
We have recently hired new operators to manage our wastewater treatment plant.
Also enclosed is the revised DMR for the month of November requested by Mr. Schuster.
For these reasons, we respectfully submit this Request for RemL%ion of the $1418.46 penalty
and enforcement costs, It has always been and continues to be our desire to be in total
compliance with the laws, rules, and regulations of our country.
Enclosures
131
Sincerely,
Harvey Murphrey
General Partner

Knightdaie Estates MHP i.irnited Partnership
808 Eagle Rock Road
Wendell, NC 27591
919-366-2700
July 3, 2001
Ms. Coleen Sullins VIA Certified Return Receipt
Water Quality Section Chief
Division of Water Quality /
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
SUBJECT: Notice of Violation and Assessment of Civil Penalty
for Violations of N. C. General Statute 143-215.1(a)(6)
and NPDES Permit NC0040266
Knightdale Estates MHP United Partnership, WWTP
Case No. LV 01-188
Wake County
REQUEST FOR REMISSION
Dear Ms. Sullins:
We request a remission of the Civil Penalty outlined in the above Notice of Violation from
Kenneth Schuster, P.E. based on the information famished herein.
From August 1997 through May 31, 2000 we had only one violation and that violation was totally
weather related: record -breaking snowfall and record -breaking freezing temperatures.
We hired a new contractor to manage our wastewater facility beginning June 1, 2000 and since
that date we have had several flow violations. Each month I contested to the operators that they
were reading the flow wrongly. They responded to me that they sincerely hoped they were
wrong and that I was right. The operators even asked Kent Penny of Wake County to check the
readings.
However, after_the flow
the prior reading, the recorded flft dMgRed_drasticaltvhombe gmdaus readin . At this point
instead of outright admitting that obviously they were in fact reading the flow wrong, the
operators spent many man hours walking the property kxAdng for ghost leaks and did not find
any anywhere.
It must be extremely dtffrcult to admit that the prior readings were incorrect — the flow meter
proves that point but it still seems that no one will accept that fact.
Enclosed is a list of the flow meter readings since its installation to May 20, 2001. You will notice
that the average flow i_f .018 MGQ,, well below the permit limit.
Following are two letters from DOT that will explain why we delayed installation of the flow
meter. The DOT has already marked our treatment plant to be taken out when the 64 Bypass is
constructed. You will notice that the first letter dated March 6, 2000 was an introductory letter
and included the phrase "now ready to begin right of way acquisition" and 'will accomplish the
acquisition of your property". After that letter I had several meetings with Sheryl Crouse and her
supervisor. At the very first meeting I was told that construction would be under way on our
property by summer 2001. We received a map of the proposed roads and interchanges and
were told that the DOT was trying to decide what to do about wastewater faciiities for our
community.
/32-
bo

DWQ, DENR
July 3, 2001
Page 2
Then after a couple of months when the DOT stopped contacting us, we spoke with Aydren
Flowers and he advised us that the part of the project involving us had been pushed back. We
asked for that in writing and his letter follows also.
We have recently hired new operators to manage our wastewater treatment plant.
A corrected DNIR fbr December 2000 is being furnished tQ Mr. Schuster per his request.
For these reasons, we respectfully submit this Request for Remission of the $1518.46 penalty
and enforcement casts. It has always been and continues to be our desire to be in total
compliance with the laws, rules, and regulations of our country.
Enclosures
Sincerely,
Harvey Murphrey
General Partner
133

Knightdale Estates MHP Limited Partnership
808 Eagle Rock Road
Wendell, NC 27591
919-366-2700
July 3, 2001
Ms. Coleen Sullins VIA Certified Return Receipt
Water Quality Section Chief
Division of Water Quality
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
SUEUEM Notice of Violation and Assessment of Civil Penalty
for Violations of N. C. General Statute 143-21S.1(a)(6)
and NPDES Permit NCO040266
Knightdale Estates MHP Limited Partnership, WWTP
Case No. LV 01-189
Wake County
REQUEST FOR REMISSION
Dear Ms. Sullins:
We request a remission of the Civil Penalty outlined in the above Notice of Violation from
Kenneth Schuster, P.E. based on the information furnished herein.
From August 1997 through May 31, 2000 we had only one violation and that violation was totally
weather related: record -breaking snowfall and record -breaking free2ing temperatures.
We hired a new contractor to manage our wastewater facility beginning June 1, 2000 and since
that date we have had several flow violations. Each month I contested to the operators that they
were reading the flow wrongly. They responded to me that they sincerely hoped they were
wrong and'that I was right. The operators even asked Kent Penny of Wake County to check the
readings.
However, after The flow meter was installed_and _calibrated, acco i g to the flow meter versus
the prior reading, the recorded flow dropped drastically from the previous reading$. At this point
instead of outright admitting that obviously they were in fad reading the flow wrong, the
operators spent many man hours walking the property looking for ghost leaks and did not find
any anywhere.
It must be extremely difficult to admit that the prior readings were incorrect — the flow meter
proves that point but it still seems that no one will accept that fact.
Enclosed is a list of the flow meter readings since its installation to May 20, 2001. You will notice
that the pyeraae flow is .018 MGD, well below the permit limit
Following are two le ers from DOT that will explain why we delayed installation of the flow
meter. The DOT has already marked our beabnent plant to be taken out when the 64 Bypass is
constructed. You will notice #hat the first letter dated March 6, 2000 was an introductory letter
and included the phrase "now ready to begin right of way acquisition" and "will accomplish the
acquisition of your property".. After that letter I had several meetings with Sheryl Crouse and her
supervisor. At the very first meeting I was told that construction would be under way on our
property by summer 2001. We received a map of the proposed roads and interchanges and
were told that the DOT was trying to decide what to do about wastewater facilities for our
community.
/3�

DWO, DENlR
July 3, 2001
Page 2
Then after a couple of months when the DOT stopped contacting us, we spoke with Aydren
Flowers and he advised us that the part of the project involving us had been pushed back. We
asked for that in writing and his letter follows also.
We have recently hired new operators to manage our wastewater treatment plant.
Regarding the fecal coliform penalty, our former operators did not keep the chlorine contact
chamber clear of tray solids which would prevent the chlorine from completely neutralizing the
fecal coiiform. I repeatedly asked them to perform this simple task but they were unable or
unwilling to do it
For these reasons, we respectfully submit this Request for Remission of the $1880.96 penalty
and enforcement costs. It has always been and continues to be our desire to be in total
compliance with the laws, rules, and regulations of our country.
Enclosures
135
Sincerely,
Harvey Murphrey
General Partner

Knightdale Estates MHP Limited Partnership
808 Eagle Rock Road
Wendell, NC 27591
919-366-2700
July 3, 2001
Ms. Coleen Sullins VIA Certified Return Receipt
Water Quality Section Chief
Division of Water Quality
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina Z7699-1617
SURIECT: Notice of Violation and Assessment of Civil Penalty
for Violations of N. C. General Statute 143-215.1(a)(6)
and NPDES Permit NC0040266
Knightdale Estates MHP Limited Partnership, WWTP
Case No. LV 01-190
Wake County
REQUEST FOR REMISSION
Dear Ms. Sullins:
We request a remission of the Civil Penalty outlined in the above Notice of Violation from
Kenneth Schuster, P.E. based on the information furnished herein.
From August 1997 through May 31, 2000 we had only one violation and that violation was totally
weather related: record -breaking snowfall and record -breaking freezing temperatures.
We hired a new contractor to manage our wastewater facility beginning June 1, 2000 and since
that date we have had several flow violations. Each month I contested to the operators that they.
were reading the flow wrongly. They responded to me that they sincerely hoped they were
wrong and that I was right. The operators even asked (Cent Penny of Wake County to check the
readings.
However, after the flow meter was installed and calibrated, a=rding to the flow meter versus
the prior Mading. the recordCd flow drg2po drastically from the l2LP'yiQUs mclings. At this point
instead of outright admitting that obviously #W were in fact reading the flow wrong, the
operators spent many man hours walking the property'iooking for ghost leaks and did not find
any anywhere.
It must be extremely difficult to admit that the prior readings were incorrect -- the flow meter
proves that point but it still seems that no one will accept that fact.
Enclosed is a list of the flow meter readings since fts installation to May 20, 2001. You will notice
that the average flow is .018 MGD. well below the permit limit.
Following are two letters from DOT that will explain why we delayed installation of the flow
meter. The DOT has already marked our treatment plant to be taken out when the 64 Bypass is
constructed. You will notice that the first letter dated March 6, 2000 was an introducbory letter
and included the phrase "now ready to begin right of way acquisition' and "will accomplish the
acquisition of your property". After that letter I had several meetings with Sheryl Crouse and her
supervisor. At the very first meeting I was bold that construction would be under way on our
property by summer 2001. We received a map of the proposed roads and interchanges and
were told that the DOT was trying to decide what to do about wastewater facilities for our
community.
/ 3(.0

DWQ, DENR
July 3, 2001
Page 2
Then after a couple of months when the DOT stopped contacting us, we spoke with Aydren
'" Flowers and he advised us that the part of the project involving us had been pushed back. We
asked for that in writing and his letter follows also.
We have recently hired new operators to manage our wastewater treatment plant.
Regarding the fecal coliform penalty, our former operators did not keep the chlorine contact
chamber clear of tray solids which would prevent the chlorine from completely neutralizing the
fecal coliform. I repeatedly asked them to perform this simple task but they were unable or
unwilling to do it.
For these reasons, we respectfully submit this Request for Remission of the $1880.96 penalty
and enforcement costs. It has always been and continues to be our desire to be in total
compliance with the laws, rules, and regulations of our country.
Enclosures
137
Sincerely,
Harvey Murphrey
General Partner

Knightdale Estates MHP Limited Partnership
808 Eagle Rock Road
Wendell, NC 27591
919-366-2700
November 7, 2001
Mr. Kenneth Schuster, P.E.
Regional Water Quality Supervisor
1628 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1628
Subject: Notice of Violation
Effluent Monitoring Limit and Monitoring Violations
Knightdale Estates MHP Limited Partnership
- NPDES Permit NCO040266
Dear Mr. Schuster:
This letter is in response to yours of September 25 with the above subject. Upon
its receipt on October 8 I requested a corrected letter from Mr. Charles Brown.
More than two weeks passed before receiving a partially corrected letter. The
correct name of our facility is Knightdale Estates MHP limited Partnership, NOT
Knightdale, Estates, Inc.
• Our new ORC was not familiar with the running of the plant and the Ammonia
Nitrogen average was just slightly above 'the limit. Please be advised that _
although the June average was also elevated, the months of July, August and
September have been .008, 1.29, and 3.49, all well below the limit of 4.8.
• Daily flows are now being shown on the DMR, effective with the September
report.
• Our ORC, Dan Brisson has now started to visit our facility 8 days out of 10,
80% of the time, as per the regulation cited in your letter.
We respectfully request that your office pardon these minor and unintentional
errors. If we can be of additional assistance, please advise.
Sincerely,
Harvey Murphrey, General Partner
cc: Wake County Health Department
FA
138

'k
Knightdale Estates�MHP Limited Partnership
808 Eagle Rock Road
Wendell, NC 27591
919-366-2700
November 7, 2001
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Ms. Coleen Sullins
Water Quality Section Chief
Division of Water Quality
P. 0. Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
Notice of Violation and Assessment of Civil Penalty
for Violations of N.C. General Statute 143-215.1(a)(6) -
and NPDES Permit NC0040266
Knightdale Estates MHP Limited Partnership
Case No. LV 01-390
REQUEST FOR REMISSION
Dear Ms. Sullins:
We request a remission of the Civil Penalty outlined in the above Notice of
Violation from Kenneth Schuster, P.E. based on the information furnished herein.
During the month of June 2001 we were still trying to recover from the
mishandling of many phases of our plant by the previous operator. One of these
mishandled items caused the electrical problem noted on the DMR.
During the previous operator's tenure the company consistently tried to operate
both blowers at the same time. During this process we burned up one blower
and four 5 HP. motors. The plant is designed electrically and mechanically to run
only one blower at the time. The electrical panel box had been overloaded so
long and so many -times that in June it completely burned up. At that time we
had an electrician to replace with new breaker boxes the entire electrical system
for both blowers and there were a number of times that the electrical power
would be off in shot intervals.
Since the panel boxes have been replaced with new ones, new wiring, etc. there
have been no more electrical problems until now and we do not anticipate any
electrical problems.
139

In addition our new 4RC was still getting familiar with the running of the plant
and although the June average for Ammonia Nitrogen 'was elevated, the months
of July, August and September have been .008, 1.29, and 3.49, all well below
the limit of 4�$.
For these reasons, we respectfully submit this Request for Remission of the
$1043.93 penalty and enforcement costs. It has always been and continues to
be our desire to be in total compliance with the laws, rules, and regulations of
our country.
CC: Kenneth Schuster, P.E.
Sir
Harvey Murphrey
General Partner
/ 5eZ�

Knightdale Estates MHP Limited Partnership
r� 808 Eagle Rock Road
Wendell, NC 27591
919-366-2700
April 20, 2002
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Gregory P. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Attention of Ms. Coleen Sullins
Water Quality Section Chief
Division of Water Quality
P. 0. Box 29535
Raleigh, NC 27626-0535
Notice of Violation and Assessment of Civil Penalty
for Violations of N.C. General Statute 143-215.1(a)(6)
and NPDES Permit NC0040266
Knightdale Estates MHP Limited Partnership
Case No. LV 02-003
REQUEST FOR REMISSION
Dear Dr. Thorpe:
We request a remission of the Civil Penalty outlined in the above Notice of
Violation from Kenneth Schuster, P.E. based on the information famished herein.
Please review the notes on the back of the DMR for October 2001, as well as the
following information.
We really need these fines dismissed because apparently we have had two sets
of operators, certified by the State, that cannot run the plant compliant. We as a
permit holder did not cause these fines and we cannot solve the problem
overnight
However, we have now rehired Guido Carrera, GC Environmental, with big bucks
fees but right now the plant looks totally different; it looks the way it is supposed
to look.
5//

La
Is the DWQ interested in clean water or are you interested in fines? We are
interested in clean water, we do not need any more fines. Please dismiss these
fines.
We have struggled with operators with no assistance from your department. All
we ever got was a list of certified operators and now we have learned that at
least one on that list has serious charges for willfully violating DWQ rules.
We respectfully submit this Request for Remission of the $2818.93 penalty and
enforcement costs. It has always been and continues to be our desire to be in
total compliance with the laws, rules, and regulations of our country.
If you cannot remit these fines, please call me for an appointment to meet with
you in your office.
CC: Kenneth Schuster, P.E.
i4e'z
Sincerely,
Harvey Murphrey
General Partner

4
Knightdale Estates MHP Limited Partnership
808 Eagle Rock Road
Wendell, NC 27591
919-366-2700
February 28, 2002
CERTIFIED MAIL -RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph. D
Attention of Ms. Coleen Sullins
Water Quality Section Chief
Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
SUBJECT: Assessment of Civil Penalties for Violation(s) of
NC General Statute(s) 143-215-1
Knightdale Estates MHP, LP
ODES Permit No. NC09040266
DWQ Enforcement Case PC 01-028
Wake County
REQUEST FOR REMISSION
Dear Dr. Thorpe:
We request a remission of the Civil Penalty outlined above based on the
information fumished herein.
Civil Penalty #1 - Failure to properly operate and maintain the
wastewater treatment plant on or about January 26, 2001:
According to our pennit we are required to employ a certified wastewater
treatment plant operator in responsible charge (ORC) of our wastewater
treatment facility. As evidenced in the list of woladons In Me "Findings
and Decisions and Assessment of Civil Penalties ; obviously the operator
on or about January 26, 2001 was the party responsible for failure to
properly operate and maintain Me plant.
The operators were always saying die Blow was too high. We have had
many fines because they were saying the flow was too high which also
caused Me solids to wash out of the plant which is absolutely not true
proven by flow meter records data after flow meter was installed in
February 2oo1.
%z/ 3

. .s.
After the flow meter was installed, the next month was compliant with
flow and has been each and every month. In April there were other
problems such as fecal and D.O.
By the first of year 2001 we realized our operators were not able to run
our plant in compliance with our permit and the governmental rules We
began to Cautious - look for reputable operators. That was not an easy
task as there are very few certified operators interested in a small plant
like ours
Civil Penalty #2 - Failure to notify DWQ within 24 hours of the
noncompliant event as observed on January 26, 2001:
It was impossible for me to report it because the operators did not tell me
about it On 1126 I happened to stop by and they had already finished
cleaning the o eek and reseeding the plant
Civil Penalty #3 - Permitting waste to be discharged into the waters of
the State in violation of the daily maximum permitted effluent limit for
Total Suspended Residue:
the mason the plant was discharging solids into the creek is because of
excessive wasting causing the solids to be young and fluty and would not
sefiAe After the solids were seen by department personnel then the
operators reseeded the plant two to three times at extra expense to us
but with the reseeding of old mature solids the plant ran better for a
while.
Attached is a copy of a letter sent to Kenneth Schuster on May 4, 2001 replying
to his letter of March 30 concerning this same event. This letter reiterates the
position of Knightdale Estates and I hope you will take the information therein
under advisement when considering remission.
There are two questions I would like to respectfully ask:
1. On what basis were the enforcement costs of $321.10 calculated?
2. Why did it take from May 200E until February 2002 to assess penalties?
Dr. Thorpe, as I have said in every letter of this nature, it has always been and
continues to be our desire to be in total compliance with the laws, rules, and
regulations of our country. We are just a small family business trying to make it
in America and in the State of forth Carolina. We do not try to hide anything
and we do the hest we can in every circumstance. I think you will agree that the
State seems to strongly resist giving us assistance and at the same time works
hard at assessing penalties.
With that in mind, what's a poor boy to do?

We appreciate that some of the previous penalties were reduced but in every
case we have asked for remission, not reduction. Not once have we received
remission. However, as this and previous requests for remission have shown,
incompetent• operators licensed by the State caused the problems. So it is our
opinion that because we have already been penalized more than adequate and
many, many more charges incurred because of the operators' incompetence, we
would ask for total remission of these penalties.
Thank you for your consideration.
Attachments
Sincerely,
Harvey Murphrey
General Partner
l(/s

I
1. INTRODUCTION _ _ DWO Meeting December 13, 2001
2. We are owners and operators of Knightdale Estates Mobile Home Park which
is a family partnership. We have been law-abiding citizens for 60 years right
here in Wake and Johnston County.
3. For 9 years we ran the wastewater treatment facility with operators being
100% compliant excluding one month.
4. In June 2000 we hired EnviroUnk who operated the plant for 12 months, with
all 12 months being non -compliant mostly because of false reading of the
flow.
5. After a few months of being non -compliant we started searching for new
operators. As you may or may not know, It is an extremely difficult task to
find capable operators.
6. During this 12 months not only was the plant non -compliant but the
operators were uneducated to the mechanical operation of the plant itself.
7. Because of their lack of knowledge 5 blower motors and 1 blower were
burned up and the electrical panel which runs all the equipment literally
caught fire and totally burned up which had to be replaced by a complete
new panel.
8. Because of all this lack of knowledge we spent thousands of dollars in repairs.
9. Not only were we non -compliant for the 12 months, EnviroLink was paid
according to written agreement on time every month as if they were
operating the plant in compiance.
10.In addition to this, the wa_ sting process was multiplied many times over
normal procedures which cost several more thousands of dollars during this
12-month period. 2 or 3 times we paid to re -seed the plant because the
good sludge was hauled away.
11. During this same time frame State personnel came to inspect the plant and
found solids flowing into the for which EnviroLink also charged us
several hundred dollars for the clean-up process.
12. Many, many times while still looking for new operators we questioned what
they did and how they did it and the Regional Supervisor also questioned the
hows and whys of the operation of the plant and still nothing changed.

2
13.1 personally would like for there to be a policy for the licensed operators to
receive the penalties for violations. I strongly believe this would create much
better operators.
14. CONCLUSION
15. For 9 years managing this %duty, there was never a flow violation.
16.Our flow meter was installed and calibrated by Mike Oudaw. The flow meter
immediately showed the flow averaging approximately .018 which proves the
flow was never non -compliant.
17. After the flow meter was installed and calibrated, inspectors requested the
flow meter to be re -calibrated — which we did and it is to this day st ll reading
.017. .018 .019 million gallons per day which.is only 70 to 75% of
yermitked Mgnthly aygraae.
18. Short Story
13. Without any requirement from the Public Water Supply Section we replaced
the older outdated fresh water tank with a new state of the art water tank
and pump house facility at a cost of over $20,000 in order to furnish our
tenants with the best quality of fresh water.
20. We were advised that we needed equalization tanks at the treatment plant.
We hired engineers to study and design an equalization system for the
treatment plant. This cost a few more thousand dollars.
21.If approved this system will cost in excess of an additional $15,000.
22. Bottom Line
23. We ask for remission of all penalties and we ask to get approval to construct
the equalization tanks so that we can spend our money in such a way that we
feel strongly would help to improve water quality instead of paying penalties
for false violations.
24. Thank you for your time and consideration.
/ K7

DWQ Meeting July 2002
Gentlemen, my name is Betty Murphrey and I will appreciate your careful
attention to what I am going to say.
Knightdale Estates MHP Limited Partnership is a small family partnership,
with my husband Harvey and I as general partners and our son and daughter
involved with the maintenance and accounting.
1. Regarding Case Number PC 01-028 please consider the following:
Civil Penalty #1— According to our permit we are required to employ a
wastewater treatment plant operator certified by the State. Obviously the
operator in January, 2001, (EnviroUnk, Inc.) was the party responsible for
failure to properly operate and maintain the plant. By this time in early 2001
we realized our operators were not able to run our plant In compliance with
our permit and the governmental rules. We began to very cautiously look for
reputable operators - - not an easy task since there are very few interested in
a small plant like ours. We did hire another set of operators who were
referred by State personnel. These two operators,.Dan Brisson and Charlie
Simpson, work for the City of Raleigh fulltime and alas, although they are
certified by the state, were unqualified to run our plant to the permit
standards and we have had to change operators again. We have been in
complete compliance since we hired our present operator in April of this year,
Guido Carerra, GC Environmental.
Civil Penalty #2 — It was impossible for us to report the noncompliant event
because the operators did not tell us about it. On January 26, 2001 Harvey
happened to stop by and the operators had already finished cleaning the
creek and reseeding the plant. State personnel had already been to the plant
and they did not notify us either. We have been penalized by the State for
lack of reporting, yet the State nor County personnel rarely ever have the
courtesy to notify us where there is a problem or when they need to visit the
plant for inspections. I do not understand that as we have never, ever tried
to hide anything and we always try our best to comply with all rules and
regulations.
Civil Penalty #3 — The reason the plant was discharging solids into the creek
is because of excessive wasting — another instance of unqualified operators.
l,elg

We have written other letters regarding this matter — I will not bore you with
reading all of them but I hope you will consider them in your decision
regarding this matter.
2. Regarding Case #LV 01-390 please consider the following:
During the month of June 2001 we were still trying to recover from -the
mishandling of many phases of our plant by the previous operator. One of
these mishandled items caused the electrical problem as noted on -the
DMR. During the previous operator's tenure the company consistently
tried to operate both blowers at the same time.
During this process we burned up one blower and four 5 HP.motors. The
plant is -designed electrically and mechanically to run only one blower at
the time. The electrical panel box had been overloaded so long and so
many times that in June it completely burned up. At that time we had an
electrician to install new breaker boxes for both blowers and there were a
number of times that the electrical power would be off in short Intervals.
Since the panel boxes have been. replaced with new ones, new wiring, etc.
there have been no more electrical problems until now and we do not
anticipate any electrical problems.
The reason we have been out of compliance is because of unqualified
State certified operators. I know this sounds like a broken record but it is
TRUE. The same plant that has been out of compliance several times in
the past two years is now running perfectly by G C Environmental.
Gentlemen, let me advise you that we are now paying $682 per month to
pay off penalties of $8,186.98 previously assessed, wrongly in my opinion.
And gentlemen, let me also tell you that we are a small Independent
family business in times when the economy is very poor, mobile homes
are being repossessed by mortgage companies and moved out of our
community monthly. Again, because of the economy mobile homes are
not being moved in and we are therefore very short on rental receipts.
/�9

We also have mortgage payments to make, utilities to pay, workers to
pay, these other fines to pay and we just simply cannot afford to pay any
more fines. I am asking you and you and you and you and you and you
and you to please vote to dismiss these penalties.
Thank you.
/.5'l9
./

EFFLUENT
ir NPDES PERMIT NO., ,`' G `f :t s� ' L DISCHARGE NO. r: o ! MONTH J k YEAR .2 i• c: '-
FACILITY NAME f t : t ,. r , ri � :.. #- , ,c iT P 4, F CLASS -LL COUNTY'
OPERATOR IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE (ORC) C- k "d o ••� (h k GRADE L PHONE
CERTIFIED LABORATORIES (1) 7r, vp T_ _ __ _ (2)
CHECK BOX IF ORC HAS CHANGED PERSON(S) COLLECTING S AMPLES G -.r c. 4 • �••
Mail ORIGINAL and 013E COPY to:
ATTN- CENTRAL FILES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
I617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALE1GII. NC 27699-1617
(SIGNATUREOFgERATOR IN RESPONSIBLECHARGE)
TM TSIGNATURL' I MRTWY THATTAIS REPORT 1S
ACCURATE AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE
no lk:L
ATE
DWQ Form NIR-1 (Q 11OQ) /

Facility Status: (Please check: one of the following)
All monitoring data and sampling frequencies meet permit requirements
Compliant
All monitoring data and sampling frequencies do NOT meet permit requirements ❑
Noncompliant
It the facility is noncompliant, please comment on corrective actions being taken in respect to i quipment, operation, maintenance, etc.,
and a thug -table for improvements to be made.
" 1 certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance
with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry
of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information
submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for
submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations"
Pcrmittee Address
00010 Temperature
00076 Turbidity
000so Color (Pt -Co')
M082 Color (ADM[)
00095
Conducbvity
00300
Dissolved Oxygen
00310
BOD5
00340
COD
00100
pH
00530
Total Suspended
Residue
00545
Settleable Matter
I(-n,, A+�,.L- r, -j-,i,I--, Nrt t
Permit ee (Please print or type)
ignature &JPCrmit e" Date
(Required)
71 _, f@ L;
Phone Number
PARAMETER CODES
00556
Oil & Grease
00951
Total Fluoride
00600
Total Nitrogen
01002
Total Arsenic
(X)610
Ammonia Nitrogen
00625
Total Kjeldhal
01027
Cadmium
Nitroeen
00630
Nitrates/Nitrites
01032
Hezavalent Chromium
01034
Chromium,
00665 Total Phosphorous
00720
Cyanide
01037
Total Cobalt
00743
Total Sulfide
01042
Copper
00927
Total Magnesium
01045
Iron
00929
Total Sodium
01051
Lead'
00940
Total Chloride
01062
Molybdenum
0 0
01067
Nickel
01077
Silver
01092
Zinc
01105
Aluminum
I i
1 T Q'
Permit Ern Date
50060 Total
Residual
Chlorine
01147
Total Selenium
71880 'Formaldehyde
31616
Fecal Colifornt
71900 ,Mercury
32730
Total Phenolics
81551 Xylene
34235
Benzene
34481
Toluene
38260
MBAS
39516
PCBs
50050
Flow
Parameter Code assistance may obtained by calling the Point Source Campliance/Enforcement Unit at [phone] or by visiting
the Water Quality Section's web site at h2o.ear.staIc.nc.us/wqs and linking to the Unit's information pages.
Use only units designated in the reporting facility's permit for reporting data.
" 09C must Visit faCillty and document visitation of facility as required per ISA NCAC 80.0204.
it signed by other than the permittee. delegation of signatory authoritymustmust be on rile with the state per I5A NCAC 2B .0506 (b)
(2) (D). /v ty
r

EFFLUENT
NPDCS PERMIT NO. :•` t 0 C' ;F a .A L- N DISCHARGE NO. 0 C I MONTH J u viE - -EAR C t
FACILITY NAME Emj+-Jf, Mtte LP CLASSZ COUNTY
OPERATOR IN RESPOhS tBLE CHARGE (ORC) &- A'id o : GRADE-Z PHONE
CERTIFIED LABORATORIES 1 11_ +r, + I_1
CHECK BOX IF ORC HAS CHANGED 0 PERSON(S) COLLECTING SAN PLES 1,.....
Mail ORIGINAL and ONE COPY to:
Al-I'M ('ENTR.IL FILES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY iSIGNATEIRE OF OgERATOR IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE,
1617 iNL1IL SERVICE CENTER BY THIS SIGNAn!RE. I CERTIFY THAT TIIIS REPORT IS
KALEIGII. NC 27609-1617 ACCUXATE AND COMPLETE TOME BE_ti' OF 36tY JLN0VVLEDGF-
4
z
Y=
S110 0
0IH)10
00400
50060
00310
00610
00530
31616
00.400
0%00
0%6•
coax ; vc k:
FLOW
=
f••
� Z
14
C Z
Z
�
L: W
{ 2
j
's z
^
Z
Z
G
IENTERP►Rx%IEiERrODF:�AOVE
NA;Ik ANT UNITS BELOW
E£F•
ff
G
{
! IIRSI1IRNl
Y;jVN
NIGD
° C
[ tiiTS
❑ l'cn
%IGA. I
SIG/L
%1G1L
p/IWJ.%ILI
SIGIL
!61GA-
NIGA.
I a�v_tll.vi 1 I,,;i3�
��I,CI.
ILys
-
Ia-7
o'l A 7
IIU1: ;sii.: 1 V
I,GtZ7
a'•a
f
I
I
I
I
I
f
l,J
i�
I. J
L'. l
e.5 Z
`f.7
%6
Z.
a
;it4tiStl:
I
.�I
JS%iT
t. 10
r.�
�Q
1. �''
7
�•�.'j
-CIO
77,
=l
-
r3�±11.�•
1
29
---
�� ii 9
1
?0
�
:tJICS
AVEILIGE
7
.rl.
.1.7 L
IF R, V
03 a 3
'�L1SI�lt.?1t
C
6.L`'
:�':
.,
.. 'D::.
:.?0
A.
�
o
Cow rf)/GrubtG1
G
(; '
:'
�.
.•
%toarhh• Limil
(< C' ~ N4
E' 9 .
Al .+
a7
0
.20 D
S. D
All A
N I
AI 1.4r
Ai .4
D11'Q Furm AIR -I 10I/(X))
15--1

Facility Status: (Please check one of the following)
All monitoring data and sampling frequencies meet permit requirements
Compliant
All monitoring data and sampling frequencies do NOT meet permit requirements ,
Noncompliant
If the facility is noncompliant. please comment on corrective actions being taken in respect to equipment, operation, maintenance, etc..
and a time -table for improvements to be made.
1 certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance
with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry
of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information. the information
submitted is. to the hest of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for
submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for ]Mowing violations."
C i v-., •k., tit r* fj 4. P
Permittee (Please print or type)
5igaature Permittee** Date
(Required)
{irt A r L -1_ ; ��i r 3 L Z? �_ �= - v %>r �> 3
Permittee Address Phone Number Permit Exp, Date
PARAMETER CODES
00010
Temperature
00556
Oil & Grease
00951
Total Fluoride
01067
Nickel
00076
Turbidity
00600
Total Nitrogen
01002
Total Arsenic
01077
Silver
00080
Color (Pt -Col
00610
Ammonia Nitrogen
01092
Zinc
00082
Color(ADMI)
00625
TotalK3eldhal
01027
Cadmium
01105
Aluminum
Nitrogen
c 01)5
Conductivity
00630
Nitraies/Nitrites
01032
Hexavalent Chromium
01147
Ttital Selenium
W300
Dissolved Oxygen
01034
Chromium
31616
Fecal Coliform
00310
BODs
00665
Total Phosphorous
32730
Total Phenolics
00140
COD
00720
Cyanide
01037
'Total Cobalt
34235
Benzene
00400
pH
00745
Total Sulfide
01042
Copper
34481
Toluene
00530
Total Suspended
00927
Total Magnesium
01045
Iron
38260
MBAS
Residue
00929
Total Sodium
01051
Lead
39516
PCBs
00545
SeLdeable Matter
00940
Total Chloride
01062
Molybdenum
50050
Flow
50060 Total
Residual
Chlorine
71990 Formaldehyde
71900 Mercury
81551 Xylene
Parameter Code assistance may obtained by calling the Point Source Compliance/Enforcement Unit at [phone] or by visiting
the Water (Quality Section's well site at h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wtls and linking to the Unit's information pages.
Use only units designated in the reporting facility's permit for reporting data.
* ORC must visit facility and document visitation of facility as required per 15A NCAC 80 .0204.
** If signet! by outer than We Permittee. delegation of signatory authority must be on We with the state per 15A NCAC 2B .0506 (h)
t�1 iD1.
151

EFFLUENT
NPDES PERMIT NO. . �` C: �, D �t 0 a & it DISCHARGE NO. C i I MONTH YEAR
FACILITY NAME_ Ij,.atc Cl.ir.*rl Mf+_P L_p CLASS__L_C__COUNTY
-OPERATOR [N RESPONSIYLE CIARGE (ORC) GRADE= PHONE_.
CHECK BOX IF Oily HAS C1IANGED Q PERSONS) COLLECTING SAMPLES C A J d 1 J C'-
Mail ORIGIN. -IL. and ONE COPY to:
AT N.(`EN RALFILES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
I617 jNL1IL SERVICE CENTER
F-M.EIGIL NC '.7699-1617
BY THIS SIGNATI,Rt I CERTIFY THAT THIS REPORT IS
ACCURATE AND COMPLETE TO T}TE BEST OF,Nn' 1►NOW'LEDGE.
=
7a
w
50050
00010
0M00
90060
00310
00610
00530
31616
00300
00600
00665
10cit4' rctca
FL(Alk.
.
x r
,�. "
..
z
X
�-
C
Z
C
rz tY'
�z
..
w L_:
Z CSt
- v
e
L
44
_
`• z
v
_. Z
5
z
r.
e»
ENTER PAR METER CODE AIROVE'
NAME AND I'tiITS BELOW
EFF
INF
I-
[•- y
1IRS1
TIRS1
YJhr,
NIGD
C
I,NITS
C1 I:Gn.
NIWL
VIGIL
NIGH.
81INSIL
MG/L
SLGIL
Nlr:n..
L
LSD
«
o.vS�..
lO
1S.Si
611A5,jl.0
1
.
EC-= 1
Ii
y
.c-fi
aI.S7
SILJ
1:0
7,7-
Q.;I41-
3
il.iq
1.3.0
l
•ii�--
I
I.Of3z
l
.0 r
3 .0
0.3
ftSil��tIt
`!
I. 0 T
aA-'
'(,l'
I --1
`f
a 1. .
rd,5
i .l 0
9, R
0,05-
7,'
S• ���
I tsi—
l
.� i
(9l "_
4 U
4 l,J
17
1 ac.C'
LI2
r. !
1, o
..
..
C I 3t
;2;43
i..
�,
Z
5. 4-r
31
lj,40LI
I:13
f
_.3,S
"
AVXJ AGF
, o l3
1, 0
I
t7, 9d
(1,01A.
12, a
S. 7
4
3,0j 140.6
9',141
�L►&T:131
.D
:.' :: :;?
::: O
, .:.::.:'
�;
;
roK:
.a.q
!
MIMNIrm
: C0 3
V?
b,
<•7.
0,05'
.61
5,4S-
,(.q
3,0q
�iC. .3
31S,4
6- .
C
[-
\[onlgk Limit
CAl ws
-
N /}
37
i{,
C
�v �7
j i J
�! A
�.! 4
)-t .4
, 14
DWQ Form 111R-i iOl/(N)) .SS

Facility Status: (Please check one of the following j
4
All monitoring data and sampling frequencies meet permit requirements El
Compliant
All monitoring data and sampling frequencies do NOT meet permit requirements ❑
Noncompliant
If the facility is noncompliant. please comment on corrective actions being taken in respect to equipment. operation, maintenance, etc..
and a time -table for impruvrments to he made.
I certify, under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance
with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry
of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information
strhtnitted is. to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate. and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for
sut+mitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
Perrnittec Address
K)01 t)
Temperature
00076
Turbidity
0A 0,,90
color (Pt-Cu )
WO-S=
Color (ADNII)
�; !JY5
CJneiuCdVit}•
00300
Dissolved Oxygen
M310
BOD5
00340
COD
00401)
pli
0115;0
Total Suspended
Residue
(M45
Settleable. Matter
k n t c 64-4 ,�c ,<; { j-4w
Perminee (Tease print or type)
Si inature of rmittee** Date
(Required) .�
Phone Number
PARAMETER CODES
00556
Oil & Grease
0095I
Total Fluoride
00600
Total Nitrogen
01002
Total Arsenic
00610
Ammonia Nitrogen
00625
Total K}eldhal
01027
Cadmium
Nitrogen
00630
Nitratcs/Nitrites
01032
Hexavalent Chromium
01034
Chromium
0(1tSfi5 Total Phosphorous
01067
Nickel
01077
Silver
01092
Zinc
01105
Aluminum
D-Y V 3
Perntit Exp. Date
5(X)N) Total
Residual
Chlorine
Ol i 47 Total Selenium 71 SSt1 Furmaide-hN-dc
31616 Fecal Coliform 71900 Mercum,
32730 Total Phenolics 81551 aylene
00720
Cyanide
01037
Total Cohalt
34235
Benzene
00745
"Total Sulfide
01042
Copper
34481
Toluene
00927
Toial Magnesium
01045
iron
.38260
MBAS
00929
Total Sodium
01051
Lead
39516
PCBs
00940
Total Chloride
01062
Molybdenum
50050
Flow
Parameter Code assistance may obtained by calling the Point Source Compliam-riEnforcemeni Unit ai (9191 733-5093 or by visiting
the Water Quality Section's web site at rQi,enr.statemc.ns/wgs and linking to the Unii s information pages.
Use only units designated in the reporting facility's permit for reporting data.
URC must visit facility and document visitation of facility as required per 15A NCAC SG .0204.
rw li signed by other than the permittee. delegation of signatory authority must be on file with the state per 15A NCAC 213 .0506 (h)
I,
IVV

. State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
i Division of Water Quality
a_
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
W 17 2002
Harvey Murphrey
Knightdale MHP Limited Partnership
808 Eagle Rock Rd
Wendell, NC 27591
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
70001530 0002 2100 4636
'T . a
- I, TF?W'A
'A
MCDENR
EWRONMENT AND NATURAL RESCURC ES
Subject: Remission Request of Civil Penalty Assessment
Knightdale NMT Limited Partnership
Case Numbers LM 02-016 and LV 02-287
NPDES Permit Number NCO040266
Wake County
Dear Mr. Murphrey:
I have considered the information submitted in support of your request for remission in
accordance with G.S. 143-215.6A(f) and have not found giounds to modify the civil penalty
assessments of $343.93 and $543.93.
Should you choose to pay the assessed penalties, payment should be tendered to me at the
letterhead address within thirty (30) days of the receipt of this letter. Please make checks payable
to the Deparu lent of Environment and Natural Resources.
You also have the option of presenting your request to the Committee on Civil Penalty
Remissions, which is comprised of members of the Environmental Management Commission.
The Committee may consider such requests and render final and binding decisions in these
matters. You may argue your request before the Committee, and the Division Staff will argue
against any reduction of the assessment.
Should you choose to present your request to the Committee, please notify me at the letterhead
address within thirty (30) days of the receipt of this letter. Your request will be scheduled to be
heard on the agenda of the next scheduled Committee meeting, and you will be notified of the
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N. C. 27699-1617 Telephone 919-733-SO83 Fax 919-733-%12
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer SO% recycledl10% post -consumer paper
1-S*7

date and time. If the Division does not receive a response regarding this notice, Division staff
will automatically place your case on the agenda for an upcoming Committee meeting.
If you have any questions about this letter, please contact Vanessa Manuel at 919n33-5083,
extension 532. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.
Cc: Raleigh Region WQ Supervisor
��rocmre���'�l04
Central Files
Sincerely,
Alan W. Klimek, P. E.
.1s

Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
t7 -1c Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
January 15, 2003
Dr. Fred Cunningham CERTIFIED MAIL
Northeast Carolina Farms, Inc. RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
P. O. Box 865
Moyock, NC 27958
RE: Rescheduling of Request for Remission of Civil Penalty
Belcross Farm (Farm #15-11)� C EFV EU
Camden County
Case Number DV 00-029 JAN 2 12003
Dear Dr. Cunningham:
.11 t 01_11tAI()
This is to confirm that your remission request hearing for the referenced civil penalty has
been scheduled for February 13, 2003. The Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions will
convene immediately following the close of the regularly scheduled business meeting of the
Environmental Management Commission in the Ground Floor Conference Room of the
Archdale Building, 512 N. Salisbury St., Raleigh, North Carolina (see enclosed directions).
You should arrive no later than 11:00 a.m. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me
at [phone], extension 539.
Sincerely,
Steven C. Lewis
cc: JIm-Mulligan-Washington Regional Supervisor
File # DV 00-029
WXY.
NCDENR
Customer Service: Mailing Address: Telephone [phone] Location:
1-877-623-6748 1617 Mail Service Center Fax [phone] N. Salisbury St.
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 State Courier #52.01-01 Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
50% recycled / 10°S post -consumer paper
httpJ/h2o. enr. state. nc. us

November 12, 2002
Dr. Fred Cunningham
Northeast Carolina Farms, Inc.
P. O. Box 865
Moyock, NC 27958
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
RE: Rescheduling of Request for Remission of Civil Penalty
Belcross Farm (Farm #15-11)
Camden County
Case Number DV 00-029
Dear Dr. Cunningham:
neCe 'E'D
Nov 15 2002
DWQ-WARD
Your remission request hearing for the referenced civil penalty has been rescheduled for
December 12, 2002. 1 apologize for any inconvenience that the cancellation of the October
remissions hearing may have caused. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at
[phone], extension 539.
Sincerely,
Steven C. Lewis
cc: Jffh Mulligan-) Washington Regional Supervisor
File # DV 00-029
Customer Service: Mailing Address: Telephone [phone]
1.877-623-6748 1617 Mail Service Center Fax [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 State Courier 452.01-01
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
50% recycled / 10% post -consumer paper
http://hZo.enr.state.nc. us
NCDEMR
Location:
512 N. Salisbury St.
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617

Michael F. Easley, Governor -bWQArxRO
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
October 9, 2002
Mr. Joseph Balok
Belcross Farm
PO Box 416
Moyock, NC 27958
Subject: Notice of Deficiency
Animal Compliance Evaluation Site Inspection
Belcross Farm
Facility No. 15-1 1
Dear Mr. Balok,
Enclosed please find a copy of the Compliance Site Inspection (as viewed in the DWQ database) conducted at the
referenced facility by the Division of Water Quality from the Washington Regional Office. Please read this
inspection and keep it with all other documents pertaining to your animal operation for future inspections.
In general, these inspections included verifying that: (1) the farm has a Certified Animal Waste Management Plan
(CAWMP); (2) the farm is complying with requirements of the State Rules 15 NCAC 21.1.0217, Senate Bill 1217, and
the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan; (3) the farm operation's waste management system is being operated
properly under the direction of a Certified Operator; (4) the required records are being kept; and (5) there are no signs
of seepage, erosion, and/or runoff. The following deficiencies were noted during the inspection:
The last soil samples analysis was dated year 2000, with no samples tested during the 2001 calendar year. In
accordance with condition III, item 3 of your general permit, you are required to conduct an annual Standard Soil
Fertility Analysis, including pH, copper and zinc. Please remember to take soil tests annually. It is also noted that
the land owner is not readily forth coming with cropping activities, such as the application of possible commercial
fertilizers or time applications. As noted during the inspection it may be possible that a soils test was conducted on
the fields which received waste during the 2001 calendar year however any possible copy of the soils test has not
been obtained for facility records. It is highly recommended that communication between the animal waste facility
operators and the land operators be improved in order for this farm to stay in compliance with it's General Permit.
As a reminder, please note the following comments, which are conditions of the Certified Animal Waste Management
Plan and the General Permit; therefore, these items must be implemented:
cp The maximum waste level in lagoons/storage ponds shall not exceed that specified in the CAWMP. At a
minimum, maximum waste level for waste for lagoons/storage ponds must not exceed the level that provides
adequate storage to contain 25 year, 24 hour storm event plus an additional foot of structural freeboard.
..... ...... ...... .._........_ _.._.�.__An-analysis-ofthe-liquid-animal-waste-from-the-lagoon-shall-be-conducted-as close to the time of application -as- -
practical and at least within 60 days (before or after) of the date of application. This analysis shall include the
following parameters: Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Zinc and Copper.
cp Soil analysis is required annually. Lime is to be applied to each receiving crop as recommended by the soil
analysis.
cp The following records are required: off -site solids removal, maintenance, repair, waste/soil analysis and land
irrigation records. These records should be maintained by the facility owner/manager in chronological and legible
form for a minimum of three years.
y Land application rates shall be in accordance with the CAWMP. In no case shall land application rates exceed the
Plant Available Nitrogen &AhD rate for the receiving crop or result in nmoffduring an v given aoplication.
cp All grassed waterways shall have a stable outlet with adequate capacity to prevent ponding or flooding damages.
The outlet can be another vegetated channel, an earth ditch, stabilization structure, or other suitable outlets.
943 Washington Square Mall Washington, NC 27889 [phone] (Telephone) [phone] (Fax)
Customer Service

Page 2
Belcross Farm
Facility No. 15-11
It is suggested, not a regukern to keep crop yield information for future use to update your waste management
plan. You will need three years of crop yield data before your plan can be updated.
The OTC has the duties to ensure that waste is applied in accordance with the CAWMP and General Permit by
properly managing, supervising, and documenting daily operation and maintenance. The OIC also has the
responsibility to certify monitoring and reporting information. The failure of an OIC to perform his/her duties can
result in a letter of reprimand, suspension, of certification, or revocation of certificates.
For your information, any swine facility that has a discharge to surface waters of the State will have to apply for
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit with the Division of Water Quality, effective
January 1, 2001.
Thank you for your assistance and cooperation during the inspection. If you have any questions, please contact me
at 252-946-6481, ext. 208 or your Technical Specialist.
Sincerely,
Scott Vinson
Environmental Engineer
Cc: NCDSWC-WaRO (w/o attachments)
Camden NRCS-Bill Blackwell
AaRO Files
SAV Files

i
, 'V s
� / 1
V
4p���/9�

.......... .
jl�

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Gregory J. Thorpe, PhD., Director
Dr. Fred Cunningham
Northeast Carolina Farms, Inc.
P. O. Box 865
Moyock, NC 27958
Dear Dr. Cunningham:
A &-
"017?915
, 4
7,LA��
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RF-souRCEs
April 5, 2002
APR 0 9 2002
RE: Rescheduling of Remission Conference
Belcross Farm
Farm # 15-11
Camden County
File #DV 00-029
Thank you for your call today regarding your schedule conflict with the April I V"
remission hearing. Your remission request has been rescheduled for the May 9, 2002 meeting. I
will notify you by mail before that date to confirm. If you have any questions, please call me at
[phone], ext. 539.
Sincerely,
�.h�.c--
Z�'4
Steve Lewis
Non -Discharge Compliance & Enforcement
Jim ulligan, Washington Regional Supervisor
n Hardison, WARO
File # DV 00-029
41failing Address: Telephone (9I9) 733-5083
1617 Mail Service Center Fax '(9I9) 733-0059
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 State Courier #52-01-01
An Equal Opportunity /Afrntative Action Employer
50.% recycled /10% post -consumer paper
hup://h2o. ennstatem cats
Location:
512 N. Salisbury St.
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617

RECE9VED
1 �
MAR 2 1 20E2
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment DWQ-WARD
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Dr. Fred Cunningham
Northeast Carolina Farms, Inc.
P.O. Box 865
Moyock, NC 27958
March 15, 2002
All
ram.
19
NCDENR
NORTH QkRo INA DEPARTmeb r of
EjwRommv,rr AND NATURAL RESOURCES
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
SUBJECT: _ Request for Remission of Civil Penalty
Pursuant to N.C.G.S. 143-215.6A(f)
Belcross Farm
Camden County
Case Number DV 01-029
Dear Dr. Cunningham:
Your request for remission has been placed on the agenda for a April 11, 2002 meeti of the
Environmental Management Commission's Committee on CS ssions. The
Committee will convene immediately following the close of the regularly scheduled business
meeting of the Environmental Management Commission in the Ground Floor Conference Room of
the Archdale Building, 512 N. Salisbury St., Raleigh, North Carolina (see enclosed directions). You
should arrive no later than 11:00 a.m.
The factors to be considered by the Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions are whether:
(a) one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in G.S. 143B-282.1(b) were
wrongly applied to the detriment of the petitioner;
(b) the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting from the
violation;
(c) the violation was inadvertent or the result of an accident;
(d) the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations;
(e) payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the remaining necessary
remedial actions.
Mailing Address: Telephone [phone] Location:
1617 Mail Service Center Fax [phone] N. Salisbury St.
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 State Courier #52-01 -01 Raleigh, NC 27699-I617
An Equal Opportunity /Affirmative Action Employer
50% recycled / 10% post -consumer paper
hap, 11h2o. en r. state.nc. its

n
You or your representative will be allowed approximately five minutes for your presentation.
A representative from the Division of Water Quality will present the case against remission. The
Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions may remit none of the penalty, a part of the penalty, or the
entire penalty. The entire amount of the penalty can only be remitted when the violator has not been
assessed civil penalties for previous violations, and when payment of the civil penalty will prevent
payment for the remaining necessary remedial actions.
You also have the option of paying the civil penalty of $5,571.72 if you decide not to request
remission. If you choose to pay the penalty, please call Steve Lewis at [phone], extension
539, so that we can remove the case from the schedule. Please make your check payable to the
Department of Environment and Natural Resources and reference the case number. Send payment
within 30 days of your receipt of this letter to the attention of:
Mr. Steve Lewis
DWQ
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
If you are unable to attend on this date, please notify us at least 10 working days in
advance and your hearing will be rescheduled. Exceptions to the 10-day notice will be made in
the event of emergency situations. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free
to contact me at [phone], extension 539.
cc: Jim Mulligan, Washington Regional Office
File DV 01-029
Sincerely,
Steven C. Lewis

State of North Carolina �
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources :` �i� 2U2
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor DWQ-WARO
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Dr. Fred Cunningham
Northeast Carolina Farms, Inc.
P.Q. Box 865
Moyock, NC 27958
Dear Dr. Cunningham :
!••
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA [DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
March 7, 2002
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
RE: Request for Remission of Civil Penalty
Belcross Farm
Farm # 15-11
Camden County
File #DV 00-029
In accordance with North Carolina General Statute 143-215.6A(f), I considered the
information you submitted in support of your request for remission and did not find grounds to
modify the civil penalty assessment of $5,571.72.
There are two options available to you. You may pay the civil penalty assessment or you may
present your request for remission to the Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions of the
Environmental Management Commission. If you choose to pay the penalty, please make your check
payable to the Department of Environment and Natural Resources and reference the case number.
Send payment within 30 days of your receipt of this letter to the attention of:
Mr. Steve Lewis
DWQ
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Mailing Address: Telephone [phone]
1617 Mail Service Center Fax [phone]
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 State Courier #52-01-01
An Equal Opportunity /Aff rmatire Action Entploy'er
50% recycled / 10% post -consumer paper
http://7i2o. enr. state. tic. us
Location:
512 N. Salisbury St.
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617

You also have the option of presenting your request to the Committee on Civil Penalty
Remissions, which is comprised of members of the Environmental Management Commission. You
or your representative will be allowed approximately five minutes for your presentation. A
representative from the Division of Water Quality will present the case against remission. The
Committee on Civil Penalty Remissions will render a final and binding decision in accordance with
NCGS 143B-282.1(c).
If you choose to present your request to the committee, please notify me at the address above
within 30 days of receipt of this letter. Your request will be scheduled on the agenda of the next
scheduled committee meeting and you will be notified of the date and time. If a response is not
received by the Division regarding this notice, your request will be automatically scheduled on the
agenda for an upcoming committee meeting.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. If you would like a receipt that your check was
received, please send it via certified mail. Please contact Steve Lewis at [phone], ext. 539
if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
cc: Jim Mulligan, Washington Regional Supervisor
�phne.Cullom WARO
Lyn Hardison, WARO
File # DV 00-029
Central Files

r; �

• l �
Y
-+� �----
r
-t.-. ��

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Dr. Fred Cunningham
Northeast Carolina. Farms, Inc.
P.O. Box 865
Moyock, NC 27958
Dear Dr. Cunningham:
�V5 -7�- " -
ATF?W,j
NCDENR
NORTH CAROL-INA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT ANo NATURAL RESOURCES
December 19, 2001
RE: Remission Request'
Belcross Farm
Farm # 15-11
Camden County
File #DV 00-029
RECEMED
DEC 2 0 2001
DWQ-WARD
. . This letter is to acknowledge receipt of your request for remission of the civil penalty levied
against the subject facility. This request will be reviewed at the next scheduled conference in
January 2002, and you will be notified about the Division's decision concerning remission. If
you have any questions, please call me at [phone], ext. 539.
Sincerely,
Steve Lewis
Non -Discharge Compliance & Enforcement
cc: Jim Mulligan; Washington Regional Supervisor w/attachment
Lyn Hardison, WARO w/attachment
aphne.Cullam, tWARO w/attachment
Central Files
File # DV 00-029 w/ 3 attachments
Mailing Address: Telephone [phone] Location:
1617 Mail Service Center Fax (9I9) 733-0059 512 N. Salisbury St.
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 State Courier #52-01-01 Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
50% recycled / 10% past -consumer paper
hip: //h2o. en r. state, nc. its

Northeast Carolina Farms. Inc.
P. 0, Box 865, Moyoc
[phone] office(252)435-2387 fax
December 10, 2001
Mr- Steve Lewis
NCDENR, DWQ
1671 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Dear Mr. Lewis,
OEC 17 Cal i
WATEF.' QUALITY SECTION
Non -Discharge Compliance Enf.
In reference to File No. DV 00-029, farm #15-11 we are requesting remission or mitigation of the proposed fine.
This problem occurred due to the failure of a pump in the lift station, which caused the lift station to overflow. The pipe
that was installed at the request of the local conservation department, located next to the lift station had already been
cemented shut prior to this incident. This was done so if the lift station failed no waste would escape from between the
buildings. Your sample indicates there was an increased Coliform count where this pipe would have entered the ditch.
Since the pipe had been cemented shut we did not consider the possibility waste could reach the ditch.
Since the inspection we have spent over $6000.00 redesigning the lift station system. We have designed and
installed a special pump that uses a boat propeller to move both wastewater and solids to the lagoon- We have installed
an additional pump that serves as a back up to the primary pump and is tied to an alarm that sounds inside the buildings
when the second pump turns on but before there is a problem.
In addition the site between the buildings has had the top 12 inches of soil removed and composted. It has been
replaced with soil and sand. The farm has been inspected twice since this incident and passed with no problems. The
pipe that leads to the ditch has been dug up completely eliminating the possibility of any future problems.
I would propose to use the money that would be due for the fine to install water nipples in the gestation building
that is the primary water source for this lift station. We have done this on three farms in the Gaston, NC area at a cost of
$15,000. This has cut our water usage in half and made lagoon management much easier and more able to be planned. I
have included a copy of the bill for the first set of equipment excluding labor cost for the water nipples. I would estimate
that it would cost $10 per gestation crate to buy and install water nipples. This building has approximately 550 gestation
crates, which would make the cost $5500.00. The ultimate plan would be to install nipples in the breeding building, which
flows directly to the lagoon, but that would require an additional $5000 and cash flow would not allow that at this time.
I have enclosed three pictures of the area in question. Picture #1 is of the general area. You can see the primary
pump, which consists, on a five horsepower electric pump that drives a shaft with a propeller attached. It is a 6-inch pipe
that contains the propeller. This pump has been very effective in not getting clogged with the solid waste from the
buildings. The area around the lift station is clean and dry.
Picture #2 is of the primary pump. Picture #3 is of the primary pump in the lift station, along with the back up pump in
place. This pump is automatically activated if the level of the lift station exceeds the safe level of the primary pump. An
alarm is also activated when this pump is energized.
We certainly did not design this system but inherited it when we leased the farm. We have already invested a lot
of money on clean up and improvements so that the system can operate properly and efficiently. I hope you will let us
invest additional money in improvements instead of a fine. Thank you for your consideration in this matter.
Sincerely,
�ZZ ��
Fred L. Cunningham Ms. D M

Northeast Carolina Farms
File Number DV 00-029
Farm Number 15-11
Picture #1 Lift Station Area - Primary Pump in Place
v .12 -111, v - I

Northeast Carolina Farms
File Number DV 00-029
Farm Number 15-11
Picture #2 Primary Pump

Northeast Carolina Farms
File Number DV 00-029
Farm Number 15-11
Picture #3 Primary Pump Pipe - Back Up Pump Hooked to Alarm
,

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
COMMISSION
COUNTY OF CAMDEN
IN THE MATTER OF ASSESSME`7 ) WAIVER OF RIGHT TO AN
OF CIVIL PENALTIES AGAINST ) ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING AND
PERMIT NO. NIA ) STIPULATION OF FACTS
FILE NO. DV W022 _
Having been assessed civil penalties totaling S5,571.72 for
violation(s) as set forth in the assessment document of the Division of Water Quality dated,
October 30.2001 _ ., the undersigned, desiring to seek remission
of the civil penalties, does hereby waive the right to an administrative hearing in the above -stated
matter and does stipulate that the facts arc as alleged in the assessment document.
This the 4Z414_ day of C'2 ✓;t 6 � v--- , 2001.
SIGNATU
ADDRESS
f�
i
TELEPHONE
2-52-

12/10/2001 12:25 25243523e7 NORTHEAST CARJ_INA =
G & M SALES OF EASTERN N.C., INC.
'You,GeT The Beat Plus Cowfaous SBMce Al GAM Safes' TE.EMONa.
xgs=t !9t9173.•100
W14OLESALE DISTRI13UTOaS Era n2 .sc+
5+�.�$ 103 INDUSTRY COURT rAA • 191% 734.2VA
L+Q10S80Rd,iJ-C.27531) /am h1910=-3=
Pp..-*1 f919+m1.2N0
PLEASE RElIAiT TO: P.O. BOX 171 S • GOLDSBORO, NC 27533-1716
SOLD
TO
North-East Farms
c/o Dr. Fred Guiiningh4m
Fa box 865
MOyoc k , NC 27958
a008072 I 11/277/00 I i 023800 @1 . DS 1 2 BB072RH
1300., 0000
1020.0000
180e. 0000
2020.0000
20. Be00
2000. 0000
40$0. {'d00s'
10A0. 060k}
I0�d0, 0$0@
160.00$0
?Asti 0Z
4
A ET'JRN AfMir"ANCE COPY WIrM
rWIMENT TO U/SURC PMOPER 0PEOIT
TC YOUR ACCOUNT.
TERMS: NET 1S DAYS
&-op
TO
North East Farms
c/o Dr. Fred CtenninghaM
Po Box 865
Moyock, NC 27958
INSTALL
1003.00001166.12X36G 2.000009 EA i
Nipple. 1/2" x36" Galvanized
160t3.00@4l 99.'3J1011 .615000 LA
j.Elbow.- 90a--1/2" Galvanized
Ward
1000.00001525.12517 2.820000 EA
(Waterer, Nipple 475
.000. 00450 207: RC12 1.240000 EA
Clarlp. 1/2" Conduit
20. 0000; 99. 441!011 3. 07OOeO EA
Fx" .Dope -1/4 p t.
2000. 0090. 2 .300000 EA
C1414o." dose 412
4000. 000'0 16tY 2.757. 480000, FT
Gram 444ter.250'/rI. €
1000. 0lf00; 99r99077 .3500Q10t EA
'Teo.' PVC 3/4" SxSxFT" f
1000. 0000 99 77551 - .140.000 EA
M4-0.ter. Nylon--I1isert-M-Pipe
40.0300 99.351107 .750000 EA
,Tee. Galvanized 1/2" JP Ward
160.000O ti.13774 1.460000 EA
LJ--Bott. w/Nut Pka
FEB o 7 2001
PO TED
MOOii10E C[ xT • GQMMENTS'. - -- --
iM7R1ClLArE tTE 6f 1 f2ti
TR AIdfT14 CA .N A► NLAL
AUWMM AMEOT�o�e SUCCESGS IS NEVER FINAL....
1EvrS4.1e uc%r.: W.ANC6 PUT FAILURE CAN D P .
W ON PAw1hT5 CA
MPT"$fOd% 04CURNNT W-WAYS TRY, TRY AGAIN. j
7KTH,1ANW FlhAVtE
u1Af,E 4 We I
E Mk"$ WAT "MADE TERMS:
rpM s CAS. "rA3 Nut 15 CUSTOMER COPY �
ajfC7 TO CAANCE W+7++
Er wlc.g
2.000.00
615.00
2.800.00
2r 480. 00
61.40
600.00
1.920. $0
140. 0R!
30.00
233.60
SALE AST
=110. 00
LABOR CHMGES i
FREIGHT
3. �50. 00
SALES TAX
.00
TOTAL
673.30
AMOUNT RECEIVEO i
15. 153. 80
BALANCE DUE
.00
>=
1,r. 153. 00

10 Division of Water,
0 Division of Soil avid WS'ier""Conservation
0 Other'Agency
Type of Visit 1E) Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Lagoon Evaluation
Reason
Reason for Visit (D Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow up 0 Emergency Notification 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Facility Number ro No ' t 0 f isne:
--perational 0 Below Threshold
IJ Permitted Certified C3 Conditionally Certified 0 Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
Farm Name: .............. ......... County: .....
....... .............. ....... . ................... . ................ ... . . . ........... .................................... .......
J"
Owner Name: ................................................... .... % � IT,". —I Phone ........ 2 7S" g.j ............... . ........................... ....... ....... .............. ; ...................................
Mailing Address . ..... ......... .. .......................
............. I .................. ..... ........................... 1-1 .... ......................... ........................................................... .....
L."
FacilityContact: ......................................................................... —.1111c: ................................................................ Plione No: ........ I-- ........ .... ...... I ..................
Onsite Representative: ....... . .. Integrator . ........... ....... ........ .. ..
.................... .... - - --------------------- ....... -.1 .... j
7)lLr ..................
Operator Certification Number: ........ . .
............. .......... .............. ............... . .................. ... ................. ........
Certified Operator:...........
Location of Farm:
A,
[D Swine [] Poultry [:1 Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude Longitude
. 11
Design Current
Swine Canacitv Ponulation
0 Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
/o7
❑ Farrow to Feeder
❑ Farrow to Finish
C1 Gilts
El Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
10 Layer FE—ID—airy 1 .1
JCI Non-LayerNoy-Dairyl
1[:] Other I I
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons 10 Subsurface Drains Present ] Area 10 Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps ❑ No Liquid Waste Management System
Discharges & Strunin Impactti
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? [3 Yes El No
Discharge originated at: [3 Lagoon C] Spray Field C3 Other
a. If discharge is ohservod. was the conveyance man-made'! ❑ Yes E] No
h. II'discharve is ohserved. did it reach Water ol'Llie Slatc? (I l'yes. notify DWQ)
[]Yes []No
c. If discharoe is observed. what is the cstinia(Cd no%, in gauniin,!
d. Docs disJi'argc bypass a lagoon symcm? (II'ves. no6l'y D%VQ) C] Yes E] No
2. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation? C] Yes Ej No
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the State other than from a discharge? El Yes 11 No
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (freeboard plus storm storage) less than adequate? D Spillway ❑ Yes No
Structure I Sil-LICLUrc 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 S(ruc[Ure i Structure 6
Identil'ier: ................................... . ................................... .................................... ..— .............................. ................................... ...................................
Frcchoard (inches):?
0-5/0.7/01 Continued

ity Number:';,, ;t,: + - Uute of InSpCCtiU11
y. tc. •
/'Arejheii arty immediate threats to the integrity or any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
❑ Yes
No
�."; `.::':•: .: ,a.:.. :-:•• seepage, etc.),
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? '"=+4.
Yes
No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and ;the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
No
8. Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenancelmprovemen t?
❑Yes
[P No
9. Do any stuctures lack -adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
Yes
No
elevation markings? ;.. - . .
❑
Waste Application ' -
10. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
j No
11. Is there evidence of over application? ❑ Excessive Ponding , ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes]
No
12. Crop type
13. Do the receiving crops diffe with those deli
in the Certified Animal Waste Management Ilan (CAWMP)?
14. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? '
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
c) This facility: is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes No
[]Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
15. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes J] No
16. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes � No
acquired Records & Documents
17. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available?
❑ Yes] No
18. Does the' facility fail to.have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
Ye4 No
(iel WUP,'checklists, design, maps, etc.) ;,
❑
19..Does'recard keeping need.improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard; wastelnalysis & soil sample reports)
❑ Yes ❑ No
20.. Is facility not incompliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at the time of design?
❑ Yes ID No
21:"Did'tite facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge?
❑ Yes •0 No
22..Fail to notify -regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
Yes No
(ie/ discharge, freeboard problems, over application)
❑ .t
3..Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑ Yes QNo
A Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑ Yes No
'5. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP?
❑ Yes 0 No
0 No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
;omments (refer to ggesti-o- Explain any YES answers and/or'any recommendations or any other comments.
Ise drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary): ❑Field Copy [I Final
�.
Notes
Reviewer/lnspector Name
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
C. ,-¢.. ca, r lCly
Date: . l'I //5/ 1.)
05103101 Continued

My Number:
Date of Inspection
orlssues :.'°.:; fjYr.�w',i"•' z1':"'
yx,�..
. ^
25. Does, the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge attor below
❑ Yes ❑ No
> liquid level of lagoon or storage pond with no agitation?
27. _ Are there any dead animals nat disposed of properly within 24 hours?
❑ Yes j No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e. residue on'neighboring vegetation, asphalt,
❑ Yes No
roads, building structure, and/or public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the liquid surface of the lagoon? -•
❑ Yes No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.)
❑ Yes No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover?
❑ Yes No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary'cover?
❑ Yes ❑ No
` yr'
■ B
5/00

To: Belcross File
Fac. # 15-11
Camden County
From: L. Hardison
Date: February 4, 2002
Mr. Cunningham failed to respond to the Notice of Intent (NOI) in a timely manner.
Approximately 53 days after receipt of the NOI, this office received a response and it was
explained that the problem was draining of the farm entrance road into the ditch and not
the storm drainage adjacent to the lift station. It was clear from C. Dunn's inspection that
the PVC pipe located in the storm drainage ditch was used to plug the outlet. The
samples that were collected indicated that waste had entered into the storm drainage ditch
and in the roadside ditch. It is understood that money has been spent at Belcross to
improve the lift station and that is commendable, however it was not until this first
penalty that Mr. Cunningham has made any adjustments. The farm continued to stock
animals, which ultimately provided an income. It should be noted that during past
inspections, Mr. Cunningham has been uncooperative or lacked concern for the
environment.
Based on the information provided and past inspections, granting remission is not
suggested.

S1
!'ate of North Carolina
j (/ Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
/ Division of Water Quality
` Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Gr y J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
r. Fred Cunningham
Northeast Carolina Farms, Inc.
7958
Dear Dr. Cunningham:
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL ftsouRGES
December 19, 2001�r��,�F�;� 70
RE: Remission Request'
Belcross Farm
Farm # 15-11
Camden County
File #DV 00-029
This letter is to acknowledge receipt of your request for remission of the civil penalty levied
against the subject facility. This request will be reviewed at the next scheduled conference in
January 2002, and you will be notified about the Division's decision concerning remission. If
you have any questions, please call me at [phone], ext. 539.
Sincerely,
S
Steve Lewis
Non -Discharge Compliance & Enforcement
cc: Jim Mulligan, Washington Regional Supervisor w/attachment
Lyn Hardison, WARO w/attachment
Daphne Cullom, WARO w/attachment
Central Files
File # DV 00-029 w/ 3 attachments
,flailing Address: Telephone [phone] Location:
I617 Mail Service Center Fax [phone] N. Salisbury St.
Raleigh. North Carolina 27699-1617 State Courier #52-01-01 Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
An Equal Opportunin-lAffi'rniath•eAction Employer
50% recycled l 10% post -consumer paper
hrip: /lh?o. en r. state. n c. Its

Northeast Carolina Farms. Inc.
P. 0, Box 865, Moyock, NC 27958
� [phone] office(252)435-2387 fax
December 10, 2001
Mr. Steve Lewis
NCDENR, DWQ
1671 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Dear Mr. Lewis,
#SEC 17 2' i
WATER QUALITY SECTION
Nan -Discharge Compliance Enf,
In reference to File No. DV 00-029, farm #15-11 we are requesting remission or mitigation of the proposed Fine.
This problem occurred due to the failure of a pump in the lift station, which caused the lift station to overflow. The pipe
that was installed at the request of the local conservation department, located next to the lift station had already been
cemented shut prior to this incident. This was done so if the lift station failed no waste would escape from between the
buildings. Your sample indicates there was an increased Coliform.count where this pipe would have entered the ditch.
Since the pipe had been cemented shut we did not consider the possibility waste could reach the ditch.
Since the inspection we have spent over $6000.00 redesigning the lift station system. We have designed and
installed a special pump that uses a boat propeller to move both wastewater and solids to the lagoon. We have installed
an additional pump that serves as a back up to the primary pump and is tied to an alarm that sounds inside the buildings
when the second pump turns on but before there is a problem.
In addition the site between the buildings has had the top 12 inches of soil removed and composted. It has been
replaced with soil and sand. The farm has been inspected twice since this incident and passed with no problems. The
pipe that leads to the ditch has been dug up completely eliminating the possibility of any future problems.
I would propose to use the money that would be due for the fine to install water nipples in the gestation building
that is the primary water source for this lift station. We have done this on three farms in the Gaston, NC area at a cost of
$15,000. This has cut our water usage in half and made lagoon management much easier and more able to be planned. I
have included a copy of the bill for the first set of equipment excluding labor cost for the water nipples. I would estimate
that it would cost $10 per gestation crate to buy and install water nipples. This building has approximately 550 gestation
crates, which would make the cost $5500.00. The ultimate plan would be to install nipples in the breeding building, which
flows directly to the lagoon, but that would require an additional $5000 and cash flow would not allow that at this time.
1 have enclosed three pictures of the area in question. Picture #1 is of the general area. You can see the primary
pump, which consists, on a five horsepower electric pump that drives a shaft with a propeller attached. It is a 6-inch pipe
that contains the propeller. This pump has been very effective in not getting clogged with the solid waste from the
buildings. The area around the lift station is clean and dry.
Picture #2 is of the primary pump. Picture #3 is of the primary pump in the lift station, along with the back up pump in
place. This pump is automatically activated if the level of the lift station exceeds the safe level of the primary pump. An
alarm is also activated when this pump is energized.
We certainly did not design this system but inherited it when we leased the farm. We have already invested a lot
of money on clean up and improvements so that the system can operate properly and efficiently. 1 hope you will let us
invest additional money in improvements instead.of a fine. Thank you for your consideration in this matter.
Sincerely,
Fred L. Cunningham Ms. DVM

Northeast Carolina Farms
File Number DV 00-029
Farm Number 15-11
Picture #1 Lift Station Area - Primary pump in Place
A

Northeast Carolina Farms
File Number DV 00-029
Farm Number 15-11
Picture #2 Primary Pump
f
at
13

Northeast Carolina Farms
File Number DV 00-029
Farm Number 15-11
Picture #3 Primary Pump Pipe - Back Up Pump Hooked to Alarm
J

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
COMMISSION
COUNTY OF CAMDEN
IN THE MATTER OF ASSESSME`7 ) WAIVER OF RIGHT TO AN
OF CIVIL PENALTIES AGAINST } ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING AND
PERMIT NO. N/A } STIPULATION OF FACTS
FILE NO. DV 00-029
Having been assessed civil penalties totaling _ �5,571.72 _ _ _ for
violation(s) as set forth in the assessment document of the Division of Water Quality dated,
October 30-2001 _ , the undersigned, desiring to seek remission
of the civil penalties, does hereby waive the right to an administrative hearing in the above -stated
matter and does stipulate that the facts are as alleged in the assessment document.
This the w day of `r .c: e ,tic 6 e 2001.
11Z vkx e v I er�
SIGNATURt
ADDRESS
TELEPHONE
�L

12/18/2g01 12:25 2524352387 NORT-gr-A5T CA�7_IWA
G & M SALES OF EASTERN N.C., INC.
'raJ,Ge: The 0"I Plus Gaudeous SianAcf AI 05M Sales' TELEPNONE:
4-W. g !01q 774-,x2
WHOLESALE DISTRIBUTORS (M EAU+
SA s 103 INDUSTAY COURT FAA • 019i 73 -WA
GOLOSSORO, N.C. 27530 On"tv,vf 332-3U7�
PLEASE REMIT T0: P.O. BOX 1716 • GOLOSBORO. NC: 27533-171 S
SOLD
TO
North East Farms
c/o Dr. Fred Cu111ningham
Po box S65
Mayoc k , NC 47958
I
600FJ072 11/27/00 i0238Rl0 1:0, Y ' ` DS
1000..000@
1000.00E�0
1000.0000
2000.0000
20. 13009
:?Off�0.004i0
are00.00�e
1000. 004�0
160.0040
��3W 01
c
.17�i
PervAN ReWir'ANCE coPY w1rr
P"IANT TONSURE ff10PER CAJOiT
TC 70UR ACCOUNT
TERMS: NET IS DAYS
SHIP
TO
North East Farms
c/o Dr. Fred Cunningham
PC Box 865
Moyock. NC 279S8
2 G8e72RH 1. I INSTALL
1000,0800�166.12X3bG
2.000050
,Nipple, 1/2" x36" Galvanized
1000. 0000 99.'351 s 11
.6150ie�Cb
E16bw.•' 90o- uv, Galvanized
;J.P.Ward
10@0,0gi00 s25.12J17
2.800000
Waterer, Nipple 475
2000. 0000 ; 207. RC12
1.240000
�CIarip ,. 1/2" C.011dILL 9.t
20. 00fd0' 99.441011
3.070000
Pi6.e DoDe -1/4 pt.
2000. 0000 97.42
.300000
Cl;:mR,*-. Hose 412
4000.OeOO 16:,.2757
.480000
Green U&ter.250'/rl
1000. 0000
! 99; 990.77
r35B000
I
Te>a P1/C 3/4" SxSxFT'
100;d. Ql00B
99'755i
.140000
40.0300199.3t1107
Addo.ter. Nylon_-Insert-M-Pipe
.750000
'Tee'.
Galvanized 1/2" JP
Ward
1bfd.0080
g2`;.13774
1.460000
l U--Bolt. w/glut Aka
FEB 0 7 nOl
•RAMC[ CMAAQE �.i GG+MMENTS: i
2PIkM C RATE of 1 "A
?"ONIT"01 AA AN",
1
�ENTPPLIEDTe TT1 7Ll ,:-IcEs 3S IS NEVER FINAL.... I
is ae AVPuen i�D Tr1e
IGVFSUe VCkTTk3 SALANCJ B t. j T FAILURE CAN B E .
Z5 ON P-%VW9NT3 OR I I
eEV"FCA04CUAAENr W-WAYS TRY, TRY. AGAIN.
7NT14. OA"U M FIKA14CE
WAGE IS We
L GLkW MST "MAU TERMS:
TNP, 5 CA?& F*C25 NI- t 15 CUSTOMER CQPY
ad£C' TO CAMCE WRw
R hon10E
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
F: A
FT
EA
i
EA
EA
EA
2.000.00
615.00
2.800.00
2. 480. 00
61.40
600.00
1.920.00
330.00
140.00
312.00
233.60
POTED
SALE AMOUNT
LABOR CHARGES
i
FREIGHT
3.250.90
SALES TAX
.00
TOTAL
673.80
AMOUNT RECEIVED
15. 15.3- 130
BALANCE DUE
• 0$
f
c

G Division of Water Quality
O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit 0 Compliance Inspection O Operation Review O Lagoon Evaluation
Reason for Visit © Routine O Complaint O Follow up O Emergency Notification O Other ❑ Denied Access
Facility Number—�� j j 7 Date or visit: : 11^ 1 rhnr:
o Nat O erational O Below Threshold
C1 Permitted Q Certified ❑ Conditionally Certified ❑ Registered Date Last Operated or Above Threshold: .........................
FarmName: .............. .....................................................County:..................}t:::........................................
OwnerName: ................................................... .... ...`. PhoneN................ff� .�...�f.,S ........' "Y...r1..................
MailingAddress: ............; ......... ................. �..�. ................................ ....................... ..........'l �.... :�":f'f .......... ......... .,........................ .....
FacilityContact:.............................................................„................Title:................................................................ Pltutte No:...................................................
Onsite Representative:...... '........�:' f� ..........C�.... ?.,:.'.................................... Inte' rator:...........L.r.,. 'r ..F:._a.......r'a.� :.... zr...',ff. !, ;
Certified Operator: •,,f:L^:............... ........ '
Location of Farm:
[] Swine ❑ Poultry ❑ Cattle ❑ Horse Latitude Longitude �• �' �c6
Design Current
Swine Canarity Ponulation
❑ Wean to Feeder
❑ Feeder to Finish
❑ Farrow to Wean
y7
❑ Farrow to Feedcr
[].Farrow to Finish
❑ Gilts
❑ Boars
Design Current Design Current
Poultry Capacity Population Cattle Capacity Population
❑ Layer ❑ Dairy
❑ Non -Layer I ❑ Non -Dairy
❑ Other
Total Design Capacity
Total SSLW
Number of Lagoons ❑ Subsurface Drains Present 110 Lagoon Area ❑ Spray Field Area
Holding Ponds / Solid Traps �� ❑ No Liquid NVaste Management System
Dischar�cs S, Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Lagoon ❑ Spray Field ❑ Other
a. If discharge is ohscrved, was the conveyance man-made•,
h. Ii'dischar_o is uhservcd. did it reach Watcr vl• the Slat,? ill• ycs• notify DWQI
c. II' dischni-oc is observed. what is the estimated flees in �!al/min:'
d. Dees hypos; a kik-,00n system? tll'vcs. notil'y DWQ1
?. Is there evidence of past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the Waters of the; State other than from a discharge?
1N'aste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (Freeboard plus storm stnra4,e) Icss than adequate? ❑ Spillway
Structurc I S111ucturc ' Structure : Structure 4 Structure 5
Idemil'icr:...............................................................................................................,....................
FrecNiard ti:lehcN}:
❑ Yes [L—] No
rk
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 0 No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes 0 No
Structure 6
05/03/01 Conlinued

lity Number:: a. + Date of Ii13pcctio11-
Are thereaiiy inttnediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? (ie/ trees, severe erosion,
❑ Yes
Noseepage,
etc.)
Are there structures on -'site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a waste management or
closure plan? •
❑ Yes
No
(If any of questions 4-6 was answered yes, and the situation poses an
immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWQ)
Do any of the structures need maintenance/improvement?
Cl Yes
No
Does any part of the waste management system other than waste structures require maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
[] No
Do any stuctures lack adequate, gauged markers with required maximum and minimum liquid level
Yes
elevation markings?...,...
❑
[ No
Vaste Annlication
0. Are there any buffers that need maintenance/improvement?
❑ Yes
,[ij No
1. Is there evidence of over, application? ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ PAN ❑ Hydraulic Overload
❑ Yes
.[j No
2. Crop type C
3. Do the receiving crops differ with those dcsign3ted in the Certified Animal Waste Management Qlan (CAWMP)? .
❑ Yes
No
4. a) Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
❑ No
b) Does the facility need a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
c) This facility is pended for a wettable acre determination?
❑ Yes
❑ No
5. Does the receiving crop need improvement?
❑ Yes
p No
6. Is there a lack of adequate waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
0 No
:cauired Record.,; & Documents
7. Fail to have Certificate of Coverage & General Permit or other Permit readily available? ❑ Yes E No
S. Does the facility fail to have all components of the Certified Animal Waste Management Plan readily available?
(iel WUP,'chccklists, design ,'' taps, etc.) / ✓ ✓ ❑ Yeq j No
9. Does recard'keeping need improvement? (ie/ irrigation, freeboard, waste analysis & soil sample reports) ❑ Yes ❑ No
4. Is facility not in compliance with any applicable setback criteria in effect at'the time of design? ❑ Yes No
:1:'Did the facility fail to have a actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes •❑ No
.2. Fail t0otify"regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by General Permit?
(iel discharge, freeboard. problems, over application) ❑ Yes © No
3. Did Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ Yes blNo
4• Does facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? [:1 Yes 'S] No
5. Were any additional problems noted which cause noncompliance of the Certified AWMP? ❑ Yes 0 No
No violations or deficiencies were noted during this visit. You will receive no further correspondence about this visit.
.omments (refer to question #i): Explain any YES answers and/or any recommendations or any other comments. ,
Ise drawings of facility to better explain situations. (use additional pages as necessary):
. ❑Field Copy El Final Notes
SOc (i i �prA �j �e +� .4f v+"` ,� �. C/� �. r"R. f:r 1.tJ 01"'tiny - !".arj vy% Y I �" : e,
4 S �-'� � 44JJ
ft,r r
EllReviewer/Inspector Name �:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: Date:
05103101 Continued

..L%',:
clllty Number: �A: — Date of Inspection
'1
dor Issues >, -• c:
26. Does the discharge pipe from the confinement building to the storage pond or lagoon fail to discharge actor below ❑ Yes ❑ No
liquid level of lagoon. or storage pond with'no agitation?
27. Are there any dead animals not disposed of properly within 24. hours? ❑ Yes No
28. Is there any evidence of wind drift during land application? (i.e.- residue on neighboring vegetation, asphalt, ❑ Yes j No
roads, building structure, andlor public property)
29. Is the land application spray system intake not located near the'liquid surface of the lagoon? ❑ Yes No
30. Were any major maintenance problems with the ventilation fan(s) noted? (i.e. broken fan belts, missing or
or broken fan blade(s), inoperable shutters, etc.) ❑ Yes (rj No
31. Do the animals feed storage bins fail to have appropriate cover? ❑ Yes No
32. Do the flush tanks lack a submerged fill pipe or a permanent/temporary cover? 0 Yes ❑ No
5100

[S-11
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
1 � •
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND N/6uRAL RESOURCES
October 31, 2001
Williams Farms of North Carolina, Inc. CERTIFIED MAIL
Post Office Box 416 RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Moyock, NC 27958
RECEIVE
Assessment of Civil Penalties for
VU Making a Outlet to Waters of the
State without a Permit
NOV - b 2001
DWQ-WARD
Dear Sirs:
Farm # 15-11
Camden County
File No. DV 00-029
This letter transmits notice of a civil penalty assessed against BeIcross Farm in the .
amount of $5,571.72 which includes $571.72 in investigative costs. Attached is a copy of the
assessment document explaining this penalty.
This action was taken under the authority vested in me by delegation provided by the
Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources and the Director of the
Division of Water Quality. Any continuing violation(s) may be the subject of a new enforcement
action, including an additional penalty.
Within thirty days of receipt of this notice, you must do one of the following:
Submit payment of the penalty -
Payment should be made directly to the order of the Department of
Environment and Natural Resources (do not include waiver form).
Payment of the penalty will not foreclose further enforcement action for
any continuing or new violation(s).
Alailing Address: Telephone [phone] Location:
1617 Mail Service Center Fax [phone] N. Salisbury St.
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 State Courier #5 2-01 -01 Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
An Equal Opportunity /Affirmative Action Employer
50% recycled / 10% post -consumer paper
hrtp://7z2o.enr.sra1e.nc.us

Please submit payment to the attention of:
Mr. Steve Lewis
NCDENR
DWQ
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
OR
2.. Submit a written request for remission or mitigation including a detailed
justification for such request:
A request for remission or mitigation is limited to consideration of the
reasonableness of the amount of the penalty and is not the proper procedure for
contesting the accuracy of any of the statements contained in the assessment
letter. Because a remission request forecloses the option of an administrative
hearing,_ such a request must be accompanied by a waiver of your right to an
administrative hearing and a stipulation that there are no factual or legal issues in
dispute. You must execute and return to this office the attached waiver and
stipulation form and a detailed statement which you believe establishes whether:
(a) one or more of the civil penalty assessment factors in G.S. 14313-282.1(b)
were wrongfully applied to the detriment of the petitioner;
(b) the violator promptly abated continuing environmental damage resulting
from the violation;
(c) the violation was inadvertent or a result of an accident;
(d) the violator had been assessed civil penalties for any previous violations;
(e) payment of the civil penalty will prevent payment for the retraining
necessary remedial actions.
Please submit this information to the attention of:
Mr. Steve Lewis
NCDENR
DWQ
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Wfl
3. Submit a written request for an administrative hearing:
If you wish to contest any portion of the civil penalty assessment, you must
request an administrative hearing. This request must be in the form of a written
petition to the Office of Administrative Hearings and must conform to Chapter
150B of the North Carolina General Statutes. You must file your original petition
with the:

Office of Administrative Hearings
6714 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-6714
AND
Mail or hand -deliver a Copy of the petition to:
Mr. Dan Oakley
NCDENR
Office of General Counsel
1601 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1601
Failure to exercise one of the options above within thirty days, as evidenced by a date
stamp (not a postmark) indicating when we received your response, will result in this matter
being referred to the Attorney General's Office with a request to initiate a civil action to collect
the penalty. Please be advised that additional assessments may be levied for future violations
which occur after the review period of this assessment.
If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Steve Lewis at [phone], ext. 539 or
Mr. Jeff Poupart at [phone], ext. 527.
Sincerely,
effrey O. Poupart, Supervisor
Non -Discharge Compliance and Enforcement Unit
ATTACHMENTS
cc: Jim Mulligan, Washington Regional Supervisor w/ attachments
aphne-Cullom, WARO w/ attachments
L n Hardison, WARO w/ attachments
File # DV 00-029 w/ attachments
Central Files w/ attachments
Public Information Officer w/ attachments

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
COMMISSION
COUNTY OF CAMDEN
IN THE MATTER OF ASSESSMENT ) WAIVER OF RIGHT TO AN
OF CIVIL PENALTIES AGAINST ) ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING AND
PERMIT NO. N/A ) STIPULATION OF FACTS
FILE NO. DV 00-029
Having been assessed civil penalties totaling _ _$5,571.72 for
violation(s) as set forth in the assessment document of the Division of Water Quality dated,
October 30, 2001 , the undersigned, desiring to seek remission
of the civil penalties, does hereby waive the right to an administrative hearing in the above -stated
matter and does stipulate that the facts are as alleged in the assessment document.
This the day of , 2001.
SIGNATURE
ADDRESS
TELEPHONE

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF CAMDEN
IN THE MATTER OF
WILLIAMS FARMS OF
NORTH CAROLINA, INC.
FOR MAKING AN OUTLET TO THE
WATERS OF THE STATE OF
NORTH CAROLINA
WITHOUT A PERMIT AND
VIOLATION OF GENERAL PERMIT
AWG I00000
NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND
NATURAL RESOURCES
File No. DV 00-029
FINDINGS AND DECISION
AND ASSESSMENT OF
CIVIL PENALTIES
Acting pursuant to delegation provided by the Secretary of the Department of
Environment and Natural Resources and the Director of the Division of Water Quality, I, Jeffrey
O. Poupart, Supervisor of the Non -Discharge Compliance and Enforcement Unit of the Division
of Water Quality (DWQ), make the following:
FINDINGS OF FACT:
A. Williams Farms of North Carolina, Inc. (Williams Farms) is a corporation
organized and existing under the laws of the State of North Carolina.
B. Williams Farms owns and operates Belcross Farm, a swine operation located
along US Highway 158 in Camden County.
C. Williams Farms was issued Certificate of Coverage AWS 150011 under General
Permit AWG100000 for Belcross Farm on April 2, 1999, effective April 2, 1999,
with an expiration date of April 30, 2003. This permit does not allow the
discharge of waste to waters of the State.
D. On October 3, 2000, DWQ staff observed evidence that a discharge of wastewater
by Belcross Farm from a lift station had reached an unnamed tributary of
Indiantown Creek, which are Class C Sw waters of the State within the
Pasyuotank River Basin.
E. Williams Farms had no valid permit for the above -described activity.

F. Condition No. III. 6. b. of the General Permit requires in part that the Permittee
shall report by telephone to the appropriate Regional Office as soon as possible,
but in no case more than 24 hours following first knowledge of the occurrence of
any failure of the animal waste treatment and disposal system that renders the
facility incapable of adequately receiving, treating or storing the animal waste.
G. Williams Farms failed to notify DWQ of the failure of the animal waste treatment
and disposal system within the required 24 hours after discovery.
H. The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures in this matter totaled $571.72.
Based upon the above Findings of Fact, I make the following:
II. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW:
A. Williams Farms is a "person" within the meaning of G.S. 143-215.6A pursuant to
G.S. 143-212(4).
B. An unnamed tributary to Indiantown Creek constitutes waters of the State within
the meaning of G.S. 143-215.1 pursuant to G_S. 143-212(6).
C. The above -cited discharge constituted making an outlet to waters of the State for
purposes of G.S. 143-215.1(a)(1), for which a permit is required by G.S. 143-
215.1.
D. The above -cited failure to report the failure of the waste treatment system violated
Condition No. III. 6. b. of the General Permit.
E. Williams Farms may be assessed civil penalties in this matter pursuant to G.S.
143-215.6A(a)(2), which provides that a civil penalty of not more than twenty-
five thousand dollars (S25,000.00) per violation may be assessed against a person
who is required but fails to apply for or to secure a permit required by G.S. 143-
215.1.
F. Williams Farms may be assessed civil penalties in this matter pursuant to G.S.
143-215.6A(a)(2), which provides that a civil penalty of not more than twenty-
five thousand dollars ($25,000.00) per violation may be assessed against a person
who fails to act in accordance with the terms, conditions, or requirements of a
permit required by G.S. 143-2I5. L
G. The State's enforcement costs in this matter may be assessed against Williams
Farms pursuant to G.S. 143-215.3(a)(9) and G.S. 14313-282.1(b)(8).

H. The Supervisor of the Non -Discharge Compliance and Enforcement Unit,
Division of Water Quality, pursuant to delegation provided by the Secretary of the
Department of Environment and Natural Resources and the Director of the
Division of Water Quality, has the authority to assess civil penalties in this matter.
Based upon the above Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, I make the following:
III. DECISION:
Accordingly, Williams Farms is hereby assessed a civil penalty of:
for making an outlet to the waters of the State without a
permit as required by G.S. 143-215.1.
$ 00 for violating Condition No. ]II. 6. b. of the General Permit
by failing to report by telephone to the appropriate Regional
Office as soon as possible, but in no case more than 24
hours following first knowledge of the occurrence of any
failure of the animal waste treatment and disposal system
that renders the facility incapable of adequately receiving,
treating or storing the animal waste
$ 571.72 Enforcement costs
$_ 5,571, 1.1- TOTAL AMOUNT DUE
As required by G.S. 143-215.6A(c), in determining the amount of the penalty I have
considered the factors listed in G.S. 143B-282. I (b), which are:
(1) The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to the public
health, or to private property resulting from the violation;
(2) The duration and gravity of the violation;
(3) The effect on ground or surface water quantity or quality or on air quality;
(4) The cost of rectifying the damage;
(5) The amount of money saved by noncompliance;
(6) Whether the violation was committed willfully or intentionally;
(7) The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with programs
over which the Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority;
(8) The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures.
(Date) rey O. Poupart, Supervisor
Non -Discharge Compliance and Enforcement Unit
Division of Water Quality

Moyock,
Office [phone] - Fax [phone]
Jim Mulligan, Water Quality Supervisor
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, NC 27889
Dear Mr. Mulligan,
3y _Du 4, _WAFT
On October 3 Mr. Carl Dunn met Mr. David Oldham at the Belcross farm for a site inspection due to an
anonymous complaint on October 1, 2000. At the time we were applying waste to our fields. This
application was closely monitored and there was no run off into any ditches. That same weekend I had a
road retrenched along the main ditch leading to Highway 158. Our feed truck had made three long deep
holes in the road. These holes retained water every time it rained and became deeper. We cut trenches
from the holes to the ditch to let the water drain so that they could dry and then be filled with sand and dirt.
There was a tremendous amount of water that drained quickly into this ditch. I believe Mr. Dunn found no
violation due to waste application and or this road drainage.
The lift station in question is in a confined area between two buildings. We have a hard time with
rainwater in this area due to the presence of a surface drain 2 to 3 feet from the lift station. NRCS and Soil
and Water designed this drain at the time the lift station was built. It is a very poor location but was put in
with cost share money and can not be removed. To prevent any incidents we cemented the drain closed
and installed a standpipe to prevent any drainage in case of a pump failure. The water surrounding the lift
station was rainwater. I have no doubt that in changing pumps (three times) this year some waste has hit
the ground but there has not been a general failure of the system that would have been reportable to DWQ.
have checked with the farm personnel and no one has pulled the standpipe. If it had been pulled there
would not have been water standing around the lift station when Mr. Dunn visited.
Mr. Oldham informed me that water samples taken form a ditch may have had higher then normal coliform
counts. I have received no results to confirm this. It is worth noting that the drain field for the office septic
tank is in the field adjacent to the ditch in question.
We have taken action since Mr. Dunn's visit. Mr. David Oldham who at the time of the inspection has
written a Sludge removal plan and a contractor has been retained to remove four inches of dirt from around
the lift station. A sample of the sludge has been sent to NCDA for analysis. New dirt and gravel will be
installed around the lift station. The lift station has had an additional back up pump installed that will only
come on in case of the failure of the first pump. An alarm has been installed to sound on the farm if the
second pump operates. We are seeking permission to relocate the surface drain so that rainwater will not
stand in this area. This will also be accomplished by grading the soil around the lift station. We have
always tried to operate within the guidelines of our nutrient management plan. We have notified the state
in every instance in the past if we had a question of a discharge or even a building leak that did not reach
state waters. 1 can't help but think that the complaint on Saturday October 1 resulted from the draining of
the road into the ditch. If you have any questions please let me know. I am sure you are aware that Mr.
Oldham has resigned and it has taken longer than I would have liked to respond to your letter.
Sincerely,
Fred L. Cunningham Ms. M

W1R-0
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
December 7, 2000
TO: Steve Lewis, Environmental Specialist
DWQ Compliance and Enforcement
THROUGH: Jim Mulligan, Water Quality Supervisor
Washington Regional Office VA
FROM: Carl Dunn, Environmental Engineer
Washington Regional Office
SUBJECT: Enforcement Action
Belcross Farm
Facility No. 15-11
Camden County
INTRODUCTION:
Belcross Farm is owned and operated by Williams Farms of North Carolina. The facility
is located on US Highway 158 approximately one mile east of Belcross in Camden County. The
facility has been permitted as a 1240 farrow to wean operation.
REPORT:
On September 29, 2000 the Washington Regional Office received a complaint of a
possible discharge of animal waste from the Belcross facility due to a faulty lift station. Because
of limited staff resources within the office aerial reconnaissance of the farm was done on October
2, 2000. The aerial surveillance showed that there was a possibility that the farm did have a
problem with the lift station and that ground truth work would need to be preformed. On
October 3, 2000 Carl Dunn of the Washington Regional Office conducted a site investigation
with Mr. David Oldham, who was the certified operator of the facility. The site investigation
revealed that the lift station located between two animal houses used to convey waste to the
lagoon had indeed had a failure. A drain used to convey surface water runoff was located within
three feet of the lift station. The drain was plugged at the time of the inspection with a PVC pipe.
There were signs of watermarks on the lift station and the PVC pipe that indicated that the waste
level had risen above the level of the lift station indicating that the lift station had had a recent
failure. Also -the watermark on the PVC pipe indicated that the level of waste ponded above the
drain had been approximately one foot deep. Waste was still ponded above the drain
approximately three to four inches deep. The only outlet for the waste that had been ponded
above the drain was to either go through the drain or be pumped back into the now working lift
station. Mr. Oldham was not aware of anyone pumping the ponded waste back into the lift
station nor was he aware that the PVC plug had been removed from the drain.

Samples were collected from within the drainage system and the outlet ditch for the drain.
The results of the samples are in the table below.
Drain
Drainage Ditch
Fecal (cold I00ml)
360,000
76,667
NH3 (mg/L)
84
81
TKN (mg/L)
92
100
NO2 plus NO3 (mg/L)
0.08
0.24
Total P (mg/L)
29
25
The results of the samples indicate a presence of animal waste within the drainage system used to
carry surface water away from the area around the lift station as well as the receiving drainage
ditch. The conclusion from the results is that the lift station had failed and the animal waste
released from the failed lift station had passed through the drainage system and entered into the
farm's drainage ditches. The drainage ditches on the farm drain to Indiantown Creek and its
connecting canals, which are classified as C SW waters of the State.

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
COUNTY OF CAMDEN
IN THE MATTER OF
Williams Farms of North Carolina, Inc
MAKING AN OUTLET TO WATERS
OF THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
WITHOUT A PERMIT AND FOR
VIOLATIONS OF GENERAL PERMIT
AWGI 00000
NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
File No.
FINDINGS AND DECISION
AND ASSESSMENT OF
CIVIL PENALTIES
Acting pursuant to delegation provided by the Secretary of the Department of
Environment and Natural Resources, I, Kerr T. Stevens, Director of the Division of Water
Quality (DWQ), make the following:
I. FINDINGS OF FACT:
A. Williams Farms of North Carolina, Inc. is a corporation organized and existing
under the laws of the State of North Carolina.
B. Williams Farms of North Carolina owns and operate the Belcross Farm located on
US Highway 158 in Camden County.
C. Williams Farms of North Carolina was issued Certificate of Coverage
AWS150011 under General Permit AWG100000 for the Belcross Farm on April
2, 1999. The permit does not allow for the discharge of waste to waters of the
State.
D. On October 3, 2000, DWQ staff observed evidence that waste water as a result of
a discharge from the Belcross Farm an unnamed tributary of the Indiantown Creek
which is classified as C SW waters of the State within the Pasquotank River
Basin.
E. Williams Farms of North Carolina had failed to report to the DWQ Regional
Office a failure of the waste system at the Belcross Farm which is a requirement
of the Swine Waste Operation General Permit Condition III.6.
F. The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures in this matter totaled $571.72.

Based upon the above Findings of Fact, I make the following:
II. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW:
A. Williams Farms of North Carolina is a "person" within the meaning of G.S. 143-
215.6A pursuant to G.S. 143-212(4).
B. A permit for this animal waste management system is required in accordance with
G.S. 143-215.10C.
C. An unnamed tributary to Indiantown Creek constitutes waters of the State within
the meaning of G.S. 143-215.1 pursuant to G.S. 143-212(6).
D. The above -cited discharge constituted making an outlet to waters of the State for
purposes of G.S. 143-215. 1 (a)(1), for which a permit is required by G.S. 143-
215.1.
E. The above -cited discharge constituted a failure of the animal waste system for
which notification to the DWQ Regional Office is required under Swine Waste
Operation General Permit Condition 111.6.
F. Williams Farms of North Carolina may be assessed civil penalties in this matter
pursuant to G.S. 143-215.6A(a)(2), which provides that a civil penalty of not more
than twenty five thousand dollars ($25,000.00) per violation may be assessed
against a person for failing to act in accordance with the terms, conditions or
requirement of a permit required by G.S. 143-215.1.
G. The State's enforcement costs in this matter may be assessed against Williams
Farms of North Carolina pursuant to G.S. 143-215.3(a)(9) and G.S. 14313-
282.1(b)(8).
H. The Director, Division of Water Quality, pursuant to delegation provided by the
Secretary of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources has the
authority to assess civil penalties in this matter.

Based upon the above Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, I make the following:
III. DECISION:
Accordingly, Williams Farms of North Carolina is hereby assessed a civil penalty of.
$
for making an outlet to the waters of the State without a
permit as required by G.S. 143-215.1.
$
for failing to notify the DWQ Regional Office of a failure
of the animal waste system as required by Swine Waste
Operation General Permit Condition III.6.
$
TOTAL CIVIL PENALTY, which is percent of
the maximum penalty authorized by G.S. 143-215.6A.
$ 571.72
Enforcement costs
$
TOTAL AMOUNT DUE
As required by G.S. 143-215.6A(c), in determining the amount of the penalty I have considered
the factors listed in G.S. 143B-282. I (b), which are:
(1) The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to the public
health, or to private property, resulting from the violation;
(2) The duration and gravity of the violation;
(3) The effect on ground or surface water quantity or quality or on air quality;
(4) The cost of rectifying the damage;
(5) The amount of money saved by noncompliance;
(6) Whether the violation was committed willfully or intentionally;
(7) The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with programs
over which the Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority;
and
(8) The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures.
(Date) Kerr T. Stevens, Director

Division of Water Quality
Animal Operations Inspection Form
1. Date of Inspection: October 3, 2000
2. Regional Office: Washington
3. Name of Property Owner: Williams Farms of North Carolina
4. Name of Operator: David Oldham
5. Address: P O Box 416 Moyock, NC 27958
6. Phone Number: [phone]
7. Description of facility location: The facility is located on US Highway 158
approximately one mile east of Belcross in Camden County.
8. Date the facility began operation: 1/1/91
9. Date of last expansion: NIA
Explain:
10. Has the facility registered with DWQ? Yes
If yes, date registered? 12/7/93
11. Does the facility have an approved animal waste management plan? Yes
Is one required? Yes
Date approved? Last plan approved 12/1/97
12. Has the facility received a CAFO Designation? No
If yes, date issued?
13. Type of operation (Examples: swine, farrow to finish, topping, dairy, beef, cattle,
poultry, breeders, layers, broilers, turkey production, etc.): 1240 farrow to wean
14. Number and type of animals: 1240 farrow to wean
15. Length of time animals have been, are, or will be stabled or confined and fed or
maintained in any 12 month period: The animals are housed for more than nine (9)
months in any twelve (12) month period.
16. Are crops, pasture, or post -harvest residues sustained in the normal growing season
over any portion of the lot or facility? The facility has an approved waste plan using

row crops.
17. Type of waste management (Examples: 1. type of confinement: free stall barns,
sheltered or limited shelter dirt lots, paved or dirt open lots, houses, or pasture; 2.
type of waste handling: direct spreading in solid form, slotted floor with lagoon or
pit, single or multi -cell lagoon, aerated lagoon, land application of liquid manure,
spray irrigation, stockpiling, contractor disposal, etc.)? The houses are designed with
flush gutter floors for waste flushing to a lift station. The lift station pumps the waste to a
lagoon. The lagoon waste water in managed through spray irrigation.
18. Description of other animal operations in immediate vicinity and proximity to same
or other surface waters: none
19. Proximity of facility to neighboring houses, wells, etc.: The closest house is less than
one mile away.
20. Approximate depth of groundwater table in the area of the facility or discharge:
The groundwater table is approximately one to three feet below surface.
21. Proximity of facility to surface waters (provide name and class of surface waters):
The facility has several drainage ditches which drain to Indiantown Creek which is
classified as C SW waters of the State within the Pasquotank River Basin.
22. Animal waste discharge including photos and witness' names, addresses, telephone
numbers, and statements of fact: Please note the attached photos for your reference.
23. Are pollutants discharged into the waters of the State? If so, How? (directly or by
man-made ditch, flushing system, or other similar man-made device): Yes, waste
discharged from a failed lift station. The waste then traveled via an underground drainage
system used to collect surface water to a drainage ditch.
24. Do or have discharges occurred in response to a storm event of less than a 25-year,
24-hour intensity (if yes, include a brief listing of incidents and suspected causes):
Yes, a lift station was not functioning properly and waste overflowed into a drainage
system used to collect surface water.
25. What is the degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to the
public health, or to private property resulting from the violation? Waste water has
the potential to deplete dissolved oxygen in the affected water body to a point which is
harmful to aquatic life. Waste water also contains nutrients which have the potential to
spawn algal growth to the point which is harmful to aquatic life.
26. What is the duration and gravity of the violation? The full amount of the discharge in
terms of gallons is unknown because the Williams Farms of North Carolina failed to
report the incident in a timely manner to the DWQ office.

27. Water Quality Assessment: (Include description of sampling, field measurements,
visual observations and slope and vegetative cover of land adjacent to water, extent
of rainfall and other factors relative to the likelihood or frequency of discharge of
animal wastes and process wastewaters ). The effect on ground or surface water
quality or quantity or on air quality. Samples of the flow from the drainage system
and the drainage ditch were collected. The results of the samples are contained in the
following table.
28.
Drain
Drainage Ditch
Fecal (col./100ml)
360,000
76,667
NH3 (mg/L)
84
81
TKN (mg/L)
92
100
NO2 plus NO3 (mg/L)
0.08
0.24
Total P (mg/L)
29
25
What is the cost of rectifying the damage? The waste was not able to be recovered
from the ditch.
29. What is the amount of money saved by noncompliance? The amount of money is
unknown, however, more effort should be put into the over site of the operation and
developing a back up system for the lift station. This would likely cost some money.
30. Was the violation committed willfully or intentionally? No. Explain: The failure of
the lift station was probably accidental however the failure to report to DWQ the failure
of the waste system is the responsibility of the operators and this was not done.
31. What is the prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with
programs over which Environmental Management Commission has regulatory
authority? No prior record.
32. What is the cost to the State for the enforcement procedures?
Staff Time (WARO): Oct 3, 2000 ( 8 hrs ) $ 201.84
Enforcement package (8 hrs) $ 201.84
Staff Time (Central Office): $ 100.00
Travel 68.04

Total Cost of Investigation
$ 571.72
33. Type or general nature of business? A swine farm owned and operated by Williams
Farms of North Carolina
34. What is the violator's degree of cooperation (including efforts to prevent or restore)
or recalcitrance (stubbornness)? The certified operator has been very cooperative,
however upper management within Williams Farms of North Carolina has been very
uncooperative. No response was even given to the NOI sent by this office.
35. Are there mitigating circumstances? None
36. Assessment Factors:
a. IWC: 100%
b. Receiving Stream: Indiantown Creek
c. Damage (YIN - If yes, include report from WRC)
37. Include a copy of any Designation letter signed by the Director. NIA
38. Recommendations made to owner/operator: Williams Farms need to have better over
site into the daily operations and train their employees on the requirements of DWQ. A
back up system for the lift station would be helpful.
39. Recommendations for further DWQ action (Re -inspect, NOV, Enforcement Action,
Designate, etc.): The Washington Regional Office recommends that Williams Farms of
North Carolina be assessed a civil penalty for the discharge of animal waste to waters of
the State and for the failure to properly notify the DWQ Regional Office of a animal
waste management system failure.
40. Other Comments: None

DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
ENFORCEMENT CASE ASSESSMENT FACTORS
TYPE: (DD) CAFO - Discharge
Violator: Williams Farms of North Carolina, Inc
Address: P 0 Box 416 Moyock, NC 27958
Regional Office: Washington
1. The degree and extent of harm to the natural resources of the State, to the public
health, or to private property resulting from the violation: Animal water has the
potential to deplete dissolved oxygen in the affected water body to a point which is
harmful to aquatic life. Waste water also contains nutrients which have the potential to
spawn algal growth to the point which is harmful to aquatic life.
2. The duration and gravity of the violation: The full amount of the discharge in terms of
gallons is unknown because the oprators failed to report the incident in a timely manner
to the DWQ office.
3. The effect on ground or surface water quantity or quality or on air quality: Samples
of the flow from the drainage ditch as well as the drainage system were collected. The
results of the samples are contained in the following table.
Drain
Drainage Ditch
Fecal (col./100ml)
360,000
76,667
NH3 (mg/L)
84
81
TKN (mg/L)
92
100
NO2 plus NO3 (mg/L)
0.08
0.24
Total P (mg/L)
29
25
4. The cost of rectifying the damage: The waste was not able to be recovered from the

ditch.
5. The amount of money saved by noncompliance: The amount of money is unknown,
however, more effort should be put into the over site of the operation. A back up system
for the lift station would be helpful. This would likely cost some money.
6. Whether the violation was committed willfully or intentionally: The failure of the lift
station was probably accidental however the failure to report to DWQ the failure of the
waste system is the responsibility of the operators and this was not done.
7. The prior record of the violator in complying or failing to comply with programs
over which the Environmental Management Commission has regulatory authority:
No prior record with this Regional Office.
8. The cost to the State of the enforcement procedures:
9.
Staff Time (WARO): Oct 3, 2000 ( 8 hrs ) $ 201.84
Enforcement package (8 hrs) $ 201.84
Staff Time (Central Office): $ 100.00
Travel 68.04
Total Cost of Investigation $ 571.72
9. Type of violator and general nature of business: A swine farm owned by Williams
Farms of North Carolina.
10. Violator's degree of cooperation (including efforts to prevent, restore or
recalcitrance): The certified operator has been very cooperative, however upper
management within Williams Farms of North Carolina has been very uncooperative. No
response was even given to the NOI sent by this office.
11. Mitigating Circumstances: None.
12. Assessment Factors:
a) IWC:100%
b) Receiving Stream: Indiantown Creek
c) Damage YIN: If yes, include report from WRC. No
13. Include a complete Animal Operations Inspection Form
14. Include a CAFO Designation Letter for the Director's Signature (will be sent to
violator with the assessment). NIA

rA
Division of Envwronmental Management
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
For Investigation of 1.✓i�i�o.�s �'��� rBIJMWQ
I
OCT - 6 2060
iAhDn •--I
Samples collected and DKI forms completed by:
Only
ELab'No.
Station.
No.
Station Location
Date
Time
No. of
Bottles
}
} 0
170.,..E>+
to-3-o?
13!SS
Rel_n uishe by( ature):
eived b gnatur
:
D to / Time
Rel
Rec by
Rel
Rec by
Rel
Rec by (Lab)
/
Method of Sh vnent:
I
Security
Seal by: _
nme and Condition: bock by:
Broken by:
Omen bv:
LAB USE ONLY
..
. . -
IF
!'g33Time
�
C111�

Division of Environmental Management
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
For Investigation of . _ L✓i jk� cG—s f�1,�, F-••^ _
Samples Collected and DHI forms completed
by: '
b Otil}i
Lab'No.
Station.
No.
Station Location
Date
Time
No. of
Bottles
I3: S 0
2.
V�
�I tee., ..
kr3 -ov
13' S0
2
I
Relinquished by�(Si ature):
(sAga re
-
Da-e / Time !
el
Rec
by
1
Rel
Rec
by
?
Rel
Rec
by (Lab)
Method of Shipment:
I
Security*
Seal bp:
Type and Condition: Lock by:
rOpen
Broken by,:
bv:
TAR TTSF MTN
Lab No.
From Through
No.
Containers
Analysis
Relinquished b
Received ki
Date Time
I�

DIV SI N _F
For Lab Use ONLY
U U ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
WATER QUALITY FIELD -LAB FORM tDM1)
OUNTY Cti.^ n
PRIO1111V
SAMIAX TYPE
+
RIVER BASIN r 3 ":A hn�
❑AMBIENT
❑ QA
ill STREAM
❑ EFFLUENT
REPORT TO: ARO FRO MRO RRO(WeR WIRO WSRO TS
AT BM
❑
Other
❑COMPLIANCE
❑
EMERGENCY
® CHAIN
OF CUSTODY
LAKE
❑ ESTUARY
❑ INFLUENT
Shipped by. Bus Caurler, Staff !the
Lab N mb r:
Q a 6 S 7
t-I-� )b
Date leceived.
a {Time:
Rec'd by: f'u1 L
I From: Bus -Courier -Band Del
DATA ENTRY BY; _[1_
CK
DATE REPORTEDDATE REPORTED:
�D�/��
COLLECTORN: 1/" -A 'A
Estimated 80D Range- STATION LOCATION:. 0-5/5-25/25-65/40.130 100 pl —— {1 •-- - —•
Seed: Yes ❑ No El Chlorinated: Yes ❑ No ❑ REMARKS: ��+ �r S !✓ 1� [.
Station # Dale Begin ( ly/mm/dd) Time Begin Date End Time End Depth DM DB DBM Value Type Composite Sample T�y-,-,p`e�
(J (� 1 {� O 3 �� , tl U �� A H L T 5 8 C 0 GNxx
1 BODS 310 / mg/i
2 COD High 340 mg/1
3
ICOD
Low 335 mg/l
4
/
Coliform: MF Fecal 31616 00ml
5
Coliform: MF Total 31504 /loom]
6
Coliform: Tube Fecal 31615 /100ml
7
Coliform: Fecal Strep 31673 /loom,
8
Residue: Total 500 mg/1
9
Volatile 505 mg/I
10
Fixed 510 mg/1
11
Residue: Suspended 530 mg/I
12
Volatile 535 mg/I
13
Fixed 540 mg/1
14
PH 403 units
15
Acidity to pH 4.5 436 mg/1
16
Acidity to pH 9.3 435 mg/1
17
Alkalinity to pH 8.3 415 mg/i
18
Alkalinity to pH 4.5 410 mg/1
19
TOC 680 mg/l
20
Turbidity 76 NTU
Chloride 940 mg/1
Chi a: TO 32217 ug/I
Chi a: Corr 32209 ug/I
Pheophytin a 32213 ug/I
Color: True 80 Pt -Co
Color. -(PH ) 83 ADM[
Color; pH 7.6 82 ADMI
Cyanide 720 mg/l
Fluoride 951 mg/I
Formaldehyde 71880 mg/1
Grease and Oils 556 mg/I
Hardness Total900 m0/1
Specific Cond. 95 uMhos/em2
MBAS 38260� mgA
Phenols 32730 ug/I
Sulfate 945 m9/1
Sulfide 745 mg/I
NH3 as N 610 mg/I
TKN as N 625 mgA
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630 m9A
P: Total as P 665 mg/I
PO4 as P 70507 mg/1
P: Dissolved as P 666 mgA
CdCadmium 1027 ugA
Cr•Chromium:Total1034 USA
CuCopper 1042 ug/I
NI -Nickel 1067 ug/1
Pb-Lead 1051 ug/I
2n-Zinc 1092 ugA
Ag liver 1077 ugA
A] -Aluminum 1105 ug/I
Be -Beryllium 1012 ug/I
Ca -Calcium 916 mg/I
Co -Cobalt 1037 ug/I
Fe -Iron 1045 ugA
LI-Lithium 1132 ug/I
Mg-Magnealum 927 mg/I
Mn-Manganese 1055 ug/l
Na-Sodlum 929 mg/1
Areenic:Total 1002 ugA
Se -Selenium 1147 ug/I
Hg-Mercury 71900 USA
Organochlorine Pesticides
Organophosphorus Pesticides
Acid Herbicides
Base/ Neutral Extractable Organics
Acid Extractable Organics
Purgeable Organics (VOA bottle reg'd)
Phytoptankton
Sampling Point
Conductance at 25 C
Water Temperature 40
D.O. mgA
pH
Alkalinity
Acidity
Air Temperature 00
PH $3 pH 4.5
pH 4.5 pH 8.3
2
94
10
300 .
400 •
82244 431
82243 182242
20
Salinity %
Precipition On/day)
Cloud Cover %
Wind Direction (Deg)Stream
now Severity
Turbidity Severity
Wind Velocity M/H
can Stream Depth ft.
Stream Width ft.
480
45
32
36
1351
1350
35
64
4
DM]/RevliL d 10/86

DIVISION OF ENVRCI INMFNTAI MANA['FMrNT W "'I r 1 I' fnr dab Uae_ONLY_, _ _
�I AI. I 1 I1.1.11 I.AII I I11(It1 ililN I I
L�' "` t�e �1
COUNTY
PRIORITY
SAMPLE TYPE
RIVER BASIN P ai s i w r•
❑AMRIENT
❑
�jj
❑
REPORT TO: ARO FRO RO RRb eR0 WIRb WSIt(1 TS
QA
Idl STREAM
Err1.ULNT
AT BM
❑COMPLIANCE
®
❑
Other
CIIAIN
LAKE
❑
INFLUENT
❑
OF CUSTODY
❑ ESTUARY
Shipped by: Bus Courier. Staff, the(D r L _
EMERGENCY
r
Lab Numbet: V
Date Received: q 0L� 0 O Time: : 30
Rec'd by: _ryk/ Q j 'From; Bus-Courler-liand Del
DATA ENTRY BY: oS CK:
y� DATE REPORTED: d
STATION LOCATION:
Estimated BOD Range: 0-5/5-25/25-65/40-130 i100 plu - —
Seed: Yes ❑ ❑ No ❑ REMARKS: �✓! (M r• f j !JJ a�i
❑ No Chlorinated: Yes _
Station # Date Begin (yy/mm/rid) Time Begin Date End Time End Depth DM D8 DBM Value Type Composite Sample Ty e
dQ l O 03 + c l J A H L T S 8 C GNxX
1
BODS 310 D mg/f
2
COD High 340 m9/1
3
COD Low 335 mg/I
4
Coliform: MF Fecal 31616 • IOQml
5
Coliform: MF Total 31504 /100ml
6
Collform: Tube Fecal 31615 /100m1
7
Coliform: Fecal Strap 31673 /100m1
8
Residue: Total 500 mg/t
9
Volatile 505 mg/I
10
Fixed 510 mg/1
11
Residue: Suspended 530 mg/I
12
Volatile 535 mg/I
13
Fixed 540 mg/I
14
pH 403 units
15
Acidity to pH 4.5 436 mg/1
16
Acidity to pH 9.3 435 mg/1
17
Alkalinity to pH 8.3 415 mg/I
18
Alkalinity to pH 4.5 410 mg/I
19
TOC 680 mg/1
20
Turbidity 76 NTU
Chloride 940 mg/I
Chi a: TO 32217 ug/l
Chi a: Corr 32209 ug/I
Pheophytin a 32213 ug/I
Color: True 80 Pt -Co
Color:(PH j 83 ADMI
Color: pH 7.6 82 ADMI
Cyanide 720 mg/I
Fluoride 951 mg/I
Formaldehyde 71880 mg/I
Grease and Oils 556 mg/1
Hardness Total900 mg/I
Specific Cond. 95 uMhos/cm2
MBAS 38260 mg/1
Phenols 32730 ug/i
Sulfate 945 mgA
Sulfide 745 mg/1
N113 as N 610 m9A
TKN as N 625 mg/1
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630 mgA
P: Total as P 665 mg/1
PO4 as P 70507 mg/1
P: Dissolved as P 666 mgA
CdCadmlum 1027 USA
Cr-Chromiurrr:Totaf 1034 ug/I
Cu-Copper 1042 ug/1
NI -Nickel 1067 ug/1
Pb-Lead 1051 ug/I
Zn-ZInc 1092 ue/1
AgAllver 1011 USA
AI -Aluminum 1105 ug/1
Be -Beryllium 1012 ag/I
Ca-Calclum 916 mgA
Co -Cobalt 1037 ug/I
Fe -Iron 1045 ugA
Ll-Lithium 1132 ugA
Mg-Mmgneslum 927 mg/I
Mn-Manganese 1055 ug/1
Na-Sodium 929 mg/I
Arsenic:TotaI 1002 ug/I
Se -Selenium 1147 ug/I
Hg-Mercury 71900 ugA
Organochlorine Pesticides
Organophosphorus Pes"es
Acid Herbicides
Base/ Neutral Extractable Organics
Acid Extractable Organics
Purgeable Organics (VOA bottle reg'd)
Phytoplankton
;Sampling Point 3
Conductance at 25 C
Water Temperature
D.O. mqA
pii
Alkalinity
Acidity
Air Temperature IG
PH 8.3 pH 4.5
pH 4.5 pH 8.3
2
94
10
300 .
400 •
82244 1431
82243 182242
20
Salinity %
Precipition On/day)
Cloud Cover %
Wind Direction (Deg)
Stream Flow Severity
Turbidity Severity
Wind Velocity M/H
can Stream Depth ft.
Stream Width ft
480
145
32
36
1351
1350
35
64
4
DMI/Revised 10/86

'
DIVISION OF WAIFE12 QUALrn'
Chemistry I-ahoralon Report/Water Qoaliry
SAMPLETYPE
COUNTS- CAMDEN
PRIORITY
RIPER BASIN:
AMBIENT QA
S1REAhS
EFFLIII?NI'
REFORTTO WARD RegionalOirce
COMPLIANCE CHAIN OF CUSTODY
LAKE
INFLUENT
01hrr :
EMERGENCY VISIT Ill
ESTUARY
COLLECTOR(S) : DUNN
L
D
l_abNumbcr
YW8180
Date Receeved 7
10/4/2000
Trmc Received'.
SAS AM
Received By :
1 A
Dara Released :
�o�ao
AR
Date Reported:
10/20/2000
Estimated BOB Range: Station Location: DOWNSTREAM
Seed: Chlorinated: Remarks: -
Station 4 Date Begin Oylmmfdd) Date End ()Ilmm/dd) Time Begin Time End Depth - D11I, DO, DBh1 Value Type - A. 11, L. Composi[o-T, S, B Sample Tape
D 20001003 1 1 1100
BOD 310 mg/L
COD High 340 mg!L
COD Lain 335 mg/L
Coliform: MF Fecal31616 /100ml
Coliform: MF Toust 31504 /loom[
Coliform; tube Fecal 31615 / 100m1
Coliform: Fecal Strep 31673 /looml
Residue: Total 500 mg/L
Volatile 505 m /L
Fixed 510 mg/L
Residue: Suspended 330 mg!L
Volatile 535 m ,/L
Fixed 540 m /L
H 403 units
Acidity to pit 45 436 n,£ I.
Acidity to p118.3 435 In ,, L
Alkalinityto PH8.3415 mg.,L
Alkalinity to PH 4.5 410 mg/L
TOC 68o m : L
Turbidity 76 NTU
Coliform Total Tube "/100 mis
COMMENTS:
Chloridc940 m /L
Chl a: -1-ti 32217 u /L
Chl a: Corr 32209 u /L
Pheo h -tin a 32213 u L
Color: True 80 C.U.
Color. (H ) 83 pH= C.U.
Color. tiff 7.6 82 C.U.
Cyanide 720 m /L
Fluoriae951 m /L
Formaldehyde 71880 mg/L
Grease and Oils 556 mg/L
Hardness T'rual 900 m 11.
5 >ni[ic Cond. 95 umlms/c1112
WAS 33260 m /L
I'liewls 3273n U r 1.
11111.11C 945 In •" I.
Sulhdc 745 m /L
Boron
Tannin & Li in u /L
Htxavalcni Chromium u /L
X
N113asN610
81
m /L
X
TKN an N 625
100
m /L
X
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630
0-24
m /L
X
P: Total as P 665
26
mg/L.
PO4 as P 70507
m /L
P. Dissolved as P 666
m /L
K-Potassium
mg/L
Cd-Cadmium 1027
u /L
Cr-C'hromium:Total1034
u L
Cu- Copper 1042
u /L
Ni-Nickel 1067
u /L
14r Lcad 1051
a 11.
'Ln-'Li;w ItP)2
u /L
V-Vanadium
u /L
A-Sit%cr:W7
ug'I
AI- Altimisam, 11115
Ile- Boyllium 10 12
u /L
Ca- Calcium 916
In/L
Co- Cobalt 1037
tr/L
Fe- Iron 1(145
ti/L
! 11� LJ L9 U U I�
OCT 2 4 2000
Li -Lithium 1132 u • L
Mg- Magnesium 927 mF.,L
Mn-Manganew1055 us, L
Na- Sodium 929 m ; L
ArsenicTotal1002 u /L
Se, Selenium 1147 u /L
Hg- Mercury 71900 u /L
Ba_Badum u /L
Organochlorine Pesticides
Organo hos horns Pesticides
Acid Herbicides
Base/Ncutral&AcidExtracrable Organics
'I PI 11)ecscl Rangr
Purgeable Organks (VOA bottle rc4df
TPH Gasolene Range
TPH/BTEX Gasoline Range
Phytopl..kion

DIVISION OF RATER QUALITY
Chemistry tAbora(ery Report I Water Qualify
w-1 s-A-mnE_TY.1'E
COUNTY CAMDEN
11102RITX
RIVER BASIN:
;� AMBIENT 0 QA
El SIRFAM
EJ EFFLULNI'
REPORTTO WARO Regional01fice
O COMPLIANCE XQ CHAINOFCUSTODY
LAKE
INFLUENT
Other
❑ EMERGENCY VISIT ID
ESTUARY
COLLECTOR(S) : DUNN
I
U
Lab Nurnbcr
Y W8181
Date Received :
10/4/2000
Dmc Received:
8:15 AM
Received [iv
IN
jC:
�o1ao
AR
Date Reported :
10120/2000
Estimated BOD Range: Station I.acatian: UPSTREAM
Seed: Chterinated: Remarks:
Station R Dale Begin (yylmm1ddl Date End (yy/mm/dd) Time Begin Time End Deplh - DAI, DR, DDAI Value Type- A, 11, L Compasile-T, S, B Samplt Type
U 20001003 I1pp
BOD310 mg? L
COD High 340 mg/L
COD Loa' 335 mg/L
Coliform: M F Fecal 31616 / 100mI
Coliform: MF Total 31504 / 100ml
Coliform: tube Feral 31015 /I(xlml
Colifor I Mal StFrp 31673 / I0Um1
Residue: Total 500 m /L
Volatile 505 m /L
Fixed 510 mg/L
Residue: Suspended 530 mgiL
Volatile 535 m /L
Fixed 540 m /L
H 403 units
Acidity to PH 4.3436 mg, L
Acidity To pH 8.343i /L
Alkalinity to EH 8.3 415 m /L
Alkalinity to pil4.3410 m /L
TOC680 m /L
Turbidity 76 NTU
Coliform Total Tube "/100 mis
COMMENTS
Chloride 940 /L
Chl a: Tri 32217 u /L
Chi a: Carr 32209 u / L
P h)tin a 32213 u /L
Color. True BD C.U.
Colon { r11 1 83 plim c,u,
Color: pf1 7.6 82 C.u,
Cyanide 720 m /L
Fluoride 951 m /L
Formaldehyde 71880 m /L
Grease and Oils 556 m /L
Hardms To(al900 m /L
Specific Cond. 95 umhos/Crn2
MBAS39260 m 1L
Phenols 31730 upt
Sulfate 945 m 1 L
Sulfide 745 m /L
Boron
Tannin & Lignin u /L
Hexavalent Chromium u /L
M
x
NH3 as N 610
84
m /L
X
TKN an N 625
92
m /L
x
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630
0.08
m /L
X
P: Total as P 663
29
m /L
PO4 as P 70507
m /L
P: Dissnlved as P 666
m /L
K-Potassium
In/L
Cd-Cadmium 1027
u /L
Cr-Chromium:Total 1034
u /L
Cu- Copper 1042
u /L
Ni-Nickel1067
u /L
Pb- Lead 1051
a -L
Zrs-Zinc 1092
u /L
V-Vanadium
u /L
Ar, Silver 1077
a-1L
Al -Aluminum 1105
u +L
Be- Bervllium 1012
u /L
Ca- Calcium 916
m /L
Co- Cobalt 1037
u /L
Fe- Iron 1045
u /L
OCT 2 4 Z000
Li -Lithium 1132 u /L
Mg- Magnesium 927 m / L
Mn-Man rise 1055 u /L
Na- Sodium 929 m IL
ArseniCTotal1002 u /L
Sc-Scleniurn 1147 u /1,
I I - Mercury 719OU u /L
Ba Barium u /L
anoehlorine Pesticides
Organophosphorus Pesticides
Acid Herbiddes
Base/Neutral&Acid Extraclable Qy2nics
1'PII Diesel anec
Pur able nits (VOA bottler 'd)
TPH Gasoline Range
TPHiBlEX Gasoline Range
Phytpl..kton

r
1Akf\©
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
CERTIFIED MAIL
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Williams Farms of NC, Inc.
P 0 Box 416
Moyock, NC 27958
A"
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
October 18, 2000
Subject: Notice of Recommendation of Enforcement
Belcross Farm
Facility Number 15-11
Camden County
Dear Sirs:
This'ietter is to notify you that the Washington Regional Office of the Division of Water Quality
is considering sending a recommendation for enforcement action to the Director of the Division
of Water Quality. The recommendation concerns the violation of North Carolina General Statute
143-215.1(a)(1) for discharging animal waste in waters of the State without a permit and for the
violation of Swine Waste Operation General Permit Condition III.6. for not reporting to the
DWQ Regional Office a failure of a component of your waste collection system.
The Belcross Farm is located on Highway 158 approximately one mile east of Belcross in
Camden County. The Belcross Farm is permitted to operate as a 1240 farrow to wean facility.
An inspection of the facility was conducted on October 3, 2000 by Carl Dunn of the Washington
Regional Office. Evidence was found to show that the lift station used to transfer waste from
animal houses to the waste lagoon failed to operate properly resulting in a discharge of animal
waste to waters of the State.
If you have an explanation for these violations, as well as any corrective action taken, that you
wish to present, please respond in writing to the Washington Regional Office within ten (10)
days after receipt of this Notice. Your explanation will be reviewed and if an enforcement action
is still deemed appropriate, your explanation will be forwarded to the Director with the
enforcement package for his consideration.
943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, NC 27889 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post -consumer paper

Mike Nixon
January 21, 2000
Page 2
1f you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact me at [phone], ext. 212
or Carl Dunn, Environmental Engineer, at [phone], ext. 208.
Sincerely,
irte�rQluality
an
Supervisor
cc: Compliance/Enforcement Group
Central Files
Camden County NRCS
P Hooper - DSWC WARO
Hooper

■ Complete items 1, 2, and 3. Also complete
item 4 if Restricted Delivery is desired.
■ Print your name and address on the reverse
so that we can return the card to you.
■ Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits.
Article Addressed to:
WILUTAMS FARMS OF NC INC
PO BOX 416
MOYOCK NC 27958
A. Received by (Please Print
ign
X S ig JI . )iv � >
D. Is delivery adds different from Rem`'
If YES, enter delivery address below:
3. Type
Certified Mail ❑ Express Mail
❑ Registered ❑ Return Receipt for Merchandise
❑ Insured Mail ❑ C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery {Extra Fee) ❑ Yes
2. Article Number (Copy from service label) y i . It s ; ; ; i y � i i
PS Form 3811, July 1999 Domestic Retum Receipt 102595 99-M-1789

ZWQ
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
"t 4
' First-Ciass Mail -
Postage & Fees Paid
USPS
Permit No. G-10
• Sender; Please print your name, address, and ZIP+4 in this box •
North Carolina Department of Environment
& Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
943 Washington Square Mall
Washington, North Carolina 27889
01 11 lil11111111i1111111111itilt III 1111111111di11I1lit III III I11I

Microsoft TerraServer Print Page
Page I of 2
Microsoft TerraServer LA�jpiay -Oukxdge JSGS T-)I)o Map
11 km NE of Elizabeth City, North Carolina, United States oi iui 1985
USGS
------ -----
4.
litt p, Hterraserver. microsoft, com/printimage. asp? S= 14&T=2&X= 124& Y= 12 5 7&Z= t 8&W=2
12/7/00

of r
DIe^. GIs^ . 1aw���
_ , a C ` C
I
000

'N/NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
November 22, 2000
Williams Farms of North Carolina, Inc.
PO Box 416
Moyock NC 27958
Subject: Designation of Operator in Charge
Facility: Belcross Farm
Facility ID#: 15-11
County: Camden
Dear Farm Owner:
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
Nov 2 7 2000
'3v _DWQ BRA
Senate Bill 1217, An Act to Implement Recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Study Commission on
Agricultural Waste, was enacted by the 1996 North Carolina General Assembly. This legislation
requires the owner of any animal waste management system that serves 250 or more swine, 100 or
more confined cattle, 75 or more horses, 1,000' or more sheep, or 30,000 or more confined poultry
with a liquid waste management system, to designate a properly certified Operator in Charge
(OIC). 15A NCAC 8F .0201(a)(2) requires the owner of such a system to designate a new OIC
within 30 days of a vacancy of the OIC position.
On November 17, 2000, the Water Pollution Control System Operators Certification Commission
received a letter from David Oldham stating that he resigned as OIC of your facility effective
November 17, 2000. Please complete and return the enclosed Operator in Charge designation form
to the WPCSOCC, 1618 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, N.C., 27699-1618 within 30 days from the
date of this letter. Failure to designate an Operator in Charge is a violation of N.C.G.S. 90A47.2
and 15A NCAC 8F .0201(a) and may result in the assessment of civil penalties.
If you have any questions, please contact me at 919-733-0026, extension 313.
Sincerely,
Beth Buffin
Technical Assistance and Certification Unit
cc: Non -Discharge Compliance/Enforcement Unit
Washington Regional Office
Central Files
Enclosure
WATER POLLUTION CONTROL SYSTEM OPERATORS CERTIFICATION COMMISSION
1018 MAIL SERVICE CENTER, RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27699-IGIB
PHONE [phone] FA% 919-733-1338
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / APPIRMATFVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% POST -CONSUMER PAPER
-=M

ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
OPERATOR IN CHARGE
DESIGNATION FORM
ANIMAL WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM:
Belcross Farm
Facility ID Number: 15-11 County: Camden
OPERATOR IN CHARGE
Home Mailing Address
city
Certificate #
Work Phone
State
Social Security #
Home Phone
Zip.
Signature Date
BACKUP OPERATOR (Optional):
Home Mailing Address
City State Zip
Certificate # Social Security #
Work Phone Home Phone
Signature Date
OWNER
Mailing Address City
State Zip Telephone#
Signature Date
Please Mail to: WPCSOCC
Division of Water Quality
1618 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, N.C. 27699-1618

Division of Rnvir r)=ental ?'.enageament
CF :S OF CUSTODY FFCDPD
For Investigation of L✓i 1 'o r ���� Y r . ••:
Samples collected and 1W.1 form =pleted by:
Tab Only j
Lab -ND.
Station.T
No.
Station Location
Date
Time j Nu. of
j Bottler.
i
C
P.enq uishe% by ature) :
Received by (Signature) :
Date / Time
lRel
Rec by
Rel
I Rec by
Rel
Rec by
thod of Sh±Dment:
Me-
Saal bv: Broken by:
Security Tv -De and Condition: Eck by: Open bv:
UB LISE ONLY
Lab No.
Prom Throu h
No.
Containers
Aaalvsie
Relinouished by
Received by
Date / Time
E I
f
I

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT WATER QUALITY FIELD -LAB FORTS (DM1)
Cat N-�Q-�
COUNTY
PRIORITY
SAMPLE TYPE
`'
'
RIVER BASIN 4 5 ��r y ` ^ ^�
❑AMBIENT
❑j
❑
REPORT TO: ARO FRO MRO RR WaRO IRO WSRO TS
QA
I/� STREAM
EN
EFFLUENT
❑COMPLIANCE
❑ LAKE
❑
OthererAT
Other
LOI CHAIN
INFLUENT
For Lab Ilse ONI-V
Lab Number:
Date Received: Time:
Rec'd by: From: Bus -Courier -hand Del
DATA ENTRY BY: CK:
OF CUSTODY
Shipped by: Bn Courie , Staff. Other ❑EMERGENCY ❑ESTUARY DATE REPORTED:
COLLECTORIS): l✓ i^ h✓1 STATION LOCATION: LAIP 5 `Q r'
Estimated ROD Range: 0-5/5-25/25-65/40-130((Jr 100 piu — — Seed: Yes Yes El No © Chlorinated: Yes[] No ❑ REMARKS:
Station #f Date Begin lyy/mm/dd) I Time Begin Date End Time End De4th DM DB DBM Value Type Composite Sample Type
,A 0 0 j 0 o 3 h� �JU A H L T S B C� GNXX
1
HODS 310 mg/I
2
COD High 340 mg/I
3
COD Low 335 mg/I
4
Collform: MF Fecal 31616 /100-1
5
Coliform: MF Total 31504 /100ml
6
Collform: Tube Fecal 31615 /100ml
7
Collform: Fecal Steep 31673 /100ml
8
Residue: Total 500 mg/I
9
Volatile 505 mg/1
10
Fixed 510 mg/1
11
Residue: Suspended 530 mg/I
12
Volatile 535 mg/I
13
Fixed 540 mg/I
14
pH 403 units
15
Acidity to pH 4-5 436 mg/I
16
Acidity to pH 8.3 435 mg/1
17
Alkalinity to PH 8.3 415 mg/1
18
Alkalinity to pH 4.5 410 m9/1
19
TOC 680 mg/I
20
Turbidity 76 NTU
Chloride 940 mg/I
Chi a: Tri 32217 ug/1
Chi a: Corr 32209 ug/1
Pheophytln a 32213 ng/I
Color: True 80 Pt -Co
Color:(pH ) 83 ADMI
Color: pH 7.6 82 ADMI
Cyanide 720 mg/I
Fluoride 951 mg/I
Formaldehyde 71880 mg/1
Grease and Oils 556 mg/I
Hardness Total900 mg/l
Specific Cond. 95 uMhos/cm2
MBAS 38260 mg/I
Phenols 32730 ug/I
Sulfate 945 m9/1
Sulfide 745 mg/I
NH3 as N 610, m9A
TKN as N 625 , mg/l
NO2 plus N031as N 630 mgA
P: Total as P 665 mg/1
PO4 as P 70507 mgA
P. Dissolved as P 666 mgA
. I
Cd-Cadmium 1027 ug/1
Cr-Chromlurn:Total1034 USA
Cu-=opper1042j u9/1
NI -Nickel 1067 ug/1
Pb-Lead 1051 • ng/I
Zn-ZInc 1092 - ug/1
Ag-Silver 1077 ug/I
A] -Aluminum 1105 ug/l
Be-BerylIium 1012 ag/I
Ca-Calclum 916 m9A
Co -Cobalt 1037 ugA
Fe-lron 1045 USA
LI-Llthlum 1132 ugA
Mg-Magneslum 927 mg/1
Mn-Manganese 1055 ug/1
Na-Sodium 929 mg/I
Arsenic -Total 1002 ug/l
Se -Selenium 1147 ugA
fig -Mercury 71900 ug/1
Organochlorine Pesticides
Organophosphmvs Pesticides
Acid Herbicides
Base/ Neutral Extractable Organics
Acid Extractable Organics
Purgeable Organics (VOA bottle reg'd)
Phytoplankton
Sampling Point %
Conductance at 25 C
Water Temperature
D.O. m%4
pH
Alkalinity
Acidity
Air Temperature 10
pH 83 pH 4.5
pH 4.5 pH 8.3
2
94
10
300 10
400 1•
82244 431
82243 182242
20
Salinity S
Preclpition (in/day)
Cloud Cover %
Wind Direction (Deg)
Stream Flow Severity
Turbidity Severity
Wind Velocity M/H
can Stream Depth ft.
Stream Width ft.
490
45
32
36
1351
1350
35
64
4
Dhil /llevi-wd

Arts: $-�ri:..:.:'.:.•.fVT WATER QUALITY FIELD -LAB FORM (DM1).
y�
C4 40-^
COUNTY`+.
PRIORITY
SAMPLE TYPE
RIVER BASIN k39tia'�^�
[]AMBIENT
j�
EI
REPORT TO: ARO FRO MRO RRO Wa p
IRO WSRO TS
QA
IL7 STREAM
EFFLUENT
AT
❑COMPLIANCE
�
❑ LAKE
❑ INFLUENT
Other
et
CHAIN
❑EMERGENCY
OF CUSTODY
❑ESTUARY
Shipped by: BCourseus , Staff, Other
For Lab Use ONLY
Lab Number:
Date Received: Time:
Rec'd -by:—' From: Bus -Courier -Hand Del
DATA ENTRY BY: CK:
DATE REPORTED:
COLLECTOR S)-- _ _��t+n✓S
STATION LOCATION:
Estimated BOD Range: 0-5/5-25/25-65/40-130 or 100 plus
Seed: Yes ❑ No ❑ Chlorinated: Yee ❑ No ❑ REMARKS:
Station # DateBegin (yy/mm/dd) Time Begin Date End Tlme End Depth DM DU DBM]Value Type Composite Sample T
Q 0 10 c231 woo A H L T S e CGNXX
:]
1
BODS 310 mg/I
2
COD High 340 mg/l
3
COD Low 335 mg/1
4
Collform: MF Fecal 31616 /100ml
5
Collform: MF Total 31504 /loom]
6
Coliform: Tube Fecal 31615 /100ml
71
Collform: Fecal Strep 31673 /loom]
$
Residue: Total 500 mg/l
9
Volatile 505 mg/l
10
Fixed 510 mg/l
11
Residue: Suspended 530 mg/l
12
Volatile 535 mg/I
13
Fixed 540 mg/1
14
ipH 403 units
15
Acidity to pli 4.5 436 mg/I
16
Acidity to PH 8.3 435 mg/1
17
Alkalinity to pH 8.3 415 mgA
18
Alkalinity to pH 4.5 410 mg/l
191
1 TOC 680 mg/l
201
1Turbidity 76 NTU
Chloride 940 mg/l
Chi a: Tri 32217 ug/l
Chi a: Corr 32209 ug/l
Pheophytin a 32213 ug/I
Color: True 80 Pt Co
Color:(PH ) 83 ADM[
Color: pH 7.6 82 ADMI
Cyanide 720 mg/l
Fluoride 951 mg/l
Formaldehyde 71880 mg/l
Grease and Oils 556 mgA
Hardness Total900 mg/l
Specific Cond- 95 umhos/cm2
MBAS 38260 mall
Phenols 32730 ug/1
Sulfate 945 B29A
Sulfide 745 mg/l
NH3 as N 610 mg/1
TKN as N 6251 mg/1
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630 mg/1
P: Total as P 665 mg/1
PO4 as P 70507 mg/l
P: Dissolved as P 666 mg/l
Cd-Cadmium 1027 ugA
Cr-Chromium:Tam11034 ugA
Cu-Copper 1042 ug/1
NI -Nickel 1067 ugA
Pb-Lead 1051 og/I
ZmZinc 1092 ugA
A Ilver 1077 ug/l
AI -Aluminum I105 ug/1
Be -Beryllium 1012 ug/I
Ca-Calclum 916 mgA
Co -Cobalt 1037 ug/1
Fe -Iron 1045 ugA
Li -Lithium 1132 u9/1
Mg -Magnesium 927 mg/1
Mn-Manganese 1055 ug/l
Na-Sodium 929 mg/l
Arsenic -Total 1002 ug/l
Se-Seienlum 1147 ug/I
Ng -Mercury 71900 ug/I
Organochlorine Pesticides
Organophosphorus Pesticides
Acid Herbicides
Base/ Neutral Extractable Organics
Acid Extractable Organics
Purgeable Organics (VOA bottle reg'd)
Phytoplankton
Sampling Point X
Conductance at 25 C
Water Tempemture P
D.O. mg/l
PH
Alkalinity
Acidity
Air Temperature (C)
PH8.3 pH4.5
pH4.5 pH8.3
2
94
10
300 •
400 1•
82244 431
82243 182242
20
Salinity S
Preclpition QnMay)
Cloud Cover %
Wind Direction (Deg)
Stream Flow Severity
Turbidity Severity
Wind Velocity M/H
can Stream Depth fL
Stream Width ft.
480
45
32
36
1351
1350
35
64
14
DF1) /nevi*rd

NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT Or
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RE9OURCE9
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
WASHINGTON REGIONAL OFFICE
WASHINGTON, N.C. 27889
Phone:[phone] FAX:[phone]
TO: � aV)'A a l j � o w1
FAX NO. 2 -I S 23
FROM: cG r ]� U -n
DATE: 0 ! 2- 0U
NO. OF PAGES (INCLUDING COVER):
COMMENTS:
943 Washington Square Mall, Washington, NC 27889

1mg pi.,.. _ .mL NT WATER QUALITY FIELD -LAB FORM (DM I)
COUNTY CG 4e1 PRIORITY
1 SAMPLE TYPE,� i ��� (I
RiVM BASIN
❑AMBIENT ❑ Q .. + 51 t' IST EAIK ❑ EFFLUENT
REPORT TO: ARO FRO MRO RRO Wn O IRO WSRO TS „ # ;� j
Otherer ❑COMPLIANCE 0 CHAIN ❑ LAKE ❑ INFLUENT
Other
OF CUSTODY
Shipped by: Bus Courie , Staff, Other [:)EMERGENCY❑ 13STUARY
Fnr tab Ilce ONLY
Lab Number:yj
r
Date Recelved: Time:
Reed� b. . � From: Bu ou r-Hand Del
DATA ENTRY BY: CK:
DATE REPORTED:
COLLECTOR(5): L,.-,' K STATION LOCATION: !./ n
Estimated ROD Range: 0-5/5-25/25-65/40-130 or 100 plus
Seed: Yes ❑ No Chlorinated: Yes ❑ No ❑ REMARKS:
ate BeginF ( /mm/dd) Time Begin Date End Time End th DM DB DBM Value Type
0 0 f '0 . 03 1� eo o t I - De p— A H L
1 1
BOD5 310
mg/1
COD High 340
mg/1
2 1
3
COD Low 335
mg/1
4
CoIiform: MF Fecal 31616
/loom]
5
Collform: MF Total 31504
/loom[
6
Collform: Tube Fecal 31615
/IOOml
.,
Collform: Fecal Strep 31673
/l0oml
8
Residue: Total 500 mu'.
9
Volatile 505 mg/1
10
Fixed 510 mg/l
11
Residue: Suspended 530 mg/I
12
Volatile 535 mg/l
13
Fixed 540 mg/l
14
pH 403 units
15
Acidity to PH 4.5 436 mg/I
16
Acidity to pH 8.3 435 mg/1
17
Alkalinity to pH 8.3 415 mg/l
18
Alkalinity to pH 4.5 410 mg/1
19
TOC 680 mgA
,,,,
Turbidity 76 NTU
Chloride 940 mg/1
Chi a: Tr] 32217 ug/]
Chi a: Carr 32209 u9A
Pheophytin a 32213 ug/I
Color: True 80 Pt -Co
Color:(pH ) 83 ADM]
Color- pH 7.6 82 ADMI
Cyanide 720 mg/1
Fluoride 951 mg/l
Formaldehyde 71880 mg/l
Grease and Offs 556 mgA
Hardness Total900 mgA
Specific Cand. 95 UMhos/cm2
MBAS 38260 mg/]
Phenols 32730 ugA
Sulfate 945 mg/1
SuIflde 745 mg/1
NH3 as N 610 U19A
TKN as N 625 mg/1
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630 M911
P: Total as P 665 mg/1
PO4 as P 70507 m2A
P: Dissolved as P 666 mgA
CdCadmium 1027 ugA
Cr-Chromlum:Tota11034 ugA
Cu<kipper 1042 no/]
NMtckel 1067 ag/l
Pb-Lead 1051 USA
Zn-Zinc 1092 ugA
A"Ilver I077 ugA
Al -Aluminum 1105 ug/1
Be -Beryllium 1012 ug/1
CaCalclum 916 mgA
Co -Cobalt 1037 - USA
Fe4roa 1045 u9/1
Composite Sample T
T S B C GNXX
LI-Lithium I132 USA
Mg -Magnesium 927 mg/I
Mn-Manganese 1055 ug/l
Na-Sodium 929 mg/1
Arsenir.Total 1002 ugA
Se -Selenium 1147 ug/1
Hg-Mercury 71900 ug/I
Organochlortne Pesticides
OrgWKq*KWPh UZ Pesticides
Acid Herbicides
Base/ Neutral Extractable Organics
Acid Extractable Organics
Purgeable Organics (VOA bottle reg'd)
Phytoplankton
Sampling Point
Conductance at 25 C
Water Temperature
D.O. mgA
1>H
Alkalinity
Acidity
Air Temperature 00
PH 83 pH 4.5
pH 4.5 pH 8.3
2
94
10
300 •
400 f.
82244 1431
82243 162242
20
Salfnity X
Preclpition On/day)
Cloud Cover X
Wind Direction 03eg)
Stream Flow Severity
Turbidity Severity
Wind Velocity MM
can Stream Depth It.Stream
Width ft.480
145
132
36
1351
1350
35
64
14
DMI/Revlsed 10/86

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ER QUALIT [ FIELD -LAB FORM (DM1)
COUNTY CG ��� PRIOR TN OF 4s `� ' E
RIVER BASIN U TYPE
_ IN � 't S ��* � �+� �l i `
REPORT '70: ARO FRO MRO RR WaRO' IRO WSRO TS ❑AMBIENT ❑ QR ST EAM ❑ EFFLUENT
AT BM ❑COMPLIANCE 10 CHAIN ❑ LAKE ❑ INFLUENT
Other OF CUSTODY
Shipped by: Bu Courie Stali, Other ❑ EMERGENCY ❑ ESTUARY
COLLECTORIS): Q Cn h ✓1
Estimated BUD -Range: 0-5/S-25/25-65/40-130 r 100 pier
Seed: Yes ❑ No❑ Chlorinated: Yes ❑ No ❑
STATION LOCATION: `' ` 54
REMARKS: ! ! r^'^S f elI''A
Lab Number:
Date Received: Time:
Rec'd by::]:)! j From: Bu_ Courie Nand Del
DATA ENTRY BY: CK:
DATE REPORTED:
Station # � p Date Begin (yy/mm/dd) Time Begin Datc End Time End Depth DM DB DBM Value Type Composite Sample'iy e
V` (9O iO o3 Woo A H L T S B CGNXX
2
COD High 340 In
3
COD Low 335 mg/l
4
Collform: MF Fecal 31616 /100m1
5
Collform: MF Total 31504 /loom[
6
Colfform: Tube Fecal 31615 /100ml
7
Collform: Fecal Strep 31673 /loom1
8
Residue: Total SW mg/l
9
Volatile 505 mg/l
10
Fixed 510 mg/l
11
Residue: Suspended 530 mg/l
12
Volatile 535 mg/l
13
Fixed 540 mg/l
14
PH 403 units
15
Acidity to pH 4.5 436 mg/1
16
Acidity to pH 8.3 435 mg/1
17
Alkalinity to pH 8.3 415 mg/l
18
Alkalinity to pH 4.5 410 mg/l
19
TOC 680 In
20
Turbidity 76 NTtI
Chloride 940 mg/1
Chi a: Tri 32217 USA
Chi a: Corr 32209 ug/i
Pheophytin a 32213 ug/1
Color: True 80 Pt -Co
Color:(pH ) 83 ADM[
Color: pH 7.6 82 ADM]
Cyanide 720 mg/l
Fluorkie 951 mg/l
Formaldehyde 71880 mg/I
Grease and Oils $56 m9/1
Hardness Total900 mg/I
Specific Cond- 95 uMhos/cm2
MBAS 38260 mg/i
Phenols 32730 ugA
Sulfate 945 mg/I
Sulfide 74S mg/1
NH3 as N 610 mg/I
TKN as N 625 mg/I
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630 mgA
P: Total as P 665 mgA
PO4 as P 70507 mg/l
P: Dissolved as P 666 mgA
CA -Cadmium 1027 USIA
CrChromium:Totat 1034 USA
Cu-Copper 1042 ag/I
NMIckel 1067 ugA
Pb-Lead 1051 ugA
Ztt-Zlnc 1092 USA
A alver 1077 ngA
AI -Aluminum 1105 ugA
Be -Beryllium 1012 ug/1
Ca-CaIclum 916 mall
CO -Cobalt 1037 Ug/I
Fe -Iron 1045 ugA
LI-Llthlum 1132 ug/1
Mg-Magneslum 927 mg/l
Mn-Manganese 1055 ug/1
Na-Sodlum 929 m9/1
Arsenic:Total 1002 ug/1
Se -Selenium 1147 ug/l
Hg-Mercury 71900 ug/1
Organocblorine Pesticides
Organophowhorus IA+ &Wes
Acid Herbicides
Base/ Neutral Extractable Organics
Acid Extractable Organics
Purgeable Organics (VOA bottle reg'd)
Phytoplankton
Sampling Point
Conductance at 25 C
Nater Temperature
D.O. mg/1
rhi
Alkalinity
Acidity
Air Temperature (C)
PH 83 pH 4.5
pH 4.5 pH 9.3
2
94
i0
300 •
400 1•
82244 431
82243 182242
20
Salinity %
Preclpition On/day)
Cloud Cover M
Wind Direction Meg)
Stream Flow Severity
Turbidity Severity
W Ind Velocity M/H
can Stream Depth fL
Stream Width ft.
480
45
32
36
1351
1350
35
64
4
DMl/Revlsed 10/86

DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
April 13, 1994
MEMORANDUM
TO: Kent Wiggins, Supervisor
Facility Assessment.Unit rs
THROUGH: Jim Mulligan, Regional Supervisor
Washington Regional Office
THROUGH: Roger K. Thorpe,Water Quality Supervisor
Washington Regional Office
FROM: Scott Jones, Environmental Technician
Water Quality Section, WARO
SUBJECT: Concentrated Animal Feeding Operation
Mike Duncan Swine Operation - Belcross Farm
Camden County
INTRODUCTION:
The purpose of this memo is to request that the Mike Duncan swine operation -
Belcross Farm be Designated as a Concentrated Animal Feeding Operation. A
summary of the investigation conducted on March 10, 1994, by Scott Jones, DEM
staff, is enclosed as follows:
Date of Inspection: March 10, 1994
Name of Property Owner: Mr. Mike Duncan
Name of Operator: Mr. Mike Duncan
Address: Post Office Box 106
Shawboro, NC 27973
Phone Number: [phone]
Description of Facility Location: The facility is located off North Carolina
Highway 158 approximately one mile east of Belcross in Camden County.
Type of Operation (Examples; farrow to finish, topping, dairy, swine, cattle,
chickens - layers or broilers, turkey production, etc.): This facility is a
swine breeding/farrowing operation incorporating flush gutter houses.
Number and Type of Animals: This facility houses 600 sows and.litters.
Length of Time Animals Have Been, Are, or Will Be Stabled or Confined and Fed or
Maintained in any 12 Month Period: Swine are housed at the facility the entire
year.
Are Crops, Vegetation Forage Growth, or Post -Harvest Residues Sustained in the
Normal Growing Season Over Any Portion of the Lot or Facility? Craps are gra n
on adjacent acreage.
Description of Other Animal Operations in Immediate Vicinity or Proximity to Same
or Other Surface Waters: There are no other known operations in the
vicinity.
Proximity of Facility to Neighboring Houses, Wells, etc.: The nearest home is
approximately 1000 feet from the operation across N.C. Highway 158.

Approximate Depth of Groundwater Table in the Area of the Facility or Discharge:
Seasonal high wetness condition and/or groundwater condition was estimated to
vary between 0 and 36 inches over the entire site.
Proximity of Facility to Surface Waters (provide name and class -of surface
waters): Facility is adjacent to an unnamed tributary to Indiantown Creek
which is classified C Sw within the Pasquotank River Basin.
Are Pollutants Discharged into the Waters of the State?. If so, How? (directly
or by man-made ditch, flushing system, or other similar man-made device):
Facility was land applying waste to agricultural field in sufficient quantity to
create runoff to the unnamed tributary to Indiantown Creek. Additionally, spray
irrigation was occurring over two filed ditches which flowed to the same
tributary.
Do or Have Discharges Occurred in Response to a Storm Event of Less Than a 25-
year, 24-hour Intensity (if yes, include a brief listing of incidents and
suspected causes): This discharge has not occurred in response to a storm
event. However, recent rainfall events have contributed to increased land
application.
Type of Waste Management (Examples: type of confinement - free stall barns,
sheltered or limited shelter dirt lots, paved or dirt open lots, swine houses,
pasture; type of waste handling - direct spreading in solid form, slotted floors
with lagoon or pit, single or multi -cell lagoon, aerated lagoon, land application
of liquid manure, spray irrigation, contractor disposal, etc.): The swine are
housed in multiple flush gutter houses. The wastewater flows to a primary and
secondary lagoon. Ultimate waste disposal is performed by spray application on
adjacent crop land.
condition of Waste Management Facility (rate as poor -good, no discharge,
sufficient freeboard in lagoon, etc. Include weather conditions during
inspection.): Mostly cloudy and showers with temperature around 600. Light
winds. The overall condition of the facility was fair. Lagoons had less than
one foot of freeboard at time of inspection. This farm shares its application
with another animal operation. As a result application events at the two farms
must be coordinated. Waste was observed discharging to an unnanmed tributary of
Indiantown Creek via runoff from spray irrigation.
Animal Waste Discharge including photos and witness' names, addresses, telephone
numbers, and statements of fact): Please note the attached photographs for your
reference. Scott Jones, DEM staff, of the Washington Regional office, (919) 946-
6481, was present at the facility and observed the discharge.
Water Quality Assessment (Include description of sampling, field measurements,
visual observations and slope and vegetative cover of land adjacent to water,
extent of rainfall and other factors relative to the likelihood or frequency of
discharge of animal wastes and process wastewaters): Discharges were pink in
color and were flowing into an unnamed tributary of Indiantown Creek. No field
measurements were taken.
Recommendations Made to Owner/Operator: Mr. Duncan was informed at the time of
inspection that any discharge was to be eliminated. He was also urged to contact
Jahn Timmons with Camden County SCS office to obtain proper application rates and
cost share information regarding additional application equipment.
Recommendations for Further DEM Action (Re -inspect, designate, etc.): T h e
Washington Regional Office recommends the Mike Duncan Swine Operation - Belcross
Farm be designated as a Concentrated Animal Feeding operation.

other Comments:
This facility was observed spraying waste over two field ditches which flowed to
an unnamed tributary of Indiantown Creek by DEM staff in the area. Mr. Duncan
was not present at the facility upon arrival. A maintenance worker was informed
of the reason for the inspection and immediately shut down the application
equipment. Mr. Duncan was contacted and soon arrived on site. He was
cooperative with DEM staff.
Mr. Duncan explained that he had recently made application to expand the lagoon
and spray application site with the local SCS office. Part of this site was
thought to be wetlands and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers was consulted. They
ultimately approved the expansion. In the mean time, SCS was designated the lead
agency in delineating agricultural wetlands and reversed the Corps' decision on
the site in question. Mr. Duncan feels the facility's inability to expand its
wastewater capabilities has led to this discharge. He is in the process of
appealing the decision.
On February 22, 1994, DEM staff were in this area and noticed "pink water" in the
same tributary which flows to Indiantown Creek. A visit was made to Mr. Duncan's
operation; however, no discharge was found. A PVC pipe which ran from the office
bathroom to a nearby drainage ditch was discovered. Mr. Duncan was informed
that this disposal method was illegal. Mr. Ralph Holowell with the local Health
Department was contacted and visited the site. The pipe was removed and
arrangements for a.subsurface system to serve the ❑ffice have been made. Scott
Jones and Deborah Sawyer of the Washington Regional Office were present during
the February 22"d visit.