20051541 Ver 1_Complete File_20050810

?4.
F VA TAR p
6wa
ti
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
August 22, 2005
DWQ Project # 05-1541
Avery County
Robert Wiseman, County Manager
Avery County
Post Office Box 640
Newland, NC 28657
a
Subject Property: North Toe EWP (DSR - NT-18, FC-2, TMC-2, 4 & 5) AUG 3 1 2005
Approval of 401 Water Quality Certification with Additional CondittN IWATER QUALITY
Dear Mr. Wiseman:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed
below, to place fill within or otherwise impact 1,800 feet of streams for the purpose of
streambank stabilization and woody debris removal / trash removal at the subject
properties, as described within your application received by the N.C. Division of Water
Quality (DWQ) on July 27, 2005. After reviewing your application, we have decided that
the impacts are covered by General Water Quality Certification Number(s) 3367 (3367).
The Certification (s) allows you to use Nationwide Permit(s) 37 when issued by the US
Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). In addition, you should obtain or otherwise comply
with any other required federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your
project including (but not limited to) Erosion and Sediment Control, Non-discharge, and
stormwater regulations. Also, this approval to proceed with your proposed impacts
or to conduct impacts to waters as depicted in your application shall expire upon
expiration of the 404 or CAMA Permit.
This approval is for the purpose that you described in your application. (Nothing in this
approval should be interpreted as giving permission to remove bedload material
from the existing channel, nor allowing for the construction of berms which
would not allow the stream access to it's floodplain.) As "stable" and "pre-storm"
are not interchangeable terms, all work must be to ensure stability, regardless of
channel location. Additionally, channels cannot be returned to it's pre-storm location
unless there is documented instability is submitted and approved as part of the
application package. If you change your project beyond the approval here, you must
notify us and you may be required to send us a new application. If the property is sold,
the new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter and is
thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. If total fills for this project (now or
in the future) exceed one acre of wetland or 150 linear feet of stream, compensatory
mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h). This approval
requires you to follow the conditions listed in the attached certification and any
additional conditions listed below.
401 Wetlands Certification Unit
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
2321 Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
?hone: 919-733-1786 / FAX [phone] Internet http7//h2o.enr.state.nc.us/navetlands
NCDEN.:
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 500,10 Recycled/10% Post Consumer Paper
Avery County:
Page 2 of 6
August 22, 2005
The Additional Conditions of the Certification are:
1. Impacts Approved
The following impacts are hereby approved as long as all of the other specific
and general conditions of this Certification (or Isolated Wetland Permit) are met.
No other impacts are approved including incidental impacts:
Amount Plan Location or Reference
Approved (Units)
Stream 1,800 (feet) North Toe River & Three Mile
River
2. Erosion & Sediment Control Practices
Erosion and sediment control practices must be in full compliance with all
specifications governing the proper design, installation and operation and
maintenance of such Best Management Practices in order to protect surface
waters standards:
a. The erosion and sediment control measures for the project must be
designed, installed, operated, and maintained in accordance with the most
recent version of the North Carolina Sediment and Erosion Control Planning
and Design Manual.
b. The design, installation, operation, and maintenance of the sediment and
erosion control measures must be such that they equal, or exceed, the
requirements specified in the most recent version of the North Carolina
Sediment and Erosion Control Manual. The devices shall be maintained on
all construction sites, borrow sites, and waste pile (spoil) projects, including
contractor-owned or leased borrow pits associated with the project.
c. For borrow pit sites, the erosion and sediment control measures must be
designed, installed, operated, and maintained in accordance with the most
recent version of the North Carolina Surface Mining Manual.
d. The reclamation measures and implementation must comply with the
reclamation in accordance with the requirements of the Sedimentation
Pollution Control Act.
3. No Waste, Spoil, Solids, or Fill of Any Kind
No waste, spoil, solids, or fill of any kind shall occur in wetlands, waters, or riparian
areas beyond the footprint of the impacts depicted in the Pre-Construction
Notification. All construction activities, including the design, installation, operation,
and maintenance of sediment and erosion control Best Management Practices,
shall be performed so that no violations of state water quality standards, statutes,
or rules occur.
!•
Avery County:
Page 3 of 6
August 22, 2005
4. No Sediment & Erosion Control Measures w/n Wetlands or Waters
Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters
to the maximum extent practicable. If placement of sediment and erosion control
devices in wetlands and waters is unavoidable, they shall be removed and the
natural grade restored within six months of the date that the Division of Land
Resources has released the project.
5. Certificate of Completion
Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification
or applicable Buffer Rules, and any subsequent modifications, the applicant is
required to return the attached certificate of completion to the 401/Wetlands Unit,
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC,
27699-1650.
6. Construction in this creek and disturbance within a 25-foot trout buffer, where
applicable, should be avoided during the October 15 to April 15 trout spawning
period to avoid adverse effects of sediment on eggs and larvae, where applicable.
However, Wildlife Resources Commission will not object to construction of Natural
Resources Conservation Service "urgent and compelling" sites during the spawning
period provided these projects are, to the extent appropriate and practical,
constructed by: (1) using flow diversion structures such as sand bags, (2) placing
large-sized rock toes and filter cloth backing for stabilization sites before backfilling,
and (3) excavating new channel alignments in dry areas. Construction at the other
non-"urgent and compelling" sites should not occur during the spawning period to
minimize the potential adverse effects of multiple construction activities on trout
resources in this creek.
7. Sediment and erosion control measures must be implemented prior to construction
and maintained on the sites to minimize sediment in downstream areas. Seeding for
a temporary cover of wheat, millet, or similar annual grain or permanent herbaceous
cover should occur on all bare soil within five (5) days of ground disturbing activities
to provide long-term erosion control. The projects should be accomplished in stages
instead of leaving large tracts exposed to further storm events. Erosion control
matting should be used in conjunction with appropriate seeding on disturbed soils in
steep slope and riparian areas. Matting should be secured in place with staples,
stakes, or, wherever possible, live stakes of native trees. Straw mulch and tall
fescue should not be used in riparian areas. In addition, because of an anticipated
difficulty in establishing ground cover during the winter, reseeding should be
conducted, as necessary, in the spring-time with a native annual and perennial seed
mix with a temporary nursery crop of wheat, millet or other grain.
Avery County: A
Page 4 of 6
August 22, 2005
8. Only clean, large, angular rock, large woody material, or other natural stream design
materials and techniques should be used for bank stabilization. Rock should not be
placed in the stream channel in a manner that constricts stream flow or that will
impede aquatic life movements during low flow conditions. Filter cloth should be
placed behind large rock that is used for bank stabilization. Properly designed rock
vanes should be constructed wherever appropriate on bank stabilization and
channel realignment stream reaches to improve channel stability and to improve
aquatic habitat. Root wads should be installed low enough in the bank so that a
significant portion (at least one-third) the root wad is inundated during normal flows.
9. The channel should be restored to a more stable condition. However, under no
circumstances should river rock, sand or other materials be dredged from the
stream channel under authorization of this permit except, if necessary, in the
immediate vicinity of the eroding banks for the explicit purpose of anchoring
stabilizing or flow/grade control structures or for reestablishing the natural
and more stable stream channel dimensions. Stream bed materials are unstable
in flowing-water situations and are unsuitable for bank stabilization. In stream
dredging has catastrophic effects on aquatic life and disturbance of the natural form
of the stream channel can cause downstream erosion problems. The natural
dimension, pattern, and profile of the stream upstream and downstream of the
permitted area should not be modified by widening the stream channel or changing
its depth.
10. Stabilization measures should only be applied on or near existing erosion sites,
leaving other stable stream bank areas in a natural condition. Grading and
backfilling should be minimized and tree and shrub growth should be retained where
possible to ensure long term availability of stream bank cover for aquatic life and
wildlife. Backfill materials should be obtained from upland sites except in cases
where excess stream bed materials are available. Berms should not be permitted
because they block the floodplain, constrict and accelerate flood flows, and often fail
and sometimes impede drainage during large flood events.
11. Repairs to eroded banks should be conducted in a dry work area where possible.
Sandbags or other clean diversion structures should be used where possible to
minimize excavation in flowing water. Channel realignments should be constructed
by excavating the new channel from downstream to upstream before connecting it to
the old channel.
12. Heavy equipment should be operated from the bank whenever possible. All
mechanized equipment operated near surface waters should be inspected and
maintained regularly to prevent contamination of stream waters from fuels,
lubricants, hydraulic fluids or other toxic materials. Equipment used in stream
channel must be clean, new or low hour equipment.
13. Disturbed stream banks and a 25-foot vegetated zone, or the widest width that is
practical under the site conditions, should be restored along the construction sites to
natural riparian conditions with native trees and shrubs (e.g., silky dogwood,
rhododendron, . dog hobble, red maple, silky willow, tag alder, black willow,
sycamore) to provide long-term bank stability and stream shading. Note, silky
dogwood, silky willow and black willow can be planted as live stakes collected during
the dormant growing season. Cuttings should be randomly planted on four (4) foot
centers from the waters edge to the top of the bank. Trees should be planted on ten
4
Avery County:
Page 5 of 6
August 22, 2005
(10) to twelve (12) foot centers. Stream banks in these areas should also be
seeded with a native annual and perennial seed mix with a temporary nursery crop
of wheat, millet or other grain.
14. If pasture along the stream is to be used for grazing, a fence must be constructed
outside of the riparian zone and the stream to prevent livestock from entering these
areas.
15. Diffuse Flow
All constructed stormwater conveyance outlets shall be directed and maintained
as diffuse flow at non-erosive velocities through the protected riparian zones
such that it will not re-concentrate before discharging into a stream. If this is not
possible, it may be necessary to provide stormwater facilities that are considered
to remove nitrogen. This may require additional approval from this Office.
16. Riparian Zone Replanting
Replanting of vegetation within disturbed areas located within 30 feet of the
streambank associated with any land disturbing activity, repair, replacement
and/or maintenance must be done in a manner consistant with the Guidelines
for Riparian Buffer Restoration immediately following construction. (Please
see attached.)
17. Deed Notifications
Deed notifications or similar mechanisms shall be placed on all retained
jurisdictional wetlands, waters and protective woody riparian zones in order to
assure compliance for future wetland, water and buffer impact. These
mechanisms shall be put in place prior to impacting any wetlands, waters and/or
buffers approved for impact under this Certification Approval and Authorization
Certificate. A sample deed notification can be downloaded from the
401/Wetlands Unit web site at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. The text of
the sample deed notification may be modified as appropriate to suit to this
project.
18. Turbidity Standard
The turbidity standard of 10 NTUs (Nephelometric Turbidity Units) shall not be
exceeded as described in 15 A NCAC 2B. .0200. Appropriate sediment and
erosion control practices must be used to meet this standard.
19. No Sediment and Erosion Control Measures in Wetlands
Sediment and erosion control measures shall not be placed in wetlands or waters
to the maximum extent practicable. If placement of sediment and erosion control
devices in wetlands and waters is unavoidable, they shall be removed and the
natural grade restored within six months of the date that the Division of Land
Resources or locally delegated program has released the project.
Avery County:
Page 6 of 6
August 22, 2005
Violations of any condition herein set forth may result in revocation of this Certification
and may result in criminal and/or civil penalties. The authorization to proceed with your
proposed impacts or to conduct impacts to waters as depicted in your application and
as authorized by this Certification, shall expire upon expiration of the 404 or CAMA
Permit.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this Certification (associated with the
approved wetland or stream impacts), you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You
must act within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing,
send a written petition, which conforms to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General
Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh,
N.C. 27699-6714. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you
ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of
the Clean Water Act. If you have any questions, please telephone Cyndi Karoly in the
Central Office in Raleigh at 919-733-9721 or Mr. Kevin Barnett in the DWQ Asheville
Regional Office at 828-296-4657.
Sincerely,
' C r6-40 ?j 'le-4 zvtzc?'?
A?'wAlan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
,;(LDivision of Water Quality
AW Klkhb
Enclosures: GC 3367
Certificate of Completion
Guidelines for Riparian Buffer Restoration
cc: Doug Smith,
Buck Engineering, PC
8000 Regency Parkway
Suite 200
Cary, NC 27511
USACE Asheville Regulatory Field Office
DWQ 401 Central Office
DLR Asheville Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
Filename: 05-1541. EWP.NorthToe&ThreeMileRiver.Approval
Triage Check List
Date: 08/15/05 Project Name: Avery County EWP - DSR 11
Sites NT-18, FC-2, TMC-2, TMC-4, TMC-5
DWQ #:05-1541
Kevin Barnett, Asheville Regional Office County: Avery
To:
60-day Processing Time: 8/10/05 to 10/8/05
From: Cyndi Karoly Telephone: [phone]
The file attached is being forwarded to you for your evaluation.
Please call if you need assistance.
? Stream length impacted
? Stream determination
Wetland determination and distance to blue-line surface waters on USFW topo maps
? Minimization/avoidance issues
? Buffer Rules (Neuse, Tar-Pamlico, Catawba, Randleman)
? Pond fill
Mitigation Ratios
? Ditching
? Are the stream and or wetland mitigation sites available and viable?
? Check drawings for accuracy
Is the application consistent with pre-application meetings?
? Cumulative impact concern

Comments: As per our discussion regarding revision of the triage and delegation processes,
please review the attached file. Note that you are the first reviewer, so this file will need to be
reviewed for administrative as well as technical details. If you elect to place this project on hold,
please ask the applicant to provide your requested information to both the Central Office in
Raleigh as well as the Asheville Regional Office. As we discussed, this is an experimental, interim
procedure as we slowly transition to electronic applications. Please apprise me of any
complications you encounter, whether related to workload, processing times, or lack of a "second
reviewer" as the triage process in Central had previously provided. Also, if you think of ways to
improve this process, especially so that we can plan for the electronic applications, let me know.
Thanks!
EWP - Avery County, North Carolina
DSR 11- Sites NT-18, FC-2, TMC-2, TMC-4 & TMC-5
French Broad River Basin
Scope of Work
These sites are part of DSR group 11 located in southwest Avery County. This submittal
contains 5 of the total 10 sites for this group. Three sites NT-16, NT-17 and FC-1 have
been previously submitted. TMC-4 will only require live staking, and debris removal, no
permits are necessary for this site. NT-18, FC-2, TMC-2, and TMC-5 will require more
extensive work for bank stability and will include a Preconstruction Notification (permit)
to the United States Army Corps of Engineers. Site specific plans are attached and show
site location, existing conditions, estimated repair quantities and planned repairs. All
repair work is being proposed under the Emergency Watershed Protection Program that
Avery County is administering. Questions about this package should be directed to Buck
Engineering's Doug Smith, at 919-463-5488.
Contents
• Preconstruction Notification (Permit Application)
• Avery County EWP Index Map of DSR Groups
• Table 1. Property owners of sites proposed for repair under EWP.
• Repair plan for site NT-18
• Repair plan for site FC-2
• Repair plan for site TMC-2
• Repair plan for site TMC-4
• Repair plan for site TMC-5
• Avery County Plant List and Riparian Seed Mix
• Construction Details
• Erosion and Sediment Control Plan
AUG I n 2005
DENR - WATER QUALITY
`?7C(JryyATERBRAjKCH
f
Office Use Only: Form Version May 2002
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
(If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ? Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
? Section 10 Permit ? Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: Nationwide 37
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (verify availability with NCWRP prior to submittal of PCN), complete
section VIII and check here: ?
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further detail 0 ck here:: M?
IL Applicant Information ??" v
D
1. Owner/Applicant Information AUG 1 0 2005
Name: Robert Wiseman (County Manager) P,^=r,p AN .-WAT&R
Mailing Address: County Administrative Offices" YAT1a1f7_?c}I
P.O. Box 640
Newland, NC 28657
Telephone Number: 828-733-8201 Fax Number: 828-737-9395
E-mail Address: Robert.wiseman(2ancmail.net
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name: Doug Smith
Company Affiliation: Buck Engineering PC
Mailing Address: 8000 Regency Parkway, Suite 200
Cary, NC 27511
Telephone Number: 919-463-5488 Fax Number: 919-463-5490
E-mail Address: dsmithambuckengineering.com
Page 1 of 9
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Avery County EWP, Group 11.
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): N/A
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): See attached Table 1.
4. Location
County: Avery Nearest Town: Newland, NC
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): N/A
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): The location of each site is
attached on the EWP Index Ma and provided in each individual site repair plan
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long):_ Attached in site repair plan.
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Property size (acres): N/A
7. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): North Toe River, Three Mile
Creek, Fork Creek.
8. River Basin: French Broad River
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://l12o.enr.state.ne.us/admin/maps/.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: A site specific description is in each site plan
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used: Specific
Page 2 of 9

repair activities for the site are provided in the site repair plans which are attached. Repair
activities proposed for the site include: installing vane structures to protect unstable stream
banks, and removing unstable woody debris. This work will require the use of a trackhoe
with hydraulic thumb and a dump truck to haul and place boulders and remove woody debris.
A bulldozer may be needed for some of the grading work. A logging winch will help debris
removal easier
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work: This work is being done as part of the
Emergency Watershed Protection program that counties impacted by 2 Hurricanes in the Fall
of 2004 are carrying out. The purpose of the work is to repair damaged stream reaches that
are unstable and continuing to cause loses to personal and public property and to public
resources by degrading water quality and other natural resources.
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
To our knowledge permits have not been issued for work at these sites in the past.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
Page 3 of 9
1i
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: Impacts from this work will be
minimized whenever possible. However to accomplish these needed repairs impacts m4Y be
realized from temporary increased turbidity, removal of aggraded bed material and temporary
loss of herbaceous vegetation. Long-term impacts will be an increase in stream bank
stability, stable dimension and profile, and improved vegetative cover.
2. Individually list wetland impacts below:
Wetland Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
acres Located within
100-year Floodplain**
(es/no Distance to
Nearest Stream
linear feet
Type of Wetland***

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at li(tp://ww%v. [gma.gov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.) Indicate if wetland is isolated (determination of isolation to be made by USACE only).
List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: 0
Total area of wetland impact proposed: 0
3. Individually list all intermittent and erennial stream impacts below:
Stream Impact
Length
Impact Average Width of Perennial or
Site Number Type of Impact* r
(linear feet) Stream Name* * Stream Before Intermittent?
indicate on ma Impact (leasespecify)
NT-18 Riffle Stabilization 200' North Toe River 50'-60' Perennial
FC-2 Channel dimension
j 500' Fork Creek 30' Perennial
ad
ustment
Stream bank
TMC-2 stabilization,
installing 1 rock 200' Three Mile Creek 25'-35' Perennial
vane
Stream bank
stabilization,
TMC-5 installing 5 rock 900' Three Mile Creek 25'-35' Perennial
vanes, and 3 cross
vanes
" List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
Page 4 of 9
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
wt sas,aov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., wwtv.topezone.coin,
III t)(1uest,eom, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 1800'
4. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.) below:
Open Water Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
acres Name of Waterbody
(if applicable) Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.
N/A

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
5. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
Access to each site will be over the most stable route possible and movement of vehicles over
access routes will be minimized. Wherever possible equipment work will be done from the
stream bank Operating equipment within the channel will be done when this is the only way to
accomplish needed work. Excavated material will be moved directly to trucks for hauling to
disposal sites when it will not be used on site. When excavated material will be used on site it
will be handled as few times as possible. Work at each site will be accomplished as quickly as
Page 5 of 9
possible and the site will be stabilized with erosion control matting and seeding within 5 days of
site completion Trees will be planted during the next dormant season. Equipment leaking any
fluids will not be used and if leaks occur during construction the equipment will be replaced or
repaired immediately. Sediment and erosion control measures, including silt fence, stoned
entrances protected stock pile areas diversions and check dams will be employed to minimize
sediment movement off site.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmaide.litml.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
N/A
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCWRP at
[phone] to determine availability and to request written approval of mitigation prior
to submittal of a PCN. For additional information regarding the application process for the
Page 6 of 9

NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o.enr.state,ne.us/wrp/index.litm. If use of
the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide the
following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): N/A
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): N/A
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): N/A
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state) funds or the use of public
(federal/state) land?
Yes ® No ?
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 213 .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ? No ® If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Page 7 of 9
Zone* Impact
(square feet Multiplier Required
Miti ation
1 3
2 1.5
Total
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0260.
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
There will be no chance in impervious acreage. Existing project sites are agricultural lands and
will remain in this land use Proposed repair work will not alter runoff of stormwater from each
site The end result of this proposed work will be stream banks that are better able to withstand
the erosive forces generated by storm flows
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A waste water will not be generated bps project
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
Page 8 of 9

XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).

AppLI&/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 9 of 9
Table 1. Property owners of sites proposed for repair under the EWP program in Avery County County. DSR site relates to the number shown on the Index Map.
I nt A I nnn rr?ri riririril
DSR NUMBER DSR SITE PIN NAME 1 ADDRESS 2 CITY/STATE ZIPCODE North West Type Length
11 NT-18 180100389784 HAWKINS, BRUCE & BETTY 1797 HANGING ROCK RD SPRUCE PINE, NC 26777 35.96242 82.02789 Debris removal. 100 ft
11 NT-18 180100490647 LOVELACE, LELA 57 DAN LN SPRUCE PINE, NC 28777 35.96463 82.02688 Debris removal and channel grading. 200 ft

11 TMC-2 181200546728 BELL, GERRY KENT & LISA 101 BRIDGE LN NEWLAND, NC 28657 35.9798 81.98921 Misc. debris removal 50 ft
11 TMC-2 181200544698 BELL, GERRY KENT & LISA 101 BRIDGE LN NEWLAND, NC 28657 35.9795 81.98971 Misc. debris removal 50 ft
11 TMC-2 181200543594 BELL, GERRY KENT & LISA 101 BRIDGE LN NEWLAND, NC 28657 35.97909 81.98998 Misc. debris removal 50 ft
11 TMC-2 181200549937 BUMGARNER, EDWARD JUNIOR & 67 BRIDGE LANE NEWLAND, NC 28657 35.98035 81.98827 Misc. debris removal 5011
11 TMC-2 181200438859 BURLESON, OLIN D & MARGARET 1461 OLD HWY 18 SOUTH MORGANTON, NC 28655 35.97792 81.99226 Minor grading. Live stake and container plant banks. 150 ft
11 TMC-2 181200436860 BURLESON, OLIN D & MARGARET 1461 OLD HWY 18 SOUTH MORGANTON, NC 28655 35.9777 81.99288 Minor grading. Live stake and container plant banks. 150 ft
11 TMC-2 181200449549 BUTLER, DAVID R. & 2697 THREE MILE HWY NEWLAND, NC 28657 35.9792 81.99152 Minor grading. Live stake and container plant banks. 50 ft
11 TMC-2 181200541471 CARPENTER, JEFFERY D. 98 BRIDGE LANE NEWLAND, NC 28657 35.97875 81.99071 Re grade stream banks, seed, mat, and live stake 150 ft
11 TMC-2 181200530978 CARPENTER, ROBY 106 GREENWAY LANE NEWLAND, NC 28657 35.97829 81.9915 Minor grading. Live stake and container plant banks. 200 ft
11 TMC-2 181200442261 FORBES, LINDA LOU 2825 THREE MILE HWY NEWLAND, NC 28657 35.97809 81.99381 Minor grading. Live stake and container plant banks. 100 ft
11 TMC-2 181200336461 HARTLEY, HOWARD 302 3 MILE HWY NEWLAND, NC 28657 35.97596 81.99566 Misc. debris removal 50 ft
11 TMC-2 181200335244 HARTLEY, HOWARD 302 3 MILE HWY NEWLAND, NC 28657 35.97537 81.99613 Misc. debris removal 50 ft
11 TMC-2 181200338981 INGRAM, CLIFTON RT 2 BOX 1090 BURNSVILLE, NC 28714 35.97716 81.99506 Misc. debris removal 50 ft
11 TMC-2 181200554075 INGRAM, LORENE RT 6, BOX 664-2 MARION, NC 38752 35.98052 81.98977 Misc. debris removal 50 ft
11 TMC-2 181200446490 JOHNSON, DUDLEY & PO BOX 123 MINNEAPOLIS, NC 28652 35.97866 81.9924 Minor grading. Live stake and container plant banks. 250 ft
11 TMC-2 181200556262 MC COURY, ZELLIAN & MYRTLE % ELWANDA LEDFORD BAKERSVILLE, NC 28705 35.98096 81.98917 Misc. debris removal 50 ft
11 TMC-2 181200543903 MC KINNEY, LARRY E 337 LITTLE BUCK HILL ROAD NEWLAND, NC 28657 35.98011 81.99036 Misc. debris removal 50 ft
11 TMC-2 181200547898 MOODY, RONNIE PO BOX 244 PINEOLA, NC 28662 35.9801 81.98864 Misc. debris removal 50 ft
11 TMC-2 181200339362 OSBORNE, HARMON & 2967 THREE MILE HWY NEWLAND, NC 28657 35.97566 81.99471 Minor grading. Seed, mat, live stake and container plant banks. 100 ft
11 TMC-2 181200444269 PITTMAN, DERRELL K & SHERRY 2787 THREE MILE HWY NEWLAND, NC 28657 35.97833 81.99311 Rip rap outlet. Minor grading. Live stake and container plant banks. 150 ft
11 TMC-2 181200440099 PITTMAN, SHERRILL & LANA 2839 THREE MILE HWY NEWLAND, NC 28657 35.97777 81.99435 Misc. debris removal 50 ft
11 TMC-2 181200337036 PRITCHARD, SCOTTY OTIS PO BOX 186 SPRUCE PINE, NC 28777 35.97509 81.99531 Misc. debris removal 50 ft
11 TMC-2 181200448542 SINGLETON, ROGER D. & 2715 THREE MILE HWY NEWLAND, NC 28657 35.97896 81.99184 Minor grading. Live stake and container plant banks. 200 ft
11 TMC-2 181200540781 TOWNSEND, HOWARD & 2639 THREE MILE HWY NEWLAND, NC 28657 35.97955 81.99109 Re grade stream banks, seed, mat, and live stake 150 ft
11 TMC-2 181200337752 WARD, DONNA S. 2963 THREE MILE HWY NEWLAND, NC 28657 35.97672 81.99549 Install 1 rock vane. Seed, mat and live stake. 100 ft.
11 TMC-2 181200431788 WISE, DAVID & CAROLYN 56 CHILDS LN NEWLAND, NC 28657 35.97686 81.99407 Minor grading. Live stake and container plant banks. 100 ft

11 TMC 4 & FC-2 181200748883 SPRY, JAMES & MARY 2145 THREE MILE RD NEWLAND, NC 28657 35.98064 81.98188 Debris removal TMC-4 . Channel grading, seed, mat and live stake FC-2 1000 ft

11 TMC-5 180200911794 MC KINNEY, LARRY E & NINA & 337 LITTLE BUCK HILL NEWLAND, NC 28657 35.97084 82.01056 Install 2 cross vanes. Re grade banks, seed, mat and live stake. 250 ft
11 TMC-5 180200920071 PHILLIPS, FRANK W JR & VIVIAN 105 ALTAPASS RD SPRUCE PINE, NC 28777 35.97149 82.01108 Install 2 cross vanes. Re grade banks, seed, mat and live stake. 250 ft
11 TMC-5 181200114857 PHILLIPS, FRANK W JR & VIVIAN 105 ALTAPASS RD SPRUCE PINE, NC 28777 35.97091 82.00403 Install 4 rock vanes, l cross vane. Re grade banks, seed, mat and live stake. 600 ft
11 TMC-5 180200915504 PHILLIPS, FRANK W JR & VIVIAN 105 ALTAPASS RD SPRUCE PINE, NC 28777 35.91029 82.00942 Install rock vane. Re grade bank, seed, mat, and live stake. 100 ft
To Whom It May Concern:
I, Robert Wiseman, County Manager for Avery County, attest to the fact that Avery County has
entered into a contract with Buck Engineering PC, a North Carolina professional corporation. Buck
Engineering will be providing engineering services and permitting assistance in support of the
Emergency Watershed Protection Program. In this contractual relationship, Buck Engineering will
act as the County's agent for the purpose of accomplishing this work. Specifically, employees of
Buck Engineering may take those actions necessary to obtain environmental pen-nits from the U. S.
Army Corps of Engineers, N. C. Division of Water Quality, and N. C. Division of Land Quality.
i
Robert Wiiseman, County Manager for Avery County
Date: eq
Office: Avery County Courthouse, Newland, NC 28657

Plan Review Checklist
EWP-Avery County, North Carolina
DSR IV l / 8? _-
I ?Alif l/1J l/ the Natural Resource Conservation Service Agent for Avery
County, have reviewed the stream repair plans listed below. These plans have been
prepared by Buck Engineering PC to accomplish stream repair under the Emergency
Watershed Protection Program being administered by Avery County. The following table
DSR Approve Disapprove Approve with Modifications
summarizes my comments on these plans:

Additional comments:
?J
blal9,?,C ,/ -., Natural Resource Conservation Service Agent
Ag nt's Sigaamut
pJ
V
DSR No. NT-18
Site Assessed By: SDW, CLY
Date Assessed: 6/8/2005
Length of Approximately 500 feet
Assessment:
X_ Debris removal
_ Bank sloping
Bank stabilization
Location: Adjacent to Lovelace Ln. near
Hanging Rock Rd.
County: Avery
Lat.: 35° 57'53" / Long.: 82° 01' 32"
Waterbody: North Toe River (28.88 mi)
Channel realignment Seeding
In-stream structures Adjust channel dimension
Riparian planting
Summary Evaluation of Conditions:
This reach is along the North Toe River just downstream from Hanging Rock Rd. Bridge adjacent to the Lovelace
property. The Lovelace property experienced flooding which damaged an accessory structure (shed). A mid channel
bar has formed and debris on this bar is directing stream energy to the outer stream bank. More debris is located on
the inside of this meander bend. See attached photos for visual representation.
Recommendations for Repair:
Prior to performing any clearing, grubbing or debris removal activities, inventory, under engineer approval, any
adequate root wad or transplant material. These items should be stockpiled; then installed or transported at the
appropriate time.
Access to the property should be made on Lovelace Ln. off Hanging Rock Rd. Heavy equipment accessing the
stream should only do so in areas marked on the "Recommendations for Repair" Figure. Demolish accessory
structure and remove from site (See photo 1). Remove woody debris from inside of meander bend (See photo 2).
Remove mid channel bar and reshape channel thalweg (See photo 3).
All work should be performed in conformance with the "Erosion & Sediment Control Plan" (see attached).
Quantities:
Item Unit Quantity
Wood Debris Removal CY 20
Grading rock debris removal CY 50
? LIY
ib
1?
I 'e
I -it

G.,Ik,- '
j

Photo 1 - Demolish and
NT-18
Ma ' ,
accessory structure.
Photo Z - Remove woody debris from inside meander bend.
NT-18
Photo 3 - Remove mid channel bar.
Plan Review Checklist
EWP-Avery County, North Carolina
DSR FC- Z -
I dwx? the Natural Resource Conservation Service Agent for Avery
County, have reviewed the stream repair plans listed below. These plans have been
prepared by Buck Engineering PC to accomplish stream repair under the Emergency
Watershed Protection Program being administered by Avery County. The following table
summarizes my comments on these plans:
DSR Approve Disapprove Approve with Modifications
Additional comments:
Natural Resource Conservation Service Agent
Agent's sipumur
DSR No. FC-2
Site Assessed By: SDW, CLY
Date Assessed: 6/8/2005
Length of Approximately 500 feet
Assessment:
_ Debris removal
X Bank sloping
X Bank stabilization
Location: Adjacent to Three Mile Hwy (NC HWY
194).
County: Avery
Lat.: 35° 59' 01" / Long.: 81° 58' 55"
Waterbody:
_ Channel realignment
_ In-stream structures
X Riparian planting
Fork Creek (0.8 mil)
X Seeding
X Adjust channel dimension
Summary Evaluation of Conditions:
This reach begins just downstream from Three Mile Highway (NC HWY 194) and flows approximately 500 ft. to it's
confluence with Three Mile Creek. This reach experienced major aggradation. The property owner has excavated the
excess material within the channel and stockpiled it on the stream banks.
Recommendations for Repair:
Prior to performing any clearing, grubbing or debris removal activities, inventory, under engineer approval, any
adequate root wad or transplant material. These items should be stockpiled; then installed or transported at the
appropriate time.
Access to this site should be made on the Spry property as shown in the "Recommendations for Repair" Figure.
Regrade and adjust channel dimensions according to the attached "Cross Section Design" sheets. The upper third of
the reach should be designed according to cross-section "XS1." While the middle third should be designed to cross-
section "XS2" and the lower third to "XS3." Permanent seed, mat, and livestake following earthwork. See photos for
visual representation.
All work should be performed in conformance with the "Erosion & Sediment Control Plan" (see attache
Quantities:
Item Unit Quantity
Live Stakes EA 450
Excavation CY 100
Temporary Silt Fence LF 1000
Temporary Seeding LBS 40
Mulch Grain Straw BALES 25
Permanent Seeding LBS 5
Coir Matting SY 650
Vicinity Map
Ay
I ? ( 4
? tlR
rkw 1 S C r"
yy?? k +
044
t sta.
s,
t
4 r y,
R ,
? w.

aI H
?? ?? y, 5t ply I'
5r P ? ` ?. r
r ,
°"t q??°f., ?.:. ? 11?lyytyPb._?M ? "?ti Y ?VH1 i ?/i ?
r " r. i e t ?
L t , yid •I,A .? ?' ???

f
`tx

?f ?1? ' 77 I + Y ?1?,?fA 1 li qS

s,
.W :o,?^?'P Y'1 +

;t N
K
„7

y t+

"

..
\

a to C.

60
wajill

i X . .
11 h
tY'?i r d? ,,./
'..
"
"
P
'i'•,Y'. - .f
'rye , 14?
?
G?}?P,nv` I??? ,
4L
r
.•r ^
k
5
r.

7
.. ?
• ?Q?? ? ?.+ fir
? v t?:+y'>a ?'
r
,
d
n
t9
N RECOMMENDATIONS FOR REPAIR
A (Group 11) Site: FC-2
Avery County EWP
0 50 100 200
-9 1 Feet
BUCK
CLIENT
PROJECT F6-2
PAGE
PROJECT NO.
SUBJECT Prepared By_
Gru33 SCG4--?c-, Oe. S k Approved By
re
Q C l?.M?? 1. p? ?? s
OF
Date
Date

scale: 4 sq./inch
cross- Se-c-4-i- iV?P_ s 1 ti h
Cross-section Data:

Feature Stream
Type
BKF Area
BKF Width BKF
Depth Max BKF
Depth
W/D
BH Ratio
ER
BKF Elev
TOB Elev
Riffle C 24.7 22.23 1.11 1.52 19.98 1.9 2.4 998.96 1000.38
1007
1006
1005
1004
0 1003
1002
d 1001
w 1000
999
998
997
996
Cross-section XS1
Fill
............. - - o - - Bankfull
o Floodprone
Proosed XS
115 125 135 145 155 165 175
Station
Pt # North East Elevation Note Station
2 5085.229 5068.289 1000.212234 X1 RIFFLE 100
3 5090.041 5046.097 1000.380189 X1 LTB 122.5631
4 5091.288 5041.292 999.354115 X1 127.4699
5 5091.675 5038.198 997.976007 X1 LCH W 130.5867
6 5092.022 5034.824 997.68663 X1 133.9789
7 5093.3 5028.785 997.440468 X1 TWG 140.1154
8 5094.808 5022.517 997.740006 X1 RCH 146.503
9 5095.494 5016.671 999.494335 X1 152.3887
10 5097.767 5005.809 1005.800753 X1 RTB 163.4246
11 5098.137 5001.908 1003.522661 X1 167.3428
12 5098.612 4995.672 1000.513295 X1 173.5951
13 5095.554 4966.269 1000.370982 X1 202.5409
Bankfull Line
Station Elevation
128.36 998.96
150.6 998.96
Flood prone Line
Station Elevation
100 1000.48
154.11 1000.48
Proposed XS
Bkf Area 20.4 ft^2
W/D ratio 13.3
Mean D th 1.2 ft
Max D th 2 ft
Station Elevatio
NA NA
127 999.4
M
131.85
999.4

37.1
1
997.65
140.1 997.4
RCH 143.1 997.65
RTB 148.35 999.4
RB 154.1 999.4
R Tie in 162 1003.5
R Tie in 167 1003.5
Cross-section Data:

Feature Stream
Type
BKF Area
BKF Width BKF
Depth Max BKF
Depth
W/D
BH Ratio
I

R

KF Elev

OB Elev
Riffle Gc 15.9 12.78 1.24 1.75 10.28 2.4 1.3 996.93 999.37
Cross-section XS 2
1003
1002
1001
c 1000
999
> 998
w 997
996
995
994
Cut
Fill
................
\\ o- Bankfull
-•----••••-- o - •Floodprone
Proposed XS
100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 190
Station
Pt # North East Elevation Note Station
14 4972.169 5021.905 998.73853 X2 RIFFLE 100
15 4973.049 5005.534 998.912065 X2 116.1688
16 4973.349 4993.796 999.677963 X2 127.7985
17 4973.583 4992.371 999.370186 X2 LTB 129.1876
18 4973.517 4990.72 998.007845 X2 130.8361
19 4973.662 4988.667 995.941026 X2 LCH 132.8596
20 4973.942 4985.046 995.447624 X2 136.4262
21 4973.854 4981.625 995.177738 X2 TWG 139.8346
22 4972.763 4978.152 995.954033 X2 RCH W 143.4085
23 4972.636 4974.156 999.031322 X2 147.3937
24 4970.844 4968.507 1001.875523 X2 RTB 153.208
25 4968.91 4963.08 1001.699866 X2 158.8184
26 4962.603 4937.421 999.732928 X2 185.0245
Bankfull Line
Station Elevation
131.89 996.93
144.67 996.93
Flood prone Line
Station Elevation
130.02 998.68
146.94 998.68
Proposed XS
Bkf Area 20.4 ft^2
W/D ratio 13.3
Mean D pt 1.2 ft
Max D th 2 ft
Station Elevatio
L Tie in 116 999
LB 125 997.2
LTB 130.75 997.2
LCH 136 995.45
TWG 139 995.2
RCH 142 995.45
RTB 147.25 997.2
RB 160 1001.5
R Tie In 180 1001.5
1 165 1000
Cross-section Data:

Feature Stream
Type
BKF Area
BKF Width BKF
Dept h Max BKF
De th
W/D
BH Ratio
I

R
I

KF Elev

OB Elev
Riffle Bc 13.1 12.21 1.07 1.66 11.38 1.5 1.7 995.18 996.09
Cross-section XS3
999
998
0 997
w.
996
0
w 995
994
993
Cut
100 110 120 130
Station
V_"7? Fill
o • - Bankfull
o - • Floodprone
Proposed XS
140 150 160
Pt # North East Elevation Note Station
27 4868.549 5041.823 997.547362 X3 100
28 4865.976 5030.953 997.075124 X3 111.1482
29 4864.295 5025.461 996.093832 X3 LTB 116.8914
30 4863.662 5023.392 995.221397 X3 119.0554
31 4862.848 5021.365 994.204133 X3 LCH W 121.2313
32 4861.774 5018.816 993.925817 X3 123.9822
33 4860.636 5017.451 993.518091 X3 TWG 125.6196
34 4859.964 5015.007 993.831769 X3 128.1532
35 4859.142 5013.327 994.198775 X3 RCH 129.9999
36 4857.561 5007.555 998.533514 X3 RTB 135.9825
37 4855.584 5000.365 998.271613 X3 143.436
38 4853.972 4993.931 997.160464 X3 150.0607
Bankfull Line
Station Elevation
119.14 995.18
131.35 995.18
[Flood prone Line
Station Elevation
112.51 996.84
133.65 996.84
Proposed XS
Bkf Area 20.4 ft^2
W/D ratio 13.3
Mean D pt 1.2 ft
Max D th 2 ft
Station Elevatio
L Tie in 109 997.25
LB 111.6 995.5
LTB 117.35 995.5
LCH 122.6 993.75
TWG 125.6 993.5
RCH 128.6 993.75
RTB 133.85 995.5
RB 142 998.35
R Tie In 148 998.35
iwj ya/I

r _

e vt' r. .. ca ?..
pie , r Y. w• •.:. •,. ;: It 1,r
Y
1 k
T f 4'.. 7 J

a
tis
't I ? t:
,
;
r

/
? {
may, ( M
• \

Photo 1 - Adjust channel dimensions, permanent
upstream).

and live stake (Looking
?A 5 7154; ?•?? ,^ ??i;t` ?'? ?.'?2 r
'?
F ?o I;?( 1 ?t 4y?j'./J+{ }*{\Y.".'444} `jy { 1
? .i r' r?: . 5 ( ?, ?fe ? 11 w 4+jY1 `9 `7•.•;??t r.. ?,Y`4 5 ?A?.?, I :? I'•.
?:ifd 4???ii+". 4'f?.`wr?,?r4?1??8gt r-..,? ?!4°1'r'?T`??.o .`n4?? ?• r t?411t I?4?1? .?i _. -.
Photo 2 - Adjust channel dimensions, permanent seed, and live stake (Looking
downstream). FC-2
Plan Review Checklist
EWP-Avery County, North Carolina
DSR %C - -
I - the Natural Resource Conservation Service Agent for Avery
County, have reviewed the stream repair plans listed below. These plans have been
prepared by Buck Engineering PC to accomplish stream repair under the Emergency
Watershed Protection Program being administered by Avery County. The following table
summarizes my comments on these plans:
DSR Approve Disapprove Approve with Modifications

Additional comments:
Natural Resource Conservation Service Agent
Agent's Signani e
DSR No. TMC-2 Location: Adjacent to Three Mile Hwy.
Site Assessed By: KSM, CLY
Date Assessed: 6/16/2005
County: Avery
Lat.: 35° 59' 03" / Long.: 81 ° 58' 30"
Length of Approximately 2800 feet Three Mile Creek (5.7 mil)
Assessment: Waterbody:
X Debris removal
_ Bank sloping
X Bank stabilization
_ Channel realignment
X In-stream structures
X Riparian planting
X Seeding
Adjust channel dimension
Summary Evaluation of Conditions:
This reach begins at the bridge on Bridge Lane crossing over Three Mile Creek and ends approximately 2800 ft.
downstream. The channel crosses under three bridges within the reach. This site experienced moderate aggradation
and stream bank erosion, and also collected woody debris. Access to the site can be obtained on Bridge Lane just off
of Three Mile Highway.
Recommendations for Repair:
Prior to performing any clearing, grubbing or debris removal activities, inventory, under engineer approval, any
adequate root wad or transplant material. These items should be stockpiled; then installed or transported at the
appropriate time.
Refer to plan sheet for the location of each recommendation and for location of planting areas.
Beginning at Bridge Lane, livestake bank slopes, container and bare root unvegetated stream banks, and eliminate
mowing practices to edge of bank and allow for re-establishment of riparian buffer, minimum 15 feet from centerline of
the stream (photos 1 and 2). Armor tributary outlet with Class 1 and 2 stones to protect area from further erosion and
remove debris (photo 3). Just upstream of the third bridge, repair bank scour and install rock vane (see details). The
exact location and tie in of these structures are to be verified by the field engineer. Use fiber matting and livestakes to
stabilize bank (photo 4). Downstream of the second bridge (photo 5), remove excess debris, and perform minor
grading in preparation of bank surface for live stake and matting (see associated details and plant species list).
Remove all woody debris from the site (photo 6).
All work should be performed in conformance with the "Erosion & Sediment Control Plan" (see attac
Quantities:
Item Unit Quantity
Debris Removal CY 10
Live Stakes EA 150
Excavation CY 7
Container Plantings EA 75

t'
ix1.l ?- y?f
?
?
w
? 4 t??
? i
? ?
?} I r 'tire
?.
I i i . ,
J
Q i " .. n
.
?i
Photo 1: Livestake along slopes. Container and bare root unvegetated stream bank
No mow zone.
Ly,b r
Photo 2: Livestake along slopes. Container and bare root unvegetated stream bank
No mow zone. TM-2 '

RI'

t ?.

1
r 4
Photo 3: Armor outlet with a combination of Class 1 and 2 stones.

RR 4 ? a i

Photo 4: Extend bank. Install Rock Vane to direct flow from bank. Use fiber
matting and live staking on the bank. TM-2
Photo 5 (taken facing downstream from bridge shown in photo 4): Remove excess debris
and grade bank. Use fiber matting and livestaking to stabilize bank. Seed and mulch
bank.
Photo 6: Remove excess debris. TM-2

Plan Review Checklist
EWP-Avery County, North Carolina
DSR Z' ? _
1
the Natural Resource Conservation Service Agent for Avery
County, have reviewed the stream repair plans listed below. These plans have been
prepared by Buck Engineering PC to accomplish stream repair under the Emergency
Watershed Protection Program being administered by Avery County. The following table
summarizes my comments on these plans:
DSR Approve Disapprove Approve with Modifications
Additional comments:
. Natural Resource Conservation Service Agent
Agcnt's Signamm
v
DSR No. TMC-4
Site Assessed By: KSM, CLY
Date Assessed: 6/16/2005
Length of Approximately 4100 feet
Assessment:
X_ Debris removal
_ Bank sloping
Bank stabilization
Location: Adjacent to NC Hwy 194.
County: Avery
Lat.: 35° 59' 05" / Long.: 81 ° 58' 37"
Waterbody:
_ Channel realignment
_ In-stream structures
X Riparian planting
Three Mile Creek (1.32 mil)
Seeding
Adjust channel dimension
Summary Evaluation of Conditions:
This reach begins at the eastern most extent along Three Mile Creek on the Spry property near Hilltop Ln. The reach
flows approximately 4100 ft. and ends at the western most extent of the Spry property. This site experienced
moderate aggradation and stream bank erosion, and also collected a major amount of woody debris. Much of the
repair work has been completed by the property owner. Much of the rocky aggradation has been removed from the
stream and placed along the eroded banks (See photos 1, 2, & 6). All of the woody debris has been removed from
the stream bed and stockpiled on the flood lain.
Recommendations for Repair:
Prior to performing any clearing, grubbing or debris removal activities, inventory, under engineer approval, any
adequate root wad or transplant material. These items should be stockpiled; then installed or transported at the
appropriate time.
Remove all woody debris from the site. Stockpile all adequately sized root wads (per engineer) for other sites in need
of bank stabilization along Three Mile Creek. Live stake (see details) areas identified in the "Recommendations for
Repairs" figure (See photos 1, 2, & 6). Live stake areas should be verified by the field engineer.
All work should be performed in conformance with the "Erosion & Sediment Control Plan" (see attach
Quantities:
Item Unit Quantity
Debris Removal CY 250
Live Stakes EA 600
r i
,,,(
r {'
A '
+ ' Alk -
Ll
�J. i ,t�J'' 'Y� r�ye• �w M1.�� f .1

TM-4
DSR No. TMC-5
Site Assessed By: KSM, CLY
Date Assessed: 6/16/2005
Length of
Assessment:
Approximately 3800 feet
_ Debris removal
X Bank sloping
X Bank stabilization
Location: Adjacent to NC HWY 194.
County: Avery
Lat.: 35° 58' 15" / Long.: 82° 00' 24"
Waterbody: Three Mile Creek (3.03 mil)
_ Channel realignment
X In-stream structures
X Riparian planting
X Seeding
X Adjust channel dimension
Summary Evaluation of Conditions:
This reach of Three Mile Creek begins at the eastern most extend on the Phillips property (Laxton Biggerstaff
Nursery). Three Mile Creek parallels NC Highway 194 and flows westward towards US Highway 19E. This reach
ends at the US HWY 19E bridge.
This reach has experienced moderate to severe bank erosion in several areas. As a result, the channel has over-
widened. Due to the over-widened channel, the channel has aggraded following large storm flows. This material has
been removed by the property owner (Phillips) and placed in the floodplain or used for armoring along the stream
banks. In the lower part of this reach, the outside of a meander bend has experienced severe erosion and is
approaching NC Hwy 194 (see photos 8 & 9). Just downstream along the McKinney property, much of the left bank
has eroded and may threaten the foundation of a house (see photos 10, 11, & 12).
Recommendations for Repair:
Prior to performing any clearing, grubbing or debris removal activities, inventory, under engineer approval, any
adequate root wad or transplant material. These items should be stockpiled; then installed or transported at the
appropriate time.
Three (3) cross vanes and four (5) rock vanes are to be installed (see details) throughout this reach. See the
"Recommendations for Repair' figure for locations of these structures. NOTE: The exact location of these structures is
to be verified by field engineer. Throughout the vicinity of the cross vane and rock vane structure installations perform
grading to stabilize the structure at the tie-in to existing grade and to prepare banks for seeding, matting and live
staking (see details and plant species list). If root wads are available, install (see details) downstream from rock vane
structures as located by the field engineer. Reshape inner point bar feature and stream bank as directed by field
engineer; for location see "Recommendations for Repair" figure.
All work should be performed in conformance with the "Erosion & Sediment Control Plan" (see attached
Quantities:
Item Unit Quantity
Grading bank preparation)
CY
525
Live Stakes EA 1250
Erosion Control Matting SY 1050
Temporary Seeding LB 65
Grain Straw Mulch EA bales 40
Permanent Seeding LB 8
Ecostakes wood stakes 12" x 1", notched at to EA 650
Wood stakes 3' x 1" x 1", for toe of sloe EA 225
Boulders 2x3x4 in size Tons 410
} UCK
r N G 1.N L: E R, I N G y
CLIENT
PROJECT 7ML-S
_--ll
PAGE
OF
PROJECT NO.
SUBJECT CC-, s -t- Prepared By Date
V
I:f,

ej'r: 4 ?Iy.iinch
Approved By Date

? y .,,?}4y1J ks

t .,

r: y

AW'
10?.._ .r _ _ ? /ti1 .•?'}r? 1 ??1, ,'?? 4t ???4,?,?y??Y?.A'?rti
Photo 1 0%Cr widCIICd channel; install cross Photo 2 - Stable reach along "Three toile Crock (Site
vanes. TMC - 5.
'Y1YIP.. •

Photo 3 - Moderate bank erosion; install two rock Photo 4 - Reshape eroded stream bank and live
vanes. stake.
"Y
+Y
J

ie'f

s

Photo 5 - Reshape eroded stream bank; seed and Photo G Stable reach along "Three mile Creek (Site
mat, live stake and install rock vane. TMC - 5).
TMC-5
TMC-5
PLANTING SPECIFICATIONS
NOTES:
1. PLANT BARE ROOT SHRUBS AND TREES TO THE WIDTH OF THE
BUFFER AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS.
2. ALLOW FOR 6-10 FEET BETWEEN PLANTINGS, DEPENDING ON SIZE
3. LOOSEN COMPACTED SOIL
TOP OF STREAMBANK 4. PLANT IN HOLES MADE BY A MATTOCK DIBBLE, PLANTING BAR,
OR OTHER APPROVED MEANS.
5. PLANT IN HOLES DEEP AND WIDE ENOUGH TO ALLOW THE ROOTS
TO SPREAD OUT AND DOWN WITHOUTJ-ROOTING.
6. KEEP ROOTS MOIST WHILE DISTRIBUTING OR WAITING TO PLANT
BY MEANS OF WET CANVAS, BURLAP, OR STRAW.
7. HEEL-IN PLANTS IN MOIST SOIL OR SAWDUST IF NOT PROMPTLY
PLANTED UPON ARRIVAL TO PROJECT SITE
NOTES:
1. WHEN PREPARING THE HOLE FOR A POTTED PLANT OR SHRUB
DIG THE HOLE 8 -12 INCHES LARGER THAN THE DIAMETER OF THE
POT AND THE SAME DEPTH AS THE POT.
2. REMOVE THE PLANT FROM THE POT. LAY THE PLANT ON ITS SIDE
IF NECESSARY TO REMOVE THE POT.
3. F THE PLANT IS ROOTBOUND (ROOTS GROWING IN A SPIRAL
AROUND THE ROOT BALL), MAKE VERTICAL CUTS WITH A KNIFE
OR SPADE JUST DEEP ENOUGH TO CUT THE NET OF ROOTS.
ALSO MAKE A CRISSCROSS CUT ACROSS THE BOTTOM OF THE BALL
4. PLACE THE PLANT IN THE HOLE
OF STREAMBANK 5. FILL HALF OF THE HOLE WITH SOIL (SAME SOIL REMOVED FOR BACKFILL).
8. WATER THE SOIL TO REMOVE AIR POCKETS AND FILL THE REST
OF THE HOLE WITH THE REMAINING SOIL

BUCK 4 80 C P Regency on 81 B 483-548811 00
Fax: 619-463-USO BARE ROOT/ CONTAINER PLANTING
EROSION CONTROL MATTING
PLACE COIR FIBER MATTING IN 8 INCH DEEP
TRENCH, STAKE, BACKFILL, AND COMPACT
i-- TOP OF STREAMBANK
DITCH

TOP OF - -
• - --
0 - --
• -- -
• -- -
• -- -
• -- -
• -- -
• -- -
• -- -
• -- -
• --
STREAMBANK - - -- -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - - -

• • • 0 0 • 0 • • 0 0 •
0 0 0 • 0 0 0 • 0 • 0 •
0 • • 0 • 0 • • • • 0 •
PLAN VIEW
Q 8000 Regency Parkway Suite 1200
Ls CK Cary, North Carolina 27 27511
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
NOTES:
1. BANKS SHOULD BE SEEDED PRIOR TO
PLACEMENT OF MATTING.
2. PLACE COIR FIBER MATTING ACCORDING TO
MANUFACTURER RECOMMENDATIONS.
3. MATTING STAKES SHOULD BE PLACED
IN A DIAMOND SHAPED PATTERN.
THE WOOD STAKE SHALL BE THE NORTH AMERICAN
GREEN ECOSTAKE OR APPROVED EQUAL WITH THE
FOLLOWING DIMENSIONS:
LEG LENGTH 11.00 IN 27.94 CM
HEAD WIDTH 1.25 IN 3.18 CM
HEAD THICKNESS 0.40 IN 1.02 CM
LEG WIDTH 0 80 IN 1.52 CM (TAPERED TO POIN
LEG THICKNESS 0.40 IN 1.02 CM
TOTAL LENGTH 12.00 IN 30.48 C
DITCH
TOP OF STREAMBANK
STAKES
COIR FIBER MATTING TO BE
EXTENDED TO TOE OF SLOPE
EROSION CONTROL MATTING
LIVE STAKING
TOP
BOTTOM OF CHANNE
TOE OF SLOPE
CROSS SECTION VIEW
6'-8' SPACING
2'-3' SPACING
TOP OF
STREAMBANK
TOE OF SLOPE
PLAN VIEW
TOP OF STREAMBANK
PLANT STAKES FROM TOP OF BANK
TO TOE OF BANK IN A DIAMOND SHAPED
STAGGERED PATTERN
SQUARE CUT TOP
BUDS FACING UPWARD
LIVE CUTTING
MIN. 12" DIA
7 - 3' LENGTH
ANGLE CUT
30-45 DEGREES
LIVE STAKE DETAIL
NOTES:
PLAN VIEW
Q 80 00 Regency Parkway Suite 00 North Ca Phry,one 91C9?31183-548811
LJCK 00
Fax: [phone]
1. STAKES SHOULD BE CUT AND INSTALLED ON THE SAME DAY.
2. DO NOT INSTALL STAKES THAT HAVE BEEN SPLIT.
3. STAKES MUST BE INSTALLED WITH BUDS POINTING UPWARDS.
4. STAKES SHOULD BE INSTALLED PERPENDICULAR TO BANK
5. STAKES SHOULD BE 12 TO 2 INCHES IN DIAMETER AND 2 TO 3 FT LONG.
6. STAKES SHOULD BE INSTALLED LEAVING 1/5 OF STAKE ABOVE GROUND.
LIVE STAKING
ROCK VANE
w
a
Ca
113
BOTTOM
WIDTH
OF
CHANNEL
TOP OF
FLOW -?
STREAMBED
ELEVATION
BACKFILL(ONSITEALLUVIUM)
?.
CLASS A STONE
CLASS 1 STONE
PROFILE VIEW
NO GAPS -
BETWEEN
BOULDERS
t- BOTTOM WIDTF
WsFl
PLAN VIEW
SCOUR POOL(EXCAVATED)PER
DIRECTION OF ENGINEER
NOTES FOR ALL VANE STRUCTURES:
1. BOULDERS MUST BE AT LEAST 4'x3'xZ.
2. INSTALL FILTER FABRIC FOR DRAINAGE BEGINNING AT THE MIDDLE OF THE
HEADER ROCKS AND EXTEND DOWNWARD TO THE DEPTH OF THE BOTTOM
FOOTER ROCK AND THEN UPSTREAM TO A MINIMUM OF TEN FEET.
3. DIG A TRENCH BELOW THE BED FOR FOOTER ROCKS AND PLACE FILL ON
UPSTREAM SIDE OF VANE ARM, BETWEEN THE ARM AND STREAMBANK
4. START AT BANK AND PLACE FOOTER ROCKS FIRST AND THEN HEADER (TOP) ROCK
S. CONTINUE WITH STRUCTURE, FOLLOWING ANGLE AND SLOPE SPECIFICATIONS.
6. AN EXTRA BOULDER CAN BE PLACED IN SCOUR POOL FOR HABITAT IMPROVEMENT.
7. USE CLASS 1 STONE TO FILL GAPS ON UPSTREAM SIDE OF BOULDERS, AND CLASS
A STONE TO FILL GAPS ON UPSTREAM SIDE OF CLASS 1 STONE
8. AFTER ALL STONE HAS BEEN PLACED, FILL IN THE UPSTREAM SIDE OF THE
STRUCTURE WITH ON-SITE ALLUVIUM TO THE ELEVATION OF THE TOP OF
THE HEADER ROCK
9. START SLOPE AT 213 TO 1 TIMES THE BANKFULL STAGE.
BUCK Q 8000 Regency Parkway Suite
Cary Ph, 91 63548811 00
Fax: [phone]
CLASS A STONE
BACKFILL (ON-SITE ALLUVIUM)
I
FILTER FABRIC
1a
r HEADER ROCK
FOOTER ROCK
SCOURPOOL
(EXCAVATED)
HEADER ROCK
Ilr (
x IS
ta
W?1-2,"'C?LASS O (,1 I?XIS
FOOTER ROCK
I 'STONE
SECTION A - A
DuL ak Ih
y ab ° 3 ?i.i 11.5' 33.8' S °/o
ROCK VANE (TAG -2)
ROCK VANE
w
a
N
113
BOTTOM
WIDTH
OF
CHANNEL
FLOW
S• 1
O'TO30 _
ill
(SCOUR Pi
EEK
NO BETWEEN
BETW
BOULDERS
BOTTOM V
PLAN VIEW
SCOUR POOL (EXCAVATED) PER
DIRECTION OF ENGINEER
NOTES FOR ALL VANE STRUCTURES;
1. BOULDERS MUST BE AT LEAST 4' x T x Z.
2 INSTALL FILTER FABRIC FOR DRAINAGE BEGINNING AT THE MIDDLE OF THE
HEADER ROCKS AND EXTEND DOWNWARD TO THE DEPTH OF THE BOTTOM
FOOTER ROCK AND THEN UPSTREAM TO A MINIMUM OF TEN FEET.
3. DIG A TRENCH BELOW THE BED FOR FOOTER ROCKS AND PLACE FILL ON
UPSTREAM SIDE OF VANE ARM, BETWEEN THE ARM AND STREAMBANK
4. START AT BANK AND PLACE FOOTER ROCKS FIRST AND THEN HEADER (TOP) ROCK
5. CONTINUE WITH STRUCTURE, FOLLOWING ANGLE AND SLOPE SPECIFICATIONS.
8. AN EXTRA BOULDER CAN BE PLACED IN SCOUR POOL FOR HABITAT IMPROVEMENT.
7. USE CLASS 1 STONE TO FILL GAPS ON UPSTREAM SIDE OF BOULDERS, AND CLASS
A STONE TO FILL GAPS ON UPSTREAM SIDE OF CLASS 1 STONE
8. AFTER ALL STONE HAS BEEN PLACED, FILL IN THE UPSTREAM SIDE OF THE
STRUCTURE WITH ON-SITE ALLUVIUM TO THE ELEVATION OF THE TOP OF
THE HEADER ROCK
9. START SLOPE AT 2!3 TO 1 TIMES THE BANKFULL STAGE.
Ell M 8000 Regency Parkway Suite 200
BuCK, Cary, North Carolina 27811
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
TOP OF
FLOW -?
STREAMBED
ELEVATION
BACKFILL(ONSITE ALLUVIUM) ?/ •/
CLASS A STONE
CLASS 1 STONE
CLASS A
BACKFILL (ON-SITE ALLUVIUM)
TO 1
2Y'
PROFILE VIEW
i-1=f
FILTER FABRIC L -?I 1,
1-r
10' MINIMUM-
SECTION A - A
HEADER ROCK '
CHANNEL BED
FOOTER ROCK
SCOURPOOL
(EXCAVATED)
,DED MIX
`- HEADER ROCK
STREAM BANK
? * B
HEADER ROCK
FOOTER ROCK
FOOTER ROCK
CLASS 1 STONE
ROCK VANE (-Fm(- S)
RIFF[ \
(-roc 3)
ROOT WADS WITHOUT TRANSPLANTS ROOT WADS
CROSS SECTION VIEW PLAN VIEW
NTS NTS
COIR FIBER MATTING
?O
TOP OF BANK
FLOOD PLAIN BERM (O.SMAX. HT.) BERMS)
7 NOT O EXTEND BEYOND
/ LIMITS OF ROOT WADS.
OPTIONAL
BANKFULL STAGE COVER LOG 1 '\7
BASEFLOW
S
Q e 1/3 OF- ROOT MASS HEIGHT. ANCHOR COVER LOG
IS BELOW'. STREAM BED UNDER FOOTER LOGS
_ OR WITH A BOULDER.
10-15 FEET LONG
>10' DIAMETER
FOOTER LOG > 12" DIAMETER INSTALLED BELOW STREAMBED ?]? yy
(OPTIONAL PER DIRECTION OF ENGINEER) \?
ROOT WAD
ROOT WADS WITH TRANSPLANTS
CROSS SECTION VIEW
NTS
TRANSPLANTS
FLOOD PLAIN / BERM (0.5' MAX. HT.) BERMS) TOP OF BANK
NOT TO EXTEND BEYOND
7 4T LIMITS OF ROOT WADS.
i
J
i
6 FEET LONG TRUNK
>12" DIAMETER
aAsumw

.113 OF- ROOT MASS HEIGHT
IS BELOW . STREAM BED

FOOTER LOG > 12" DIAMETER INSTALLED BELOW STREAMBED
(OPTIONAL PER DIRECTION OF ENGINEER)
00
BUCK, 80 C Regency Parkway Suite 00
Cary, 19-483-548811
F" 919-483-5490
TRANSPLANTS OR BOULDERS
FOOTER LOG FOR
TRENCHING METHOD
ONLY
NOTES
TRENCHING METHOD:
IF THE ROOT WAD CANNOT BE DRIVEN INTO THE BANK OR THE BANK
NEEDS TO BE RECONSTRUCTED, THE TRENCHING METHOD SHOULD
BE USED. THIS METHOD REQUIRES THAT A TRENCH BE EXCAVATED
FOR THE LOG PORTION OF THE ROOT WAD. IN THIS CASE, A FOOTER
LOG SHOULD BE INSTALLED UNDERNEATH THE ROOT WAD IN A TRENCH
EXCAVATED PARALLEL TO THE BANK AND WELL BELOW THE STREAMBED.
ONE-THIRD OF THE ROOT WAD SHOULD REMAIN BELOW NORMAL BASE
FLOW CONDITIONS.
NOTES
DRIVE POINT METHOD:
SHARPEN THE END OF THE LOG WITH A CHAINSAW BEFORE "DRIVING"
IT INTO THE BANK ORIENT ROOT WADS UPSTREAM SO THAT THE STREAM
FLOW MEETS THE ROOT WAD AT A 90-DEGREE ANGLE, DEFLECTING THE
WATER AWAY FROM THE BANK A TRANSPLANT OR BOULDER SHOULD BE
PLACED ON THE DOWNSTREAM SIDE OF THE ROOT WAD IF A BACK EDDY
IS FORMED BY THE ROOT WAD. THE BOULDER SHALL BE APPROXIMATELY
,V X TX 2'.
ROOT WADS
TEMPORARY SILT FENCE
NOTES:
FILTER FABRIC -
1. USE FILTER FABRIC A MINIMUM OF 36" IN WIDTH AND
FASTEN ADEQUATELY TO THE WIRE AS DIRECTED COMPACTED FILL
BY THE ENGINEER.
2 PROVIDE V STEEL POST OF THE SELF-FASTENER
ANGLE STEEL TYPE.
EXTENSION OF FABRIC
INTO TRENCH
Q 8001 Phone: Regency Parkway Suite 119-483548811 00
ary, North
Fa)c 919-4635490
SILT FENCE
6' MAXIMUM
w?nmr?rcruorarowm
? ?er a r.ue ?+.. is
ie..vc r...an aww
auca
GROUNDCOVER PLANTING DETAIL

l" 2761250
Q 8000 Ra Nor PO"ay
L I C K Cary, North C-arolina 27611
Phone: 919.{8}.6468
Fax [phone]
RNP•
r,iia .vw•, u.Y ae.?w?.eo emE?.enae
MTA a[RMICN
PRUNING CUTS
?
co
ou..cr awaai
ewriemro?srm arr
SHRUB BED PLANTING DETAIL
vGUYING 8 STAKNG
liRfRYa s.wl se ?rtxOTMi M lie 0/?R.wrMn Rx?W¢r rwl
r'M boiMHAi1?01Y1Ua1aYYU WiN?ro?Nr- WAYLa eGYFD
?erow aRM IIIOY Td Oi a41Ie50'a eKJOUI4YO1/e1 aYl •
? CCYRtIi
GUY SPACING DETAIL
+ O + aw°
v'"+ 0 Q
RANDOM PLANT SPACING DETAIL-PLAN VIEW
M MMiW f4F1P/uttw a+i R.wr er.Wauq
1D e.YM wawa?? rCiu 112 MMI Fitn4A
TREE & SHRUB PLANTING DETAILS
GUY TYING DETAIL
..oe n.:en woe
ww a.id
TREE OR SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL
STAKNG DETAIL
FOR TREES V TO 10' TALL
UteO RM W Y CC VL Oli I Ilf ?1ff i®f/ M UG?FFR
(JQ©
RM lY
• a[i0arltD M eMiertFa M M 116II ro R
TREE OR SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL
LEE GUYING DETAIL
FOR TREES 10' OR TALLER
ARID OYYW CRALOIIYIaFOI.IRIII rIM WYEtR
Erosion and Sediment Control Plan
Emergency Watershed Protection Program
Avery County
The following erosion and sediment control measures will be incorporated into all stream
repair sites.
1. The Contractor shall minimize vegetation disturbance by only working on the
stream bank and channel that is in need of repair. Existing buffers shall not be
disturbed unless directed by the designer.
2. The Contractor shall only enter the stream channel as shown on the plans or
directed by the designer. These stream accesses shall conform to the design
standards shown in the attached detail drawings. Timber mats may be used as a
substitute for rock per the approval of the designer.
3. The Contractor shall limit all bank and channel disturbance to activities that can
be completed by the end of each working day such that the work would remain in
place during an overnight storm event.
4. All equipment and uninstalled materials shall be removed from the channel at the
end of each working day and secured safely from potential out-of-bank flow
events that may occur prior to performing additional work.
5. Graded stream banks shall be stabilized with temporary and permanent seed and
coir fiber matting at the end of each working day. Seeding and coir fiber
-- matting specifications are included with this plan.
6. Stockpiles shall remain at least fifteen feet from flowing water and outside of the
top of bank. Silt fence shall be placed at the base of the stockpile between the
stockpile and the channel and must function to receive stockpile runoff before
entering the channel. Silt fence shall conform to design standards shown in the
detail drawings.
7. Temporary vegetation and permanent herbaceous vegetation shall be established
on all disturbed areas not already stabilized with matting, within five days after
construction is completed.
8. Permanent woody vegetations species are listed in the vegetation specifications;
planting details are also included.
River Works
1 of 3
Buck Engineering
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION
Velzetation Planting
General Seeding
Seeding should be done immediately upon completion of final grading. Apply seed prior
to installing matting. Prepare the soil surface so that it is smooth and free from stones,
clods, or debris that will prevent the contact of the matting with the soil. Fertilizer and
lime are generally not necessary on most projects, particularly not on sites that have been
used for agriculture production or cattle grazing. Urban soils may require amendments.
Seed should be broadcast with a centrifugal seeder or by hand, at the full rate along
stream banks and in stockpile areas. In all areas where permanent seeding is used in
addition to the temporary seed, mixing of the seed for broadcasting is acceptable. Seed
and amendments (if needed) should be covered to a depth of 1/2 to 1 inch with soil by
using a hand rake, drag or other tillage equipment.
Seeding may also be done with a hydroseeder. Wood cellulose fiber will not be
acceptable as a substitute for straw mulch. A suitable tracer shall be used to clearly
identify areas hydroseeded. A minimum of 500 lbs. per acre of wood cellulose fiber or a
non-toxic water base dye may be used as a tracer. Seed shall not remain in water
containing fertilizer more than 45 minutes before being used. All products used to
hydroseed shall be non-toxic to aquatic organisms.
Temporary Seeding
For temporary seeding, apply the following vegetation at the listed rates and times.
Temporary Seeding (September to March):
Rye grain 3 lbs per 1,000 sq ft or 1301bs per acre
Temporary Seeding (April to August):
Foxtail Millet 1 lb per 1,000 sq ft or 40 lbs per acre
A combination of the two temporary seed types shall be used during the boundary months
of March, April, August and September to ensure survival. In all disturbed areas where
no permanent seed is being used (i.e. yard or agricultural field) and temporary seed is not
desired at the higher rate, broadcast temporary seed at the lower rate of approximately 1/2
the full lbs/acre stocking rate. When used in conjunction with permanent seed mix, apply
at 1/2 the full lbs/acre rate.
Permanent Seeding
Permanent seeding will be accomplished using the mix listed below:
Buck Engineering 2 of 8 River Works
i
Riparian Seed List
Scientifie name
Agrostis alba
Carex vulpinoidea
Elymus virginicus
Juncus effisus
Panicum clandestinum
Polygonum pennsylvaticunt
Bidens frondosa
Coreopsis laicolata
Cassia fasciculata
Yerbesina alternifolia
Common Name % of Mix
Redtop 15%
Fox Sedge 10%
Virginia Wild Rye 20%
Soft Rush 5%
Deer Tongue 15%
Smartweed 5%
Beggers Ticks 5%
Lance leafed Coreopsis 15%
Partridge Pea 5%
Wingstem 5%
Seed at full rate of 15 lbs/acre along stream banks and in any stream buffer and wetland
areas.
Riparian Buffers
Trees and Shrubs
Trees and shrubs will be used to provide permanent vegetation for EWP repair sites.
Species used shall be selected from the following list:
Shrub and Small Trees
Scientific naive Common name
Sal& sericea Silky Willow
Xanthorhiza simphcisslnla Yellowroot
Physocarpus opulifolius Ninebark
Coryus anonum Silky Dogwood
Hanamelis virginiana Witch-hazel
Carpinus caroliniana Ironwood
Corylus americana Hazel-nut
Alnus serrulata Tag Alder
Ostrya virginiana Hornbeam
Spirea tomentosa Hardhack
Rhododendron arborescens Smooth Azalea
Rhododendron maximum Rosebay Rhododendron
Cephalaidw occidentalis Button Bush
Itea virginica Virginia Sweetspire
Calycaithusfloridus Sweet Shrub
Leucothoe axillaris var. editorum Dog Hobble
Hydrangea arborescens Mountain Hydrangea
Sambucus canadensis Elderberry
Buck Engineering 3 of 8
River Works
LargeTrees
Scientific name Common name
Aesculus octandra Buckeye
Tsuga canadensis Canadian Hemlock
Platanus occidentalis Sycamore
Acer rubrum Red Maple
Quercus alba White Oak
Quercus rubra Red Oak
Liriodendron tulipifera Tulip Poplar
Tsuga carolinianum Carolina Hemlock
Betula lenta Cherry Birch
Trees shall be planted as either bare rooted or containerized material. Trees should be
planted at a rate of 400 stems/acre (roughly 10 feet on center) where EWP repairs have
been accomplished. Planting of this material will be done during the dormant season
(late fall and winter of 2005-2006). Refer to the attached details and specifications for
more information.
Stream banks
Live Staking
Species used for live staking shall be taken from the following species:
Scientific name Common name
Cornus aniomum Silky Dogwood
Salix sericea Silky Willow
Sambucus canadensis Elderberry
Cephalanthus occidentalis Buttonbush
Salix nigra Black Willow
Stake at 2-3 foot spacing on the outside of all meander bends. Stake at 6-7 foot spacing
on the inside of meander bends and all tangent sections. Note this is appropriate for most
rural systems. Urban or flashy systems should be staked at higher rates. Utilize as
diverse a species group as feasible and make sure that black willow constitutes less than
25% of total stakes used.
Containerized Plants:
Containerized shrub material may also be used on the stream banks to increase the
diversity. Applications and spacing should reflect that of live stake material.
Mulching
Mulching shall be used to provide temporary protection of soil surfaces from erosion.
Mulching should be performed within 48 hours of seeding. Grain straw mulch should be
applied on seeded areas at a rate of 75 bales per acre. Apply mulch uniformly.
Buck Engineering 4 of 8 River Works
Erosion Control Matting
Ecostakes
Provide wooden stake not less than 12 in. (300 mm) in length with a notch cut 1 in. (25
mm) from the top. These stakes shall be used to stake the matting along the slopes.
Wooden 3 ft. stakes spaced approximately 4 ft. apart shall be used to secure the matting
at the toe of slope. The toe stakes shall have a minimum 1-inch by 1-inch cross-section
and shall be designed so that the matting can not slide past the exposed end of the stake.
Refer to the attached details and specifications for EWP work for more information.
Coir Fiber Matting
The erosion control matting shall be a machine-produced mat of 100% coconut fiber with
the following properties:
Matrix 100% Coconut Fiber
Weight 20 oz/SY (678 gm/m2)
Tensile Strength 1348 x 626 lb/ft minimum (1650.5 x 766.5 kg/m)
Elongation 34% x 38%
Open Area (measured) 50%
Thickness 0.30 in minimum (7.6 mm)
Flexibility (mg -cm) 65030 x 29590
Recommended Flow 11 feet/second (3.35 m/s)
Size 6.6 x 164 ft (120 SY) or (100 SM)
"C" Factor 0.002
Place the coir fiber matting immediately upon final grading. Provide a smooth soil
surface free from stones, clods, or debris that will prevent the contact of the matting with
the soil. Apply seed prior to installing matting. Begin at the bottom of the slope by
anchoring the matting in a 6-inch (15 cm) deep by 6-inch (15 cm) wide trench. Backfill
and compact the trench after staking. Walking backward down the stream, allow the
matting to unroll slowly; ideally the matting roll will rest against your shin as you walk.
Stake the matting according to recommended stake pattern for specific product and slope.
(See stake pattern guide that comes with the product.) Place matting in full contact with
the soil.
The edges of the parallel matting must be staked with approximately 2 inches (5 cm) of
overlap such that the edge of the downstream matting is under the one just upstream.
When matting must be spliced down the slope, place matting end over end (shingle style)
with approximately 6 inches overlap. Drive stakes through the overlapped area.
Place stakes across the matting at ends, junctions and trenches approximately 1.3 ft apart.
Place stakes along the outer edges, down the center of each strip of matting and along all
lapped edges approximately 2 ft apart. Cut excess matting and anchor at the end of the
slope.
Buck Engineering 5 of 8 River Works
Temporary Stream Access Ramps
Stream access ramps shall be constructed using either rock or timber mats in locations as
shown on the plans or as directed. Grading shall be performed only to the extent needed
to form a stable ramp connecting the stream bank grade to the streambed. The Contractor
shall determine the appropriate number of timber mats and ramp angle according to the
equipment that will be using the ramp. Stream access ramps are temporary and shall be
removed and the areas restored to their original state when they are no longer needed or
permanent measures are installed.
Sediment Fence
Geotextile sediment fences shall be used to trap sediment from areas of limited runoff.
Sediment fences shall be properly anchored to prevent erosion under them. These works
are temporary and shall be removed and the areas restored to their original state when
they are no longer needed or permanent measures are installed. Locations for sediment
filters are shown on the plans. Refer to sediment fence specifications (6.62) in the NC
Erosion and Sediment Control Planning and Design Manual for material and installation
requirements.
Gravel Construction Entrance/Exit
Temporary gravel construction entrances shall be constructed as shown on the plans and
according to specification 6.06 of the NC Erosion and Sediment Control Planning and
Design Manual.
In-stream Structures
In-stream structures include w-weirs, cross vanes, j-hook vanes, log vanes, and wing
deflectors. The quantity of in-stream structures to be constructed shall follow approved
plans, but may be affected by conditions encountered during construction
Boulders used for in-stream structures shall be relatively flat on either side in the same
dimension, preferably the long dimension, and must have relatively smooth ends. No
more than 5% of the boulders shall be smaller than 3'x2'x2'. Boulders larger than
6'x4'x3' shall be permitted. Boulders found on-site and approved for use by the
Developer will be used to the extent feasible.
The Contractor shall construct in-stream structures with equipment capable of moving
and accurately placing boulders of approximate dimensions 6'x4'x3'. If suitable for
backfill, excavated material shall be placed on the upstream side of structures or as
directed. Unless otherwise approved by the Developer, excavation to prepare the
subgrade for the installation of in-stream structures shall be consecutive and continuous.
Once the excavation of a structure has begun, the structure shall be completed by the end
of the workday. All equipment shall be removed from the stream at the end of each
workday. Any accumulation of sediment in the channel shall be cleaned as needed
during construction and at the end of construction. No separate payment will be made for
this clean-up work.
Buck Engineering 6 of 8 River Works
Construction Sequence of Events
Construction shall be performed at the EWP site in accordance with the plans and in
general accordance with the following sequence:
1. Mobilize equipment and materials to the site.
2. Set up construction access pads, staging areas, haul roads, and silt fences.
3. Install stream access ramps.
4. Excavate and grade banks and construct in-stream structures.
5. Seed and mat graded banks and immediately upon reaching final grades.
6. Stabilize all disturbed soil with temporary and permanent seed prior to leaving the
site each day and prior to moving to the next work area.
7. Dispose of excess materials at approved off-site locations.
8. Remove stream access ramps.
9. Remove silt fence and seed and mulch staging areas to restore these areas to pre-
project conditions.
10. Demobilize grading equipment from the site. Remove construction access pads.
11. Plant bank, floodplain and buffer woody vegetation and live stakes during the
dormant season.
Buck Engineering 7 of 8 River Works
13
i
Details and Specifications for EWP Work
Planting
• Bare Root/Container Planting
• Brush Mattress
• Tree & Shrub Planting Details
• Live Staking
Erosion Control
• Erosion Control Matting
• Silt Check
• Silt Fence
• Typical Pump Around Operation
• Temporary Gravel Construction Entrance
• Ford Stream Crossing
• Ford Stream Crossing 2
• Temporary Ford Stream Crossing W/ Flume Pipe
Stream Repair Structures
• Typical Structure Placement
• Typical Plan View & Profile
• Constructed Riffle
• Double Drop Rock Cross Vane
• Double Wing Deflector
• "J" Hook Vane
• Log Vane
• Log Vane 2
• Log Step Pool
• Rock Vane
• Rock Cross Vane Type 1
• Rock Cross Vane Type 2
• Root Wads
• Single Wing Deflector
• Step Pool Channel
Buck Engineering 8 of 8 River Works

6/28/05
Subject: Cultural Resources Literature Search and Survey Results for Avery County NRCS Planned
EWP Undertakings
To: Jane Shaw, NRCS District Conservationist
Date of Survey: 6/14 - 15/2005
From : Jim Errante
USDA-NRCS, CRS SC & NC
1835 Assembly St., Rm 950
Columbia SC 29201
Phone: [phone]
The following list of DSR's were reviewed by Jim Errante, NRCS Cultural Resources Specialist (CRS). A
literature search for each planed practice location took place in the Archaeological Map room of the NC Office
of State Archaeology. Each location was reviewed for the potential of NRCS planned activities to effect
cultural resources (CR's). In addition, photographs of the APE's were reviewed and discussions were held
with knowledgeable field office and the engineering staff in order to determine the potential of planned
activities to effect CR's at each EWP practice location. Each practice location received a ranking of a low,
medium or high potential to effect CR's.
All EWP practice locations receiving a medium or high ranking to effect cultural resources were
archeologically surveyed by the NRCS CRS. Archaeological survey procedures included reconnaissance
survey of all visible soils in the area including river bank profiles, and shovel testing. All shovel tested soils
were screened through '/4 inch hardware mesh. The following Excel file list of EWP locations includes a
statement describing the results of this survey work. The NRCS CRS maintains the field work details of the
archaeological survey at each APE. Any questions concerning the results of these survey results as listed
below should contact the NRCS CRS for further explanation.
DSR #s CR Review Comments
BC 1 Elk Mills Low potential for impact to CR's FO to survey
BC 1 Elk Park Low potential for impact to CR's FO to survey
BC 2 Low potential for impact to CR's FO to survey
CB 1 Low potential for impact to CR's FO to survey
cc 1 No previous recorded CR's. Very low terrace over stream & disturbed soils in APE. Surveyed by
CRS. Ok to proceed.
CC 2 No previous recorded CR's. Very low terrace over stream & disturbed soils in APE. Surveyed by
CRS. Ok to proceed.
CC 3 No previous recorded CR's. Very low terrace over stream & disturbed soils in APE. Surveyed by
CRS. Ok to proceed.
w,
DSR #s CR Review Comments
CC 4 Low potential for impact to CR's FO to survey
CH 1 Low potential for impact to CR's FO to survey
Cross Cr 1 Low potential for impact to CR's FO to survey
Cross Cr 2 Low potential for impact to CR's FO to survey
Curtis Cr 1 Low potential for impact to CR's FO to survey
Dellinger Br 1 Low potential for impact to CR's FO to survey
ER 1 Low potential for impact to CR's FO to survey
ER 2 Low potential for impact to CR's FO to survey
ER 3 No impact to CR's in area. All CR's are outside of APE. All work planned in-stream. Primarily debris
removal. Surveyed by CRS. Ok to proceed.
ER 5 No previously recorded CR's in area. Very disturbed soils in APE. No CR's. Surveyed by CRS. OK
to proceed.
ER 6 Low potential for impact to CR's FO to survey
ER 7 No previous recorded CR's. Alluvial, silty soils. Surveyed by CRS. Ok to proceed.
FC 1 Small Area, OK for FO to Survey
FC 2 Low potential for impact to CR's FO to survey
GP 1 Low potential for impact to CR's FO to survey
HB 1 Low potential for impact to CR's FO to survey
HP 1 Low potential for impact to CR's FO to survey
K 3 Low potential for impact to CR's FO to survey
K 4 Low potential for impact to CR's FO to survey
KC 1 Low potential for impact to CR's FO to survey
KC 2 Low potential for impact to CR's FO to survey
LEC 1 Low potential for impact to CR's FO to survey
LHC 1 Low potential for impact to CR's FO to survey
LL 1 Low potential for impact to CR's FO to survey
LR 1 No previously recorded CR's area. APE is roadside. Soils are disturbed. No CR's. Surveyed by CR
Specialist. OK to proceed.
LR 2 No previously CR's recorded in APE. This reach is primarily just debris removal or requiring fill. No
CR's in APE. Surveyed by CRS. Ok to proceed.
LR 3 No previously recorded CR's in APE. Only debris removal scheduled. No CR's in APE. Surveyed by
CRS. Ok to proceed.
LR 4 Low potential for impact to CR's FO to survey
LR 5 Low potential for impact to CR's FO to survey
LR 6 Low potential for impact to CR's FO to survey
LS 1 Low potential for impact to CR's FO to survey
LS 2 Low potential for impact to CR's FO to survey
LS 3 Low potential for impact to CR's FO to survey
LS 5 Low potential for impact to CR's FO to survey
LS 6 Low potential for impact to CR's FO to survey
LS 7 Low potential for impact to CR's FO to survey
LS 8 Low potential for impact to CR's FO to survey
LS 9 Low potential for impact to CR's FO to survey
LS 10 Low potential for impact to CR's FO to survey
LS 11 Low potential for impact to CR's FO to survey
LS 12 Low potential for impact to CR's FO to survey
MB 1 Low potential for impact to CR's FO to survey
Mrk 123 Low potential for impact to CR's FO to survey
MT 1 Low potential for impact to CR's FO to survey
MT 2 Low potential for impact to CR's FO to survey
MT 3 Low potential for impact to CR's FO to survey
MT 4 Low potential for impact to CR's FO to survey
NT 1 Low potential for impact to CR's FO to survey
NT 2 No CR's previously recorded in area. Location will primarily involve debris removal. Low banks in
area and no evidence of CR's found. Surveyed by CRS. Ok to proceed.
" M
DSR #s CR Review Comments
NT 3 Low potential for impact to CR's FO to survey - primarily debris removal.
NT 4 No CR's previously recorded in area. Location will primarily involve debris removal. Low banks in
area and no evidence of CR's found. Surveyed by CRS. Ok to proceed.
NT 5 No CR's previously recorded in area. Location will primarily involve debris removal. Low banks in
area and no evidence of CR's found. Surveyed by CRS. Ok to proceed.
NT 6 No CR's previously recorded in area. Location will primarily involve debris removal. Low banks in
area and no evidence of CR's found. Surveyed by CRS. Ok to proceed.
NT 7 Low potential for impact to CR's FO to survey (previously surveyed - No CR's)
NT 8 No CR's previously recorded in area. Location will primarily involve debris removal. Low banks in
area and no evidence of CR's found. Surveyed by CRS. Ok to proceed.
NT 9 No CR's previously recorded in area. Location will primarily involve debris removal. Low banks in
area and no evidence of CR's found. Surveyed by CRS. Ok to proceed.
NT 10 No CR's previously recorded in area. Location will primarily involve debris removal. Low banks in
area and no evidence of CR's found. Surveyed by CRS. Ok to proceed.
NT 11 No previously recorded CR's in area. Impacts planned are adjacent to bridge and are disturbed and
heavily scoured. No CR's. Surveyed by CRS. Ok to proceed.
NT 12 No previously recorded CR's in area. No CR's. Surveyed by CRS. Ok to proceed.
NT 13 No previously recorded CR's in area. Survey focused on streambank stabilization areas. No CR's
discovered. Location will primarily involve debris removal. Surveyed by CRS. Ok to proceed.
NT 14 No previously recorded CR's in area. Survey focused on streambank stabilization areas. Significant
nursery agricultural impacts in area. No CR's discovered. Location will primarily involve debris
removal. Surveyed by CRS. Ok to proceed.
NT 15 No previously recorded CR's in area. Survey focused on streambank stabilization areas. Significant
nursery agricultural impacts in area. No CR's discovered. Location will primarily involve debris
removal. Surveyed by CRS. Ok to proceed.
NT 16 No CR's previously recorded in area. Location will primarily involve debris removal. No evidence of
CR's found. Surveyed by CRS. Ok to proceed.
NT 17 Low potential for impact to CR's FO to survey
NT 18 No previously recorded CR's in area. Very low terrace, and very scoured area. Area floods
frequently. No CR's. Surveyed by CRS. Ok to proceed.
NT 19 Low potential for impact to CR's FO to survey
PC 1 Low potential for impact to CR's FO to survey
PM1 Low potential for impact to CR's FO to survey
RB 1 Low potential for impact to CR's FO to survey
RC 1 No previously recorded CR's in area. Very disturbed soils in APE - re-routed stream & scoured area.
No CR's. Surveyed by CRS. OK to proceed.
SB 1 Newland Low potential for impact to CR's FO to survey
SB 1 V.Crucis Low potential for impact to CR's FO to survey
Sc 1 Low potential for impact to CR's FO to survey
Sol Low potential for impact to CR's FO to survey
TMC 1 Low potential for impact to CR's FO to survey
TMC 2 Low potential for impact to CR's FO to survey
TMC 3 Low potential for impact to CR's FO to survey
TMC 4 Low potential for impact to CR's FO to survey
TMC 5 Low potential for impact to CR's FO to survey
UNR 4 Low potential for impact to CR's FO to survey
LINT 1 Low potential for impact to CR's FO to survey
LINT 2 Low potential for impact to CR's FO to survey
LINT 3 Low potential for impact to CR's FO to survey
LINT 5 Low potential for impact to CR's FO to survey
LINT 6 Low potential for impact to CR's FO to survey
UNT 7 Low potential for impact to CR's FO to survey
LINT 8 Low potential for impact to CR's FO to survey
W 1,
DSR #s CR Review Comments
WC 1 Low potential for impact to CR's FO to survey
WF 1 Low potential for impact to CR's FO to survey
WF 2 Low potential for impact to CR's FO to survey (previously surveyed - No CR's)
WO 1 Low potential for impact to CR's FO to survey
WO 2 Low potential for impact to CR's FO to survey
WO 3 Low potential for impact to CR's FO to survey
WP 1 Low potential for impact to CR's FO to survey
WP 2 Low potential for impact to CR's FO to survey
BUCK 10 0 0 R c t; c n c y 1' a I- k w a v. S ti i t c 2 0 0
1 C a r v. N o r t h C a r o l i n a 2 7 5 1 1
I'Itonc 9 t 9 a 63 54 K
ENGINEERING F > I t> >•61 541)0
w w%v. b u c kc ti inccri n? coin
July 12, 2005
Mr. Mark Cantrell
US Fish and Wildlife Service
160 Zillicoa Street
Asheville, NC 28801
Dear Mr. Cantrell:
Subject: USFWS concerns for EWP DSR sites in Avery County
In an USFWS memo, dated June 21, 2005, the USFWS listed a table of EWP DSR sites
in Avery County that could potentially impact protected species. Sites NT-13 through 19
and TMC-5 from that list are located upstream of the Appalachian elktoe and therefore
may serve as critical habitat for the Appalachian elktoe. However, from a conversation
made on June 20, 2005 with Steve Frayley of NC Wildlife Resources Commission, Mr.
Frayley stated that the above mentioned sites are too far upstream of existing populations
of Appalachian elktoe and therefore would not affect those populations. Mr. Frayley's
most recent monitoring data is from 2004. He recommended that additional surveys in
the mentioned above sites are not necessary.
The USFWS concern for EWP DSR site KC-1 is Gray's lily. It was determined that no
work is proposed for this site. Therefore the Gray's lily will not be affected.
Debris removal is only work being proposed for EWP DSR LR-4. Debris is woody
material (trees and leaf pack) on the riverbanks and should not affect the USFWS
concerns for that site. The EWP DSR LS-8 is a residential yard and is not located in or
near an area of USFWS concern (swamp-forest bog complex).
EWP DSR LL-1 (Squirrel Creek) is'the only site from the list that may require an
additional survey. Once final designs are made for this site, a biologist from Buck
Engineering will perform any necessary surveys to determine if site exists in or near a
Southern Appalachian mountain bog and determine potential impacts from proposed
work.
Table 1 below lists the federally threatened and endangered species for Avery County.
No habitat exists for these listed species at the above mentioned sites except for DSR LL-
1 (potential bog turtle habitat) and therefore construction should not impact the listed
species. Please contact me at 919-459-9009 for any questions you may have regarding
the Avery County EWP DSR sites.
R ?• s /? n rf i b!. G rr ?' i n <• c• r i n ;, n rt ?1 S' r• i t rr r- r I rr r .r 11 c! t c• r 1: n r i r u rr ur r rr
C I r a r I o t t c. N C -A , I ?• i I I c t ? C A t 1? n;: l . C i: ti.
BUCK A
Table 1. Federally Threatened and Endangered Species in Avery County
Common Name Scientific Name Status
Vertebrates
Bog turtle Clemniys nwhlenbergii T(S/A)
Carolina northern flying squirrel Glaucomys sabrinus coloratzss Endangered
Virginia big-eared bat Corynorhinus townsendii virginianus Endangered
Invertebrates
Spruce-fir moss spider Microhexura montivaga Endangered
Vascular Plants
Blue Ridge goldenrod Solidago spithamaea Threatened
Heller's blazing star Liatris helleri Threatened
Roan Mountain bluet Houstonia niontana Endangered
Spreading avens Geum radiatun2 Endangered
Nonvascular Plants
Rock Gnome Lichen Gylnnodenna lineare Endangered
Sincerely,
Gregory W. Price, PWS
2 0 0 5 1 5 "